FCC Web Documents citing 76.939

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1069 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100024 FRN 0009725276 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Cablevision is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cablevision to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.pdf
  • ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1068 NAL/Acct. No. 2008321000009 FRN 0018103622 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Bright House is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Bright House to respond fully to the LOI
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1072 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100007 FRN 0016034050 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. (``Cox'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cox to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1070 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100013 FRN 0017179383 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Charter is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Charter to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1074 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100012 FRN 0016642761 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Harron Communications, L.P. (``Harron'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Harron is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Harron to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1071 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100015 FRN 0015401581 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Comcast is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Comcast to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1077 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100014 FRN 0018147504 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Suddenlink Communications, Inc. (``Suddenlink'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Suddenlink is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Suddenlink to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1078 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100010 FRN 0016618670 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order TWC to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-90A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-90A1.pdf
  • System ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-07-SE-352 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100022 FRN 0018049841 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-93A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-93A1.pdf
  • Central Cable System ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-07-SE-352 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100023 FRN 0018049841 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture(``NAL''), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-94A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-94A1.pdf
  • Cable System ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-07-SE-351 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100008 FRN 0016034050 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. (``Cox'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1075 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100011 FRN 0009713678 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Midcontinent Communications, Inc. (``Midcontinent'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Midcontinent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Midcontinent to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.txt
  • been concealed. For instance, the City alleges that it could not determine whether TCI received any quality discounts or rebates and the terms of payments. The City also alleges that the information for F&V and WTBS was incomplete because the contract agreements reflected SSI as the contracting party rather than TCI. The City argues that TCI is required by section 76.939 of the Commission's rules to comply with its information request and is prohibited from submitting information that omits relevant material information. Finally, the City argues that it relied upon the best information available to it at the time the order was issued and objects to TCI's attempt to submit information on appeal that the City requested and that was readily
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.txt
  • alleges that the redacted information prevented it from determining whether TCI received any quality discounts or rebates and the terms of payments. The City also alleges that TCI's information was incomplete as evidenced by TCI providing a contract agreement with F&V that reflected SSI as the contracting party rather than TCI. The City argues that TCI is required by section 76.939 of the Commission's rules to comply with a local franchising authority's information request and is prohibited from submitting information that omits relevant material information. The City further argues that under Section 76.938 of the Commission's rules, an operator is required to produce even proprietary information. The City cites Tele-Media Company of Virginia, which denied a cable operator's appeal requesting that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • receive the basic service tier. 76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. 76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. 76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. 76.935 Participation of interested parties. 76.936 Written decision. 76.937 Burden of proof. 76.938 Proprietary information. 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. 76.941 Rate prescription. 76.942 Refunds. 76.943 Fines. 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. 76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. 76.946 Advertising of rates. 76.950 Complaints regarding cable programming service rates. 76.951 Standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1069 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100024 FRN 0009725276 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Cablevision is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cablevision to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.txt
  • ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1068 NAL/Acct. No. 2008321000009 FRN 0018103622 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Bright House is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Bright House to respond fully to the LOI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1072 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100007 FRN 0016034050 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. (``Cox'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cox to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1070 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100013 FRN 0017179383 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Charter is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Charter to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1074 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100012 FRN 0016642761 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Harron Communications, L.P. (``Harron'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Harron is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Harron to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1071 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100015 FRN 0015401581 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Comcast is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Comcast to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1077 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100014 FRN 0018147504 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Suddenlink Communications, Inc. (``Suddenlink'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Suddenlink is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Suddenlink to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.txt
  • ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1078 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100010 FRN 0016618670 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order TWC to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-90A1.txt
  • System ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-07-SE-352 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100022 FRN 0018049841 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-93A1.txt
  • Central Cable System ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-07-SE-352 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100023 FRN 0018049841 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture(``NAL''), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-94A1.txt
  • Cable System ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-07-SE-351 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100008 FRN 0016034050 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. (``Cox'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-1075 NAL/Acct. No. 200932100011 FRN 0009713678 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find that Midcontinent Communications, Inc. (``Midcontinent'') apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), that Midcontinent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Midcontinent to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-45A1.txt
  • certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). A copy of this certification will also be published in the Federal Register. Id. Authority 23. Authority for this rulemaking is contained in 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), and 303(r). V. ORDERING CLAUSES 24. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, That 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 73.1015, and 76.939 ARE AMENDED as set forth in the attached Appendix effective upon publication in the Federal Register. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Report and Order, including the Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-65A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-65A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-65A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.17 of the Rules, and denying a related petition for rulemaking filed by Kay. Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 18 FCC Rcd 4016 (2003) (R&O). Kay challenges the Regulatory Flexibility Certification contained in that action and also challenges the denial of his petition for rulemaking. Additionally, we make an editorial amendment to 47 C.F.R. § 76.939, which we amended to conform to the modified section 1.17. I. REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY CERTIFICATION 2. The Commission amended section 1.17 to achieve a clearer, more comprehensive, and more focused articulation of the standards applicable to regulatees with respect to their obligation to make truthful statements to the Commission. R&O, 18 FCC Rcd at 4016 ¶ 1. The Commission also intended
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-119A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100024 Cablevision Systems Corp. ) FRN 0009725276 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Cablevision Systems Corp. ("Cablevision") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Cablevision is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cablevision to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-79A1.html
  • Bright House Networks, LLC ) FRN 0018103622 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Bright House Networks, LLC ("Bright House") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Bright House is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Bright House to respond fully to the LOI
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-80A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100007 Cox Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0016034050 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. ("Cox") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cox to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-81A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100013 Charter Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0017179383 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Charter is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Charter to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-82A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100012 Harron Communications, LP ) FRN 0016642761 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Harron Communications, L.P. ("Harron") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Harron is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Harron to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-83A1.html
  • of ) NAL/Acct. No. 200932100015 Comcast Corporation ) FRN 0015401581 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Comcast Corporation ("Comcast") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Comcast is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Comcast to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-84A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100014 Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0018147504 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ("Suddenlink") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Suddenlink is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Suddenlink to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-85A1.html
  • 200932100010 Time Warner Cable, Inc. ) FRN 0016618670 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order TWC to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-90A1.html
  • Time Warner Cable, Inc. ) FRN 0018049841 Oceanic Kauai Cable System ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-93A1.html
  • of Time Warner Cable, Inc. ) FRN 0018049841 Oceanic Oahu Central Cable System ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture("NAL"), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-94A1.html
  • Inc., NAL/Acct. No. 200932100008 ) Fairfax County, Virginia Cable System FRN 0016034050 ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. ("Cox") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-95A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100011 Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0009713678 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ("Midcontinent") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Midcontinent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Midcontinent to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090121.html
  • and Order in the amount of $7,500 for violation of Section 76.1603(b) of the Commission's Rules. by ORDER. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/19/2009 by NALF. (DA No. 09-128). EB [58]DA-09-128A1.doc [59]DA-09-128A1.pdf [60]DA-09-128A1.txt COMCAST CORPORATION. Notified Comcast Corporation of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order in the amount of $25,000 for violation of a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules. by ORDER. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/19/2009 by NAL. (DA No. 09-83). EB [61]DA-09-83A1.doc [62]DA-09-83A1.pdf [63]DA-09-83A1.txt OCEANIC TIME WARNER CABLE, A SUBSIDIARY OF TIME WARNER CABLE. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,500 to Oceanic Time Warner Cable for violation of Section 76.1603(c) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-79A1.html
  • Bright House Networks, LLC ) FRN 0018103622 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Bright House Networks, LLC ("Bright House") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Bright House is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Bright House to respond fully to the LOI
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-80A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100007 Cox Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0016034050 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. ("Cox") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Cox to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-81A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100013 Charter Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0017179383 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Charter is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Charter to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-82A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100012 Harron Communications, LP ) FRN 0016642761 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Harron Communications, L.P. ("Harron") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Harron is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Harron to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-83A1.html
  • of ) NAL/Acct. No. 200932100015 Comcast Corporation ) FRN 0015401581 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Comcast Corporation ("Comcast") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Comcast is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Comcast to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-84A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100014 Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0018147504 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ("Suddenlink") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Suddenlink is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Suddenlink to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-85A1.html
  • 200932100010 Time Warner Cable, Inc. ) FRN 0016618670 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order TWC to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-90A1.html
  • Time Warner Cable, Inc. ) FRN 0018049841 Oceanic Kauai Cable System ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-93A1.html
  • of Time Warner Cable, Inc. ) FRN 0018049841 Oceanic Oahu Central Cable System ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture("NAL"), we find that Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that TWC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-94A1.html
  • Inc., NAL/Acct. No. 200932100008 ) Fairfax County, Virginia Cable System FRN 0016034050 ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Cox Communications, Inc. ("Cox") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with a Bureau directive to describe the methodology it planned to use to refund money to subscribers harmed by the company's apparent violation of various Commission Rules. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Cox is apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-95A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200932100011 Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ) FRN 0009713678 ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture AND ORDER Adopted: January 19, 2009 Released: January 19, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find that Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ("Midcontinent") apparently willfully violated a Commission Order and Section 76.939 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") in failing to respond fully to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Midcontinent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). We also order Midcontinent to respond fully to the LOI within ten
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • receive the basic service tier. [102]76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. [103]76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. [104]76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. [105]76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. [106]76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. [107]76.935 Participation of interested parties. [108]76.936 Written decision. [109]76.937 Burden of proof. [110]76.938 Proprietary information. [111]76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. [112]76.940 Prospective rate reduction. [113]76.941 Rate prescription. [114]76.942 Refunds. [115]76.943 Fines. [116]76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. [117]76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. [118]76.946 Advertising of rates. [119]76.950 Complaints regarding cable programming service rates. [120]76.951 Standard
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. § 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. § 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. § 76.935 Participation of interested parties. § 76.936 Written decision. § 76.937 Burden of proof. § 76.938 Proprietary information. Page 3of 243 Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: 5/6/2011 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a0b1c7045abd9e3f08f6d3233a640e58&rg... § 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. § 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. § 76.941 Rate prescription. § 76.942 Refunds. § 76.943 Fines. § 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. § 76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. § 76.946 Advertising of rates. § 76.950