FCC Web Documents citing 69.701

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2618A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Pacific Bell requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Pacific Bell November 17, 2000 Request. See Pacific Bell November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2619A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Verizon requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Verizon November 17, 2000 Request. See Verizon November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2623A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. SWBT requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See SWBT November 17, 2000 Request. See SWBT November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2624A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Ameritech requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Ameritech November 17, 2000 Request. See Ameritech November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.txt
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. The MSAs are: Los Angeles-Long Beach/Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, CA; Sarasota, Fl; Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fl; Dallas-Fort Worth, TX. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Verizon requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.txt
  • ftp.fcc.gov Released: October 12, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QWEST CORPORATION PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-18 COMMENTS: October 25, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: November 5, 2001 On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than October 25, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.txt
  • particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Qwest requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Qwest October 10, 2001 Request. See Qwest October 10, 2001 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). See Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.txt
  • sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999)(Access Charge Reform Fifth Report and Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Sprint requests confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petition pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Sprint November 16, 2001 Request. See Sprint November 16, 2001 Request. Access Charge Reform Fifth Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.txt
  • Released: November 20, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SPRINT PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-22 COMMENTS: December 3, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: December 13, 2001 On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies (Sprint) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 3, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.txt
  • 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-27 COMMENTS: December 14, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: December 24, 2001 On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 14, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.txt
  • CCB/CPD File No. 01-27 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 3, 2001 Released: December 3, 2001 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.txt
  • 20554 DA 01-2837 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: December 6, 2001 QWEST WITHDRAWS PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD File No. 01-18 On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The Commission established a pleading cycle for the petition, and received comments from interested parties and reply comments from Qwest. On December 4, 2001, Qwest filed a request to withdraw its petition. Based on the request to withdraw, Qwest's petition for pricing flexibility is dismissed without prejudice and this proceeding is terminated. As required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.txt
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. The MSAs are: Las Vegas, NV; Tallahassee, FL; Orlando, FL; Charlottesville, VA; Greenville, NC; Hickory, NC; and Rocky Mount, NC. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Sprint requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.txt
  • FILE NO. 01-35 COMMENTS: January 3, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 14, 2002 On December 19, 2001, Ameritech Operating Companies (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin), Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (collectively referred to as ``Petitioners'') filed petitions for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than January 3, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.txt
  • to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Access Charge Reform Fifth Report and Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, Ameritech Operating Companies, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, (filed Dec. 19, 2001); Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, (filed Dec. 19, 2001); Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, Southern New England Telephone Company, to Magalie Roman Salas,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.txt
  • FOR FRONTIER PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-07 COMMENTS: April 4, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: April 16, 2001 On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. (Frontier) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than April 4, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.txt
  • Bureau: On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. (Frontier) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in the Rochester, New York Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in its service territory in accordance with the Commission's directive in CC Docket No. 96-262 and pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. 2. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Frontier filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) the identities of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Frontier's wire centers; and (2) Frontier disaggregated revenue data for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.txt
  • August 6, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR BELLSOUTH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-24 COMMENTS: August 19, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: August 29, 2002 On August 2, 2002, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than August 19, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.txt
  • ) WCB/Pricing 02-24 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: August 6, 2002 Released: August 6, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On August 2, 2002, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in BellSouth wire centers, and (2) data on BellSouth's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.txt
  • http://www.fcc.gov Released: January 2, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QWEST CORPORATION PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 02-01 COMMENTS: January 15, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 25, 2002 On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than January, 15, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.744(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES FILED BY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY CCB/CPD FILE NO. 02-03 COMMENTS: February 11, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: February 21, 2002 On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Petitioner) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than February 11, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.txt
  • particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, SBC, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, (filed Jan. 25, 2002)(Petitioner's Request for Confidentiality). Petitioner requests confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petition, pursuant to sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.txt
  • 15, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-29 COMMENTS: October 24, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: November 4, 2002 On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than October 24, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.txt
  • WCB/Pricing 02-29 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: October 15, 2002 Released: October 15, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.txt
  • particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Qwest requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459, and 1.774(b). See Qwest December 31, 2001 Request. See Qwest December 31, 2001 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). See Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.txt
  • 02-3073 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: November 7, 2002 VERIZON WITHDRAWS PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/PPD File No. 02-29 On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The Commission established a pleading cycle for the petition. On November 4, 2002, Verizon filed a request to withdraw its petition. Based on the request to withdraw, Verizon's petition for pricing flexibility is dismissed without prejudice and this proceeding is terminated. As required by the Protective Order in this proceeding, reviewing parties holding confidential
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.txt
  • 19, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-33 COMMENTS: December 30, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 10, 2003 On December 13, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 30, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.txt
  • WCB/Pricing 02-33 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 18, 2002 Released: December 19, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On December 13, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.txt
  • ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES FILED BY THE AMERITECH OPERATING COMPANIES, NEVADA BELL, PACIFIC BELL, SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND, AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANIES WCB/PPD 03-08 COMMENTS: February 14, 2003 REPLY COMMENTS: February 24, 2003 On January 30, 2003, SBC local telephone companies (SBC) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than February 14, 2003, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.txt
  • WCB/PPD 03-08 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2003 Released: February 3, 2003 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 30, 2003, SBC local telephone companies (SBC) filed five separate petitions seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SBC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SBC wire centers, and (2) data on SBC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.txt
  • February 27, 2003 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 03-10 COMMENTS: March 13, 2003 REPLY COMMENTS: March 24, 2003 On February 26, 2003, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than March 13, 2003, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/Pricing 03-10 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2003 Released: February 27, 2003 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 26, 2003, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.txt
  • January 22, 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-01 COMMENTS: February 2, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: February 12, 2004 On January 16, 2004, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 2, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-01 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: January 22, 2004 Released: January 22, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 16, 2004, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.txt
  • PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-09 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-10 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Nevada Bell Telephone Company (NBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-11 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.txt
  • FOR SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-12 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-13 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.txt
  • Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Ameritech wire centers, and (2) data on Ameritech's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-10 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Nevada Bell Telephone Company (NBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, NBTC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in NBTC wire centers, and (2) data on NBTC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-11 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, PBTC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in PBTC wire centers, and (2) data on PBTC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-12 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SNET filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SNET wire centers, and (2) data on SNET's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-13 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SWBT wire centers, and (2) data on SWBT's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.txt
  • OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 25, 2005 Released: May 25, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking Phase II pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility for special access services in its Pricing Flexibility Order. In doing so, the Commission recognized the importance of granting pricing flexibility to incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) as competition develops in the market for interstate access services ``to ensure that our own
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.txt
  • 4; SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. SNET Petition, App. D at 4; SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. SNET Petition, App. D at 4; SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. Ameritech Petition, App. C; SNET Petition, App. C; SWBT Petition, App. C. Ameritech Petition, App. E; SNET Petition, App. E; SWBT Petition, App. E. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701-69.731. See, e.g., SBC Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, WCB/Pricing File Nos. 04-09, 04-10, 04-11, 04-12, 04-13, 19 FCC Rcd 10298, 10303-04, paras. 11-15 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2004). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1525 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1525 2 K L M h� � � @& � �� ���� �� ^ 0 0 �r"^�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS SERVICES WCB/Pricing 05-11 COMMENTS: February 14, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: February 24, 2005 On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 14, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SPRINT PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 05-35 COMMENTS: December 22, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: January 3, 2006 On December 7, 2005, the Sprint Local Telephone Companies (Sprint) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than December 22, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.txt
  • ) Special Access and ) Dedicated Transport Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 15, 2005 Released: December 15, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On December 7, 2005, the Sprint Local Telephone Companies (Sprint) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Sprint filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Sprint wire centers, and (2) data on Sprint's special access and dedicated transport service revenues earned in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.txt
  • ) Special Access Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 7, 2005 Released: February 7, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access revenues earned in the subject MSA. Today,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.txt
  • Bell Telephone Company - WCB/Pricing 05-16 COMMENTS: March 7, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: March 17, 2005 On February 18, 2005, Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech), Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) (collectively SBC) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for certain dedicated transport and special access services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petitions are available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 7, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.txt
  • February 25, 2005 Released: February 25, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 18, 2005, the Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech), Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) (collectively SBC) filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for certain dedicated transport and special access services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SBC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SBC wire centers, and (2) data on SBC's special access revenues earned in the relevant geographic areas.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-740 Released: March 21, 2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR BELLSOUTH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SWITCHED ACCESS SERVICES WC Docket No. 05-148 COMMENTS: April 1, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 11, 2005 On March 17, 2005, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for switched access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In its petition, BellSouth states that it meets the criteria necessary to obtain Phase I pricing flexibility relief in thirty-four (34) Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and two (2) non-MSA areas. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.txt
  • WC Docket No. 05-148 Pricing Flexibility for ) Switched Access Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2005 Released: March 21, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On March 17, 2005, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for switched access services located in multiple Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed three categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in BellSouth wire centers; (2) customer class location information at the wire center level; and (3) line counts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.txt
  • D at 3. Ameritech Petition, App. D at 3, 8; SWBT Petition, App. D at 3, 8. Ameritech Petition, App. D at 4. Ameritech Petition, App. D at 4-7. Id. Id. SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. Id. Id. Ameritech Petition, App. C; SWBT Petition, App. C. Ameritech Petition, App. E; SWBT Petition, App. E. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701-69.731. See, e.g., Ameritech Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, WCB/Pricing File Nos. 04-09, 04-10, 04-11, 04-12, 04-13, 19 FCC Rcd 10298, 10303-04, paras. 11-15 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2004). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1017 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1017 � � P T q ` � � � � � � � � h� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.txt
  • Bell Telephone Company - WCB/Pricing 06-09 COMMENTS: February 3, 2006 REPLY COMMENTS: February 13, 2006 On January 19, 2006, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petitions are available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 3, 2006. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.txt
  • Adopted: January 23, 2006 Released: January 23, 2006 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 19, 2006, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of their petitions for pricing flexibility, Ameritech and SWBT identify and request confidential treatment for two categories of information included in their petitions: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Ameritech and SWBT wire centers, and (2) data displaying Ameritech or SWBT's access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.txt
  • See id. Id. at 3-4. Sprint's billing system contains circuit location information. Circuit location ``1'' is associated with channel terminations between the service wire center and another carrier's point of presence. Circuit locations other than ``1'' are associated with end user channel terminations. Id. at 4. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 4-7 and Attachment D. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701-69.731. See, e.g., Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, CCB/CPB File No. 01-022, 17 FCC Rcd 2335, 2338-40, paras. 6-9 (Common Carrier Bur. 2002). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-753 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-753 � � � � h� � � D @& w W ' 0 �r"^� � h �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.txt
  • MSAs ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2007 Released: March 21, 2007 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 12, 2007, Ameritech Indiana and Ameritech Ohio (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in the Kokomo, IN and Youngstown-Warren, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Ameritech wire centers; and (2) data displaying Ameritech access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.txt
  • 18, 2007 Released: May 18, 2007 By the Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On January 12, 2007, Ameritech Indiana and Ameritech Ohio (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in the Youngstown-Warren, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and channel termination services in the Kokomo, IN MSA pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. We received one opposition to Ameritech's petition. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services and channel termination services in its Pricing Flexibility Order. In doing so, the Commission recognized the importance of granting pricing flexibility to incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.txt
  • 07-13 COMMENTS: June 7, 2007 REPLY COMMENTS: June 18, 2007 On April 30, 2007, the Embarq Local Operating Companies (Embarq) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Lima, OH and Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and certain channel termination services in the Lima, OH MSA pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than June 7, 2007. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.txt
  • SERVICES WCB/Pricing 07-07 COMMENTS: February 13, 2007 REPLY COMMENTS: February 23, 2007 On January 12, 2007, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated (Ameritech Indiana) and The Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Ameritech Ohio) (collectively Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Kokomo, IN and Youngstown-Warren, OH MSAs pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 13, 2007. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.txt
  • Areas and Phase I and Phase II Pricing ) Flexibility for Channel Termination Services ) in the Lima, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area ) Adopted: September 5, 2007 Released: September 5, 2007 By the Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On April 30, 2007, the Embarq local operating companies (Embarq) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for: (1) certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Lima, OH and Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs); and (2) certain channel termination services in the Lima, OH MSA. We issued a public notice seeking comments on May 18, 2007, but received no comments. As detailed below, the Commission established the rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.txt
  • 2007, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (CBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access, dedicated transport, end-user channel termination services, and Point of Presence (POP) channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IND Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and certain special access, dedicated transport and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middleton, Ohio MSA, pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, CBT identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific CBT wire centers; and (2) data displaying CBT access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.txt
  • Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (Cincinnati Bell) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access, dedicated transport, end-user channel termination services, and Point of Presence (POP) channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IND Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and certain special access, dedicated transport and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middleton, Ohio MSA, pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than January 7, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.txt
  • of ) ) Petition of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. for Phase I ) WCB/Pricing File No. 08-01 Pricing Flexibility Pursuant to Section 69.709 of ) the Commission's Rules ) ) Adopted: May 14, 2008 Released: May 14, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On November 16, 2007, Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a petition pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises, provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu Metropolitan Statistical Area (the Hawaii Non-MSA area). On January 3, 2008, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.txt
  • Channel ) Terminations in the Albany, GA; Athens, GA; ) Alexandria LA; Anderson, SC; Charleston-North ) Charleston, SC; and Florence, SC Metropolitan ) Statistical Areas ) Adopted: May 16, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules seeking: (1) Phase I relief for certain special access and dedicated transport services other than end user channel terminations in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robins, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, and Florence, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA); (2) Phase II relief for certain dedicated transport and special access services other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.txt
  • FOR WINDSTREAM KENTUCKY EAST, LLC PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing No. 08-17 COMMENTS: July 15, 2008 REPLY COMMENTS: July 25, 2008 On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises,'' in the Ashland, Kentucky MSA. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.txt
  • for the ) Lexington, Kentucky MSA and ) Ashland, Kentucky MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2008 Released: June 30, 2008 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Windstream identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Windstream wire centers; and (2) data displaying Windstream's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.txt
  • of Hawaii outside of the Honolulu Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Specifically, Hawaiian seeks Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations, between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu MSA (the Hawaii Non-MSA Area), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 4, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.txt
  • 1. On November 16, 2007, Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a petition for Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu MSA (the Hawaiian Non-MSA Area), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Hawaiian identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Hawaiian wire centers; and (2) data displaying Hawaiian access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules for the ) Lexington, Kentucky MSA and ) Ashland, Kentucky MSA ) Adopted: October 6, 2008 Released: October 6, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises,'' in the Ashland, Kentucky MSA. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.txt
  • 15, 2008 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: February 25, 2008 On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robins, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, Florence, SC, and Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 15, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.txt
  • 31, 2008 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robin, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, Florence, SC, and Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific BellSouth wire centers; and (2) data displaying BellSouth access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.txt
  • Flexibility for Special Access, ) Dedicated Transport Services and POP ) Channel Terminations in the Hamilton- ) Middletown, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area ) Adopted: March 13, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On November 27, 2007, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (Cincinnati Bell) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for: (1) certain special access, dedicated transport and end-user channel termination services, and POP channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA); and (2) certain special access, dedicated transport, and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middletown, OH MSA. On December 18, 2007, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.txt
  • Petition, the ACS LECs specifically seek: (1) Phase I and Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises; and (2) Phase I and Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. On February 16, 2010, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comment on the Petition. As described below, we conclude that the ACS LECs have met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which they request relief. To recover the costs of providing interstate access services, incumbent LECs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.txt
  • and the Fairbanks MSA. Specifically, the ACS LECs seek: (1) Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), and (2) Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 3, 2010. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(e)(2)(i). The ETFS provides instructions for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.txt
  • and the Fairbanks MSA. Specifically, the ACS LECs seek: (1) Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), and (2) Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In support of their petition for pricing flexibility, the ASC LECs identify and request confidential treatment for two categories of information included in their petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific ACS LEC wire centers; and (2) data displaying ACS LECs' access service revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.txt
  • a rolling basis. I. Definitions for this data request: Changing Service Provider(s) or Change Service Providers means switching from your company's current provider of DS1 and/or DS3 services (``current provider'') to another provider, whether the new provider is a facilities-based provider or leases facilities from your current provider. Collocator refers to the term as used pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, for purposes of applying for a grant of Phase I or Phase II Pricing Flexibility from the Commission. Thus, for purposes of this Public Notice, the definition of Collocator excludes competitive providers that collocate in carrier hotels. Contract-Based Tariff, for purposes of all questions except III.C.1 of this Public Notice, means an interstate Tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • carriers and were adopted to ensure that the Commission's regulations did not interfere with the operation of competitive markets by removing services from price cap regulation as competition develops. These rules also were adopted to detail the prerequisites to a grant of pricing flexibility. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201-203, 205, 218, 220, 254 and 403. Section Number and Title: 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. 69.703 Definitions. 69.705 Procedure. 69.707 Geographic scope of petition. 69.709 Dedicated transport and special access service other than channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.711 Channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.713 Common line, traffic-sensitive, and tandem-switched transport services. 69.725 Attribution of revenues to particular wire centers. 69.727
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.txt
  • PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY UNDER SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-04 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 20, 2012, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the San Francisco/Oakland Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, PBTC seeks Phase II relief for channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the San Francisco/Oakland MSA. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY UNDER SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-05 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 20, 2012, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, SWBT seeks Phase II relief for channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the San Antonio, Texas MSA. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.txt
  • File No. 12-04 Commission's Rules for the ) San Francisco/Oakland California MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 20, 2012, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the San Francisco/Oakland California Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, PBTC identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific PBTC wire centers; and (2) data displaying PBTC's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.txt
  • File No. 12-05 Commission's Rules for the ) San Antonio, Texas MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 20, 2012, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific SWBT wire centers; and (2) data displaying SWBT's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.txt
  • RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-06 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugarland, Inc., and Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LP d/b/a Windstream Communications Southwest (collectively Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lincoln, Nebraska; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport, special access, and channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the Lincoln, Nebraska; and Tulsa, Oklahoma MSAs. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport, special access, and channel terminations between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.txt
  • 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugarland, Inc., and Valor Telecommunication of Texas, LP d/b/a Windstream Communications South (collectively, Windstream) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the Lincoln, Nebraska, Inc.; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Windstream identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Windstream wire centers; and (2) data displaying Windstream's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.txt
  • Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 eq seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. PN 03/23/01; DA 01-742 Telergy, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Seek Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Pleading Cycle Established. On March 7, 2001, Telergy,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.txt
  • Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4*; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. PN 03/23/01; DA 01-742 Telergy, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Seek Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Pleading Cycle Established. On March 7, 2001, Telergy,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.txt
  • Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4*; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. CC 98-141, 98-184; PN 03/26/01; DA 01-764 Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Worldnet Telecommunications, Inc. Ex Parte Letter Concerning Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Conditions. On February 12, 2001, WorldNew Telecommunications, Inc. filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.txt
  • 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks comment regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.txt
  • 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25*; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks comment regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.txt
  • 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25*; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks comment regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.txt
  • published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002. Contact: Ed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.txt
  • published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002. Contact: Ed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.txt
  • published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3*; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002. Contact: Ed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.txt
  • due January 14, 2002. Contact: Paul Moon at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 12/03/01; DA 01-2788 Pleading Cycle Established for Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 14*; replies due December 24. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520 (voice). CC 01-314; PN 12/03/01; DA No. 01-2814 Commission Seeks Comment on Application Filed by NEVD Holdings, LLC (``NEVD'') for Transfer of Control to Conversent Holdings, Inc. On October 18, 2001, NEVD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.txt
  • publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. PN 01/02/02; DA 02-1 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corporation Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq.of the Commission's rules47 C.F.R. � 1/774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due January 15*; replies due January 25. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-98; PN 01/10/02; DA 02-42 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on the New York State Public Service Commission's Request for Delegated Authority for Jurisdiction Over Area Code Changes Pursuant to 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.txt
  • or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). INTERNATIONAL BUREAU PN 01/09/02; DA 02-39 Eliska Wireless Ventures License Subsidiary I, L.L.C., Eliska Wireless Investors I, L.P., Powertel, Inc., and Sonera Holding, B.V. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.txt
  • or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 01/31/02; DA 02-237 Comments Invited on Broadwing Local Services, Inc. Application to Discontinue Domestic Telecommunications Services. On January 8, 2002, Broadwing Local Services, Inc. filed an application with the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.txt
  • or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11*; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 02/04/02; DA 02-258 Ambient Corporation Seeks Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. On January 14, 2002, Ambient Corporation filed an application requesting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306969A1.txt
  • 1 of 3 06/02/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:06/02/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/01/2011AMERITECH SERVICES 1 1740 RLS 0 0 1 1 0 06/02/2011 2 With this filing, Ameritech is proposing adjustments to various Special Access rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/01/2011NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 1 220 JWL 0 0 1 1 0 06/02/2011 1 With this filing, NBTC is proposing adjustments to various Special Access rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308210A1.txt
  • at (202) 418-0270. Page 1 of 3 07/01/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:07/01/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/30/2011AMERITECH 1 1743 RLS 0 0 1 1 0 07/01/2011 2 Ameritech is proposing to lower various Switched Access rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules SYNOPSIS Non Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/29/2011CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISE S 1 3 LJB 0 0 2 1 07/01/2011 1 Revised rates SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/27/2011GCI COMMUNICATION CORPORATION 1 261
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308812A1.txt
  • 1 of 3 08/01/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:08/01/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 07/29/2011BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 5 VJ 0 0 1 1 0 07/30/2011 1 Proposes adjustments to monthly rates and charges for Program Audio Service in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 07/29/2011CENTURYTEL OPERATING COMPANIES 1 7 VJ 0 0 1 1 0 08/13/2011 1 2 3 6 7 08/05/2011 Proposes to add rates and regulations introducing Ethernet Virtual Private Line service in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Missouri.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310154A1.txt
  • Information Center at (202) 418-0270. Page 1 of 3 10/04/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:10/03/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 09/30/2011AMERITECH SERVICES 1 1752 RLS 0 0 1 1 10/01/2011 2 Proposes adjustments to various Switched Acces rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 09/30/2011BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 14 VJ 0 0 1 1 10/01/2011 1 Proposes adjustments to various Switched Access rates in Pricing Flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
  • 96-262, 94-1, 99-249, 96-45, Order on Remand, 18 FCC Rcd 14976 (2003). See also Cost Review Proceeding for Residential and Single-Line Business Subscriber Line Charge (SLC) Caps, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 10868 (2002), aff'd, Nat'l Ass'n of State Util. Consumer Advocates v. FCC, 372 F.3d 454 (D.C. Cir. June 29, 2004). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.701 et seq.; Access Charge Reform, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, 98-63, 98-157, Fifth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 14221, 14224-25, 14232-33, 14234-35, 14257-310, paras. 1-4, 19, 24-26, 67-175 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order), aff'd WorldCom v. FCC, 238 F.3d 449 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 13014-39, paras. 129-184. CALLS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.txt
  • services do not use local switches; instead they employ dedicated facilities that run directly between the end user and an IXC's point of presence, where an IXC connects its network with the LEC network, or between two discrete end user locations. Id. at 1997, para. 7. Special Access NPRM, 20 FCC Rcd at 1995-97, paras. 1-5. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.701 et seq.; Access Charge Reform, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, 98-63, 98-157, Fifth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 14221, 14224-25, 14232-33, 14234-35, 14257-310, paras. 1-4, 19, 24-26, 67-175 (1999), aff'd WorldCom v. FCC, 238 F.3d 449 (D.C. Cir. 2001). The Wireline Competition Bureau entered a Protective Order in this proceeding to enable parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • local exchange carrier must reallocate costs Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-12 from the interexchange charge each time it increases the ratio between the prices in its lowest-cost zone and any other zone in that study area. * * * * * 20. Revise Part 69 by adding Subpart H to read as follows: Subpart H -- Pricing Flexibility � 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in Section 61.3(x) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area. � 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: (a) Channel terminations. (1) A channel
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carrier must reallocate costs Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-12 from the interexchange charge each time it increases the ratio between the prices in its lowest-cost zone and any other zone in that study area. * * * * * 20. Revise Part 69 by adding Subpart H to read as follows: Subpart H -- Pricing Flexibility � 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in Section 61.3(x) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area. � 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: (a) Channel terminations. (1) A channel
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carrier must reallocate costs Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-12 from the interexchange charge each time it increases the ratio between the prices in its lowest-cost zone and any other zone in that study area. * * * * * 20. Revise Part 69 by adding Subpart H to read as follows: Subpart H -- Pricing Flexibility � 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in Section 61.3(x) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area. � 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: (a) Channel terminations. (1) A channel
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002006.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. See Letter from Helen Shockey, BellSouth Attorney, to Magalie Salas, Secretary, FCC, Requesting Confidential Treatment of Information Filed Under Seal in Support of its Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Certain Switched Access Services, August 28, 2000 (BellSouth August 28, 2000 Request). Bell South requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2618A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Pacific Bell requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Pacific Bell November 17, 2000 Request. See Pacific Bell November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2619A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Verizon requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Verizon November 17, 2000 Request. See Verizon November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2623A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. SWBT requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See SWBT November 17, 2000 Request. See SWBT November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2624A1.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Ameritech requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Ameritech November 17, 2000 Request. See Ameritech November 17, 2000 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.txt
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. The MSAs are: Los Angeles-Long Beach/Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, CA; Sarasota, Fl; Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fl; Dallas-Fort Worth, TX. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Verizon requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.txt
  • ftp.fcc.gov Released: October 12, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QWEST CORPORATION PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-18 COMMENTS: October 25, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: November 5, 2001 On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than October 25, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.txt
  • particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Qwest requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Qwest October 10, 2001 Request. See Qwest October 10, 2001 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). See Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.txt
  • sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999)(Access Charge Reform Fifth Report and Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Sprint requests confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petition pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459 and 1.774(b). See Sprint November 16, 2001 Request. See Sprint November 16, 2001 Request. Access Charge Reform Fifth Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.txt
  • Released: November 20, 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SPRINT PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-22 COMMENTS: December 3, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: December 13, 2001 On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies (Sprint) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 3, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.txt
  • 2001 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-27 COMMENTS: December 14, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: December 24, 2001 On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 14, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.txt
  • CCB/CPD File No. 01-27 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 3, 2001 Released: December 3, 2001 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: 1. On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2837A1.txt
  • 20554 DA 01-2837 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: December 6, 2001 QWEST WITHDRAWS PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD File No. 01-18 On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The Commission established a pleading cycle for the petition, and received comments from interested parties and reply comments from Qwest. On December 4, 2001, Qwest filed a request to withdraw its petition. Based on the request to withdraw, Qwest's petition for pricing flexibility is dismissed without prejudice and this proceeding is terminated. As required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.txt
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. The MSAs are: Las Vegas, NV; Tallahassee, FL; Orlando, FL; Charlottesville, VA; Greenville, NC; Hickory, NC; and Rocky Mount, NC. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Sprint requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.txt
  • FILE NO. 01-35 COMMENTS: January 3, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 14, 2002 On December 19, 2001, Ameritech Operating Companies (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin), Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (collectively referred to as ``Petitioners'') filed petitions for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than January 3, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.txt
  • to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Access Charge Reform Fifth Report and Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, Ameritech Operating Companies, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, (filed Dec. 19, 2001); Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, (filed Dec. 19, 2001); Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, Southern New England Telephone Company, to Magalie Roman Salas,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.txt
  • FOR FRONTIER PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 01-07 COMMENTS: April 4, 2001 REPLY COMMENTS: April 16, 2001 On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. (Frontier) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In accordance with Section 1.774(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c), comments and oppositions shall be filed no later than April 4, 2001, 15 days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to Section 1.774(e)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(e)(2)(i), interested parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.txt
  • Bureau: On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. (Frontier) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in the Rochester, New York Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in its service territory in accordance with the Commission's directive in CC Docket No. 96-262 and pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. 2. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Frontier filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) the identities of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Frontier's wire centers; and (2) Frontier disaggregated revenue data for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.txt
  • August 6, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR BELLSOUTH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-24 COMMENTS: August 19, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: August 29, 2002 On August 2, 2002, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than August 19, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.txt
  • ) WCB/Pricing 02-24 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: August 6, 2002 Released: August 6, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On August 2, 2002, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in BellSouth wire centers, and (2) data on BellSouth's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.txt
  • http://www.fcc.gov Released: January 2, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QWEST CORPORATION PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES CCB/CPD FILE NO. 02-01 COMMENTS: January 15, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 25, 2002 On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than January, 15, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.744(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES FILED BY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY CCB/CPD FILE NO. 02-03 COMMENTS: February 11, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: February 21, 2002 On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Petitioner) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than February 11, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.txt
  • particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Letter from Davida Grant, Senior Counsel, SBC, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, (filed Jan. 25, 2002)(Petitioner's Request for Confidentiality). Petitioner requests confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petition, pursuant to sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.txt
  • 15, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-29 COMMENTS: October 24, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: November 4, 2002 On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than October 24, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.txt
  • WCB/Pricing 02-29 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: October 15, 2002 Released: October 15, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.txt
  • particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. Qwest requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in support of its pricing flexibility petitions pursuant to sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.457, 0.459, and 1.774(b). See Qwest December 31, 2001 Request. See Qwest December 31, 2001 Request. 47 U.S.C. � 222(b). See Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3073A1.txt
  • 02-3073 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Released: November 7, 2002 VERIZON WITHDRAWS PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/PPD File No. 02-29 On October 9, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The Commission established a pleading cycle for the petition. On November 4, 2002, Verizon filed a request to withdraw its petition. Based on the request to withdraw, Verizon's petition for pricing flexibility is dismissed without prejudice and this proceeding is terminated. As required by the Protective Order in this proceeding, reviewing parties holding confidential
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.txt
  • 19, 2002 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 02-33 COMMENTS: December 30, 2002 REPLY COMMENTS: January 10, 2003 On December 13, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than December 30, 2002, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.txt
  • WCB/Pricing 02-33 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 18, 2002 Released: December 19, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On December 13, 2002, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.txt
  • ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES FILED BY THE AMERITECH OPERATING COMPANIES, NEVADA BELL, PACIFIC BELL, SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND, AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANIES WCB/PPD 03-08 COMMENTS: February 14, 2003 REPLY COMMENTS: February 24, 2003 On January 30, 2003, SBC local telephone companies (SBC) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than February 14, 2003, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS), although they are not required to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.txt
  • WCB/PPD 03-08 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2003 Released: February 3, 2003 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 30, 2003, SBC local telephone companies (SBC) filed five separate petitions seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SBC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SBC wire centers, and (2) data on SBC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.txt
  • February 27, 2003 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 03-10 COMMENTS: March 13, 2003 REPLY COMMENTS: March 24, 2003 On February 26, 2003, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments and oppositions may be filed no later than March 13, 2003, 15 days after the petition was filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(c). Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/Pricing 03-10 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2003 Released: February 27, 2003 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 26, 2003, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and non-MSA areas in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.txt
  • January 22, 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-01 COMMENTS: February 2, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: February 12, 2004 On January 16, 2004, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 2, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-01 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: January 22, 2004 Released: January 22, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 16, 2004, Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.txt
  • PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-09 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-10 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Nevada Bell Telephone Company (NBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-11 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.txt
  • FOR SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-12 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 04-13 COMMENTS: March 1, 2004 REPLY COMMENTS: March 11, 2004 On February 13, 2004, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 1, 2004. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.txt
  • Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Ameritech wire centers, and (2) data on Ameritech's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-10 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Nevada Bell Telephone Company (NBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, NBTC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in NBTC wire centers, and (2) data on NBTC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-11 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, PBTC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in PBTC wire centers, and (2) data on PBTC's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.txt
  • ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-12 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SNET filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SNET wire centers, and (2) data on SNET's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.txt
  • ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-13 PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2004 Released: February 19, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 13, 2004, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services for numerous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in its service territory pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SWBT wire centers, and (2) data on SWBT's special access and dedicated transport revenues earned in certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.txt
  • OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 25, 2005 Released: May 25, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking Phase II pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility for special access services in its Pricing Flexibility Order. In doing so, the Commission recognized the importance of granting pricing flexibility to incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) as competition develops in the market for interstate access services ``to ensure that our own
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.txt
  • 4; SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. SNET Petition, App. D at 4; SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. SNET Petition, App. D at 4; SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. Ameritech Petition, App. C; SNET Petition, App. C; SWBT Petition, App. C. Ameritech Petition, App. E; SNET Petition, App. E; SWBT Petition, App. E. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701-69.731. See, e.g., SBC Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, WCB/Pricing File Nos. 04-09, 04-10, 04-11, 04-12, 04-13, 19 FCC Rcd 10298, 10303-04, paras. 11-15 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2004). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1525 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1525 2 K L M h� � � @& � �� ���� �� ^ 0 0 �r"^�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR VERIZON PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS SERVICES WCB/Pricing 05-11 COMMENTS: February 14, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: February 24, 2005 On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 14, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SPRINT PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ACCESS AND DEDICATED TRANSPORT SERVICES WCB/Pricing 05-35 COMMENTS: December 22, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: January 3, 2006 On December 7, 2005, the Sprint Local Telephone Companies (Sprint) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than December 22, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.txt
  • ) Special Access and ) Dedicated Transport Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: December 15, 2005 Released: December 15, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On December 7, 2005, the Sprint Local Telephone Companies (Sprint) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Sprint filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Sprint wire centers, and (2) data on Sprint's special access and dedicated transport service revenues earned in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.txt
  • ) Special Access Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 7, 2005 Released: February 7, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 28, 2005, the Verizon Telephone Companies (Verizon) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access end user channel termination services located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Verizon filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in Verizon wire centers, and (2) data on Verizon's special access revenues earned in the subject MSA. Today,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.txt
  • Bell Telephone Company - WCB/Pricing 05-16 COMMENTS: March 7, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: March 17, 2005 On February 18, 2005, Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech), Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) (collectively SBC) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for certain dedicated transport and special access services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petitions are available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 7, 2005. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.txt
  • February 25, 2005 Released: February 25, 2005 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On February 18, 2005, the Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech), Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) (collectively SBC) filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for certain dedicated transport and special access services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SBC filed two categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in SBC wire centers, and (2) data on SBC's special access revenues earned in the relevant geographic areas.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-740 Released: March 21, 2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR BELLSOUTH PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY FOR SWITCHED ACCESS SERVICES WC Docket No. 05-148 COMMENTS: April 1, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 11, 2005 On March 17, 2005, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for switched access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In its petition, BellSouth states that it meets the criteria necessary to obtain Phase I pricing flexibility relief in thirty-four (34) Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and two (2) non-MSA areas. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.txt
  • WC Docket No. 05-148 Pricing Flexibility for ) Switched Access Services ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2005 Released: March 21, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On March 17, 2005, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for switched access services located in multiple Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth filed three categories of information for which it seeks confidential treatment: (1) data showing the identity of specific service providers and where they have collocated their facilities in BellSouth wire centers; (2) customer class location information at the wire center level; and (3) line counts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.txt
  • D at 3. Ameritech Petition, App. D at 3, 8; SWBT Petition, App. D at 3, 8. Ameritech Petition, App. D at 4. Ameritech Petition, App. D at 4-7. Id. Id. SWBT Petition, App. D at 4. Id. Id. Ameritech Petition, App. C; SWBT Petition, App. C. Ameritech Petition, App. E; SWBT Petition, App. E. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701-69.731. See, e.g., Ameritech Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, WCB/Pricing File Nos. 04-09, 04-10, 04-11, 04-12, 04-13, 19 FCC Rcd 10298, 10303-04, paras. 11-15 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2004). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1017 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1017 � � P T q ` � � � � � � � � h� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.txt
  • Bell Telephone Company - WCB/Pricing 06-09 COMMENTS: February 3, 2006 REPLY COMMENTS: February 13, 2006 On January 19, 2006, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed petitions for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petitions are available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 3, 2006. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.txt
  • Adopted: January 23, 2006 Released: January 23, 2006 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 19, 2006, Ameritech Illinois, Ameritech Indiana, Ameritech Michigan, Ameritech Ohio, and Ameritech Wisconsin (Ameritech), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed petitions seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in several designated geographic areas pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of their petitions for pricing flexibility, Ameritech and SWBT identify and request confidential treatment for two categories of information included in their petitions: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Ameritech and SWBT wire centers, and (2) data displaying Ameritech or SWBT's access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.txt
  • See id. Id. at 3-4. Sprint's billing system contains circuit location information. Circuit location ``1'' is associated with channel terminations between the service wire center and another carrier's point of presence. Circuit locations other than ``1'' are associated with end user channel terminations. Id. at 4. Sprint Petition, Attachment B at 4-7 and Attachment D. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701-69.731. See, e.g., Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, CCB/CPB File No. 01-022, 17 FCC Rcd 2335, 2338-40, paras. 6-9 (Common Carrier Bur. 2002). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-753 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-753 � � � � h� � � D @& w W ' 0 �r"^� � h �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.txt
  • MSAs ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2007 Released: March 21, 2007 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 12, 2007, Ameritech Indiana and Ameritech Ohio (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in the Kokomo, IN and Youngstown-Warren, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Ameritech identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Ameritech wire centers; and (2) data displaying Ameritech access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.txt
  • 18, 2007 Released: May 18, 2007 By the Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On January 12, 2007, Ameritech Indiana and Ameritech Ohio (Ameritech) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services located in the Youngstown-Warren, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and channel termination services in the Kokomo, IN MSA pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. We received one opposition to Ameritech's petition. As detailed below, the Commission established the parameters for granting pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services and channel termination services in its Pricing Flexibility Order. In doing so, the Commission recognized the importance of granting pricing flexibility to incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.txt
  • 07-13 COMMENTS: June 7, 2007 REPLY COMMENTS: June 18, 2007 On April 30, 2007, the Embarq Local Operating Companies (Embarq) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Lima, OH and Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and certain channel termination services in the Lima, OH MSA pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than June 7, 2007. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.txt
  • SERVICES WCB/Pricing 07-07 COMMENTS: February 13, 2007 REPLY COMMENTS: February 23, 2007 On January 12, 2007, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated (Ameritech Indiana) and The Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Ameritech Ohio) (collectively Ameritech) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Kokomo, IN and Youngstown-Warren, OH MSAs pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 13, 2007. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.txt
  • Areas and Phase I and Phase II Pricing ) Flexibility for Channel Termination Services ) in the Lima, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area ) Adopted: September 5, 2007 Released: September 5, 2007 By the Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On April 30, 2007, the Embarq local operating companies (Embarq) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for: (1) certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Lima, OH and Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs); and (2) certain channel termination services in the Lima, OH MSA. We issued a public notice seeking comments on May 18, 2007, but received no comments. As detailed below, the Commission established the rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.txt
  • 2007, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (CBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access, dedicated transport, end-user channel termination services, and Point of Presence (POP) channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IND Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and certain special access, dedicated transport and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middleton, Ohio MSA, pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, CBT identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific CBT wire centers; and (2) data displaying CBT access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.txt
  • Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (Cincinnati Bell) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access, dedicated transport, end-user channel termination services, and Point of Presence (POP) channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IND Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and certain special access, dedicated transport and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middleton, Ohio MSA, pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than January 7, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.txt
  • of ) ) Petition of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. for Phase I ) WCB/Pricing File No. 08-01 Pricing Flexibility Pursuant to Section 69.709 of ) the Commission's Rules ) ) Adopted: May 14, 2008 Released: May 14, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On November 16, 2007, Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a petition pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises, provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu Metropolitan Statistical Area (the Hawaii Non-MSA area). On January 3, 2008, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.txt
  • Channel ) Terminations in the Albany, GA; Athens, GA; ) Alexandria LA; Anderson, SC; Charleston-North ) Charleston, SC; and Florence, SC Metropolitan ) Statistical Areas ) Adopted: May 16, 2008 Released: May 16, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules seeking: (1) Phase I relief for certain special access and dedicated transport services other than end user channel terminations in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robins, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, and Florence, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA); (2) Phase II relief for certain dedicated transport and special access services other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.txt
  • FOR WINDSTREAM KENTUCKY EAST, LLC PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing No. 08-17 COMMENTS: July 15, 2008 REPLY COMMENTS: July 25, 2008 On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises,'' in the Ashland, Kentucky MSA. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.txt
  • for the ) Lexington, Kentucky MSA and ) Ashland, Kentucky MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: June 30, 2008 Released: June 30, 2008 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Windstream identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Windstream wire centers; and (2) data displaying Windstream's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.txt
  • of Hawaii outside of the Honolulu Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Specifically, Hawaiian seeks Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations, between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu MSA (the Hawaii Non-MSA Area), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 4, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.txt
  • 1. On November 16, 2007, Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (Hawaiian) filed a petition for Phase I pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between Hawaiian's end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), provided within Hawaiian's state-wide study area but outside of the Honolulu MSA (the Hawaiian Non-MSA Area), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Hawaiian identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Hawaiian wire centers; and (2) data displaying Hawaiian access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules for the ) Lexington, Kentucky MSA and ) Ashland, Kentucky MSA ) Adopted: October 6, 2008 Released: October 6, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On June 13, 2008, Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lexington, Kentucky and Ashland, Kentucky Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises,'' in the Ashland, Kentucky MSA. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between its end offices and end
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.txt
  • 15, 2008 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: February 25, 2008 On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for pricing flexibility for certain special access and dedicated transport services in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robins, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, Florence, SC, and Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than February 15, 2008. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.txt
  • 31, 2008 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 25, 2008, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in the Albany, GA, Athens, GA, Macon-Warner Robin, GA, Alexandria, LA, Pascagoula, MS, Anderson, SC, Florence, SC, and Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, BellSouth identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific BellSouth wire centers; and (2) data displaying BellSouth access service revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.txt
  • Flexibility for Special Access, ) Dedicated Transport Services and POP ) Channel Terminations in the Hamilton- ) Middletown, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area ) Adopted: March 13, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction On November 27, 2007, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (Cincinnati Bell) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules for: (1) certain special access, dedicated transport and end-user channel termination services, and POP channel termination services in the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA); and (2) certain special access, dedicated transport, and POP channel termination services in the Hamilton-Middletown, OH MSA. On December 18, 2007, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.txt
  • Petition, the ACS LECs specifically seek: (1) Phase I and Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises; and (2) Phase I and Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. On February 16, 2010, the Commission issued a public notice seeking comment on the Petition. As described below, we conclude that the ACS LECs have met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which they request relief. To recover the costs of providing interstate access services, incumbent LECs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.txt
  • and the Fairbanks MSA. Specifically, the ACS LECs seek: (1) Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), and (2) Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than March 3, 2010. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically through ETFS, although they are not required to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774(e)(2)(i). The ETFS provides instructions for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.txt
  • and the Fairbanks MSA. Specifically, the ACS LECs seek: (1) Phase II pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services, other than channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (Qualifying DT/SA Services), and (2) Phase II relief for channel terminations between their end offices and end-user customer premises (end-user channel terminations), pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. In support of their petition for pricing flexibility, the ASC LECs identify and request confidential treatment for two categories of information included in their petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific ACS LEC wire centers; and (2) data displaying ACS LECs' access service revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.txt
  • a rolling basis. I. Definitions for this data request: Changing Service Provider(s) or Change Service Providers means switching from your company's current provider of DS1 and/or DS3 services (``current provider'') to another provider, whether the new provider is a facilities-based provider or leases facilities from your current provider. Collocator refers to the term as used pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, for purposes of applying for a grant of Phase I or Phase II Pricing Flexibility from the Commission. Thus, for purposes of this Public Notice, the definition of Collocator excludes competitive providers that collocate in carrier hotels. Contract-Based Tariff, for purposes of all questions except III.C.1 of this Public Notice, means an interstate Tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • carriers and were adopted to ensure that the Commission's regulations did not interfere with the operation of competitive markets by removing services from price cap regulation as competition develops. These rules also were adopted to detail the prerequisites to a grant of pricing flexibility. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201-203, 205, 218, 220, 254 and 403. Section Number and Title: 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. 69.703 Definitions. 69.705 Procedure. 69.707 Geographic scope of petition. 69.709 Dedicated transport and special access service other than channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.711 Channel terminations between LEC end offices and customer premises. 69.713 Common line, traffic-sensitive, and tandem-switched transport services. 69.725 Attribution of revenues to particular wire centers. 69.727
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.txt
  • PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY UNDER SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-04 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 20, 2012, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the San Francisco/Oakland Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, PBTC seeks Phase II relief for channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the San Francisco/Oakland MSA. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.txt
  • CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY UNDER SECTION 69.727 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-05 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 20, 2012, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, SWBT seeks Phase II relief for channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the San Antonio, Texas MSA. The petition is available for review through the Commission's Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). Comments or oppositions may be filed no later
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.txt
  • File No. 12-04 Commission's Rules for the ) San Francisco/Oakland California MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 20, 2012, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PBTC) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the San Francisco/Oakland California Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, PBTC identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific PBTC wire centers; and (2) data displaying PBTC's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.txt
  • File No. 12-05 Commission's Rules for the ) San Antonio, Texas MSA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Adopted: February 6, 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 20, 2012, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the San Antonio, Texas Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, SWBT identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific SWBT wire centers; and (2) data displaying SWBT's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.txt
  • RULES WCB/Pricing File No. 12-06 COMMENTS: March 7, 2012 REPLY COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugarland, Inc., and Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LP d/b/a Windstream Communications Southwest (collectively Windstream) filed a petition for pricing flexibility in the Lincoln, Nebraska; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Specifically, Windstream seeks Phase I relief for dedicated transport, special access, and channel terminations between its end offices and end user ``customer premises'' in the Lincoln, Nebraska; and Tulsa, Oklahoma MSAs. Windstream also requests Phase II relief for dedicated transport, special access, and channel terminations between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.txt
  • 2012 Released: February 6, 2012 By the Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division: 1. On January 26, 2012, Windstream Nebraska, Inc., Windstream Sugarland, Inc., and Valor Telecommunication of Texas, LP d/b/a Windstream Communications South (collectively, Windstream) filed a petition seeking pricing flexibility in the Lincoln, Nebraska, Inc.; Houston, Texas; and Tulsa, Oklahoma Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules. In support of its petition for pricing flexibility, Windstream identifies and requests confidential treatment for two categories of information included in its petition: (1) data identifying the entities collocating in specific Windstream wire centers; and (2) data displaying Windstream's wire center-level revenues disaggregated at the MSA level. Today, we authorize examination of the revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.txt
  • Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 eq seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. PN 03/23/01; DA 01-742 Telergy, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Seek Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Pleading Cycle Established. On March 7, 2001, Telergy,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.txt
  • Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4*; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. PN 03/23/01; DA 01-742 Telergy, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Seek Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Pleading Cycle Established. On March 7, 2001, Telergy,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.txt
  • Contact: Janice M. Myles at (202) 418-1577. PN 03/22/2001; DA 01-731 Pleading Cycle Established for Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On March 20, 2001, Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. and Frontier Communications of Seneca-Gorham, Inc. filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Sections 1.774 and 69.701 et. seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due: April 4*; replies due April 16. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520. CC 98-141, 98-184; PN 03/26/01; DA 01-764 Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Worldnet Telecommunications, Inc. Ex Parte Letter Concerning Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Conditions. On February 12, 2001, WorldNew Telecommunications, Inc. filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.txt
  • 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks comment regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.txt
  • 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25*; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks comment regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.txt
  • 13; replies due November 29. Contact: Christine Newcomb or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). PN 10/12/01; DA 01-2368 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corp. Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On October 10, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to Section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due October 25*; replies due November 5. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-45; PN 10/12/01; FCC 01J-2 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Review of Lifeline and Link-Up Service for All Low-Income Consumers. The Joint Board seeks comment regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217970A1.txt
  • published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002. Contact: Ed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218052A1.txt
  • published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002. Contact: Ed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218299A1.txt
  • published the Federal Register; replies due 21 days after the comment date. CCB/CPD 01-22; PN 11/20/01; DA 01-2665 Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 16, 2001, Sprint local telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 3*; replies due December 13. Contact: Julie Saulnier, at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 11/21/2001; DA 01-2724 Comments Sought on Verizon's Revised Cost Allocation Manual. The Commission seeks comment on the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due December 21; reply due January 7, 2002. Contact: Ed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218429A1.txt
  • due January 14, 2002. Contact: Paul Moon at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 12/03/01; DA 01-2788 Pleading Cycle Established for Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On November 29, 2001, Verizon telephone companies filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services in designated geographic areas pursuant to section 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due December 14*; replies due December 24. Contact: Shannon Lipp at (202) 418-1520 (voice). CC 01-314; PN 12/03/01; DA No. 01-2814 Commission Seeks Comment on Application Filed by NEVD Holdings, LLC (``NEVD'') for Transfer of Control to Conversent Holdings, Inc. On October 18, 2001, NEVD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219390A1.txt
  • publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. PN 01/02/02; DA 02-1 Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Corporation Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services. On December 31, 2001, Qwest Corporation filed a petition for pricing flexibility for special access and dedicated transport services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq.of the Commission's rules47 C.F.R. � 1/774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due January 15*; replies due January 25. Contact: Julie Saulnier at (202) 418-1530 (voice). CC 96-98; PN 01/10/02; DA 02-42 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on the New York State Public Service Commission's Request for Delegated Authority for Jurisdiction Over Area Code Changes Pursuant to 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219668A1.txt
  • or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). INTERNATIONAL BUREAU PN 01/09/02; DA 02-39 Eliska Wireless Ventures License Subsidiary I, L.L.C., Eliska Wireless Investors I, L.P., Powertel, Inc., and Sonera Holding, B.V. Seek FCC Consent to Transfer Control of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219825A1.txt
  • or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 01/31/02; DA 02-237 Comments Invited on Broadwing Local Services, Inc. Application to Discontinue Domestic Telecommunications Services. On January 8, 2002, Broadwing Local Services, Inc. filed an application with the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220080A1.txt
  • or Janice Myles at (202) 418-1580 (voice). CCB/CPD 02-03; PN 01/29/02; DA 02-214 Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company. On January 25, 2002, Pacific Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and special access services pursuant to sections 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. Comments due February 11*; replies due February 21. Contact: Calvin Osborne at (202) 418-1530 (voice). PN 02/04/02; DA 02-258 Ambient Corporation Seeks Commission Determination of "Exempt Telecommunications Company" Status under the Public Utility Holding Company Act. On January 14, 2002, Ambient Corporation filed an application requesting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306969A1.txt
  • 1 of 3 06/02/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:06/02/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/01/2011AMERITECH SERVICES 1 1740 RLS 0 0 1 1 0 06/02/2011 2 With this filing, Ameritech is proposing adjustments to various Special Access rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/01/2011NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 1 220 JWL 0 0 1 1 0 06/02/2011 1 With this filing, NBTC is proposing adjustments to various Special Access rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308210A1.txt
  • at (202) 418-0270. Page 1 of 3 07/01/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:07/01/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/30/2011AMERITECH 1 1743 RLS 0 0 1 1 0 07/01/2011 2 Ameritech is proposing to lower various Switched Access rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules SYNOPSIS Non Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/29/2011CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISE S 1 3 LJB 0 0 2 1 07/01/2011 1 Revised rates SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 06/27/2011GCI COMMUNICATION CORPORATION 1 261
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308812A1.txt
  • 1 of 3 08/01/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:08/01/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 07/29/2011BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 5 VJ 0 0 1 1 0 07/30/2011 1 Proposes adjustments to monthly rates and charges for Program Audio Service in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 07/29/2011CENTURYTEL OPERATING COMPANIES 1 7 VJ 0 0 1 1 0 08/13/2011 1 2 3 6 7 08/05/2011 Proposes to add rates and regulations introducing Ethernet Virtual Private Line service in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Missouri.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310154A1.txt
  • Information Center at (202) 418-0270. Page 1 of 3 10/04/2011 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG:10/03/2011 Dominant ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 09/30/2011AMERITECH SERVICES 1 1752 RLS 0 0 1 1 10/01/2011 2 Proposes adjustments to various Switched Acces rates in pricing flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING #TRANS # EFF DATE# DISKS# CDS# PAGESNTC61.3861.49PUS FCC # PET DUE S. P. # 09/30/2011BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 14 VJ 0 0 1 1 10/01/2011 1 Proposes adjustments to various Switched Access rates in Pricing Flexibility areas granted in accordance with Subpart H of Section 69.701 of the Commission's Rules. SYNOPSIS ISSUEDCARRIER FILING
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
  • 96-262, 94-1, 99-249, 96-45, Order on Remand, 18 FCC Rcd 14976 (2003). See also Cost Review Proceeding for Residential and Single-Line Business Subscriber Line Charge (SLC) Caps, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 10868 (2002), aff'd, Nat'l Ass'n of State Util. Consumer Advocates v. FCC, 372 F.3d 454 (D.C. Cir. June 29, 2004). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.701 et seq.; Access Charge Reform, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, 98-63, 98-157, Fifth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 14221, 14224-25, 14232-33, 14234-35, 14257-310, paras. 1-4, 19, 24-26, 67-175 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order), aff'd WorldCom v. FCC, 238 F.3d 449 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 13014-39, paras. 129-184. CALLS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.txt
  • services do not use local switches; instead they employ dedicated facilities that run directly between the end user and an IXC's point of presence, where an IXC connects its network with the LEC network, or between two discrete end user locations. Id. at 1997, para. 7. Special Access NPRM, 20 FCC Rcd at 1995-97, paras. 1-5. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.701 et seq.; Access Charge Reform, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, 98-63, 98-157, Fifth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 14221, 14224-25, 14232-33, 14234-35, 14257-310, paras. 1-4, 19, 24-26, 67-175 (1999), aff'd WorldCom v. FCC, 238 F.3d 449 (D.C. Cir. 2001). The Wireline Competition Bureau entered a Protective Order in this proceeding to enable parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • local exchange carrier must reallocate costs Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-12 from the interexchange charge each time it increases the ratio between the prices in its lowest-cost zone and any other zone in that study area. * * * * * 20. Revise Part 69 by adding Subpart H to read as follows: Subpart H -- Pricing Flexibility � 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in Section 61.3(x) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area. � 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: (a) Channel terminations. (1) A channel
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carrier must reallocate costs Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-12 from the interexchange charge each time it increases the ratio between the prices in its lowest-cost zone and any other zone in that study area. * * * * * 20. Revise Part 69 by adding Subpart H to read as follows: Subpart H -- Pricing Flexibility � 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in Section 61.3(x) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area. � 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: (a) Channel terminations. (1) A channel
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • local exchange carrier must reallocate costs Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-12 from the interexchange charge each time it increases the ratio between the prices in its lowest-cost zone and any other zone in that study area. * * * * * 20. Revise Part 69 by adding Subpart H to read as follows: Subpart H -- Pricing Flexibility � 69.701 Application of rules in this subpart. The rules in this subpart apply to all incumbent LECs subject to price cap regulation, as defined in Section 61.3(x) of this chapter, seeking pricing flexibility on the basis of the development of competition in parts of its service area. � 69.703 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: (a) Channel terminations. (1) A channel
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002006.doc
  • a particular market is sufficient to warrant relaxation of such rules governing interstate access services. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999) (Pricing Flexibility Order). To make such a showing, a price cap LEC may submit information concerning collocation, wire-center revenue data, and wire-center line count information. See 47 C.F.R. �69.701 et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.774. See Letter from Helen Shockey, BellSouth Attorney, to Magalie Salas, Secretary, FCC, Requesting Confidential Treatment of Information Filed Under Seal in Support of its Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Certain Switched Access Services, August 28, 2000 (BellSouth August 28, 2000 Request). Bell South requested confidential treatment of designated portions of the information filed in