Sec. 101.1112 Definitions.
(a) Scope. The definitions in this section apply to Secs. 101.1101
through 101.1112, unless otherwise specified in those sections.
(b) Small business; consortium. (1) A small business is an entity
that, together with its affiliates and controlling principals, has
average gross revenues for the three preceding years of not more than
$40 million.
(2) For purposes of determining whether an entity meets the
definition of small business
[[Page 823]]
or qualifies as a business with average gross revenues for the three
preceding years of more than $40 million but not more than $75 million,
the gross revenues of the applicant, its affiliates and controlling
principals shall be considered on a cumulative basis and aggregated.
(3) Consortium. A consortium of small businesses, or a consortium of
businesses with average gross revenues for the three preceding years of
more than $40 million but not more than $75 million, is a conglomerate
organization formed as a joint venture between or among mutually
independent business firms, each of which individually satisfies the
definition of a small business or business with average gross revenues
for the three preceding years of more than $40 million but not more than
$75 million. Each individual member must establish its eligibility as a
small business or business with average gross revenues for the three
preceding years of more than $40 million but not more than $75 million.
Where an applicant (or licensee) is a consortium of small businesses or
a consortium of businesses with average gross revenues for the three
preceding years of more than $40 million but not more than $75 million,
the gross revenues of each business shall not be aggregated.
(c) Gross revenues. Gross revenues shall mean all income received by
an entity, whether earned or passive, before any deductions are made for
costs of doing business (e.g., cost of goods sold), as evidenced by
audited financial statements for the relevant number of most recently
completed calendar years, or, if audited financial statements were not
prepared on a calendar-year basis, for the most recently completed
fiscal years preceding the filing of the applicant's short-form
application (FCC Form 175). If an entity was not in existence for all or
part of the relevant period, gross revenues shall be evidenced by the
audited financial statements of the entity's predecessor-in-interest or,
if there is no identifiable predecessor-in-interest, unaudited financial
statements certified by the applicant as accurate. When an applicant
does not otherwise use audited financial statements, its gross revenues
may be certified by its chief financial officer or its equivalent.
(d) Affiliate--(1) Basis for affiliation. An individual or entity is
an affiliate of an applicant if such individual or entity:
(i) Directly or indirectly controls or has the power to control the
applicant, or
(ii) Is directly or indirectly controlled by the applicant, or
(iii) Is directly or indirectly controlled by a third party or
parties who also control or have the power to control the applicant, or
(iv) Has an ``identity of interest'' with the applicant.
(2) Nature of control in determining affiliation. (i) Every business
concern is considered to have one or more parties who directly or
indirectly control or have the power to control it. Control may be
affirmative or negative and it is immaterial whether it is exercised so
long as the power to control exists.
Example for paragraph (d)(2)(i). An applicant owning 50 percent of
the voting stock of another concern would have negative power to control
such concern since such party can block any action of the other
stockholders. Also, the bylaws of a corporation may permit a stockholder
with less than 50 percent of the voting stock to block any actions taken
by the other stockholders in the other entity. Affiliation exists when
the applicant has the power to control a concern while at the same time
another person, or persons, are in control of the concern at the will of
the party or parties with the power of control.
(ii) Control can arise through stock ownership; occupancy of
director, officer, or key employee positions; contractual or other
business relations; or combinations of these and other factors. A key
employee is an employee who, because of her position in the concern, has
a critical influence in or substantive control over the operations or
management of the concern.
(iii) Control can arise through management positions if the voting
stock is so widely distributed that no effective control can be
established.
Example for paragraph (d)(2)(iii). In a corporation where the
officers and directors own various size blocks of stock totaling 40
percent of the corporation's voting stock, but no officer or director
has a block sufficient to give him control or the power to control and
the remaining 60 percent is widely distributed with no individual
stockholder having a stock interest greater than 10 percent, management
has the power to control. If persons with such management control of the
other entity are controlling principals of the applicant, the other
entity will be deemed an affiliate of the applicant.
(3) Identity of interest between and among persons. Affiliation can
arise between or among two or more persons with an identity of interest,
such as members of the same family or persons with common investments.
In determining if the applicant controls or is controlled by a concern,
persons with an identity of interest will be treated as though they were
one person.
(i) Spousal affiliation. Both spouses are deemed to own or control
or have the power to control interests owned or controlled by either of
them, unless they are subject to a legal separation recognized by a
court of competent jurisdiction in the United States.
(ii) Kinship affiliation. Immediate family members will be presumed
to own or control or have the power to control interests owned or
controlled by other immediate family
[[Page 824]]
members. In this context ``immediate family member'' means father,
mother, husband, wife, son, daughter, brother, sister, father-or mother-
in-law, son-or daughter-in-law, brother-or sister-in-law, step-father or
-mother, step-brother or -sister, step-son or -daughter, half-brother or
-sister. This presumption may be rebutted by showing that:
(A) The family members are estranged,
(B) The family ties are remote, or
(C) The family members are not closely involved with each other in
business matters.
Example for paragraph (d)(3)(ii). A owns a controlling interest in
Corporation X. A's sister-in-law, B, has a controlling interest in an
LMDS license application. Because A and B have a presumptive kinship
affiliation, A's interest in Corporation X is attributable to B, and
thus to the applicant, unless B rebuts the presumption with the
necessary showing.
(4) Affiliation through stock ownership. (i) An applicant is
presumed to control or have the power to control a concern if she owns
or controls or has the power to control 50 percent or more of its voting
stock.
(ii) An applicant is presumed to control or have the power to
control a concern even though he owns, controls, or has the power to
control less than 50 percent of the concern's voting stock, if the block
of stock she owns, controls, or has the power to control is large as
compared with any other outstanding block of stock.
(iii) If two or more persons each owns, controls or has the power to
control less than 50 percent of the voting stock of a concern, such
minority holdings are equal or approximately equal in size, and the
aggregate of these minority holdings is large as compared with any other
stock holding, the presumption arises that each one of these persons
individually controls or has the power to control the concern; however,
such presumption may be rebutted by a showing that such control or power
to control, in fact, does not exist.
(5) Affiliation arising under stock options, convertible debentures,
and agreements to merge. Stock options, convertible debentures, and
agreements to merge (including agreements in principle) are generally
considered to have a present effect on the power to control the concern.
Therefore, in making a size determination, such options, debentures, and
agreements will generally be treated as though the rights held
thereunder had been exercised. However, neither an affiliate nor an
applicant can use such options and debentures to appear to terminate its
control over another concern before it actually does so.
Example 1 for paragraph (d)(5). If company B holds an option to
purchase a controlling interest in company A, who holds a controlling
interest in an LMDS application, the situation is treated as though
company B had exercised its rights and had become owner of a controlling
interest in company A. The gross revenues of company B must be taken
into account in determining the size of the applicant.
Example 2 for paragraph (d)(5). If a large company, BigCo, holds 70
percent (70 of 100 outstanding shares) of the voting stock of company A,
who holds a controlling interest in an LMDS license application, and
gives a third party, SmallCo, an option to purchase 50 of the 70 shares
owned by BigCo, BigCo will be deemed to be an affiliate of company A,
and thus the applicant, until SmallCo actually exercises its options to
purchase such shares. In order to prevent BigCo from circumventing the
intent of the rule, which requires such options to be considered on a
fully diluted basis, the option is not considered to have present effect
in this case.
Example 3 for paragraph (d)(5). If company A has entered into an
agreement to merge with company B in the future, the situation is
treated as though the merger has taken place.
(6) Affiliation under voting trusts. (i) Stock interests held in
trust shall be deemed controlled by any person who holds or shares the
power to vote such stock, to any person who has the sole power to sell
such stock, and to any person who has the right to revoke the trust at
will or to replace the trustee at will.
(ii) If a trustee has a familial, personal or extra-trust business
relationship to the grantor or the beneficiary, the stock interests held
in trust will be deemed controlled by the grantor or beneficiary, as
appropriate.
(iii) If the primary purpose of a voting trust, or similar
agreement, is to separate voting power from beneficial ownership of
voting stock for the purpose of shifting control of or the power to
control a concern in order that such concern or another concern may meet
the Commission's size standards, such voting trust shall not be
considered valid for this purpose regardless of whether it is or is not
recognized within the appropriate jurisdiction.
(7) Affiliation through common management. Affiliation generally
arises where officers, directors, or key employees serve as the majority
or otherwise as the controlling element of the board of directors or the
management (or both) of another entity.
(8) Affiliation through common facilities. Affiliation generally
arises where one concern shares office space, employees, or other
facilities (or any combination of the foregoing) with another concern,
particularly where such concerns are in the same or related industry or
field of operations, or where such concerns were formerly affiliated,
and through these sharing arrangements one concern has control, or
potential control, of the other concern.
(9) Affiliation through contractual relationships. Affiliation
generally arises where one concern is dependent upon another concern for
contracts and business to such a degree
[[Page 825]]
that one concern has control, or potential control, of the other
concern.
(10) Affiliation under joint venture arrangements. (i) A joint
venture for size determination purposes is an association of concerns or
individuals (or both), with interests in any degree or proportion,
formed by contract, express or implied, to engage in and carry out a
single, specific business venture for joint profit for which purpose
they combine their efforts, property, money, skill and knowledge, but
not on a continuing or permanent basis for conducting business
generally. The determination whether an entity is a joint venture is
based upon the facts of the business operation, regardless of how the
business operation may be designated by the parties involved. An
agreement to share profits/losses proportionate to each party's
contribution to the business operation is a significant factor in
determining whether the business operation is a joint venture.
(ii) The parties to a joint venture are considered to be affiliated
with each other.
(11) Exclusion from affiliation coverage. For purposes of paragraphs
(b) and (d) of this section, Indian tribes or Alaska Regional or Village
Corporations organized pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), or entities owned and controlled by such
tribes or corporations, are not considered affiliates of an applicant
(or licensee) that is owned and controlled by such tribes, corporations
or entities, and that otherwise complies with the requirements of
paragraphs (b), except that gross revenues derived from gaming
activities conducted by affiliated entities pursuant to the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) will be counted in
determining such applicant's (or licensee's) compliance with the
financial requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, unless such
applicant establishes that it will not receive a substantial unfair
competitive advantage because significant legal constraints restrict the
applicant's ability to access such gross revenues.
[ 62 FR 23172 , Apr. 29, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 28375 , May 23, 1997]
[[Page 827]]
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.