FCC Web Documents citing 73.3539

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2658A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2658A1.pdf
  • manager concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KITZ(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and repeatedly
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2659A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2659A1.pdf
  • manager concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KGTK(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and repeatedly
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3613A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3613A1.pdf
  • station KFCA-LP, in Fresno, California, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for operating a LPFM station without Commission authority and failing to file a timely renewal application for the station. Hmong American acted in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). BACKGROUND On December 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint that Hmong American failed to renew its license and continued to operate station KFCA-LP beyond the license term of its authorization. Commission records show that on July 15, 2003, Hmong American was granted a station license under call sign KFCA-LP with an expiration
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1757A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1757A1.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. � 301. A-O filed the renewal application on July 3, 2003, eights months after the twelve-month period had run under Section 312(g), and almost two years before the July 1, 2005, filing deadline for New Mexico radio station renewals. 47 C.F.R. �� 73.1020, 73.3539. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 603 (2008) (``2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order''). 2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 617. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1310, 11.35, 73.1125, and 73.1400. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 31 Comm. Reg (P&F) 411 (2003) (``2003 Forfeiture Order''). The noted violations involved A-O's failing to comply with radio frequency radiation (``RFR'') maximum permissible exposure (``MPE'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.pdf
  • the proposed forfeiture of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for its failure to file a timely renewal application is inconsistent with other actions in which the Media Bureau proposed or assessed forfeitures of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for closely-related conduct. Specifically, Saga cites several NALs and Forfeiture Orders issued by the Media Bureau for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. The cases cited by Saga are, however, distinguishable from the instant case because in each of those cases, the renewal application was filed late, but prior to the expiration of the license term. In contrast, Saga filed its STA more than nine months after its license expired. Saga further argues that the proposed $5,000 forfeiture for its
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • � 21.901, 47 C.F.R. � 74.902. Spectrum Policy Report at 19. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.11(c). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.44(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.43(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.929(b). See Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Suspends Electronic Filing for the Broadband Licensing System on October 11, 2002 , 17 FCC Rcd 18,365 (2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. See, e.g., Jonsson Communications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, (DA 02-3099, released Nov. 13, 2002). There is no codified rule specifically addressing reinstatement of ITFS licenses. ULS R&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 21071 � 96. See Rules and Regulations to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Service, 63 Fed. Reg. 68904, 68908
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2497A1.txt
  • date and will be dependent upon circumstances existing at such later time. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the request for a 60-day waiver of the Commission's rules filed by the National Association of Broadcasters, IS GRANTED, effective upon release of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau See 47 U.S.C. � 308(d); 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3539, 73.3500 (Form Number FCC 303-S). See Letter of Henry L. Baumann, Jack N. Goodman and Larry Walke, Legal and Regulatory Affairs, National Association of Broadcasters to Roy J. Stewart, Chief, Mass Media Bureau and David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (October 19, 2001). Id. Id. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2497 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2497 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1828A1.txt
  • ID No. 8503 Zybek Media Group, LLC File No. BR-20030917ABZ Dear Mr. Gutmann: This letter refers to the captioned application of Zybek Media Group, LLC (``Zybek'') for renewal of license for station WZRH(AM), Dallas, North Carolina. For the reasons set forth below, we issue a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE to Zybek for violation of 47 C.F.R. Section 73.3539, the Commission's rule regarding the timing for filing license renewal applications, and we grant the WZRH(AM) license renewal application. Section 73.3539 violation. Zybek's renewal application for the current WZRH(AM) license term, was due on August 1, 2003, four months prior to the December 1, 2003 expiration date. The application was not filed until September 17, 2003. Zybek provides no explanation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2539A1.txt
  • Maranatha's license renewal application below. Conclusion/Actions. For the reasons set forth above, and pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 503(b), and Sections 0.283 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Maranatha Broadcasting Company, Inc. is hereby advised of its apparent liability for a forfeiture of $6,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, that within thirty days of the release of this Notice, Maranatha SHALL PAY to the United States the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2540A1.txt
  • therefore grant GMI's license renewal application below. Conclusion/Actions. For the reasons set forth above, and pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 503(b), and Sections 0.283 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Gospel Media, Inc., is hereby advised of its apparent liability for a forfeiture of $6,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Notice, GMI SHALL PAY to the United States the full amount of the proposed forfeiture of SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1595A1.txt
  • simply because WBLT claims it is a ``relatively minimal operation.'' Finally, we reject WBLT's request to reduce the proposed forfeiture based on its history of compliance with the Rules. According to Commission records, WBLT failed to submit a license renewal application in a timely fashion during the renewal cycle, e.g., prior to October 1, 2003, in apparent violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. WBLT submitted its license renewal application after it was contacted by the Media Bureau that its license had expired. Accordingly, we conclude that WBLT does not have a history of compliance with the Rules and is not entitled to receive a reduction on those grounds. We have examined WBLT's response to the NAL pursuant to the statutory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.txt
  • Motion for Leave to File a Response to Reply to Opposition (``Motion for Leave'') on January 22, 2004, and submitted a Response to Reply to Opposition along with its Motion for Leave. Piedmont then filed a Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Response to Reply to Opposition on February 4, 2004, submitting the referenced pleading simultaneously. According to Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules, an application for renewal of a license must be filed the first day of the fourth full month prior to the expiration of the license. Section 73.1020 of the rules states that North Carolina stations' licenses expire on December 1, 2003. Therefore, Southern's August 1, 2003, filing was timely. Piedmont makes other claims in its Petition:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3273A1.txt
  • license renewal application was not timely filed. The Media Bureau also has before it the results of a review of the stations' EEO public file reports for compliance with the Commission's equal employment opportunities (``EEO'') rule. For the reasons set forth below, we issue a Notice of Apparent Liability in the amount of $9,500 to Viper for violation of Sections 73.3539 and 73.2080 of the Commission's rules, and we grant the KRMS(AM) and KRMS-FM license renewal applications. 2. Section 73.3539 Violation. Viper's renewal application for the current KRMS-FM license term was due on October 1, 2004, four months prior to the February 1, 2005 expiration date. The application was not filed until December 30, 2004. Viper explains that it did not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1203A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission, by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1204A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission, by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KRSN(AM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1205A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission, by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1206A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission, by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1208A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission, by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1210A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission, by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WMEL(AM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1498A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file its license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3526 of the Rules by failing to retain all required documentation in the WSSA(AM) public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1499A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W267AD license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1889A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after its licenses for those facilities had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1894A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1897A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1981A1.txt
  • issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that Alpha Broadcasting Corporation (the ``Licensee''), licensee of Station WSVI(TV), Christiansted, Virgin Islands (the ``Station''), apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules by failing to file the Station's license renewal application in a timely manner. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500). II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules provides that a license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2342A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KRRP(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2343A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal applications for the Stations, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after its licenses for those facilities had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2345A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WTKI(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2347A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KEDU-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2348A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K232BE license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2380A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2453A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2454A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WWGC(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2455A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCWC-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2579A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-500A1.txt
  • before us: (1) the captioned application of McKissick Enterprises (``McKissick'') for renewal of license for station WYNI(AM), Monroeville, Alabama; (2) Robert Hilliard Boothe's (``Boothe'') Formal Petition to Deny filed on May 28, 2004; and (3) related responsive pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, we issue a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABLILITY FOR A FORFEITURE to McKissick for violation of Sections 73.3539 and 73.3526 of the Commission's rules regarding renewal application filings and a broadcast station's public inspection file, and grant the WYNI(AM) license renewal application. Procedural Issue. McKissick charges that Boothe does not have standing to file a petition to deny the WYNI(AM) renewal application because Boothe's residence is outside WYNI(AM)'s service area and because Boothe failed to include an affidavit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-754A1.txt
  • public interest, convenience, and necessity during the subject license term. We will therefore grant KBC's license renewal application below. Conclusion/Actions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act and Sections 0.283 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, KBC is hereby advised of its apparent liability for a forfeiture of $7,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, that within thirty days of the release of this Notice, KBC SHALL PAY to the United States the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-755A1.txt
  • Christian Broadcasting K240CJ(FX), Oakes, ND Facility ID No. 49932 File No. BRFT-20050127AFK Dear Applicant: This letter refers to the captioned application of Oakes Community Christian Broadcasting (``OCCB'') for renewal of license for FM translator Station K240CJ, Oakes, North Dakota. For the reasons set forth below, we issue a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE to OCCB for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules regarding the timing for filing license renewal applications, and we grant the K240CJ license renewal application. Section 73.3539 violation. OCCB's renewal application for the current K240CJ license term was due on December 1, 2004, four months prior to the April 1, 2005 license expiration date. The application was not filed until January 27, 2005. OCCB provides
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-759A1.txt
  • with the Commission's rules. Mr. Brimer asked for the public file once; he should not have had to ask for it again to see the complete file. We also caution Rogers to make the whole public file available when it is requested and not just the parts of the file that someone at the station may deem ``of interest.'' Section 73.3539 violation. Rogers's renewal application for the current WYXC(AM) license term was due on December 1, 2003, four months prior to the April 1, 2004, license expiration date. The application was not filed until October 18, 2004, more than six months after the station's license had expired. Rogers provides no explanation for the untimely filing of the license renewal application. Upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1044A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their licenses had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1045A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1046A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1047A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1048A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1049A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1050A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1051A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1246A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WVFG(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1247A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WVKC(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1248A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned W300AN renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-124A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file its license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3527 of the Rules by failing to retain all required documentation in the WBOR(FM) public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1344A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1345A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1346A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1347A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1378A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KKNO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1379A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after the license for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1380A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W266AC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1381A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFIT(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1382A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WVSD(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1442A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1443A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1444A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KTCN(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1479A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1480A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBPB(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1481A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WONG(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1553A1.txt
  • on March 5, 2004, which authorized him to act on behalf of the Chapman Estate. See Durable Special Power of Attorney, Jefferson County, Alabama, March 5, 2004. Civil Action CV-2004-0173-RSV, Order, Sept. 9, 2004 (the ``Circuit Court Order''). Circuit Court Order at 2. Id. Letter to Herb Steadman, Sumiton Broadcasting Co., Inc., Ref. No. 1800B-ALM (MB Feb. 21, 2003). Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed. An application for renewal of the WRSM(AM) license should have been filed by December 1, 2003, four months prior to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1802A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFJO(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1803A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1804A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1805A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1806A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1807A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLNX(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1810A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1961A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired, and Section 73.3526 of the Rules, by failing to retain required documentation in the KPXS(FM) public inspection file. Based upon our review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1965A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WJTB(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2099A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2099A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2099A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2100A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned WQST(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND 2. Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2102A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KAYE-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2125A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2126A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KFGG-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2127A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KLBA-FM license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-240A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCHM(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-241A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WAPR(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-242A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBKZ(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-243A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WKWL(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-244A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBDX(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-245A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBFZ(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-246A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WHIE(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-247A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLVV(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-250A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K233AK license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-251A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K201AY license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2658A1.txt
  • manager concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KITZ(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and repeatedly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2659A1.txt
  • manager concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KGTK(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and repeatedly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2785A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2786A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned W201BW renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2787A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2788A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned W267AL renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2975A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2976A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2977A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3097A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500). We further deny MMG's Objection, and we grant the captioned KASR(FM) license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3260A1.txt
  • and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-330A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned WECO(AM) and WECO-FM renewal applications. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-331A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-332A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBLG-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-334A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WGVE-FM renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-336A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WQOX (FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-337A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFHB(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-339A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WTTU(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-342A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WZYZ(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-343A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after his authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3504A1.txt
  • also find that our recourse for the improper filing is dictated by Section 1.1116(b) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Accordingly, we grant, in part, Licensee's Petition for Reconsideration of the staff's cancellation of his license and deletion of the Station's call sign, and grant the captioned WLVO(FM) renewal application and reinstate the call sign for the Station. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of WLVO(FM)'s license should have been filed by October 1, 2003, four months prior to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3515A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station; willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired; and willfully violated Section 73.3527 of the Rules by failing to retain all required documentation in the WBFH(FM) public inspection file. Based upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-352A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-353A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-354A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-355A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-356A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-357A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-359A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3613A1.txt
  • station KFCA-LP, in Fresno, California, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for operating a LPFM station without Commission authority and failing to file a timely renewal application for the station. Hmong American acted in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). BACKGROUND On December 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint that Hmong American failed to renew its license and continued to operate station KFCA-LP beyond the license term of its authorization. Commission records show that on July 15, 2003, Hmong American was granted a station license under call sign KFCA-LP with an expiration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3810A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3902A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3903A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the total amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4018A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4020A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned KWSP-LP renewal application. I. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4021A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensees apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensees are apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4022A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensees apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensees are apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4023A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensees apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensees are apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-408A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K236AC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-409A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K240CN renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-412A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KACV-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4134A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-413A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KYNR(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-414A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCUK(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-416A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KZPA(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-418A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCHW-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4194A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WPCR-FM renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4196A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WSVV-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4197A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by, authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned KMOB-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4198A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBDG(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4301A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4302A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4303A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4315A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WOOL-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4316A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WOON(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4317A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4326A1.txt
  • deem filed the renewal application tendered on February 1, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 14, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent penalty for submitting the Renewal Application with an insufficient fee. We grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite application fee and penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KITX(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such application was successfully
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4327A1.txt
  • we deem filed the renewal application tendered on January 28, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on November 7, 2005, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent penalty for submitting the Renewal Application with no fee. We grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite application fee and penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KMGZ(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4332A1.txt
  • succeeding license term (the ``2005 Renewal Application''). We will treat the 2003 Renewal Application as a petition for reconsideration of an April 10, 2003, staff letter advising the Licensee that its authority to operate the Station was terminated. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss that filing as untimely, and dismiss the 2005 Renewal Application as moot. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by August 1, 1997, four months prior to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4333A1.txt
  • March 1, 2006, application (the ``Application'') filed by Jamie Patrick Broadcasting, Ltd. (the ``Licensee'') to renew the license of expired FM Station DKTRY-FM, Bastrop, Louisiana. For the reasons set forth below, we will treat the Application in part as a Petition for Reconsideration under Section 1.106 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and dismiss that filing as untimely. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by February 1, 2004, four months prior to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4352A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Sections 73.3539 and 73.3526 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and failing to retain all the required documentation in Station KTMP(AM)'s public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we deny Johnson's Petition, grant in part and deny in part Guthrie's Petition, and conclude that the Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4385A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KHRA(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-442A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-444A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K265AP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4455A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WEIB(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4456A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCMX(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4457A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WXHQ-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4458A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-445A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K269AV renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-446A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-446A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K259AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-447A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K278AA renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-448A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K280DL renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-449A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K285AB renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4506A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WBLQ-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4508A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4509A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4510A1.txt
  • of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we admonish the Licensee for its violation of the Section 301 of the Act, grant the Licensee's Petition, grant White Park's Objection in part, reinstate the license and call sign for the Station, and grant the captioned Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KIIQ(FM)'s license should have been filed by December 1, 2004. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4554A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4555A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4556A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WAPP-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4557A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WIPS(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4624A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4625A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4626A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4628A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBJB-FM renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-462A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4647A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WITC(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4648A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4649A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-464A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KXOI(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4650A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLNL(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-465A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KMXO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4667A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4668A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4669A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-466A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KNBO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4670A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-467A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KTER(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4729A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4729A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4730A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4731A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4741A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4742A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4743A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4744A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4802A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WMCX(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4806A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4809A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal applications for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-481A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K203CH renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-483A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K272AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-484A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-485A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K296EL renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4862A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned W220CR renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4863A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4864A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, apparently and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4865A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file timely license renewal applications for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4870A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4871A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4872A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-488A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KGRU-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-489A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KUHB-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4909A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4910A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned KMSJ-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4911A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4912A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-491A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely and properly file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K272AQ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4959A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4960A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4961A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4962A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5042A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5043A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5044A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5048A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBMT(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5074A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5075A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5076A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-534A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-53A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-541A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Stations after the licenses for those facilities had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-544A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-545A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for each Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-546A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K288DZ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-547A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KILI(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-54A1.txt
  • No. BR-20031219AAC FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 10, 2007 Released: January 12, 2007 By the Chief, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two thousand one hundred dollars ($2,100) to A&L Broadcasting, Inc. (``A&L''), licensee of Station WSQL(AM), Brevard, North Carolina (the ``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve A&L's failure to have timely filed a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WSQL(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. On March 16, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-560A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-561A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-562A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-563A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WSAO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-564A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KKAY(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-565A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KAVH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-566A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-567A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCLF(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-585A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-586A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-588A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-589A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-590A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-591A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLSO(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-592A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-592A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-593A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-611A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned W230AN and K218AR renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-612A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-613A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WOJB(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-614A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WJHV-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-615A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W272AY renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-616A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W232AR renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-618A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-619A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-621A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-621A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K213BN renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-622A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K215AB renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-623A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K217CM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-624A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K217EY renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-625A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-626A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-627A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-628A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-629A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-631A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-632A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-633A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-634A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-644A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBZI(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-645A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-646A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-647A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-648A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-649A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. The Commission also has before it a ``Motion for Waiver of the Rules and Acceptance of Late-Filed Renewal Application.'' Based upon our
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-650A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-652A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-653A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-660A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K252CQ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-661A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KDRT-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-662A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KRVH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-663A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBPK(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-664A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K261AY renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-665A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KYDS(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-666A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KSRH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-670A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for each of the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500), and we grant the captioned K205BH, K201AR, and K209AK renewal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-682A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500), and we grant the captioned K220BW, K269DU, K220BX renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-683A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500), and we grant the captioned K242AC, K247AC, and K262AA renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-684A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K244DU renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-685A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K253AC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-686A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-687A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-688A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K257AA renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-697A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-698A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-699A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-700A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-702A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-703A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WHHC-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-704A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K228DI renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-705A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K202AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-706A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCMI(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-707A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-708A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-708A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned K201FP and K216FR renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-745A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-746A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned KHOB(AM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-747A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-748A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned K292DN license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-749A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned KDEM(FM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-750A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned KSHI(FM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-751A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500) and we grant the captioned K296AQ, K292AR, and K288AS license renewal applications. II.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-773A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K232BC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-774A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for each of the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) and we grant the captioned KOTO(FM), K207AS, K207AT, K288BM, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-775A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KDXL(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-776A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K220GV renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-777A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K280AT renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-778A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K264AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-779A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K219AH renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-780A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K205AZ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-781A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K216BE renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-782A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KESW-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-788A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBSG(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-789A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WABV(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-790A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WKCL(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-791A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFMI(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-792A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WPFL(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-793A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W267AD renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-794A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WMNT(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-795A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-796A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-797A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-856A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-857A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-858A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-858A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-858A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBAF(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-859A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-860A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-861A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-887A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-888A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-889A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLMH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-890A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCER(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-891A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WOBC-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-892A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-917A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-918A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-919A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-920A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-921A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-922A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-923A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K257CI renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-924A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KJTR-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1059A1.txt
  • filed the renewal application filed on February 1, 2006 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on November 14, 2007, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application, and we reinstate the Station's call sign. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of WRIV(AM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2006. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-106A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-107A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-108A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1096A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1097A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1098A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-109A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-110A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1200A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2008 Released: May 22, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to Central Carolina Community College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WDCC(FM), Sanford, North Carolina (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On July 15, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1415A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1419A1.txt
  • BRED-20030903ACN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 13, 2008 Released: June 16, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to Alderson-Broaddus College, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WQAB(FM), Philippi, West Virginia (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1420A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20031007AAJ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 13, 2008 Released: June 16, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to WUAW-88.3 FM (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WUAW(FM), Erwin, North Carolina (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. On August 17, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on September 27,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1478A1.txt
  • sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to John R. King, 1901 East 86th Street, Radio Station WJEL, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240, and to its counsel, Kathryn R. Schmeltzer, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, 2300 N Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Kathryn Schmeltzer, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-SS (MB August 10, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on August 10, 2004. According to Licensee, the Station was initially licensed as a 10-watt, Class D FM station when it went on the air in 1975. See Request at 7. Licensee states that the Station provides local,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1479A1.txt
  • Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Terry E. Forcht, T.C.W. Broadcasting, Inc., 200 South Kentucky Ave., Corbin, Kentucky 40701, and to its counsel, John Garziglia, Esq., Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, 1401 Eye St., Suite 700, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letters to John Garziglia, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-SS (MB August 5, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal applications on August 5, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1654A1.txt
  • BR-200309330AUE FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 14, 2008 Released: July 15, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Community-First Broadcasters, Inc. (``Community''), licensee of Station WAMV(AM), Amherst, Virginia (``Station''), for willful and repeated violation of 47 C.F.R. Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the station. BACKGROUND On August 4, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Community for this violation. Community filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1655A1.txt
  • shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Phoenix Broadcasting Group, Inc., P.O. Box 989, Blytheville, AR 72316-0989, and to its counsel, Gary S. Smithwick, Esq., Smithwick & Belundiuk, P.C., 5028 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20016. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Gary S. Smithwick, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Sep. 10, 2004) (``Letter''). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on September 10, 2004. Vernon Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 R.R. 2d 1275 (1986) (``Vernon Broadcasting''). See Mel Wheeler, Inc., Letter, 18 FCC Rcd 20215 (MB 2003). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1656A1.txt
  • Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 1050 South Foster Drive, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70806, and to its counsel, Charles L. Spencer, Esq., Herbert, Spencer, Cusimano & Fry, LLP, 701 Laurel St., Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802-5692. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letters to East Baton Rouge Parish School Board from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Sept. 10, 2004) (``September 10th Letters''). Licensee's applications were amended on August 20, 2004. The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal applications on September 10, 2004. Request, Attachment at xxxiv. Request at 3. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1657A1.txt
  • shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Phoenix Broadcasting Group, Inc., P.O. Box 989, Blytheville, AR 72316-0989, and to its counsel, Gary S. Smithwick, Esq., Smithwick & Belundiuk, P.C., 5028 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20016. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Gary S. Smithwick, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Sep. 10, 2004) (``Letter''). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on September 10, 2004. Vernon Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 R.R. 2d 1275 (1986) (``Vernon Broadcasting''). See Mel Wheeler, Inc., Letter, 18 FCC Rcd 20215 (MB 2003). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1662A1.txt
  • FRN: 0006881601 File No. BR-20040305AAG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 14, 2008 Released: July 15, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), to VI/MAN Broadcasting (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WEGA(AM), Vega Baja, Puerto Rico (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On August 25, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand ($6,000) to Licensee for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1738A1.txt
  • Order shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Sudbury Services, Inc., P.O. Box 989, Blytheville, AR 72316-0989, and to its counsel, Gary S. Smithwick, Esq., Smithwick & Belundiuk, P.C., 5028 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20016. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Gary S. Smithwick, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-SS (MB Dec. 10, 2004) (``Letter''). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on December 10, 2004. Vernon Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 R.R. 2d 1275 (1986) (``Vernon Broadcasting''). See Mel Wheeler, Inc., Letter, 18 FCC Rcd 20215 (MB 2003). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1739A1.txt
  • No. BR-20031030ACG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 24, 2008 Released: July 25, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand eight hundred dollars ($4,800) to Tol-Tol Communications, Inc. (``Tol-Tol''), licensee of Station WILA(AM), Danville, Virginia (the ``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve Tol-Tol's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WILA(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. II. BACKGROUND On October 21, 2004, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1740A1.txt
  • Michigan FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 24, 2008 Released: July 25, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to Muskegon Training & Educational Center ("Licensee"), licensee of Low Power FM Station WMMT-LP, Muskegon, Michigan ("Station"), for willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On October 26, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee. Licensee filed a response to the NAL on November 8, 2004, requesting cancellation of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1757A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. � 301. A-O filed the renewal application on July 3, 2003, eights months after the twelve-month period had run under Section 312(g), and almost two years before the July 1, 2005, filing deadline for New Mexico radio station renewals. 47 C.F.R. �� 73.1020, 73.3539. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 603 (2008) (``2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order''). 2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 617. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1310, 11.35, 73.1125, and 73.1400. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 31 Comm. Reg (P&F) 411 (2003) (``2003 Forfeiture Order''). The noted violations involved A-O's failing to comply with radio frequency radiation (``RFR'') maximum permissible exposure (``MPE'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1764A1.txt
  • Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to: Sonya M. Hall-Harris, Esq. and Linda Vilardo, Esq., ROA Licenses, LLC, 5900 Princess Garden Parkway, Lanham, MD 2076, and to its counsel, Eve Klindera Reed, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, 1776 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Sonya M. Hall-Harris, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-MH (MB Oct. 21, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on October 21, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1766A1.txt
  • Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to: Sonya M. Hall-Harris, Esq. and Linda Vilardo, Esq., ROA Licenses, LLC, 5900 Princess Garden Parkway, Lanham, MD 2076, and to its counsel, Eve Klindera Reed, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, 1776 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Sonya M. Hall-Harris, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-MH (MB Oct. 21, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on October 21, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-17A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-17A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-17A1.txt
  • Mr. Young: We have before us Full Armor Ministries, Inc. (``FAMI'') and the City of Virginia, Minnesota's (the ``City'') jointly-filed July 31, 2006, Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') of the staff action terminating FAMI's authority to operate Station WEEP(AM) (the ``Station'') and deleting the Station's call sign. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petition for reconsideration. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by December 1, 2004, four
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2158A1.txt
  • Mr. Steiner: The Chief, Audio Division, has before him the May 23, 2005, letter filed on behalf of West Mecklenburg Broadcasting (``WMB''), licensee of Station WJYK(AM), Chase City, Virginia (the ``Station''). The Response requests cancellation of an April 28, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve WMB's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WJYK(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish WMB for violating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2159A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2237A1.txt
  • BR-20040420AAO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 3, 2008 Released: October 6, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand eight hundred dollars ($12,800) to Manuel Huerta (``Huerta''), licensee of Station WJHX(AM), Lexington, Alabama (the ``Station''), for his willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), involving Huerta's failure to have timely filed a license renewal application for the Station and his unauthorized operation of WJHX(AM) after his license for the Station had expired; and for Huerta's willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3526 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2244A1.txt
  • Chief, Audio Division, has before him the April 13, 2005, letter filed on behalf of WBLT, Inc. (``WBLT''), former licensee of Station WBLT(AM), Bedford, Virginia (the ``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of a March 16, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve WBLT's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WBLT(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish WBLT for filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2477A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: November 10, 2008 Released: November 12, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Jason Communications, Inc. (``Jason''), licensee of Station WDOW(AM), Dowagiac, Michigan (``WDOW'') and Station WHPD-FM, Dowagiac, Michigan (``WHPD'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the station. BACKGROUND On February 14, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of three thousand ($3,000) to Jason for this violation. Jason filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on March 10,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-278A1.txt
  • on January 27, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 13, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent penalty for submitting the Renewal Application with no fee. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite application fee and penalty, the Renewal Application and reinstate Station KIXR(FM)'s call sign. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KIXR(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-383A1.txt
  • Naknek, Alaska. For the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on March 28, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 19, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KAKN(FM)'s license should have been filed by October 1, 2005. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-384A1.txt
  • filed the renewal application filed on March 28, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 19, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application, and we reinstate the Station's call sign. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KELP(AM)'s license should have been filed by April 1, 2005. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-385A1.txt
  • the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on January 27, 2004 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on April 26, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of WMER(AM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2004. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-386A1.txt
  • the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on May 31, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on September 12, 2007, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of K276DA's license should have been filed by June 1, 2005. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-390A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-481A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-489A1.txt
  • Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that Richard D. Tatham (the ``Licensee''), licensee of Station K36DU, Lake Havasu City, Arizona (the ``Station''), apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules, by failing to file the Station's license renewal application in a timely manner. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500). II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules provides that a license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-494A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we grant the Objection in part, conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and grant the captioned WGYV(AM) license renewal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-534A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-596A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WKIV(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-788A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-789A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1083A1.txt
  • Adopted: May 15, 2009 Released: May 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), against RealRadio, LLC (``RealRadio''), former licensee of Station KRSN(AM), Los Alamos, New Mexico (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND RealRadio's renewal application for the Station's license term was due on June 1, 2005, four months prior to the October 1, 2005, expiration date. RealRadio did not file the application until September 30, 2005. In the application, RealRadio explained that, on or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1091A1.txt
  • No. BRH-20040312AEE FRN 0003761251 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 18, 2009 Released: May 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000), to MFR, Inc. ( ``Licensee''), licensee of Stations WJAQ(FM), WTOR(AM), Marianna, Florida (the ``Stations''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On March 24, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1092A1.txt
  • BRH-20040108ALF FRN 0005004155 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 18, 2009 Released: May 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to GFR, Inc. (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station WTOT-FM, Graceville, Florida (the ``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On March 24, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station WTOT-FM. Licensee filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1161A1.txt
  • treating the Application as a petition for reconsideration and dismissing it as untimely and dismissing the STA Request, be stayed pending further disposition of the case; and (4) a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Staff Decision filed by CFN on March 24, 2009. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Motion and the Petition. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that an application for renewal of a broadcast license must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by June 1, 2004, four
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1222A1.txt
  • MB200641410137 FRN: 0012839189 File No. BR-20050222AAT FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 29, 2009 Released: June 1, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to WBCE, Inc. (``WBCE''), former licensee of Station WBCE(AM), Wickliffe, Kentucky (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 11, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to WBCE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1243A1.txt
  • No. MB-200741410015 FRN: 0003762333 File No. BRH-20050412AAX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 2, 2009 Released: June 3, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Meade County Communications, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WMMG-FM, Brandenburg, Kentucky (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1282A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBRA(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1283A1.txt
  • No. BR-20040203AAS FRN 0008703514 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 4, 2009 Released: June 5, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) to WLVV, Inc. (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station WLVV(AM), Mobile, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station WLVV(AM). Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1284A1.txt
  • BR-20040219ABI FRN: 0005039508 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 4, 2009 Released: June 5, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Florala Broadcasting Company (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station WKWL(AM), Florala, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station WKWL(AM). Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1330A1.txt
  • No. BRFT-20050331DBM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 15, 2009 Released: June 16, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to Dillon N.P.R. (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Station K288DZ(FX), Dillon, Montana (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1367A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 18, 2009 Released: June 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to John Reynolds (``Reynolds''), licensee of FM translator station W267AD, Bryson City, North Carolina (``Station''), for his willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On July 27, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Reynolds for this violation. In response to the NAL, Reynolds submitted a letter (``Letter'') on August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1394A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 23, 2009 Released: June 24, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Soul's Harbor Assembly of God Church (``Licensee''), licensee of Low Power FM Station WRDS-LP, Roscommon, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-140A1.txt
  • be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to: The Christian Center, Inc., 2405 SW Lee Boulevard, Lawton, Oklahoma 73505, and to its counsel, Elise M. Stubbe, Esq., Hardy, Carey & Chautin, LLP, 110 Veterans Boulevard, Suite 300, Metairie, Louisiana 70005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Elise M. Stubbe, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Jun. 22, 2005). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on June 22, 2005. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-142A1.txt
  • Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to: World Overcomers Outreach Ministries, Alton R. Williams, President, 2124 E. Holmes Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38116, and to its counsel, Robin H. Rasmussen, Esq., Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, PLC, 6000 Poplar Avenue, Suite 400, Memphis, Tennessee 38119-3972. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Alton R. Williams from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-MAT (MB Dec. 22, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on December 22, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1517A1.txt
  • Adopted: July 9, 2009 Released: July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to College Wesleyan Church (``Wesleyan''), former licensee of Low Power FM Station WIWU-LP (formerly WCWC-LP), Marion, Indiana (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On December 6, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Wesleyan for this violation. Wesleyan filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on December
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1518A1.txt
  • File No. BRL-20041223ABN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2009 Released: July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Calvary Chapel (Church) of Menomonie (``Licensee''), licensee of Low Power FM Station WRJF-LP, Menomonie, Wisconsin (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1519A1.txt
  • FRN: 0013307129 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2009 Released: July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Pribilof School District Board of Education (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KUHB-FM, St. Paul, Alaska (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On February 5, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station KUHB-FM. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1704A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: July 29, 2009 Released: July 30, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Bowie County Broadcasting Co., Inc. (`` Bowie''), former licensee of Station KLBW(AM) (formerly KNBO(AM)), New Boston, Texas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On February 2, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Bowie in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station KLBW(AM). Bowie filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1741A1.txt
  • No. BRH-20040303ABB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 31, 2009 Released: August 3, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to Imani Communications Corporation, Inc. (``Imani''), licensee of Station WBFX(FM), Selma, Alabama (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Imani for this violation. In response to the NAL, Imani submitted a letter (``Letter'') on February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1749A1.txt
  • 0.331 of the Commission's rules, that the attached Consent Decree IS ADOPTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent, by First Class and Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested, to Jon Halverson, West Slope FM, P.O. Box 881695, Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80488. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert H. Ratcliffe Acting Chief, Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539(a). 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 4(i) and (j). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.131, 0.283, and 0.331. __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1749 __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1749
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1749A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1749A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1749A2.txt
  • Rules, found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations; (l) ``Translator Stations'' means FM Translator Stations K263AC, Canyon Valley, Colorado, (Facility ID No. 71641) and K249AW, Steamboat Springs, Colorado (Facility ID No. 71643); and (m) ``Violations'' means the violation of the requirement to timely file applications for renewal of license for the Translator Stations as set forth at 73.3539(a) of the Rules, and the violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act by continuing to operate the Translator Stations after the licenses had expired. III. Background 3. Applications for renewal of the license for the Translator Stations should have been filed by December 1, 2004, but were not filed and the licenses expired on April 1, 2005. On October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1830A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 18, 2009 Released: August 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Alan Towle (``Towle'') , former licensee of FM translator Station K232BE, Wausau, Wisconsin (the "Station"), for his willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2006, the Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Towle for this violation. Towle filed a Request for Cancellation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-192A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WMDI-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND 2. Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1973A1.txt
  • No. BRFT-20051018ACW FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 28, 2009 Released: August 31, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Christian Radio Translator Association/Salmon, Inc. (``Christian Radio''), former licensee of FM Translator Station K257DJ, Salmon, Idaho (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1974A1.txt
  • Chief, Audio Division, has before him the March 9, 2007, Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition''), filed on behalf of Jack W. Ivy, Sr. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WRMG(AM), Red Bay, Alabama (``Station''). The Petition requests cancellation of a February 7, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). The violations involve Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and his unauthorized operation of WRMG(AM) after his license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for violating Sections 73.3539
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1975A1.txt
  • No. BR-20040331AEL FRN: 0010555878 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 28, 2009 Released: August 31, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Cactus Communications, LLC (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station KKAY(AM), White Castle, Louisiana (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On February 7, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station KKAY(AM). Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1996A1.txt
  • The Chief, Audio Division has before him the January 5, 2007, letter filed on behalf of MVB, Inc. (``MVB''), former licensee of Station WWGC(AM), Albertville, Alabama (the ``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation of a December 6, 2006, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL''). in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). The violation involves MVB's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish MVB for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, MVB's renewal application for the current WWGC(AM) license term was due
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2065A1.txt
  • 26688 NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410137 FRN: 0005280995 File No. BR-20060912AAP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 16, 2009 Released: September 17, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Heidelberg College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WHEI(FM), Tiffin, Ohio (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2066A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 16, 2009 Released: September 17, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), to Morgan County Broadcasting Co., Inc. (``Morgan County Broadcasting''), licensee of Stations WECO(AM) and WECO-FM (the ``Stations''), for its willful and repeated violations of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Morgan County Broadcasting for these apparent violations. In response to the NAL, Morgan County Broadcasting submitted a Statement Seeking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2067A1.txt
  • File No. BRED-20050228ABN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 16, 2009 Released: September 17, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Columbia City Joint High School (``Columbia City''), licensee of Station WJHS(FM), Columbia City, Indiana (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2077A1.txt
  • September 17, 2009 Released: September 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand, five hundred dollars ($7,500) to Kalispell Christian Radio Fellowship, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KALS(FM), Kalispell, Montana, and FM Translator Station K257BR, Polson, Montana (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2078A1.txt
  • 0006132963 File No. BRFT-20050729BEP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 17, 2009 Released: September 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Carbon County (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Station K285AB(FX), Price, Utah (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 1, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2153A1.txt
  • File No. BRFT-20041022ADT FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2009 Released: October 1, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to TEA-VISZ, Inc. (``TEA-VISZ''), licensee of FM translator station W272AY, Park Falls, Wisconsin (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to TEA-VISZ for this violation. In response to the NAL, TEA-VISZ submitted a letter (``Letter'') on March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2154A1.txt
  • No. BRFT-20051216AAO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2009 Released: October 1, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Big Sky Owners Association, Inc. (``BSOA''), licensee of FM translator station K257AE, West Fork, Montana (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND The Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to BSOA for these violations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2163A1.txt
  • 1, 2009 Released: October 2, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) to Pikes Peak Community College (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Stations K228EY (formerly K268AR), Pueblo, Colorado, and K206BZ, Manitou Springs, Colorado (collectively, the ``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of fourteen thousand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2197A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2009 Released: October 9, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Meadowland Baptist Church (``Meadowland''), licensee of Low Power FM (``LPFM'') Station WBLG-LP, Bowling Green, Kentucky (the ``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Meadowland for this violation. In response to the NAL, Meadowland submitted a letter (``Letter'') on February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2227A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2228A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2229A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2230A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2231A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2232A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2233A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2304A1.txt
  • Adopted: October 27, 2009 Released: October 28, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Bruce MacAfee (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator stations K269AV, Tonopah & Goldfield, Nevada, and K261AY, Bridgeport, California (collectively, the ``Stations''), for his willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 1, 2007, and February 14, 2007, respectively, the Bureau issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) each to Licensee for these violations, for a total of $3,000. Licensee filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2380A1.txt
  • 3, 2009 Released: November 4, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Calvary Chapel of Twin Falls, Inc. (``Calvary''), licensee of FM translator stations K201FP, Arapaho, Oklahoma, and K216FR, Clinton, Oklahoma (collectively, ``Stations''), for its willful violations of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. II. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Calvary for this violation. In response to the NAL, Calvary submitted a letter (``Response'') on February 23, 2007.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2382A1.txt
  • File No. BRFT-20060628AAQ Dear Mr. Marburger: The Chief, Audio Division, has before him a March 9, 2007, Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') filed by Richard P. Marburger (``Licensee''). Licensee requests cancellation of a February 8, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), regarding FM Translator Station W232AI, Niles, Ohio (``Station''). The violations involve Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and Licensee's unauthorized operation of the Station after the license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2438A1.txt
  • MB-20051810099 Dear Mr. Tillotson: Before the Audio Division is a September 20, 2005, letter filed on behalf of Perry Broadcasting Company (``Perry''), former licensee of Station KDLS(AM), Perry, Iowa (``Station''). The Response seeks cancellation of the September 21, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Perry for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on September 21, 2005,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2439A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410136 File No. BRFT-20060712AEU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 17, 2009 Released: November 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Wayne Kowalski (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Station W251AD Alpena, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. II. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2455A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WENA(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2520A1.txt
  • File No. BRED-20090316ABN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 30, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Corning Community College (``Corning''), licensee of Class D FM Station WCEB(FM), Corning, New York ( ``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On October 16, 2009, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2521A1.txt
  • December 1, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Independent School District # 283 (``Licensee''), licensee of Class D noncommercial educational Station KDXL (FM), St. Louis Park, Minnesota (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 21, 2007, the Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Response requesting that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2546A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20040121ABC FRN: 0001752955 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 4, 2009 Released: December 7, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to UA-ASU-TSU Educational Radio Corporation (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WAPR(FM), Selma, Alabama ( ``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for its failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), for this violation. Licensee filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the Proposed Forfeiture (``Petition'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2571A1.txt
  • a March 13, 2007, Petition for Reconsideration (the "Response") filed on behalf of Wennes Communications Stations, Inc. (the "Licensee") licensee of Station KNEI-FM, Waukon, Iowa (the "Station"). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 13, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (the "Application") and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2592A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2592A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station (the ``Application''), and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-403A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we deny the Schademann Objection and the Powers Objection, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the Station's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-404A1.txt
  • Desai Chief, Media Bureau Filed May 20, 2004. DRI requested the extension, inter alia, because it required additional time to assemble financial documents. It provided the documents within a reasonable time and we will, therefore, grant the request. Discussion Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd. 7433 (2004) (``Order''). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. (``Application for Renewal of License''). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.1020 (``Station License Period''). See also 47 U.S.C. � 301. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3526 (``Local public inspection file of commercial stations''). Second Supplement, Affidavit of Albert E. Grady at 7. Mr. Grady is president of DRI. Id. at 4. In addition to the tax returns, DRI has submitted affidavits from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-424A1.txt
  • ``Station''); and (2) the concurrently filed request for Special Temporary Authorization (``STA Request'') to continue station operations pending consideration of the renewal application. For the reasons set forth below, we will treat the Application as a Petition for Reconsideration under Section 1.106 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), dismiss that filing as untimely, and dismiss the STA Request. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by June 1, 2004, four months prior to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-659A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: March 20, 2009 Released: March 23, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to East Tennessee State University (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Station W218BW(FX), Lenoir, North Carolina (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 24, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-728A1.txt
  • the proposed forfeiture of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for its failure to file a timely renewal application is inconsistent with other actions in which the Media Bureau proposed or assessed forfeitures of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for closely-related conduct. Specifically, Saga cites several NALs and Forfeiture Orders issued by the Media Bureau for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. The cases cited by Saga are, however, distinguishable from the instant case because in each of those cases, the renewal application was filed late, but prior to the expiration of the license term. In contrast, Saga filed its STA more than nine months after its license expired. Saga further argues that the proposed $5,000 forfeiture for its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-734A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 30, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Des Moines Independent Community School District (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational Station KDPS(FM), Des Moines, Iowa (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On June 8, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-795A1.txt
  • 8, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000), to Best Media, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Stations K217DJ(FX), Kemah, Texas, W207B1(FX), University Park, Illinois, W206B1(FX), Hamtramck, Michigan, and K217DP(FX), Barker, Texas (collectively, the ``Stations''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for its failure to timely file the Stations' license renewal applications and for unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2006, and June 8, 2006, respectively, the Bureau issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-829A1.txt
  • FRN: 0007693641 File No. BR-20050408ACG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 14, 2009 Released: April 15, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Dewey D. Lankford (``Lankford''), former licensee of Station WANA(AM), Anniston, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for his failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 17, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Lankford
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-880A1.txt
  • Chief, Audio Division, has before him the May 10, 2006, letter filed on behalf of KSLO Broadcasting Co., Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KSLO(AM), Opelousas, Louisiana (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of a March 31, 2006, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). The violations involve Licensee's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of KSLO(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-881A1.txt
  • No. BR-20031216ABX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 20, 2009 Released: April 21, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand eight hundred dollars ($4,800), to Sumter Baptist Temple, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WSSC(AM), Sumter, South Carolina (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 3, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000) to Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-988A1.txt
  • BRED-20040107AAJ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 28, 2009 Released: April 29, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Board of Trustees, Davis & Elkins College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WCDE(FM), Elkins, West Virginia (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On September 27, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1029A1.txt
  • FRN: 0009664343 File No. BRFT-20060323AGD FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 3, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Lane County School District 4J (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K211BP, Florence, Oregon (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1042A1.txt
  • 62109 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410043 FRN: 0013143805 File No. BR-20050323AGL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2010 Released: June 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Stocks Broadcasting, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFHK(AM) (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1063A1.txt
  • Facility ID No. 52550 File No. BR-20050407IHO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 10, 2010 Released: June 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, one hundred dollars ($1,100) to Piedmont Radio Co. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WPID(AM), Piedmont, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 27, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1072A1.txt
  • ID No. 91339 NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410107 FRN: 0009461716 File No. BRED-20050124AGB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 14, 2010 Released: June 15, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Grace Baptist Church (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WBLW(FM) (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau granted the Station license renewal application and issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-111A1.txt
  • 0006373559 File No. BRFT-20050701ABZ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 20, 2010 Released: January 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of FM translator station K217EY, Laramie, Wyoming (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to BBN for its failure to timely file the Station's renewal application. As noted in the NAL,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-111A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-111A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-111A2.txt
  • 0006373559 File No. BRFT-20050701ABZ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 20, 2010 Released: January 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of FM translator station K217EY, Laramie, Wyoming (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to BBN for its failure to timely file the Station's renewal application. As noted in the NAL,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1179A1.txt
  • No. BRL-20060928AQD FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 25, 2010 Released: June 28, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Whidbey Island Center for the Arts (``Licensee''), licensee of Low Power FM (``LPFM'') Station KWPA-LP, Coupeville, Washington (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 19, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1180A1.txt
  • March 26, 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability (``Response'') filed on behalf of Faith Enterprises, Inc. (``Faith''), licensee of Station WZOO(AM), Asheboro, North Carolina (``Station''). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 22, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), issued to Faith for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (``Application'') and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1196A1.txt
  • 0011194388 File No. BRED-20040707ABK FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 28, 2010 Released: June 29, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) to Oberlin College Student Network, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WOBC-FM, Oberlin, Ohio (``Station''). Licensee willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current Station license term should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-122A1.txt
  • have before us a March 13, 2007, Petition for Reconsideration (``Response'') filed on behalf of Wennes Communications Stations, Inc. (``Wennes'') licensee of Station KHPP(AM), Waukon, Iowa (``Station''). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 13, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Wennes for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (``Application'') and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February 13,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-123A1.txt
  • have before us a March 13, 2007, Petition for Reconsideration (``Response'') filed on behalf of Wennes Communications Stations, Inc. (``Wennes``) licensee of Station KVIK(FM), Decorah, Iowa (``Station``). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 13, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Wennes for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (``Application'') and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February 13,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1273A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20050913AAH FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 7, 2010 Released: July 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Christian Action Team, Inc. (``CAT''), former licensee of Station KJLG(FM) (formerly KNGM(FM)), Emporia, Kansas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 2, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CAT in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1280A1.txt
  • FRN: 0010669588 File No. BRED-20050929AIO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2010 Released: July 9, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to West Texas A&M University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KWTS(FM), Canyon, Texas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1281A1.txt
  • FRN: 0013088547 Facility ID No. 65336 File No. BRED-20050928AMN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2010 Released: July 9, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Texas Southern University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KTSU(FM), Houston, Texas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file its license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1282A1.txt
  • before him a February 27, 2007, letter (``Response'') filed on behalf of Friends of KHFM-Ruidoso (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KHFM(FM), Ruidoso, New Mexico (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for Licensee's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for its failure to timely file a renewal application for the Station. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current license term should have been filed by June 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1289A1.txt
  • before him a February 27, 2007, letter (``Response'') filed on behalf of Friends of KHFM-Ruidoso (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KHFM(FM), Ruidoso, New Mexico (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for Licensee's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for its failure to timely file a renewal application for the Station. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current license term should have been filed by June 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-130A1.txt
  • its false certifications in the Modification Applications. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, that Ethics, Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for its apparent willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules and apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 73.3540 of the Commission's Rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, that, within thirty (30) days of the release date of this NAL, Ethics, Inc. SHALL PAY the full amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1449A1.txt
  • No. MB-200741410225 FRN: 0011733425 File No. BRFT-20060515ADD FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 5, 2010 Released: August 5, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Eddie Floyd (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K273AF, Carson City, Nevada (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 5, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1555A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1590A1.txt
  • 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Response'') filed on behalf of Faith Bible College, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTGF(FM), Milton, Florida (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the March 19, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) issued to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1591A1.txt
  • The Chief, Audio Division, has before him an April 18, 2007, Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') filed by Metz, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTCL(AM), Chattahoochee, Florida (``Station''). Licensee requests cancellation of a March 19, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and Licensee's unauthorized operation of the Station after the license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for violating Sections 73.3539 of the Rules and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1605A1.txt
  • Facility ID: 12842 File No. BRFT-20060718AES Dear Counsel: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Herbert J. Hedstrom on behalf of Community Christian Broadcasting (``CCB''), former licensee of FM Translator Station K294AI, Scandia, Kansas (``Station''), requesting cancellation of a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). CCB also seeks the refund of its $500 payment for the NAL. The violations addressed in the NAL involve CCB's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of the Station after its license for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1634A1.txt
  • FRN: 0004282307 File No. BRH-20031121AKP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 26, 2010 Released: August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, two hundred dollars ($1,200) to Communications Systems, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFMI(FM), Southern Shores, North Carolina (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 22, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1635A1.txt
  • 26465 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410094 FRN: 0007854961 File No. BR-20060627ABG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 26, 2010 Released: August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) to Hawkins Broadcasting Company (``Hawkins''), licensee of Station WWHN(AM), Joliet, Illinois (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On March 7, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1666A1.txt
  • Tomsen: We have before us a November 18, 2009, Written Statement (``Statement''), filed by North Custer, Radio, Inc., (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Station K232CL, Challis, Idaho (``Station'') requesting reduction or cancellation of an October 16, 2009, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) for its apparent willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). The violations involve Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of the Station after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1701A1.txt
  • File No. BRFT-20041122AFX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 7, 2010 Released: September 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Living Word Communications, Inc. (``Living Word''), licensee of FM translator station W232AR, Marshfield, Wisconsin (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Living Word for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Living Word's renewal application for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1759A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1765A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410401 FRN: 0006828271 File No. BR-20061026ACV ORDER Adopted: September 17, 2010 Released: September 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: In this Order, we cancel the proposed forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Donald H. De Rosa (``Mr. De Rosa''), former licensee of WAMF(AM), Fulton, New York (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934 (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. On October 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1766A1.txt
  • Response to our Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Response'') filed on behalf of Twin City Baptist Temple, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WCMX(AM), Leominster, Massachusetts (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation of the October 30, 2007, NAL in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) issued to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's current license term was due on December 1, 2005, four months prior
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1768A1.txt
  • Division, has before him an April 18, 2005, Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') filed by Central Georgia Broadcasting Company (``Central''), former licensee of Station WYTH(AM), Madison, Georgia (``Station''). Central requests cancellation of a March 16, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for Central's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Central for violating Sections 73.3539 of the Rules and 301
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1769A1.txt
  • 0010694776 File No. BRED-20040602AAZ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 17, 2010 Released: September 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand, five hundred dollars ($3,500) to The University of Southern Mississippi (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station WUSM-FM, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and for willfully violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. BACKGROUND On March 27, 2007, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1793A1.txt
  • No. MB-200741410073 FRN: 0003788890 File No. BRH-20050623AAO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 21, 2010 Released: September 22, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Gallatin Valley Witness, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station KCMM(FM), Belgrade, Montana (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1951A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB200641410163 FRN: 0007463037 File No. BRED-20050309AAU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2010 Released: October 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Cornell College (``Licensee''), licensee of KRNL-FM, Mount Vernon, Iowa (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and its willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 13, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1952A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410462 FRN: 0005026166 File No. BR-20060302ACL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2010 Released: October 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Applegate Media, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of KAPL(AM), Phoenix, Oregon (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 20, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1993A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2003A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file timely license renewal applications for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after the licenses had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2009A1.txt
  • MB-200741410145 FRN: 0005077110 File No. BR-20050531BPU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 19, 2010 Released: October 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Ray R. Silva (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KMXO(AM), Merkel, Texas (``Station'') for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND 2. On January 31, 2007, the Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2010A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410396 FRN: 0014894042 File No. BRED-20060418ABG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 19, 2010 Released: October 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Pittsfield Public School Committee ("Licensee"), licensee of station WTBR-FM, Pittsfield, Massachusetts (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On October 17, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2011A1.txt
  • 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Response'') filed on behalf of O-N Radio, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WOON(AM), Woonsocket, Rhode Island (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation of the October 17, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) issued to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), for its failure to timely file a license renewal application. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's current license term was due on December 1, 2005, four months
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2032A1.txt
  • South Hadley, Massachusetts ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 21, 2010 Released: October 22, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Trustees of Mount Holyoke College (``Licensee''), licensee of WMHC(FM), South Hadley, Massachusetts (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND 2. On November 15, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2260A1.txt
  • (the ``Station''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2312A1.txt
  • No. BR-20060112AAI FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 06, 2010 Released: December 07, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to The Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of KABR(AM), Isleta, New Mexico (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and its willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 13, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2321A1.txt
  • MB200741410130 FRN: 0008077877 File No. BR-20041014AEM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 7, 2010 Released: December 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Victory & Power Ministries (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station WPFC(AM), Baton Rouge, Louisiana (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2339A1.txt
  • MB-200741410319 FRN: 0010296325 File No. BR-20040224AAC FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 9, 2010 Released: December 10, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Robert John Williamson (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WGYV(AM), Greenville, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On March 4, 2008, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current Station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2374A1.txt
  • FRN: 0004519880 File No. BRED-20051223AAU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 16, 2010 Released: December 17, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Trinity Church of the Nazarene (``Trinity''), former licensee of Station KRQZ(FM), Lompoc, California (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 4, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2385A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20031203ABX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 20, 2010 Released: December 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to The Florida Institute of Technology (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational radio station WFIT(FM), Melbourne, Florida (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On March 21, 2007, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for failure to timely file the Station's renewal application. As noted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2393A1.txt
  • MB200741410054 FRN: 0009785098 File No. BR-20050324ABX ORDER Adopted: December 21, 2010 Released: December 22, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to R & B Communications, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station WWTM(AM), Decatur, Alabama (``Station'') and admonish Licensee for violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') granted the above-referenced application for license renewal. On April 19, 2007, the Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2394A1.txt
  • Ross: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Great Falls Community Broadcasting Company on behalf of Falls Area Community Television, Inc. (``FACT''), licensee of Low Power FM Station WOOL-LP, Bellows Falls, Vermont (``Station''), requesting cancellation of a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). FACT also seeks the refund of its $250 payment for the NAL. The violation addressed in the NAL involves FACT's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we deny FACT's request for cancellation of the NAL and deny its request for a refund of the paid forfeiture. Background.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-260A1.txt
  • No. BRFT-20060207AAE FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 16, 2010 Released: February 17, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand four hundred dollars ($3,400) to CARE Broadcasting, Inc. (``CARE''), licensee of Station KHGN(FM) and FM translator station K220CN, Kirksville, Missouri (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of fourteen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-261A1.txt
  • February 17, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750) to Spokane Public Radio, Inc. (``Spokane''), licensee of FM translator stations K220BW, Kellogg, Idaho; K269DU, Sandpoint, Idaho; and K220BX, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (collectively, ``Stations''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of four thousand, five hundred dollars ($4,500) to Spokane for these violations. In response to the NAL, Spokane submitted a response (``Response'') on March 19,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-343A1.txt
  • 7, 2007, Reply to Notice of Apparent Liability (``Reply'') filed on behalf of Fairview Broadcasting, Inc. (``Fairview''), former licensee of Station WPFD(AM), Fairview, Tennessee (``Station''). The Reply requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for Fairview's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). The violations involve Fairview's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Fairview for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-344A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20040913AAR FRN: 0011510450 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 25, 2010 Released: February 26, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Bible Broadcast Church School (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WMSD(FM), Rose Township, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On, December 20, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for failing to timely file its license renewal application. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-364A1.txt
  • the Audio Division is a March 2, 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability (``Response'') filed on behalf of RSE Broadcasting, LLC (``RSE''), former licensee of Station WSVX(AM) (formerly WKWH), Shelbyville, Indiana (``Station''). RSE seeks cancellation of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on January 31, 2007,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-392A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-413A1.txt
  • Adopted: March 10, 2010 Released: March 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Chapel of the Holy Spirit Church and Bible College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WKCL(FM), Ladsen, South Carolina (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 22, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-414A1.txt
  • File No. BRED-20051004ABQ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 10, 2010 Released: March 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to San Juan Unified School District (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KYDS(FM), Sacramento, California (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 14, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-415A1.txt
  • FRN: 0011154796 File No. BRED-20040630ACB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 10, 2010 Released: March 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Tennessee Technological University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTTU(FM), Cookeville, Tennessee (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-432A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-440A1.txt
  • 0013131453 File No. BRFT-20050414AAJ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 15, 2010 Released: March 16, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Friends of Christian Radio (``FCR''), licensee of FM translator station K228DI, Sidney, Nebraska (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-441A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 15, 2010 Released: March 16, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Alacca Bible Conference, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Stations K213BN, Orofino, Idaho, and K215AB, Kamiah, Idaho (collectively, ``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), for its failure to timely file the Stations' license renewal applications. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued two separate Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NALs'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) each to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-443A1.txt
  • FRN: 0007879455 File No. BRED-20040721AHP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 15, 2010 Released: March 16, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Faith Trinity Assemblies (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WZYZ(FM), Spencer, Tennessee (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-541A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: March 26, 2010 Released: March 29, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000) to the Board of Regents, Northwest Missouri State University (``Northwest''), licensee of noncommercial educational (``NCE'') radio station KRNW(FM), Chillicothe, Missouri (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 13, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-566A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-575A1.txt
  • File No. BRED-20050207ABW FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 30, 2010 Released: March 31, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to the Ritenour Consolidated School District (``Ritenour''), licensee of noncommercial educational (``NCE'') radio station KRHS(FM), Overland, Missouri (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Media Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-597A1.txt
  • 0009042656 File No. BRFT-20070720AAU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Kane County Special Service District #1 (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K269DQ, Orderville, Utah (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 3, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-598A1.txt
  • 0011373347 File No. BRED-20040811AAY FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Little Miami Local Schools (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WLMH(FM), Morrow, Ohio (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-601A1.txt
  • File No. BR-20040323AUV FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Barnesville Broadcasting, Inc. (``Barnesville Broadcasting''), former licensee of Station WBAF(AM), Barnesville, Georgia (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 27, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Barnesville Broadcasting for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-603A1.txt
  • ID No. 12220 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200641410117 FRN: 008345886 File No. BRED-20050829AAQ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Colby Community College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KTCC(FM) (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-619A1.txt
  • BRFT-20050728ABG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 9, 2010 Released: April 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to La Promesa Foundation (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K217CM, Clayton, New Mexico (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. II. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station should have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-620A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WARY(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-621A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-621A1.txt
  • MB-200741410018 FRN: 0010782563 File No. BRED-20050316ABW FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 9, 2010 Released: April 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Manchester College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WBKE-FM, North Manchester, Indiana (``Station''). Licensee willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-634A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 13, 2010 Released: April 14, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) to Christian Radio Fellowship (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFTF(FM), Rutland, Vermont, and FM translator station W220AX, Ludlow, Vermont (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. BACKGROUND On November 15, 2007, the Bureau issued two separate Notices of Apparent Liability for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-63A1.txt
  • 12, 2010 Released: January 13, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) to Boundary County TV Translator District (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Stations K217FR (formerly K220AE), K296BJ, K265AV, K257DH, and K272AR (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. II. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued five Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (collectively, the ``NALs'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-673A1.txt
  • 0006373559 File No. BRFT-20040730ADB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 20, 2010 Released: April 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of FM translator station W201BW, Hopkinsville, Kentucky (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On June 25, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to BBN for this violation. As noted in the NAL, BBN's renewal application for the Station's license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-674A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20060619ACK FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 20, 2010 Released: April 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Centerville City Schools Board of Education (``Centerville''), licensee of Class D Station WCWT-FM, Centerville, Ohio ( ``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-675A1.txt
  • Introduction}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \f0\kerning0 \par {\pntext\pard\plain\ltrpar \s15 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\kerning28 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 1.\tab}}\pard\plain \ltrpar\s15\ql \fi720\li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\jclisttab\tx1440\wrapdefault{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls6\pnrnot0 \pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnsp120 {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls6\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\lang1033\langfe1033\kerning28\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Nicholls State University (\'93Nicholls\'94), licensee of radio station KNSU(FM), Thibodaux, Louisiana (\'93Station\'94), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission\rquote s Rules (\'93Rules\'94) by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (\'93Act \'94) by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs19\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar \s18\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-906A1.txt
  • the Media Bureau and Danville Christian Radio, Ltd. (the ``Licensee''), licensee of Station DWVOV(AM), Danville, Virginia (the ``Station''). The Consent Decree resolves issues arising from the Bureau's review of the captioned license renewal application. These issues include whether the Licensee violated Section 73.3526 of the Commission's rules (the ``Rules''), which governs the maintenance of a commercial station's public file, Section 73.3539 of the Rules, which sets forth the filing deadline for license renewal applications, and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act), which requires a valid authorization from the Commission to operate a broadcast station. 2. The Consent Decree provides, among other things, that the Licensee and, if applicable, its successors and assigns, will institute and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-921A1.txt
  • Wamego, Kansas. For the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on January 25, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on October 22, 2009, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KHCA(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1009A1.txt
  • 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed by Faith Trinity Assemblies (``Faith Trinity''), licensee of Station WZYZ(FM), Spencer, Tennessee (``Station''). Faith Trinity seeks reconsideration of the Media Bureau's (``Bureau'') Forfeiture Order in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for Faith Trinity's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. We hereby deny reconsideration and affirm the forfeiture. Background On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), proposing a forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1064A1.txt
  • In re: Tennessee Technological University Licensee of Station WTTU(FM) Cookeville, Tennessee Facility ID: 65217 File No. BRED-20040630ACB Dear Mr. Hutchison: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Tennessee Technological University (``TTU''), licensee of Station WTTU(FM), Cookeville, Tennessee (``Station''), requesting reduction of a Forfeiture Order in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The violation addressed in the Forfeiture Order involves TTU's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we deny TTU's request for reduction of the Forfeiture Order. Background. As noted in the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), TTU's license renewal application for the Station was due on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1071A1.txt
  • Rose Township, Michigan Bible Broadcast Church School Facility ID: 88118 File No. BRED-20040913AAR Dear Mr. Karbginsky: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Bible Broadcast Church School (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WMSD(FM), Rose Township, Michigan (``Station''), requesting reduction or cancellation of a Forfeiture Order in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). The violation addressed in the Forfeiture Order involves Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we treat the Letter as a petition for reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order under Section 1.106 of the Rules and deny it. Background. As noted in the Forfeiture Order, Licensee's license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-108A1.txt
  • File No. BRH-20040405ACH FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 20, 2011 Released: January 21, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200) to Southern Broadcasting & Investment Co., Inc. (``Southern''), licensee of Station WBTY(FM), Homerville, Georgia (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On September 17, 2010, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1091A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on August 4, 2009, by Florala Broadcasting Company (``Florala''), licensee of Station WKWL(AM), Florala, Alabama (``Station''). Florala seeks reconsideration of the Media Bureau's (``Bureau'') Forfeiture Order in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for Florala's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition. Background Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for license renewal for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1105A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION The Audio Division has before it a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on November 20, 2008, by Manuel Huerta, licensee of Station WJHX(AM) (``Station''), Lexington, Alabama. The Petition requests reconsideration of a twelve thousand eight hundred dollar ($12,800) Forfeiture Order released on October 6, 2008, for Huerta's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to file a timely renewal application for the Station, and for willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station, and of Section 73.3526 of the Rules by failing to properly maintain a public inspection file for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1135A1.txt
  • we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) to La Tremenda Radio Mexico, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KZUE(AM), El Reno, Oklahoma (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for these violations. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current license term should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1138A1.txt
  • Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on November 19, 2010, by Pittsfield Public School Committee (``Pittsfield''), licensee of Station WTBR-FM, Pittsfield, Massachusetts (``Station''). Pittsfield seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order issued by the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for Pittsfield's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license expired. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we grant reconsideration in part and reduce the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1227A1.txt
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau (the ``Bureau'') by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1338A1.txt
  • Division has before it a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on May 23, 2011, by Applied Life Ministries, Inc. (``Applied Life''), former licensee of KALR(FM), Hot Springs, Arkansas (``Station''). The Petition requests reconsideration of a five thousand, six hundred dollar ($5,600) Forfeiture Order issued by the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') on February 8, 2011, for Applied Life's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the Petition. BACKGROUND On April 23, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1339A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1341A1.txt
  • File No. BRFT-20040609AAI FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 2, 2011 Released: August 3, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Butler Broadcasting Company, L.L.C. (``Butler''), former licensee of FM translator station K246BS (formerly K244DS), Fayetteville, Arkansas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1437A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1438A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1601A1.txt
  • (the ``Station''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1602A1.txt
  • (the ``Station''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1603A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1663A1.txt
  • 13630 NAL/Acct. No. MB-201141410004 FRN: 0007934268 File No. BR-20101008ABU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2011 Released: October 3, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Nievezquez Productions, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WPRX(AM), Bristol, Connecticut (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1688A1.txt
  • before us is Capstar TX Limited Partnership's (``Capstar'') Petition to Deny and its ``Motion to Dismiss'' filed against the First and Second Applications, respectively, as well as related pleadings. Pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), we find that Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the First Application for the Station and for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1752A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1753A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1757A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1758A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1805A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1823A1.txt
  • We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on March 9, 2011, by Robert and Katherine Bohn (collectively, the ``Licensees''), licensees of Stations KCNQ(FM), Kernville, California, KRVQ-FM (formerly KVLI-FM), Lake Isabella, California, and KVLI(AM) (formerly KQAB(AM)), Lake Isabella, California (collectively, the ``Stations''). The Petition requests reconsideration of two forfeiture orders issued to the Licensees for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to file a timely license renewal application for, and engaging in unauthorized operation of, each of the Stations. For the reasons stated below, we deny the Petition. Background. On September 25, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1848A1.txt
  • for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on May 29, 2009, by the Board of Trustees, Davis & Elkins College (``College''), licensee of non-commercial educational Station WCDE(FM), Elkins, West Virginia (``Station''). The Petition asks for reconsideration of a April 29, 2009, decision to issue a monetary forfeiture (``Forfeiture Order'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for its failure to timely file a license renewal application for, and unauthorized operation of, the Station. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the Petition. II. BACKGROUND 2. On September 27, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1947A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the Station's license renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1961A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file timely license renewal applications for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1980A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB2011941410014 FRN: 0007821846 File No. BR-20100604ACU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 5, 2011 Released: December 6, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000), to R&M Broadcasting Company (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KJCB(AM), Lafayette, Louisiana (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On July 22, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2014A1.txt
  • No. MB-2007414140318 FRN: 0011431749 File No. BR-20040830ACC FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 13, 2011 Released: December 14, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Taylor Broadcasting (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WJTB(AM), North Ridgeville, Ohio (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On May 3, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-212A1.txt
  • No. BRED-20090826ABA FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2011 Released: February 4, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to the Westport Board of Education (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational radio station WWPT(FM), Westport, Connecticut (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On March 29, 2010, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-223A1.txt
  • 43280 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410428 FRN: 0003787793 File No. BRL-20060719AAL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 4, 2011 Released: February 7, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to MM&K of Alva, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of KALV(AM), Alva, Oklahoma (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by continuing to operate the Station after its license expired. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-234A1.txt
  • FRN: 0006123392 File No. BRH-20061027ACI FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 7, 2011 Released: February 8, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Robert J. and Katherine M. Bohn (collectively, ``Licensees''), licensees of Station KCNQ(FM), Kernville, California (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file license a renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. II. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), proposing a forfeiture in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-235A1.txt
  • 2011 Released: February 8, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Robert J. and Katherine M. Bohn (collectively, ``Licensees''), licensees of Stations KVLI-FM Lake Isabella, California, and KQAB(AM), Lake Isabella, California (each, a ``Station,'' collectively, ``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. II. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2007, the Bureau issued two separate Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Bohn NALs''), each proposing a forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-236A1.txt
  • See, e.g., Vista Point Communications, Inc}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 ., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Forfeiture Order, 14 FCC Rcd 140, 140 n.2 (MMB 1999) (finding licensee liable for forfeiture for violations of the Commission's Rules that took place when station was under its stewardship). }}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 of KALR(FM), Hot Springs, Arkansas }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 (\'93Station\'94), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission\rquote s Rules (\'93Rules\'94) by fai ling to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (\'93Act\'94) by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs32\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s27\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\tx180\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\wrapdefault\aspalpha\ aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-265A1.txt
  • 31856 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200841410019 FRN: 00103114078 File No. BR-20070925AIA FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 10, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000) to James Rouse (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTOW(AM), Washington, North Carolina (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file his license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On April 2, 2008, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-266A1.txt
  • No. MB-200841410020 FRN: 0010019768 File No. BR-20070925AIM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 10, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000) to The Minority Voice, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WOOW(AM), Greenville, North Carolina (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On April 2, 2008, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-283A1.txt
  • captioned license renewal application. These issues include whether Licensee violated Section 73.3527}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar \s20\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn }{ \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R. \'a7 73.3527.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 of the Commission\rquote s rules (\'93Rules\'94), which governs the maintenance of a noncommercial station\rquote s public file; Section 73.3539}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s20\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i See}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1033\langfe2052\langfenp2052 \'a7 73.3539.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 of the Rules, which sets forth the filing deadline for license renewal applications; Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-310A1.txt
  • BR-20060717ABO Gentlemen: Before the Audio Division is a January 2, 2008, Response filed on behalf of Stein Broadcasting Company, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Stations KXOX(AM) and KXOX-FM, Sweetwater, Texas (``Stations''). The Response seeks cancellation of the December 3, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000), to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations and for unauthorized operation of the Stations after their licenses had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on December
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-397A1.txt
  • No. 89006 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410311 File No. BRFT-20040730ADB MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 1, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of the captioned FM translator station (the ``Station''), filed a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Forfeiture Order issued to BBN for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny reconsideration and affirm the forfeiture issued by the Media Bureau, Audio Division (``Bureau'') in the total amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to BBN. Background On June 25, 2007, the Bureau issued a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-398A1.txt
  • No. BRH-20030728AGV MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 1, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of the captioned FM translator stations (collectively, ``Stations''), filed a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Forfeiture Order issued to BBN on June 6, 2008, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny the Petition and affirm the forfeitures issued by the Media Bureau, Audio Division (``Bureau'') in the total amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to BBN. Background On August 3, 2004, the Bureau issued two Notices of Apparent Liability for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-399A1.txt
  • No. 77191 NAL/Acct. No. MB-20074140187 File No. BRFT-20050701ABZ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 1, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of the captioned FM translator station (the ``Station''), filed a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Forfeiture Orders issued to BBN for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny reconsideration and affirm the forfeiture issued by the Media Bureau, Audio Division (``Bureau'') in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to BBN. Background On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Memorandum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-458A1.txt
  • MB-200741410175 FRN: 0003766359 File No. BR-20060713ADJ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 9, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Media Associates, Inc. (``Media Associates''), licensee of Station KBJM(AM), Lemmon, South Dakota (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-459A1.txt
  • MB-200741410176 FRN: 0003766490 File No. BR-20060713ADL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 8, 2011 Released: March 9, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Schweitzer Media, Inc. (``Schweitzer Media''), licensee of Station KNDC(AM), Hettinger, North Dakota (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-531A1.txt
  • March 21, 2011 Released: March 22, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed by West Texas A&M University (``University''), licensee of the Class A station KWTS(FM), Canyon, Texas (``Station''). The University filed this Petition in response to a Forfeiture Order issued to the University for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we deny reconsideration with respect to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-678A1.txt
  • File No. BRED-20050124AGB MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: April 13, 2011 Released: April 14, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed by Grace Baptist Church (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KBLW(FM), Gaylord, Michigan (``Station''). Licensee filed this Petition in response to a Forfeiture Order issued for willful violation Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for its willful and repeated violation Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we deny reconsideration with respect to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-682A1.txt
  • did not seek an extension of the STA. Instead, on May 1, 2009, the Trustee filed an STA to remain silent, which the staff dismissed on July 8, 2009 after the Station returned to the air. On October 16, 2009, the Bureau issued an NAL in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to the Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. The Trustee timely filed a Response to the NAL. In her Response, the Trustee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-690A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-690A1.txt
  • a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two-hundred fifty dollars ($250) to Paul Smith's College (``Licensee''), licensee of Class D FM Station WPSA(FM), Paul Smiths, New York (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On November 19, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee for these violations. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction or Cancellation (``Request'') on December 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-694A1.txt
  • in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000) to Escalante City (``Licensee''), former licensee of FM translator Station K237AD, Escalante, Utah (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station. BACKGROUND On March 15, 2010, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand ($4,000) to Licensee for these violations. On March 30, 2010, Licensee filed a response to the NAL (``Response'').
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-987A1.txt
  • a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to Adrian College (``Licensee''), licensee of Class D noncommercial educational radio station WVAC-FM, Adrian, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee for these violations. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-186A1.txt
  • formal agreement was executed on November 10, 2010. See File No. BALFT-20101118AIX, Exh. 1. See, e.g., Edwards v. Wyatt, 2009 WL 1395472 (3rd Cir. 2009) (calculating damages based on handshake agreement); Canet v. Gooch Ware Travelstead, 917 F.Supp. 969 (E.D.N.Y. 1996) (enforcing handshake agreement). Reply, Exhibit A. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). See Petition at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539(a). See BRFT-20110927AHB. The renewal application was uncontested. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 13, 2012 DA 12-186 In Reply Refer to 1800B3-SAR/KAD Released: February 13, 2012 � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_ �e�P�g� �ك�� �_ą
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-205A1.txt
  • File Nos. BR-20110525ADI BR-20110902AAE FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 13, 2012 Released: February 14, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand six hundred dollars ($4,600) to Hope Broadcasting, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFGN(AM), Gaffney, South Carolina (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by twice failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 1, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-219A1.txt
  • No. MB-201141410003 FRN: 0020240347 File No. BRED-20101007AAM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2012 Released: February 15, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to St. Bonaventure University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WSBU(FM), St. Bonaventure, New York (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On September 26, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $7,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-219A1_Rcd.pdf
  • No. MB-201141410003 FRN: 0020240347 File No. BRED-20101007AAM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2012 Released: February 15, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order,we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to St. Bonaventure University ("Licensee"), licensee of Station WSBU(FM), St. Bonaventure, New York("Station"), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station.1 II. BACKGROUND 2. On September 26, 2011, the Media Bureau ("Bureau") issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture("NAL") in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-674A1.txt
  • MB-200741410409 FRN: 0009828039 File No. BR-20060530AJN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 27, 2012 Released: April 30, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) to Bisiblue, L.L.C. (``Licensee''), former licensee of Station WIPS(AM), Ticonderoga, New York (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On November 7, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-675A1.txt
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that Licensee apparently willfully violated Sections 73.3539 and 73.1740 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and by discontinuing operation of the Station without authority. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500). II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-986A1.txt
  • June 22, 2012 Released: June 22, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500), to Bethany College (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational (``NCE'') Station WVBC(FM), Bethany, West Virginia (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Sections 73.561 and 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by remaining off the air without Commission authorization for a period of more than 30 days and failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On April 27, 2012, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand, five hundred dollars ($6,500) to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262728A1.pdf
  • GRANTED , GALLATIN 1130 KHZ E TN Voluntary Assignment of License From: JON GARY ENTERPRISES, INC. To: IGLESIA DE DIOS HISPANA PENTECOSTAL DE NASHVILLE TENNESSEE Form 314 JON GARY ENTERPRISES, INC. WYXE 3424 BAL-20050728ALJ TN AM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR RENEWAL GRANTED , GALLATIN 1130 KHZ E TN Renewal of License Amendment filed 06/09/2005 NAL for violation of Sections 73.3526 and 73.3539 issued, license renewal application granted per letter ref. 1800B3 on 12-13-05. JON GARY ENTERPRISES, INC. WYXE 3424 BR-20040716ACD TN DIGITAL TV APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR MODIFICATION TO A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT GRANTED , RIVERHEAD CHAN-57 E NY Modification of construction permit file number BMPCDT-20000501AAL. WLNY-TV, INC. WLNY-DT 73206 BMPCDT-20051201BIN NY Page 6 of 13 Broadcast Actions 12/16/2005 PUBLIC NOTICEFederal Communications Commission 445
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264409A1.pdf
  • 1983, no ownership report since 1990, no radio issues/programs lists since 1994, and no copies of any time brokerage agreements. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Arizona ended on October 1, 2005, Cortaro was required to file a renewal application for KCKY with the Commission no later than June 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the San Diego agent revealed Cortaro did file a timely renewal application. The search also revealed an assignment of license in 2003, and an application for a construction permit for a major modification, filed on January 13, 2005, was also pending. As of the date of this NAL, the renewal application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264727A1.pdf
  • 2005, were missing. The agent asked the Chief Engineer for the stations about the items missing from the public inspection files, and the Chief Engineer indicated that he did not know where the missing items were. Entravision was required to file renewal applications for KMXX(FM), KWST(AM) and KSEH(FM) with the Commission no later than August 1, 2005, pursuant to Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records revealed Entravision filed timely renewal applications for each station. Each of the renewal applications were granted on November 29, 2005. The Public Notice announcing the renewal grants was issued on December 2, 2005. As no petitions for reconsideration were filed against the renewal grants, these grants became final actions on January 2,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267101A1.pdf
  • manager concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KITZ(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application. As of the date of this NAL, the renewal application remains pending. III. DISCUSSION Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267214A1.pdf
  • manager concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KGTK with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application. As of the date of this NAL, the renewal application remains pending. III. DISCUSSION Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268421A1.pdf
  • � 312(f)(2), which also applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." Section 73.3539 of the Rules directs broadcast station licensees to file an application for renewal no later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. �1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • � 21.901, 47 C.F.R. � 74.902. Spectrum Policy Report at 19. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.11(c). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.44(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.43(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.929(b). See Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Suspends Electronic Filing for the Broadband Licensing System on October 11, 2002 , 17 FCC Rcd 18,365 (2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. See, e.g., Jonsson Communications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, (DA 02-3099, released Nov. 13, 2002). There is no codified rule specifically addressing reinstatement of ITFS licenses. ULS R&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 21071 � 96. See Rules and Regulations to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Service, 63 Fed. Reg. 68904, 68908
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
  • � 21.901, 47 C.F.R. � 74.902. Spectrum Policy Report at 19. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.11(c). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.44(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.43(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.929(b). See Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Suspends Electronic Filing for the Broadband Licensing System on October 11, 2002 , 17 FCC Rcd 18,365 (2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. See, e.g., Jonsson Communications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, (DA 02-3099, released Nov. 13, 2002). There is no codified rule specifically addressing reinstatement of ITFS licenses. ULS R&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 21071 � 96. See Rules and Regulations to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Service, 63 Fed. Reg. 68904, 68908
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • OWTC Comments at 4. See NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd at 6792-93 �� 173-177. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.11(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.44(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.43(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.929(b). See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Suspends Electronic Filing for the Broadband Licensing System on October 11, 2002, Public Notice, 7 FCC Rcd 18365 (2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. See, e.g Renewal Applications of Jonsson Communications Corp., DA 02-3099, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 22697, 22698 (2002). There is no codified rule specifically addressing reinstatement of ITFS licenses. ULS R&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 21071 � 96. See Biennial Regulatory Review - Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 80, 87, 90, 95, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-94A1.txt
  • of fact, we do find a level of carelessness and inattention on the part of DRI that warrants a forfeiture, as discussed below. 13. ABS' ``de facto waiver'' argument. Citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, ABS maintains that the staff, in granting DRI's request for reconsideration of the cancellation of WDIS' license, in effect waived Sections 73.1020 (``Station License Period'') and 73.3539 (``Application for Renewal of License'') of the Commission's rules without articulating a justification for doing so. As noted, DRI timely appealed the initial staff action. Moreover, a staff examination of DRI's petition established that reconsideration was warranted. Hence, DRI's petition was granted in accordance with the Commission's provisions for seeking reconsideration of staff actions, and we do not believe the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.txt
  • Division, Media Bureau, prior to the date of the change. (3) Where a station is authorized pursuant to a voluntary time-sharing proposal, the parties to the time-sharing agreement may apportion among themselves any air time that, for any reason, becomes vacant. (4) Successive license terms granted under subsection (d) may be converted into voluntary time-sharing arrangements renewable pursuant to Section 73.3539 by submitting a universal time-sharing proposal. (d) Successive license terms. (1) If a tie among mutually exclusive applications is not resolved through voluntary time-sharing in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the tied applications will be reviewed for acceptability and applicants with tied, grantable applications will be eligible for equal, successive, non-renewable license terms of no less than one
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.txt
  • deletion of the KTMN(FM) call sign and all associated authorizations, A-O continued and eventually completed construction at Wofford Peak. On July 3, 2003, A-O filed two applications: one requesting ``renewal'' of the station's expired license, and the other seeking a license to cover the newly completed Wofford Peak facilities. The license renewal application contained a request for waiver of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') concerning timeliness of license renewal applications, because the application was filed more than a year before the June 1, 2005, filing deadline for New Mexico radio station renewals. Both applications indicated that A-O had operated the station after the November 8, 2002, Section 312(g) forfeiture of its license. A-O claimed that such operations were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-9A1.txt
  • ``renew'' KVEZ(FM)'s expired license. The March Petition states that on February 23, 2004, immediately upon its receipt of the Staff Decision, Eagle removed KVEZ(FM) from the air. The license renewal application indicated that the station was silent in March 2004, but had not been silent for any consecutive 12-month period. The renewal application contained a request for waiver of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') concerning timeliness of license renewal applications, because the application was filed more than a year before the June 1, 2005, filing deadline for Arizona radio station renewals. On April 29, 2004, Eagle requested STA to operate from the Buckskin site (``2004 STA Request''). On May 3, 2004, the staff dismissed the renewal application, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-102A1.txt
  • public interest, convenience, and necessity, as required by Section 310(d) of the Act. B. License Renewal Applications Also pending before the Commission are renewal applications for Stations WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM. In view of our determination regarding the Second Thursday application and for the reasons set forth below we grant the renewal applications. As a preliminary matter, we note that Section 73.3539(a) of the rules requires that applications for renewal of licenses for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' On September 30, 2003, Family filed an application seeking renewal of the licenses for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM. This satisfied the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • Provide Additional Spectrum for the Medical Device Radiocommunication Service in the 413-457 MHz band, ET Docket No. 09-36, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 3445 (2009). Call Sign WF2XJX (available for viewing through the Commission's Experimental Licensing System at https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/index.cfm). See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.165(2); 22.377(b); 22.401; 22.403; 22.409; 22.413; 22.591(a); 22.599(b); 73.72; 73.1010(e)(1); 73.1510; 73.1010; 73.3500(a); 73.3533(a)(2); 73.3536(b)(2); 73.3539(a); 74.1; 74.15; 74.16; 74.101; 74.102; 74.103; 74.112; 74.113; 74.131; 74.132; 74.133; 74.151; 74.161; 74.162; 74.163; 74.165; 74.181; 74.182; 74.183; 74.184; 78.107(a)(2)(ii); 80.25(c); 80.33; 80.377; 80.391; 87.27(b); 87.37; 90.35(c)(75); 90.35(c)(89); 90.35(d)(6); 90.250(i); 90.501; 90.503; 90.505; 90.507; 90.509; 90.511; 90.513; 90.515; 90.517; 101.21(b); 101.129(a); 101.401; 101.403; 101.405; 101.407; 101.409; 101.411; and 101.413. Additionally, provisions contained in Part 1 set forth general rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1595A1.html
  • simply because WBLT claims it is a ``relatively minimal operation.'' Finally, we reject WBLT's request to reduce the proposed forfeiture based on its history of compliance with the Rules. According to Commission records, WBLT failed to submit a license renewal application in a timely fashion during the renewal cycle, e.g., prior to October 1, 2003, in apparent violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. WBLT submitted its license renewal application after it was contacted by the Media Bureau that its license had expired. Accordingly, we conclude that WBLT does not have a history of compliance with the Rules and is not entitled to receive a reduction on those grounds. 7. We have examined WBLT's response to the NAL pursuant to the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2658A1.html
  • concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KITZ(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. 4. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2659A1.html
  • concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KGTK(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. 4. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3613A1.html
  • station KFCA-LP, in Fresno, California, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for operating a LPFM station without Commission authority and failing to file a timely renewal application for the station. Hmong American acted in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint that Hmong American failed to renew its license and continued to operate station KFCA-LP beyond the license term of its authorization. Commission records show that on July 15, 2003, Hmong American was granted a station license under call sign KFCA-LP with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1757A1.html
  • FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S: 301. A-O filed the renewal application on July 3, 2003, eights months after the twelve-month period had run under Section 312(g), and almost two years before the July 1, 2005, filing deadline for New Mexico radio station renewals. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 73.1020, 73.3539. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 603 (2008) ("2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order"). 2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 617. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1310, 11.35, 73.1125, and 73.1400. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 31 Comm. Reg (P&F) 411 (2003) ("2003 Forfeiture Order"). The noted violations involved A-O's failing to comply with radio frequency radiation ("RFR") maximum permissible exposure ("MPE")
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-728A1.html
  • the proposed forfeiture of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for its failure to file a timely renewal application is inconsistent with other actions in which the Media Bureau proposed or assessed forfeitures of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for closely-related conduct. Specifically, Saga cites several NALs and Forfeiture Orders issued by the Media Bureau for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. The cases cited by Saga are, however, distinguishable from the instant case because in each of those cases, the renewal application was filed late, but prior to the expiration of the license term. In contrast, Saga filed its STA more than nine months after its license expired. 12. Saga further argues that the proposed $5,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/bc-chklsts/EB18LPFM06_2008.pdf
  • version of Title 47 C.F.R. Parts 11, 17 and 73 can be found at: Part 11: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=dfb774ab024c5b210621bfdd118f08f1&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title47/47cfr11_main_02.tpl Part 17: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=dfb774ab024c5b210621bfdd118f08f1&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title47/47cfr17_main_02.tpl Part 73: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=dfb774ab024c5b210621bfdd118f08f1&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title47/47cfr73_main_02.tpl SECTION I: ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-TECHNICAL A. AUTHORIZATIONS: The station license, construction permit and/or any other instrument of authorization shall be readily available and easily accessible at the station's principal control point. [See 73.845, 73.1230, 73.3533(a)(8), 73.3536 and 73.3539] 1. AUTHORIZATIONS: Are current station authorizations readily available at the principal control point for this station? B. STATION LOGS/RECORDS: STATION LOGS include entries pertaining to equipment outages due to equipment malfunction, servicing, or replacement; entries for operation not in accordance with the station license; entries relating to required tests and activations of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and, when applicable,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.pdf
  • of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we admonish the Licensee for its violation of the Section 301 of the Act, grant the Licensee's Petition, grant White Park's Objection in part, reinstate the license and call sign for the Station, and grant the captioned Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KIIQ(FM)'s license should have been filed by December 1, 2004. No such
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-108A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-108A1.pdf
  • File No. BRH-20040405ACH FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 20, 2011 Released: January 21, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200) to Southern Broadcasting & Investment Co., Inc. (``Southern''), licensee of Station WBTY(FM), Homerville, Georgia (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On September 17, 2010, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
  • [620]TEXT [621]PDF 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial educational stations. [622]TEXT [623]PDF 73.3533 Application for construction permit or modification of construction permit. [624]TEXT [625]PDF 73.3536 Application for license to cover construction permit. [626]TEXT [627]PDF 73.3537 Application for license to use former main antenna as an auxiliary. [628]TEXT [629]PDF 73.3538 Application to make changes in an existing station. [630]TEXT [631]PDF 73.3539 Application for renewal of license. [632]TEXT [633]PDF 73.3540 Application for voluntary assignment or transfer of control. [634]TEXT [635]PDF 73.3541 Application for involuntary assignment of license or transfer of control. [636]TEXT [637]PDF 73.3542 Application for emergency authorization. [638]TEXT [639]PDF 73.3543 Application for renewal or modification of special service authorization. [640]TEXT [641]PDF 73.3544 Application to obtain a modified station license. [642]TEXT [643]PDF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fc00019a.doc
  • attacks. Section 73.1940-Legally qualified candidates for public office. Section 73.1941-Equal opportunities. Section 73.1943-Political file. Section 73.1944-Reasonable access. Section 73.3511-Applications required. Section 73.3512-Where to file; number of copies. Section 73.3513-Signing of applications. Section 73.3514-Content of applications. Section 73.3516-Specification of facilities. Section 73.3517-Contingent applications. Section 73.3518-Inconsistent or conflicting applications. Section 73.3519-Repetitious applications. Section 73.3520-Multiple applications. Section 73.3525-Agreements for removing application conflicts. Section 73.3539-Application for renewal of license. Section 73.3542-Application for emergency authorization. Section 73.3545-Application for permit to deliver programs to foreign stations. Section 73.3550-Requests for new or modified call sign assignments. Section 73.3561-Staff consideration of applications requiring Commission consideration. Section 73.3562-Staff consideration of applications not requiring action by the Commission. Section 73.3566-Defective applications. Section 73.3568-Dismissal of applications. Section 73.3584-Procedure for filing petitions to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080304.html
  • CALIFORNIA. The violation of Section 73.670 of the Commission's Rules does not warrant further consideration in connection with KFSN-TV's renewal application. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-492). MB [17]DA-08-492A1.doc [18]DA-08-492A1.pdf [19]DA-08-492A1.txt RICHARD D. TATHAM. Issued a $1,500 Notice of Apparent Liability to Station K36DU, Lake Havasu City, Arizona for the admitted violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules described in K36DU's renewal application. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 03/03/2008 by NAL. (DA No. 08-489). MB [20]DA-08-489A1.doc [21]DA-08-489A1.pdf [22]DA-08-489A1.txt BEARTOOTH COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY. Issued a $10,000 Notice of Apparent Liability to Station KBBJ(TV), Havre, Montana for the admitted violation of Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules described in KBBJ(TV)'s renewal application. Action by:
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264409A1.html
  • no ownership report since 1990, no radio issues/programs lists since 1994, and no copies of any time brokerage agreements. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Arizona ended on October 1, 2005, Cortaro was required to file a renewal application for KCKY with the Commission no later than June 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the San Diego agent revealed Cortaro did file a timely renewal application. The search also revealed an assignment of license in 2003, and an application for a construction permit for a major modification, filed on January 13, 2005, was also pending. As of the date of this NAL, the renewal application
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264727A1.html
  • were missing. The agent asked the Chief Engineer for the stations about the items missing from the public inspection files, and the Chief Engineer indicated that he did not know where the missing items were. 4. Entravision was required to file renewal applications for KMXX(FM), KWST(AM) and KSEH(FM) with the Commission no later than August 1, 2005, pursuant to Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records revealed Entravision filed timely renewal applications for each station. Each of the renewal applications were granted on November 29, 2005. The Public Notice announcing the renewal grants was issued on December 2, 2005. As no petitions for reconsideration were filed against the renewal grants, these grants became final actions on January 2,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-267101A1.html
  • concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KITZ(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application. As of the date of this NAL, the renewal application remains pending. III. DISCUSSION 4. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-267214A1.html
  • concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KGTK with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application. As of the date of this NAL, the renewal application remains pending. III. DISCUSSION 4. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268421A1.html
  • S 312(f)(2), which also applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." Section 73.3539 of the Rules directs broadcast station licensees to file an application for renewal no later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed. 47 C.F.R. S 73.3539. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S1.80. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(D).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1595A1.html
  • simply because WBLT claims it is a ``relatively minimal operation.'' Finally, we reject WBLT's request to reduce the proposed forfeiture based on its history of compliance with the Rules. According to Commission records, WBLT failed to submit a license renewal application in a timely fashion during the renewal cycle, e.g., prior to October 1, 2003, in apparent violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. WBLT submitted its license renewal application after it was contacted by the Media Bureau that its license had expired. Accordingly, we conclude that WBLT does not have a history of compliance with the Rules and is not entitled to receive a reduction on those grounds. 7. We have examined WBLT's response to the NAL pursuant to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2658A1.html
  • concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KITZ(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. 4. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2659A1.html
  • concerning the missing items. The general manager indicated that he did not know why these items were missing. 3. Because the license period for radio stations in the State of Washington ended on February 1, 2006, KITZ Radio was required to file a renewal application for KGTK(AM) with the Commission no later than October 1, 2005, as required by Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. A search of Commission's records by the Seattle agent revealed KITZ Radio did file a timely renewal application, however, as of the date of the NAL, the renewal application remained pending. 4. On August 23, 2006, the Seattle Office issued a NAL in the amount of $4,000 to KITZ Radio, finding that KITZ Radio apparently willfully and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3613A1.html
  • station KFCA-LP, in Fresno, California, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for operating a LPFM station without Commission authority and failing to file a timely renewal application for the station. Hmong American acted in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint that Hmong American failed to renew its license and continued to operate station KFCA-LP beyond the license term of its authorization. Commission records show that on July 15, 2003, Hmong American was granted a station license under call sign KFCA-LP with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1757A1.html
  • FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S: 301. A-O filed the renewal application on July 3, 2003, eights months after the twelve-month period had run under Section 312(g), and almost two years before the July 1, 2005, filing deadline for New Mexico radio station renewals. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 73.1020, 73.3539. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 603 (2008) ("2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order"). 2008 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 617. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1310, 11.35, 73.1125, and 73.1400. A-O Broadcasting Corporation, 31 Comm. Reg (P&F) 411 (2003) ("2003 Forfeiture Order"). The noted violations involved A-O's failing to comply with radio frequency radiation ("RFR") maximum permissible exposure ("MPE")
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-728A1.html
  • the proposed forfeiture of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for its failure to file a timely renewal application is inconsistent with other actions in which the Media Bureau proposed or assessed forfeitures of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for closely-related conduct. Specifically, Saga cites several NALs and Forfeiture Orders issued by the Media Bureau for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Rules. The cases cited by Saga are, however, distinguishable from the instant case because in each of those cases, the renewal application was filed late, but prior to the expiration of the license term. In contrast, Saga filed its STA more than nine months after its license expired. 12. Saga further argues that the proposed $5,000 forfeiture for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-2539A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-2539A1.pdf
  • Maranatha's license renewal application below. Conclusion/Actions. For the reasons set forth above, and pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 503(b), and Sections 0.283 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Maranatha Broadcasting Company, Inc. is hereby advised of its apparent liability for a forfeiture of $6,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, that within thirty days of the release of this Notice, Maranatha SHALL PAY to the United States the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-2540A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-2540A1.pdf
  • therefore grant GMI's license renewal application below. Conclusion/Actions. For the reasons set forth above, and pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 503(b), and Sections 0.283 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Gospel Media, Inc., is hereby advised of its apparent liability for a forfeiture of $6,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Notice, GMI SHALL PAY to the United States the full amount of the proposed forfeiture of SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1498A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1498A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file its license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3526 of the Rules by failing to retain all required documentation in the WSSA(AM) public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1499A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1499A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W267AD license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1889A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1889A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after its licenses for those facilities had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1894A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1894A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1897A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1897A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2342A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2342A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KRRP(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2345A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2345A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WTKI(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2347A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2347A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KEDU-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2348A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2348A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K232BE license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2380A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2380A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2453A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2453A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2454A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2454A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WWGC(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2455A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2455A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCWC-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2579A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2579A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-500A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-500A1.pdf
  • before us: (1) the captioned application of McKissick Enterprises (``McKissick'') for renewal of license for station WYNI(AM), Monroeville, Alabama; (2) Robert Hilliard Boothe's (``Boothe'') Formal Petition to Deny filed on May 28, 2004; and (3) related responsive pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, we issue a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABLILITY FOR A FORFEITURE to McKissick for violation of Sections 73.3539 and 73.3526 of the Commission's rules regarding renewal application filings and a broadcast station's public inspection file, and grant the WYNI(AM) license renewal application. Procedural Issue. McKissick charges that Boothe does not have standing to file a petition to deny the WYNI(AM) renewal application because Boothe's residence is outside WYNI(AM)'s service area and because Boothe failed to include an affidavit
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-754A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-754A1.pdf
  • public interest, convenience, and necessity during the subject license term. We will therefore grant KBC's license renewal application below. Conclusion/Actions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act and Sections 0.283 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, KBC is hereby advised of its apparent liability for a forfeiture of $7,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's rules and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, that within thirty days of the release of this Notice, KBC SHALL PAY to the United States the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-755A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-755A1.pdf
  • Christian Broadcasting K240CJ(FX), Oakes, ND Facility ID No. 49932 File No. BRFT-20050127AFK Dear Applicant: This letter refers to the captioned application of Oakes Community Christian Broadcasting (``OCCB'') for renewal of license for FM translator Station K240CJ, Oakes, North Dakota. For the reasons set forth below, we issue a NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE to OCCB for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules regarding the timing for filing license renewal applications, and we grant the K240CJ license renewal application. Section 73.3539 violation. OCCB's renewal application for the current K240CJ license term was due on December 1, 2004, four months prior to the April 1, 2005 license expiration date. The application was not filed until January 27, 2005. OCCB provides
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-759A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-759A1.pdf
  • with the Commission's rules. Mr. Brimer asked for the public file once; he should not have had to ask for it again to see the complete file. We also caution Rogers to make the whole public file available when it is requested and not just the parts of the file that someone at the station may deem ``of interest.'' Section 73.3539 violation. Rogers's renewal application for the current WYXC(AM) license term was due on December 1, 2003, four months prior to the April 1, 2004, license expiration date. The application was not filed until October 18, 2004, more than six months after the station's license had expired. Rogers provides no explanation for the untimely filing of the license renewal application. Upon
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1044A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1044A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their licenses had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1045A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1045A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1046A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1046A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1047A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1047A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1048A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1048A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1049A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1049A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1050A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1050A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1051A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1051A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1246A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1246A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WVFG(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1247A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1247A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WVKC(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1248A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1248A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned W300AN renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-124A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-124A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file its license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3527 of the Rules by failing to retain all required documentation in the WBOR(FM) public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1344A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1344A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1345A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1345A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1346A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1346A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1347A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1347A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1378A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1378A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KKNO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1379A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1379A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after the license for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1380A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1380A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W266AC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1381A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1381A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFIT(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1382A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1382A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WVSD(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1442A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1442A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1443A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1443A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1444A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1444A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KTCN(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1479A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1479A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1480A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1480A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBPB(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1481A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1481A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WONG(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1553A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1553A1.pdf
  • on March 5, 2004, which authorized him to act on behalf of the Chapman Estate. See Durable Special Power of Attorney, Jefferson County, Alabama, March 5, 2004. Civil Action CV-2004-0173-RSV, Order, Sept. 9, 2004 (the ``Circuit Court Order''). Circuit Court Order at 2. Id. Letter to Herb Steadman, Sumiton Broadcasting Co., Inc., Ref. No. 1800B-ALM (MB Feb. 21, 2003). Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed. An application for renewal of the WRSM(AM) license should have been filed by December 1, 2003, four months prior to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1802A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1802A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFJO(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1803A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1803A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1804A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1804A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1805A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1805A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1806A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1806A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1807A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1807A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLNX(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1810A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1810A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1961A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1961A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired, and Section 73.3526 of the Rules, by failing to retain required documentation in the KPXS(FM) public inspection file. Based upon our review
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1965A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1965A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WJTB(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2099A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2099A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2100A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2100A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned WQST(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND 2. Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2102A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2102A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KAYE-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-240A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-240A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCHM(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-241A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-241A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WAPR(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-242A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-242A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBKZ(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-243A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-243A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WKWL(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-244A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-244A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBDX(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-245A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-245A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBFZ(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-246A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-246A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WHIE(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-247A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-247A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLVV(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-250A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-250A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K233AK license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-251A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-251A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K201AY license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2785A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2785A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2786A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2786A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned W201BW renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2787A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2787A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2788A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2788A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned W267AL renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2975A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2975A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2976A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2976A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2977A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2977A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3097A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3097A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500). We further deny MMG's Objection, and we grant the captioned KASR(FM) license
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3260A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3260A1.pdf
  • and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Associate Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-330A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-330A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned WECO(AM) and WECO-FM renewal applications. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-331A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-331A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-332A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-332A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBLG-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-334A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-334A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WGVE-FM renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-336A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-336A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WQOX (FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-337A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-337A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFHB(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-339A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-339A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WTTU(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-342A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-342A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WZYZ(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-343A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-343A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after his authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3504A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3504A1.pdf
  • also find that our recourse for the improper filing is dictated by Section 1.1116(b) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Accordingly, we grant, in part, Licensee's Petition for Reconsideration of the staff's cancellation of his license and deletion of the Station's call sign, and grant the captioned WLVO(FM) renewal application and reinstate the call sign for the Station. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of WLVO(FM)'s license should have been filed by October 1, 2003, four months prior to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3515A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3515A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station; willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired; and willfully violated Section 73.3527 of the Rules by failing to retain all required documentation in the WBFH(FM) public inspection file. Based upon
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-352A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-352A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-353A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-353A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-354A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-354A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-355A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-355A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-356A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-356A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-357A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-357A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-359A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-359A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3810A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3810A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3902A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3902A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3903A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3903A1.pdf
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the total amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4018A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4018A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4020A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4020A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned KWSP-LP renewal application. I. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4021A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4021A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensees apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensees are apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4022A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4022A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensees apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensees are apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4023A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4023A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensees apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensees are apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-409A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-409A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K240CN renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-412A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-412A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KACV-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4134A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4134A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-413A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-413A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KYNR(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-414A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-414A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCUK(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-418A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-418A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCHW-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4194A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4194A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WPCR-FM renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4196A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4196A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WSVV-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4197A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4197A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by, authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned KMOB-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4198A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4198A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBDG(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4301A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4301A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4302A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4302A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4303A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4303A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4315A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4315A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WOOL-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4316A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4316A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WOON(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4317A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4317A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4326A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4326A1.pdf
  • deem filed the renewal application tendered on February 1, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 14, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent penalty for submitting the Renewal Application with an insufficient fee. We grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite application fee and penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KITX(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such application was successfully
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4327A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4327A1.pdf
  • we deem filed the renewal application tendered on January 28, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on November 7, 2005, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent penalty for submitting the Renewal Application with no fee. We grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite application fee and penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KMGZ(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4332A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4332A1.pdf
  • succeeding license term (the ``2005 Renewal Application''). We will treat the 2003 Renewal Application as a petition for reconsideration of an April 10, 2003, staff letter advising the Licensee that its authority to operate the Station was terminated. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss that filing as untimely, and dismiss the 2005 Renewal Application as moot. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by August 1, 1997, four months prior to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4333A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4333A1.pdf
  • March 1, 2006, application (the ``Application'') filed by Jamie Patrick Broadcasting, Ltd. (the ``Licensee'') to renew the license of expired FM Station DKTRY-FM, Bastrop, Louisiana. For the reasons set forth below, we will treat the Application in part as a Petition for Reconsideration under Section 1.106 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and dismiss that filing as untimely. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by February 1, 2004, four months prior to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4352A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4352A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Sections 73.3539 and 73.3526 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and failing to retain all the required documentation in Station KTMP(AM)'s public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we deny Johnson's Petition, grant in part and deny in part Guthrie's Petition, and conclude that the Licensee
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4385A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4385A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KHRA(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-442A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-442A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-444A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-444A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K265AP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4455A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4455A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WEIB(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4456A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4456A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCMX(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4457A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4457A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WXHQ-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4458A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4458A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-445A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-445A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K269AV renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-446A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-446A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K259AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-448A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-448A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K280DL renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-449A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-449A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K285AB renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4506A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4506A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WBLQ-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4508A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4508A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4509A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4509A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.pdf
  • of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we admonish the Licensee for its violation of the Section 301 of the Act, grant the Licensee's Petition, grant White Park's Objection in part, reinstate the license and call sign for the Station, and grant the captioned Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KIIQ(FM)'s license should have been filed by December 1, 2004. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4554A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4554A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4555A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4555A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4556A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4556A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WAPP-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4557A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4557A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WIPS(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4624A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4624A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4625A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4625A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4626A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4626A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4628A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4628A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBJB-FM renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-462A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-462A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4647A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4647A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WITC(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4648A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4648A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4649A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4649A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-464A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-464A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KXOI(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4650A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4650A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLNL(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4667A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4667A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4668A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4668A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4669A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4669A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-466A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-466A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KNBO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4670A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4670A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-467A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KTER(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4729A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4729A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4730A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4730A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4731A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4731A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4741A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4741A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4742A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4742A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4743A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4743A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-483A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-483A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K272AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-484A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-484A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-485A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-485A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K296EL renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4862A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4862A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned W220CR renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4863A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4863A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4864A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4864A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, apparently and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4865A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4865A1.pdf
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file timely license renewal applications for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4870A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4870A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4871A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4871A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4872A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4872A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-488A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-488A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KGRU-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-489A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-489A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KUHB-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4909A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4909A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4910A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4910A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned KMSJ-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4911A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4911A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4912A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4912A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-491A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-491A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely and properly file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K272AQ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4959A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4959A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4960A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4960A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4961A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4961A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4962A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4962A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5042A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5042A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5043A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5043A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5044A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5044A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5048A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5048A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBMT(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5074A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5074A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5075A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5075A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5076A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-5076A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-534A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-534A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-53A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-53A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-541A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-541A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Stations after the licenses for those facilities had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-544A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-544A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-545A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-545A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for each Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-546A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-546A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K288DZ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-547A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-547A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KILI(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-54A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-54A1.pdf
  • No. BR-20031219AAC FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 10, 2007 Released: January 12, 2007 By the Chief, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two thousand one hundred dollars ($2,100) to A&L Broadcasting, Inc. (``A&L''), licensee of Station WSQL(AM), Brevard, North Carolina (the ``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve A&L's failure to have timely filed a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WSQL(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. On March 16, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-560A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-560A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-561A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-561A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-562A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-562A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-563A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-563A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WSAO(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-564A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-564A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KKAY(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-565A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-565A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KAVH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-566A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-566A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-585A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-585A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-586A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-586A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-588A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-588A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-589A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-589A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-590A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-590A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-591A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-591A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLSO(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-592A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-592A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-593A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-593A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-612A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-612A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-613A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-613A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WOJB(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-614A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-614A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WJHV-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-615A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-615A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W272AY renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-616A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-616A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W232AR renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-619A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-619A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-621A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-621A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K213BN renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-622A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-622A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K215AB renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-623A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-623A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K217CM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-625A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-625A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-626A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-626A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-627A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-627A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-629A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-629A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its License for that facility had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-631A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-631A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-632A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-632A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-633A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-633A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-634A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-634A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-645A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-645A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-646A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-646A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-647A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-647A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-648A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-648A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-649A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-649A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. The Commission also has before it a ``Motion for Waiver of the Rules and Acceptance of Late-Filed Renewal Application.'' Based upon our
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-650A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-650A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-652A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-652A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-653A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-653A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-660A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-660A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K252CQ renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-661A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-661A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KDRT-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-662A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-662A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KRVH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-663A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-663A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBPK(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-664A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-664A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K261AY renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-665A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-665A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KYDS(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-666A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-666A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KSRH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-670A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-670A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for each of the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500), and we grant the captioned K205BH, K201AR, and K209AK renewal
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-682A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-682A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500), and we grant the captioned K220BW, K269DU, K220BX renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-683A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-683A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500), and we grant the captioned K242AC, K247AC, and K262AA renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-684A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-684A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K244DU renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-685A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-685A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K253AC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-686A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-686A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-687A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-687A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-688A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-688A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K257AA renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-697A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-697A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-698A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-698A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-699A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-699A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-700A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-700A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-702A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-702A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-703A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-703A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WHHC-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-704A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-704A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K228DI renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-705A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-705A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K202AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-706A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-706A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KCMI(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-707A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-707A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-708A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-708A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the captioned K201FP and K216FR renewal applications. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-745A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-745A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-746A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-746A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned KHOB(AM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-747A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-747A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-748A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-748A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned K292DN license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-749A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-749A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned KDEM(FM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-750A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-750A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and we grant the captioned KSHI(FM) license renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-751A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-751A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500) and we grant the captioned K296AQ, K292AR, and K288AS license renewal applications. II.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-773A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-773A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K232BC renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-774A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-774A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for each of the Stations. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) and we grant the captioned KOTO(FM), K207AS, K207AT, K288BM, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-775A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-775A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KDXL(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-776A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-776A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K220GV renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-777A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-777A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K280AT renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-778A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-778A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K264AG renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-779A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-779A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K219AH renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-781A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-781A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K216BE renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-782A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-782A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KESW-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-788A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-788A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBSG(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-789A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-789A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WABV(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-790A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-790A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WKCL(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-791A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-791A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WFMI(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-792A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-792A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WPFL(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-793A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-793A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned W267AD renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-794A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-794A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WMNT(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-795A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-795A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-796A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-796A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-797A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-797A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-856A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-856A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-857A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-857A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-858A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-858A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WBAF(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-859A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-859A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-860A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-860A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-861A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-861A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-887A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-887A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-889A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-889A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WLMH(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-890A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-890A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WCER(AM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-891A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-891A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WOBC-FM renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-917A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-917A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-918A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-918A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-919A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-919A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-920A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-920A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-921A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-921A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-922A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-922A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-923A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-923A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned K257CI renewal application. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-924A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-924A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KJTR-LP renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1059A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1059A1.pdf
  • filed the renewal application filed on February 1, 2006 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on November 14, 2007, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application, and we reinstate the Station's call sign. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of WRIV(AM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2006. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-106A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-106A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-107A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-107A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-108A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-108A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1096A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1096A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1097A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1097A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1098A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1098A1.pdf
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-109A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-109A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-110A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-110A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1200A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1200A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2008 Released: May 22, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to Central Carolina Community College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WDCC(FM), Sanford, North Carolina (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On July 15, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on August
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1415A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1415A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1419A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1419A1.pdf
  • BRED-20030903ACN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 13, 2008 Released: June 16, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to Alderson-Broaddus College, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WQAB(FM), Philippi, West Virginia (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on September
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1420A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1420A1.pdf
  • No. BRED-20031007AAJ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 13, 2008 Released: June 16, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to WUAW-88.3 FM (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WUAW(FM), Erwin, North Carolina (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. On August 17, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on September 27,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1478A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1478A1.pdf
  • sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to John R. King, 1901 East 86th Street, Radio Station WJEL, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240, and to its counsel, Kathryn R. Schmeltzer, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, 2300 N Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Kathryn Schmeltzer, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-SS (MB August 10, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on August 10, 2004. According to Licensee, the Station was initially licensed as a 10-watt, Class D FM station when it went on the air in 1975. See Request at 7. Licensee states that the Station provides local,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1479A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1479A1.pdf
  • Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Terry E. Forcht, T.C.W. Broadcasting, Inc., 200 South Kentucky Ave., Corbin, Kentucky 40701, and to its counsel, John Garziglia, Esq., Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, 1401 Eye St., Suite 700, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letters to John Garziglia, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-SS (MB August 5, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal applications on August 5, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997),
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1655A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1655A1.pdf
  • shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Phoenix Broadcasting Group, Inc., P.O. Box 989, Blytheville, AR 72316-0989, and to its counsel, Gary S. Smithwick, Esq., Smithwick & Belundiuk, P.C., 5028 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20016. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Gary S. Smithwick, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Sep. 10, 2004) (``Letter''). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on September 10, 2004. Vernon Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 R.R. 2d 1275 (1986) (``Vernon Broadcasting''). See Mel Wheeler, Inc., Letter, 18 FCC Rcd 20215 (MB 2003). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1656A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1656A1.pdf
  • Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 1050 South Foster Drive, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70806, and to its counsel, Charles L. Spencer, Esq., Herbert, Spencer, Cusimano & Fry, LLP, 701 Laurel St., Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802-5692. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letters to East Baton Rouge Parish School Board from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Sept. 10, 2004) (``September 10th Letters''). Licensee's applications were amended on August 20, 2004. The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal applications on September 10, 2004. Request, Attachment at xxxiv. Request at 3. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1657A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1657A1.pdf
  • shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Phoenix Broadcasting Group, Inc., P.O. Box 989, Blytheville, AR 72316-0989, and to its counsel, Gary S. Smithwick, Esq., Smithwick & Belundiuk, P.C., 5028 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20016. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Gary S. Smithwick, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Sep. 10, 2004) (``Letter''). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on September 10, 2004. Vernon Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 R.R. 2d 1275 (1986) (``Vernon Broadcasting''). See Mel Wheeler, Inc., Letter, 18 FCC Rcd 20215 (MB 2003). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1662A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1662A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0006881601 File No. BR-20040305AAG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 14, 2008 Released: July 15, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), to VI/MAN Broadcasting (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WEGA(AM), Vega Baja, Puerto Rico (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On August 25, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand ($6,000) to Licensee for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1738A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1738A1.pdf
  • Order shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to Sudbury Services, Inc., P.O. Box 989, Blytheville, AR 72316-0989, and to its counsel, Gary S. Smithwick, Esq., Smithwick & Belundiuk, P.C., 5028 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20016. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Gary S. Smithwick, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-SS (MB Dec. 10, 2004) (``Letter''). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on December 10, 2004. Vernon Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 R.R. 2d 1275 (1986) (``Vernon Broadcasting''). See Mel Wheeler, Inc., Letter, 18 FCC Rcd 20215 (MB 2003). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1739A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1739A1.pdf
  • No. BR-20031030ACG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 24, 2008 Released: July 25, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand eight hundred dollars ($4,800) to Tol-Tol Communications, Inc. (``Tol-Tol''), licensee of Station WILA(AM), Danville, Virginia (the ``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve Tol-Tol's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WILA(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. II. BACKGROUND On October 21, 2004, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1740A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1740A1.pdf
  • Michigan FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 24, 2008 Released: July 25, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to Muskegon Training & Educational Center ("Licensee"), licensee of Low Power FM Station WMMT-LP, Muskegon, Michigan ("Station"), for willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On October 26, 2004, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee. Licensee filed a response to the NAL on November 8, 2004, requesting cancellation of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-17A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-17A1.pdf
  • Mr. Young: We have before us Full Armor Ministries, Inc. (``FAMI'') and the City of Virginia, Minnesota's (the ``City'') jointly-filed July 31, 2006, Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') of the staff action terminating FAMI's authority to operate Station WEEP(AM) (the ``Station'') and deleting the Station's call sign. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petition for reconsideration. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by December 1, 2004, four
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2158A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2158A1.pdf
  • Mr. Steiner: The Chief, Audio Division, has before him the May 23, 2005, letter filed on behalf of West Mecklenburg Broadcasting (``WMB''), licensee of Station WJYK(AM), Chase City, Virginia (the ``Station''). The Response requests cancellation of an April 28, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve WMB's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WJYK(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish WMB for violating
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2159A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2159A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2237A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2237A1.pdf
  • BR-20040420AAO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 3, 2008 Released: October 6, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand eight hundred dollars ($12,800) to Manuel Huerta (``Huerta''), licensee of Station WJHX(AM), Lexington, Alabama (the ``Station''), for his willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), involving Huerta's failure to have timely filed a license renewal application for the Station and his unauthorized operation of WJHX(AM) after his license for the Station had expired; and for Huerta's willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3526 of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2244A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2244A1.pdf
  • Chief, Audio Division, has before him the April 13, 2005, letter filed on behalf of WBLT, Inc. (``WBLT''), former licensee of Station WBLT(AM), Bedford, Virginia (the ``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of a March 16, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). The violations involve WBLT's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of WBLT(AM) after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish WBLT for filing
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2477A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2477A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: November 10, 2008 Released: November 12, 2008 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Jason Communications, Inc. (``Jason''), licensee of Station WDOW(AM), Dowagiac, Michigan (``WDOW'') and Station WHPD-FM, Dowagiac, Michigan (``WHPD'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the station. BACKGROUND On February 14, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of three thousand ($3,000) to Jason for this violation. Jason filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on March 10,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-383A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-383A1.pdf
  • Naknek, Alaska. For the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on March 28, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 19, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KAKN(FM)'s license should have been filed by October 1, 2005. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-384A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-384A1.pdf
  • filed the renewal application filed on March 28, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on July 19, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application, and we reinstate the Station's call sign. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KELP(AM)'s license should have been filed by April 1, 2005. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-385A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-385A1.pdf
  • the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on January 27, 2004 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on April 26, 2006, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of WMER(AM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2004. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-386A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-386A1.pdf
  • the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on May 31, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on September 12, 2007, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite filing fee and penalty, the Renewal Application Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of K276DA's license should have been filed by June 1, 2005. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-390A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-390A1.pdf
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-481A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-481A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-494A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-494A1.pdf
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by the Commission by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we grant the Objection in part, conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and grant the captioned WGYV(AM) license renewal
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-534A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-534A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-596A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WKIV(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-788A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-788A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-789A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-789A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1083A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1083A1.pdf
  • Adopted: May 15, 2009 Released: May 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), against RealRadio, LLC (``RealRadio''), former licensee of Station KRSN(AM), Los Alamos, New Mexico (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND RealRadio's renewal application for the Station's license term was due on June 1, 2005, four months prior to the October 1, 2005, expiration date. RealRadio did not file the application until September 30, 2005. In the application, RealRadio explained that, on or
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1091A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1091A1.pdf
  • No. BRH-20040312AEE FRN 0003761251 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 18, 2009 Released: May 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000), to MFR, Inc. ( ``Licensee''), licensee of Stations WJAQ(FM), WTOR(AM), Marianna, Florida (the ``Stations''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On March 24, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000),
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1092A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1092A1.pdf
  • BRH-20040108ALF FRN 0005004155 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 18, 2009 Released: May 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to GFR, Inc. (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station WTOT-FM, Graceville, Florida (the ``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On March 24, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station WTOT-FM. Licensee filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1161A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1161A1.pdf
  • treating the Application as a petition for reconsideration and dismissing it as untimely and dismissing the STA Request, be stayed pending further disposition of the case; and (4) a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Staff Decision filed by CFN on March 24, 2009. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Motion and the Petition. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that an application for renewal of a broadcast license must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by June 1, 2004, four
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1243A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1243A1.pdf
  • No. MB-200741410015 FRN: 0003762333 File No. BRH-20050412AAX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 2, 2009 Released: June 3, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Meade County Communications, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WMMG-FM, Brandenburg, Kentucky (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1282A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1282A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned KBRA(FM) renewal application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1283A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1283A1.pdf
  • No. BR-20040203AAS FRN 0008703514 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 4, 2009 Released: June 5, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) to WLVV, Inc. (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station WLVV(AM), Mobile, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station WLVV(AM). Licensee
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1284A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1284A1.pdf
  • BR-20040219ABI FRN: 0005039508 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 4, 2009 Released: June 5, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Florala Broadcasting Company (`` Licensee''), licensee of Station WKWL(AM), Florala, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station WKWL(AM). Licensee
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1330A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1330A1.pdf
  • No. BRFT-20050331DBM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 15, 2009 Released: June 16, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to Dillon N.P.R. (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Station K288DZ(FX), Dillon, Montana (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on February
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1367A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1367A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 18, 2009 Released: June 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to John Reynolds (``Reynolds''), licensee of FM translator station W267AD, Bryson City, North Carolina (``Station''), for his willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On July 27, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Reynolds for this violation. In response to the NAL, Reynolds submitted a letter (``Letter'') on August
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1394A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1394A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 23, 2009 Released: June 24, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Soul's Harbor Assembly of God Church (``Licensee''), licensee of Low Power FM Station WRDS-LP, Roscommon, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-140A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-140A1.pdf
  • be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to: The Christian Center, Inc., 2405 SW Lee Boulevard, Lawton, Oklahoma 73505, and to its counsel, Elise M. Stubbe, Esq., Hardy, Carey & Chautin, LLP, 110 Veterans Boulevard, Suite 300, Metairie, Louisiana 70005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Elise M. Stubbe, Esq. from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-KV (MB Jun. 22, 2005). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on June 22, 2005. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-142A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-142A1.pdf
  • Mail Return Receipt Requested and by First Class Mail, to: World Overcomers Outreach Ministries, Alton R. Williams, President, 2124 E. Holmes Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38116, and to its counsel, Robin H. Rasmussen, Esq., Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, PLC, 6000 Poplar Avenue, Suite 400, Memphis, Tennessee 38119-3972. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. Letter to Alton R. Williams from Peter Doyle, reference 1800B3-MAT (MB Dec. 22, 2004). The Commission granted the above-referenced license renewal application on December 22, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997),
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1704A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1704A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: July 29, 2009 Released: July 30, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Bowie County Broadcasting Co., Inc. (`` Bowie''), former licensee of Station KLBW(AM) (formerly KNBO(AM)), New Boston, Texas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On February 2, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Bowie in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violations at Station KLBW(AM). Bowie filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1741A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1741A1.pdf
  • No. BRH-20040303ABB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 31, 2009 Released: August 3, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), to Imani Communications Corporation, Inc. (``Imani''), licensee of Station WBFX(FM), Selma, Alabama (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Imani for this violation. In response to the NAL, Imani submitted a letter (``Letter'') on February
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1749A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1749A1.pdf
  • 0.331 of the Commission's rules, that the attached Consent Decree IS ADOPTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent, by First Class and Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested, to Jon Halverson, West Slope FM, P.O. Box 881695, Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80488. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert H. Ratcliffe Acting Chief, Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539(a). 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 4(i) and (j). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.131, 0.283, and 0.331. __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1749 __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1749
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1749A2.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1749A2.pdf
  • Rules, found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations; (l) ``Translator Stations'' means FM Translator Stations K263AC, Canyon Valley, Colorado, (Facility ID No. 71641) and K249AW, Steamboat Springs, Colorado (Facility ID No. 71643); and (m) ``Violations'' means the violation of the requirement to timely file applications for renewal of license for the Translator Stations as set forth at 73.3539(a) of the Rules, and the violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act by continuing to operate the Translator Stations after the licenses had expired. III. Background 3. Applications for renewal of the license for the Translator Stations should have been filed by December 1, 2004, but were not filed and the licenses expired on April 1, 2005. On October
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1830A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1830A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 18, 2009 Released: August 19, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Alan Towle (``Towle'') , former licensee of FM translator Station K232BE, Wausau, Wisconsin (the "Station"), for his willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2006, the Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Towle for this violation. Towle filed a Request for Cancellation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-192A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-192A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WMDI-LP renewal application. BACKGROUND 2. Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1996A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1996A1.pdf
  • The Chief, Audio Division has before him the January 5, 2007, letter filed on behalf of MVB, Inc. (``MVB''), former licensee of Station WWGC(AM), Albertville, Alabama (the ``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation of a December 6, 2006, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL''). in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). The violation involves MVB's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish MVB for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, MVB's renewal application for the current WWGC(AM) license term was due
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2066A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2066A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 16, 2009 Released: September 17, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), to Morgan County Broadcasting Co., Inc. (``Morgan County Broadcasting''), licensee of Stations WECO(AM) and WECO-FM (the ``Stations''), for its willful and repeated violations of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Morgan County Broadcasting for these apparent violations. In response to the NAL, Morgan County Broadcasting submitted a Statement Seeking
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2067A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2067A1.pdf
  • File No. BRED-20050228ABN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 16, 2009 Released: September 17, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Columbia City Joint High School (``Columbia City''), licensee of Station WJHS(FM), Columbia City, Indiana (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2077A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2077A1.pdf
  • September 17, 2009 Released: September 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand, five hundred dollars ($7,500) to Kalispell Christian Radio Fellowship, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KALS(FM), Kalispell, Montana, and FM Translator Station K257BR, Polson, Montana (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2078A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2078A1.pdf
  • 0006132963 File No. BRFT-20050729BEP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 17, 2009 Released: September 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Carbon County (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Station K285AB(FX), Price, Utah (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 1, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on March
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2153A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2153A1.pdf
  • File No. BRFT-20041022ADT FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2009 Released: October 1, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to TEA-VISZ, Inc. (``TEA-VISZ''), licensee of FM translator station W272AY, Park Falls, Wisconsin (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to TEA-VISZ for this violation. In response to the NAL, TEA-VISZ submitted a letter (``Letter'') on March
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2154A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2154A1.pdf
  • No. BRFT-20051216AAO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2009 Released: October 1, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Big Sky Owners Association, Inc. (``BSOA''), licensee of FM translator station K257AE, West Fork, Montana (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND The Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to BSOA for these violations.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2163A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2163A1.pdf
  • 1, 2009 Released: October 2, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) to Pikes Peak Community College (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Stations K228EY (formerly K268AR), Pueblo, Colorado, and K206BZ, Manitou Springs, Colorado (collectively, the ``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 6, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of fourteen thousand
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2197A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2197A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2009 Released: October 9, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Meadowland Baptist Church (``Meadowland''), licensee of Low Power FM (``LPFM'') Station WBLG-LP, Bowling Green, Kentucky (the ``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Meadowland for this violation. In response to the NAL, Meadowland submitted a letter (``Letter'') on February
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2227A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2227A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2228A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2228A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2229A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2229A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2230A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2230A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2231A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2231A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2233A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2233A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2304A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2304A1.pdf
  • Adopted: October 27, 2009 Released: October 28, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Bruce MacAfee (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator stations K269AV, Tonopah & Goldfield, Nevada, and K261AY, Bridgeport, California (collectively, the ``Stations''), for his willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 1, 2007, and February 14, 2007, respectively, the Bureau issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) each to Licensee for these violations, for a total of $3,000. Licensee filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2380A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2380A1.pdf
  • 3, 2009 Released: November 4, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Calvary Chapel of Twin Falls, Inc. (``Calvary''), licensee of FM translator stations K201FP, Arapaho, Oklahoma, and K216FR, Clinton, Oklahoma (collectively, ``Stations''), for its willful violations of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. II. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Calvary for this violation. In response to the NAL, Calvary submitted a letter (``Response'') on February 23, 2007.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2382A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2382A1.pdf
  • File No. BRFT-20060628AAQ Dear Mr. Marburger: The Chief, Audio Division, has before him a March 9, 2007, Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') filed by Richard P. Marburger (``Licensee''). Licensee requests cancellation of a February 8, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), regarding FM Translator Station W232AI, Niles, Ohio (``Station''). The violations involve Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and Licensee's unauthorized operation of the Station after the license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2438A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2438A1.pdf
  • MB-20051810099 Dear Mr. Tillotson: Before the Audio Division is a September 20, 2005, letter filed on behalf of Perry Broadcasting Company (``Perry''), former licensee of Station KDLS(AM), Perry, Iowa (``Station''). The Response seeks cancellation of the September 21, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Perry for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on September 21, 2005,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2439A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2439A1.pdf
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410136 File No. BRFT-20060712AEU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 17, 2009 Released: November 18, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Wayne Kowalski (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Station W251AD Alpena, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. II. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2455A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2455A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), and we grant the captioned WENA(AM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2520A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2520A1.pdf
  • File No. BRED-20090316ABN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 30, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Corning Community College (``Corning''), licensee of Class D FM Station WCEB(FM), Corning, New York ( ``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On October 16, 2009, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2521A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2521A1.pdf
  • December 1, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Independent School District # 283 (``Licensee''), licensee of Class D noncommercial educational Station KDXL (FM), St. Louis Park, Minnesota (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 21, 2007, the Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Response requesting that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2546A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2546A1.pdf
  • No. BRED-20040121ABC FRN: 0001752955 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 4, 2009 Released: December 7, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to UA-ASU-TSU Educational Radio Corporation (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WAPR(FM), Selma, Alabama ( ``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for its failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 29, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500), for this violation. Licensee filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the Proposed Forfeiture (``Petition'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2571A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2571A1.pdf
  • a March 13, 2007, Petition for Reconsideration (the "Response") filed on behalf of Wennes Communications Stations, Inc. (the "Licensee") licensee of Station KNEI-FM, Waukon, Iowa (the "Station"). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 13, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (the "Application") and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2592A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2592A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station (the ``Application''), and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-403A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-403A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we deny the Schademann Objection and the Powers Objection, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and we grant the Station's
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-404A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-404A1.pdf
  • Desai Chief, Media Bureau Filed May 20, 2004. DRI requested the extension, inter alia, because it required additional time to assemble financial documents. It provided the documents within a reasonable time and we will, therefore, grant the request. Discussion Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd. 7433 (2004) (``Order''). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. (``Application for Renewal of License''). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.1020 (``Station License Period''). See also 47 U.S.C. � 301. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3526 (``Local public inspection file of commercial stations''). Second Supplement, Affidavit of Albert E. Grady at 7. Mr. Grady is president of DRI. Id. at 4. In addition to the tax returns, DRI has submitted affidavits from
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-424A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-424A1.pdf
  • ``Station''); and (2) the concurrently filed request for Special Temporary Authorization (``STA Request'') to continue station operations pending consideration of the renewal application. For the reasons set forth below, we will treat the Application as a Petition for Reconsideration under Section 1.106 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), dismiss that filing as untimely, and dismiss the STA Request. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's license should have been filed by June 1, 2004, four months prior to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-659A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-659A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: March 20, 2009 Released: March 23, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250), to East Tennessee State University (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Station W218BW(FX), Lenoir, North Carolina (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 24, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') on
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-734A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-734A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 30, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Des Moines Independent Community School District (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational Station KDPS(FM), Des Moines, Iowa (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On June 8, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-795A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-795A1.pdf
  • 8, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000), to Best Media, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Translator Stations K217DJ(FX), Kemah, Texas, W207B1(FX), University Park, Illinois, W206B1(FX), Hamtramck, Michigan, and K217DP(FX), Barker, Texas (collectively, the ``Stations''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for its failure to timely file the Stations' license renewal applications and for unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2006, and June 8, 2006, respectively, the Bureau issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-829A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-829A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0007693641 File No. BR-20050408ACG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 14, 2009 Released: April 15, 2009 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Dewey D. Lankford (``Lankford''), former licensee of Station WANA(AM), Anniston, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for his failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 17, 2006, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Lankford
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1029A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1029A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0009664343 File No. BRFT-20060323AGD FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 3, 2010 Released: June 4, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Lane County School District 4J (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K211BP, Florence, Oregon (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1042A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1042A1.pdf
  • 62109 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410043 FRN: 0013143805 File No. BR-20050323AGL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2010 Released: June 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Stocks Broadcasting, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFHK(AM) (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1063A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1063A1.pdf
  • Facility ID No. 52550 File No. BR-20050407IHO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 10, 2010 Released: June 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, one hundred dollars ($1,100) to Piedmont Radio Co. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WPID(AM), Piedmont, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 27, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1072A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1072A1.pdf
  • ID No. 91339 NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410107 FRN: 0009461716 File No. BRED-20050124AGB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 14, 2010 Released: June 15, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000) to Grace Baptist Church (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WBLW(FM) (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Bureau granted the Station license renewal application and issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1179A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1179A1.pdf
  • No. BRL-20060928AQD FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 25, 2010 Released: June 28, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Whidbey Island Center for the Arts (``Licensee''), licensee of Low Power FM (``LPFM'') Station KWPA-LP, Coupeville, Washington (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 19, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1180A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1180A1.pdf
  • March 26, 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability (``Response'') filed on behalf of Faith Enterprises, Inc. (``Faith''), licensee of Station WZOO(AM), Asheboro, North Carolina (``Station''). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 22, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), issued to Faith for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (``Application'') and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February 22,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1196A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1196A1.pdf
  • 0011194388 File No. BRED-20040707ABK FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 28, 2010 Released: June 29, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) to Oberlin College Student Network, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WOBC-FM, Oberlin, Ohio (``Station''). Licensee willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current Station license term should
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-122A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-122A1.pdf
  • have before us a March 13, 2007, Petition for Reconsideration (``Response'') filed on behalf of Wennes Communications Stations, Inc. (``Wennes'') licensee of Station KHPP(AM), Waukon, Iowa (``Station''). The Response seeks cancellation or substantial reduction of the February 13, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to Wennes for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application (``Application'') and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on February 13,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1273A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1273A1.pdf
  • No. BRED-20050913AAH FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 7, 2010 Released: July 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Christian Action Team, Inc. (``CAT''), former licensee of Station KJLG(FM) (formerly KNGM(FM)), Emporia, Kansas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 2, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CAT in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1280A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1280A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0010669588 File No. BRED-20050929AIO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2010 Released: July 9, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to West Texas A&M University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KWTS(FM), Canyon, Texas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1281A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1281A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0013088547 Facility ID No. 65336 File No. BRED-20050928AMN FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2010 Released: July 9, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Texas Southern University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KTSU(FM), Houston, Texas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file its license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1282A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1282A1.pdf
  • before him a February 27, 2007, letter (``Response'') filed on behalf of Friends of KHFM-Ruidoso (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KHFM(FM), Ruidoso, New Mexico (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for Licensee's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for its failure to timely file a renewal application for the Station. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current license term should have been filed by June 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-130A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-130A1.pdf
  • its false certifications in the Modification Applications. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, that Ethics, Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for its apparent willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules and apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 73.3540 of the Commission's Rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, that, within thirty (30) days of the release date of this NAL, Ethics, Inc. SHALL PAY the full amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1449A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1449A1.pdf
  • No. MB-200741410225 FRN: 0011733425 File No. BRFT-20060515ADD FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 5, 2010 Released: August 5, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Eddie Floyd (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K273AF, Carson City, Nevada (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 5, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1555A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1555A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1590A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1590A1.pdf
  • 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Response'') filed on behalf of Faith Bible College, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTGF(FM), Milton, Florida (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the March 19, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) issued to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1591A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1591A1.pdf
  • The Chief, Audio Division, has before him an April 18, 2007, Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') filed by Metz, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTCL(AM), Chattahoochee, Florida (``Station''). Licensee requests cancellation of a March 19, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and Licensee's unauthorized operation of the Station after the license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for violating Sections 73.3539 of the Rules and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1605A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1605A1.pdf
  • Facility ID: 12842 File No. BRFT-20060718AES Dear Counsel: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Herbert J. Hedstrom on behalf of Community Christian Broadcasting (``CCB''), former licensee of FM Translator Station K294AI, Scandia, Kansas (``Station''), requesting cancellation of a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). CCB also seeks the refund of its $500 payment for the NAL. The violations addressed in the NAL involve CCB's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of the Station after its license for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1634A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1634A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0004282307 File No. BRH-20031121AKP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 26, 2010 Released: August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, two hundred dollars ($1,200) to Communications Systems, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFMI(FM), Southern Shores, North Carolina (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 22, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1635A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1635A1.pdf
  • 26465 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410094 FRN: 0007854961 File No. BR-20060627ABG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 26, 2010 Released: August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) to Hawkins Broadcasting Company (``Hawkins''), licensee of Station WWHN(AM), Joliet, Illinois (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On March 7, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1666A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1666A1.pdf
  • Tomsen: We have before us a November 18, 2009, Written Statement (``Statement''), filed by North Custer, Radio, Inc., (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Station K232CL, Challis, Idaho (``Station'') requesting reduction or cancellation of an October 16, 2009, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) for its apparent willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). The violations involve Licensee's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of the Station after its license for the Station had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1701A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1701A1.pdf
  • File No. BRFT-20041122AFX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 7, 2010 Released: September 8, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Living Word Communications, Inc. (``Living Word''), licensee of FM translator station W232AR, Marshfield, Wisconsin (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Living Word for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Living Word's renewal application for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1759A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1759A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1765A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1765A1.pdf
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410401 FRN: 0006828271 File No. BR-20061026ACV ORDER Adopted: September 17, 2010 Released: September 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: In this Order, we cancel the proposed forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Donald H. De Rosa (``Mr. De Rosa''), former licensee of WAMF(AM), Fulton, New York (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934 (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. On October 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1766A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1766A1.pdf
  • Response to our Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Response'') filed on behalf of Twin City Baptist Temple, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WCMX(AM), Leominster, Massachusetts (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation of the October 30, 2007, NAL in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) issued to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's current license term was due on December 1, 2005, four months prior
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1768A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1768A1.pdf
  • Division, has before him an April 18, 2005, Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'') filed by Central Georgia Broadcasting Company (``Central''), former licensee of Station WYTH(AM), Madison, Georgia (``Station''). Central requests cancellation of a March 16, 2005, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for Central's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station and unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Central for violating Sections 73.3539 of the Rules and 301
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1769A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1769A1.pdf
  • 0010694776 File No. BRED-20040602AAZ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 17, 2010 Released: September 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand, five hundred dollars ($3,500) to The University of Southern Mississippi (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station WUSM-FM, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and for willfully violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. BACKGROUND On March 27, 2007, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1793A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1793A1.pdf
  • No. MB-200741410073 FRN: 0003788890 File No. BRH-20050623AAO FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 21, 2010 Released: September 22, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Gallatin Valley Witness, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station KCMM(FM), Belgrade, Montana (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1952A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1952A1.pdf
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410462 FRN: 0005026166 File No. BR-20060302ACL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2010 Released: October 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Applegate Media, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of KAPL(AM), Phoenix, Oregon (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 20, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1993A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1993A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2003A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2003A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file timely license renewal applications for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after the licenses had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2009A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2009A1.pdf
  • MB-200741410145 FRN: 0005077110 File No. BR-20050531BPU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 19, 2010 Released: October 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Ray R. Silva (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KMXO(AM), Merkel, Texas (``Station'') for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND 2. On January 31, 2007, the Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2010A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2010A1.pdf
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB200741410396 FRN: 0014894042 File No. BRED-20060418ABG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 19, 2010 Released: October 20, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Pittsfield Public School Committee ("Licensee"), licensee of station WTBR-FM, Pittsfield, Massachusetts (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On October 17, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2011A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2011A1.pdf
  • 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Response'') filed on behalf of O-N Radio, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WOON(AM), Woonsocket, Rhode Island (``Station''). The Response requests the cancellation of the October 17, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) issued to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), for its failure to timely file a license renewal application. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Licensee for filing the renewal application in paper format without demonstrating good cause. Background. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's current license term was due on December 1, 2005, four months
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2032A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2032A1.pdf
  • South Hadley, Massachusetts ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: October 21, 2010 Released: October 22, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Trustees of Mount Holyoke College (``Licensee''), licensee of WMHC(FM), South Hadley, Massachusetts (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND 2. On November 15, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2260A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2260A1.pdf
  • (the ``Station''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2312A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2312A1.pdf
  • No. BR-20060112AAI FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 06, 2010 Released: December 07, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to The Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of KABR(AM), Isleta, New Mexico (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and its willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 13, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2339A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2339A1.pdf
  • MB-200741410319 FRN: 0010296325 File No. BR-20040224AAC FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 9, 2010 Released: December 10, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Robert John Williamson (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WGYV(AM), Greenville, Alabama (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On March 4, 2008, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current Station
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2374A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2374A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0004519880 File No. BRED-20051223AAU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 16, 2010 Released: December 17, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Trinity Church of the Nazarene (``Trinity''), former licensee of Station KRQZ(FM), Lompoc, California (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 4, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2385A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2385A1.pdf
  • No. BRED-20031203ABX FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 20, 2010 Released: December 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to The Florida Institute of Technology (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational radio station WFIT(FM), Melbourne, Florida (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On March 21, 2007, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for failure to timely file the Station's renewal application. As noted
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2393A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2393A1.pdf
  • MB200741410054 FRN: 0009785098 File No. BR-20050324ABX ORDER Adopted: December 21, 2010 Released: December 22, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to R & B Communications, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of radio station WWTM(AM), Decatur, Alabama (``Station'') and admonish Licensee for violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') granted the above-referenced application for license renewal. On April 19, 2007, the Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2394A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2394A1.pdf
  • Ross: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Great Falls Community Broadcasting Company on behalf of Falls Area Community Television, Inc. (``FACT''), licensee of Low Power FM Station WOOL-LP, Bellows Falls, Vermont (``Station''), requesting cancellation of a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). FACT also seeks the refund of its $250 payment for the NAL. The violation addressed in the NAL involves FACT's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we deny FACT's request for cancellation of the NAL and deny its request for a refund of the paid forfeiture. Background.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-260A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-260A1.pdf
  • No. BRFT-20060207AAE FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 16, 2010 Released: February 17, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand four hundred dollars ($3,400) to CARE Broadcasting, Inc. (``CARE''), licensee of Station KHGN(FM) and FM translator station K220CN, Kirksville, Missouri (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of fourteen
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-261A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-261A1.pdf
  • February 17, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750) to Spokane Public Radio, Inc. (``Spokane''), licensee of FM translator stations K220BW, Kellogg, Idaho; K269DU, Sandpoint, Idaho; and K220BX, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (collectively, ``Stations''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of four thousand, five hundred dollars ($4,500) to Spokane for these violations. In response to the NAL, Spokane submitted a response (``Response'') on March 19,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-343A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-343A1.pdf
  • 7, 2007, Reply to Notice of Apparent Liability (``Reply'') filed on behalf of Fairview Broadcasting, Inc. (``Fairview''), former licensee of Station WPFD(AM), Fairview, Tennessee (``Station''). The Reply requests the cancellation or substantial reduction of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for Fairview's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). The violations involve Fairview's failure to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and its unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. By this action, we cancel the NAL and admonish Fairview for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-344A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-344A1.pdf
  • No. BRED-20040913AAR FRN: 0011510450 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 25, 2010 Released: February 26, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Bible Broadcast Church School (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WMSD(FM), Rose Township, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application. BACKGROUND On, December 20, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for failing to timely file its license renewal application. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-364A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-364A1.pdf
  • the Audio Division is a March 2, 2007, Response to Notice of Apparent Liability (``Response'') filed on behalf of RSE Broadcasting, LLC (``RSE''), former licensee of Station WSVX(AM) (formerly WKWH), Shelbyville, Indiana (``Station''). RSE seeks cancellation of the January 31, 2007, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we cancel the monetary forfeiture issued on January 31, 2007,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-392A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-392A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-414A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-414A1.pdf
  • File No. BRED-20051004ABQ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 10, 2010 Released: March 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to San Juan Unified School District (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KYDS(FM), Sacramento, California (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 14, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-415A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-415A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0011154796 File No. BRED-20040630ACB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 10, 2010 Released: March 11, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Tennessee Technological University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTTU(FM), Cookeville, Tennessee (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-432A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-432A1.pdf
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-440A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-440A1.pdf
  • 0013131453 File No. BRFT-20050414AAJ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 15, 2010 Released: March 16, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Friends of Christian Radio (``FCR''), licensee of FM translator station K228DI, Sidney, Nebraska (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-441A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-441A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 15, 2010 Released: March 16, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Alacca Bible Conference, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Stations K213BN, Orofino, Idaho, and K215AB, Kamiah, Idaho (collectively, ``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), for its failure to timely file the Stations' license renewal applications. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued two separate Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NALs'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) each to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-443A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-443A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0007879455 File No. BRED-20040721AHP FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 15, 2010 Released: March 16, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Faith Trinity Assemblies (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WZYZ(FM), Spencer, Tennessee (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-541A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-541A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: March 26, 2010 Released: March 29, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000) to the Board of Regents, Northwest Missouri State University (``Northwest''), licensee of noncommercial educational (``NCE'') radio station KRNW(FM), Chillicothe, Missouri (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 13, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-566A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-566A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-575A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-575A1.pdf
  • File No. BRED-20050207ABW FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 30, 2010 Released: March 31, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to the Ritenour Consolidated School District (``Ritenour''), licensee of noncommercial educational (``NCE'') radio station KRHS(FM), Overland, Missouri (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2007, the Media Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-597A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-597A1.pdf
  • 0009042656 File No. BRFT-20070720AAU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Kane County Special Service District #1 (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K269DQ, Orderville, Utah (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 3, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-598A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-598A1.pdf
  • 0011373347 File No. BRED-20040811AAY FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Little Miami Local Schools (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WLMH(FM), Morrow, Ohio (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it failed
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-601A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-601A1.pdf
  • File No. BR-20040323AUV FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Barnesville Broadcasting, Inc. (``Barnesville Broadcasting''), former licensee of Station WBAF(AM), Barnesville, Georgia (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 27, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Barnesville Broadcasting for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Rules, based on the fact that it
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-603A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-603A1.pdf
  • ID No. 12220 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200641410117 FRN: 008345886 File No. BRED-20050829AAQ FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 5, 2010 Released: April 6, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Colby Community College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KTCC(FM) (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-619A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-619A1.pdf
  • BRFT-20050728ABG FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 9, 2010 Released: April 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to La Promesa Foundation (``Licensee''), licensee of FM translator station K217CM, Clayton, New Mexico (``Station''), for its willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. II. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station should have
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-620A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-620A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the captioned WARY(FM) renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-621A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-621A1.pdf
  • MB-200741410018 FRN: 0010782563 File No. BRED-20050316ABW FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 9, 2010 Released: April 12, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Manchester College (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WBKE-FM, North Manchester, Indiana (``Station''). Licensee willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-634A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-634A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 13, 2010 Released: April 14, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) to Christian Radio Fellowship (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFTF(FM), Rutland, Vermont, and FM translator station W220AX, Ludlow, Vermont (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations, and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after their authorizations had expired. BACKGROUND On November 15, 2007, the Bureau issued two separate Notices of Apparent Liability for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-63A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-63A1.pdf
  • 12, 2010 Released: January 13, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) to Boundary County TV Translator District (``Licensee''), licensee of FM Translator Stations K217FR (formerly K220AE), K296BJ, K265AV, K257DH, and K272AR (``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Stations and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations. II. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued five Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (collectively, the ``NALs'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-673A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-673A1.pdf
  • 0006373559 File No. BRFT-20040730ADB FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 20, 2010 Released: April 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of FM translator station W201BW, Hopkinsville, Kentucky (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On June 25, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to BBN for this violation. As noted in the NAL, BBN's renewal application for the Station's license
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-674A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-674A1.pdf
  • No. BRED-20060619ACK FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 20, 2010 Released: April 21, 2010 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Centerville City Schools Board of Education (``Centerville''), licensee of Class D Station WCWT-FM, Centerville, Ohio ( ``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-675A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-675A1.pdf
  • Introduction}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \f0\kerning0 \par {\pntext\pard\plain\ltrpar \s15 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\kerning28 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 1.\tab}}\pard\plain \ltrpar\s15\ql \fi720\li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\jclisttab\tx1440\wrapdefault{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls6\pnrnot0 \pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnsp120 {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls6\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\lang1033\langfe1033\kerning28\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Nicholls State University (\'93Nicholls\'94), licensee of radio station KNSU(FM), Thibodaux, Louisiana (\'93Station\'94), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission\rquote s Rules (\'93Rules\'94) by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (\'93Act \'94) by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs19\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar \s18\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-906A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-906A1.pdf
  • the Media Bureau and Danville Christian Radio, Ltd. (the ``Licensee''), licensee of Station DWVOV(AM), Danville, Virginia (the ``Station''). The Consent Decree resolves issues arising from the Bureau's review of the captioned license renewal application. These issues include whether the Licensee violated Section 73.3526 of the Commission's rules (the ``Rules''), which governs the maintenance of a commercial station's public file, Section 73.3539 of the Rules, which sets forth the filing deadline for license renewal applications, and Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act), which requires a valid authorization from the Commission to operate a broadcast station. 2. The Consent Decree provides, among other things, that the Licensee and, if applicable, its successors and assigns, will institute and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-921A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-921A1.pdf
  • Wamego, Kansas. For the reasons set forth below, we deem filed the renewal application filed on January 25, 2005 (the ``Renewal Application''), dismiss as moot the renewal application filed on October 22, 2009, and assess the Licensee a 25 percent late-fee penalty charge. Furthermore, we grant, contingent on the timely payment of the requisite penalty, the Renewal Application. Background. Section 73.3539(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of KHCA(FM)'s license should have been filed by February 1, 2005. No such
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1064A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1064A1.pdf
  • In re: Tennessee Technological University Licensee of Station WTTU(FM) Cookeville, Tennessee Facility ID: 65217 File No. BRED-20040630ACB Dear Mr. Hutchison: We have before us a letter (``Letter'') filed by Tennessee Technological University (``TTU''), licensee of Station WTTU(FM), Cookeville, Tennessee (``Station''), requesting reduction of a Forfeiture Order in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The violation addressed in the Forfeiture Order involves TTU's failure to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. By this action, we deny TTU's request for reduction of the Forfeiture Order. Background. As noted in the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), TTU's license renewal application for the Station was due on
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-108A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-108A1.pdf
  • File No. BRH-20040405ACH FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 20, 2011 Released: January 21, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200) to Southern Broadcasting & Investment Co., Inc. (``Southern''), licensee of Station WBTY(FM), Homerville, Georgia (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On September 17, 2010, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1091A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1091A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on August 4, 2009, by Florala Broadcasting Company (``Florala''), licensee of Station WKWL(AM), Florala, Alabama (``Station''). Florala seeks reconsideration of the Media Bureau's (``Bureau'') Forfeiture Order in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for Florala's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition. Background Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for license renewal for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1105A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1105A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION The Audio Division has before it a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on November 20, 2008, by Manuel Huerta, licensee of Station WJHX(AM) (``Station''), Lexington, Alabama. The Petition requests reconsideration of a twelve thousand eight hundred dollar ($12,800) Forfeiture Order released on October 6, 2008, for Huerta's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to file a timely renewal application for the Station, and for willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station, and of Section 73.3526 of the Rules by failing to properly maintain a public inspection file for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1135A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1135A1.pdf
  • we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) to La Tremenda Radio Mexico, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KZUE(AM), El Reno, Oklahoma (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Licensee in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for these violations. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the current license term should
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1138A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1138A1.pdf
  • Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on November 19, 2010, by Pittsfield Public School Committee (``Pittsfield''), licensee of Station WTBR-FM, Pittsfield, Massachusetts (``Station''). Pittsfield seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order issued by the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for Pittsfield's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license expired. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we grant reconsideration in part and reduce the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1227A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1227A1.pdf
  • and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau (the ``Bureau'') by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely renewal application for the Station, and willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1338A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1338A1.pdf
  • Division has before it a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on May 23, 2011, by Applied Life Ministries, Inc. (``Applied Life''), former licensee of KALR(FM), Hot Springs, Arkansas (``Station''). The Petition requests reconsideration of a five thousand, six hundred dollar ($5,600) Forfeiture Order issued by the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') on February 8, 2011, for Applied Life's willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application, and willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the Petition. BACKGROUND On April 23, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1339A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1339A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1341A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1341A1.pdf
  • File No. BRFT-20040609AAI FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 2, 2011 Released: August 3, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to Butler Broadcasting Company, L.L.C. (``Butler''), former licensee of FM translator station K246BS (formerly K244DS), Fayetteville, Arkansas (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2005, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1437A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1437A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1438A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1438A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1601A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1601A1.pdf
  • (the ``Station''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1602A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1602A1.pdf
  • (the ``Station''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1603A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1603A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1663A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1663A1.pdf
  • 13630 NAL/Acct. No. MB-201141410004 FRN: 0007934268 File No. BR-20101008ABU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2011 Released: October 3, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Nievezquez Productions, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WPRX(AM), Bristol, Connecticut (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1688A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1688A1.pdf
  • before us is Capstar TX Limited Partnership's (``Capstar'') Petition to Deny and its ``Motion to Dismiss'' filed against the First and Second Applications, respectively, as well as related pleadings. Pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), we find that Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules by failing to timely file the First Application for the Station and for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1752A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1752A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1753A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1753A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1757A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1757A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1758A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1758A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1805A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1805A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by continuing Station operations after its license had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1823A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1823A1.pdf
  • We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed on March 9, 2011, by Robert and Katherine Bohn (collectively, the ``Licensees''), licensees of Stations KCNQ(FM), Kernville, California, KRVQ-FM (formerly KVLI-FM), Lake Isabella, California, and KVLI(AM) (formerly KQAB(AM)), Lake Isabella, California (collectively, the ``Stations''). The Petition requests reconsideration of two forfeiture orders issued to the Licensees for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to file a timely license renewal application for, and engaging in unauthorized operation of, each of the Stations. For the reasons stated below, we deny the Petition. Background. On September 25, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1947A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1947A1.pdf
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and we grant the Station's license renewal application. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1961A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1961A1.pdf
  • Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by authority delegated to the Bureau under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules, by failing to file timely license renewal applications for the Station, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act, by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1980A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1980A1.pdf
  • NAL/Acct. No. MB2011941410014 FRN: 0007821846 File No. BR-20100604ACU FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 5, 2011 Released: December 6, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000), to R&M Broadcasting Company (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KJCB(AM), Lafayette, Louisiana (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for its failure to timely file a license renewal application and for unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On July 22, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-2014A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-2014A1.pdf
  • No. MB-2007414140318 FRN: 0011431749 File No. BR-20040830ACC FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 13, 2011 Released: December 14, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Taylor Broadcasting (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WJTB(AM), North Ridgeville, Ohio (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to file a timely license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On May 3, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) to Licensee for this violation. As noted in the NAL, Licensee's renewal application for the Station's license
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-223A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-223A1.pdf
  • 43280 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410428 FRN: 0003787793 File No. BRL-20060719AAL FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 4, 2011 Released: February 7, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to MM&K of Alva, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of KALV(AM), Alva, Oklahoma (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by continuing to operate the Station after its license expired. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-234A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-234A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0006123392 File No. BRH-20061027ACI FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 7, 2011 Released: February 8, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Robert J. and Katherine M. Bohn (collectively, ``Licensees''), licensees of Station KCNQ(FM), Kernville, California (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file license a renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. II. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2007, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), proposing a forfeiture in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-235A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-235A1.pdf
  • 2011 Released: February 8, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Robert J. and Katherine M. Bohn (collectively, ``Licensees''), licensees of Stations KVLI-FM Lake Isabella, California, and KQAB(AM), Lake Isabella, California (each, a ``Station,'' collectively, ``Stations''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. II. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2007, the Bureau issued two separate Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``Bohn NALs''), each proposing a forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-236A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-236A1.pdf
  • See, e.g., Vista Point Communications, Inc}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 ., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Forfeiture Order, 14 FCC Rcd 140, 140 n.2 (MMB 1999) (finding licensee liable for forfeiture for violations of the Commission's Rules that took place when station was under its stewardship). }}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 of KALR(FM), Hot Springs, Arkansas }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 (\'93Station\'94), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission\rquote s Rules (\'93Rules\'94) by fai ling to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (\'93Act\'94) by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs32\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s27\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\tx180\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\wrapdefault\aspalpha\ aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-265A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-265A1.pdf
  • 31856 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200841410019 FRN: 00103114078 File No. BR-20070925AIA FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 10, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000) to James Rouse (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WTOW(AM), Washington, North Carolina (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file his license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On April 2, 2008, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-266A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-266A1.pdf
  • No. MB-200841410020 FRN: 0010019768 File No. BR-20070925AIM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 9, 2011 Released: February 10, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of thirteen thousand dollars ($13,000) to The Minority Voice, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WOOW(AM), Greenville, North Carolina (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by failing to timely file its license renewal application and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On April 2, 2008, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-283A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-283A1.pdf
  • captioned license renewal application. These issues include whether Licensee violated Section 73.3527}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar \s20\qj \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn }{ \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R. \'a7 73.3527.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 of the Commission\rquote s rules (\'93Rules\'94), which governs the maintenance of a noncommercial station\rquote s public file; Section 73.3539}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s20\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs22\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i See}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1033\langfe2052\langfenp2052 \'a7 73.3539.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 of the Rules, which sets forth the filing deadline for license renewal applications; Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-397A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-397A1.pdf
  • No. 89006 NAL/Acct. No. MB-200741410311 File No. BRFT-20040730ADB MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 1, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of the captioned FM translator station (the ``Station''), filed a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Forfeiture Order issued to BBN for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny reconsideration and affirm the forfeiture issued by the Media Bureau, Audio Division (``Bureau'') in the total amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to BBN. Background On June 25, 2007, the Bureau issued a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-398A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-398A1.pdf
  • No. BRH-20030728AGV MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 1, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of the captioned FM translator stations (collectively, ``Stations''), filed a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Forfeiture Order issued to BBN on June 6, 2008, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny the Petition and affirm the forfeitures issued by the Media Bureau, Audio Division (``Bureau'') in the total amount of five hundred dollars ($500) to BBN. Background On August 3, 2004, the Bureau issued two Notices of Apparent Liability for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-399A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-399A1.pdf
  • No. 77191 NAL/Acct. No. MB-20074140187 File No. BRFT-20050701ABZ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 1, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction Bible Broadcasting Network, Inc. (``BBN''), licensee of the captioned FM translator station (the ``Station''), filed a Petition for Reconsideration (the ``Petition'') of the Forfeiture Orders issued to BBN for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny reconsideration and affirm the forfeiture issued by the Media Bureau, Audio Division (``Bureau'') in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) to BBN. Background On February 12, 2007, the Bureau issued a Memorandum
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-678A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-678A1.pdf
  • File No. BRED-20050124AGB MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: April 13, 2011 Released: April 14, 2011 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: Introduction We have before us a Petition for Reconsideration (``Petition'') filed by Grace Baptist Church (``Licensee''), licensee of Station KBLW(FM), Gaylord, Michigan (``Station''). Licensee filed this Petition in response to a Forfeiture Order issued for willful violation Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and for its willful and repeated violation Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. For the reasons set forth below, we deny reconsideration with respect to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-682A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-682A1.pdf
  • did not seek an extension of the STA. Instead, on May 1, 2009, the Trustee filed an STA to remain silent, which the staff dismissed on July 8, 2009 after the Station returned to the air. On October 16, 2009, the Bureau issued an NAL in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to the Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its license had expired. The Trustee timely filed a Response to the NAL. In her Response, the Trustee
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-690A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-690A1.pdf
  • a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two-hundred fifty dollars ($250) to Paul Smith's College (``Licensee''), licensee of Class D FM Station WPSA(FM), Paul Smiths, New York (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On November 19, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee for these violations. Licensee filed a Request for Reduction or Cancellation (``Request'') on December 26,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-694A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-694A1.pdf
  • in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000) to Escalante City (``Licensee''), former licensee of FM translator Station K237AD, Escalante, Utah (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in the unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications for the Station. BACKGROUND On March 15, 2010, the Media Bureau adopted a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand ($4,000) to Licensee for these violations. On March 30, 2010, Licensee filed a response to the NAL (``Response'').
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-987A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-987A1.pdf
  • a monetary forfeiture in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to Adrian College (``Licensee''), licensee of Class D noncommercial educational radio station WVAC-FM, Adrian, Michigan (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. We also admonish Licensee for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2007, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Licensee for these violations. Licensee filed a Request for Cancellation or Reduction of Proposed Forfeiture (``Request'')
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-186A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-186A1.pdf
  • formal agreement was executed on November 10, 2010. See File No. BALFT-20101118AIX, Exh. 1. See, e.g., Edwards v. Wyatt, 2009 WL 1395472 (3rd Cir. 2009) (calculating damages based on handshake agreement); Canet v. Gooch Ware Travelstead, 917 F.Supp. 969 (E.D.N.Y. 1996) (enforcing handshake agreement). Reply, Exhibit A. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). See Petition at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539(a). See BRFT-20110927AHB. The renewal application was uncontested. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 13, 2012 DA 12-186 In Reply Refer to 1800B3-SAR/KAD Released: February 13, 2012 � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_ �e�P�g� �ك�� �_ą
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-205A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-205A1.pdf
  • File Nos. BR-20110525ADI BR-20110902AAE FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 13, 2012 Released: February 14, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of four thousand six hundred dollars ($4,600) to Hope Broadcasting, Inc. (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WFGN(AM), Gaffney, South Carolina (``Station''), for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by twice failing to timely file a license renewal application, and for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station after its authorization had expired. BACKGROUND On December 1, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-219A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-219A1.pdf
  • No. MB-201141410003 FRN: 0020240347 File No. BRED-20101007AAM FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2012 Released: February 15, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to St. Bonaventure University (``Licensee''), licensee of Station WSBU(FM), St. Bonaventure, New York (``Station''), for willfully violating Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') by failing to timely file license renewal applications and engaging in unauthorized operation of the Station. BACKGROUND On September 26, 2011, the Media Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $7,000
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-986A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-986A1.pdf
  • June 22, 2012 Released: June 22, 2012 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500), to Bethany College (``Licensee''), licensee of noncommercial educational (``NCE'') Station WVBC(FM), Bethany, West Virginia (``Station''), for its willful and repeated violation of Sections 73.561 and 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by remaining off the air without Commission authorization for a period of more than 30 days and failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. BACKGROUND On April 27, 2012, the Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of six thousand, five hundred dollars ($6,500) to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-204A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-204A1.pdf
  • Division, Media Bureau, prior to the date of the change. (3) Where a station is authorized pursuant to a voluntary time-sharing proposal, the parties to the time-sharing agreement may apportion among themselves any air time that, for any reason, becomes vacant. (4) Successive license terms granted under subsection (d) may be converted into voluntary time-sharing arrangements renewable pursuant to Section 73.3539 by submitting a universal time-sharing proposal. (d) Successive license terms. (1) If a tie among mutually exclusive applications is not resolved through voluntary time-sharing in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the tied applications will be reviewed for acceptability and applicants with tied, grantable applications will be eligible for equal, successive, non-renewable license terms of no less than one
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-10A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-10A1.pdf
  • deletion of the KTMN(FM) call sign and all associated authorizations, A-O continued and eventually completed construction at Wofford Peak. On July 3, 2003, A-O filed two applications: one requesting ``renewal'' of the station's expired license, and the other seeking a license to cover the newly completed Wofford Peak facilities. The license renewal application contained a request for waiver of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') concerning timeliness of license renewal applications, because the application was filed more than a year before the June 1, 2005, filing deadline for New Mexico radio station renewals. Both applications indicated that A-O had operated the station after the November 8, 2002, Section 312(g) forfeiture of its license. A-O claimed that such operations were
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-9A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-9A1.pdf
  • ``renew'' KVEZ(FM)'s expired license. The March Petition states that on February 23, 2004, immediately upon its receipt of the Staff Decision, Eagle removed KVEZ(FM) from the air. The license renewal application indicated that the station was silent in March 2004, but had not been silent for any consecutive 12-month period. The renewal application contained a request for waiver of Section 73.3539 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') concerning timeliness of license renewal applications, because the application was filed more than a year before the June 1, 2005, filing deadline for Arizona radio station renewals. On April 29, 2004, Eagle requested STA to operate from the Buckskin site (``2004 STA Request''). On May 3, 2004, the staff dismissed the renewal application, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-102A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-102A1.pdf
  • public interest, convenience, and necessity, as required by Section 310(d) of the Act. B. License Renewal Applications Also pending before the Commission are renewal applications for Stations WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM. In view of our determination regarding the Second Thursday application and for the reasons set forth below we grant the renewal applications. As a preliminary matter, we note that Section 73.3539(a) of the rules requires that applications for renewal of licenses for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' On September 30, 2003, Family filed an application seeking renewal of the licenses for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM. This satisfied the
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
  • [620]TEXT [621]PDF 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial educational stations. [622]TEXT [623]PDF 73.3533 Application for construction permit or modification of construction permit. [624]TEXT [625]PDF 73.3536 Application for license to cover construction permit. [626]TEXT [627]PDF 73.3537 Application for license to use former main antenna as an auxiliary. [628]TEXT [629]PDF 73.3538 Application to make changes in an existing station. [630]TEXT [631]PDF 73.3539 Application for renewal of license. [632]TEXT [633]PDF 73.3540 Application for voluntary assignment or transfer of control. [634]TEXT [635]PDF 73.3541 Application for involuntary assignment of license or transfer of control. [636]TEXT [637]PDF 73.3542 Application for emergency authorization. [638]TEXT [639]PDF 73.3543 Application for renewal or modification of special service authorization. [640]TEXT [641]PDF 73.3544 Application to obtain a modified station license. [642]TEXT [643]PDF
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
  • [573]TEXT [574]PDF 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial educational stations. [575]TEXT [576]PDF 73.3533 Application for construction permit or modification of construction permit. [577]TEXT [578]PDF 73.3536 Application for license to cover construction permit. [579]TEXT [580]PDF 73.3537 Application for license to use former main antenna as an auxiliary. [581]TEXT [582]PDF 73.3538 Application to make changes in an existing station. [583]TEXT [584]PDF 73.3539 Application for renewal of license. [585]TEXT [586]PDF 73.3540 Application for voluntary assignment or transfer of control. [587]TEXT [588]PDF 73.3541 Application for involuntary assignment of license or transfer of control. [589]TEXT [590]PDF 73.3542 Application for emergency authorization. [591]TEXT [592]PDF 73.3543 Application for renewal or modification of special service authorization. [593]TEXT [594]PDF 73.3544 Application to obtain a modified station license. [595]TEXT [596]PDF
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1110.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1110.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1110.pdf
  • (same); May 19, 1995 Letter from James R. Burtle to Birach (same); September 11, 1995 Letter from James R. Burtle to Birach (same). The WDMV license that Birach acquired from Five Star was scheduled to expire on October 1, 1995. Consistent with the FCC rule requiring a renewal applicant to file four months before the expiration date, see 47 C.F.R. 73.3539, Birach filed an application for renewal of broadcast station WDMV, Pocomoke City, Maryland dated May 30, 1995 (Renewal Application). On September 18, 1995 New World filed an informal objection, claiming, inter alia, that Birach had not operated the radio station during the approximately 32 months that it held the WDMV license and had no firm plans to do so. On