FCC Web Documents citing 69.725

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1279A1.doc
  • Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 2. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 2. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 2. The billing systems used for this process were the Customer Access Support System (CASS), which contains current customer records, and the Carrier Access Information Management System (CAIMS), which contains the historical billing records. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(a)-(b). Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3 Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 4. Sprint's billing system contains circuit location information. Circuit location ``1'' is associated with channel terminations between the serving wire center and another carrier's point of presence. Circuit locations other than ``1'' are associated with end user channel terminations. Id. Sprint Petition, Attachment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.txt
  • six months before the effective date of the LECs' annual access tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(g). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14,309; 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(a)(3)(i)-(iii), (iv)(B). See Frontier Petition at 4. This information was provided by the CLEC at the time of or subsequent to its initial collocation application. See id. See 47 C.F.R. § 69.725. For a detailed description of Frontier's allocation methods, see Frontier Petition at 4-7. See Frontier Petition, Attachment 3. See AT&T Opposition at 2 (citing Carpiniello Declaration, ¶ 2) (these wire centers are identified in the confidential version of the Carpiniello Declaration). See Reply Comments of Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc., CCB/CPD No. 01-07 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.txt
  • in suburban and rural areas within the same MSA, where competition is weaker. Id. at 6-7. WorldCom adds that the Commission's revenue allocation rule overstates competitive supply for circuits based on the existence of collocation at only one end of a circuit, such as the entrance facility where competition is the greatest. WorldCom Comments at 4; see also 47 C.F.R. §69.725 (permitting incumbent LECs to allocate 50 percent of the revenue from an interoffice circuit to the wire center at each end of the transmission path). OnFiber echoes the contentions of AT&T and WorldCom that the Commission's pricing flexibility standards are inadequate. OnFiber Comments at 2. WorldCom, Inc. v. FCC, supra note 2. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14309.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.txt
  • Petition, Attachment B at 2. Sprint Petition, Certification of Jessica Joyce; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(1)(ii). The billing systems used for this process were the Customer Access Support System (CASS), which contains current customer records, and the Carrier Access Information Management System (CAIMS), which contains the historical billing records. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. See 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(a)-(b). Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3 Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 4. Sprint's billing system contains circuit location information. Circuit location ``1'' is associated with channel terminations between the serving wire center and another carrier's point of presence. Circuit locations other than ``1'' are associated with end user channel terminations. Id. Sprint Petition, Attachment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • 4-11; Pacific Bell Second Petition, Appendix D at 4-11; SNET Petition, Appendix D at 4-11; SWBT Petition, Appendix D at 4-11. All carriers explain use of Circuit Location (CKL) number to identify type of channel termination: CKL 1 designates a channel termination to a carrier POP; all other CKLs designate channel terminations to end users. See also 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(a)-(b). 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(c). Ameritech Petition, Appendix D at 4. For a depiction of a ``multi-point bridging circuit,'' see, e.g., Ameritech Petition, Appendix D, Figure 3 at 7. Ameritech Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; Pacific Bell First Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; Pacific Bell Second Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; SNET Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; and SWBT Petition, Appendix
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.txt
  • Specifically, records identified the ends of a circuit between a Qwest serving wire center and an IXC POP with a ``1'', and the ends of a circuit between a Qwest end office and an end user premises with a number other than ``1''. Id. at Attach. D, n. 4. Id. at Attach. D, pp. 3-5. See also 47 C.F.R. § 69.725 (a) and (b). Id. at Attach. D, p. 5. Id. Id. at Attach. D, p. 3. See also 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(c). Qwest Petition at Attach. D, p. 2. The Cellular MSA/RSA Markets and Counties Report assigned individual counties to MSAs for purposes of establishing cellular markets. It relied on 1980 census data. See Common Carrier Public Mobile Services Information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.txt
  • instructions for that template are identified in Table III.B.3 of Attachment B. a. For each MSA and Non-MSA in which your firm acts as an ILEC: i. MSA name; ii. Whether the MSA has Phase I or Phase II Pricing Flexibility or is exclusively a price cap MSA; and iii. Total revenues earned, determined as specified in 47 C.F.R. § 69.725, for all wire centers in the MSA from sales of channel terminations (as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 69.703(a)(2)); b. For each wire center in the MSAs and Non-MSAs in which your firm acts as an ILEC: i. Provide the actual situs address, the coordinates, and the CLLI code of the wire center; ii. Total revenues earned, determined as specified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • 220, 254 and 403. Section Number and Title: 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. 69.703 Definitions. 69.705 Procedure. 69.707 Geographic scope of petition. 69.709 Dedicated transport and special access service other than channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.711 Channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.713 Common line, traffic-sensitive, and tandem-switched transport services. 69.725 Attribution of revenues to particular wire centers. 69.727 Regulatory relief. 69.729 New services. 69.731 Low-end adjustment mechanism. PART 73-RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES SUBPART E-TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS Brief Description: This rule requires applicants who request a DTV allotment on channel 6 to submit an engineering study that demonstrates no interference will be caused by the allotment to FM radio stations on FM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.txt
  • not subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's special access and transport revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in § 69.725. * * * * * (c) Notwithstanding § 69.3(e)(7), in study areas in which a telephone company offers a cross-connect, as described in § 69.121(a)(1), for the transmission of interstate special access traffic, telephone companies may charge rates for special access sub-elements of DS1, DS3, and such other special access services as the Commission may designate, that differ depending on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.txt
  • wire center level. We note at the outset that the Bureau Order explained in detail BellSouth's data submission, and we agree that BellSouth, consistent with our rules, adequately met its burden of proof. As we explained in the Bureau Order, the pricing flexibility rules do not require an incumbent LEC to provide revenue data at the wire center level. Section 69.725 of the Commission's rules, cited by ASCENT in support of this argument, is irrelevant because it does not govern the production of revenue data. Rather, it instructs the incumbent LEC how to make its internal revenue allocations. We find that BellSouth was not required to provide additional data at the wire center level as AT&T and WorldCom claim, therefore we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.txt
  • not subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's special access and transport revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in § 69.725. (2) [Reserved] * * * (c) Notwithstanding § 69.3(e)(7) of this chapter, in study areas in which a telephone company offers a cross-connect, as described in § 69.121(a)(1) of this chapter, for the transmission of interstate special access traffic, telephone companies may charge rates for special access sub-elements of DS1, DS3, and such other special access services as the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's trunking basket revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in Section 69.725 of this part. (2) Price cap incumbent local exchange carriers may establish only one set of density pricing zones within each study area, to be used for the pricing of all services within the trunking basket for which zone density pricing is permitted. (3) An access service subelement for which zone density pricing is permitted shall be deemed to be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's trunking basket revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in Section 69.725 of this part. (2) Price cap incumbent local exchange carriers may establish only one set of density pricing zones within each study area, to be used for the pricing of all services within the trunking basket for which zone density pricing is permitted. (3) An access service subelement for which zone density pricing is permitted shall be deemed to be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's trunking basket revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in Section 69.725 of this part. (2) Price cap incumbent local exchange carriers may establish only one set of density pricing zones within each study area, to be used for the pricing of all services within the trunking basket for which zone density pricing is permitted. (3) An access service subelement for which zone density pricing is permitted shall be deemed to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1279A1.doc
  • Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 2. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 2. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 2. The billing systems used for this process were the Customer Access Support System (CASS), which contains current customer records, and the Carrier Access Information Management System (CAIMS), which contains the historical billing records. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(a)-(b). Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3 Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 4. Sprint's billing system contains circuit location information. Circuit location ``1'' is associated with channel terminations between the serving wire center and another carrier's point of presence. Circuit locations other than ``1'' are associated with end user channel terminations. Id. Sprint Petition, Attachment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.txt
  • six months before the effective date of the LECs' annual access tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(g). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14,309; 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(a)(3)(i)-(iii), (iv)(B). See Frontier Petition at 4. This information was provided by the CLEC at the time of or subsequent to its initial collocation application. See id. See 47 C.F.R. § 69.725. For a detailed description of Frontier's allocation methods, see Frontier Petition at 4-7. See Frontier Petition, Attachment 3. See AT&T Opposition at 2 (citing Carpiniello Declaration, ¶ 2) (these wire centers are identified in the confidential version of the Carpiniello Declaration). See Reply Comments of Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc., CCB/CPD No. 01-07 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.txt
  • in suburban and rural areas within the same MSA, where competition is weaker. Id. at 6-7. WorldCom adds that the Commission's revenue allocation rule overstates competitive supply for circuits based on the existence of collocation at only one end of a circuit, such as the entrance facility where competition is the greatest. WorldCom Comments at 4; see also 47 C.F.R. §69.725 (permitting incumbent LECs to allocate 50 percent of the revenue from an interoffice circuit to the wire center at each end of the transmission path). OnFiber echoes the contentions of AT&T and WorldCom that the Commission's pricing flexibility standards are inadequate. OnFiber Comments at 2. WorldCom, Inc. v. FCC, supra note 2. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14309.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.txt
  • Petition, Attachment B at 2. Sprint Petition, Certification of Jessica Joyce; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(1)(ii). The billing systems used for this process were the Customer Access Support System (CASS), which contains current customer records, and the Carrier Access Information Management System (CAIMS), which contains the historical billing records. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. See 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(a)-(b). Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 3 Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 4. Sprint's billing system contains circuit location information. Circuit location ``1'' is associated with channel terminations between the serving wire center and another carrier's point of presence. Circuit locations other than ``1'' are associated with end user channel terminations. Id. Sprint Petition, Attachment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • 4-11; Pacific Bell Second Petition, Appendix D at 4-11; SNET Petition, Appendix D at 4-11; SWBT Petition, Appendix D at 4-11. All carriers explain use of Circuit Location (CKL) number to identify type of channel termination: CKL 1 designates a channel termination to a carrier POP; all other CKLs designate channel terminations to end users. See also 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(a)-(b). 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(c). Ameritech Petition, Appendix D at 4. For a depiction of a ``multi-point bridging circuit,'' see, e.g., Ameritech Petition, Appendix D, Figure 3 at 7. Ameritech Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; Pacific Bell First Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; Pacific Bell Second Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; SNET Petition, Appendix D at 4-5; and SWBT Petition, Appendix
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.txt
  • Specifically, records identified the ends of a circuit between a Qwest serving wire center and an IXC POP with a ``1'', and the ends of a circuit between a Qwest end office and an end user premises with a number other than ``1''. Id. at Attach. D, n. 4. Id. at Attach. D, pp. 3-5. See also 47 C.F.R. § 69.725 (a) and (b). Id. at Attach. D, p. 5. Id. Id. at Attach. D, p. 3. See also 47 C.F.R. § 69.725(c). Qwest Petition at Attach. D, p. 2. The Cellular MSA/RSA Markets and Counties Report assigned individual counties to MSAs for purposes of establishing cellular markets. It relied on 1980 census data. See Common Carrier Public Mobile Services Information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.txt
  • instructions for that template are identified in Table III.B.3 of Attachment B. a. For each MSA and Non-MSA in which your firm acts as an ILEC: i. MSA name; ii. Whether the MSA has Phase I or Phase II Pricing Flexibility or is exclusively a price cap MSA; and iii. Total revenues earned, determined as specified in 47 C.F.R. § 69.725, for all wire centers in the MSA from sales of channel terminations (as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 69.703(a)(2)); b. For each wire center in the MSAs and Non-MSAs in which your firm acts as an ILEC: i. Provide the actual situs address, the coordinates, and the CLLI code of the wire center; ii. Total revenues earned, determined as specified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • 220, 254 and 403. Section Number and Title: 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. 69.703 Definitions. 69.705 Procedure. 69.707 Geographic scope of petition. 69.709 Dedicated transport and special access service other than channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.711 Channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.713 Common line, traffic-sensitive, and tandem-switched transport services. 69.725 Attribution of revenues to particular wire centers. 69.727 Regulatory relief. 69.729 New services. 69.731 Low-end adjustment mechanism. PART 73-RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES SUBPART E-TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS Brief Description: This rule requires applicants who request a DTV allotment on channel 6 to submit an engineering study that demonstrates no interference will be caused by the allotment to FM radio stations on FM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.txt
  • not subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's special access and transport revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in § 69.725. * * * * * (c) Notwithstanding § 69.3(e)(7), in study areas in which a telephone company offers a cross-connect, as described in § 69.121(a)(1), for the transmission of interstate special access traffic, telephone companies may charge rates for special access sub-elements of DS1, DS3, and such other special access services as the Commission may designate, that differ depending on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-287A1.txt
  • wire center level. We note at the outset that the Bureau Order explained in detail BellSouth's data submission, and we agree that BellSouth, consistent with our rules, adequately met its burden of proof. As we explained in the Bureau Order, the pricing flexibility rules do not require an incumbent LEC to provide revenue data at the wire center level. Section 69.725 of the Commission's rules, cited by ASCENT in support of this argument, is irrelevant because it does not govern the production of revenue data. Rather, it instructs the incumbent LEC how to make its internal revenue allocations. We find that BellSouth was not required to provide additional data at the wire center level as AT&T and WorldCom claim, therefore we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.txt
  • not subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's special access and transport revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in § 69.725. (2) [Reserved] * * * (c) Notwithstanding § 69.3(e)(7) of this chapter, in study areas in which a telephone company offers a cross-connect, as described in § 69.121(a)(1) of this chapter, for the transmission of interstate special access traffic, telephone companies may charge rates for special access sub-elements of DS1, DS3, and such other special access services as the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's trunking basket revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in Section 69.725 of this part. (2) Price cap incumbent local exchange carriers may establish only one set of density pricing zones within each study area, to be used for the pricing of all services within the trunking basket for which zone density pricing is permitted. (3) An access service subelement for which zone density pricing is permitted shall be deemed to be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's trunking basket revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in Section 69.725 of this part. (2) Price cap incumbent local exchange carriers may establish only one set of density pricing zones within each study area, to be used for the pricing of all services within the trunking basket for which zone density pricing is permitted. (3) An access service subelement for which zone density pricing is permitted shall be deemed to be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation may establish any number of density zones within a study area that is used for purposes of jurisdictional separations, provided that each zone, except the highest-cost zone, accounts for at least 15 percent of that carrier's trunking basket revenues within that study area, calculated pursuant to the methodology set forth in Section 69.725 of this part. (2) Price cap incumbent local exchange carriers may establish only one set of density pricing zones within each study area, to be used for the pricing of all services within the trunking basket for which zone density pricing is permitted. (3) An access service subelement for which zone density pricing is permitted shall be deemed to be