FCC Web Documents citing 80.207
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.txt
- table in paragraph (a) between J2C and J3C to read as follows: § 80.205 Bandwidths. * * * J2D14........................................ * * * * * * * * 2K80J2D * * * * * * * * 3.0 * * * * * * * * * * 14 The information is contained in multiple very low level subcarriers. 18. Section 80.207 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 80.207 Classes of emission. * * * * * (d) The authorized classes of emission are as follows: Types of stations Classes of emission Ship Stations1 Radiotelegraphy: * * * * * 1605-27500 kHz: Manual15 16 17.......... DSC16.................... NB-DP14 16............ * * * Radiotelephony: 1605-27500 kHz5 16........... * *
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.txt
- it proposes are consistent with existing international standards. Although we disagree with Maritel that its recommended regulations are essential to the provision of narrowband operations, we note that Section 80.213(d) of our Rules currently provides that maritime VHF transmitters ``must be capable of proper operation with a frequency deviation of +/- 5 kHz when using any emission authorized by § 80.207.'' To avoid any uncertainty as to whether this provision requires a frequency deviation of +/- 5 kHz, which would not be compatible with 12.5 kHz narrowband operations, or instead permits any frequency deviation up to +/- 5 kHz, we propose to revise the rule to provide that the equipment ``must be capable of proper operation with a frequency deviation that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
- UST 3450; 3 UST 4726; 12 UST 2377. Section Number and Title: SUBPART B - APPLICATIONS AND LICENSES Automated Maritime Telecommunications System (AMTS) - system licensing. SUBPART C - OPERATING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Public coast stations using facsimile and data. 80.141 General provisions for ship stations. SUBPART E - GENERAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS 80.203 Authorization of transmitters for licensing. 80.205 Bandwidths. 80.207 Classes of emission. 80.211 Emission limitations. 80.213 Modulation requirements. 80.223 Special requirements for survival craft stations. SUBPART G - SAFETY WATCH REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Watch required by voluntary vessels. SUBPART H - FREQUENCIES 80.355 Distress, urgency, safety, call and reply Morse code frequencies. 80.357 Morse code working frequencies. 80.363 Frequencies for facsimile. 80.371 Public correspondence frequencies. 80.373 Private communications frequencies.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1115A1.txt
- 6685, 6702-03 ¶ 37). Havens also suggests that service to fixed land units, such as telemetry and telecommand, does not require interconnection. Petition at 13, 20-21. Such communications do not come within the definition of ``public correspondence,'' and thus are not permitted by Section 80.123. Contrary to Havens's suggestion, see Petition at 7 & n.4, the recent amendment of Section 80.207 to add digital emissions to the list of authorized AMTS emissions, see 47 C.F.R. § 80.207(d) (as amended by Fifth Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 6730), did not in any way expand the scope of Section 80.123. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.txt
- the Commission remove all VPC restrictions relating to maritime traffic and clarify the rules on what inland VPC licenses (and non-inland VPC licenses, when used solely to serve land areas) are permitted to do. Globe Wireless recommends several revisions regarding the Part 80 rules: elimination of sections 80.141(c)(1) and (2), 80.203(b)(3), 80.355, 80.357, and 80.802, modifications to sections 80.203(l), 80.205(a), 80.207(d), 80.363(a), 80.363(a)(1) and (2), 80.371(a) and (b), 80.375 and 80.836, and reevaluation of section 80.373. Recommendation The Part 80 rules commented upon by parties in this proceeding concern licensing, technical, and operational rules, such as technical and operational standards and interference-related issues among Part 80 licensees as well as licensees in adjacent services. As such, the need and purposes for
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2_Erratum.doc
- the Commission remove all VPC restrictions relating to maritime traffic and clarify the rules on what inland VPC licenses (and non-inland VPC licenses, when used solely to serve land areas) are permitted to do. Globe Wireless recommends several revisions regarding the Part 80 rules: elimination of sections 80.141(c)(1) and (2), 80.203(b)(3), 80.355, 80.357, and 80.802, modifications to sections 80.203(l), 80.205(a), 80.207(d), 80.363(a), 80.363(a)(1) and (2), 80.371(a) and (b), 80.375 and 80.836, and reevaluation of section 80.373. Recommendation The Part 80 rules commented upon by parties in this proceeding concern licensing, technical, and operational rules, such as technical and operational standards and interference-related issues among Part 80 licensees as well as licensees in adjacent services. As such, the need and purposes for
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1325A1.pdf
- routing of security alerts, Regulation XI-2/6.2.1.Updated References to International Standards. F. 2002 Biennial Review Remote Control Programming of Transmitters. The Commission retained Section 80.203(b)(3) but added to it a provision permitting computerized remote control programming of maritime transmitters, provided that the remote control software is disabled from selecting non-authorized frequencies. Emission Classes. The Commission declined at this timeto amend Section 80.207(d) to remove the list of permissible emission classes and also including various requests to add specific emission designators to Section 80.207(d). Morse Code Frequencies. There remain a number of valid licenses with Morse radiotelegraphy authorizations. The Commission remained unconvinced that deleting the Morse radiotelegraph frequencytables is necessaryor beneficial at this time. The Commission noted that eliminating the Morse rules would
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.txt
- to the Assignment of a Five-Channel 220 MHz Nationwide License to the Association of American Railroads, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24711 (WTB 2003). Id. at 4. See Attachment 2 to Waiver Request, which list 35 counties from Washington, DC to Boston, Massachusetts included in Amtrak's Northeast Corridor. Specifically, Amtrak seeks a waiver of Sections 80.92(a), 80.102(a), 80.105, 80.106, 80.123, 80.205, 80.207, 80.215(e)(2), 80.215(h)(5), 80.215(i), 80.385(a)(2), 80.475(c) and 80.479(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 80.105, 80.106, 80.123, 80.205, 80.207, 80.371, 80.215(e)(2), 80.215(h)(5), 80.215(i), 80.385(a)(2), 80.475(c) and 80.479(c) to the extent applicable, in order to permit use of the frequencies for exclusive-use private land mobile radio (PLMR) communications. We note that the Commission has offered guidance to prospective waiver applicants regarding
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1_Rcd.pdf
- Consent to the Assignment of a Five-Channel 220 MHz Nationwide License to the Association of American Railroads, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24711 (WTB 2003). 6Id.at 4. 7See Attachment 2 to Waiver Request, which list 35 counties from Washington, DC to Boston, Massachusetts included in Amtrak's Northeast Corridor. 8Specifically, Amtrak seeks a waiver of Sections 80.92(a), 80.102(a), 80.105, 80.106, 80.123, 80.205, 80.207, 80.215(e)(2), 80.215(h)(5), 80.215(i), 80.385(a)(2), 80.475(c) and 80.479(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 80.105, 80.106, 80.123, 80.205, 80.207, 80.371, 80.215(e)(2), 80.215(h)(5), 80.215(i), 80.385(a)(2), 80.475(c) and 80.479(c) to the extent applicable, in order to permit use of the frequencies for exclusive-use private land mobile radio (PLMR) communications. We note that the Commission has offered guidance to prospective waiver applicants regardingsome
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.txt
- be maintained between 75 and 100 percent. A frequency deviation of ± 5 kHz is defined as 100 percent peak modulation; and * * * * * (d) Ship and coast station transmitters operating in the 156-162 MHz band must be capable of proper operation with a frequency deviation of ± 5 kHz when using any emission authorized by § 80.207 of this part. * * * * * 6. Section 80.215 is amended by removing and reserving footnote 7, and revising paragraphs (h)(2), (h)(5), and (i) introductory paragraph to read as follows: § 80.215 Transmitter power. * * * * * (h) * * * (2) Coast stations located less than 169 kilometers (105 miles) from a channel 13 TV
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.txt
- it proposes are consistent with existing international standards. Although we disagree with Maritel that its recommended regulations are essential to the provision of narrowband operations, we note that Section 80.213(d) of our Rules currently provides that maritime VHF transmitters ``must be capable of proper operation with a frequency deviation of +/- 5 kHz when using any emission authorized by § 80.207.'' To avoid any uncertainty as to whether this provision requires a frequency deviation of +/- 5 kHz, which would not be compatible with 12.5 kHz narrowband operations, or instead permits any frequency deviation up to +/- 5 kHz, we propose to revise the rule to provide that the equipment ``must be capable of proper operation with a frequency deviation that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.txt
- and must otherwise be in accord with ITU Radio Regulation S52.54.1. We agree with the Task Force and other commenters that 500 kHz and 8364 kHz should be deleted as distress and safety frequencies, as these frequencies are not currently in use. Therefore, we will delete the references thereto throughout our Rules, including the references in Sections 80.101(c), 80.143, 80.146, 80.207, 80.223, and 80.302. We will not, however, delete the Morse radiotelegraph frequencies, because despite the USCG's assertion that there are no commercial or government operated coast radio stations providing any Morse radiotelegraphy services in the U.S., we find that though the Morse radiotelegraph frequencies are rarely used, if at all, there is no concrete evidence that they are completely unused
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1_Erratum.doc
- and must otherwise be in accord with ITU Radio Regulation S52.54.1. We agree with the Task Force and other commenters that 500 kHz and 8364 kHz should be deleted as distress and safety frequencies, as these frequencies are not currently in use. Therefore, we will delete the references thereto throughout our Rules, including the references in Sections 80.101(c), 80.143, 80.146, 80.207, 80.223, and 80.302. We will not, however, delete the Morse radiotelegraph frequencies, because despite the USCG's assertion that there are no commercial or government operated coast radio stations providing any Morse radiotelegraphy services in the U.S., we find that though the Morse radiotelegraph frequencies are rarely used, if at all, there is no concrete evidence that they are completely unused
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-74A1.txt
- paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 80.153 Coast station operator requirements. (a) Except as provided in § 80.179, operation of a coast station transmitter must be performed by a person who is on duty at the control point of the station. The operator is responsible for the proper operation of the station. * * * * * 7. Section 80.207 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 80.207 Classes of emission. * * * * * (d) The authorized classes of emission are as follows: Types of stations Classes of emission Ship Stations1 Radiotelegraphy: * * * * * 216-220 MHz3 ................. * * * * * * Land Stations1 Radiotelegraphy: * * * * *
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-74A1_Erratum.doc
- paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 80.153 Coast station operator requirements. (a) Except as provided in § 80.179, operation of a coast station transmitter must be performed by a person who is on duty at the control point of the station. The operator is responsible for the proper operation of the station. * * * * * 7. Section 80.207 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 80.207 Classes of emission. * * * * * (d) The authorized classes of emission are as follows: Types of stations Classes of emission Ship Stations1 Radiotelegraphy: * * * * * 216-220 MHz3 ................. * * * * * * Land Stations1 Radiotelegraphy: * * * * *
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
- and there is nothing in the record to indicate that it will adversely affect manufacturers. In addition, we conclude that a prohibition on devices capable of transmitting unauthorized signals is consistent with the Communications Act. Emission Classes The Commission invited further comment in the FNPRM on whether to delete any of the emission classes authorized under section 80.205 or section 80.207. The Commission asked any proponents of the deletion of an emission class to explain the public interest benefits of such a deletion, and said it was especially interested in receiving data or anecdotal evidence indicating whether the availability of these emission classes has caused actual interference to marine radio communications. The Commission received no comments addressing this issue, and we
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.txt
- applicable to maritime transmitters under Part 80 of the Commission's Rules. MariTEL's contentions to the contrary appear to be premised on a comparison of the IEC 61993-2 25 kHz mask that is incorporated by reference in Section 80.1101(c)(12) with the Part 90 emission mask, set forth in Section 90.210, that is applicable to narrowband Part 80 operations pursuant to Section 80.207(d). The proper comparison, however, is with the emission mask set forth in Section 80.211. That comparison demonstrates that the AIS emission mask is not less rigorous than the otherwise applicable Part 80 mask. We conclude that the public interest benefits of conforming our Part 80 rules governing the certification of AIS equipment with those used in other nations and internationally
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.txt
- requirement that manual, i.e., non-remote control, programming be done only by persons holding one of the enumerated Commission authorizations. Instead, we retain Section 80.203(b)(3) but add to it a provision permitting computerized remote control programming of maritime transmitters, provided that the remote control software is disabled from selecting non-authorized frequencies. Emission Classes. Globe Wireless and MariTEL both recommend amending Section 80.207 of the Commission's Rules so that any emission class of the licensee's choosing may be used on any non-distress frequencies, provided that licensees transmit only within their authorized bandwidth and in compliance with the applicable emission mask. According to Globe Wireless and MariTEL, the Section 80.207 list of permissible emission classes is not up to date, does not accommodate new
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.txt
- the testing requirement is beyond the scope of this proceeding. We therefore retain the requirement for weekly testing of the equipment. Other Matters We take this opportunity to remove obsolete provisions and correct typographical errors in Part 80. These are non-controversial rule amendments that the Commission may adopt without notice and comment. Specifically, we remove obsolete provisions from Sections 80.205, 80.207, 80.209, and 80.375(d), remove obsolete references to Class A and Class B EPIRBs from Sections 80.15(e), 80.310, and 80.905(a)(3)(iii)(B), update the cross-reference in the Section 80.5 definition of ``navigable waters,'' conform the commercial radio operator license codes referenced in the Part 80 rules to the codes actually used for such licenses in the Commission's Universal Licensing System (ULS) database, and
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.wp
- (a) is amended by modifying the second "J2B" entry to read as follows: § 80.205 Bandwidths. (a) * * * Classes of emission Emission Authorized designator bandwidth (kHz) * * * J2B................ 300HJ2B 0.5 5 * * * * * NB-DP radiotelegraph and data transmissions for communications with public coast stations. 5 * * * * * 16. In Section 80.207, paragraph (a) is revised, paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) are deleted and the table listed in paragraph (d) is amended by revising footnote 1, footnote 2 and adding footnote 13 to read as follows: § 80.207 Classes of emission. (a) Authorization to use radiotelephone and radiotelegraph emissions by ship and coast stations includes the use of digital selective calling and selective calling techniques
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.wp
- of alternative data communications protocols on NB-DP frequencies so long as the transmissions meet the present bandwidth, frequency tolerance, and emission limitations for NB-DP signals and the equipment is capable of, but not limited to, operation in Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-217 Further Notice at 10 FCC Rcd 5729. These technical criteria are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 80.205, 80.207, 119 80.209, and 80.211(f). The international standard ND-DP protocol is specified in ITU-R Recommendation 625, Direct- printing Telegraph Equipment Employing Automatic Identification in the Maritime Mobile Service. See, e.g., Globe Wireless Comments at 3; MMR Comments at 13; Malloy Comments at 1; Pin Oak Comments 120 at 4; RTCM Comments at 5. Pin Oak Comments at 4-5. 121 See supra
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.wp
- modulation is used in the 156-162 MHz band the peak modulation must be maintained between 75 and 100 percent. * * * * * * * * (d) Ship and coast station transmitters operating in the 156-162 MHz band must be capable of proper operation with a frequency deviation of ± 5 kHz when using any emission authorized by § 80.207 of this part. 11. Section 80.303 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 80.303 Watch on 156.800 MHz (Channel 16). * * * * * (b) A coast station is exempt from compliance with the watch requirement when Federal, State, or Local Government stations maintain a watch on 156.800 MHz over 95% of the coast station's
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op981002.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op981002.wp
- the Year 2000 problem. Comments due 60 days after Federal Register publication; replies due 90 days after Federal Register Publication. PN 9/30/98; DA 98-1985 FCC Seeks Comment on Technology for Communications International's Requests for Waiver to Permit Use of Marine Frequencies for Land-Based Services On January 6, 1998, Technology for Communications International (TIC) filed a request of waiver of Sections 80.207 and 80.453 of the Commission's Rules to enable it to use maritime frequencies for both maritime communications service and service to fixed and mobile transceivers on land, on a secondary, non-interference basis, using 2K8D1D and 2K8F1D emission. The secondary service would be devoted to a tracking and messaging system for the commercial trucking industry. Comments due October 15; replies October
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op981009.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op981009.wp
- the Year 2000 problem. Comments due 60 days after Federal Register publication; replies due 90 days after Federal Register Publication. PN 9/30/98; DA 98-1985 FCC Seeks Comment on Technology for Communications International's Requests for Waiver to Permit Use of Marine Frequencies for Land-Based Services On January 6, 1998, Technology for Communications International (TIC) filed a request of waiver of Sections 80.207 and 80.453 of the Commission's Rules to enable it to use maritime frequencies for both maritime communications service and service to fixed and mobile transceivers on land, on a secondary, non-interference basis, using 2K8D1D and 2K8F1D emission. The secondary service would be devoted to a tracking and messaging system for the commercial trucking industry. Comments due October 15; replies October
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00105.doc
- table in paragraph (a) between J2C and J3C to read as follows: § 80.205 Bandwidths. * * * J2D14........................................ * * * * * * * * 2K80J2D * * * * * * * * 3.0 * * * * * * * * * * 14 The information is contained in multiple very low level subcarriers. 18. Section 80.207 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 80.207 Classes of emission. * * * * * (d) The authorized classes of emission are as follows: Types of stations Classes of emission Ship Stations1 Radiotelegraphy: * * * * * 1605-27500 kHz: Manual15 16 17.......... DSC16.................... NB-DP14 16............ * * * Radiotelephony: 1605-27500 kHz5 16........... * *
- http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980604.html
- Internet URL: [14]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98103.wp APPLICATIONS OF TCI WIRELESS, INC. FOR PUBLIC COAST LICENSES FOR OCEAN GATE, NEW JERSEY, PENNSUCO, FLORIDA AND DIXON, CALIFORNIA. Granted in part and denied in part TCI Wireless, Inc.'s (TCIW) applications seeking authority to operate high seas public coast stations at Ocean Gate, NJ, Pennsuco, FL, and Dixon, CA and TCIW's waiver request seeking waiver of Sections 80.207 and 80.371 of the Commission's Rules and of Article S52.217 and the Appendix 25 International Frequency List of the International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulations to permit TCIW to use emission designator 2K80J1DEN on radiotelephony frequencies currently assigned to AT&T Corporation. Action by Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division. Adopted: June 1, 1998. by Order. (DA No. 98-1034). WTB *
- http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd991004.html
- of a decision made by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau denying its request for a finder's preference for Station WNIR380, licensed to Larry Callander d/b/a C & L Service, Inc. Action by Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division. Adopted: October 1, 1999. by MO&O. (DA No. 99-1951). WTB TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL. Denied Technology Communications International's (TCI's) request for waiver of Sections 80.207 and 80.453 of the Commission's Rules to permit TCI to use data and telemetry emissions and to serve fixed mobile transceivers on land in addition to maritime units. Action by Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division. Adopted: September 30, 1999. by Order. (DA No. 99-2015). WTB Internet URL: [32]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992015.wp USA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. II. Dismissed as moot the petition