FCC Web Documents citing 213.1

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1086A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1086A1.pdf
  • cause harmful interference to, nor experience harmful interference from co-channel TV stations. We also find that DCS's proposed operations will not cause harmful interference to adjacent channel TV licensees. For the lower adjacent Channel 15, DCS states that ``[t]he closest full service licensed station is KJTL-DT in Wichita Falls, Texas'' and ``closest of the proposed sites is Coppell which is 213.1 km away'' and for upper adjacent channel 17, ``[t]he closest licensed station is K17BP in Palestine, Texas'' and ``closest of the proposed sites is Kleberg which is 140.6 km away.'' DCS argues that the ``station is technically not entitled to protection, as it is a low power station.'' DCS states that ``[t]he closest full service station is KPCB-DT in Snyder,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1829A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 2009 Released: August 19, 2009 By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1.Introduction. On April 1, 2009, Comm Enterprises, LLC; James A. Kay, Jr.; MS Airwaves, Inc.; and Marc D.Sobel (Petitioners) filed a petition for reconsideration of the grant of the above- captioned application of to modify the license of License Communications Services, Inc. (LCS) for Industrial/Business Pool Station WPMP213.1For the reasons set for the below, we deny the petition for reconsideration. 2.Background. On February 20, 2007, LCS filed an application to modify its license for Station WPMP213 by adding nine 12.5 kHz "offset" channels in the 470-512 MHz band. Some of LCS's requested center frequencies were separated by 12.5 kilohertz from the center frequencies of nearby stations licensed to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1086A1.txt
  • cause harmful interference to, nor experience harmful interference from co-channel TV stations. We also find that DCS's proposed operations will not cause harmful interference to adjacent channel TV licensees. For the lower adjacent Channel 15, DCS states that ``[t]he closest full service licensed station is KJTL-DT in Wichita Falls, Texas'' and ``closest of the proposed sites is Coppell which is 213.1 km away'' and for upper adjacent channel 17, ``[t]he closest licensed station is K17BP in Palestine, Texas'' and ``closest of the proposed sites is Kleberg which is 140.6 km away.'' DCS argues that the ``station is technically not entitled to protection, as it is a low power station.'' DCS states that ``[t]he closest full service station is KPCB-DT in Snyder,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.txt
  • 0 1 370.05 670.149 Tm 93 Tz (2003) Tj 1 0 0 1 441.6 669.899 Tm 97 Tz (8/11/2009) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 658.149 Tm 99 Tz (Elementary) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.3 645.399 Tm 97 Tz (Silverdale,) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 632.7 Tm 250 Tz /OPBaseFont3 4 Tf (Washington) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.1 629.799 Tm 227 Tz (_____________) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 619.5 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Maine School Admin) Tj 1 0 0 1 229.4 619.45 Tm 93 Tz (679401) Tj 1 0 0 1 284.15 629.549 Tm 252 Tz /OPBaseFont1 4 Tf (_____________) Tj 1 0 0 1 299.75 619 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Appeal)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1246A1.txt
  • (discount rate amounted to a denial of funding for these requests.'6) Tj 1 0 0 1 110.4 647.299 Tm 92 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (5.) Tj 1 0 0 1 137.5 647.35 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (On July) Tj 1 0 0 1 174.7 647.549 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (7, 2005,) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.1 646.85 Tm 110 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Loving appealed USAC's decision to USAC stating that FRNs 1143816) Tj 1 0 0 1 78.95 634.399 Tm 109 Tz (and 1144222 qualified for B-rate funding for internal connections at the shared 85 percent discount level,) Tj 1 0 0 1 78.95 621.649 Tm 110 Tz (instead of the 80 percent discount level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1562A1.txt
  • Tf (WC Docket No. 07-267, Report and Order, 24 FCC Red) Tj 1 0 0 1 476.85 261.149 Tm 93 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (9543) Tj 1 0 0 1 499.4 261.149 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (\(2009\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 250.6 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (\(Forbearance Procedures Order\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.1 250.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (http:!/hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatchlFCC-09-56A1 .doc. All of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 239.049 Tm (forbearance procedural rules are now effective.) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.1 238.6 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (See Notice of Effective Date of ATew Forbearance Procedural Rules,) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 227.549 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 77.25 142.799 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See, e.g.,) Tj 1 0 0 1 115.9 142.799 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Bethel School District Funding Year 2005, FCC Form 471, Attachment: YR8-B2.16a, FRN 1278066,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.4 131.049 Tm 99 Tz (Bethel School District Invoice Oct.) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.1 131.049 Tm 86 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (5,) Tj 1 0 0 1 222.95 131.049 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (2004 - Oct. 20, 2004.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 114.049 Tm 52 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (13) Tj 1 0 0 1 77.25 109.449 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 93.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-445A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 0002919008 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 9, 2011 By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. Introduction. Mobile Relay Associates (MRA) seeks reconsideration of the action of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Mobility Division (Division) dismissing as moot MRA's request that the Division modify the license of License Communications Services, Inc. (LCS) for Industrial/Business Pool Station WPMP213.1MRA argues that its request was not moot, and should have been addressed on the merits. We agree with MRA that its request was not moot, but conclude that it nonetheless should not have been granted. Consequently, we deny MRA's petition for reconsideration. 2. Background. Station WPMP213 originally was authorized to operate at three locations in Southern California on three channels
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.txt
  • 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (et al.,) Tj 1 0 0 1 458.6 201.899 Tm /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (CC Docket No. 02-) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 190.85 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (6, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 9256) Tj 1 0 0 1 183.8 190.85 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (\(2010\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.1 190.6 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (\(Academy of Math and Science Order\); infra) Tj 1 0 0 1 395.75 190.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (para. 2;) Tj 1 0 0 1 428.6 190.35 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (see also Request for) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 179.049 Tm (Waivers and Review of the Decisions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • RegulatedSeparations Collection and CommonTraffic Special Total and Adjustments Line Sensitive Interexchange All Reporting Cos. $106,659.8 $9,155.9 $97,503.9$65,049.9$32,454.0$11,996.2$3,559.0$15,156.7$30,711.9$1,667.1 Bell Operating Cos. 97,317.5 8,244.3 89,073.1 59,136.1 29,937.0 10,827.33,204.0 14,274.4 28,305.7 1,631.4 All Other Cos. 9,342.3 911.5 8,430.8 5,913.7 2,517.0 1,168.9 355.0 882.4 2,406.3 35.7 Alabama 1,636.2 102.0 1,534.2 1,094.8 439.4 174.2 55.6 183.4 413.2 26.2 AL Arizona 1,577.3 87.6 1,489.8 905.3 584.4 213.1 68.6 252.2 533.9 50.5 AZ Arkansas 781.3 91.8 689.5 485.8 203.7 62.5 23.8 105.2 191.5 12.3 AR California 13,133.2 1,965.2 11,168.0 7,591.0 3,577.0 1,357.3 333.9 1,717.6 3,408.8 168.2 CA Colorado 1,937.1 82.6 1,854.5 1,152.0 702.5 248.3 70.4 314.1 632.8 69.6 CO Connecticut 1,508.8 44.2 1,464.6 981.6 483.0 152.2 64.7 246.5 463.4 19.6 CT Delaware 340.7 18.4 322.3 187.1 135.2 45.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
  • 258.0 83.9 422.2 764.1 41.9 MD Massachusetts 2,495.3 134.5 2,360.9 1,461.9 899.0 308.4 81.5 474.8 864.7 34.3 MA Michigan 3,256.9 360.9 2,895.9 2,050.8 845.1 326.5 99.9 384.7 811.1 34.0 MI Minnesota 1,131.5 46.8 1,084.7 662.4 422.2 101.3 43.6 237.4 382.3 39.9 MN Mississippi 1,063.4 48.5 1,014.9 745.2 269.7 103.4 39.0 107.0 249.4 20.3 MS Missouri 2,277.6 357.6 1,920.0 1,275.2 644.8 213.1 69.1 324.3 606.5 38.3 MO Montana 256.4 24.9 231.5 148.7 82.8 27.7 11.1 34.8 73.6 9.3 MT Nebraska 545.1 41.2 503.9 325.4 178.5 49.2 23.4 95.2 167.8 10.7 NE Nevada 777.8 89.8 688.0 434.5 253.5 93.9 43.4 106.1 243.4 10.1 NV New Hampshire 452.6 19.0 433.6 265.0 168.6 60.4 19.5 82.5 162.4 6.3 NH New Jersey 3,600.4 209.1 3,391.3 1,993.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 1,774.2 81.3 1,692.9 1,162.8 530.1 284.5 80.1 160.1 524.7 5.4 KS Kentucky 3,271.9 377.5 2,894.5 2,151.4 743.1 482.1 104.4 161.7 748.2 -5.1KY Louisiana 3,940.6 382.2 3,558.4 2,713.2 845.2 573.7 100.8 164.1 838.6 6.6 LA Maine 1,123.4 45.0 1,078.4 773.4 305.0 145.8 61.2 96.5 303.5 1.5ME Maryland 4,539.6 557.2 3,982.4 2,706.1 1,276.3 539.8 219.3 512.2 1,271.4 4.9MD Massachusetts 6,996.0 632.0 6,364.1 4,213.1 2,151.0 692.8 382.1 1,065.5 2,140.4 10.6MA Michigan 7,856.8 527.1 7,329.7 5,664.1 1,665.6 999.6 359.5 292.1 1,651.2 14.5 MI Minnesota 3,079.3 277.1 2,802.3 1,993.8 808.4 392.4 128.8 284.4 805.6 2.8MN Mississippi 2,383.3 262.0 2,121.3 1,570.1 551.2 373.4 72.8 100.1 546.4 4.8 MS Missouri 4,531.8 106.7 4,425.1 3,172.3 1,252.8 676.5 193.3 350.3 1,220.1 32.7MO Montana 603.5 51.9 551.6 374.6 177.0 84.1 39.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 533.7 235.9 118.2 33.8 78.4 230.4 5.6 RI South Carolina 3,235.7 328.8 2,906.9 2,138.7 768.2 491.5 92.7 178.9 763.1 5.2 SC South Dakota 529.1 49.0 480.1 318.7 161.4 80.2 30.2 50.5 160.9 0.5 SD Tennessee 4,754.8 557.7 4,197.0 3,043.6 1,153.4 680.2 148.4 309.5 1,138.1 15.4 TN Texas 20,884.3 1,372.0 19,512.3 13,686.7 5,825.6 2,892.0 745.7 2,159.4 5,797.1 28.6 TX Utah 1,938.4 213.1 1,725.3 1,201.5 523.9 264.5 96.4 159.7 520.6 3.4 UT Vermont 689.6 37.9 651.7 442.5 209.2 99.5 43.2 54.5 197.2 12.1 VT Virginia 7,082.8 536.2 6,546.7 4,633.6 1,913.1 977.1 342.8 584.8 1,904.7 8.4 VA Washington 6,413.9 583.8 5,830.2 4,290.3 1,539.9 870.1 243.7 418.0 1,531.8 8.1 WA West Virginia 1,673.8 105.4 1,568.4 1,128.4 440.0 241.2 90.0 106.0 437.2 2.9 WV Wisconsin 3,274.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 614.0 1,571.4 877.7 467.5 223.6 1,568.7 2.628 FL GEORGIA 885.2 9.25 876.0 131.1 744.8 375.1 228.5 139.8 743.4 1.479 GA HAWAII 153.7 0.38 153.4 19.4 134.0 63.1 51.9 18.9 134.0 HI IDAHO 168.5 (0.27) 168.7 30.8 137.9 61.3 54.6 22.0 137.9 ID ILLINOIS 1,188.8 58.41 1,130.4 244.5 885.9 359.3 346.8 178.7 884.8 1.161 IL INDIANA 684.6 (3.97) 688.6 221.7 466.9 213.1 171.2 82.2 466.5 0.359 IN IOWA 320.9 0.04 320.8 108.5 212.3 86.7 82.6 43.0 212.3 IA KANSAS 278.9 (1.66) 280.5 79.5 201.0 90.0 66.1 46.4 202.5 (1.442)KS KENTUCKY 393.4 (0.54) 393.9 112.0 282.0 150.2 86.2 45.1 281.5 0.446 KY LOUISIANA 383.8 2.09 381.7 71.3 310.4 173.7 88.4 47.5 309.6 0.842 LA MAINE 152.1 2.28 149.9 32.4 117.4 40.9 57.5 19.0