FCC Web Documents citing 73.682

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-259A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-259A1.pdf
  • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 303(u). 47 U.S.C. � 330(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.119. See Fourth Report and Order in MM Docket 87-268, FCC 96-493, 62 Fed. Reg. 14006 (1997). In that proceeding, the Commission incorporated into its rules ATSC Doc. A/53 ("ATSC Digital Television Standard, 16 Sep 95"), with modifications. See also 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). The Electronics Industries Alliance is a trade organization representing the U.S. high technology community. Among other tasks, EIA develops performance standards for consumer electronics equipment. In the past we have relied upon EIA standards and recommendations for developing regulations covering television receivers. See, for example, Amendment of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules to Implement the Provisions of the Television
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-95-412A1.pdf
  • TV station must have measuring equipment for determining that the transmitted visual signal conforms to the provisions of this subpart. The licensee shall decide the monitoring and measurement methods or procedures for indicating and controlling the visual signal. (b) In the event technical problems make it impossible to operate in accordance with the timing and carrier level tolerance requirements of �73.682 (a)(9)(i), (a)(9)(ii), (a)(12), (a)(13). and (a)(17), a TV broadcast station may operate at variance for a period of not more than 30 days without specific authority from the FCC; provided that, the date and time of the initial out-of-tolerance condition has been entered in the station log. If the operation at variance will exceed 10 consecutive days, a notification must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1552A1.txt
  • N.W., Suite 5500 Washington, D.C. 20006 John C. Quale, Esq. and Linda G.Morrison, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Barry A. Friedman, Esq. Thompson Hine LLP 1920 N Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Re: Application of Dotcast, Inc. for Approval of System for Insertion of Non-Video Data Pursuant to Section 73.682 Comments of Fox Television Stations, Inc. Informal Objection of Metropolitan Area Networks, Inc. Dear Counselors: By application dated November 1, 2001, as supplemented on November 21, 2001, December 21, 2001, and February 12, 2002, (collectively, the ``Application'') Dotcast, Inc. (``Dotcast'') requests advanced approval pursuant to Section 73.682(a)(24)(iii) of the Commission's rules for broadcast television licensees to use its proposed system
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-472A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA-02-472 March 1, 2002 DOTCAST, INC. SEEKS FCC CLEARANCE FOR ITS SYSTEM FOR INSERTION OF NON-VIDEO DATA PURSUANT TO SECTION 73.682 OF THE COMMISSION'S TELEVISION BROADCAST RULES RULES SEC. 73.682(a)(24)(iii) REQUESTOR Dotcast, Inc. (Filed by Douglas B. Evans, General Counsel, Dotcast, Inc. 1808 N. Shoreline Boulevard Mountain View, CA 94043 and Margaret L. Tobey, Attorney Morrison & Foerster LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 5500 Washington, D.C. 20006 DATE RECEIVED November 1, 2001 NATURE OF REQUEST Requests the Commission to authorize
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-771A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit v v v v v v DA 02-771 April 5, 2002 MEDIA BUREAU ACTION application of dotcast, inc. FOR APPROVAL OF SYSTEM FOR INSERTION OF NON-VIDEO DATA PURSUANT TO SECTION 73.682 ``permit but disclose'' ex parte status accorded On November 1, 2001, Dotcast, Inc. (``Dotcast'') filed an application for Approval of System for Insertion of Non-Video Data Pursuant to Section 73.682 (the ``Application''), which it later supplemented. On March 1, 2002, the Commission issued a Public Notice, DA 02-472, announcing that the Application had been filed. On March 22, 2002, Metropolitan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3936A1.txt
  • BE EFFECTIVE upon publication in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Andrew S. Fishel Managing Director APPENDIX Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 73 - BROADCAST RADIO SERVICES 1. The authority for part 73 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336. 2. Amend � 73.682 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: � 73.682 TV transmission standards. * * * * * (d) Digital broadcast television transmission standard. Transmission of digital broadcast television (DTV) signals shall comply with the standards for such transmissions set forth in ATSC A/52: ``ATSC Standard Digital Audio Compression (AC-3)'' (incorporated by reference, see � 73.8000) and ATSC Doc. A/53B,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2068A1.txt
  • 67089 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420002 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2070A1.txt
  • 24514 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420001 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2071A1.txt
  • 51708 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420003 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2072A1.txt
  • 51479 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420004 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2073A1.txt
  • 35084 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420005 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2074A1.txt
  • 69692 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420006 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2075A1.txt
  • 64877 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420007 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2076A1.txt
  • 12144 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420008 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2077A1.txt
  • 35611 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420009 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2078A1.txt
  • 68753 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200010 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2080A1.txt
  • 36170 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200011 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2081A1.txt
  • 30577 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200012 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2082A1.txt
  • 3072 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200013 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2083A1.txt
  • 16788 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200014 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2084A1.txt
  • 131 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200015 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter responds to your request for an extension of time for the above-captioned DTV station implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. This letter also constitutes a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE against Entravision Holdings, LLC (Entravision) for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the PSIP standard. Waiver Request. You state that the equipment necessary for this station to implement PSIP has been ordered, but that you have been unable to secure the delivery of that equipment from the manufacturer. You assert that the equipment is on ``backorder,'' and the manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2858A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2858A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2858A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KNVO-DT, McAllen, TX Facility ID No. 69692 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420006 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we cancel the forfeiture imposed. On April 15, 2005, Entravision filed a request for waiver of the PSIP implementation deadline for 15 of its stations, including KNVO-DT. In the NAL,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2860A1.txt
  • West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KINC-DT, Las Vegas, NV Facility ID No. 67089 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420002 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we cancel the forfeiture imposed. On April 15, 2005, Entravision filed a request for waiver of the PSIP implementation deadline for 15 of its stations, including KINC-DT. In the NAL,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2861A1.txt
  • West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KPMR-DT, Santa Barbara, CA Facility ID No. 12144 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420008 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KPMR-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2868A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: WVEA-DT, Venice, FL Facility ID No. 16788 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200014 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that WVEA-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2869A1.txt
  • West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: WVEN-DT, Daytona Beach, FL Facility ID No. 131 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200015 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that WVEN-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2872A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KCEC-DT, Denver, CO Facility ID No. 24514 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420001 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KCEC-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2873A1.txt
  • West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KINT-DT, El Paso, TX Facility ID No. 51708 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420003 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KINT-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2875A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KLDO-DT, Laredo, TX Facility ID No. 51479 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420004 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KLDO-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2876A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KSMS-DT, Monterrey, CA Facility ID No. 35611 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420009 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KSMS-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2877A1.txt
  • West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KTFN-DT, El Paso, TX Facility ID No. 68753 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200010 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KTFN-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2878A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: WUVN-DT, Hartford, CT Facility ID No. 3072 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200013 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that WUVN-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2879A1.txt
  • West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KORO-DT, Corpus Christi, TX Facility ID No. 64877 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420007 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that KORO-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2880A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: WUNI-DT, Worcester, MA Facility ID No. 30577 NAL/Acct. No. 05414200012 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we affirm the forfeiture imposed. In the NAL, we found that WUNI-DT did not comply with the PSIP implementation deadline and did not seek relief from that obligation by, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2893A1.txt
  • 6000 West Santa Monica, CA 90404 Re: KLUZ-DT, Albuquerque, NM Facility ID No. 35084 NAL/Acct. No. 0541420005 FRN: 0001529627 Dear Licensee: This letter addresses the response to the Notice Of Apparent Liability For A Forfeiture (NAL) in the amount of $3,000 issued on July 26, 2005, against Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), licensee of the above-captioned station, for violation of Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), by failing to timely implement the ATSC A/65B Program System and Information Protocol (PSIP) standard by February 1, 2005. As described herein, we cancel the forfeiture imposed. On April 15, 2005, Entravision filed a request for waiver of the PSIP implementation deadline for 15 of its stations, including KLUZ-DT. In the NAL,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-605A1.txt
  • to block unwanted high frequency signals while allowing lower frequency signals to pass through. Digital Low Power TV and TV Translator Transmission System Facilities To qualify for Commission certification, a digital LPTV or TV translator transmitter must: (a) be designed to produce digital TV signals that can be satisfactorily viewed on consumer receiving equipment as detailed in 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d); (b) produce emissions on frequencies outside the authorized channel, measured at the output terminals of the transmitter that meet the applicable requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 74.794; (c) be equipped to display the digital power (i.e., average power over a 6 MHz channel) and be designed to prevent the power out from exceeding the maximum rated power output under any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • digital broadcast television signals. Need: This rule is necessary to ensure that the benefits of digital technology are available to terrestrial television broadcasting and to the American public. The rule is designed to provide the certainty that many broadcasters, equipment manufacturers, and consumers need to invest in new technology. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), (j), 303(r). Section Number and Title: 73.682(d) TV transmission standards. SUBPART H-RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL BOADCAST STATIONS Brief Description: This rule and process change eliminates the construction permit requirement for certain minor changes to broadcast facilities, specifically codifying the current conditions imposed on construction permits for AM, FM, and TV stations which are authorized to construct on or near AM stations. Need: This rule is intended to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-172A1.txt
  • Stat 163 (1995) (codified in Chapter 35 of title 44 U.S.C.). See Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, supra note 1, at �� 205 and 210. The rules, forms and procedures that received OMB approval prior to publication of the summary of the Report and Order in the Federal Register are now in effect. We note that 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d), which is one of the rules subject to OMB approval, will take effect no earlier than May 29, 2008. See Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, supra note 1, at � 185. See OMB Control Nos. 3060-0027 (Form 301), 3060-0407 (Form 337), 3060-0029 (Form 340) and 3060-1105 (Form 387). The details of each station's channel assignment, including technical facilities and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1342A1.txt
  • have before us a petition for reconsideration filed on December 17, 2009 by Associated Christian Television System, Inc. (``Associated Christian''), licensee of television station WACX(TV), Leesburg, Florida. Associated Christian seeks reconsideration of the Video Division's declaratory ruling letter directing WACX(TV) to cease operating on virtual channel 40 and to immediately commence operation on virtual channel 55 as required by Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's Rules. For the reasons stated below, we deny the petition for reconsideration. On October 9, 2009, WWSB License, LLC (``WWSB License'') submitted a request for a declaratory ruling that the correct virtual channel number designation to be used in the PSIP portion of the television signal broadcast by WACX(TV) is virtual channel 55 pursuant to Section 73.682(d)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • 609-T and FCC 611-T 01/31/11 3060-1094 Licensing, Operation, and Transition of the 2500-2690 MHz Band 09/30/11 3060-1095 Surrenders of Authorizations for International Carrier, Space Station and Earth Station Licensees 03/31/12 3060-1096 Prepaid Calling Card Service Provider Certification, WC Docket No. 05-68 04/30/13 3060-1100 Sec. 15.117(k) 06/30/13 3060-1101 Children's Television Requests for Preemption Flexibility 04/30/13 3060-1103 Sec. 76.41 06/30/13 3060-1104 Sec. 73.682(d) 03/31/11 3060-1105 FCC 387 06/30/11 3060-1106 Licensing and Service Rules for Vehicle Mounted Earth Stations (VMES) 12/31/12 3060-1108 Consummations of Assignments and Transfers of Control of Authorization 06/30/13 3060-1110 Sunset of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service Analog Service Requirement and Related Matters, FCC 07-103 10/31/13 3060-1111 Sections 225 and 255, Interconnected Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Services 01/31/11 3060-1112 Comprehensive Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-679A1.txt
  • as ``a portion of the electromagnetic frequency spectrum which is used in a cable system and which is capable of delivering a television channel (as television channel is defined by the Commission by regulation)''); 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(r)-(u) (defining ``cable television channel'' as a ``signaling path provided by a cable television system''); see also 47 C.F.R. �� 73.603, 73.606, 73.681, 73.682(a)(1). See 47 U.S.C. � 522(13). Although the list is preceded by the phrase ``not limited to,'' making it clear that the list is illustrative rather than exclusive, it is also preceded by the phrase ``such as,'' which suggests that other covered entities should be similar to those listed. See Sky Angel Complaint at 2 (stating that Sky Angel's service is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-698A1.txt
  • to Seaford is not mutually-exclusive with an allotment of channel 2 to Wilmington, Delaware, the outcome of PMCM's appeal of the Media Bureau's December 18, 2009 decision is not pertinent to the instant proceeding. Id. at 4. ABC Comments at 1. Id. at 4. Id. at 1, 5-6. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 6. Fox Comments at 1. 47 C.F.R. �73.682(d) (incorporated by reference, see �73.8000). Section 73.682(d) requires digital broadcast television signals to comply with ATSC A/65C (``ATSC Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable, Revision C With Amendment No. 1, dated May 9, 2006'') (``PSIP Standard''). PSIP is data that is transmitted along with a station's digital signal and enables DTV receivers to link a station's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1432A1.txt
  • Incorporated Standards � 73.8000 Incorporation by reference. . . . (2) ATSC A/53 Parts 1-4 and 6: 2007 ``ATSC Digital Television Standard,'' (January 3, 2007) and ATSC A/53 Part 5: 2010 ``ATSC Digital Television Standard: Part 5--AC-3 Audio System Characteristic,'' (July 6, 2010), as listed below: (i) A/53, Part 1:2007, ``Digital Television System'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682. (ii) A/53, Part 2:2007, ``RF/Transmission System Characteristics'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682. (iii) A/53, Part 3:2007, ``Service Multiplex and Transport Subsystem Characteristics'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682. (iv) A/53, Part 4:2007, ``MPEG-2 Video System Characteristics'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682, except for � 6.1.2 of A/53 Part 4: 2007, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.txt
  • 8065, � 42 (1992); Implementation of Sections 12 and 19 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Development of Competition and Diversity in Video Programming Distribution and Carriage, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 194, 195, � 6 n.13 (1992). 47 U.S.C. � 522(4). 47 C.F.R. � 73.681; see also 47 C.F.R. �� 73.603, 73.606, 73.682(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 76.5(r)-(u). 47 U.S.C. � 522(20). See Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. Discovery Communications LLC, et al., Program Access Complaint, MB Docket No. 12-80, File No. CSR-8605-P (March 24, 2010) (``Sky Angel Complaint''); Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. Discovery Communications LLC, et al., Emergency Petition for Temporary Standstill, MB Docket No. 12-80, File No. CSR-8605-P (March 24, 2010)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222223A1.txt
  • Bureau Secretary X X CC 02-67 4/29 4/29 4/29 BellSouth SBC Telecommunications , Inc. Ofc. of Cmsr. Abernathy Ofc. of General Counsel Wireline Competition Bureau Wireline Competition Bureau X X X X CC 02-80 Non-docketed proceedings 4/26 Metropolitan Area Networks, Inc. Media Bureau X Application of Dotcast, Inc. for Approval of System for Insertion of Non-Video Data Pursuant to Section 73.682 (``Application'') -FCC- q � b c n q  � � � � � � " � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279689A1.txt
  • Appendix B. We find good cause for the rules, forms and procedures adopted in this Report and Order to be effective upon publication of the summary of the Report and Order in the Federal Register to ensure that full power television stations can meet the statutory deadline for transitioning to all digital service, except for rule sections 47 C.F.R. �� 73.682(d), 73.8000(b), and 73.9000(k), provided, however, that the rules, forms and procedures described in paragraph 205, supra, contain information collection requirements subject to the PRA and are not effective until approved by the OMB. The Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing when OMB approval for these rules and forms has been received. Rule sections 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302783A1.doc
  • 47 C.F.R. � 79 et. seq. Closed captioning is the visual display of the audio portion of video programming pursuant to the technical specifications set forth in 47 C.F.R. Part 15. Section 713 was added to the Act by Section 305 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56. 47 C.F.R. � 79.1. 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(a)(22). Pub. L. No. 101-431, 104 Stat. 960 (1990) (codified at 47 U.S.C. �� 303(u), 330(b)). Amendment of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules to Implement the Provisions of the Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 2419 (1991), recon. granted in part, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2279 (1992), codified at 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305140A1.txt
  • 2010 ) ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 11-43 erratum Released: March 11, 2011 By the Chief, Media Bureau: On March 3, 2011, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``NPRM''), FCC 11-36, in the above-captioned proceeding. This Erratum corrects paragraph 2 of Appendix A under ``Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services'' to read as follows: ``Section 73.682 is amended by revising subsection (d) to read as follows:'' FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William Lake Chief Media Bureau (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309387A1.txt
  • Accessibility Act of 2010 ) ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 11-43 erratum Released: September 1, 2011 By the Chief, Media Bureau: On August 25, 2011, the Commission released a Report and Order (``R&O''), FCC 11-126, in the above-captioned proceeding. This Erratum corrects footnote 206 on page 26 of the Report and Order to read as ``47 C.F.R. 73.682(d), 47 CFR 73.8000(b)(2)'' and amends Appendix A in its entirety. Please see new Appendix A attached. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William Lake Chief Media Bureau ATTACHMENT APPENDIX A Final Rules We amend Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310006A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310006A1.txt
  • Incorporated Standards � 73.8000 Incorporation by reference. . . . (2) ATSC A/53 Parts 1-4 and 6: 2007 ``ATSC Digital Television Standard,'' (January 3, 2007) and ATSC A/53 Part 5: 2010 ``ATSC Digital Television Standard: Part 5--AC-3 Audio System Characteristic,'' (July 6, 2010), as listed below: (i) A/53, Part 1:2007, ``Digital Television System'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682. (ii) A/53, Part 2:2007, ``RF/Transmission System Characteristics'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682. (iii) A/53, Part 3:2007, ``Service Multiplex and Transport Subsystem Characteristics'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682. (iv) A/53, Part 4:2007, ``MPEG-2 Video System Characteristics'' (January 3, 2007), IBR approved for � 73.682, except for � 6.1.2 of A/53 Part 4: 2007, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-123A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 73.6001(d). In appropriately compelling circumstances involving a temporary inability to comply, a licensee may apply to the Commission for Special Temporary Authority to operate at variance with the CBPA's programming and operational requirements, without affecting its Class A status. Telecom Services Inc. ex parte presentation dated August 28, 2000. 47 U.S.C. � 73.624(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). Report and Order at � 31, note 61. PAI Petition for Reconsideration, or Alternatively, for Clarification at 5 (``PAI Petition''); PAI Reply to NCTA Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration at 2 (``PAI Reply''). 47 U.S.C. � 534(a). 47 U.S.C. � 534(h)(1)(A). NCTA points out a single reference to must carry in the legislative history contained in a letter from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-24A1.txt
  • the completion of a broadcast auction. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5005. We estimate that there are approximately 20 applications in these three categories. The cut-off singleton applications remain pending for a variety of legal and technical reasons. Notice, supra at 5276-77. See Fourth Report and Order in MM Docket No. 87-268, 11 FCC Rcd 17771 (1996)(``Fourth Report and Order''). Section 73.682(d) of our rules requires that broadcast DTV transmissions comply with standard ATSC Doc. A/53 dated September 9, 1995, except for its constraints on video formats. The ATSC DTV Standard contains a provision mandating eighteen video transmission formats for the DTV system. These formats are described by criteria such as aspect ratio, frame rate, vertical and horizontal resolution and type of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
  • requirements). This policy was articulated for applicants in RM-7586. See TV Auxiliary Use of Vacant UHF-TV Channels, RM-7586, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 4896 (1995). We note that the licensing database specifies EIRP in terms of dBm, not dBW. The conversion factor between dBm and dBW is 30 dB (i.e., 0 dBW = 30 dBm). 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(a)(14). See Pub. L. No. 105-33, Title III, 111 Stat. 251 (1997) �� 3003, 3004. See In the Matter of Reallocation of Television Channels 60-69, the 746-806 MHz Band, ET Docket No. 97-157, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd.22,953 (1997). See In The Matter of Principles for Reallocation of Spectrum to Encourage the Development of Telecommunications Technologies for the New Millennium,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-230A1.txt
  • broad industry consensus developed through ATSC's standards-making procedures. While it will be necessary to conduct rule making activity to incorporate such changes in the rules, we nonetheless will endeavor to pursue such rule making as quickly as possible, either through our periodic review of the DTV transition or through separate proceedings as may be appropriate. Accordingly, we are revising Section 73.682(d) of the rules to specify ATSC Doc A/53B (ATSC Digital Television Standard, 7 Aug 01), except for Section 5.1.2 (``Compression format constraints'') of Annex A (``Video Systems Characteristics'') and the phrase ``see Table 3'' in Section 5.1.1 Table 2 and Section 5.1.2 Table 4. These exceptions are as provided in the current Section 73.682(d) and were set forth in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.txt
  • for analog broadcast television service for a period extending beyond December 31, 2006. We seek comment on whether this provision applies to analog authorizations in the low power television service. We note that Section 3 of the Communications Act defines the term ``analog television service'' as ``television service provided pursuant to the transmission standards prescribed by the Commission in Section 73.682(a) of its regulations. The LPTV service rules (Part 74, Subpart G) do not make reference to this rule section. Does this mean that stations licensed in the LPTV service do not have to cease analog service by the deadline prescribed in Section 309(j)(14)? What about Class A stations licensed under Part 73? If we conclude that stations in the low
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.txt
  • corresponding addresses noted below, and all are available for inspection at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC, at the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th. St., SW, Room CY- A257, Washington, DC 20554. http://webstore.ansi.org/ansidocstore/default.asp. (1) ATSC A/52: ``ATSC Standard Digital Television Audio Compression (AC-3),'' 1995, IBR approved for � 73.682. (2) ATSC A/53: ``ATSC Digital Television Standard,'' 1995, IBR approved for � 73.682, except for section 5.1.2 of Annex A, and the phrase ``see Table 3'' in section 5.1.1. Table 2 and section 5.1.2 Table 4. (3) ATSC A/65B: ``ATSC Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable,'' 2003, IBR approved for �� 73.9000-73.9001. (4) International Standard ISO/IEC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.txt
  • � 25. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 19830, � 33. Children's DTV Public Interest NPRM, 15 FCC Rcd at 22952-56, �� 14-24. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 22956-57, �� 25-28. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 22960-61, �� 35-37. See � 130, infra. First DTV Periodic Review Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 16001, � 50. We revised Section 73.682(d) of the rules to specify ATSC Doc. A/53B (ATSC Digital Television Standard, 7 Aug. 01), except for Section 5.1.2 (``Compression format constraints'') of Annex A (``Video Systems Characteristics'') and the phrase ``see Table 3'' in Section 5.1.1 Table 2 and Section 5.1.2 Table 4. Id. � 51. Id. � 55. In the interim we will continue to support and encourage
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A1.txt
  • We will update our DTV rules to recognize Amendment 2, as released by the ATSC on May 19, 2003. Updating the rules to reflect improvements in the standard will benefit both the public and broadcasters by allowing broadcasters to make technical improvements in their service that will enhance the quality of DTV services they provide. Accordingly, we are revising Section 73.682(d) of the rules to specify ATSC Doc A/53B (ATSC Digital Television Standard, 7 Aug 01), Revision B with Amendment 1 and Amendment 2. We also continue to encourage further improvements to the DTV standards. Although it will be necessary to conduct additional rule making activity to incorporate such changes in the rules, we nonetheless will endeavor to pursue such rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A4.txt
  • Form 383 - Schedule B (date) DRAFT PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION I certify that I have prepared Schedule B-DTV Engineering Data on behalf of the applicant, and that after such praperation, I have examined and found it to be accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. If a directional antenna is proposed, the requirements of 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.685 must be satisfied. Exhibit required. Exhibit No. e. Directional Antenna Relative Field Values: Not applicable (Nondirectional) Degree 0 10 20 30 40 50 Value Degree 60 70 80 90 100 110 Value Degree 120 130 140 150 160 170 Value Degree Value Degree 180 190 200 210 220 230 Value Degree 240 250 260 270 280 290 Value
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-192A6.txt
  • Form 385 - Schedule B (date) DRAFT PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION I certify that I have prepared Schedule B-DTV Engineering Data on behalf of the applicant, and that after such praperation, I have examined and found it to be accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. If a directional antenna is proposed, the requirements of 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.685 must be satisfied. Exhibit required. Exhibit No. e. Directional Antenna Relative Field Values: Not applicable (Nondirectional) Degree 0 10 20 30 40 50 Value Degree 60 70 80 90 100 110 Value Degree 120 130 140 150 160 170 Value Degree Value Degree 180 190 200 210 220 230 Value Degree 240 250 260 270 280 290 Value
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.txt
  • 309(j)(14)(A) of the Communications Act provides that the Commission may not renew a television broadcast license for ``analog television service'' for a period extending beyond December 31, 2006. The term ``analog television service'' in Section 309(j)(14) is defined in Section 3 of the Communications Act as ``television service provided pursuant to the transmission standards prescribed by the Commission in Section 73.682(a) of its regulations,'' a rule that deals with full-service station transmission standards. In the Notice we sought comment on whether Section 309(j)(14)(A) applies to analog authorizations in the LPTV, TV translator, and Class A services. Further, we considered Section 336(f)(4) of the Communications Act that is entitled ``Issuances of Licenses for Advanced Television Services to Television Translator Stations and Qualifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-142A1.txt
  • captioned for purposes of meeting the captioning requirements. We seek comment on these assertions. Technical Quality Standards. In the Closed Captioning Report and Order, the Commission adopted a ``pass through'' rule to ensure that programming with closed captions is delivered in a complete manner with the belief that the enforcement of this rule, the captioning requirements, and Sections 15.119 and 73.682 would ensure the technical quality of captioning. The Commission stated: ``We find it unacceptable that existing captions might fail to be transmitted in a complete and intact manner to consumers. The reported problems - such as captions not being delivered intact, captions not synchronized with the video portion of the program, captions ending before the end of the programming, programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.txt
  • DTV stations. A station must comply with the following DTV rules, except when such compliance is inconsistent with an explicit requirement in this section: � 73.622 Digital television table of allotments. � 73.623 DTV applications and changes to DTV allotments. � 73.624 Digital television broadcast stations. � 73.625 DTV coverage of principal community and antenna system. Paragraph (d) of � 73.682 TV transmission standards. An application proposing use of a distributed transmission system (DTS) will not be accepted for filing if it proposes coverage by any of the proposed transmitters of areas farther from the station's DTS reference point than the distance in the following table for the station's proposed channel and zone, except where coverage of such areas by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.txt
  • Appendix B) to apply to applications for post-transition facilities and also to future maximization applications and applications to implement new allotments. [Section V.F., infra and Rule 47 C.F.R. � 73.616 in Appendix B.] We update the Commission's rules to reflect the latest revisions to the ATSC standards concerning DTV transmission and PSIP. [Sections V.H.1-3., infra and Rule 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d) in Appendix B.] We revise Section 73.624(g) to require DTV stations that are permittees operating pursuant to an STA or any other FCC instrument authorizing DTV transmissions to file FCC Form 317 and pay fees on any revenue derived from feeable ancillary or supplementary services in the same way required of DTV licensees. [Sections V.H.4., infra, Rule 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.txt
  • predicted interference percentages will continue to be based on the standard OET 69 methodology, including use of 1990 Census data. The current database of authorized or applied for stations would also continue to be used. Other Issues DTV Transmission Standard (ATSC A/53) In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission revised its DTV transmission standard, contained in Section 73.682(d) of the rules, to specify the use of the August 7, 2001 Advanced Television Systems Committee (``ATSC'') DTV transmission standard A/53 Revision B with Amendment 1 and Amendment 2 (``A/53-B''). The Commission also stated that it would continue to encourage further improvements to the DTV standards and conduct additional rulemakings as appropriate to incorporate future updates of the ATSC DTV
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-141A1.txt
  • Rcd 4134 (2008) (``DTV Consumer Education Order''), recon. order adopted April 23, 2008 (FCC 08-119). See also Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 3033, � 80, 3037-38, � 91, 3044, � 106, 3057-58, � 132, and 3058, � 134. See Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 3079-81, � 185-189; 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). Cohen, Dippell and Everist, P.C. also requested clarification regarding whether real-time updates are required under the new PSIP standard. See Ex Parte Comments of Cohen, Dippell and Everist, MB Docket 07-91 (dated May 21, 2008). John Willkie, doing business as EtherGuide Systems, filed a partial Opposition to the MSTV/NAB Petition. See Opposition to Petitions for Reconsideration filed by Harris Corporation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.txt
  • Programming, Implementation of Section 305 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 12 FCC Rcd 1044 (Jan. 17, 1997); see also Closed Captioning and Video Description of Video Programming, Implementation of Section 305 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Video Programming Accessibility, MM Docket No. 95-176, Report, 11 FCC Rcd at 19214, 19223, para. 25 (July 29, 1996). 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(a)(22). 47 C.F.R. �� 15.119, 15.122. Pub. L. No. 101-431, 104 Stat. 960 (1990) (codified at 47 U.S.C. �� 303(u), 330(b)). See also Implementation of Television Decoder Circuitry Act, GEN Docket No. 91-1, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 2419 (Apr. 15, 1991). See Closed Captioning and Video Description of Video Programming, Implementation of Section 305 of the Telecommunications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.txt
  • at 14; Rohde & Schwarz and Samsung comments at 1-2. We note that CBA says that Class A and LPTV stations using DTS should not have to comply with the ATSC technical standard and that the Commission should allow experimentation with an alternative technical standard, such as COFDM. CBA comments at 4. MSTV comments at 12. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). MSTV comments at 12. DTS Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 17809, � 34. See ATSC's Patent Policy at http://www.atsc.org/policy_documents/B-4-2006-03-13_PATENT_POLICY.pdf. See Patent Statement of MWG to the ATSC (dated Dec. 17, 2002) at http://www.atsc.org/standards/patent_statements/mwg.pdf; see also MWG comments at 23. See Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket 87-268, Fourth Report and Order 11
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.txt
  • dBm should be adequate to protect TV receivers given mobile powers of 100 mW.'' We subtracted -84 dBm from these figures to obtain the values indicated above, but recognize that the NAF may have considered other factors in their suggestion for a minimum sensing threshold. See Motorola written ex parte presentation of October 18, 2007 at 17-20. 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(e). Section 73.622(e) further provides that ``[w]ithin this contour, service is considered available at locations where the station's signal strength, as predicted by the Longley-Rice propagation model, exceeds [the noise-limited service levels.'' The Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-447, � 204, 118 Stat 2809, 3393 3423-24, (2004), codified at 47 U.S.C. �339(c)(1). The SHVERA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-11A1.txt
  • March 31, 2009 June 30, 2009. Part 73 - RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 2. Section 73.624 is revised to read as follows: � 73.624 Digital television broadcast stations ***** (d) Digital television broadcast facilities that comply with the FCC DTV Standard (section 73.682(d)), shall be constructed in the following markets by the following dates: (1) * * * ***** (vii) June 12, 2009 February 17, 2009 in all markets for completion of construction of post-transition (DTV) facilities for all commercial and noncommercial television stations whose post-transition digital channel is different from their pre-transition digital channel and for those stations whose post-transition channel is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-69A1.txt
  • standard supports labeling E/I content through the Genre Descriptor, but not within the content advisory descriptor (which contains the ratings data). See CEA Reply at 8. While carriage of the Genre Descriptor is mandatory in the A/65C PSIP standard, neither the standard nor the Commission's rules presently require labeling of E/I content in the Genre Descriptor. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d) (incorporating by reference ATSC Doc. A/65C, ATSC Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable, Revision C With Amendment No. 1, dated May 9, 2006). Child Safe Viewing Act at Section 2(b)(4). Id. at Section 2(b)(5). See, e.g., CMPC Comments at 8; Common Sense Media Comments at 7-8; PFF Comments at 138. See, e.g., Comcast Comments at 9;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.txt
  • increases in VHF power under this proposal by existing stations and new stations that are located within 300 kilometers (183 miles) of our border with Canada or within 400 kilometers (248.5 miles) of our border with Mexico will need to be coordinated with the appropriate foreign administration. We also observe that the provisions governing transmission of television signals in Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.625(c) of the rules specify that it shall be standard to employ horizontal polarization. The ERP of a television station is therefore considered to be that of its horizontally polarized component. However, Section 73.682(a)(14) also provides that circular or elliptical polarization may be employed and that, in such cases, transmission of the horizontal and vertical components in time and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-126A1.txt
  • the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(1)(A). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch APPENDIX A Final Rules We amend Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 2. Section 73.682 is amended by revising subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) Digital broadcast television transmission standard. Effective May 29, 2008 transmission of digital broadcast television (DTV) signals shall comply with the standards for such transmissions set forth in ATSC A/52: ``ATSC Standard Digital Audio Compression (AC-3)'' (incorporated by reference, see �73.8000), ATSC A/53, Parts 1-4 and 6: 2007 ``ATSC Digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.txt
  • Report, 11 FCC Rcd 19214, 19223, � 25 (1996). See TV Captioning for the Deaf, Report and Order, 63 FCC 2d 378 (1977). See also Permissible Uses of the Vertical Blanking Interval, Report and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 3613 (1993) (permitting enhanced closed captioning and other broadcast-related information services on line 21, field 2 of the VBI). 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(a)(22)(i). See Closed Captioning of Video Programming, Closed Captioning Requirements for Digital Television Receivers, Declaratory Ruling, Order, and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 16674, 16675, � 2 (2008) (``2008 Closed Captioning Order''). See id. Pub. L. No. 101-431, 104 Stat. 960 (1990) (codified at 47 U.S.C. �� 303(u), 330(b)). See 2008 Closed Captioning Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 16675,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Final Rules The Federal Communications Commission amends Parts 73 and 76 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as set forth below: PART 73- Radio Broadcast Services 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336. 2. Amend �73.682 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows: � 73.682 TV transmission standards. * * * * * (e) Transmission of commercial advertisements by television broadcast station. (1) Mandatory compliance with ATSC A/85. Effective December 13, 2012, television broadcast stations must comply with the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) A/85: ``ATSC Recommended Practice: Techniques for Establishing and Maintaining Audio Loudness
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-36A1.txt
  • Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch APPENDIX A Proposed Rules We propose to amend Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 2. Section 73.682 is amended by revising subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) Digital broadcast television transmission standard. Effective May 29, 2008 transmission of digital broadcast television (DTV) signals shall comply with the standards for such transmissions set forth in ATSC A/52: ``ATSC Standard Digital Audio Compression (AC-3)'' (incorporated by reference, see �73.8000), ATSC A/53, Parts 1-4 and 6: 2007 ``ATSC Digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.txt
  • Verizon Wide Open West APPENDIX B Proposed Rules The Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend Parts 73 and 76 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as set forth below: PART 73- Radio Broadcast Services 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336. 2. Amend �73.682 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows: � 73.682 TV transmission standards. * * * * * . (2) A television broadcast station that installs, utilizes, and maintains in a commercially reasonable manner the equipment and associated software to comply with ATSC A/85 shall be deemed in compliance with this section. 3. Amend �73.8000 by adding paragraph (b)(5) to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.wp
  • Technology Standard. The Telecommunications Act requires that our rules: 1) provide for Commission oversight of the adoption of industry standards for blocking technology; and 2) require television receivers to receive ratings signals that are transmitted via line 21 of the television vertical blanking interval (VBI) and which conform to industry standards. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-340 See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(a)(22). 9 The television picture is divided into two "fields", which are interlaced to create the picture that is 10 displayed on the television screen. Lines 1 to 21 of each field constitute the "vertical blanking interval," which allows the beam inside a television picture tube to move from the bottom of the screen, after displaying one field of the picture,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.wp
  • See 47 U.S.C. 303 and 330. 4. See 47 U.S.C. 303 and 330. 5. Pub. L. No. 104-104, supra, at 551(a)(9). 6. Id. at 551(c), codified at 47 U.S.C. 303(x). 7. Id. at 551(d), codified at 47 U.S.C. 330(c). 8. Id. 9. See Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in ET Docket 97-206, 12 FCC Rcd 15573 (1997). 10. See 47 C.F.R. 73.682(a)(22). 11. See Amendment of the rules relating to permissible uses of the vertical blanking interval of broadcast television signals, Report and Order, MM Docket No. 92-305, 8 FCC Rcd 3613 (1993). 12. See note in 47 C.F.R. 73.682(a)(22)(i)(B). Part 15 of our Rules contains specific requirements on how television receivers must respond to closed captioning information transmitted on line 21
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98281.pdf
  • in items 1-11 of the Tech Box are accurate. Conflicting data found elsewhere in the application will be disregarded. All items must be competed. The response "on file" is not acceptable. The response "not applicable" is not acceptable unless otherwise noted. Item 11e.: Directional Antenna. If a directional antenna is proposed, the directional antenna must comply with 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.685, and the applicant must submit an exhibit demonstrating such compliance. See Section 73.685. 2. Certifications. Items 12-18 set forth a series of certifications concerning the Commission's technical allotment standards and operational requirements for TV stations. The applicant must certify that the proposed facility complies with the Commission's allotment requirements for TV stations, Section 73.607. Item 12: Allotment. The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.txt
  • * 33. Section 73.1690 is amended to read as follows: � 73.1690 Modification of transmission systems. * * * * * (a) * * * (2) Those that would cause the transmission system to exceed the equipment performance measurements prescribed for the class of service, (AM, � 73.44; FM, �� 73.317, 73.319, and 73.322; TV and Class A TV, �� 73.682 and 73.687). (b) * * * (2) Any change in station geographic coordinates, including coordinate corrections. FM, TV and Class A TV directional stations must also file a construction permit application for any move of the antenna to another tower structure located at the same coordinates. Any change which would require an increase along any azimuth in the composite directional
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.txt
  • replacing references to obsolete ATSC standards for Electronic Program Guide and System Information with a reference to a new ATSC Doc. A/65 for Program and System Information Protocol (PSIP), and requiring a signal when colorimetry other than that defined by 116 See Fourth Report and Order in MM Docket No. 87-268, 11 FCC Rcd 17771 (1996)("Fourth Report and Order"). Section 73.682(d) of our rules requires that broadcast DTV transmissions comply with standard ATSC Doc. A/53 dated September 9, 1995, except for its constraints on video formats. The ATSC DTV Standard contains a provision mandating eighteen video transmission formats for the DTV system. These formats are described by criteria such as aspect ratio, frame rate, vertical and horizontal resolution and type of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 73.6001(d). In appropriately compelling circumstances involving a temporary inability to comply, a licensee may apply to the Commission for Special Temporary Authority to operate at variance with the CBPA's programming and operational requirements, without affecting its Class A status. Telecom Services Inc. ex parte presentation dated August 28, 2000. 47 U.S.C. � 73.624(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). Report and Order at � 31, note 61. PAI Petition for Reconsideration, or Alternatively, for Clarification at 5 (``PAI Petition''); PAI Reply to NCTA Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration at 2 (``PAI Reply''). 47 U.S.C. � 534(a). 47 U.S.C. � 534(h)(1)(A). NCTA points out a single reference to must carry in the legislative history contained in a letter from the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/cc_report.html
  • closed captioning obligations on all VPDs, regardless of distribution technology. [Footnote 10: 47 C.F.R. 79.1. End Footnote 10.] For analog television, closed captioning is carried as encoded data transmitted within the vertical blanking interval (VBI) of the television signal which, "when decoded, provides a visual depiction of information simultaneously being presented on the aural channel (captions)." [Footnote 11: 47 C.F.R. 73.682(a)(22). End Footnote 11.] In 1991, pursuant to the Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990, [Footnote 12: Pub. L. No. 101-431, 104 Stat. 960 (1990) (codified at 47 U.S.C. 303(u), 330(b)). End Footnote 12.] the Commission adopted regulations requiring decoder circuitry to be built into all analog televisions with screens larger than thirteen inches when those televisions are manufactured or sold
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-95-412A1.pdf
  • TV station must have measuring equipment for determining that the transmitted visual signal conforms to the provisions of this subpart. The licensee shall decide the monitoring and measurement methods or procedures for indicating and controlling the visual signal. (b) In the event technical problems make it impossible to operate in accordance with the timing and carrier level tolerance requirements of �73.682 (a)(9)(i), (a)(9)(ii), (a)(12), (a)(13). and (a)(17), a TV broadcast station may operate at variance for a period of not more than 30 days without specific authority from the FCC; provided that, the date and time of the initial out-of-tolerance condition has been entered in the station log. If the operation at variance will exceed 10 consecutive days, a notification must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
  • 73.667 TV subsidiary communications services. [342]TEXT [343]PDF 73.669 TV stereophonic aural and multiplex subcarrier operation. [344]TEXT [345]PDF 73.670 Commercial limits in children's programs. [346]TEXT [347]PDF 73.671 Educational and informational programming for children. [348]TEXT [349]PDF 73.673 Public information initiatives regarding educational and informational programming for children. [350]TEXT [351]PDF 73.674 Digital Television Transition Notices by broadcasters. [352]TEXT [353]PDF 73.681 Definitions. [354]TEXT [355]PDF 73.682 TV transmission standards. [356]TEXT [357]PDF 73.683 Field strength contours and presumptive determination of field strength at individual locations. [358]TEXT [359]PDF 73.684 Prediction of coverage. [360]TEXT [361]PDF 73.685 Transmitter location and antenna system. [362]TEXT [363]PDF 73.686 Field strength measurements. [364]TEXT [365]PDF 73.687 Transmission system requirements. [366]TEXT [367]PDF 73.688 Indicating instruments. [368]TEXT [369]PDF 73.691 Visual modulation monitoring. [370]TEXT [371]PDF 73.698 Tables. [372]TEXT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.wp
  • Technology Standard. The Telecommunications Act requires that our rules: 1) provide for Commission oversight of the adoption of industry standards for blocking technology; and 2) require television receivers to receive ratings signals that are transmitted via line 21 of the television vertical blanking interval (VBI) and which conform to industry standards. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-340 See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(a)(22). 9 The television picture is divided into two "fields", which are interlaced to create the picture that is 10 displayed on the television screen. Lines 1 to 21 of each field constitute the "vertical blanking interval," which allows the beam inside a television picture tube to move from the bottom of the screen, after displaying one field of the picture,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98036.wp
  • See 47 U.S.C. 303 and 330. 4. See 47 U.S.C. 303 and 330. 5. Pub. L. No. 104-104, supra, at 551(a)(9). 6. Id. at 551(c), codified at 47 U.S.C. 303(x). 7. Id. at 551(d), codified at 47 U.S.C. 330(c). 8. Id. 9. See Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in ET Docket 97-206, 12 FCC Rcd 15573 (1997). 10. See 47 C.F.R. 73.682(a)(22). 11. See Amendment of the rules relating to permissible uses of the vertical blanking interval of broadcast television signals, Report and Order, MM Docket No. 92-305, 8 FCC Rcd 3613 (1993). 12. See note in 47 C.F.R. 73.682(a)(22)(i)(B). Part 15 of our Rules contains specific requirements on how television receivers must respond to closed captioning information transmitted on line 21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00259.doc
  • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 303(u). 47 U.S.C. � 330(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.119. See Fourth Report and Order in MM Docket 87-268, FCC 96-493, 62 Fed. Reg. 14006 (1997). In that proceeding, the Commission incorporated into its rules ATSC Doc. A/53 ("ATSC Digital Television Standard, 16 Sep 95"), with modifications. See also 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). The Electronics Industries Alliance is a trade organization representing the U.S. high technology community. Among other tasks, EIA develops performance standards for consumer electronics equipment. In the past we have relied upon EIA standards and recommendations for developing regulations covering television receivers. See, for example, Amendment of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules to Implement the Provisions of the Television
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96493.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96493.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96493.wp
  • We are not persuaded by those who contend that not specifying video formats in the DTV Standard will inject uncertainty into the transition process and delay implementation of digital television. As explained above, we believe that by adopting a transmission standard, we are 104 Federal Communications Commission FCC 96-493 Fifth Further Notice, supra at p. 6250. 105 See, e.g., Section 73.682(a)(21)(iv) ("ghost cancelling"), 73.682(c)(3) and 73.681("BTSC stereo sound"), 106 73.682(a)(14)("circular and elliptical polarization"), and 15.31(a)(6)("intentional and unintentional radiators"). Although they do not specifically incorporate material by reference, the ghost cancelling and stereo sound provisions reference Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletins which, in turn, incorporated ATSC and Broadcast Television Systems Committee ("BTSC") standards and recommendations. The polarization provision references an IEEE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98281.pdf
  • in items 1-11 of the Tech Box are accurate. Conflicting data found elsewhere in the application will be disregarded. All items must be competed. The response "on file" is not acceptable. The response "not applicable" is not acceptable unless otherwise noted. Item 11e.: Directional Antenna. If a directional antenna is proposed, the directional antenna must comply with 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.685, and the applicant must submit an exhibit demonstrating such compliance. See Section 73.685. 2. Certifications. Items 12-18 set forth a series of certifications concerning the Commission's technical allotment standards and operational requirements for TV stations. The applicant must certify that the proposed facility complies with the Commission's allotment requirements for TV stations, Section 73.607. Item 12: Allotment. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.txt
  • * 33. Section 73.1690 is amended to read as follows: � 73.1690 Modification of transmission systems. * * * * * (a) * * * (2) Those that would cause the transmission system to exceed the equipment performance measurements prescribed for the class of service, (AM, � 73.44; FM, �� 73.317, 73.319, and 73.322; TV and Class A TV, �� 73.682 and 73.687). (b) * * * (2) Any change in station geographic coordinates, including coordinate corrections. FM, TV and Class A TV directional stations must also file a construction permit application for any move of the antenna to another tower structure located at the same coordinates. Any change which would require an increase along any azimuth in the composite directional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.txt
  • the completion of a broadcast auction. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5005. We estimate that there are approximately 20 applications in these three categories. The cut-off singleton applications remain pending for a variety of legal and technical reasons. Notice, supra at 5276-77. See Fourth Report and Order in MM Docket No. 87-268, 11 FCC Rcd 17771 (1996)(``Fourth Report and Order''). Section 73.682(d) of our rules requires that broadcast DTV transmissions comply with standard ATSC Doc. A/53 dated September 9, 1995, except for its constraints on video formats. The ATSC DTV Standard contains a provision mandating eighteen video transmission formats for the DTV system. These formats are described by criteria such as aspect ratio, frame rate, vertical and horizontal resolution and type of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 73.6001(d). In appropriately compelling circumstances involving a temporary inability to comply, a licensee may apply to the Commission for Special Temporary Authority to operate at variance with the CBPA's programming and operational requirements, without affecting its Class A status. Telecom Services Inc. ex parte presentation dated August 28, 2000. 47 U.S.C. � 73.624(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.682(d). Report and Order at � 31, note 61. PAI Petition for Reconsideration, or Alternatively, for Clarification at 5 (``PAI Petition''); PAI Reply to NCTA Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration at 2 (``PAI Reply''). 47 U.S.C. � 534(a). 47 U.S.C. � 534(h)(1)(A). NCTA points out a single reference to must carry in the legislative history contained in a letter from the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/da002204.doc
  • removing the words ``1919 M St., NW., Dockets Branch (Room 239)'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Room CY-C203, 445-12th Street, SW., Reference Information Center''. 27. Section 73.623(c)(2) is amended by removing the words ``1919 M St., NW., Dockets Branch (Room 239)'' and adding in their place, the words ``Room CY-C203, 445-12th Street, SW., Reference Information Center''. 28. Section 73.682 (a)(21)(iv) is amended by removing the words ``Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology, Technical Standards Branch, 2025 M Street, NW'' and adding, in their place, the words ``FCC Warehouse, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743''. 29. Section 73.682 (d) is amended by removing the words `` 1919 M Street, N.W.,'' and adding, in their place, the words ``445-12th
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970618.html
  • ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION. Took various actions on various petitions for review and/or clarification. By Order on Recon., 2nd R&O and 2nd FNPRM. Action by the Commission. Adopted: June 12, 1997. by Order. (FCC No. 97-209). CCB Internet URL: [33]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97209.txt EN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION. Granted En Technology Corporation's request for an extension to September 30, 1997, of the temporaty waiver of Sec. 73.682(a)(24) of the Commission's rules for all noncommercial broadcast television stations wishing to air the program "The Internet Cafe.". Action by Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. Adopted: June 17, 1997. by Letter. (DA No. 97-1266). MMB INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Denied Innovative Communications, Inc.'s Petition requesting reclassification of the Silver Plume base station in Clear Creek County, Colorado from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020301.html
  • ACCEPTED FOR FILING. MMB [28]DOC-220382A1.doc [29]DOC-220382A1.pdf [30]DOC-220382A1.txt Released: 03/01/2002. MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE DTV APPLICATIONS MASS MEDIA BUREAU ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT PERIOD ENDING MAY 30, 2002. (DA No. 02-461). MMB. Contact: Clay Pendarvis, Shaun Maher, Kevin Harding, John Morgan at (202) 418-1600 [31]DA-02-461A1.doc [32]DA-02-461A1.pdf [33]DA-02-461A1.txt Released: 03/01/2002. DOTCAST, INC. SEEKS FCC CLEARANCE FOR ITS SYSTEM FOR INSERTION OF NON-VIDEO DATA PURSUANT TO SECTION 73.682 OF THE COMMISSION'S TELEVISION BROADCAST RULES. (DA No. 02-472). MMB. Contact: Keith Larson at (202) 418-2600 or Gordon Godfrey at (202) 418-2190 [34]DA-02-472A1.doc [35]DA-02-472A1.pdf [36]DA-02-472A1.txt Released: 03/01/2002. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILINGS IN PERMIT BUT DISCLOSE PROCEEDINS (2 of 2). OMD. Contact: Barbara Lowe at (202) 418-0310 [37]DOC-220369A1.doc [38]DOC-220369A1.pdf [39]DOC-220369A1.txt Released: 03/01/2002. EX PARTE-PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020305.html
  • to license EA 173B, both of which were 800 SMR service licenses by LETTER. (DA No. 02-493). WTB [70]DA-02-493A1.doc [71]DA-02-493A2.doc [72]DA-02-493A1.pdf [73]DA-02-493A2.pdf [74]DA-02-493A1.txt [75]DA-02-493A2.txt * * * * * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- CORRECTIONS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- CORRECTION TO DAILY DIGEST DATED MARCH 01, 2002, PUBLIC NOTICE: DOTCAST, INC. SEEKS FCC CLEARANCE FOR ITS SYTEM FOR INSERTION OF NON-VIDEO DATA PURSUANT TO SECTION 73.682 OF THE COMMISSION'S TELEVISION BROADCAST RULES. DA 02-472 contact person should read Keith Larson at (202) 418-2600 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220498A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220498A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220498A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-526A1.doc 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-526A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-526A1.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-528A1.doc 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-528A1.pdf 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-528A1.txt 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220472A1.txt 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220508A1.txt 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220501A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220501A1.txt 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220500A1.pdf 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220500A1.txt 16. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-527A1.doc 17. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-527A1.pdf 18. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-527A1.txt 19. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-523A1.doc 20. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-523A1.pdf 21. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-523A1.txt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020408.html
  • process for AMTS stations. Action by: The Commission. Adopted: 03/13/2002 by MO&OR. (FCC No. 02-74). WTB [36]FCC-02-74A1.doc [37]FCC-02-74A1.pdf [38]FCC-02-74A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED APRIL 5, 2002, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 66: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 04/05/2002. MEDIA BUREAU ACTION - APPLICATION OF DOTCAST, INC. FOR APPROVAL SYSTEM INSERTION OF NON-VIDEO DATA PURSUANT TO SECTION 73.682. (DA No. 02-771) "PERMIT BUT DISCLOSE" EX PARTE STATUS ACCORDED. MB. Contact: Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, email: bmillin@fcc.gov, (202) 418-7365, Keith Larson at (202) 418-2600. News Media Contact: Michelle Russo at (202) 418-2358, TTY: (202) 418-418-7172 or 888-835-5322 [39]DA-02-771A1.doc [40]DA-02-771A1.pdf [41]DA-02-771A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC., BELL ATLANIC COMMUNICATIONS,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form301/301.pdf
  • in items 1-11 of the Tech Box are accurate. Conflicting data found elsewhere in the application will be disregarded. All items must be competed. The response "on file" is not acceptable. The response "not applicable" is not acceptable unless otherwise noted. Item 11e.: Directional Antenna. If a directional antenna is proposed, the directional antenna must comply with 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.685, and the applicant must submit an exhibit demonstrating such compliance. See Section 73.685. 2. Certifications. Items 12-17 set forth a series of certifications concerning the Commission's technical allotment standards and operational requirements for TV stations. The applicant must certify that the proposed facility complies with the Commission's allotment requirements for TV stations, Section 73.607. Item 12: Allotment. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form340/340.pdf
  • in items 1-11 of the Tech Box are accurate. Conflicting data found elsewhere in the application will be disregarded. All items must be completed. The response "on file" is not acceptable. The response "not applicable" is not acceptable unless otherwise noted. Item 11e.: Directional Antenna. If a directional antenna is proposed, the directional antenna must comply with 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.682(a)(14) and 73.685, and the applicant must submit an exhibit demonstrating such compliance. See Section 73.685. 2. Certifications. Items 12-17 set forth a series of certifications concerning the Commission's technical allotment standards and operational requirements for TV stations. The applicant must certify that the proposed facility complies with the Commission's allotment requirements for TV stations, Section 73.607. Item 12: Allotment. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/cc_report.html
  • closed captioning obligations on all VPDs, regardless of distribution technology. [Footnote 10: 47 C.F.R. 79.1. End Footnote 10.] For analog television, closed captioning is carried as encoded data transmitted within the vertical blanking interval (VBI) of the television signal which, "when decoded, provides a visual depiction of information simultaneously being presented on the aural channel (captions)." [Footnote 11: 47 C.F.R. 73.682(a)(22). End Footnote 11.] In 1991, pursuant to the Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990, [Footnote 12: Pub. L. No. 101-431, 104 Stat. 960 (1990) (codified at 47 U.S.C. 303(u), 330(b)). End Footnote 12.] the Commission adopted regulations requiring decoder circuitry to be built into all analog televisions with screens larger than thirteen inches when those televisions are manufactured or sold
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286914A1.html
  • pursuant to Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, to Venture Technologies Group, LLC, licensee of Class A television station KSFV-LP in Los Angeles, California. 2. On September 11, 2008, an agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office inspected Class A television station KSFV-LP located on Mt Harvard, Los Angeles, California, and observed the following violation: a. 47 C.F.R. S: 73.682(a)(15): "TV Transmission standards: The effective radiated power of the aural transmitter must not exceed 22% of the peak radiated power of the visual transmitter." At the time of inspection, the agent observed that the effective radiated power of the aural transmitter of KSFV-LP was 171% of the station's visual transmitter. 3. Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/95-412.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/95-412.pdf
  • TV station must have measuring equipment for determining that the transmitted visual signal conforms to the provisions of this subpart. The licensee shall decide the monitoring and measurement methods or procedures for indicating and controlling the visual signal. (b) In the event technical problems make it impossible to operate in accordance with the timing and carrier level tolerance requirements of �73.682 (a)(9)(i), (a)(9)(ii), (a)(12), (a)(13), and (a)(17), a TV broadcast station may operate at variance for a period of not more than 30 days without specific authority from the FCC; provided that, the date and time of the initial out-of-tolerance condition has been entered in the station log. If the operation at variance will exceed 10 consecutive days, a notification must
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
  • 73.667 TV subsidiary communications services. [342]TEXT [343]PDF 73.669 TV stereophonic aural and multiplex subcarrier operation. [344]TEXT [345]PDF 73.670 Commercial limits in children's programs. [346]TEXT [347]PDF 73.671 Educational and informational programming for children. [348]TEXT [349]PDF 73.673 Public information initiatives regarding educational and informational programming for children. [350]TEXT [351]PDF 73.674 Digital Television Transition Notices by broadcasters. [352]TEXT [353]PDF 73.681 Definitions. [354]TEXT [355]PDF 73.682 TV transmission standards. [356]TEXT [357]PDF 73.683 Field strength contours and presumptive determination of field strength at individual locations. [358]TEXT [359]PDF 73.684 Prediction of coverage. [360]TEXT [361]PDF 73.685 Transmitter location and antenna system. [362]TEXT [363]PDF 73.686 Field strength measurements. [364]TEXT [365]PDF 73.687 Transmission system requirements. [366]TEXT [367]PDF 73.688 Indicating instruments. [368]TEXT [369]PDF 73.691 Visual modulation monitoring. [370]TEXT [371]PDF 73.698 Tables. [372]TEXT
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
  • 73.667 TV subsidiary communications services. [295]TEXT [296]PDF 73.669 TV stereophonic aural and multiplex subcarrier operation. [297]TEXT [298]PDF 73.670 Commercial limits in children's programs. [299]TEXT [300]PDF 73.671 Educational and informational programming for children. [301]TEXT [302]PDF 73.673 Public information initiatives regarding educational and informational programming for children. [303]TEXT [304]PDF 73.674 Digital Television Transition Notices by broadcasters. [305]TEXT [306]PDF 73.681 Definitions. [307]TEXT [308]PDF 73.682 TV transmission standards. [309]TEXT [310]PDF 73.683 Field strength contours and presumptive determination of field strength at individual locations. [311]TEXT [312]PDF 73.684 Prediction of coverage. [313]TEXT [314]PDF 73.685 Transmitter location and antenna system. [315]TEXT [316]PDF 73.686 Field strength measurements. [317]TEXT [318]PDF 73.687 Transmission system requirements. [319]TEXT [320]PDF 73.688 Indicating instruments. [321]TEXT [322]PDF 73.691 Visual modulation monitoring. [323]TEXT [324]PDF 73.698 Tables. [325]TEXT