FCC Web Documents citing 76.937

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.txt
  • and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). See Bowie Cable Rate Regulation Commission Order No 4-1995 (adopted Feb. 27, 1996) (``Initial Rate Order''). See FCC Form 1205 Instructions for Determining Costs of Regulated Cable Equipment and Installation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.txt
  • Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4344. Id. at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Falcon Telecable, 11 FCC Rcd 9849, 9853 para. 10 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1996); Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Local Rate Order at 2. The Consultant's Report can
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1598A1.txt
  • 13, 2001) (``City Reply''). As an ancillary matter, the City argues that there will be no need to remand the City's adjustment of the inflation factor if reconsideration is granted on the channel count and true-up issues. This issue is rendered moot by the disposition of the channel count and true-up issues herein. Comcast Opposition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937 (a), (b). 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d), (e); Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5718-19 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4344 ¶ 77, 4348 ¶¶ 89-90 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.txt
  • Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 57-18-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). See Attachment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.txt
  • Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). TWC Appeal at 1-3. TWC Appeal, Exhibit A. See TCI of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-268A1.txt
  • City of Burbank (``Ungar Affidavit''). Cities Opposition, Ungar Affidavit & Attachment. Charter Consolidated Reply at 3-4. Id. at Exhibit 1. Charter's appeals simply state that it currently offers a whole house plan for all home communications lines. Charter Burbank and Glendale Appeals at 2 Id. Affidavit of Tom Schaeffer in Support of Appeal of Local Rate Order. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Joint Opposition at 7 n.8. Our action on these appeals does not preclude Charter from offering unregulated whole house plans in these communities that are clearly marketed as whole house plans. 47 C.F.R. § 76.933(g)(2). Burbank Resolution at 1, 3; Glendale Resolution at 1,3. Cities Opposition at 10. Id., citing 47 C.F.R. § 76.942(b). Charter Consolidated Reply at 6-7, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.txt
  • 1996 Petition at 5. Falcon stated that both the June 10, 1996 and the September 9, 1996 Rate Orders were based on the same Form 1205. Id. at 6 n.6. Falcon First Communications, L.P., 14 FCC Rcd 7277, 7282 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1999). See discussion of depreciation adjustment in the September 1996 Rate Order, infra, paras. 17-18. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. See Falcon September 1996 Petition, Exhibit A, August 1996 Rate Order, first page; id. Exhibit B, Letter from Don Schanding, Rate Analyst, Georgia Municipal Association to David Johnson, City Manager (July 24, 1996); Falcon October 1996 Petition, Exhibit A, September 1996 Rate Order, first page; id. Exhibit B, Letter from Schanding to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-825A1.txt
  • the SPP are subject to rate regulation, TWC faults PCTA for ignoring costs of some of the products included in its SPP when setting an unreasonably low rate for the SPP. TWC argues that the PCTA order must be remanded so that the rate prescribed by PCTA can take into account all of the costs associated with the plan. Section 76.937 of the Commission's rules places the burden of justifying rates on the cable operator. An operator that does not attempt to demonstrate the reasonableness of its rates or respond to reasonable requests for supportive information from the franchising authority has not met its burden and can be subject to an order mandating appropriate relief. This relief can include ordering a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.txt
  • Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (CSB 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (CSB 1998). Charter Appeal at 1-3. Charter Appeal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.txt
  • Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 57-18-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R §76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). Charter Appeal, Attachment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Resolution 215. Resolution 216. 47 C.F.R. § 76.933. 10 FCC Rcd 6638 (1995). 47 C.F.R. § 76.933(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.936(a).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Cable Division Docket CTV 01-1. Cable Division Docket CTV 01-3. For the communities involved, refer to Exhibit B of DTE's opposition.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2339A1.txt
  • (``Appeal'') filed by Adelphia on Aug. 19, 2002. Order Mandating Compliance in Docket No. CTV 01-4, issued Aug. 12, 2002, Exhibit B to Appeal. July 2002 Rate Order at 2-5. Appeal at 2-5. Opposition at 4-6. Id. at 6. Id. at 7. July 2002 Rate Order at 5. Appeal at 5 & n.4. Opposition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.937. Crown Media, Inc., 10 F.C.C.R. 6626, 6629 (1995) ¶ 17. Warner Cable Commun., Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 9246, 9250 (1996) ¶ 9 (a cable operator may recover the cost of inventory or spare equipment for which it demonstrates demand). July 2002 Rate Order at 2-5. Compare Crown Media, Inc., 10 F.C.C.R. 6626, 6629 (1995) ¶ 17, with Falcon Community Ventures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3127A1.txt
  • Commission should not consider evidence and arguments that were not presented to the City. We deny the Motion for the same reasons, and to the extent, stated in footnote 3 above. Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order, filed on July 18, 2003. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4108A1.txt
  • Supplement. On November 13, 2003, Comcast filed an Opposition to Motion to Strike, to which the Township filed a Reply to Opposition and a second Motion to Strike on November 19, 2003. The latter filing drew an Opposition, filed by Comcast on December 3, 2003. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Cablevision of Paterson d/b/a Cablevision of Allamuchy et al., 17 FCC Rcd 17239 (2002). Cablevision Appeal at 5. Id. Id.; See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.txt
  • 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Norton Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau See 47 C.F.R. § 76.944; 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Falcon Telecable,15 FCC Rcd 52, 54 (CSB 1999); Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995); TCI-TKR of Northern Kentucky Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 17353,17365 (CSB 1996). See A-R Cable Services-ME Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 1783, 1784 (CSB 1995). 47 C.F.R. § 76.922(c)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Appeal at 6-7. Id. Id. at 7. Opposition at 5. 47 U.S.C. § 76.933(g). The rate order was issued in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.txt
  • Rcd 3065, 3079 (1999) ¶ 38 & n.87, citing SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 203 (1947) (``the choice made between proceeding by general rule or by individual, ad hoc litigation is one that lies primarily in the informed discretion of the administrative agency.''). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.txt
  • 393, and after May 15, 1994 were required to complete FCC Form 1200. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.944; 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Falcon Telecable,15 FCC Rcd 52, 54 (CSB 1999); Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995); TCI-TKR of Northern Kentucky Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 17353,17365 (CSB 1996). See A-R Cable Services-ME Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 1783, 1784 (CSB 1995). On March 14, 1995
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2851A1.txt
  • proceedings below. The City does not specify what material it is objecting to, however, and we do not discern any material in Comcast's presentation that is new, surprising, and prejudicial to the City. Accordingly, we deny the City's objection. 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). The Form 1210 was filed with the Form 1240 because TCI was switching from the quarterly to the annual rate methodology.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3618A1.txt
  • 18, at 14-15; Flower Mound Appeal, supra note 17, at 14; Grapevine Appeal, supra note 17, at 14-15; McKinney Appeal, supra note 17, at 14-15. Dallas Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 10639, ¶ 26. Petition at 5-7; Reply at 4-5. See, e.g., Petition at 6-7. Comcast had the burden of proof that its proposed rates were lawful. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Allen Appeal, supra note 17, Exhibit H (Declaration of Ms. Pepper at ¶ 3, dated Jan. 8, 2004); Colleyville Appeal, supra note 18, Attachment I (Declaration of Ms. Pepper at ¶ 3, dated March 4, 2004); Flower Mound Appeal, supra note 17, Attachment G (Declaration of Ms. Pepper at ¶ 3, dated Feb. 4, 2004); Grapevine Appeal, supra note 17,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.txt
  • of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration"). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Rate Order at 5755 ¶ 187; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Second Report and Order, First Order on Reconsideration, and Further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • Rates for equipment and installation used to receive the basic service tier. 76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. 76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. 76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. 76.935 Participation of interested parties. 76.936 Written decision. 76.937 Burden of proof. 76.938 Proprietary information. 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. 76.941 Rate prescription. 76.942 Refunds. 76.943 Fines. 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. 76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. 76.946 Advertising of rates. 76.950 Complaints
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1766A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 20416, 20417 (2003) ¶ 3, application for review denied, 19 FCC Rcd 23096 (2004), appeal pending on other grounds sub nom. City of Winchester et al. v. FCC, Case No. 05-3083 (6th Cir., filed Jan. 13, 2005). 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2030A1.txt
  • . See First Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 1225 ¶ 110 & nn.193-94. Exemptions were sought for minority channels like BET and non-profit, non-stock program services. Id. at n.193. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.922(f)(6). See Cost Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4663-68. TWC Appeal at 7-8. See Cost Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4667 ¶¶ 267-68. . 47 C.F.R. § 76.937. According to TWC, TWC affiliates have created regional news channels but, with one exception, do not sell these to unaffiliated cable operators. TWC Appeal at 7 n.13; Cable Division Opposition, Ex. C, Transcript of Public Hearing on June 8, 2004 (``Transcript'') at 35 (TWC witness said ``No'' in response to question whether TWC attempted to sell Capital News 9 to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.txt
  • Leave to Submit Late-Filed Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order or Petition for Declaratory Ruling (``Motion''), filed by Adelphia on March 29, 2005. Motion passim. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Motion at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 76.944(b). 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3250A1.txt
  • Partners, 18 FCC Rcd 20416, 20417 (2003) ¶ 3, application for review denied on other grounds, 19 FCC Rcd 23096 (2004), appeal pending sub nom. City of Winchester v. FCC, Case No. 05-3083 (6th Cir., filed Jan. 13, 2005). 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.txt
  • and, absent objection, we grant the Motion. Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Reply''), filed March 16, 2004. Form 1205 is the Commission form that cable operators use to calculate permitted rates for equipment and installation. 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-681A1.txt
  • Services, Inc., to Mr. Nick Fehrenbach, dated May 20, 2004). Dallas' Response Opposing Comcast's Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Response''), filed August 9, 2004. Reply to Response Opposing Comcast's Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Reply''), filed August 19, 2004. 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.922. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) ¶ 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) ¶ 12. 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. Harron Commun. Corp., 15 FCC Rcd 7901 (2000) ¶ 2; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993), 9 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992227.doc
  • Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5723. Communications Act § 623(b)(3), 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(3); 47 C.F.R. § 76.923(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 76.923(b). See Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4365 para. 135. The regulated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992397.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also In the Matter of Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992678.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992679.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992761.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992774.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Citing Intermedia Partners, 12 FCC Rcd 12592 (CSB 1996). See Questions and Answers on Cable Television Rate Regulation, Public Notice dated July 27, 1994. We note in this connection the RCC's rate order in this case
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993014.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993014.txt
  • 1240 is filed and does not coincide exactly with the previous year's projected rate period. Thirteenth Order 11 FCC Rcd at 420 n.151; see Instructions for FCC Form 1240 Annual Updating of Maximum Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services, FCC Form 1240, "Timing" at 3-4 (July 1996). Thirteenth Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 420-21 ¶¶ 79-80. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.937; see also Sammons Communications, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 5089, 5091 ¶ 14 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5723-24. A-R Cable Service-ME Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 1783, 1784 ¶ 6 (Cable Serv. Bur. 1995); TCI of Northern New Jersey, 10 FCC Rcd 1657, 1658 ¶ 6 (Cable Serv. Bur. 1995); TCI Cablevision of Northern Central
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000039.doc
  • § 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); Third Order on Reconsideration, MM Docket No. 92-266, (FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Section 623(b)(1), 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(1). Rate Order at 5718. See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (CSB, 1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (CSB, 1998). External costs include the following: state and local taxes applicable to the provision of cable television service; franchise fees; costs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000053.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000123.doc
  • rate order''). 47 C.F.R. 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640-6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, 11 FCC Rcd 388, 420-21 para. 79 (1995) ) (``Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration''). Id. at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000377.doc
  • the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Rate Order at 5755 para. 187; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Second Report and Order, First Order on Reconsideration, and Further
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000440.doc
  • Warner's Reply filed September 24, 1997. 47 C.F.R. 76.944. See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640-6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Time Warner Petition at 3; City Opposition at 1. See Local Rate Order at 1-2, Petition at 3, City Opposition at 1-2. Operators are permitted to make changes to their rates on a quarterly basis using FCC Form
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000550.doc
  • For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, that the captioned appeal of the local rate order adopted on September 16, 1996 by the New Hanover County, North Carolina, Board of Commissioners (CSB-A-0359) IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5718-19 (1993). 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000656.doc
  • Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). 47 C.F.R. § 76.923(a). City Opposition at 2 n.2. 47 C.F.R. § 76.923(a)(2), (o). See Cablevision VII, Inc. (Fort Madison, IA), DA 00-39 at paras 9-10, 2000 WL 16450 (F.C.C.) (Cab. Serv.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000657.doc
  • IS GRANTED, and the rate order IS REMANDED to the City for further consideration consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City shall not enforce matters remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by the City on these matters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation etc., 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5718-19 (1993) (``Rate Order''). 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000697.doc
  • form for justifying the program service rate. Falcon Petition for Review of Rate Order at 1, 2, 3. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4344 para. 77 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Third Reconsideration, 11 FCC Rcd at 4348 para. 89; 47 C.F.R. § 76.937 (d), (e). See Century Southwest Cable Television Corp., 9 FCC Rcd 2423, 2424 (CSB 1994). 47 C.F.R. § 76.938; Third Reconsideration at 4344 paras. 77-78. 47 C.F.R. S 76.937(a). Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347 para. 84, 4348 para. 90; 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.940, 76.941, 76.942. Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347 para. 84; Falcon First Communications, L.P.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000936.doc
  • will not be considered. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958). See Cuomo v. NRC, 772 F.2d 972, 974 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm'n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843-44 (D.C. Cir. 1977). 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.933(g), 76.937(e); Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration in MM Docket No. 92-266, 11 FCC Rcd 388, 425-27 (1995) (``Thirteenth Order''). Stay request, Attachment C, Letter from Murphy to Somereve (3/1/00). Stay request, Attachment C, FCC Form 1240, p.1. Stay request, Attachment A, Letter from Boyle to Murphy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000950.doc
  • the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). Petition for Review of Rate at 3. Id. at 2. 10 FCC Rcd 11076 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Id. at 11078 para. 13. 10 FCC Rcd 6626, 6627-28 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001008.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Our issuance of an effective competition order, see Falcon Cablevision, 12 FCC Rcd 21611 (CSB 1997), did not abrogate the City's jurisdiction to respond to this order, since the rate filing and the rate-effective period at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001071.doc
  • Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). External costs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001148.doc
  • Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). Attach. to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001149.doc
  • Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No. 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). See Attachment
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001403.doc
  • Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). FCC Form 393 was used to compute equipment and installation charges when rate regulation first began but was replaced with Form 1205 in 1994 when the Commission revised the benchmark
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001544.doc
  • and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. § 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. § 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). See Bowie Cable Rate Regulation Commission Order No 4-1995 (adopted Feb. 27, 1996) (``Initial Rate Order''). See FCC Form 1205 Instructions for Determining Costs of Regulated Cable Equipment and Installation
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • Rates for equipment and installation used to receive the basic service tier. [102]76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. [103]76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. [104]76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. [105]76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. [106]76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. [107]76.935 Participation of interested parties. [108]76.936 Written decision. [109]76.937 Burden of proof. [110]76.938 Proprietary information. [111]76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. [112]76.940 Prospective rate reduction. [113]76.941 Rate prescription. [114]76.942 Refunds. [115]76.943 Fines. [116]76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. [117]76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. [118]76.946 Advertising of rates. [119]76.950 Complaints
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • the basic service tier. § 76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. § 76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. § 76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. § 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. § 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. § 76.935 Participation of interested parties. § 76.936 Written decision. § 76.937 Burden of proof. § 76.938 Proprietary information. Page 3of 243 Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: 5/6/2011 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a0b1c7045abd9e3f08f6d3233a640e58&rg... § 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. § 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. § 76.941 Rate prescription. § 76.942 Refunds. § 76.943 Fines. § 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and