FCC Web Documents citing 73.3519

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306281A1.pdf
  • U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P 04/29/2011 Actions of: FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A LICENSED FACILITY DISMISSED , MORRISTOWN 88.1 MHZ E IN Minor change in licensed facilities. Engineering Amendment filed 04/13/2011 Engineering Amendment filed 04/14/2011 Dismissed by letter 4/29/2011 (47 CFR Section 73.3519(b) violation) INDIANA COMMUNITY RADIO CORP. WJCF-FM 91193 BPED-20110314ABB IN DIGITAL TV APPLICATIONS FOR LICENSE TO COVER GRANTED , BILOXI CHAN-39 E MS License to cover construction permit no: BPCDT-20090930AGN, callsign WLOX. Engineering Amendment filed 04/27/2011 WLOX LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC WLOX 13995 BLCDT-20091217AEF MS , SEATTLE CHAN-38 E WA License to cover construction permit no: BPCDT-20090527AAF, callsign KOMO-TV. FISHER BROADCASTING -
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
  • (EEO). [ [589]Media Bureau's EEO Page ] [590]TEXT [591]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [592]TEXT [593]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [594]TEXT [595]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [596]TEXT [597]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [598]TEXT [599]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [600]TEXT [601]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [602]TEXT [603]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [604]TEXT [605]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [606]TEXT [607]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [608]TEXT [609]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [610]TEXT [611]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [612]TEXT [613]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [614]TEXT [615]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in renewal proceedings. [616]TEXT [617]PDF 73.3525 Agreements for removing application conflicts. [618]TEXT [619]PDF 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations. [620]TEXT [621]PDF 73.3527 Local
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fc00019a.doc
  • AM broadcast tower. Section 73.1745-Unauthorized operation. Section 73.1750-Discontinuance of operation. Section 73.1920-Personal attacks. Section 73.1940-Legally qualified candidates for public office. Section 73.1941-Equal opportunities. Section 73.1943-Political file. Section 73.1944-Reasonable access. Section 73.3511-Applications required. Section 73.3512-Where to file; number of copies. Section 73.3513-Signing of applications. Section 73.3514-Content of applications. Section 73.3516-Specification of facilities. Section 73.3517-Contingent applications. Section 73.3518-Inconsistent or conflicting applications. Section 73.3519-Repetitious applications. Section 73.3520-Multiple applications. Section 73.3525-Agreements for removing application conflicts. Section 73.3539-Application for renewal of license. Section 73.3542-Application for emergency authorization. Section 73.3545-Application for permit to deliver programs to foreign stations. Section 73.3550-Requests for new or modified call sign assignments. Section 73.3561-Staff consideration of applications requiring Commission consideration. Section 73.3562-Staff consideration of applications not requiring action by the Commission. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/93-301.pdf
  • 2.OnJanuary22,1988,NIU/REBFfiledanapplication foranewnoncommercialeducationalFM("NCE-FM") stationtoserveRockford,Illinois.'OnMay27.1988.Open Mediafiledamutuallyexclusiveapplicationforanew NCE-FMstationtoserveChicago.Illinois.2Byletterdated May26.1989,followinganinformalobjectionbyNIU.the staffdeniedOpenMedia'srequestforwaiverofSection 73.509(x)oftheCommission'sRulesandreturnedOpen Media'sapplication.OnJune23.1989,OpenMediafiled itsapplicationforreviewofthereturnofitsapplication. OnJanuary23.1990,thestaff,bydelegatedauthority. grantedtheapplicationofNIU/REBFconditionedonthe finaldispositionofOpenMedia'sadministrativeappeal. ThegrantofthisconstructionpermitappearedonPublic Notice(ReportNo.20776)ofJanuary29,1990.Thereafter, onFebruary28.1990,OpenMediafileditspetitionfor reconsiderationofthestaffactiongrantingtheNIU/REBF application. DISCUSSION 8FCCRcd.No.13 3. ApplicationforReviewofDismissalofOpenMedia Application.Initsapplicationforreview.OpenMediaar- gues:thatthestafffailedtoconsiderthebasicpublicinter- estquestionsunderSection307(b)oftheCommunications Actof1934.asamended;thatithasmetthestandardfor waivertoreceiveinterferencebydemonstratingthe unavailabilityofalternativesites;thatthestaffrulingis premisedonaninappropriatelegalstandardinthatthe stafftookanabsolutistviewoftheoverlaprule:thatthe requestedwaiverisconsistentwithpreviousactionsbythe Commission;thatthestaffrulingispremisedonanerro- neousunderstandingofthenatureoftheoverlaparea;that underSection307(b)OpenMedia'sproposednewservice toChicagoistobepreferredoverNIU'sduplicativeservice toRockford:andthatthestationfromwhichOpenMedia wouldreceiveinterference.WAUS(FM). BerrienSprings, Michigan.woulditselfreceiveinterferencefromyetan- otherstation.Accordingly;OpenMediaseekstohavethe staffrulingvacated.grantofitsrequestedwaiverofSection 73.509oftheCommission'sRules.andnuncprotuncac- ceptanceofitsapplication. 4.Initsopposition,NIUarguesthat:OpenMedia's failuretocomplywiththeCommission'srulesisfataland thatwaiverisnotwarrantedbecauseOpenMedia'sinabil- itytocoverChicagodoesnotmakeothersitesunavailable; thenon-technicalpublicserviceargumentsshouldbeig- noredandshouldnotbesubstitutedforpurelytechnical allocationsquestions:OpenMedia'sapplicationhasnot beensubjecttodisparatetreatmentasevidencedbythefact thatNIU/REBF'searlierapplicationforanewFMfacility atRockford,Illinoishadbeenreturnedbecausethepro- posalwouldreceiveobjectionableinterferenceto1.3 percentofitsprotected60dBucontour;and.thatOpen Media'snon-technical,servicerelatedargumentsareirrele- CorporationfromDennisWilliams,Chief,FMBranch,Audio ServicesDivision(8920-WJG).Sincethisfirstapplicationwas returnedandnotdeniedordismissedwithprejudice.thestaff determinedthatOpenMedia'sMay27.1988.applicationdidnot violateSection73.3519(Repetitiousapplications)oftheCom- mission'sRules.SeeLettertoOpenMediaCorporationfrom LarryD.Eads,Chief,AudioServicesDivision,datedMay26, 1989(8920-DT)("Eadsletter'). Seen.l 8FCCRcd.No.13 vantandseektoshiftthefocusofinquiryawayfromthe onlyproperissue,namelytheacceptabilityofOpenMe- dia'sapplicationunderSection73.509oftheCommission's Rules.Insummary.NIUarguesthatOpenMedia's voluntarynon-compliancewithSection73.509oftheCom- mission'sRulesmilitatesagainsttherequestedreliefand mandatesaffirmanceofthestaffaction. 5.OpenMedia'sapplicationforreviewisessentiallya restatementofargumentspreviouslyconsideredandre- jectedbythestaff.SeeEadsletter.Therethestaff.citing BoardofEducationoftheCityofAtlanta,48RR2d637, 639(1980).correctlynotedthatincreasedcoverageatthe expenseofobjectionableinterferencealonedoesnotjustify awaiverof'theFMallocationsrules.Acomparisonbe- tweenthenumberofpeopleservedandthenumberpre- cludedisnotnowandhasneverbeenthepertinent standardforjudgingthepreclusionaryeffectofaNCE-FM proposal.ItistheoverallschemeofNCE-FMallocations whichisparamount.andwhenfacedwithachoicebe- tweenalargerserviceareawithoverlapreceivedonone hand.andalessercoveragewithnoprohibitedoverlapon theother.theCommissionfavorsthelatter.SeeEduca- tionalInformationCorporation,6FCCRcd2207.2208 (1991). 6.Moreover.citingICBCCorporationvFCC,716F.2d 926(D.C.Cir.1983).thestaffproperlyrejectedOpen Media'sargumentwhichfocusedonitsprovidingthe"first minority/femalepublicradioservice."Initially.thestaff correctlynotedthatOpenMediamadenoshowingofa deficiencyofNCEservicetoChicagosuchthatawaiverof thetechnicalrules(whichformthebasisfortheCommis- sion'sNCE-FMallocationsscheme)wasnecessarytoper- mitabasiclevelofNCE-FMserviceandthereforewas warranted.Further,eventhoughOpenMediaseeksto achievewhatitbelievestobeacommendableobjective.it iswellestablishedthatourpolicyofrefusingtobasewaiv- ersofrulesdesignedtopreventinterferenceuponnon- technical considerations such as ownership or programmingisarationalimplementationofourmandate to"[makesuchregulationsnotinconsistentwithlawas [we]maydeemnecessarytopreventinterferencebetween stations...."47U.S.C.Section303(f).This policyhasbeen approvedbythecourts.Seee.g.ICBC,supra;NorthTe.ras :Media,Inc.vFCC,FCC84-456(releasedOctober5.1984), aff'd778F.2d28(D.C.Cir.1985);WalterF.Faber,Jr.,4 FCCRcd5492,5493(1989).recon.denied,6FCCRcd 3601(1991).aff'dsubnom.WalterP.Faber,!r.v.FCC,No. 91-177(D.C.Cir.June4.1992). 7.WefurtherfindthatOpenMedia'ssupplementalpub-
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
  • (EEO). [ [589]Media Bureau's EEO Page ] [590]TEXT [591]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [592]TEXT [593]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [594]TEXT [595]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [596]TEXT [597]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [598]TEXT [599]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [600]TEXT [601]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [602]TEXT [603]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [604]TEXT [605]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [606]TEXT [607]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [608]TEXT [609]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [610]TEXT [611]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [612]TEXT [613]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [614]TEXT [615]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in renewal proceedings. [616]TEXT [617]PDF 73.3525 Agreements for removing application conflicts. [618]TEXT [619]PDF 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations. [620]TEXT [621]PDF 73.3527 Local
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
  • (EEO). [ [542]Media Bureau's EEO Page ] [543]TEXT [544]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [545]TEXT [546]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [547]TEXT [548]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [549]TEXT [550]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [551]TEXT [552]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [553]TEXT [554]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [555]TEXT [556]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [557]TEXT [558]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [559]TEXT [560]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [561]TEXT [562]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [563]TEXT [564]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [565]TEXT [566]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [567]TEXT [568]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in renewal proceedings. [569]TEXT [570]PDF 73.3525 Agreements for removing application conflicts. [571]TEXT [572]PDF 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations. [573]TEXT [574]PDF 73.3527 Local