FCC Web Documents citing 101.23

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-393A1.txt
  • paths are currently pending. However, given Nextel's modification applications seeking to cancel these paths, Nextel's waiver request will be considered moot with respect to these paths. Therefore, this Order will consider Nextel's waiver request only with respect to the 2138 MHz and 2149 MHz paths of Station WNER467. Nextel Application, Exhibit 1. 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3) (formerly 47 C.F.R. § 101.23). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Westinghouse Application, Exhibit 1 at 4. Id. UTC Comments at 3. Id. Id. I.e., 2110-2130 MHz and 2160-2180 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.101. Globetrotter Services, Inc. Comments at 2. Westinghouse Opposition to Informal Objection at 6-7. Redevelopment of Spectrum to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-472A1.txt
  • Station KYC56 operating in the Gulf. Datacom requested use of 10 MHz bandwidth in the previously authorized common carrier point-to-point microwave frequency bands 2110-2130/2160-2180 MHz and use of the private operational fixed point-to-point microwave frequency band 1850-1990 MHz for transmission of common carrier message traffic. Datacom asserted that it met the standards for obtaining a waiver in accordance with Section 101.23 of the Commission's Rules. With regard to the 2110-2130/2160-2180 MHz bands, Datacom stated that its current point-to-point facilities in the Gulf were inadequate because they were limited by regulation to a bandwidth of 3.5 MHz and it required at least 10 MHz of bandwidth to satisfy the needs of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Datacom acknowledged that the 6 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-487A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. Part 101. Datacom Request for Waiver (filed March 24, 1999) (Waiver Request). Id. at 1. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 101.101; see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.603(b)(1). Id. at 2. Id. at 1, 3. Id. at 1-2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.23 (1998); 47 C.F.R. § 1.925 (1999). When Datacom submitted its Waiver Request, former 47 C.F.R. § 101.23 was the applicable waiver rule for Part 101 services. The Commission subsequently released a Report and Order that streamlined and revised the Commission's Rules governing license procedures for radio services licensed by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Biennial Regulatory Review -- Amendment of Parts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-226A1.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit " " " " Z n " (R) Ä ø ø ø ø ø (R) ø ø ø š " " Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of GENUITY SOLUTIONS, INC. Request for Waiver and Extension of the Filing Deadline for Private Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Construction Certification pursuant to Sections 1.925 and 101.23 of the Commission's Rules, as Amended ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Nos. 0001142864, 0001142865 Adopted: January 28, 2003 Released: January 29, 2003 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Introduction We have before us a request for waiver of Section 101.63 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 101.63, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2182A1.txt
  • Waiver and Extension of Time to Comply with the Commission's MVDDS Substantial Service Requirements in Section 101.1413, ULS File Nos. 0003516339 et al., (filed July 25, 2008). Sixth Request at 6. Id. at 6. Sixth Request at 6; DTVN Comments at 2-3. See Sixth Request at 7; DTVN Comments at 3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3); see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.23. See Sixth Request at 3-6; DTVN Comments at 1-2. , supra and accompanying text. We also note that, although in full force and effect, the MVDDS service rules did not become final, i.e., no longer subject to judicial review, until 2005. See Northpoint Technology, Ltd. v. FCC, 414 F.3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2005). , supra. Prior to the instant ruling,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2182A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Finally, we note that granting DTV Norwich's Sixth Requestin no way alters or delays the date for DTVN's requirement to provide substantial service or otherwise prejudices the outcome of the 24Sixth Requestat 6. 25Id. at 6. 26Sixth Requestat 6; DTVN Comments at 2-3. 27See Sixth Requestat 7; DTVN Comments at 3. 2847 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3); see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.23. 29See Sixth Requestat 3-6; DTVN Comments at 1-2. 30Seenotes 22, 23, supraand accompanying text. We also note that, although in full force and effect, the MVDDS service rules did not become final, i.e., no longer subject to judicial review, until 2005. See Northpoint Technology, Ltd. v. FCC, 414 F.3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2005). 12458 Wayne D. Johnsen, Esquire October 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1889A1.txt
  • of the current license term, it be granted an additional 360-day extension. Seventh Request at 6 n.19. Public Notice, WTB Seeks Comment on Request of DTV Norwich, LLC for Waiver and Extension of Divestiture Deadline for New York Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service License, DA 10-1606 (rel. Aug. 25, 2010). 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3); see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.23. See Seventh Request at 5-6; DTVN Comments at 2-3. See note 15, supra and accompanying text. We also note that, although in full force and effect, the MVDDS service rules did not become final, i.e., no longer subject to judicial review, until 2005. See Northpoint Technology, Ltd. v. FCC, 414 F.3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2005). We further note that there
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1889A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the facts presented, shall take any other action it may deem appropriate. See generally47 C.F.R. § 101.1412(g)(6). 25Public Notice, WTB Seeks Comment on Request of DTV Norwich, LLC for Waiver and Extension of Divestiture Deadline for New York Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service License, DA 10-1606 (rel. Aug. 25, 2010). 2647 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3); see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.23. 27See Seventh Requestat 5-6; DTVN Comments at 2-3. 28Seenote 15, supraand accompanying text. We also note that, although in full force and effect, the MVDDS service rules did not become final, i.e., no longer subject to judicial review, until 2005. See Northpoint Technology, Ltd. v. FCC, 414 F.3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2005). 29We further note that there has been no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • C R FARMERS TEL COOP -AL 8,869,625 19,664 451.06 1,385,056 0.122 250295 C R GRACEBA TOTAL COMM 2,266,289 4,511 502.39 491,400 0.043 250298 C R GULF TEL CO - AL Madison River Telephone Company 19,065,560 57,165 333.52 0 0.000 250299 C R HAYNEVILLE TEL CO 1,422,461 2,583 550.70 374,964 0.033 250300 C R HOPPER TELECOMM. CO. CEA Capital 4,172,543 3,789 1,101.23 2,114,503 0.186 250301 A R FRONTIER-LAMAR CNTY Citizens Communications Company 987,423 2,414 409.04 103,282 0.009 250302 C R ALLTEL ALABAMA ALLTEL Communications Service Corp. 12,677,935 28,197 449.62 1,955,635 0.172 250304 C R MILLRY TEL CO 3,599,862 7,409 485.88 715,347 0.063 250305 C R MON-CRE TEL COOP 3,093,558 3,434 900.86 1,400,338 0.123 250306 C R FRONTIER COMM.-AL Citizens Communications Company 6,287,931
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • C R FARMERS TEL COOP -AL 8,869,625 19,664 451.06 1,385,056 0.122 250295 C R GRACEBA TOTAL COMM 2,266,289 4,511 502.39 491,400 0.043 250298 C R GULF TEL CO - AL Madison River Telephone Company 19,065,560 57,165 333.52 0 0.000 250299 C R HAYNEVILLE TEL CO 1,422,461 2,583 550.70 374,964 0.033 250300 C R HOPPER TELECOMM. CO. CEA Capital 4,172,543 3,789 1,101.23 2,114,503 0.186 250301 A R FRONTIER-LAMAR CNTY Citizens Communications Company 987,423 2,414 409.04 103,282 0.009 250302 C R ALLTEL ALABAMA ALLTEL Communications Service Corp. 12,677,935 28,197 449.62 1,955,635 0.172 250304 C R MILLRY TEL CO 3,599,862 7,409 485.88 715,347 0.063 250305 C R MON-CRE TEL COOP 3,093,558 3,434 900.86 1,400,338 0.123 250306 C R FRONTIER COMM.-AL Citizens Communications Company 6,287,931
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-274A1.txt
  • higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies. See Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See also Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, FCC 00-207 (rel. June 23, 2000); Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4535 (1998) and Requests for Waiver of Section 101.1003(a) of the Commission's Rules Establishing Eligibility Restrictions on Incumbent LECs and Cable Operators in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18694 (1998). See, e.g., Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266, Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.txt
  • and higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies. See Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See also Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, 16 FCC Rcd 4078 (2000); Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4535 (1998); Requests for Waiver of Section 101.1003(a) of the Commission's Rules Establishing Eligibility Restrictions on Incumbent LECs and Cable Operators in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18694 (1998). See, e.g., Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266, Report and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • 101.13 Application forms and requirements for private 1.913, 1.915, 1.949 operational fixed stations (move to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.15 Application forms for common carrier fixed stations 1.913, 1.915, 1.949 (move to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.19 General application requirements (move to consolidated 1.915 Part 1 Rule). 101.21(g) Technical Content of Applications (change form number 101.21(g) to reflect ULS forms). 101.23 Waiver (change to reflect electronic filing via ULS). 101.23 101.25 Inconsistent or conflicting applications (move to 1.937 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.27 Repetitious applications (move to consolidated Part 1 1.937 Rule). 101.29 Amendment to pending applications (move to 1.927 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.31 Special temporary, temporary and conditional 101.31 applications revise and see 1.933). 101.33 Who may sign applications
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980387.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980387.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980387.wp
  • 1 between Kathleen O'Brien Ham, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, and VTF's counsel, John Branscome, in which he was informed that the Bureau had granted VTF's Emergency Petition for Reconsideration. 1 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of )) Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. ) Petition for Reconsideration of Request ) for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- ) Auction No. 17, ) Local Multipoint Distribution Service ) ORDER Adopted: February 20, 1998 Released: March 4, 1998 By the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau has before it the Emergency Petition for Reconsideration of Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. ("VTF"), requesting reconsideration of a waiver request on new grounds -- namely, that grant of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da981920.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da981920.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da981920.wp
  • requests in their long-form applications, and other winning bidders also filed requests for waiver of the eligibility restriction at that time. In 25 addition, CTC, Craw-Kan, and Northwest filed waiver requests as minor modifications to their long- form applications. Some petitioners argued that they met the waiver criteria established under 26 Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1920 See 47 CFR §§ 101.23 and 101.1003(a)(2). See also Exhibit G of FCC Form 601s filed by CTTI (File No. 27 0000000093) and Northern (File No. 0000000087); and Letter to Robert James, Senior Engineer, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Jerry R. James, General Manager, Craw-Kan Telephone Cooperative, Inc, dated May 29, 1998. See Exhibit G of FCC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da991642.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da991642.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da991642.txt
  • they lack the ability and incentive to engage in anti-competitive behavior. We disagree. With regard to the first issue, these petitioners made similar arguments in their underlying waiver requests, which were not addressed because there is no de minimis exception to the rule, and, as stated above, they had not otherwise made the required showing under either prong of Section 101.23. With regard to the second argument, after extensive analysis, the Commission concluded that ``all incumbent LECs and cable operators would have incentives to attempt to foreclose competitive entry in their respective markets.'' In criticizing this conclusion, Petitioners challenge the applicability of the rule to rural LECs, but fail to demonstrate either unique facts about their individual circumstances (beyond claiming that
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990692.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit See Petition of Elite JV for Acceptance of Late-Filed Application ("Petition"). 1 Petition at 2-3. 2 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.1104 and 1.2105. 3 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3). See also 47 C.F.R. § 101.23 (waiver of the Part 101 rules may be granted in 4 accordance with § 1.925); Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). DA 99-692 April 13, 1999 Ms. Sylvia Lesse Kraskin, Lesse & Cosson, LLP 2120 L Street, NW, Suite 520 Washington, DC 20037 Re: Petition for Acceptance of Late-Filed Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990706.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit See Letter from John D. Szuchan to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless 1 Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 2, 1999) ("Letter"). Id. 2 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.1104 and 1.2105. 3 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.23 and 1.925; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 4 U.S. 1027 (1972). See "Auction of Local Multipoint Distribution Service Spectrum; Auction Notice and Filing Requirements 5 for 168 Local Multipoint Distribution Service Licenses Scheduled for April 27, 1999; Minimum Opening Bids and Other Procedural Issues," Public Notice, DA 99-266 (rel. January 29, 1999)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990732.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990732.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990732.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit See Letter from James A. Rech, President of Landmark Site Development to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions 1 and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 2, 1999) ("Letter"). Id. 2 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.1104; 1.2105; 101.1105(a); 1.2106. 3 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.23 and 1.925; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 4 U.S. 1027 (1972). DA 99-732 April 19, 1999 Mr. James A. Rech Landmark Site Development, LLC 480 Pleasant Street Lee, MA 01238 Dear Mr. Rech: This letter responds to your April 13, 1999 correspondence on behalf of Landmark Site Development, LLC ("Landmark"), requesting a
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da991642.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da991642.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da991642.txt
  • they lack the ability and incentive to engage in anti-competitive behavior. We disagree. With regard to the first issue, these petitioners made similar arguments in their underlying waiver requests, which were not addressed because there is no de minimis exception to the rule, and, as stated above, they had not otherwise made the required showing under either prong of Section 101.23. With regard to the second argument, after extensive analysis, the Commission concluded that ``all incumbent LECs and cable operators would have incentives to attempt to foreclose competitive entry in their respective markets.'' In criticizing this conclusion, Petitioners challenge the applicability of the rule to rural LECs, but fail to demonstrate either unique facts about their individual circumstances (beyond claiming that
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da991726.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da991726.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da991726.wp
  • required down payment within ten (10) 8 business days after the Commission has declared competitive bidding closed, the bidder will be deemed to have defaulted, its application will be dismissed, and it will be liable for the default payment specified in Section 1.2104(g)(2)." 47 C.F.R. § 1.925. This rule replaces the former Part 101 rule regarding waivers, 47 C.F.R. § 101.23. 9 47 C.F.R. § 1.2109(b). 10 2 that a down payment of 20 percent of net winning bids was due from all winning bidders on or before May 28, 1999. At the conclusion of the auction, Grand Connectivity was the high bidder 4 on seven licenses with total net bids of $2,674,650. To comply with the Commission's down 5 payment
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.txt
  • and higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies. See Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See also Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, 16 FCC Rcd 4078 (2000); Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4535 (1998); (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-364 69 toward achieving that goal.503 As we noted in our Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, we will address issues affecting rural communities and underserved areas in other upcoming proceedings and believe a more extensive record can be developed at
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_auction&id=17&page=P
  • Attachment E: [73]pdf - [74]text - [75]WordPerfect Attachment F: [76]pdf - [77]text - [78]WordPerfect Attachment G: [79]pdf - [80]text - [81]WordPerfect Attachment D-- Appendix A: [82]pdf - [83]text - [84]WordPerfect Part of Attachment (Sample Ownership Flow Chart): [85]pdf 3/4/1998 LETTER ORDER (DA 98-387) In the Matter of Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service This Order grants the Emergency Petition for Reconsideration of Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. ("VTF"). [86]pdf - [87]text - [88]WordPerfect 2/17/1998 United States Court of Appeals Order WebCel Communications, Inc., petition for a writ of mandamus, is Hereby Denied. [89]pdf 2/17/1998 LETTER ORDER (DA 98-307) Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Request for Waiver in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=releases_year&y=1998&m=3
  • with a competing auction participant for the Olympia Washington market in the Commission's Broadband Personal Communications Services (PCS) D, E and F block auction and failed to timely notify the Commission. [88]pdf - [89]text - [90]WordPerfect 3/4/1998 LETTER ORDER (DA 98-387) Auction [91]17 In the Matter of Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service This Order grants the Emergency Petition for Reconsideration of Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. ("VTF"). [92]pdf - [93]text - [94]WordPerfect 3/2/1998 ERRATUM TO THIRD REPORT AND ORDER AND SECOND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING (DA 98-419) In the Matter of Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules -- Competitive Bidding Procedures
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000274.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000274.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000274.txt
  • higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies. See Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See also Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, FCC 00-207 (rel. June 23, 2000); Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4535 (1998) and Requests for Waiver of Section 101.1003(a) of the Commission's Rules Establishing Eligibility Restrictions on Incumbent LECs and Cable Operators in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18694 (1998). See, e.g., Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266, Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • 101.13 Application forms and requirements for private 1.913, 1.915, 1.949 operational fixed stations (move to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.15 Application forms for common carrier fixed stations 1.913, 1.915, 1.949 (move to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.19 General application requirements (move to consolidated 1.915 Part 1 Rule). 101.21(g) Technical Content of Applications (change form number 101.21(g) to reflect ULS forms). 101.23 Waiver (change to reflect electronic filing via ULS). 101.23 101.25 Inconsistent or conflicting applications (move to 1.937 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.27 Repetitious applications (move to consolidated Part 1 1.937 Rule). 101.29 Amendment to pending applications (move to 1.927 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.31 Special temporary, temporary and conditional 101.31 applications revise and see 1.933). 101.33 Who may sign applications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992793.doc
  • (currently codified at 47 C.F.R. § 1.931). The Commission also granted Tampa Electric's two subsequent requests to extend the special temporary authority (STA), subject to the same conditions of the original STA grant, which now is scheduled to expire on February 15, 2000. See Waiver Request at 1. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3) (formerly codified at 47 C.F.R § 101.23). Waiver Request at 3. Id. Id. Waiver Request at 3-4. Duke Power Company, Order, DA 99-2574, at ¶ 6 (WTB PSPWD rel. November 18, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.69. Cost Sharing First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8869 ¶ 88. 47 C.F.R. § 101.81. Id. Waiver Request at 4. Id. Duke Power Company at ¶ 7 (citing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000393.doc
  • paths are currently pending. However, given Nextel's modification applications seeking to cancel these paths, Nextel's waiver request will be considered moot with respect to these paths. Therefore, this Order will consider Nextel's waiver request only with respect to the 2138 MHz and 2149 MHz paths of Station WNER467. Nextel Application, Exhibit 1. 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3) (formerly 47 C.F.R. § 101.23). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Westinghouse Application, Exhibit 1 at 4. Id. UTC Comments at 3. Id. Id. I.e., 2110-2130 MHz and 2160-2180 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.101. Globetrotter Services, Inc. Comments at 2. Westinghouse Opposition to Informal Objection at 6-7. Redevelopment of Spectrum to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000472.doc
  • Station KYC56 operating in the Gulf. Datacom requested use of 10 MHz bandwidth in the previously authorized common carrier point-to-point microwave frequency bands 2110-2130/2160-2180 MHz and use of the private operational fixed point-to-point microwave frequency band 1850-1990 MHz for transmission of common carrier message traffic. Datacom asserted that it met the standards for obtaining a waiver in accordance with Section 101.23 of the Commission's Rules. With regard to the 2110-2130/2160-2180 MHz bands, Datacom stated that its current point-to-point facilities in the Gulf were inadequate because they were limited by regulation to a bandwidth of 3.5 MHz and it required at least 10 MHz of bandwidth to satisfy the needs of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Datacom acknowledged that the 6 GHz
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000487.doc
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. Part 101. Datacom Request for Waiver (filed March 24, 1999) (Waiver Request). Id. at 1. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 101.101; see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.603(b)(1). Id. at 2. Id. at 1, 3. Id. at 1-2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.23 (1998); 47 C.F.R. § 1.925 (1999). When Datacom submitted its Waiver Request, former 47 C.F.R. § 101.23 was the applicable waiver rule for Part 101 services. The Commission subsequently released a Report and Order that streamlined and revised the Commission's Rules governing license procedures for radio services licensed by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Biennial Regulatory Review -- Amendment of Parts
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00274.doc
  • higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies. See Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See also Statement of Policy on Establishing a Government-to-Government Relationship with Indian Tribes, FCC 00-207 (rel. June 23, 2000); Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Waiver of Section 101.23 -- Auction No. 17, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4535 (1998) and Requests for Waiver of Section 101.1003(a) of the Commission's Rules Establishing Eligibility Restrictions on Incumbent LECs and Cable Operators in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18694 (1998). See, e.g., Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266, Report