FCC Web Documents citing 97.5

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1486A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1486A1.pdf
  • Class and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Parker Construction, Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301. (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, January 24, 2007) (``NAL''). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(a). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
  • stations. Discussion. We agree that placing these operating limitations in our Rules would increase their availability to all amateur station licensees. Accordingly, we believe that inserting these limitations into our Rules is a reasonable manner to make these limitations known. For these reasons, we propose to amend Section 97.303(g)(1) as the ARRL requests. Color Coded Amateur Radio Licenses Background. Section 97.5 of our Rules sets forth the various types of amateur service station license grants we issue. We print amateur service license documents for the different types of station licenses and the different classes of operator licenses on the same license form using an automated process. On December 10, 2002, Mr. Dale E. Reich asked that we issue color-coded amateur radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-36A1.txt
  • System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Report and Order, WT Docket 98-20, 13 FCC Rcd 21027, 21105-06 � 181 (1998), on recon., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 11476 (1999). No new RACES station licenses will be issued and a RACES station license will not be renewed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.17(a), 97.21(a)(3)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(4). See FCC Begins Accepting Applications for Amateur Service Club and Military Recreation Station Call Sign Administrators, Public Notice, DA 99-3018 (WTB rel. Jan. 3, 2000). See Letter dated March 1, 2000, from The American Radio Relay League, Inc.; Letter dated March 1, 2000, from W4VEC, Volunteer Examiners Club of America;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1741A1.txt
  • (March 24, 2003) Horvath Broadcasting, L. L. C. - Request for refund of FY 2002 regulatory fees Granted (February 14, 2003) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, 9 FCC Rcd 5333, 5346 (1994), recon granted, 10 FCC Rcd 12759 (1995)] KGKL Incorporated - Request for waiver of FY 2000 regulatory fee late payment penalty for KGKL FM 97.5 & KGKL AM 960 Denied (January 16, 2003) KMRI Radio, Inc. - Request for waiver of regulatory fees for FY 2002 for KMRI-AM Denied (January 22, 2003) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, 9 FCC Rcd 5333, 5346 (1994), reconsideration granted, 10 FCC Rcd 12759 (1995)] Mississippi College - Request for waiver of FY 2002 regulatory fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3305A1.txt
  • City, Missouri District Office (``Kansas City Office'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to AAT for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). AAT's response to the NAL was received on April 7, 2003. BACKGROUND AAT is the registered owner of a tower with antenna structure registration (``ASR'') number 1005728 that is 319.88 feet (97.5 meters) above ground level and 1274.93 feet (388.6 meters) above mean sea level. The structure's registration includes a requirement that it be painted in alternating bands of aviation orange and white. On January 13, 2003, a Kansas City Office agent inspected the tower in question, ASR No. 1005728. The structure had chipped and faded paint and was partially obscured with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1486A1.txt
  • Class and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Parker Construction, Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301. (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, January 24, 2007) (``NAL''). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(a). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-182A1.txt
  • July 20, 2005, you submitted a response to these applications, indicating that the board of directors of West Central Florida Group, Inc., of which you are president, did not designate Mr. Turner as club trustee, that the June 2005 applications were submitted without the board's knowledge or approval, and that Mr. Turner is not a member of the club. Section 97.5(b)(2) of the Commission's Rules provides that a club station license grant may be held only by the person who is the license trustee designated by an officer of the club. Based on the information before us, we conclude that Mr. Turner was not authorized to request changes to the club trustee and club name. Therefore, grant of those applications is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-162A1.txt
  • over fifty percent, and thus there was no potential ``major'' change in ownership to report. Further, we note that on August 29, 2005, ENFC filed a minor amendment to its Application to update its ownership information and thus, has remedied any deficiencies. Reasonable Site Assurance. In its Application ENFC proposes to install an antenna with a center of radiation of 97.5 meters above ground at a tower site owned by Delmarva Power & Light. PAR asserts that ENFC never obtained reasonable assurance of the availability of the site specified in the Application, and accordingly, the Application must be denied. In support of its allegation, PAR states that its President inquired about the availability of space at 97.5 meters on the tower
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1233A1.txt
  • 603 0 R 604 0 R 605 0 R 606 0 R 607 0 R 608 0 R] endobj 596 0 obj<>/A 610 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 597 0 obj<>/A 611 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 598 0 obj<>/A 612 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 599 0 obj< 488.726 203.511 500.82]/Subtype/Link/BS<>/A 613 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 600 0 obj<>/A 614 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 601 0 obj<>/A 615 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 602 0 obj<>/A 616 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 603 0 obj<>/A 617 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • which portions of the radio spectrum are made available and licensed for amateur radio service. Subpart A contains administrative, technical, and operational requirements for use of the spectrum and equipment in the amateur radio service. Need: This rule provides guidance on the issuance of International Amateur Radio Permits (IARP). Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154 and 303. Section Number and Title: 97.5(e) Station license required. SUBPART D-TECHNICAL STANDARDS Brief Description: The Part 97 rules set forth the conditions under which portions of the radio spectrum are made available and licensed for amateur radio service. Subpart D outlines technical standards for the frequency bands available to amateur stations. Need: The rule suspends amateur station transmitting in the 76-77 GHz segment of the 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1412A1.txt
  • (``the license of a deceased person who was a member of the club''); Amateur Station Vanity Call Sign System Filing Gate 3 Opens August 6, 1997, Public Notice, at 3 (rel. July 3, 1997) (same); Amateur Station Vanity Call Sign System Filing Gate 4 Opens December 2, 1997, Public Notice, at 3 (rel. Oct. 30, 1997) (same). 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). FCC File No. 0003655894. See Dismissal Letter, Ref. No. 4823077 (Jan. 10, 2009). Petition at 1. Id. at 2. See, e.g., Jerry D. Janow, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11546, 11546 (WTB MD 2007) (affirming dismissal of application by Saucer Ridge Amateur Radio Association, Roswell, New Mexico, for call sign NM5UFO, because the call sign was not available to the sequential
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1412A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 1996) ("the license of a deceased person who was a member of the club"); Amateur Station Vanity Call Sign System Filing Gate 3 Opens August 6, 1997, Public Notice, at 3(rel. July 3, 1997) (same); Amateur Station Vanity Call Sign System Filing Gate 4 Opens December 2, 1997, Public Notice, at 3 (rel. Oct. 30, 1997) (same). 547 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). 8473 Mr. Michael J. Keane . authorized under call sign KB1RLY.6The trustee of the Club then filed the above-referenced application requesting K1TTY as an in memoriam call sign. This application was dismissed on the grounds that Fr. McCaffreydied before the Club was formed, and therefore could not have been a member of the Club.7 In your petition for reconsideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-662A1.txt
  • Baldwin IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131 and 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Scot Stone Deputy Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Petition by Thomas J. Baldwin (filed January 23, 2008) (Petition). 47 C.F.R. � 97.103(c). See Petition at 1. See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.5(e), 97.9(a) (1993). See Amendment of the Amateur Service Rules to Change Procedures for Filing an Amateur Service License Application and to Make Other Procedural Changes, Order, 9 FCC Rcd 6111 (PRB 1994). See id. at 6111 � 3. See id. at 6111 n.10. See Petition at 2-3. See http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/searchLicense.jsp. See, e.g., www.qrz.com, http://hamcall.net/call, www.arrl.org. . � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-851A1.txt
  • her letter a petition for reconsideration, we will treat it as a petition for reconsideration because it clearly seeks further review of the action consenting to the application.'') (citing Jack Gerritsen, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 4273, 4273 n.3 (EB 2005); Redlands Municipal Airport, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 14782, 14782 � 4 (WTB PSCID 2005)). Section 97.5(b)(2) of the Commission's Rules provides that a club station license grant may be held only by the person who is the license trustee designated by an officer of the club. 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). Section 97.21(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules provides, in part, that a person holding a valid amateur station license grant must apply to the FCC for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-851A1_Rcd.pdf
  • did not title her letter a petition for reconsideration, we will treat it as a petition for reconsideration because it clearly seeks further review of the action consenting to the application.") (citing Jack Gerritsen, Memorandum Opinion and Order,20 FCC Rcd 4273, 4273 n.3 (EB 2005);Redlands Municipal Airport, Order on Reconsideration,20 FCC Rcd 14782, 14782 � 4 (WTB PSCID 2005)). 13Section 97.5(b)(2) of the Commission's Rules provides that a club station license grant may be held only by the person who is the license trustee designated by an officer of the club. 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). Section 97.21(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules provides, in part, that a person holding a valid amateur station license grant must apply to the FCC for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1315A1.txt
  • IS DISMISSED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131 and 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Scot Stone Deputy Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. Part 97. Petition for Rule Making filed by Bernard J. Parker (filed May 25, 2011) (Petition). Specifically, you propose that Section 97.5 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 97.5, be amended to state, ``To be eligible for a station license the person must not be a convicted felon, or be the subject of pending felony charges.'' You also request changes to the certifications on the FCC Form 605 so that the applicant is required to certify that he or she ``has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1315A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Commission to revisit this policy. Your argument that the policy is contrary to the basis and purpose of the amateur service fails to recognize that the Commission has an established process for assessing whether a felony 147 C.F.R. Part 97. 2Petition for Rule Making filed by Bernard J. Parker (filed May 25, 2011) (Petition). Specifically, you propose that Section 97.5 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 97.5,be amended to state, "To be eligible for a station license the person must not be a convicted felon, or be the subject of pending felony charges." You also request changes to the certifications on the FCC Form 605 so that the applicant is required to certify that he or she "has not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.txt
  • (_________________) Tj 1 0 0 1 468.2 135.899 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Oct. 18, 2011) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.35 123.399 Tm 100 Tz (Program) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 110.699 Tm 257 Tz /OPBaseFont3 4 Tf (Newark, NJ) Tj 1 0 0 1 263 108 Tm 260 Tz (____________________) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.35 97.5 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Yeshiva Avir Yakov) Tj 1 0 0 1 305 97.25 Tm 97 Tz (774720) Tj 1 0 0 1 385.9 107.799 Tm 289 Tz /OPBaseFont1 4 Tf (__________) Tj 1 0 0 1 403.2 97.25 Tm 92 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (2011) Tj 1 0 0 1 449.25 107.799 Tm 288 Tz /OPBaseFont1 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
  • 0 1 308.15 128.199 Tm 98 Tz (764598) Tj 1 0 0 1 371 128.199 Tm (2010) Tj 1 0 0 1 462 128.449 Tm 95 Tz (10/31/2011) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.4 115.25 Tm 99 Tz (Chicago, IL) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 97.25 Tm 103 Tz (St. Joseph 73' Summit) Tj 1 0 0 1 308.15 97.5 Tm 99 Tz (765762) Tj 1 0 0 1 371 97.5 Tm 98 Tz (2010) Tj 1 0 0 1 462 97.75 Tm 94 Tz (10/31/2011) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.6 84.549 Tm 99 Tz (Summit, IL) Tj ET endstream endobj 39 0 obj 5785 endobj 42 0 obj <> 0 0 0 rg 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-920A1.txt
  • of the Rules requires all red obstruction lighting to be exhibited from sunset to sunrise unless otherwise specified. Section 17.48 of the Rules requires antenna structure owners to notify the FAA immediately of any known extinguishment of any top steady burning light or any flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, not corrected within 30 minutes. The Antenna Structure is 97.5 meters above ground in overall height and, thus, is required to be painted and lit. On November 7 and 8, 2011, agents from the New Orleans Office observed that no lighting on the Antenna Structure was exhibited after sunset. During the inspection on November 9, 2011, station personnel admitted to the agents that they were aware of the lighting outage.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3018A1.txt
  • 87, 90, 95, 97, and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, WT Docket 98-20, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21027, 21105-06 � 181 (1998) (Report and Order), on recon., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 11476 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. � 154(g)(3)(B). Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 21106 � 181. See 47 U.S.C. � 154(g)(3)(B). � � ...���PNG ��(R)�R����(R)l2� "� � �p | [ݶѵ R�u�-��s�] <��7�� |��-�
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
    • 94.7 District of Columbia 19 0 100.0 22 2 91.7 43 95.3 Florida 475 2 99.6 236 18 92.9 731 97.3 Georgia 417 10 97.7 103 12 89.6 542 95.9 Guam 18 0 100.0 0 0 NA 18 100.0 Hawaii 93 0 100.0 1 0 100.0 94 100.0 Idaho 171 15 91.9 8 1 88.9 195 91.8 Illinois 1,007 26 97.5 86 13 86.9 1,132 96.6 Indiana 574 2 99.7 35 10 77.8 621 98.1 Iowa 807 3 99.6 32 7 82.1 849 98.8 Kansas 561 9 98.4 15 5 75.0 590 97.6 Kentucky 375 18 95.4 13 7 65.0 413 93.9 Louisiana 328 2 99.4 36 4 90.0 370 98.4 Maine 248 10 96.1 6 1 85.7 265 95.8 Maryland
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220690A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220690A1.txt
    • VILLISCA, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 103.1 MHz Channel 276 BNPL-20010615AJE NEW THAYER, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 104.7 MHz Channel 284 BNPL-20010615AJG NEW MOUNT PLEASANT, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 98.5 MHz Channel 253 BNPL-20010615AJH NEW PERRY, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 101.5 MHz Channel 268 BNPL-20010615AJL NEW SIBLEY, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 97.5 Channel 248 BNPL-20010615AJM NEW SPIRIT LAKE, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 100.7 MHz Channel 264 BNPL-20010615AJO NEW FORT MADISON, IA DIVINE MERCY EDUCATIONAL RADIO ASSOCIATION REQ: 99.9 MHz Channel 260 BNPL-20010615AJQ NEW DAVENPORT, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 102.7 MHz Channel 274 BNPL-20010615AJR NEW CHARITON, IA IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQ: 106.1 MHz Channel 291 BNPL-20010615AJU NEW PELLA,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.txt
    • non-broadcast, cable origination video programming networks. In 1990, there were only about 70 cable origination networks available to multichannel video program distributors (``MVPDs'') for carriage. By year-end 2001, there were nearly 287 national non-broadcast, cable origination networks available for carriage. : Availability of Video Media 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2010p Total Households(1) (mil) 71.5(2) 81.8 87.6 94.8 97.5 104.1 107.4 123.3 TV Households(1) (mil) 69.6(2) 79.9 85.9 93.1 95.9 102.2 105.5 121.1 Cable Subs/TVHH (%) 14.1%(3) 24.0% 42.7% 55.5% 64.8% 67.0% 65.0% 61.4% Cable HP/TVHH (%) 33.2%(4) 43.7% 75.3% 92.4% 96.7% 96.7% 96.7% 96.6% Satellite Subs/TVHH (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 4.8% 15.7% 17.7% 22.3% Cable+Sat. Subs/TVHH(%) 14.1.0% 24.0% 42.7% 56.4% 69.6% 82.7% 82.7% 83.7% VCR Homes/TVHH (%)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.txt
    • 3.2 of Appendix C1 is revised to change the heading of the final column from ``ATC AT'' to ATC MT''. The revised table reads: SR/SO Earth Stations Units ATC BS ATC MT Frequency (GHz) 2.2 2.2 Range (km) 0.82 0.09 ATC Transmitter Out-of-Band Power (dBW/4kHz) -100.6 -119.6 Bandwidth Ratio (dB) 36.0 36.0 ATC Emission (dBW/Hz) -136.6 -155.6 Propagation Loss (dB/m2) -97.5 -78.5 Interference Power (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Normalized Interference Level (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Margin (dB) 0.0 0.0 These errors will be corrected before publication in the Federal Register. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International Bureau (...continued
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238456A1.pdf
    • 26' 47''W, a disparity of approximately six seconds of latitude and 33 seconds of longitude (a distance of approximately 2100 feet). b. 47 C.F.R. � 17.50: Antenna structures requiring painting under this part shall be cleaned or repainted as often as necessary to maintain good visibility (of the required bands of paint). Antenna structure registration 1217597 lists the structure as 97.5 meters in height with a requirement to be painted and lit in accordance with FCC paragraphs 1, 3, 12, and 21. VIOLATION: On May 29, 2003, you had failed to repaint this structure as often as necessary to maintain good visibility. The painting on this antenna structure was extremely deteriorated reducing the visibility of the structure and obscuring the bands
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243430A1.txt
    • dBi Beamwidth in degrees between the half power points: 1.55" Radiation pattern of the antenna: Region 2 reference antenna pattern in AP30 Equivalent diameter of the antenna: 1.20 meters C. 1 1 .b Service area Service area: USA, ALS, HWA, MEX, PTR, and VIR. 3 Test points for BSS-19A Beam: 1 2 117.0 32.8 103.3 29.3 3 4 5 6 97.5 26.2 80.7 25.5 76.3 35.7 69.3 47.0 I 8 I 105.0 I 48.7 I 7 85.2 46.4 9 122.3 48.7 10 11 ~ 123.8 40.3 105.0 39.7 12 13 86.0 33.0 81.0 40.0 C. 15 Not applicable. Description of groups required in the case of non-simultaneous emissions 14 15 4 156.3 20.8 66.3 18.2 16 17 149.8 61.2 134.4 58.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
    • 379.1 438.4 749.9 665.5 716.41,005.7 19.5 Egypt 43.9 49.0 56.9 68.6 90.0 109.9 111.3 169.1 94.4 170.7 291.8 17.3 El Salvador 99.9 107.0 120.8 135.7 141.8 154.9 197.9 237.4 298.1 331.6 669.3 29.7 France 239.9 263.7 304.9 362.8 442.6 511.0 560.3 577.1 539.4 725.5 653.5 5.7 Germany 563.1 572.6 604.1 662.3 782.41,008.31,153.41,466.41,251.4 886.91,057.4 n.m. Greece 70.0 75.6 82.1 86.5 91.3 97.5 115.3 183.8 213.8 259.9 172.9 16.9 Guatemala 88.0 93.8 105.4 115.1 128.0 127.3 144.7 189.8 233.1 368.9 909.1 44.3 Haiti 48.6 52.9 62.8 73.6 79.2 93.6 99.6 135.9 94.4 67.3 107.8 -2.4 Hong Kong 114.3 143.2 213.9 315.8 539.7 677.3 565.3 193.0 163.3 278.1 171.2 -23.1 India 97.9 134.2 191.6 285.7 428.0 583.3 749.7 960.11,243.51,332.71,512.2 21.3 Israel 137.7 162.7 195.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
    • 11.3 Somalia $13,360,262 22.9 4.8 32.2 20.4 19.7 $1 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 $0 20,583,005 14.5 6.0 43.9 16.4 19.2 South Africa $56,566,663 66.6 8.2 9.0 12.7 3.5 $1,050,032 34.8 14.4 2.9 16.7 31.3 $645,316 3.3 96.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 312,032,316 42.4 27.3 11.1 14.1 5.1 Sudan $4,361,144 59.2 4.6 11.2 11.1 13.7 $190,346 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $9,082 97.5 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 20,349,849 64.3 5.4 8.0 7.2 15.2 Swaziland $735,004 73.9 2.8 2.6 19.2 1.4 $21,792 98.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 $162 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,777,714 73.1 3.0 4.0 18.4 1.5 Tanzania $5,181,836 33.2 15.2 17.9 27.0 6.7 $117,283 8.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 91.6 $2,590 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,697,495 19.7 19.3 17.7 32.8 10.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
    • 780.3 11.6 Egypt 49.0 56.9 68.6 90.0 109.9 111.3 169.1 94.4 170.7 291.8 260.4 20.3 El Salvador 107.0 120.8 135.7 141.8 154.9 197.9 237.4 298.1 331.6 669.3 1,016.7 38.5 France 263.7 304.9 362.8 442.6 511.0 560.3 577.1 539.4 725.5 653.5 681.4 4.8 Germany 572.6 604.1 662.3 782.4 1,008.3 1,153.4 1,466.4 1,251.4 886.9 1,057.4 1,501.9 0.0 Greece 75.6 82.1 86.5 91.3 97.5 115.3 183.8 213.8 259.9 172.9 203.6 8.5 Guatemala 93.8 105.4 115.1 128.0 127.3 144.7 189.8 233.1 368.9 909.1 1,455.9 61.2 Haiti 52.9 62.8 73.6 79.2 93.6 99.6 135.9 94.4 67.3 107.8 231.8 9.5 Hong Kong 143.2 213.9 315.8 539.7 677.3 565.3 193.0 163.3 278.1 171.2 232.6 -11.5 India 134.2 191.6 285.7 428.0 583.3 749.7 960.1 1,243.5 1,332.7 1,512.2 1,319.4 12.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.txt
    • 93.8 94.0 0.2 Minnesota 96.4 96.5 0.2 Mississippi 82.4 89.9 7.5 * Missouri 92.1 95.2 3.1 Montana 92.8 94.1 1.3 Nebraska 94.0 94.8 0.8 Nevada 89.4 93.1 3.7 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.3 2.3 New Jersey 94.1 94.7 0.6 New Mexico 85.3 91.9 6.6 * New York 90.8 92.7 1.9 * North Carolina 89.3 93.8 4.5 * North Dakota 95.1 97.5 2.4 * Ohio 92.2 95.0 2.8 * Oklahoma 91.5 89.1 -2.4 Oregon 91.2 96.3 5.1 * Pennsylvania 95.1 96.7 1.6 * Rhode Island 93.3 95.7 2.4 South Carolina 81.8 94.8 13.0 * South Dakota 92.7 96.8 4.1 * Tennessee 87.6 93.8 6.2 * Texas 89.0 92.2 3.2 * Utah 90.3 96.8 6.5 * Vermont 92.7 95.6 2.9 Virginia 93.1 93.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
    • 461.7 13.9 447.8 299.9 147.9 54.8 18.9 69.5 143.2 4.7 ME Maryland 2,264.8 120.2 2,144.7 1,389.7 755.0 257.9 84.1 377.9 719.9 35.0 MD Massachusetts 2,426.0 105.2 2,320.8 1,458.9 861.9 313.3 81.7 432.1 827.1 34.7 MA Michigan 3,269.7 304.8 2,964.9 2,128.0 836.9 323.6 94.7 388.0 806.3 30.6 MI Minnesota 1,183.1 56.5 1,126.6 704.3 422.3 111.1 50.2 224.1 385.4 36.9 MN Mississippi 1,097.5 39.8 1,057.7 794.3 263.4 109.0 40.7 95.6 245.3 18.0 MS Missouri 2,055.3 352.2 1,703.0 1,151.7 551.4 188.0 56.3 273.8 518.1 33.4 MO Montana 268.7 23.8 244.9 155.8 89.1 34.4 13.7 32.6 80.7 8.5 MT Nebraska 579.2 52.4 526.8 345.2 181.6 53.0 29.2 88.0 170.2 11.3 NE Nevada 779.3 84.0 695.3 437.8 257.5 100.2 44.8 102.6 247.6 9.9 NV New Hampshire
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
    • 15.9 9.1 22.8 47.8 4.5 ND Ohio 4,007.4 351.4 3,655.9 2,606.8 1,049.2 436.8 125.7 451.7 1,014.2 34.9 OH Oklahoma 1,130.6 150.2 980.4 666.6 313.8 108.2 39.2 146.7 294.1 19.7 OK Oregon 1,221.7 74.5 1,147.2 699.0 448.2 170.5 50.2 186.9 407.6 40.5 OR Pennsylvania 4,446.9 258.6 4,188.3 2,638.3 1,550.0 556.7 153.3 721.2 1,431.2 43.9 PA Rhode Island 289.6 13.1 276.5 178.9 97.5 42.2 9.5 41.4 93.1 4.4 RI South Carolina 1,192.3 72.2 1,120.1 780.2 339.9 138.9 38.5 140.8 318.2 21.7 SC South Dakota 151.2 4.5 146.7 91.9 54.8 14.5 9.8 25.4 49.7 5.1 SD Tennessee 1,858.3 118.1 1,740.3 1,194.9 545.4 206.9 60.0 240.4 507.3 38.1 TN Texas 8,947.4 1,150.3 7,797.1 5,548.0 2,249.0 818.5 223.7 1,087.0 2,129.2 119.8 TX Utah 660.8 34.9 625.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.txt
    • 99.7 SBC Ameritech 99.0 98.9 98.8 99.1 98.9 98.6 SBC Pacific 99.0 99.1 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.4 SBC Southwestern 98.6 98.8 98.8 98.9 99.1 99.0 SBC SNET 96.7 98.9 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.6 Verizon GTE 95.6 96.2 95.5 98.5 98.3 98.4 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.4 98.5 98.9 98.7 98.7 98.8 Sprint 98.0 97.7 98.8 98.2 97.5 96.8 Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* 98.1 98.6 98.8 99.1 98.8 98.8 *Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.txt
    • 9.0 17.9 16.2 17.4 20.7 21.3 16.5 20.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.3 2.8 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.7 5.4 3.8 17.3 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.7 99.6 98.6 99.4 98.9 99.5 98.8 98.7 98.1 Residence 98.7 99.7 98.6 99.4 98.9 99.6 98.8 98.8 98.4 Business 90.6 98.8 98.3 99.1 98.5 99.0 98.0 97.5 95.5 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.5 0.3 1.4 1.8 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.4 0.7 Residence 1.2 0.3 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.6 Business 1.9 1.2 1.4 3.0 2.4 2.9 1.5 2.0 2.3 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 31.3 16.0 16.7 26.9 27.7 26.7 25.7 29.0 26.4 Residence 33.5 16.3 17.2 28.8 28.9 27.2 27.1 31.7 28.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
    • charges Land-line telephone services, long distance charges Land-line interstate toll calls Land-line intrastate toll calls Wireless Telephone Services CUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SEED CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SEED02 CUUR0000SS27051 CUUR0000SS27061 CUUR0000SEED03 1999January 101.9 100.7 102.2 99.9 99.3 101.3 90.9 February 102.0 100.4 102.0 99.5 99.1 100.7 89.7 March 102.3 100.2 102.3 98.9 98.4 100.3 89.0 April 103.0 100.0 100.9 99.8 99.5 100.7 87.8 May 103.0 99.6 102.7 97.5 96.4 100.2 85.8 June 103.0 99.7 103.2 97.4 96.3 100.2 84.0 July 103.3 99.5 103.7 96.7 95.3 100.0 82.9 August 103.6 99.8 103.8 97.1 95.9 99.8 82.3 September 104.1 99.6 103.7 96.8 95.9 99.2 82.6 October 104.3 99.8 103.5 97.4 96.9 98.8 82.0 November 104.3 100.6 103.9 98.7 99.1 99.2 81.2 December 104.3 100.7 104.2 98.6 98.5 99.9 81.1 2000January
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
    • 16.8 3.5 $8,811,404 55.8 3.1 24.8 10.4 5.9 $1,847,180 0.0 99.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 482,675,248 28.1 5.8 31.3 8.5 26.3 India $508,270,981 27.3 1.7 15.4 8.1 47.6 $48,020,548 3.8 0.2 2.9 1.3 91.8 $1,322,282 0.0 89.2 2.1 0.0 8.7 4,083,169,003 15.3 1.3 17.0 4.7 61.7 Indonesia $32,820,647 51.6 5.6 9.9 19.1 13.8 $971,892 21.6 0.0 8.7 26.9 42.8 $18,695 0.0 97.5 0.6 0.0 1.9 318,914,948 47.1 6.9 15.6 9.9 20.5 Japan $164,592,237 58.4 0.8 19.3 15.6 5.8 $18,535,893 55.3 0.0 30.8 9.6 4.4 $285,699 94.3 0.0 4.5 0.0 1.2 1,609,404,717 35.6 0.7 32.6 11.0 20.1 Kampuchea $0 $0 $0 0 Korea, North $281,775 1.4 0.2 41.2 31.3 26.0 $203,822 0.0 99.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 $694,657 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,514,515 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
    • 99.1 99.0 99.1 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 99.3 98.9 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 94.8 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 91.6 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 94.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.txt
    • Than 3,147 98.2% 98.1% 98.7% 98.9% 99.1% 99.2 % 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % 99.9 % 947-3,147 97.1 97.3 98.2 98.5 98.7 99.3 99.8 99.7 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 268-947 95.7 95.8 97.9 98.8 99.1 99.3 99.3 99.5 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 118-268 91.5 93.3 96.7 97.9 98.2 99.2 98.1 99.1 99.7 99.8 99.8 99.8 67-118 85.9 89.3 95.0 97.5 98.0 98.8 95.0 97.1 99.1 99.7 99.7 99.8 41-67 76.1 83.3 91.5 96.0 97.5 98.8 87.9 94.4 97.8 99.0 99.3 99.5 25-41 65.0 73.1 87.6 92.6 95.5 98.1 80.0 87.6 95.6 97.7 98.5 99.3 15-25 50.1 61.2 77.8 88.0 91.4 96.6 69.4 80.4 90.8 95.7 96.8 98.9 6-15 38.5 52.1 69.4 82.7 86.2 95.8 61.9 76.2 86.4 93.2 95.0 98.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
    • 87.5 67.9 November 112.4 99.8 120.8 82.7 80.7 87.0 67.5 December 112.2 99.9 121.0 82.6 80.7 86.7 67.4 2003January 112.6 100.4 121.3 83.4 81.9 87.0 67.6 February 113.5 100.5 121.2 83.5 82.2 86.9 67.7 March 114.2 99.7 121.7 81.5 79.8 85.1 67.6 April 113.9 98.7 121.9 79.2 77.4 83.1 67.5 May 113.7 98.1 122.0 77.9 76.0 81.8 67.5 June 113.8 97.5 122.2 76.7 74.6 80.8 66.3 July 114.0 98.1 123.1 77.2 75.6 80.8 66.2 August 114.4 97.8 123.7 76.0 74.0 79.7 66.1 September 114.8 97.4 123.8 75.2 73.3 78.9 66.1 October 114.6 97.1 124.0 74.3 72.1 78.7 66.1 November 114.3 97.2 124.2 74.1 71.8 78.3 66.7 December 114.2 97.2 124.1 74.3 72.0 78.6 66.5 2004January 114.8 97.0 124.4 73.9 71.6 78.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
    • 98.7% 98.5% 98.3% Renter Occupied 93.4 92.6 91.6 90.4 Age of Householder 15 - 34 94.5 93.6 92.0 90.2 35 - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islande 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7% Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2002 2001 Table 6.3 Telephone Penetration by Selected Characteristics (Percentage of Housing Units with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
    • 98.7% 98.5% 98.3% Renter Occupied 93.4 92.6 91.6 90.4 Age of Householder 15 - 34 94.5 93.6 92.0 90.2 35 - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islande 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7% Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2002 2001 Table 6.3 Telephone Penetration by Selected Characteristics (Percentage of Housing Units with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
    • charges Land-line telephone services, long distance charges Land-line interstate toll calls Land-line intrastate toll calls Wireless Telephone Services CUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SEED CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SEED02 CUUR0000SS27051 CUUR0000SS27061 CUUR0000SEED03 1999January 101.9 100.7 102.2 99.9 99.3 101.3 90.9 February 102.0 100.4 102.0 99.5 99.1 100.7 89.7 March 102.3 100.2 102.3 98.9 98.4 100.3 89.0 April 103.0 100.0 100.9 99.8 99.5 100.7 87.8 May 103.0 99.6 102.7 97.5 96.4 100.2 85.8 June 103.0 99.7 103.2 97.4 96.3 100.2 84.0 July 103.3 99.5 103.7 96.7 95.3 100.0 82.9 August 103.6 99.8 103.8 97.1 95.9 99.8 82.3 September 104.1 99.6 103.7 96.8 95.9 99.2 82.6 October 104.3 99.8 103.5 97.4 96.9 98.8 82.0 November 104.3 100.6 103.9 98.7 99.1 99.2 81.2 December 104.3 100.7 104.2 98.6 98.5 99.9 81.1 2000January
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269876A1.pdf
    • violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(a). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. �1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. �� 301, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914 (...continued from previous page) (continued....) $ - ' A tm Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission F � � �� � ^�� �4 *
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
    • Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) Change State Alabama 95.2% 95.3% 95.1% 94.5% 93.3% Alaska 96.6 97.9 96.7 97.6 96.6 Arizona 95.8 95.6 95.0 95.2 93.1 Arkansas 94.7 94.3 92.5 91.0 90.9 California 98.0 98.3 98.3 97.9 97.0 Colorado 98.5 97.4 97.0 96.5 95.1 Connecticut 98.8 98.7 98.2 98.3 97.3 Delaware 98.2 98.2 97.7 97.9 97.5 District of Columbia 97.1 97.5 96.9 96.1 95.2 Florida 97.0 96.6 96.3 95.5 94.0 Georgia 95.6 95.5 95.0 94.1 92.9 Hawaii 97.9 97.0 96.3 95.2 95.6 Idaho 96.2 97.4 96.3 95.7 96.2 Illinois 95.9 95.7 95.4 94.7 94.4 Indiana 95.4 94.7 93.7 93.4 94.4 Iowa 97.6 97.4 96.6 95.6 96.0 Kansas 96.9 96.3 95.8 95.7 93.6 Kentucky 96.0 94.8 95.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.txt
    • 99.7 99.6 AT&T Ameritech 98.9 98.8 99.1 98.9 98.6 98.6 AT&T Pacific 99.1 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.4 99.2 AT&T Southwestern 98.8 98.8 98.9 99.1 99.0 99.1 AT&T SNET 98.9 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.6 99.6 Verizon GTE 96.2 95.5 98.5 98.3 98.4 98.0 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.5 98.9 98.7 98.7 98.8 98.9 Sprint 97.7 98.8 98.2 97.5 96.8 97.2 Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* 98.6 98.8 99.1 98.8 98.8 98.8 *Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
    • 0.0100.0 409,728,395 32.3 0.018.718.2 30.8 South America $580,266,539 22.4 0.019.417.1 41.1 $47,311,934 2.3 0.013.326.8 57.6 $12,734,334 89.2 0.0 0.3 0.6 9.8 7,220,943,084 30.3 0.013.517.8 38.5 Afghanistan $17,589,283 12.8 0.058.417.9 10.9 $761,956 0.0 0.0 0.047.3 52.7 $313 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 69,172,093 14.6 0.034.534.0 16.9 Bangladesh $7,891,011 6.8 1.024.410.6 57.2 $2,112,446 0.0 0.0 4.9 3.4 91.7 $285 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 97.5 171,956,688 5.9 0.811.4 3.1 78.8 Bhutan $124,457 8.6 0.022.225.8 43.5 $2,693 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 1,123,938 5.1 0.0 8.744.9 41.3 Brunei $3,738,421 0.4 0.0 3.492.2 4.0 $439,813 0.0 0.021.552.3 26.3 $159 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 20,836,050 0.8 0.029.036.7 33.5 Burma $5,746,331 5.3 0.046.7 0.0 48.1 $107,575 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $39 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 23,475,302 3.7 0.039.8 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
    • 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 99.3 98.9 99.1 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 94.8 95.0 $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 91.6 86.0 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 94.7 96.9 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 99.2 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 99.3 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 98.2 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 96.3 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Table 4 Percentage of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277784A1.txt
    • % 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % 99.9 % 99.9 % 947-3,147 97.1 97.3 98.2 98.5 98.7 99.3 99.7 99.8 99.7 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 268-947 95.7 95.8 97.9 98.8 99.1 99.3 99.5 99.3 99.5 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 118-268 91.5 93.3 96.7 97.9 98.2 99.2 99.3 98.1 99.1 99.7 99.8 99.8 99.8 99.8 67-118 85.9 89.3 95.0 97.5 98.0 98.8 99.0 95.0 97.1 99.1 99.7 99.7 99.8 99.8 41-67 76.1 83.3 91.5 96.0 97.5 98.8 99.1 87.9 94.4 97.8 99.0 99.3 99.5 99.5 25-41 65.0 73.1 87.6 92.6 95.5 98.1 98.6 80.0 87.6 95.6 97.7 98.5 99.3 99.5 15-25 50.1 61.2 77.8 88.0 91.4 96.6 97.8 69.4 80.4 90.8 95.7 96.8 98.9 99.1 6-15 38.5 52.1 69.4 82.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
    • 91.6 90.4 89.0 Age of Householder 15 - 34 94.5 93.6 92.0 90.2 88.0 35 - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 96.1 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7% 94.8% Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2005 Table 6.3 Telephone Penetration by Selected Characteristics
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
    • 91.6 90.4 89.0 Age of Householder 15 - 34 94.5 93.6 92.0 90.2 88.0 35 - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 96.1 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7% 94.8% Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2005 Table 6.3 Telephone Penetration by Selected Characteristics
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
    • 98.5 79.2 April 106.2 98.6 105.2 93.7 92.4 97.8 78.9 May 106.3 98.5 105.3 93.4 92.0 97.6 78.2 June 106.9 97.2 105.8 90.6 89.0 95.0 76.8 July 107.1 98.2 107.3 91.3 89.8 95.7 74.9 August 107.1 98.9 109.5 90.7 89.2 95.1 73.7 September 107.7 97.0 108.5 87.9 86.2 92.0 72.8 October 107.9 98.3 109.8 89.4 87.9 92.9 73.0 November 107.9 97.5 110.3 87.2 85.0 91.9 72.9 December 107.9 98.4 110.0 89.5 87.5 93.9 71.1 2001January 108.6 98.8 110.5 89.9 88.0 94.2 68.9 February 109.0 98.7 110.7 89.5 87.6 93.7 68.9 March 109.2 99.4 110.9 90.7 89.0 94.5 68.7 April 109.7 99.0 111.9 89.1 87.2 93.1 68.8 May 110.2 98.7 112.1 88.2 86.2 92.6 68.5 June 110.4 99.0 112.3 88.7 86.7 93.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.txt
    • 98.7 98.2 AT&T Pacific 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.4 99.2 99.3 AT&T Southwestern 98.8 98.9 99.1 99.0 99.1 99.3 AT&T SNET 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.7 Qwest 99.3 99.5 99.7 99.7 99.6 99.6 Verizon GTE 95.5 98.5 98.3 98.4 98.0 97.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.9 98.7 98.7 98.8 98.9 98.7 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 98.8 98.2 97.5 96.8 97.2 97.0 Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* 98.8 99.1 98.8 98.8 98.8 98.7 *Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Years Percent o f Co mmitments
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
    • 14.1 7.3 23.8 45.2 4.5 ND Ohio 4,012.6 395.7 3,616.9 2,535.9 1,081.0 429.3 136.0 476.4 1,041.7 39.3 OH Oklahoma 1,064.3 140.7 923.6 596.7 326.8 101.6 34.5 169.3 305.4 21.4 OK Oregon 1,132.5 71.0 1,061.5 629.3 432.2 156.9 45.4 189.4 391.7 40.5 OR Pennsylvania 4,284.9 274.2 4,010.7 2,464.9 1,545.8 531.2 150.8 741.8 1,423.8 48.4 PA Rhode Island 272.5 14.0 258.5 161.0 97.5 37.7 8.9 46.1 92.7 4.8 RI South Carolina 1,248.0 87.8 1,160.1 809.7 350.5 133.2 38.1 154.2 325.5 25.0 SC South Dakota 145.1 6.6 138.5 86.2 52.3 13.4 8.5 25.6 47.5 4.8 SD Tennessee 1,860.5 129.4 1,731.1 1,170.3 560.7 199.2 60.2 257.7 517.1 43.6 TN Texas 8,778.1 1,146.4 7,631.7 5,350.8 2,280.9 784.1 201.3 1,155.8 2,141.2 139.6 TX Utah 645.2 34.3 610.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
    • Households with Telephone Service) Change State Alabama 95.2% 95.3% 95.1% 94.5% 93.3% 92.6% Alaska 96.6 97.9 96.7 97.6 96.6 96.3 Arizona 95.8 95.6 95.0 95.2 93.1 93.6 Arkansas 94.7 94.3 92.5 91.0 90.9 90.3 California 98.0 98.3 98.3 97.9 97.0 96.6 Colorado 98.5 97.4 97.0 96.5 95.1 94.6 Connecticut 98.8 98.7 98.2 98.3 97.3 96.5 Delaware 98.2 98.2 97.7 97.9 97.5 97.0 District of Columbia 97.1 97.5 96.9 96.1 95.2 94.5 Florida 97.0 96.6 96.3 95.5 94.0 92.4 Georgia 95.6 95.5 95.0 94.1 92.9 90.9 Hawaii 97.9 97.0 96.3 95.2 95.6 95.7 Idaho 96.2 97.4 96.3 95.7 96.2 94.2 Illinois 95.9 95.7 95.4 94.7 94.4 93.7 Indiana 95.4 94.7 93.7 93.4 94.4 93.4 Iowa 97.6 97.4 96.6 95.6 96.0 94.9 Kansas
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
    • 67.9 November 112.4 99.8 120.8 82.7 80.7 87.0 67.5 December 112.2 99.9 121.0 82.6 80.7 86.7 67.4 2003 January 112.6 100.4 121.3 83.4 81.9 87.0 67.6 February 113.5 100.5 121.2 83.5 82.2 86.9 67.7 March 114.2 99.7 121.7 81.5 79.8 85.1 67.6 April 113.9 98.7 121.9 79.2 77.4 83.1 67.5 May 113.7 98.1 122.0 77.9 76.0 81.8 67.5 June 113.8 97.5 122.2 76.7 74.6 80.8 66.3 July 114.0 98.1 123.1 77.2 75.6 80.8 66.2 August 114.4 97.8 123.7 76.0 74.0 79.7 66.1 September 114.8 97.4 123.8 75.2 73.3 78.9 66.1 October 114.6 97.1 124.0 74.3 72.1 78.7 66.1 November 114.3 97.2 124.2 74.1 71.8 78.3 66.7 December 114.2 97.2 124.1 74.3 72.0 78.6 66.5 2004 January 114.8 97.0 124.4 73.9 71.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
    • 90.2 88.0 86.3 87.8 35 - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 96.1 95.4 95.6 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.5 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 NA NA Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 NA NA American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 NA NA Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 NA NA Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 NA NA Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 NA NA Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 NA NA Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 NA NA Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7% 94.8% 94.1% 94.6% NA -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
    • 90.2 88.0 86.3 87.8 35 - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 96.1 95.4 95.6 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.5 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 NA NA Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 NA NA American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 NA NA Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 NA NA Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 NA NA Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 NA NA Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 NA NA Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 NA NA Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7% 94.8% 94.1% 94.6% NA -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
    • 67.9 November 112.4 99.8 120.8 82.7 80.7 87.0 67.5 December 112.2 99.9 121.0 82.6 80.7 86.7 67.4 2003 January 112.6 100.4 121.3 83.4 81.9 87.0 67.6 February 113.5 100.5 121.2 83.5 82.2 86.9 67.7 March 114.2 99.7 121.7 81.5 79.8 85.1 67.6 April 113.9 98.7 121.9 79.2 77.4 83.1 67.5 May 113.7 98.1 122.0 77.9 76.0 81.8 67.5 June 113.8 97.5 122.2 76.7 74.6 80.8 66.3 July 114.0 98.1 123.1 77.2 75.6 80.8 66.2 August 114.4 97.8 123.7 76.0 74.0 79.7 66.1 September 114.8 97.4 123.8 75.2 73.3 78.9 66.1 October 114.6 97.1 124.0 74.3 72.1 78.7 66.1 November 114.3 97.2 124.2 74.1 71.8 78.3 66.7 December 114.2 97.2 124.1 74.3 72.0 78.6 66.5 2004 January 114.8 97.0 124.4 73.9 71.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.txt
    • 98.7 98.2 98.2 AT&T Pacific 99.6 99.6 99.4 99.2 99.3 99.3 AT&T Southwestern 98.9 99.1 99.0 99.1 99.3 99.2 AT&T SNET 100.0 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.7 99.7 Qwest 99.5 99.7 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.7 Verizon GTE 98.5 98.3 98.4 98.0 97.9 98.1 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.7 98.7 98.8 98.9 98.7 98.6 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 98.2 97.5 96.8 97.2 97.0 97.3 Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* 99.1 98.8 98.8 98.8 98.7 98.6 *Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Years Percent o f Co
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.txt
    • 92.1 97.0 4.9 * Montana 92.8 94.9 2.1 Nebraska 94.0 95.6 1.6 Nevada 89.4 95.8 6.4 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.2 3.2 New Jersey 94.1 94.6 0.5 New Mexico 85.3 92.4 7.1 New York 90.8 94.3 3.4 * North Carolina 89.3 94.5 5.2 * North Dakota 95.1 98.8 3.7 Ohio 92.2 97.0 4.8 * Oklahoma 91.5 95.1 3.6 Oregon 91.2 97.5 6.3 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.6 2.5 Rhode Island 93.3 97.3 4.0 South Carolina 81.8 90.1 8.3 * South Dakota 92.7 97.8 5.1 * Tennessee 87.6 93.1 5.5 Texas 89.0 95.4 6.4 * Utah 90.3 97.1 6.8 * Vermont 92.7 96.4 3.7 Virginia 93.1 95.5 2.4 Washington 92.5 97.9 5.4 West Virginia 88.1 94.2 6.0 * Wisconsin 94.8 97.7 2.9 Wyoming
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
    • 1.4 96.0 $0 $452,556 5.219.90.032.4 42.5 $129,9840.00.00.00.0 100.0 Sweden 0 $0 $0 $0 Switzerland 39,065 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $420,096 0.0 0.00.0 5.7 94.3 $0 Turkey 2 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $196,117 0.0100.00.0 0.0 0.0 $0 United Kingdom 444,090 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 $0 $9,412,60514.0 0.00.0 3.6 82.4 $542,2190.00.00.00.0 100.0 Western Europe 670,604 0.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 97.5 $0 $13,863,13010.311.20.0 7.1 71.4 $934,2450.00.00.00.0 100.0 Algeria 0 $0 $0 $0 Angola 30 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $940,230 0.0100.00.0 0.0 0.0 $0 Benin 0 $0 $0 $0 Botswana 0 $0 $0 $0 Burkina 0 $0 $0 $0 Burundi 0 $0 $0 $0 Cameroon 0 $0 $0 $0 Canary Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Cape Verde 0 $0 $0 $0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
    • 99.3 98.9 99.1 98.3 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 94.8 95.0 94.6 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 91.6 86.0 87.4 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 94.7 96.9 94.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 99.2 99.0 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 99.3 99.1 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 98.2 98.5 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 96.3 96.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.txt
    • Minnesota 96.4 98.4 2.1 Mississippi 82.4 93.5 11.1 * Missouri 92.1 97.2 5.1 * Montana 92.8 95.7 2.9 Nebraska 94.0 95.9 1.9 Nevada 89.4 94.1 4.7 New Hampshire 95.0 98.5 3.6 New Jersey 94.1 94.8 0.6 New Mexico 85.3 92.3 7.0 New York 90.8 94.7 3.8 * North Carolina 89.3 95.3 6.0 * North Dakota 95.1 98.5 3.4 Ohio 92.2 97.5 5.2 * Oklahoma 91.5 96.0 4.5 Oregon 91.2 98.2 7.0 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.6 2.5 Rhode Island 93.3 96.0 2.7 South Carolina 81.8 94.6 12.8 * South Dakota 92.7 96.9 4.2 Tennessee 87.6 92.6 5.0 Texas 89.0 94.7 5.7 * Utah 90.3 96.2 6.0 * Vermont 92.7 97.1 4.4 Virginia 93.1 95.4 2.3 Washington 92.5 98.7 6.3 * West Virginia
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.txt
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
    • 98.7 98.2 98.2 98.5 AT&T Pacific 99.6 99.4 99.2 99.3 99.3 99.6 AT&T Southwestern 99.1 99.0 99.1 99.3 99.2 99.0 AT&T SNET 99.5 99.6 99.6 99.7 99.7 99.7 Qwest 99.7 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.7 99.8 Verizon GTE 98.3 98.4 98.0 97.9 98.1 98.2 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.7 98.8 98.9 98.9 98.6 98.7 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 97.5 96.8 97.2 97.0 97.3 96.8 Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* 98.8 98.8 98.8 98.7 98.6 98.7 *Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Years Percent o f
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
    • 1.05 Oklahoma 1,432,001 79.9 1.25 Oregon 1,587,119 91.3 1.09 Pennsylvania 6,108,671 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 924,692 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 348,325 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 1,839,847 71.7 1.40 South Dakota 283,872 57.9 1.73 Tennessee 2,617,191 85.2 1.17 Texas 9,692,891 92.2 1.08 Utah 920,272 91.3 1.10 Vermont 363,274 84.2 1.19 Virginia 3,611,657 97.3 1.03 Virgin Islands 64,964 0.0 NA Washington 2,743,179 97.5 1.03 West Virginia 859,788 82.5 1.21 Wisconsin 2,477,557 72.1 1.39 Wyoming 235,173 82.3 1.21 Total 135,789,632 92.5% 1.08 NA - Not Applicable. 1/ USF loops, a measure of access lines, are defined in subcategory 1.3 of 47 C.F.R. 36.154(a). 2/ Average percent reporting to ARMIS (Report 43-01) is based on USF loops. USF Loops 1/ Year End 1 - 48
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
    • PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SWITCHED ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 99.7 100.0 99.7 98.6 86.4 99.4 99.4 99.7 96.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 21.2 17.7 20.4 23.2 15.4 15.1 12.9 12.4 17.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 8.3 11.1 11.8 4.3 3.1 2.6 2.5 8.5 8.4 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 89.4 99.4 94.6 97.5 98.4 96.5 95.0 94.7 96.3 Average Installation Interval (days) 18.0 14.2 16.3 16.0 19.3 4.3 12.9 12.9 11.8 Average Repair Interval (hours) 6.0 3.5 5.8 5.0 4.1 3.7 4.0 3.7 3.8 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.4 97.3 99.5 99.1 99.7 99.7 99.0 98.3 98.0 Residence 98.5 98.5 99.6 99.0 99.7 99.8 99.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
    • 1.05 Oklahoma 1,432,001 79.9 1.25 Oregon 1,587,119 91.3 1.09 Pennsylvania 6,108,671 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 924,692 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 348,325 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 1,839,847 71.7 1.40 South Dakota 283,872 57.9 1.73 Tennessee 2,617,191 85.2 1.17 Texas 9,692,891 92.2 1.08 Utah 920,272 91.3 1.10 Vermont 363,274 84.2 1.19 Virginia 3,611,657 97.3 1.03 Virgin Islands 64,964 0.0 NA Washington 2,743,179 97.5 1.03 West Virginia 859,788 82.5 1.21 Wisconsin 2,477,557 72.1 1.39 Wyoming 235,173 82.3 1.21 Total 135,789,632 92.5% 1.08 NA - Not Applicable. 1/ USF loops, a measure of access lines, are defined in subcategory 1.3 of 47 C.F.R. 36.154(a). 2/ Average percent reporting to ARMIS (Report 43-01) is based on USF loops. USF Loops 1/ Year End 1 - 48
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
    • - 64 97.3 97.2 97.1 96.7 96.1 95.4 95.6 98.4 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.5 99.2 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 NA NA NA Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 NA NA NA American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 NA NA NA Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 NA NA NA Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 NA NA NA Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 NA NA NA Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 NA NA NA Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 NA NA NA Total United States 96.9% 96.6% 96.2% 95.7%
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
    • 67.9 November 112.4 99.8 120.8 82.7 80.7 87.0 67.5 December 112.2 99.9 121.0 82.6 80.7 86.7 67.4 2003 January 112.6 100.4 121.3 83.4 81.9 87.0 67.6 February 113.5 100.5 121.2 83.5 82.2 86.9 67.7 March 114.2 99.7 121.7 81.5 79.8 85.1 67.6 April 113.9 98.7 121.9 79.2 77.4 83.1 67.5 May 113.8 98.1 122.0 77.9 76.0 81.8 67.5 June 113.9 97.5 122.2 76.7 74.6 80.8 66.3 July 114.0 98.1 123.1 77.2 75.6 80.8 66.2 August 114.4 97.8 123.7 76.0 74.0 79.7 66.1 September 114.8 97.4 123.8 75.2 73.3 78.9 66.1 October 114.7 97.1 124.0 74.3 72.1 78.7 66.1 November 114.4 97.2 124.2 74.1 71.8 78.3 66.7 December 114.3 97.2 124.1 74.3 72.0 78.6 66.5 2004 January 114.8 97.0 124.4 73.9 71.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296121A1.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.txt
    • 13,428 15,060 22,804 11,503 178 85,865 102,043 Percentages aDSL 3.9 8.1 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 32.5 * 1.6 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 12.3 55.1 8.7 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
    • 8.8 87.0 Grenada $6,317,592 0.0 0.0 1.0 24.3 74.6 $317,441 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $31,254 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 59,908,489 0.0 0.0 0.6 22.4 77.0 Guadeloupe $2,062,390 0.0 0.0 1.1 43.2 55.7 $6,935 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $487,818 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 14,463,678 0.0 0.0 3.0 36.1 60.9 Haiti $108,759,179 0.0 0.0 15.5 8.2 76.4 $2,534,822 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 97.5 $7,367,396 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 639,065,952 0.0 0.0 14.5 8.6 76.9 Jamaica $106,906,210 0.0 0.0 1.4 14.1 84.5 $3,787,725 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 92.7 $2,649,098 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 996,560,789 0.0 0.0 1.0 12.6 86.3 Montserrat $375,620 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 55.8 $1,678 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $11,501 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,841,687 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 43.0 Netherlands Antilles
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.txt
    • 99.3 98.9 99.1 98.3 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 94.8 95.0 94.6 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 91.6 86.0 87.4 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 94.7 96.9 94.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 99.2 99.0 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 99.3 99.1 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 98.2 98.5 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 96.3 96.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
    • and RegulatedSeparations Collection and Common Traffic Special Total and Adjustments Line Sensitive Interexchange All Reporting Cos. $103,153.5 $13,070.9 $90,074.9$56,609.1 $33,465.7$10,280.3$3,190.6$18,070.4$31,541.3$1,852.9 Bell Operating Cos. 92,691.4 11,193.6 81,497.9 50,664.0 30,833.8 9,122.3 2,823.0 17,066.9 29,012.2 1,821.7 All Other Cos. 10,462.1 1,877.3 8,577.0 5,945.1 2,631.9 1,158.0 367.6 1,003.5 2,529.1 31.2 Alabama 1,640.0 225.4 1,414.5 982.5 432.0 161.8 48.3 188.9 399.0 33.0 AL Arizona 1,522.6 97.5 1,425.1 762.1 663.1 168.5 63.9 383.7 616.1 47.0 AZ Arkansas 767.9 86.6 681.3 441.7 239.6 58.0 23.1 139.7 220.8 18.8 AR California 13,167.8 2,045.8 11,122.0 7,097.9 4,024.2 1,249.7 317.7 2,240.1 3,807.5 216.6 CA Colorado 1,877.0 116.8 1,760.2 990.5 769.7 203.7 65.5 449.7 718.9 50.9 CO Connecticut 1,462.6 95.3 1,367.3 855.3 512.0 122.4 53.4 295.3 471.1 40.8 CT Delaware 352.0 30.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
    • 13,428 15,060 22,804 11,503 178 85,865 102,043 Percentages aDSL 3.9 8.1 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 32.5 * 1.6 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 12.3 55.1 8.7 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
    • 14,498 16,131 23,591 16,472 308 115,959 133,148 Percentages aDSL 3.5 4.8 8.3 6.7 19.6 29.2 30.9 4.1 1.2 0.0 91.7 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.9 32.2 17.5 7.5 * * * 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 10.4 60.0 10.8 3.7 2.9 3.4 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.7 1.8 2.5 0.8 3.7 4.4 11.7 46.8 29.8 0.5 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.6 10.2 1.6 81.7 2.1 99.8 100.0 Satellite 45.4 39.7 85.1 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.9 100.0 Fixed Wireless 7.7 3.7 11.4 17.7 25.6 27.5 14.3 1.9 1.4 0.2 88.6 100.0 Mobile Wireless 14.0 9.8 23.9 19.9 45.4 5.2 1.8 * 0.0 * 76.1 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
    • 96.7 96.1 95.4 95.6 98.4 97.9 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.5 99.2 98.9 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 NA NA NA NA Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 NA NA NA NA American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 NA NA NA NA Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 NA NA NA NA Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 NA NA NA NA Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 NA NA NA NA Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 NA NA NA NA Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 NA NA NA NA Total United
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
    • 10.6 17.7 32.0 15.7 16.6 26.4 16.6 14.3 53.3 7.0 7.2 7.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.8 106.3 6.2 23.3 56.2 21.3 56.2 15.5 16.3 4.3 4.1 4.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 96.5 98.5 99.6 94.4 97.9 73.4 97.9 97.4 90.4 96.2 96.1 96.1 Residence 96.9 99.2 99.7 95.2 97.8 74.6 97.8 97.5 91.8 96.7 96.7 96.5 Business 95.1 96.3 99.2 91.0 98.1 65.6 98.1 97.0 77.4 90.8 90.4 90.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.6 0.4 2.2 4.3 3.9 1.9 3.9 3.1 13.1 4.1 3.4 3.7 Residence 1.6 0.3 1.6 4.4 4.3 1.8 4.3 3.1 9.8 3.9 3.4 3.7 Business 1.6 0.8 4.0 4.2 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.8 46.0 5.0 3.6 4.4 Average
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
    • 96.7 96.1 95.4 95.6 98.4 97.9 65 + 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.5 99.2 98.9 Race of Householder White 97.6 97.3 96.9 96.3 95.6 NA NA NA NA Black or African American 93.6 93.0 93.0 92.3 91.9 NA NA NA NA American Indian or Alaska Native 89.1 89.5 87.8 89.6 86.8 NA NA NA NA Asian 98.4 98.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 NA NA NA NA Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 95.9 95.5 91.4 92.2 93.1 NA NA NA NA Other 94.6 95.1 93.9 93.3 91.0 NA NA NA NA Two or More Races 95.1 92.7 95.6 92.8 92.7 NA NA NA NA Ethnicity of Householder Hispanic or Latino 94.2 93.9 93.4 92.6 91.6 NA NA NA NA Total United
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
    • 73.5 64.7 August 126.4 95.9 131.2 68.2 64.8 73.9 64.6 September 125.8 96.1 131.8 68.3 65.0 74.0 64.7 October 125.1 96.8 131.9 69.8 67.0 75.5 64.6 November 124.9 96.5 132.0 69.3 66.8 75.3 64.6 December 125.1 96.8 132.4 69.6 66.9 76.1 64.6 2007January 125.5 96.9 132.5 69.8 67.2 75.9 64.6 February 126.2 97.1 133.3 69.9 67.2 75.9 64.6 March 127.3 97.5 133.9 70.5 67.2 76.7 64.6 April 128.1 97.6 134.6 70.3 67.5 76.6 64.6 May 128.9 98.5 135.0 72.2 68.5 80.6 64.5 June 129.2 98.5 135.3 72.2 68.5 80.8 64.4 July 129.1 98.6 136.1 72.0 68.5 80.8 64.3 August 128.9 98.8 136.6 72.2 68.7 81.1 64.4 September 129.3 98.9 137.0 72.2 68.7 81.0 64.4 October 129.5 99.0 137.6 72.1 68.7 80.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.txt
    • Arkansas 88.2 93.8 5.7 * California 91.7 96.9 5.1 * Colorado 94.4 97.2 2.8 Connecticut 95.5 97.3 1.8 Delaware 95.0 96.9 1.9 District of Columbia 94.7 93.0 -1.7 Florida 85.5 93.9 8.4 * Georgia 88.9 93.4 4.5 Hawaii 94.6 95.7 1.1 Idaho 89.5 98.1 8.6 * Illinois 95.0 95.7 0.7 Indiana 90.3 93.0 2.6 Iowa 95.4 97.3 1.9 Kansas 94.9 97.5 2.6 Kentucky 86.9 95.3 8.3 * Louisiana 88.9 96.9 7.9 Maine 90.7 98.3 7.6 * Maryland 96.3 95.3 -0.9 Massachusetts 94.3 98.1 3.8 Michigan 93.8 97.1 3.3 Minnesota 96.4 99.0 2.6 Mississippi 82.4 96.0 13.6 * Missouri 92.1 96.6 4.5 * Montana 92.8 94.6 1.8 Nebraska 94.0 95.6 1.6 Nevada 89.4 97.3 7.8 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.3 3.3 New
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310264A1.txt
    • user's location under the purchased service plan. Provided by Some data for June 2009, December 2009, and June 2010 have been revised. Date 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 ILEC Non-ILEC Non-ILEC 34.0 31.4 29.9 28.6 28.7 28.7 30.0 44.3 44.3 45.9 48.5 51.1 ILEC 143.8 143.8 142.3 138.8 134.6 129.7 124.6 118.5 112.7 107.0 102.4 97.5 Jun 2005 Dec 2005 Jun 2006 Dec 2006 Jun 2007 Dec 2007 Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Jun 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 Dec 2010 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2010 12 Jun 2005 95,316 48,442 66.3 16,338 17,637 48.1 Dec 2005 94,393 49,381 65.7 13,873 17,515 44.2 Jun 2006 92,453 49,840 65.0 12,474
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
    • 1/3/11 Revises the Amateur Radio Service rules to clarify the rules with respect to amateur service vanity call signs, eliminating licensee confusion. 0.191(o) 0.392(g) 2/14/11 Eliminated restrictions on Amateur Radio Service: eliminate the automatic power control provision which has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311523A1.txt
    • 92.8 95.0 2.3 NEBRASKA 94.0 97.6 3.6 NEVADA 89.4 97.9 8.5 * NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 98.3 3.3 NEW JERSEY 94.1 96.6 2.5 NEW MEXICO 85.3 92.0 6.7 NEW YORK 90.8 94.6 3.7 * NORTH CAROLINA 89.3 95.4 6.1 * NORTH DAKOTA 95.1 98.5 3.4 OHIO 92.2 96.7 4.5 * OKLAHOMA 91.5 95.1 3.6 OREGON 91.2 97.7 6.5 * PENNSYLVANIA 95.1 97.5 2.4 RHODE ISLAND 93.3 97.6 4.3 SOUTH CAROLINA 81.8 95.6 13.8 * SOUTH DAKOTA 92.7 97.8 5.1 * TENNESSEE 87.6 91.4 3.8 TEXAS 89.0 95.8 6.9 * UTAH 90.3 95.8 5.5 * VERMONT 92.7 98.1 5.4 * VIRGINIA 93.1 95.2 2.1 WASHINGTON 92.5 98.4 6.0 * WEST VIRGINIA 88.1 94.7 6.6 * WISCONSIN 94.8 96.3 1.5 WYOMING 89.7 98.2 8.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
    • Telephone Service1 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service2 Year 95.8 95.6 1 Housing Unit penetration statistics are from the U.S. Census Bureau's Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Part 2, page 783 (1920 - 1970); the decennial censuses (1980 - 2000); and the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year estimates (2001 - 2010). 97.7 95.7 97.5 2 Household penetration data (1990 - 2010) are annual averages from the U.S. Census based on the Current Population Survey. For 2011, July CPS data are used. 4 At the time of publication, 2011 ACS statistics were not available. 3 Errata #53: released April 12, 2010, regarding 2008 ACS 1-year and 2006-2008 ACS 3-year estimates for household kitchen facilities and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.txt
    • 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,891,134 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 396,761,258 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 99.2 Italy $32,470,005 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 96.7 $8,131,637 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $39,099,750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 818,950,600 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 Liechtenstein $2,064,776 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 99.3 $772 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $7,471 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.2 7,661,264 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3 97.5 Luxembourg $1,510,384 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 $366,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,104,760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 57,007,671 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 Malta $830,676 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 97.7 $37,334 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,60316.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.1 6,915,471 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 92.5 Netherlands $23,424,030 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 99.6 $1,594,086 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $12,116,320 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
    • 54.522 1/3/11 Revised the Amateur Radio Service rules to clarify the rules with respect to amateur service vanity call signs, eliminating licensee confusion. 0.191(o) 0.392(g) 2/14/11 Eliminated restrictions on Amateur Radio Service: eliminated the automatic power control provision which has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311(d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminated outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 76.1613 9/9/11 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
    • condition. Qualcomm selected the 34 dB-Hz level as it represented a value exceeded in 5% of the test cases for within building applications. The UWB signal was then input to the GPS receiver and the location accuracy determined as a function of UWB signal level. For dithered (noise-like) UWB signals the 50th percentile position accuracy increased to 50 m at -97.5 dBm/2 MHz or -100.5dBm/MHz. This interference level is 9.5dB above receiver noise (I/N = 9.5dB). However, our requirement for E-911 performance includes a specification for 95% of the calls. Using the Qualcomm cumulative distribution plots for C/N0, a value that would be exceeded in 95% of the cases can be determined. This value is 22.5 dB-Hz and is 11.5 dB
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-01A1.txt
    • with his work. It is, therefore, concluded that Mr. Schoenbohm has not been involved in any significant wrongdoing since the occurrence of the misconduct for which he lost his licenses. 28. In its PFCs, the Bureau contends that Mr. Schoenbohm's operation of Mr. Reichlyn's station during the October 2001 amateur contest violated Section 301 of the Communications Act and Sections 97.5 and 97.7 of the Commission's Rules because Mr. Schoenbohm did not have a license to transmit and was not otherwise authorized to operate the station. Bureau PFCs at 15-16. Thus, the Bureau argues that Mr. Schoenbohm had physical control of the station and that, ``even though Mr. Reichlyn was present or nearby and able to supervise Mr. Schoenbohm, . .
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
    • ATC transmitter but elevated the appropriate amount above the horizon and the ATC transmitter. Table 3.2.C - Interference Analysis to Space Research Earth Stations SR/SO Earth Stations Units ATC BS ATC AT Frequency (GHz) 2.2 2.2 Range (km) 0.82 0.09 ATC Transmitter Out-of-Band Power (dBW/4kHz) -100.6 -119.6 Bandwidth Ratio (dB) 36.0 36.0 ATC Emission (dBW/Hz) -136.6 -155.6 Propagation Loss (dB/m2) -97.5 -78.5 Interference Power (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Normalized Interference Level (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Margin (dB) 0.0 0.0 Table 3.2.C shows that a separation distance of 820 m is required to protect the space operations receiver from an ATC BS. If the ATC system is limited to the Forward Link mode of operations there would be no MTs adjacent to the 2200-2290
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
    • ATC transmitter but elevated the appropriate amount above the horizon and the ATC transmitter. Table 3.2.C - Interference Analysis to Space Research Earth Stations SR/SO Earth Stations Units ATC BS ATC AT Frequency (GHz) 2.2 2.2 Range (km) 0.82 0.09 ATC Transmitter Out-of-Band Power (dBW/4kHz) -100.6 -119.6 Bandwidth Ratio (dB) 36.0 36.0 ATC Emission (dBW/Hz) -136.6 -155.6 Propagation Loss (dB/m2) -97.5 -78.5 Interference Power (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Normalized Interference Level (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Margin (dB) 0.0 0.0 Table 3.2.C shows that a separation distance of 820 m is required to protect the space operations receiver from an ATC BS. If the ATC system is limited to the Forward Link mode of operations there would be no MTs adjacent to the 2200-2290
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.pdf
    • the Reference Book demonstrates that a log-logistic distribution, rather than a normal distribution, best fits the data. In this log-logistic distribution, approximately 96 percent of the total area under the log-logistic curve (and, therefore, 96 percent of urban rates) is to the left (i.e., below) the average plus two standard deviations. In contrast, if the data were normally distributed, approximately 97.5 percent of the total area under the normal curve would be to the left of the average plus two standard deviations. The average urban rate plus three standard deviations is also normally a better estimate of the highest urban rate nationwide than the highest rate shown in the Reference Book's survey. Recommended Decision, 17 FCC Rcd at 20738, para. 53.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
    • stations. Discussion. We agree that placing these operating limitations in our Rules would increase their availability to all amateur station licensees. Accordingly, we believe that inserting these limitations into our Rules is a reasonable manner to make these limitations known. For these reasons, we propose to amend Section 97.303(g)(1) as the ARRL requests. Color Coded Amateur Radio Licenses Background. Section 97.5 of our Rules sets forth the various types of amateur service station license grants we issue. We print amateur service license documents for the different types of station licenses and the different classes of operator licenses on the same license form using an automated process. On December 10, 2002, Mr. Dale E. Reich asked that we issue color-coded amateur radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-178A1.txt
    • Rcd 7293, 7300 � 11 (2004)). As the ARRL notes, the Phone Band Expansion R&O did not delete 3620-3635 kHz from the frequencies on which Section 97.221(b) authorizes operation of automatically controlled digital stations, which further indicates that the Commission did not intend to reduce the spectrum available for such operations. See ARRL Petition at 10. See 47 C.F.R � 97.5(d). See Biennial Regulatory Review -- Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21027, 21103 (1998); see also 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(d). See 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-181A1.txt
    • pleading was submitted. By simplifying and expediting how users file pleadings, the burdens and costs of filing have been reduced. These improvements are of particular benefit to entrepreneurs and other small businesses. WTB continually works with the public and the industry to identify areas for improvement and to further facilitate and encourage electronic filing. As a result of WTB's efforts, 97.5 percent of all applications were filed electronically, and 72.1 percent of those were processed automatically in 2006. WTB also continues to maintain its website in a manner that provides online access to all released documents, Public Notices, and the current auction schedule (including maps and channel band plans). Small businesses benefit from this approach by on-line access to information about
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-90A1.txt
    • percent replication. The licensee states that the width of the towers blocks the stations' signals from correctly propagating. KHAS-DT is providing 46.9 percent coverage and KNOP-DT is providing 51.2 percent coverage. The licensee of KJRH-DT, Tulsa, Oklahoma, WCPO-DT, Cincinnati, Ohio, WEWS-DT, Cleveland, Ohio, WMAR-DT, Baltimore, Maryland, and WXYZ-DT, Detroit, Michigan, states that it is currently providing 96.4 percent, 98.4 percent, 97.5 percent, 97.2 percent and 98.5 percent coverage, respectively, from the stations' side-mounted DTV facilities. The licensee states that it cannot move its DTV antennas to their final positions because the analog antennas are currently located there. The licensee predicts that relocating the analog antenna to a lower location would result in a loss of service to 191,158 persons for KJRH-DT,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-265A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-265A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-265A2.txt
    • 0 R/TT1 1360 0 R/TT2 1369 0 R/TT3 1361 0 R/TT4 1321 0 R/C2_0 1323 0 R>>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> endobj 469 0 obj[470 0 R 471 0 R 472 0 R 473 0 R 474 0 R 475 0 R 476 0 R] endobj 470 0 obj<>/A 478 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 471 0 obj< 494.906 120.632 507.0]/Subtype/Link/BS<>/A 479 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 472 0 obj<>/A 480 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 473 0 obj<>/A 481 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 474 0 obj<>/A 482 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0 0]/Type/Annot>> endobj 475 0 obj<>/A 483 0 R/H/I/Border[0 0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.txt
    • as paragraphs (a)(28) through (a)(50), and adding a new paragraph (a)(27) to read as follows: � 97.3 Definitions. (a) * * * (27) In-law. A parent or stepparent of a licensee's spouse; a licensee's spouse's sibling; the spouse of a licensee's spouse's sibling; or the spouse of a licensee's sibling, child, or stepchild. * * * * * 3. Section 97.5 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows: � 97.5 Station license required. * * * * * (b) * * * (2) A club station license grant. A club station license grant may be held only by the person who is the license trustee designated by an officer of the club. The trustee must be a person
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.txt
    • 13,428 15,060 22,804 11,503 178 85,865 102,043 Percentages aDSL 3.9 8.1 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 32.5 * 1.6 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 12.3 55.1 8.7 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-189A1.txt
    • the club license and call sign, or refusing to agree to a change in trustee" and "address instances in which a trustee becomes incapacitated." We also amend Section 97.21 to provide that other applications on behalf of the club may be submitted to the CSCSA only by the trustee listed in the Commission's licensing database. In addition, we amend Section 97.5(b)(2) to permit Novice Class licensees to serve as club station trustees. The only objection in the record to permitting Novice Class licensees to serve as club station trustees is that they do not have operating privileges on bands which are used by many amateur radio repeater stations. We conclude, however, that this is not a reason to prohibit them from
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-1A1.txt
    • FCC Registration Numbers (FRNs) and applying for a vanity call sign under each FRN. As explained below, we do not believe that the vanity call sign system is subject to the abuses identified by the ARRL or that its suggested rule changes are necessary. First, we note that a club may have only one license trustee at a time. Section 97.5(b)(2) of our Rules states, in part, ``A club station license grant may be held only by the person who is the license trustee designated by an officer of the club.'' Consequently, we believe that Section 97.19(a), which provides that ``the person named in a club station license grant that shows on the license a call sign that was selected by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-1A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the Amateur Service Rules Governing Vanity and Club Station Call Signs, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 09-209, 25 FCC Rcd 16351, 16358�� 27-28 (2010) (Report and Order). 2See American Radio Relay League, Inc., Petition for Partial Reconsideration (filed Jan. 13, 2011) (ARRL Petition). The ARRL Petition was placed on public notice. No comments were received. 3See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.5(b)(1), (2); 97.17(d). 447 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). 5Id. 619 Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-1 equitable and administratively efficient. Among other rule changes, the Commission amended the rules to limit club stations to holding only one vanity call sign6and to limit an individual to being the trustee for only one club station license.7The purpose of these rule changes was to prevent club
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.txt
    • are unaware that the unauthorized charges are on their telephone bills. One investigation by the Vermont Attorney General revealed that 89.5 percent of the third-party charges on Vermont consumers' telephone bills were unauthorized. In a different investigation by the New York Attorney General, none of the cramming victims contacted reported authorizing the subject charges, 2.5 percent reported being unsure, and 97.5 percent reported that they did not authorize the charges. The New York Attorney General reports that even one of the telephone companies that billed the crammed charges to its consumers had the same crammed charges billed to its own lines, but did not discover that it, like its consumers, was a victim of cramming until the Attorney General's investigation. In
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
    • example, in response to Sprint's allegation that it has experienced "ongoing" problems with loops, BellSouth asserts that between January 2, 1998 and August 14, 1998, only 1.3 percent of unbundled loops provided to Sprint had problems resulting in missed due dates. BellSouth adds that during this same period it met 91 percent of its due dates. Moreover, BellSouth claims that 97.5 percent of unbundled loop cutovers for Sprint were completed within the expected time interval.646 BellSouth's affiant, however, simply presents these figures without any supporting documentation or analysis to allow the Commission, or other third-party observer, to verify the numbers. 5. Checklist Item 5 -- Unbundled Local Transport a. Background 201.Section 271(c)(2)(B)(v) of the competitive checklist requires a BOC to provide
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
    • see Department of Justice Texas I Evaluation at 38-39, we note that SWBT's performance has been satisfactory in this calendar year, notwithstanding considerably heightened order volumes. For December 1999 to April 2000, SWBT returned 85.8, 96.2, 98.4, 98.1 and 98.8 percent of confirmation notices on orders for stand-alone loops sumbitted via EDI within 5 hours, with corresponding LEX performance at 97.5, 97.5, 92.9, 98.1 and 97.6 hours. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 5 (``Percent FOCs Received Within `X' Hours - Mechanized'') (UNE Loop 1-49) at 271-No. 5b and 5d. Although SWBT's performance in this area was slightly below the benchmark for EDI in December 1999 and for LEX in February 2000, we note that it surpassed the benchmark for
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
    • 50.0 175.0 3633 629 3028 618 0.4 0.1 100.0 AZ TUCSON 40 42 50.0 619.0 15188 673 13979 672 0.2 0.0 100.0 AZ YUMA 11 41 962.3 493.0 34473 233 33353 232 0.0 0.0 99.9 AZ YUMA 13 16 509.7 475.0 28059 231 26438 229 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 75.1 728.0 19805 11348 19520 11398 0.8 0.4 97.5 CA ARCATA 23 22 50.0 510.0 12225 112 11147 99 0.1 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 17 25 285.1 427.0 17512 545 17028 507 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 23 10 4.6 1128.0 22757 671 20817 611 1.0 0.0 99.9 CA BAKERSFIELD 29 33 70.1 1137.0 15846 538 15051 472 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 45 55 245.8 404.0 16271 562
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
    • 0.0 100.0 COPUEBLO 5 27 1000.0 396.0 31224 589 31495 580 0.5 0.0 93.6 COPUEBLO 8 29 372.2 727.0 30440 1364 26336 621 0.0 0.0 99.6 COSTEAMBOATSPRIN24 10 3.2 157.0 1891 12 1499 11 0.0 0.0 100.0 COSTERLING 3 23 1000.0 232.0 26327 71 22797 62 0.0 0.0 100.0 CTBRIDGEPORT 43 42 50.0 156.0 9657 2661 9725 2690 3.1 4.2 97.5 CTBRIDGEPORT 49 52 50.0 222.0 9997 3173 9696 3157 6.6 10.6 97.4 CTHARTFORD 3 11 39.5 276.0 24733 3789 24528 3874 0.0 0.0 95.5 CTHARTFORD 18 46 210.1 299.0 18530 3283 17364 3156 6.2 6.3 97.2 CTHARTFORD 24 32 50.0 262.0 13189 2859 11674 2651 11.5 11.2 98.9 CTHARTFORD 61 5 1.0 515.0 23206 3738 23113 3795 8.1 10.9 87.3
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
    • 50.0 175.0 3633 629 3028 618 0.4 0.1 100.0 AZ TUCSON 40 42 50.0 619.0 15188 673 13979 672 0.2 0.0 100.0 AZ YUMA 11 41 962.3 493.0 34473 233 33353 232 0.0 0.0 99.9 AZ YUMA 13 16 509.7 475.0 28059 231 26438 229 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 75.1 728.0 19805 11348 19520 11398 0.8 0.4 97.5 CA ARCATA 23 22 50.0 510.0 12225 112 11147 99 0.1 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 17 25 285.1 427.0 17512 545 17028 507 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 23 10 4.6 1128.0 22757 671 20817 611 1.0 0.0 99.9 CA BAKERSFIELD 29 33 70.1 1137.0 15846 538 15051 472 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 45 55 245.8 404.0 16271 562
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
    • 50.0 175.0 3633 629 3028 618 0.6 0.1 100.0 AZ TUCSON 40 42 50.0 619.0 15188 673 13979 672 0.2 0.0 100.0 AZ YUMA 11 41 962.3 493.0 34473 233 33353 232 0.0 0.0 99.9 AZ YUMA 13 16 509.7 475.0 28059 231 26438 229 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 75.1 728.0 19805 11348 19520 11398 0.8 0.4 97.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-5 CA ARCATA 23 22 50.0 510.0 12225 112
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
    • Commission's Rules Concerning the Inspection of Radio Installations on Large Cargo 138 and Small Passenger Ships, CI Docket No. 95-55, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 17165 (1996). Currently examination managers may submit applications for examinees or other individuals. This service, 139 however, is a non-regulated service, separate from their activities as an examination manager. See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.5(c)(2), 97.7(b). 140 34 aboard U.S. vessels. Because of the critical, safety-related responsibilities of license holders, the 138 Commission must ensure that only qualified individuals receive a Commercial Radio Operator license. 90. We seek comment on ways for the Commission to automate the verification of applicants' PPCs. One alternative would be for examination managers to electronically file with the Commission data
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-238456A1.html
    • 101 26' 47''W, a disparity of approximately six seconds of latitude and 33 seconds of longitude (a distance of approximately 2100 feet). b. 47 C.F.R. 17.50: Antenna structures requiring painting under this part shall be cleaned or repainted as often as necessary to maintain good visibility (of the required bands of paint). Antenna structure registration 1217597 lists the structure as 97.5 meters in height with a requirement to be painted and lit in accordance with FCC paragraphs 1, 3, 12, and 21. VIOLATION: On May 29, 2003, you had failed to repaint this structure as often as necessary to maintain good visibility. The painting on this antenna structure was extremely deteriorated reducing the visibility of the structure and obscuring the bands
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3305A1.html
    • District Office (``Kansas City Office'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to AAT for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000).2 AAT's response to the NAL was received on April 7, 2003. II. BACKGROUND 3. AAT is the registered owner of a tower with antenna structure registration (``ASR'') number 1005728 that is 319.88 feet (97.5 meters) above ground level and 1274.93 feet (388.6 meters) above mean sea level. The structure's registration includes a requirement that it be painted in alternating bands of aviation orange and white. 4. On January 13, 2003, a Kansas City Office agent inspected the tower in question, ASR No. 1005728. The structure had chipped and faded paint and was partially obscured
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1486A1.html
    • MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200732700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, January 24, 2007) ("NAL"). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S 1.80. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D). 47 C.F.R. S 2.106. 47 C.F.R. S 97.5(a). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/da97-2568.html
    • 100.000 247C1 97.3 KMXC SIOUX FALLS SD LIC BLH780815AE 43-35-48.0 96-38-20.0 No 60.000 67. 100.000 247A 97.3 KMLD CASPER WY CP BPH950103MB 42-44-37.0 106-18-26.0 No 0.090 551. 0.180 8-DEC-97 06:40:26 List of Fully Spaced FM Facilities Able to Increase Power Page: 00007 Chan Int. Freq Call City St Status File Latitude Longitude Border 73.215 Old ERP HAAT New ERP 248A 97.5 WUFFFM EASTMAN GA LIC BMLH930527KD 32-13-35.0 83-13-10.0 No 2.000 113. 4.700 248C1 97.5 KPOIFM HONOLULU HI LIC BLH820713AC 21-17-37.0 157-50-32.0 No 80.000 14. 100.000 248B1 97.5 WBBAFM PITTSFIELD IL LIC BLH890821KE 39-34-53.0 90-47-52.0 No 10.000 93. 25.000 248C1 97.5 KNLR BEND OR LIC BLH850114LW 44-04-38.0 121-19-49.0 No 97.000 163. 100.000 248C1 97.5 KDLY LANDER WY LIC BLH800226AA 42-49-20.0 108-45-48.0 No
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files09/CREPOR09.pdf
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $105,247 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 38,134,705 0.0 4.4 20.9 0.0 74.7 Tunisia $12,805,222 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 97.4 $376,658 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,172 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 56,073,480 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 96.4 Uganda $9,202,314 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 98.0 $293,907 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $629,208 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 81,964,353 0.0 0.1 2.5 0.0 97.5 Western Sahara $64,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $0 166,963 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 Zaire $20,265,211 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $530,816 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,735,375 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 45,804,615 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 Zambia $2,885,971 0.0 0.0 22.1 0.0 77.8 $66,582 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2,100,839 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 27,999,619 0.0 0.0 33.5 0.0 66.5 Zimbabwe $10,980,538
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files10/CREPOR10.pdf
    • 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,891,134 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 396,761,258 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 99.2 Italy $32,470,005 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 96.7 $8,131,637 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $39,099,750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 818,950,600 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 Liechtenstein $2,064,776 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 99.3 $772 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $7,471 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.2 7,661,264 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3 97.5 Luxembourg $1,510,384 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 $366,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,104,760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 57,007,671 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 Malta $830,676 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 97.7 $37,334 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,60316.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.1 6,915,471 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 92.5 Netherlands $23,424,030 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 99.6 $1,594,086 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $12,116,320 0.0
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
    • 14 43.8 n/a 96.4 Mar-00 83 33 14 14 41.377.192.4 Mar-01 85 35 16 14 40.075.592.2 Charleston SC Mar-96 87 27 17 9 22.6n/a 65.1 Nov-97 91 27 15 9 32.8n/a 77.8 Nov-98 97 28 14 9 44.5 n/a 87.6 Mar-00 87 28 15 11 46.777.593.5 Mar-01 86 28 13 10 49.479.194.5 Stockton CA Mar-96 85 10 5 7 58.0n/a 97.5 Nov-97 85 10 6 6 29.7n/a 84.8 Nov-98 84 10 5 6 34.4 n/a 95.1 Mar-00 85 10 5 5 37.974.096.6 Mar-01 87 9 5 6 41.169.5100.0 Wichita KS Mar-96 91 23 9 11 29.3n/a 83.6 Nov-97 90 23 10 11 37.3n/a 91.3 Nov-98 89 23 9 11 36.3 n/a 93.4 Mar-00 84 25 12 12 42.965.592.7 Mar-01 88 25
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
    • known as "satellite-to-home") were comprised mostly of home satellite dish systems in the C-Band. As Table 24 shows, in 1990, there were approximately 760,000 C-Band subscribers.85 By year-end 2001, however, there were less than one million home satellite C-Band subscribers left, but Table 24: Direct-to-Home Subscribers and Cable Subscribers 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2010p Total Households(1) (mil) 87.6 94.8 97.5 104.1 107.4123.3 TV Households(1) (mil) 85.9 93.1 95.9 102.2 105.5121.1 Cable Subscribers (mil.) 36.7 51.7 62.1 68.5 68.6 74.3 Satellite Subscribers (mil.) 0.0 0.8 4.6 16.0 18.7 27.0 C-Band Subscribers(2) (mil) 0.0 0.8(3) 2.4 1.2 0.8 0.0 DBS Subscribers (mil) 0.0 0.0 2.2 14.8 17.9 27.0 Satellite + Cable Subscribers (mil) 36.7 52.5 66.7 84.5 87.3 101.3 Satellite Subs/TVHH (%)
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da010036.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da010036.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da010036.txt
    • System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Report and Order, WT Docket 98-20, 13 FCC Rcd 21027, 21105-06 � 181 (1998), on recon., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 11476 (1999). No new RACES station licenses will be issued and a RACES station license will not be renewed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.17(a), 97.21(a)(3)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(4). See FCC Begins Accepting Applications for Amateur Service Club and Military Recreation Station Call Sign Administrators, Public Notice, DA 99-3018 (WTB rel. Jan. 3, 2000). See Letter dated March 1, 2000, from The American Radio Relay League, Inc.; Letter dated March 1, 2000, from W4VEC, Volunteer Examiners Club of America;
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=about_1&id=amateur
    • to maximize coverage; and + Where the schedule of normal operating times and frequencies is published at least 30 days in advance of the actual transmissions; and + Where the control operator does not accept any direct or indirect compensation for any other service as a control operator. Note that control operators of other types of stations (refer to [88]Section 97.5) transmitting telegraphy practice or information bulletins may not accept compensation. [89]Return to Top Arrow Return To Top Operations in Emergencies Q: Is it correct that my station must not transmit analog voice emissions on the HF band digital emission segments even during an emergency? Yes. The [90]Rules, including the analog/digital emission exclusive segments, are carefully designed to provide an amateur
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=call_signs_3&id=amateur&page=2
    • and RACES stations are not eligible to request a vanity call sign. Q: May the same call sign be assigned to more than one station? A. No. Q: Can I obtain more than one vanity call sign for my primary station? A. No. [55]Section 97.19(a) provides for only one vanity call sign for each operator/primary station license grant and [56]Section 97.5(b)(1) of the FCC's Rules limits you to one primary station license grant. Q: Can we obtain an additional vanity call sign for our club station? A. No. A club requesting a vanity call sign after Feb. 14, 2011 may hold only one vanity call sign grant. A club that has been assigned more than one vanity call sign must surrender
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=licensing_1&id=amateur
    • a club station license, a club must have: 1. A name 2. A document of organization 3. Management 4. A primary purpose devoted to amateur service activities consistent with the FCC Rules 5. At least four persons 6. A license trustee designated by an officer of the club 7. Trustee must hold an amateur service operator license grant. ([45]See Section 97.5(b)(2) of the FCC Rules) Obtaining a Club Station License A club may apply for a club station license grant by filing with a Club Station Call Sign Administrator (CSCSA), an amateur radio organization that has agreed to provide voluntary, uncompensated and unreimbursed services for processing applications. If you are an amateur radio operator and would like to obtain a club
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
    • example, in response to Sprint's allegation that it has experienced "ongoing" problems with loops, BellSouth asserts that between January 2, 1998 and August 14, 1998, only 1.3 percent of unbundled loops provided to Sprint had problems resulting in missed due dates. BellSouth adds that during this same period it met 91 percent of its due dates. Moreover, BellSouth claims that 97.5 percent of unbundled loop cutovers for Sprint were completed within the expected time interval.646 BellSouth's affiant, however, simply presents these figures without any supporting documentation or analysis to allow the Commission, or other third-party observer, to verify the numbers. 5. Checklist Item 5 -- Unbundled Local Transport a. Background 201.Section 271(c)(2)(B)(v) of the competitive checklist requires a BOC to provide
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
    • see Department of Justice Texas I Evaluation at 38-39, we note that SWBT's performance has been satisfactory in this calendar year, notwithstanding considerably heightened order volumes. For December 1999 to April 2000, SWBT returned 85.8, 96.2, 98.4, 98.1 and 98.8 percent of confirmation notices on orders for stand-alone loops sumbitted via EDI within 5 hours, with corresponding LEX performance at 97.5, 97.5, 92.9, 98.1 and 97.6 hours. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 5 (``Percent FOCs Received Within `X' Hours - Mechanized'') (UNE Loop 1-49) at 271-No. 5b and 5d. Although SWBT's performance in this area was slightly below the benchmark for EDI in December 1999 and for LEX in February 2000, we note that it surpassed the benchmark for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd0603.pdf
    • 99.1 50-60 $32,122 to $34,743 71.2 78.2 87.1 95.9 97.6 98.9 40-50 $29,893 to $32,121 67.4 75.5 85.6 94.5 96.8 98.5 30-40 $27,542 to $29,892 66.9 75.2 85.4 93.8 96.5 98.3 20-30 $24,855 to $27,541 65.1 71.8 83.2 93.1 95.6 98.1 10-20 $21,645 to $24,855 61.2 70.0 83.1 91.1 95.0 97.9 0-10 $0 to $21,644 54.9 62.7 74.5 91.5 95.1 97.5 Dec 2001 Dec 2002 High-Speed Subscribership Ranked by Household Income (Over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction) Dec 2001 Percent of Population in Decile that Resides in Zip Codes with High-Speed Service Dec 2002 Percent of Zip Codes in Decile with at Least One High-Speed Subscriber Median Household Income (In Each Decile of Zip Codes) Deciles (Blocks of Zip
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd0604.pdf
    • kbps in at Least One Direction) Table 13 More Number of Providers Zero One Four Five Dec 2003 More Than 3,147 98.2% 98.1% 98.7% 98.9% 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 947-3,147 97.1 97.3 98.2 98.5 99.8 99.7 100.0 99.9 268-947 95.7 95.8 97.9 98.8 99.3 99.5 99.9 100.0 118-268 91.5 93.3 96.7 97.9 98.1 99.1 99.7 99.8 67-118 85.9 89.3 95.0 97.5 95.0 97.1 99.1 99.7 41-67 76.1 83.3 91.5 96.0 87.9 94.4 97.8 99.0 25-41 65.0 73.1 87.6 92.6 80.0 87.6 95.6 97.7 15-25 50.1 61.2 77.8 88.0 69.4 80.4 90.8 95.7 6-15 38.5 52.1 69.4 82.7 61.9 76.2 86.4 93.2 Fewer Than 6 27.5 43.3 59.7 73.5 49.9 67.9 80.9 88.9 Dec 2003 $53,494 to $291,938 96.1% 96.8% 98.3% 98.7%
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd0705.pdf
    • of Providers Zero One Four Five Dec 2003 Dec 2004 More Than 3,147 98.2% 98.1% 98.7% 98.9% 99.1% 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 947-3,147 97.1 97.3 98.2 98.5 98.7 99.8 99.7 100.0 99.9 99.9 268-947 95.7 95.8 97.9 98.8 99.1 99.3 99.5 99.9 100.0 100.0 118-268 91.5 93.3 96.7 97.9 98.2 98.1 99.1 99.7 99.8 99.8 67-118 85.9 89.3 95.0 97.5 98.0 95.0 97.1 99.1 99.7 99.7 41-67 76.1 83.3 91.5 96.0 97.5 87.9 94.4 97.8 99.0 99.3 25-41 65.0 73.1 87.6 92.6 95.5 80.0 87.6 95.6 97.7 98.5 15-25 50.1 61.2 77.8 88.0 91.4 69.4 80.4 90.8 95.7 96.8 6-15 38.5 52.1 69.4 82.7 86.2 61.9 76.2 86.4 93.2 95.0 Fewer Than 6 27.5 43.3 59.7 73.5 74.8 49.9 67.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1202.pdf
    • Two Three Eight Nine Percentage of Zip Codes with High-Speed Lines in Service as of June 30, 2002 (Over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction) Table 10 More Number of Providers Zero One Four Five Jun 2000 90-100 More Than 3,147 97.3% 98.1% 98.7% 99.7% 99.9% 99.8% 80-90 947-3,147 95.8 97.1 98.2 99.4 99.8 99.9 70-80 268-947 93.4 95.6 97.5 98.4 99.5 99.9 60-70 118-268 86.7 92.3 95.2 95.9 98.8 99.5 50-60 67-118 77.9 87.5 93.0 90.2 96.8 98.5 40-50 41-67 65.4 80.9 88.0 81.2 93.0 96.3 30-40 25-41 54.5 72.8 81.0 71.4 87.3 92.2 20-30 15-25 39.2 58.9 70.0 59.9 78.4 86.5 10-20 6-15 31.3 51.1 60.9 56.6 74.6 81.9 0-10 Fewer Than 6 23.0 36.8 49.6 43.9 60.7
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1203.pdf
    • High-Speed Lines in Service as of June 30, 2003 (Over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction) Table 13 More Number of Providers Zero One Four Five Six Ten or Seven Two Three Eight Nine Jun 2003 More Than 3,147 97.3% 98.1% 98.7% 98.9% 99.7% 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 947-3,147 95.8 97.1 98.2 98.2 99.4 99.8 99.9 99.9 268-947 93.4 95.6 97.5 98.4 98.4 99.5 99.9 99.9 118-268 86.7 92.3 95.2 96.9 95.9 98.8 99.5 99.7 67-118 77.9 87.5 93.0 96.4 90.2 96.8 98.5 99.4 41-67 65.4 80.9 88.0 93.8 81.2 93.0 96.3 98.5 25-41 54.5 72.8 81.0 90.4 71.4 87.3 92.2 96.9 15-25 39.2 58.9 70.0 83.3 59.9 78.4 86.5 93.3 6-15 31.3 51.1 60.9 77.3 56.6 74.6 81.9 90.3 Fewer
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1204.pdf
    • June 30, 2004 (Over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction) Table 13 More Number of Providers Zero One Four Five Six Ten or Seven Two Three Eight Nine Jun 2003 Jun 2004 More Than 3,147 97.3% 98.1% 98.7% 98.9% 98.9% 99.7% 99.9% 99.8% 100.0% 99.9% 947-3,147 95.8 97.1 98.2 98.2 98.5 99.4 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.9 268-947 93.4 95.6 97.5 98.4 98.5 98.4 99.5 99.9 99.9 99.9 118-268 86.7 92.3 95.2 96.9 97.7 95.9 98.8 99.5 99.7 99.8 67-118 77.9 87.5 93.0 96.4 97.6 90.2 96.8 98.5 99.4 99.6 41-67 65.4 80.9 88.0 93.8 96.4 81.2 93.0 96.3 98.5 99.1 25-41 54.5 72.8 81.0 90.4 94.3 71.4 87.3 92.2 96.9 98.2 15-25 39.2 58.9 70.0 83.3 88.5 59.9 78.4 86.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1208_tables.doc
    • 13,479 15,322 22,032 10,790 178 84,442 102,239 Percentages aDSL 3.9 8.1 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 32.5 * 1.7 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 12.5 54.7 8.8 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.4 2.5 0.8 2.9 4.4 15.0 52.6 21.5 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.4 68.3 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 13.1 4.4 17.5 21.1 23.0 25.1 9.4 2.0 1.8 0.2 82.5 100.0 Mobile Wireless 32.1 14.1 46.2 28.8 17.9 6.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
    • 94.0 99.2 March 106.1 98.9 105.1 94.4 93.1 98.5 April 106.2 98.6 105.2 93.7 92.4 97.8 May 106.3 98.5 105.3 93.4 92.0 97.6 June 106.9 97.2 105.8 90.6 89.0 95.0 July 107.1 98.2 107.3 91.3 89.8 95.7 August 107.1 98.9 109.5 90.7 89.2 95.1 September 107.7 97.0 108.5 87.9 86.2 92.0 October 107.9 98.3 109.8 89.4 87.9 92.9 November 107.9 97.5 110.3 87.2 85.0 91.9 2/ Series began in December 1997. BLS Series ID All Items CUUR0000SA0 CUUR0000SEED Local Telephone Services 1/ Series revised in December 1997. Current and previous series are not comparable. Intrastate Long Distance Services CUUR0000SS27061 CUUR0000SE270A Table 26 Interstate Long Distance Services CUUR0000SS27051 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Indices (December 1997 = 100) Telephone Services
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
    • 98.5 97.7 98.6 98.6 $40,000 or more 98.1 99.1 99.0 99.1 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
    • 98.5 97.7 98.6 98.6 $40,000 or more 98.1 99.1 99.0 99.1 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
    • $40,000 or more 98.1 99.1 99.0 99.1 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 99.3 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
    • $40,000 or more 98.1 99.1 99.0 99.1 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 99.3 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
    • 99.1 99.0 99.1 98.5 99.2 98.2 99.1 98.8 99.3 98.9 All Households 92.6 92.6 93.3 94.1 94.7 95.0 94.7 95.1 95.0 95.2 94.8 Colorado $9,999 or less 86.9 93.0 85.9 85.2 82.8 90.0 86.1 80.3 86.9 90.7 91.6 $10,000 - $19,999 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 94.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
    • 3.7 7.2 3.5 5.5 Total Local Competitors 1,546.3 5,081.0 1,694.1 1,790.2 5.7 1,762.9 1.5 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,492.5 18,956.8 4,718.8 4,768.5 1.1 4,704.2 1.3 Payphone Service Providers 22.8 47.7 4.4 4.5 1.4 4.5 0.0 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,615.5 29,426.2 7,686.3 8,180.0 6.4 8,023.7 1.9 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 10.9 97.5 12.3 11.8 -4.1 11.6 1.3 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 2.0 7.8 * * 58.3 * 65.7 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 3.5 16.1 1.2 2.2 81.2 2.2 2.1 Providers Wireless Service Providers 1,631.9 29,547.5 7,700.1 8,194.5 6.4 8,037.7 1.9 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 2,581.9 6,791.1 5,068.1 4,866.9 -4.0 4,811.7 1.1 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 16.9 231.7 45.5 49.0 7.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
    • 93.2 87.3 83.3 95.8 88.7 October 93.4 88.4 84.0 97.3 90.1 November 93.7 89.1 85.4 97.3 89.9 December 94.0 89.8 86.0 97.3 91.4 1982January 94.3 90.0 85.8 97.4 93.2 February 94.6 90.4 86.7 97.3 93.1 March 94.5 90.8 86.9 98.2 93.0 April 94.9 92.1 88.5 100.0 93.0 May 95.8 92.6 89.2 100.1 93.3 June 97.0 93.5 90.7 99.8 93.7 July 97.5 93.8 91.2 99.8 93.9 August 97.7 94.0 91.6 99.8 93.9 September 97.9 94.8 92.9 99.8 94.0 October 98.2 95.2 93.5 99.8 94.2 November 98.0 95.4 93.6 99.8 94.8 December 97.6 96.3 95.3 99.8 95.2 1983January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May 99.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
    • 93.9 September 100.7 101.4 100.4 100.0 101.4 94.1 October 100.7 101.5 100.4 100.0 101.6 93.7 November 101.1 101.6 101.0 100.8 102.1 92.4 December 100.3 101.3 99.9 99.2 101.5 91.7 1999January 100.7 102.2 99.9 99.3 101.3 90.9 February 100.4 102.0 99.5 99.1 100.7 89.7 March 100.2 102.3 98.9 98.4 100.3 89.0 April 100.0 100.9 99.8 99.5 100.7 87.8 May 99.6 102.7 97.5 96.4 100.2 85.8 June 99.7 103.2 97.4 96.3 100.2 84.0 July 99.5 103.7 96.7 95.3 100.0 82.9 August 99.8 103.8 97.1 95.9 99.8 82.3 September 99.6 103.7 96.8 95.9 99.2 82.6 October 99.8 103.5 97.4 96.9 98.8 82.0 November 100.6 103.9 98.7 99.1 99.2 81.2 December 100.7 104.2 98.6 98.5 99.9 81.1 2000January 100.9 104.8 98.5 98.3 100.1 80.6 February
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
    • Telephone Services Local Telephone Service Long Distance Charges Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service Wireless Telephone Services CUUR0000SA0 CUUR0000SEED CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SEED02 CUUR0000SS27051 CUUR0000SS27061 CUUR0000SEED03 1999January 101.9 100.7 102.2 99.9 99.3 101.3 90.9 February 102.0 100.4 102.0 99.5 99.1 100.7 89.7 March 102.3 100.2 102.3 98.9 98.4 100.3 89.0 April 103.0 100.0 100.9 99.8 99.5 100.7 87.8 May 103.0 99.6 102.7 97.5 96.4 100.2 85.8 June 103.0 99.7 103.2 97.4 96.3 100.2 84.0 July 103.3 99.5 103.7 96.7 95.3 100.0 82.9 August 103.6 99.8 103.8 97.1 95.9 99.8 82.3 September 104.1 99.6 103.7 96.8 95.9 99.2 82.6 October 104.3 99.8 103.5 97.4 96.9 98.8 82.0 November 104.3 100.6 103.9 98.7 99.1 99.2 81.2 December 104.3 100.7 104.2 98.6 98.5 99.9 81.1 2000January
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
    • 98.5 79.2 April 106.2 98.6 105.2 93.7 92.4 97.8 78.9 May 106.3 98.5 105.3 93.4 92.0 97.6 78.2 June 106.9 97.2 105.8 90.6 89.0 95.0 76.8 July 107.1 98.2 107.3 91.3 89.8 95.7 74.9 August 107.1 98.9 109.5 90.7 89.2 95.1 73.7 September 107.7 97.0 108.5 87.9 86.2 92.0 72.8 October 107.9 98.3 109.8 89.4 87.9 92.9 73.0 November 107.9 97.5 110.3 87.2 85.0 91.9 72.9 December 107.9 98.4 110.0 89.5 87.5 93.9 71.1 2001January 108.6 98.8 110.5 89.9 88.0 94.2 68.9 February 109.0 98.7 110.7 89.5 87.6 93.7 68.9 March 109.2 99.4 110.9 90.7 89.0 94.5 68.7 April 109.7 99.0 111.9 89.1 87.2 93.1 68.8 May 110.2 98.7 112.1 88.2 86.2 92.6 68.5 June 110.4 99.0 112.3 88.7 86.7 93.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
    • 93.2 87.3 83.3 95.8 88.7 October 93.4 88.4 84.0 97.3 90.1 November 93.7 89.1 85.4 97.3 89.9 December 94.0 89.8 86.0 97.3 91.4 1982January 94.3 90.0 85.8 97.4 93.2 February 94.6 90.4 86.7 97.3 93.1 March 94.5 90.8 86.9 98.2 93.0 April 94.9 92.1 88.5 100.0 93.0 May 95.8 92.6 89.2 100.1 93.3 June 97.0 93.5 90.7 99.8 93.7 July 97.5 93.8 91.2 99.8 93.9 August 97.7 94.0 91.6 99.8 93.9 September 97.9 94.8 92.9 99.8 94.0 October 98.2 95.2 93.5 99.8 94.2 November 98.0 95.4 93.6 99.8 94.8 December 97.6 96.3 95.3 99.8 95.2 1983January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May 99.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
    • February 94.6 90.4 86.7 97.3 93.1 March 94.5 90.8 86.9 98.2 93.0 72 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100) All Goods & Services Telephone Services Local ServicesInterstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series IdentifierCUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051CUUR0000SS27061 April 94.9 92.1 88.5 100.0 93.0 May 95.8 92.6 89.2 100.1 93.3 June 97.0 93.5 90.7 99.8 93.7 July 97.5 93.8 91.2 99.8 93.9 August 97.7 94.0 91.6 99.8 93.9 September 97.9 94.8 92.9 99.8 94.0 October 98.2 95.2 93.5 99.8 94.2 November 98.0 95.4 93.6 99.8 94.8 December 97.6 96.3 95.3 99.8 95.2 1983 January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
    • 87.3 83.3 95.8 88.7 October 93.4 88.4 84.0 97.3 90.1 November 93.7 89.1 85.4 97.3 89.9 December 94.0 89.8 86.0 97.3 91.4 1982 January 94.3 90.0 85.8 97.4 93.2 February 94.6 90.4 86.7 97.3 93.1 March 94.5 90.8 86.9 98.2 93.0 April 94.9 92.1 88.5 100.0 93.0 May 95.8 92.6 89.2 100.1 93.3 June 97.0 93.5 90.7 99.8 93.7 July 97.5 93.8 91.2 99.8 93.9 August 97.7 94.0 91.6 99.8 93.9 September 97.9 94.8 92.9 99.8 94.0 October 98.2 95.2 93.5 99.8 94.2 November 98.0 95.4 93.6 99.8 94.8 December 97.6 96.3 95.3 99.8 95.2 1983 January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
    • HAMPSHIRE 93.8 1.07 NEW JERSEY 99.8 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.2 1.11 NEW YORK 96.9 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 86.5 1.16 NORTH DAKOTA 62.1 1.61 OHIO 95.3 1.05 OKLAHOMA 88.4 1.13 OREGON 92.0 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 95.6 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.0 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 73.8 1.36 SOUTH DAKOTA 65.5 1.53 TENNESSEE 87.5 1.14 TEXAS 94.2 1.06 UTAH 95.4 1.05 VERMONT 84.7 1.18 VIRGINIA 97.5 1.03 WASHINGTON 93.0 1.07 WEST VIRGINIA 83.5 1.20 WISCONSIN 81.6 1.22 WYOMING 83.4 1.20 UNITED STATES 93.8 1.07 GUAM 0.0 N/A N. MARIANA ISL. 0.0 N/A PUERTO RICO 100.0 1.00 VIRGIN ISLANDS 0.0 N/A GRAND TOTAL 93.7 1.07 FIGURES MAY NOT ADD UP DUE TO ROUNDING. * ACCESS LINES ARE MEASURED USING USF LOOPS. 27 Table 13 Local Exchange Excluding
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0301.pdf
    • July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 91.9% 4.0% Alaska 83.8 96.4 12.6 * Arizona 88.8 94.5 5.8 * Arkansas 88.2 91.6 3.4 California 91.7 96.1 4.4 * Colorado 94.4 96.2 1.8 Connecticut 95.5 95.9 0.4 Delaware 95.0 97.5 2.5 District of Columbia 94.7 95.5 0.8 Florida 85.5 92.0 6.5 * Georgia 88.9 92.2 3.3 * Hawaii 94.6 94.3 -0.3 Idaho 89.5 93.5 4.0 * Illinois 95.0 92.0 -3.0 # Indiana 90.3 93.7 3.4 * Iowa 95.4 97.1 1.7 Kansas 94.9 92.6 -2.3 Kentucky 86.9 93.4 6.5 * Louisiana 88.9 93.4 4.5 * Maine 90.7 97.9 7.2 * Maryland
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0302.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0303.pdf
    • 1.4 Kentucky 86.9 94.0 7.1 * Louisiana 88.9 93.4 4.5 * Maine 90.7 98.0 7.3 * Maryland 96.3 98.5 2.2 Massachusetts 94.3 97.1 2.8 * Michigan 93.8 95.2 1.4 Minnesota 96.4 96.6 0.3 Mississippi 82.4 91.3 8.9 * Missouri 92.1 97.0 4.9 * Montana 92.8 94.2 1.4 Nebraska 94.0 96.5 2.5 * Nevada 89.4 94.9 5.5 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.5 2.6 New Jersey 94.1 96.1 2.0 New Mexico 85.3 93.0 7.7 * New York 90.8 95.3 4.5 * North Carolina 89.3 94.4 5.1 * North Dakota 95.1 94.4 -0.7 Ohio 92.2 96.6 4.4 * Oklahoma 91.5 92.7 1.2 Oregon 91.2 96.7 5.5 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.1 2.0 * Rhode Island 93.3 97.4 4.1 * South Carolina 81.8 93.6 11.8 *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0304.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0305.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0398.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0399.pdf
    • Connecticut 95.5 94.9 -0.6 Delaware 95.0 98.2 3.1 District of Columbia 94.7 92.3 -2.4 Florida 85.5 92.6 7.1 * Georgia 88.9 92.3 3.4 Hawaii 94.6 95.6 1.0 Idaho 89.5 93.6 4.1 Illinois 95.0 91.2 -3.8 ** Indiana 90.3 93.8 3.4 * Iowa 95.4 96.1 0.7 Kansas 94.9 97.1 2.2 Kentucky 86.9 93.5 6.6 * Louisiana 88.9 90.3 1.4 Maine 90.7 97.5 6.8 * Maryland 96.3 96.8 0.5 Massachusetts 94.3 95.4 1.1 Michigan 93.8 94.0 0.2 Minnesota 96.4 95.9 -0.4 Mississippi 82.4 87.1 4.7 Missouri 92.1 94.6 2.5 Montana 92.8 95.4 2.7 Nebraska 94.0 94.8 0.8 Nevada 89.4 93.4 4.0 New Hampshire 95.0 95.8 0.8 New Jersey 94.1 95.0 0.9 New Mexico 85.3 90.0 4.7 New York 90.8 95.2 4.3 * North
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0700.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0701.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
    • 90 92 94 96 98 Month (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01N01M02J02 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 92.6% 4.7% * Alaska 83.8 96.6 12.8 * Arizona 88.8 93.1 4.3 * Arkansas 88.2 90.4 2.3 California 91.7 97.1 5.4 * Colorado 94.4 97.5 3.1 * Connecticut 95.5 97.5 2.0 Delaware 95.0 96.1 1.1 District of Columbia 94.7 93.1 -1.6 Florida 85.5 93.6 8.1 * Georgia 88.9 94.6 5.7 * Hawaii 94.6 96.4 1.8 Idaho 89.5 94.0 4.5 * Illinois 95.0 91.2 -3.8 Indiana 90.3 92.5 2.2 Iowa 95.4 96.5 1.1 Kansas 94.9 95.6 0.7 Kentucky 86.9 94.6 7.7 * Louisiana 88.9 92.7 3.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0703.pdf
    • Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 92.3% 4.4% * Alaska 83.8 96.6 12.9 * Arizona 88.8 95.0 6.3 * Arkansas 88.2 90.4 2.3 California 91.7 97.6 5.9 * Colorado 94.4 97.3 2.9 * Connecticut 95.5 95.1 -0.4 Delaware 95.0 96.3 1.2 District of Columbia 94.7 95.3 0.6 Florida 85.5 95.2 9.7 * Georgia 88.9 94.7 5.8 * Hawaii 94.6 97.5 2.9 Idaho 89.5 95.8 6.3 * Illinois 95.0 91.3 -3.7 Indiana 90.3 92.8 2.5 Iowa 95.4 96.5 1.1 Kansas 94.9 95.3 0.4 Kentucky 86.9 96.0 9.1 * Louisiana 88.9 93.7 4.8 * Maine 90.7 97.3 6.6 * Maryland 96.3 97.2 0.9 Massachusetts 94.3 97.9 3.5 * Michigan 93.8 94.2 0.4 Minnesota 96.4 97.7 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 92.5 10.2 * Missouri
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0704.pdf
    • -0.3 Kansas 94.9 95.2 0.3 Kentucky 86.9 91.9 5.0 * Louisiana 88.9 90.7 1.7 Maine 90.7 96.9 6.1 * Maryland 96.3 92.2 -4.0 Massachusetts 94.3 96.3 1.9 Michigan 93.8 93.8 0.1 Minnesota 96.4 96.6 0.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.2 6.9 * Missouri 92.1 92.0 0.0 Montana 92.8 92.8 0.0 Nebraska 94.0 96.5 2.5 * Nevada 89.4 90.9 1.5 New Hampshire 95.0 97.5 2.5 New Jersey 94.1 94.3 0.2 New Mexico 85.3 91.5 6.2 * New York 90.8 94.3 3.5 * North Carolina 89.3 93.5 4.2 * North Dakota 95.1 94.4 -0.7 Ohio 92.2 96.1 3.9 * Oklahoma 91.5 88.7 -2.8 Oregon 91.2 96.1 4.9 * Pennsylvania 95.1 95.6 0.5 Rhode Island 93.3 96.0 2.7 South Carolina 81.8 93.3 11.5 * South Dakota
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0798.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
    • Georgia 88.9 91.2 2.3 Hawaii 94.6 97.4 2.8 * Idaho 89.5 95.1 5.6 * Illinois 95.0 91.7 -3.3 ** Indiana 90.3 93.7 3.4 Iowa 95.4 96.3 0.9 Kansas 94.9 92.1 -2.8 ** Kentucky 86.9 93.3 6.4 * Louisiana 88.9 92.2 3.3 Maine 90.7 96.9 6.2 * Maryland 96.3 94.1 -2.2 Massachusetts 94.3 94.7 0.4 Michigan 93.8 94.3 0.5 Minnesota 96.4 97.5 1.2 Mississippi 82.4 89.1 6.7 * Missouri 92.1 97.1 5.0 * Montana 92.8 95.4 2.6 Nebraska 94.0 97.0 3.0 Nevada 89.4 94.9 5.5 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.9 3.0 New Jersey 94.1 92.4 -1.7 New Mexico 85.3 90.9 5.6 New York 90.8 95.4 4.6 * North Carolina 89.3 94.3 5.0 * North Dakota 95.1 98.9 3.8 Ohio 92.2 94.8 2.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1101.pdf
    • 6.3 * Hawaii 93.5 95.7 2.2 * Idaho 90.7 94.5 3.8 * Illinois 94.2 92.5 -1.7 # Indiana 91.6 93.9 2.4 * Iowa 96.2 97.1 0.9 Kansas 94.3 94.2 -0.1 Kentucky 88.1 93.5 5.4 * Louisiana 89.7 93.6 3.9 * Maine 93.4 97.8 4.4 * Maryland 95.7 96.0 0.3 Massachusetts 95.9 95.6 -0.2 Michigan 92.8 94.7 1.8 * Minnesota 95.8 97.5 1.6 * Mississippi 82.4 89.9 7.5 * Missouri 91.5 96.1 4.6 * Montana 91.0 95.0 4.0 * Nebraska 95.7 96.6 0.9 Nevada 90.4 95.1 4.8 * New Hampshire 94.3 98.3 3.9 * New Jersey 94.8 95.8 1.0 New Mexico 82.0 92.2 10.1 * New York 91.8 95.1 3.3 * North Carolina 88.3 93.6 5.3 * North Dakota 94.6 94.4 -0.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1102.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1103.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
    • with Telephone N83J84M85N85J86M87N87J88M89N89J90M91N91J92M93N93J94M95N95J96 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 6 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 1996 Change Alabama 88.4% 92.2% 3.7% * Alaska 86.5 94.4 7.9 * Arizona 86.9 93.1 6.2 * Arkansas 86.6 86.9 0.3 California 92.5 95.0 2.6 * Colorado 93.2 95.5 2.2 * Connecticut 95.5 97.5 2.0 * Delaware 94.3 96.1 1.8 District of Columbia 94.9 93.0 -1.9 Florida 88.7 93.1 4.4 * Georgia 86.2 89.7 3.5 * Hawaii 93.5 94.8 1.3 Idaho 90.7 92.9 2.2 Illinois 94.2 93.0 -1.2 Indiana 91.6 93.7 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.6 0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.9 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 92.3 4.2 * Louisiana 89.7 91.1 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.5 3.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1198.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1199.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
    • 96.2 Maryland 212 0 100.0 8 0 100.0 220100.0 Massachusetts 273 2 99.3 5 1 83.3 281 98.9 Michigan 336 1 99.7 363 15 96.0 715 97.8 Minnesota 159 0 100.0 567 4 99.3 730 99.5 Mississippi 206 0 100.0 52 11 82.5 269 95.9 Missouri 214 0 100.0 444 46 90.6 704 93.5 Montana 75 0 100.0 199 5 97.5 279 98.2 Nebraska 69 0 100.0 391 4 99.0 464 99.1 Nevada 45 0 100.0 56 21 72.7 122 82.8 New Hampshire 125 1 99.2 30 1 96.8 157 98.7 New Jersey 206 0 100.0 35 2 94.6 243 99.2 New Mexico 65 0 100.0 83 39 68.0 187 79.1 New York 524 1 99.8 310 15 95.4 850 98.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
    • 477 95.4 Nevada 50 1 98.0 55 23 70.5 129 81.4 New Hampshire 126 1 99.2 28 1 96.6 156 98.7 New Jersey 212 0 100.0 27 1 96.4 240 99.6 New Mexico 72 0 100.0 84 39 68.3 195 80.0 New York 586 1 99.8 305 18 94.4 910 97.9 North Carolina 144 0 100.0 363 13 96.5 520 97.5 North Dakota 47 0 100.0 168 87 65.9 302 71.2 Ohio 240 17 93.4 546 64 89.5 867 90.7 Oklahoma 236 0 100.0 288 36 88.9 560 93.6 Oregon 100 0 100.0 219 5 97.8 324 98.5 Pennsylvania 401 0 100.0 413 43 90.6 857 95.0 Puerto Rico 0 0 N.A. 91 0 100.0 91100.0 Rhode Island 30 0 100.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
    • 75 0 100.0 198 2 99.0 10 4 71.4 289 97.9 Nebraska 69 0 100.0 391 4 99.0 6 4 60.0 474 98.3 Nevada 45 0 100.0 58 15 79.5 23 1 95.8 142 88.7 New Hampshire 125 1 99.2 27 1 96.4 6 1 85.7 161 98.1 New Jersey 206 0 100.0 28 0 100.0 37 7 84.1 278 97.5 New Mexico 65 0 100.0 83 39 68.0 2 1 66.7 190 78.9 New York 526 1 99.8 298 15 95.2 74 15 83.1 929 96.7 North Carolina 140 0 100.0 356 12 96.7 41 10 80.4 559 96.1 North Dakota 36 0 100.0 235 19 92.5 7 2 77.8 299 93.0 Ohio 237 15 94.0 583 24 96.0 53
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
    • Non-Equal % Equal Equal Non-Equal % Equal Total % Equal Access Access Access Access Access Access Offices Access Alabama 149 0 100.0% 209 10 95.4% 368 97.3% Alaska 0 0 N.A. 40 215 15.7 255 15.7 Arizona 158 0 100.0 79 28 73.8 265 89.4 Arkansas 145 0 100.0 249 27 90.2 421 93.6 California 712 0 100.0 388 10 97.5 1110 99.1 Colorado 190 1 99.5 95 24 79.8 310 91.9 Connecticut 1 0 100.0 144 0 100.0 145100.0 Delaware 33 0 100.0 0 0 N.A. 33100.0 District of Columbia 33 0 100.0 0 0 N.A. 33100.0 Florida 213 0 100.0 275 17 94.2 505 96.6 Georgia 253 0 100.0 243 10 96.0 506 98.0 Guam 0 0 N.A. 17
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
    • Telecommunications Industry Chart 5.1 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003 Telecom Carriers Wired Carriers Wireless Carriers Cellular & Other Wireless Telecom Resellers Cable & Other 5 - 3 Year 1987 59.2 45.7 1988 62.8 54.6 1989 65.5 64.7 1990 66.5 76.0 1991 70.9 73.5 1992 76.8 85.6 1993 81.7 94.8 1994 85.8 97.1 1995 90.6 98.3 1996 97.5 103.0 1997 100.0 100.0 1998 106.9 114.2 1999 114.6 133.9 2000 122.3 138.2 2001 124.3 171.6 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Wired Wireless Table 5.2 Labor Productivity Index for the Wired and Wireless Telecommunications Industry Measured in Output per Hour (OPH) (Base Year 1997 = 100) Carriers Carriers Wired and Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (NAICS 5171 and 5172) Labor Productivity Index
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
    • Telecommunications Industry Chart 5.1 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004 Telecom Carriers Wired Carriers Wireless Carriers Cellular & Other Wireless Telecom Resellers Cable & Other 5 - 3 Year 1987 56.1 77.7 1988 59.7 86.2 1989 63.3 79.6 1990 64.8 76.3 1991 68.4 73.8 1992 74.5 85.6 1993 79.7 94.8 1994 85.1 97.1 1995 90.6 98.3 1996 97.5 103.0 1997 100.0 100.0 1998 105.5 114.2 1999 112.7 134.3 2000 119.9 139.0 2001 121.0 172.7 2002 130.6 192.0 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics as of September 10, 2004. Carriers Carriers Wired and Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (NAICS 5171 and 5172) Labor Productivity Index (NAICS 5171)(NAICS 5172) Chart 5.2 Wired Wireless Table 5.2 Labor Productivity Index for the Wired and Wireless
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
    • 94.7 District of Columbia 19 0 100.0 22 2 91.7 43 95.3 Florida 475 2 99.6 236 18 92.9 731 97.3 Georgia 417 10 97.7 103 12 89.6 542 95.9 Guam 18 0 100.0 0 0 NA 18 100.0 Hawaii 93 0 100.0 1 0 100.0 94 100.0 Idaho 171 15 91.9 8 1 88.9 195 91.8 Illinois 1,007 26 97.5 86 13 86.9 1,132 96.6 Indiana 574 2 99.7 35 10 77.8 621 98.1 Iowa 807 3 99.6 32 7 82.1 849 98.8 Kansas 561 9 98.4 15 5 75.0 590 97.6 Kentucky 375 18 95.4 13 7 65.0 413 93.9 Louisiana 328 2 99.4 36 4 90.0 370 98.4 Maine 248 10 96.1 6 1 85.7 265 95.8 Maryland
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
    • Access Revenues $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $206.1 83.1 $200.3 88.6 $406.4 85.7 49.3 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $23.3 9.4 $12.5 5.5 $35.8 7.6 34.9 Long Distance Private Line Service $3.7 1.5 $0.0 0.0 $3.7 0.8 0.0 All Other Long Distance $8.7 3.5 $9.8 4.4 $18.5 3.9 53.1 Total Toll Revenues $241.8 97.5 $222.6 98.5 $464.4 98.0 47.9 Total Carrier Revenue $248.1 100.0 $226.0 100.0 $474.1 100.0 47.7 Figures may not add due to rounding and amounts that have been withheld to preserve confidentiality of individual carrier data. ** Denotes amounts that have been omitted to preserve carrier confidentiality. Telecommunications Industry Table 9 Revenue: Prepaid Calling Card Providers (Dollar amounts shown in millions)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
    • 11.3 Somalia $13,360,262 22.9 4.8 32.2 20.4 19.7 $1 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 $0 20,583,005 14.5 6.0 43.9 16.4 19.2 South Africa $56,566,663 66.6 8.2 9.0 12.7 3.5 $1,050,032 34.8 14.4 2.9 16.7 31.3 $645,316 3.3 96.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 312,032,316 42.4 27.3 11.1 14.1 5.1 Sudan $4,361,144 59.2 4.6 11.2 11.1 13.7 $190,346 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $9,082 97.5 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 20,349,849 64.3 5.4 8.0 7.2 15.2 Swaziland $735,004 73.9 2.8 2.6 19.2 1.4 $21,792 98.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 $162 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,777,714 73.1 3.0 4.0 18.4 1.5 Tanzania $5,181,836 33.2 15.2 17.9 27.0 6.7 $117,283 8.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 91.6 $2,590 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,697,495 19.7 19.3 17.7 32.8 10.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
    • Egypt 27.7 30.6 38.1 43.9 49.0 56.9 68.6 90.0 109.9 111.3 169.1 21.8 El Salvador 68.6 84.1 89.1 99.9 107.0 120.8 135.7 141.8 154.9 197.9 235.5 13.3 France 172.1 201.6 210.5 239.9 263.7 304.9 362.8 442.6 511.0 560.3 577.1 15.0 Germany 15/ 416.8 494.3 561.2 563.1 572.6 604.1 662.3 782.41,008.31,153.41,465.9 17.6 Greece 52.4 57.9 61.1 70.0 75.6 82.1 86.5 91.3 97.5 115.3 183.8 13.2 Guatemala 57.3 70.5 80.6 88.0 93.8 105.4 115.1 128.0 127.3 144.7 189.2 10.7 Haiti 39.9 47.7 50.6 48.6 52.9 62.8 73.6 79.2 93.6 99.6 135.9 15.3 Hong Kong 76.4 85.4 95.6 114.3 143.2 213.9 315.8 539.7 677.3 565.3 193.0 13.7 India 45.4 58.8 71.4 97.9 134.2 191.6 285.7 428.0 583.3 749.7 960.1 39.6 Israel 91.2 107.0 129.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
    • 379.1 438.4 749.9 665.5 716.41,005.7 19.5 Egypt 43.9 49.0 56.9 68.6 90.0 109.9 111.3 169.1 94.4 170.7 291.8 17.3 El Salvador 99.9 107.0 120.8 135.7 141.8 154.9 197.9 237.4 298.1 331.6 669.3 29.7 France 239.9 263.7 304.9 362.8 442.6 511.0 560.3 577.1 539.4 725.5 653.5 5.7 Germany 563.1 572.6 604.1 662.3 782.41,008.31,153.41,466.41,251.4 886.91,057.4 n.m. Greece 70.0 75.6 82.1 86.5 91.3 97.5 115.3 183.8 213.8 259.9 172.9 16.9 Guatemala 88.0 93.8 105.4 115.1 128.0 127.3 144.7 189.8 233.1 368.9 909.1 44.3 Haiti 48.6 52.9 62.8 73.6 79.2 93.6 99.6 135.9 94.4 67.3 107.8 -2.4 Hong Kong 114.3 143.2 213.9 315.8 539.7 677.3 565.3 193.0 163.3 278.1 171.2 -23.1 India 97.9 134.2 191.6 285.7 428.0 583.3 749.7 960.11,243.51,332.71,512.2 21.3 Israel 137.7 162.7 195.7
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
    • N. Mariana Islands 21,521 0.0 NA Ohio 7,053,650 95.1 1.05 Oklahoma 2,035,796 82.0 1.22 Oregon 2,171,014 92.0 1.09 Pennsylvania 8,301,408 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,333,656 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 641,977 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,366,512 72.4 1.38 South Dakota 410,229 63.6 1.57 Tennessee 3,385,953 86.4 1.16 Texas 13,192,061 92.9 1.08 Utah 1,172,443 93.4 1.07 Vermont 426,028 84.6 1.18 Virginia 4,760,302 97.5 1.03 Virgin Islands 69,073 0.0 NA Washington 3,743,055 92.7 1.08 West Virginia 1,035,885 83.5 1.20 Wisconsin 3,525,444 74.0 1.35 Wyoming 312,778 83.4 1.20 Total 185,588,578 92.8% 1.08 NA - Not Applicable. 1/ USF loops, a measure of access lines, are defined in subcategory 1.3 of 47 CFR 36.154(a). 2/ Average percent reporting to ARMIS is based on USF loops. USF
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
    • October 101.7 100.7 101.5 100.4 100.0 101.6 93.7 November 101.7 101.1 101.6 101.0 100.8 102.1 92.4 December 101.6 100.3 101.3 99.9 99.2 101.5 91.7 1999January 101.9 100.7 102.2 99.9 99.3 101.3 90.9 February 102.0 100.4 102.0 99.5 99.1 100.7 89.7 March 102.3 100.2 102.3 98.9 98.4 100.3 89.0 April 103.0 100.0 100.9 99.8 99.5 100.7 87.8 May 103.0 99.6 102.7 97.5 96.4 100.2 85.8 June 103.0 99.7 103.2 97.4 96.3 100.2 84.0 July 103.3 99.5 103.7 96.7 95.3 100.0 82.9 August 103.6 99.8 103.8 97.1 95.9 99.8 82.3 September 104.1 99.6 103.7 96.8 95.9 99.2 82.6 October 104.3 99.8 103.5 97.4 96.9 98.8 82.0 November 104.3 100.6 103.9 98.7 99.1 99.2 81.2 December 104.3 100.7 104.2 98.6 98.5 99.9 81.1 2000January
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
    • October 101.7 100.7 101.5 100.4 100.0 101.6 93.7 November 101.7 101.1 101.6 101.0 100.8 102.1 92.4 December 101.6 100.3 101.3 99.9 99.2 101.5 91.7 1999January 101.9 100.7 102.2 99.9 99.3 101.3 90.9 February 102.0 100.4 102.0 99.5 99.1 100.7 89.7 March 102.3 100.2 102.3 98.9 98.4 100.3 89.0 April 103.0 100.0 100.9 99.8 99.5 100.7 87.8 May 103.0 99.6 102.7 97.5 96.4 100.2 85.8 June 103.0 99.7 103.2 97.4 96.3 100.2 84.0 July 103.3 99.5 103.7 96.7 95.3 100.0 82.9 August 103.6 99.8 103.8 97.1 95.9 99.8 82.3 September 104.1 99.6 103.7 96.8 95.9 99.2 82.6 October 104.3 99.8 103.5 97.4 96.9 98.8 82.0 November 104.3 100.6 103.9 98.7 99.1 99.2 81.2 December 104.3 100.7 104.2 98.6 98.5 99.9 81.1 2000January
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
    • 12.0 9.2 17.4 17.2 17.0 17.5 23.9 17.8 19.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.2 2.8 4.3 3.5 3.1 3.6 8.0 4.4 18.2 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.3 99.6 98.9 99.5 99.0 99.5 98.5 98.7 98.6 Residence 98.3 99.7 98.9 99.6 99.1 99.5 98.6 98.8 98.8 Business 90.1 98.8 98.2 99.2 98.3 98.9 97.5 97.1 96.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.4 0.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.5 0.5 Residence 1.1 0.4 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.4 0.5 Business 1.8 1.2 1.7 3.3 2.4 3.3 2.3 2.3 1.9 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 19.7 14.6 16.4 23.6 20.9 26.6 32.6 31.1 18.4 Residence 21.5 14.7 16.9 25.8 22.1 26.7 34.8 33.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
    • with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 20 Table 1.2 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 1996 Change Alabama 88.4% 92.2% 3.7% * Alaska 86.5 94.4 7.9 * Arizona 86.9 93.1 6.2 * Arkansas 86.6 86.9 0.3 California 92.5 95.0 2.6 * Colorado 93.2 95.5 2.2 * Connecticut 95.5 97.5 2.0 * Delaware 94.3 96.1 1.8 District of Columbia 94.9 93.0 -1.9 Florida 88.7 93.1 4.4 * Georgia 86.2 89.7 3.5 * Hawaii 93.5 94.8 1.3 Idaho 90.7 92.9 2.2 Illinois 94.2 93.0 -1.2 Indiana 91.6 93.7 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.6 0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.9 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 92.3 4.2 * Louisiana 89.7 91.1 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.5 3.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
    • Interstate Toll CPI Telephone Service Price Indices (Annual Rates of Change) 582 Table 5.5 Consumer Price Indices (1982-1984=100) All Goods & Services All Telephone Services Local Services Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service 1983January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May 99.2 98.9 97.5 101.6 100.0 June 99.5 99.3 98.1 101.6 100.2 July 99.9 99.5 98.1 101.7 100.9 August 100.2 99.6 98.3 101.7 101.0 September 100.7 99.9 98.6 101.7 101.2 October 101.0 99.7 98.3 101.4 101.6 November 101.2 100.4 99.5 101.4 102.3 December 101.3 99.8 98.3 101.3 102.2 1984January 101.9 105.0 106.7 101.3 104.2 February 102.4 107.0 110.0 102.1 104.2 March 102.6 106.4 109.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-6.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
    • Change) 7 - 7 Table 7.4 Consumer Price Indices (1982-1984=100) All Goods & Services All Telephone Services Local Services Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series ID CUUR0000SA0 CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051 CUUR0000SS27061 1983January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May 99.2 98.9 97.5 101.6 100.0 June 99.5 99.3 98.1 101.6 100.2 July 99.9 99.5 98.1 101.7 100.9 August 100.2 99.6 98.3 101.7 101.0 September 100.7 99.9 98.6 101.7 101.2 October 101.0 99.7 98.3 101.4 101.6 November 101.2 100.4 99.5 101.4 102.3 December 101.3 99.8 98.3 101.3 102.2 1984January 101.9 105.0 106.7 101.3 104.2 February 102.4 107.0 110.0 102.1 104.2 March 102.6 106.4 109.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
    • Average Installation Interval (days) 18.4 14.6 13.2 29.3 22.6 0.0 14.1 11.5 6.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.3 99.3 98.7 98.1 99.0 99.0 97.8 98.0 98.8 Residence 98.4 99.4 98.9 98.5 99.0 99.1 98.3 98.4 99.0 Business 97.1 98.7 97.5 96.0 98.7 98.1 94.3 95.6 97.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 2.2 1.6 0.7 3.1 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.8 2.9 Residence 2.0 1.5 0.6 2.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 2.6 2.5 Business 3.5 2.6 1.4 5.3 3.4 0.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 218.9 176.4 280.3 237.7 126.3 244.3 191.2 201.0 222.6 Total MSA 217.1 179.5 274.5 243.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
    • - 7 Table 7.4 Consumer Price Indices (1982-1984 = 100) All Goods & Services All Telephone Services Local Services Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series ID CUUR0000SA0 CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051 CUUR0000SS27061 1983January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May 99.2 98.9 97.5 101.6 100.0 June 99.5 99.3 98.1 101.6 100.2 July 99.9 99.5 98.1 101.7 100.9 August 100.2 99.6 98.3 101.7 101.0 September 100.7 99.9 98.6 101.7 101.2 October 101.0 99.7 98.3 101.4 101.6 November 101.2 100.4 99.5 101.4 102.3 December 101.3 99.8 98.3 101.3 102.2 1984January 101.9 105.0 106.7 101.3 104.2 February 102.4 107.0 110.0 102.1 104.2 March 102.6 106.4 109.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
    • Average Installation Interval (days) 18.4 14.6 13.2 29.3 22.6 0.0 14.2 11.5 6.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.3 99.1 98.7 98.1 99.0 99.0 97.8 98.0 98.8 Residence 98.4 99.2 98.9 98.5 99.0 99.1 98.3 98.3 99.0 Business 97.1 98.3 97.5 96.0 98.7 98.1 94.3 95.6 97.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 2.2 1.6 0.7 3.1 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.8 2.9 Residence 2.0 1.5 0.6 2.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 2.6 2.5 Business 3.5 2.6 1.4 5.3 3.4 0.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 218.9 178.1 277.8 221.6 126.3 244.3 191.2 201.0 222.6 Total MSA 217.1 179.5 263.5 216.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-6.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
    • Change) 7 - 7 Table 7.4 Consumer Price Indexes (1982-1984=100) All Goods & Services All Telephone Services Local Services Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series ID CUUR0000SA0 CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051 CUUR0000SS27061 1983January 97.8 98.1 97.2 100.9 97.3 February 97.9 98.3 96.8 101.6 98.9 March 97.9 98.5 97.0 101.6 99.3 April 98.6 98.4 96.8 101.6 99.5 May 99.2 98.9 97.5 101.6 100.0 June 99.5 99.3 98.1 101.6 100.2 July 99.9 99.5 98.1 101.7 100.9 August 100.2 99.6 98.3 101.7 101.0 September 100.7 99.9 98.6 101.7 101.2 October 101.0 99.7 98.3 101.4 101.6 November 101.2 100.4 99.5 101.4 102.3 December 101.3 99.8 98.3 101.3 102.2 1984January 101.9 105.0 106.7 101.3 104.2 February 102.4 107.0 110.0 102.1 104.2 March 102.6 106.4 109.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
    • 94.4 96.4 94.6 96.1 KENTUCKY 86.9 90.9 88.1 91.0 87.4 91.1 86.2 90.6 LOUISIANA 88.9 93.3 89.7 92.7 90.3 93.6 88.7 91.9 MAINE 90.7 93.1 93.4 95.3 94.0 95.6 93.4 95.4 MARYLAND 96.3 96.7 95.7 96.5 95.5 96.7 95.7 96.7 MASSACHUSETTS 94.3 95.9 95.9 96.9 95.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 MICHIGAN 93.8 94.9 92.8 94.5 92.9 94.2 93.4 94.5 MINNESOTA 96.4 97.5 95.8 97.1 96.4 97.4 96.2 97.2 MISSISSIPPI 82.4 89.1 82.4 87.5 80.9 87.6 80.1 87.3 MISSOURI 92.1 94.1 91.5 93.7 92.5 94.8 93.4 94.9 MONTANA 92.8 94.5 91.0 94.0 91.4 93.9 90.9 93.7 NEBRASKA 94.0 95.3 95.7 96.8 95.3 96.6 95.6 96.8 NEVADA 89.4 91.9 90.4 92.8 91.8 93.8 92.4 93.7 NEW HAMPSHIRE 95.0 96.9 94.3 95.8 93.2 94.6 94.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
    • NA Ohio 7,001,888 95.1 1.05 Oklahoma 2,110,393 85.4 1.17 Oregon 2,206,230 91.9 1.09 Pennsylvania 8,385,348 95.3 1.05 Puerto Rico 1,331,851 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 660,645 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 2,387,770 72.4 1.38 South Dakota 428,561 64.9 1.54 Tennessee 3,473,138 86.8 1.15 Texas 13,423,873 94.3 1.06 Utah 1,213,348 95.0 1.05 Vermont 425,849 84.6 1.18 Virgin Islands 68,283 0.0 NA Virginia 4,842,685 97.5 1.03 Washington 3,829,104 92.9 1.08 West Virginia 1,040,178 83.7 1.19 Wisconsin 3,507,890 76.1 1.31 Wyoming 310,803 83.2 1.20 Total 2/ 188,497,257 93.2% 1.07 NA - Not Applicable. 1/ USF loops, a measure of access lines, are defined in subcategory 1.3 of 47 CFR 36.154(a). 2/ Total includes 9,978 loops in American Samoa. 3/ Includes lines from NECA pool and rate-of-return
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
    • Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.6 98.5 98.4 98.5 98.9 98.7 Sprint 98.3 98.5 98.0 97.7 98.8 98.2 Weighted Composite* 98.6 98.6 98.1 98.6 98.8 98.5 * Industry weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met 96.0 96.5 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted Composite * Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest Sprint 11 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 BellSouth 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 Qwest 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 SBC Ameritech 2.1 2.2 2.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual03.pdf
    • SBC Ameritech 98.8 99.0 98.9 98.8 99.1 98.9 SBC Pacific 98.8 99.0 99.1 99.5 99.6 99.6 SBC Southwestern 98.9 98.6 98.8 98.8 98.9 99.1 SBC SNET 95.0 96.7 98.9 100.0 100.0 99.5 Verizon GTE 98.4 95.6 96.2 95.5 98.5 98.3 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 98.5 98.4 98.5 98.9 98.7 98.7 Sprint 98.5 98.0 97.7 98.8 98.2 97.5 Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* 98.6 98.1 98.6 98.8 99.1 98.8 *Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
    • Average Installation Interval (days) 18.4 14.6 13.2 29.3 22.6 0.0 14.2 11.5 6.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.3 99.1 98.7 98.1 99.0 99.0 97.8 98.0 98.8 Residence 98.4 99.2 98.9 98.5 99.0 99.1 98.3 98.3 99.0 Business 97.1 98.3 97.5 96.0 98.7 98.1 94.3 95.6 97.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 2.2 1.6 0.7 3.1 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.8 2.9 Residence 2.0 1.5 0.6 2.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 2.6 2.5 Business 3.5 2.6 1.4 5.3 3.4 0.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 218.9 178.1 277.8 221.6 126.3 244.3 191.2 201.0 222.6 Total MSA 217.1 179.5 263.5 216.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
    • 72.4 31.3 48.8 152.4 5.8NM New York 8,765.2 376.3 8,388.9 6,017.2 2,371.7 1,063.6 397.0 832.2 2,292.8 78.9NY North Carolina 3,405.7 333.0 3,072.7 2,280.8 791.9 405.8 140.9 218.0 764.7 27.2NC North Dakota 178.2 6.8 171.4 113.5 57.9 21.7 12.2 21.0 54.8 3.1ND Ohio 4,354.8 356.8 3,998.0 2,917.1 1,080.9 493.8 176.6 378.6 1,049.0 32.0OH Oklahoma 1,144.9 158.8 986.1 707.6 278.5 122.8 50.9 97.5 271.2 7.3OK Oregon 1,117.7 90.4 1,027.2 617.9 409.3 187.1 70.9 131.1 389.1 20.2OR Pennsylvania 4,722.3 284.5 4,437.8 3,103.5 1,334.4 588.2 212.9 415.8 1,216.9 117.5PA Rhode Island 383.0 21.3 361.8 251.0 110.8 53.1 22.8 29.4 105.3 5.5RI South Carolina 1,297.8 74.4 1,223.3 923.8 299.5 151.9 54.3 83.4 289.6 9.9SC South Dakota 199.5 7.8 191.7 129.6 62.1 23.3 11.7 25.5 60.5 1.6SD
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
    • 64.4 0 0.0 152,381 35.6 428,561 64.4 SD Tennessee 25 2,754,858 79.3 254,563 7.3 463,717 13.4 3,473,138 86.6 TN Texas 5812,096,308 90.1 397,680 3.0 929,885 6.9 13,423,873 93.1 TX Utah 13 1,152,656 95.0 0 0.0 60,692 5.0 1,213,348 95.0 UT Vermont 10 360,411 84.6 0 0.0 65,438 15.4 425,849 84.6 VT Virginia 21 4,309,367 89.0 413,279 8.5 120,039 2.5 4,842,685 97.5 VA Washington 23 3,467,139 90.5 87,790 2.3 274,175 7.2 3,829,104 92.8 WA West Virginia 10 871,569 83.8 0 0.0 168,609 16.2 1,040,178 83.8 WV Wisconsin 90 2,587,357 73.8 0 0.0 920,533 26.2 3,507,890 73.8 WI Wyoming 10 258,704 83.2 0 0.0 52,099 16.8 310,803 83.2 WY United States 1,433162,796,130 87.1% 10,880,547 5.8% 13,315,111 7.1%186,991,788 92.9% US American Samoa 1 0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
    • Commission. 192 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 5.3 - Telephone Penetration by State Percent of Households with Telephone Service State July November March July 2002 2002 2003 2003 92.6% 92.0% 90.5% 92.3% AL Alaska 96.6 96.3 96.8 96.6 AK 93.1 95.5 95.6 95.0 AZ 90.4 92.5 93.0 90.4 AR 97.1 96.8 97.2 97.6 CA 97.5 97.8 97.0 97.3 CO 97.5 97.0 97.6 95.1 CT 96.1 96.8 96.9 96.3 DE District of Columbia 93.1 95.0 95.1 95.3 DC 93.6 94.8 95.0 95.2 FL 94.6 92.4 95.2 94.7 GA 96.4 96.9 98.0 97.5 HI 94.0 95.6 94.8 95.8 ID 91.2 93.0 92.4 91.3 IL 92.5 93.2 93.8 92.8 IN 96.5 97.1 97.0 96.5 IA 95.6 95.1 96.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
    • 39.4 97.7 246.6 15.0 KY Louisiana 1,651.0 69.5 1,581.6 1,160.8 420.8 183.5 51.5 158.8 393.8 27.1 LA Maine 477.0 15.6 461.4 318.9 142.5 57.7 18.6 62.3 138.6 3.8 ME Maryland 2,302.0 143.4 2,158.6 1,432.2 726.4 279.3 83.1 335.2 697.6 28.8 MD Massachusetts 2,567.7 119.3 2,448.4 1,561.6 886.9 336.7 84.9 428.6 850.2 36.7 MA Michigan 3,221.3 113.1 3,108.2 2,267.7 840.5 350.0 97.5 359.6 807.1 33.4 MI Minnesota 1,283.7 79.2 1,204.5 775.7 428.8 115.9 64.9 221.7 402.5 26.3 MN Mississippi 1,108.6 29.2 1,079.4 817.4 262.1 115.2 45.0 85.9 246.1 15.9 MS Missouri 2,110.2 289.2 1,821.0 1,225.9 595.0 203.4 64.4 293.9 561.7 33.4 MO Montana 266.6 21.7 245.0 161.9 83.1 29.8 14.9 32.4 77.1 6.0 MT Nebraska 604.0 49.5 554.5 375.1 179.4 53.7 32.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
    • 93.1 93.0 IL INDIANA 94.5 94.8 94.7 94.5 IN IOWA 97.6 95.8 95.8 98.0 IA KANSAS 93.5 93.2 93.6 94.3 KS KENTUCKY 93.4 91.8 91.2 92.8 KY LOUISIANA 93.4 93.6 90.4 91.6 LA MAINE 96.9 94.8 96.5 96.8 ME MARYLAND 97.2 97.3 96.3 96.5 MD MASSACHUSETTS 95.8 95.8 95.5 95.2 MA MICHIGAN 95.3 94.9 94.0 95.5 MI MINNESOTA 97.7 97.3 97.5 97.2 MN MISSISSIPPI 83.4 89.0 86.8 87.9 MS MISSOURI 93.9 95.3 96.2 94.8 MO MONTANA 93.2 93.1 94.1 94.6 MT NEBRASKA 96.5 97.5 96.0 95.8 NE NEVADA 92.9 92.6 94.0 92.7 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 96.0 97.3 97.6 94.5 NH NEW JERSEY 92.9 91.3 92.8 92.8 NJ NEW MEXICO 82.9 86.7 84.9 86.1 NM NEW YORK 92.2 93.3 93.1 93.2 NY
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
    • 96.0 97.3 IA KANSAS 94.3 93.8 94.5 93.6 KS KENTUCKY 92.8 93.0 93.1 93.2 KY LOUISIANA 91.6 91.3 91.3 91.5 LA MAINE 96.8 96.2 93.6 97.4 ME MARYLAND 96.5 97.3 95.3 95.5 MD MASSACHUSETTS 95.2 96.4 95.9 95.7 MA MICHIGAN 95.5 95.4 94.9 93.3 MI MINNESOTA 97.2 96.6 97.4 96.4 MN MISSISSIPPI 87.9 87.9 89.3 89.8 MS MISSOURI 94.8 95.0 97.5 93.7 MO MONTANA 94.6 94.1 94.1 94.4 MT NEBRASKA 95.8 96.2 96.9 97.9 NE NEVADA 92.7 93.8 94.1 94.6 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 94.5 96.3 97.1 95.5 NH NEW JERSEY 92.8 95.2 95.9 95.6 NJ NEW MEXICO 86.1 87.7 86.4 90.7 NM NEW YORK 93.2 94.0 94.3 93.7 NY NORTH CAROLINA 95.3 93.0 93.5 93.2 NC NORTH DAKOTA 96.9 95.8 96.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
    • 96.0 97.3 96.8 96.6 IA KANSAS 94.5 93.6 93.8 95.4 KS KENTUCKY 93.1 93.2 93.2 94.1 KY LOUISIANA 91.3 91.5 90.3 93.5 LA MAINE 93.6 97.4 97.4 95.8 ME MARYLAND 95.3 95.5 96.3 96.1 MD MASSACHUSETTS 95.9 95.7 94.6 94.0 MA MICHIGAN 94.9 93.3 94.6 95.1 MI MINNESOTA 97.4 96.4 97.0 97.4 MN MISSISSIPPI 89.3 89.8 88.5 89.1 MS MISSOURI 97.5 93.7 93.9 95.0 MO MONTANA 94.1 94.4 92.6 93.2 MT NEBRASKA 96.9 97.9 96.4 95.7 NE NEVADA 94.1 94.6 93.7 93.0 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 97.1 95.5 96.9 95.3 NH NEW JERSEY 95.9 95.6 93.3 95.7 NJ NEW MEXICO 86.4 90.7 87.2 88.2 NM NEW YORK 94.3 93.7 94.6 95.2 NY NORTH CAROLINA 93.5 93.2 92.6 93.2 NC NORTH DAKOTA 96.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
    • COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 1.7-TELEPHONE DEVELOPMENT BY STATE PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH TELEPHONE SERVICE STATE JULY NOVEMBER MARCH JULY 1998 1998 1999 1999 ALABAMA 93.2 93.1 91.9 92.6 AL ALASKA 94.4 95.4 94.9 94.6 AK ARIZONA 91.0 92.8 92.8 92.4 AZ ARKANSAS 88.2 89.2 88.9 90.5 AR CALIFORNIA 95.3 95.3 94.7 96.5 CA COLORADO 95.8 95.3 95.9 97.2 CO CONNECTICUT 96.2 97.5 94.9 97.6 CT DELAWARE 96.8 96.1 98.2 94.4 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 90.6 90.8 92.3 92.7 DC FLORIDA 92.2 92.3 92.6 93.3 FL GEORGIA 92.2 92.2 92.3 91.2 GA HAWAII 96.1 94.9 95.6 97.4 HI IDAHO 93.4 93.9 93.6 95.1 ID ILLINOIS 93.3 92.3 91.2 91.7 IL INDIANA 94.5 94.8 93.8 93.7 IN IOWA 97.3 96.2 96.1 96.3 IA KANSAS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
    • 0 0.0 144,469 34.6 418,032 65.4 SD Tennessee 25 2,684,626 79.7 256,109 7.6 428,094 12.7 3,368,829 87.3 TN Texas 57 9,802,614 77.7 2,277,946 18.1 536,028 4.2 12,616,588 95.8 TX Utah 13 1,081,672 95.0 0 0.0 56,417 5.0 1,138,089 95.0 UT Vermont 10 339,570 84.5 0 0.0 62,301 15.5 401,871 84.5 VT Virginia 21 3,474,493 75.9 987,813 21.6 112,636 2.5 4,574,942 97.5 VA Washington 23 2,489,593 68.0 919,500 25.1 253,492 6.9 3,662,585 93.1 WA West Virginia 10 824,403 83.6 0 0.0 162,135 16.4 986,538 83.6 WV Wisconsin 88 2,175,880 64.1 499,812 14.7 716,333 21.1 3,392,025 78.9 WI Wyoming 10 240,854 83.1 0 0.0 49,009 16.9 289,863 83.1 WY United States 1,432138,488,145 77.6% 28,881,319 16.2% 11,032,002 6.2% 178,401,466 93.8% US Guam 1 0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
    • 450.7 148.5 273.3 872.5 4.2 KS Kentucky 3,536.8 109.2 3,427.5 2,524.0 903.5 564.4 124.1 205.9 894.4 9.1 KY Louisiana 5,558.4 177.8 5,380.6 4,053.6 1,326.9 876.2 166.8 267.9 1,310.9 16.0 LA Maine 1,833.2 56.9 1,776.2 1,268.0 508.2 233.5 85.4 171.0 489.9 18.3 ME Maryland 7,985.0 347.9 7,637.1 5,210.1 2,427.0 1,000.4 397.4 1,017.7 2,415.5 11.5 MD Massachusetts 11,048.6 348.8 10,699.8 6,979.2 3,720.6 1,097.5 586.4 1,949.6 3,633.5 87.1 MA Michigan 12,720.1 320.4 12,399.7 9,574.9 2,824.8 1,684.2 621.2 501.6 2,807.0 17.7 MI Minnesota 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MN Mississippi 3,744.3 143.3 3,601.0 2,682.6 918.4 624.2 119.7 163.3 907.2 11.2 MS Missouri 6,856.9 181.9 6,675.0 4,686.0 1,988.9 994.2 324.0 649.9 1,968.1 20.9 MO Montana 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
    • Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 5.3 - Telephone Penetration by State Percent of Households with Telephone Service State November March July November 2001 2002 2002 2002 93.4% 92.0% 92.6% 92.0% AL Alaska 96.9 96.4 96.6 96.3 AK 95.4 95.9 93.1 95.5 AZ 90.9 93.4 90.4 92.5 AR 96.6 97.2 97.1 96.8 CA 96.6 96.3 97.5 97.8 CO 95.5 97.6 97.5 97.0 CT 96.8 97.4 96.1 96.8 DE District of Columbia 94.3 94.0 93.1 95.0 DC 94.5 94.6 93.6 94.8 FL 91.9 95.1 94.6 92.4 GA 96.0 97.0 96.4 96.9 HI 96.0 95.3 94.0 95.6 ID 91.7 94.1 91.2 93.0 IL 93.1 94.6 92.5 93.2 IN 97.0 97.1 96.5 97.1 IA 94.6 95.7 95.6 95.1 KS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.txt
    • FCC Rcd 49103 ( FCC 96-330, adopted: August 6,1996, released: October 10, 1996). Second Order on Reconsideration and Seventh Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 2639 (1995). Fourth Report and Order In the Matter of Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act- Competitive Bidding, 9 FCC Rcd 2330 (1994). See 47 C.F.R. ( 97.1 et seq. 47 C.F.R. ( 97.5 (b)(1),(2), (3),(4). See 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Major Group Code 44 -- Water Transportation (4491, 4492, 4493, 4499) and 45 -- Transportation by Air (4522, 4581). 47 C.F.R. ( 101 et seq (formerly part 21 of the Commission's rules). Persons eligible under Parts 80 and 90 of the Commission's rules can use private Operational Fixed Microwave services. See 47
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
    • 50.0 175.0 3633 629 3028 618 0.4 0.1 100.0 AZ TUCSON 40 42 50.0 619.0 15188 673 13979 672 0.2 0.0 100.0 AZ YUMA 11 41 962.3 493.0 34473 233 33353 232 0.0 0.0 99.9 AZ YUMA 13 16 509.7 475.0 28059 231 26438 229 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 75.1 728.0 19805 11348 19520 11398 0.8 0.4 97.5 CA ARCATA 23 22 50.0 510.0 12225 112 11147 99 0.1 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 17 25 285.1 427.0 17512 545 17028 507 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 23 10 4.6 1128.0 22757 671 20817 611 1.0 0.0 99.9 CA BAKERSFIELD 29 33 70.1 1137.0 15846 538 15051 472 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 45 55 245.8 404.0 16271 562
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
    • 3915.9 591.0 43582 4795 42119 4221 0.0 0.0 97.6 CA SACRAMENTO 6 45 3912.4 567.0 42159 4680 38510 4021 0.0 0.0 97.7 CA SACRAMENTO 10 59 1731.3 595.0 36687 4518 35767 4076 0.3 0.0 96.9 CA SACRAMENTO 29 14 333.4 321.0 12379 1546 12763 1564 0.7 0.2 95.7 CA SACRAMENTO 31 21 412.2 558.0 25953 3732 24988 3540 6.8 2.1 97.5 CA SACRAMENTO 40 53 408.7 597.0 25704 3733 25297 3427 2.0 0.5 98.0 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
    • 0.0 100.0 COPUEBLO 5 27 1000.0 396.0 31224 589 31495 580 0.5 0.0 93.6 COPUEBLO 8 29 372.2 727.0 30440 1364 26336 621 0.0 0.0 99.6 COSTEAMBOATSPRIN24 10 3.2 157.0 1891 12 1499 11 0.0 0.0 100.0 COSTERLING 3 23 1000.0 232.0 26327 71 22797 62 0.0 0.0 100.0 CTBRIDGEPORT 43 42 50.0 156.0 9657 2661 9725 2690 3.1 4.2 97.5 CTBRIDGEPORT 49 52 50.0 222.0 9997 3173 9696 3157 6.6 10.6 97.4 CTHARTFORD 3 11 39.5 276.0 24733 3789 24528 3874 0.0 0.0 95.5 CTHARTFORD 18 46 210.1 299.0 18530 3283 17364 3156 6.2 6.3 97.2 CTHARTFORD 24 32 50.0 262.0 13189 2859 11674 2651 11.5 11.2 98.9 CTHARTFORD 61 5 1.0 515.0 23206 3738 23113 3795 8.1 10.9 87.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
    • 50.0 175.0 3633 629 3028 618 0.4 0.1 100.0 AZ TUCSON 40 42 50.0 619.0 15188 673 13979 672 0.2 0.0 100.0 AZ YUMA 11 41 962.3 493.0 34473 233 33353 232 0.0 0.0 99.9 AZ YUMA 13 16 509.7 475.0 28059 231 26438 229 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 75.1 728.0 19805 11348 19520 11398 0.8 0.4 97.5 CA ARCATA 23 22 50.0 510.0 12225 112 11147 99 0.1 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 17 25 285.1 427.0 17512 545 17028 507 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 23 10 4.6 1128.0 22757 671 20817 611 1.0 0.0 99.9 CA BAKERSFIELD 29 33 70.1 1137.0 15846 538 15051 472 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA BAKERSFIELD 45 55 245.8 404.0 16271 562
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992849.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992849.txt
    • can turn off any transponder if there is a technical problem, can control individual channels on half of the transponders and is being equipped to relay U.S. originated programming. In its 1999 amendment, AfriSpace describes its ownership structure as follows: AfriSpace is a Washington, D.C. corporation that is 100 percent owned by WorldSpace, Inc., a Maryland corporation. WorldSpace, Inc. is 97.5 percent owned by U.S. shareholders and 2.5 percent owned by foreign shareholders. In December, 1996, WorldSpace, Inc. sold all its non-AfriSpace assets to an offshore entity, WIN, in exchange for capital and a sixteen percent equity stake in WIN. The cash proceeds of the sale are being used to finance AfriSpace's financial needs through the second quarter of 1999. Simultaneously,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
    • 50.0 175.0 3633 629 3028 618 0.6 0.1 100.0 AZ TUCSON 40 42 50.0 619.0 15188 673 13979 672 0.2 0.0 100.0 AZ YUMA 11 41 962.3 493.0 34473 233 33353 232 0.0 0.0 99.9 AZ YUMA 13 16 509.7 475.0 28059 231 26438 229 0.0 0.0 100.0 CA ANAHEIM 56 32 75.1 728.0 19805 11348 19520 11398 0.8 0.4 97.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-5 CA ARCATA 23 22 50.0 510.0 12225 112
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
    • Commission's Rules Concerning the Inspection of Radio Installations on Large Cargo 138 and Small Passenger Ships, CI Docket No. 95-55, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 17165 (1996). Currently examination managers may submit applications for examinees or other individuals. This service, 139 however, is a non-regulated service, separate from their activities as an examination manager. See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.5(c)(2), 97.7(b). 140 34 aboard U.S. vessels. Because of the critical, safety-related responsibilities of license holders, the 138 Commission must ensure that only qualified individuals receive a Commercial Radio Operator license. 90. We seek comment on ways for the Commission to automate the verification of applicants' PPCs. One alternative would be for examination managers to electronically file with the Commission data
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da993018.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da993018.txt
    • 87, 90, 95, 97, and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, WT Docket 98-20, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21027, 21105-06 � 181 (1998) (Report and Order), on recon., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 11476 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 97.5(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. � 154(g)(3)(B). Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 21106 � 181. See 47 U.S.C. � 154(g)(3)(B). 2 ? ^ f g k - ...���PNG ��(R)�R����(R)l2� "� � �p | [ݶѵ R�u�-��s�] <��7�� |��-�
    • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-238456A1.html
      • 101 26' 47''W, a disparity of approximately six seconds of latitude and 33 seconds of longitude (a distance of approximately 2100 feet). b. 47 C.F.R. 17.50: Antenna structures requiring painting under this part shall be cleaned or repainted as often as necessary to maintain good visibility (of the required bands of paint). Antenna structure registration 1217597 lists the structure as 97.5 meters in height with a requirement to be painted and lit in accordance with FCC paragraphs 1, 3, 12, and 21. VIOLATION: On May 29, 2003, you had failed to repaint this structure as often as necessary to maintain good visibility. The painting on this antenna structure was extremely deteriorated reducing the visibility of the structure and obscuring the bands
    • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269876A1.html
      • violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 47 C.F.R. S 2.106. 47 C.F.R. S 97.5(a). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S1.80. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. SS 301, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914 (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269876A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269876A1.doc
    • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3305A1.html
      • District Office (``Kansas City Office'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to AAT for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000).2 AAT's response to the NAL was received on April 7, 2003. II. BACKGROUND 3. AAT is the registered owner of a tower with antenna structure registration (``ASR'') number 1005728 that is 319.88 feet (97.5 meters) above ground level and 1274.93 feet (388.6 meters) above mean sea level. The structure's registration includes a requirement that it be painted in alternating bands of aviation orange and white. 4. On January 13, 2003, a Kansas City Office agent inspected the tower in question, ASR No. 1005728. The structure had chipped and faded paint and was partially obscured
    • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1486A1.html
      • MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 150 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S 15.209. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200732700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, January 24, 2007) ("NAL"). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S 1.80. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D). 47 C.F.R. S 2.106. 47 C.F.R. S 97.5(a). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
    • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-162A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-162A1.pdf
      • over fifty percent, and thus there was no potential ``major'' change in ownership to report. Further, we note that on August 29, 2005, ENFC filed a minor amendment to its Application to update its ownership information and thus, has remedied any deficiencies. Reasonable Site Assurance. In its Application ENFC proposes to install an antenna with a center of radiation of 97.5 meters above ground at a tower site owned by Delmarva Power & Light. PAR asserts that ENFC never obtained reasonable assurance of the availability of the site specified in the Application, and accordingly, the Application must be denied. In support of its allegation, PAR states that its President inquired about the availability of space at 97.5 meters on the tower
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
      • 780.3 11.6 Egypt 49.0 56.9 68.6 90.0 109.9 111.3 169.1 94.4 170.7 291.8 260.4 20.3 El Salvador 107.0 120.8 135.7 141.8 154.9 197.9 237.4 298.1 331.6 669.3 1,016.7 38.5 France 263.7 304.9 362.8 442.6 511.0 560.3 577.1 539.4 725.5 653.5 681.4 4.8 Germany 572.6 604.1 662.3 782.4 1,008.3 1,153.4 1,466.4 1,251.4 886.9 1,057.4 1,501.9 0.0 Greece 75.6 82.1 86.5 91.3 97.5 115.3 183.8 213.8 259.9 172.9 203.6 8.5 Guatemala 93.8 105.4 115.1 128.0 127.3 144.7 189.8 233.1 368.9 909.1 1,455.9 61.2 Haiti 52.9 62.8 73.6 79.2 93.6 99.6 135.9 94.4 67.3 107.8 231.8 9.5 Hong Kong 143.2 213.9 315.8 539.7 677.3 565.3 193.0 163.3 278.1 171.2 232.6 -11.5 India 134.2 191.6 285.7 428.0 583.3 749.7 960.1 1,243.5 1,332.7 1,512.2 1,319.4 12.9
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
      • 0.0100.0 409,728,395 32.3 0.018.718.2 30.8 South America $580,266,539 22.4 0.019.417.1 41.1 $47,311,934 2.3 0.013.326.8 57.6 $12,734,334 89.2 0.0 0.3 0.6 9.8 7,220,943,084 30.3 0.013.517.8 38.5 Afghanistan $17,589,283 12.8 0.058.417.9 10.9 $761,956 0.0 0.0 0.047.3 52.7 $313 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 69,172,093 14.6 0.034.534.0 16.9 Bangladesh $7,891,011 6.8 1.024.410.6 57.2 $2,112,446 0.0 0.0 4.9 3.4 91.7 $285 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 97.5 171,956,688 5.9 0.811.4 3.1 78.8 Bhutan $124,457 8.6 0.022.225.8 43.5 $2,693 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 1,123,938 5.1 0.0 8.744.9 41.3 Brunei $3,738,421 0.4 0.0 3.492.2 4.0 $439,813 0.0 0.021.552.3 26.3 $159 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 20,836,050 0.8 0.029.036.7 33.5 Burma $5,746,331 5.3 0.046.7 0.0 48.1 $107,575 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $39 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 23,475,302 3.7 0.039.8 0.0
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
      • 1.4 96.0 $0 $452,556 5.219.90.032.4 42.5 $129,9840.00.00.00.0 100.0 Sweden 0 $0 $0 $0 Switzerland 39,065 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $420,096 0.0 0.00.0 5.7 94.3 $0 Turkey 2 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $196,117 0.0100.00.0 0.0 0.0 $0 United Kingdom 444,090 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 $0 $9,412,60514.0 0.00.0 3.6 82.4 $542,2190.00.00.00.0 100.0 Western Europe 670,604 0.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 97.5 $0 $13,863,13010.311.20.0 7.1 71.4 $934,2450.00.00.00.0 100.0 Algeria 0 $0 $0 $0 Angola 30 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $940,230 0.0100.00.0 0.0 0.0 $0 Benin 0 $0 $0 $0 Botswana 0 $0 $0 $0 Burkina 0 $0 $0 $0 Burundi 0 $0 $0 $0 Cameroon 0 $0 $0 $0 Canary Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Cape Verde 0 $0 $0 $0
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
      • 8.8 87.0 Grenada $6,317,592 0.0 0.0 1.0 24.3 74.6 $317,441 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $31,254 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 59,908,489 0.0 0.0 0.6 22.4 77.0 Guadeloupe $2,062,390 0.0 0.0 1.1 43.2 55.7 $6,935 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $487,818 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 14,463,678 0.0 0.0 3.0 36.1 60.9 Haiti $108,759,179 0.0 0.0 15.5 8.2 76.4 $2,534,822 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 97.5 $7,367,396 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 639,065,952 0.0 0.0 14.5 8.6 76.9 Jamaica $106,906,210 0.0 0.0 1.4 14.1 84.5 $3,787,725 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 92.7 $2,649,098 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 996,560,789 0.0 0.0 1.0 12.6 86.3 Montserrat $375,620 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 55.8 $1,678 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $11,501 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,841,687 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 43.0 Netherlands Antilles
    • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/docs/prtpgoldfarb.pdf
      • the number of children's series broadcast decreased by 47%, from 88 to 47 different shows per week, and most of that decrease (38 of the 41 shows) was in the children's programming of the stations that are part of the newly created duopolies. ! the number of hours each week devoted to children's programming decreased by more than 50%, from 97.5 hours to 48 hours, and most of that decrease (43.5 hours) was in the children's programming of the stations that are part of the newly created duopolies. However, since the quantity of children's programming fell by approximately half during this period, this 8 appears to represent a doubling, not a quadrupling, of the number of programs repurposed. 3 ! the
    • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prstudy7.pdf
      • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Peer-reviewReporton "MinorityandFemaleOwnershipinMediaEnterprises" byBeresteanuandEllickson Reviewer:B.D.McCullough,DepartmentofDecisionSciences,DrexelUniversity Attheoutset,itshouldbenotedthatareviewoftheauthors'curriculavitae indicatesthattheycertainlyhavetheabilitytodothesophisticatedanalysisthat thisreviewerwouldprefertohaveseen,ratherthanthesimpleanalysisthatthey actuallydid.Theobviousreasonforthisdiscrepancybetweenwhatshouldhave beendoneandwhatwasdoneisthattheauthorswerenotpaidenoughtodoso- phisticatedanalyses.TheFCCshouldhavecontractedwiththeauthorstodoa full-blownstudyoftheproblem,ratherthansimplyconductasmallandperfunc- toryanalysis.TheFCCgotwhatitpaidfor,andiftheresultsarenotverygood thefaultdoesnotliewiththeauthors. Theauthorsconcludethat"minoritiesandfemalesareclearlyunderrepre- sented"intheradio,tv,andnewspapermarketsasifraceandsexaretheonly determiningfactors.Itisentirelypossiblethat,conditioningonrelevantvari- ables,e.g.education,industryexperience,etc.,thereisverylittledisparity,but wewouldn'tknowitfromreadingthisreport.Toillustratethispointanexample fromthewomen'searningsdebateisuseful.Veryoftenwehearthat"awoman earn77centsforeverydollaramanmakes",butthisisjustamarginalresult.A directquotefrom"WomenatWork:AProgressReport"byW.MichaelCoxand RichardAlmoftheDallasFederalReserveBank[EconomicLetter-Insightsfrom theFederalReserveBankofDallas2(5)May2007]isrelevant: Muchofthediscussionofwomenintheworkplacefixatesonpayra- tiosbetweenmenandwomen.Thewagegaphasbeenarallyingcry sincethe1960s,whenwomenonaverageearnedlessthan60cents forevery$1mendid.Overthenext40years,that60centsroseto 81cents.Butmoresophisticatedanalyseswhichaccountforsuch variablesaseducation,workexperience,occupationandfamilyfac- torsshowevengreaterprogressinreducingthewagegap.Economist JuneO'Neill'smostcomprehensivemodel,forexample,concludes thatwomenages35to43earn97.5percentofwhatmendo. Thepointhereisthatsimplisticmarginalcalculationscanmakethingslookmuch worsethantheyare.Ayoungwomanwhohearsonlythe"77cents"refrainmight wellimaginethatherjobprospectsarenotgood.Anotheryoungwomanwho 1 hearsofthebetteranalysisthattakesintoaccountrelevantvariablesmightwell concludethatifshegraduatesfromcollegewithamarketabledegreeandstaysin thelaborforce,she'llearnjustasmuchasaman.Whichisthemessagebetter communicatedtoyoungwomen:"77cents"or"97.5cents"?Thisexampleis onlyusedanillustrativeexampleofthedifferenttypesofanalysesthatcanbe conducted,becauseitisanexamplewithwhichmanyarefamiliar,andshouldnot beconstruedasthefinalwordonthewomen'searningsdebate. Sotherearetwotypesofanalysesthatcanbedone,the"77cents"analysis andthe"97.5cents"analysis.Bothofthemtelldifferentpartsofthestory,but bothofthemhavetobetoldtoformasoundbasisforpolicy.Theauthorsof thepresentstudyhavedonea"77cents"analysisofthesituationinradio,tvand newspapers.Beforepolicyismadeonthisbasis,the"97.5cents"analysisshould bedone.Maybeitwillsustaintheauthors'conclusion,maybeitwon't.Butthe morethorougheconomicanalysisofthesituationiswhatshouldhavebeendoneif thisanalysisistobeusedasabasisforpolicy.Sincethemorethoroughanalysis wasnotdone,thisreportcannotbeusedasasoundbasisforpolicy.TheFCC shouldhaverequested�andpaidfor�the"97.5cents"studyofthisproblem. Additionally,economistsshouldknowbetterthantolumpdifferentgroupsto- gethertoformalargergroup,forthisinvitesSimpson'sParadox.Atthevery least,ifsuchdataaregiventotheeconomistheshouldwarnofthispossibility. Forexample,theauthorsreportthat"Hispanics"areunder-represented.Solelyon theputativebasisoflanguage,thislumpstogetherPuerto-Ricans,Mexicans,and Cubans,despiteoverwhelmingevidencethatthesegroupsareremarkablydissim- ilarintermsofmeaneducation,income,health,etc.(see,.e.g,"Theimpactof ethnicity,familyincome,andparentaleducationonchildren'shealthanduseof healthservices,"AmJPublicHealth199989(7):1066-1071).Howdoweknow thatthisaggregateresultisnotamanifestationofSimpson'sParadox?Toanswer thisproblemwouldhaverequiredagreatdealofwork,morethantheauthorswere paidtodo. Itisonethingtoprovideadescriptiveanalysisofadataset,toprovidemeans, mediansandpercentages.Toclaimtohavefoundthereasonsforthesemeans, mediansandpercentagesissomethingelsealtogether.Theauthorsclaimthatlack ofaccesstocapitalis"aprimarycauseofunder-representationforminorities"on thebasisofananalysisthatdoesnotincludeeducation,workexperience,orany ofahostofothervariables.Again,the"77cents"analysisproblemoccurs.While theauthorsmakeaprimafaciecasethatlackofaccesstocapitalisimportant,the actualassertionofsuchalinkbetweenraceandaccesstocapitalwouldrequire amorecarefulanddetailedanalysis.Itiscertainlyworthconsideringthataccess 2 tocapitalisnotafunctionofrace,butofeducation,personalnetworth,etc.,and thattheserelevantvariablesareonlycorrelatedwithrace.Untilthe"97.5cents" versionofthisstudyisdone,itisnotsafetoconcludethatlackofaccesstocapital (insteadofothervariablesthathappentobecorrelatedwithaccesstocapital)is aprimarycauseofminorityunder-representation.Again,thiswouldhavebeena fullstudyinitself,somethingtheauthorsdoubtlesswerenotpaidtodo. Theauthorsmakefourbulletedrecommendations: �"TheFCCshouldtakestepstoimprovetheirdatacollectionprocess."Itis hardtoarguewiththis. �"[I]nformationonminorityandfemaleownershipshouldbecarefullytracked andintegratedintothemainfirmdatabaseinacoherentfashion."Theau- thorsshouldhaveofferedtheirconsideredopiniononhowtodefinethevari- ablestheywantcollected.Forexample,howwilltheFCCdefineminority status?Forapersontoqualifyasaminority,musthehavetwominority parents,oristhreeoutoffourgrandparentsbeingminoritysufficient?Shall only"minoritystatus"beflagged?Shall"Hispanic"beleftasanaggre- gate,susceptibletoSimpson'sParadox?Shall"Hispanic"bebrokendown
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
      • 14 43.8 n/a 96.4 Mar-00 83 33 14 14 41.377.192.4 Mar-01 85 35 16 14 40.075.592.2 Charleston SC Mar-96 87 27 17 9 22.6n/a 65.1 Nov-97 91 27 15 9 32.8n/a 77.8 Nov-98 97 28 14 9 44.5 n/a 87.6 Mar-00 87 28 15 11 46.777.593.5 Mar-01 86 28 13 10 49.479.194.5 Stockton CA Mar-96 85 10 5 7 58.0n/a 97.5 Nov-97 85 10 6 6 29.7n/a 84.8 Nov-98 84 10 5 6 34.4 n/a 95.1 Mar-00 85 10 5 5 37.974.096.6 Mar-01 87 9 5 6 41.169.5100.0 Wichita KS Mar-96 91 23 9 11 29.3n/a 83.6 Nov-97 90 23 10 11 37.3n/a 91.3 Nov-98 89 23 9 11 36.3 n/a 93.4 Mar-00 84 25 12 12 42.965.592.7 Mar-01 88 25
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
      • known as "satellite-to-home") were comprised mostly of home satellite dish systems in the C-Band. As Table 24 shows, in 1990, there were approximately 760,000 C-Band subscribers.85 By year-end 2001, however, there were less than one million home satellite C-Band subscribers left, but Table 24: Direct-to-Home Subscribers and Cable Subscribers 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2010p Total Households(1) (mil) 87.6 94.8 97.5 104.1 107.4123.3 TV Households(1) (mil) 85.9 93.1 95.9 102.2 105.5121.1 Cable Subscribers (mil.) 36.7 51.7 62.1 68.5 68.6 74.3 Satellite Subscribers (mil.) 0.0 0.8 4.6 16.0 18.7 27.0 C-Band Subscribers(2) (mil) 0.0 0.8(3) 2.4 1.2 0.8 0.0 DBS Subscribers (mil) 0.0 0.0 2.2 14.8 17.9 27.0 Satellite + Cable Subscribers (mil) 36.7 52.5 66.7 84.5 87.3 101.3 Satellite Subs/TVHH (%)
    • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/Depreciation0904.doc
      • 2422.2 UNDERGROUND NON-METAL 7,300,705 3,284,842 45.0 2,935,777 40.2 (349,064) -4.8 2423 BURIED CABLE COMBINED 8,232 3,322 40.3 3,622 44.0 301 3.7 2423.1 BURIED CABLE METALLIC 51,786,291 35,440,913 68.4 30,549,271 59.0 (4,891,642) -9.4 2423.2 BURIED CABLE NON-METALLIC 4,528,903 1,927,183 42.6 1,713,773 37.8 (213,410) -4.7 2424 SUBMARINE CABLE COMBINED 85,071 58,245 68.5 51,085 60.0 (7,160) -8.4 2424.1 SUBMARINE CABLE METALLIC 9,211 8,980 97.5 8,063 87.5 (917) -10.0 2424.2 SUBMARINE CABLE NON-METAL 4,596 1,406 30.6 1,343 29.2 (63) -1.4 2426 INTRABLDG CABLE COMBINED 587,044 515,029 87.7 398,621 67.9 (116,408) -19.8 2426.0 INTRABLDG CABLE METALLIC 1,441,250 1,296,761 90.0 1,072,507 74.4 (224,254) -15.6 2426.0 INTRABLDG CABLE NON-METAL 135,683 110,543 81.5 54,855 40.4 (55,689) -41.0 2431 AERIAL WIRE 94,742 133,930 141.4 103,331 109.1 (30,599) -32.3 2441 CONDUIT