FCC Web Documents citing 76.1206

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.pdf
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.pdf
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.pdf
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 14981 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.pdf
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 14962 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2748A1.txt
  • the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, which provides that multichannel video programming distributors shall not be prohibited from offering converter boxes and other equipment used by consumers to access multichannel video programming services, if the system operator's charges are separately stated and not subsidized by charges for any such services. This statutory provision is implemented by 47 C.F.R. � 76.1206, which incorporates the standards of 47 C.F.R. � 76.923. (...continued from previous page) (continued...) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2748 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2748 � � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� n E a � �� � �� B K p w p
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2299A1.txt
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2300A1.txt
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2301A1.txt
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-120A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 14981 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-122A1.txt
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-123A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 14962 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (``TWC NAL and Order''). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.txt
  • House Report stated that [C]ompetition in the manufacturing and distribution of consumer devices has always led to innovation, lower prices and higher quality. Clearly, consumers will benefit from having more choices among telecommunications subscription services arriving by various distribution services. H.R. Rep. No. 104-204, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 112 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.1201, 76.1202. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.1206. Cable Labs, Cable Labs Certifies Best Data and Com 21 Modems, Re-Certifies GI and RCA Modems, Re-Qualifies Cisco CMTs (press release), Dec. 9, 1999; Clearing Shelf Space: Set-Top Boxes Mandated to be Available Via Retail Channels by July 2000, Multichannel News, July 19, 1999, at 15A (noting that Circuit City is already selling cable modems). See, e.g., Bell Atlantic Comments
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.wp
  • to rate regulation are not permitted to charge subscribers for equipment beyond actual cost.193 This approach is consistent with Section 629(f), which states that "[n]othing in this section shall be construed as expanding or limiting any authority that the Commission may have under law in effect before the enactment of the 1996 Act."194 The relevant rule is found in Section 76.1206. 87. We think it is important that pro-competitive pricing, similar to that of the cellular telephone industry and the DBS industry, evolves in the navigation equipment market. In the DBS market, consumers have the option of avoiding high up front expenditures for equipment by bundling service and equipment and considering charges for those components jointly. The different marketing plans, by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.txt
  • House Report stated that [C]ompetition in the manufacturing and distribution of consumer devices has always led to innovation, lower prices and higher quality. Clearly, consumers will benefit from having more choices among telecommunications subscription services arriving by various distribution services. H.R. Rep. No. 104-204, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 112 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.1201, 76.1202. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.1206. Cable Labs, Cable Labs Certifies Best Data and Com 21 Modems, Re-Certifies GI and RCA Modems, Re-Qualifies Cisco CMTs (press release), Dec. 9, 1999; Clearing Shelf Space: Set-Top Boxes Mandated to be Available Via Retail Channels by July 2000, Multichannel News, July 19, 1999, at 15A (noting that Circuit City is already selling cable modems). See, e.g., Bell Atlantic Comments
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2299A1.html
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2300A1.html
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2301A1.html
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-120A1.html
  • FCC Rcd 14981 (Enf. Bur. 2008) ("TWC NAL and Order"). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-122A1.html
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-123A1.html
  • FCC Rcd 14962 (Enf. Bur. 2008) ("TWC NAL and Order"). Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.wp
  • to rate regulation are not permitted to charge subscribers for equipment beyond actual cost.193 This approach is consistent with Section 629(f), which states that "[n]othing in this section shall be construed as expanding or limiting any authority that the Commission may have under law in effect before the enactment of the 1996 Act."194 The relevant rule is found in Section 76.1206. 87. We think it is important that pro-competitive pricing, similar to that of the cellular telephone industry and the DBS industry, evolves in the navigation equipment market. In the DBS market, consumers have the option of avoiding high up front expenditures for equipment by bundling service and equipment and considering charges for those components jointly. The different marketing plans, by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.txt
  • House Report stated that [C]ompetition in the manufacturing and distribution of consumer devices has always led to innovation, lower prices and higher quality. Clearly, consumers will benefit from having more choices among telecommunications subscription services arriving by various distribution services. H.R. Rep. No. 104-204, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 112 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.1201, 76.1202. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.1206. Cable Labs, Cable Labs Certifies Best Data and Com 21 Modems, Re-Certifies GI and RCA Modems, Re-Qualifies Cisco CMTs (press release), Dec. 9, 1999; Clearing Shelf Space: Set-Top Boxes Mandated to be Available Via Retail Channels by July 2000, Multichannel News, July 19, 1999, at 15A (noting that Circuit City is already selling cable modems). See, e.g., Bell Atlantic Comments
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2299A1.html
  • We have provided relevant excerpts and identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Because these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The LOI described an investigation into possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Gary S. Lutzker, Esq., Dow Lohnes PLLC, Counsel for Cox Communications, Inc., (Sept. 5,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2300A1.html
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2301A1.html
  • identifying information for those complaints in Attachment A. Unlike the Flatt Complaint, these complaints were not filed in a public Commission docket, so we will treat the complainants' names as confidential for privacy reasons. The Nov. 8 LOI stated we were investigating possible violations of Section 629 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 549, and Sections 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 76.640, 76.980(f), 76.984, 76.1204, 76.1206, and 76.1603. See Plug and Play Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 20885 n.3. Id. at 20885. See Letter from JoAnn Lucanik, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to Arthur H. Harding, Fleischman and Harding LLP and Matthew A. Brill, Latham & Watkins
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • Program access proceedings. [148]76.1004 Applicability of program access rules to common carriers and affiliates. [149]76.100576.1010 [Reserved] Subpart P -- Competitive Availability of Navigation Devices [150]76.1200 Definitions. [151]76.1201 Rights of subscribers to use or attach navigation devices. [152]76.1202 Availability of navigation devices. [153]76.1203 Incidence of harm. [154]76.1204 Availability of equipment performing conditional access or security functions. [155]76.1205 Availability of interface information. [156]76.1206 Equipment sale or lease charge subsidy prohibition. [157]76.1207 Waivers. [158]76.1208 Sunset of regulations. [159]76.1209 Theft of service. [160]76.1210 Effect on other rules. Subpart Q -- Regulation of Carriage Agreements [161]76.1300 Definitions. [162]76.1301 Prohibited practices. [163]76.1302 Carriage agreement proceedings. [164]76.13031305 [Reserved] Subpart R -- Telecommunications Act Implementation [165]76.1400 Purpose. [166]76.1402 CPST rate complaints. [167]76.1404 Use of cable facilities by local exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • program access rules to common carriers and affiliates. �� 76.1005-76.1010 [Reserved] Subpart P-Competitive Availability of Navigation Devices � 76.1200 Definitions. � 76.1201 Rights of subscribers to use or attach navigation devices. � 76.1202 Availability of navigation devices. � 76.1203 Incidence of harm. � 76.1204 Availability of equipment performing conditional access or security functions. � 76.1205 Availability of interface information. � 76.1206 Equipment sale or lease charge subsidy prohibition. � 76.1207 Waivers. � 76.1208 Sunset of regulations. � 76.1209 Theft of service. Page 4of 243 Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: 5/6/2011 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a0b1c7045abd9e3f08f6d3233a640e58&rg... � 76.1210 Effect on other rules. Subpart Q-Regulation of Carriage Agreements � 76.1300 Definitions. � 76.1301 Prohibited practices. � 76.1302 Carriage agreement proceedings. �� 76.1303-76.1305 [Reserved] Subpart R-Telecommunications Act Implementation