FCC Web Documents citing 76.980

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.pdf
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.pdf
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.pdf
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.pdf
  • On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband (``Bend Broadband'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.pdf
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cox Communications (``Cox'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to GCI, Inc. (``GCI'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.pdf
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Harron Entertainment Company (``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. (``Midcontinent'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to RCN Corporation (``RCN'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. (``Suddenlink'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Verizon Communications (``Verizon'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.pdf
  • and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14981 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.pdf
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.pdf
  • and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14962 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • to file corrected complaint. 76.956 Cable operator response. 76.957 Commission adjudication of the complaint. 76.960 Prospective rate reductions. 76.961 Refunds. 76.962 Implementation and certification of compliance. 76.963 Forfeiture. 76.970 Commercial leased access rates. 76.971 Commercial leased access terms and conditions. 76.975 Commercial leased access dispute resolution. 76.977 Minority and educational programming used in lieu of designated commercial leased access capacity. 76.980 Charges for customer changes. 76.981 Negative option billing. 76.982 Continuation of rate agreements. 76.983 Discrimination. 76.984 Geographically uniform rate structure. 76.985 Subscriber bill itemization. 76.986 "A la carte" offerings. 76.987 New product tiers. 76.990 Small cable operators. SUBPART O -- COMPETITIVE ACCESS TO CABLE PROGRAMMING Brief Description: These rules prescribe regulations that govern the access by competing multichannel video programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.txt
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.txt
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.txt
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.txt
  • On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband (``Bend Broadband'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.txt
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cox Communications (``Cox'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to GCI, Inc. (``GCI'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.txt
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Harron Entertainment Company (``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. (``Midcontinent'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to RCN Corporation (``RCN'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. (``Suddenlink'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.txt
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Verizon Communications (``Verizon'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 C.F.R. §§76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b. of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.txt
  • and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14981 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.txt
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.txt
  • and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14962 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • Brief Description: These rules define the obligations of cable operators subject to rate regulation, in particular the limits imposed on cable operators' ability to charge subscribers for changes in subscriber services. Need: The statute requires adoption of rate regulations and imposes limits on charges that cable operators can impose on subscribers. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 543. Section Number and Title: 76.980 Charges for customer changes. SUBPART S-OPEN VIDEO SYSTEMS Brief Description: These rules provide for the certification and programming requirements for open video systems, including recordkeeping requirements. Need: Maintenance of records documenting nondiscrimination is needed. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 573 Section Number and Title: 76.1503(c)(2)(ii) Carriage of video programming providers on open video systems. SUBPART T-NOTICES Brief Description: These rules require
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.txt
  • was raised for comment throughout the PN.I4l Under this scenario, similar services would be required to be sold together for the subscriber's convenience. Some examples of this approach include family tiers, sports tiers, and foreign language tiers. The Sports `36 Id 13' Insight Comments at 19. DirecTV Comments at 8. 138 Charter Comments at 14-15. 139 14' 47 C.F.R. 9 76.980(d). 14' See 19 FCC Rcd at 9291-9294. THE REPORT 33 . / Leagues' comments exemplify the difficulties in establishing themed tiers. They state that sports programming is programming that can be viewed by the entire family, and would fit well within a "family tier." The inclusion or exclusion of sports programming networks from a "family tier" would raise important questions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.txt
  • recognized and that would need to be accounted for? Regardless of the rule changes made in this proceeding, the existing rules would continue to apply to all pending CPST matters. We propose to delete the following rule sections or paragraphs: 76.901(d); 76.922(c)(4); 76.924(e)(1)(ii); 76.924(e)(2)(ii); 76.934(c)(2); 76.934(d); 76.934(h)(3)(iii); 76.934(h)(6); 76.934(h)(10); 76.950; 76.951; 76.953; 76.954; 76.955; 76.956; 76.957; 76.960; 76.961; 76.962; 76.963(b); 76.980(b), (d)-(f); 76.985 (FCC Form 329 and Instructions); 76.986; 76.987; 76.1402; 76.1605; and 76.1606. Other rules continue to be applicable to BST rate making but should be updated or amended to eliminate references to CPST or to reflect the end of CPST rate regulation. These rule sections or paragraphs are: 76.922(a); 76.922(b)(5); 76.922(b)(7); 76.922(e)(2)(iii)(C); 76.922(f)(4); 76.922(f)(8); 76.922(g); 76.922(i)(1), (2); 76.922(k); 76.924(a);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.txt
  • (i.e., non-SDV) cable products. EB is investigating whether Cox's deployment of SDV made certain channels inaccessible without a Cox set top receiver and thus inaccessible by non-Cox unidirectional products such as CableCARD. These include 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, which requires separate charges for services and equipment, and the more general requirements regarding customer charges set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.980 and 76.984. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.1603 (requiring written notice of service changes). See Request at 1. Wein had obtained a copy of a supplemental response to the LOI when that document was mistakenly made publicly available. See Wein, FCC Investigation of Switched Digital Video Began in November, Comm. Daily (Apr. 7, 2008) (Wein Article) at 7. See Letter from
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2299A1.html
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2300A1.html
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2301A1.html
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2488A1.html
  • On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband ("Bend Broadband" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2489A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bright House Networks, LLC ("Bright House" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2490A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cablevision Systems Corp. ("Cablevision" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2491A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Comcast Corporation ("Comcast" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2492A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cox Communications ("Cox" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2493A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to GCI, Inc. ("GCI" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2494A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Harron Entertainment Company ("Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2495A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ("Midcontinent" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2496A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to RCN Corporation ("RCN" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2497A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ("Suddenlink" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2498A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2499A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Verizon Communications ("Verizon" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2500A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-120A1.html
  • and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14981 (Enf. Bur. 2008) ("TWC NAL and Order"). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-122A1.html
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-123A1.html
  • and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14962 (Enf. Bur. 2008) ("TWC NAL and Order"). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2299A1.html
  • County cable system. We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2300A1.html
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2301A1.html
  • relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2488A1.html
  • On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband ("Bend Broadband" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2489A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bright House Networks, LLC ("Bright House" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2490A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cablevision Systems Corp. ("Cablevision" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2491A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Comcast Corporation ("Comcast" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2492A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cox Communications ("Cox" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2493A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to GCI, Inc. ("GCI" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2494A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Harron Entertainment Company ("Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2495A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ("Midcontinent" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2496A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to RCN Corporation ("RCN" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2497A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ("Suddenlink" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2498A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2499A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Verizon Communications ("Verizon" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2500A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question 8.b.
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • to file corrected complaint. [125]76.956 Cable operator response. [126]76.957 Commission adjudication of the complaint. [127]76.960 Prospective rate reductions. [128]76.961 Refunds. [129]76.962 Implementation and certification of compliance. [130]76.963 Forfeiture. [131]76.970 Commercial leased access rates. [132]76.971 Commercial leased access terms and conditions. [133]76.975 Commercial leased access dispute resolution. [134]76.977 Minority and educational programming used in lieu of designated commercial leased access capacity. [135]76.980 Charges for customer changes. [136]76.981 Negative option billing. [137]76.982 Continuation of rate agreements. [138]76.983 Discrimination. [139]76.984 Geographically uniform rate structure. [140]76.985 Subscriber bill itemization. [141]76.986 "A la carte" offerings. [142]76.987 New product tiers. [143]76.990 Small cable operators. Subpart O -- Competitive Access to Cable Programming [144]76.1000 Definitions. [145]76.1001 Unfair practices generally. [146]76.1002 Specific unfair practices prohibited. [147]76.1003 Program access proceedings.
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • Refunds. § 76.962 Implementation and certification of compliance. § 76.963 Forfeiture. § 76.970 Commercial leased access rates. § 76.971 Commercial leased access terms and conditions. § 76.972 Customer service standards. § 76.975 Commercial leased access dispute resolution. § 76.977 Minority and educational programming used in lieu of designated commercial leased access capacity. § 76.978 Leased access annual reporting requirement. § 76.980 Charges for customer changes. § 76.981 Negative option billing. § 76.982 Continuation of rate agreements. § 76.983 Discrimination. § 76.984 Geographically uniform rate structure. § 76.985 Subscriber bill itemization. § 76.986 "A la carte" offerings. § 76.987 New product tiers. § 76.990 Small cable operators. Subpart O-Competitive Access to Cable Programming § 76.1000 Definitions. § 76.1001 Unfair practices generally. §