FCC Web Documents citing 76.936

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1554A1.txt
  • see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). See Bowie Cable Rate Regulation Commission Order No 4-1995 (adopted Feb. 27, 1996) (``Initial Rate Order''). See FCC Form 1205 Instructions for Determining Costs of Regulated Cable Equipment and Installation at 8 (cable operators that are organized in forms other than C corporations (e.g. partnerships, Subchapter S corporations,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.txt
  • the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4344. Id. at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Falcon Telecable, 11 FCC Rcd 9849, 9853 para. 10 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1996); Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Local Rate Order at 2. The Consultant's Report can be found at Comcast Appeal, Exhibit 5, Review of Comcast's 1998 1240 and 1205 Filed with the City of Detroit (January 4, 1998), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1057A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1057A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 76.944; Rate Regulation, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5729 (1993) (``Rate Order''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732; Rate Regulation & Buy-Through Prohibition, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Recon.''). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732; see also, Third Recon., 9 FCC Rcd at 4346. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(b). Falcon Appeal at n.1, p. 1. City Opposition at pp. 2-4. Id., Affidavit of A. L. Tate, Mayor, City of Cave Spring (July 21, 1997), Attachment to City Opposition. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(a). See Falcon Classic Cable v. McCreary County, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5718 para. 4 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 2000) (public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1777A1.txt
  • 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 57-18-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). See Attachment to the TCI's Appeal of Local Rate Order. TCI's Appeal at 1-3. In TCI of Southeast Mississippi, the local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2142A1.txt
  • of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket No.92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). TWC Appeal at 1-3. TWC Appeal, Exhibit A. See TCI of Southeast Mississippi, 10 FCC Rcd 8728 (Cab. Serv.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-483A1.txt
  • 76.922(d), (e), (f). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"), Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(b). 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(b). The City reviewed Falcon's Form 1210 dated February 15, 1996 and its Form 1205 dated February 13, 1996. June 1996 Rate Order, first page, found at Falcon July 1996 Petition, Exhibit A. Falcon July 1996 Appeal at 1 n.1. City July 1996 Opposition at 2-3. Id., Affidavit of J. David Thompson, City
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1721A1.txt
  • 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (CSB 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (CSB 1998). Charter Appeal at 1-3. Charter Appeal at Attachment A. See TCI of Southeast Mississippi, 10 FCC Rcd 8728 (CSB 1995), reconsideration denied on other grounds,13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-324A1.txt
  • 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 57-18-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R �76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). Charter Appeal, Attachment A. See TCI of Southeast Mississippi, 10 FCC Rcd 8728 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995), reconsideration denied on other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1151A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Resolution 215. Resolution 216. 47 C.F.R. � 76.933. 10 FCC Rcd 6638 (1995). 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(a). Chillicothe Cablevision, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6055, 6056
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.txt
  • C.F.R. �� 76.601-630) and equipment-related problems are addressed by the Commission's equipment compatibility rules (47 C.F.R. � 76.630). The Order noted that a franchising authority may not arbitrarily reduce prices for programming and equipment below maximum permitted rate levels in an effort to address signal quality or equipment compatibility issues). 13 FCC Rcd 11996, 11998 (CSB 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5715-16. See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.601-630. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.309. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(c)(1) and (3). See Opposition at 10. See TCI of Richardson, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd at 11710. As part of the annual rate change, the Commission's rules include a ``true-up'' mechanism which permits an operator to correct projected cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1863A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Cable Division Docket CTV 01-1. Cable Division Docket CTV 01-3. For the communities involved, refer to Exhibit B of DTE's opposition. AT&T's appeal includes all communities whose rates were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-603A1.txt
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Falcon Cable Systems Company II, a California Limited Partnership, D/B/A Charter Communications, 17 FCC Rcd 4648 (2002)(``Falcon''). The 12 Oregon communities include: Bay City (OR0086); Brownsville (OR0214); Coberg (OR0176); Cottage Grove (OR0340); Creswell (OR0321); Drain (OR0052); Garibaldi (OR0087); Lowell (OR0206); Oakridge (OR0079); Veneta (OR0209); Westfir (OR0248); Yoncalla
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-784A1.txt
  • Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(b). In the case of a cost-of-service filing, the local franchising authority may extend the review period by 150 days. Id. This would give the local franchising authority a total of 180 days (the original 30 days plus the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1265A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Cablevision of Paterson d/b/a Cablevision of Allamuchy et al., 17 FCC Rcd 17239 (2002). Cablevision Appeal at 5. Id. Id.; See also Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. FCC, 56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-135A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Falcon Telecable,15 FCC Rcd 52, 54 (CSB 1999); Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995); TCI-TKR of Northern Kentucky Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 17353,17365 (CSB 1996). See A-R Cable Services-ME Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 1783, 1784 (CSB 1995). 47 C.F.R. � 76.922(c) and (f). See Bresnan Communications, 15 FCC Rcd 12893, 12894 (CSB 2000). Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1496A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). Appeal at 6-7. Id. Id. at 7. Opposition at 5. 47 U.S.C. � 76.933(g). The rate order was issued in the form of a letter dated May 30, 1996
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.txt
  • instead will remand the issue to the franchising authority with instructions to resolve the case consistent with the Commission's decision on appeal. PRELIMINARY ISSUES Written Explanation for the Cities' Decisions Comcast challenges the Cities' rate orders on the grounds that they merely state that its proposed rates are ``not reasonable'' and give no rationale or explanation for that decision. Section 76.936 of our rules requires that a franchising authority issue a written decision in a rate case. Our case law has also required that the written decision affirmatively support any ruling that a cable operator's proposed rate is unreasonable. This protects the cable operator's right to due process and gives it a basis to re-file its rate or appeal the decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2070A1.txt
  • to arrive at the City's prescribed numbers. Sammons further alleges that the consultant's report is ``fraught with an overwhelming number of mathematical errors, simple mistakes and flawed logic.'' As Sammons notes in its appeal, if the City alleges that the operator has failed to justify its rates, then the City is required to explain and justify its rate adjustment. Section 76.936 of our rules requires that a franchising authority issue a written decision in a rate case. Our case law has also required that the written decision affirmatively support any ruling that a cable operator's proposed rate is unreasonable. This protects the cable operator's right to due process and gives it a basis to re-file its rate or appeal the decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2079A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. � 76.944; 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731-32 (1993) ("Rate Order"); 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration Order"). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4347-48. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Falcon Telecable,15 FCC Rcd 52, 54 (CSB 1999); Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995); TCI-TKR of Northern Kentucky Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 17353,17365 (CSB 1996). See A-R Cable Services-ME Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 1783, 1784 (CSB 1995). On March 14, 1995 Clear-Vu submitted FCC Form 393 to the City of Summerville. Appeal Petition at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2448A1.txt
  • of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Communications Act � 623(b)(3), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(3). Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992). See TCI of Southeast Mississippi, 13 FCC Rcd 11080 (CSB 1998). TCI Cablevision of Nevada, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 14378, 14384 (CSB 1996). See also 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(b). Appeal Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-34A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Reconsideration Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Rate Order at 5718. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (1995); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020 (1998). The Form 1210 was filed with the Form 1240 because TCI was switching from the quarterly to the annual rate methodology. Attachment B of TCI's appeal is an unsigned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-541A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) ("Third Reconsideration"). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Rate Order at 5755 � 187; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Second Report and Order, First Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 2220, 2223-24 (1996) ("Final Cost Order"). Rate Order at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • services tiers. 76.923 Rates for equipment and installation used to receive the basic service tier. 76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. 76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. 76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. 76.935 Participation of interested parties. 76.936 Written decision. 76.937 Burden of proof. 76.938 Proprietary information. 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. 76.941 Rate prescription. 76.942 Refunds. 76.943 Fines. 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. 76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. 76.946 Advertising of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Questions concerning the OMB control numbers and expiration dates should be directed to the Associate Managing Director - Performance Evaluation and Records Management, ("AMD-PERM"), Office of Managing Director, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554 by sending an email to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. (b) Display 68 Sec. 76.936 03/31/08 3060-0669 Sec. 76.946 05/31/08 3060-0674 Sec. 76.1618 10/31/08 3060-0678 FCC 312, Schedule S 03/31/10 3060-0681 Secs. 52.103 and 52.105 10/31/09 3060-0685 FCC 1210 and FCC 1240 04/30/09 3060-0686 Streamlining the International Section 214 Authorization Process and Tariff Requirements 02/28/09 3060-0687 Access to Telecommunications Equipment and Services by Persons with Disabilities, CC Docket No. 87-124 05/31/09 3060-0688 FCC 1235 01/31/08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, THAT Section 0.408 of the Rules is REVISED as set forth in the revised text, effective upon publication in the Federal Register. 5. Persons having questions on this matter should contact Judith B. Herman at (202) 418-0214 or send an email to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anthony J. Dale Managing Director (b) Display 68 Sec. 76.936 12/31/10 3060-0669 Sec. 76.946 02/28/11 3060-0674 Sec. 76.1618 08/31/11 3060-0678 FCC 312, Schedule S 03/31/10 3060-0681 Secs. 52.103 and 52.105 10/31/09 3060-0685 FCC 1210 and FCC 1240 04/30/09 3060-0686 Streamlining the International Section 214 Authorization Process and Tariff Requirements 02/28/09 3060-0687 Access to Telecommunications Equipment and Services by Persons with Disabilities, CC Docket No. 87-124 05/31/09 3060-0688 FCC 1235 11/30/10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-351A1.txt
  • Northeast Gwinnett Cablevision IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary 47 C.F.R. � 1.115. Northeast Gwinnett Cablevision, 13 FCC Rcd 10,282 (CSB 1998) See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5715 (1993); 47 C.F.R. � 76.936. Bureau Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 10283-84. Id. at n. 11. (...continued from previous page) (continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-351 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-351 H I h u � � � J [ � � J [ � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992227.doc
  • of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5723. Communications Act � 623(b)(3), 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(3); 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(b). See Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4365 para. 135. The regulated revenues to which the rate reduction formulas were from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992397.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also In the Matter of Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Thirteenth Reconsideration Order at 392. Id. The Town
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992678.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Thirteenth Reconsideration Order at 392. Id. In footnote 4 to its petition,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992679.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Thirteenth Reconsideration Order at 392. Id. Falcon multiplied 2.22% (the 7/1/95 to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992761.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Thirteenth Reconsideration Order at 392. Id. The County notes that those instructions
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da992774.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Citing Intermedia Partners, 12 FCC Rcd 12592 (CSB 1996). See Questions and Answers on Cable Television Rate Regulation, Public Notice dated July 27, 1994. We note in this connection the RCC's rate order in this case does not question the bulk rates charged to MDU's. See 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993014.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993014.txt
  • of Cincinnati, Inc, 10 FCC Rcd 6015, 6018 � 16 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). February 1995 Order at � 3. Specifically, the relevant sentence reads as follows: "[T]he basic service rate of $16.79 per month, which is within the maximum permitted rate for 18 channels are reflected on Form 1210 dated October 5, 1994 is HEREBY APPROVED." 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(a). Id.; see TCI-TKR of Northern Kentucky, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 17353; A-R Cable Services-ME, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd at 1784-85 � 10. November 1995 Order at 3 � 9. The City speculates that Falcon set its BST rate below the MPR, because Falcon may have overcharged for its CPST rates. Opposition at 2-3. Until the sunset of CPST rate regulation,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000039.doc
  • to Fort Madison in order to permit it to comply with our rules governing written decisions by a local franchising authority. See n. 34, supra. Any refund liability determined by this review shall be determined pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 76.942. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944. Appeal Supplement at 1 and n.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.910(b)(2) See 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(b). In its supplement, TCI-EI argued that the City's allegedly unjustified action in the 1996 Order supports the need for the requested relief. In its petition, TCI-EI also expressed concern that the City might take action against the operator for implementing the rate adjustment, but acknowledged that the City had taken no such action as of the filing. Motion to File
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000053.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Thirteenth Reconsideration Order at 392. Id. Falcon Petition for Review at 8.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000123.doc
  • Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640-6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, 11 FCC Rcd 388, 420-21 para. 79 (1995) ) (``Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration''). Id. at 420 n.151; see Instructions for FCC Form 1240, Annual Updating of Maximum
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000377.doc
  • 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Rate Order at 5755 para. 187; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Second Report and Order, First Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 2220, 2223-24 (1996) ("Final Cost Order"). Rate Order at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000440.doc
  • See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) (``Rate Order''); Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640-6641-42 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Time Warner Petition at 3; City Opposition at 1. See Local Rate Order at 1-2, Petition at 3, City Opposition at 1-2. Operators are permitted to make changes to their rates on a quarterly basis using FCC Form 1210 or on an annual basis using FCC Form
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000550.doc
  • Hanover County, North Carolina, Board of Commissioners (CSB-A-0359) IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5718-19 (1993). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Id. at 392. Id. Citing 47 C.F.R. � 76.925(a)(5). Thirteenth Reconsideration Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000656.doc
  • Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(a). City Opposition at 2 n.2. 47 C.F.R. � 76.923(a)(2), (o). See Cablevision VII, Inc. (Fort Madison, IA), DA 00-39 at paras 9-10, 2000 WL 16450 (F.C.C.) (Cab. Serv. Bur. released Jan. 12, 2000); Mickelson Media, Inc., DA 99-1264, 1999 WL 436216 (Cab. Serv. Bur.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000657.doc
  • not enforce matters remanded for further consideration herein pending further action by the City on these matters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation etc., 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5718-19 (1993) (``Rate Order''). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.960; see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Rate Regulation, Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration, ("Thirteenth Reconsideration Order"), 11 FCC Rcd 388, 391 (1995). Id at 392. Id. Citing Thirteenth Reconsideration Order, 11 FCC Rcd 388,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000697.doc
  • submitted with its reconsideration petition raises a substantial question whether the rate order was published in a local newspaper, as assumed in Falcon to be the case, and the County has not responded to this information. We find that the record is insufficient to determine whether the County gave public notice of the rate order pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 76.936(b) in a manner consistent with local law and the County's regulations governing its rate review before mailing the rate order to Falcon. On reconsideration, we are remanding this proceeding so that the County can determine when it released the text of the rate order to the public and began the 30-day appeal period specified in 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). Regarding
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000950.doc
  • 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). Petition for Review of Rate at 3. Id. at 2. 10 FCC Rcd 11076 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Id. at 11078 para. 13. 10 FCC Rcd 6626, 6627-28 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1995). Department Opposition at 4-5. Rate Order at 6. FCC Form 1205 Instructions for Determining Costs of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001008.doc
  • Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). Our issuance of an effective competition order, see Falcon Cablevision, 12 FCC Rcd 21611 (CSB 1997), did not abrogate the City's jurisdiction to respond to this order, since the rate filing and the rate-effective period at issue in this proceeding predate our finding of effective competition. However, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001071.doc
  • 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). External costs include the following: state and local taxes applicable to the provision of cable television service; franchise fees; costs of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001148.doc
  • 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). Attach. to Appeal at 7. Id. at 5-7. Appeal at 1-2. Id. at 3. 14 FCC Rcd 7897, 7899 (Cab. Serv.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001149.doc
  • 5731 (1993) ("Rate Order"); See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Reconsideration''). Rate Order at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5718-19; Third Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (CSB 1995). See Century Cable of Southern California, 11 FCC Rcd 501 (Cab Serv. Bur. 1955); TCI of Iowa, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 12020, 12022 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1998). See Attachment to the Company's Appeal of Local Rate Order. The Company's Appeal at 1-3. In TCI of Southeast Mississippi, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001240.doc
  • 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958). See Cuomo v. NRC, 772 F.2d 972, 974 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm'n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843-44 (D.C. Cir. 1977). 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(g). 47 C.F.R. �� 76.932, 76.933(g)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 76.933(g)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, Report and Order, MM Docket 92-266, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5715 para. 126 (1993). Request for Emergency Stay, Attach. A. Id., Attach. B at 1, 2. Id., Attach. C. Attachment to May 26, 2000 Supplement to Request for Emergency Stay of Local Rate Order.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001403.doc
  • See also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). FCC Form 393 was used to compute equipment and installation charges when rate regulation first began but was replaced with Form 1205 in 1994 when the Commission revised the benchmark formula and required operators to recompute their initial regulated rates for programming services, including the amount of equipment
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001544.doc
  • see also Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Rate Regulation, Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd 4316, 4346 (1994) (``Third Order on Reconsideration''). Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5732. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(a). See Rate Order at 5718-19; Third Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4348. 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; see Ultracom of Marple, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 6640, 6641-42 (Cab.Serv.Bur. 1995). See Bowie Cable Rate Regulation Commission Order No 4-1995 (adopted Feb. 27, 1996) (``Initial Rate Order''). See FCC Form 1205 Instructions for Determining Costs of Regulated Cable Equipment and Installation at 8 (cable operators that are organized in forms other than C corporations (e.g. partnerships, Subchapter S corporations,
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • service tiers. [101]76.923 Rates for equipment and installation used to receive the basic service tier. [102]76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. [103]76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. [104]76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. [105]76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. [106]76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. [107]76.935 Participation of interested parties. [108]76.936 Written decision. [109]76.937 Burden of proof. [110]76.938 Proprietary information. [111]76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. [112]76.940 Prospective rate reduction. [113]76.941 Rate prescription. [114]76.942 Refunds. [115]76.943 Fines. [116]76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment. [117]76.945 Procedures for Commission review of basic service rates. [118]76.946 Advertising of
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • installation used to receive the basic service tier. � 76.924 Allocation to service cost categories. � 76.925 Costs of franchise requirements. � 76.930 Initiation of review of basic cable service and equipment rates. � 76.933 Franchising authority review of basic cable rates and equipment costs. � 76.934 Small systems and small cable companies. � 76.935 Participation of interested parties. � 76.936 Written decision. � 76.937 Burden of proof. � 76.938 Proprietary information. Page 3of 243 Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: 5/6/2011 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a0b1c7045abd9e3f08f6d3233a640e58&rg... � 76.939 Truthful written statements and responses to requests of franchising authority. � 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. � 76.941 Rate prescription. � 76.942 Refunds. � 76.943 Fines. � 76.944 Commission review of franchising authority decisions on rates for the