FCC 51.323 Revised as of October 1, 2005
Goto Year:2004 |
2006
Sec. 51.323 Standards for physical collocation and virtual collocation.
(a) An incumbent LEC shall provide physical collocation and virtual
collocation to requesting telecommunications carriers.
(b) An incumbent LEC shall permit the collocation and use of any equipment
necessary for interconnection or access to unbundled network elements.
(1) Equipment is necessary for interconnection if an inability to deploy
that equipment would, as a practical, economic, or operational matter,
preclude the requesting carrier from obtaining interconnection with the
incumbent LEC at a level equal in quality to that which the incumbent
obtains within its own network or the incumbent provides to any affiliate,
subsidiary, or other party.
(2) Equipment is necessary for access to an unbundled network element if an
inability to deploy that equipment would, as a practical, economic, or
operational matter, preclude the requesting carrier from obtaining
nondiscriminatory access to that unbundled network element, including any of
its features, functions, or capabilities.
(3) Multi-functional equipment shall be deemed necessary for interconnection
or access to an unbundled network element if and only if the primary purpose
and function of the equipment, as the requesting carrier seeks to deploy it,
meets either or both of the standards set forth in paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2) of this section. For a piece of equipment to be utilized primarily to
obtain equal in quality interconnection or nondiscriminatory access to one
or more unbundled network elements, there also must be a logical nexus
between the additional functions the equipment would perform and the
telecommunication services the requesting carrier seeks to provide to its
customers by means of the interconnection or unbundled network element. The
collocation of those functions of the equipment that, as stand-alone
functions, do not meet either of the standards set forth in paragraphs
(b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section must not cause the equipment to
significantly increase the burden on the incumbent's property.
(c) Whenever an incumbent LEC objects to collocation of equipment by a
requesting telecommunications carrier for purposes within the scope of
section 251(c)(6) of the Act, the incumbent LEC shall prove to the state
commission that the equipment is not necessary for interconnection or access
to unbundled network elements under the standards set forth in paragraph (b)
of this section. An incumbent LEC may not object to the collocation of
equipment on the grounds that the equipment does not comply with safety or
engineering standards that are more stringent than the safety or engineering
standards that the incumbent LEC applies to its own equipment. An incumbent
LEC may not object to the collocation of equipment on the ground that the
equipment fails to comply with Network Equipment and Building Specifications
performance standards or any other performance standards. An incumbent LEC
that denies collocation of a competitor's equipment, citing safety
standards, must provide to the competitive LEC within five business days of
the denial a list of all equipment that the incumbent LEC locates at the
premises in question, together with an affidavit attesting that all of that
equipment meets or exceeds the safety standard that the incumbent LEC
contends the competitor's equipment fails to meet. This affidavit must set
forth in detail: the exact safety requirement that the requesting carrier's
equipment does not satisfy; the incumbent LEC's basis for concluding that
the requesting carrier's equipment does not meet this safety requirement;
and the incumbent LEC's basis for concluding why collocation of equipment
not meeting this safety requirement would compromise network safety.
(d) When an incumbent LEC provides physical collocation, virtual
collocation, or both, the incumbent LEC shall:
(1) Provide an interconnection point or points, physically accessible by
both the incumbent LEC and the collocating telecommunications carrier, at
which the fiber optic cable carrying an interconnector's circuits can enter
the incumbent LEC's premises, provided that the incumbent LEC shall
designate interconnection points as close as reasonably possible to its
premises;
(2) Provide at least two such interconnection points at each incumbent LEC
premises at which there are at least two entry points for the incumbent
LEC's cable facilities, and at which space is available for new facilities
in at least two of those entry points;
(3) Permit interconnection of copper or coaxial cable if such
interconnection is first approved by the state commission; and
(4) Permit physical collocation of microwave transmission facilities except
where such collocation is not practical for technical reasons or because of
space limitations, in which case virtual collocation of such facilities is
required where technically feasible.
(e) When providing virtual collocation, an incumbent LEC shall, at a
minimum, install, maintain, and repair collocated equipment meeting the
standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section within the same time
periods and with failure rates that are no greater than those that apply to
the performance of similar functions for comparable equipment of the
incumbent LEC itself.
(f) An incumbent LEC shall provide space for the collocation of equipment
meeting the standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section in
accordance with the following requirements:
(1) An incumbent LEC shall make space available within or on its premises to
requesting telecommunications carriers on a first-come, first-served basis,
provided, however, that the incumbent LEC shall not be required to lease or
construct additional space to provide for physical collocation when existing
space has been exhausted;
(2) To the extent possible, an incumbent LEC shall make contiguous space
available to requesting telecommunications carriers that seek to expand
their existing collocation space;
(3) When planning renovations of existing facilities or constructing or
leasing new facilities, an incumbent LEC shall take into account projected
demand for collocation of equipment;
(4) An incumbent LEC may retain a limited amount of floor space for its own
specific future uses, provided, however, that neither the incumbent LEC nor
any of its affiliates may reserve space for future use on terms more
favorable than those that apply to other telecommunications carriers seeking
to reserve collocation space for their own future use;
(5) An incumbent LEC shall relinquish any space held for future use before
denying a request for virtual collocation on the grounds of space
limitations, unless the incumbent LEC proves to the state commission that
virtual collocation at that point is not technically feasible; and
(6) An incumbent LEC may impose reasonable restrictions on the warehousing
of unused space by collocating telecommunications carriers, provided,
however, that the incumbent LEC shall not set maximum space limitations
applicable to such carriers unless the incumbent LEC proves to the state
commission that space constraints make such restrictions necessary.
(7) An incumbent LEC must assign collocation space to requesting carriers in
a just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory manner. An incumbent LEC must
allow each carrier requesting physical collocation to submit space
preferences prior to assigning physical collocation space to that carrier.
At a minimum, an incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices
must meet the following principles:
(A) An incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices must not
materially increase a requesting carrier's collocation costs.
(B) An incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices must not
materially delay a requesting carrier occupation and use of the incumbent
LEC's premises.
(C) An incumbent LEC must not assign physical collocation space that will
impair the quality of service or impose other limitations on the service a
requesting carrier wishes to offer.
(D) An incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices must not
reduce unreasonably the total space available for physical collocation or
preclude unreasonably physical collocation within the incumbent's premises.
(g) An incumbent LEC shall permit collocating telecommunications carriers to
collocate equipment and connect such equipment to unbundled network
transmission elements obtained from the incumbent LEC, and shall not require
such telecommunications carriers to bring their own transmission facilities
to the incumbent LEC's premises in which they seek to collocate equipment.
(h) As described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this section, an incumbent LEC
shall permit a collocating telecommunications carrier to interconnect its
network with that of another collocating telecommunications carrier at the
incumbent LEC's premises and to connect its collocated equipment to the
collocated equipment of another telecommunications carrier within the same
premises, provided that the collocated equipment is also used for
interconnection with the incumbent LEC or for access to the incumbent LEC's
unbundled network elements.
(1) An incumbent LEC shall provide, at the request of a collocating
telecommunications carrier, a connection between the equipment in the
collocated spaces of two or more telecommunications carriers, except to the
extent the incumbent LEC permits the collocating parties to provide the
requested connection for themselves or a connection is not required under
paragraph (h)(2) of this section. Where technically feasible, the incumbent
LEC shall provide the connection using copper, dark fiber, lit fiber, or
other transmission medium, as requested by the collocating
telecommunications carrier.
(2) An incumbent LEC is not required to provide a connection between the
equipment in the collocated spaces of two or more telecommunications
carriers if the connection is requested pursuant to section 201 of the Act,
unless the requesting carrier submits to the incumbent LEC a certification
that more than 10 percent of the amount of traffic to be transmitted through
the connection will be interstate. The incumbent LEC cannot refuse to accept
the certification, but instead must provision the service promptly. Any
incumbent LEC may file a section 208 complaint with the Commission
challenging the certification if it believes that the certification is
deficient. No such certification is required for a request for such
connection under section 251 of the Act.
(i) As provided herein, an incumbent LEC may require reasonable security
arrangements to protect its equipment and ensure network reliability. An
incumbent LEC may only impose security arrangements that are as stringent as
the security arrangements that the incumbent LEC maintains at its own
premises for its own employees or authorized contractors. An incumbent LEC
must allow collocating parties to access their collocated equipment 24 hours
a day, seven days a week, without requiring either a security escort of any
kind or delaying a competitor's employees' entry into the incumbent LEC's
premises. An incumbent LEC may require a collocating carrier to pay only for
the least expensive, effective security option that is viable for the
physical collocation space assigned. Reasonable security measures that the
incumbent LEC may adopt include:
(1) Installing security cameras or other monitoring systems; or
(2) Requiring competitive LEC personnel to use badges with computerized
tracking systems; or
(3) Requiring competitive LEC employees to undergo the same level of
security training, or its equivalent, that the incumbent's own employees, or
third party contractors providing similar functions, must undergo; provided,
however, that the incumbent LEC may not require competitive LEC employees to
receive such training from the incumbent LEC itself, but must provide
information to the competitive LEC on the specific type of training required
so the competitive LEC's employees can conduct their own training.
(4) Restricting physical collocation to space separated from space housing
the incumbent LEC's equipment, provided that each of the following
conditions is met:
(i) Either legitimate security concerns, or operational constraints
unrelated to the incumbent's or any of its affiliates' or subsidiaries
competitive concerns, warrant such separation;
(ii) Any physical collocation space assigned to an affiliate or subsidiary
of the incumbent LEC is separated from space housing the incumbent LEC's
equipment;
(iii) The separated space will be available in the same time frame as, or a
shorter time frame than, non-separated space;
(iv) The cost of the separated space to the requesting carrier will not be
materially higher than the cost of non-separated space; and
(v) The separated space is comparable, from a technical and engineering
standpoint, to non-separated space.
(5) Requiring the employees and contractors of collocating carriers to use a
central or separate entrance to the incumbent's building, provided, however,
that where an incumbent LEC requires that the employees or contractors of
collocating carriers access collocated equipment only through a separate
entrance, employees and contractors of the incumbent LEC's affiliates and
subsidiaries must be subject to the same restriction.
(6) Constructing or requiring the construction of a separate entrance to
access physical collocation space, provided that each of the following
conditions is met:
(i) Construction of a separate entrance is technically feasible;
(ii) Either legitimate security concerns, or operational constraints
unrelated to the incumbent's or any of its affiliates' or subsidiaries
competitive concerns, warrant such separation;
(iii) Construction of a separate entrance will not artificially delay
collocation provisioning; and
(iv) Construction of a separate entrance will not materially increase the
requesting carrier's costs.
(j) An incumbent LEC shall permit a collocating telecommunications carrier
to subcontract the construction of physical collocation arrangements with
contractors approved by the incumbent LEC, provided, however, that the
incumbent LEC shall not unreasonably withhold approval of contractors.
Approval by an incumbent LEC shall be based on the same criteria it uses in
approving contractors for its own purposes.
(k) An incumbent LEC's physical collocation offering must include the
following:
(1) Shared collocation cages. A shared collocation cage is a caged
collocation space shared by two or more competitive LECs pursuant to terms
and conditions agreed to by the competitive LECs. In making shared cage
arrangements available, an incumbent LEC may not increase the cost of site
preparation or nonrecurring charges above the cost for provisioning such a
cage of similar dimensions and material to a single collocating party. In
addition, the incumbent must prorate the charge for site conditioning and
preparation undertaken by the incumbent to construct the shared collocation
cage or condition the space for collocation use, regardless of how many
carriers actually collocate in that cage, by determining the total charge
for site preparation and allocating that charge to a collocating carrier
based on the percentage of the total space utilized by that carrier. An
incumbent LEC must make shared collocation space available in single-bay
increments or their equivalent, i.e., a competing carrier can purchase space
in increments small enough to collocate a single rack, or bay, of equipment.
(2) Cageless collocation. Incumbent LECs must allow competitors to collocate
without requiring the construction of a cage or similar structure. Incumbent
LECs must permit collocating carriers to have direct access to their
equipment. An incumbent LEC may not require competitors to use an
intermediate interconnection arrangement in lieu of direct connection to the
incumbent's network if technically feasible. An incumbent LEC must make
cageless collocation space available in single-bay increments, meaning that
a competing carrier can purchase space in increments small enough to
collocate a single rack, or bay, of equipment.
(3) Adjacent space collocation. An incumbent LEC must make available, where
physical collocation space is legitimately exhausted in a particular
incumbent LEC structure, collocation in adjacent controlled environmental
vaults, controlled environmental huts, or similar structures located at the
incumbent LEC premises to the extent technically feasible. The incumbent LEC
must permit a requesting telecommunications carrier to construct or
otherwise procure such an adjacent structure, subject only to reasonable
safety and maintenance requirements. The incumbent must provide power and
physical collocation services and facilities, subject to the same
nondiscrimination requirements as applicable to any other physical
collocation arrangement. The incumbent LEC must permit the requesting
carrier to place its own equipment, including, but not limited to, copper
cables, coaxial cables, fiber cables, and telecommunications equipment, in
adjacent facilities constructed by the incumbent LEC, the requesting
carrier, or a third-party. If physical collocation space becomes available
in a previously exhausted incumbent LEC structure, the incumbent LEC must
not require a carrier to move, or prohibit a competitive LEC from moving, a
collocation arrangement into that structure. Instead, the incumbent LEC must
continue to allow the carrier to collocate in any adjacent controlled
environmental vault, controlled environmental vault, or similar structure
that the carrier has constructed or otherwise procured.
(l) An incumbent LEC must offer to provide and provide all forms of physical
collocation (i.e., caged, cageless, shared, and adjacent) within the
following deadlines, except to the extent a state sets its own deadlines or
the incumbent LEC has demonstrated to the state commission that physical
collocation is not practical for technical reasons or because of space
limitations.
(1) Within ten days after receiving an application for physical collocation,
an incumbent LEC must inform the requesting carrier whether the application
meets each of the incumbent LEC's established collocation standards. A
requesting carrier that resubmits a revised application curing any
deficiencies in an application for physical collocation within ten days
after being informed of them retains its position within any collocation
queue that the incumbent LEC maintains pursuant to paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
(2) Except as stated in paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this section, an
incumbent LEC must complete provisioning of a requested physical collocation
arrangement within 90 days after receiving an application that meets the
incumbent LEC's established collocation application standards.
(3) An incumbent LEC need not meet the deadline set forth in paragraph
(l)(2) of this section if, after receipt of any price quotation provided by
the incumbent LEC, the telecommunications carrier requesting collocation
does not notify the incumbent LEC that physical collocation should proceed.
(4) If, within seven days of the requesting carrier's receipt of any price
quotation provided by the incumbent LEC, the telecommunications carrier
requesting collocation does not notify the incumbent LEC that physical
collocation should proceed, then the incumbent LEC need not complete
provisioning of a requested physical collocation arrangement until 90 days
after receiving such notification from the requesting telecommunications
carrier.
[ 61 FR 45619 , Aug. 28, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 23242 , Apr. 30, 1999; 65 FR 54439 , Sept. 8, 2000; 66 FR 43521 , Aug. 20, 2001]
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.