FCC Web Documents citing 73.3514

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2291A1.txt
  • See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j); 47 C.F.R. § 73.5005(d); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding for Commercial Broadcast and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licenses, First Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15920, 15944 (1998) (``Broadcast Auction First Report and Order''). See 47 U.S.C. § 8; 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.401(b), 1.1104, 1.1109, 1.1110, 73.5005(d), 73.3512, 73.3513, 73.3514. See 47 C.F.R. § 73.5005. Non-mutually exclusive applicants filing long form applications may propose minor changes to the technical proposals specified in their previous filing. However, such non-mutually exclusive applicants may not specify in their application a change in the proposed facility that constitutes a major change from the facility specified during the earlier auction filing window, nor may applicants
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1935A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1935A1.txt
  • The principal community contour of the proposed Pinetop facility and that of KTHQ(FM) overlapped. In the Petition to Deny, Navajo points out that the application, as initially tendered, lacked a ``duopoly'' showing demonstrating compliance with the Commission's local radio ownership rule. Navajo maintains that Konopnicki failed to include all information called for in FCC Form 301, as required by Section 73.3514(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), and therefore the application should be dismissed. We reject Navajo's contentions. The failure to include a duopoly study is not an omission that renders Konipnicki's application fatally defective. Moreover, on March 12, 1996, subsequent to the filing of the Petition to Deny, Konopnicki submitted an amendment containing, among other things, a duopoly showing. An
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3087A1.txt
  • See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j); 47 C.F.R. § 73.5005(d); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding for Commercial Broadcast and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licenses, First Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15920, 15944 (1998) (``Broadcast Auction First Report and Order''). See 47 U.S.C. § 8; 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.401(b), 1.1104, 1.1109, 1.1110, 73.5005(d), 73.3512, 73.3513, 73.3514. See 47 C.F.R. § 73.5005. Non-mutually exclusive applicants filing long form applications may propose minor changes to the technical proposals specified in their previous filing. However, such non-mutually exclusive applicants may not specify in their application a change in the proposed facility that constitutes a major change from the facility specified during the earlier auction filing window, nor may applicants
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1958A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1958A1.txt
  • (Community Television, MM Docket No. 86-45, FR Doc. 86-3253 at ¶ 2), denied the petition, and asked the applicant to amend its application to show that the signor was an officer of the applicant and was authorized to execute the application on behalf of the applicant. The issue designated for hearing involved the completeness of the application (47 C.F.R. § 73.3514, requiring applicants to provide all information requested in a form), not the authority of the signer (47 C.F.R. § 73.3513). The new cases cited by Plus in support of its argument that the Commission staff should have looked to the application as a whole to determine the correct site coordinates are also inapposite. See Second Petition at 5, citing Special
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-381A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. Section 1.115(g), that the application for review filed July 15, 1998 by Nationwide Communication Specialists IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Román Salas Secretary ALZ Broadcasting responded on January 27, 2000, pursuant to an informal staff request. The Commission, in its discretion, can consider this information to the extent necessary to resolve the instant allegations. 47 C.F.R. Section 73.3514. Letter to Henry E. Crawford, Esq., reference 1800B3-BSH (M.M. Bur., June 10, 1998). Under WWOR-TV, 6 FCC Rcd 193, 197 n.10 (1990) the Commission, in evaluating an informal objection under 47 C.F. R. Section 73.3587, will review the objectors' pleadings ``to determine whether it has alleged properly supported facts that, if true, would establish a substantial and material question of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-235A1.txt
  • III (Assignee), respectively. Item 1 asks each applicant to certify that it has reviewed the application, worksheets, and Instructions and that each of its certifications represents an accurate response based on those materials. 6 Univision Holdings, Inc., 7 FCC Rcd 6672, 6675 (1992). The staff retains the right to request omitted materials if appropriate. Id. See also 47 C.F.R. § 73.3514. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-235 3 reliance on Univision is misplaced because the Instructions to the subject application are dated April 2001 and thus supercede the 1992 Univision case. 5. We affirm the staff's decision to grant the assignment application, but we clarify the reasoning that leads to this result. We conclude that LUJ's and Long Nine's subject certifications were
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00120.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00120.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00120.txt
  • holding period must demonstrate the factors enumerated therein. 9. Section 73.3522 is amended to revise paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 73.3522 Amendment of applications ***** (b) Reserved Channel FM and reserved noncommercial educational television stations- Applications may be amended after Public Notice announcing a period for filing amendments. Amendments, when applicable, are subject to the provisions of Sections 73.3514, 73.3525, 73.3572, 73.3573, 73.3580, and Section 1.65. Unauthorized or untimely amendments are subject to return by the FCC's staff without consideration. Amendments will be accepted as described below and otherwise will only be considered upon a showing of good cause for late filing or pursuant to Section 1.65 or Section 73.3514: (i) Section 73.7002 Selectee. A Public Notice will announce
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
  • 73.1941 Equal opportunities. [581]TEXT [582]PDF 73.1942 Candidate rates. [583]TEXT [584]PDF 73.1943 Political file. [585]TEXT [586]PDF 73.1944 Reasonable access. [587]TEXT [588]PDF 73.2080 Equal employment opportunities (EEO). [ [589]Media Bureau's EEO Page ] [590]TEXT [591]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [592]TEXT [593]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [594]TEXT [595]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [596]TEXT [597]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [598]TEXT [599]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [600]TEXT [601]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [602]TEXT [603]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [604]TEXT [605]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [606]TEXT [607]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [608]TEXT [609]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [610]TEXT [611]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [612]TEXT [613]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [614]TEXT [615]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.wp
  • matter of right by the date specified (not less than 30 days after issuance) in the FCC's Public Notice announcing the acceptance for filing of the last-filed mutually exclusive application. Subsequent amendments prior to designation of the proceeding for hearing will be considered only upon a showing of good cause for late filing or pursuant to § 1.65 or § 73.3514. Unauthorized or untimely amendments are subject to return by the FCC's staff without consideration. (2) Postdesignation amendments. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (ii) of this section, requests to amend an application after it has been designated for hearing will be considered only upon written petition properly served upon the parties of record in accordance with § 1.47 and, where
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.wp
  • matter of right by the date specified (not less than 30 days after issuance) in the FCC's Public Notice announcing the acceptance for filing of the last-filed mutually exclusive application. Subsequent amendments prior to designation of the proceeding for hearing will be considered only upon a showing of good cause for late filing or pursuant to § 1.65 or § 73.3514. Unauthorized or untimely amendments are subject to return by the FCC's staff without consideration. (2) Postdesignation amendments. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (ii) of this section, requests to amend an application after it has been designated for hearing will be considered only upon written petition properly served upon the parties of record in accordance with § 1.47 and, where
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001174.doc
  • "each segment of programming, 5 minutes or more in duration, designed for children 12 years old and under and broadcast during the license period which contained commercial matter in excess of the limits," including "the length of the segment, the amount of commercial matter contained therein, and an explanation of why the limits were exceeded." We note, moreover, that Section 73.3514 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.3514, provides that "[e]ach application shall include all information called for by the particular form on which the application is required to be filed . . . .[,]" and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, provides that "[n]o licensee, permittee or applicant shall . . . in any application
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fc00019a.doc
  • 73.1660-Acceptability of broadcast transmitters. Section 73.1665-Main transmitters. Section 73.1692-Broadcast station construction near or installation on an AM broadcast tower. Section 73.1745-Unauthorized operation. Section 73.1750-Discontinuance of operation. Section 73.1920-Personal attacks. Section 73.1940-Legally qualified candidates for public office. Section 73.1941-Equal opportunities. Section 73.1943-Political file. Section 73.1944-Reasonable access. Section 73.3511-Applications required. Section 73.3512-Where to file; number of copies. Section 73.3513-Signing of applications. Section 73.3514-Content of applications. Section 73.3516-Specification of facilities. Section 73.3517-Contingent applications. Section 73.3518-Inconsistent or conflicting applications. Section 73.3519-Repetitious applications. Section 73.3520-Multiple applications. Section 73.3525-Agreements for removing application conflicts. Section 73.3539-Application for renewal of license. Section 73.3542-Application for emergency authorization. Section 73.3545-Application for permit to deliver programs to foreign stations. Section 73.3550-Requests for new or modified call sign assignments. Section 73.3561-Staff consideration of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00120.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00120.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00120.txt
  • holding period must demonstrate the factors enumerated therein. 9. Section 73.3522 is amended to revise paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 73.3522 Amendment of applications ***** (b) Reserved Channel FM and reserved noncommercial educational television stations- Applications may be amended after Public Notice announcing a period for filing amendments. Amendments, when applicable, are subject to the provisions of Sections 73.3514, 73.3525, 73.3572, 73.3573, 73.3580, and Section 1.65. Unauthorized or untimely amendments are subject to return by the FCC's staff without consideration. Amendments will be accepted as described below and otherwise will only be considered upon a showing of good cause for late filing or pursuant to Section 1.65 or Section 73.3514: (i) Section 73.7002 Selectee. A Public Notice will announce
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1935A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1935A1.pdf
  • The principal community contour of the proposed Pinetop facility and that of KTHQ(FM) overlapped. In the Petition to Deny, Navajo points out that the application, as initially tendered, lacked a ``duopoly'' showing demonstrating compliance with the Commission's local radio ownership rule. Navajo maintains that Konopnicki failed to include all information called for in FCC Form 301, as required by Section 73.3514(a) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), and therefore the application should be dismissed. We reject Navajo's contentions. The failure to include a duopoly study is not an omission that renders Konipnicki's application fatally defective. Moreover, on March 12, 1996, subsequent to the filing of the Petition to Deny, Konopnicki submitted an amendment containing, among other things, a duopoly showing. An
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1958A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1958A1.pdf
  • (Community Television, MM Docket No. 86-45, FR Doc. 86-3253 at ¶ 2), denied the petition, and asked the applicant to amend its application to show that the signor was an officer of the applicant and was authorized to execute the application on behalf of the applicant. The issue designated for hearing involved the completeness of the application (47 C.F.R. § 73.3514, requiring applicants to provide all information requested in a form), not the authority of the signer (47 C.F.R. § 73.3513). The new cases cited by Plus in support of its argument that the Commission staff should have looked to the application as a whole to determine the correct site coordinates are also inapposite. See Second Petition at 5, citing Special
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-120A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-120A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-120A1.txt
  • holding period must demonstrate the factors enumerated therein. 9. Section 73.3522 is amended to revise paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 73.3522 Amendment of applications ***** (b) Reserved Channel FM and reserved noncommercial educational television stations- Applications may be amended after Public Notice announcing a period for filing amendments. Amendments, when applicable, are subject to the provisions of Sections 73.3514, 73.3525, 73.3572, 73.3573, 73.3580, and Section 1.65. Unauthorized or untimely amendments are subject to return by the FCC's staff without consideration. Amendments will be accepted as described below and otherwise will only be considered upon a showing of good cause for late filing or pursuant to Section 1.65 or Section 73.3514: (i) Section 73.7002 Selectee. A Public Notice will announce
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
  • 73.1941 Equal opportunities. [581]TEXT [582]PDF 73.1942 Candidate rates. [583]TEXT [584]PDF 73.1943 Political file. [585]TEXT [586]PDF 73.1944 Reasonable access. [587]TEXT [588]PDF 73.2080 Equal employment opportunities (EEO). [ [589]Media Bureau's EEO Page ] [590]TEXT [591]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [592]TEXT [593]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [594]TEXT [595]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [596]TEXT [597]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [598]TEXT [599]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [600]TEXT [601]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [602]TEXT [603]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [604]TEXT [605]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [606]TEXT [607]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [608]TEXT [609]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [610]TEXT [611]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [612]TEXT [613]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [614]TEXT [615]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
  • 73.1941 Equal opportunities. [534]TEXT [535]PDF 73.1942 Candidate rates. [536]TEXT [537]PDF 73.1943 Political file. [538]TEXT [539]PDF 73.1944 Reasonable access. [540]TEXT [541]PDF 73.2080 Equal employment opportunities (EEO). [ [542]Media Bureau's EEO Page ] [543]TEXT [544]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [545]TEXT [546]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [547]TEXT [548]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [549]TEXT [550]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [551]TEXT [552]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [553]TEXT [554]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [555]TEXT [556]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [557]TEXT [558]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [559]TEXT [560]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [561]TEXT [562]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [563]TEXT [564]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [565]TEXT [566]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [567]TEXT [568]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in