FCC Web Documents citing 76.907

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2413A1.txt
  • Communities therein ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5455-E Adopted: October 25, 2000 Released: October 27, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. and Time Warner Entertainment -Advance/Newhouse Partnership, collectively d/b/a Time Warner Communications (``Time Warner'') have filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Seminole County, Florida and certain communities within Seminole County (collectively, the ``Communities''). Time Warner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2860A1.txt
  • Heights, and Strongsville, Ohio (CUID Nos. OH1606; OH0823; OH1193; OH0971: OH0175; OH0841) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5582-E; CSR 5583-E; CSR 5584-E; CSR 5585-E; CSR 5586-E; CSR 5587-E Adopted: December 19, 2000 Released: December 20, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Six petitions have been filed pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Brooklyn, Brook Park, Garfield Heights, North Royalton, Shaker Heights, and Strongsville, Ohio (the ``Communities''). The petitioners (herein ``Cablevision'') allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1750A1.txt
  • 3. Mansfield 5130 2426 47.29 4. Edgecliff Village 976 171 17.52 5. Kennedale 1458 363 24.90 6. Blue Mound 668 116 17.4 7. N. Richland Hills 16,901 3508 20.76 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(a). 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(b)(1). Petitions at 2, citing Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership d/b/a Time Warner Communications, 15 FCC Rcd 8852, 8854 (CSB 2000); Jones Intercable, Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 7257, 7258 (CSB 2000). We note that Charter has relied upon 1990 Census figures to determine the number of households in the given franchise areas. We will accept 1990 data for these petitions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1942A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. CSR-5650-E Kearney, Missouri CUID No. MO0442 Adopted: August 14, 2001 Released: August 16, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION Kansas City Cable Partners (``KCCP'') has filed a Petition for Special Relief seeking a determination of effective competition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules. KCCP asserts that its cable television system serving the City of Kearney, Missouri is subject to local exchange carrier (``LEC'') effective competition because of the presence of ExOp Missouri, Inc.'s (``ExOp'') cable services in Kearney. The petition is unopposed. For the reasons discussed below, the petition is granted. BACKGROUND Section 623(a)(4) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2439A1.txt
  • Partners Petition For Determination of Effective Competition ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5711-E Lenexa, Kansas CUID No. KS0087 Adopted: October 17, 2001 Released: October 19, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION Kansas City Cable Partners (``KCCP'') has filed a Petition for Special Relief seeking a determination of effective competition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules. KCCP asserts that it is subject to local exchange carrier (``LEC'') effective competition in Lenexa, Kansas because of the presence of Everest Connections Corporation (``ECC'') cable services in that community. Everest submitted a late-filed pleading opposing Time Warner's request. Time Warner filed a reply. For the reasons discussed below, the petition is granted. BACKGROUND Section 623(a)(4)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-308A1.txt
  • cable operator's cable system. The Commission -- (3) shall not apply the requirements of this subsection to any cable operator in any franchise area in which a cable operator is subject to effective competition as determined under section 623(1). 47 U.S.C. § 533(a)(3); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.501(f). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(b). 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(A); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(1). See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, First Report on Reconsideration, Second Report and Order, and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 9 FCC Rcd 1164, 1180 (1993). See Cable Operators' Petitions for Reconsideration of Franchising Authorities' Certifications to Regulate Basic Cable Rates, 9 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-536A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Waco, Texas (CUID No. TX0230) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5637-E Adopted: February 27, 2001 Released: March 2, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76 905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for revocation of the certification of the City of Waco, Texas to regulate basic cable service rates due to the presence of effective competition in Waco, Texas. Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving Waco is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-553A1.txt
  • the Matter of: Texas Cable Partners, L.P. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Certain Communities in Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5634-E Adopted: February 27, 2001 Released: March 2, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Texas Cable Partners, L.P. (``Texas Cable'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the twenty eight Texas communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Communities''). Texas Cable alleges that its cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-571A1.txt
  • revoke the certification of the Vermont Public Service Board to regulate basic cable rates. Since the Vermont Public Service Board's cable franchising and regulatory authority arises from Vermont statutes and not from any Commission certification (See Vermont Public Service Board letter dated December 14, 2000), the petition will be treated as a petition for determination of effective competition pursuant Section 76.907 of the Commission's rules. The Certificates of Public Good are not implicated in this proceeding. See also Vermont Department of Public Service letter dated December 11, 2000. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 907. Communications Act, Section 623(1)(1)(B), 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-808A1.txt
  • No. OH0522 Westerville, Ohio CUID No. OH0517 Bexley, Ohio CUID No. OH0512 Obetz, Ohio Adopted: March 29, 2001 Released: April 2, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., d/b/a Time Warner Communications (``Time Warner'') has filed a Petition for Special Relief seeking a determination of effective competition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules. Time Warner asserts that it is subject to local exchange carrier (``LEC'') effective competition in the above-noted community units (the ``Communities'') because of the presence of Ameritech New Media, Inc.'s (``Ameritech'') cable services in those Communities. Time Warner also requests that the Commission revoke the certification of the City of Westerville, Ohio to regulate Time Warner's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2166A1.txt
  • the Commission, SkyTRENDS' zip code subscriber numbers are inflated by roughly ten percent ``due to dual receivers, and limited commercial and test accounts.'' See Charter Communications, DA 02-1919 at n.13 (MB rel. Aug. 6, 2002). Petition at 5 and Exhibit 3. See id. at Exhibit 4 (1,309 DBS subscribers ÷ 7,742 Athens 2000 Census households = 16.9%). Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules, Charter sought to bolster its competitive penetration showing by obtaining subscriber information for P.C.L. Cable (``P.C.L.''), a cable overbuilder serving Athens. Id. at Exhibit 7. P.C.L. did not respond to Charter's request. Id. at 7. In light of our resolution herein, we need not address Charter's request that we require P.C.L. to submit its Athens subscriber
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2174A1.txt
  • who live outside Denton. Id. at 3. Denton also criticizes the timeliness of the data, which was current as of April 30, 2002, at the time Charter filed its Petition in June 2002. Id. at 5. Denton faults Charter and SkyTrends for failing to provide Denton with an opportunity to verify the SkyTrends data. Reply at 3-5. Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competition purposes. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(c). This subscriber information may be limited to numerical totals. Id. The Commission has accepted DBS subscriber reports from SkyTrends on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of this requirement. See, e.g, Mountain Cable Company d/b/a Adelphia Cable Communications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2294A1.txt
  • Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications Phoenix Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Phoenix, AZ, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5897-E Adopted: September 12, 2002 Released: September 18, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction CoxCom, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications Phoenix (``Cox'') has filed with the Commission a petition (the ``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in eight communities in Arizona (collectively, the ``Communities''). Cox alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Cox
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2842A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Wisconsin Rapids, WI (CUID No. WA0062) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5895-E Adopted: October 24, 2002 Released: October 25, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Charter Cable Partners, LLC, d/b/a Charter Communications (``Charter'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin. Charter alleges that its cable system serving the City of Wisconsin Rapids is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Charter claims
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2986A1.txt
  • Certification and Determination of Effective Competition in Colorado Springs, Colorado (CO0030) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5884-E Adopted: November 1, 2002 Released: November 5, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Century Colorado Springs Partnership d/b/a Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for revocation of the certification of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado to regulate basic cable service rates due to the presence of effective competition. Adelphia alleges that its cable system serving Colorado Springs is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3237A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules, that the captioned petition for a determination of effective competition filed by Hometown Online, Inc. IS HEREBY GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 543(a); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 U.S.C § 543(l)(1)(A); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(l). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. Petition at 3. Id. >. Hometown's West Milford Township occupied housing unit data is taken from the 2000 Census. See Petition at 3 n.6. Petition at 3. Id. at 3-4. Id. at 4. Id. Id. at 4 n.8. Id. at 4-5. Id.;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3338A1.txt
  • plus four extensions that fall outside the relevant cable franchise area. Mediacom also submits documentation reflecting that SkyTrends does not publicly release any zip code plus four data beyond its general methodology and the aggregate DBS subscriber total for the franchise area in question. As such, Mediacom contends that it cannot supply Maquoketa with the requested data. Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competition purposes, however, such subscriber information may be limited to numerical totals. The Commission has accepted DBS subscriber reports from SkyTrends on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of this requirement. Under Section 76.7(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, Mediacom sent a service copy of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3376A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: AT&T CSC, Inc. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Lexington, Massachusetts (MA0140) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6015-E Adopted: December 4, 2002 Released: December 9, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction AT&T CSC, Inc. (``AT&T'') has filed with the Commission a petition (the ``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Lexington, Massachusetts (``Lexington''). AT&T alleges that its cable system serving Lexington is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising authority in Lexington to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3599A1.txt
  • Time Warner Cable Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Gardena, California (CA0934) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5901-E Adopted: December 13, 2002 Released: December 27, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Paragon Communications, Inc. d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition (the ``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Gardena, California (``Gardena''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving Gardena is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising authority in Gardena
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-544A1.txt
  • the Matter of: Texas Cable Partners, L.P. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Corpus Christi, Texas (TX0205) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5676-E Adopted: March 5, 2002 Released: March 7, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Texas Cable Partners, L.P. (``TCP'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for revocation of the certification of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas to regulate basic cable service rates due to the presence of effective competition. Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving Corpus Christi is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-611A1.txt
  • in Twelve Oregon Cities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Nos. CSR 5678-E Thru CSR 5689-E Adopted: March 12, 2002 Released: March 15, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Falcon Cable Systems Company II, a California Limited Partnership, d/b/a Charter Communications (``Charter''), has filed with the Commission twelve petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations of effective competition in each of the twelve Oregon communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Communities''). Charter alleges that its cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-792A1.txt
  • Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in St. John the Baptist, Parish, Louisiana (CUID No. LA0151) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5728-E Adopted: March 29, 2002 Released: April 11, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana (``The Parish''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving The Parish is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-793A1.txt
  • Competition in Dunedin (FL0482), Oldsmar (FL0716), Safety Harbor (FL0233), and Tarpon Springs (FL0488), Florida ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5729-E Adopted: April 1, 2002 Released: April 11, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and (4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for revocation of the certification of the Cities of Dunedin, Oldsmar, Safety Harbor, and Tarpon Springs, Florida (``The Cities'') to regulate basic cable service rates due to the presence of effective competition in The Cities. Time Warner alleges that its cable systems serving The Cities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-794A1.txt
  • Bishop, Donna, Falfurrias, and Mathis, and the towns of Lake City, Lakeside, Palm Village, and Refugio, Texas, which are not certified by the Commission to regulate basic tier cable service rates, (see Petition in File No. CSR 5790-E at 2, n. 1), the petition will be treated as a petition for determination of effective competition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). See Petitions at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1192A1.txt
  • satisfy Santa Rosa's concerns regarding the accuracy of SkyTrends' data, however, Mediacom requested from SkyTrends a list of the zip code plus four extensions mapped within Santa Rosa County without the associated DBS subscriber totals for each extension. Mediacom submits that it has supplied Santa Rosa with sufficient data to verify the reliability of SkyTrends' subscriber totals. Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competition purposes, however, such subscriber information may be limited to numerical totals. The Commission has accepted DBS subscriber reports from SkyTrends on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of this requirement. Pursuant to Section 76.7(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, Mediacom sent a service copy of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1564A1.txt
  • for not producing for verification the supporting data used by SkyTrends in its zip code plus four analysis for the City. Denton asks that the Commission find that Charter is in violation of its franchise and assess a monetary forfeiture against the cable operator. We have repeatedly accepted SkyTrends' subscriber reports on behalf of the DBS Providers in satisfaction Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to this provision, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competition purposes, however, this information may be limited to numerical totals. Charter provided Denton with the relevant portion of the SkyTrends report identifying the total number of DBS subscribers allocated to the City, as well as a copy of the methodology detailing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2097A1.txt
  • data as a source of household data for effective competition, rather than the City's proposed building permit figure. Even using the City's figure, Mediacom asserts that it would still be able to establish that DBS penetration exceeds 15 percent. 7. As Mediacom notes, we have repeatedly accepted SkyTrends' subscriber reports on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to this provision, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competitive purposes, however, this information may be limited to numerical totals. Mediacom provided Chanhassen with the relevant portion of the SkyTrends report identifying the total number of DBS subscribers allocated to the City, as well as a copy of the methodology detailing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2102A1.txt
  • need to be adjusted downward. Cable One also indicated that the SkyTrends report specifically states that it is limited to the City boundaries and not outlying areas. Finally, Cable One obtained revised subscribership numbers from Teton that include only subscribers within the City limits. 8. As Cable One notes, we have repeatedly accepted SkyTrends' subscriber reports in satisfaction of Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules. Cable One provided Pocatello with the relevant portion of the SkyTrends report identifying the total number of DBS subscribers allocated to the City, as well as a copy of the methodology detailing how SkyTrends reached this result. Pocatello presents no evidence to call into question the validity of the SkyTrends' report submitted by Cable One. Moreover,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2198A1.txt
  • In the Matter of: Kansas City Cable Partners Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Shawnee, Kansas (KS0431) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5956-E Adopted: June 30, 2003 Released: July 9, 2003 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Kansas City Cable Partners (``KCCP'') has filed with the Commission a petition (``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Shawnee, Kansas (``Shawnee''). KCCP alleges that its cable system serving Shawnee is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising authority in Shawnee to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2199A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5714-E New Ulm, Minnesota CUID No. NM0033 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2003 Released: July 9, 2003 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION Amzak Cable Midwest, Inc., d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed a Petition for Special Relief seeking a determination of effective competition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules, and an order to revoke the basic rate certification authority of the City of New Ulm, Minnesota. Time Warner asserts that it is subject to local exchange carrier (``LEC'') effective competition in the above-captioned community because of the presence of New Ulm Telecom, Inc.'s (``NT'') cable services in that community. The petition is unopposed. For the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-28A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Dedham (MA0238) and Needham (MA0199), Massachusetts ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6021-E Adopted: January 3, 2003 Released: January 9, 2003 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction MediaOne of Massachusetts, Inc. (``MediaOne'') (providing service as ``AT&T Broadband'') has filed with the Commission a petition (the ``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Dedham and Needham, Massachusetts (``the Communities''). MediaOne alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-353A1.txt
  • the Matter of: Kansas City Cable Partners Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Overland Park, Kansas (KS0064) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5993-E Adopted: February 3, 2003 Released: February 5, 2003 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Kansas City Cable Partners (``KCCP'') has filed with the Commission a petition (``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Overland Park, Kansas (``Overland Park''). KCCP alleges that its cable system serving Overland Park is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-415A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Media Bureau See 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(1); 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7(a)(1) and 76.905(b)(2). The Communities are Florida City, Key Biscayne and a portion of unincorporated Miami Dade County (``Miami-Dade''). Florida City and Miami-Dade are certified by the Commission to regulate basic cable service rates. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 U.S.C. §§ 76.906 and 76.907. 47 U.S.C. §543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. §76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). See Adelphia Petition at 4-5 and Exhibit A. See 47 C.F.R. §76.905(g). See also Adelphia Petition at 5-6 and Exhibits B, C and D. Adelphia Petition at 4-5 and Exhibit A. Id. and Exhibit F. Id. at 7-8. Id. at 7 and Exhibits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-416A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Doylestown (OH0787) and Chippewa (OH1590), Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-5955-E Adopted: February 5, 2003 Released: February 12, 2003 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. and TW Fanch-Two Co. (collectively, ``Time Warner'') have filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Doylestown and Chippewa, Ohio (``the Communities''). Time Warner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules. Time Warner claims the presence of effective competition in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1015A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1015A1.txt
  • subscribing to MVPDs, other than the largest MVPD, exceed 15 percent of the households in a franchise area. Cablevision sought to determine the competing provider penetration in its franchise area by purchasing a report from SkyTrends that identified the number of subscribers attributable to the DBS providers within Communities on a franchise-specific zip code plus four basis. Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competition purposes, however, such subscriber information may be limited to numerical totals. The Commission has accepted DBS subscriber reports from SkyTrends on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of this requirement. Under the circumstances of the instant case, we believe that Cablevision has satisfied its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1040A1.txt
  • to withdraw the petitions with respect to Granite Falls, Lenoir, and Weaverville, North Carolina, which the LFAs opposed. A request for Commission action may be withdrawn as a matter of right unless restricted by regulation. See for example 47 C.F.R. 1.420(j). No such regulation applies to petitions for determination of effective competition filed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7 & 76.907. Additionally, the unopposed Motions for Extension of Time filed by Charter are granted. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1072A1.txt
  • exceeded fifteen percent, it is unclear that DBS penetration alone can suffice to constitute effective competition and curb Comcast's market power. In reply, Comcast argues that the Commission has recognized that SkyTrends is an appropriate source of DBS subscriber data and that SkyTrends' methodology is a reliable means for cable operators to make an effective competition showing. Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules, cable operators may request subscriber information from competitors for effective competition purposes, however, such subscriber information may be limited to numerical totals. The Commission has accepted DBS subscriber reports from SkyTrends on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of this requirement. Under the circumstances of the instant case, we believe that Comcast has satisfied its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1994A1.txt
  • CSR 6111-E CSR 6126-E & 6182-E CSR 6148-E, 6159-E & 6212-E CSR 6184-E CSR 6211-E, 6224-E & 6239-E Adopted: June 29, 2004 Released: June 30, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. INtroduction 1. This Order considers eleven unopposed petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and the Commission's implementing rules and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to the petitions was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-213A1.txt
  • Matter of: Kansas City Cable Partners Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Kansas City, MO (MO0199) (MO200) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6104-E Adopted: January 28, 2004 Released: January 29, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Kansas City Cable Partners (``KCCP'') has filed with the Commission a petition (``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Kansas City, Missouri (``Kansas City''). KCCP alleges that its cable system serving Kansas City is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3049A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6307-E, 6318-E & 6319-E CSR 6302-E CSR 6312-E & 6327-E Adopted: September 22, 2004 Released: September 24, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. INtroduction 1. This Order considers six unopposed petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and the Commission's implementing rules and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3088A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Forest City (IA0151), Clear Lake (IA0076) and Ventura (IA0393), IA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6323-E CSR-6328-E Adopted: September 24, 2004 Released: September 28, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Forest City, Clear Lake and Ventura, Iowa (``the Communities''). Mediacom alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-939A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Eleven Minnesota Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6106-E Adopted: March 31, 2004 Released: April 5, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Amzak Cable Midwest, Inc. and Minnesota Cable Properties, Inc. (``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the eleven Minnesota communities listed below (the ``Communities''). The Cable Operators alleges that their cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. More particularly, the Cable Operators claim the presence of effective competition in the eleven Communities stems from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-940A1.txt
  • Cable Partners, L.P. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Eleven Texas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6091-E Adopted: March 30, 2004 Released: April 7, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Texas Cable Partners, L.P. d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Texas Cable'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the eleven communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Communities''). Texas Cable alleges that its cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act, and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. More particularly, Texas Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-948A1.txt
  • File No. CSR 6171-E File No. CSR 6102-E File No. CSR 6137-E File No. CSR 6099-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: April 2, 2004 Released: April 6, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers nineteen unopposed petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such cable operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No oppositions to the petitions were filed. Finding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • 6588-E, 6589-E, 6624-E CSR CSR 6558-E CSR 6566-E CSR 6591-E CSR 6468-E, 6469-E, 6470-E, 6471-E, 6472-E, 6473-E, 6474-E, 6475-E, 6476-E Adopted: May 18, 2005 Released: May 19, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers twenty-two unopposed petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • 6483-E, 6638-E, 6641-E, 6644-E, 6645-E, 6646-E, 6655-E, 6659-E CSR CSR 6436-E, 6642-E, 6643-E, 6649-E CSR 6590-E, 6647-E, 6648-E CSR 6601-E Adopted: May 18, 2005 Released: May 19, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers twenty-four unopposed petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • rules provides for regulation of cable rates by local franchising authorities and the Commission. Need: The rules ensure that subscribers pay reasonable rates for regulated cable services with minimum regulatory and administrative burden on cable entities. . Section Number and Title: 76.901 Definitions. 76.905 Standards for identification of cable systems subject to effective competition. 76.906 Presumption of no effective competition. 76.907 Petition for a determination of effective competition. 76.910 Franchising authority certification. 76.911 Petition for reconsideration of certification. 76.912 Joint certification. 76.913 Assumption of jurisdiction by the Commission. 76.914 Revocation of certification. 76.916 Petition for recertification. 76.917 Notification of certification withdrawal. 76.920 Composition of the basic tier. 76.921 Buy-through of other tiers prohibited. 76.922 Rates for the basic service tier and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6612-E CSR-6613-E CSR-6614-E CSR-6615-E CSR-6616-E CSR-6617-E CSR-6618-E CSR-6619-E CSR-6620-E CSR-6621-E CSR-6622-E CSR-6623-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 27, 2005 Released: June 2, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers twelve petitions filed with the Commission by TCA Cable Partners (``Cox'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Cox's cable systems serving eighteen Arkansas communities and one Oklahoma and one Texas community (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • ) CSR-6456-E CSR-6457-E CSR-6458-E CSR-6459-E CSR-6460-E CSR-6461-E CSR-6462-E CSR-6463-E CSR-6464-E CSR-6465-E CSR-6466-E CSR-6467-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 9, 2005 Released: June 13, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers twelve petitions filed with the Commission by Charter Communications, on behalf of its affiliates, (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving twenty-three Oregon communities (``the Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. Charter's petitions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6603-E CSR-6604-E CSR-6605-E CSR-6606-E CSR-6607-E CSR-6608-E CSR-6609-E CSR-6610-E CSR-6611-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2005 Released: July 1, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers nine petitions filed with the Commission by Cox Communications Louisiana, LLC (``Cox'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Cox's cable systems serving seventeen communities in Louisiana (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6713-E CSR-6714-E CSR-6715-E CSR-6716-E CSR-6717-E CSR-6718-E CSR-6719-E CSR-6720-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2005 Released: July 1, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers eight petitions filed with the Commission by Charter Communications, on behalf of its affiliates, (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving twenty-three Michigan communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. We grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6672-E CSR-6673-E CSR-6674-E CSR-6675-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2005 Released: July 1, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers four petitions filed with the Commission by Charter Communications, on behalf of its affiliates, (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving twenty-seven Michigan communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. We grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CSR-6688-E CSR-6689-E CSR-6690-E CSR-6691-E CSR-6692-E CSR-6693-E CSR-6694-E CSR-6695-E CSR-6696-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2005 Released: July 1, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers nine petitions filed with the Commission by Charter Communications, on behalf of its affiliates, (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving twenty-five Michigan communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. We grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • & 6680-E CSR 6663-E CSR 6640-E, 6656-E, 6682-E, 6683-E & 6685-E CSR 6533-E & 6534-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2005 Released: July 6, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers seventeen petitions which cable operators (``the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the Cable Operators are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • 6740-E, 6784-E, 6861-E & 6892-E CSR 6780-E CSR 6433-E & 6434-E CSR 6439-E & 6444-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: September 23, 2005 Released: September 27, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers twenty petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the Cable Operators are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2512A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of: MCC Iowa, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Alta, Iowa (IA0121) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6436-E Adopted: September 23, 2005 Released: September 26, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the City of Alta, Iowa (``Alta'' or the ``City''). Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving Alta is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and Section 76.905(b)(3) of the Commission's rules and seeks revocation of the certification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • of: MCC Iowa LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition for Six Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6482-E Adopted: September 28, 2005 Released: September 30, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa, LLC and Mediacom Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the Communities listed in Attachment A. Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving these Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. More particularly,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2528A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of: MCC Iowa LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Cedar Rapids, Iowa (IA0079) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6389-E Adopted: September 28, 2005 Released: September 30, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (the ``Franchise Area''). Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving the Franchise Area is subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(4) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore is exempt from cable rate regulation. Mediacom claims
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6639-E, 6661-E CSR-6664-E, 6684-E CSR-6668-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: September 23, 2005 Released: September 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers five petitions filed with the Commission by MCC Illinois LLC, Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom Indiana LLC (``Mediacom'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom's cable systems serving twenty-one Illinois and Michigan communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6705-E CSR-6731-E, 6732-E, 6733-E, 6735-E & 6746-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: September 23, 2005 Released: September 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers six petitions filed with the Commission by Mediacom Southeast LLC and Mediacom Illinois LLC (``Mediacom'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom's cable systems serving twenty-seven Illinois communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. We grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • ) CSR 6729-E, 6840-E, 6841-E, 6847-E, 6851-E, 6852-E, 6862-E, 6867-E CSR 6710-E, 6756-E, 6768-E, 6770-E, 6773-E, 6775-E, 6788-E, 6797-E, 6798-E, 6799-E Adopted: September 27, 2005 Released: September 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers eighteen petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • CSR 6781-E, 6782-E & 6783-E, CSR 6598-E, 6734-E, 6743-E, 6796-E, 6802-E, 6807-E, 6825-E & 6889-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: September 28, 2005 Released: September 30, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers eighteen petitions which cable operators (``the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the Cable Operators are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2642A1.txt
  • Reminder As To Procedures for Filing Cable Television Effective Competition Petitions, 20 FCC Rcd 7294, (M.B. April 1, 2005). Time Warner refiled its Petitions to accurately reflect its physical system unit status. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). . (last accessed on August 15, 2005). (last accessed on August 15, 2005). See Eleventh Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for Delivery of Video Programming, 20 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Unincorporated Hillsborough County, Florida ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6133-E Adopted: October 27, 2005 Released: October 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in unincorporated Hillsborough County, Florida (the ``Community''). Bright House alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service provided by two
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • CSR 6722-E CSR 6828-E, 6830-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: October 28, 2005 Released: October 31, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers three petitions that cable operators, MCC Missouri LLC (``MCC'') and Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom; collectively, the ``Cable Operators''), have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the Cable Operators are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • 6652-E, 6653-E, 6657-E, 6658-E, 6707-E, 6708-E, 6791-E, 6806-E, 6819-E, 6822-E, 6835-E, 6836-E, 6837-E, 6838-E, 6844-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: October 28, 2005 Released: October 31, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers seventeen petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the Cable Operators are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • Cable Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Five Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6364-E Adopted: November 3, 2005 Released: November 4, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers a petition that Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the local franchise areas listed in Attachments A and B (the ``Franchise Areas''). The petition is unopposed. Finding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • in Springfield, Missouri ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6771-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: November 3, 2005 Released: November 7, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a Petition for Special Relief (``Petition'') that cable operator MCC Missouri LLC (``MCC'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the Springfield, Missouri, franchise area (``Springfield''). Responding to the Petition, the City of Springfield, Missouri (the ``City''), filed an Opposition to Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • Comcast of Dallas, L.P. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Dallas, Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6445-E Adopted: November 7, 2005 Released: November 14, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Comcast of Dallas, L.P. (``Comcast'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Dallas, Texas (the ``Community''). Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service provided by two direct broadcast satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • CSR-6795-E CSR-6805-E CSR-6811-E CSR-6813-E CSR-6814-E CSR-6817-E CSR-6821-E CSR-6823-E CSR-6824-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 27, 2005 Released: December 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers twelve petitions filed with the Commission by MCC Iowa LLC, MCC Illinois LLC, Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom Indiana LLC (``Mediacom'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1)&(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom's cable systems serving twenty-three Illinois and Michigan communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in St. James, Minnesota (CUID MN0312) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6010-E Adopted: December 20, 2005 Released: December 22, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction 1. Mediacom Minnesota LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in the City of St. James, Minnesota. Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving the City is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing services provided by two direct
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • Subscribership Households+ Subscribers+ Cockrell Hill TX0715 16.26%** 1150 187 Comcast Cable Communications, LLC: CSR 6401-E Cable 2000 Census Cable Community CUID Subscribership Households+ Subscribers+ Hebron TX0839 1.11%** 271 3 * CPR = Percent DBS penetration **= mathematical errors by Petitioner corrected + = See Cable Operator Petitions 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7, 76.905. Comcast's petitions do not invoke 47 C.F.R. § 76.907 (``Petition for a determination of effective competition''), but we will treat the petitions as if they do. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). Comcast filed one document, titled ``Petition for Special Relief,'' on September 3, 2004. Because it concerns six different cable systems, each with its unique physical system identification number, we treated it as six petitions. Comcast appears to believe that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6422-E, 6423-E, 6454-E, 6496-E, 6497-E, 6498-E, 6559-E, 6560-E, 6561-E, 6562-E, 6563-E, 6564-E CSR 6405-E Adopted: December 27, 2005 Released: December 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers thirteen petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3330A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of: MCC Iowa, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Algona, Iowa (IA0014) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6745-E Adopted: December 27, 2005 Released: December 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the City of Algona, Iowa (``Algona'' or the ``City''). Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving Algona is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and Section 76.905(b)(3) of the Commission's rules and seeks revocation of the certification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6721-E, 6724-E, 6737-E, 6739-E, 6758-E CSR 6887-E CSR 6709-E, 6728-E, 6748-E, 6800-E, 6803-E, 6888-E Adopted: December 27, 2005 Released: December 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers twelve petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6702-E, 6706-E, 6736-E, 6741-E, 6742-E, 6744-E, 6754-E, 6839-E, 6869-E CSR 6808-E, 6809-E, 6810-E Adopted: December 27, 2005 Released: December 28, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers twelve petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: MCC Iowa, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Carroll, IA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6438-E Adopted: December 28, 2005 Released: December 29, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Carroll, Iowa. Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving this community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. More particularly, Mediacom claims the presence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6747-E CSR-6752-E CSR-6753-E CSR-6757-E CSR-6776-E CSR-6777-E CSR-6778-E CSR-6787-E CSR-6789-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 28, 2005 Released: December 29, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers nine petitions filed with the Commission by Mediacom Illinois LLC and MCC Illinois LLC (``Mediacom'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1)&(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom's cable systems serving thirty Illinois communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed. We grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6514-E, 6515-E, 6516-E, 6517-E, 6518-E, 6519-E, 6520-E, 6521-E Adopted: December 28, 2005 Released: December 29, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers a petition that Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') filed with the Commission on behalf of its affiliates pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in twenty-three franchise areas (the ``Franchise Areas''). The Cities of Winchester, Morehead, and Cynthiana (``the Cities'') have filed a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Twenty-six Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6404-E Adopted: December 28, 2005 Released: December 30, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers a petition that Service Electric Cable TV of New Jersey, Inc. (``Service Electric'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in twenty-six franchise areas (``Franchise Areas''). The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (``BPU'') has filed an opposition and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3351A1.txt
  • service rates IS REVOKED. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (MB 1997). . (last accessed on August 15, 2005). (last accessed on August 15, 2005). See Eleventh Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for Delivery of Video Programming, 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • Adelphia Cable Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Cullman, Garden City, Hanceyville, and Holly Pond, Alabama ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6340-E Adopted: February 28, 2005 Released: March 7, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Cullman, Garden City, Hanceville, and Holly Pond, Alabama (the ``Communities''). Adelphia alleges that its cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-542A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6357-E CSR 6353-E; CSR 6372-E & CSR 6385-E Adopted: March 1, 2005 Released: March 7, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa LLC and MCC Georgia LLC (collectively ``MCC'') have filed with the Commission four petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Spencer, Iowa, and in Cairo, Moultrie, Thomasville, and Tifton, Georgia (the ``Communities''). MCC alleges that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(C) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore are exempt from cable rate regulation. MCC claims
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Cable One, Inc. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Rio Rancho, New Mexico ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6337-E Adopted: February 28, 2005 Released: March 7, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Cable One, Inc. has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Rio Rancho, New Mexico. Cable One alleges that its cable systems serving this community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. More particularly, Cable One claims
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • in Greenacres, Hypoluxo, Lake Charles Shores, Lantana, Palm Springs, Royal Palm Beach, and West Palm Beach, Florida ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6329-E Adopted: February 28, 2005 Released: March 7, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Greenacres, Hypoluxo, Lake Charles Shores, Lantana, Palm Springs, Royal Palm Beach, and West Palm Beach, Florida (the ``Communities''). Adelphia alleges that its cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, and the Commission's implementing rules, and are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • Mediacom Minnesota LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition and Revocation of Certification in Sixteen Minnesota Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6241-E Adopted: February 28, 2005 Released: March 7, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introductions Mediacom Minnesota LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for revocation of the certification of the Lake Minnesota Cable Commission (``LMCC'') to regulate basic cable rates due to the presence of effective competition in the sixteen communities (``the Franchise Area'') listed on Attachment A. Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving the Franchise Area is subject to effective competition and is therefore exempt from cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-665A1.txt
  • franchise areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6375-E CSR-6376-E CSR-6377-E CSR-6378-E CSR-6379-E Adopted: March 9, 2005 Released: March 14, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction MCC Iowa LLC, Mediacom Minnesota LLC, and Zylstra Communications Corporation (collectively ``Mediacom'') have filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in the Cities of Storm Lake and Lakeside, Iowa; the Cities of Luverne, Pipestone, Slayton and Worthington, Minnesota; the Cities of Colman, Flandreau, and Yankton, South Dakota and the Town of Gayville, South Dakota (collectively ``the Communities''). Mediacom alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • 6487-E, 6489-E, 6499-E, 6500-E , 6501-E, 6527-E, 6528-E & 6529-E CSR 6478-E CSR 6481-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 31, 2005 Released: April 1, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers nineteen unopposed petitions which cable operators (``the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the Cable Operators are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Competition in Argyle, Wisconsin (WI0550) and Blanchardville, WI (WI0465) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6599-E, 6831-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: January 25, 2006 Released: January 30, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Mediacom Wisconsin LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed two petitions with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the Villages of Argyle and Blanchardville, Wisconsin (the ``Communities''). No opposition to either petition was filed. Finding that Mediacom is subject to effective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1946A1.txt
  • Competition in two Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7045-E CSR-7047-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: September 27, 2006 Released: September 29, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction This Order considers two petitions which MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1975A1.txt
  • LLC Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in two Iowa Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7044-E & 7046-E Adopted: October 2, 2006 Released: October 5, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers two petitions which MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operator is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1985A1.txt
  • Matter of: Charter Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Nevada Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6417-E, 6418-E, 6419-E Adopted: October 2, 2006 Released: October 5, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Charter Communications (``Charter'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations of effective competition in several Nevada communities pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A. The cities of Carson City, Reno, Sparks, Nevada and Washoe County Nevada (collectively,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2038A1.txt
  • MINNESOTA LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Minnesota Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6895-E Adopted: October 12, 2006 Released: October 17, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Minnesota LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving various Minnesota franchise areas listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in those communities. No opposition to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2119A1.txt
  • CSR-7015-E, 7016-E, 7017-E, 7018-E, 7019-E, 7020-E, 7021-E, 7022-E, 7023-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: October 26, 2006 Released: October 27, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a Petition for Special Relief (``Petition'') that the cable operator Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Ltd. (``Liberty''), filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905, and 76.907 of the Commission's rules. The Petition seeks a determination that, in seven franchise areas in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Liberty is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. No opposition to the Petition was filed. Finding that Liberty is subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • Charter Communications Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in Beatrice, Louisville and Plattsmouth, Nebraska ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6420-E CSR 6421-E Adopted: February 1, 2006 Released: February 2, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Charter Communications (``Charter'') has filed two petitions with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving the three Nebraska communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in those communities. No opposition to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • 2006 Released: February 6, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers eleven petitions filed with the Commission by Mediacom Illinois LLC, MCC Illinois, LLC, Mediacom Indiana LLC, Mediacom Southeast LLC, Bright House Networks and Charter Communications (collectively ``the Petitioners,'' unless otherwise specifically referred to by individual company name) pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1)&(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners' cable systems serving twenty-two Illinois and Michigan communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. No opposition to any petition was filed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • ) ) ) CSR 6761-E CSR 6762-E CSR 6763-E CSR 6764-E CSR 6765-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2006 Released: February 7, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers five petitions filed with the Commission by Charter Communications, on behalf of its affiliates, (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving seven Missouri communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. An opposition was filed by the City of Cape
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • ) ) ) CSR 6902-E CSR 6903-E CSR 6904-E CSR 6907-E CSR 6908-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2006 Released: February 7, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers five petitions filed with the Commission by Charter Communications, on behalf of its affiliates, (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving twenty nine Missouri communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The Communities are listed in Attachment A. An opposition was filed by the St. Charles
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-59A1.txt
  • (IL0284), Morris, Minnesota (MN0012) and Chokio, Minnesota (MN0179) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6352-E CSR 6354-E Adopted: January 12, 2006 Released: January 13, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Minnesota LLC (``Mediacom'') and MCC Illinois LLC (collectively ``Mediacom'') have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the Village of Louisville, Illinois and the Cities of Morris and Chokio, Minnesota (collectively ``the Franchise Areas''). Mediacom alleges that its cable systems serving the Franchise Areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(4) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-623A1.txt
  • Certification of the City Fort Stockton, Texas to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6510-E Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: March 31, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction U.S. Cable of Coastal-Texas, L.P. (``U.S. Cable'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Fort Stockton, Texas. U.S. Cable alleges that its cable system serving the City of Fort Stockton, Texas (the ``City'') is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • Competition in Seventeen Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6700-E, 6701-E, 6703-E, 6704-E, 6730-E, 6853-E, 6602-E, 6625-E Adopted: January 12, 2006 Released: January 13, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers eight petitions which Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the franchise areas listed in Attachments A and B (the ``Franchise Areas''). No opposition to any petition was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-744A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Seven Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6660-E, 6667-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: March 31, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Mediacom Wisconsin LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed two petitions with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the franchise areas listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to either petition was filed. Finding that Mediacom is subject to effective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-745A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6855-E CSR 6894-E CSR 6567-E, 6833-E CSR 6832-E CSR 6856-E CSR 6940-E Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: March 31, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers eight petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-746A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6568-E, 6569-E CSR 6522-E, 6523-E, 6538-E, 6539-E, 6540-E, 6541-E CSR 6530, 6531-E Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: March 31, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers ten petitions which cable operators (the ``Cable Operators'') have filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-747A1.txt
  • Communications, LLC Two Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in various Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6596-E, 6597-E Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: March 31, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, (``Comcast'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving various Colorado franchise areas listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. In addition, pursuant to Section 76.911(a)(1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-750A1.txt
  • Communications Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in Mount Vernon, Okawville, Salem and Richmond, Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6759-E CSR-6760-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: March 31, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Charter Communications has filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving four Illinois communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The City of Salem, Illinois (``Salem'') filed an opposition against one of the petitions and Charter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-760A1.txt
  • LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6896-E Adopted: March 30, 2006 Released: April 3, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Iowa LLC and MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') have filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving various Iowa communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in those communities. No opposition to the petition was filed. Finding that Mediacom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-776A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Twenty-One Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6723-E, 6725-E, 6727-E, 6755-E Adopted: March 31, 2006 Released: April 4, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. INtroduction 1. This Order considers four petitions which Mediacom Southeast, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and the Commission's implementing rules and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A and in the communities listed in Attachment B (the ``Communities''). No opposition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6047-E Adopted: January 25, 2006 Released: January 26, 2006 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Alert Cable TV of South Carolina, Inc. and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in thirty-eight communities in South Carolina (the ``Communities''). Time Warner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Time Warner alleges that its cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1041A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Various North Carolina Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6524-E, CSR 6525-E & CSR 6526-E Adopted: March 6, 2007 Released: March 7, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Caswell County, Lenoir County, Pink Hill, and Pitt County, North Carolina (collectively the ``Communities''). Adelphia alleges that its cable system serving the communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1065A1.txt
  • Special Relief, CSR No. 6891-E (``Motion to Withdraw''). We grant Charter's Motion to Withdraw. Accordingly, we address the Petition only as it relates to Buncombe County, North Carolina. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.7; 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC 2503 at ¶¶ 6, 13, 72-73 (rel. March 3, 2006). See Petition at 4 and Exhibit 1. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1066A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6942-E, 6943-E, 6944-E, 6945-E, 6946-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 6, 2007 Released: March 7, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers five petitions which the cable operator CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a/ Cox Communications North Carolina (``Cox''), filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that, in 13 franchise areas in North Carolina (the ``Communities''), it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Cox filed its Petition for Determination of Effective Competition and subsequently filed a revision (collectively,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1088A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Weston, Florida ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6548-E Adopted: March 7, 2007 Released: March 8, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a petition filed with the Commission by Advocate Communications, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Cable Communications, Inc (``Advanced'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Advanced's cable system serving Weston, Florida is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The City of Weston (``Weston'') opposed the petition and Advanced filed a reply. We deny the petition. In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1115A1.txt
  • an addendum filed December 5, 2006 Cox added CUID No. AZ0281 (Pima County-Tucson), which uses the same physical system as the communities of South Tucson, Davis-Monthan AFB, Green Valley, and Santa Rita Bel Aire. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907(b). 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19,406 (1997). See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC Rcd 2503 at ¶¶ 6, 13, 72-73 (rel. March 3, 2006). See Petition at 6-7 and Exhibits 3 (``National
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1116A1.txt
  • New York to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6339-E Adopted: March 8, 2007 Released: March 9, 2007 By the Deputy Chief Media Bureau: I. Introduction 1. Atlantic Broadband (Penn) LLC (``Atlantic'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in the following New York communities: (1) the Town of Great Valley; (2) the Town of Little Valley; (3) the Village of Little Valley; (4) the City of Salamanca; (5) and the Town of Salamanca. Atlantic alleges that its cable systems serving the captioned areas are subject to effective competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1210A1.txt
  • of DBS subscriber data furnished by the Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association (``SCBA''). See CoxCom Inc., d/b/a Cox Communications Orange County, 2007 WL 6854831 (2007); U.S. Cable of Coastal-Texas, L.P., 2006 WL 845479 (2006); MCC Iowa LLC, 2005 WL 3555454 (2005) (Commission has repeatedly accepted SBCA subscriber reports on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(c) of the Commission's rules); see also Time Warner Entertainment-Advance Newhouse Partnership, 2007 WL 654257 (2007) (Commission denied the effective competition petition filed by the cable operator due to zip code plus four data submitted by the local franchising authority that reflected a penetration rate of less than 15 percent). See Alert Cable TV of North Carolina, Inc., d/b/a Time Warner
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1250A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in San Antonio, Texas (CUID No. TX0029) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5721-E Adopted: March 12, 2007 Released: March 13, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Paragon Communications, Inc. d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in San Antonio, Texas (``San Antonio'' or the ``City''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving San Antonio is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1251A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Austin, Texas (CUID No. TX0029) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5701-E Adopted: March 12, 2007 Released: March 13, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Austin, Texas (``Austin'' or the ``City''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving Austin is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of the local franchising
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • of Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in San Marcos, Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5712-E Adopted: March 12, 2007 Released: March 13, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in San Marcos, Texas (``San Marcos'' or the ``City''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving San Marcos is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and seeks revocation of the certification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-159A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in the Farmington Hills, Livonia, and Novi, Michigan Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6941-E Adopted: January 22, 2007 Released: January 24, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving various Michigan communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in those communities. Southwestern Oakland Cable Commission (``SWOCC'') filed a comment to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-160A1.txt
  • Horse Thief Canyon, CA1621; Santa Barbra County (Santa Barbara, CA0157; Santa Ynez Valley, CA0158; Orcutt, CA0454; Vandenberg Village, CA1635) Santa Clarita (CA1630), Santa Fe Springs (CA0922), South El Monte (CA1120), and Tustin (CA0811). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See Comcast Petition at 5. See Comcast Exhibit 7. Los Angeles Opposition at 3. Id. Id. at 4. Id.at 4, 5. Id. at 4-5, 5-6. Id. at 7. Id. at 8. Id. Id. at 9-10. Id.at 10. Id. Id. at 11. Id. Id. at 11-12. Id. at 13. Id. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-161A1.txt
  • to file a processing fee for each physical system unit. See Public Notice, Reminder As To Procedures for Filing Cable Television Effective Competition Petitions, 20 FCC Rcd 7294 (M.B. April 1, 2005). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC 2503 at ¶¶ 6, 13, 72-73 (rel. March 3, 2006).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-162A1.txt
  • (FL09905), FL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6534-E & 6535-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: January 22, 2007 Released: January 24, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Telesat Acquisition LLC d/b/a Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia'') has filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Osceola County and the City of Inverness, Florida (the ``Communities''). Adelphia alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because the Commission has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-183A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in the Town of Hempstead, New York (NY0454) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7040-E Adopted: January 22, 2007 Released: January 24, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation (``Cablevision'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the Town of Hempstead, New York (the ``Franchise Area''). Cablevision alleges that its cable system serving the Franchise Area is subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(4) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore is exempt from cable rate regulation. Cablevision claims
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-184A1.txt
  • Villages of Nyack, New York (NY0870) and South Nyack, New York (NY0872) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7031-E Adopted: January 22, 2007 Released: January 24, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo, LLC (``Cablevision'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the Villages of Nyack, New York and South Nyack, New York (collectively, the ``Franchise Areas''). Cablevision alleges that its cable system serving the Franchise Areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(4) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore are exempt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-185A1.txt
  • Three Local Franchise Areas in Kentucky and Tennessee ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6865-E CSR-6874-E Adopted: January 22, 2007 Released: January 24, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers two petitions filed with the Commission by Mediacom Southeast LLC (Mediacom) pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom's cable systems serving certain communities in Kentucky (the ``communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The communities include Clinton, Gamaliel, and Henderson, Kentucky. No opposition to any petition was filed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-195A1.txt
  • Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Charter Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6453-E Adopted: January 24, 2007 Released: January 25, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers a petition which Charter Communications (``Charter'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operator is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in Owatonna, Minnesota. No opposition to the petition was filed. Finding that Charter is subject to effective competition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-196A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Germantown, Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6551-E Adopted: January 24, 2007 Released: January 25, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment Company LP d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable system serving Germantown, Ohio (``Germantown'') is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the community listed in Attachment A. The Miami Valley Communications Council (the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2282A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6924-E, 6991-E CSR 7071-E, 7072-E, 7123-E Adopted: May 31, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers several petitions which Coxcom, Inc. (``Coxcom'') and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'') (collectively the ``Petitioners'' or ``operators'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that Petitioners
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2283A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Two Local Franchise Areas in Wisconsin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7106-E Adopted: May 31, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a petition filed with the Commission by Charter Communications (``Charter'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter's cable systems serving Beloit and Janesville, Wisconsin are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The City of Janesville (``Janesville'') opposes the petition with respect to that franchise area. We grant the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2284A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7060-E CSR 7062-E, 7068-E, 7125-E Adopted: May 31, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers several petitions which Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Bright House Networks, LLC (collectively ``the Petitioners'' or ``operators'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that Petitioners
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-275A1.txt
  • Television, Inc. Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in Pearl and Flowood, MS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7005-E CSR-7013-E Adopted: January 26, 2007 Released: January 30, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION York Cable Television, Inc. d/b/a SusCom (``SusCom'') has filed two petitions with the Commission pursuant to 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable television systems serving Pearl and Flowood, Mississippi (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petitions were filed. We grant the petitions finding that SusCom is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2796A1.txt
  • LLC d/b/a Charter Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Burbank, CA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6949-E Adopted: June 22, 2007 Released: June 26, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION Marcus Cable Associates LLC d/b/a Charter Communications (``Charter'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable television system serving Burbank, California is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petition were filed. We grant the petition finding that Charter is subject to effective competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2797A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6537-E CSR-6670-E CSR-6671-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 22, 2007 Released: June 26, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo Inc., CSC TKR, Inc. d/b/a Cablevision of Elizabeth, and Cablevision of Warwick LLC (collectively ``Cablevision'') have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Cablevision's cable systems serving Montvale, Elizabeth and West Milford, New Jersey (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Specifically, Cablevision asserts that the competing provider test is met in Montvale,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2807A1.txt
  • & 6875-E Adopted: June 22, 2007 Released: June 26, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction This Order considers several petitions that Adelphia Cable Communications (``Adelphia''), MCC Georgia LLC (``MCC''), Mediacom Arizona LLC (``Mediacom Arizona''), and Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom Southeast'') (collectively the ``Petitioners'' or ``operators'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3136A1.txt
  • Dubuque (CUID IA0011), Epworth (CUID IA0115), Farley (CUID IA0114), Sageville (CUID IA0689) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6600-E Adopted: July 9, 2007 Released: July 11, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in the franchise areas listed in the above caption. Mediacom alleges that its cable systems serving the franchise areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service provided
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3146A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6726-E, 6738-E, 6750-E, 6751-E, 6816-E CSR 6769-E Adopted: July 9, 2007 Released: July 12, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers several petitions which Mediacom Southeast LLC ``Mediacom'' and Mediacom Minnesota LLC ``Mediacom'' (collectively the ``Petitioners'' or ``operators'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A and B (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. Finding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3192A1.txt
  • of Bright House Networks, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Temple Terrace, FL (FL0490) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7034-E Adopted: July 12, 2007 Released: July 13, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Temple Terrace, Florida. Bright House Networks alleges that its cable system serving Temple Terrace is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Bright House claims the presence of effective competition in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3253A1.txt
  • Time Warner Cable Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Platte City, Missouri (MO0075) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6391-E Adopted: July 16, 2007 Released: July 18, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction KCCP Trust d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``KCCP'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Platte City, Missouri (the ``Franchise Area''). KCCP alleges that its cable system serving the Franchise Area is subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(4) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore is exempt from cable rate regulation. KCCP claims the presence of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3254A1.txt
  • in Ten Local Franchise Areas in Illinois and in Ridgecrest, California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6818-E CSR-6452-E Adopted: July 16, 2007 Released: July 19, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom California LLC (``Mediacom'') have filed two petitions with the Commission pursuant to 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable television systems serving ten Illinois communities and Ridgecrest, California (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petitions were filed. We grant the petitions finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3295A1.txt
  • California and Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6505-E CSR-6678-E CSR-6792-E CSR-6826-E CSR-6829-E Adopted: July 17, 2007 Released: July 19, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION WaveDivision VI, LLC (``WaveDivision''), Mediacom California LLC, and Mediacom Illinois LLC (``Mediacom'') have filed petitions with the Commission pursuant to 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable television systems serving various communities in California and Illinois (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petitions were filed. We grant the petitions, finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3297A1.txt
  • Corporation Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in The Village of Massapequa Park, New York ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7011-E Adopted: July 18, 2007 Released: July 19, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation (``Cablevision'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of local exchange carrier (``LEC'') effective competition in the Village of Massapequa Park, New York (``Massapequa Park'' or ``Village''). Cablevision alleges that its cable system serving Massapequa Park is subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3310A1.txt
  • Matter of MEDIACOM SOUTHEAST LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Kentucky Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6909-E, 6910-E Adopted: July 17, 2007 Released: July 20, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving various Kentucky franchise areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in those communities. No opposition to the petition was filed. Finding that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3311A1.txt
  • Mediacom Southeast LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Kentucky Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6699-E Adopted: July 17, 2007 Released: July 20, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Minnesota LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving the City of Sonora, the City of Upton, and the unincorporated areas of Larue County which are adjacent or connected to Upton, Kentucky (the ``Communities''), are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3312A1.txt
  • Mediacom Minnesota LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Minnesota Local Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6876-E Adopted: July 16, 2007 Released: July 20, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Minnesota, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving various Minnesota communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). Southern Minnesota Cable Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3313A1.txt
  • § 1.106. 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2); see 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(b). Petition for Reconsideration at 2-3; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(c)(2). See In the Matter of Mediacom Southeast LLC, Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Unincorporated Santa Rosa County, Florida, 18 FCC Rcd 7718, 7720-21 (2003) (``Initial Order''). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. Initial Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 7718. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). Initial Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 7719-20. Id. At 7721. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(c). 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(c)(2). Santa Rose also argues that Section 1.106(b)(2)(ii) justifies consideration of its new evidence. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(b)(2)(ii). Because we find that reconsideration is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3314A1.txt
  • of Bright House Networks, LLC Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in Bradenton, FL (CUID FL0183) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7054-E Adopted: July 19, 2007 Released: July 20, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Brandenton, Florida. Bright House alleges that its cable system serving Brandenton is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore is exempt from cable rate regulation. Bright House claims the presence of effective competition in this area stems
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3334A1.txt
  • Eight Kentucky Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6866-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: July 20, 2007 Released: July 23, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction 1. This Order considers a petition for special relief that Mediacom Southeast, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in seven Kentucky communities (``Franchise Areas'') as listed in Attachment A and B. No opposition was filed. II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3336A1.txt
  • Rockcastle, KY (KY1157) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6868-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: July 20, 2007 Released: July 23, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction 1. This Order considers a petition for special relief that Mediacom Southeast, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in two Kentucky communities (``Franchise Areas'') as listed in Attachment A. Rockcastle filed an opposition. II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3337A1.txt
  • KY (KY0735) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6871-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: July 20, 2007 Released: July 23, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction 1. This Order considers a petition for special relief that Mediacom Southeast, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Medicom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in four Kentucky communities (``Franchise Areas'') as listed in Attachments A and B. No oppositions were filed. II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3338A1.txt
  • Russell, KY (KY1117) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6872-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: July 20, 2007 Released: July 23, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction 1. This Order considers a petition for special relief that Mediacom Southeast, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in two Kentucky communities (``Franchise Areas'') as listed in Attachment A. No oppositions were filed. II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3339A1.txt
  • (KY1205) Nebo (KY0721) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6848-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: July 20, 2007 Released: July 23, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction 1. This Order considers a petition for special relief that Mediacom Southeast, LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Medicom is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in three Kentucky communities (``Franchise Areas''), as listed in Attachments A and B. No oppositions were filed. II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3343A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Hutchinson (MN0078), Litchfield (MN0050) and Hassen Valley, Minnesota (MN0985) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6338-E Adopted: July 20, 2007 Released: July 23, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Mediacom Minnesota LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Section 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the Cities of Hutchinson, Litchfield, and Hassen Valley, Minnesota (collectively the ``Franchise Areas''). Mediacom alleges that its cable system serving the Franchise Areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Sections 623(a)(2) and 623(1)(1)(4) of the Communications Act and the Commission's implementing rules, and therefore is exempt from cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3355A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in 12 Local Franchise Areas in Illinois and Indiana ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6749-E Adopted: July 23, 2007 Released: July 25, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom Indiana LLC (``Mediacom'') have filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable television systems serving 12 Illinois and Indiana communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petition were filed. We grant the petitions finding that Mediacom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3356A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in 14 Local Franchise Areas in Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6812-E Adopted: July 23, 2007 Released: July 25, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION MCC Iowa LLC and Mediacom Illinois LLC (``Mediacom'') have filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that their cable television systems serving 14 Illinois communities (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petition were filed. We grant the petition finding that Mediacom is subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-397A1.txt
  • Filing Cable Television Effective Competition Petitions, 20 FCC Rcd 7294 (MB April 1, 2005). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). No oppositions were filed by the following cities: Hialeah Gardens, Miami Springs, Sweetwater, Virginia Gardens, and West Miami. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(A)-(D). See 47 C.F.R. §76.905. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC Rcd 2503 at ¶¶ 6, 13, 72-73 (2006). See Comcast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4259A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Five Local Franchise Areas in Arizona and California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7226-E Adopted: October 12, 2007 Released: October 16, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the Communities. No opposition to the petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4260A1.txt
  • Georgia LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Fitzgerald, Georgia (CUID GA0501) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6679-E Adopted: October 12, 2007 Released: October 16, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction MCC Georgia LLC (``MCC'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in the unincorporated areas within the County of Ben Hill, Georgia, which is commonly known as Fitzgerald and is adjacent to the incorporated area of the City of Fitzgerald (``Fitzgerald''). MCC alleges that its cable system serving Fitzgerald is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4261A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Mississippi Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7196-E Adopted: October 12, 2007 Released: October 16, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction This Order considers a petition which Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'') filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Comcast is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to the petition was filed. Finding that Comcast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-638A1.txt
  • Networks, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Four Florida Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6484-E Adopted: February 27, 2007 Released: March 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in four Florida communities. Bright House alleges that its cable system serving the communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service provided by two direct broadcast satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-876A1.txt
  • In the Matter of MCC Iowa LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition Jo Daviess, IL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6858-E Adopted: February 27, 2007 Released: February 28, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Mediacom's cable system serving the unincorporated, unnamed area of Jo Daviess County, Illinois is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. No opposition to the petition was filed. We grant the petition finding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-909A1.txt
  • Competition in Five Local Franchise Areas in Florida ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6626-E, 6627-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2007 Released: March 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a petition that the cable operator CoxCom, Inc. (``Cox''), filed with the Commission, pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules, for a determination that, in five local franchise areas in Florida, it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The five areas in question are in two neighboring counties in north inland Florida, Alachua County and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-910A1.txt
  • 35.4% 5,436 1,925.7 LA0036 Calcasieu Parish, LA 20.2% 15,888 3,221 LA0475 LA0168 Acadia Parish, LA 36.7% 2,956 1,085 LA0169 * = See Cable Operator Petitions + CPR = Percent DBS penetration 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). Petitions at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907(b). 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19,406 (1997). See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC Rcd 2503 at ¶¶ 6, 13, 72-73 (rel. March 3, 2006). Petitions at 8 & Exhibits 3. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-911A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Plant City, Florida (FL0199) and Tampa, Florida (FL0706) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6925-E Adopted: February 27, 2007 Released: March 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Plant City, Florida and Tampa, Florida. Bright House alleges that its cable systems serving the franchise areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service provided by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-912A1.txt
  • Matter of SBC Cable Co. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Shelbyville, IN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7014-E Adopted: February 27, 2007 Released: March 1, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION SBC Cable Co. d/b/a SusCom (``SusCom'') has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable television system serving Shelbyville, Indiana (the ``Community'') is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from rate regulation. No opposition to the petition was filed. We grant the petition finding that SusCom is subject to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-913A1.txt
  • County, FL (CUIDs FL0067, FL0863, FL0483) and Palmetto, FL (CUID FL0357) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6926-E Adopted: February 27, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction 1. Bright House Networks LLC (``Bright House Networks'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in unincorporated Manatee County, Florida and Palmetto, Florida. Bright House Networks alleges that its cable system serving the captioned areas are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-933A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CSR 6877-E CSR 6878-E CSR 6879-E CSR 6880-E CSR 6881-E CSR 6882-E CSR 6883-E CSR 6884-E CSR 6885-E CSR 6886-E Adopted: February 28, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Cox Southwest Holdings, LP (``Cox'') has filed ten unopposed petitions with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Cox is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the ``Communities''). No opposition to any petition was filed. We grant the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-940A1.txt
  • Bragg City, Twentynine Palms City and Yucca Valley Town, CA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6386-E Adopted: March 1, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: InTRODUCTION Adelphia Cable Communications, on behalf of its affiliates (``Adelphia''), has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 for a determination that its cable systems serving three Southern California franchise areas (the ``Franchise Areas'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. No oppositions to the petition were filed. We grant the petition finding that Adelphia is subject to effective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-941A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Winter Haven, Florida (CUID FL0154) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6546-E Adopted: February 28, 2007 Released: March 5, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Winter Haven, Florida (the ``City''). Bright House alleges that its cable system serving the City is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service provided by two direct
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-942A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Two Local Franchise Areas in Florida ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6839-E Adopted: March 1, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a petition filed with the Commission by Bright House Networks LLC (``Bright House'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Bright House's cable systems serving Pasco County (``Pasco'') and Port Richey, Florida are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. Pasco County opposed the petition with respect to that franchise area. We grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-943A1.txt
  • Networks, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Various Florida Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6132-E Adopted: February 28, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in five franchise areas in Florida (the ``Communities''). Bright House alleges that its cable system serving four of the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of competing service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-944A1.txt
  • in Fairfax County, Virginia ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6957-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 1, 2007 Released: March 5, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Order considers a petition that the cable operator CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a/ Cox Communications Northern Virginia (``Cox''), filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules. The Petition seeks a determination that, in its several local franchise areas in Fairfax County, Virginia, it is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. In Fairfax County, a Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C., Cox has several
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-945A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6938-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: March 1, 2007 Released: March 5, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction This Memorandum Opinion and Order considers a Petition for Special Relief (``Petition'') that the cable operator, Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House''), filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules. The Petition seeks a determination that, in two franchise areas in Florida, Bright House is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation. The City of Lake Alfred, Florida (``Lake Alfred'') and the Town of Dundee, Florida, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-947A1.txt
  • LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Various Florida Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6937-E Adopted: March 1, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(1) & (2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules seeking a finding of effective competition in Crystal River (the ``City'') and unincorporated Hernando County, Florida (the ``County'') (collectively, the ``Communities''). Bright House alleges that its cable system serving the communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") and therefore exempt from cable rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-963A1.txt
  • House Networks, LLC ARE REVOKED. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 543(a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997). See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC 2503 at ¶¶ 6, 13, 72-73 (rel. March 3, 2006). See Petition at 8 and Exh. D. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-966A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Fullerton and Santa Monica, California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6390-E CSR 6394-E Adopted: March 2, 2007 Released: March 5, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Adelphia Cable Communications, on behalf of its affiliates (``Adelphia''), has filed two petitions with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the rules for a determination that its cable systems serving Fullerton and Santa Monica, California (the ``Franchise Areas'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. Both the City of Fullerton and the City of Santa Monica (the ``Cities'') have filed oppositions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-967A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR-6927-E Memorandum Opinion AND ORDER Adopted: March 2, 2007 Released: March 5, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction This Order considers a petition for special relief that Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership d/b/a Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner) has filed with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that such operators are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from cable rate regulation in the community, as listed in Attachment A. The City of Wilson, North Carolina (``Wilson'') filed an opposition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-968A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Beverly Hills, Calabasas, Ojai and Palmdale, CA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6387-E Adopted: March 2, 2007 Released: March 5, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction Adelphia Cable Communications, on behalf of its affiliates (``Adelphia''), has filed a petition with the Commission pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that its cable systems serving four Southern California franchise areas (the ``Franchise Areas'') are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Communications Act''), and are therefore exempt from rate regulation. The City of Beverly Hills (the ``City'') has filed an opposition and Adelphia has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1028A1.txt
  • in Moorpark, California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7710-E Adopted: May 1, 2008 Released: May 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner NY Cable LLC (``Time Warner''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1032A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CSR 7772-E 7774-E 7807-E 7808-E 7810-E 7811-E Adopted: April 30, 2008 Released: May 1, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1033A1.txt
  • in California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7768-E 7769-E 7770-E Adopted: April 30, 2008 Released: May 1, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and background COXCOM, INC., d/b/a/ Cox Communications San Diego, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1036A1.txt
  • 7750-E, CSR 7751-E, CSR 7752-E & CSR 7754-E Adopted: May 1, 2008 Released: May 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates (``Comcast''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1037A1.txt
  • CSR7522-E CSR 7524-E CSR 7526-E CSR 7527-E CSR 7529-E CSR 7530-E CSR 7531-E CSR 7532-E CSR 7533-E Adopted: May 1, 2008 Released: May 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1038A1.txt
  • ) CSR 7458-E CSR 7481-E CSR 7482-E CSR 7484-E CSR 7544-E Adopted: May 1, 2008 Released: May 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1039A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7420-E, 7488-E, 7498-E, 7545-E Adopted: May 1, 2008 Released: May 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1045A1.txt
  • in Various Texas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7728-E Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1075A1.txt
  • Competition in various Indiana Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7679-E, 7680-E, 7681-E, 7682-E Adopted: May 5, 2008 Released: May 6, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1076A1.txt
  • Various Pennsylvania Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7726-E CSR 7722-E Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as ``Group B Communities'' are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1089A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1089A1.txt
  • ) CSR 7711-E CSR 7708-E CSR 7712-E Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner NY Cable LLC, and CAC Exchange I, LLC hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as ``Group B Communities'' are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1099A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1099A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1099A1.txt
  • ) CSR 7460-E CSR 7461-E CSR 7469-E CSR 7472-E CSR 7473-E CSR 7474-E CSR 7476-E CSR 7513-E Adopted: May 8, 2008 Released: May 9, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1100A1.txt
  • Competition in various Indiana Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7595-E, 7602-E, 7683-E, 7684-E Adopted: May 8, 2008 Released: May 9, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1111A1.txt
  • Communities in North and South Carolina ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7393-E, 7397-E, 7398-E Adopted: May 12, 2008 Released: May 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission several petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1152A1.txt
  • Franchise Areas in Pennsylvania ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7566-E CSR 7569-E CSR 7667-E Adopted: May 14, 2008 Released: May 15, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1160A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Jenkins, Kentucky (CUID KY0051) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7567-E Adopted: May 15, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mikrotec CATV, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1161A1.txt
  • of Oyster Bay, New York (CUID NY0489) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7048-E Adopted: May 15, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1162A1.txt
  • ) ) ) CSR 7479-E & CSR 7480-E Adopted: May 15, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates (``Comcast''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1163A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Colorado Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7575-E, 7600-E, 7693-E Adopted: May 15, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1215A1.txt
  • 28, 2008 Released: May 28, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc., Comcast of Massachusetts III, Inc., Comcast of Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Ohio, Inc., and Comcast of California/Massachusetts/Michigan/Utah, Inc. (collectively ``Comcast''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1216A1.txt
  • CSR 7502-E, CSR 7504-E, CSR 7506-E & CSR 7507-E Adopted: May 28, 2008 Released: May 28, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1218A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7158-E, 7666-E Adopted: May 28, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1219A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7375-E, 7423-E, 7434-E, 7436-E Adopted: May 28, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1224A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Jackson, Alabama (CUID AL0097) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6666-E Adopted: May 28, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Various Franchise Areas in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7806-E Adopted: May 29, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1262A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CSR 7617-E, 7618-E Adopted: May 29, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision of Connecticut, L.P. and Cablevision Systems of Southern Connecticut, L.P. (collectively, ``Cablevision''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1263A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7715-E, 7716-E, 7760-E, 7791-E Adopted: May 29, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1264A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7163-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 29, 2008 Released: May 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction and background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast''), on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1270A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7186-E CSR-7187-E CSR-7195-E Adopted: May 29, 2008 Released: May 30, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1285A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Various Franchise Areas in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7725-E Adopted: June 12, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1286A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Various Franchise Areas in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7724-E Adopted: June 12, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1304A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in 25 Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7570-E CSR 7571-E Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1333A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) CSR 7762-E & CSR 7763-E Adopted: June 5, 2008 Released: June 6, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1334A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7437-E & CSR 7439-E Adopted: June 5, 2008 Released: June 6, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1335A1.txt
  • in various Idaho and Washington Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7593-E, 7594-E, 7603-E Adopted: June 5, 2008 Released: June 6, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner NY Cable LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1396A1.txt
  • ) ) CSR 7730-E, CSR 7775-E & CSR 7777-E Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 12, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1397A1.txt
  • various Iowa Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7685-E, 7688-E, 7689-E, 7690-E Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 12, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC and Mediacom Iowa LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1412A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Wisconsin Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7456-E Adopted: June 12, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1413A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR Nos. 7626-E, 7627-E, 7628-E, 7629-E, 7630-E, 7631-E, 7632-E, 7633-E, 7634-E Adopted: June 12, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission nine petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1414A1.txt
  • in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7704-E, 7705-E, 7713-E, 7714-E, 7718-E Adopted: June 12, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1446A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1446A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7717-E, 7719-E, 7720-E, 7721-E, 7723-E Adopted: June 19, 2008 Released: June 20, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1456A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7424-E Adopted: June 19, 2008 Released: June 20, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1473A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Various North Carolina Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6834-E Adopted: June 24, 2008 Released: June 25, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mediacom Southeast LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1507A1.txt
  • CSR Nos. 7654-E, 7655-E, 7656-E, 7657-E, 7658-E, 7659-E, 7660-E, 7661-E, 7662-E, 7663-E, 7664-E, 7665-E Adopted: June 25, 2008 Released: June 26, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner'' or ``Comcast,'' has filed with the Commission twelve petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Comcast is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Comcast alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1509A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Groton, CT - Area Franchise ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7121-E Adopted: June 26, 2008 Released: June 27, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1515A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Ohio and Indiana Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7706-E, 7779-E, 7780-E, 7781-E Adopted: June 26, 2008 Released: June 26, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1563A1.txt
  • SC0633) and McClellanville (CUID SC0384), South Carolina ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7394-E Adopted: June 30, 2008 Released: June 30, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1582A1.txt
  • in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7782-E, 7786-E, 7787-E, 7789-E, 7790-E Adopted: July 2, 2008 Released: July 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1593A1.txt
  • (PA0917) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7860-E Adopted: July 3, 2008 Released: July 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1594A1.txt
  • Massachusetts Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7852-E Adopted: July 3, 2008 Released: July 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1595A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Oakland, California (CA0589) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7824-E Adopted: July 3, 2008 Released: July 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1638A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Michigan and Wisconsin Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7816-E and 7817-E Adopted: July 10, 2008 Released: July 11, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1639A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7776-E, 7783-E, 7784-E, 7785-E, 7788-E Adopted: July 10, 2008 Released: July 11, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1658A1.txt
  • 7417-E CSR 7433-E CSR 7435-E CSR 7441-E CSR 7463-E Adopted: July 14, 2008 Released: July 15, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1783A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7900-E CSR 7901-E Adopted: July 29, 2008 Released: July 30, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision of Wappingers Falls, Inc., and Cablevision Systems Long Island Corp., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1786A1.txt
  • LA (CUID 0274) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7830-E Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: July 30, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Charter Communications, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1787A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7855-E Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: July 30, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1817A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1817A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Wisconsin Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7820-E and 7821-E Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: July 31, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1818A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7105-E, 7778-E, 7792-E Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: July 31, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1883A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Washington Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7731-E, 7734-E, 7759-E Adopted: August 8, 2008 Released: August 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1884A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Colorado Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7732-E, 7739-E, 7740-E, 7746-E Adopted: August 8, 2008 Released: August 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1893A1.txt
  • 7499-E CSR 7501-E CSR 7536-E CSR 7555-E CSR 7556-E CSR 7557-E CSR 7559-E CSR 7560-E Adopted: August 12, 2008 Released: August 13, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the 754 communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Attachment B Communities, as well as the communities listed in Attachment C and hereinafter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1899A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Various Virginia Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7537-E Adopted: August 12, 2008 Released: August 13, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Coxcom, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications Northern Virginia, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1), 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1902A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in 17 Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7064-E Adopted: August 13, 2008 Released: August 14, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC,, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1903A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in 12 Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7134-E Adopted: August 13, 2008 Released: August 14, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1908A1.txt
  • ) CSR 7905-E CSR 7906-E CSR 7908-E CSR 7909-E CSR 7910-E CSR 7911-E CSR 7913-E CSR 7914-E CSR 7916-E Adopted: August 13, 2008 Released: August 14, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1916A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Various South Carolina Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7396-E Adopted: August 14, 2008 Released: August 15, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities, as well as the communities listed in Attachment C and hereinafter referred
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1917A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in 8 Communities in New Jersey ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7547-E Adopted: August 14, 2008 Released: August 15, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2135A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7958-E CSR 7959-E Adopted: September 23, 2008 Released: September 24, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. and Time Warner Cable LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' have filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2217A1.txt
  • CSR 7605-E CSR 7606-E CSR 7607-E CSR 7608-E CSR 7609-E CSR 7979-E CSR 7980-E CSR 7981-E Adopted: October 1, 2008 Released: October 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and background Subsidiaries of Cablevision Systems Corporation, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2 and 4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Attachment A Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2344A1.txt
  • Charter as described in paragraph 14 above. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(3). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.907(b). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). These requirements are, in brief, that the franchising authority certify in writing to the Commission that (1) it will adopt and administer basic rate regulations that are consistent with those prescribed by the Commission, (2) it has the legal authority to adopt, and the personnel to administer, such regulations, and (3) the franchising authority's procedural laws
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2465A1.txt
  • of the petitions and was therefore not mentioned in the Commission's Memorandum Opinions and Orders. New York/Pennsylvania R&O at ¶ 10; New Jersey R&O, R&O at ¶ 8. Petition for Reconsideration in CSR 7234-E et al. at 3-6; Petition for Reconsideration in CSR 7547-E at 3-6. 47 C.F.R. § 76.906; see also 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2), (l). 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(b). Petition for Reconsideration in CSR 7234-E et al. at 6 (theorizing that perhaps ``where one or more DBS Providers may not provide local-into-local broadcast service or a full complement of all local broadcast HD and multicast SD streams, . . . some subscribers [may] receive a combination of `basic' service from the cable operator and `expanded' video services from a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2504A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Eight Connecticut Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8021-E Adopted: November 13, 2008 Released: November 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and background Cablevision of Litchfield, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the eight Connecticut communities of Litchfield, Watertown, Cornwall, Goshen, Torrington, Thomaston, Warren, and Morris (listed on Attachment A) and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2505A1.txt
  • Communities (CUIDS: IN0027, IN0366, IN0577, IN0377, IN0113) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8053-E CSR 8007-E Adopted: November 13, 2008 Released: November 13, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2541A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Six Communities in California ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8048-E Adopted: November 19, 2008 Released: November 19, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Bright House Networks, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2542A1.txt
  • in Four Communities in California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8056-E Adopted: November 19, 2008 Released: November 19, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a Cox Communications Orange County, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2554A1.txt
  • the State of New York ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8068-E CSR 8069-E Adopted: November 24, 2008 Released: November 24, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2617A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7377-E CSR 7493-E CSR 7496-E Adopted: December 16, 2008 Released: December 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the 52 communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as the Attachment B Communities, as well as the communities listed on Attachment C and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2632A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Salisbury, Massachusetts (CUID 0162) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7985-E Adopted: December 2, 2008 Released: December 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2633A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in two Massachusetts Communities. ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7999-E & 8000-E Adopted: December 2, 2008 Released: December 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2634A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Tulpehocken, Pennsylvania (3193) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8014-E Adopted: December 2, 2008 Released: December 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2635A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8035-E, 8043-E, 8049-E, 8042-E, 8038-E, 8046-E, 8034-E, 8031-E, 8054-E, 8032-E Adopted: December 2, 2008 Released: December 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2636A1.txt
  • Texas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8033-E, 8052-E, 8030-E, 8047-E, 8044-E, 8050-E, 8039-E, 8027-E Adopted: December 2, 2008 Released: December 3, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2709A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8015-E CSR 8016-E CSR 8017-E CSR 8018-E Adopted: December 15, 2008 Released: December 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Subsidiaries of Cablevision Systems Corporation, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2812A1.txt
  • and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7490-E Adopted: December 29, 2008 Released: December 29, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the 24 communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as the Attachment B Communities, as well as the communities listed on Attachment C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-569A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Connecticut Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7066-E Adopted: March 13, 2008 Released: March 14, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-572A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7578-E, 7579-E, 7580-E, 7581-E, 7582-E, 7583-E, 7584-E, 7585-E, 7586-E, 7587-E Adopted: March 13, 2008 Released: March 14, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-632A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in two Minnesota Communities (CUID MN0057 and MN0082) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7076-E and 7077-E Adopted: March 20, 2008 Released: March 21, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Charter Communications, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-683A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7099-E, 7100-E, 7101-E, 7180-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 25, 2008 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-701A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in various Florida Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7086-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-702A1.txt
  • Pasco County, Florida (CUIDs FL0238, FL1296, FL1297) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7043-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-703A1.txt
  • in Various Georgia Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7087-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cox Communications, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications Middle Georgia (``Cox''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-704A1.txt
  • Kansas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7150-E, CSR-7151-E & CSR 7535-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner'') , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-705A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Hopkinsville, Kentucky (CUID KY0896) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7194-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-706A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7371-E, 7400-E, 7427-E, 7438-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-707A1.txt
  • LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in two Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7402-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-708A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-708A1.txt
  • TN0012, TN0049, TN0023) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7668-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Charter Communications, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates (``Charter''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-709A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Detroit, Michigan CUID (MI1039) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7374-E Adopted: March 25, 2008 Released: March 26, 2008 By the Associate Bureau Chief, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-724A1.txt
  • Adopted: March 26, 2008 Released: March 28, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background C-Native Exchange IIA, L.P. d/b/a Time Warner Cable and C-Native Exchange III, L.P. d/b/a Time Warner Cable (collectively ``Time Warner''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-739A1.txt
  • CSR 7153-E, CSR 7161-E, CSR 7171-E & CSR 7172-E Adopted: March 26, 2008 Released: March 28, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission five petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-749A1.txt
  • Competition in Lake County, Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7380-E, 7381-E, 7382-E, 7383-E Adopted: March 27, 2008 Released: March 28, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-750A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in DuPage County, Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7453-E, 7454-E, 7455-E Adopted: March 27, 2008 Released: March 28, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-771A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7191-E and 7392-E Adopted: March 31, 2008 Released: April 1, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-772A1.txt
  • Competition in McHenry County, Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7378-E and 7379-E Adopted: March 31, 2008 Released: April 1, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communication, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-773A1.txt
  • 7419-E, CSR 7421-E, CSR 7428-E, CSR 7459-E & CSR 7462-E Adopted: March 31, 2008 Released: April 1, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission six petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-782A1.txt
  • CSR 7063-E 7067-E 7073-E 7102-E 7103-E 7122-E 7678-E Adopted: April 1, 2008 Released: April 2, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission seven petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1), 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving those Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-806A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Fairhope, Alabama (CUID AL0160) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6683-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mediacom Southeast LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-807A1.txt
  • CSR 7651-E, CSR 7652-E & CSR 7653-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable San Antonio LP and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (collectively ``Time Warner''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission seven petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-808A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7601-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-809A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7065-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-810A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7426-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-813A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7431-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-820A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7384-E and 7401-E Adopted: April 3, 2008 Released: April 4, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-826A1.txt
  • 7622-E CSR 7623-E CSR 7624-E CSR 7686-E CSR 7687-E CSR 7691-E CSR 7694-E CSR 7695-E Adopted: April 7, 2008 Released: April 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Corporation, through several subsidiaries, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-827A1.txt
  • Competition in Fourteen Oklahoma Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7561-E Adopted: April 7, 2008 Released: April 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications Oklahoma City, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-828A1.txt
  • Competition in Five California Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6225-E Adopted: April 7, 2008 Released: April 8, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner'') , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-833A1.txt
  • Competition in Franchise Area Seven in Connecticut ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7357-E Adopted: April 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background MetroCast Communications of Connecticut, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-839A1.txt
  • CSR 7673-E Adopted: April 9, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner NY Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Advance/Newhouse Partnership, and CAC Exchange I, LLC,, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission thirteen petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-852A1.txt
  • in Rhode Island ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7495-E Adopted: April 10, 2008 Released: April 10, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a/ Cox Communications New England, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-856A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7136-E 7137-E 7138-E Adopted: April 10, 2008 Released: April 11, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-861A1.txt
  • (CUID NM0008) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7466-E Adopted: April 11, 2008 Released: April 11, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-862A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7471-E Adopted: April 11, 2008 Released: April 11, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-863A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7509-E Adopted: April 11, 2008 Released: April 11, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-864A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7061-E, 7213-E, 7541-E Adopted: April 11, 2008 Released: April 11, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-865A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7373-E, 7376-E, 7425-E Adopted: April 11, 2008 Released: April 11, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-870A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7676-E and 7677-E Adopted: April 14, 2008 Released: April 14, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-875A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7231-E CSR 7232-E Adopted: April 14, 2008 Released: April 15, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership and Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission two petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-886A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7553-E & CSR 7554-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cebridge Acquisition, L.P. d/b/a Suddenlink Communications (``Cebridge''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-887A1.txt
  • NY (CUID 0741) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7173-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-888A1.txt
  • NY (CUID NY 0851) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7174-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision of Southern Westchester, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-890A1.txt
  • 7165-E 7166-E 7167-E 7168-E 7169-E 7170-E 7188-E 7189-E 7190-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission ten petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-891A1.txt
  • 7080-E CSR 7735-E CSR 7741-E CSR 7742-E CSR 7793-E CSR 7794-E CSR 7795-E CSR 7796-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 16, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Corporation, through several subsidiaries, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-894A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Pennsylvania Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7549-E CSR 7550-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-895A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Pennsylvania Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7489-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-896A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Pennsylvania Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR- 7486-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-897A1.txt
  • ) CSR 7515-E CSR 7516-E CSR 7517-E CSR 7518-E CSR 7519-E CSR 7521-E Adopted: April 16, 2008 Released: April 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-898A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7572-E, 7573-E, 7574-E Adopted: April 17, 2008 Released: April 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-899A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7562-E, 7563-E, 7564-E Adopted: April 17, 2008 Released: April 17, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-921A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 9 Washington Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7156-E Adopted: April 18, 2008 Released: April 21, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities listed on Attachment B is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-922A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 9 Washington Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7160-E Adopted: April 18, 2008 Released: April 21, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities listed on Attachment B is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-923A1.txt
  • Poulsbo, WA (CUID WA0009) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7155-E Adopted: April 18, 2008 Released: April 21, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities listed on Attachment B is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-924A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 6 Washington Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7154-E Adopted: April 18, 2008 Released: April 21, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-938A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-938A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-938A1.txt
  • 7520-E CSR 7523-E CSR 7525-E CSR 7528-E CSR 7542-E CSR 7543-E Adopted: April 22, 2008 Released: April 22, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-939A1.txt
  • ) CSR 7510-E, CSR 7511-E & CSR 7512-E Adopted: April 22, 2008 Released: April 22, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates (``Comcast''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-951A1.txt
  • Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7457-E, 7464-E, 7467-E, 7635-E Adopted: April 23, 2008 Released: April 24, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-959A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7465-E, 7485-E, 7487-E Adopted: April 24, 2008 Released: April 25, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-960A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7440-E CSR 7558-E CSR 7565-E Adopted: April 24, 2008 Released: April 25, 2008 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Time Warner Cable, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1349A1.txt
  • ) CSR 8154-E CSR 8155-E CSR 8156-E Adopted: June 17, 2009 Released: June 17, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CSC Holdings, Inc., Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo Inc., and Cablevision of Wappingers Falls Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1489A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Franchise Areas in Montgomery County, Maryland ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7179-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 29, 2009 Released: June 30, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Comcast of Potomac, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the franchise areas of Montgomery County, Maryland (the ``County''). Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the County are subject to ``competing provider'' effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1759A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8163-E Adopted: August 6, 2009 Released: August 6, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates and hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1826A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Eight Communities in the State of New York ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8170-E Adopted: August 17, 2009 Released: August 18, 2009 By the Associate Chief, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Cablevision Systems East Hampton Corp. (``Cablevision'' or ``the Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition in eight franchise areas in New York's Long Island. They are listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``the Communities.'' Cablevision alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-217A1.txt
  • Competition in Twenty Three North Carolina Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8029-E Adopted: February 10, 2009 Released: February 10, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2192A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in 13 Franchise Areas in Montgomery County, Maryland ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8188-E Adopted: October 6, 2009 Released: October 8, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Comcast of Potomac, LLC (``Comcast''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' The Communities are franchise authorities in some, but not all, of Montgomery County, Maryland (the ``County''). Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2636A1.txt
  • ) CSR 8236-E CSR 8237-E Adopted: December 28, 2009 Released: December 29, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation, Cablevision Systems Huntington Corporation, and Cablevision Systems Westchester Corporation, hereinafter referred to collectively as ``Petitioner,'' have filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-284A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in San Diego, California ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8097-E Adopted: February 18, 2009 Released: February 18, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warmer Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-285A1.txt
  • CSR 7869-E CSR 7870-E CSR 7872-E CSR 7877-E CSR 7885-E Adopted: February 18, 2009 Released: February 19, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1), 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those franchise areas listed on the Attachments hereto. Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving those franchise areas listed in Attachment A hereto and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities'' are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-286A1.txt
  • NY1413 and 1414) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8099-E CSR 8100-E Adopted: February 18, 2009 Released: February 19, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems New York City Corp., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-287A1.txt
  • in New Jersey ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8089-E CSR 8090-E Adopted: February 19, 2009 Released: February 20, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Cablevision of Oakland Inc., and CSC TKR Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-416A1.txt
  • Rhode Island ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7871-E CSR 8088-E Adopted: February 19, 2009 Released: February 20, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications New England , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-417A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 28 Delaware Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7701-E CSR 7702-E Adopted: February 19, 2009 Released: February 23, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-418A1.txt
  • Competition in the Franchise Area of Norwich, CT ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7703-E Adopted: February 19, 2009 Released: February 23, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-419A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 48 Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7577-E Adopted: February 19, 2009 Released: February 23, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-436A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Various Alabama Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6893-E Adopted: February 24, 2009 Released: February 25, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom'') , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-70A1.txt
  • Mount Vernon, New York (CUID NY 0398) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8087-E Adopted: January 27, 2009 Released: January 28, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-71A1.txt
  • ) CSR 8091-E CSR 8092-E CSR 8093-E Adopted: January 27, 2009 Released: January 28, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Huntington Corporation, Cablevision Systems Long Island Corp., and CSC Acquisition-MA Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-72A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Putnam Valley, New York (CUID NY1083) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8095-E Adopted: February 2, 2009 Released: February 3, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Westchester Corp. (``Petitioner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-903A1.txt
  • 8140-E CSR 8141-E Adopted: April 23, 2009 Released: April 24, 2009 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Long Island Corp., Cablevision Systems Suffolk Corp., CSC Holdings, Inc., and Cablevision of Brookhaven, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1020A1.txt
  • Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8072-E CSR 8075-E CSR 8078-E Adopted: June 3, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1021A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8179-E CSR 8180-E CSR 8181-E CSR 8182-E CSR 8183-E Adopted: June 3, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1023A1.txt
  • in 33 Scranton, Pennsylvania-area Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8191-E Adopted: June 3, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1024A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7948-E, 7949-E, 7950-E, 7951-E, 7952-E, 7953-E, 7954-E, 7955-E Adopted: June 3, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1028A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7857-E CSR 7858-E CSR 7859-E Adopted: June 4, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Charter Communications, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1713A1.txt
  • in Maryland ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8026-E Adopted: September 9, 2010 Released: September 9, 2010 By Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the four communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1714A1.txt
  • ) ) ) CSR 8077-E CSR 8239-E CSR 8240-E CSR 8241-E Adopted: September 9, 2010 Released: September 9, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cox Communications Louisiana, LLC, d/b/a/ Cox Communications Greater Louisiana, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1, 2, 4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1723A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7773-E Adopted: September 10, 2010 Released: September 10, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates (``Comcast''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1), 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1787A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8161-E Adopted: September 21, 2010 Released: September 21, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or ``the Company''), on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, has filed with the Commission a Petition for Special Relief (``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in two franchise areas (``the Communities'') in the Maryland part of the Delmarva Peninsula. The Communities are listed in Attachment A hereto. Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1838A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Eight Arlington, Washington-Area Franchises ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR No. 7854-E Adopted: September 27, 2010 Released: September 27, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1840A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8248-E CSR 8270-E CSR 8282-E Adopted: September 28, 2010 Released: September 28, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Inter Mountain Cable, Inc. and Mediacom Southeast LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1860A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7956-E Adopted: September 27, 2010 Released: September 28, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in Angel Fire, New Mexico, hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1883A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Colorado Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7733-E, 7745-E, 7809, 7823-E Adopted: September 28, 2010 Released: September 29, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1931A1.txt
  • CSR 8300-E, CSR 8309-E, CSR 8310-E, CSR 8313-E, CSR 8321-E & CSR 8312-E CSR 8339-E Adopted: October 6, 2010 Released: October 6, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Mediacom Southeast LLC and Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1932A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7969-E Adopted: October 6, 2010 Released: October 6, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1949A1.txt
  • in various Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8006-E Adopted: October 8, 2010 Released: October 8, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1950A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Ohio Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8337-E CSR 8338-E Adopted: October 8, 2010 Released: October 13, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1976A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 105 Franchise Areas in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7799-E Adopted: October 14, 2010 Released: October 14, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on the Attachments hereto and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities listed on Attachments A hereto (the ``Attachment A Communities'') is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2113A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Five Communities in New York ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7500-E Adopted: November 3, 2010 Released: November 3, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the five communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2114A1.txt
  • (0113) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-7957-E CSR-7960-E CSR-7961-E CSR-7962-E CSR-7963-E Adopted: November 3, 2010 Released: November 3, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2115A1.txt
  • NM0211 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR7964-E CSR7965-E Adopted: November 3, 2010 Released: November 3, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2116A1.txt
  • NM (NM 0003) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8020-E Adopted: November 3, 2010 Released: November 3, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2183A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Six Communities in New York State ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8363-E Adopted: November 15, 2010 Released: November 15, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2197A1.doc
  • Communities in Arkansas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8243-E CSR 8244-E CSR 8245-E CSR 8246-E Adopted: November 17, 2010 Released: November 17, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a/ Cox Communications Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in 15 franchise areas in Arkansas (the ``Communities''). Petitioner alleges that its cable system is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2204A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in four Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8362-E Adopted: November 18, 2010 Released: November 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2246A1.txt
  • County and West Point, Virginia ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8187 -E Adopted: November 29, 2010 Released: November 29, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and background Cox Communications Hampton Roads, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2247A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7812-E, CSR 7813-E & CSR 7814-E Adopted: November 29, 2010 Released: November 29, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a Cox Communications Phoenix , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2405A1.txt
  • Virginia Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8370-E Adopted: December 22, 2010 Released: December 22, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2409A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Oregon Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8137-E Adopted: December 22, 2010 Released: December 22, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2420A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Five Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8372-E Adopted: December 22, 2010 Released: December 29, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-284A1.txt
  • Nineteen Franchise Areas in Connecticut ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7864-E Adopted: February 18, 2010 Released: February 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications New England, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-286A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8057-E and 8058-E Adopted: February 19, 2010 Released: February 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Coxcom, Inc, d/b/a Cox Communications Omaha and Cox Communications Sun Valley, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-359A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in two Iowa Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7045-E and 7047-E Adopted: March 3, 2010 Released: March 3, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC (``Mediacom''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-360A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8012-E Adopted: March 3, 2010 Released: March 3, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Coxcom, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-398A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8005-E Adopted: March 9, 2010 Released: March 9, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-399A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8022-E Adopted: March 8, 2010 Released: March 9, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-400A1.txt
  • North Carolina, 24 FCC Rcd 10130 (2009) (``Charter III''). Cable systems are presumed not to be subject to effective competition, and a cable operator bears the burden of rebutting that with evidence that effective competition is present within the relevant franchise area. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 907. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.907. Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration & Petition for Special Relief, dated Dec. 20, 2009. Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration, dated Jan. 4, 2009. The County's Supplement and Motion are dated January 25, 2010. Charter's Opposition to Motion is dated February 1, 2010. 47 C.F.R. § 76.7(d); see also Charter Commun., Memorandum Opinion & Order DA 09-2515 at ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-408A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Nevada Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8098-E Adopted: March 10, 2010 Released: March 10, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-417A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in various Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8150-E Adopted: March 11, 2010 Released: March 11, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Buckeye Cablevision, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-570A1.txt
  • in Eight Communities in California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8255-E Adopted: March 30, 2010 Released: March 31, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and background CoxCom, Inc., doing business as Cox Communications Orange County (``Cox''), has filed with the Commission a petition (``Petition'') pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Cox is subject to effective competition in eight communities in southern California between Los Angeles and San Diego. Cox alleges that, in the three communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities,'' its system is subject to ``competing provider'' effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-76A1.txt
  • (CUID CA0180) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8247-E Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Charter Communications, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-788A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in various Illinois and Wisconsin Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8215-E, 8218-E, 8220-E Adopted: May 6, 2010 Released: May 7, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Charter Communications, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-789A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8222-E, 8223-E, 8224-E, 8225-E, 8226-E, 8227-E, 8228-E Adopted: May 6, 2010 Released: May 7, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cox Communications Kansas, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1), 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-790A1.txt
  • Maryland ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8013-E Adopted: May 7, 2010 Released: May 7, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-791A1.txt
  • New York State ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7826-E CSR 7827-E CSR 7828-E Adopted: May 7, 2010 Released: May 7, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Corporation, through several subsidiaries, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-792A1.txt
  • pursuant to delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 76.916. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B). Response at 1. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.907(b). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 76.916. These requirements are, in brief, that the franchising authority certify in writing to the Commission that (1) it will adopt and administer basic rate regulations that are consistent with those prescribed by the Commission, (2) it has the legal authority to adopt, and the personnel to administer, such regulations, and (3) the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-822A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8036-E CSR 8037-E Adopted: May 10, 2010 Released: May 11, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-823A1.txt
  • Five Franchise Areas in Maryland ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7982-E CSR 7983-E CSR 7984-E Adopted: May 10, 2010 Released: May 11, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-826A1.txt
  • Competition in the Franchise Area of Lyme, CT ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7761-E Adopted: May 10, 2010 Released: May 12, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities'' or the Lyme, CT - Area Franchise. Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-827A1.txt
  • Pennsylvania ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7966-E CSR 7967-E CSR 7968-E CSR 7978-E Adopted: May 10, 2010 Released: May 12, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-828A1.txt
  • Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8024-E CSR 8025-E CSR 8040-E CSR 8045-E Adopted: May 10, 2010 Released: May 12, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-841A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Various Oklahoma Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-8059-E CSR-8060-E Adopted: May 13, 2010 Released: May 13, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background COXCOM, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-843A1.txt
  • New Jersey ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8275-E Adopted: May 13, 2010 Released: May 13, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background CSC TKR Inc., an affiliate of Cablevision Systems Corporation and hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a Petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in Highland Park Borough, New Jersey, hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-844A1.txt
  • York State ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7873-E CSR 7874-E CSR 7875-E Adopted: May 13, 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision Systems Corporation, through several subsidiaries, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-845A1.txt
  • action is taken pursuant to delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 76.916. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.907(b). Charter Commun., LLC, 19 FCC Rcd 7003, 7009 (2004) (``Richlands Decertification''). Id. 47 U.S.C. § 543(l)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). Richlands Decertification, 19 FCC Rcd at 7009. Richlands Decertification, 19 FCC Rcd at 7006 ¶¶ 6-7; Petition at 2. Richlands Decertification, 19 FCC Rcd at 7005 ¶ 5; Petition at 2, 4 nn.12-13. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-847A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-847A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-847A1.txt
  • Competition in Braintree, MA (CUID MA0217) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7120-E Adopted: May 13, 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(3) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(C) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-848A1.txt
  • ) ) ) CSR 7917-E CSR 7918-E CSR 7919-E CSR 7920-E CSR 7921-E CSR 7922-E CSR 7923-E Adopted: May 13, 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-874A1.txt
  • in various Maine and New Hampshire Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7534-E Adopted: May 17, 2010 Released: May 18, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-876A1.txt
  • CSR 7974-E, CSR 7975-E, CSR 7976-E & CSR 7977-E Adopted: May 17, 2010 Released: May 17, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-878A1.txt
  • in Nine Franchise Areas in New Jersey ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8147 - E Adopted: May 17, 2010 Released: May 17, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the nine franchise areas listed on the Attachments hereto. Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the two franchise areas listed in Attachment A hereto (the ``Attachment A Communities'') is subject to ``competing provider'' effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-881A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in: Fairfield, Alabama (CUID AL001) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8219-E Adopted: May 18, 2010 Released: May 18, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Charter Communications, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-889A1.txt
  • Alabama (AL0143) Millbrook, Alabama (AL0199) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8148-E Adopted: May 18, 2010 Released: May 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Bright House Networks LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-890A1.txt
  • ) ) CSR 7863-E CSR 7878-E CSR 7879-E CSR 7880-E CSR 7881-E CSR 7882-E CSR 7883-E CSR 7884-E Adopted: May 18, 2010 Released: May 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Attachment B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-891A1.txt
  • various Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8230-E CSR 8231-E CSR 8235-E Adopted: May 18, 2010 Released: May 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-894A1.txt
  • Competition in Eleven Communities in Georgia ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8264-E CSR 8266-E CSR 8278-E Adopted: May 19, 2010 Released: May 19, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Georgia LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as the Attachment B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-907A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 16 Communities in Kentucky ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8131-E Adopted: May 19, 2010 Released: May 20, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-908A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Dawson Springs, KY (CUID KY 0032) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8195-E Adopted: May 19, 2010 Released: May 20, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Insight Communications Midwest, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-909A1.txt
  • Competition in Unincorporated Warren, KY (CUID KY 0468) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8130-E Adopted: May 19, 2010 Released: May 20, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-915A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8260-E, 8262-E, 8267-E, 8269-E Adopted: May 20, 2010 Released: May 21, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC, MCC Illinois LLC and MCC Missouri LLC ( ``Mediacom''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-917A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in various Iowa Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8261-E, 8263-E, 8265-E, 8268-E Adopted: May 20, 2010 Released: May 21, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-928A1.txt
  • 8217-E & CSR 8221-E CSR 8041-E Adopted: May 24, 2010 Released: May 24, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Cebridge Acquisition, L.P. d/b/a Suddenlink (``Suddenlink''), Charter Communications (``Charter''), and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-966A1.txt
  • 7929-E, 7930-E, 7931-E, 7932-E, 7933-E, 7934-E, 7935-E, 7936-E, 7937-E, 7938-E, 7939-E, 7940-E, 7941-E, 7942-E, 7943-E, 7944-E, 7945-E Adopted: May 26, 2010 Released: May 26, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-970A1.txt
  • CSR 8279-E CSR 8280-E & CSR 8281-E Adopted: May 26, 2010 Released: May 26, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Cebridge Acquisition, L.P., d/b/a Suddenlink Communications (``Cebridge''), MCC Georgia LLC (``MCC''), and Mediacom Southeast LLC (``Mediacom''), hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-971A1.txt
  • Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8167-E CSR 8168-E CSR 8171-E CSR 8172-E Adopted: May 26, 2010 Released: May 27, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-972A1.txt
  • six Bakersfield, Vermont-Area Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8108-E CSR 8109-E Adopted: May 26, 2010 Released: May 27, 2010 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Group B Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1013A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in various Ohio Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8349-E Adopted: June 6, 2011 Released: June 9, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on Attachment B and hereinafter referred to as Attachment B Communities, is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1023A1.txt
  • Competition in 34 Communities in North Carolina and South Carolina ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8374-E Adopted: June 8, 2011 Released: June 10, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in 34 North Carolina and South Carolina communities. The petition alleged that Petitioner's cable system serving most of those communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1073A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8485-E CSR 8486-E Adopted: June 17, 2011 Released: June 21, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a Cox Communications Orange County and Cox Communications Santa Barbara, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner'' or ``CoxCom,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1080A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Communities in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8341-E Adopted: June 21, 2011 Released: June 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1118A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 11 Ohio and Pennsylvania Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8484-E Adopted: June 24, 2011 Released: June 28, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1139A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8385-E CSR 8386-E Adopted: June 28, 2011 Released: June 30, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and background CoxCom, Inc. d/b/a Cox Communications Oklahoma City and Cox Communications Tulsa , hereinafter referred to as ``Cox'' or ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''). Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Attachment A Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-11A1.txt
  • Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8358-E CSR 8359-E Adopted: January 5, 2011 Released: January 5, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-122A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Six Gadsden, Alabama, Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7203-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: January 24, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1236A1.txt
  • Virginia ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8470-E Adopted: July 25, 2011 Released: July 25, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1247A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Le Grand, Iowa ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8491-E Adopted: July 25, 2011 Released: July 28, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1248A1.txt
  • ILLINOIS LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Fulton, Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8492-E Adopted: July 25, 2011 Released: July 29, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Illinois LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1249A1.txt
  • GEORGIA LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Bainbridge, Georgia ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8493-E Adopted: July 25, 2011 Released: August 1, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Georgia LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1256A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in North Platte, Nebraska (CUID NE0023) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8384-E Adopted: July 25, 2011 Released: July 27, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Charter Communications, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-12A1.txt
  • Competition in Five Communities in Iowa ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8296-E CSR 8298-E CSR 8314-E CSR 8317-E Adopted: January 5, 2011 Released: January 5, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-130A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8342-E CSR 8343-E CSR 8348-E CSR 8364-E CSR 8365-E CSR 8366-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: January 25, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission six petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1317A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Waterloo, Iowa (CUID IA0073) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8398-E Adopted: July 28, 2011 Released: August 3, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``the Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1319A1.txt
  • Communities in Virginia ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8472-E CSR 8474-E CSR 8475-E CSR 8481-E CSR 8482-E Adopted: July 28, 2011 Released: August 4, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''). Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1325A1.txt
  • Wyoming ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8495-E CSR 8496-E CSR 8497-E CSR 8498-E CSR 8499-E CSR 8500-E Adopted: July 29, 2011 Released: August 5, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bresnan Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1331A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Communities in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8415-E CSR 8416-E CSR 8417-E Adopted: July 29, 2011 Released: August 2, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission three petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Attachment A Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-134A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in various Kansas and Missouri Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8174-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: January 26, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1364A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Communities in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8418-E CSR 8419-E CSR 8420-E Adopted: August 4, 2011 Released: August 8, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Communities in Ohio and Pennsylvania ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8489-E CSR 8490-E Adopted: August 5, 2011 Released: August 9, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1478A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in 12 Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8503-E Adopted: August 31, 2011 Released: September 1, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1479A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Three Pennsylvania Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8506-E Adopted: August 31, 2011 Released: September 2, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1532A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Four Communities in Virginia ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8502-E CSR 8505-E Adopted: September 12, 2011 Released: September 13, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the three Virginia communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Attachment A Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1683A1.txt
  • Competition in 19 Texas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8511-E CSR 8512-E CSR 8513-E CSR 8514-E Adopted: October 6, 2011 Released: October 11, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1778A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in 12 Communities in Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8519-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: October 26, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-177A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Three Virginia Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8377-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: January 28, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a/ Cox Communications Roanoke, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1780A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Thirty Ohio Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8515-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: October 27, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1781A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Six Ohio Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8516-E CSR 8517-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: October 28, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1792A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Four New York Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8520-E CSR 8521-E CSR 8522-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: October 31, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Subsidiaries of Cablevision, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-181A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Berwyn Heights, Maryland (CUID MD0142) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8375-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: January 31, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1824A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Six North Carolina Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8523-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: November 1, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a Petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1827A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Two Virginia Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8526-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: November 2, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1850A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Three Maryland Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8531-E Adopted: October 21, 2011 Released: November 3, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2088A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 23 Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8534-E CSR 8535-E CSR 8536-E Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-227A1.txt
  • Charter Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Fergus Falls, MN (CUID MN017) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7075-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: February 7, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and background Charter Communications (``Petitioner'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A (the ``Community''). Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-237A1.txt
  • in the Delmarva, Delaware Franchise Area ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8135-E CSR 8136-E Adopted: February 7, 2011 Released: February 10, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-251A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Ten Nebraska Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8376-E Adopted: February 7, 2011 Released: February 11, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''). Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-254A1.txt
  • Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7753-E Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-26A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Seven Minnesota Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8299-E CSR 8318-E CSR 8320-E CSR 8331-E Adopted: January 6, 2011 Released: January 6, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Mediacom Minnesota LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-270A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Cheshire, MA ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7233-E Adopted: February 7, 2011 Released: February 15, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner'' or ``Time Warner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-279A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Eight Communities in Kentucky ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8129-E Adopted: January 21, 2011 Released: February 14, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the eight communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-30A1.txt
  • Iowa Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8297-E CSR 8329-E CSR 8315-E Adopted: January 7, 2011 Released: January 7, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC and Mediacom Iowa LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioners,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioners are subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioners allege that their cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-318A1.txt
  • Charter Communications Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Eau Claire, Wisconsin ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8379-E Adopted: February 17, 2011 Released: February 18, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Charter Communications, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-31A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Five Wisconsin Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8304-E CSR 8305-E CSR 8311-E Adopted: January 7, 2011 Released: January 10, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Mediacom Wisconsin LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-320A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Five Indiana Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8124-E Adopted: February 17, 2011 Released: February 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bright House Networks LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-350A1.txt
  • in Kansas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8222-E CSR 8223-E CSR 8224-E CSR 8225-E CSR 8226-E CSR 8227-E CSR 8228-E Adopted: February 23, 2011 Released: February 24, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cox Communications Kansas, LLC (``Cox''), has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''). Cox alleges that its cable systems serving the Attachment A Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-351A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Communities in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7798-E Adopted: February 24, 2011 Released: February 28, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Time Warner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-39A1.txt
  • CSR 8308-E CSR 8319-E CSR 8322-E CSR 8323-E CSR 8324-E CSR 8325-E CSR 8327-E CSR 8328-E CSR 8330-E CSR 8332-E Adopted: January 10, 2011 Released: January 10, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Several Mediacom companies, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' have filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • several parts of Title VI of the Communications Act of 1934. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 303, 303a, 307, 308, 309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 503, 521, 522, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548, 549, 552, 554, 556, 558, 560, 561, 571, 572 and 573. Section Number and Title: 76.907 Petition for a determination of effective competition. Brief Description: This rule sets forth the standards for filing a petition for a determination of effective competition by a cable operator. Need: This rule adopts amendments to the cable attribution and affiliation rules, which determine whether an entity is subject to the Commission's cable regulations, in order to more accurately identify interests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-429A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in 7 Washington Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7159-E Adopted: March 3, 2011 Released: March 4, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in seven franchise areas in the State of Washington. The seven franchise areas in question are listed on Attachment A and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the ``Communities.'' A grant of the petition would end regulation of Petitioner's basic cable service by local franchise authorities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-430A1.txt
  • LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Five Illinois Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7390-E Adopted: March 3, 2011 Released: March 7, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition in the five franchise areas north of Chicago, Illinois, that are listed on Attachment A (the ``Communities''). Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-448A1.txt
  • Sussex County known as Clarksville, DE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8019-E Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 9, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Mediacom Delaware LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities or the ``unincorporated areas.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-466A1.txt
  • Determination of Effective Competition in Four Communities in Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7391-E Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 10, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast''), hereinafter referred to as ``Comcast,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Comcast is subject to effective competition in the four communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the four Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-467A1.txt
  • Cable Communications, LLC Petitions for Determination of Effective Competition in Two Communities in Michigan ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7422-E Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 11, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Comcast is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-491A1.txt
  • Ohio and Kentucky ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8380-E CSR 8381-E CSR 8388-E CSR 8389-E Adopted: March 14, 2011 Released: March 15, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission four petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-494A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Wilson, North Carolina (CUID NC0110) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7199-E Adopted: March 11, 2011 Released: March 16, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Time Warner is subject to effective competition in Wilson, North Carolina (``Wilson''). Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving Wilson is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-495A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in South Carolina Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7395-E Adopted: March 11, 2011 Released: March 17, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (``Time Warner'' or the ``Company'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in the six communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-496A1.txt
  • Cable Communications, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Nine Texas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7470-E Adopted: March 14, 2011 Released: March 18, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or the ``Company''), filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition in nine communities in the Houston and Galveston areas of Texas. Comcast alleges that its cable system serving those communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-509A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Virginia and North Carolina Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8061-E Adopted: March 16, 2011 Released: March 21, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Cox Communications Hampton Roads, LLC (``Cox'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''). Cox alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-522A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Two Minnesota Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7475-E Adopted: March 17, 2011 Released: March 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Comcast,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Comcast is subject to effective competition in the two communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-524A1.txt
  • Cable Communications, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Tuscaloosa, AL (CUID AL0042) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7477-E Adopted: March 17, 2011 Released: March 23, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that it is subject to effective competition in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Comcast alleges that its cable system serving Tuscaloosa is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation there because of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-525A1.txt
  • LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Six Michigan Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7514-E Adopted: March 17, 2011 Released: March 24, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Comcast is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-526A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Mossyrock, Washington (CUID WA0327) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7697-E Adopted: March 17, 2011 Released: March 25, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in Mossyrock, Washington. Comcast alleges that its cable system serving Mossyrock is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation because of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-557A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in 12 Mississippi Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7478-E Adopted: March 24, 2011 Released: March 28, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A (the ``Attachment A Communities''), all of which are in the Jackson, Mississippi, area. Comcast alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-616A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Time Warner Cable Inc. Petition for Subscribership Information Pursuant to Section 76.907(c) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7568-R Adopted: April 5, 2011 Released: April 6, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner'' or ``the Company''), intends to file a petition seeking a finding that it is subject to ``competing provider'' effective competition in and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-617A1.txt
  • Inc. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Kansas Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8173-E Adopted: April 5, 2011 Released: April 7, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-649A1.txt
  • ) ) ) CSR 8391-E, CSR 8392-E , CSR 8393-E, CSR 8394-E, CSR 8395-E, CSR 8396-E & CSR 8397-E Adopted: April 8, 2011 Released: April 8, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in St. Louis, Missouri (CUID MO0545) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6916-E MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: April 15, 2011 Released: April 18, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Charter Communications Entertainment I LLC (``Charter'' or ``the Company'') has filed with the Commission a Petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in St. Louis, Missouri. Charter alleges that its cable system serving St. Louis is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate regulation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-716A1.txt
  • ) CSR 8284-E CSR 8285-E CSR 8286-E CSR 8288-E CSR 8291-E CSR 8292-E Adopted: April 19, 2011 Released: April 21, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Mediacom Illinois LLC, Mediacom Indiana LLC, and MCC Missouri LLC hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-725A1.txt
  • 8402-E CSR 8403-E CSR 8404-E CSR 8405-E CSR 8406-E CSR 8407-E CSR 8408-E CSR 8409-E CSR 8410-E CSR 8412-E CSR 8413-E CSR 8414-E Adopted: April 21, 2011 Released: April 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bresnan Communications, LLC (``Bresnan''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Bresnan is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Bresnan alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-726A1.txt
  • 8426-E CSR 8427-E CSR 8428-E CSR 8429-E CSR 8430-E CSR 8431-E CSR 8432-E CSR 8433-E CSR 8434-E CSR 8435-E CSR 8436-E CSR 8437-E Adopted: April 21, 2011 Released: April 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bresnan Communications, LLC (``Bresnan''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Bresnan is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Bresnan alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-727A1.txt
  • 8446-E CSR 8447-E CSR 8448-E CSR 8449-E CSR 8450-E CSR 8451-E CSR 8452-E CSR 8453-E CSR 8454-E CSR 8455-E Adopted: April 21, 2011 Released: April 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bresnan Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-728A1.txt
  • CSR 8460-E CSR 8461-E CSR 8462-E CSR 8463-E CSR 8464-E CSR 8465-E CSR 8466-E CSR 8467-E CSR 8468-E CSR 8469-E Adopted: April 21, 2011 Released: April 22, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bresnan Communications, LLC (``Bresnan'' or ``the Company''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Bresnan alleges that its cable system serving the Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-933A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in Georgia and Tennessee Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8478-E Adopted: May 19, 2011 Released: May 24, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in certain Georgia and Tennessee Franchise Areas. Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the community of Chattanooga (``the Attachment A Community'') is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(C) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-934A1.txt
  • Effective Competition in Maryland and West Virginia Franchise Areas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8476-E Adopted: May 19, 2011 Released: May 23, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-935A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-935A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Eight Ohio Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8341-E Adopted: May 19, 2011 Released: May 26, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the six communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-946A1.txt
  • various Iowa Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8271-E CSR 8287-E CSR 8289-E CSR 8290-E CSR 8293-E Adopted: May 23, 2011 Released: May 25, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background MCC Iowa LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-947A1.txt
  • Networks, LLC Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Farmington, Michigan (CUID MI0640) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8086-E Adopted: May 24, 2011 Released: May 27, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Bright House Networks, LLC (``Petitioner''), has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the Detroit suburb of Farmington, Michigan, which is listed on Attachment A. Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving Farmington is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.txt
  • Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Communities in Ohio ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7707-E Adopted: May 24, 2011 Released: May 31, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Time Warner Cable Inc. (``Time Warner'' or the ``Company'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(1-2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in franchise areas (the ``Communities'') in Ohio. Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving the communities listed on the Attachments hereto is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(A & B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-957A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Hoover, Alabama ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7546-E Adopted: May 25, 2011 Released: June 2, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Charter Communications (``Charter''), on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates, has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Charter is subject to effective competition in the Birmingham suburb of Hoover, Alabama. Charter alleges that its cable system serving Hoover is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt from cable rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-958A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-958A1.txt
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in 50 Communities in Illinois ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7135-E CSR 7162-E Adopted: May 25, 2011 Released: June 1, 2011 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (``Comcast'' or the ``Company''), has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that the Company is subject to effective competition in those communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Communities.'' Comcast alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), and the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-645A1.txt
  • North Castle, New York (CUID NY1277) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 7619-E Adopted: April 24, 2012 Released: April 26, 2012 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: I. introduction and Background Cablevision of Southern Westchester, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.905(b)(4) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for determinations that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the community listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Community.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable systems serving the Community is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1)(1)(D) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'') and the Commission's implementing rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-649A1.txt
  • of Effective Competition in 26 Pennsylvania Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 8564-E CSR 8565-E CSR 8566-E Adopted: April 24, 2012 Released: April 27, 2012 By the Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: introduction and Background Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner,'' has filed with the Commission petitions pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2), and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Petitioner is subject to effective competition in the 20 communities listed on Attachment A and hereinafter referred to as the ``Attachment A Communities.'' Petitioner alleges that its cable system serving the Attachment A Communities is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.txt
  • ``lead'' application in a group typically will not be ``contingent'' on any other application, but nevertheless will be counted as a ``related'' application. 1999 Technical Streamlining Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 5282 n.43. Second Report and Order on Technical Streamlining, FCC 00-368, (rel. Nov. 1, 2000). 47 U.S.C. § 623(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905 (a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.907. The Satellite Home Improvement Act of 1999 (SHVIA), Title I of the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act of 1999 (IPACORA), Pub. Law No. 106-113, 113 Stat. 1501. Id. 47 U.S.C.§ 533. 47 C.F.R § 76.503. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. United States of America, 211 F.3d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 2000). 47 U.S.C. § 534 (b)(4)(B). Carriage of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-235A1.txt
  • included in the definition of such term. 47 U.S.C. § 153(26). Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 13 FCC Rcd 9326 (1998) Charter Communications Entertainment II, L.P. and Long Beach Acquisition Corp., 13 FCC Rcd 8506 (1998). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(4). 47 U.S.C. § 543(1); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.905; see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.906 & 76.907. Communications Act, § 623(1)(1)(D), 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(D); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(4). This fourth statutory effective competition test within Section 623(1) may be referred to as the ``LEC'' effective competition test. H.R. Rep. No. 458, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. 170 (1996) (``Conference Report''); See Implementation of Cable Act Reform Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 14 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.txt
  • and the associated rules, which specifically permit the aggregation of low cost and high cost devices for rate setting purposes. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(7); 47 C.F.R. § 76.923(c)(1). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.923, 76.980(c). 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(7). 47 U.S.C. § 543(b)(3). See 47 § 76.923(n). 47 C.F.R. § 76.980. . See 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(b). See Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, CS Docket No. 01-129, Eighth Annual Report, 17 FCC Rcd 1244, 1273 ¶ 58 (2002) (citing Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Ass'n Comments at 3-4 and App. A). See 47 C.F.R. § 76.922(g); Going Forward Order, 10 FCC Rcd at 1260 ¶ 98. Briefly,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-70A1.txt
  • City's request for review. DTE states that it is interested in the final determination of this matter because ``the decision will impact the outcome of matters pending before our cable division.'' See Boston Reply at Exhibit A. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(4). 47 U.S.C. § 543(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 C.F.R. § 76.905; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906 & 76.907. The Communications Act defines the term ``local exchange carrier'' as: any person that is engaged in the provision of telephone exchange service or exchange access. Such term does not include a person insofar as such person is engaged in the provision of a Commercial mobile service under Section 332(c), except to the extent that the Commission finds that such service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.txt
  • Comcast Reply Comments at 14. Comcast also states that some of RCN's statements concerning the availability to RCN of Comcast SportsNet are inaccurate, and that Comcast SportsNet has always been available for carriage by RCN. Id. at 15. See Appendix B, Table B-1. See also NCTA Comments at 8. DirecTV Comments at 11. See Appendix B, Table B-1. Under Section 76.907, a cable operator (or other interested party) may petition the Commission for a determination of effective competition pursuant to Commission's procedural rules in Section 76.7. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7, 76.907. In its petition, a cable operator must provide evidence that it meets one of the statutory tests for the existence of effective competition. See 47 U.S.C. § 543 (1)(l)(A)-(D).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Broadband Over Power Line Systems, ET Docket Nos. 04-37, 03-104, FCC 04-245 (rel. Oct. 28, 2004). See, e.g., 2003 Report, 19 FCC Rcd at 1681 ¶ 123. See Appendix B, Table B-1. See also NCTA Comments at 8. Previous year numbers in Table B-1 have been revised due to improved data sources. See New Jersey Comments at 8. Under Section 76.907, a cable operator (or other interested party) may petition the Commission for a determination of effective competition pursuant to Commission's procedural rules in Section 76.7. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7, 76.907. In its petition, a cable operator must provide evidence that it meets one of the statutory tests for the existence of effective competition. See 47 U.S.C. § 543 (l)(1)(A)-(D).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-64A1.txt
  • 76.905(b). 47 C.F.R. § 76.906. 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(a). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.906, 907. 47 U.S.C. § 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(b)(2). Under the Commission's rules, cable operators may obtain subscriber information from competitors for the purpose of making a showing of effective competition within the relevant franchise area(s).. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.907(c). We agree with the Bureau that it is appropriate to rely upon subscriber data compiled by independent entities such as Sky Trends on behalf of the DBS providers in satisfaction of the Section 76.907(c) requirements. Reconsideration Order at 9651 (noting that such information may be limited to numerical totals and that SkyTrends does not publicly release zip code information beyond
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.wp
  • a local franchising authority's certification to regulate rates should continue to be filed pursuant to the Section 76.911 and Section 1.106, the Commission's rules setting forth the procedures for petitions for reconsideration.103 All other effective competition cases should be filed with the Commission as petitions for determinations of effective competition under Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules and new Section 76.907, which describers the petitioner's burden and addresses the availability of evidence. We are eliminating Section 76.915 from our rules, so cable operators will no longer petition local franchising authorities for a change in regulatory status based on effective competition. Section 76.917 of our rules is not affected by this action.104 Section 76.917 provides procedures by which a franchising authority certified
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.txt
  • one is necessary to permit the grant of the second application. Thus, the ``lead'' application in a group typically will not be ``contingent'' on any other application, but nevertheless will be counted as a ``related'' application. 1999 Technical Streamlining Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 5282 n.43. 47 U.S.C. § 623(a)(2); 47 C.F.R. § 76.905 (a). 47 C.F.R. § 76.907. The Satellite Home Improvement Act of 1999 (SHVIA), Title I of the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act of 1999 (IPACORA), Pub. Law No. 106-113, 113 Stat. 1501. Id. 47 U.S.C.§ 533. 47 C.F.R § 76.503. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. United States of America, 211 F.3d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 2000). 47 U.S.C. § 534 (b)(4)(B). Carriage of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.wp
  • a local franchising authority's certification to regulate rates should continue to be filed pursuant to the Section 76.911 and Section 1.106, the Commission's rules setting forth the procedures for petitions for reconsideration.103 All other effective competition cases should be filed with the Commission as petitions for determinations of effective competition under Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules and new Section 76.907, which describers the petitioner's burden and addresses the availability of evidence. We are eliminating Section 76.915 from our rules, so cable operators will no longer petition local franchising authorities for a change in regulatory status based on effective competition. Section 76.917 of our rules is not affected by this action.104 Section 76.917 provides procedures by which a franchising authority certified
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001241.doc
  • for Determination of Effective Competition in Conway, South Carolina (CUID No. SC0023) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5541-E Adopted: June 5, 2000 Released: June 7, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, d/b/a Time Warner Company ("Time Warner") has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.907 and 76.905(b)(4) of the Commission's rules for a revocation of the certification of the City of Conway, South Carolina (the ``City''), to regulate cable rates due to the presence of effective competition. Time Warner alleges that its cable system serving the City is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001554.doc
  • (CUID Nos. NC0084, NC0112, & NC0320) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5218-E Adopted: July 10, 2000 Released: July 13, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction TWI Summit Communications/Summit Cable Services of Thom-a-Lex, Inc. and TW Fanch-One Co. (``Time Warner'') have filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the City of Lexington and Davidson County, North Carolina (the ``Communities''). Time Warner alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and is therefore exempt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001672.doc
  • MediaOne of Colorado, Inc. Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Atlanta, Georgia and Nearby Communities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5413-E Adopted: July 21, 2000 Released: July 28, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction MediaOne of Colorado, Inc. (MediaOne) has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in the City of Atlanta, Georgia, and certain surrounding cable service franchise areas (the ``Communities''). MediaOne alleges that its cable systems serving the Communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002394.doc
  • County (CUID ID0097), Canyon County (CUID ID0098) and Meridian (CUID ID0064), Idaho ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Adopted: October 19, 2000 Released: October 25, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: introduction United Cable Television Corporation d/b/a TCI Cablevision of Treasure Valley (``TCI'') has filed with the Commission a petition pursuant to Sections 76.7 and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination of effective competition in Meridian and the unincorporated portions of Ada and Canyon Counties, Idaho. TCI alleges that its cable systems serving these communities are subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), and the Commission's implementing rules, and are therefore exempt from
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • Public access. Subpart M -- Cable Inside Wiring [81]76.800 Definitions. [82]76.801 Scope. [83]76.802 Disposition of cable home wiring. [84]76.804 Disposition of home run wiring. [85]76.805 Access to molding. [86]76.806 Pre-termination access to cable home wiring. Subpart N -- Cable Rate Regulation [87]76.901 Definitions. [88]76.905 Standards for identification of cable systems subject to effective competition. [89]76.906 Presumption of no effective competition. [90]76.907 Petition for a determination of effective competition. [91]76.910 Franchising authority certification. [92]76.911 Petition for reconsideration of certification. [93]76.912 Joint certification. [94]76.913 Assumption of jurisdiction by the Commission. [95]76.914 Revocation of certification. [96]76.916 Petition for recertification. [97]76.917 Notification of certification withdrawal. [98]76.920 Composition of the basic tier. [99]76.921 Buy-through of other tiers prohibited. [100]76.922 Rates for the basic service tier and
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • § 76.800 Definitions. § 76.801 Scope. § 76.802 Disposition of cable home wiring. § 76.804 Disposition of home run wiring. § 76.805 Access to molding. § 76.806 Pre-termination access to cable home wiring. Subpart N-Cable Rate Regulation § 76.901 Definitions. § 76.905 Standards for identification of cable systems subject to effective competition. § 76.906 Presumption of no effective competition. § 76.907 Petition for a determination of effective competition. § 76.910 Franchising authority certification. § 76.911 Petition for reconsideration of certification. § 76.912 Joint certification. § 76.913 Assumption of jurisdiction by the Commission. § 76.914 Revocation of certification. § 76.916 Petition for recertification. § 76.917 Notification of certification withdrawal. § 76.920 Composition of the basic tier. § 76.921 Buy-through of other tiers