FCC Web Documents citing 101.141

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.txt
  • necessary, but must request contiguous spectrum (minus channels that are already licensed in the area and thus blocked) for all their needs in order to prevent such applicants from spacing their channels in a manner that effectively could prevent other licensees from using the remaining spectrum within the same area. However, channels still must meet the efficiency requirements of section 101.141 of this subpart. [Option 2] (x) Applicants who request one-way spectrum in 17.7-18.58 GHz can use any size channels necessary, but must request contiguous spectrum (minus channels that are already licensed in the area and thus blocked) for all their needs in order to prevent such applicants from spacing their channels in a manner that effectively could prevent other licensees
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1500A1.txt
  • 9901715 ) Application and Request for Waiver to Operate ) a Microwave Path in the 6525-6875 MHz Band ) ORDER Adopted: July 5, 2000 Released: July 6, 2000 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. We have before us a request by Wilderness Valley Telephone Company (Wilderness) for a waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules, to permit it to install a microwave transmitter that does not meet the Commission's minimum payload capacity requirements. For the reasons stated herein, we grant the waiver request. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules sets forth the minimum capacity and loading requirements for microwave transmitters employing digital modulation techniques and operating below 19.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2926A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY Application and Request for Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. 0000421758 Adopted: December 17, 2001 Released: December 19, 2001 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Introduction. We have before us a modification application and request by Siskiyou Telephone Company (Siskiyou) for a waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-8A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Z Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY d/b/a AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER Application and Request for Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. 0000550346 Adopted: January 3, 2002 Released: January 7, 2002 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: introduction We have before us a request by Kentucky Power Company d/b/a American Electric (American Electric) for a waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1891A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of MINNESOTA POWER INC. Request for Waiver of Sections 101.141(a)(3) and 101.147 of the Commission's Rules for Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Station WEG480, Salol, Minnesota ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FCC File No. 0000898197 ORDER Adopted: June 9, 2003; Released: June 11, 2003 By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Introduction. We have before us a request by Minnesota Power Inc. (Minnesota Power)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2065A1.txt
  • 2-3, 10-13. Havens also argues that the material submitted by Watercom in 1983 did not show a sufficient need to warrant grant of the second frequency block. Id. at 12-13. We conclude that it is too late for Havens to challenge the Commission's 1984 licensing decision, which is a final action. Opposition at 21. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 90.633(b), 101.141(a)(3). Petition to Deny at 3. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2065 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2065 z { � (c) � " � � (R) � � � (R) � � F � x6 x6 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-1427 Released: June 25, 2009 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON REQUEST OF ALCATEL-LUCENT, et al. FOR INTERPRETATION OF 47 C.F.R. � 101.141(a)(3) TO PERMIT THE USE OF ADAPTIVE MODULATION SYSTEMS WT Docket No. 09-106 Comments Due: July 27, 2009 Reply Comments Due: August 11, 2009 On May 8, 2009, Alcatel-Lucent; Dragonwave Inc.; Ericsson Inc; Exalt Communications; Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition; Harris Stratex Networks; and Motorola, Inc. (``Petitioners'') filed a request for a declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12thSt., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 09-1427 Released: June 25, 2009 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON REQUEST OF ALCATEL-LUCENT, et al. FOR INTERPRETATION OF 47 C.F.R. � 101.141(a)(3) TO PERMIT THE USE OF ADAPTIVE MODULATION SYSTEMS WT Docket No. 09-106 Comments Due: July 27, 2009 Reply Comments Due: August 11, 2009 On May 8, 2009, Alcatel-Lucent; Dragonwave Inc.; Ericsson Inc; Exalt Communications; Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition; Harris Stratex Networks; and Motorola, Inc. ("Petitioners") filed a request for a declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules.1In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.txt
  • concern, and proposes certain exemptions to address the concern. With respect to this issue, we note that the NPRM did not propose to apply the capacity and loading criteria to operations authorized under Part 74 and Part 78, such as TV studio-transmitter links and intercity relays, but rather only to the FS operations authorized under Part 101. In addition, Section 101.141(a)(5) of the Rules exempts transmitters carrying digital video motion material from the capacity and loading requirements of Sections 101.141(a)(2) and (3), provided that at least 50 percent of the payload is digital video motion material and the minimum bit rate specified in Section 101.141(a)(1) is met, i.e., that the bit rate, in bits per second, is equal to or greater
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the proposed rule change.40EIBASS echoes SBE's concern, and proposes certain exemptions to address the concern.41 17.With respect to this issue, we note that the NPRMdid not propose to apply the capacity and loading criteria to operations authorized under Part 74 and Part 78, such as TV studio-transmitter links 34Id.at 3, 5; See also FWCC Comments at 5. 3547 C.F.R. � 101.141(a)(3). 36Wireless Backhaul NPRM/NOI, 25 FCC Rcd at 11255-11256 � 20. 37Comments of Ceragon at3-4, EIBASS at 6, FiberTower at 5 and Sprint at 4. 38See SBE Comments at 10; EIBASS Comments at 6. 39SBE Comments at 10. 40Id. 41EIBASS Comments at 6. 7958 and intercity relays, but rather only to the FS operations authorized under Part 101. In addition, Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • GHz Service, Multiple Address Systems, and Operational Fixed Stations. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154 and 303. Section Number and Title: 101.101 Frequency availability. 101.103 Frequency coordination procedures. 101.105 Interference protection criteria. 101.109 Bandwidth. 101.111 Emission limitations. 101.113 Transmitter power limitations. 101.115 Directional antennas. 101.135 Shared use of radio stations and the offering of private carrier service. 101.139 Authorization of transmitters. 101.141 Microwave modulation. 101.143 Minimum path length requirements. 101.145 Interference to geostationary-satellites. 101.147 Frequency assignments. SUBPART E-MISCELLANEOUS COMMON CARRIER PROVISIONS Brief Description: Subpart E sets forth miscellaneous provisions applicable to Common Carrier microwave stations. Need: The revised rules apply requirements relating to discontinuance of service and equal employment opportunities to common carrier operation in the 24 GHz service. Legal Basis: 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300585A1.txt
  • with hearing loss to enjoy the tremendous benefits offered by modern advanced telephone voice communication devices. 2 WIRELESS TELE- COMMUINCATIONS TITLE: Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees; Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al. (WT Docket No 09-106); Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc. (WT Docket No. 07-121); and Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition. SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry seeking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit v STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JULIUS GENACHOWSKI Re: In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees, WT Docket 10-153, Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al., WT Docket 09-106, Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc., WT Docket 07-121, Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition. Today we implement another important recommendation of the National Broadband Plan. Some of the most important recommendations of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A3.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit D � D D STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS Re: In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees, WT Docket 10-153, Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al., WT Docket 09-106, Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc., WT Docket 07-121, Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition. Today's action is yet another important step in implementing the National Broadband Plan. We are looking at ways
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A4.txt
  • � � � � � � � STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ROBERT M. McDOWELL Re: In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees, WT Docket 10-153, Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al., WT Docket 09-106, Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc., WT Docket 07-121, Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition. I am delighted to vote to approve today's notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of inquiry seeking guidance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300704A5.txt
  • � � � � � � � STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MIGNON L. CLYBURN Re: In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees, WT Docket 10-153, Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al., WT Docket 09-106, Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc., WT Docket 07-121, Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition. I am pleased to support this item because the changes it proposes may reduce the costs that companies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-272A1_Erratum.doc
  • been certified by the Commission, however, most other point-to-point microwave transmitters are subject to the less onerous verification procedure. Teligent indicates that utilizing the verification procedure promotes the public interest by allowing faster implementation of new technology. We note that this matter is being addressed in the Part 101 proceeding, and should be decided in that proceeding. Efficiency Standard Section 101.141 of the Commission's Rules requires that 24 GHz band DEMS licensees meet a spectral efficiency standard. However, in this proceeding we have altered the nature of 24 GHz Service to allow more flexibility in system design and to license on a geographic basis. Moreover, consistent with our actions in other proceedings, we believe it unwise to adopt technical rules that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.txt
  • Id. at 18 n.27. Alcatel Comments at 6. Digital Comments at 3; Harris Comments at 3. Digital Comments at 4; Harris Comments at 4-5. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.147(s). 47 C.F.R. � 101.107(a). TIA Petition at 18-19. Id. at 19. Id. Alcatel Comments at 6-7; Digital Comments at 3; Harris Comments at 3. TIA Petition at 19. 47 C.F.R. � 101.141(a). TIA Petition at 20. Alcatel Comments at 7; Digital Comments at 3; Harris Comments at 3-4. TIA Petition at 20. Id. at 20-21. TIA would reserve these frequencies primarily for narrowband systems, but permit wideband systems also if no other appropriate frequencies are available. Id. at 21 & n.31. Digital Comments at 4-5; Harris Comments at 5; Teledesic Comments at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.txt
  • and the FSS earth station must not cause unacceptable interference to, nor is it protected from interference from, the FS station on that spectrum in the future. We propose to exempt from the rule those FSS earth stations that are licensed for 40 MHz or less of bandwidth in each direction. At the same time, we propose to amend Section 101.141 to shorten the loading period for FS licensees in the C- and Ku-bands from 30 to 24 months. Modification of the Part 25 and 101 rules in this manner would give both the FSS and FS licensees a comparable period of time in which to put their spectrum to use before it is susceptible to re-licensing to others. We ask
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • Section 21.120 of our Rules to require verification of all MVDDS transmitters in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band. We also propose to require MVDDS transmitters with digital modulation and operating bandwidth of 500 megahertz to provide as many video and data channels as possible. We do not believe that MVDDS transmitters should be required to meet the efficiency standards in Section 101.141 of our Rules, because terrestrial licensees will, by necessity, utilize the most efficient technology available. In addition, we propose to require all MVDDS stations to meet the digital emission mask, set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2) of our Rules. Further, we propose to retain the frequency tolerance standard of 0.005% in Section 101.107 of our Rules, changing the maximum bandwidth in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
  • radio and proposed amendments to Parts 2 and 24, Gen. Docket No. 19311, Report and Order, FCC 74-985, 39 FR 35658 (October 10, 1974). 47 C.F.R. �� 15.321(d), 15.323(d) and 24.238(b). See also, Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communicating Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Third Memorandum and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 6908 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 101.141(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.201 and 2.202 describe the symbols used to describe emission designators. For example, the emission designator 15M0F9W describes an emission with a 15 megahertz necessary bandwidth (15M0) using a frequency modulated composite system with one or more channels containing digital information and one or more channels containing analog information transmitting multiple types of information, such as telephony
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
  • our rules. Further, the Commission proposed to retain the frequency tolerance standard of 0.005% in Section 101.107 of our rules, and to change the maximum bandwidth in Section 101.109 of our Rules to reflect a value of 500 megahertz for MVDDS systems. The Commission also indicated that MVDDS transmitters should not be required to meet the efficiency standards in Section 101.141 of our rules. Discussion. SkyBridge supports requiring all MVDDS transmitters to meet the emissions mask set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2), but opposes expanding the maximum authorized bandwidth of fixed microwave service carriers from 20 megahertz to 500 megahertz. SkyBridge believes that employing this value in the equation will significantly relax the emissions mask, resulting in no limitation on interference levels
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-17A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-17A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-17A1.txt
  • could not cause unacceptable interference to, and would not receive any protection from, the FS station in that spectrum in the future. The FWCC/Onsat/Hughes NPRM further proposed to exempt from the rule those FSS earth stations that are licensed for 40 MHz or less of bandwidth in each of the uplink and downlink directions. It also proposed to amend section 101.141 to shorten the loading period for FS licensees in the C- and Ku-bands from 30 to 24 months. The FWCC/Onsat/Hughes NPRM reasoned that modification of the Part 25 and 101 rules in this manner would give both the FSS and FS licensees a comparable period of time in which to put their spectrum to use before their spectrum became susceptible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.txt
  • 25.25 GHz. With the advent of the new channeling plan, we will expect applicants for analog equipment to select smaller channels with only the bandwidth necessary to provide the analog service envisioned. We will grandfather existing licensed equipment for the 23 GHz band without an efficiency rate, but require all new digital equipment to meet the new efficiency standard. Section 101.141 will now state that all 21.2-23.6 GHz band equipment, utilizing digital modulation, applied for or authorized more than twenty-four months after the rule's effective date shall be required to meet the new efficiency standards, but before that date equipment may be installed with no minimum bit rate. Low power systems Background. TIA claims that the 23 GHz frequencies set aside
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.txt
  • permitted in these bands, the Commission should consider modifying the BAS frequency plans in these bands, such as by overlaying narrowband channels on the existing 25 MHz channels in the 7 GHz band. Comsearch also recommends that, to promote efficient use of the spectrum, the Commission consider capacity and loading requirements for digital BAS systems, similar to those in Section 101.141(a)(3), but adjusted for technical differences in the services. Microwave Radio Communications, LLC (MRC) recommends that digitally modulated BAS transmissions be required to contain a signal identifier, either in the program source or the digital modulation process, and recommends a phase-in period during which a universally recognized standard can be adopted. SBE asserts that there is a need for automatic identification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • GHz segments in the 71-76 GHz and 81-86 GHz bands, and as much of the two segments (92-94 GHz and 94.1 to 95 GHz) in the 92-95 GHz band as needed. An entity may request any portion of this spectrum, up to 12.9 GHz, as the licensee wishes. However, commercial licensees will have to meet the loading requirements of Section 101.141 of the Rules which is a minimum of one bit per Hertz. If it is determined that a licensee has not met the loading requirements, then the database will be modified to limit coordination rights to the spectrum that is loaded and the licensee will lose protection rights on spectrum that has not been loaded. Application of Title II Requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.txt
  • necessary, but must request contiguous spectrum (minus channels that are already licensed in the area and thus blocked) for all their needs in order to prevent such applicants from spacing their channels in a manner that effectively could prevent other licensees from using the remaining spectrum within the same area. However, channels still must meet the efficiency requirements of section 101.141 of this subpart. [Option 2] (x) Applicants who request one-way spectrum in 17.7-18.58 GHz can use any size channels necessary, but must request contiguous spectrum (minus channels that are already licensed in the area and thus blocked) for all their needs in order to prevent such applicants from spacing their channels in a manner that effectively could prevent other licensees
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-45A1.txt
  • on a 1.25 GHz increment. The Commission stated that the flexible or ``soft'' segmentation, coupled with a loading requirement, are appropriate safeguards that provide new entrants with reasonable access to spectrum by ensuring that spectrum is used rather than hoarded. The Commission also determined that commercial 70/80 GHz licensees will have to meet the 1 bps/Hz loading requirement of section 101.141 of the Commission's rules. Thus, when a licensee has not met that requirement, the registration database would be modified to limit coordination rights to the spectrum that meets the section 101.141 requirement and the licensee loses protection rights on spectrum that has not. Petition The Petitioner asks the Commission to reconsider its ``soft'' segmentation of the 70/80 GHz bands and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-141A1.txt
  • channels for one-way operations in the 17.7-18.58 GHz band for any permissible communications specified for this band in � 101.603 provided that they have coordinated the appropriate emission designators and power, but must request contiguous spectrum (minus spectrum that is already licensed or prior coordinated in the area and thus blocked). MVPD systems must meet the efficiency requirements of � 101.141 of this part. Spectrum at 18.3-18.58 GHz is only available for grandfathered stations. See � 101.85 of this part. (7) 10 Megahertz maximum authorized bandwidth channels: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Receive Transmit (receive) (MHz) (transmit) (MHz) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1560 Megahertz Separation (* channels are no longer available on primary basis) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17705.0.................................................... 19265.0* 17715.0.................................................... 19275.0* 17725.0.................................................... 19285.0* 17735.0.................................................... 19295.0* 17745.0.................................................... 19305.0 17755.0.................................................... 19315.0 17765.0....................................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.txt
  • at 5. The 6535 MHz/6575 MHz channel pair is reserved for emergency restoration, maintenance bypass, and other temporary fixed purposes. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.147(l)(7) n.2. Id. FWCC 6 GHz Petition at 4, 6. Id. at 2. Id. at 2-3. Id. at 4 Id. Id. at 3. Id. Id. Id. Id. at 5. Id. at 5, citing 47 C.F.R. � 101.141(a)(3). Id., Appendix. See FWCC Reply Comments at 7. Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Reference Information Center Petition for Rulemaking Filed, Public Notice, Report No. 2852 (Feb. 28, 2008) (Public Notice). See Statement in Opposition, American Petroleum Institute Telecommunications Committee (API), (filed Mar. 31, 2008) (API Opposition); AT&T Inc., Comments (filed Mar. 31, 2008) (AT&T Comments); Comsearch, Comments (filed Mar. 28,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1_Rcd.pdf
  • comments and three reply comments in response to the Public Notice.35The comments submitted in response to the Public Notice represent the views of an equipment manufacturer,36associations representing the fixed microwave community,37a frequency coordinator that specializes in spectrum management of terrestrial microwave, satellite, and mobile telecommunications systems,38and a telecommunications carrier.39The American Petroleum Institute 29Id. 30Id.at 5. 31Id.at 5, citing47 C.F.R. � 101.141(a)(3). 32Id., Appendix. 33SeeFWCC Reply Comments at 7. 34Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Reference Information Center Petition for Rulemaking Filed, Public Notice, Report No. 2852 (Feb. 28, 2008) (Public Notice). 35See Statement in Opposition, American Petroleum Institute Telecommunications Committee (API), (filed Mar. 31, 2008) (API Opposition); AT&T Inc., Comments (filed Mar. 31, 2008) (AT&T Comments); Comsearch, Comments (filed Mar. 28, 2008)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-109A1.txt
  • GHz Band could encourage speculative licensing by applicants seeking more spectrum than they need for their own operational purposes, commenters that address the issue are unanimous in their belief that it will not do so. They cite a variety of existing and proposed rules as grounds for that position. FWCC, AT&T, NSMA, Tier One and Cielo all argue that Section 101.141(a) of the Commission's Rules, which sets a minimum payload capacity and requires stations to load to at least 50 percent of capacity within 30 months, is effective at deterring speculative licensing. FWCC also cites the requirement that Part 101 stations be placed into operation within 18 months after their licenses are issued. FWCC, AT&T and NSMA also support the NPRM's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.txt
  • � � � � � � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc. Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit P STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JULIUS GENACHOWSKI Re: Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees; Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al.; Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc.; Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition; WT Docket Nos. 10-153; 09-106; 07-121 Today we implement another important recommendation of the National Broadband Plan. Some of the most important recommendations of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS Re: Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees; Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al.; Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc.; Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition; WT Docket Nos. 10-157; 09-106; 07-121 Today's action is yet another important step in implementing the National Broadband Plan. We are looking at ways
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A4.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ROBERT M. McDOWELL Re: Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees; Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al.; Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc.; Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition; WT Docket Nos. 10-153; 09-106; 07-121 I am delighted to vote to approve today's notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of inquiry seeking guidance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A5.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit _ STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MIGNON L. CLYBURN Re: Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Use of Microwave for Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and to Provide Additional Flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service and Operational Fixed Microwave Licensees; Request for Interpretation of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al.; Petition for Declaratory Ruling Filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc.; Request for Temporary Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules Filed by Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition; WT Docket Nos. 10-153; 09-106; 07-121 I am pleased to support this item because the changes it proposes may reduce the costs that companies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.txt
  • defines substantial service ``as service which is sound, favorable and substantially above a level of mediocre service which just might minimally warrant renewal.'' Id. Section 27.14(a) provides that failure by any WCS licensee to meet its performance ``requirement will result in forfeiture of the license and the licensee will be ineligible to regain it.'' Id. We note that under section 101.141 of the Commission's rules, for example, a link with a 5 MHz bandwidth would be required to provide 18.5 megabits/second in capacity. 47 C.F.R. � 101.141. See Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 06-150, Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1_Rcd.pdf
  • point-to-point services, construction and operation of a minimum number of links as proposed above, and: oA minimum number of links in defined market areas within 30 and 60 months, respectively. We seek comment on the minimum number of links we should require for each EA within an MEA, and for each MEA within a REAG. 3We note that under section 101.141 of the Commission's rules, for example, a link with a 5 MHz bandwidth would be required to provide 18.5megabits/second in capacity. 47 C.F.R. � 101.141. 4SeeService Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 06-150, Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94- 102, Section 68.4(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • and deploy systems efficiently. Based on the record before us, we find that our goal to ensure that the WCS spectrum is used intensively in the public interest will be furthered by requiring that each point-to-point link have a minimum payload capacity (megabits/second (Mbits/s) for a given bandwidth). We agree with the WCS Coalition that the capacity requirements in section 101.141(b) of our rules-which require for nominal bandwidths of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 megahertz, a minimum payload capacity of 3.08 Mbits/s, 6.17 Mbits/s, 12.30 Mbits/s, and 18.5 Mbits/s, respectively-may require more construction than would be necessary to ensure meaningful deployment in certain markets. Rather, we believe that the less stringent payload requirement specified in section 101.141(a) of the rules is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • deploy systems efficiently.501 210. Based on the record before us, we find that our goal to ensure that the WCS spectrum is used intensively in the public interest will be furthered by requiring that each point-to-point link have a minimum payload capacity (megabits/second (Mbits/s) for a given bandwidth). We agree with the WCS Coalition that the capacity requirements in section 101.141(b) of our rules-which require for nominal bandwidths of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 megahertz, a minimumpayload capacity of 3.08 Mbits/s, 6.17 Mbits/s, 12.30Mbits/s, and 18.5 Mbits/s, respectively-may require more construction than would be necessary to ensure meaningful deployment in certain markets.502Rather, we believe that the less stringent payload requirement specified in section 101.141(a) of the rules503is sufficient to ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.txt
  • CARS operations. Eliminates Final Link Rule: We grant broadcasters greater access to microwave spectrum by eliminating the ``final link'' rule that prohibits broadcasters from using FS stations as the final radiofrequency (RF) link in the chain of distribution of program material to broadcast stations. Permits Adaptive Modulation: The Part 101 rules contain a minimum payload capacity rule, 47 CFR � 101.141(a)(3), intended to ensure that FS links are operated efficiently. We permit temporary operations below the minimum capacity under certain circumstances, which will enable FS links to maintain critical communications during periods of fading. Declines to Permit ``Auxiliary'' Fixed Stations: We decline to permit FS licensees to coordinate and deploy ``auxiliary'' links, which would effectively allow point-to-multipoint operations under the point-to-point
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • Section 21.120 of our Rules to require verification of all MVDDS transmitters in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band. We also propose to require MVDDS transmitters with digital modulation and operating bandwidth of 500 megahertz to provide as many video and data channels as possible. We do not believe that MVDDS transmitters should be required to meet the efficiency standards in Section 101.141 of our Rules, because terrestrial licensees will, by necessity, utilize the most efficient technology available. In addition, we propose to require all MVDDS stations to meet the digital emission mask, set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2) of our Rules. Further, we propose to retain the frequency tolerance standard of 0.005% in Section 101.107 of our Rules, changing the maximum bandwidth in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • Section 21.120 of our Rules to require verification of all MVDDS transmitters in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band. We also propose to require MVDDS transmitters with digital modulation and operating bandwidth of 500 megahertz to provide as many video and data channels as possible. We do not believe that MVDDS transmitters should be required to meet the efficiency standards in Section 101.141 of our Rules,636 because terrestrial licensees will, by necessity, utilize the most efficient technology available. In addition, we propose to require all MVDDS stations to meet the digital emission mask, set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2) of our Rules.637 Further, we propose to retain the frequency tolerance standard of 0.005% in Section 101.107 of our Rules,638 changing the maximum bandwidth in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • our rules.507 Further, the Commission proposed to retain the frequency tolerance standard of 0.005% in Section 101.107 of our rules,508 and to change the maximum bandwidth in Section 101.109 of our Rules to reflect a value of 500 megahertz for MVDDS systems.509 The Commission also indicated that MVDDS transmitters should not be required to meet the efficiency standards in Section 101.141 of our rules.510 207. Discussion. SkyBridge supports requiring all MVDDS transmitters to meet the emissions mask set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2), but opposes expanding the maximum authorized bandwidth of (...continued from previous page) Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 99-217, Fifth Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 96-98, and Fourth
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/resources/M_Pollak.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/resources/M_Pollak.pdf
  • require successive relocations of the proposed transmitter site in order to meet the minimum spacing distance as determined on each anniversary of non-operation. � 101.139 Authorization of transmitters. (a) * * * Transmitters designed for use in the 31.0-31.3 GHz band and transmitters designed for MVDDS use in the 12,200-12,700 MHz band will be authorized under the verification procedure. � 101.141 Microwave modulation. (a) Microwave transmitters employing digital modulation techniques and operating below 19.7 GHz (except for MVDDS stations in the 12,200-12,700 MHz band) must, with appropriate multiplex equipment, comply with the following additional requirements: � 101.147 Frequency assignments. (a) * * * 12,200-12,700 MHz (31) * * * (31) This frequency band can be used for Multichannel Video Distribution and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.txt
  • been certified by the Commission, however, most other point-to-point microwave transmitters are subject to the less onerous verification procedure. Teligent indicates that utilizing the verification procedure promotes the public interest by allowing faster implementation of new technology. We note that this matter is being addressed in the Part 101 proceeding, and should be decided in that proceeding. Efficiency Standard Section 101.141 of the Commission's Rules requires that 24 GHz band DEMS licensees meet a spectral efficiency standard. However, in this proceeding we have altered the nature of 24 GHz Service to allow more flexibility in system design and to license on a geographic basis. Moreover, consistent with our actions in other proceedings, we believe it unwise to adopt technical rules that
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/63/resources/MVDDS_rules_excerpts.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/63/resources/MVDDS_rules_excerpts.pdf
  • percent up to and including 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 35 decibels; (iii) On any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 43+10 Log10 (mean output power in watts) decibels, or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation. (2) When using transmissions employing digital modulation techniques (see �101.141(b)) in situations not covered in this section: (i) For operating frequencies below 15 GHz, in any 4 KHz band, the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 50 percent up to and including 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: As specified by the following equation but in no event less than 50 decibels: mitter
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2009
  • 6/25/2009 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 09-1415) WTB Clarifies that Certain 121.5 MHz Devices are Permitted Despite Termination of Satellite Processing of 121.5 MHz Distress Signals [446]pdf - [447]Word 6/25/2009 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 09-1424) Wireless America, L.L.C. [448]pdf - [449]Word 6/25/2009 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 09-1427) WTB Seeks Comment on Request of Alcatel-Lucent, et al. for Interpretation of 47 C.F.R. Section 101.141 (a)(3) to Permit the use of Adaptive Modulation Systems [450]pdf - [451]Word 6/25/2009 ORDER (DA 09-1425) Request of PTC-220, LLC for Waivers of Certain 220 MHz Rules [452]pdf - [453]Word 6/24/2009 LETTER (DA 09-1400) Catholic Diocese of Honolulu [454]pdf - [455]Word 6/24/2009 LETTER (DA 09-1402) Todd D. Gray, Esq., Petition for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Application for Major Modification to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2009
  • 6/25/2009 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 09-1415) WTB Clarifies that Certain 121.5 MHz Devices are Permitted Despite Termination of Satellite Processing of 121.5 MHz Distress Signals [446]pdf - [447]Word 6/25/2009 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 09-1424) Wireless America, L.L.C. [448]pdf - [449]Word 6/25/2009 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 09-1427) WTB Seeks Comment on Request of Alcatel-Lucent, et al. for Interpretation of 47 C.F.R. Section 101.141 (a)(3) to Permit the use of Adaptive Modulation Systems [450]pdf - [451]Word 6/25/2009 ORDER (DA 09-1425) Request of PTC-220, LLC for Waivers of Certain 220 MHz Rules [452]pdf - [453]Word 6/24/2009 LETTER (DA 09-1400) Catholic Diocese of Honolulu [454]pdf - [455]Word 6/24/2009 LETTER (DA 09-1402) Todd D. Gray, Esq., Petition for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Application for Major Modification to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2009&m=6&t=Public_Notice
  • [66]pdf - [67]word - [68]txt 06/25/2009 WTB Public Notices (DA 09-1417) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU APPROVES NEW COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION (COLE) QUESTION POOLS FOR ELEMENTS 1, 3 AND 8 DA-09-1417A1_Rcd: [69]pdf DA-09-1417A1: [70]pdf - [71]word - [72]txt 06/25/2009 WTB Public Notices (DA 09-1427) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON REQUEST OF ALCATEL-LUCENT, ET AL. FOR INTERPRETATION OF 47 C.F.R. SECTION 101.141 (a)(3) TO PERMIT THE USE OF ADAPTIVE MODULATION SYSTEMS DA-09-1427A1_Rcd: [73]pdf DA-09-1427A1: [74]pdf - [75]word - [76]txt 06/24/2009 WTB Public Notices Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Market-Based Applications Accepted for Filing DOC-291560A1: [77]pdf - [78]txt 06/24/2009 WTB Public Notices Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Market-Based Applications Accepted for Filing DOC-291561A1: [79]pdf - [80]txt 06/24/2009 WTB Public Notices Public Safety and Homeland
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • Section 21.120 of our Rules to require verification of all MVDDS transmitters in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band. We also propose to require MVDDS transmitters with digital modulation and operating bandwidth of 500 megahertz to provide as many video and data channels as possible. We do not believe that MVDDS transmitters should be required to meet the efficiency standards in Section 101.141 of our Rules, because terrestrial licensees will, by necessity, utilize the most efficient technology available. In addition, we propose to require all MVDDS stations to meet the digital emission mask, set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2) of our Rules. Further, we propose to retain the frequency tolerance standard of 0.005% in Section 101.107 of our Rules, changing the maximum bandwidth in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00369.doc
  • and the FSS earth station must not cause unacceptable interference to, nor is it protected from interference from, the FS station on that spectrum in the future. We propose to exempt from the rule those FSS earth stations that are licensed for 40 MHz or less of bandwidth in each direction. At the same time, we propose to amend Section 101.141 to shorten the loading period for FS licensees in the C- and Ku-bands from 30 to 24 months. Modification of the Part 25 and 101 rules in this manner would give both the FSS and FS licensees a comparable period of time in which to put their spectrum to use before it is susceptible to re-licensing to others. We ask
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00033.doc
  • Id. at 18 n.27. Alcatel Comments at 6. Digital Comments at 3; Harris Comments at 3. Digital Comments at 4; Harris Comments at 4-5. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.147(s). 47 C.F.R. � 101.107(a). TIA Petition at 18-19. Id. at 19. Id. Alcatel Comments at 6-7; Digital Comments at 3; Harris Comments at 3. TIA Petition at 19. 47 C.F.R. � 101.141(a). TIA Petition at 20. Alcatel Comments at 7; Digital Comments at 3; Harris Comments at 3-4. TIA Petition at 20. Id. at 20-21. TIA would reserve these frequencies primarily for narrowband systems, but permit wideband systems also if no other appropriate frequencies are available. Id. at 21 & n.31. Digital Comments at 4-5; Harris Comments at 5; Teledesic Comments at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00272.doc
  • been certified by the Commission, however, most other point-to-point microwave transmitters are subject to the less onerous verification procedure. Teligent indicates that utilizing the verification procedure promotes the public interest by allowing faster implementation of new technology. We note that this matter is being addressed in the Part 101 proceeding, and should be decided in that proceeding. Efficiency Standard Section 101.141 of the Commission's Rules requires that 24 GHz band DEMS licensees meet a spectral efficiency standard. However, in this proceeding we have altered the nature of 24 GHz Service to allow more flexibility in system design and to license on a geographic basis. Moreover, consistent with our actions in other proceedings, we believe it unwise to adopt technical rules that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090626.html
  • 51 NPSPAC RPCS' STREAMLINED AMENDMENTS TO REFLECT 800 MHZ BAND RECONFIGURATION IN THE 806-809/851-854 BAND. (Dkt No 90-7 93-77 88-476 02-55 89-452 92-189 ) Issued an Erratum correcting Public Notice, DA 09-1967, released June 24, 2009. PSHSB [89]DA-09-1397A1.doc [90]DOC-291655A1.doc [91]DOC-291655A1.pdf [92]DOC-291655A1.txt Released: 06/25/2009. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON REQUEST OF ALCATEL-LUCENT, ET AL. FOR INTERPRETATION OF 47 C.F.R. SECTION 101.141 (A)(3) TO PERMIT THE USE OF ADAPTIVE MODULATION SYSTEMS. (DA No. 09-1427). (Dkt No 09-106 ). Comments Due: 07/27/2009. Reply Comments Due: 08/11/2009. WTB . Contact: Barrett Brick at (202) 418-1065, email: Barrett.Brick@fcc.gov [93]DA-09-1427A1.doc [94]DA-09-1427A1.pdf [95]DA-09-1427A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SERVICE BROADCASTING GROUP, LLC. Notified Service Broadcasting Group, LLC of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of