FCC Web Documents citing 213.0

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.txt
  • 2240.0 366. 12 3.20 366.0 4247972 18581.3 4620493 18872.6 DC WASHINGTON WBDC-TV 30576 50 2450.0 247. 51 65.0 247.0 6032829 14170.8 5868782 14130.9 DC WASHINGTON WDCA 51567 20 3980.0 235. 35 232. 235.0 6460994 17166.7 6740674 17326.6 DC WASHINGTON WETA-TV 65670 26 2290.0 233. 27 67.2 233.0 6368549 15566.3 6494343 15030.4 DC WASHINGTON WHUT-TV 27772 32 5000.0 213. 33 194. 213.0 6468037 14337.9 6250367 13881.6 DC WASHINGTON WJLA-TV 1051 07 316.00 235. 39 1000 235.0 7175660 23211.2 6806495 23367.3 DC WASHINGTON WRC-TV 47904 04 100.00 237. 48 1000 237.0 7282797 24704.6 7385443 26957.4 DC WASHINGTON WTTG 22207 05 100.00 235. 36 1000 235.0 7388544 26767.0 7355960 26382.9 DC WASHINGTON WUSA 65593 09 316.00 235. 34 1000 235.0 7099037 22783.2 7274803 24699.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 37 Table 5: Local News Coverage Excluding Sports and Weather (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 25.7 (0.65) 8.4 (0.15) -10.2 (0.20) 25.0 (0.59) 12.6 (0.38) Cross-owned radio station -301.4*** (2.88) -264.8** (2.64) -213.0*** (3.01) -170.6*** (2.77) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 239.6* (1.73) 285.2** (2.29) 258.3** (2.57) 210.2** (2.30) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 12.0*** (3.39) 10.4*** (3.40) 5.3* (1.87) Network owned and operated -129.1 (1.52) -175.0* (1.89) -68.4 (0.83) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 33.6 (0.34) 276.4*** (3.51) CBS -42.0 (0.43) 234.3*** (2.94) FOX 276.0** (2.54) 157.4* (1.94)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • absolute yearly increase of 28.8 million subscribers in 2006, the total mobile telephone subscriber base has increased 23 percent in the last two years. Table 14: NRUF-Estimated Mobile Telephone Subscribers Subscribers (millions) Increase from previous year (millions) Penetration Rate 2001 128.5 n/a 45 % 2002 141.8 13.3 49 % 2003 160.6 18.8 54 % 2004 184.7 24.1 62 % 2005 213.0 28.3 71 % 2006 241.8 28.8 80 % 2007 263.0 21.2 86 % Source: Federal Communications Commission estimates. 198. CTIA's estimate for year-end 2007 was 255.4 million subscribers, a ten percent increase over its estimate of 233.0 million subscribers as of year-end 2006.556 CTIA's estimate shows a similar trend in subscriber growth, with the increase of 22.3 million subscribers shown
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.txt
  • report, the Commission had relied on national subscribership data from a highly-respected survey conducted by CTIA. While the Commission now uses NRUF data as the basis for its estimate of mobile telephone subscribership for the purposes of this report, we continue to report the CTIA data as a benchmark for comparison. As of December 2005, we estimate that there were 213.0 million mobile telephone subscribers, up from 184.7 million at the end of 2004, which translates into a nationwide penetration rate of 71 percent. This addition of 28.3 million subscribers was a 17 percent increase from the 24.1 million added in 2004, and a 51 percent increase over the 18.8 million added in 2003. In the last three years alone, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
  • subscribership data from a highly-respected survey conducted by CTIA. While the Commission now uses NRUF data as the basis for its estimate of mobile telephone subscribership for the purposes of this report, we continue to report the CTIA data as a benchmark for comparison. As of December 2006, we estimate that there were 241.8 million mobile telephone subscribers, up from 213.0 million at the end of 2004, which translates into a nationwide penetration rate of 80 percent. This addition of 28.8 million subscribers was slightly more than the 28.3 million added in 2005, and is the largest absolute yearly increase in the number of subscribers. In the last two years alone, the total mobile telephone subscriber base has increased 31 percent.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • more in the change observed from year to year, rather than the absolute value. NRUF and CTIA - Estimated Mobile Wireless Subscribers NRUF CTIA Subscribers (millions) Increase from previous year (millions) Penetration Rate Subscribers (millions) 2001 128.5 n/a 45 % 128.4 2002 141.8 13.3 49 % 140.8 2003 160.6 18.8 54 % 158.7 2004 184.7 24.1 62 % 182.1 2005 213.0 28.3 71 % 207.9 2006 241.8 28.8 80 % 233.0 2007 263.0 21.2 86 % 255.4 2008 277.6 14.6 90 % 270.3 CTIA reported similar growth in mobile wireless subscribership during 2008. CTIA's estimate for year-end 2008 was 270.3 million subscribers, a 5.8 percent increase over its estimate of 255.3 million subscribers as of year-end 2007. According to CTIA, since
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • V.B, Penetration Rates Across Economic Areas (EAs), infra. 11506 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-81 Table 14 NRUF and CTIA -Estimated Mobile Wireless Subscribers477 NRUF CTIA Subscribers (millions)Increase from previous year (millions) Penetration Rate Subscribers (millions) 2001 128.5 n/a 45 % 128.4 2002 141.8 13.3 49 % 140.8 2003 160.6 18.8 54 % 158.7 2004 184.7 24.1 62 % 182.1 2005 213.0 28.3 71 % 207.9 2006 241.8 28.8 80 % 233.0 2007 263.0 21.2 86 % 255.4 2008 277.6 14.6 90 % 270.3 157. CTIA reported similar growth in mobile wireless subscribership during 2008.478 CTIA's estimate for year-end 2008was 270.3 million subscribers, a 5.8percent increase over its estimate of 255.3million subscribers as of year-end 2007.479According to CTIA, since the end of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • Wireless Connections Mobile Telephone Subscribers Mobile Internet Access Subscribers NRUF (millions) CTIA (millions) Form 477* (millions) Form 477 (millions) Total Net Adds Total Net Adds Total Net Adds Total Net Adds 2001 128.5 n/a 128.4 18.9 124.0 23.0 2002 141.8 13.3 140.9 12.4 138.9 14.9 2003 160.6 18.8 158.7 18 157.0 18.1 2004 184.7 24.1 182.1 23.4 181.1 24.1 2005 213.0 28.3 207.9 25.8 203.7 22.6 2006 241.8 28.8 233.0 25.1 229.6 25.9 2007 263.0 21.2 255.4 22.4 249.3 19.7 2008 279.6 16.6 270.3 14.9 261.3 12.0 26.5 2009 290.7 11.1 285.6 15.3 274.3 13.0 55.8 29.3 * Prior to December 2004, only facilities-based wireless carriers with at least 10,000 mobile telephone subscribers per state were required to report data. Starting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Connections Mobile Telephone Subscribers Mobile Internet Access Subscribers NRUF (millions) CTIA (millions) Form 477* (millions) Form 477 (millions) Year Total Net Adds Total Net Adds Total Net Adds Total Net Adds 2001 128.5 n/a 128.4 18.9 124.0 23.0 2002 141.8 13.3 140.9 12.4 138.9 14.9 2003 160.6 18.8 158.7 18 157.0 18.1 2004 184.7 24.1 182.1 23.4 181.1 24.1 2005 213.0 28.3 207.9 25.8 203.7 22.6 2006 241.8 28.8 233.0 25.1 229.6 25.9 2007 263.0 21.2 255.4 22.4 249.3 19.7 2008 279.6 16.6 270.3 14.9 261.3 12.0 26.5 2009 290.7 11.1 285.6 15.3 274.3 13.0 55.8 29.3 * Prior to December 2004, only facilities-based wireless carriers with at least 10,000 mobile telephone subscribers per state were required to report data. Starting
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 95.9 DC WASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 23331 6004 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 95.4 DC WASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24624 6440 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 231.6 235.0 17347 6010 17179 5746 0.1 0.0 96.0 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 67.2 233.0 15070 5823 15606 5637 13.3 4.1 94.9 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 194.3 213.0 13878 5588 14310 5777 10.0 2.3 93.5 DC WASHINGTON 50 51 65.0 247.0 14147 5160 14207 5376 0.1 0.0 97.7 DE SEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4202 154 4202 154 3.2 2.9 100.0 DE WILMINGTON 12 55 1000.0 294.0 23176 7443 20136 6742 0.0 0.0 99.8 DE WILMINGTON 61 31 50.0 292.0 16054 5337 15401 5324 5.3 6.5 97.1 FL
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 235.0 22879 6343 26711 6533 0.0 0.0 82.9 DCWASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 24391 6346 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 99.0 DCWASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24684 6438 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DCWASHINGTON 20 35 221.7 235.0 17611 6043 17179 5746 0.2 0.0 97.0 DCWASHINGTON 26 27 64.3 233.0 15402 5868 15606 5637 14.5 4.4 96.9 DCWASHINGTON 32 33 186.0 213.0 14526 5769 14310 5777 10.2 2.4 97.7 DCWASHINGTON 50 51 62.2 247.0 15011 5859 14207 5376 0.1 0.0 99.8 DESEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4202 154 4202 154 3.4 2.9 100.0 DEWILMINGTON 12 55 1000.0 294.0 23834 7726 20132 6742 0.0 0.0 99.7 DEWILMINGTON 61 31 50.0 292.0 16707 5587 15401 5324 5.4 6.5 98.6 FLBOCARATON 63 44 59.1 310.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 95.9 DC WASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 23331 6004 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 95.4 DC WASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24624 6440 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 231.6 235.0 17347 6010 17179 5746 0.1 0.0 96.0 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 67.2 233.0 15070 5823 15606 5637 13.3 4.1 94.9 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 194.3 213.0 13878 5588 14310 5777 10.0 2.3 93.5 DC WASHINGTON 50 51 65.0 247.0 14147 5160 14207 5376 0.1 0.0 97.7 DE SEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4202 154 4202 154 3.2 2.9 100.0 DE WILMINGTON 12 55 1000.0 294.0 23176 7443 20136 6742 0.0 0.0 99.8 DE WILMINGTON 61 31 50.0 292.0 16054 5337 15401 5324 5.3 6.5 97.1 FL
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 95.9 DC WASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 23331 6004 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 95.4 DC WASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24624 6440 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 231.6 235.0 17347 6010 17179 5746 0.1 0.0 96.0 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 67.2 233.0 15070 5823 15606 5637 13.3 4.1 94.9 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 194.3 213.0 13878 5588 14310 5777 10.0 2.3 93.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-9 DC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 51.5 59.6 69.5 77.7 84.2 59.8 85.1 72.2 65.9 51.7 63.2 -8.9% Jamaica 1.1 0.9 2.5 3.5 5.6 6.8 1.2 2.9 12.5 17.4 16.0 13.9 24.9 30.3 32.6 47.5 56.2 64.3 78.3 93.0 99.5 115.3 133.2 13.6% Japan 2.9 2.9 3.4 9.6 20.5 29.5 29.1 38.0 46.6 59.4 52.9 62.4 78.4 91.4 78.5 72.5 45.3 38.5 52.0 76.7 119.2 169.3 213.0 43.5% Korea, Rep. of 3.4 4.8 6.3 8.2 10.8 17.3 18.8 30.4 43.1 60.1 72.0 76.7 85.2 106.2 111.7 110.6 99.3 92.2 103.0 110.9 118.7 122.6 100.9 0.6% Mexico NA NA NA 60.1 82.7 84.5 159.0 191.7 201.4 218.4 222.1 247.1 312.6 410.9 533.9 573.5 613.2 676.9 720.0 818.9 871.7 875.0 703.3 0.2% Netherlands -0.2 -0.7 -1.9 1.4 1.0 -2.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 9,597.927,226.9 1,014.0 All Other Cos. 7,758.0 915.3 6,842.7 5,064.4 1,778.2 911.2 388.9 345.8 1,646.0 132.2 Alabama 1,683.6 85.3 1,598.3 1,207.1 391.2 213.2 75.6 88.0 376.7 14.4AL Arizona 1,840.5 129.2 1,711.4 1,183.9 527.4 242.7 93.1 172.7 508.5 18.9AZ Arkansas 807.3 91.8 715.5 532.3 183.2 79.7 33.0 64.7 177.5 5.7AR California 14,073.4 1,839.5 12,233.9 9,045.8 3,188.1 1,491.0 496.6 1,117.9 3,105.4 82.7CA Colorado 2,213.0 132.7 2,080.2 1,446.7 633.5 283.9 109.1 220.9 613.9 19.6CO Connecticut 1,575.7 13.4 1,562.3 1,091.4 470.9 180.2 120.0 159.8 460.1 10.8CT Delaware 309.0 20.2 288.8 193.3 95.5 30.5 18.9 37.8 87.3 8.3DE District of Columbia 686.7 45.3 641.3 379.6 261.7 71.2 47.9 134.8 253.9 7.9DC Florida 7,483.6 630.5 6,853.1 4,883.9 1,969.2 1,018.9 330.8 535.5 1,885.1 84.1FL Georgia 3,578.1 199.6 3,378.5 2,481.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • Shown In Thousands) Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.11 - Revenues of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the Year Ended December 31, 2003 Total Operating Revenues Total Non- Subject to State Interstate Access Billing and RegulatedSeparations Collection and CommonTraffic Special Total and Adjustments Line Sensitive Interexchange All Reporting Cos. $108,171.4 $8,474.3 $99,697.0$67,762.0$31,935.0$12,537.6$3,663.7$14,152.6$30,353.9$1,510.1 Bell Operating Cos. 99,357.6 7,490.1 91,867.5 62,213.0 29,654.5 11,410.93,321.3 13,456.0 28,188.2 1,466.3 All Other Cos. 8,813.7 984.2 7,829.6 5,549.0 2,280.5 1,126.6 342.4 696.6 2,165.6 43.8 Alabama 1,421.0 60.4 1,360.6 998.0 362.6 144.5 47.5 146.8 338.8 23.9 AL Arizona 1,684.0 110.0 1,574.0 1,000.8 573.2 219.2 76.9 241.8 537.9 35.4 AZ Arkansas 771.4 81.7 689.6 487.1 202.5 68.9 23.2 99.7 191.8 10.8 AR California 13,312.0 1,863.5 11,448.5 7,932.1 3,516.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • OF COLUMBIA 144.2 0.08 144.2 0.2 143.9 58.7 27.4 57.6 143.7 0.233 DC FLORIDA 2,304.8 27.89 2,276.9 619.8 1,657.1 1,000.0 360.5 294.4 1,654.8 2.319 FL GEORGIA 928.9 10.64 918.2 142.7 775.5 422.4 178.9 173.0 774.2 1.278 GA HAWAII 166.9 0.25 166.6 23.2 143.4 66.9 52.6 24.0 143.4 HI IDAHO 173.1 1.67 171.4 29.6 141.8 74.6 40.1 27.2 141.8 ID ILLINOIS 1,213.0 (22.94) 1,235.9 223.8 1,012.1 507.5 249.9 253.5 1,010.9 1.156 IL INDIANA 727.2 (6.25) 733.4 228.9 504.5 259.6 134.5 110.2 504.3 0.264 IN IOWA 328.5 (0.04) 328.5 103.4 225.2 113.0 60.0 52.2 225.2 IA KANSAS 267.8 267.8 62.2 205.6 93.2 56.0 56.4 205.6 KS KENTUCKY 423.9 4.32 419.6 117.0 302.6 171.0 73.7 57.5 302.2 0.383 KY LOUISIANA 403.1 5.92 397.2 62.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • to State Interstate Access Billing & RegulatedSeparations Collection and Common Traffic Special Total and Adjustments Line Sensitive Interexchange All Reporting Cos.************** $15,196.0$319,811.6**************$85,070.2$46,423.4$15,597.2$21,909.2$83,929.9$1,099.7 Bell Operating Cos.267,361.3 12,119.4 255,241.8185,560.5 69,681.436,569.412,518.719,580.668,668.7 972.1 All Other Cos. 67,646.4 3,076.6 64,569.8 49,180.9 15,388.9 9,854.1 3,078.5 2,328.615,261.2 127.7 Alabama 5,521.3 185.5 5,335.8 4,007.0 1,328.7 857.1 186.3 238.1 1,281.5 47.2 AL Arizona 5,117.1 295.9 4,821.2 3,533.0 1,288.2 804.6 213.0 265.4 1,283.0 5.2 AZ Arkansas 2,404.8 82.3 2,322.5 1,690.3 632.2 409.5 83.3 132.3 625.1 7.1AR California 40,043.6 1,685.5 38,358.1 29,781.4 8,576.7 5,054.2 1,982.6 1,318.4 8,355.2 221.5CA Colorado 6,597.8 396.5 6,201.3 4,527.4 1,673.9 986.1 302.6 368.4 1,657.1 16.8CO Connecticut 4,688.6 114.5 4,574.1 3,298.6 1,275.5 554.2 440.4 279.9 1,274.5 1.0CT Delaware 946.1 42.5 903.6 626.7 276.9 149.9 39.9 85.8 275.6 1.2DE District
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 95.9 DC WASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 23331 6004 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 95.4 DC WASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24624 6440 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 231.6 235.0 17347 6010 17179 5746 0.1 0.0 96.0 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 67.2 233.0 15070 5823 15606 5637 13.3 4.1 94.9 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 194.3 213.0 13878 5588 14310 5777 10.0 2.3 93.5 DC WASHINGTON 50 51 65.0 247.0 14147 5160 14207 5376 0.1 0.0 97.7 DE SEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4202 154 4202 154 3.2 2.9 100.0 DE WILMINGTON 12 55 1000.0 294.0 23176 7443 20136 6742 0.0 0.0 99.8 DE WILMINGTON 61 31 50.0 292.0 16054 5337 15401 5324 5.3 6.5 97.1 FL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
  • AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-17 DC WASHINGTON 20 69 255.0 235.0 16706 5975 16076 5661 7.7 1.0 99.2 DC WASHINGTON 26 35 112.0 233.0 15035 5813 14883 5584 1.0 0.2 99.0 DC WASHINGTON 32 6 1.0 213.0 13524 5704 14056 5743 8.9 6.2 91.8 DC WASHINGTON 50 51 134.1 247.0 15733 5887 14818 5382 0.2 0.3 99.9 DE SEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4936 179 4936 179 28.7 27.5 100.0 DE WILMINGTON 12 36 2042.2 294.0 23295 7656 20471 6705 0.0 0.0 99.2 DE WILMINGTON 61 31 182.8 292.0 18352 5739 17618 5847 9.5 10.9 97.9 FL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 235.0 22879 6343 26711 6533 0.0 0.0 82.9 DCWASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 24391 6346 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 99.0 DCWASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24684 6438 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DCWASHINGTON 20 35 221.7 235.0 17611 6043 17179 5746 0.2 0.0 97.0 DCWASHINGTON 26 27 64.3 233.0 15402 5868 15606 5637 14.5 4.4 96.9 DCWASHINGTON 32 33 186.0 213.0 14526 5769 14310 5777 10.2 2.4 97.7 DCWASHINGTON 50 51 62.2 247.0 15011 5859 14207 5376 0.1 0.0 99.8 DESEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4202 154 4202 154 3.4 2.9 100.0 DEWILMINGTON 12 55 1000.0 294.0 23834 7726 20132 6742 0.0 0.0 99.7 DEWILMINGTON 61 31 50.0 292.0 16707 5587 15401 5324 5.4 6.5 98.6 FLBOCARATON 63 44 59.1 310.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 95.9 DC WASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 23331 6004 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 95.4 DC WASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24624 6440 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 231.6 235.0 17347 6010 17179 5746 0.1 0.0 96.0 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 67.2 233.0 15070 5823 15606 5637 13.3 4.1 94.9 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 194.3 213.0 13878 5588 14310 5777 10.0 2.3 93.5 DC WASHINGTON 50 51 65.0 247.0 14147 5160 14207 5376 0.1 0.0 97.7 DE SEAFORD 64 44 50.0 195.0 4202 154 4202 154 3.2 2.9 100.0 DE WILMINGTON 12 55 1000.0 294.0 23176 7443 20136 6742 0.0 0.0 99.8 DE WILMINGTON 61 31 50.0 292.0 16054 5337 15401 5324 5.3 6.5 97.1 FL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • 0.0 0.0 95.9 DC WASHINGTON 7 39 1000.0 235.0 23331 6004 23215 6365 0.0 0.0 95.4 DC WASHINGTON 9 34 1000.0 235.0 24624 6440 22883 6299 0.0 0.0 100.0 DC WASHINGTON 20 35 231.6 235.0 17347 6010 17179 5746 0.1 0.0 96.0 DC WASHINGTON 26 27 67.2 233.0 15070 5823 15606 5637 13.3 4.1 94.9 DC WASHINGTON 32 33 194.3 213.0 13878 5588 14310 5777 10.0 2.3 93.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-9 DC
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/fmbc.pdf
  • 41 50.00 HAAT A 223.0 333.0 340.0 567.0 433.0 369.0 299.0 424 .O 424 .O 332 .O 555.0 363.0 91.0 59.0 42.0 212.0 72.0 418.0 142 .o 290.0 51 .O 91 .o 91 .o 353.0 301.0 83.0 170.0 67.0 84 .O 91 .o 122.0 594 .o 30.0 291 .O 279.0 244 .O 553.0 106.0 175 .O 88 .O 247 .O 213.0 65.0 64 .a 140 .O 100 .o 140.0 383.0 92.0 150.0 9 TEXAS (continued) LOCAT ION Mca 11 en Mca 1 len Mcallen Mercedes Merkel Midland Midland Midland Midland Midland Midland Mirando City Mission Monahans Monahans New Braunfels New Braunfels Odem Odessa Odessa Odessa Odessa Odessa Odessa Odessa Ozona Pearsall Pearsall Pecos P leas an ton Port Isabel Port Lavaca