FCC Web Documents citing 73.3592
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-187A1.txt
- the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, 18 FCC Rcd 16978, 17406, ¶ 706 (2003) (stating that a party's gamesmanship, refusal to negotiate, or actions causing unnecessary delay may lead to a finding of bad faith). Black's Law Dictionary characterizes a frivolous claim as one lacking legal basis or legal merit. See also, e.g. 47 C.F.R. § 73.3592 (a)(1) (stating that an application is not filed in good faith where its purpose is to delay or hinder grant of another application); William P. Johnson & Hollis P. Johnson, d/b/a Radio Carrollton, 69 FCC 2d 1139, 1150, ¶ 24 (1978) (explaining that a ``strike pleading'' is one filed in bad faith for the primary purpose of blocking, impeding, or
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
- [673]PDF 73.3580 Local public notice of filing of broadcast applications. [674]TEXT [675]PDF 73.3584 Procedure for filing petitions to deny. [676]TEXT [677]PDF 73.3587 Procedure for filing informal objections. [678]TEXT [679]PDF 73.3588 Dismissal of petitions to deny or withdrawal of informal objections. [680]TEXT [681]PDF 73.3589 Threats to file petitions to deny or informal objections. [682]TEXT [683]PDF 73.3591 Grants without hearing. [684]TEXT [685]PDF 73.3592 Conditional grant. [686]TEXT [687]PDF 73.3593 Designation for hearing. [688]TEXT [689]PDF 73.3594 Local public notice of designation for hearing. [690]TEXT [691]PDF 73.3597 Procedures on transfer and assignment applications. [692]TEXT [693]PDF 73.3598 Period of construction. [694]TEXT [695]PDF 73.3601 Simultaneous modification and renewal of license. [696]TEXT [697]PDF 73.3603 Special waiver procedure relative to applications. [698]TEXT [699]PDF 73.3605 Retention of applications in hearing status
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.wp
- as the Commission may conduct in order to choose either an interim or a final licensee." Moreover, in reversing the Commission's grant of interim authority 34 to a consortium comprised of the other competing applicants, the court implicitly rejected the argument that interim operation by Orion is fundamentally unfair to the other applicants. Specifically, the court interpreted 47 C.F.R. § 73.3592(b) and Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. FCC, 403 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1968), to apply only in cases in which a hearing is yet to be held. The court again rejected this argument when it dismissed a court Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-74 Biltmore Forest Broadcasting FM v. FCC, D.C. Cir. Case No. 98-1026 (filed Jan. 16, 1998). 35 Order, Case
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.wp
- as the Commission may conduct in order to choose either an interim or a final licensee." Moreover, in reversing the Commission's grant of interim authority 34 to a consortium comprised of the other competing applicants, the court implicitly rejected the argument that interim operation by Orion is fundamentally unfair to the other applicants. Specifically, the court interpreted 47 C.F.R. § 73.3592(b) and Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. FCC, 403 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1968), to apply only in cases in which a hearing is yet to be held. The court again rejected this argument when it dismissed a court Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-74 Biltmore Forest Broadcasting FM v. FCC, D.C. Cir. Case No. 98-1026 (filed Jan. 16, 1998). 35 Order, Case
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.wp
- as the Commission may conduct in order to choose either an interim or a final licensee." Moreover, in reversing the Commission's grant of interim authority 34 to a consortium comprised of the other competing applicants, the court implicitly rejected the argument that interim operation by Orion is fundamentally unfair to the other applicants. Specifically, the court interpreted 47 C.F.R. § 73.3592(b) and Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. FCC, 403 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1968), to apply only in cases in which a hearing is yet to be held. The court again rejected this argument when it dismissed a court Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-74 Biltmore Forest Broadcasting FM v. FCC, D.C. Cir. Case No. 98-1026 (filed Jan. 16, 1998). 35 Order, Case
- http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
- [673]PDF 73.3580 Local public notice of filing of broadcast applications. [674]TEXT [675]PDF 73.3584 Procedure for filing petitions to deny. [676]TEXT [677]PDF 73.3587 Procedure for filing informal objections. [678]TEXT [679]PDF 73.3588 Dismissal of petitions to deny or withdrawal of informal objections. [680]TEXT [681]PDF 73.3589 Threats to file petitions to deny or informal objections. [682]TEXT [683]PDF 73.3591 Grants without hearing. [684]TEXT [685]PDF 73.3592 Conditional grant. [686]TEXT [687]PDF 73.3593 Designation for hearing. [688]TEXT [689]PDF 73.3594 Local public notice of designation for hearing. [690]TEXT [691]PDF 73.3597 Procedures on transfer and assignment applications. [692]TEXT [693]PDF 73.3598 Period of construction. [694]TEXT [695]PDF 73.3601 Simultaneous modification and renewal of license. [696]TEXT [697]PDF 73.3603 Special waiver procedure relative to applications. [698]TEXT [699]PDF 73.3605 Retention of applications in hearing status
- http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
- [626]PDF 73.3580 Local public notice of filing of broadcast applications. [627]TEXT [628]PDF 73.3584 Procedure for filing petitions to deny. [629]TEXT [630]PDF 73.3587 Procedure for filing informal objections. [631]TEXT [632]PDF 73.3588 Dismissal of petitions to deny or withdrawal of informal objections. [633]TEXT [634]PDF 73.3589 Threats to file petitions to deny or informal objections. [635]TEXT [636]PDF 73.3591 Grants without hearing. [637]TEXT [638]PDF 73.3592 Conditional grant. [639]TEXT [640]PDF 73.3593 Designation for hearing. [641]TEXT [642]PDF 73.3594 Local public notice of designation for hearing. [643]TEXT [644]PDF 73.3597 Procedures on transfer and assignment applications. [645]TEXT [646]PDF 73.3598 Period of construction. [647]TEXT [648]PDF 73.3601 Simultaneous modification and renewal of license. [649]TEXT [650]PDF 73.3603 Special waiver procedure relative to applications. [651]TEXT [652]PDF 73.3605 Retention of applications in hearing status
- http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/orion.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/orion.wp
- against Orion for reconsideration in the wake of Bechtel, had vacated the Commission's decision granting Orion's license application; (2) created an unfounded exception to the general rule announced in its Public Notice of August 4, 1994 that a station already broadcasting could continue to do so; (3) failed to follow the standards it had set for itself in 47 C.F.R. 73.3592(b), in that it considered neither the equities of the situation nor other aspects of the public interest; and (4) departed from its own recent precedent without providing a reasoned explanation for so doing. A. Orion's conduct The Commission argues that this court's remand of March 15, 1994, by vacating the Commission order granting Orion's license, served automatically to revoke Orion's