FCC Web Documents citing 76.944

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.txt
  • L.P. from a Rate Order of the City of Bowie, Maryland (filed Dec. 31, 1997) (``Maryland Cable Appeal''), Exhibit 1. Opposition to Appeal of Maryland Cable Partners, L.P. from a Rate Order of the City of Bowie, Maryland (filed Jan. 21, 1998) (``City Opposition''). Reply of Maryland Cable Partners, L.P. (filed Jan. 23, 1998) (``Maryland Cable Reply''). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration'').
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.txt
  • Appeal, Exhibit 1, Resolution and Rate Order Regarding Basic Service and Equipment and Other Charges of Comcast Cablevision of Detroit, approved Jan. 29. 1999 (``Local Rate Order''). The Local Rate Order can also be found at City Opposition, Exhibit A. In light of the disposition on the merits, the petition for stay is being dismissed as moot. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1057A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1057A1.txt
  • action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section � 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Petition for Review of Rate Order (July 11, 1997) (``Falcon Appeal''). Opposition of City to Petition (July 22, 1997) (``City Opposition''). Reply (July 31, 1997) (``Falcon Reply''). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5729 (1993) (``Rate Order''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732; Rate Regulation & Buy-Through Prohibition, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Recon.''). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732; see also, Third Recon., 9 FCC Rcd at 4346. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(b). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1460A1.txt
  • 95-3450 (Sept. 14, 1995); Cencom Cable Television, Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Walnut Appeal''), Exhibit A, City of Walnut Local Resolutions No. 4030, 4031 (Jul. 28, 1995). 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(3); 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(a)(2). 47 C.F.R � 76.922(d), (e), (f). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"), Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Temple City Appeal at 2; Cencom Walnut Appeal at 3. Temple City Appeal, Exhibit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.txt
  • Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.R.F. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (June 25, 2001); Rate Order adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bainbridge on June 19, 2001, and signed by the City Manager on June 20, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.txt
  • is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.R.F. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (March 21, 2001); Exhibit A, Letter from John D. Day, Deputy County Manager, to Robert Melton, General Manager, Time Warner Cable (March 1, 2001) 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.txt
  • Report and Order, and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 9 FCC Rcd 4119 (1994) ("Second Reconsideration Order"); FCC Form 1200, Setting Maximum Initial Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services Pursuant to Rules Adopted February 22, 1994. Operators may also elect to justify rates with a cost-of-service showing. 47 C.F.R � 76.922(d), (e), (f). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"), Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(b). The City
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-825A1.txt
  • Time Warner Cable (``TWC'') to be Unreasonable, Prescribing a Reasonable Rate and Ordering Refunds to Subscribers (adopted Feb. 20, 2001) (``PCTA Rate Order''). Emergency Petition for Stay of Enforcement Pending Appeal of Local Rate Order (Mar. 2, 2001). In light of our action on the merits, this stay request is dismissed as moot. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 para. 149 (1993) ("Rate Order"), Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 para. 81 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). TWC Appeal, Exhibit C, Nov. 9, 2000 Letter from Kristy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1475A1.txt
  • � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Media Bureau Petition for Review of Rate Order, CUID No. GA0399 (June 11, 1997) (``Petition''). Opposition of the City of Bowdon, Georgia to Petition for Review of Rate Order (June 19, 1997) (``City Opposition''). Reply to Opposition (July 2, 1997) (``Falcon Reply''). 47 U.S.C. � 543(a), (b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993). Petition at 2. Id.; see also Falcon Reply at 2. Falcon Petition at 2. Id. at 3. Form 1240 implements the Commission's rules governing the annual rate adjustment methodology. Falcon Reply at 3. City Opposition at 2. Id. Id. at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1671A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steve Broeckaert Acting Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Azusa (Resolution No. 97-C140). Duarte (Resolution No. 97-40). Norwalk (Resolution No. 4546). In light of our action on the merits, we dismiss the stay requests as moot. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Charter Communications Entertainment II, L.P. and Long Beach Acquisition Corp., 13 FCC Rcd 8506 (1998). Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. 16 FCC Rcd 15612 (2001). (continued....) Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.txt
  • This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Acting Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (February 8, 2002); Attachment A, Letter from Ronald Lee, Township Manager, to David Mothershed, General Manager, Charter Communications (January 29, 2002). 47 C.F.R � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1768A1.txt
  • Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 9 FCC Rcd 4119 (1994) ("Second Reconsideration Order"); FCC Form 1200, Setting Maximum Initial Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services Pursuant to Rules Adopted February 22, 1994. Operators may also elect to justify rates with a cost-of-service showing. 47 C.F.R � 76.922(d), (e), (f). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Rifkin Appeal at 2. Id. at 1. City of Duluth Opposition at 2. Rifkin & Associates, 16 FCC Rcd 2918 (CSB 2001). Id. at 2922. See Falcon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.txt
  • This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (December 12, 2001); Attachment A, Letter from Scott E. McNeil, City Manager, to Denise M. Jones, Director, Charter Communications, (November 15, 2001). 47 C.F.R � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-967A1.txt
  • of the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy (``Cox Appeal''), Exhibits 1, 2, respectively (May 29, 2001). DTE, Opposition of the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy to Coxcom, Inc.'s Appeal of Local Rate Order (``DTE Opposition'') (June 13, 2001). Cox, Reply to Opposition (June 25, 2001). Section 623(a), (b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 543(a), (b). Section 76.944 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, MM Docket No. 92-266, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("Rate Order"), 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993); see also MM Docket No. 92-266, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.txt
  • consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 23. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Resolution Nos. 215 and 216. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-149A1.txt
  • with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 9. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Resolution No. 69036. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). San Jose is certified by the Commission to regulate basic cable television rates. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-150A1.txt
  • Policy Division Media Bureau The Commission previously granted TCI-G's request for a stay of Moultrie's local rate order pending resolution of the operator's appeal on the merits. In the Matter of TCI TKR of Georgia, Inc., DA 00-406 (February 25, 2000). 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(g)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(g). MB Docket No. 02-144,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.txt
  • PART as provided above and the Rate Order of the Town of Smithfield IS REMANDED for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(c) and (f). Id. at 2. Id. Id. See Exhibit C, December 6, 2001 Letter from TWC to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-178A1.txt
  • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-177, 8 FCC Rcd. 5631 at 5815, � 295 (1993) (footnote omitted). See also First Order on Reconsideration, Second Report and Order, and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-428, 9 FCC Rcd 1164 at 1190, � 47 (1993). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). 5) (``Cablevision''). TCI filed an Application for Review and a request for stay of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-179A1.txt
  • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-177, 8 FCC Rcd. 5631 at 5815, � 295 (1993) (footnote omitted). See also First Order on Reconsideration, Second Report and Order, and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-428, 9 FCC Rcd 1164 at 1190, � 47 (1993). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). In the Matter of TCI Cablevision of Hayward, Inc., Benchmark Filings to Support Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-180A1.txt
  • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-177, 8 FCC Rcd. 5631 at 5815, � 295 (1993) (footnote omitted). See also First Order on Reconsideration, Second Report and Order, and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-428, 9 FCC Rcd 1164 at 1190, � 47 (1993). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). 5) (``TCI Cablevision''). TCI filed an Application for Review and a request for stay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.txt
  • Media Bureau Locally identified as Docket No. CTV 01-1/01-3. A ``true-up'' adjustment is an adjustment or correction of projected cost increases from a prior year done in an annual computation of basic service rates by every cable system without effective competition. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2339A1.txt
  • Simultaneously with its appeal, Adelphia filed an Emergency Petition for Stay of Enforcement Pending Appeal of Rate Order (``Emergency Petition for Stay''). Since we are reviewing Adelphia's appeal on its merits, we are dismissing the Emergency Petition for Stay as moot. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. See Commission web page, http://www.fcc.gov/mb/mbform.html (visited June 24, 2003). Under 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(g)(2), if the franchising authority fails to act within 12 months, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2554A1.txt
  • information at the time of the County's order.''). Opposition at 2-9. Appeal of Local Rate Order, filed by Adelphia on June 26, 2003; Opposition of the City of Los Angeles, California to Adelphia's Appeal of Local Rate Order, filed on July 11, 2003; Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order, filed on July 21, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(c) provides: ``An operator that uses the annual rate adjustment method under Section 76.922(e) may include in its next true up under Section 76.922(e)(3) any amounts to which the operator would have been entitled but for a franchising authority decision that is not upheld on appeal.'' Request at 14. Request at 14-15; Opposition at 12 & n.34. (...continued from previous page)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3127A1.txt
  • Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order, filed on July 18, 2003. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. Adelphia of Winchester Appeal at 2; City of Winchester Opposition, Attachment 2 at 1. City of Winchester Opposition, Attachment 2 (Adelphia of Winchester's 2002 Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3537A1.txt
  • is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Identified locally as Resolutions Nos. 23-96 and 96-14, respectively. Appeal at 1. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Appeal at 1. Appeal Exhibit C at 2. Id.at 8. Id. at 1 - 2. Id. at 2. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3658A1.txt
  • at 5. Id. OCTV Response at 1. OCTV Response at 2. Id. See Cencom Cable Income Partners II, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). Communications Act � 623, 47 U.S.C. � 543. Communications Act � 623(b)(1), (3), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1), (3); 47 C.F.R. �� 76.922, 76.923. Communications Act � 623 (b)(5)(B), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F. R. � 76.944. See Cencom, 12 FCC Rcd 7948, 7958. See id. See Continental, 10 FCC Rcd 7569-70 (CSB 1995). Id. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3658 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3658 �@��� �@��� ' ( ) * + + , . ? C I L [ \ � � � � � hY h h� @& � + /. 2p # �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4108A1.txt
  • 2003. The latter filing drew an Opposition, filed by Comcast on December 3, 2003. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. Township's first Motion to Strike, Exh. 2 (2002 Form 1240 Cover Letter); Reply at 3 n.3. Petition at 2, n.1 & text accompanying n.3. Appeal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-451A1.txt
  • No. 99-R-10185. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5718-19, 5731-32 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). ``Forced relocate'' costs involve the relocation of Century's underground facilities. CSB-A-0587. CSB-A-0639. Appeal at 2; citing In the Matter of Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation (1995), Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 95-397, MM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-603A1.txt
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Falcon Cable Systems Company II, a California Limited Partnership, D/B/A Charter Communications, 17 FCC Rcd 4648 (2002)(``Falcon''). The 12 Oregon communities include: Bay City (OR0086); Brownsville (OR0214); Coberg (OR0176); Cottage Grove (OR0340); Creswell (OR0321); Drain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-771A1.txt
  • extent indicated herein and the Rate Order of the Township of Middletown, Pennsylvania IS REMANDED for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(c) and (f). Appeal Petition at 1. Id. at 3. Id. As part of the annual rate change,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-784A1.txt
  • Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(b). In the case of a cost-of-service filing, the local franchising authority may extend the review period by 150 days. Id. This would give the local franchising
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.txt
  • rates or the ordering of refunds. The Ratepayer Advocate is an independent New Jersey State agency that represents the interests of utility consumers, including residential, business, commercial, and industrial entities, and participates in proceedings before the Board. Ratepayer Opposition at 2. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.txt
  • IT IS ORDERED that the Appeal of Mediacom from a Rate Order of the City of Iowa City, Iowa IS GRANTED the extent indicated herein. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Falcon Telecable,15 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.txt
  • that TCI of Pennsylvania's stay request IS DISMISSED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Identified locally as Resolution No. 280. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.txt
  • litigation is one that lies primarily in the informed discretion of the administrative agency.''). 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. See, e.g., Flower Mound Appeal at 2 n.5; Grapevine Appeal at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936 See, e.g., TCI of Pennsylvania, Inc., 18 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2070A1.txt
  • Rate Order IS DISMISSED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Identified locally as Resolution No. 95-06. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("Rate Order"), 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993); Third Order on Reconsideration ("Third Reconsideration Order"), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Appeal at 3. Id., Exhibit C. Resolution No. 95-06. Id. at 5. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.txt
  • Reconsideration, Second Report and Order, and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 93-428, 9 FCC Rcd 1164, 1190 (1993). Operators attempting to justify their prices for the period prior to May 15, 1994 were required to complete FCC Form 393, and after May 15, 1994 were required to complete FCC Form 1200. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Falcon Telecable,15 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2448A1.txt
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Communications Act � 623(b)(3), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(3). Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992). See TCI of Southeast Mississippi, 13 FCC Rcd 11080 (CSB 1998). TCI Cablevision of Nevada, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 14378, 14384 (CSB 1996). See also 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2458A1.txt
  • 2004 Rate Order of the Durham Board of County Commissioners IS REMANDED for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 � 149 (1993); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 � 81 (1994). Id. Id. Durham County, NC, Review of FCC 1240 Annual Rate Adjustment Request, FCC 1235 Abbreviated Cost of Service Rate Request, and FCC 1205 Equipment and Installation Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2851A1.txt
  • the City. Accordingly, we deny the City's objection. 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. Comcast also offers another kind of converter, for ``Basic Service Only.'' Rate Order, supra note 4, at 3. Comcast Appeal at 2-4. 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.txt
  • Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau Letter dated May 30, 1996 from Deborah S. Miskovich, Superintendent, Bureau of Cable Communications, City of Pittsburgh, to Shawn M. McGorry, General Manager, TCI of Pennsylvania, Inc. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.txt
  • did not respond to Comcast's Petition, we will apply the points made in the foregoing pleadings to their cases. Reply of Comcast Cable Communications, LLC to Responses to Comcast's Petition for Partial Reconsideration & Clarification (``Reply''), filed on August 19, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. Comcast Cable of Indiana/Michigan/Texas, Inc (``Irving Order''), Order DA 04-2615 at � 11 (rel. Aug. 24, 2004), available at 2004 WL 1883980; Dallas Order, 19
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.txt
  • 10 FCC Rcd 9519 (CSB 1995). See Pegasus Cable Television, Inc., DA 96-318, 11 FCC Rcd 3561 (CSB 1996), erratum, DA 96-784, 11 FCC Rcd 18028 (CSB 1996) (concerning the communities of New Hartford, Winchester, Goshen, Barkhamsted, and Harwinton); and Pegasus Cable Television, Inc., DA 96-457, 11 FCC Rcd 4239 (CSB 1996) (concerning the community of Colebrook). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration"). Rate Order at 5732. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1270A1.txt
  • Falcon, Reply to Opposition to Petition for Review of Rate Order, filed June 26, 1996 (``Falcon Reply'' or ``Reply''). Falcon, Supplement to Petitions for Review, filed Jan. 17, 1997 (``Falcon Supplement'' or ``Supplement''). City, Opposition to Supplement to Petitions for Review, filed Feb. 18, 1997 (``City Opposition to Supplement'' or ``Opposition to Supplement''). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 � 149 (1993) (``Rate Order''); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 � 81 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 5731. Id. at 5732. See FCC Form 1200, Setting Maximum Initial Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • cable service and equipment rates. 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. 76.935 Participation of interested parties. 76.936 Written decision. 76.937 Burden of proof. 76.938 Proprietary information. 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. 76.941 Rate prescription. 76.942 Refunds. 76.943 Fines. 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. 76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. 76.946 Advertising of rates. 76.950 Complaints regarding cable programming service rates. 76.951 Standard complaint form; other filing requirements. 76.952 Information to be provided by cable operator on monthly subscriber bills. 76.953 Limitation on filing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1766A1.txt
  • No. 05-3083 (6th Cir., filed Jan. 13, 2005). 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. See, e.g., Comcast of McKinney Appeal, Attachment B (Form 1240 filed by Comcast of McKinney on March 1, 2004) at 4. Id. Comcast Cable Communications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-193A1.txt
  • refund offsets for initial permitted rates but did not encompass those rates in its refund order. June 10, 1999 Appeal Falcon asks that corrections to the starting rate on Line A1 of FCC Form 1240 resulting from the Commission's action on its original appeal be reflected in the FCC Form 1240 reviewed in the City's May 11, 1999 Resolution. Section 76.944(c) of the Commission's rules provides that an operator using the annual rate adjustment method for computing BST rate adjustments may include in its next true up any amounts to which the operator would have been entitled but for a franchising authority decision that is not upheld on appeal. This should protect Falcon's interests in being able to reflect favorable Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2030A1.txt
  • Fed. Communications Comm'n Forms 1240 and 1205 filed by Time Warner Cable, Inc., CTV 03-4, Rate Order (Sept. 21, 2004) (``2004 Rate Order''). Cable Division, Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order (Nov. 3, 2004) (``Cable Division Opposition''). TWC, Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order (Nov. 9, 2004) (``TWC Reply''). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 � 149 (1993) (``Rate Order''); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 � 81 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 5731. Id. at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(f)(1)(v), (6)-(8). 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(e); Implementation of Sections of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.txt
  • Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order or Petition for Declaratory Ruling (``Reply''), filed by Adelphia on March 29, 2005. Motion for Leave to Submit Late-Filed Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order or Petition for Declaratory Ruling (``Motion''), filed by Adelphia on March 29, 2005. Motion passim. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Motion at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3250A1.txt
  • No. 05-3083 (6th Cir., filed Jan. 13, 2005). 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. 47 U.S.C. � 542 (b). City of Pasadena, California, 18 FCC Rcd 18192 � 3, 18198 � 15 (2001), petition for review denied, Texas Coalition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-392A1.txt
  • 2, 2004, Charter filed a corrected copy of Attachment E to the appeal. In its Reply, Charter withdrew an issue raised in its appeal, a request that the Commission confirm that "cable operators are entitled to itemize the entire franchise fee assessment as a single percentage entry on customer bills." Appeal at 9. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). 47 U.S.C. � 542. Id. See, e.g., City of Pasadena, et al., 16 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.txt
  • to calculate permitted rates for equipment and installation. 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. Comcast's predecessors as owner of the Arlington cable system were, starting with the most recent, AT&T, TCI, and Telecable. Appeal, Attachment E (Letter from Robin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-681A1.txt
  • Local Rate Order (``Reply''), filed August 19, 2004. 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) � 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) � 81. Comcast Cable of Indiana/Michigan/Texas, Inc. (``Irving Order''), 19 FCC Rcd 16344 (2004) � 11; Comcast Cablevision of Dallas (``Dallas Order''), 19 FCC Rcd 10628, 10634
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3157A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau See Cencom Cable Income Partners II, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). Communications Act � 623, 47 U.S.C. � 543. Communications Act � 623(b)(1), (3), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1), (3); 47 C.F.R. �� 76.922, 76.923. Communications Act � 623 (b)(5)(B), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F. R. � 76.944. See Cencom, 12 FCC Rcd 7948, 7958. See id. We most recently addressed this issue in Cablevision of New Jersey, Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 24018 (2003). In addition, all CPST complaint issues involving the referenced community, CUID No. NJ0476, were resolved by resolution. See Cablevision Systems Corporation, 13 FCC Rcd. 15894 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-3157 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.txt
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended; (2) All materials associated with a rate proceeding for basic cable service and associated equipment over which the Commission has assumed jurisdiction pursuant to �76.913 of this chapter; (3) All materials associated with Commission review of franchise authority decisions concerning the rate charged for the basic cable service tier and associated equipment pursuant to �76.944 of this chapter; (4) All materials associated with local government requests for authorization to regulate basic cable rates pursuant to �76.910 of this chapter (Form 328); (5) All materials associated with the certification of Open Video System (OVS) operators pursuant to �76.1502 of this chapter; (6) A list of all registered cable communities is maintained electronically at ; and (7)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • (Registration Statements); (iii) Subpart C (Federal-State/Local Relationships [Reserved]; (iv) Subpart D (carriage of television broadcast signals); (v) Subpart E (equal employment opportunity requirements); (vi) Subpart F (nonduplication protection and syndicated exclusivity); (vi) Subpart G, sections 76.205, 76.206 and 76.209 (political broadcasting); (vii) subpart I (Forms and Reports)(viii) Subpart J (ownership); (ix) Subpart L (cable television access); (x) Subpart N, sections 76.944 (basic cable rate appeals), and sections 76.970, 76.971 and 76.977 (cable leased access rates); (xi) Subpart O (competitive access to cable programming); (xii) Subpart P (competitive availability of navigation devices); (xiii) Subpart Q (regulation of carriage agreements); (xiv) Subpart S (Open Video Systems); and (xv) Subparts T, U and V to the extent related to the matters listed above. *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-72A1.txt
  • done in an annual computation of basic service rates by every cable system without effective competition. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5729-30 para. 147 (1993). Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992), 47 U.S.C. �� 521 et seq. (1992). See also 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation and Buy-Through Prohibition, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Id. 17 FCC Rcd 7931, 7935 (2002). Id. at 7935. Id. Id. at 7936. See FCC Form 1240; FCC Form 1240 Instructions; section 76.922(e)(2)(ii) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(e)(ii); Falcon Telecable,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992227.doc
  • that neither MACC nor any community represented by MACC in this proceeding shall enforce matters remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by MACC on those matters. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992397.doc
  • ARE REMANDED to the Town of Cary for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Town of Cary, North Carolina shall not enforce matters remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by the Town on these matters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSSION Marjorie Reed Greene Associate Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992539.doc
  • rejection of ML Media Partners L.P. ("Multivision") small cable operator certification in a Resolution ("Resolution") adopted by the City on July 23, 1996. The City filed an opposition on September 10, 1996. Century filed a reply on October 4, 1996. Century in its reply argues that the City did not file its opposition within the time frame specified in Section 76.944(b) of the Commission's rules. The City requested acceptance of the late-filed opposition, and Century responded. For good cause shown, we accept the City's opposition. 2. Under the Commission's rules, rate orders issued by local franchising authorities may be appealed to the Commission. In ruling on an appeal of a local rate order, the Commission will not conduct a de novo
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992678.doc
  • by the City of Roseburg, Oregon on October 28, 1996 IS REMANDED for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Roseburg, Oregon shall not enforce Resolution 96-18 pending further action by the City on these matters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992679.doc
  • Lincoln City, Oregon (CSB-A-0358) IS GRANTED AND REMANDED to the City for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City shall not enforce matters remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by the City on these matters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992761.doc
  • HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, that the Petition for Review of the Local Rate Order of the County of Los Alamos, New Mexico, (CSB-A-0380), filed by Mickelson Media, Inc., d/b/a Century Communications on March 3, 1997, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992774.doc
  • agreement to, among other things, carry out cable regulation on behalf of its member communities located in the state of Oregon. Astoria, Bay City, Brownsville, Cannon Beach, Coburg, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Dunes City, Florence, Garabaldi, Lowell, Oakridge, Veneta, and Westfir, Oregon. Astoria, Bay City, Coburg, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Drain, Dunes City, Florence, Garibaldi, Veneta, and Westfir, Oregon. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992794.doc
  • FURTHER ORDERED that the Town of Vinton shall not enforce matters remanded for further consideration pending further action by the Town on those matters. 9. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C. F. R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration in MM Docket No. 92-266, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. Local rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993014.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993014.txt
  • No. 98-01 IS REMANDED to the City for action consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Falcon Telecable's January 11, 1996 and October 27, 1997 filed Petitions for Stay Pending Review of Rate Order ARE DISMISSED as moot. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Calvert City's Petition for Waiver of Rule 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b) IS GRANTED and Calvert City's November 18, 1996 Opposition is accepted as late-filed. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Calvert City shall not enforce matters remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by the City on those matters. 22. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/er992110.doc
  • as follows: The year in the first sentence is changed to 1996. The final sentence in paragraph 1 is replaced with the following: The City filed an opposition on September 10, 1996. Century filed a reply on October 4, 1996. Century in its reply argues that the City did not file its opposition within the time frame specified in Section 76.944(b) of the Commission's rules. The City requested acceptance of the late-filed opposition, and Century responded. For good cause shown, we accept the City's opposition. New paragraph 8 is added, which reads as follows: IT IS FUTHER ORDERED, that the City's Request to Accept Late Filed Opposition IS GRANTED. The number of paragraph 8 is changed to number 9. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000039.doc
  • in light of this Order. We direct Fort Madison to base its review on FCC rate rules and rate forms. 11. In its Appeal Supplement, TCI-EI seeks consolidated consideration of the 1997 Order with the 1996 Order. TCI-EI has not appealed the 1997 Order, however. We find that TCI-EI failed to show good cause for failing to comply with Section 76.944 of the Commission's rules, which governs appeals of rate decisions by local franchising authorities. Section 76.944 provides thirty days within which to file an appeal of a local rate order. The local rate order complained of was adopted by the City on March 25, 1997; therefore, TCI-EI should have submitted an appeal of that order within thirty days of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000053.doc
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Stay Pending Review filed by Cablevision IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Euclid, Ohio shall not enforce Section 2 of Ordinance No. 205-1998 pending further action by the City on these matters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000123.doc
  • by section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Review of FCC 1240 Annual Basic Service Tier Rate Adjustment Request filed by Time Warner Cable for the City of Raleigh, NC-0028, dated Dec. 18, 1997, found at Time Warner Appeal Exh. A (``local rate order''). 47 C.F.R. 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000377.doc
  • and Request for a Stay of the Rate Order of Tele-Media Company of North Carolina (June 7, 1995). Because of our action herein, the request for stay included in the appeal is dismissed as moot. Opposition to Petition for Review and to Request for Stay of the Local Rate Order, Alamance County, North Carolina (June 28, 1995). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000440.doc
  • Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Time Warner Petition for Review filed August 21, 1997; City of Loveland Ordinance No. 1997-38, dated July 22, 1997, found at Time Warner Petition, Attachment A, and the City's Opposition, Exhibit A (``local rate order''). City of Loveland's Opposition to Petition filed September 15, 1997, and Time Warner's Reply filed September 24, 1997. 47 C.F.R. 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000488.doc
  • approving Adelphia's BST rate is reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Appeal of Local Rate Order filed by the City of North Adams, Massachusetts IS DENIED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000656.doc
  • remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by the City on those matters. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by � 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau The request for stay is rendered moot by our action on the merits. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000697.doc
  • � 76.936(b) in a manner consistent with local law and the County's regulations governing its rate review before mailing the rate order to Falcon. On reconsideration, we are remanding this proceeding so that the County can determine when it released the text of the rate order to the public and began the 30-day appeal period specified in 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). Regarding the merits of Falcon's challenge to the County's rate order, Falcon submitted FCC Forms 1240 and 1205 proposing adjusted BST and equipment rates for County review. The rate order found that Falcon failed to provide audited financial statements related to the operation of the basic cable service tier in McCreary County in response to requirements of County Resolution 9606901.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000950.doc
  • matters. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Cablevision also filed a Petition for Stay Pending Review. This is being dismissed as moot in light of our disposition of the issues on the merits. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001002.doc
  • the decision. The Department has 14 days to rule on the appeal before the order is reviewable by the courts. Because the Commission ``is in effect acting like an appellate court,'' the Cable Division argues the same exhaustion requirement applies to its rate orders. Harron disagrees that it must first appeal to the Department. It relies on 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(a), which specifies that the Commission is the only forum for appeals of decisions by franchising authorities. Section 76.944(a) provides that ``[t]he Commission shall be the sole forum for appeals of decisions by franchising authorities on rates for the basic service tier or associated equipment involving whether or not a franchising authority has acted consistently with the Cable Act or ��
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001008.doc
  • reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, that the Petition for Review filed by Falcon Cablevision on February 6, 1998, of Resolution No. 97-277 adopted December 16, 1997 by the City of Thousand Oaks, California, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001071.doc
  • rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (June 18, 1999); Rate Order by the City denying Marcus' request to increase BST rates, adopted by the Common Council on May 11, 1999, and signed by the Mayor and City Clerk on May 24, 1999. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001148.doc
  • matters. 10. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (April 13, 2000); Minutes, City Council Regular Meeting, March 27, 2000, found at Attach. to the Company's Appeal at 5-7. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001149.doc
  • Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Appeal of Local Rate Order (April 12, 2000); Rate Order adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bainbridge on March 21, 2000, and signed by the City Manager on March 22, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001403.doc
  • County approved the transfer to Prime Communications-Potomac, LLC, which filed the instant appeal, on June 20, 1998. Opposition of Arlington County, Virginia, to Prime Communications-Potomac's Appeal of Local Rate Order (``County Opposition''), Declaration of Gail M. Lucas in Support of Opposition of Arlington County, Virginia, to Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Lucas Declaration''), Attachment C at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001544.doc
  • L.P. from a Rate Order of the City of Bowie, Maryland (filed Dec. 31, 1997) (``Maryland Cable Appeal''), Exhibit 1. Opposition to Appeal of Maryland Cable Partners, L.P. from a Rate Order of the City of Bowie, Maryland (filed Jan. 21, 1998) (``City Opposition''). Reply of Maryland Cable Partners, L.P. (filed Jan. 23, 1998) (``Maryland Cable Reply''). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration'').
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001691.doc
  • of Los Alamos, New Mexico to Appeal of Local Rate Order, filed Jun. 9, 2000) (``County June 2000 Opposition''). Reply, filed Mar. 15, 2000 (``Adelphia March 2000 Reply''); Reply, filed Jun. 20, 2000 (``Adelphia June 2000 Reply''). In view of the action taken herein, Adelphia's petition for stay of the January 2000 Rate Order is rendered moot. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732.
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • cable service and equipment rates. [105]76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. [106]76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. [107]76.935 Participation of interested parties. [108]76.936 Written decision. [109]76.937 Burden of proof. [110]76.938 Proprietary information. [111]76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. [112]76.940 Prospective rate reduction. [113]76.941 Rate prescription. [114]76.942 Refunds. [115]76.943 Fines. [116]76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. [117]76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. [118]76.946 Advertising of rates. [119]76.950 Complaints regarding cable programming service rates. [120]76.951 Standard complaint form; other filing requirements. [121]76.952 Information to be provided by cable operator on monthly subscriber bills. [122]76.953 Limitation on filing a
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • small cable companies. � 76.935 Participation of interested parties. � 76.936 Written decision. � 76.937 Burden of proof. � 76.938 Proprietary information. Page 3of 243 Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: 5/6/2011 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a0b1c7045abd9e3f08f6d3233a640e58&rg... � 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. � 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. � 76.941 Rate prescription. � 76.942 Refunds. � 76.943 Fines. � 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. � 76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. � 76.946 Advertising of rates. � 76.950 Complaints regarding cable programming service rates. � 76.951 Standard complaint form; other filing requirements. � 76.952 Information to be provided by cable operator on monthly subscriber bills.