FCC Web Documents citing 90.753

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-116A1.txt
  • Rules to Provider for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, PR Docket No. 89-552, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93-252, Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 3668 (1996) (220 MHz Second Report and Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c). See Petitions for Reconsideration at 4-5. Id. at 7. See Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Provider for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, PR Docket No. 89-552, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93-252, Implementation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-117A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd. 3668, 3673, ¶¶ 15-16 (220 MHz Second Report and Order). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA could permanently relocate their base station to that site so long as it had constructed the base station and placed it into operation, or commenced service, at the STA site on or before January 26, 1996. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(1). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA and had only taken delivery of their base station transceivers on or before January 26, 1996, were also allowed to permanently relocate to that site. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(2). Application to Modify a License in the 220-222 MHz Band, filed by Dale Eaton and Henry Zappia d/b/a/ Arizona Two-Way Communications on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-118A1.txt
  • 24, 2000 Released: January 24, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION . Before us are three petitions for reconsideration filed by Kathleen M. Sloan (Sloan), Kathleen B. Edwards (Edwards) and Maria Dancs (Dancs) seeking reconsideration of the denial by the Land Mobile Branch (Branch) of their individual requests for a waiver of section 90.753(a) of the Commission's rules and the dismissal of their respective applications for modification of their non-nationwide Phase I 220 MHz systems. For the reasons discussed below, we deny all three petitions for reconsideration and affirm the dismissal of their applications for modification. II. BACKGROUND . Pursuant to the 220 MHz Second Report and Order, non-nationwide Phase I 220 MHz licensees
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-193A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd. 3668, 3673, ¶¶ 15-16 (220 MHz Second Report and Order). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA could permanently relocate their base station to that site so long as it had constructed the base station and placed it in operation, or commenced service, at the STA site on or before January 26, 1996. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(1). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA and had only taken delivery of their base station transceivers on or before January 26, 1996, were also allowed to permanently relocate to that site. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(2). Country Petition at 2. Since Country's filing, the former Land Mobile Branch of the Licensing Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-216A1.txt
  • provide accurate information in its application.7 Therefore, we find that the Branch was within its discretion to deny Leggett's request. Nonetheless, in view of the unique circumstances of the instant case, we believe that a waiver of the modification procedures is appropriate. The site granted by Leggett's original modification application was well beyond the 8 kilometer limit allowed under section 90.753(a). The site that Leggett had requested that the license be modified to reflect - and where she has constructed her base station and placed it in operation is approximately 8 kilometers from her originally authorized site. Therefore, amending Leggett's license to reflect the requested coordinates is more consistent with the underlying purpose of the 220 MHz Second Report and Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-45A1.txt
  • Provide for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Services, PR Docket No. 89-552, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93-252, Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 3668 (1996) (220 MHz Second Report and Order). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.751, 90.753, and 90.755. Smith Request. Id. See Letter of Janet L. Sievert, Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, to Andy Bowell, Youngstown Radio, dated June 1, 1998. The staff requested that Youngstown Radio respond within five business days from the date of the letter. See Letter of Janet L. Sievert, Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • policies governing the construction and modification of 220-222 MHz stations. Need: These rules are needed to provide 220-222 MHz licensees with flexibility to modify their authorized facilities, and to provide a safeguard against the warehousing of 220-222 MHz spectrum. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7). Section Number and Title: 90.751 Minor modifications of Phase I, non-nationwide licenses. 90.753 Conditions of license modification. 90.757 Construction requirements. SUBPART V - COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR 800 MHz SPECIALIZED MOBILE RADIO SERVICE Brief Description: The part 90 rules state the conditions under which radio communications systems may be licensed and used in the Public Safety, Industrial/Business Radio Pool, and Radiolocation Radio Services. Subpart V sets forth the rules governing the use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-85A1.txt
  • for Review filed on May 20, 1996, by Arundel Trunked Partnership, James W. Byrnes III, Judith K. Warden, Robert J. Zamito, Norma Beckett, PCK Systems, Paul W. Rutter, Bruce L. Jones, Michael J. Sample, James R. Jensen, Jr., ROKK Associates, and Gerald Crozier (jointly, the Petitioners), seeking review of the denial of the Petitioners' request for a waiver of section 90.753(c) of the Commission's rules. In addition, we have a petition for reconsideration filed by the Petitioners on June 22, 1998 seeking partial reconsideration of the 220 MHz Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration. Both of these pleadings deal with the same issue, and therefore, for administrative convenience, we respond to them in a consolidated order. For the reasons discussed below,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • allow electronic filing of information via ULS; add notification section). 90.727(a) Extended implementation schedules (change to allow 90.727(a) electronic filing of information via ULS). 90.733(h)(2) Permissible operations (change cross-reference). 90.733(h)(2) 90.737(b)-(e) Supplemental reports required of licensees (change to 90.737(b)-(e) allow electronic filing of information via ULS). 90.751 Minor modifications add "of" non-nationwide licenses 90.751 (change to cross-reference new rule sections). 90.753(d), (e) Conditions of license modifications (eliminate letter 90.753(d), (e) filing and change to allow electronic filing of information via ULS). Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 K-6 90.755 Procedures for license modification (move to 1.927, 1.929 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 90.763(b) EA, Regional and Nationwide system operations (change90.763(b) to allow electronic filing of information via ULS). 90.767(b), (c) Construction and implementation
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
  • modification procedure.355 187. The petitioners ask the Commission to reconsider or clarify that licensees who filed STA requests not later than the adoption date of the 220 MHz Second Report and Order and were granted STAs after January 26, 1996 (the adoption date of the 220 MHz Second Report and Order), and who otherwise meet the relocation requirements of Section 90.753(c)(2) of the Commission's Rules, will be allowed to seek permanent authorization at their STA sites. Incom 356 concludes that a licensee who had constructed its base station and had placed it in operation or commenced service as of January 26, 1996, must have been granted an STA by January 26, 1996 - otherwise operation at that site would be in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc960027.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc960027.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc960027.wp
  • and Seattle areas, as well as See Third Notice at para. 31. 33 Page 9 any other urban areas with comparable terrain features, to relocate their stations to sites at higher elevations that may be situated more than 8 km (or 25 km, for licensees authorized outside DFAs) from their authorized location. A licensee seeking such a waiver of Section 90.753 of our Rules must provide (1) a showing that the terrain in question does, in fact, present unique technical and operational problems; and (2) a technical analysis demonstrating that in relocating its base station to its desired location at a higher elevation, the licensee will provide service to substantially the same geographic area it was authorized to serve pursuant to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.wp
  • of the licensee's assigned base station frequencies or mobile station frequencies. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-57 PAGE B-15 (i) Except for nationwide assignments, the separation of co-channel Phase I base stations, or fixed stations transmitting on base station frequencies, shall be 120 kilometers. Except for Phase I licensees seeking license modification in accordance with the provisions of Sections 90.751 and 90.753, shorter separations between such stations will be considered by the Commission on a case-by-case basis upon submission of a technical analysis indicating that at least 10 dB protection will be provided to an existing Phase I station's predicted 38 dBu signal level contour. The existing Phase I station's predicted 38 dBu signal level contour shall be calculated using the F(50,50)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.wp
  • PAGE 79 186. The petitioners ask the Commission to reconsider or clarify that licensees who filed STA requests not later than the adoption date of the 220 MHz Second Report and Order and were granted STAs after January 26, 1996 (the adoption date of the 220 MHz Second Report and Order), and who otherwise meet the relocation requirements of Section 90.753(c)(2) of the Commission's Rules, will be allowed to seek permanent authorization at their STA sites. Incom concludes that a licensee who had 356 constructed its base station and had placed it in operation or commenced service as of January 26, 1996, must have been granted an STA by January 26, 1996 - otherwise operation at that site would be in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.wp
  • station is authorized to transmit on any of the licensee's assigned base station frequencies or mobile station frequencies. (k) Except for nationwide assignments, the separation of co-channel Phase I base stations, or fixed stations transmitting on base station frequencies, shall be 120 kilometers. Except for Phase I licensees seeking license modification in accordance with the provisions of §§ 90.751 and 90.753, shorter separations between such stations will be considered by the Commission on a case-by-case basis upon submission of a technical analysis indicating that at least 10 dB protection will be provided to an existing Phase I station's predicted 38 dBu signal level contour. The existing Phase I station's predicted 38 dBu signal level contour shall be calculated using the F(50,50)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations_1&id=220mhz
  • [25]WTB > [26]Services > [27]220 MHz Services > [28]Operations > Construction Requirements [29]FCC Site Map Operations Construction Requirements Phase I Construction Requirements Phase I non-nationwide licensees are required to complete construction and place their systems into operation within 12 months of initial license grant in accordance with [30]Rule 90.725. Phase I non-nationwide licensees that modified their stations pursuant to [31]Rule 90.753 are required to construct their stations on or before August 15, 1996 or within 12 months of the initial grant date of their modification application in accordance with [32]Rule 90.757. Phase I Nationwide licensees are required to follow a schedule for construction and file benchmark reports at 2, 4, 6, and 10 years after initial license grant. The Construction requirements
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • allow electronic filing of information via ULS; add notification section). 90.727(a) Extended implementation schedules (change to allow 90.727(a) electronic filing of information via ULS). 90.733(h)(2) Permissible operations (change cross-reference). 90.733(h)(2) 90.737(b)-(e) Supplemental reports required of licensees (change to 90.737(b)-(e) allow electronic filing of information via ULS). 90.751 Minor modifications add "of" non-nationwide licenses 90.751 (change to cross-reference new rule sections). 90.753(d), (e) Conditions of license modifications (eliminate letter 90.753(d), (e) filing and change to allow electronic filing of information via ULS). Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 K-6 90.755 Procedures for license modification (move to 1.927, 1.929 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 90.763(b) EA, Regional and Nationwide system operations (change90.763(b) to allow electronic filing of information via ULS). 90.767(b), (c) Construction and implementation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000045.doc
  • Provide for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Services, PR Docket No. 89-552, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93-252, Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 3668 (1996) (220 MHz Second Report and Order). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.751, 90.753, and 90.755. Smith Request. Id. See Letter of Janet L. Sievert, Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, to Andy Bowell, Youngstown Radio, dated June 1, 1998. The staff requested that Youngstown Radio respond within five business days from the date of the letter. See Letter of Janet L. Sievert, Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000116.doc
  • Rules to Provider for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, PR Docket No. 89-552, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93-252, Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 3668 (1996) (220 MHz Second Report and Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c). See Petitions for Reconsideration at 4-5. Id. at 7. See Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Provider for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, PR Docket No. 89-552, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, GN Docket No. 93-252, Implementation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000117.doc
  • FCC Rcd. 3668, 3673, ¶¶ 15-16 (220 MHz Second Report and Order). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA could permanently relocate their base station to that site so long as it had constructed the base station and placed it into operation, or commenced service, at the STA site on or before January 26, 1996. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(1). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA and had only taken delivery of their base station transceivers on or before January 26, 1996, were also allowed to permanently relocate to that site. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(2). Application to Modify a License in the 220-222 MHz Band, filed by Dale Eaton and Henry Zappia d/b/a/ Arizona Two-Way Communications on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000118.doc
  • 24, 2000 Released: January 24, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION . Before us are three petitions for reconsideration filed by Kathleen M. Sloan (Sloan), Kathleen B. Edwards (Edwards) and Maria Dancs (Dancs) seeking reconsideration of the denial by the Land Mobile Branch (Branch) of their individual requests for a waiver of section 90.753(a) of the Commission's rules and the dismissal of their respective applications for modification of their non-nationwide Phase I 220 MHz systems. For the reasons discussed below, we deny all three petitions for reconsideration and affirm the dismissal of their applications for modification. II. BACKGROUND . Pursuant to the 220 MHz Second Report and Order, non-nationwide Phase I 220 MHz licensees
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000193.doc
  • FCC Rcd. 3668, 3673, ¶¶ 15-16 (220 MHz Second Report and Order). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA could permanently relocate their base station to that site so long as it had constructed the base station and placed it in operation, or commenced service, at the STA site on or before January 26, 1996. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(1). Non-nationwide licensees that had been granted an STA and had only taken delivery of their base station transceivers on or before January 26, 1996, were also allowed to permanently relocate to that site. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(2). Country Petition at 2. Since Country's filing, the former Land Mobile Branch of the Licensing Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau was
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00085.doc
  • for Review filed on May 20, 1996, by Arundel Trunked Partnership, James W. Byrnes III, Judith K. Warden, Robert J. Zamito, Norma Beckett, PCK Systems, Paul W. Rutter, Bruce L. Jones, Michael J. Sample, James R. Jensen, Jr., ROKK Associates, and Gerald Crozier (jointly, the Petitioners), seeking review of the denial of the Petitioners' request for a waiver of section 90.753(c) of the Commission's rules. In addition, we have a petition for reconsideration filed by the Petitioners on June 22, 1998 seeking partial reconsideration of the 220 MHz Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration. Both of these pleadings deal with the same issue, and therefore, for administrative convenience, we respond to them in a consolidated order. For the reasons discussed below,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd971017.html
  • establish compensation proxies for call termination between local exchange carriers and paging mobile radio service providers because Metrocall withdrew its Petition for Rulemaking. Action by Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: October 16, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-2213). CCB MINNEAPOLIS SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. Granted the request filed by the Minneapolis Special School District for waiver of Section 90.753 (a) to relocate the base station of its 220 MHz system beyond the maximum distance allowed by the Commission's rules. Action by Bureau Chief. Adopted: October 15, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-2212). WTB Internet URL: [15]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1997/da972212.txt PAGEPLUS, INC. Denied the Petition for Reconsideration filed by PagePlus, Inc. March 25, 1996 seeking review of the Narrowband Branch's letter dismissing the