FCC Web Documents citing 74.182

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-99A1.txt
  • of experimental stations should not affect the competitiveness or the diversity of the commercial broadcast marketplace.'' We agree. Repeal of the experimental station multiple ownership rule will not affect the Commission's ability to ensure that experimental stations are used specifically for bona fide experimental purposes and not for commercial purposes, as the Commission can continue to do so under Section 74.182. Nor will experimental stations be able to tie up excessive spectrum even absent § 74.134 because, under other Commission rules, experimental licensees are limited to the minimum frequencies necessary to conduct their experimental operations and an experimental license does not grant the licensee exclusive use of a frequency. If interference would be caused by simultaneous operation of stations licensed experimentally,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 3445 (2009). Call Sign WF2XJX (available for viewing through the Commission's Experimental Licensing System at https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/index.cfm). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.165(2); 22.377(b); 22.401; 22.403; 22.409; 22.413; 22.591(a); 22.599(b); 73.72; 73.1010(e)(1); 73.1510; 73.1010; 73.3500(a); 73.3533(a)(2); 73.3536(b)(2); 73.3539(a); 74.1; 74.15; 74.16; 74.101; 74.102; 74.103; 74.112; 74.113; 74.131; 74.132; 74.133; 74.151; 74.161; 74.162; 74.163; 74.165; 74.181; 74.182; 74.183; 74.184; 78.107(a)(2)(ii); 80.25(c); 80.33; 80.377; 80.391; 87.27(b); 87.37; 90.35(c)(75); 90.35(c)(89); 90.35(d)(6); 90.250(i); 90.501; 90.503; 90.505; 90.507; 90.509; 90.511; 90.513; 90.515; 90.517; 101.21(b); 101.129(a); 101.401; 101.403; 101.405; 101.407; 101.409; 101.411; and 101.413. Additionally, provisions contained in Part 1 set forth general rules for development licenses issued in the eight service rule parts. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.913(a)(1); 1.981; and 1.2003.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.wp
  • of television homes passed by cable reached 97.1 percent in June 1997. In addition, 252 wireless cable systems are in operation, mainly in urban areas. Fourth Annual Report, supra at para. 11 and 14. 82 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.101 - 74.184. 83 47 C.F.R. § 74.101. 84 47 C.F.R. § 74.102. 85 47 C.F.R. § 74.134. 86 47 C.F.R. § 74.182. 18 commenters to describe how likely such economies are to be passed on to audiences and advertisers. 52. Effects on Diversity. Our concern with diversity is most acute with respect to local ownership issues. Both television and competing video outlets are viewed at the local level. While the existing rule may foster diversity by promoting a larger number of independent
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.txt
  • F.C.C.R. 11276, 11293-94 (1998)(hereinafter ``Notice of Inquiry''). Biennial Review Report, FCC 00-191 (adopted May 26, 2000), at para. 114. Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). Section 202(h). 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.101 - 74.184. 47 C.F.R § 74.101. 7 C.F.R § 74.102. 47 C.F.R. § 74.162 - 74.183. 47 C.F.R. § 74.134. 47 C.F.R § 74.182(b). 47 C.F.R. § 74.182(a). 47 C.F.R § 74.113. 47 C.F.R § 74.131. Id. 47 U.S.C. § 303(g). Notice of Inquiry, supra. NAB Comments at 16. Id. at 16. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00191.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00191.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00191.txt
  • services. Experimental broadcast licenses are also subject to a broad variety of operating and reporting requirements, as well as a requirement that prohibits their commercial use. The licensee of an experimental broadcast station may make no charges nor ask for any payment, directly or indirectly, for the production or transmission of any programming or information used for experimental broadcast purposes (§74.182(b). Nor may it transmit program material unless it is necessary to the experiments being conducted, and no regular program service may be broadcast unless specifically authorized (§74.182(a)). These commercial restrictions prevent entities from exploiting an experimental broadcast station for commercial purposes while functioning under the guise of an experimental authorization. The supplementary statement to be filed with an application for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.wp
  • of television homes passed by cable reached 97.1 percent in June 1997. In addition, 252 wireless cable systems are in operation, mainly in urban areas. Fourth Annual Report, supra at para. 11 and 14. 82 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.101 - 74.184. 83 47 C.F.R. § 74.101. 84 47 C.F.R. § 74.102. 85 47 C.F.R. § 74.134. 86 47 C.F.R. § 74.182. 18 commenters to describe how likely such economies are to be passed on to audiences and advertisers. 52. Effects on Diversity. Our concern with diversity is most acute with respect to local ownership issues. Both television and competing video outlets are viewed at the local level. While the existing rule may foster diversity by promoting a larger number of independent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.txt
  • F.C.C.R. 11276, 11293-94 (1998)(hereinafter ``Notice of Inquiry''). Biennial Review Report, FCC 00-191 (adopted May 26, 2000), at para. 114. Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). Section 202(h). 47 C.F.R. §§ 74.101 - 74.184. 47 C.F.R § 74.101. 7 C.F.R § 74.102. 47 C.F.R. § 74.162 - 74.183. 47 C.F.R. § 74.134. 47 C.F.R § 74.182(b). 47 C.F.R. § 74.182(a). 47 C.F.R § 74.113. 47 C.F.R § 74.131. Id. 47 U.S.C. § 303(g). Notice of Inquiry, supra. NAB Comments at 16. Id. at 16. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00191.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00191.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00191.txt
  • services. Experimental broadcast licenses are also subject to a broad variety of operating and reporting requirements, as well as a requirement that prohibits their commercial use. The licensee of an experimental broadcast station may make no charges nor ask for any payment, directly or indirectly, for the production or transmission of any programming or information used for experimental broadcast purposes (§74.182(b). Nor may it transmit program material unless it is necessary to the experiments being conducted, and no regular program service may be broadcast unless specifically authorized (§74.182(a)). These commercial restrictions prevent entities from exploiting an experimental broadcast station for commercial purposes while functioning under the guise of an experimental authorization. The supplementary statement to be filed with an application for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-01-99A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-01-99A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-01-99A1.txt
  • of experimental stations should not affect the competitiveness or the diversity of the commercial broadcast marketplace.'' We agree. Repeal of the experimental station multiple ownership rule will not affect the Commission's ability to ensure that experimental stations are used specifically for bona fide experimental purposes and not for commercial purposes, as the Commission can continue to do so under Section 74.182. Nor will experimental stations be able to tie up excessive spectrum even absent § 74.134 because, under other Commission rules, experimental licensees are limited to the minimum frequencies necessary to conduct their experimental operations and an experimental license does not grant the licensee exclusive use of a frequency. If interference would be caused by simultaneous operation of stations licensed experimentally,