FCC Web Documents citing 69.2

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.pdf
  • id. at � 371 (``Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ....''). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of ``end user'' found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ...''); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, � 2.6 (1984) (``ECA Tariff Order'') (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define ``end user'');
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.pdf
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. �� 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of ``end user'' in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff � 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: ``The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.pdf
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 69.4(a) (``The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ....''); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, � 10 (1983) (``Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings.''), 345, Appendix A, � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-519A1.txt
  • in December 1992, and TFN was acquired by LDDS in August 1992. Id. at 1. For purposes of this order, we treat LDDS as the entity that purchased the relevant services. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 148-49 (1930) (requiring ``separation of the intrastate and interstate property, revenues and expenses'' of LECs); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b), 69.3(a) (in combination, requiring filing of interstate access tariffs at FCC). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 151 (assigning to FCC the regulation of ``interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio''); id. � 152(b) (excluding from FCC jurisdiction matters relating to ``intrastate communication service by wire or radio''). The Commission previously has recognized that LECs are not able
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.txt
  • of their payphones, and thus this proceeding concerns rules that are not currently in effect. The Commission's Liability Order IPPs Not End Users The Commission's Liability Order responded to the court's remand of an earlier Commission ruling. The Commission's earlier ruling held that IPP payphones were subject to a EUCL charge because the IPPs were "end users" pursuant to section 69.2(m) of the rules. But on remand from an appeal of that decision, the Commission reversed itself and concluded in the Liability Order that, although C.F. Communications and other IPPs own the payphones, they cannot be considered "end users" under section 69.2(m), because they do not own the premises where their payphones are located. IPPs Must Pay EUCL Charge Nonetheless, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.txt
  • generally file biennial revisions in even numbered years (47 C.F.R. �69.3 (f)(1)). 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. These carriers generally file biennial revisions in odd numbered years (47 C.F.R. �69.3(f)(1)). Regulatory Reform for Local Exchange Carriers Subject to Rate of Return Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 4545 (1993) (Regulatory Reform Order), recon. pending. Regulatory Reform Order at para. 97. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b) and (z). Some companies that, on their own, would qualify as small telephone companies are not so classified either because 1) they are affiliated with companies that are NECA Subset 2 companies or 2) the combined study areas of a company and its affiliates are greater than 50,000 access lines. 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(f)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 61.39(b). Annual 1987
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1279A1.doc
  • Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 00-256, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 00-448 (Jan. 25, 2001). For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o); see also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14287. Id. at 14234-35.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY FILED A PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2 (hh) ``UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND'' OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC DKT 96-45 Released Date: June 15, 2001 Comment Date: June 29, 2001 Reply Date: July 16, 2001 On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company (Skyline Telephone) filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F. R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order applies only to price cap LECs, that is, those LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14,234 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) of the Commission's rules for a definition of an MSA. A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o); see also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing the required composition of the contract-based tariffs). See Pricing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.txt
  • No. 00-256, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 00-448 (Jan. 25, 2001). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Interexchange Competition Order, 6 FCC Rcd. 5880, 5897 (1991); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.txt
  • No. 96-45; and Report and Order in CC Docket Nos. 98-77 and 98-166, FCC 01-304 (rel. November 8, 2001). For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o); see also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14287. Id. at 14234-35.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.txt
  • and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd. 19613 (2001). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Interexchange Competition Order, 6 FCC Rcd. 5880, 5897 (1991); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.txt
  • to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, the term ``dedicated transport services'' refers to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.txt
  • 2220, and 2230 respectively, per Section 69.401(b). Note 2 - OPP Expense (Account 6510) and Networks Operations Expense (Account 6530) are allocated on COE, IOT, and C&WF investment (Rows 1410, 1440, and 1530) combined, per Sections 36.353(b) and 69.401(d). Note 3 - Excluding Billing and Collections Note 4 - Corporate Operations Expense is allocated on Big 3 Expenses, per Sections 69.2(e) and 69.2(f). Report Definition - Row/Column Instructions The following row instructions are deleted: Rows 4013, 3220, 3230, 3240, 3250, 3260, and 3270. Row 4010 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``End User Revenue that is directly assigned pursuant to Sections 36.213(b) and 36.213(e).'' Row 4011 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``Switched
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.txt
  • Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.txt
  • 14995.4 935844.0 935844.0 TX BELTON KNCT 9754 46 575. 384 305912.0 38 200. 360 3059 8.0 1125255 21468.9 973747.0 973751.0 TX BIG SPRING KWAB-TV 42008 4 12.9 116 321514.0 33 174. 83 321655.0 72654 10805.3 1012644.0 1012934.0 TX BROWNSVILLE KVEO 12523 23 2570. 445 2606 1.0 24 1000. 445 2606 1.7 959065 35541.9 975020.0 975020.4 TX BRYAN KBTX-TV 6669 3 69.2 515 303310.0 50 1000. 477 303316.0 2924634 35977.0 960150.0 960151.0 TX BRYAN KYLE 60384 28 2090. 220 304118.0 29 50. 220 304118.0 271378 13121.5 962535.0 962535.0 TX COLLEGE STATION KAMU-TV 65301 15 22.9 119 303748.0 12 3.2 105 303747.0 271751 12545.6 962033.0 962033.0 TX CONROE KTBU 28324 55 5000. 554 301353.0 42 1000. 597 293344.0 4836674 38457.3 950726.0 953035.0 TX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.txt
  • 4954-55, paras. 10-13. VarTec Reply at 2. VarTec Reply at 7-12. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 148-49 (1930) (``The separation of the intrastate and interstate property, revenues, and expenses'' of LECs ``is essential to the appropriate recognition of the competent governmental authority in each field of regulation.''); 47 U.S.C. � 203(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b), 69.3(a) (in combination requiring filing of interstate access tariffs at the Commission). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 151 (creating the Commission ``[f]or the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio'') and 152(b) (excluding from Commission jurisdiction matters relating to ``intrastate communication service by wire or radio''). Determination of Interstate and Intrastate Usage of Feature
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3687A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-3687 Released Date: November 24, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE PETITIONS OF DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY, LLC, QWEST CORPORATION, AND DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC., TO WAIVE THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE, AS CODIFIED IN PART 36, AND SECTIONS 69.2(hh) AND 69.605(c) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45 Comment Date: December 8, 2004 Reply Comment Date: December 15, 2004 On November 2, 2004, Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC (Direct Communications) and Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze, as codified in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.txt
  • 9754 46 575. 00384 0305912.0 38 200. 00360 03059 8.0 793151 14609.9 1120896 21472.9 00973747.0 00973751.0 TX BIG SPRING KWAB-TV 42008 04 12.9 00116 0321514.0 33 174. 00083 0321655.0 58643 11918.4 96274 10867.2 01012644.0 01012934.0 TX BROWNSVILLE KVEO 12523 23 2570. 00445 02606 1.0 24 1000. 00445 02606 1.7 933723 22488.8 959065 35542.0 00975020.0 00975020.4 TX BRYAN KBTX-TV 6669 03 69.2 00515 0303310.0 50 1000. 00477 0303316.0 702060 30178.2 2928907 36001.1 00960150.0 00960151.0 TX BRYAN KYLE-DT 60384 28 2090. 00220 0304118.0 29 50.0 220.0 304118 269879 12721.8 269850 12725.8 00962535.0 962535 TX COLLEGE STATION KAMU-DT 65301 15 22.9 00119 0303748.0 12 3.20 119.0 303748 164938 3871.0 275684 12709.3 00962033.0 962033 TX CONROE KPXB 58835 49 4270. 00359 0301545.0 05 9.5 00555
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-105A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-105 SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER NUNC PRO TUNC OF THE DEFINTION OF ``STUDY AREA'' IN PART 36 AND SECTIONS 36.611 AND 69.2(hh) COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45 Release Date: January 18, 2005 Comment Date: February 8, 2005 Reply Comment Date: February 22, 2005 On December 27, 2004, Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. (Sandwich Isles), filed a petition requesting waiver, nunc pro tunc, of the definition of ``Study Area,'' as codified in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36, and sections 36.611
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1220 Released: April 27, 2005 ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2(hh) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED WC Docket No. 05-174 COMMENTS: May 19, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: June 2, 2005 By this Public Notice, we seek comment on a petition filed on April 7, 2005 by Allband Communications Cooperative (Allband) requesting waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. Allband intends to provide local exchange service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit L Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary and Sections 36.611, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: May 16, 2005 Released: May 16, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant a request from Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. (Sandwich Isles) for waiver, nunc pro tunc, of the study area boundary freeze codified in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201 and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and protect consumers by preventing the exercise of market power by incumbent local exchange carriers by ensuring that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules also provide definitions for terms used in rules. Need: Sections 69.2(uu) and (vv) define the terms ``price cap regulation'' and ``signalling for tandem switching'' and are essential for the implementation and understanding of other rule sections. Section 69.4(b)(9) was added to help correct the misallocation of general support facility investment and related expenses among the part 69 cost categories for local exchange carriers. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1544 Released: May 27, 2005 ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a ADAK TELEPHONE UTILITY SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) AND 69.3(e)(6) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND, IF NECESSARY, A WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45 Comments Due: June 13, 2005 Reply Comments Due: June 20, 2005 On February 9, 2005, Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility (Adak) filed a petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Allband Communications Cooperative Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 05-174 Adopted: August 11, 2005 Released: August 11, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant the request of Allband Communications Cooperative (Allband) for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. We also grant Allband waivers of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's Rules Beaver Creek Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 05-58 WC Docket No. 05-69 Adopted: August 11, 2005 Released: August 11, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.txt
  • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit & & & � � & : n & � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC and Qwest Corporation Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.605(c) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: November 29, 2005 Released: November 29, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant a joint request from Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC (Direct Communications) and Qwest Corporation (Qwest)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 4 4 4 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: December 29, 2005 Released: December 30, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we grant Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility (Adak Telephone), a new local exchange carrier (LEC) in Alaska, waivers of certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-593 Released: March 4, 2005 BEAVER CREEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED WC Docket No. 05-69 COMMENTS: March 25, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 8, 2005 By this Public Notice, we seek comment on a petition filed on December 8, 2004 by Beaver Creek Telephone Company (Beaver Creek) requesting waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. Beaver Creek is a new
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-595 Released: March 4, 2005 WESTGATE COMMUNICATIONS LLC d/b/a WEAVTEL PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED WC Docket No. 05-58 COMMENTS: March 25, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 8, 2005 By this Public Notice, we seek comment on a petition filed on August 18, 2004 by Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel (WeavTel) requesting waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. WeavTel is a new local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.txt
  • grant these waivers on our own motion to permit Skyline Telephone to be eligible to receive high-cost universal service support, beginning in 2004, consistent with the Commission's intention as articulated in the Skyline Order. Background In the Skyline Order, the Commission dismissed in part, and granted in part, a request from Skyline Telephone for waiver of sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's rules and on its own motion waived the study area definition in Part 36 of the Commission's rules. The Commission concluded that to grant Skyline the relief it sought, the Commission had to grant waivers beyond those Skyline Telephone specifically sought. The Commission found that a study area waiver was required in order for Skyline Telephone to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.txt
  • Waiver Filed by Alaska Telephone Company, Ducor Telephone Company, and Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Concerning the Definition of ``Study Area'' in the Part 36 Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 8156, 8160, at para. 9 (Com. Car. Bur. 1996). See M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6766, at para. 11 (2004). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov M
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.txt
  • its New Mexico study area and permit Sacred Wind to establish a new study area in New Mexico. Sacred Wind also seeks waiver of certain Commission rules so that it may receive immediate federal high-cost universal service support and enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support for serving eligible residents of near-Tribal lands. Specifically, Sacred Wind requests waivers of sections 36.611, 36.612, 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6), and 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission's rules. Waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules would enable Sacred Wind to receive immediate high-cost loop support payments based on projected costs until historical costs become available. Waiver of sections 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6), and 69.3(e)(11) would permit Sacred Wind to become a member of NECA and to participate immediately in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 4 4 4 � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: November 27, 2006 Released: November 27, 2006 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: In this Order, we extend the timing of the waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules granted to Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-934A1.txt
  • 214 APPLICATION FILED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SELECTED ASSETS OF QWEST CORPORATION BY SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. STREAMLINED Pleading Cycle Established WC Docket No. 06-82 SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND QWEST CORPORATION SEEK WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36, AND SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.305, 54.314(d), 54.903(a), 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6) AND 69.3(e)(11) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF THE COMMISSION'S STAY OF THE PROVISION OF ENHANCED LIFELINE AND LINK-UP SUPPORT TO CUSTOMERS ON NEAR-TRIBAL LANDS PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109 Comments Due: May 11, 2006 Reply Comments Due: May 18, 2006 On March 30, 2006, Qwest Corporation (``Qwest'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Signal = DMIN + 3 dB Table A-3. D/U Statistics for 8 Receivers at D = DMIN + 3 dB on Channel 30 Undesired Channel Best D/U (dB) Median D/U (dB) Mean D/U (dB) 2nd Worst D/U (dB) Worst D/U (dB) Standard Deviation (dB) N-16 < -76.0 -73.2 < -72.3 -67.8 -67.8 > 3.4 N-15 < -76.0 -71.4 < -72.1 -69.2 -69.0 > 2.8 N-14 < -75.3 -72.7 < -71.8 -67.6 -67.1 > 3.4 N-13 < -74.8 -72.9 < -71.4 -66.7 -65.3 > 3.9 N-12 < -74.8 -72.3 < -70.7 -65.2 -63.5 > 4.5 N-11 < -74.6 -70.5 < -68.9 -63.5 -61.6 > 4.8 N-10 < -74.7 -68.7 < -67.8 -61.8 -59.6 > 5.0 N-9 < -74.1 -67.2 < -65.3 -59.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For pricing flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.txt
  • to its first customer. Allband further requests that the Commission grant on its own motion any additional waivers of the Commission's rules necessary to expedite Allband's receipt of all federal universal service support and participation in National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pools. On August 11, 2005, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) granted a request from Allband for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules to allow Allband to participate in NECA tariffs and pools. In addition, the Bureau granted Allband waivers of the definition of incumbent local exchange carrier in Part 36 and section 54.5 of the Commission's rules to the limited extent necessary to permit Allband to receive universal service support based on its own costs. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 4.3 + -4.4 - Live Angle 39.3 41.0 38.6 33.1 39.3 7.9 + -0.7 - Content Angle 50.2 46.8 40.7 50.2 51.1 -3.4 - -10.4 - Origination Angle 33.4 12.1 30.3 25.9 33.8 -13.8 - -3.5 - Live Angle 38.3 40.6 31.2 39.0 38.9 1.5 + -7.7 - Content Angle 52.0. 48.9 76.8 52.2 -3.3 - Origination Angle 41.2. 38.5 69.2 41.3 -2.8 - Live Angle 42.7. 39.1 56.4 42.9 -3.8 - Content Angle 64.0 86.2 61.3 57.9 64.1 28.3 + -2.9 - Origination Angle 40.3 5.4 24.9 2.5 41.5 2.9 + -16.5 - Live Angle 41.4 5.9 38.9 24.8 41.7 -18.9 - -2.9 - Content Angle 55.5 86.4 49.6 58.1 55.9 28.3 + -6.4 - Origination Angle 26.6 12.3 12.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.txt
  • please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Osirus Communications, Inc., Petition for Waivers of the Commission's Rules to Participate in NECA Pools and Tariffs and to Obtain Accelerated USF Support, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 2, 2007) (Petition). Specifically, Osirus seeks a waiver of sections 69.2(hh), 69.601, and 69.3(e) to allow Osirus to become a member of NECA and to immediately participate in NECA pools; sections 36.611 and 36.612 to allow accelerated high-cost loop support; the July 1, 2007 and October 1, 2007 state certification deadlines set forth in section 54.314(d); and data filing deadlines set forth in sections 54.301(b) and 54.903(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(hh),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). In its petition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules (filed Mar. 12, 2008) (ETS Request); M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6766, at paras. 11-13 (2004) (Skyline Order). See Request for Clarification Filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., and Petitions for Waiver Filed by Alaska Telephone Company, Ducor Telephone Company, and Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Concerning the Definition of ``Study Area'' in the Part 36 Appendix-Glossary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • -44.7 O O 42 ATSC Y Y ATSC -43.9 O O 43 NTSC N Y NTSC -72.7 A A ATSC N N 44 - N N - - A A 45 NTSC Y Y NTSC -23.0 O O 46 ATSC Y Y ATSC -20.7 O O 47 ATSC N N NTSC -78.7 A A 48 ATSC Y N ATSC < -69.2 O O 49 NTSC N N NTSC -93.1 A A 50 NTSC Y Y NTSC -66.1 O A 51 ATSC Y N NTSC -69.1 O O TABLE 5-10. I2R WSD Prototype Results at Test Site 2. CH Signal Type (Database) Within Service Contour? (Y/N) Viewable? (Y/N) Signal Type (Measured) Measured Power Level (dBm) Occupied (O) & Available (A) Channels Reported
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.txt
  • 35 D 596.3 -62.6 Y 36 D 602.3 -62.2 Y 37 38 D 614.3 -16 Y 39 D 620.3 -65.3 N 40 D 626.3 -20.4 Y 41 D 632.3 -44.7 Y 42 D 638.3 -43.9 Y 43 N 645.25 -72.7 6 44 45 N 657.25 -23 2 46 D 662.3 -20.7 Y 47 N 669.2 -78.7 N 48 D 674.3 <-69.2 N 49 N 681.2 -93.1 N 50 N 687.25 -66.1 5 51 N 693.2 -69.1 N Table C-6. Measurement Results - Ellicott City Site Channel Signal Type (N or D) Frequency (MHz) Measured Power (dBm) Viewable (Picture/TASO) Reported PSIP 21 N 513.25 -95.7 N 22 N 519.28 -29.8 1 23 N 525.2 -72 N 24 N 531.26 -39.2 1 25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.txt
  • Date: June 22, 2009 On April 1, 2009, DTS of CA, Inc. (DTS) filed a petition for waiver of the Commission's rules to allow it to participate in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pools and tariffs and to obtain accelerated universal service support. First, DTS seeks a waiver of the definition of ``incumbent local exchange carrier'' in sections 54.5, 69.2(hh), and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, and of the annual election filing deadline in section 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's rules, to allow DTS to become a member of NECA and to immediately participate in NECA pools and tariffs. Second, DTS seeks a waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules to allow DTS to receive universal service high-cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.txt
  • 96-45 Comment Date: August 20, 2009 Reply Comment Date: September 4, 2009 On April 20, 2009, Huron Mountain Communications Co. (Huron) filed a petition for waiver of the Commission's rules to participate in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pools and to obtain accelerated universal service support. Specifically, Huron requests: 1) waiver of the definition of ``telephone company'' in sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, and of the annual election filing deadline in section 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's rules to allow Huron to become a member of NECA and to immediately participate in NECA pools and tariffs; 2) a declaratory ruling that a waiver of the definition of ``study area'' in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. Part 36 App.; Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., and Oregon Telephone Corporation, Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed May 4, 2006) (Qwest-Pine-Oregon Petition). See M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6765, para. 10 (2004) (Skyline Order). See MTS and WATS Market Structure, Amendment of Part 67 of the Commission's Rules and Establishment of a Joint Board, CC Docket Nos. 78-72, 80-286, Decision and Order, 50 Fed. Reg. 939 (1985) (Part 67 Order); see also 47 C.F.R. Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout these parts). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.txt
  • if both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). . See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761 (2004); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline Comp. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.txt
  • 54.305(b). See Qwest/Iowa Telecom Petition at 3. Id. We have no reason to believe the estimate of $300 would be significantly different since the time the petition was filed and, nevertheless, any additional support for these five transferred lines would be de minimis. See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, (2004) (Skyline Order); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.txt
  • in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, and Petition for Waiver of Section 61.41(c) of the Commission's Rules, AAD 94-27, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 4644 (1997). 47 C.F.R. Part 36 App. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). See Petition at 5; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). See Accipiter estimates that potential annual ICLS for the subject area would range between $166,000 and $216,000 by year three of operation depending on the degree of build-out and market penetration. See Accipiter December 17 Ex Parte Letter at 6-7.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1880A1.txt
  • the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 4672 (2002). The term ``Bureau'' in this order refers to the Common Carrier Bureau prior to the reorganization, and to the Wireline Competition Bureau after the reorganization. See Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc., Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary and Sections 36.611 and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 8999, 8999-9000, para. 1 (Wir. Comp. Bur. 2005) (Study Area Waiver Order). On June 15, 2005, Hawaiian Telcom filed an application for review of the Bureau's order, which remains pending. Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. Application for Review, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June 15, 2005). See id. at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.txt
  • rural customers for cost-recovery of amounts that otherwise should be recovered through universal service support in a manner consistent with Commission policy and practice. Finally, Direct states that the relief sought has been granted by the Commission to other carriers in similar circumstances. Allband Petition for Waiver On April 7, 2005, Allband filed a petition requesting a waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules to allow it to join NECA and to participate in NECA tariffs and pools. Allband also requested a waiver of certification and data filing deadlines contained in Part 54 of the Commission's rules that would prevent it from receiving universal service high-cost loop, local switching, and interstate common line support ``on the date on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.txt
  • at Exhibit B (attaching Joint Application of Dubois Telephone Exchange, Inc., and Qwest Corporation for Authority to Transfer, Assign, and Acquire Certain Certificated and Uncertificated Areas, Docket No. 70000-1361-TA-07, Docket No. 70007-48-TA-07 (Record No. 11464), Order (Wyoming Commission, Jan. 10, 2008)). See Petition at 3-4; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). The Petitioners claim that the incremental universal service support to be received by Dubois as a result of this transaction is zero. See Petition at 4. See, e.g., US WEST Communications, Inc., and Eagle Telecommunications, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.txt
  • this transaction, could approach the current one-percent threshold of $49 million. See Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanism, Fund Size Projection for the Second Quarter 2010, Table HC02 (Jan. 29, 2010) (projecting total annual high-cost support of approximately $4.9 billion). See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761 (2004); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline Comp. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.txt
  • this transaction, could approach the current one-percent threshold of $49 million. See Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanism, Fund Size Projection for the Second Quarter 2010, Table HC02 (Jan. 29, 2010) (projecting total annual high-cost support of approximately $4.9 billion). See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761 (2004); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline Comp. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.txt
  • both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008), Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). See Petition at 5; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). Because the per-line support limitation in section 54.305(b) does not apply to these transfers, El Paso will be eligible, as a rural carrier, to receive universal service high-cost support based on the average cost per loop of all of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.txt
  • both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008), Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). See Petition at 1-2; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). Because the per-line support limitation in section 54.305(b) does not apply to these transfers, Range will be eligible, as a rural carrier, to receive universal service high-cost support based on the average costs of all its lines. See generally 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.txt
  • waivers, in light of the Commission's 2004 Skyline Order in which the Commission concluded that treating an area as unserved when it is part of an existing study area would be inconsistent with the purpose of the study area freeze. Id. at 4987-8, para. 4; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6765, para. 11 (2004) (Skyline Order). The Skyline Order clarified that ``a study area waiver must be filed with the Commission where a company is seeking to create a new study area from within one or more existing study areas.'' Skyline Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6767,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A2.txt
  • Rulemaking Filed In 1995 CC RM-8606 View RM-8606edocs: RM-8606 2/27/1995 4311/20/1995Disclosures byOperator Service Providers of Serving Public Radio CC RM-8585 View RM-8585edocs: RM-8585 2/2/1995 1211/29/1995Establishment of a Funding Mechanism for Interstate Operator Assistance for the Deaf CC PRM96CC View PRM96CCedocs: PRM96CC 1/17/1996 11/16/1996Common Carrier Bureau Petitions for Rulemaking Filed In 1996 CC RM-8723 View RM-8723edocs: RM-8723 11/3/1995 152/13/1996Amendment of Section 69.2 (m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones within the Public Telephone Exemption from End-User Common-Line Access Charges CC RM-8303 View RM-8303edocs: RM-8303 8/2/1993 313/15/1996Request Amendment of the Rules to Determine the Terms and Conditions Under Which Tier 1 LECs Should be Permitted to Provide InterLATA Telecommunications Services CC RM-8708 View RM-8708edocs: RM-8708 10/12/1995 12 4/1/1996Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A2.txt
  • Wireline Bureau Bureau in ECFS Proceeding #ECFS Link EDOCS Link Date CreatedFilingsLast FilingSubject WC 05-56 View 05-56 edocs: 05-56 2/11/2005 75/12/2005Joint Appplication of Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. and Westcom Corp. for Transfer of Control of Certain Domestic and International Lines. WC 05-58 View 05-58 edocs: 05-58 2/11/2005 68/11/2005In re Petition of WestGate Commnications LLC d/b/a Weavtel for Waiver of Section 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's to Allow New Local Exchange Carrier to Participate in National Exchange Carrier Association Tariffs and Pools. .. WC 05-64 View 05-64 edocs: 05-64 2/15/2005 42/28/2005In the Matter of MercedNet, Inc. Section 63.71 Application to Domestic Non-Dominant Telecommunications Services in the Merced, California Basic Trading Area. .. WC 05-69 View 05-69 edocs: 05-69 2/17/2005 38/11/2005In re
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • that either originating or terminating incumbent LECs would intentionally risk the collection of often significant per-minute access charge revenues 180 IXCs today incur access charges for originating access minutes of use from the time when the originating LEC hands a call off to the IXC's POP, regardless of whether the call is completed at the called location. 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(a). As a result, originating minutes of use are approximately seven percent greater than originating minutes of use. IXCs today do not generally choose to bill their customers directly for access minutes of use charged by the LEC for uncompleted calls or for the interval before the called party answers. Federal Communications Commission, Com. Car. Bur., Industry Analysis Division, Telecommunications Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204727A1.txt
  • report focuses on three categories of wireless services: mobile telephony, mobile data, and dispatch. The Fifth Report makes the following observations about these categories: Mobile Telephony: The mobile telephony sector has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Mobile telephony carriers continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. Over 172 million people, or 69 percent of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.txt
  • 59.2 3766.82 5997.3775 1720 G7DDT 57 3764.795 6004.9825 1720 G7DDT 57.8 3775.9775 6096.2725 437 G7DDT 58.6 3871.2725 6100.7275 218 G7DDT 54.2 3875.7275 6105.5425 1720 G7DDT 67.9 3880.5425 6108.0625 1720 G7DDT 63.8 3883.0625 6117.94 1720 G7DDT 57.5 4082.94 6119.9425 1720 G7DDT 56.4 4084.9525 6121.945 1720 G7DDT 57.5 4086.954 6123.9475 1720 G7DDT 55.3 4088.9475 6238.9675 1720 G7DDT 69.5 3934.2725 6240.88 1720 G7DDT 69.2 3936.185 6242.7925 1720 G7DDT 69.5 3940.01 6244.705 1720 G7DDT 68.6 3940.01 6249.5875 1720 G7DDT 50.5 4024.7 6255.1675 546 G7DDT 61.8 3912.5375 6273.9925 1720 G7DDT 71 3880.0475 6275.995 1720 G7DDT 71.1 3878.045 6277.9975 1720 G7DDT 71 3884.0525 6280 1720 G7DDT 71 3882.05 6316.9 1720 G7DDT 65.1 4090.7 6323.42 1720 G7DDT 61.6 4098.1275 6323.6675 437 G7DDT 62.4 4096.8675 6324.8825 1720 G7DDT 66.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213863A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 01-126; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1445 Pleading Cycle Established for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29*; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 01-126; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1445 Pleading Cycle Established for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29*; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 01-126; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1445 Pleading Cycle Established for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29*; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 96-45; PN 06/20/01; DA 01-1458 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 100.0 1 0 100.0 87 100.0 Rhode Island 30 0 100.0 5 1 83.3 36 97.2 South Carolina 276 2 99.3 17 5 77.3 300 97.7 South Dakota 245 9 96.5 5 2 71.4 261 95.8 Tennessee 355 9 97.5 38 4 90.5 406 96.8 Texas 1,483 26 98.3 583 26 95.7 2,118 97.5 Utah 147 18 89.1 9 4 69.2 178 87.6 Vermont 132 2 98.5 2 0 100.0 136 98.5 Virgin Islands 5 0 100.0 0 0 NA 5 100.0 Virginia 461 7 98.5 49 10 83.1 527 96.8 Washington 359 8 97.8 58 5 92.1 430 97.0 West Virginia 228 6 97.4 6 2 75.0 242 96.7 Wisconsin 635 5 99.2 46 6 88.5 692 98.4 Wyoming 63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.txt
  • IF... *** MAGAZINES *** WERE NO LONGER AVAILABLE, HOW MUCH MORE LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO USE... *** BROADCAST TV CHANNELS *** FOR LOCAL OR NATIONAL NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS? BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO USE MAGAZINES MOST OFTEN AS THEIR SOURCE FOR LOCAL OR NATIONAL NEWS TOTAL ----- UNWEIGHTED TOTAL 15 WEIGHTED TOTAL 1247 (000) 100.0 TOP 2 BOX (%4-5) ---------------- 69.2 5 MUCH MORE LIKELY 37.3 4 31.9 3 9.8 2 5.6 1 NO MORE LIKELY 15.4 DON'T KNOW - REFUSE - MEAN 3.7 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. COPYRIGHT 2002 NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH, INC. NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH PAGE: 42 FCC PHONE SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243420A1.txt
  • U.S. could result in smaller satellite spacing than the current nine degree spacing between U.S. DBS orbital slots." Part 100 NPM, 13 FCC Rcd at 6934. Canada and Mexico have filed modifications of many of their original Plan assignments to extend coverage to the United States -- at 72.5", 82", 91" and 129" W.L. in the case of Canada, and 69.2" and 77" W.L. in the case of Mexico - which, if implemented, would result in several instances of reduced spacing, including 4.5". In addition to coordination of SES AMERICOM's proposed satellite at 105.5" W.L., coordination is also ongoing with respect to a DBS satellite at 96.5" W.L. proposed by the Isle of Man. Coordinations are also presumably underway with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.01,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.91,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.31,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.72,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9 349.6 61.8 2,650.82,776.7 39,180
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
  • 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017 0.7 97.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 798,023,705 35.4 3.5 33.2 16.7 11.2 Norway $28,785,730 42.3 1.3 15.9 26.1 14.4 $2,235,416 20.2 1.0 12.3 66.0 0.5 $861,416 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206,065,128 21.0 2.2 18.7 41.1 17.0 Portugal $31,812,704 76.4 3.2 13.3 3.9 3.2 $1,612,633 68.0 0.0 26.5 4.9 0.5 $8,824 0.0 19.9 10.9 69.2 0.0 180,759,687 50.8 8.9 24.9 6.1 9.3 Spain $114,772,545 55.0 4.0 11.2 26.4 3.5 $3,613,281 34.3 20.8 30.7 8.3 5.9 $12,437,764 0.8 94.6 0.3 4.3 0.0 637,440,248 28.3 12.5 18.3 24.5 16.4 Sweden $32,755,210 51.7 2.1 24.1 18.5 3.7 $3,414,780 37.1 5.2 37.3 20.1 0.4 $3,564,642 0.2 99.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 324,182,160 23.4 4.9 52.2 14.6 4.9 Switzerland $74,010,699 60.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.0 1,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.9 1,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.3 1,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.7 2,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • 2.8 ND Ohio 3,026.7 319.4 2,707.3 2,024.9 682.8 311.5 155.9 135.9 603.3 79.5 OH Oklahoma 818.2 144.5 673.7 482.5 192.0 94.6 27.9 52.0 174.5 17.4 OK Oregon 964.6 86.8 877.8 626.9 250.9 119.0 44.1 55.1 218.2 32.8 OR Pennsylvania 3,525.1 237.0 3,288.1 2,393.2 895.1 415.5 104.0 271.7 791.2 103.9 PA Rhode Island 295.3 19.4 275.9 193.4 82.4 34.6 9.0 25.6 69.2 13.3 RI South Carolina 917.9 101.6 816.2 599.5 217.1 112.9 24.6 43.3 180.8 36.4 SC South Dakota 119.4 9.5 109.9 75.1 34.8 15.7 6.6 9.7 32.0 2.9 SD Tennessee 1,468.6 191.5 1,277.0 921.9 356.0 173.5 41.6 75.5 290.6 65.3 TN Texas 7,151.7 1,171.0 5,980.8 4,317.9 1,669.9 768.2 187.7 563.2 1,519.1 150.9 TX Utah 533.5 40.2 493.3 342.8 150.6 68.3 26.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 3.7 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 115.1 295.5 85.0 0.0 26.2 9.6 226.2 20.1 0.0 9. Natural Causes 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399 0 12. External Power Failure 4.6 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14. Remote 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. Other/Unknown 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications. Table 1(d): Company Comparision -- 2004 Customer Perception
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 3.7 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 115.1 295.5 85.0 0.0 26.2 9.6 226.2 20.1 0.0 9. Natural Causes 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 398.9 0.0 12. External Power Failure 4.6 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14. Remote 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. Other/Unknown 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table 9.3 (a) Switch Downtime Causes -- Outages More Than 2 Minutes in Duration Bell Companies - 2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • Intrastate Private Line Service Other Telephone Services NAICS Series ID 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • $234,611 14.2 0.0 7.9 6.1 71.8 $14 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 92.9 27,859,933 25.7 2.7 10.9 10.7 50.0 Qatar $5,483,423 3.7 7.0 44.3 30.8 14.1 $390,190 0.0 7.8 0.7 21.8 69.7 $845,999 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27,072,165 2.9 12.1 47.9 20.0 17.1 Saudi Arabia $71,840,055 48.4 1.0 14.8 26.8 9.1 $1,567,083 10.3 0.0 13.3 10.7 65.7 $4,387 0.0 0.0 11.7 69.2 19.1 409,737,534 35.4 1.0 26.2 23.9 13.5 Syria $21,957,653 15.0 4.0 4.6 21.5 54.9 $2,319,733 25.5 0.0 38.5 0.0 36.0 $3,008 0.0 0.0 19.8 0.0 80.2 88,706,444 14.8 3.7 6.3 16.7 58.6 United Arab Emirates $54,662,610 49.1 1.1 9.8 23.1 16.8 $1,972,068 26.3 0.0 7.9 15.1 50.7 $128,164 0.0 0.0 99.4 0.0 0.6 286,777,039 38.2 1.0 13.1 24.6 23.0 Yemen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Intrastate Private Line Service Other Telephone Services NAICS Series ID 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
  • 3.4 0.124.718.8 53.1 $2,518,706 12.6 0.0 7.214.1 66.1 $4,445,794 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 316,185,733 6.0 0.115.821.9 56.2 Cyprus $2,889,857 3.2 0.019.548.6 28.7 $182,618 0.0 0.029.625.4 45.0 $321 0.0 0.0 0.014.3 85.7 24,836,022 4.8 0.033.021.9 40.3 Denmark $16,329,719 3.1 0.115.220.3 61.3 $1,600,642 42.2 0.015.7 4.1 38.0 $6,012,314 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 193,783,259 6.3 0.123.018.1 52.4 Finland $8,815,262 2.0 0.011.217.6 69.2 $197,777 0.1 0.016.731.3 51.9 $2,429 55.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 38.7 80,013,337 2.5 0.1 9.328.3 59.8 France $107,720,508 4.6 0.017.717.7 59.9 $10,353,833 1.5 0.015.129.2 54.2 $20,218,951 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1,238,699,417 4.8 0.013.426.5 55.3 Germany $206,465,435 2.9 0.044.013.3 39.8 $25,657,092 1.1 0.014.719.2 65.0 $19,308,150 88.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 2,698,058,517 2.7 0.028.228.7 40.4 Gibraltar $186,917 2.0 0.034.027.2 36.8 $11,530 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276930A1.pdf
  • competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high- cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction would be required. 11. For example, if in State A, the capped amount is $90 million and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If in State B, however, the base period capped amount is $100 million and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 28.3 48.6 55.6 November 65.4 80.6 82.3 92.1 27.7 47.6 55.6 December 66.6 82.7 82.4 96.0 29.2 47.7 55.4 2007January 65.2 79.1 81.8 86.8 32.9 48.2 55.9 February 65.7 81.0 83.8 88.0 34.9 47.4 55.1 March 66.8 83.0 84.2 91.4 34.9 47.9 54.7 April 67.7 85.9 85.6 94.7 36.5 47.3 54.4 May 67.8 86.1 86.8 95.1 36.1 47.2 53.9 June 69.2 88.9 87.7 99.1 37.1 47.4 54.4 July 71.3 93.7 88.6 106.1 38.6 47.3 55.3 August 69.7 91.3 89.4 101.3 38.9 46.4 54.2 September 71.2 94.1 89.5 106.1 39.1 46.8 53.5 October* 72.0 94.7 90.7 107.8 38.0 47.8 54.9 November* 69.7 93.0 89.2 106.8 36.0 44.9 51.1 December* 69.9 92.5 90.0 106.4 35.0 45.8 50.8 517110212 517110213 51711022 517110221 5171102 51711021
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287180A1.txt
  • the band �consumers may use the wireless device of their choice 10 MHz block ("D Block") for the creation of a national public safety network No bid met reserve price FCC seeking comment on rules governing the public/private partnership to achieve public safety network goal Total US Mobile Telephone Wireless Subscribers 255.4 233 207.9 182.1 158.7 140.8 128.4 109.5 86 69.2 55.3 33.8 24.1 44 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007 Millio ns o f Subs cribe rs Source: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, Semi-Annual Survey, 2007. Growth in the Mobile Telephone Industry (June 2002 � June 2007) DOWN 43% From $0.12 per minute in June 2002 Subscribers Service Revenues Price per minute 243 Million Subscribers in June 2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287184A1.txt
  • use the wireless device of their choice 10 MHz block ("D Block") for the creation of a national public safety network No bid met reserve price FCC seeking comment on rules governing the public/private partnership to achieve public safety network goal Chairman Kevin J. Martin Total US Mobile Telephone Wireless Subscribers 255.4 233 207.9 182.1 158.7 140.8 128.4 109.5 86 69.2 55.3 33.8 24.1 44 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007 Millio ns o f Subs cribe rs Source: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, Semi-Annual Survey, 2007. Chairman Kevin J. Martin Growth in the Mobile Telephone Industry (June 2002 � June 2007) DOWN 43% From $0.12 per minute in June 2002 Subscribers Service Revenues Price per minute 243 Million
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
  • $28,538,271 0.0 35.5 0.4 19.9 44.2 $3,178,874 0.0 41.6 0.0 20.8 37.5 $13,725,669 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 523,828,362 0.0 30.8 0.8 33.6 34.8 Turkey $19,337,349 0.1 25.0 4.9 16.0 53.9 $382,776 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.7 79.0 $379,346 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 200,273,502 0.1 14.8 15.0 17.4 52.8 United Kingdom $246,149,106 0.2 34.5 0.2 22.2 42.8 $26,829,095 0.0 13.3 0.0 17.5 69.2 $64,481,819 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,547,339,581 0.2 13.8 1.0 30.5 54.6 Western Europe $776,307,034 0.1 28.5 1.3 20.9 49.2 $81,479,312 0.0 18.1 0.0 26.3 55.6 $170,351,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 13,979,516,518 0.1 15.7 1.9 31.3 51.1 Algeria $8,715,356 0.0 7.0 4.3 21.5 67.3 $411,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,619 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 89,141,636 0.0 4.7 4.1 21.9 69.3 Angola
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
  • 0.0 5.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.1 26.9 2. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 5.4 15.2 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 211.5 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 25.4 0.0 2,069.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.6 6. Software Design 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 10 0 7. Hardware design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 44.9 84.9 0.0 0.0237.9 20.0 47.6 471.9 9. Natural Causes 4.9 167.6 0.0 2,213.8 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 0.0 5.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.1 26.9 2. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 5.4 15.2 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 211.5 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 25.4 0.0 2,069.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.6 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.1 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 44.9 84.9 0.0 0.0 237.9 20.0 47.6 471.9 9. Natural Causes 4.9 167.6 0.0 2,213.8 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
  • 0.0 5.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.1 26.9 2. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 5.4 15.2 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 211.5 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 25.4 0.0 2,069.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.6 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.1 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 44.9 84.9 0.0 0.0 237.9 20.0 47.6 471.9 9. Natural Causes 4.9 167.6 0.0 2,213.8 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296121A1.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 2.5 7.6 90.0 Canary Island $0 $0 $0 0 Cape Verde $6,281,711 0.0 0.0 4.8 71.5 23.7 $31,844 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 $17,417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 37,460,798 0.0 0.0 4.4 67.0 28.7 Central African Republic $517,244 0.0 0.0 0.1 37.7 62.2 $2,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,032,333 0.0 0.0 0.1 30.7 69.2 Chad $1,450,680 0.0 0.0 0.4 48.4 51.2 $16,193 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,468 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 12,347,337 0.0 0.0 0.4 54.0 45.6 Comoros $2,248,214 0.0 0.0 6.6 23.9 69.5 $8,767 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $798 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,649,567 0.0 0.0 8.1 23.1 68.8 Congo $4,103,083 0.0 0.6 7.9 37.7 53.9 $70,190 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,628 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 332.1 246.8 83.5 22.0 122.3 227.8 18.9 NM New York 6,658.3 291.9 6,366.4 4,026.2 2,340.1 750.5 193.5 1,312.9 2,256.9 83.2 NY North Carolina 2,903.5 374.0 2,529.5 1,691.5 838.0 340.6 94.0 362.3 796.9 41.2 NC North Dakota 124.8 6.2 118.6 70.1 48.5 13.2 6.5 26.1 45.8 2.7 ND Ohio 3,904.3 455.3 3,448.9 2,349.3 1,099.7 408.7 127.2 519.6 1,055.5 44.2 OH Oklahoma 1,069.2 142.4 926.8 581.0 345.7 96.7 33.0 189.3 319.0 26.8 OK Oregon 1,118.7 81.7 1,037.0 604.6 432.4 146.3 43.9 212.9 403.1 29.2 OR Pennsylvania 4,223.4 259.5 3,964.0 2,408.0 1,555.9 496.1 148.1 782.3 1,426.5 60.2 PA Rhode Island 256.5 11.9 244.7 148.1 96.6 32.8 8.5 50.7 92.0 4.6 RI South Carolina 1,208.3 136.8 1,071.5 762.2 309.3 125.2 35.6 124.3 285.1 24.2 SC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Windstream 2.3% Verizon 28.8% Embarq 4.5% All Others 11.0% 7 - 7 Table 7.4 Distribution of Households with Wireless and Wireline Telephone Service Households In Millions Year Period Wireline Only Wireless Only Both Wireline and Wireless Wireline and Wireless Unknown No Telephone Service 1 Total Households 2007 1st Half 28.0 16.0 69.3 2.0 2.4 117.7 2007 2nd Half 25.7 18.6 69.2 1.5 2.7 118.2 2008 1st Half 24.2 20.6 68.9 1.1 2.9 118.0 2008 2nd Half 20.5 23.8 70.1 1.1 2.2 118.6 2009 1st Half 18.2 26.7 69.9 0.5 2.4 118.4 2009 2nd Half 17.5 28.8 68.5 0.5 2.4 119.2 Year Period Wireline Only Wireless Only Both Wireline and Wireless Wireline and Wireless Unknown No Telephone Service 1 Total Households 2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
  • 18.3 15.3 22.8 18.3 14.0 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 167.4 248.6 114.6 216.0 148.0 98.3 165.5 159.9 163.4 Total MSA 166.8 236.1 113.5 209.5 145.8 111.4 162.9 151.6 151.7 Total Non MSA 173.8 318.6 143.0 245.3 169.8 40.1 225.1 263.0 210.7 Total Residence 237.0 315.1 166.1 286.1 196.8 126.3 226.4 232.4 209.7 Total Business 76.4 132.8 47.2 102.7 69.2 50.9 90.1 69.4 77.2 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 124.2 184.6 85.8 158.2 103.4 80.2 137.0 132.0 136.3 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Reports 15.3% 14.9% 10.5% 13.8% 14.2% 19.4% 17.3% 16.6% 15.6% Res. Complaints per Mill. Res. Access Lines 17.1 218.4 35.9 71.0 159.6 137.2 109.1 968.6 272.6 Bus. Complaints per Mill. Bus. Access Lines 3.6 26.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309858A1.pdf
  • Basis to Judge N 187 398 135 111 31 862 NA % 67.2 21.8 45.4 16.4 12.8 3.5 100.0 N 171 454 124 95 17 861 NA % 72.8 20.4 52.4 14.7 10.7 1.8 100.0 N 204 321 155 127 54 861 NA % 61.4 24.5 36.9 18.2 14.3 6.2 100.0 N 211 385 138 80 46 860 NA % 69.2 24.7 44.5 16.4 9.0 5.4 100.0 N 269 414 111 44 19 857 NA % 78.7 31.7 47.1 13.7 5.2 2.4 100.0 N 243 426 103 63 22 857 NA % 78.6 28.9 49.6 11.9 6.9 2.6 100.0 N 537 297 14 7 6 861 NA % 96.9 61.9 35.0 1.6 0.7 0.8 100.0 N 371 394 80 11 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.txt
  • States must pass through to long distance customers the savings that IXCs realize from lower access rates charged by Path A LECs and Path B LECs. PART 65 Subpart F - Maximum Allowable Rates of Return Section 65.702(b) is amended by inserting the phrase ``pool or pools'' in place of the word ``pools''. PART 69 Subpart A - General Section 69.2 is amended by inserting the following definitions alphabetically and renumbering existing definitions: �69.2 * * * * * Non-price cap LEC. This term means the same as in �61.3. Path A incentive study area. This term means the same as in �61.3. Path A LEC. This term means the same as in �61.3. Path A transition period. This term means
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.txt
  • as described in subsection (b) of this section, on the date that it first files its line count information pursuant to � 54.903 of this subpart, and thereafter on June 30th of each year. PART 69 - ACCESS CHARGES The authority citation continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403. Section 69.2 is amended by adding a new paragraph (www) as follows: � 69.2 Definitions (www) Interstate Common Line Support (ICLS) means funds that are provided pursuant to Section 54.901 of Part 54. Section 69.4 is revised by amending paragraph (b)(2), deleting and reserving paragraph (c), amending paragraphs (d) and (g), and adding paragraph (j) as follows: � 69.4 Charges to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
  • the same proportionate relationships as the interstate/intrastate expenses which gave rise to the liability. Part 69, Subparts A through E of Title 47 of the C.F.R. is amended as follows: PART 69 ACCESS CHARGES 1. The authority citation for Part 69 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. ��154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403 2. Section 69.2 Definitions is amended by revising paragraphs (j) and (z) to read as follows: � 69.2 Definitions. * * * * * (j) Corporate Operations Expenses are included in General and Administrative Expenses (Account 6720); * * * * * (z) Net Investment means allowable original cost investment in Accounts 2001 through 2003, 1220 and the investments in nonaffiliated companies included
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • Capacity Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Average system capacity (MHz) 630 666 623 652 Percent of systems with capacity of: 330 MHz and below 10.0% 8.5% 9.0% 8.3% 331 through 749 MHz 31.7% 22.8% 36.9% 28.5% 750 MHz and above 58.3% 68.7% 54.1% 63.2% Number of 6-MHz activated channels: Devoted to analog service 69.2 72.0 67.7 69.9 Devoted to digital service 6.7 11.3 7.0 11.8 Total number of channels 75.9 83.3 74.4 81.7 Table 12. Advanced Services Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Percent of cable systems offering: Digital programming 52.3% 74.1% 57.8% 77.6% Internet access 51.7% 65.5% 51.4% 70.8% Cable telephony 19.7% 19.8% 20.7% 21.1% Percent of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.txt
  • Court held that CFC was not an ``end user,'' and, alternatively, that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis. In its April 13, 2000 Liability Order on remand, the Commission applied the Court's analysis and found that CFC and the other IPPs cannot be considered "end users" under Section 69.2(m). The Commission also determined, however, that irrespective of whether CFC was an ``end user,'' the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were ``public'' or ``semi-public.'' Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of Section 201(b) by classifying all IPP payphones as semi-public and assessing EUCL charges against IPP payphones
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.txt
  • Channel Capacity Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Average system capacity (MHz) 630 666 623 652 Percent of systems with capacity of: 330 MHz and below 10.0% 8.5% 9.0% 8.3% 331 through 749 MHz 31.7% 22.8% 36.9% 28.5% 750 MHz 58.3% 68.7% 54.1% 63.2% Number of 6 MHz activated channels: Devoted to analog service 69.2 72.0 67.7 69.9 Devoted to digital service 6.7 11.3 7.0 11.8 Total number of channels 75.9 83.3 74.4 81.7 Viewership. Viewership, when measured in audience shares of cable networks, continues to grow, while viewership shares of broadcast television stations continue to decline. Audience share statistics for total day viewing, show that cable audience shares rose from an average 54.2 share
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Other satellite 40.5 42.9 2.3 5.7% 38.9 42.0 2.1 8.0% Standard error 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.8 Total of above 59.9 62.9 2.9 4.8% 58.9 62.7 3.8 6.5% Standard error 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.0 Other Analog Channels Other Analog�� 9.2 7.4 -1.9 -20.4% 9.8 7.4 -2.4 -24.5% Standard error 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 Total analog 69.2 70.3 1.1 1.6% 68.7 70.1 1.4 2.0% Standard error 2.0 1.9 1.3 1.3 � Excluding music and other non-video channels. �� Includes premium, pay-per-view, and mini-tiers. Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps, Dissenting Re: Implementation of Section 3 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. I respectfully dissent from today's Report on cable rates. At a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-170A1.txt
  • Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Policies and Rules Concerning Operator Service Access and Pay Telephone Compensation, Petition of Public Telephone Council to Treat Bell Operating Company Payphones as Customer Premises Owners and Presubscribed Operator Services Providers, Petition of California Payphone Association to Amend and Clarify Section 68.2(a) of the Commission's Rules, Amendment of Section 69.2(m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones Within the ``Public Telephone'' Exemption from End User Common Line Access Charges, Report and Order, CC Docket Nos. 96-128, 91-35, 11 FCC Rcd 20541, 20677-83. See Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, FCC 03-139 (rel. June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.txt
  • concedes that the areas it proposed to serve were ``in the vicinity of existing GTE facilities,'' but argues that the proposed areas met the definition of ``unserved'' because there was no telephone service at the time of its Petition. Sandwich Isles Reply at 5. See M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules. CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 04-86 (rel. April 12, 2004) (Skyline) Skyline, FCC 04-86, at paras. 11-13. The Commission dismissed as moot Skyline's request for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. See Skyline, FCC 04-86, at paras. 22-23. Skyline relied on a 1996 Bureau order that held that carriers are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � � � � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: April 2, 2004 Released: April 12, 2004 By the Commission: introduction In this Order, we dismiss in part, and grant in part, a request from M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company (Skyline Telephone), for waiver of sections 36.611, 36.612, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
  • is the physical point where an IXC connects its network with the LEC network. See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14226, para. 8. ``Serving wire center means the telephone company central office designated by the telephone company to serve the geographic area in which the interexchange carrier or other person's point of demarcation is located.'' 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(rr). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14227, para. 10. Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12968, paras. 13, 15. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • 2004, of the 1657 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. Similarly, of the 2804 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. On the other hand, 1146 licensed emissions, or 69.2 percent, in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, and 1439 or 43.9 percent in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, were for digital operations. 47 C.F.R. � 25.212(c). Hughes Comments at 16-17; Hughes Reply at 7. Spacenet Comments at 30-34 and Exhibits B and C, citing Ku-band NGSO Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4096; Spacenet Reply at 14. Hughes Reply at 8. SIA Further Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
  • 2004, of the 1657 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. Similarly, of the 2804 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. On the other hand, 1146 licensed emissions, or 69.2 percent, in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, and 1439 or 43.9 percent in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, were for digital operations. 47 C.F.R. � 25.212(c). Hughes Comments at 16-17; Hughes Reply at 7. Spacenet Comments at 30-34 and Exhibits B and C, citing Ku-band NGSO Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4096; Spacenet Reply at 14. Hughes Reply at 8. SIA Further Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.txt
  • D.C. Circuit Court rejected these determinations and remanded the case to the Commission. The Court held that CFC was not an end user, and that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPSP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis. On remand, the Commission found that CFC and the other IPSPs were not end users under section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. The Commission also determined that, regardless of whether CFC was an end user, the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were public or semi-public. Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs had imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of section 201(b) of the Act by classifying all IPSP payphones as semi-public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • 1.4 2.0 2.9 January 1, 2004 Basic tier 24.5 24.5 24.3 23.7 21.3 30.3 25.6 23.6 23.1 Standard error 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 0.9 2.9 1.1 1.1 2.7 Expanded basic tier 44.3 44.0 46.6 48.9 50.6 44.3 43.6 47.6 44.1 Standard error 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.6 1.0 3.0 1.4 1.2 3.3 Basic & expanded 68.8 68.5 70.9 72.6 71.9 74.6 69.2 71.2 67.2 Standard error 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.6 1.4 0.9 1.0 2.2 Digital tier 31.3 31.2 32.4 33.5 33.2 34.2 35.2 27.0 19.4 Standard error 1.3 1.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.9 Standard error 0.9 0.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 2.0 1.3 2.3 3.0 Source: Survey. ATTACHMENT 4 Number of Channels, Comparison of Sample Groups January 1, 2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.txt
  • for each competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high-cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction would be required. For example, if in State A, the capped amount is $90 million and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If in State B, however, the base period capped amount is $100 million and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07J-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07J-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07J-1A1.txt
  • for each competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high-cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction would be required. For example, if in State A, the capped amount is $90 million and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If in State B, however, the base period capped amount is $100 million and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.txt
  • for each competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high-cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction will be required. For example, if, in State A, the capped amount is $90 million, and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's uncapped support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If, in State B, however, the capped amount is $100 million, and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Finally, if,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
  • study area is a geographic segment of an incumbent LEC's telephone operations. Generally, a study area corresponds to an incumbent LEC's entire service territory within a state. Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC and Qwest Corporation Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules, Petition for Waiver of Section 69.2(hh) and 69.605(c) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19180, 19181, para. 2 (WCB 2005). Section 54.207 of the Commission's rules provides that a rural telephone company's service area will be its study area ``unless and until the Commission and the states, after taking into account recommendations of a Federal-State Joint Board instituted under section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • to be submitted with letters of transmittal for tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap local exchange carrier that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in �61.3(pp) of this part-including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in �69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service-that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap local exchange carrier may submit without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • 74.4 Colorado 19 100.5 38.1 5,289 2,007 $16,830 $31,610 $39,726 17.7 2.17 5.5 5 88.4 Nevada 10 98.9 38.2 9,894 3,822 $18,492 $39,158 $50,779 12.7 1.07 2.61 7 1.1 Arizona 2 90.3 28.7 45,147 14,354 $11,951 $24,592 $32,351 29.7 1.85 5.36 72.3 Idaho 11 75.4 27.2 6,853 2,471 $15,014 $32,460 $42,417 13.3 2.04 5.79 88 .8 Northern Mariana Islands 3 69.2 14.1 23,072 4,685 $9,897 $24,935 NA NA 107.54 528.26 41.4 Florida 5 61.1 20.1 12,225 4,017 $13,448 $28,406 $36,216 22.8 8.31 25.08 90.5 American Samoa 4 57.3 9.3 14,323 2,337 $4,203 $17,295 NA NA 88.50 538.92 54.8 West Virginia 6 54.6 21.9 9,104 3,648 $13,680 $26,013 $31,772 20.4 11.38 28.7 5 92.7 Virginia 7 52.8 20.6 7,544 2,947 $17,920 $35,024
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-26A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3813, 3825, para. 30 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001) (granting Mescalero a waiver ``to permit it to receive high-cost loop support for the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002''); Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 20543, 20547, para. 10 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2005) (granting Adak Telephone a waiver ``to permit it to receive high-cost loop support for the period beginning May 25, 2005''). Referral Notice at 5. Twin Valley Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 10115, para. 10; Referral Notice at 5-6.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.txt
  • id. at � 371 (``Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ....''). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of ``end user'' found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ...''); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, � 2.6 (1984) (``ECA Tariff Order'') (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define ``end user'');
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • used by the telephone company to route calls to the trunk group designated by the entity to which the code was assigned. See ATIS Telecom Glossary http://www.atis.org/glossary/definition.aspx?id=6095 (last visited June 6, 2011). CIC is also defined in the Commission's rules as a code used in tandem switching that can be used to identify an interexchange provider. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(vv). The Jurisdiction Information Parameter (JIP) is defined as an optional parameter in the SS7 Initial Address Message. In the number portability context, the JIP parameter is used to retain, in call signaling, the first six dialed digits of a telephone number that has been ported. See Travis Russell, Signaling System #7 366, 643 (Table 8.35) McGraw-Hill Communications (Fifth Edition 2006);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.txt
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. �� 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of ``end user'' in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff � 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: ``The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.txt
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 69.4(a) (``The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ....''); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, � 10 (1983) (``Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings.''), 345, Appendix A, � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • to be submitted with letters of transmittal for tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap local exchange carrier that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in �61.3(pp) of this part-including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in �69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service-that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap local exchange carrier may submit without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-8 (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap LEC that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in Section 61.3(pp) of this part -- including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in Section 69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service -- that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap LEC may submit without
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
  • Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. July 18, 1997) (seeking comment on models that will be used to calculate forward-looking costs for non-rural LECs after Jan. 1, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104(d), (e), 69.203(a) (rules currently in effect); see also 47 C.F.R. 69.152(d), (e) (rules in 20 effect as of January 1, 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 69.104(h). 21 47 C.F.R. � 69.2; Access Charge Reform Order at para. 396. 22 4 Commission. Accordingly, although this NPRM focuses on price cap ILECs, we also solicit 18 comment on whether the various proposals set forth in this NPRM for defining, identifying, and verifying primary lines for price cap ILECs could also be applied for rate-of-return ILECs if, in a future proceeding, the Commission concludes
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • without an effective date, which specifies the schedules which have been suspended. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 63 93. Revise Section 63.10(c)(1) to read as follows: � 63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. * * * (c) * * * (1) File international service tariffs pursuant to Section 61.28 of this Chapter. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 69 94. Revise Section 69.2 to remove and reserve paragraph (tt). 95. Revise Section 69.3 to read as follows: � 69.3Filing of access service tariffs. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-164 37 (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, a tariff for access service shall be filed with this Commission for a two-year period. Such tariffs shall be filed with a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.wp
  • 1996" (SBREFA), Subtitle II of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing 172 universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and TRS fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 44 affected entities. For this part of the Order, we have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), as required by 5 U.S.C. � 603. 1. Certification 84. In the NECA NPRM, the Commission tentatively certified that the rules it proposed to adopt in this proceeding would not have a significant economic
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • Groups Block. Thus, for example, of BellSouth's local trunks, 116 of 4,429 trunk groups (2.6 %) exceeded the three percentage threshold whereas 26 out of 591 (4.4 %) competitive LEC trunk groups experienced blockage in excess of three percent, resulting in a difference of 1.8 percentage points. 218 The calculation that competitive LECs' experienced trunk blockage 54.5 % for March, 69.2 % for April, and 38.8 % for May greater than BellSouth's retail customers is derived by dividing the percentage of competitive LEC trunk groups blocked by the percentage of BellSouth retail trunk groups blocked. Thus for example, in the period from March 23, 1998, to April 24, 1998, competitive LECs' trunk groups experienced blockage of 4.4 % whereas, BellSouth's trunk
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.wp
  • 2631, 2635 n.8, 2637 n.53. The subscriber line charge (SLC) is an access charge imposed on end users to recover at least a portion of the cost of the interstate portion of LEC facilities used to link each end user to the public switched telephone network ("PSTN"). Access Charge Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16010. 18 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an "end user" when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.wp
  • to end users, ISP traffic delivered via the ILECs' ADSL service offerings constitutes local traffic for separations purposes.47 Therefore, competitive LECs argue that such traffic must terminate at the ISP's point of presence.48 Finally, several commenters maintain that the ILECs' ADSL service offerings must be tariffed on the state level, because they do not qualify as "access services" under section 69.2 of the Commission's rules.49 III. DISCUSSION Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-317 50 See GTE DSL Order at �� 16-27; see also GTE Direct Case at 7; Ameritech Comments at 9; Time Warner Comments at 4; US West Comments at 1; Bell Atlantic Comments at 2; Northpoint Comments at 1; USTA Comments at 2; and ACI/Firstworld Comments at 4. 9 14.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
  • upon public end users, and upon providers of public telephones. . . ."); see also 47 C.F.R. � 69.5(c) ("Special access surcharges shall be assessed upon users of exchange facilities that interconnect these facilities with means of interstate or foreign telecommunications to the extent that carrier's carrier charges are not assessed upon such interconnected usage."). See also 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an 'end user' when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-8 (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap LEC that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in Section 61.3(pp) of this part -- including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in Section 69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service -- that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap LEC may submit without
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • PART 61 - TARIFFS � 61.3 Definitions (a) Act. The Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1004; 47 U.S.C. chapter 5), as amended. (b) Actual Price Index (API). An index of the level of aggregate rate element rates in a basket, which index is calculated pursuant to � 61.46. (c) Association. This term has the meaning given it in � 69.2(d). (d) Average Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line month. Price Cap CMT Revenue (as defined in � 61.3(cc)) per month as of July 1, 2000 (adjusted to remove Universal Service Contributions assessed to Local Exchange Carriers pursuant to � 54.702 of this chapter) using 2000 annual filing base period demand, divided by the 2000 annual filing base period demand. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.wp
  • 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 31 5 U.S.C. � 601(4). 32 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 33 Id. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the Long Term Support program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and the Telecommunications Relay Services fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii)). 34 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 7 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)28 requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 50.0 198.0 12141 742 10995 409 0.5 0.2 100.0 KYHARLAN 44 51 50.0 601.0 19175 562 16832 475 2.2 4.0 100.0 KYHAZARD 35 16 50.0 384.0 15138 348 13480 296 4.5 3.6 100.0 KYHAZARD 57 12 3.2 475.0 16984 393 14617 324 0.4 0.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 18 20 50.0 195.0 13015 626 12783 622 1.0 0.2 99.8 KYLEXINGTON 27 59 69.2 300.0 16909 681 16781 678 1.4 0.5 99.9 KYLEXINGTON 36 40 66.5 305.0 17900 696 17412 691 1.5 1.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 46 42 50.0 265.0 13711 639 13491 635 6.3 3.2 99.1 KYLOUISVILLE 3 47 1000.0 555.0 45682 2902 35162 2244 0.6 0.4 99.7 KYLOUISVILLE 11 55 428.5 390.0 27674 1482 26136 1462 0.1 0.0 100.0 KYLOUISVILLE 15 17 50.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • regulation generally. To obtain connections, ESPs generally pay local business rates and interstate subscriber line charges for their switched access connections to LEC central offices. 262 Amendments of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules Relating to Enhanced Service Providers, Order, 3 FCC Rcd 2631 (para. 2 n.8) (1988); see also MTS and WATs Market Structure, (para. 4); 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m)(1996) ("End User" means any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier). 263 Access Charge Reform; Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers; Transport Rate Structure and Pricing; Usage of the Public Switched Network by Information Service and Internet Access Providers, CC Docket Nos. 92-262, 94-1, 91-213, 96-263, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Third Report
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.txt
  • report focuses on three categories of wireless services: mobile telephony, mobile data, and dispatch. The Fifth Report makes the following observations about these categories: Mobile Telephony: The mobile telephony sector has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Mobile telephony carriers continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. Over 172 million people, or 69 percent of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • of their payphones, and thus this proceeding concerns rules that are not currently in effect. The Commission's Liability Order IPPs Not End Users The Commission's Liability Order responded to the court's remand of an earlier Commission ruling. The Commission's earlier ruling held that IPP payphones were subject to a EUCL charge because the IPPs were "end users" pursuant to section 69.2(m) of the rules. But on remand from an appeal of that decision, the Commission reversed itself and concluded in the Liability Order that, although C.F. Communications and other IPPs own the payphones, they cannot be considered "end users" under section 69.2(m), because they do not own the premises where their payphones are located. IPPs Must Pay EUCL Charge Nonetheless, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • held that CFC was not an ``end user,'' and, alternatively, that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis.35 9. In its April 13, 2000 Liability Order on remand, the Commission applied the Court's analysis and found that CFC and the other IPPs cannot be considered "end users" under Section 69.2(m).36 The Commission also determined, however, that irrespective of whether CFC was an ``end user,'' the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were ``public'' or ``semi-public.''37 Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of Section 201(b) by classifying all IPP payphones as semi-public and assessing EUCL charges against IPP payphones
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-111A1.html
  • id. at S: 371 ("Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ...."). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of "end user" found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ..."); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, S: 2.6 (1984) ("ECA Tariff Order") (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define "end user");
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-59A1.html
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of "end user" in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff S: 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: "The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-87A1.html
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.4(a) ("The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ...."); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, P: 10 (1983) ("Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings."), 345, Appendix A, S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • be done for prime time due to the lack of data on total cable and broadcast advertising revenues for the prime time daypart. 33 In 2000 and 2001, Nielsen separated out "all other cable" from pay and basic. This is not included in the universe of advertiser-supported programming. See notes to table 11. 1984/85 1989/90 1994/95 1999/00 2000/01 Network Affiliates 69.2 57.3 58.4 50.9 49.6 Independents 15.0 19.1 9.7 3.4 3.5 Public 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.6 2.6 Basic Cable 6.5 14.5 23.9 35.3 36.5 Pay Cable 5.6 5.5 4.4 5.2 5.2 All Other Cable 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.6 Commercial Broadcast 84.1 76.4 68.1 54.3 53.0 Source: Neilsen Galaxy Explorer. Notes: Shares are normalized to 100 to account for multiset usage.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • CMRS industry added over 18 million new subscribers for the fourth consecutive year.14 Mobile Telephony. Since the release of the Third Report, the mobile telephony sector of CMRS experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1998, the mobile telephony sector generated over $33 billion in revenues,15 increased subscribership from 55 million to 69.2 million,16 and produced a national penetration rate of nearly 26 percent.17 In addition, new entrant wireless providers18 have continued to deploy their networks. While the new entrant network buildout and coverage has not caught up to that of cellular, there are now at least five mobile telephone operators in each of the 35 largest Basic Trading Areas19 ("BTAs") and at
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fcc00289.doc
  • to the needs of the dispatch sector, creating the potential for inter-service competition. Industry Development Mobile Telephony. Since the release of the Fourth Report, the mobile telephony sector of CMRS has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. (``Nextel'') continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/access_reform/samples/0155376.htm
  • attributable to analog end office trunk ports. 126. ^126 Like the trunk ports to which they connect, common transport facilities are by definition shared, and their costs must be recovered on a usage sensitive basis. 127. ^127 Notice 73. 128. ^128 Emmerson, pp. 8-9. 129. ^129 Schedule CAL. P.U.C. No. 175-T, Section 6.8.3. 130. ^130 Notice 76. 131. ^131 Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules (47 C.F.R. 69.2) defines Access Minutes or Access Minutes of Use. "On the originating end of an interstate or foreign call, usage is to be measured from the time the originating end users call is delivered by the telephone company and acknowledged as received by the interexchange carriers facilities connected with the originating exchange. On the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
  • Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. July 18, 1997) (seeking comment on models that will be used to calculate forward-looking costs for non-rural LECs after Jan. 1, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104(d), (e), 69.203(a) (rules currently in effect); see also 47 C.F.R. 69.152(d), (e) (rules in 20 effect as of January 1, 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 69.104(h). 21 47 C.F.R. � 69.2; Access Charge Reform Order at para. 396. 22 4 Commission. Accordingly, although this NPRM focuses on price cap ILECs, we also solicit 18 comment on whether the various proposals set forth in this NPRM for defining, identifying, and verifying primary lines for price cap ILECs could also be applied for rate-of-return ILECs if, in a future proceeding, the Commission concludes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97316.pdf
  • Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. July 18, 1997) (seeking comment on models that will be used to calculate forward-looking costs for non-rural LECs after Jan. 1, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104(d), (e), 69.203(a) (rules currently in effect); see also 47 C.F.R. 69.152(d), (e) (rules in 20 effect as of January 1, 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 69.104(h). 21 47 C.F.R. � 69.2; Access Charge Reform Order at para. 396. 22 4 Commission. Accordingly, although this NPRM focuses on price cap ILECs, we also solicit 18 comment on whether the various proposals set forth in this NPRM for defining, identifying, and verifying primary lines for price cap ILECs could also be applied for rate-of-return ILECs if, in a future proceeding, the Commission concludes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • without an effective date, which specifies the schedules which have been suspended. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 63 93. Revise Section 63.10(c)(1) to read as follows: � 63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. * * * (c) * * * (1) File international service tariffs pursuant to Section 61.28 of this Chapter. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 69 94. Revise Section 69.2 to remove and reserve paragraph (tt). 95. Revise Section 69.3 to read as follows: � 69.3Filing of access service tariffs. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-164 37 (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, a tariff for access service shall be filed with this Commission for a two-year period. Such tariffs shall be filed with a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99235.doc
  • determined by the Administrator. � 61.3 Definitions (a) Act. The Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1004; 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5), as amended. (b) Actual Price Index (API). An index of the level of aggregate rate element rates in a basket, which index is calculated pursuant to � 61.46. (c) Association. This term has the meaning given it in � 69.2(d) (d) Average Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line Month. Price Cap CMT Revenue per Month as of December 31, 1999 (including the adjustments to be made pursuant to � 61.48(1)) using base period demand, divided by the base period demand number of lines as of December 31, 1999. In filing entities with multiple study areas, if it becomes necessary to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.wp
  • than June 15, 1997: 47 CFR 61.45, 61.47, 69.104, 69.126, 69.151, and 69.152. The following rules, or amendments thereto, shall be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: 47 CFR 69.103, 69.107, 69.122, 69.303, and 69.304. The following rules, or amendments thereto, in this Report and Order shall be effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.3, 61.46, 69.1, 69.2, 69.105, 69.123, 69.124, 69.125, 69.154, 69.155, 69.157, 69.305, 69.306, 69.309, 69.401, 69.411, 69.502, and 69.611. The following rules, which impose new or modified information or collection requirements, shall become effective upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), but no sooner than January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.42, 61.48, 69.4, 69.106, 69.111, 69.153, 69.156. Unless otherwise stated herein,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.wp
  • 1996" (SBREFA), Subtitle II of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing 172 universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and TRS fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 44 affected entities. For this part of the Order, we have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), as required by 5 U.S.C. � 603. 1. Certification 84. In the NECA NPRM, the Commission tentatively certified that the rules it proposed to adopt in this proceeding would not have a significant economic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.wp
  • 54.711(b) 42. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.203, and 1.1206. 43. 5 U.S.C. 603. 44. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 45. 5 U.S.C. 601(3). 46. 15 U.S.C. 632(a). 47. See 47 C.F.R. 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. 69.2(y), 69.612); and TRS Fund (47 C.F.R. 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 48. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 49. 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 50. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. We require that a summary be included, however, with all comments and reply comments, regardless of length. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • will become a common line charge levied on end-users. 14 The EUCL charge is also referred to as the subscriber line charge (SLC). 15 Costs assigned directly to the CCL element and, therefore, recovered solely from IXCs, are those attributable to customer premises equipment (CPE), surrogate CPE, and customer premises wiring included in information origination-termination equipment accounts. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(r), 69.501(b)-(c). The Commission recently revised section 69.501 to include the costs of public telephone loops in the BFP revenue requirement. See Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 2054 (1996); Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • Groups Block. Thus, for example, of BellSouth's local trunks, 116 of 4,429 trunk groups (2.6 %) exceeded the three percentage threshold whereas 26 out of 591 (4.4 %) competitive LEC trunk groups experienced blockage in excess of three percent, resulting in a difference of 1.8 percentage points. 218 The calculation that competitive LECs' experienced trunk blockage 54.5 % for March, 69.2 % for April, and 38.8 % for May greater than BellSouth's retail customers is derived by dividing the percentage of competitive LEC trunk groups blocked by the percentage of BellSouth retail trunk groups blocked. Thus for example, in the period from March 23, 1998, to April 24, 1998, competitive LECs' trunk groups experienced blockage of 4.4 % whereas, BellSouth's trunk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.wp
  • 2631, 2635 n.8, 2637 n.53. The subscriber line charge (SLC) is an access charge imposed on end users to recover at least a portion of the cost of the interstate portion of LEC facilities used to link each end user to the public switched telephone network ("PSTN"). Access Charge Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16010. 18 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an "end user" when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.wp
  • to end users, ISP traffic delivered via the ILECs' ADSL service offerings constitutes local traffic for separations purposes.47 Therefore, competitive LECs argue that such traffic must terminate at the ISP's point of presence.48 Finally, several commenters maintain that the ILECs' ADSL service offerings must be tariffed on the state level, because they do not qualify as "access services" under section 69.2 of the Commission's rules.49 III. DISCUSSION Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-317 50 See GTE DSL Order at �� 16-27; see also GTE Direct Case at 7; Ameritech Comments at 9; Time Warner Comments at 4; US West Comments at 1; Bell Atlantic Comments at 2; Northpoint Comments at 1; USTA Comments at 2; and ACI/Firstworld Comments at 4. 9 14.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
  • upon public end users, and upon providers of public telephones. . . ."); see also 47 C.F.R. � 69.5(c) ("Special access surcharges shall be assessed upon users of exchange facilities that interconnect these facilities with means of interstate or foreign telecommunications to the extent that carrier's carrier charges are not assessed upon such interconnected usage."). See also 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an 'end user' when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-8 (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap LEC that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in Section 61.3(pp) of this part -- including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in Section 69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service -- that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap LEC may submit without
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99365.doc
  • phases and on an MSA basis. Id. at � 72. Pricing flexibility also is available for the non-MSA sections of a study area, provided the price cap LEC satisfies the triggers adopted for MSAs. For purposes of this Order, "dedicated transport services" refer to entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2 (oo), (qq), and (ss). Pricing Flexibility Order, at �� 24, 77-80, and 122-40. All of the collocation triggers in the Pricing Flexibility Order require that the LEC also demonstrate, with respect to each wire center upon which it relies to satisfy the trigger, that a collocated competitor is relying on transport facilities provided by an entity other than the incumbent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001883.doc
  • three of the exchanges (Bethel, McGrath and Unalakleet, comprising approximately 5,016 aggregate access lines) are to be transferred from ATEAC to United-KUC (Docket No. U-99-123. See Petition, pp. 3-4. Petition at 4. Id.. Petition at 4-5. As assignees of GTEA, a pre-February 8, 1996 incumbent local exchange carrier, ATEAC and United-KUC each will qualify as a ``telephone company'' under section 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 69.2 (hh), and Section 251(h)(1)(B)(ii) of the Communications Act, 47 USC � 251(h)(1)(B)(ii). They would, therefore, be eligible to participate in the NECA tariffs and pools under section 69.601 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 69.601. Petition at 6. Petition at 6. See Maine Telecommunications Group, Inc., 9 FCC Rcd 3082
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00133.doc
  • additional 52 formal complaints with the initial complaints. . In the Bureau Order, addressing the initial seven formal complaints filed by CFC, the Commission's Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) found that the defendants had properly assessed the EUCL charge on CFC's payphone lines. In arriving at that decision, the Bureau concluded that CFC did not provide "public telephone" service under section 69.2(ee) of the Commission's rules and, thus, was not exempt from the EUCL charge as other public payphones. Rather, the Bureau found that CFC was providing "semi-public" telephone service as described in Part 69 of the Commission's rules and, therefore, the LECs were allowed to assess EUCL charges to CFC's payphones. In addition, the Bureau determined that CFC was also subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00134.doc
  • in the Order. First, AT&T emphasizes that Section 69.105(a) specifically limits CCL charges to "per line per access minute of use"; that is, that there may be only one charge for each line. Second, AT&T raises a pre-1989 rule (which has since been superseded) on the computation of CCL charges that AT&T alleges was closely related and relevant to Section 69.2. This former rule, Section 69.105(b)(1), stated that the CCL charge: shall be computed by dividing the revenue requirement for the Carrier Common Line element by the projected annual access minutes of use for all interstate and international services that use local exchange common line facilities. Each minute of use of any local exchange common line by such services shall be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • PART 61 - TARIFFS � 61.3 Definitions (a) Act. The Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1004; 47 U.S.C. chapter 5), as amended. (b) Actual Price Index (API). An index of the level of aggregate rate element rates in a basket, which index is calculated pursuant to � 61.46. (c) Association. This term has the meaning given it in � 69.2(d). (d) Average Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line month. Price Cap CMT Revenue (as defined in � 61.3(cc)) per month as of July 1, 2000 (adjusted to remove Universal Service Contributions assessed to Local Exchange Carriers pursuant to � 54.702 of this chapter) using 2000 annual filing base period demand, divided by the 2000 annual filing base period demand. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00384.doc
  • out of an abundance of caution, the Commission has included small incumbent LECs in its regulatory flexibility analyses. See, e.g., Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15499, 16144-45 (1996). FCC, Common Carrier Bureau, Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers (Jan. 2000). Locator at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(hh). See Locator at Fig. 1. Statistics of Communications Common Carriers (1999 ed.) at Tables 2.10 and 2.11. See 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. � 604(b). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-384 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-384 % & � ' ' ���� � ���� (��� F��� G��� h��� i��� � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0�
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.wp
  • 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 31 5 U.S.C. � 601(4). 32 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 33 Id. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the Long Term Support program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and the Telecommunications Relay Services fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii)). 34 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 7 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)28 requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011414.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011414.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY FILED A PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2 (hh) ``UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND'' OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC DKT 96-45 Released Date: June 15, 2001 Comment Date: June 29, 2001 Reply Date: July 16, 2001 On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company (Skyline Telephone) filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F. R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber96.pdf
  • NA NA NYNEX 1,935 2,656 3,995 5,388 7,095 8,976 10,398 12,799 14,442 Pacific Telesis 537 722 1,451 2,210 2,874 3,426 3,938 4,636 5,332 SBC NA 2,500 2,800 4,498 5,409 8,008 9,866 16,479 NA US West 2,816 3,484 4,714 6,595 8,706 10,879 13,047 16,340 NA GTE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20,420 Company Thousands of Fiber-Miles Ameritech 56.6 69.2 84.6 153.0 234.4 NA NA NA NA Bell Atlantic 116.9 152.3 226.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth 185.8 267.3 355.2 440.4 NA NA NA 648.7 748.7 NYNEX 66.8 90.0 135.9 209.7 302.0 404.0 510.8 615.5 712.4 Pacific Telesis 22.1 30.4 64.1 96.9 120.9 139.7 160.2 189.0 216.0 SBC NA 95.4 135.6 185.3 221.8 365.4 514.6 878.2 NA US
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber97.pdf
  • 7,095 8,976 10,398 12,799 14,442 NA Pacific Telesis 537 722 1,451 2,210 2,874 3,426 3,938 4,636 5,332 5,920 SBC NA 2,500 2,800 4,498 5,409 8,008 9,866 16,479 NA NA U S WEST 2,816 3,484 4,714 6,595 8,706 10,879 13,047 16,340 NA NA GTE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20,420 22,998 Company Thousands of Fiber Miles Ameritech 56.6 69.2 84.6 153.0 234.4 NA NA NA NA NA Bell Atlantic 116.9 152.3 226.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth 185.8 267.3 355.2 440.4 NA NA NA 648.7 748.7 802.2 NYNEX 66.8 90.0 135.9 209.7 302.0 404.0 510.8 615.5 712.4 NA Pacific Telesis 22.1 30.4 64.1 96.9 120.9 139.7 160.2 189.0 216.0 239.9 SBC NA 95.4 135.6 185.3 221.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber98.pdf
  • 12,799 14,442 Pacific Telesis 537 722 1,451 2,210 2,874 3,426 3,938 4,636 5,332 5,920 6,608 SBC NA 2,500 2,800 4,498 5,409 8,008 9,866 16,479 NA NA NA U S WEST 2,816 3,484 4,714 6,595 8,706 10,879 13,047 16,340 NA NA NA GTE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20,420 22,998 25,216 Company Thousands of Fiber Miles Ameritech 56.6 69.2 84.6 153.0 234.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bell Atlantic ** 116.9 152.3 226.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth 185.8 267.3 355.2 440.4 NA NA NA 648.7 748.7 802.2 871.2 NYNEX ** 66.8 90.0 135.9 209.7 302.0 404.0 510.8 615.5 712.4 Pacific Telesis 22.1 30.4 64.1 96.9 120.9 139.7 160.2 189.0 216.0 239.9 264.5 SBC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1202.pdf
  • 85.0 94.8 97.9 98.7 50-60 $32,122 to $34,743 64.3 77.3 83.3 93.5 97.4 98.4 40-50 $29,893 to $32,121 61.3 73.4 80.4 92.2 96.3 97.7 30-40 $27,542 to $29,892 58.7 73.5 79.7 90.5 95.9 97.5 20-30 $24,855 to $27,541 56.8 69.6 77.2 89.8 95.2 97.0 10-20 $21,645 to $24,855 53.3 67.4 76.9 87.5 93.9 96.5 0-10 $0 to $21,644 47.9 59.1 69.2 88.7 94.1 96.3 Note: Some previously published data for June 2000 have been revised. Jun 2001 Jun 2002 Jun 2000 Persons per Square Mile (In Each Decile of Zip Codes) Jun 2001 Deciles (Blocks of Zip Codes Grouped by Density) Deciles (Blocks of Zip Codes Grouped by Median Household Income) Table 11 High-Speed Subscribership Ranked by Population Density (Over 200
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1203.pdf
  • $32,122 to $34,743 64.3 77.3 83.3 90.2 93.5 97.4 98.4 99.2 $29,893 to $32,121 61.3 73.4 80.4 89.9 92.2 96.3 97.7 99.1 $27,542 to $29,892 58.7 73.5 79.7 89.2 90.5 95.9 97.5 98.9 $24,855 to $27,541 56.8 69.6 77.2 87.1 89.8 95.2 97.0 98.5 $21,645 to $24,855 53.3 67.4 76.9 87.4 87.5 93.9 96.5 98.5 $0 to $21,644 47.9 59.1 69.2 78.3 88.7 94.1 96.3 98.1 2 The percent of population residing in Zip Codes with more than 3,147 person per square mile and with High-speed Service is 99.7% which rounds to 100%. Jun 2003 2 Percent of Zip Codes with at Least One High-Speed Subscriber 1 Persons per square mile and median household income are in decile groups. Each groups
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1204.pdf
  • 98.4 99.2 99.5 $29,893 to $32,121 61.3 73.4 80.4 89.9 92.5 92.2 96.3 97.7 99.1 99.3 $27,542 to $29,892 58.7 73.5 79.7 89.2 92.5 90.5 95.9 97.5 98.9 99.3 $24,855 to $27,541 56.8 69.6 77.2 87.1 90.9 89.8 95.2 97.0 98.5 99.0 $21,645 to $24,855 53.3 67.4 76.9 87.4 91.2 87.5 93.9 96.5 98.5 99.1 $0 to $21,644 47.9 59.1 69.2 78.3 81.3 88.7 94.1 96.3 98.1 98.8 Persons per Square Mile 1 Jun 2000 Jun 2002 Jun 2002 Table 14 High-Speed Subscribership Ranked by Population Density 1 Persons per-square mile and median household income are in decile groups. Each groups contains 10% of the zip codes. Jun 2001 Jun 2003 Jun 2000 Jun 2001 Jun 2002 Jun 2002 Jun 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0609_tables.doc
  • 70.5 33.6 7.9 1.1 Illinois 87.0 77.1 39.4 28.1 23.9 Indiana 83.7 74.2 41.1 29.4 18.1 Iowa 86.9 75.4 47.3 31.2 6.9 Kansas 80.9 72.9 37.8 28.5 3.8 Kentucky 86.0 79.0 48.3 30.7 27.5 Louisiana 83.5 78.1 33.9 22.8 13.6 Maine 83.6 70.8 59.0 43.9 6.3 Maryland 80.2 72.5 53.8 39.3 32.6 Massachusetts 83.1 77.2 60.1 44.6 40.2 Michigan 83.9 69.2 44.6 29.2 17.2 Minnesota 85.1 75.6 42.6 30.0 22.3 Mississippi 85.1 70.4 35.1 16.8 10.3 Missouri 83.8 74.3 32.8 14.8 4.7 Montana 72.7 55.0 31.3 27.4 1.1 Nebraska 75.8 67.9 42.5 29.6 3.2 Table 15 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Download Speed by State as of June 30, 2009 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • 15.3 4.8 4.0 793 Colorado 64.5 16.0 3.9 15.6 256 72.6 11.9 9.6 5.9 135 62.3 19.4 6.9 11.4 175 Connecticut 42.4 9.7 3.0 44.9 216 44.6 9.2 6.2 40.0 65 83.1 8.4 2.4 6.0 83 Delaware 65.6 13.1 8.2 13.1 61 64.7 23.5 11.8 0.0 17 87.5 8.3 0.0 4.2 24 Dist. of Columbia 52.0 18.0 8.0 22.0 25 69.2 15.4 0.0 15.4 13 90.9 9.1 0.0 0.0 11 Florida 69.3 10.0 8.4 12.2 1,115 71.4 10.2 6.4 12.0 451 75.6 12.5 4.3 7.6 536 Georgia 72.3 9.2 5.5 12.9 417 79.5 8.9 4.1 7.5 146 73.3 16.8 3.8 6.1 131 Idaho 61.9 8.3 8.3 21.4 84 72.5 10.0 7.5 10.0 40 78.7 14.8 3.3 3.3 61 Illinois 69.7 12.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • 15.3 4.8 4.0 793 Colorado 64.5 16.0 3.9 15.6 256 72.6 11.9 9.6 5.9 135 62.3 19.4 6.9 11.4 175 Connecticut 42.4 9.7 3.0 44.9 216 44.6 9.2 6.2 40.0 65 83.1 8.4 2.4 6.0 83 Delaware 65.6 13.1 8.2 13.1 61 64.7 23.5 11.8 0.0 17 87.5 8.3 0.0 4.2 24 Dist. of Columbia 52.0 18.0 8.0 22.0 25 69.2 15.4 0.0 15.4 13 90.9 9.1 0.0 0.0 11 Florida 69.3 10.0 8.4 12.2 1,115 71.4 10.2 6.4 12.0 451 75.6 12.5 4.3 7.6 536 Georgia 72.3 9.2 5.5 12.9 417 79.5 8.9 4.1 7.5 146 73.3 16.8 3.8 6.1 131 Idaho 61.9 8.3 8.3 21.4 84 72.5 10.0 7.5 10.0 40 78.7 14.8 3.3 3.3 61 Illinois 69.7 12.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • (ILECs) Total ILECs 8,684.1 17,278.4 4,205.7 4,205.1 0.0 4,157.3 1.1 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) 787.4 2,952.6 1,131.6 1,113.6 -1.6 1,090.1 2.1 and Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers 21.6 494.0 79.4 82.0 3.3 77.9 5.0 Private Service Providers 42.2 55.7 44.1 46.7 6.1 46.2 1.2 Shared-Tenant Service Providers * 4.5 1.2 1.2 2.5 1.1 10.7 Other Local Service Providers 69.2 89.3 13.0 12.5 -4.1 12.2 2.1 Total Local Competitors 920.9 3,596.2 1,269.2 1,256.0 -1.0 1,227.5 2.3 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,604.9 20,874.6 5,474.9 5,461.1 -0.3 5,384.8 1.4 Payphone Service Providers 21.9 80.3 6.6 7.6 14.9 7.4 2.6 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,690.2 24,828.5 5,894.7 6,168.3 4.6 6,058.9 1.8 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • Coaxial Cable IVoIP Providers 8/ 188.6 1,193.7 331.1 346.6 4.7 342.3 1.2 Interconnected VoIP (IVoIP) Providers 8/ 56.4 1,066.7 404.5 425.3 5.1 418.0 1.7 Total IVoIP 8/ 245.0 2,260.4 735.6 771.9 4.9 760.3 1.5 Other Local Service Providers 48.6 16.3 3.4 3.2 -4.9 3.2 0.4 Total Local Competitors 2,871.6 5,427.3 1,840.9 2,082.8 13.1 1,873.1 10.1 Fixed Local Service Providers 10,701.9 17,069.2 4,456.8 4,734.5 6.2 4,405.0 7.0 Payphone Service Providers 11.8 40.5 2.9 2.9 1.0 2.9 0.7 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,471.7 27,554.2 7,255.3 7,408.7 2.1 7,284.7 1.7 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 5.5 73.3 9.4 9.3 -1.3 9.2 1.1 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 3.5 14.6 2.6 2.4 -7.0 2.3 1.5 Wireless Data
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 64.7 June 41.7 65.1 July 41.9 65.2 August 42.0 65.4 September 42.1 65.6 October 42.3 65.8 November 42.4 65.8 December 42.5 65.9 1973January 42.6 65.6 February 42.9 65.9 March 43.3 66.0 April 43.6 66.2 May 43.9 66.2 June 44.2 66.4 July 44.3 66.4 August 45.1 67.0 September 45.2 67.1 October 45.6 67.3 November 45.9 67.3 December 46.2 69.0 1974January 46.6 69.2 February 47.2 69.3 March 47.8 69.3 April 48.0 69.4 May 48.6 69.4 June 49.0 69.4 July 49.4 69.4 August 50.0 69.4 September 50.6 69.9 October 51.1 69.9 November 51.5 69.9 December 51.9 69.9 1975January 52.1 69.8 February 52.5 70.1 March 52.7 70.7 April 52.9 70.9 May 53.2 71.2 June 53.6 71.8 July 54.2 71.9 August 54.3 72.2 September 54.6 72.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.9 101.0 100.0 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.5 100.7 100.0 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.1 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.7 100.9 100.0 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 101.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.0 101.2 100.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.2 101.5 101.8 100.0 February 62.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 100.3 100.8 100.9 December 74.3 84.5 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.4 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 100.3 100.8 100.9 December 74.3 84.5 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.4 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 66.0 March 55.9 73.8 April 43.6 66.2 April 56.1 73.8 May 43.9 66.2 May 56.5 73.9 June 44.2 66.4 June 56.8 74.0 July 44.3 66.4 July 57.1 74.1 August 45.1 67.0 August 57.4 75.0 September 45.2 67.1 September 57.6 74.9 October 45.6 67.3 October 57.9 75.0 November 45.9 67.3 November 58.0 75.3 December 46.2 69.0 December 58.2 75.3 1974January 46.6 69.2 1977January 58.5 74.5 February 47.2 69.3 February 59.1 74.7 March 47.8 69.3 March 59.5 74.8 April 48.0 69.4 April 60.0 75.0 May 48.6 69.4 May 60.3 75.0 June 49.0 69.4 June 60.7 75.1 July 49.4 69.4 July 61.0 75.1 August 50.0 69.4 August 61.2 75.3 September 50.6 69.9 September 61.4 75.4 October 51.1 69.9 October 61.6 75.5 November 51.5 69.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 41.7 65.1 July 41.9 65.2 August 42.0 65.4 September 42.1 65.6 October 42.3 65.8 November 42.4 65.8 December 42.5 65.9 1973 January 42.6 65.6 February 42.9 65.9 March 43.3 66.0 April 43.6 66.2 May 43.9 66.2 June 44.2 66.4 July 44.3 66.4 August 45.1 67.0 September 45.2 67.1 October 45.6 67.3 November 45.9 67.3 December 46.2 69.0 1974 January 46.6 69.2 February 47.2 69.3 March 47.8 69.3 April 48.0 69.4 May 48.6 69.4 June 49.0 69.4 July 49.4 69.4 August 50.0 69.4 September 50.6 69.9 October 51.1 69.9 November 51.5 69.9 December 51.9 69.9 1975 January 52.1 69.8 February 52.5 70.1 March 52.7 70.7 April 52.9 70.9 May 53.2 71.2 70 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 41.7 65.1 July 41.9 65.2 August 42.0 65.4 September 42.1 65.6 October 42.3 65.8 November 42.4 65.8 December 42.5 65.9 1973 January 42.6 65.6 February 42.9 65.9 March 43.3 66.0 April 43.6 66.2 May 43.9 66.2 June 44.2 66.4 July 44.3 66.4 August 45.1 67.0 September 45.2 67.1 October 45.6 67.3 November 45.9 67.3 December 46.2 69.0 1974 January 46.6 69.2 February 47.2 69.3 March 47.8 69.3 April 48.0 69.4 May 48.6 69.4 June 49.0 69.4 July 49.4 69.4 August 50.0 69.4 September 50.6 69.9 October 51.1 69.9 November 51.5 69.9 December 51.9 69.9 1975 January 52.1 69.8 February 52.5 70.1 March 52.7 70.7 April 52.9 70.9 May 53.2 71.2 June 53.6 71.8 July 54.2 71.9 August 54.3 72.2 September 54.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • Virginia, and West Virginia. Mid-West: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin Table A-2 General Information: 1999 6 Others Average PercentAdjustment Formula Companies Companies Companies Reporting 4/100/Average Percent % of Lines % of Lines % of Lines Reporting Alabama 2,521,633 79.3% 12.8% 7.9% 91.0% 1.10 Alaska 458,700 NA NA NA 0.0 NA Arizona 2,971,550 93.4 5.5 1.2 93.7 1.07 Arkansas 1,501,281 69.2 14.8 16.0 75.1 1.33 California 22,736,457 78.2 20.9 0.9 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,864,170 95.6 0.0 4.4 95.6 1.05 Connecticut 2,435,206 99.0 0.0 1.0 99.0 1.01 Delaware 582,735 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 926,875 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,309,559 59.1 39.3 1.6 98.3 1.02 Georgia 5,208,825 83.3 0.6 16.2 89.5 1.12 Hawaii 722,416 0.0 100.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 25 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0301.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0302.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0303.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0304.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0305.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0398.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 25 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0399.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 24 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0700.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN 26 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0701.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0703.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0704.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0798.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 25 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 24 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
  • 99.0 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN 25 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1101.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1102.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1103.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1198.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 24 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1199.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 83.6 57.9 74.2 0.0 98.2 Indiana 34 81 131,910 62 76.5 76.5 76.4 17.7 100.0 Iowa 143 332 210,561 283 85.2 78.3 84.9 7.0 95.2 Kansas 33 202 115,152 173 85.6 81.8 93.5 18.2 99.0 Kentucky 14 95 173,593 76 80.0 78.6 74.3 21.4 96.8 Louisiana 18 100 152,711 91 91.0 83.3 90.7 61.1 99.0 Maine 22 120 150,291 83 69.2 63.6 64.9 13.6 99.2 Maryland 1 1 7,781 1 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Massachusetts 2 2 4,173 2 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Michigan 32 100 110,595 65 65.0 71.9 81.7 18.8 97.0 Minnesota 76 319 315,243 215 67.4 61.8 75.4 10.5 99.7 Mississippi 15 59 75,882 30 50.9 53.3 64.1 13.3 93.2 Missouri 34 287 227,463 260 90.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 100.0 1 0 100.0 87 100.0 Rhode Island 30 0 100.0 5 1 83.3 36 97.2 South Carolina 276 2 99.3 17 5 77.3 300 97.7 South Dakota 245 9 96.5 5 2 71.4 261 95.8 Tennessee 355 9 97.5 38 4 90.5 406 96.8 Texas 1,483 26 98.3 583 26 95.7 2,118 97.5 Utah 147 18 89.1 9 4 69.2 178 87.6 Vermont 132 2 98.5 2 0 100.0 136 98.5 Virgin Islands 5 0 100.0 0 0 NA 5 100.0 Virginia 461 7 98.5 49 10 83.1 527 96.8 Washington 359 8 97.8 58 5 92.1 430 97.0 West Virginia 228 6 97.4 6 2 75.0 242 96.7 Wisconsin 635 5 99.2 46 6 88.5 692 98.4 Wyoming 63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
  • 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Other Local $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Total Local Revenues $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Intrastate Access $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Total Access Revenues $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $12.0 23.0 $128.2 69.2 $140.2 59.0 91.4 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $30.5 58.3 $39.0 21.1 $69.5 29.3 56.1 Long Distance Private Line Service $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. All Other Long Distance $9.8 18.7 $18.1 9.8 $27.9 11.7 64.9 Total Toll Revenues $52.3 100.0 $185.3 100.0 $237.6 100.0 78.0 Total Carrier Revenue $52.3 100.0 $185.3 100.0 $237.6 100.0 78.0 Figures may not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f01.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 $0 $70,623 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 $0 Tuvalu 0 $0 $0 $0 Vanuatu 0 $0 $0 $0 Wallis and Futuna 0 $0 $0 $0 Western Samoa 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $91,800 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 $0 American Samoa 66 0.0 0.0 0.016.783.3 $34,380 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,091,085 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 $0 Baker Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Guam 2,924 0.0 6.910.879.4 2.8 $0 $12,384,812 0.019.5 2.3 74.7 3.5 $0 Hawaii 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $394,629 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 $0 Howland Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Jarvis Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Johnston Atoll 0 $0 $0 $0 Kingman Reef 0 $0 $0 $0 Midway Atoll 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
  • 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017 0.7 97.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 798,023,705 35.4 3.5 33.2 16.7 11.2 Norway $28,785,730 42.3 1.3 15.9 26.1 14.4 $2,235,416 20.2 1.0 12.3 66.0 0.5 $861,416 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206,065,128 21.0 2.2 18.7 41.1 17.0 Portugal $31,812,704 76.4 3.2 13.3 3.9 3.2 $1,612,633 68.0 0.0 26.5 4.9 0.5 $8,824 0.0 19.9 10.9 69.2 0.0 180,759,687 50.8 8.9 24.9 6.1 9.3 Spain $114,772,545 55.0 4.0 11.2 26.4 3.5 $3,613,281 34.3 20.8 30.7 8.3 5.9 $12,437,764 0.8 94.6 0.3 4.3 0.0 637,440,248 28.3 12.5 18.3 24.5 16.4 Sweden $32,755,210 51.7 2.1 24.1 18.5 3.7 $3,414,780 37.1 5.2 37.3 20.1 0.4 $3,564,642 0.2 99.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 324,182,160 23.4 4.9 52.2 14.6 4.9 Switzerland $74,010,699 60.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 45.4 406.7 7,825 8,232 4.9 1970 252.2 63.1 53.1 15.5 49.9 433.8 8,522 8,956 4.8 1971 289.1 72.5 49.2 12.7 52.0 475.6 9,486 9,962 4.8 1972 357.1 88.3 44.8 14.2 57.7 562.2 10,761 11,323 5.0 1973 436.4 115.0 47.7 15.1 62.8 677.0 12,449 13,126 5.2 1974 508.9 142.7 52.3 12.9 64.1 781.0 13,801 14,582 5.4 1975 576.3 163.4 42.5 13.2 69.2 864.6 15,233 16,098 5.4 1976 677.7 188.0 37.3 14.1 74.8 991.9 17,688 18,680 5.3 1977 806.4 225.2 35.5 13.8 84.4 1,165.3 19,994 21,159 5.5 1978 975.5 267.3 37.1 14.0 93.3 1,387.3 23,039 24,426 5.7 1979 1,120.7 299.4 37.7 14.7 96.0 1,568.4 26,031 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 324.9 62.6 14.8 100.0 2,599.5 28,402 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 349.6 61.8 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 45.4 406.7 7,825 8,232 4.9 1970 252.2 63.1 53.1 15.5 49.9 433.8 8,522 8,956 4.8 1971 289.1 72.5 49.2 12.7 52.0 475.6 9,486 9,962 4.8 1972 357.1 88.3 44.8 14.2 57.7 562.2 10,761 11,323 5.0 1973 436.4 115.0 47.7 15.1 62.8 677.0 12,449 13,126 5.2 1974 508.9 142.7 52.3 12.9 64.1 781.0 13,801 14,582 5.4 1975 576.3 163.4 42.5 13.2 69.2 864.6 15,233 16,098 5.4 1976 677.7 188.0 37.3 14.1 74.8 991.9 17,688 18,680 5.3 1977 806.4 225.2 35.5 13.8 84.4 1,165.3 19,994 21,159 5.5 1978 975.5 267.3 37.1 14.0 93.3 1,387.3 23,039 24,426 5.7 1979 1,120.7 299.4 37.7 14.7 96.0 1,568.4 26,031 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 324.9 62.6 14.8 100.0 2,599.5 28,402 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 349.6 61.8 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 344.0 7,888 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 378.2 8,578 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 423.8 9,538 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 496.9 10,826 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 605.5 12,521 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 700.8 13,881 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 778.5 15,319 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 915.4 17,765 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,103.2 20,056 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,366.2 23,060 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,585.9 26,013 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,599.5 28,402 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.01,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.91,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.31,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.72,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9 349.6 61.8 2,650.82,776.7 39,180
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.9 101.0 100.0 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.5 100.7 100.0 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.1 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.7 100.9 100.0 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 101.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.0 101.2 100.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.2 101.5 101.8 100.0 February 62.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • Intrastate Private Line Service Other Telephone Services NAICS Series ID 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 6,048.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 168.4 3,580.0 2,837.4 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 1,222.2 16,525.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10,583.3 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 854.8 9.8 0.0 0.0 428.6 6. Software Design 784.5 0.0 0.0 69.2 0.0 92.3 9.4 0.0 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 7,012.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 398.4 1,553.6 28.9 0.0 9. Natural Causes 13,160.8 0.0 0.0 44.7 469.9 92.1 2,332.1 54.1 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 971.1 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12. External
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-6.pdf
  • 98.4 98.8 98.5 98.9 96.9 97.3 97.7 98.6 $60,000 - $74,999 99.0 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
  • 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 - 30 TABLE 6.4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 55.7 74.1 65.4 65.7 70.5 84.8 60.1 76.0 70.1 71.4 73.8 84.6 65.6 75.9 67.2 70.1 75.3 79.6 69.9 72.9 65.4 67.0 78.0 83.4 65.2 71.2 63.5 63.0 74.7 82.9 65.4 70.5 62.3 63.5 76.5 86.8 70.9 73.3 64.7 69.5 74.4 83.7 75.7 72.0 63.1 66.0 73.6 82.4 74.5 71.2 60.0 61.9 70.7 74.5 79.3 63.0 58.3 61.5 74.8 80.2 69.2 67.2 58.8 69.9 74.2 79.1 69.2 66.0 57.0 68.7 72.1 80.1 61.2 63.8 55.7 60.8 68.0 73.3 68.8 61.7 54.9 55.8 7 - 17 Table 7.6 Producer Price Indices (June 1995 = 100) BLS Series ID 1995June July August September October November December 1996January February March April May June July August September October November December 1997January February March April May
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-6.pdf
  • 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 - 28 TABLE 6.5 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 - 31 TABLE 6.5 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN 6 - 32 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 3,090.6 1,228.1 598.5 194.2 429.6 1,222.3 5.8MN Mississippi 3,395.1 168.3 3,226.8 2,416.4 810.4 553.2 109.7 138.5 801.5 8.9MS Missouri 7,253.9 183.3 7,070.5 5,088.9 1,981.6 1,079.8 287.8 556.1 1,923.6 58.0MO Montana 869.9 43.9 826.0 558.9 267.1 129.6 58.3 78.3 266.3 0.8MT Nebraska 2,156.9 156.0 2,000.9 1,382.5 618.4 256.3 155.1 201.6 613.0 5.4 NE Nevada 2,230.8 154.7 2,076.1 1,550.2 525.9 275.5 176.5 69.2 521.3 4.6 NV New Hampshire 1,898.7 75.3 1,823.4 1,216.8 606.6 260.2 133.7 209.3 603.1 3.5 NH New Jersey 12,118.4 651.7 11,466.7 7,854.5 3,612.2 1,671.3 582.5 1,336.5 3,590.3 22.0 NJ New Mexico 1,993.0 106.6 1,886.3 1,345.2 541.1 316.4 96.1 126.2 538.7 2.5NM New York 26,804.8 1,673.7 25,131.2 17,177.1 7,954.1 2,922.0 1,012.1 3,969.9 7,904.1 50.0 NY North Carolina 10,285.9 573.3 9,712.6 7,203.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 29.4 16.4 28.8 74.6 4.2MT Nebraska 677.5 52.3 625.2 442.8 182.4 58.7 36.1 79.5 174.2 8.2NE Nevada 705.4 77.4 628.0 403.2 224.8 98.9 46.1 72.2 217.2 7.6NV New Hampshire 507.6 20.2 487.4 312.8 174.6 68.5 30.8 70.4 169.8 4.8NH New Jersey 4,065.1 246.4 3,818.7 2,515.0 1,303.6 582.4 149.6 537.7 1,269.7 33.9NJ New Mexico 592.6 38.3 554.3 373.1 181.1 71.8 30.0 69.2 171.0 10.2NM New York 8,385.8 335.4 8,050.4 5,612.4 2,438.0 1,059.9 285.6 1,008.5 2,354.1 84.0NY North Carolina 3,396.2 287.8 3,108.4 2,262.9 845.5 397.5 111.4 308.4 817.2 28.3NC North Dakota 166.8 6.6 160.1 102.7 57.5 18.1 12.0 23.8 53.9 3.6ND Ohio 4,354.7 364.9 3,989.8 2,871.8 1,117.9 491.6 152.6 451.5 1,095.8 22.2OH Oklahoma 1,160.6 163.4 997.2 697.7 299.5 126.9 43.7 121.7 292.3 7.2OK
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 31.7 74.9 2.9 MT Nebraska 217.5 2.5 215.0 56.0 159.0 46.5 28.8 79.3 154.6 4.3 NE Nevada 228.5 0.1 228.4 15.5 212.9 95.2 37.5 77.9 210.6 2.2 NV New Hampshire 186.5 2.2 184.4 24.9 159.5 63.3 24.2 71.9 159.4 NH New Jersey 1,545.6 21.3 1,524.3 238.1 1,286.2 521.3 131.9 632.4 1,285.6 0.6 NJ New Mexico 228.1 4.3 223.8 46.3 177.5 69.2 26.2 74.9 170.3 7.1 NM New York 2,476.0 37.2 2,438.8 327.9 2,110.9 889.2 227.7 994.0 2,110.9 NY North Carolina 1,055.3 13.8 1,041.6 218.2 823.4 385.6 100.5 323.0 809.1 14.3 NC North Dakota 64.8 1.1 63.7 13.9 49.8 15.1 8.4 24.6 48.1 1.7 ND Ohio 1,369.1 (1.2) 1,370.4 321.5 1,048.9 451.4 138.6 442.8 1,032.8 16.1 OH Oklahoma 318.7 318.7 41.4 277.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • MINNESOTA 2,212.7 217.4 1,995.4 1,479.6 510.2 259.6 124.0 126.6 510.2 MN MISSISSIPPI 1,605.0 66.0 1,539.0 1,162.0 374.3 238.8 103.9 31.2 373.9 0.329 MS MISSOURI 3,271.1 49.8 3,221.3 2,388.5 832.8 431.3 229.0 171.8 832.1 0.637 MO MONTANA 349.3 (1.7) 351.0 239.6 110.6 49.3 37.4 24.0 110.6 MT NEBRASKA 1,319.1 173.0 1,146.2 816.9 327.6 135.0 103.4 88.2 326.6 1.004 NE NEVADA 744.6 69.2 675.4 489.4 183.2 88.4 79.4 15.5 183.2 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 889.3 92.6 796.7 543.1 253.5 118.3 97.9 37.4 253.5 NH NEW JERSEY 5,211.0 558.7 4,652.3 3,223.1 1,473.2 584.3 501.2 385.3 1,470.8 2.417 NJ NEW MEXICO 1,128.6 133.1 995.5 713.7 281.4 146.6 94.0 40.7 281.4 NM NEW YORK 15,371.4 3,053.8 12,317.6 8,888.8 3,428.8 1,457.5 1,501.1 460.3 3,418.8 10.052 NY NORTH CAROLINA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 286.7 28.1 1958 467.3 2,057.5 370.3 329.4 296.3 28.9 1959 507.2 2,210.2 394.4 349.9 318.1 29.1 1960 526.6 2,262.9 412.2 363.8 332.2 29.6 1961 544.8 2,314.3 430.0 379.7 342.6 29.9 1962 585.2 2,454.8 457.0 402.2 363.4 30.2 1963 617.4 2,559.4 480.0 422.0 383.0 30.6 1964 663.0 2,708.4 514.5 458.5 411.4 31.0 1965 719.1 2,881.1 556.7 494.8 444.3 31.5 1966 787.8 3,069.2 605.7 534.7 481.9 32.4 1967 833.6 3,147.2 650.7 572.9 509.5 33.4 1968 910.6 3,293.9 714.5 622.5 559.8 34.8 1969 982.2 3,393.6 779.3 669.4 604.7 36.7 1970 1,035.6 3,397.6 837.1 728.1 648.1 38.8 1971 1,125.4 3,510.0 900.2 791.5 702.5 40.5 1972 1,237.3 3,702.3 988.8 856.8 770.7 41.8 1973 1,382.6 3,916.3 1,107.5 967.0 851.6 44.4 1974 1,496.9 3,891.2 1,215.9 1,056.8 931.2 49.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 334.0 68.8 265.1 139.8 81.9 42.8 264.5 0.588 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 65.4 0.24 65.1 13.6 51.5 16.2 20.2 15.1 51.5 SD TENNESSEE 529.7 (1.33) 531.0 103.4 427.6 226.7 127.5 72.4 426.6 0.957 TN TEXAS 2,757.6 14.97 2,742.6 1,116.4 1,626.2 784.0 468.5 373.9 1,626.3 (0.109)TX UTAH 211.9 (0.34) 212.3 31.3 181.0 69.4 69.8 41.8 181.0 UT VERMONT 80.9 2.27 78.6 9.4 69.2 23.3 36.3 9.6 69.2 VT VIRGINIA 916.4 9.44 907.0 257.9 649.1 303.9 202.8 141.8 648.4 0.648 VA WASHINGTON 707.9 (2.34) 710.3 174.2 536.1 233.2 204.2 98.8 536.1 WA WEST VIRGINIA 171.3 0.87 170.4 34.4 136.0 80.6 36.4 18.8 135.8 0.184 WV WISCONSIN 444.3 24.67 419.7 90.0 329.6 144.9 116.2 68.3 329.4 0.231 WI WYOMING 61.1 (6.40) 67.5 8.9 58.6 17.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 286.7 28.1 1958 467.3 2,057.5 370.3 329.4 296.3 28.9 1959 507.2 2,210.2 394.4 349.9 318.1 29.1 1960 526.6 2,262.9 412.2 363.8 332.2 29.6 1961 544.8 2,314.3 430.0 379.7 342.6 29.9 1962 585.2 2,454.8 457.0 402.2 363.4 30.2 1963 617.4 2,559.4 480.0 422.0 383.0 30.6 1964 663.0 2,708.4 514.5 458.5 411.4 31.0 1965 719.1 2,881.1 556.7 494.8 444.3 31.5 1966 787.8 3,069.2 605.7 534.7 481.9 32.4 1967 833.6 3,147.2 650.7 572.9 509.5 33.4 1968 910.6 3,293.9 714.5 622.5 559.8 34.8 1969 982.2 3,393.6 779.3 669.4 604.7 36.7 1970 1,035.6 3,397.6 837.1 728.1 648.1 38.8 1971 1,125.4 3,510.0 900.2 791.5 702.5 40.5 1972 1,237.3 3,702.3 988.8 856.8 770.7 41.8 1973 1,382.6 3,916.3 1,107.5 967.0 851.6 44.4 1974 1,496.9 3,891.2 1,215.9 1,056.8 931.2 49.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 2.91 0.78 0.50 4.19 24.4 NC NORTH DAKOTA 5.5 5.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 (0.50) (0.25) (0.28) (1.03) 1.3 ND OHIO 467.5 370.2 97.3 66.0 31.3 0.91 0.83 0.53 2.27 29.0 OH OKLAHOMA 126.3 121.1 5.3 (4.7) 10.0 (0.31) (0.11) 0.03 (0.39) 10.4 OK OREGON 94.0 64.8 29.2 21.1 8.0 (0.94) (0.57) (0.26) (1.77) 9.8 OR PENNSYLVANIA 435.7 228.9 188.2 119.0 69.2 8.08 3.25 3.49 14.82 54.4 PA RHODE ISLAND 78.3 78.0 0.2 (1.5) 1.7 (4.99) (2.10) (1.45) (8.53) 10.3 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 40.4 16.2 24.2 17.0 7.3 0.34 0.09 0.16 0.59 6.7 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 93.9 57.8 36.2 27.2 9.0 1.07 0.81 0.44 2.32 6.7 SD TENNESSEE 5.5 6.2 (0.7) (0.7) (0.0) (0.72) (0.30) (0.29) (1.31) 1.3 TN TEXAS 164.0 99.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000519.doc
  • in December 1992, and TFN was acquired by LDDS in August 1992. Id. at 1. For purposes of this order, we treat LDDS as the entity that purchased the relevant services. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 148-49 (1930) (requiring ``separation of the intrastate and interstate property, revenues and expenses'' of LECs); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b), 69.3(a) (in combination, requiring filing of interstate access tariffs at FCC). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 151 (assigning to FCC the regulation of ``interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio''); id. � 152(b) (excluding from FCC jurisdiction matters relating to ``intrastate communication service by wire or radio''). The Commission previously has recognized that LECs are not able
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 50.0 198.0 12141 742 10995 409 0.5 0.2 100.0 KYHARLAN 44 51 50.0 601.0 19175 562 16832 475 2.2 4.0 100.0 KYHAZARD 35 16 50.0 384.0 15138 348 13480 296 4.5 3.6 100.0 KYHAZARD 57 12 3.2 475.0 16984 393 14617 324 0.4 0.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 18 20 50.0 195.0 13015 626 12783 622 1.0 0.2 99.8 KYLEXINGTON 27 59 69.2 300.0 16909 681 16781 678 1.4 0.5 99.9 KYLEXINGTON 36 40 66.5 305.0 17900 696 17412 691 1.5 1.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 46 42 50.0 265.0 13711 639 13491 635 6.3 3.2 99.1 KYLOUISVILLE 3 47 1000.0 555.0 45682 2902 35162 2244 0.6 0.4 99.7 KYLOUISVILLE 11 55 428.5 390.0 27674 1482 26136 1462 0.1 0.0 100.0 KYLOUISVILLE 15 17 50.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/pnmm7137.pdf
  • Authorizations July 11, 1997 Report No. D-938 Non- ARN Common Latitude Longitude Ground BTA Channel Center of Market Name Winning Bidder New Name (If Applicable) Carrier Elev Rad. BMDP960510AU X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 1 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP960510ES X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 2A 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP970416QX X 313740 841145 69.2 B006 F 139 Albany, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QU X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H1 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QV X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H2 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QW X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H3 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/pnmm7146.pdf
  • Service Grants July 25, 1997 Report No. D-941-A Non- ARN Common Latitude Longitude Ground BTA Channel Center ofMarket Name Winning Bidder New Name (If Applicable) Carrier Elev Rad. BMDP960510AU X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 1 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP960510ES X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 2A 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP970416QX X 313740 841145 69.2 B006 F 139 Albany, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QU X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H1 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QW X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H3 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDS960510KCS B036 Bellingham, WA Pacific Telesis Enterprises BMDP960510KN X 132920 1444936 200 B490 H1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • regulation generally. To obtain connections, ESPs generally pay local business rates and interstate subscriber line charges for their switched access connections to LEC central offices. 262 Amendments of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules Relating to Enhanced Service Providers, Order, 3 FCC Rcd 2631 (para. 2 n.8) (1988); see also MTS and WATs Market Structure, (para. 4); 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m)(1996) ("End User" means any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier). 263 Access Charge Reform; Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers; Transport Rate Structure and Pricing; Usage of the Public Switched Network by Information Service and Internet Access Providers, CC Docket Nos. 92-262, 94-1, 91-213, 96-263, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Third Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.txt
  • report focuses on three categories of wireless services: mobile telephony, mobile data, and dispatch. The Fifth Report makes the following observations about these categories: Mobile Telephony: The mobile telephony sector has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Mobile telephony carriers continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. Over 172 million people, or 69 percent of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • Report Appendixes, at H-2. 21 See Section II.A.1.d for a detailed discussion. 6 Mobile Telephony. Since the release of the Third Report, the mobile telephony sector of CMRS experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1998, the mobile telephony sector generated over $33 billion in revenues,15 increased subscribership from 55 million to 69.2 million,16 and produced a national penetration rate of nearly 26 percent.17 In addition, new entrant wireless providers18 have continued to deploy their networks. While the new entrant network buildout and coverage has not caught up to that of cellular, there are now at least five mobile telephone operators in each of the 35 largest Basic Trading Areas19 ("BTAs") and at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980401.html
  • COMPANY, INC. Adopted, on its own motion, Order on Reconsideration of the February 26, 1998 Order granting Wilderness Valley's petition requesting a waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules in order to address another specific waiver necessary to allow Wilderness Valley to participate in NECA's average schedule settlements; waived, to the extent discussed, the incumbent LEC requirements of sections 69.2 and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. Action by Chief, Accounting and Audits Division. Adopted: March 31, 1998. by Order on Recon. (DA No. 98-603). CCB Internet URL: [19]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980603.txt TIME WARNER CABLE. Granted appeal and remanded a case involving a local rate order issued by Guilford County, North Carolina. The County used the Commission's rate regulation framework to address technical and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd010615.html
  • Contact Sharon Hurd at (202) 418-0504 [7]DOC-213661A1.pdf [8]DOC-213661A1.doc [9]DOC-213661A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Report No: N-238-A Released: 06/15/2001. CONNECTION OF TERMINAL EQUIPMENT TO THE TELEPHONE NETWORK FCC Certifications for Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network. CCB [10]DOC-213668A1.pdf [11]DOC-213668A1.doc [12]DOC-213668A1.txt Released: 06/15/2001. M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2(HH) "UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND". (DA No. 01-1414). (Dkt No 96-45). Comments Due: 06/29/2001. Reply Comments Due: 07/16/2001. CCB. Contact: Antoinette Stevens 202-418-7400 [13]DA-01-1414A1.pdf [14]DA-01-1414A1.doc [15]DA-01-1414A1.txt Released: 06/15/2001. PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON QWEST PETITION FOR WAIVER TO PROVIDE OPERATOR-ASSISTED REVERSE DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE SERVICES. (DA No. 01-1445) CC Docket 01-126; contact Jance Myles 202-418-1580. Comments Due: 07/02/2001. Reply Comments Due: 07/12/2001.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040413.html
  • educational Stations WAEF(FM), Cordele, Georgia, & WBJY(FM), Americus, GA for broadcasting advertisements in violation of the pertinent statutory and Commission underwriting rule provisions. Action by: Deputy Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/12/2004 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 04-1000). EB [37]DA-04-1000A1.doc [38]DA-04-1000A1.pdf [39]DA-04-1000A1.txt M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2 (HH) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Dismissed in part, and granted in part, a Request for Waiver and waived the study area definition of Part 36 of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 04/02/2004 by ORDER. (FCC No. 04-86). WCB [40]FCC-04-86A1.doc [41]FCC-04-86A1.pdf [42]FCC-04-86A1.txt FEDERAL- STATE JOINT BOARD ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE/HIGHLAND CELLULAR, INC. PETITION FOR DESIGNATION AS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd041124.html
  • Comments Due: 12/17/2004. Reply Comments Due: 01/07/2005. WCB. Contact: Victoria Schlesinger at (202) 418-7353 [33]DA-04-3652A1.doc [34]DA-04-3652A1.pdf [35]DA-04-3652A1.txt Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE PETITIONS OF DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY LLC,. (DA No. 04-3687). (Dkt No 96-45) QWEST CORPORATION AND DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND INC TO WAIVE THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36 AND SECTION 69.2(HH) AND 69.605(C) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Comments Due: 12/08/2004. Reply Comments Due: 12/15/2004. WCB. Contact: Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879 [36]DA-04-3687A1.doc [37]DA-04-3687A1.pdf [38]DA-04-3687A1.txt Report No: 1996 Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SITE-BY-SITE ACTION. WTB [39]DOC-254573A1.pdf [40]DOC-254573A1.txt Report No: 1995 Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SITE-BY-SITE ACCEPTED FOR FILING. WTB [41]DOC-254574A1.pdf [42]DOC-254574A1.txt Report No: 1998 Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU MARKET-BASED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050118.html
  • REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN THE SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES FIFTH REPORT AND ORDER, FCC 04-190. (DA No. 05-103). (Dkt No 02-6). Comments Due: 02/16/2005. Reply Comments Due: 03/03/2005. WCB. Contact: Erica Myers at (202) 418-7400 [9]DA-05-103A1.doc [10]DA-05-103A1.pdf [11]DA-05-103A1.txt Released: 01/18/2005. SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER NUNC PRO TUNC OF THE DEFINTION OF "STUDY AREA" IN PART 36 AND SECTIONS 36.611 AND 69.2(HH) COMMISSION'S RULES. (DA No. 05-105). (Dkt No 96-45) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 02/08/2005. Reply Comments Due: 02/22/2005. WCB. Contact: Sheryl Todd at (202) 418-7386 [12]DA-05-105A1.doc [13]DA-05-105A1.pdf [14]DA-05-105A1.txt Released: 01/18/2005. PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QUALCOMM INCORPORATED PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING. (DA No. 05-87). (Dkt No 05-7). Comments Due: 02/17/2005. Reply Comments Due: 03/04/2005. WTB. Contact: Paul Moon at (202) 418-0620,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050304.html
  • OMD. Contact: Barbara P. Chappelle @ (202) 418-0310 [35]DOC-257198A1.pdf [36]DOC-257198A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD. Contact: Barbara P. Chappelle @ (202) 418-0310 [37]DOC-257199A1.pdf [38]DOC-257199A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. TARIFF TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG. WCB. Contact: (202) 418-0270 [39]DOC-257192A1.pdf [40]DOC-257192A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. BEAVER CREEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES. (DA No. 05-593). (Dkt No 05-69) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 03/25/2005. Reply Comments Due: 04/08/2005. WCB. Contact: Randy Clarke at (202) 418-1587 [41]DA-05-593A1.doc [42]DA-05-593A1.pdf [43]DA-05-593A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. WESTGATE COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A WEAVTEL PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION RULES. (DA No. 05-595). (Dkt No 05-58) Pleading Cycle Established.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050428.html
  • 05-56, released March 16, 2005. (Dkt No. 98-237 , 02-380). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 04/28/2005 by ERRATUM. (DA No. 05-1186). OMD [35]DOC-258385A1.doc [36]DOC-258385A1.pdf [37]DOC-258385A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED APRIL 27, 2005, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 79: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 04/27/2005. ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2(HH) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION RULES. (DA No. 05-1220). (Dkt No 05-174) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 05/19/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/02/2005. WCB. Contact: Randy Clarke at (202) 418-1587 [38]DA-05-1220A1.doc [39]DA-05-1220A1.pdf [40]DA-05-1220A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1159A1.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1159A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258339A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258339A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258337A2.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258337A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258449A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258449A1.txt 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258446A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258446A1.txt 14.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050517.html
  • No. 05-1356). (Dkt No 05-168) Streamlined Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 05/30/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/06/2005. WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or or Alexis Johns at (202) 418-1167 [38]DA-05-1356A1.doc [39]DA-05-1356A1.pdf [40]DA-05-1356A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PETITION FOR WAIVER OF THE DEFINITION OF "STUDY AREA" CONTAINED IN PART 36, APPENDIX-GLOSSARY AND SECTIONS 36.611, AND 69.2(HH) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 05/16/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-1355). WCB [41]DA-05-1355A1.doc [42]DA-05-1355A1.pdf [43]DA-05-1355A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A2.doc 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A1.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A2.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258682A2.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258682A1.pdf 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258679A2.txt 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258679A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1360A1.doc 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1360A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1360A1.txt 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1361A1.doc 15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050527.html
  • DESIGNATION AS AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER IN THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS. (DA No. 05-1543). (Dkt No 96-45) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 06/10/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/24/2005. WCB. Contact: Pam Slipakoff at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [37]DA-05-1543A1.doc [38]DA-05-1543A1.pdf [39]DA-05-1543A1.txt Released: 05/27/2005. ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A ADAK TELEPHONE UTILITY SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(B), 54.314(D), 54.903(A)(3), 69.2 (HH) AND 69.3(E)(6) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND, IF NECESSARY,. (DA No. 05-1544). (Dkt No 96-45) A WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES, Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 06/13/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/20/2005. WCB. Contact: Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879 OR Katie King at (202) 418-7491 [40]DA-05-1544A1.doc [41]DA-05-1544A1.pdf [42]DA-05-1544A1.txt Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050811.html
  • [16]DA-05-2262A1.txt BIG ISLAND RADIO, ASSIGNOR AND PACIFIC RADIO GROUP, INC., ASSIGNEE. Granted the applications for consent to assign licenses for KKON(AM), Kealakekua, HI, KLUA(FM), Kailua Kona, HI, KAGB(FM), Waimea, HI, and KPVS(FM) and KAPA(FM), Hilo, HI. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 05-2270). MB [17]DA-05-2270A1.doc [18]DA-05-2270A1.pdf [19]DA-05-2270A1.txt ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2(HH) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted Allband's Request for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-174). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 08/11/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-2268). WCB [20]DA-05-2268A1.doc [21]DA-05-2268A1.pdf [22]DA-05-2268A1.txt WESTGATE COMMUNICATIONS AND BEAVER CREEK TELEPHONE COMPANY'S REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS OF SECTION 69.2(HH) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-69 , 05-58).
• http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/DA-11-992-attachment-A.pdf
  • Filed In 1995 CC RM-8606 View RM-8606edocs: RM-8606 2/27/1995 4311/20/1995Disclosures by Operator Service Providers of Serving Public Radio CC RM-8585 View RM-8585edocs: RM-8585 2/2/1995 1211/29/1995Establishment of a Funding Mechanism for Interstate Operator Assistance for the Deaf CC PRM96CC View PRM96CCedocs: PRM96CC 1/17/1996 11/16/1996Common Carrier Bureau Petitions for Rulemaking Filed In 1996 CC RM-8723 View RM-8723edocs: RM-8723 11/3/1995 152/13/1996Amendment of Section 69.2 (m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones within the Public Telephone Exemption from End-User Common-Line Access Charges CC RM-8303 View RM-8303edocs: RM-8303 8/2/1993 313/15/1996Request Amendment of the Rules to Determine the Terms and Conditions Under Which Tier 1 LECs Should be Permitted to Provide InterLATA Telecommunications Services CC RM-8708 View RM-8708edocs: RM-8708 10/12/1995 12 4/1/1996Request
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • of their payphones, and thus this proceeding concerns rules that are not currently in effect. The Commission's Liability Order IPPs Not End Users The Commission's Liability Order responded to the court's remand of an earlier Commission ruling. The Commission's earlier ruling held that IPP payphones were subject to a EUCL charge because the IPPs were "end users" pursuant to section 69.2(m) of the rules. But on remand from an appeal of that decision, the Commission reversed itself and concluded in the Liability Order that, although C.F. Communications and other IPPs own the payphones, they cannot be considered "end users" under section 69.2(m), because they do not own the premises where their payphones are located. IPPs Must Pay EUCL Charge Nonetheless, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • held that CFC was not an ``end user,'' and, alternatively, that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis.35 9. In its April 13, 2000 Liability Order on remand, the Commission applied the Court's analysis and found that CFC and the other IPPs cannot be considered "end users" under Section 69.2(m).36 The Commission also determined, however, that irrespective of whether CFC was an ``end user,'' the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were ``public'' or ``semi-public.''37 Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of Section 201(b) by classifying all IPP payphones as semi-public and assessing EUCL charges against IPP payphones
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-111A1.html
  • id. at S: 371 ("Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ...."). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of "end user" found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ..."); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, S: 2.6 (1984) ("ECA Tariff Order") (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define "end user");
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-59A1.html
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of "end user" in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff S: 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: "The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-87A1.html
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.4(a) ("The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ...."); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, P: 10 (1983) ("Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings."), 345, Appendix A, S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.0 1,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.9 1,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.3 1,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.7 2,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
  • 3.4 0.124.718.8 53.1 $2,518,706 12.6 0.0 7.214.1 66.1 $4,445,794 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 316,185,733 6.0 0.115.821.9 56.2 Cyprus $2,889,857 3.2 0.019.548.6 28.7 $182,618 0.0 0.029.625.4 45.0 $321 0.0 0.0 0.014.3 85.7 24,836,022 4.8 0.033.021.9 40.3 Denmark $16,329,719 3.1 0.115.220.3 61.3 $1,600,642 42.2 0.015.7 4.1 38.0 $6,012,314 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 193,783,259 6.3 0.123.018.1 52.4 Finland $8,815,262 2.0 0.011.217.6 69.2 $197,777 0.1 0.016.731.3 51.9 $2,429 55.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 38.7 80,013,337 2.5 0.1 9.328.3 59.8 France $107,720,508 4.6 0.017.717.7 59.9 $10,353,833 1.5 0.015.129.2 54.2 $20,218,951 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1,238,699,417 4.8 0.013.426.5 55.3 Germany $206,465,435 2.9 0.044.013.3 39.8 $25,657,092 1.1 0.014.719.2 65.0 $19,308,150 88.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 2,698,058,517 2.7 0.028.228.7 40.4 Gibraltar $186,917 2.0 0.034.027.2 36.8 $11,530 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
  • $28,538,271 0.0 35.5 0.4 19.9 44.2 $3,178,874 0.0 41.6 0.0 20.8 37.5 $13,725,669 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 523,828,362 0.0 30.8 0.8 33.6 34.8 Turkey $19,337,349 0.1 25.0 4.9 16.0 53.9 $382,776 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.7 79.0 $379,346 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 200,273,502 0.1 14.8 15.0 17.4 52.8 United Kingdom $246,149,106 0.2 34.5 0.2 22.2 42.8 $26,829,095 0.0 13.3 0.0 17.5 69.2 $64,481,819 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,547,339,581 0.2 13.8 1.0 30.5 54.6 Western Europe $776,307,034 0.1 28.5 1.3 20.9 49.2 $81,479,312 0.0 18.1 0.0 26.3 55.6 $170,351,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 13,979,516,518 0.1 15.7 1.9 31.3 51.1 Algeria $8,715,356 0.0 7.0 4.3 21.5 67.3 $411,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,619 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 89,141,636 0.0 4.7 4.1 21.9 69.3 Angola
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
  • 0.0 0.0 2.5 7.6 90.0 Canary Island $0 $0 $0 0 Cape Verde $6,281,711 0.0 0.0 4.8 71.5 23.7 $31,844 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 $17,417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 37,460,798 0.0 0.0 4.4 67.0 28.7 Central African Republic $517,244 0.0 0.0 0.1 37.7 62.2 $2,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,032,333 0.0 0.0 0.1 30.7 69.2 Chad $1,450,680 0.0 0.0 0.4 48.4 51.2 $16,193 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,468 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 12,347,337 0.0 0.0 0.4 54.0 45.6 Comoros $2,248,214 0.0 0.0 6.6 23.9 69.5 $8,767 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $798 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,649,567 0.0 0.0 8.1 23.1 68.8 Congo $4,103,083 0.0 0.6 7.9 37.7 53.9 $70,190 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,628 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/cf_comm.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/cf_comm.wp
  • Wisconsin, Inc., 10 F.C.C.R. 9775 (1995) ("Order"). The Commission found that CFC was an "end user" under its rules, and thus subject to EUCL charges. Specifically, the Commission found that CFC met the regulatory definition of "end user" because it "offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller" and that all such resale transactions "originate on [CFC's] premises." See 47 C.F.R. 69.2(m). The Commission further concluded that CFC's independent payphones did not qualify for the "public telephone" exemption from the EUCL charges. Relying on an FCC rule defining "public telephone" as being "provided by a telephone company," 47 C.F.R. 69.2(ee), the Commission reasoned that CFC's payphones were not "public" because CFC is not a "telephone company" under the applicable rules. See 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1094.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1094.html
  • }{\i\fs24\insrsid214472 access}{\fs24\insrsid214472 ," which the Commission here says constitute the only possibilities, the reference to "access service," combining the different key words from the two terms before us, sheds no light. "Access service" is in fact a pre\_ Act term, defined as "services and facilities provided for the origination or termination of any interstate or foreign telecommunication." 47 CFR \'a7 69.2(b). \par \par \tab If the Commission meant to place ISP\_traffic within a third category, not "telephone exchange service" and not "exchange access," that would conflict with its concession on appeal that "exchange access" and "telephone exchange service" occupy t he field. But if it meant that just as ESPs were "users of access service" but treated as end users for
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1207.html
  • meaning of the Access Charge Reconsideration no matter where they were located or how they were used. CFC sought review of the FCC decision in this court and found some success. In C.F. Communications, the court vacated the EUCL Decisions, holding both that the classification of IPPs as "end users" was an unreasonable interpretation of the relevant regulation, 47 C.F.R. 69.2(m), and that the FCC had not adequately justified allowing EUCL charges to be collected for IPP phones while exempting similarly situated LEC-owned payphones from such fees. See 128 F.3d at 738-42. In deciding this second issue, the court pointedly rejected the FCC's theory that a payphone should be denied "public" (and thus EUCL-exempt) status under the Access Charge Reconsideration merely
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1059.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1059.html
  • as "end users"--no different from a local pizzeria or barber shop. See Order at 16, p 37; In re Amendments of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules Relating to the Creation of Access Charge Subelements for Open Network Architecture, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 4 FCC Rcd 3983, 3988, p 39 & n.89 (1989) ("ONA NPRM"); see also 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m). While this categorization exempted ISPs from interstate access charges paid by IXCs, it left them obliged to purchase access through intrastate tariffs--namely, local business line charges. The Commission contends that ACS's allocation of ISP costs to interstate service would thus create a cost-revenue mismatch. Order at 14-16, p p 32-37. The tariff revenue would be allocated to intrastate and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2004/02-1364-043004.pdf
  • (D.C. Cir. 1984). Under those rules, LECs could assess EUCL charges only on ``end users,'' defined by the Commis- sion's rules as ``any customer of TTT telecommunications service TTT [or] a person or entity that offers telecommunica- tions services exclusively as a reseller TTT if all resale trans- missions TTT originate on the premises of such reseller.'' 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (2003). Of particular significance to the issue we face here, the access charge rules applied differently to public and semi- public payphone service. The Commission explained: ``A pay telephone is used to provide public telephone service when a public need exists, such as at an airport lobby, at the option of the telephone company and with the agreement of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • be done for prime time due to the lack of data on total cable and broadcast advertising revenues for the prime time daypart. 33 In 2000 and 2001, Nielsen separated out "all other cable" from pay and basic. This is not included in the universe of advertiser-supported programming. See notes to table 11. 1984/85 1989/90 1994/95 1999/00 2000/01 Network Affiliates 69.2 57.3 58.4 50.9 49.6 Independents 15.0 19.1 9.7 3.4 3.5 Public 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.6 2.6 Basic Cable 6.5 14.5 23.9 35.3 36.5 Pay Cable 5.6 5.5 4.4 5.2 5.2 All Other Cable 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.6 Commercial Broadcast 84.1 76.4 68.1 54.3 53.0 Source: Neilsen Galaxy Explorer. Notes: Shares are normalized to 100 to account for multiset usage.
• http://www.fcc.gov/telecom.html
  • Rules Concerning Operator Service Access and Pay Telephone Compensation; Petition of the Public Telephone Council to Treat Bell Operating Company Payphones as Customer Premises Equipment ; Petition of Oncor Communications Requesting Compensation for Competitive Payphone Premises Owners and Presubscribed Operator Services Providers, Petition of the California Payphone Association to Amend and Clarify Section 68.2(a)of the Commission's Rules, Amendment of Section 69.2(m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones Within the "Public Telephone" Exemption from End User Common Line Access Charges (November 8, 1996) (CC Docket No. 96-128, CC Docket. No. 91-35) [ News Release | [154]Text Version | [155]WordPerfect Version ] * Order In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/publicintereststate092300.pdf
  • the public, and, as a result, mobile telephone 39 Id. 40 Id. at para. 23. (Continued) Exhibit B FCC Form 603 Page 14 of 24 subscribership continues to grow at a rapid pace. As of December 1999, there were approximately 86 million mobile telephone subscribers in the U.S. 41 This, according to the Commission, was a 24% increase over the 69.2 million subscribers at the end of 1998.42 By auctioning the A, B, C, D, E and F blocks in the PCS service, the Commission has created up to six new wireless competitors in the mobile telephone service. In fact, many PCS providers have already deployed systems in a number of markets throughout the country, including all of the major markets
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive06.html
  • APPLICATION FILED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SELECTED ASSETS OF QWEST CORPORATION BY SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. - STREAMLINED PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED. WC Docket No. 06-82. SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND QWEST CORPORATION SEEK WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36, AND SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.305, 54.314(d), 54.903(a), 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6) AND 69.3(e)(11) OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES; SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF THE COMMISSIONS STAY OF THE PROVISION OF ENHANCED LIFELINE AND LINK-UP SUPPORT TO CUSTOMERS ON NEAR-TRIBAL LANDS - PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED. CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109. Public Notice: [466]Word | [467]Acrobat 04/26/2006 Domestic Section 214 Application for Transfer of Control of ICG Telecom
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304C98.PDF
  • containinganN/A,thecarriermustentertheamount(s)andanexplanationasafootnote tothefield.Theamount(s)mustnotbeenteredintheN/A'dfield.Allotherfields mustbepopulated.Iftherearenodataapplicabletoagivenfield,enterzero. 2.ReportingcarriersmustfollowthespecificinstructionsprovidedintheattachedColumn DescriptionsandRowInstructions.Inaddition,carriersmustfollowthejurisdictional separationsandaccesschargeproceduressetforthinParts36,65and69ofthe Commission'sRulesandreferencedintheRowInstructions.Carriersmustexplainany deviationsinfootnotes.Donotincludeexplanatorynotesinthetransmittalletter;such notesmustbeincludedintheFootnotessectionofthefilingasindicatedinthe AutomatedReportSpecificationsandPaperReportSpecifications. 3.AdjustmentstoaccommodatereallocationofcommonpowercostsinPart36fromthe assignmentmethodinPart32mustbecompletedbeforeenteringdatainthisreport. AlthoughthereallocationofcommonpowercostsbetweenCOEcategoriesdoesnot occuruntilCOEisseparated,theseadjustmentsmustbemadepriortoenteringdatain theAccessReportinordertopreserveitslinearintegrity.Iftheseadjustmentsarenot madepriortoenteringthedatainthisreport,columns(p)plus(q)plus(r)willnot equalcolumn(d)forrows1100through1400. 4.WhenreportinginvestmentamountsforPlant,OtherInvestment,andReserves,usethe sameaveragingmethodologyasinstructedfortheARMISReport43-03.When reportingRevenues,Expenses,Taxes,Return(exceptrateofreturn),andRevenue Requirementdata,carriersmustprovidethetotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly, quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies.Whenreportingallocationfactors,carriersmust reportdataasfollows:(1)usageamounts,suchasminutes,shouldbereportedastotal annualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudiesthatrepresentthe totalusagefor365days.Forexample,sevendaystudiesmustbeprojectedtoreflect eachmonth'stotalusageforatotaloftwelvemonths;(2)expensesorrevenues,when usedasanallocationfactor,shouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumof monthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies;(3)allocationfactorssuchasweightedactual contactsshouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,or semi-annualstudies;(4)percentageallocationfactors,suchastheLoopAllocation Factor,shouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage;and(5)terminations,users, andmilesshouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage. Page3of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 5.Alldatamustbereported"asearned,"i.e.,afteradjustmentstopriorperiodsandSNFA adjustments. 6.Ifanentryistobeasubtraction,indicatesobyplacingaminussigninthecolumn immediatelyprecedingthenumericdata,e.g.,use-4,NOT-4or(4)forthedatadisk file. 7.Thegeneralstructureofthisreportisasfollows.Amountsthatacarrierallocates betweenjurisdictionsand/oramongaccesscategoriesandelementsareindicatedon rowsnotdesignated"forallocation."Theserowsarefollowedbyrowsindicatingthe allocationfactorusedtoallocatetheprecedinglines.Alldirectlyassignedamounts mustbereportedonrowsthatarenotdesignated"forallocation."Thesymbol"#" precedingtheapplicablerowdescriptionwouldindicateitemsthatarenotdollarsor percentages(e.g.,minutes,miles,conversationalminutes,workingloops,etc.)Alldata thatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestpenny(e.g.,costperloop)is indicatedbyasymbol"$"(dollarsign)precedingtheapplicablerowdescription.All datathatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestthousand(e.g.,equalaccess investment)isindicatedbythesymbol"K$"precedingtheapplicablerowdescription. Allfactorsthatmustbereportedasapercentageareprecededbythesymbol"%" (percentsign).Thesymbol"%"intherowinstructionwouldindicateitemstobe enteredasapercent(e.g.,rateofreturn). 8.Incasesinwhichthetotalinterstateamountofthecostcategoryisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoPart69,thePart69datamustbereportedonthetotalrowforthatcategory asindicatedintherowinstructionsforthetotalrow.AllPart69amountsforacost categorymustequalthetotaloftheamountsallocatedtotheinterstatejurisdictionfor thatcategory. 9.AlltermsandabbreviationsusedinthereportandinstructionsaredefinedinSection 69.2oftheCommission'sRules,theGlossaryoftheSeparationsManual,andPart36 oftheCommission'sRules. 10.Alldollaramountsmustberoundedtothenearestthousand,withtheexceptionofrows 1273,1335,1453,1495,9005,9008and9009.Thedollaramountsintheserowsmust beroundedtothenearestpennyandsuchamountsmustbeenteredindollarsandcents (e.g.,ifcostperloopis$6.445,itmustbeenteredas6.45).Amountsofminutes (including,butnotlimitedto,connectionminutes,DEMsandMOU)mustberounded tothenearestmillion,exceptfortollminutes(onrow1127),whichmustberounded tothenearestthousand.Allsecondsincludingweightedstandardworksecondsmust beroundedtothousands.Allweightedactualcontacts,users,loops,accesslines, terminationsandnumberofhouseholdsreceivinglifelineconnectionassistance(row 9007)mustbereportedinwholenumbers.Allconversation-minute-milesmustbe roundedtothenearestmillion.Allcircuitmiles/kilometers(including,butnotlimited Page4of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 to,MOUmiles/kilometers)mustberoundedtothenearestthousand.Allrateofreturn amountsmustbeenteredinpercentandmustberoundedto2decimalplaces(e.g., 23.70561shouldbeenteredas23.71).Allotherpercentageamountsmustbeentered inpercentandmustberoundedto4decimalplaces(e.g.,23.70561shouldbeentered as23.7056).Allotheramounts(including,butnotlimitedto,serviceobservingunits, MTSmessages,PLaccountsandTWXconnections)mustberoundedtothenearest thousand. FCC Report 43-04 - Report Definition - Form December 1998 Page 5 of 158 FCC Report 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT COMPANY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX Version STUDY AREA: XXXXXXXXXXXX SUBMISSION XXX PERIOD: From mmm yyyyy To mmm yyyyy TABLE I
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304P98.PDF
  • containinganN/A,thecarriermustentertheamount(s)andanexplanationasafootnote tothefield.Theamount(s)mustnotbeenteredintheN/A'dfield.Allotherfields mustbepopulated.Iftherearenodataapplicabletoagivenfield,enterzero. 2.ReportingcarriersmustfollowthespecificinstructionsprovidedintheattachedColumn DescriptionsandRowInstructions.Inaddition,carriersmustfollowthejurisdictional separationsandaccesschargeproceduressetforthinParts36,65and69ofthe Commission'sRulesandreferencedintheRowInstructions.Carriersmustexplainany deviationsinfootnotes.Donotincludeexplanatorynotesinthetransmittalletter;such notesmustbeincludedintheFootnotessectionofthefilingasindicatedinthe AutomatedReportSpecificationsandPaperReportSpecifications. 3.AdjustmentstoaccommodatereallocationofcommonpowercostsinPart36fromthe assignmentmethodinPart32mustbecompletedbeforeenteringdatainthisreport. AlthoughthereallocationofcommonpowercostsbetweenCOEcategoriesdoesnot occuruntilCOEisseparated,theseadjustmentsmustbemadepriortoenteringdatain theAccessReportinordertopreserveitslinearintegrity.Iftheseadjustmentsarenot madepriortoenteringthedatainthisreport,columns(p)plus(q)plus(r)willnot equalcolumn(d)forrows1100through1400. 4.WhenreportinginvestmentamountsforPlant,OtherInvestment,andReserves,usethe sameaveragingmethodologyasinstructedfortheARMISReport43-03.When reportingRevenues,Expenses,Taxes,Return(exceptrateofreturn),andRevenue Requirementdata,carriersmustprovidethetotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly, quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies.Whenreportingallocationfactors,carriersmust reportdataasfollows:(1)usageamounts,suchasminutes,shouldbereportedastotal annualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudiesthatrepresentthe totalusagefor365days.Forexample,sevendaystudiesmustbeprojectedtoreflect eachmonth'stotalusageforatotaloftwelvemonths;(2)expensesorrevenues,when usedasanallocationfactor,shouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumof monthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies;(3)allocationfactorssuchasweightedactual contactsshouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,or semi-annualstudies;(4)percentageallocationfactors,suchastheLoopAllocation Factor,shouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage;and(5)terminations,users, andmilesshouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage. Page3of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 5.Alldatamustbereported"asearned,"i.e.,afteradjustmentstopriorperiodsandSNFA adjustments. 6.Ifanentryistobeasubtraction,indicatesobyplacingaminussigninthecolumn immediatelyprecedingthenumericdata,e.g.,use-4,NOT-4or(4)forthedatadisk file. 7.Thegeneralstructureofthisreportisasfollows.Amountsthatacarrierallocates betweenjurisdictionsand/oramongaccesscategoriesandelementsareindicatedon rowsnotdesignated"forallocation."Theserowsarefollowedbyrowsindicatingthe allocationfactorusedtoallocatetheprecedinglines.Alldirectlyassignedamounts mustbereportedonrowsthatarenotdesignated"forallocation."Thesymbol"#" precedingtheapplicablerowdescriptionwouldindicateitemsthatarenotdollarsor percentages(e.g.,minutes,miles,conversationalminutes,workingloops,etc.)Alldata thatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestpenny(e.g.,costperloop)is indicatedbyasymbol"$"(dollarsign)precedingtheapplicablerowdescription.All datathatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestthousand(e.g.,equalaccess investment)isindicatedbythesymbol"K$"precedingtheapplicablerowdescription. Allfactorsthatmustbereportedasapercentageareprecededbythesymbol"%" (percentsign).Thesymbol"%"intherowinstructionwouldindicateitemstobe enteredasapercent(e.g.,rateofreturn). 8.Incasesinwhichthetotalinterstateamountofthecostcategoryisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoPart69,thePart69datamustbereportedonthetotalrowforthatcategory asindicatedintherowinstructionsforthetotalrow.AllPart69amountsforacost categorymustequalthetotaloftheamountsallocatedtotheinterstatejurisdictionfor thatcategory. 9.AlltermsandabbreviationsusedinthereportandinstructionsaredefinedinSection 69.2oftheCommission'sRules,theGlossaryoftheSeparationsManual,andPart36 oftheCommission'sRules. 10.Alldollaramountsmustberoundedtothenearestthousand,withtheexceptionofrows 1273,1335,1453,1495,9005,9008and9009.Thedollaramountsintheserowsmust beroundedtothenearestpennyandsuchamountsmustbeenteredindollarsandcents (e.g.,ifcostperloopis$6.445,itmustbeenteredas6.45).Amountsofminutes (including,butnotlimitedto,connectionminutes,DEMsandMOU)mustberounded tothenearestmillion,exceptfortollminutes(onrow1127),whichmustberounded tothenearestthousand.Allsecondsincludingweightedstandardworksecondsmust beroundedtothousands.Allweightedactualcontacts,users,loops,accesslines, terminationsandnumberofhouseholdsreceivinglifelineconnectionassistance(row 9007)mustbereportedinwholenumbers.Allconversation-minute-milesmustbe roundedtothenearestmillion.Allcircuitmiles/kilometers(including,butnotlimited Page4of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 to,MOUmiles/kilometers)mustberoundedtothenearestthousand.Allrateofreturn amountsmustbeenteredinpercentandmustberoundedto2decimalplaces(e.g., 23.70561shouldbeenteredas23.71).Allotherpercentageamountsmustbeentered inpercentandmustberoundedto4decimalplaces(e.g.,23.70561shouldbeentered as23.7056).Allotheramounts(including,butnotlimitedto,serviceobservingunits, MTSmessages,PLaccountsandTWXconnections)mustberoundedtothenearest thousand. FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page96of158 I.EqualAccess Note:Thefirststepintheseparationsprocessistheremovalofequalaccesscosts fromtheprimaryaccounts.Thesecostsincludeonlyinitial,incrementalexpenditures forhardware,otherequipment,presubscription,andotherinitial,incremental expendituresrelateddirectlytotheprovisionofequalaccessandwhichexpenditures wouldnotberequiredtoupgradethecapabilitiesoftheofficeinvolvedabsentthe provisionofequalaccess.Equalaccessinvestmentandexpensesarelimitedtosuch expendituresforconvertingcentralofficesthatservecompetitiveinterexchange carriersincasesinwhichtherehasbeenabonafiderequestforconversiontoequal access.SeeSections36.191(a)and36.421.InSectionIoftheARMISAccess Report,carriersmustreportallcoststhatmeetthesecriteria.Insubsequentsections, carriersmustreportallothercostsafterremovingequalaccesscosts.Carriershaving anequalaccesselementmustenterthesecostsintheequalaccesscolumn(column k).Carriersnothavinganequalaccesselementmustenterthesecostsinthe appropriatecolumn. A.Investments 10 EqualAccessinvestmentinGeneralSupportFacilitiesthatisallocatedpursuantto Sections36.191(c)and69.308(a).SeealsoSection36.111. 11 EqualAccessminutes-of-useusedtoallocateEqualAccessinvestmentinGeneral SupportFacilitiespursuanttoSection36.191(c). 12 EqualAccessinvestmentinCategory2CentralOfficeEquipment(COE)thatis allocatedpursuanttoSections36.191(c)and69.308(a).SeealsoSection36.124. 13 EqualAccessminutes-of-useusedtoallocateEqualAccessinvestmentinCategory 2COEpursuanttoSection36.191(c). 14 EqualAccessinvestmentinCategory3COEthatisallocatedpursuanttoSections 36.191(c)and69.308(a). 15 EqualAccessminutes-of-useusedtoallocateEqualAccessinvestmentinCategory 3COEpursuanttoSection36.191(c). 16
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304PF98.PDF
  • containinganN/A,thecarriermustentertheamount(s)andanexplanationasafootnote tothefield.Theamount(s)mustnotbeenteredintheN/A'dfield.Allotherfields mustbepopulated.Iftherearenodataapplicabletoagivenfield,enterzero. 2.ReportingcarriersmustfollowthespecificinstructionsprovidedintheattachedColumn DescriptionsandRowInstructions.Inaddition,carriersmustfollowthejurisdictional separationsandaccesschargeproceduressetforthinParts36,65and69ofthe Commission'sRulesandreferencedintheRowInstructions.Carriersmustexplainany deviationsinfootnotes.Donotincludeexplanatorynotesinthetransmittalletter;such notesmustbeincludedintheFootnotessectionofthefilingasindicatedinthe AutomatedReportSpecificationsandPaperReportSpecifications. 3.AdjustmentstoaccommodatereallocationofcommonpowercostsinPart36fromthe assignmentmethodinPart32mustbecompletedbeforeenteringdatainthisreport. AlthoughthereallocationofcommonpowercostsbetweenCOEcategoriesdoesnot occuruntilCOEisseparated,theseadjustmentsmustbemadepriortoenteringdatain theAccessReportinordertopreserveitslinearintegrity.Iftheseadjustmentsarenot madepriortoenteringthedatainthisreport,columns(p)plus(q)plus(r)willnot equalcolumn(d)forrows1100through1400. 4.WhenreportinginvestmentamountsforPlant,OtherInvestment,andReserves,usethe sameaveragingmethodologyasinstructedfortheARMISReport43-03.When reportingRevenues,Expenses,Taxes,Return(exceptrateofreturn),andRevenue Requirementdata,carriersmustprovidethetotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly, quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies.Whenreportingallocationfactors,carriersmust reportdataasfollows:(1)usageamounts,suchasminutes,shouldbereportedastotal annualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudiesthatrepresentthe totalusagefor365days.Forexample,sevendaystudiesmustbeprojectedtoreflect eachmonth'stotalusageforatotaloftwelvemonths;(2)expensesorrevenues,when usedasanallocationfactor,shouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumof monthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies;(3)allocationfactorssuchasweightedactual contactsshouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,or semi-annualstudies;(4)percentageallocationfactors,suchastheLoopAllocation Factor,shouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage;and(5)terminations,users, andmilesshouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage. Page3of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 5.Alldatamustbereported"asearned,"i.e.,afteradjustmentstopriorperiodsandSNFA adjustments. 6.Ifanentryistobeasubtraction,indicatesobyplacingaminussigninthecolumn immediatelyprecedingthenumericdata,e.g.,use-4,NOT-4or(4)forthedatadisk file. 7.Thegeneralstructureofthisreportisasfollows.Amountsthatacarrierallocates betweenjurisdictionsand/oramongaccesscategoriesandelementsareindicatedon rowsnotdesignated"forallocation."Theserowsarefollowedbyrowsindicatingthe allocationfactorusedtoallocatetheprecedinglines.Alldirectlyassignedamounts mustbereportedonrowsthatarenotdesignated"forallocation."Thesymbol"#" precedingtheapplicablerowdescriptionwouldindicateitemsthatarenotdollarsor percentages(e.g.,minutes,miles,conversationalminutes,workingloops,etc.)Alldata thatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestpenny(e.g.,costperloop)is indicatedbyasymbol"$"(dollarsign)precedingtheapplicablerowdescription.All datathatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestthousand(e.g.,equalaccess investment)isindicatedbythesymbol"K$"precedingtheapplicablerowdescription. Allfactorsthatmustbereportedasapercentageareprecededbythesymbol"%" (percentsign).Thesymbol"%"intherowinstructionwouldindicateitemstobe enteredasapercent(e.g.,rateofreturn). 8.Incasesinwhichthetotalinterstateamountofthecostcategoryisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoPart69,thePart69datamustbereportedonthetotalrowforthatcategory asindicatedintherowinstructionsforthetotalrow.AllPart69amountsforacost categorymustequalthetotaloftheamountsallocatedtotheinterstatejurisdictionfor thatcategory. 9.AlltermsandabbreviationsusedinthereportandinstructionsaredefinedinSection 69.2oftheCommission'sRules,theGlossaryoftheSeparationsManual,andPart36 oftheCommission'sRules. 10.Alldollaramountsmustberoundedtothenearestthousand,withtheexceptionofrows 1273,1335,1453,1495,9005,9008and9009.Thedollaramountsintheserowsmust beroundedtothenearestpennyandsuchamountsmustbeenteredindollarsandcents (e.g.,ifcostperloopis$6.445,itmustbeenteredas6.45).Amountsofminutes (including,butnotlimitedto,connectionminutes,DEMsandMOU)mustberounded tothenearestmillion,exceptfortollminutes(onrow1127),whichmustberounded tothenearestthousand.Allsecondsincludingweightedstandardworksecondsmust beroundedtothousands.Allweightedactualcontacts,users,loops,accesslines, terminationsandnumberofhouseholdsreceivinglifelineconnectionassistance(row 9007)mustbereportedinwholenumbers.Allconversation-minute-milesmustbe roundedtothenearestmillion.Allcircuitmiles/kilometers(including,butnotlimited Page4of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 to,MOUmiles/kilometers)mustberoundedtothenearestthousand.Allrateofreturn amountsmustbeenteredinpercentandmustberoundedto2decimalplaces(e.g., 23.70561shouldbeenteredas23.71).Allotherpercentageamountsmustbeentered inpercentandmustberoundedto4decimalplaces(e.g.,23.70561shouldbeentered as23.7056).Allotheramounts(including,butnotlimitedto,serviceobservingunits, MTSmessages,PLaccountsandTWXconnections)mustberoundedtothenearest thousand. FCC Report 43-04 - Report Definition - Form December 1998 Page 5 of 158 FCC Report 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT COMPANY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX Version STUDY AREA: XXXXXXXXXXXX SUBMISSION XXX PERIOD: From mmm yyyyy To mmm yyyyy TABLE I
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4304C99.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4304P99.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4304C00.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4304P00.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2001PDFs/4304C01.PDF
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2002PDFs/4304c02.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2002PDFs/4304p02.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2003PDFs/4304c03.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2003PDFs/4304p03.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2004PDFs/4304c04.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2004PDFs/4304p04.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2005PDFs/4304c05.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2005PDFs/4304p05.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2006PDFs/4304c06.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2006PDFs/4304p06.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2007PDFs/4304c07.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2007PDFs/4304p07.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/dkt_86_182_order_da_90_30.pdf
  • read, "Total Telecommunications Property, the total of rows 1540, 2240, and row 2250". Row 3080 -The instruction is revised to read, "Total accumulated depreciation, total of rows 40,3010,3020,3030,3040, 3050, 3060, and 3010". Row 3090 -The instruction is revised to read, "Accumulated amortization of capital leases associated with General Support Facilities and which accumulated amortization is allocated pursuant to Sections 36.505(a), 69.2(z), and 69.301(a)". Row 3091 -The instruction is revised to read, "General Support Facilities investment used to allocate accumulated amortization of associated capital leases pursuant to Sections 36.505(a), 69.2(z), and 69.301(a)". Row 3100 -The instruction is revised to read, "Accumulated amortization of capital leases associated with Switching Equipment and which accumulated amortization is allocated pursuant to Sections 36.505(a), 69.2(z), and 69.301(a)".
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/order_da_91_143.pdf
  • and 69." Taxes not Row 3340 is revised to read, "Total Net Current Deferred Operating Income Taxes, total of rows 44,3280,3290,3300,3310,3320,3330, and 3332. If net current deferred operating income taxes are apportioned among the access elements based on Teleconununicationfl Plant in Service, enter the amounts of net current deferred operating income l:.axes on this -row, pursuant to Parts 36.506 and 69.2(z) and 69.301(a);!' Row 3402 is added. It reads, "Other IfJet Noncurrent Deferred Operating Income Taxes not included above that are allocated pursuant to Parts 36.506 and 69.2(a) and 69.301(a)". Row 3410 is revised to read, "Total Net Noncurrent Deferred Operating Income Taxes, total of rows 46,3350,3360,3370,3380,3390,3400 and 3402. If net noncurrent deferred operating income taxes are apportioned among the access
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/archive/2006ord.html
  • Application filed for the Acquisition of Selected Assets of Qwest Corporation by Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. * Streamlined Pleading Cycle Established WC Docket No. 06-82 Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. and Qwest Corporation Seek Waiver of the Study Area Boundary Freeze as Codified in Part 36, and Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. Seeks Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(B), 54.305, 54.314(D), 54.903(A), 69.2(Hh), 69.3(E)(6) and 69.3(E)(11) of the Commission's Rules * Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. Seeks Waiver of the Commission's Stay of the Provision of Enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up Support to Customers on Near-Tribal Lands DA 06-934 CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109. Comments Due: 5/11/06. Replies Due: 5/18/06. [379]Word | [380]Acrobat 04/26/06 PUBLIC NOTICE: Domestic Section 214 Application filed for
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/2005archive.html
  • port telephone numbers geographically outside of rate centers during this period of service disruption. (Dkt No. 95-116 , 99-200). [62][Word] [63][Acrobat] 8/22/2005 Public Notice:Qwest Corporation Petition For Waiver Of Depreciation Regulation. (Dkt No 05-259) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 09/21/2005. Reply Comments Due: 10/06/2005. [64][Word] [65][Acrobat] 8/11/2005 Order: Westgate Communications And Beaver Creek Telephone Company's Requests For Waiver Of Sections 69.2(HH) And 69.601 Of The Commission's Rules. Granted the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-69 , 05-58). [66][Word] [67][Acrobat] 8/11/2005 Order: Allband Communications Cooperative Petition For Waiver Of Sections 69.2(HH) And 69.601 Of The Commission's Rules. Granted Allband's Request for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-174). [68][Word] [69][Acrobat] 8/8/2005 Public Notice:SBC Files Cost Allocation Manual Revision. (DA No. 05-2261). Comments Due: 09/06/2005. Reply
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/Archives/highcost2001archive.html
  • announces posting of updated Turbo-Pascal version of the cost model. Comments Due: 45 days from publication in Federal Register. Reply Comments Due: 60 days from publication in Federal Register. (Dkt No. CC-96-45, Released 6/20/01) DA No. 01-1458. [60]Text [61]Word The Common Carrier Bureau released a Public Notice announcing that Skyline Telephone is seeking a waiver of sections 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2(HH) Universal Service Fund" to provide expedited and economic service to previously unserved areas. Comments Due: 06/29/2001 Reply Comments Due: 07/16/2001. (Dkt No 96-45, DA No. 01-1414, released 6/15/01) [62]Text [63]Word Common Carrier Bureau released an Order granting the requests from Amana Colonies Telephone Company and South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company: for a waiver of the definition of "study area" contained
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/Archives/highcost2005archive.html
  • this order released today, we grant petition of NTELOS to be designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) for requested service areas in Virginia. [48]Word | [49]Acrobat 5/16/05 Order: In this order released today, we grant a request from Sandwich Isles for waiver of the study area boundary freeze codified in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36, and sections 36.611 and 69.2(hh) of the Commissions rules. We also grant Sandwich Isles a waiver of the definition of incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) in Part 36 and in section 54.5 of the Commissions rules to the limited extent necessary to permit Sandwich Isles to receive universal service support based on its own costs. These waivers will permit Sandwich Isles to continue being treated
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.pdf
  • id. at � 371 (``Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ....''). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of ``end user'' found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ...''); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, � 2.6 (1984) (``ECA Tariff Order'') (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define ``end user'');
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.pdf
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. �� 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of ``end user'' in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff � 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: ``The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.pdf
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 69.4(a) (``The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ....''); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, � 10 (1983) (``Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings.''), 345, Appendix A, � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-519A1.txt
  • in December 1992, and TFN was acquired by LDDS in August 1992. Id. at 1. For purposes of this order, we treat LDDS as the entity that purchased the relevant services. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 148-49 (1930) (requiring ``separation of the intrastate and interstate property, revenues and expenses'' of LECs); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b), 69.3(a) (in combination, requiring filing of interstate access tariffs at FCC). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 151 (assigning to FCC the regulation of ``interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio''); id. � 152(b) (excluding from FCC jurisdiction matters relating to ``intrastate communication service by wire or radio''). The Commission previously has recognized that LECs are not able
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.txt
  • of their payphones, and thus this proceeding concerns rules that are not currently in effect. The Commission's Liability Order IPPs Not End Users The Commission's Liability Order responded to the court's remand of an earlier Commission ruling. The Commission's earlier ruling held that IPP payphones were subject to a EUCL charge because the IPPs were "end users" pursuant to section 69.2(m) of the rules. But on remand from an appeal of that decision, the Commission reversed itself and concluded in the Liability Order that, although C.F. Communications and other IPPs own the payphones, they cannot be considered "end users" under section 69.2(m), because they do not own the premises where their payphones are located. IPPs Must Pay EUCL Charge Nonetheless, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.txt
  • generally file biennial revisions in even numbered years (47 C.F.R. �69.3 (f)(1)). 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. These carriers generally file biennial revisions in odd numbered years (47 C.F.R. �69.3(f)(1)). Regulatory Reform for Local Exchange Carriers Subject to Rate of Return Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 4545 (1993) (Regulatory Reform Order), recon. pending. Regulatory Reform Order at para. 97. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b) and (z). Some companies that, on their own, would qualify as small telephone companies are not so classified either because 1) they are affiliated with companies that are NECA Subset 2 companies or 2) the combined study areas of a company and its affiliates are greater than 50,000 access lines. 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(f)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 61.39(b). Annual 1987
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1279A1.doc
  • Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 00-256, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 00-448 (Jan. 25, 2001). For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o); see also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14287. Id. at 14234-35.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY FILED A PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2 (hh) ``UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND'' OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC DKT 96-45 Released Date: June 15, 2001 Comment Date: June 29, 2001 Reply Date: July 16, 2001 On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company (Skyline Telephone) filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F. R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order applies only to price cap LECs, that is, those LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14,234 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) of the Commission's rules for a definition of an MSA. A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o); see also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing the required composition of the contract-based tariffs). See Pricing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.txt
  • No. 00-256, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 00-448 (Jan. 25, 2001). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Interexchange Competition Order, 6 FCC Rcd. 5880, 5897 (1991); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.txt
  • No. 96-45; and Report and Order in CC Docket Nos. 98-77 and 98-166, FCC 01-304 (rel. November 8, 2001). For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o); see also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14287. Id. at 14234-35.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.txt
  • and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd. 19613 (2001). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Interexchange Competition Order, 6 FCC Rcd. 5880, 5897 (1991); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See also 47 C.F.R. � 61.55 (describing required composition of contract-based tariffs). Pricing Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.txt
  • to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, the term ``dedicated transport services'' refers to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport) and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.txt
  • 2220, and 2230 respectively, per Section 69.401(b). Note 2 - OPP Expense (Account 6510) and Networks Operations Expense (Account 6530) are allocated on COE, IOT, and C&WF investment (Rows 1410, 1440, and 1530) combined, per Sections 36.353(b) and 69.401(d). Note 3 - Excluding Billing and Collections Note 4 - Corporate Operations Expense is allocated on Big 3 Expenses, per Sections 69.2(e) and 69.2(f). Report Definition - Row/Column Instructions The following row instructions are deleted: Rows 4013, 3220, 3230, 3240, 3250, 3260, and 3270. Row 4010 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``End User Revenue that is directly assigned pursuant to Sections 36.213(b) and 36.213(e).'' Row 4011 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``Switched
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.txt
  • applies only to LECs that are subject to price cap regulation. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). A contract tariff is a tariff based on an individually negotiated service contract. See Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, CC Docket No. 90-132, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 5880, 5897 (1991) (Interexchange Competition Order); 47 C.F.R. � 61.3(o). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.txt
  • Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3203A2.txt
  • 14995.4 935844.0 935844.0 TX BELTON KNCT 9754 46 575. 384 305912.0 38 200. 360 3059 8.0 1125255 21468.9 973747.0 973751.0 TX BIG SPRING KWAB-TV 42008 4 12.9 116 321514.0 33 174. 83 321655.0 72654 10805.3 1012644.0 1012934.0 TX BROWNSVILLE KVEO 12523 23 2570. 445 2606 1.0 24 1000. 445 2606 1.7 959065 35541.9 975020.0 975020.4 TX BRYAN KBTX-TV 6669 3 69.2 515 303310.0 50 1000. 477 303316.0 2924634 35977.0 960150.0 960151.0 TX BRYAN KYLE 60384 28 2090. 220 304118.0 29 50. 220 304118.0 271378 13121.5 962535.0 962535.0 TX COLLEGE STATION KAMU-TV 65301 15 22.9 119 303748.0 12 3.2 105 303747.0 271751 12545.6 962033.0 962033.0 TX CONROE KTBU 28324 55 5000. 554 301353.0 42 1000. 597 293344.0 4836674 38457.3 950726.0 953035.0 TX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.txt
  • 4954-55, paras. 10-13. VarTec Reply at 2. VarTec Reply at 7-12. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 148-49 (1930) (``The separation of the intrastate and interstate property, revenues, and expenses'' of LECs ``is essential to the appropriate recognition of the competent governmental authority in each field of regulation.''); 47 U.S.C. � 203(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b), 69.3(a) (in combination requiring filing of interstate access tariffs at the Commission). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 151 (creating the Commission ``[f]or the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio'') and 152(b) (excluding from Commission jurisdiction matters relating to ``intrastate communication service by wire or radio''). Determination of Interstate and Intrastate Usage of Feature
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3687A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-3687 Released Date: November 24, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE PETITIONS OF DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY, LLC, QWEST CORPORATION, AND DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC., TO WAIVE THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE, AS CODIFIED IN PART 36, AND SECTIONS 69.2(hh) AND 69.605(c) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45 Comment Date: December 8, 2004 Reply Comment Date: December 15, 2004 On November 2, 2004, Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC (Direct Communications) and Qwest Corporation (Qwest) filed a joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze, as codified in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.txt
  • 9754 46 575. 00384 0305912.0 38 200. 00360 03059 8.0 793151 14609.9 1120896 21472.9 00973747.0 00973751.0 TX BIG SPRING KWAB-TV 42008 04 12.9 00116 0321514.0 33 174. 00083 0321655.0 58643 11918.4 96274 10867.2 01012644.0 01012934.0 TX BROWNSVILLE KVEO 12523 23 2570. 00445 02606 1.0 24 1000. 00445 02606 1.7 933723 22488.8 959065 35542.0 00975020.0 00975020.4 TX BRYAN KBTX-TV 6669 03 69.2 00515 0303310.0 50 1000. 00477 0303316.0 702060 30178.2 2928907 36001.1 00960150.0 00960151.0 TX BRYAN KYLE-DT 60384 28 2090. 00220 0304118.0 29 50.0 220.0 304118 269879 12721.8 269850 12725.8 00962535.0 962535 TX COLLEGE STATION KAMU-DT 65301 15 22.9 00119 0303748.0 12 3.20 119.0 303748 164938 3871.0 275684 12709.3 00962033.0 962033 TX CONROE KPXB 58835 49 4270. 00359 0301545.0 05 9.5 00555
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-105A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-105 SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER NUNC PRO TUNC OF THE DEFINTION OF ``STUDY AREA'' IN PART 36 AND SECTIONS 36.611 AND 69.2(hh) COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45 Release Date: January 18, 2005 Comment Date: February 8, 2005 Reply Comment Date: February 22, 2005 On December 27, 2004, Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. (Sandwich Isles), filed a petition requesting waiver, nunc pro tunc, of the definition of ``Study Area,'' as codified in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36, and sections 36.611
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1220 Released: April 27, 2005 ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2(hh) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED WC Docket No. 05-174 COMMENTS: May 19, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: June 2, 2005 By this Public Notice, we seek comment on a petition filed on April 7, 2005 by Allband Communications Cooperative (Allband) requesting waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. Allband intends to provide local exchange service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit L Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary and Sections 36.611, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: May 16, 2005 Released: May 16, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant a request from Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. (Sandwich Isles) for waiver, nunc pro tunc, of the study area boundary freeze codified in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201 and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and protect consumers by preventing the exercise of market power by incumbent local exchange carriers by ensuring that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules also provide definitions for terms used in rules. Need: Sections 69.2(uu) and (vv) define the terms ``price cap regulation'' and ``signalling for tandem switching'' and are essential for the implementation and understanding of other rule sections. Section 69.4(b)(9) was added to help correct the misallocation of general support facility investment and related expenses among the part 69 cost categories for local exchange carriers. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1544 Released: May 27, 2005 ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a ADAK TELEPHONE UTILITY SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) AND 69.3(e)(6) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND, IF NECESSARY, A WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45 Comments Due: June 13, 2005 Reply Comments Due: June 20, 2005 On February 9, 2005, Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility (Adak) filed a petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Allband Communications Cooperative Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 05-174 Adopted: August 11, 2005 Released: August 11, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant the request of Allband Communications Cooperative (Allband) for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. We also grant Allband waivers of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's Rules Beaver Creek Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 05-58 WC Docket No. 05-69 Adopted: August 11, 2005 Released: August 11, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.txt
  • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit & & & � � & : n & � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC and Qwest Corporation Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules Petition for Waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.605(c) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: November 29, 2005 Released: November 29, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: introduction In this Order, we grant a joint request from Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC (Direct Communications) and Qwest Corporation (Qwest)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 4 4 4 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: December 29, 2005 Released: December 30, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we grant Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility (Adak Telephone), a new local exchange carrier (LEC) in Alaska, waivers of certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-593 Released: March 4, 2005 BEAVER CREEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED WC Docket No. 05-69 COMMENTS: March 25, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 8, 2005 By this Public Notice, we seek comment on a petition filed on December 8, 2004 by Beaver Creek Telephone Company (Beaver Creek) requesting waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. Beaver Creek is a new
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-595 Released: March 4, 2005 WESTGATE COMMUNICATIONS LLC d/b/a WEAVTEL PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED WC Docket No. 05-58 COMMENTS: March 25, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS: April 8, 2005 By this Public Notice, we seek comment on a petition filed on August 18, 2004 by Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel (WeavTel) requesting waiver of Sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. WeavTel is a new local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.txt
  • grant these waivers on our own motion to permit Skyline Telephone to be eligible to receive high-cost universal service support, beginning in 2004, consistent with the Commission's intention as articulated in the Skyline Order. Background In the Skyline Order, the Commission dismissed in part, and granted in part, a request from Skyline Telephone for waiver of sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's rules and on its own motion waived the study area definition in Part 36 of the Commission's rules. The Commission concluded that to grant Skyline the relief it sought, the Commission had to grant waivers beyond those Skyline Telephone specifically sought. The Commission found that a study area waiver was required in order for Skyline Telephone to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.txt
  • Waiver Filed by Alaska Telephone Company, Ducor Telephone Company, and Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Concerning the Definition of ``Study Area'' in the Part 36 Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 8156, 8160, at para. 9 (Com. Car. Bur. 1996). See M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6766, at para. 11 (2004). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov M
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.txt
  • its New Mexico study area and permit Sacred Wind to establish a new study area in New Mexico. Sacred Wind also seeks waiver of certain Commission rules so that it may receive immediate federal high-cost universal service support and enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up support for serving eligible residents of near-Tribal lands. Specifically, Sacred Wind requests waivers of sections 36.611, 36.612, 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6), and 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission's rules. Waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules would enable Sacred Wind to receive immediate high-cost loop support payments based on projected costs until historical costs become available. Waiver of sections 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6), and 69.3(e)(11) would permit Sacred Wind to become a member of NECA and to participate immediately in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 4 4 4 � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: November 27, 2006 Released: November 27, 2006 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: In this Order, we extend the timing of the waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules granted to Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). A contract tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-934A1.txt
  • 214 APPLICATION FILED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SELECTED ASSETS OF QWEST CORPORATION BY SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. STREAMLINED Pleading Cycle Established WC Docket No. 06-82 SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND QWEST CORPORATION SEEK WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36, AND SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.305, 54.314(d), 54.903(a), 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6) AND 69.3(e)(11) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF THE COMMISSION'S STAY OF THE PROVISION OF ENHANCED LIFELINE AND LINK-UP SUPPORT TO CUSTOMERS ON NEAR-TRIBAL LANDS PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109 Comments Due: May 11, 2006 Reply Comments Due: May 18, 2006 On March 30, 2006, Qwest Corporation (``Qwest'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Signal = DMIN + 3 dB Table A-3. D/U Statistics for 8 Receivers at D = DMIN + 3 dB on Channel 30 Undesired Channel Best D/U (dB) Median D/U (dB) Mean D/U (dB) 2nd Worst D/U (dB) Worst D/U (dB) Standard Deviation (dB) N-16 < -76.0 -73.2 < -72.3 -67.8 -67.8 > 3.4 N-15 < -76.0 -71.4 < -72.1 -69.2 -69.0 > 2.8 N-14 < -75.3 -72.7 < -71.8 -67.6 -67.1 > 3.4 N-13 < -74.8 -72.9 < -71.4 -66.7 -65.3 > 3.9 N-12 < -74.8 -72.3 < -70.7 -65.2 -63.5 > 4.5 N-11 < -74.6 -70.5 < -68.9 -63.5 -61.6 > 4.8 N-10 < -74.7 -68.7 < -67.8 -61.8 -59.6 > 5.0 N-9 < -74.1 -67.2 < -65.3 -59.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For pricing flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.txt
  • to its first customer. Allband further requests that the Commission grant on its own motion any additional waivers of the Commission's rules necessary to expedite Allband's receipt of all federal universal service support and participation in National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pools. On August 11, 2005, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) granted a request from Allband for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules to allow Allband to participate in NECA tariffs and pools. In addition, the Bureau granted Allband waivers of the definition of incumbent local exchange carrier in Part 36 and section 54.5 of the Commission's rules to the limited extent necessary to permit Allband to receive universal service support based on its own costs. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 4.3 + -4.4 - Live Angle 39.3 41.0 38.6 33.1 39.3 7.9 + -0.7 - Content Angle 50.2 46.8 40.7 50.2 51.1 -3.4 - -10.4 - Origination Angle 33.4 12.1 30.3 25.9 33.8 -13.8 - -3.5 - Live Angle 38.3 40.6 31.2 39.0 38.9 1.5 + -7.7 - Content Angle 52.0. 48.9 76.8 52.2 -3.3 - Origination Angle 41.2. 38.5 69.2 41.3 -2.8 - Live Angle 42.7. 39.1 56.4 42.9 -3.8 - Content Angle 64.0 86.2 61.3 57.9 64.1 28.3 + -2.9 - Origination Angle 40.3 5.4 24.9 2.5 41.5 2.9 + -16.5 - Live Angle 41.4 5.9 38.9 24.8 41.7 -18.9 - -2.9 - Content Angle 55.5 86.4 49.6 58.1 55.9 28.3 + -6.4 - Origination Angle 26.6 12.3 12.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.txt
  • please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Osirus Communications, Inc., Petition for Waivers of the Commission's Rules to Participate in NECA Pools and Tariffs and to Obtain Accelerated USF Support, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 2, 2007) (Petition). Specifically, Osirus seeks a waiver of sections 69.2(hh), 69.601, and 69.3(e) to allow Osirus to become a member of NECA and to immediately participate in NECA pools; sections 36.611 and 36.612 to allow accelerated high-cost loop support; the July 1, 2007 and October 1, 2007 state certification deadlines set forth in section 54.314(d); and data filing deadlines set forth in sections 54.301(b) and 54.903(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(hh),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). In its petition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules (filed Mar. 12, 2008) (ETS Request); M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6766, at paras. 11-13 (2004) (Skyline Order). See Request for Clarification Filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., and Petitions for Waiver Filed by Alaska Telephone Company, Ducor Telephone Company, and Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Concerning the Definition of ``Study Area'' in the Part 36 Appendix-Glossary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • -44.7 O O 42 ATSC Y Y ATSC -43.9 O O 43 NTSC N Y NTSC -72.7 A A ATSC N N 44 - N N - - A A 45 NTSC Y Y NTSC -23.0 O O 46 ATSC Y Y ATSC -20.7 O O 47 ATSC N N NTSC -78.7 A A 48 ATSC Y N ATSC < -69.2 O O 49 NTSC N N NTSC -93.1 A A 50 NTSC Y Y NTSC -66.1 O A 51 ATSC Y N NTSC -69.1 O O TABLE 5-10. I2R WSD Prototype Results at Test Site 2. CH Signal Type (Database) Within Service Contour? (Y/N) Viewable? (Y/N) Signal Type (Measured) Measured Power Level (dBm) Occupied (O) & Available (A) Channels Reported
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.txt
  • 35 D 596.3 -62.6 Y 36 D 602.3 -62.2 Y 37 38 D 614.3 -16 Y 39 D 620.3 -65.3 N 40 D 626.3 -20.4 Y 41 D 632.3 -44.7 Y 42 D 638.3 -43.9 Y 43 N 645.25 -72.7 6 44 45 N 657.25 -23 2 46 D 662.3 -20.7 Y 47 N 669.2 -78.7 N 48 D 674.3 <-69.2 N 49 N 681.2 -93.1 N 50 N 687.25 -66.1 5 51 N 693.2 -69.1 N Table C-6. Measurement Results - Ellicott City Site Channel Signal Type (N or D) Frequency (MHz) Measured Power (dBm) Viewable (Picture/TASO) Reported PSIP 21 N 513.25 -95.7 N 22 N 519.28 -29.8 1 23 N 525.2 -72 N 24 N 531.26 -39.2 1 25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout that area). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.txt
  • Date: June 22, 2009 On April 1, 2009, DTS of CA, Inc. (DTS) filed a petition for waiver of the Commission's rules to allow it to participate in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pools and tariffs and to obtain accelerated universal service support. First, DTS seeks a waiver of the definition of ``incumbent local exchange carrier'' in sections 54.5, 69.2(hh), and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, and of the annual election filing deadline in section 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's rules, to allow DTS to become a member of NECA and to immediately participate in NECA pools and tariffs. Second, DTS seeks a waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules to allow DTS to receive universal service high-cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.txt
  • 96-45 Comment Date: August 20, 2009 Reply Comment Date: September 4, 2009 On April 20, 2009, Huron Mountain Communications Co. (Huron) filed a petition for waiver of the Commission's rules to participate in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pools and to obtain accelerated universal service support. Specifically, Huron requests: 1) waiver of the definition of ``telephone company'' in sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, and of the annual election filing deadline in section 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's rules to allow Huron to become a member of NECA and to immediately participate in NECA pools and tariffs; 2) a declaratory ruling that a waiver of the definition of ``study area'' in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. Part 36 App.; Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., and Oregon Telephone Corporation, Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed May 4, 2006) (Qwest-Pine-Oregon Petition). See M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6765, para. 10 (2004) (Skyline Order). See MTS and WATS Market Structure, Amendment of Part 67 of the Commission's Rules and Establishment of a Joint Board, CC Docket Nos. 78-72, 80-286, Decision and Order, 50 Fed. Reg. 939 (1985) (Part 67 Order); see also 47 C.F.R. Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.txt
  • Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14224, para. 1 n.1. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14225, para. 3. For purposes of pricing flexibility proceedings, ``dedicated transport services'' refer to services associated with entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport. Id. at 14234, para. 24 n.54. These services are defined in 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(oo) (direct-trunked transport), � 69.2(qq) (entrance facilities), and � 69.2(ss) (tandem-switched transport). See 47 C.F.R. � 22.909(a) (definition of MSA). See also Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14261, para. 76 (pricing flexibility will be granted to price cap LECs within the non-MSA parts of a study area if they satisfy the applicable triggers throughout these parts). For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.txt
  • if both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). . See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761 (2004); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline Comp. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.txt
  • 54.305(b). See Qwest/Iowa Telecom Petition at 3. Id. We have no reason to believe the estimate of $300 would be significantly different since the time the petition was filed and, nevertheless, any additional support for these five transferred lines would be de minimis. See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, (2004) (Skyline Order); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.txt
  • in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, and Petition for Waiver of Section 61.41(c) of the Commission's Rules, AAD 94-27, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 4644 (1997). 47 C.F.R. Part 36 App. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). See Petition at 5; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). See Accipiter estimates that potential annual ICLS for the subject area would range between $166,000 and $216,000 by year three of operation depending on the degree of build-out and market penetration. See Accipiter December 17 Ex Parte Letter at 6-7.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1880A1.txt
  • the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 4672 (2002). The term ``Bureau'' in this order refers to the Common Carrier Bureau prior to the reorganization, and to the Wireline Competition Bureau after the reorganization. See Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc., Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary and Sections 36.611 and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 8999, 8999-9000, para. 1 (Wir. Comp. Bur. 2005) (Study Area Waiver Order). On June 15, 2005, Hawaiian Telcom filed an application for review of the Bureau's order, which remains pending. Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. Application for Review, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June 15, 2005). See id. at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.txt
  • rural customers for cost-recovery of amounts that otherwise should be recovered through universal service support in a manner consistent with Commission policy and practice. Finally, Direct states that the relief sought has been granted by the Commission to other carriers in similar circumstances. Allband Petition for Waiver On April 7, 2005, Allband filed a petition requesting a waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules to allow it to join NECA and to participate in NECA tariffs and pools. Allband also requested a waiver of certification and data filing deadlines contained in Part 54 of the Commission's rules that would prevent it from receiving universal service high-cost loop, local switching, and interstate common line support ``on the date on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.txt
  • at Exhibit B (attaching Joint Application of Dubois Telephone Exchange, Inc., and Qwest Corporation for Authority to Transfer, Assign, and Acquire Certain Certificated and Uncertificated Areas, Docket No. 70000-1361-TA-07, Docket No. 70007-48-TA-07 (Record No. 11464), Order (Wyoming Commission, Jan. 10, 2008)). See Petition at 3-4; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). The Petitioners claim that the incremental universal service support to be received by Dubois as a result of this transaction is zero. See Petition at 4. See, e.g., US WEST Communications, Inc., and Eagle Telecommunications, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.txt
  • this transaction, could approach the current one-percent threshold of $49 million. See Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanism, Fund Size Projection for the Second Quarter 2010, Table HC02 (Jan. 29, 2010) (projecting total annual high-cost support of approximately $4.9 billion). See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761 (2004); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline Comp. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.txt
  • this transaction, could approach the current one-percent threshold of $49 million. See Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanism, Fund Size Projection for the Second Quarter 2010, Table HC02 (Jan. 29, 2010) (projecting total annual high-cost support of approximately $4.9 billion). See, e.g., M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761 (2004); Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., Oregon Telephone Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4986 (Wireline Comp. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.txt
  • both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008), Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). See Petition at 5; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). Because the per-line support limitation in section 54.305(b) does not apply to these transfers, El Paso will be eligible, as a rural carrier, to receive universal service high-cost support based on the average cost per loop of all of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.txt
  • both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008), Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.305(b). See Petition at 1-2; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6767, para. 16 (2004) (Skyline Order). Because the per-line support limitation in section 54.305(b) does not apply to these transfers, Range will be eligible, as a rural carrier, to receive universal service high-cost support based on the average costs of all its lines. See generally 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.txt
  • waivers, in light of the Commission's 2004 Skyline Order in which the Commission concluded that treating an area as unserved when it is part of an existing study area would be inconsistent with the purpose of the study area freeze. Id. at 4987-8, para. 4; M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6761, 6765, para. 11 (2004) (Skyline Order). The Skyline Order clarified that ``a study area waiver must be filed with the Commission where a company is seeking to create a new study area from within one or more existing study areas.'' Skyline Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6767,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A2.txt
  • Rulemaking Filed In 1995 CC RM-8606 View RM-8606edocs: RM-8606 2/27/1995 4311/20/1995Disclosures byOperator Service Providers of Serving Public Radio CC RM-8585 View RM-8585edocs: RM-8585 2/2/1995 1211/29/1995Establishment of a Funding Mechanism for Interstate Operator Assistance for the Deaf CC PRM96CC View PRM96CCedocs: PRM96CC 1/17/1996 11/16/1996Common Carrier Bureau Petitions for Rulemaking Filed In 1996 CC RM-8723 View RM-8723edocs: RM-8723 11/3/1995 152/13/1996Amendment of Section 69.2 (m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones within the Public Telephone Exemption from End-User Common-Line Access Charges CC RM-8303 View RM-8303edocs: RM-8303 8/2/1993 313/15/1996Request Amendment of the Rules to Determine the Terms and Conditions Under Which Tier 1 LECs Should be Permitted to Provide InterLATA Telecommunications Services CC RM-8708 View RM-8708edocs: RM-8708 10/12/1995 12 4/1/1996Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A2.txt
  • Wireline Bureau Bureau in ECFS Proceeding #ECFS Link EDOCS Link Date CreatedFilingsLast FilingSubject WC 05-56 View 05-56 edocs: 05-56 2/11/2005 75/12/2005Joint Appplication of Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. and Westcom Corp. for Transfer of Control of Certain Domestic and International Lines. WC 05-58 View 05-58 edocs: 05-58 2/11/2005 68/11/2005In re Petition of WestGate Commnications LLC d/b/a Weavtel for Waiver of Section 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's to Allow New Local Exchange Carrier to Participate in National Exchange Carrier Association Tariffs and Pools. .. WC 05-64 View 05-64 edocs: 05-64 2/15/2005 42/28/2005In the Matter of MercedNet, Inc. Section 63.71 Application to Domestic Non-Dominant Telecommunications Services in the Merced, California Basic Trading Area. .. WC 05-69 View 05-69 edocs: 05-69 2/17/2005 38/11/2005In re
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1446A1.txt
  • of 15.5 West Longitude and will serve as the primary Inmarsat operational satellite for the Atlantic Ocean Region-East (AOR-East) to support Inmarsat maritime, aeronautical, and land mobile satellite services. 3. The estimated costs associated with the Inmarsat-3 (F-2) satellite are as follows (all amounts in real year dollars): Cost of Spacecraft Manufacture (including delivery price, engineering changes and amendments) $ 69.2 million Launch Support Service $ 2.6 million 1 See Communications Satellite Corporation Application to Participate in Inmarsat Third Generation Satellites, 7 F.C.C. Red. 6278 (1992), petition for reconsideration pending. Our authorization today in no way prejudges Commission action on the Petition for Reconsideration. 10428 Performance Incentives $ 25.2 million Lease Interest Cost, Capitalized $ 23.2 million2 Consultancy $ 2.6 million
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • that either originating or terminating incumbent LECs would intentionally risk the collection of often significant per-minute access charge revenues 180 IXCs today incur access charges for originating access minutes of use from the time when the originating LEC hands a call off to the IXC's POP, regardless of whether the call is completed at the called location. 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(a). As a result, originating minutes of use are approximately seven percent greater than originating minutes of use. IXCs today do not generally choose to bill their customers directly for access minutes of use charged by the LEC for uncompleted calls or for the interval before the called party answers. Federal Communications Commission, Com. Car. Bur., Industry Analysis Division, Telecommunications Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204727A1.txt
  • report focuses on three categories of wireless services: mobile telephony, mobile data, and dispatch. The Fifth Report makes the following observations about these categories: Mobile Telephony: The mobile telephony sector has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Mobile telephony carriers continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. Over 172 million people, or 69 percent of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.txt
  • 59.2 3766.82 5997.3775 1720 G7DDT 57 3764.795 6004.9825 1720 G7DDT 57.8 3775.9775 6096.2725 437 G7DDT 58.6 3871.2725 6100.7275 218 G7DDT 54.2 3875.7275 6105.5425 1720 G7DDT 67.9 3880.5425 6108.0625 1720 G7DDT 63.8 3883.0625 6117.94 1720 G7DDT 57.5 4082.94 6119.9425 1720 G7DDT 56.4 4084.9525 6121.945 1720 G7DDT 57.5 4086.954 6123.9475 1720 G7DDT 55.3 4088.9475 6238.9675 1720 G7DDT 69.5 3934.2725 6240.88 1720 G7DDT 69.2 3936.185 6242.7925 1720 G7DDT 69.5 3940.01 6244.705 1720 G7DDT 68.6 3940.01 6249.5875 1720 G7DDT 50.5 4024.7 6255.1675 546 G7DDT 61.8 3912.5375 6273.9925 1720 G7DDT 71 3880.0475 6275.995 1720 G7DDT 71.1 3878.045 6277.9975 1720 G7DDT 71 3884.0525 6280 1720 G7DDT 71 3882.05 6316.9 1720 G7DDT 65.1 4090.7 6323.42 1720 G7DDT 61.6 4098.1275 6323.6675 437 G7DDT 62.4 4096.8675 6324.8825 1720 G7DDT 66.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213863A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 01-126; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1445 Pleading Cycle Established for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29*; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 01-126; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1445 Pleading Cycle Established for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29*; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 01-126; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1445 Pleading Cycle Established for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.txt
  • to provide domestic and international telecommunications services. Comments due within 30 days following the release of the Public Notice. Final action will be taken 31 days following the date of the Public Notice. Contact: Aaron Goldberger at (202) 418-1580. CC 96-45; PN 06/15/01; DA 01-1414 M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2(HH) "Universal Service Fund" of the Commission's Rules. On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 29*; replies due July 16. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400. CC 96-45; PN 06/20/01; DA 01-1458 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 100.0 1 0 100.0 87 100.0 Rhode Island 30 0 100.0 5 1 83.3 36 97.2 South Carolina 276 2 99.3 17 5 77.3 300 97.7 South Dakota 245 9 96.5 5 2 71.4 261 95.8 Tennessee 355 9 97.5 38 4 90.5 406 96.8 Texas 1,483 26 98.3 583 26 95.7 2,118 97.5 Utah 147 18 89.1 9 4 69.2 178 87.6 Vermont 132 2 98.5 2 0 100.0 136 98.5 Virgin Islands 5 0 100.0 0 0 NA 5 100.0 Virginia 461 7 98.5 49 10 83.1 527 96.8 Washington 359 8 97.8 58 5 92.1 430 97.0 West Virginia 228 6 97.4 6 2 75.0 242 96.7 Wisconsin 635 5 99.2 46 6 88.5 692 98.4 Wyoming 63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.txt
  • IF... *** MAGAZINES *** WERE NO LONGER AVAILABLE, HOW MUCH MORE LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO USE... *** BROADCAST TV CHANNELS *** FOR LOCAL OR NATIONAL NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS? BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO USE MAGAZINES MOST OFTEN AS THEIR SOURCE FOR LOCAL OR NATIONAL NEWS TOTAL ----- UNWEIGHTED TOTAL 15 WEIGHTED TOTAL 1247 (000) 100.0 TOP 2 BOX (%4-5) ---------------- 69.2 5 MUCH MORE LIKELY 37.3 4 31.9 3 9.8 2 5.6 1 NO MORE LIKELY 15.4 DON'T KNOW - REFUSE - MEAN 3.7 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. COPYRIGHT 2002 NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH, INC. NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH PAGE: 42 FCC PHONE SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243420A1.txt
  • U.S. could result in smaller satellite spacing than the current nine degree spacing between U.S. DBS orbital slots." Part 100 NPM, 13 FCC Rcd at 6934. Canada and Mexico have filed modifications of many of their original Plan assignments to extend coverage to the United States -- at 72.5", 82", 91" and 129" W.L. in the case of Canada, and 69.2" and 77" W.L. in the case of Mexico - which, if implemented, would result in several instances of reduced spacing, including 4.5". In addition to coordination of SES AMERICOM's proposed satellite at 105.5" W.L., coordination is also ongoing with respect to a DBS satellite at 96.5" W.L. proposed by the Isle of Man. Coordinations are also presumably underway with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.01,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.91,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.31,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.72,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9 349.6 61.8 2,650.82,776.7 39,180
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
  • 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017 0.7 97.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 798,023,705 35.4 3.5 33.2 16.7 11.2 Norway $28,785,730 42.3 1.3 15.9 26.1 14.4 $2,235,416 20.2 1.0 12.3 66.0 0.5 $861,416 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206,065,128 21.0 2.2 18.7 41.1 17.0 Portugal $31,812,704 76.4 3.2 13.3 3.9 3.2 $1,612,633 68.0 0.0 26.5 4.9 0.5 $8,824 0.0 19.9 10.9 69.2 0.0 180,759,687 50.8 8.9 24.9 6.1 9.3 Spain $114,772,545 55.0 4.0 11.2 26.4 3.5 $3,613,281 34.3 20.8 30.7 8.3 5.9 $12,437,764 0.8 94.6 0.3 4.3 0.0 637,440,248 28.3 12.5 18.3 24.5 16.4 Sweden $32,755,210 51.7 2.1 24.1 18.5 3.7 $3,414,780 37.1 5.2 37.3 20.1 0.4 $3,564,642 0.2 99.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 324,182,160 23.4 4.9 52.2 14.6 4.9 Switzerland $74,010,699 60.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.0 1,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.9 1,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.3 1,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.7 2,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • 2.8 ND Ohio 3,026.7 319.4 2,707.3 2,024.9 682.8 311.5 155.9 135.9 603.3 79.5 OH Oklahoma 818.2 144.5 673.7 482.5 192.0 94.6 27.9 52.0 174.5 17.4 OK Oregon 964.6 86.8 877.8 626.9 250.9 119.0 44.1 55.1 218.2 32.8 OR Pennsylvania 3,525.1 237.0 3,288.1 2,393.2 895.1 415.5 104.0 271.7 791.2 103.9 PA Rhode Island 295.3 19.4 275.9 193.4 82.4 34.6 9.0 25.6 69.2 13.3 RI South Carolina 917.9 101.6 816.2 599.5 217.1 112.9 24.6 43.3 180.8 36.4 SC South Dakota 119.4 9.5 109.9 75.1 34.8 15.7 6.6 9.7 32.0 2.9 SD Tennessee 1,468.6 191.5 1,277.0 921.9 356.0 173.5 41.6 75.5 290.6 65.3 TN Texas 7,151.7 1,171.0 5,980.8 4,317.9 1,669.9 768.2 187.7 563.2 1,519.1 150.9 TX Utah 533.5 40.2 493.3 342.8 150.6 68.3 26.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 3.7 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 115.1 295.5 85.0 0.0 26.2 9.6 226.2 20.1 0.0 9. Natural Causes 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399 0 12. External Power Failure 4.6 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14. Remote 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. Other/Unknown 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications. Table 1(d): Company Comparision -- 2004 Customer Perception
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 3.7 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 115.1 295.5 85.0 0.0 26.2 9.6 226.2 20.1 0.0 9. Natural Causes 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 398.9 0.0 12. External Power Failure 4.6 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14. Remote 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. Other/Unknown 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table 9.3 (a) Switch Downtime Causes -- Outages More Than 2 Minutes in Duration Bell Companies - 2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • Intrastate Private Line Service Other Telephone Services NAICS Series ID 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • $234,611 14.2 0.0 7.9 6.1 71.8 $14 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 92.9 27,859,933 25.7 2.7 10.9 10.7 50.0 Qatar $5,483,423 3.7 7.0 44.3 30.8 14.1 $390,190 0.0 7.8 0.7 21.8 69.7 $845,999 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27,072,165 2.9 12.1 47.9 20.0 17.1 Saudi Arabia $71,840,055 48.4 1.0 14.8 26.8 9.1 $1,567,083 10.3 0.0 13.3 10.7 65.7 $4,387 0.0 0.0 11.7 69.2 19.1 409,737,534 35.4 1.0 26.2 23.9 13.5 Syria $21,957,653 15.0 4.0 4.6 21.5 54.9 $2,319,733 25.5 0.0 38.5 0.0 36.0 $3,008 0.0 0.0 19.8 0.0 80.2 88,706,444 14.8 3.7 6.3 16.7 58.6 United Arab Emirates $54,662,610 49.1 1.1 9.8 23.1 16.8 $1,972,068 26.3 0.0 7.9 15.1 50.7 $128,164 0.0 0.0 99.4 0.0 0.6 286,777,039 38.2 1.0 13.1 24.6 23.0 Yemen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Intrastate Private Line Service Other Telephone Services NAICS Series ID 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
  • 3.4 0.124.718.8 53.1 $2,518,706 12.6 0.0 7.214.1 66.1 $4,445,794 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 316,185,733 6.0 0.115.821.9 56.2 Cyprus $2,889,857 3.2 0.019.548.6 28.7 $182,618 0.0 0.029.625.4 45.0 $321 0.0 0.0 0.014.3 85.7 24,836,022 4.8 0.033.021.9 40.3 Denmark $16,329,719 3.1 0.115.220.3 61.3 $1,600,642 42.2 0.015.7 4.1 38.0 $6,012,314 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 193,783,259 6.3 0.123.018.1 52.4 Finland $8,815,262 2.0 0.011.217.6 69.2 $197,777 0.1 0.016.731.3 51.9 $2,429 55.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 38.7 80,013,337 2.5 0.1 9.328.3 59.8 France $107,720,508 4.6 0.017.717.7 59.9 $10,353,833 1.5 0.015.129.2 54.2 $20,218,951 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1,238,699,417 4.8 0.013.426.5 55.3 Germany $206,465,435 2.9 0.044.013.3 39.8 $25,657,092 1.1 0.014.719.2 65.0 $19,308,150 88.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 2,698,058,517 2.7 0.028.228.7 40.4 Gibraltar $186,917 2.0 0.034.027.2 36.8 $11,530 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276930A1.pdf
  • competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high- cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction would be required. 11. For example, if in State A, the capped amount is $90 million and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If in State B, however, the base period capped amount is $100 million and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 28.3 48.6 55.6 November 65.4 80.6 82.3 92.1 27.7 47.6 55.6 December 66.6 82.7 82.4 96.0 29.2 47.7 55.4 2007January 65.2 79.1 81.8 86.8 32.9 48.2 55.9 February 65.7 81.0 83.8 88.0 34.9 47.4 55.1 March 66.8 83.0 84.2 91.4 34.9 47.9 54.7 April 67.7 85.9 85.6 94.7 36.5 47.3 54.4 May 67.8 86.1 86.8 95.1 36.1 47.2 53.9 June 69.2 88.9 87.7 99.1 37.1 47.4 54.4 July 71.3 93.7 88.6 106.1 38.6 47.3 55.3 August 69.7 91.3 89.4 101.3 38.9 46.4 54.2 September 71.2 94.1 89.5 106.1 39.1 46.8 53.5 October* 72.0 94.7 90.7 107.8 38.0 47.8 54.9 November* 69.7 93.0 89.2 106.8 36.0 44.9 51.1 December* 69.9 92.5 90.0 106.4 35.0 45.8 50.8 517110212 517110213 51711022 517110221 5171102 51711021
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287180A1.txt
  • the band �consumers may use the wireless device of their choice 10 MHz block ("D Block") for the creation of a national public safety network No bid met reserve price FCC seeking comment on rules governing the public/private partnership to achieve public safety network goal Total US Mobile Telephone Wireless Subscribers 255.4 233 207.9 182.1 158.7 140.8 128.4 109.5 86 69.2 55.3 33.8 24.1 44 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007 Millio ns o f Subs cribe rs Source: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, Semi-Annual Survey, 2007. Growth in the Mobile Telephone Industry (June 2002 � June 2007) DOWN 43% From $0.12 per minute in June 2002 Subscribers Service Revenues Price per minute 243 Million Subscribers in June 2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287184A1.txt
  • use the wireless device of their choice 10 MHz block ("D Block") for the creation of a national public safety network No bid met reserve price FCC seeking comment on rules governing the public/private partnership to achieve public safety network goal Chairman Kevin J. Martin Total US Mobile Telephone Wireless Subscribers 255.4 233 207.9 182.1 158.7 140.8 128.4 109.5 86 69.2 55.3 33.8 24.1 44 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007 Millio ns o f Subs cribe rs Source: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, Semi-Annual Survey, 2007. Chairman Kevin J. Martin Growth in the Mobile Telephone Industry (June 2002 � June 2007) DOWN 43% From $0.12 per minute in June 2002 Subscribers Service Revenues Price per minute 243 Million
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
  • $28,538,271 0.0 35.5 0.4 19.9 44.2 $3,178,874 0.0 41.6 0.0 20.8 37.5 $13,725,669 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 523,828,362 0.0 30.8 0.8 33.6 34.8 Turkey $19,337,349 0.1 25.0 4.9 16.0 53.9 $382,776 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.7 79.0 $379,346 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 200,273,502 0.1 14.8 15.0 17.4 52.8 United Kingdom $246,149,106 0.2 34.5 0.2 22.2 42.8 $26,829,095 0.0 13.3 0.0 17.5 69.2 $64,481,819 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,547,339,581 0.2 13.8 1.0 30.5 54.6 Western Europe $776,307,034 0.1 28.5 1.3 20.9 49.2 $81,479,312 0.0 18.1 0.0 26.3 55.6 $170,351,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 13,979,516,518 0.1 15.7 1.9 31.3 51.1 Algeria $8,715,356 0.0 7.0 4.3 21.5 67.3 $411,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,619 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 89,141,636 0.0 4.7 4.1 21.9 69.3 Angola
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
  • 0.0 5.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.1 26.9 2. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 5.4 15.2 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 211.5 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 25.4 0.0 2,069.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.6 6. Software Design 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 10 0 7. Hardware design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 44.9 84.9 0.0 0.0237.9 20.0 47.6 471.9 9. Natural Causes 4.9 167.6 0.0 2,213.8 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 0.0 5.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.1 26.9 2. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 5.4 15.2 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 211.5 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 25.4 0.0 2,069.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.6 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.1 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 44.9 84.9 0.0 0.0 237.9 20.0 47.6 471.9 9. Natural Causes 4.9 167.6 0.0 2,213.8 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
  • 0.0 5.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 24.1 26.9 2. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 5.4 15.2 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 211.5 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 25.4 0.0 2,069.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.6 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.1 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 44.9 84.9 0.0 0.0 237.9 20.0 47.6 471.9 9. Natural Causes 4.9 167.6 0.0 2,213.8 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296121A1.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
  • 0.0 0.0 2.5 7.6 90.0 Canary Island $0 $0 $0 0 Cape Verde $6,281,711 0.0 0.0 4.8 71.5 23.7 $31,844 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 $17,417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 37,460,798 0.0 0.0 4.4 67.0 28.7 Central African Republic $517,244 0.0 0.0 0.1 37.7 62.2 $2,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,032,333 0.0 0.0 0.1 30.7 69.2 Chad $1,450,680 0.0 0.0 0.4 48.4 51.2 $16,193 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,468 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 12,347,337 0.0 0.0 0.4 54.0 45.6 Comoros $2,248,214 0.0 0.0 6.6 23.9 69.5 $8,767 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $798 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,649,567 0.0 0.0 8.1 23.1 68.8 Congo $4,103,083 0.0 0.6 7.9 37.7 53.9 $70,190 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,628 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 332.1 246.8 83.5 22.0 122.3 227.8 18.9 NM New York 6,658.3 291.9 6,366.4 4,026.2 2,340.1 750.5 193.5 1,312.9 2,256.9 83.2 NY North Carolina 2,903.5 374.0 2,529.5 1,691.5 838.0 340.6 94.0 362.3 796.9 41.2 NC North Dakota 124.8 6.2 118.6 70.1 48.5 13.2 6.5 26.1 45.8 2.7 ND Ohio 3,904.3 455.3 3,448.9 2,349.3 1,099.7 408.7 127.2 519.6 1,055.5 44.2 OH Oklahoma 1,069.2 142.4 926.8 581.0 345.7 96.7 33.0 189.3 319.0 26.8 OK Oregon 1,118.7 81.7 1,037.0 604.6 432.4 146.3 43.9 212.9 403.1 29.2 OR Pennsylvania 4,223.4 259.5 3,964.0 2,408.0 1,555.9 496.1 148.1 782.3 1,426.5 60.2 PA Rhode Island 256.5 11.9 244.7 148.1 96.6 32.8 8.5 50.7 92.0 4.6 RI South Carolina 1,208.3 136.8 1,071.5 762.2 309.3 125.2 35.6 124.3 285.1 24.2 SC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Windstream 2.3% Verizon 28.8% Embarq 4.5% All Others 11.0% 7 - 7 Table 7.4 Distribution of Households with Wireless and Wireline Telephone Service Households In Millions Year Period Wireline Only Wireless Only Both Wireline and Wireless Wireline and Wireless Unknown No Telephone Service 1 Total Households 2007 1st Half 28.0 16.0 69.3 2.0 2.4 117.7 2007 2nd Half 25.7 18.6 69.2 1.5 2.7 118.2 2008 1st Half 24.2 20.6 68.9 1.1 2.9 118.0 2008 2nd Half 20.5 23.8 70.1 1.1 2.2 118.6 2009 1st Half 18.2 26.7 69.9 0.5 2.4 118.4 2009 2nd Half 17.5 28.8 68.5 0.5 2.4 119.2 Year Period Wireline Only Wireless Only Both Wireline and Wireless Wireline and Wireless Unknown No Telephone Service 1 Total Households 2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
  • 18.3 15.3 22.8 18.3 14.0 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 167.4 248.6 114.6 216.0 148.0 98.3 165.5 159.9 163.4 Total MSA 166.8 236.1 113.5 209.5 145.8 111.4 162.9 151.6 151.7 Total Non MSA 173.8 318.6 143.0 245.3 169.8 40.1 225.1 263.0 210.7 Total Residence 237.0 315.1 166.1 286.1 196.8 126.3 226.4 232.4 209.7 Total Business 76.4 132.8 47.2 102.7 69.2 50.9 90.1 69.4 77.2 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 124.2 184.6 85.8 158.2 103.4 80.2 137.0 132.0 136.3 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Reports 15.3% 14.9% 10.5% 13.8% 14.2% 19.4% 17.3% 16.6% 15.6% Res. Complaints per Mill. Res. Access Lines 17.1 218.4 35.9 71.0 159.6 137.2 109.1 968.6 272.6 Bus. Complaints per Mill. Bus. Access Lines 3.6 26.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.txt
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309858A1.pdf
  • Basis to Judge N 187 398 135 111 31 862 NA % 67.2 21.8 45.4 16.4 12.8 3.5 100.0 N 171 454 124 95 17 861 NA % 72.8 20.4 52.4 14.7 10.7 1.8 100.0 N 204 321 155 127 54 861 NA % 61.4 24.5 36.9 18.2 14.3 6.2 100.0 N 211 385 138 80 46 860 NA % 69.2 24.7 44.5 16.4 9.0 5.4 100.0 N 269 414 111 44 19 857 NA % 78.7 31.7 47.1 13.7 5.2 2.4 100.0 N 243 426 103 63 22 857 NA % 78.6 28.9 49.6 11.9 6.9 2.6 100.0 N 537 297 14 7 6 861 NA % 96.9 61.9 35.0 1.6 0.7 0.8 100.0 N 371 394 80 11 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314558A1.txt
  • m Antenna Diameter/TX Gain/RX Gain: 1.7 m / 42.0 dBi / N/A Antenna Azimuth/Elevation Angle: 148.9 deg / 17.40 deg Transmitter Polarity: tx horizontal / N/A Maximum Power Density (dBW/Hz): -53.9 dBW/Hz Satellite Operating Arc: 107.3 deg W Satellite transmission VIA: ANIK F1R Date Effective: May 4, 2012 TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 6325.000 69.2 G1EDN 35.7 N/A -6- 9 9 Q z � � "MI6u�8t��PNG ~ ��0)G��Qum1��%�\")�Z��l[�;�*��.�Z�E �m�+�+� �v [o`� ^�D����� !-�gW�ˡ �v''�. ��z' �De�1���A��Iԍ\ ���w�����M>��Y�B��DN�ow0�� $� �'G5�(c)~� ��� _U�+ #m��q) �c��)�"��6�@N�� � OLS[jD�V�� �� 2;݇1S�� �uO^f�J9�"-� ��1@�S�-` j ` � � � � � j ` � � � � � j ` � � 9 x(c)''���+���(R) � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.txt
  • States must pass through to long distance customers the savings that IXCs realize from lower access rates charged by Path A LECs and Path B LECs. PART 65 Subpart F - Maximum Allowable Rates of Return Section 65.702(b) is amended by inserting the phrase ``pool or pools'' in place of the word ``pools''. PART 69 Subpart A - General Section 69.2 is amended by inserting the following definitions alphabetically and renumbering existing definitions: �69.2 * * * * * Non-price cap LEC. This term means the same as in �61.3. Path A incentive study area. This term means the same as in �61.3. Path A LEC. This term means the same as in �61.3. Path A transition period. This term means
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.txt
  • as described in subsection (b) of this section, on the date that it first files its line count information pursuant to � 54.903 of this subpart, and thereafter on June 30th of each year. PART 69 - ACCESS CHARGES The authority citation continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403. Section 69.2 is amended by adding a new paragraph (www) as follows: � 69.2 Definitions (www) Interstate Common Line Support (ICLS) means funds that are provided pursuant to Section 54.901 of Part 54. Section 69.4 is revised by amending paragraph (b)(2), deleting and reserving paragraph (c), amending paragraphs (d) and (g), and adding paragraph (j) as follows: � 69.4 Charges to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
  • the same proportionate relationships as the interstate/intrastate expenses which gave rise to the liability. Part 69, Subparts A through E of Title 47 of the C.F.R. is amended as follows: PART 69 ACCESS CHARGES 1. The authority citation for Part 69 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. ��154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403 2. Section 69.2 Definitions is amended by revising paragraphs (j) and (z) to read as follows: � 69.2 Definitions. * * * * * (j) Corporate Operations Expenses are included in General and Administrative Expenses (Account 6720); * * * * * (z) Net Investment means allowable original cost investment in Accounts 2001 through 2003, 1220 and the investments in nonaffiliated companies included
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • Capacity Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Average system capacity (MHz) 630 666 623 652 Percent of systems with capacity of: 330 MHz and below 10.0% 8.5% 9.0% 8.3% 331 through 749 MHz 31.7% 22.8% 36.9% 28.5% 750 MHz and above 58.3% 68.7% 54.1% 63.2% Number of 6-MHz activated channels: Devoted to analog service 69.2 72.0 67.7 69.9 Devoted to digital service 6.7 11.3 7.0 11.8 Total number of channels 75.9 83.3 74.4 81.7 Table 12. Advanced Services Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Percent of cable systems offering: Digital programming 52.3% 74.1% 57.8% 77.6% Internet access 51.7% 65.5% 51.4% 70.8% Cable telephony 19.7% 19.8% 20.7% 21.1% Percent of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.txt
  • Court held that CFC was not an ``end user,'' and, alternatively, that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis. In its April 13, 2000 Liability Order on remand, the Commission applied the Court's analysis and found that CFC and the other IPPs cannot be considered "end users" under Section 69.2(m). The Commission also determined, however, that irrespective of whether CFC was an ``end user,'' the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were ``public'' or ``semi-public.'' Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of Section 201(b) by classifying all IPP payphones as semi-public and assessing EUCL charges against IPP payphones
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.txt
  • Channel Capacity Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Average system capacity (MHz) 630 666 623 652 Percent of systems with capacity of: 330 MHz and below 10.0% 8.5% 9.0% 8.3% 331 through 749 MHz 31.7% 22.8% 36.9% 28.5% 750 MHz 58.3% 68.7% 54.1% 63.2% Number of 6 MHz activated channels: Devoted to analog service 69.2 72.0 67.7 69.9 Devoted to digital service 6.7 11.3 7.0 11.8 Total number of channels 75.9 83.3 74.4 81.7 Viewership. Viewership, when measured in audience shares of cable networks, continues to grow, while viewership shares of broadcast television stations continue to decline. Audience share statistics for total day viewing, show that cable audience shares rose from an average 54.2 share
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Other satellite 40.5 42.9 2.3 5.7% 38.9 42.0 2.1 8.0% Standard error 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.8 Total of above 59.9 62.9 2.9 4.8% 58.9 62.7 3.8 6.5% Standard error 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.0 Other Analog Channels Other Analog�� 9.2 7.4 -1.9 -20.4% 9.8 7.4 -2.4 -24.5% Standard error 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 Total analog 69.2 70.3 1.1 1.6% 68.7 70.1 1.4 2.0% Standard error 2.0 1.9 1.3 1.3 � Excluding music and other non-video channels. �� Includes premium, pay-per-view, and mini-tiers. Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps, Dissenting Re: Implementation of Section 3 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. I respectfully dissent from today's Report on cable rates. At a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-170A1.txt
  • Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Policies and Rules Concerning Operator Service Access and Pay Telephone Compensation, Petition of Public Telephone Council to Treat Bell Operating Company Payphones as Customer Premises Owners and Presubscribed Operator Services Providers, Petition of California Payphone Association to Amend and Clarify Section 68.2(a) of the Commission's Rules, Amendment of Section 69.2(m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones Within the ``Public Telephone'' Exemption from End User Common Line Access Charges, Report and Order, CC Docket Nos. 96-128, 91-35, 11 FCC Rcd 20541, 20677-83. See Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 94-1, FCC 03-139 (rel. June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.txt
  • concedes that the areas it proposed to serve were ``in the vicinity of existing GTE facilities,'' but argues that the proposed areas met the definition of ``unserved'' because there was no telephone service at the time of its Petition. Sandwich Isles Reply at 5. See M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2(hh) of the Commission's Rules. CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 04-86 (rel. April 12, 2004) (Skyline) Skyline, FCC 04-86, at paras. 11-13. The Commission dismissed as moot Skyline's request for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. See Skyline, FCC 04-86, at paras. 22-23. Skyline relied on a 1996 Bureau order that held that carriers are not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � � � � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: April 2, 2004 Released: April 12, 2004 By the Commission: introduction In this Order, we dismiss in part, and grant in part, a request from M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company (Skyline Telephone), for waiver of sections 36.611, 36.612, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
  • is the physical point where an IXC connects its network with the LEC network. See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14226, para. 8. ``Serving wire center means the telephone company central office designated by the telephone company to serve the geographic area in which the interexchange carrier or other person's point of demarcation is located.'' 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(rr). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14227, para. 10. Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12968, paras. 13, 15. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • 2004, of the 1657 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. Similarly, of the 2804 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. On the other hand, 1146 licensed emissions, or 69.2 percent, in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, and 1439 or 43.9 percent in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, were for digital operations. 47 C.F.R. � 25.212(c). Hughes Comments at 16-17; Hughes Reply at 7. Spacenet Comments at 30-34 and Exhibits B and C, citing Ku-band NGSO Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4096; Spacenet Reply at 14. Hughes Reply at 8. SIA Further Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
  • 2004, of the 1657 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. Similarly, of the 2804 licensed emissions authorizing operations in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, none were authorized analog audio operations using bandwidths of 360 kHz or less. On the other hand, 1146 licensed emissions, or 69.2 percent, in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band, and 1439 or 43.9 percent in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band, were for digital operations. 47 C.F.R. � 25.212(c). Hughes Comments at 16-17; Hughes Reply at 7. Spacenet Comments at 30-34 and Exhibits B and C, citing Ku-band NGSO Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4096; Spacenet Reply at 14. Hughes Reply at 8. SIA Further Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.txt
  • D.C. Circuit Court rejected these determinations and remanded the case to the Commission. The Court held that CFC was not an end user, and that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPSP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis. On remand, the Commission found that CFC and the other IPSPs were not end users under section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. The Commission also determined that, regardless of whether CFC was an end user, the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were public or semi-public. Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs had imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of section 201(b) of the Act by classifying all IPSP payphones as semi-public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • 1.4 2.0 2.9 January 1, 2004 Basic tier 24.5 24.5 24.3 23.7 21.3 30.3 25.6 23.6 23.1 Standard error 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 0.9 2.9 1.1 1.1 2.7 Expanded basic tier 44.3 44.0 46.6 48.9 50.6 44.3 43.6 47.6 44.1 Standard error 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.6 1.0 3.0 1.4 1.2 3.3 Basic & expanded 68.8 68.5 70.9 72.6 71.9 74.6 69.2 71.2 67.2 Standard error 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.6 1.4 0.9 1.0 2.2 Digital tier 31.3 31.2 32.4 33.5 33.2 34.2 35.2 27.0 19.4 Standard error 1.3 1.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.9 Standard error 0.9 0.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 2.0 1.3 2.3 3.0 Source: Survey. ATTACHMENT 4 Number of Channels, Comparison of Sample Groups January 1, 2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.txt
  • for each competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high-cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction would be required. For example, if in State A, the capped amount is $90 million and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If in State B, however, the base period capped amount is $100 million and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07J-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07J-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07J-1A1.txt
  • for each competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high-cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction would be required. For example, if in State A, the capped amount is $90 million and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If in State B, however, the base period capped amount is $100 million and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.txt
  • for each competitive ETC within the state to arrive at the capped level of high-cost support. Where the state uncapped support is less than the available state capped support amount, no reduction will be required. For example, if, in State A, the capped amount is $90 million, and the total uncapped support is $130 million, the reduction factor would be 69.2 percent ($90/$130). In State A, each competitive ETC's uncapped support would be multiplied by 69.2 percent to reduce support to the capped amount. If, in State B, however, the capped amount is $100 million, and the total uncapped support is $95 million, there would be no reduction factor because the uncapped amount is less than the capped amount. Finally, if,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
  • study area is a geographic segment of an incumbent LEC's telephone operations. Generally, a study area corresponds to an incumbent LEC's entire service territory within a state. Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC and Qwest Corporation Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules, Petition for Waiver of Section 69.2(hh) and 69.605(c) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19180, 19181, para. 2 (WCB 2005). Section 54.207 of the Commission's rules provides that a rural telephone company's service area will be its study area ``unless and until the Commission and the states, after taking into account recommendations of a Federal-State Joint Board instituted under section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • to be submitted with letters of transmittal for tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap local exchange carrier that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in �61.3(pp) of this part-including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in �69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service-that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap local exchange carrier may submit without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • 74.4 Colorado 19 100.5 38.1 5,289 2,007 $16,830 $31,610 $39,726 17.7 2.17 5.5 5 88.4 Nevada 10 98.9 38.2 9,894 3,822 $18,492 $39,158 $50,779 12.7 1.07 2.61 7 1.1 Arizona 2 90.3 28.7 45,147 14,354 $11,951 $24,592 $32,351 29.7 1.85 5.36 72.3 Idaho 11 75.4 27.2 6,853 2,471 $15,014 $32,460 $42,417 13.3 2.04 5.79 88 .8 Northern Mariana Islands 3 69.2 14.1 23,072 4,685 $9,897 $24,935 NA NA 107.54 528.26 41.4 Florida 5 61.1 20.1 12,225 4,017 $13,448 $28,406 $36,216 22.8 8.31 25.08 90.5 American Samoa 4 57.3 9.3 14,323 2,337 $4,203 $17,295 NA NA 88.50 538.92 54.8 West Virginia 6 54.6 21.9 9,104 3,648 $13,680 $26,013 $31,772 20.4 11.38 28.7 5 92.7 Virginia 7 52.8 20.6 7,544 2,947 $17,920 $35,024
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-26A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3813, 3825, para. 30 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001) (granting Mescalero a waiver ``to permit it to receive high-cost loop support for the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002''); Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 20543, 20547, para. 10 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2005) (granting Adak Telephone a waiver ``to permit it to receive high-cost loop support for the period beginning May 25, 2005''). Referral Notice at 5. Twin Valley Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 10115, para. 10; Referral Notice at 5-6.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-111A1.txt
  • id. at � 371 (``Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ....''). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of ``end user'' found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ...''); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, � 2.6 (1984) (``ECA Tariff Order'') (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define ``end user'');
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • used by the telephone company to route calls to the trunk group designated by the entity to which the code was assigned. See ATIS Telecom Glossary http://www.atis.org/glossary/definition.aspx?id=6095 (last visited June 6, 2011). CIC is also defined in the Commission's rules as a code used in tandem switching that can be used to identify an interexchange provider. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(vv). The Jurisdiction Information Parameter (JIP) is defined as an optional parameter in the SS7 Initial Address Message. In the number portability context, the JIP parameter is used to retain, in call signaling, the first six dialed digits of a telephone number that has been ported. See Travis Russell, Signaling System #7 366, 643 (Table 8.35) McGraw-Hill Communications (Fifth Edition 2006);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-59A1.txt
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. �� 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of ``end user'' in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff � 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: ``The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-87A1.txt
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 69.4(a) (``The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ....''); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, � 10 (1983) (``Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings.''), 345, Appendix A, � 69.2(m) (defining ``end user'' as ``any customer of an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • to be submitted with letters of transmittal for tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap local exchange carrier that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in �61.3(pp) of this part-including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in �69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service-that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap local exchange carrier may submit without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-8 (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap LEC that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in Section 61.3(pp) of this part -- including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in Section 69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service -- that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap LEC may submit without
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
  • Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. July 18, 1997) (seeking comment on models that will be used to calculate forward-looking costs for non-rural LECs after Jan. 1, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104(d), (e), 69.203(a) (rules currently in effect); see also 47 C.F.R. 69.152(d), (e) (rules in 20 effect as of January 1, 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 69.104(h). 21 47 C.F.R. � 69.2; Access Charge Reform Order at para. 396. 22 4 Commission. Accordingly, although this NPRM focuses on price cap ILECs, we also solicit 18 comment on whether the various proposals set forth in this NPRM for defining, identifying, and verifying primary lines for price cap ILECs could also be applied for rate-of-return ILECs if, in a future proceeding, the Commission concludes
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • without an effective date, which specifies the schedules which have been suspended. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 63 93. Revise Section 63.10(c)(1) to read as follows: � 63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. * * * (c) * * * (1) File international service tariffs pursuant to Section 61.28 of this Chapter. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 69 94. Revise Section 69.2 to remove and reserve paragraph (tt). 95. Revise Section 69.3 to read as follows: � 69.3Filing of access service tariffs. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-164 37 (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, a tariff for access service shall be filed with this Commission for a two-year period. Such tariffs shall be filed with a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.wp
  • 1996" (SBREFA), Subtitle II of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing 172 universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and TRS fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 44 affected entities. For this part of the Order, we have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), as required by 5 U.S.C. � 603. 1. Certification 84. In the NECA NPRM, the Commission tentatively certified that the rules it proposed to adopt in this proceeding would not have a significant economic
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • Groups Block. Thus, for example, of BellSouth's local trunks, 116 of 4,429 trunk groups (2.6 %) exceeded the three percentage threshold whereas 26 out of 591 (4.4 %) competitive LEC trunk groups experienced blockage in excess of three percent, resulting in a difference of 1.8 percentage points. 218 The calculation that competitive LECs' experienced trunk blockage 54.5 % for March, 69.2 % for April, and 38.8 % for May greater than BellSouth's retail customers is derived by dividing the percentage of competitive LEC trunk groups blocked by the percentage of BellSouth retail trunk groups blocked. Thus for example, in the period from March 23, 1998, to April 24, 1998, competitive LECs' trunk groups experienced blockage of 4.4 % whereas, BellSouth's trunk
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.wp
  • 2631, 2635 n.8, 2637 n.53. The subscriber line charge (SLC) is an access charge imposed on end users to recover at least a portion of the cost of the interstate portion of LEC facilities used to link each end user to the public switched telephone network ("PSTN"). Access Charge Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16010. 18 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an "end user" when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.wp
  • to end users, ISP traffic delivered via the ILECs' ADSL service offerings constitutes local traffic for separations purposes.47 Therefore, competitive LECs argue that such traffic must terminate at the ISP's point of presence.48 Finally, several commenters maintain that the ILECs' ADSL service offerings must be tariffed on the state level, because they do not qualify as "access services" under section 69.2 of the Commission's rules.49 III. DISCUSSION Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-317 50 See GTE DSL Order at �� 16-27; see also GTE Direct Case at 7; Ameritech Comments at 9; Time Warner Comments at 4; US West Comments at 1; Bell Atlantic Comments at 2; Northpoint Comments at 1; USTA Comments at 2; and ACI/Firstworld Comments at 4. 9 14.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
  • upon public end users, and upon providers of public telephones. . . ."); see also 47 C.F.R. � 69.5(c) ("Special access surcharges shall be assessed upon users of exchange facilities that interconnect these facilities with means of interstate or foreign telecommunications to the extent that carrier's carrier charges are not assessed upon such interconnected usage."). See also 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an 'end user' when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-8 (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap LEC that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in Section 61.3(pp) of this part -- including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in Section 69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service -- that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap LEC may submit without
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • PART 61 - TARIFFS � 61.3 Definitions (a) Act. The Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1004; 47 U.S.C. chapter 5), as amended. (b) Actual Price Index (API). An index of the level of aggregate rate element rates in a basket, which index is calculated pursuant to � 61.46. (c) Association. This term has the meaning given it in � 69.2(d). (d) Average Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line month. Price Cap CMT Revenue (as defined in � 61.3(cc)) per month as of July 1, 2000 (adjusted to remove Universal Service Contributions assessed to Local Exchange Carriers pursuant to � 54.702 of this chapter) using 2000 annual filing base period demand, divided by the 2000 annual filing base period demand. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.wp
  • 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 31 5 U.S.C. � 601(4). 32 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 33 Id. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the Long Term Support program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and the Telecommunications Relay Services fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii)). 34 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 7 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)28 requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 50.0 198.0 12141 742 10995 409 0.5 0.2 100.0 KYHARLAN 44 51 50.0 601.0 19175 562 16832 475 2.2 4.0 100.0 KYHAZARD 35 16 50.0 384.0 15138 348 13480 296 4.5 3.6 100.0 KYHAZARD 57 12 3.2 475.0 16984 393 14617 324 0.4 0.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 18 20 50.0 195.0 13015 626 12783 622 1.0 0.2 99.8 KYLEXINGTON 27 59 69.2 300.0 16909 681 16781 678 1.4 0.5 99.9 KYLEXINGTON 36 40 66.5 305.0 17900 696 17412 691 1.5 1.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 46 42 50.0 265.0 13711 639 13491 635 6.3 3.2 99.1 KYLOUISVILLE 3 47 1000.0 555.0 45682 2902 35162 2244 0.6 0.4 99.7 KYLOUISVILLE 11 55 428.5 390.0 27674 1482 26136 1462 0.1 0.0 100.0 KYLOUISVILLE 15 17 50.0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • regulation generally. To obtain connections, ESPs generally pay local business rates and interstate subscriber line charges for their switched access connections to LEC central offices. 262 Amendments of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules Relating to Enhanced Service Providers, Order, 3 FCC Rcd 2631 (para. 2 n.8) (1988); see also MTS and WATs Market Structure, (para. 4); 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m)(1996) ("End User" means any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier). 263 Access Charge Reform; Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers; Transport Rate Structure and Pricing; Usage of the Public Switched Network by Information Service and Internet Access Providers, CC Docket Nos. 92-262, 94-1, 91-213, 96-263, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Third Report
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.txt
  • report focuses on three categories of wireless services: mobile telephony, mobile data, and dispatch. The Fifth Report makes the following observations about these categories: Mobile Telephony: The mobile telephony sector has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Mobile telephony carriers continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. Over 172 million people, or 69 percent of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • of their payphones, and thus this proceeding concerns rules that are not currently in effect. The Commission's Liability Order IPPs Not End Users The Commission's Liability Order responded to the court's remand of an earlier Commission ruling. The Commission's earlier ruling held that IPP payphones were subject to a EUCL charge because the IPPs were "end users" pursuant to section 69.2(m) of the rules. But on remand from an appeal of that decision, the Commission reversed itself and concluded in the Liability Order that, although C.F. Communications and other IPPs own the payphones, they cannot be considered "end users" under section 69.2(m), because they do not own the premises where their payphones are located. IPPs Must Pay EUCL Charge Nonetheless, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • held that CFC was not an ``end user,'' and, alternatively, that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis.35 9. In its April 13, 2000 Liability Order on remand, the Commission applied the Court's analysis and found that CFC and the other IPPs cannot be considered "end users" under Section 69.2(m).36 The Commission also determined, however, that irrespective of whether CFC was an ``end user,'' the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were ``public'' or ``semi-public.''37 Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of Section 201(b) by classifying all IPP payphones as semi-public and assessing EUCL charges against IPP payphones
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-111A1.html
  • id. at S: 371 ("Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ...."). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of "end user" found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ..."); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, S: 2.6 (1984) ("ECA Tariff Order") (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define "end user");
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-59A1.html
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of "end user" in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff S: 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: "The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-87A1.html
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.4(a) ("The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ...."); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, P: 10 (1983) ("Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings."), 345, Appendix A, S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • be done for prime time due to the lack of data on total cable and broadcast advertising revenues for the prime time daypart. 33 In 2000 and 2001, Nielsen separated out "all other cable" from pay and basic. This is not included in the universe of advertiser-supported programming. See notes to table 11. 1984/85 1989/90 1994/95 1999/00 2000/01 Network Affiliates 69.2 57.3 58.4 50.9 49.6 Independents 15.0 19.1 9.7 3.4 3.5 Public 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.6 2.6 Basic Cable 6.5 14.5 23.9 35.3 36.5 Pay Cable 5.6 5.5 4.4 5.2 5.2 All Other Cable 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.6 Commercial Broadcast 84.1 76.4 68.1 54.3 53.0 Source: Neilsen Galaxy Explorer. Notes: Shares are normalized to 100 to account for multiset usage.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • CMRS industry added over 18 million new subscribers for the fourth consecutive year.14 Mobile Telephony. Since the release of the Third Report, the mobile telephony sector of CMRS experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1998, the mobile telephony sector generated over $33 billion in revenues,15 increased subscribership from 55 million to 69.2 million,16 and produced a national penetration rate of nearly 26 percent.17 In addition, new entrant wireless providers18 have continued to deploy their networks. While the new entrant network buildout and coverage has not caught up to that of cellular, there are now at least five mobile telephone operators in each of the 35 largest Basic Trading Areas19 ("BTAs") and at
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fcc00289.doc
  • to the needs of the dispatch sector, creating the potential for inter-service competition. Industry Development Mobile Telephony. Since the release of the Fourth Report, the mobile telephony sector of CMRS has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. (``Nextel'') continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/access_reform/samples/0155376.htm
  • attributable to analog end office trunk ports. 126. ^126 Like the trunk ports to which they connect, common transport facilities are by definition shared, and their costs must be recovered on a usage sensitive basis. 127. ^127 Notice 73. 128. ^128 Emmerson, pp. 8-9. 129. ^129 Schedule CAL. P.U.C. No. 175-T, Section 6.8.3. 130. ^130 Notice 76. 131. ^131 Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules (47 C.F.R. 69.2) defines Access Minutes or Access Minutes of Use. "On the originating end of an interstate or foreign call, usage is to be measured from the time the originating end users call is delivered by the telephone company and acknowledged as received by the interexchange carriers facilities connected with the originating exchange. On the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
  • Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. July 18, 1997) (seeking comment on models that will be used to calculate forward-looking costs for non-rural LECs after Jan. 1, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104(d), (e), 69.203(a) (rules currently in effect); see also 47 C.F.R. 69.152(d), (e) (rules in 20 effect as of January 1, 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 69.104(h). 21 47 C.F.R. � 69.2; Access Charge Reform Order at para. 396. 22 4 Commission. Accordingly, although this NPRM focuses on price cap ILECs, we also solicit 18 comment on whether the various proposals set forth in this NPRM for defining, identifying, and verifying primary lines for price cap ILECs could also be applied for rate-of-return ILECs if, in a future proceeding, the Commission concludes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97316.pdf
  • Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 97-256 (rel. July 18, 1997) (seeking comment on models that will be used to calculate forward-looking costs for non-rural LECs after Jan. 1, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104(d), (e), 69.203(a) (rules currently in effect); see also 47 C.F.R. 69.152(d), (e) (rules in 20 effect as of January 1, 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 69.104(h). 21 47 C.F.R. � 69.2; Access Charge Reform Order at para. 396. 22 4 Commission. Accordingly, although this NPRM focuses on price cap ILECs, we also solicit 18 comment on whether the various proposals set forth in this NPRM for defining, identifying, and verifying primary lines for price cap ILECs could also be applied for rate-of-return ILECs if, in a future proceeding, the Commission concludes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • without an effective date, which specifies the schedules which have been suspended. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 63 93. Revise Section 63.10(c)(1) to read as follows: � 63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. * * * (c) * * * (1) File international service tariffs pursuant to Section 61.28 of this Chapter. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PART 69 94. Revise Section 69.2 to remove and reserve paragraph (tt). 95. Revise Section 69.3 to read as follows: � 69.3Filing of access service tariffs. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-164 37 (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, a tariff for access service shall be filed with this Commission for a two-year period. Such tariffs shall be filed with a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99235.doc
  • determined by the Administrator. � 61.3 Definitions (a) Act. The Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1004; 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5), as amended. (b) Actual Price Index (API). An index of the level of aggregate rate element rates in a basket, which index is calculated pursuant to � 61.46. (c) Association. This term has the meaning given it in � 69.2(d) (d) Average Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line Month. Price Cap CMT Revenue per Month as of December 31, 1999 (including the adjustments to be made pursuant to � 61.48(1)) using base period demand, divided by the base period demand number of lines as of December 31, 1999. In filing entities with multiple study areas, if it becomes necessary to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.wp
  • than June 15, 1997: 47 CFR 61.45, 61.47, 69.104, 69.126, 69.151, and 69.152. The following rules, or amendments thereto, shall be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: 47 CFR 69.103, 69.107, 69.122, 69.303, and 69.304. The following rules, or amendments thereto, in this Report and Order shall be effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.3, 61.46, 69.1, 69.2, 69.105, 69.123, 69.124, 69.125, 69.154, 69.155, 69.157, 69.305, 69.306, 69.309, 69.401, 69.411, 69.502, and 69.611. The following rules, which impose new or modified information or collection requirements, shall become effective upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), but no sooner than January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.42, 61.48, 69.4, 69.106, 69.111, 69.153, 69.156. Unless otherwise stated herein,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97253.wp
  • 1996" (SBREFA), Subtitle II of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing 172 universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and TRS fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 44 affected entities. For this part of the Order, we have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), as required by 5 U.S.C. � 603. 1. Certification 84. In the NECA NPRM, the Commission tentatively certified that the rules it proposed to adopt in this proceeding would not have a significant economic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.wp
  • 54.711(b) 42. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.203, and 1.1206. 43. 5 U.S.C. 603. 44. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 45. 5 U.S.C. 601(3). 46. 15 U.S.C. 632(a). 47. See 47 C.F.R. 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. 69.2(y), 69.612); and TRS Fund (47 C.F.R. 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 48. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 49. 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 50. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. We require that a summary be included, however, with all comments and reply comments, regardless of length. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • will become a common line charge levied on end-users. 14 The EUCL charge is also referred to as the subscriber line charge (SLC). 15 Costs assigned directly to the CCL element and, therefore, recovered solely from IXCs, are those attributable to customer premises equipment (CPE), surrogate CPE, and customer premises wiring included in information origination-termination equipment accounts. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(r), 69.501(b)-(c). The Commission recently revised section 69.501 to include the costs of public telephone loops in the BFP revenue requirement. See Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 2054 (1996); Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • Groups Block. Thus, for example, of BellSouth's local trunks, 116 of 4,429 trunk groups (2.6 %) exceeded the three percentage threshold whereas 26 out of 591 (4.4 %) competitive LEC trunk groups experienced blockage in excess of three percent, resulting in a difference of 1.8 percentage points. 218 The calculation that competitive LECs' experienced trunk blockage 54.5 % for March, 69.2 % for April, and 38.8 % for May greater than BellSouth's retail customers is derived by dividing the percentage of competitive LEC trunk groups blocked by the percentage of BellSouth retail trunk groups blocked. Thus for example, in the period from March 23, 1998, to April 24, 1998, competitive LECs' trunk groups experienced blockage of 4.4 % whereas, BellSouth's trunk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98292.wp
  • 2631, 2635 n.8, 2637 n.53. The subscriber line charge (SLC) is an access charge imposed on end users to recover at least a portion of the cost of the interstate portion of LEC facilities used to link each end user to the public switched telephone network ("PSTN"). Access Charge Reform Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16010. 18 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an "end user" when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98317.wp
  • to end users, ISP traffic delivered via the ILECs' ADSL service offerings constitutes local traffic for separations purposes.47 Therefore, competitive LECs argue that such traffic must terminate at the ISP's point of presence.48 Finally, several commenters maintain that the ILECs' ADSL service offerings must be tariffed on the state level, because they do not qualify as "access services" under section 69.2 of the Commission's rules.49 III. DISCUSSION Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-317 50 See GTE DSL Order at �� 16-27; see also GTE Direct Case at 7; Ameritech Comments at 9; Time Warner Comments at 4; US West Comments at 1; Bell Atlantic Comments at 2; Northpoint Comments at 1; USTA Comments at 2; and ACI/Firstworld Comments at 4. 9 14.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
  • upon public end users, and upon providers of public telephones. . . ."); see also 47 C.F.R. � 69.5(c) ("Special access surcharges shall be assessed upon users of exchange facilities that interconnect these facilities with means of interstate or foreign telecommunications to the extent that carrier's carrier charges are not assessed upon such interconnected usage."). See also 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (End user means "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier except that a carrier other than a telephone company shall be deemed to be an 'end user' when such carrier uses a telecommunications service for administrative purposes and a person or entity that offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • tariffs of carriers subject to price cap regulation. * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-206 B-8 (f) * * * (2) Each tariff filing submitted by a price cap LEC that introduces a new loop-based service, as defined in Section 61.3(pp) of this part -- including a restructured unbundled basic service element (BSE), as defined in Section 69.2(mm) of this chapter, that constitutes a new loop-based service -- that is or will later be included in a basket, must be accompanied by cost data sufficient to establish that the new loop-based service or unbundled BSE will not recover more than a just and reasonable portion of the carrier's overhead costs. (3) A price cap LEC may submit without
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99365.doc
  • phases and on an MSA basis. Id. at � 72. Pricing flexibility also is available for the non-MSA sections of a study area, provided the price cap LEC satisfies the triggers adopted for MSAs. For purposes of this Order, "dedicated transport services" refer to entrance facilities, direct-trunked transport, and the dedicated component of tandem-switched transport service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2 (oo), (qq), and (ss). Pricing Flexibility Order, at �� 24, 77-80, and 122-40. All of the collocation triggers in the Pricing Flexibility Order require that the LEC also demonstrate, with respect to each wire center upon which it relies to satisfy the trigger, that a collocated competitor is relying on transport facilities provided by an entity other than the incumbent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001883.doc
  • three of the exchanges (Bethel, McGrath and Unalakleet, comprising approximately 5,016 aggregate access lines) are to be transferred from ATEAC to United-KUC (Docket No. U-99-123. See Petition, pp. 3-4. Petition at 4. Id.. Petition at 4-5. As assignees of GTEA, a pre-February 8, 1996 incumbent local exchange carrier, ATEAC and United-KUC each will qualify as a ``telephone company'' under section 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 69.2 (hh), and Section 251(h)(1)(B)(ii) of the Communications Act, 47 USC � 251(h)(1)(B)(ii). They would, therefore, be eligible to participate in the NECA tariffs and pools under section 69.601 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 69.601. Petition at 6. Petition at 6. See Maine Telecommunications Group, Inc., 9 FCC Rcd 3082
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00133.doc
  • additional 52 formal complaints with the initial complaints. . In the Bureau Order, addressing the initial seven formal complaints filed by CFC, the Commission's Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) found that the defendants had properly assessed the EUCL charge on CFC's payphone lines. In arriving at that decision, the Bureau concluded that CFC did not provide "public telephone" service under section 69.2(ee) of the Commission's rules and, thus, was not exempt from the EUCL charge as other public payphones. Rather, the Bureau found that CFC was providing "semi-public" telephone service as described in Part 69 of the Commission's rules and, therefore, the LECs were allowed to assess EUCL charges to CFC's payphones. In addition, the Bureau determined that CFC was also subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00134.doc
  • in the Order. First, AT&T emphasizes that Section 69.105(a) specifically limits CCL charges to "per line per access minute of use"; that is, that there may be only one charge for each line. Second, AT&T raises a pre-1989 rule (which has since been superseded) on the computation of CCL charges that AT&T alleges was closely related and relevant to Section 69.2. This former rule, Section 69.105(b)(1), stated that the CCL charge: shall be computed by dividing the revenue requirement for the Carrier Common Line element by the projected annual access minutes of use for all interstate and international services that use local exchange common line facilities. Each minute of use of any local exchange common line by such services shall be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • PART 61 - TARIFFS � 61.3 Definitions (a) Act. The Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1004; 47 U.S.C. chapter 5), as amended. (b) Actual Price Index (API). An index of the level of aggregate rate element rates in a basket, which index is calculated pursuant to � 61.46. (c) Association. This term has the meaning given it in � 69.2(d). (d) Average Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line month. Price Cap CMT Revenue (as defined in � 61.3(cc)) per month as of July 1, 2000 (adjusted to remove Universal Service Contributions assessed to Local Exchange Carriers pursuant to � 54.702 of this chapter) using 2000 annual filing base period demand, divided by the 2000 annual filing base period demand. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00384.doc
  • out of an abundance of caution, the Commission has included small incumbent LECs in its regulatory flexibility analyses. See, e.g., Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15499, 16144-45 (1996). FCC, Common Carrier Bureau, Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers (Jan. 2000). Locator at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(hh). See Locator at Fig. 1. Statistics of Communications Common Carriers (1999 ed.) at Tables 2.10 and 2.11. See 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. � 604(b). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-384 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-384 % & � ' ' ���� � ���� (��� F��� G��� h��� i��� � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0�
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.wp
  • 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 31 5 U.S.C. � 601(4). 32 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 33 Id. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. �� 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.117, 69.603), the Long Term Support program (47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(y), 69.612), and the Telecommunications Relay Services fund (47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(4)(iii)). 34 NECA Governance Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18444-45. 7 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)28 requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011414.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011414.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY FILED A PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2 (hh) ``UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND'' OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC DKT 96-45 Released Date: June 15, 2001 Comment Date: June 29, 2001 Reply Date: July 16, 2001 On May 25, 2001, M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company (Skyline Telephone) filed a petition for waiver of 47 C.F. R. Sections 36.611, 36.612 and 69.2 (hh) of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber96.pdf
  • NA NA NYNEX 1,935 2,656 3,995 5,388 7,095 8,976 10,398 12,799 14,442 Pacific Telesis 537 722 1,451 2,210 2,874 3,426 3,938 4,636 5,332 SBC NA 2,500 2,800 4,498 5,409 8,008 9,866 16,479 NA US West 2,816 3,484 4,714 6,595 8,706 10,879 13,047 16,340 NA GTE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20,420 Company Thousands of Fiber-Miles Ameritech 56.6 69.2 84.6 153.0 234.4 NA NA NA NA Bell Atlantic 116.9 152.3 226.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth 185.8 267.3 355.2 440.4 NA NA NA 648.7 748.7 NYNEX 66.8 90.0 135.9 209.7 302.0 404.0 510.8 615.5 712.4 Pacific Telesis 22.1 30.4 64.1 96.9 120.9 139.7 160.2 189.0 216.0 SBC NA 95.4 135.6 185.3 221.8 365.4 514.6 878.2 NA US
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber97.pdf
  • 7,095 8,976 10,398 12,799 14,442 NA Pacific Telesis 537 722 1,451 2,210 2,874 3,426 3,938 4,636 5,332 5,920 SBC NA 2,500 2,800 4,498 5,409 8,008 9,866 16,479 NA NA U S WEST 2,816 3,484 4,714 6,595 8,706 10,879 13,047 16,340 NA NA GTE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20,420 22,998 Company Thousands of Fiber Miles Ameritech 56.6 69.2 84.6 153.0 234.4 NA NA NA NA NA Bell Atlantic 116.9 152.3 226.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth 185.8 267.3 355.2 440.4 NA NA NA 648.7 748.7 802.2 NYNEX 66.8 90.0 135.9 209.7 302.0 404.0 510.8 615.5 712.4 NA Pacific Telesis 22.1 30.4 64.1 96.9 120.9 139.7 160.2 189.0 216.0 239.9 SBC NA 95.4 135.6 185.3 221.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber98.pdf
  • 12,799 14,442 Pacific Telesis 537 722 1,451 2,210 2,874 3,426 3,938 4,636 5,332 5,920 6,608 SBC NA 2,500 2,800 4,498 5,409 8,008 9,866 16,479 NA NA NA U S WEST 2,816 3,484 4,714 6,595 8,706 10,879 13,047 16,340 NA NA NA GTE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20,420 22,998 25,216 Company Thousands of Fiber Miles Ameritech 56.6 69.2 84.6 153.0 234.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bell Atlantic ** 116.9 152.3 226.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth 185.8 267.3 355.2 440.4 NA NA NA 648.7 748.7 802.2 871.2 NYNEX ** 66.8 90.0 135.9 209.7 302.0 404.0 510.8 615.5 712.4 Pacific Telesis 22.1 30.4 64.1 96.9 120.9 139.7 160.2 189.0 216.0 239.9 264.5 SBC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1202.pdf
  • 85.0 94.8 97.9 98.7 50-60 $32,122 to $34,743 64.3 77.3 83.3 93.5 97.4 98.4 40-50 $29,893 to $32,121 61.3 73.4 80.4 92.2 96.3 97.7 30-40 $27,542 to $29,892 58.7 73.5 79.7 90.5 95.9 97.5 20-30 $24,855 to $27,541 56.8 69.6 77.2 89.8 95.2 97.0 10-20 $21,645 to $24,855 53.3 67.4 76.9 87.5 93.9 96.5 0-10 $0 to $21,644 47.9 59.1 69.2 88.7 94.1 96.3 Note: Some previously published data for June 2000 have been revised. Jun 2001 Jun 2002 Jun 2000 Persons per Square Mile (In Each Decile of Zip Codes) Jun 2001 Deciles (Blocks of Zip Codes Grouped by Density) Deciles (Blocks of Zip Codes Grouped by Median Household Income) Table 11 High-Speed Subscribership Ranked by Population Density (Over 200
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1203.pdf
  • $32,122 to $34,743 64.3 77.3 83.3 90.2 93.5 97.4 98.4 99.2 $29,893 to $32,121 61.3 73.4 80.4 89.9 92.2 96.3 97.7 99.1 $27,542 to $29,892 58.7 73.5 79.7 89.2 90.5 95.9 97.5 98.9 $24,855 to $27,541 56.8 69.6 77.2 87.1 89.8 95.2 97.0 98.5 $21,645 to $24,855 53.3 67.4 76.9 87.4 87.5 93.9 96.5 98.5 $0 to $21,644 47.9 59.1 69.2 78.3 88.7 94.1 96.3 98.1 2 The percent of population residing in Zip Codes with more than 3,147 person per square mile and with High-speed Service is 99.7% which rounds to 100%. Jun 2003 2 Percent of Zip Codes with at Least One High-Speed Subscriber 1 Persons per square mile and median household income are in decile groups. Each groups
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1204.pdf
  • 98.4 99.2 99.5 $29,893 to $32,121 61.3 73.4 80.4 89.9 92.5 92.2 96.3 97.7 99.1 99.3 $27,542 to $29,892 58.7 73.5 79.7 89.2 92.5 90.5 95.9 97.5 98.9 99.3 $24,855 to $27,541 56.8 69.6 77.2 87.1 90.9 89.8 95.2 97.0 98.5 99.0 $21,645 to $24,855 53.3 67.4 76.9 87.4 91.2 87.5 93.9 96.5 98.5 99.1 $0 to $21,644 47.9 59.1 69.2 78.3 81.3 88.7 94.1 96.3 98.1 98.8 Persons per Square Mile 1 Jun 2000 Jun 2002 Jun 2002 Table 14 High-Speed Subscribership Ranked by Population Density 1 Persons per-square mile and median household income are in decile groups. Each groups contains 10% of the zip codes. Jun 2001 Jun 2003 Jun 2000 Jun 2001 Jun 2002 Jun 2002 Jun 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0609_tables.doc
  • 70.5 33.6 7.9 1.1 Illinois 87.0 77.1 39.4 28.1 23.9 Indiana 83.7 74.2 41.1 29.4 18.1 Iowa 86.9 75.4 47.3 31.2 6.9 Kansas 80.9 72.9 37.8 28.5 3.8 Kentucky 86.0 79.0 48.3 30.7 27.5 Louisiana 83.5 78.1 33.9 22.8 13.6 Maine 83.6 70.8 59.0 43.9 6.3 Maryland 80.2 72.5 53.8 39.3 32.6 Massachusetts 83.1 77.2 60.1 44.6 40.2 Michigan 83.9 69.2 44.6 29.2 17.2 Minnesota 85.1 75.6 42.6 30.0 22.3 Mississippi 85.1 70.4 35.1 16.8 10.3 Missouri 83.8 74.3 32.8 14.8 4.7 Montana 72.7 55.0 31.3 27.4 1.1 Nebraska 75.8 67.9 42.5 29.6 3.2 Table 15 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Download Speed by State as of June 30, 2009 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • 15.3 4.8 4.0 793 Colorado 64.5 16.0 3.9 15.6 256 72.6 11.9 9.6 5.9 135 62.3 19.4 6.9 11.4 175 Connecticut 42.4 9.7 3.0 44.9 216 44.6 9.2 6.2 40.0 65 83.1 8.4 2.4 6.0 83 Delaware 65.6 13.1 8.2 13.1 61 64.7 23.5 11.8 0.0 17 87.5 8.3 0.0 4.2 24 Dist. of Columbia 52.0 18.0 8.0 22.0 25 69.2 15.4 0.0 15.4 13 90.9 9.1 0.0 0.0 11 Florida 69.3 10.0 8.4 12.2 1,115 71.4 10.2 6.4 12.0 451 75.6 12.5 4.3 7.6 536 Georgia 72.3 9.2 5.5 12.9 417 79.5 8.9 4.1 7.5 146 73.3 16.8 3.8 6.1 131 Idaho 61.9 8.3 8.3 21.4 84 72.5 10.0 7.5 10.0 40 78.7 14.8 3.3 3.3 61 Illinois 69.7 12.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • 15.3 4.8 4.0 793 Colorado 64.5 16.0 3.9 15.6 256 72.6 11.9 9.6 5.9 135 62.3 19.4 6.9 11.4 175 Connecticut 42.4 9.7 3.0 44.9 216 44.6 9.2 6.2 40.0 65 83.1 8.4 2.4 6.0 83 Delaware 65.6 13.1 8.2 13.1 61 64.7 23.5 11.8 0.0 17 87.5 8.3 0.0 4.2 24 Dist. of Columbia 52.0 18.0 8.0 22.0 25 69.2 15.4 0.0 15.4 13 90.9 9.1 0.0 0.0 11 Florida 69.3 10.0 8.4 12.2 1,115 71.4 10.2 6.4 12.0 451 75.6 12.5 4.3 7.6 536 Georgia 72.3 9.2 5.5 12.9 417 79.5 8.9 4.1 7.5 146 73.3 16.8 3.8 6.1 131 Idaho 61.9 8.3 8.3 21.4 84 72.5 10.0 7.5 10.0 40 78.7 14.8 3.3 3.3 61 Illinois 69.7 12.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • (ILECs) Total ILECs 8,684.1 17,278.4 4,205.7 4,205.1 0.0 4,157.3 1.1 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) 787.4 2,952.6 1,131.6 1,113.6 -1.6 1,090.1 2.1 and Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers 21.6 494.0 79.4 82.0 3.3 77.9 5.0 Private Service Providers 42.2 55.7 44.1 46.7 6.1 46.2 1.2 Shared-Tenant Service Providers * 4.5 1.2 1.2 2.5 1.1 10.7 Other Local Service Providers 69.2 89.3 13.0 12.5 -4.1 12.2 2.1 Total Local Competitors 920.9 3,596.2 1,269.2 1,256.0 -1.0 1,227.5 2.3 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,604.9 20,874.6 5,474.9 5,461.1 -0.3 5,384.8 1.4 Payphone Service Providers 21.9 80.3 6.6 7.6 14.9 7.4 2.6 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,690.2 24,828.5 5,894.7 6,168.3 4.6 6,058.9 1.8 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • Coaxial Cable IVoIP Providers 8/ 188.6 1,193.7 331.1 346.6 4.7 342.3 1.2 Interconnected VoIP (IVoIP) Providers 8/ 56.4 1,066.7 404.5 425.3 5.1 418.0 1.7 Total IVoIP 8/ 245.0 2,260.4 735.6 771.9 4.9 760.3 1.5 Other Local Service Providers 48.6 16.3 3.4 3.2 -4.9 3.2 0.4 Total Local Competitors 2,871.6 5,427.3 1,840.9 2,082.8 13.1 1,873.1 10.1 Fixed Local Service Providers 10,701.9 17,069.2 4,456.8 4,734.5 6.2 4,405.0 7.0 Payphone Service Providers 11.8 40.5 2.9 2.9 1.0 2.9 0.7 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,471.7 27,554.2 7,255.3 7,408.7 2.1 7,284.7 1.7 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 5.5 73.3 9.4 9.3 -1.3 9.2 1.1 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 3.5 14.6 2.6 2.4 -7.0 2.3 1.5 Wireless Data
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 64.7 June 41.7 65.1 July 41.9 65.2 August 42.0 65.4 September 42.1 65.6 October 42.3 65.8 November 42.4 65.8 December 42.5 65.9 1973January 42.6 65.6 February 42.9 65.9 March 43.3 66.0 April 43.6 66.2 May 43.9 66.2 June 44.2 66.4 July 44.3 66.4 August 45.1 67.0 September 45.2 67.1 October 45.6 67.3 November 45.9 67.3 December 46.2 69.0 1974January 46.6 69.2 February 47.2 69.3 March 47.8 69.3 April 48.0 69.4 May 48.6 69.4 June 49.0 69.4 July 49.4 69.4 August 50.0 69.4 September 50.6 69.9 October 51.1 69.9 November 51.5 69.9 December 51.9 69.9 1975January 52.1 69.8 February 52.5 70.1 March 52.7 70.7 April 52.9 70.9 May 53.2 71.2 June 53.6 71.8 July 54.2 71.9 August 54.3 72.2 September 54.6 72.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.9 101.0 100.0 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.5 100.7 100.0 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.1 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.7 100.9 100.0 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 101.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.0 101.2 100.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.2 101.5 101.8 100.0 February 62.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 100.3 100.8 100.9 December 74.3 84.5 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.4 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 100.3 100.8 100.9 December 74.3 84.5 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.4 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 66.0 March 55.9 73.8 April 43.6 66.2 April 56.1 73.8 May 43.9 66.2 May 56.5 73.9 June 44.2 66.4 June 56.8 74.0 July 44.3 66.4 July 57.1 74.1 August 45.1 67.0 August 57.4 75.0 September 45.2 67.1 September 57.6 74.9 October 45.6 67.3 October 57.9 75.0 November 45.9 67.3 November 58.0 75.3 December 46.2 69.0 December 58.2 75.3 1974January 46.6 69.2 1977January 58.5 74.5 February 47.2 69.3 February 59.1 74.7 March 47.8 69.3 March 59.5 74.8 April 48.0 69.4 April 60.0 75.0 May 48.6 69.4 May 60.3 75.0 June 49.0 69.4 June 60.7 75.1 July 49.4 69.4 July 61.0 75.1 August 50.0 69.4 August 61.2 75.3 September 50.6 69.9 September 61.4 75.4 October 51.1 69.9 October 61.6 75.5 November 51.5 69.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 41.7 65.1 July 41.9 65.2 August 42.0 65.4 September 42.1 65.6 October 42.3 65.8 November 42.4 65.8 December 42.5 65.9 1973 January 42.6 65.6 February 42.9 65.9 March 43.3 66.0 April 43.6 66.2 May 43.9 66.2 June 44.2 66.4 July 44.3 66.4 August 45.1 67.0 September 45.2 67.1 October 45.6 67.3 November 45.9 67.3 December 46.2 69.0 1974 January 46.6 69.2 February 47.2 69.3 March 47.8 69.3 April 48.0 69.4 May 48.6 69.4 June 49.0 69.4 July 49.4 69.4 August 50.0 69.4 September 50.6 69.9 October 51.1 69.9 November 51.5 69.9 December 51.9 69.9 1975 January 52.1 69.8 February 52.5 70.1 March 52.7 70.7 April 52.9 70.9 May 53.2 71.2 70 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 41.7 65.1 July 41.9 65.2 August 42.0 65.4 September 42.1 65.6 October 42.3 65.8 November 42.4 65.8 December 42.5 65.9 1973 January 42.6 65.6 February 42.9 65.9 March 43.3 66.0 April 43.6 66.2 May 43.9 66.2 June 44.2 66.4 July 44.3 66.4 August 45.1 67.0 September 45.2 67.1 October 45.6 67.3 November 45.9 67.3 December 46.2 69.0 1974 January 46.6 69.2 February 47.2 69.3 March 47.8 69.3 April 48.0 69.4 May 48.6 69.4 June 49.0 69.4 July 49.4 69.4 August 50.0 69.4 September 50.6 69.9 October 51.1 69.9 November 51.5 69.9 December 51.9 69.9 1975 January 52.1 69.8 February 52.5 70.1 March 52.7 70.7 April 52.9 70.9 May 53.2 71.2 June 53.6 71.8 July 54.2 71.9 August 54.3 72.2 September 54.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • Virginia, and West Virginia. Mid-West: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin Table A-2 General Information: 1999 6 Others Average PercentAdjustment Formula Companies Companies Companies Reporting 4/100/Average Percent % of Lines % of Lines % of Lines Reporting Alabama 2,521,633 79.3% 12.8% 7.9% 91.0% 1.10 Alaska 458,700 NA NA NA 0.0 NA Arizona 2,971,550 93.4 5.5 1.2 93.7 1.07 Arkansas 1,501,281 69.2 14.8 16.0 75.1 1.33 California 22,736,457 78.2 20.9 0.9 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,864,170 95.6 0.0 4.4 95.6 1.05 Connecticut 2,435,206 99.0 0.0 1.0 99.0 1.01 Delaware 582,735 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 926,875 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,309,559 59.1 39.3 1.6 98.3 1.02 Georgia 5,208,825 83.3 0.6 16.2 89.5 1.12 Hawaii 722,416 0.0 100.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 25 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0301.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0302.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0303.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0304.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0305.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0398.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 25 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0399.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 24 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0700.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN 26 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0701.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0703.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0704.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0798.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 25 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 24 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
  • 99.0 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN 25 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1101.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1102.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1103.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1198.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 24 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1199.pdf
  • 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 83.6 57.9 74.2 0.0 98.2 Indiana 34 81 131,910 62 76.5 76.5 76.4 17.7 100.0 Iowa 143 332 210,561 283 85.2 78.3 84.9 7.0 95.2 Kansas 33 202 115,152 173 85.6 81.8 93.5 18.2 99.0 Kentucky 14 95 173,593 76 80.0 78.6 74.3 21.4 96.8 Louisiana 18 100 152,711 91 91.0 83.3 90.7 61.1 99.0 Maine 22 120 150,291 83 69.2 63.6 64.9 13.6 99.2 Maryland 1 1 7,781 1 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Massachusetts 2 2 4,173 2 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Michigan 32 100 110,595 65 65.0 71.9 81.7 18.8 97.0 Minnesota 76 319 315,243 215 67.4 61.8 75.4 10.5 99.7 Mississippi 15 59 75,882 30 50.9 53.3 64.1 13.3 93.2 Missouri 34 287 227,463 260 90.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 100.0 1 0 100.0 87 100.0 Rhode Island 30 0 100.0 5 1 83.3 36 97.2 South Carolina 276 2 99.3 17 5 77.3 300 97.7 South Dakota 245 9 96.5 5 2 71.4 261 95.8 Tennessee 355 9 97.5 38 4 90.5 406 96.8 Texas 1,483 26 98.3 583 26 95.7 2,118 97.5 Utah 147 18 89.1 9 4 69.2 178 87.6 Vermont 132 2 98.5 2 0 100.0 136 98.5 Virgin Islands 5 0 100.0 0 0 NA 5 100.0 Virginia 461 7 98.5 49 10 83.1 527 96.8 Washington 359 8 97.8 58 5 92.1 430 97.0 West Virginia 228 6 97.4 6 2 75.0 242 96.7 Wisconsin 635 5 99.2 46 6 88.5 692 98.4 Wyoming 63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
  • 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Other Local $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Total Local Revenues $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Intrastate Access $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Total Access Revenues $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $12.0 23.0 $128.2 69.2 $140.2 59.0 91.4 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $30.5 58.3 $39.0 21.1 $69.5 29.3 56.1 Long Distance Private Line Service $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0 n.a. All Other Long Distance $9.8 18.7 $18.1 9.8 $27.9 11.7 64.9 Total Toll Revenues $52.3 100.0 $185.3 100.0 $237.6 100.0 78.0 Total Carrier Revenue $52.3 100.0 $185.3 100.0 $237.6 100.0 78.0 Figures may not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f01.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 $0 $70,623 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 $0 Tuvalu 0 $0 $0 $0 Vanuatu 0 $0 $0 $0 Wallis and Futuna 0 $0 $0 $0 Western Samoa 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $91,800 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 $0 American Samoa 66 0.0 0.0 0.016.783.3 $34,380 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,091,085 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 $0 Baker Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Guam 2,924 0.0 6.910.879.4 2.8 $0 $12,384,812 0.019.5 2.3 74.7 3.5 $0 Hawaii 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $394,629 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 $0 Howland Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Jarvis Island 0 $0 $0 $0 Johnston Atoll 0 $0 $0 $0 Kingman Reef 0 $0 $0 $0 Midway Atoll 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
  • 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017 0.7 97.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 798,023,705 35.4 3.5 33.2 16.7 11.2 Norway $28,785,730 42.3 1.3 15.9 26.1 14.4 $2,235,416 20.2 1.0 12.3 66.0 0.5 $861,416 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206,065,128 21.0 2.2 18.7 41.1 17.0 Portugal $31,812,704 76.4 3.2 13.3 3.9 3.2 $1,612,633 68.0 0.0 26.5 4.9 0.5 $8,824 0.0 19.9 10.9 69.2 0.0 180,759,687 50.8 8.9 24.9 6.1 9.3 Spain $114,772,545 55.0 4.0 11.2 26.4 3.5 $3,613,281 34.3 20.8 30.7 8.3 5.9 $12,437,764 0.8 94.6 0.3 4.3 0.0 637,440,248 28.3 12.5 18.3 24.5 16.4 Sweden $32,755,210 51.7 2.1 24.1 18.5 3.7 $3,414,780 37.1 5.2 37.3 20.1 0.4 $3,564,642 0.2 99.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 324,182,160 23.4 4.9 52.2 14.6 4.9 Switzerland $74,010,699 60.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 45.4 406.7 7,825 8,232 4.9 1970 252.2 63.1 53.1 15.5 49.9 433.8 8,522 8,956 4.8 1971 289.1 72.5 49.2 12.7 52.0 475.6 9,486 9,962 4.8 1972 357.1 88.3 44.8 14.2 57.7 562.2 10,761 11,323 5.0 1973 436.4 115.0 47.7 15.1 62.8 677.0 12,449 13,126 5.2 1974 508.9 142.7 52.3 12.9 64.1 781.0 13,801 14,582 5.4 1975 576.3 163.4 42.5 13.2 69.2 864.6 15,233 16,098 5.4 1976 677.7 188.0 37.3 14.1 74.8 991.9 17,688 18,680 5.3 1977 806.4 225.2 35.5 13.8 84.4 1,165.3 19,994 21,159 5.5 1978 975.5 267.3 37.1 14.0 93.3 1,387.3 23,039 24,426 5.7 1979 1,120.7 299.4 37.7 14.7 96.0 1,568.4 26,031 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 324.9 62.6 14.8 100.0 2,599.5 28,402 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 349.6 61.8 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 45.4 406.7 7,825 8,232 4.9 1970 252.2 63.1 53.1 15.5 49.9 433.8 8,522 8,956 4.8 1971 289.1 72.5 49.2 12.7 52.0 475.6 9,486 9,962 4.8 1972 357.1 88.3 44.8 14.2 57.7 562.2 10,761 11,323 5.0 1973 436.4 115.0 47.7 15.1 62.8 677.0 12,449 13,126 5.2 1974 508.9 142.7 52.3 12.9 64.1 781.0 13,801 14,582 5.4 1975 576.3 163.4 42.5 13.2 69.2 864.6 15,233 16,098 5.4 1976 677.7 188.0 37.3 14.1 74.8 991.9 17,688 18,680 5.3 1977 806.4 225.2 35.5 13.8 84.4 1,165.3 19,994 21,159 5.5 1978 975.5 267.3 37.1 14.0 93.3 1,387.3 23,039 24,426 5.7 1979 1,120.7 299.4 37.7 14.7 96.0 1,568.4 26,031 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 324.9 62.6 14.8 100.0 2,599.5 28,402 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 349.6 61.8 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 344.0 7,888 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 378.2 8,578 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 423.8 9,538 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 496.9 10,826 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 605.5 12,521 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 700.8 13,881 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 778.5 15,319 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 915.4 17,765 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,103.2 20,056 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,366.2 23,060 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,585.9 26,013 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,599.5 28,402 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.01,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.91,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.31,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.72,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9 349.6 61.8 2,650.82,776.7 39,180
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.9 101.0 100.0 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.5 100.7 100.0 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.0 100.1 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.7 100.9 100.0 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 101.4 100.6 100.7 100.0 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 101.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.3 101.6 100.0 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.4 101.0 101.2 100.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.2 101.5 101.8 100.0 February 62.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • Intrastate Private Line Service Other Telephone Services NAICS Series ID 2000January 75.2 90.6 99.1 100.4 101.2 100.7 February 79.5 90.0 99.6 100.4 101.2 100.9 March 76.1 90.8 100.2 100.4 101.2 100.5 April 74.3 88.5 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.6 May 70.2 89.1 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.0 June 70.6 89.1 100.8 100.4 101.2 100.0 July 67.6 85.2 100.6 100.4 101.2 100.7 August 69.2 93.0 100.3 100.4 101.2 100.6 September 69.8 95.5 100.4 100.4 101.2 101.3 October 65.2 93.0 99.3 100.4 101.1 100.0 November 61.2 78.2 99.8 100.4 101.2 101.3 December 72.9 88.8 95.6 100.4 101.2 101.0 2001January 71.6 84.2 101.7 100.4 101.1 101.5 February 62.7 81.3 102.9 100.4 101.0 101.5 March 67.2 84.5 101.0 100.4 101.0 101.5 April 60.4 90.4 101.6 100.4 101.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 6,048.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 168.4 3,580.0 2,837.4 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 1,222.2 16,525.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10,583.3 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 854.8 9.8 0.0 0.0 428.6 6. Software Design 784.5 0.0 0.0 69.2 0.0 92.3 9.4 0.0 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 7,012.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 398.4 1,553.6 28.9 0.0 9. Natural Causes 13,160.8 0.0 0.0 44.7 469.9 92.1 2,332.1 54.1 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 971.1 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12. External
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-6.pdf
  • 98.4 98.8 98.5 98.9 96.9 97.3 97.7 98.6 $60,000 - $74,999 99.0 99.2 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
  • 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 - 30 TABLE 6.4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 55.7 74.1 65.4 65.7 70.5 84.8 60.1 76.0 70.1 71.4 73.8 84.6 65.6 75.9 67.2 70.1 75.3 79.6 69.9 72.9 65.4 67.0 78.0 83.4 65.2 71.2 63.5 63.0 74.7 82.9 65.4 70.5 62.3 63.5 76.5 86.8 70.9 73.3 64.7 69.5 74.4 83.7 75.7 72.0 63.1 66.0 73.6 82.4 74.5 71.2 60.0 61.9 70.7 74.5 79.3 63.0 58.3 61.5 74.8 80.2 69.2 67.2 58.8 69.9 74.2 79.1 69.2 66.0 57.0 68.7 72.1 80.1 61.2 63.8 55.7 60.8 68.0 73.3 68.8 61.7 54.9 55.8 7 - 17 Table 7.6 Producer Price Indices (June 1995 = 100) BLS Series ID 1995June July August September October November December 1996January February March April May June July August September October November December 1997January February March April May
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-6.pdf
  • 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 - 28 TABLE 6.5 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 98 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 6 - 31 TABLE 6.5 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 99.0 99.2 99.5 99.8 98.4 98.4 $75,000 + 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.3 98.5 98.8 98.1 98.3 RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN 6 - 32 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail MARCH 1998 TOTAL 94.1 95.1 95.1 96.0 88.1 89.7 88.8 90.2 UNDER $5,000 75.7 79.5 78.4 82.1 69.2 73.4 74.3 77.1 $5,000 - $7,499 82.4 85.3 84.0 87.0 77.7 80.9 77.8 80.0 $7,500 - $9,999 88.7 90.3 89.7 91.1 86.4 88.7 82.5 83.9 $10,000 - $12,499 90.2 92.2 90.6 92.7 88.1 89.9 81.8 84.2 $12,500 - $14,999 91.6 93.7 92.1 94.3 87.0 88.5 87.0 88.1 $15,000 - $19,999 93.3 94.4 94.2 95.3 89.3 90.2 92.4 93.9 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 86.3 88.5 89.3 89.3 60-64 YRS OLD 95.5 96.4 96.4 97.2 89.5 90.7 87.3 90.2 65-69 YRS OLD 95.5 96.2 96.5 97.0 87.2 89.0 90.7 90.7 70-99 YRS OLD 95.4 96.5 96.0 97.0 90.1 92.3 85.5 89.1 1984 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.6 93.7 93.2 94.9 79.8 84.5 80.9 84.3 16-24 YRS OLD 77.0 83.6 79.6 85.4 58.2 70.8 60.9 69.2 25-54 YRS OLD 91.7 93.7 93.4 95.1 79.6 84.1 83.1 85.7 55-59 YRS OLD 94.9 96.1 96.1 97.1 86.6 89.2 87.1 90.1 60-64 YRS OLD 94.9 96.0 96.0 97.0 86.6 88.8 87.1 89.1 65-69 YRS OLD 96.2 96.8 97.1 97.6 87.9 89.9 90.2 91.5 70-99 YRS OLD 95.3 96.5 96.0 97.1 88.2 90.9 84.4 87.6 1985 ANNUAL AVERAGE TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 3,090.6 1,228.1 598.5 194.2 429.6 1,222.3 5.8MN Mississippi 3,395.1 168.3 3,226.8 2,416.4 810.4 553.2 109.7 138.5 801.5 8.9MS Missouri 7,253.9 183.3 7,070.5 5,088.9 1,981.6 1,079.8 287.8 556.1 1,923.6 58.0MO Montana 869.9 43.9 826.0 558.9 267.1 129.6 58.3 78.3 266.3 0.8MT Nebraska 2,156.9 156.0 2,000.9 1,382.5 618.4 256.3 155.1 201.6 613.0 5.4 NE Nevada 2,230.8 154.7 2,076.1 1,550.2 525.9 275.5 176.5 69.2 521.3 4.6 NV New Hampshire 1,898.7 75.3 1,823.4 1,216.8 606.6 260.2 133.7 209.3 603.1 3.5 NH New Jersey 12,118.4 651.7 11,466.7 7,854.5 3,612.2 1,671.3 582.5 1,336.5 3,590.3 22.0 NJ New Mexico 1,993.0 106.6 1,886.3 1,345.2 541.1 316.4 96.1 126.2 538.7 2.5NM New York 26,804.8 1,673.7 25,131.2 17,177.1 7,954.1 2,922.0 1,012.1 3,969.9 7,904.1 50.0 NY North Carolina 10,285.9 573.3 9,712.6 7,203.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 29.4 16.4 28.8 74.6 4.2MT Nebraska 677.5 52.3 625.2 442.8 182.4 58.7 36.1 79.5 174.2 8.2NE Nevada 705.4 77.4 628.0 403.2 224.8 98.9 46.1 72.2 217.2 7.6NV New Hampshire 507.6 20.2 487.4 312.8 174.6 68.5 30.8 70.4 169.8 4.8NH New Jersey 4,065.1 246.4 3,818.7 2,515.0 1,303.6 582.4 149.6 537.7 1,269.7 33.9NJ New Mexico 592.6 38.3 554.3 373.1 181.1 71.8 30.0 69.2 171.0 10.2NM New York 8,385.8 335.4 8,050.4 5,612.4 2,438.0 1,059.9 285.6 1,008.5 2,354.1 84.0NY North Carolina 3,396.2 287.8 3,108.4 2,262.9 845.5 397.5 111.4 308.4 817.2 28.3NC North Dakota 166.8 6.6 160.1 102.7 57.5 18.1 12.0 23.8 53.9 3.6ND Ohio 4,354.7 364.9 3,989.8 2,871.8 1,117.9 491.6 152.6 451.5 1,095.8 22.2OH Oklahoma 1,160.6 163.4 997.2 697.7 299.5 126.9 43.7 121.7 292.3 7.2OK
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 31.7 74.9 2.9 MT Nebraska 217.5 2.5 215.0 56.0 159.0 46.5 28.8 79.3 154.6 4.3 NE Nevada 228.5 0.1 228.4 15.5 212.9 95.2 37.5 77.9 210.6 2.2 NV New Hampshire 186.5 2.2 184.4 24.9 159.5 63.3 24.2 71.9 159.4 NH New Jersey 1,545.6 21.3 1,524.3 238.1 1,286.2 521.3 131.9 632.4 1,285.6 0.6 NJ New Mexico 228.1 4.3 223.8 46.3 177.5 69.2 26.2 74.9 170.3 7.1 NM New York 2,476.0 37.2 2,438.8 327.9 2,110.9 889.2 227.7 994.0 2,110.9 NY North Carolina 1,055.3 13.8 1,041.6 218.2 823.4 385.6 100.5 323.0 809.1 14.3 NC North Dakota 64.8 1.1 63.7 13.9 49.8 15.1 8.4 24.6 48.1 1.7 ND Ohio 1,369.1 (1.2) 1,370.4 321.5 1,048.9 451.4 138.6 442.8 1,032.8 16.1 OH Oklahoma 318.7 318.7 41.4 277.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • MINNESOTA 2,212.7 217.4 1,995.4 1,479.6 510.2 259.6 124.0 126.6 510.2 MN MISSISSIPPI 1,605.0 66.0 1,539.0 1,162.0 374.3 238.8 103.9 31.2 373.9 0.329 MS MISSOURI 3,271.1 49.8 3,221.3 2,388.5 832.8 431.3 229.0 171.8 832.1 0.637 MO MONTANA 349.3 (1.7) 351.0 239.6 110.6 49.3 37.4 24.0 110.6 MT NEBRASKA 1,319.1 173.0 1,146.2 816.9 327.6 135.0 103.4 88.2 326.6 1.004 NE NEVADA 744.6 69.2 675.4 489.4 183.2 88.4 79.4 15.5 183.2 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 889.3 92.6 796.7 543.1 253.5 118.3 97.9 37.4 253.5 NH NEW JERSEY 5,211.0 558.7 4,652.3 3,223.1 1,473.2 584.3 501.2 385.3 1,470.8 2.417 NJ NEW MEXICO 1,128.6 133.1 995.5 713.7 281.4 146.6 94.0 40.7 281.4 NM NEW YORK 15,371.4 3,053.8 12,317.6 8,888.8 3,428.8 1,457.5 1,501.1 460.3 3,418.8 10.052 NY NORTH CAROLINA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 286.7 28.1 1958 467.3 2,057.5 370.3 329.4 296.3 28.9 1959 507.2 2,210.2 394.4 349.9 318.1 29.1 1960 526.6 2,262.9 412.2 363.8 332.2 29.6 1961 544.8 2,314.3 430.0 379.7 342.6 29.9 1962 585.2 2,454.8 457.0 402.2 363.4 30.2 1963 617.4 2,559.4 480.0 422.0 383.0 30.6 1964 663.0 2,708.4 514.5 458.5 411.4 31.0 1965 719.1 2,881.1 556.7 494.8 444.3 31.5 1966 787.8 3,069.2 605.7 534.7 481.9 32.4 1967 833.6 3,147.2 650.7 572.9 509.5 33.4 1968 910.6 3,293.9 714.5 622.5 559.8 34.8 1969 982.2 3,393.6 779.3 669.4 604.7 36.7 1970 1,035.6 3,397.6 837.1 728.1 648.1 38.8 1971 1,125.4 3,510.0 900.2 791.5 702.5 40.5 1972 1,237.3 3,702.3 988.8 856.8 770.7 41.8 1973 1,382.6 3,916.3 1,107.5 967.0 851.6 44.4 1974 1,496.9 3,891.2 1,215.9 1,056.8 931.2 49.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 334.0 68.8 265.1 139.8 81.9 42.8 264.5 0.588 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 65.4 0.24 65.1 13.6 51.5 16.2 20.2 15.1 51.5 SD TENNESSEE 529.7 (1.33) 531.0 103.4 427.6 226.7 127.5 72.4 426.6 0.957 TN TEXAS 2,757.6 14.97 2,742.6 1,116.4 1,626.2 784.0 468.5 373.9 1,626.3 (0.109)TX UTAH 211.9 (0.34) 212.3 31.3 181.0 69.4 69.8 41.8 181.0 UT VERMONT 80.9 2.27 78.6 9.4 69.2 23.3 36.3 9.6 69.2 VT VIRGINIA 916.4 9.44 907.0 257.9 649.1 303.9 202.8 141.8 648.4 0.648 VA WASHINGTON 707.9 (2.34) 710.3 174.2 536.1 233.2 204.2 98.8 536.1 WA WEST VIRGINIA 171.3 0.87 170.4 34.4 136.0 80.6 36.4 18.8 135.8 0.184 WV WISCONSIN 444.3 24.67 419.7 90.0 329.6 144.9 116.2 68.3 329.4 0.231 WI WYOMING 61.1 (6.40) 67.5 8.9 58.6 17.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 286.7 28.1 1958 467.3 2,057.5 370.3 329.4 296.3 28.9 1959 507.2 2,210.2 394.4 349.9 318.1 29.1 1960 526.6 2,262.9 412.2 363.8 332.2 29.6 1961 544.8 2,314.3 430.0 379.7 342.6 29.9 1962 585.2 2,454.8 457.0 402.2 363.4 30.2 1963 617.4 2,559.4 480.0 422.0 383.0 30.6 1964 663.0 2,708.4 514.5 458.5 411.4 31.0 1965 719.1 2,881.1 556.7 494.8 444.3 31.5 1966 787.8 3,069.2 605.7 534.7 481.9 32.4 1967 833.6 3,147.2 650.7 572.9 509.5 33.4 1968 910.6 3,293.9 714.5 622.5 559.8 34.8 1969 982.2 3,393.6 779.3 669.4 604.7 36.7 1970 1,035.6 3,397.6 837.1 728.1 648.1 38.8 1971 1,125.4 3,510.0 900.2 791.5 702.5 40.5 1972 1,237.3 3,702.3 988.8 856.8 770.7 41.8 1973 1,382.6 3,916.3 1,107.5 967.0 851.6 44.4 1974 1,496.9 3,891.2 1,215.9 1,056.8 931.2 49.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 2.91 0.78 0.50 4.19 24.4 NC NORTH DAKOTA 5.5 5.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 (0.50) (0.25) (0.28) (1.03) 1.3 ND OHIO 467.5 370.2 97.3 66.0 31.3 0.91 0.83 0.53 2.27 29.0 OH OKLAHOMA 126.3 121.1 5.3 (4.7) 10.0 (0.31) (0.11) 0.03 (0.39) 10.4 OK OREGON 94.0 64.8 29.2 21.1 8.0 (0.94) (0.57) (0.26) (1.77) 9.8 OR PENNSYLVANIA 435.7 228.9 188.2 119.0 69.2 8.08 3.25 3.49 14.82 54.4 PA RHODE ISLAND 78.3 78.0 0.2 (1.5) 1.7 (4.99) (2.10) (1.45) (8.53) 10.3 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 40.4 16.2 24.2 17.0 7.3 0.34 0.09 0.16 0.59 6.7 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 93.9 57.8 36.2 27.2 9.0 1.07 0.81 0.44 2.32 6.7 SD TENNESSEE 5.5 6.2 (0.7) (0.7) (0.0) (0.72) (0.30) (0.29) (1.31) 1.3 TN TEXAS 164.0 99.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000519.doc
  • in December 1992, and TFN was acquired by LDDS in August 1992. Id. at 1. For purposes of this order, we treat LDDS as the entity that purchased the relevant services. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 148-49 (1930) (requiring ``separation of the intrastate and interstate property, revenues and expenses'' of LECs); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(b), 69.3(a) (in combination, requiring filing of interstate access tariffs at FCC). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 151 (assigning to FCC the regulation of ``interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio''); id. � 152(b) (excluding from FCC jurisdiction matters relating to ``intrastate communication service by wire or radio''). The Commission previously has recognized that LECs are not able
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 50.0 198.0 12141 742 10995 409 0.5 0.2 100.0 KYHARLAN 44 51 50.0 601.0 19175 562 16832 475 2.2 4.0 100.0 KYHAZARD 35 16 50.0 384.0 15138 348 13480 296 4.5 3.6 100.0 KYHAZARD 57 12 3.2 475.0 16984 393 14617 324 0.4 0.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 18 20 50.0 195.0 13015 626 12783 622 1.0 0.2 99.8 KYLEXINGTON 27 59 69.2 300.0 16909 681 16781 678 1.4 0.5 99.9 KYLEXINGTON 36 40 66.5 305.0 17900 696 17412 691 1.5 1.4 100.0 KYLEXINGTON 46 42 50.0 265.0 13711 639 13491 635 6.3 3.2 99.1 KYLOUISVILLE 3 47 1000.0 555.0 45682 2902 35162 2244 0.6 0.4 99.7 KYLOUISVILLE 11 55 428.5 390.0 27674 1482 26136 1462 0.1 0.0 100.0 KYLOUISVILLE 15 17 50.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/pnmm7137.pdf
  • Authorizations July 11, 1997 Report No. D-938 Non- ARN Common Latitude Longitude Ground BTA Channel Center of Market Name Winning Bidder New Name (If Applicable) Carrier Elev Rad. BMDP960510AU X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 1 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP960510ES X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 2A 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP970416QX X 313740 841145 69.2 B006 F 139 Albany, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QU X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H1 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QV X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H2 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QW X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H3 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/pnmm7146.pdf
  • Service Grants July 25, 1997 Report No. D-941-A Non- ARN Common Latitude Longitude Ground BTA Channel Center ofMarket Name Winning Bidder New Name (If Applicable) Carrier Elev Rad. BMDP960510AU X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 1 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP960510ES X 402242 1044956 1530 B172 2A 93 Greeley, CO American Telecasting Development, Inc. BMDP970416QX X 313740 841145 69.2 B006 F 139 Albany, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QU X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H1 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDP970416QW X 311006 832150 68.9 B454 H3 215.5 Valdosta, GA John H. Phipps, Inc. Wireless Ventures, L.L.C. BMDS960510KCS B036 Bellingham, WA Pacific Telesis Enterprises BMDP960510KN X 132920 1444936 200 B490 H1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • regulation generally. To obtain connections, ESPs generally pay local business rates and interstate subscriber line charges for their switched access connections to LEC central offices. 262 Amendments of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules Relating to Enhanced Service Providers, Order, 3 FCC Rcd 2631 (para. 2 n.8) (1988); see also MTS and WATs Market Structure, (para. 4); 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m)(1996) ("End User" means any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier). 263 Access Charge Reform; Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers; Transport Rate Structure and Pricing; Usage of the Public Switched Network by Information Service and Internet Access Providers, CC Docket Nos. 92-262, 94-1, 91-213, 96-263, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Third Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2000/nrwl0026.txt
  • report focuses on three categories of wireless services: mobile telephony, mobile data, and dispatch. The Fifth Report makes the following observations about these categories: Mobile Telephony: The mobile telephony sector has experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1999, the mobile telephony sector generated over $40 billion in revenues, increased subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million, and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent. Mobile telephony carriers continue to deploy their networks. To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. Over 172 million people, or 69 percent of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • Report Appendixes, at H-2. 21 See Section II.A.1.d for a detailed discussion. 6 Mobile Telephony. Since the release of the Third Report, the mobile telephony sector of CMRS experienced another year of strong growth and competitive development. In the twelve months ending December 1998, the mobile telephony sector generated over $33 billion in revenues,15 increased subscribership from 55 million to 69.2 million,16 and produced a national penetration rate of nearly 26 percent.17 In addition, new entrant wireless providers18 have continued to deploy their networks. While the new entrant network buildout and coverage has not caught up to that of cellular, there are now at least five mobile telephone operators in each of the 35 largest Basic Trading Areas19 ("BTAs") and at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • aspects of the wireless industry. The accuracy of the data from these materials, however, was not independently verified by the Commission. The inclusion of these data in this report does not constitute a representation or warranty by the Commission of their accuracy or completeness. 20 See Appendix B, Table 1, p. B-2. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 6 subscribership from 69.2 million to 86.0 million,21 and produced a nationwide penetration rate of roughly 32 percent.22 Broadband PCS carriers and Nextel Communications, Inc. ("Nextel") continue to deploy their networks.23 To date, 222 million people, or 88 percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, broadband PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980401.html
  • COMPANY, INC. Adopted, on its own motion, Order on Reconsideration of the February 26, 1998 Order granting Wilderness Valley's petition requesting a waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules in order to address another specific waiver necessary to allow Wilderness Valley to participate in NECA's average schedule settlements; waived, to the extent discussed, the incumbent LEC requirements of sections 69.2 and 69.601 of the Commission's rules. Action by Chief, Accounting and Audits Division. Adopted: March 31, 1998. by Order on Recon. (DA No. 98-603). CCB Internet URL: [19]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980603.txt TIME WARNER CABLE. Granted appeal and remanded a case involving a local rate order issued by Guilford County, North Carolina. The County used the Commission's rate regulation framework to address technical and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd010615.html
  • Contact Sharon Hurd at (202) 418-0504 [7]DOC-213661A1.pdf [8]DOC-213661A1.doc [9]DOC-213661A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Report No: N-238-A Released: 06/15/2001. CONNECTION OF TERMINAL EQUIPMENT TO THE TELEPHONE NETWORK FCC Certifications for Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network. CCB [10]DOC-213668A1.pdf [11]DOC-213668A1.doc [12]DOC-213668A1.txt Released: 06/15/2001. M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2(HH) "UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND". (DA No. 01-1414). (Dkt No 96-45). Comments Due: 06/29/2001. Reply Comments Due: 07/16/2001. CCB. Contact: Antoinette Stevens 202-418-7400 [13]DA-01-1414A1.pdf [14]DA-01-1414A1.doc [15]DA-01-1414A1.txt Released: 06/15/2001. PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON QWEST PETITION FOR WAIVER TO PROVIDE OPERATOR-ASSISTED REVERSE DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE SERVICES. (DA No. 01-1445) CC Docket 01-126; contact Jance Myles 202-418-1580. Comments Due: 07/02/2001. Reply Comments Due: 07/12/2001.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040413.html
  • educational Stations WAEF(FM), Cordele, Georgia, & WBJY(FM), Americus, GA for broadcasting advertisements in violation of the pertinent statutory and Commission underwriting rule provisions. Action by: Deputy Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/12/2004 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 04-1000). EB [37]DA-04-1000A1.doc [38]DA-04-1000A1.pdf [39]DA-04-1000A1.txt M&L ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A SKYLINE TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2 (HH) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Dismissed in part, and granted in part, a Request for Waiver and waived the study area definition of Part 36 of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 04/02/2004 by ORDER. (FCC No. 04-86). WCB [40]FCC-04-86A1.doc [41]FCC-04-86A1.pdf [42]FCC-04-86A1.txt FEDERAL- STATE JOINT BOARD ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE/HIGHLAND CELLULAR, INC. PETITION FOR DESIGNATION AS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd041124.html
  • Comments Due: 12/17/2004. Reply Comments Due: 01/07/2005. WCB. Contact: Victoria Schlesinger at (202) 418-7353 [33]DA-04-3652A1.doc [34]DA-04-3652A1.pdf [35]DA-04-3652A1.txt Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE PETITIONS OF DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY LLC,. (DA No. 04-3687). (Dkt No 96-45) QWEST CORPORATION AND DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND INC TO WAIVE THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36 AND SECTION 69.2(HH) AND 69.605(C) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Comments Due: 12/08/2004. Reply Comments Due: 12/15/2004. WCB. Contact: Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879 [36]DA-04-3687A1.doc [37]DA-04-3687A1.pdf [38]DA-04-3687A1.txt Report No: 1996 Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SITE-BY-SITE ACTION. WTB [39]DOC-254573A1.pdf [40]DOC-254573A1.txt Report No: 1995 Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SITE-BY-SITE ACCEPTED FOR FILING. WTB [41]DOC-254574A1.pdf [42]DOC-254574A1.txt Report No: 1998 Released: 11/24/2004. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU MARKET-BASED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050118.html
  • REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN THE SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES FIFTH REPORT AND ORDER, FCC 04-190. (DA No. 05-103). (Dkt No 02-6). Comments Due: 02/16/2005. Reply Comments Due: 03/03/2005. WCB. Contact: Erica Myers at (202) 418-7400 [9]DA-05-103A1.doc [10]DA-05-103A1.pdf [11]DA-05-103A1.txt Released: 01/18/2005. SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER NUNC PRO TUNC OF THE DEFINTION OF "STUDY AREA" IN PART 36 AND SECTIONS 36.611 AND 69.2(HH) COMMISSION'S RULES. (DA No. 05-105). (Dkt No 96-45) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 02/08/2005. Reply Comments Due: 02/22/2005. WCB. Contact: Sheryl Todd at (202) 418-7386 [12]DA-05-105A1.doc [13]DA-05-105A1.pdf [14]DA-05-105A1.txt Released: 01/18/2005. PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR QUALCOMM INCORPORATED PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING. (DA No. 05-87). (Dkt No 05-7). Comments Due: 02/17/2005. Reply Comments Due: 03/04/2005. WTB. Contact: Paul Moon at (202) 418-0620,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050304.html
  • OMD. Contact: Barbara P. Chappelle @ (202) 418-0310 [35]DOC-257198A1.pdf [36]DOC-257198A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD. Contact: Barbara P. Chappelle @ (202) 418-0310 [37]DOC-257199A1.pdf [38]DOC-257199A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. TARIFF TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG. WCB. Contact: (202) 418-0270 [39]DOC-257192A1.pdf [40]DOC-257192A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. BEAVER CREEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES. (DA No. 05-593). (Dkt No 05-69) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 03/25/2005. Reply Comments Due: 04/08/2005. WCB. Contact: Randy Clarke at (202) 418-1587 [41]DA-05-593A1.doc [42]DA-05-593A1.pdf [43]DA-05-593A1.txt Released: 03/04/2005. WESTGATE COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A WEAVTEL PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2 AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION RULES. (DA No. 05-595). (Dkt No 05-58) Pleading Cycle Established.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050428.html
  • 05-56, released March 16, 2005. (Dkt No. 98-237 , 02-380). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 04/28/2005 by ERRATUM. (DA No. 05-1186). OMD [35]DOC-258385A1.doc [36]DOC-258385A1.pdf [37]DOC-258385A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED APRIL 27, 2005, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 79: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 04/27/2005. ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2(HH) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION RULES. (DA No. 05-1220). (Dkt No 05-174) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 05/19/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/02/2005. WCB. Contact: Randy Clarke at (202) 418-1587 [38]DA-05-1220A1.doc [39]DA-05-1220A1.pdf [40]DA-05-1220A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1159A1.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1159A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258339A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258339A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258337A2.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258337A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258449A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258449A1.txt 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258446A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258446A1.txt 14.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050517.html
  • No. 05-1356). (Dkt No 05-168) Streamlined Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 05/30/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/06/2005. WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or or Alexis Johns at (202) 418-1167 [38]DA-05-1356A1.doc [39]DA-05-1356A1.pdf [40]DA-05-1356A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PETITION FOR WAIVER OF THE DEFINITION OF "STUDY AREA" CONTAINED IN PART 36, APPENDIX-GLOSSARY AND SECTIONS 36.611, AND 69.2(HH) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 05/16/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-1355). WCB [41]DA-05-1355A1.doc [42]DA-05-1355A1.pdf [43]DA-05-1355A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A2.doc 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A1.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A2.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258699A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258682A2.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258682A1.pdf 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258679A2.txt 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258679A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1360A1.doc 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1360A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1360A1.txt 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1361A1.doc 15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050527.html
  • DESIGNATION AS AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER IN THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS. (DA No. 05-1543). (Dkt No 96-45) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 06/10/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/24/2005. WCB. Contact: Pam Slipakoff at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [37]DA-05-1543A1.doc [38]DA-05-1543A1.pdf [39]DA-05-1543A1.txt Released: 05/27/2005. ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A ADAK TELEPHONE UTILITY SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(B), 54.314(D), 54.903(A)(3), 69.2 (HH) AND 69.3(E)(6) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND, IF NECESSARY,. (DA No. 05-1544). (Dkt No 96-45) A WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES, Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 06/13/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/20/2005. WCB. Contact: Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879 OR Katie King at (202) 418-7491 [40]DA-05-1544A1.doc [41]DA-05-1544A1.pdf [42]DA-05-1544A1.txt Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050811.html
  • [16]DA-05-2262A1.txt BIG ISLAND RADIO, ASSIGNOR AND PACIFIC RADIO GROUP, INC., ASSIGNEE. Granted the applications for consent to assign licenses for KKON(AM), Kealakekua, HI, KLUA(FM), Kailua Kona, HI, KAGB(FM), Waimea, HI, and KPVS(FM) and KAPA(FM), Hilo, HI. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 05-2270). MB [17]DA-05-2270A1.doc [18]DA-05-2270A1.pdf [19]DA-05-2270A1.txt ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 69.2(HH) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted Allband's Request for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-174). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 08/11/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-2268). WCB [20]DA-05-2268A1.doc [21]DA-05-2268A1.pdf [22]DA-05-2268A1.txt WESTGATE COMMUNICATIONS AND BEAVER CREEK TELEPHONE COMPANY'S REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS OF SECTION 69.2(HH) AND 69.601 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-69 , 05-58).
• http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/DA-11-992-attachment-A.pdf
  • Filed In 1995 CC RM-8606 View RM-8606edocs: RM-8606 2/27/1995 4311/20/1995Disclosures by Operator Service Providers of Serving Public Radio CC RM-8585 View RM-8585edocs: RM-8585 2/2/1995 1211/29/1995Establishment of a Funding Mechanism for Interstate Operator Assistance for the Deaf CC PRM96CC View PRM96CCedocs: PRM96CC 1/17/1996 11/16/1996Common Carrier Bureau Petitions for Rulemaking Filed In 1996 CC RM-8723 View RM-8723edocs: RM-8723 11/3/1995 152/13/1996Amendment of Section 69.2 (m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones within the Public Telephone Exemption from End-User Common-Line Access Charges CC RM-8303 View RM-8303edocs: RM-8303 8/2/1993 313/15/1996Request Amendment of the Rules to Determine the Terms and Conditions Under Which Tier 1 LECs Should be Permitted to Provide InterLATA Telecommunications Services CC RM-8708 View RM-8708edocs: RM-8708 10/12/1995 12 4/1/1996Request
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • of their payphones, and thus this proceeding concerns rules that are not currently in effect. The Commission's Liability Order IPPs Not End Users The Commission's Liability Order responded to the court's remand of an earlier Commission ruling. The Commission's earlier ruling held that IPP payphones were subject to a EUCL charge because the IPPs were "end users" pursuant to section 69.2(m) of the rules. But on remand from an appeal of that decision, the Commission reversed itself and concluded in the Liability Order that, although C.F. Communications and other IPPs own the payphones, they cannot be considered "end users" under section 69.2(m), because they do not own the premises where their payphones are located. IPPs Must Pay EUCL Charge Nonetheless, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • held that CFC was not an ``end user,'' and, alternatively, that the Commission had improperly discriminated between similarly situated services (IPP-owned and LEC-owned public payphones) without a rational basis.35 9. In its April 13, 2000 Liability Order on remand, the Commission applied the Court's analysis and found that CFC and the other IPPs cannot be considered "end users" under Section 69.2(m).36 The Commission also determined, however, that irrespective of whether CFC was an ``end user,'' the primary determination the Commission should have made was whether CFC's payphones were ``public'' or ``semi-public.''37 Accordingly, the Commission found that the LECs imposed an unreasonable charge in violation of Section 201(b) by classifying all IPP payphones as semi-public and assessing EUCL charges against IPP payphones
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-111A1.html
  • id. at S: 371 ("Contracting parties are presumed to contract in reference to the existing law, and to have in mind all the existing laws relating to the contract ...."). These principles apply with particular force here, because the Tariff adopts the precise definition of "end user" found in Commission rules and orders governing ILEC tariffs. See 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an interstate or foreign telecommunications service that is not a carrier ..."); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 97 FCC 2d 1082, 1192, S: 2.6 (1984) ("ECA Tariff Order") (requiring that the Exchange Carriers' Association tariff, as the model tariff for exchange access tariffs, so define "end user");
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-59A1.html
  • that it provides no ability to originate calls with YMax's assertion here that it provides originating access service. Specifically, we find that YMax's violation of section 203(c) of the Act constitutes an unreasonable practice that violates section 201(b) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 203(c), 201(b). We note that neither party has mentioned the definition of "end user" in section 69.2(m) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m). Thus, this Order need not, and does not, address the question of whether section 69.2(m) has any bearing on the claims and defenses presented. Tariff S: 3.3.2, Original Page No. 47. Section 3.3.2 provides in full: "The End Office Switching rate category establishes the charges related to the use of end office
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-87A1.html
  • application of the section 203(a) tariff-filing requirement to ILECs). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.4(a) ("The end user charges for access service filed with this Commission shall include charges for the End User Common Line element ...."); 69.104 (end user common line charge for non-price cap ILECs); 69.152 (end user common line charge for price cap LECs). 47 C.F.R. S: 69.2(m); see MTS and WATS Market Structure, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241, 245-46, P: 10 (1983) ("Today we...adopt[ ] rules that will determine the rates interexchange carriers and end users will pay for access to local telephone company facilities used to complete interstate service offerings."), 345, Appendix A, S: 69.2(m) (defining "end user" as "any customer of an
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 45.4 56.0 53.8 281.8 344.0 8,232 4.2 1970 196.6 15.5 49.9 63.1 53.1 312.8 378.2 8,956 4.2 1971 237.4 12.7 52.0 72.5 49.2 359.1 423.8 9,962 4.3 1972 291.8 14.2 57.7 88.3 44.8 424.9 496.9 11,323 4.4 1973 364.9 15.1 62.8 115.0 47.7 527.6 605.5 13,126 4.6 1974 428.7 12.9 64.1 142.7 52.3 623.7 700.8 14,582 4.8 1975 490.2 13.2 69.2 163.4 42.5 696.1 778.5 16,098 4.8 1976 601.1 14.1 74.8 188.0 37.3 826.4 915.4 18,680 4.9 1977 744.3 13.8 84.4 225.2 35.5 1,005.0 1,103.2 21,159 5.2 1978 954.4 14.0 93.3 267.3 37.1 1,258.9 1,366.2 24,426 5.6 1979 1,138.2 14.7 96.0 299.4 37.7 1,475.3 1,585.9 27,599 5.7 1980 2,097.2 14.8 100.0 324.9 62.6 2,484.7 2,599.5 31,001 8.4 1981 2,239.4 14.1 111.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
  • 3.4 0.124.718.8 53.1 $2,518,706 12.6 0.0 7.214.1 66.1 $4,445,794 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 316,185,733 6.0 0.115.821.9 56.2 Cyprus $2,889,857 3.2 0.019.548.6 28.7 $182,618 0.0 0.029.625.4 45.0 $321 0.0 0.0 0.014.3 85.7 24,836,022 4.8 0.033.021.9 40.3 Denmark $16,329,719 3.1 0.115.220.3 61.3 $1,600,642 42.2 0.015.7 4.1 38.0 $6,012,314 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 193,783,259 6.3 0.123.018.1 52.4 Finland $8,815,262 2.0 0.011.217.6 69.2 $197,777 0.1 0.016.731.3 51.9 $2,429 55.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 38.7 80,013,337 2.5 0.1 9.328.3 59.8 France $107,720,508 4.6 0.017.717.7 59.9 $10,353,833 1.5 0.015.129.2 54.2 $20,218,951 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1,238,699,417 4.8 0.013.426.5 55.3 Germany $206,465,435 2.9 0.044.013.3 39.8 $25,657,092 1.1 0.014.719.2 65.0 $19,308,150 88.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 2,698,058,517 2.7 0.028.228.7 40.4 Gibraltar $186,917 2.0 0.034.027.2 36.8 $11,530 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
  • $28,538,271 0.0 35.5 0.4 19.9 44.2 $3,178,874 0.0 41.6 0.0 20.8 37.5 $13,725,669 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 523,828,362 0.0 30.8 0.8 33.6 34.8 Turkey $19,337,349 0.1 25.0 4.9 16.0 53.9 $382,776 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.7 79.0 $379,346 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 200,273,502 0.1 14.8 15.0 17.4 52.8 United Kingdom $246,149,106 0.2 34.5 0.2 22.2 42.8 $26,829,095 0.0 13.3 0.0 17.5 69.2 $64,481,819 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,547,339,581 0.2 13.8 1.0 30.5 54.6 Western Europe $776,307,034 0.1 28.5 1.3 20.9 49.2 $81,479,312 0.0 18.1 0.0 26.3 55.6 $170,351,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 13,979,516,518 0.1 15.7 1.9 31.3 51.1 Algeria $8,715,356 0.0 7.0 4.3 21.5 67.3 $411,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,619 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 89,141,636 0.0 4.7 4.1 21.9 69.3 Angola
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
  • 0.0 0.0 2.5 7.6 90.0 Canary Island $0 $0 $0 0 Cape Verde $6,281,711 0.0 0.0 4.8 71.5 23.7 $31,844 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 $17,417 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 37,460,798 0.0 0.0 4.4 67.0 28.7 Central African Republic $517,244 0.0 0.0 0.1 37.7 62.2 $2,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,032,333 0.0 0.0 0.1 30.7 69.2 Chad $1,450,680 0.0 0.0 0.4 48.4 51.2 $16,193 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,468 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 12,347,337 0.0 0.0 0.4 54.0 45.6 Comoros $2,248,214 0.0 0.0 6.6 23.9 69.5 $8,767 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $798 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 6,649,567 0.0 0.0 8.1 23.1 68.8 Congo $4,103,083 0.0 0.6 7.9 37.7 53.9 $70,190 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,628 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/cf_comm.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/cf_comm.wp
  • Wisconsin, Inc., 10 F.C.C.R. 9775 (1995) ("Order"). The Commission found that CFC was an "end user" under its rules, and thus subject to EUCL charges. Specifically, the Commission found that CFC met the regulatory definition of "end user" because it "offers telecommunications services exclusively as a reseller" and that all such resale transactions "originate on [CFC's] premises." See 47 C.F.R. 69.2(m). The Commission further concluded that CFC's independent payphones did not qualify for the "public telephone" exemption from the EUCL charges. Relying on an FCC rule defining "public telephone" as being "provided by a telephone company," 47 C.F.R. 69.2(ee), the Commission reasoned that CFC's payphones were not "public" because CFC is not a "telephone company" under the applicable rules. See 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1094.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1094.html
  • }{\i\fs24\insrsid214472 access}{\fs24\insrsid214472 ," which the Commission here says constitute the only possibilities, the reference to "access service," combining the different key words from the two terms before us, sheds no light. "Access service" is in fact a pre\_ Act term, defined as "services and facilities provided for the origination or termination of any interstate or foreign telecommunication." 47 CFR \'a7 69.2(b). \par \par \tab If the Commission meant to place ISP\_traffic within a third category, not "telephone exchange service" and not "exchange access," that would conflict with its concession on appeal that "exchange access" and "telephone exchange service" occupy t he field. But if it meant that just as ESPs were "users of access service" but treated as end users for
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1207.html
  • meaning of the Access Charge Reconsideration no matter where they were located or how they were used. CFC sought review of the FCC decision in this court and found some success. In C.F. Communications, the court vacated the EUCL Decisions, holding both that the classification of IPPs as "end users" was an unreasonable interpretation of the relevant regulation, 47 C.F.R. 69.2(m), and that the FCC had not adequately justified allowing EUCL charges to be collected for IPP phones while exempting similarly situated LEC-owned payphones from such fees. See 128 F.3d at 738-42. In deciding this second issue, the court pointedly rejected the FCC's theory that a payphone should be denied "public" (and thus EUCL-exempt) status under the Access Charge Reconsideration merely
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1059.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/01-1059.html
  • as "end users"--no different from a local pizzeria or barber shop. See Order at 16, p 37; In re Amendments of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules Relating to the Creation of Access Charge Subelements for Open Network Architecture, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 4 FCC Rcd 3983, 3988, p 39 & n.89 (1989) ("ONA NPRM"); see also 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m). While this categorization exempted ISPs from interstate access charges paid by IXCs, it left them obliged to purchase access through intrastate tariffs--namely, local business line charges. The Commission contends that ACS's allocation of ISP costs to interstate service would thus create a cost-revenue mismatch. Order at 14-16, p p 32-37. The tariff revenue would be allocated to intrastate and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2004/02-1364-043004.pdf
  • (D.C. Cir. 1984). Under those rules, LECs could assess EUCL charges only on ``end users,'' defined by the Commis- sion's rules as ``any customer of TTT telecommunications service TTT [or] a person or entity that offers telecommunica- tions services exclusively as a reseller TTT if all resale trans- missions TTT originate on the premises of such reseller.'' 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(m) (2003). Of particular significance to the issue we face here, the access charge rules applied differently to public and semi- public payphone service. The Commission explained: ``A pay telephone is used to provide public telephone service when a public need exists, such as at an airport lobby, at the option of the telephone company and with the agreement of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • be done for prime time due to the lack of data on total cable and broadcast advertising revenues for the prime time daypart. 33 In 2000 and 2001, Nielsen separated out "all other cable" from pay and basic. This is not included in the universe of advertiser-supported programming. See notes to table 11. 1984/85 1989/90 1994/95 1999/00 2000/01 Network Affiliates 69.2 57.3 58.4 50.9 49.6 Independents 15.0 19.1 9.7 3.4 3.5 Public 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.6 2.6 Basic Cable 6.5 14.5 23.9 35.3 36.5 Pay Cable 5.6 5.5 4.4 5.2 5.2 All Other Cable 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.6 Commercial Broadcast 84.1 76.4 68.1 54.3 53.0 Source: Neilsen Galaxy Explorer. Notes: Shares are normalized to 100 to account for multiset usage.
• http://www.fcc.gov/telecom.html
  • Rules Concerning Operator Service Access and Pay Telephone Compensation; Petition of the Public Telephone Council to Treat Bell Operating Company Payphones as Customer Premises Equipment ; Petition of Oncor Communications Requesting Compensation for Competitive Payphone Premises Owners and Presubscribed Operator Services Providers, Petition of the California Payphone Association to Amend and Clarify Section 68.2(a)of the Commission's Rules, Amendment of Section 69.2(m) and (ee) of the Commission's Rules to Include Independent Public Payphones Within the "Public Telephone" Exemption from End User Common Line Access Charges (November 8, 1996) (CC Docket No. 96-128, CC Docket. No. 91-35) [ News Release | [154]Text Version | [155]WordPerfect Version ] * Order In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/publicintereststate092300.pdf
  • the public, and, as a result, mobile telephone 39 Id. 40 Id. at para. 23. (Continued) Exhibit B FCC Form 603 Page 14 of 24 subscribership continues to grow at a rapid pace. As of December 1999, there were approximately 86 million mobile telephone subscribers in the U.S. 41 This, according to the Commission, was a 24% increase over the 69.2 million subscribers at the end of 1998.42 By auctioning the A, B, C, D, E and F blocks in the PCS service, the Commission has created up to six new wireless competitors in the mobile telephone service. In fact, many PCS providers have already deployed systems in a number of markets throughout the country, including all of the major markets
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive06.html
  • APPLICATION FILED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SELECTED ASSETS OF QWEST CORPORATION BY SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. - STREAMLINED PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED. WC Docket No. 06-82. SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND QWEST CORPORATION SEEK WAIVER OF THE STUDY AREA BOUNDARY FREEZE AS CODIFIED IN PART 36, AND SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF SECTIONS 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.305, 54.314(d), 54.903(a), 69.2(hh), 69.3(e)(6) AND 69.3(e)(11) OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES; SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEEKS WAIVER OF THE COMMISSIONS STAY OF THE PROVISION OF ENHANCED LIFELINE AND LINK-UP SUPPORT TO CUSTOMERS ON NEAR-TRIBAL LANDS - PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED. CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109. Public Notice: [466]Word | [467]Acrobat 04/26/2006 Domestic Section 214 Application for Transfer of Control of ICG Telecom
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304C98.PDF
  • containinganN/A,thecarriermustentertheamount(s)andanexplanationasafootnote tothefield.Theamount(s)mustnotbeenteredintheN/A'dfield.Allotherfields mustbepopulated.Iftherearenodataapplicabletoagivenfield,enterzero. 2.ReportingcarriersmustfollowthespecificinstructionsprovidedintheattachedColumn DescriptionsandRowInstructions.Inaddition,carriersmustfollowthejurisdictional separationsandaccesschargeproceduressetforthinParts36,65and69ofthe Commission'sRulesandreferencedintheRowInstructions.Carriersmustexplainany deviationsinfootnotes.Donotincludeexplanatorynotesinthetransmittalletter;such notesmustbeincludedintheFootnotessectionofthefilingasindicatedinthe AutomatedReportSpecificationsandPaperReportSpecifications. 3.AdjustmentstoaccommodatereallocationofcommonpowercostsinPart36fromthe assignmentmethodinPart32mustbecompletedbeforeenteringdatainthisreport. AlthoughthereallocationofcommonpowercostsbetweenCOEcategoriesdoesnot occuruntilCOEisseparated,theseadjustmentsmustbemadepriortoenteringdatain theAccessReportinordertopreserveitslinearintegrity.Iftheseadjustmentsarenot madepriortoenteringthedatainthisreport,columns(p)plus(q)plus(r)willnot equalcolumn(d)forrows1100through1400. 4.WhenreportinginvestmentamountsforPlant,OtherInvestment,andReserves,usethe sameaveragingmethodologyasinstructedfortheARMISReport43-03.When reportingRevenues,Expenses,Taxes,Return(exceptrateofreturn),andRevenue Requirementdata,carriersmustprovidethetotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly, quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies.Whenreportingallocationfactors,carriersmust reportdataasfollows:(1)usageamounts,suchasminutes,shouldbereportedastotal annualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudiesthatrepresentthe totalusagefor365days.Forexample,sevendaystudiesmustbeprojectedtoreflect eachmonth'stotalusageforatotaloftwelvemonths;(2)expensesorrevenues,when usedasanallocationfactor,shouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumof monthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies;(3)allocationfactorssuchasweightedactual contactsshouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,or semi-annualstudies;(4)percentageallocationfactors,suchastheLoopAllocation Factor,shouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage;and(5)terminations,users, andmilesshouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage. Page3of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 5.Alldatamustbereported"asearned,"i.e.,afteradjustmentstopriorperiodsandSNFA adjustments. 6.Ifanentryistobeasubtraction,indicatesobyplacingaminussigninthecolumn immediatelyprecedingthenumericdata,e.g.,use-4,NOT-4or(4)forthedatadisk file. 7.Thegeneralstructureofthisreportisasfollows.Amountsthatacarrierallocates betweenjurisdictionsand/oramongaccesscategoriesandelementsareindicatedon rowsnotdesignated"forallocation."Theserowsarefollowedbyrowsindicatingthe allocationfactorusedtoallocatetheprecedinglines.Alldirectlyassignedamounts mustbereportedonrowsthatarenotdesignated"forallocation."Thesymbol"#" precedingtheapplicablerowdescriptionwouldindicateitemsthatarenotdollarsor percentages(e.g.,minutes,miles,conversationalminutes,workingloops,etc.)Alldata thatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestpenny(e.g.,costperloop)is indicatedbyasymbol"$"(dollarsign)precedingtheapplicablerowdescription.All datathatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestthousand(e.g.,equalaccess investment)isindicatedbythesymbol"K$"precedingtheapplicablerowdescription. Allfactorsthatmustbereportedasapercentageareprecededbythesymbol"%" (percentsign).Thesymbol"%"intherowinstructionwouldindicateitemstobe enteredasapercent(e.g.,rateofreturn). 8.Incasesinwhichthetotalinterstateamountofthecostcategoryisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoPart69,thePart69datamustbereportedonthetotalrowforthatcategory asindicatedintherowinstructionsforthetotalrow.AllPart69amountsforacost categorymustequalthetotaloftheamountsallocatedtotheinterstatejurisdictionfor thatcategory. 9.AlltermsandabbreviationsusedinthereportandinstructionsaredefinedinSection 69.2oftheCommission'sRules,theGlossaryoftheSeparationsManual,andPart36 oftheCommission'sRules. 10.Alldollaramountsmustberoundedtothenearestthousand,withtheexceptionofrows 1273,1335,1453,1495,9005,9008and9009.Thedollaramountsintheserowsmust beroundedtothenearestpennyandsuchamountsmustbeenteredindollarsandcents (e.g.,ifcostperloopis$6.445,itmustbeenteredas6.45).Amountsofminutes (including,butnotlimitedto,connectionminutes,DEMsandMOU)mustberounded tothenearestmillion,exceptfortollminutes(onrow1127),whichmustberounded tothenearestthousand.Allsecondsincludingweightedstandardworksecondsmust beroundedtothousands.Allweightedactualcontacts,users,loops,accesslines, terminationsandnumberofhouseholdsreceivinglifelineconnectionassistance(row 9007)mustbereportedinwholenumbers.Allconversation-minute-milesmustbe roundedtothenearestmillion.Allcircuitmiles/kilometers(including,butnotlimited Page4of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 to,MOUmiles/kilometers)mustberoundedtothenearestthousand.Allrateofreturn amountsmustbeenteredinpercentandmustberoundedto2decimalplaces(e.g., 23.70561shouldbeenteredas23.71).Allotherpercentageamountsmustbeentered inpercentandmustberoundedto4decimalplaces(e.g.,23.70561shouldbeentered as23.7056).Allotheramounts(including,butnotlimitedto,serviceobservingunits, MTSmessages,PLaccountsandTWXconnections)mustberoundedtothenearest thousand. FCC Report 43-04 - Report Definition - Form December 1998 Page 5 of 158 FCC Report 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT COMPANY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX Version STUDY AREA: XXXXXXXXXXXX SUBMISSION XXX PERIOD: From mmm yyyyy To mmm yyyyy TABLE I
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304P98.PDF
  • containinganN/A,thecarriermustentertheamount(s)andanexplanationasafootnote tothefield.Theamount(s)mustnotbeenteredintheN/A'dfield.Allotherfields mustbepopulated.Iftherearenodataapplicabletoagivenfield,enterzero. 2.ReportingcarriersmustfollowthespecificinstructionsprovidedintheattachedColumn DescriptionsandRowInstructions.Inaddition,carriersmustfollowthejurisdictional separationsandaccesschargeproceduressetforthinParts36,65and69ofthe Commission'sRulesandreferencedintheRowInstructions.Carriersmustexplainany deviationsinfootnotes.Donotincludeexplanatorynotesinthetransmittalletter;such notesmustbeincludedintheFootnotessectionofthefilingasindicatedinthe AutomatedReportSpecificationsandPaperReportSpecifications. 3.AdjustmentstoaccommodatereallocationofcommonpowercostsinPart36fromthe assignmentmethodinPart32mustbecompletedbeforeenteringdatainthisreport. AlthoughthereallocationofcommonpowercostsbetweenCOEcategoriesdoesnot occuruntilCOEisseparated,theseadjustmentsmustbemadepriortoenteringdatain theAccessReportinordertopreserveitslinearintegrity.Iftheseadjustmentsarenot madepriortoenteringthedatainthisreport,columns(p)plus(q)plus(r)willnot equalcolumn(d)forrows1100through1400. 4.WhenreportinginvestmentamountsforPlant,OtherInvestment,andReserves,usethe sameaveragingmethodologyasinstructedfortheARMISReport43-03.When reportingRevenues,Expenses,Taxes,Return(exceptrateofreturn),andRevenue Requirementdata,carriersmustprovidethetotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly, quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies.Whenreportingallocationfactors,carriersmust reportdataasfollows:(1)usageamounts,suchasminutes,shouldbereportedastotal annualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudiesthatrepresentthe totalusagefor365days.Forexample,sevendaystudiesmustbeprojectedtoreflect eachmonth'stotalusageforatotaloftwelvemonths;(2)expensesorrevenues,when usedasanallocationfactor,shouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumof monthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies;(3)allocationfactorssuchasweightedactual contactsshouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,or semi-annualstudies;(4)percentageallocationfactors,suchastheLoopAllocation Factor,shouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage;and(5)terminations,users, andmilesshouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage. Page3of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 5.Alldatamustbereported"asearned,"i.e.,afteradjustmentstopriorperiodsandSNFA adjustments. 6.Ifanentryistobeasubtraction,indicatesobyplacingaminussigninthecolumn immediatelyprecedingthenumericdata,e.g.,use-4,NOT-4or(4)forthedatadisk file. 7.Thegeneralstructureofthisreportisasfollows.Amountsthatacarrierallocates betweenjurisdictionsand/oramongaccesscategoriesandelementsareindicatedon rowsnotdesignated"forallocation."Theserowsarefollowedbyrowsindicatingthe allocationfactorusedtoallocatetheprecedinglines.Alldirectlyassignedamounts mustbereportedonrowsthatarenotdesignated"forallocation."Thesymbol"#" precedingtheapplicablerowdescriptionwouldindicateitemsthatarenotdollarsor percentages(e.g.,minutes,miles,conversationalminutes,workingloops,etc.)Alldata thatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestpenny(e.g.,costperloop)is indicatedbyasymbol"$"(dollarsign)precedingtheapplicablerowdescription.All datathatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestthousand(e.g.,equalaccess investment)isindicatedbythesymbol"K$"precedingtheapplicablerowdescription. Allfactorsthatmustbereportedasapercentageareprecededbythesymbol"%" (percentsign).Thesymbol"%"intherowinstructionwouldindicateitemstobe enteredasapercent(e.g.,rateofreturn). 8.Incasesinwhichthetotalinterstateamountofthecostcategoryisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoPart69,thePart69datamustbereportedonthetotalrowforthatcategory asindicatedintherowinstructionsforthetotalrow.AllPart69amountsforacost categorymustequalthetotaloftheamountsallocatedtotheinterstatejurisdictionfor thatcategory. 9.AlltermsandabbreviationsusedinthereportandinstructionsaredefinedinSection 69.2oftheCommission'sRules,theGlossaryoftheSeparationsManual,andPart36 oftheCommission'sRules. 10.Alldollaramountsmustberoundedtothenearestthousand,withtheexceptionofrows 1273,1335,1453,1495,9005,9008and9009.Thedollaramountsintheserowsmust beroundedtothenearestpennyandsuchamountsmustbeenteredindollarsandcents (e.g.,ifcostperloopis$6.445,itmustbeenteredas6.45).Amountsofminutes (including,butnotlimitedto,connectionminutes,DEMsandMOU)mustberounded tothenearestmillion,exceptfortollminutes(onrow1127),whichmustberounded tothenearestthousand.Allsecondsincludingweightedstandardworksecondsmust beroundedtothousands.Allweightedactualcontacts,users,loops,accesslines, terminationsandnumberofhouseholdsreceivinglifelineconnectionassistance(row 9007)mustbereportedinwholenumbers.Allconversation-minute-milesmustbe roundedtothenearestmillion.Allcircuitmiles/kilometers(including,butnotlimited Page4of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 to,MOUmiles/kilometers)mustberoundedtothenearestthousand.Allrateofreturn amountsmustbeenteredinpercentandmustberoundedto2decimalplaces(e.g., 23.70561shouldbeenteredas23.71).Allotherpercentageamountsmustbeentered inpercentandmustberoundedto4decimalplaces(e.g.,23.70561shouldbeentered as23.7056).Allotheramounts(including,butnotlimitedto,serviceobservingunits, MTSmessages,PLaccountsandTWXconnections)mustberoundedtothenearest thousand. FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page96of158 I.EqualAccess Note:Thefirststepintheseparationsprocessistheremovalofequalaccesscosts fromtheprimaryaccounts.Thesecostsincludeonlyinitial,incrementalexpenditures forhardware,otherequipment,presubscription,andotherinitial,incremental expendituresrelateddirectlytotheprovisionofequalaccessandwhichexpenditures wouldnotberequiredtoupgradethecapabilitiesoftheofficeinvolvedabsentthe provisionofequalaccess.Equalaccessinvestmentandexpensesarelimitedtosuch expendituresforconvertingcentralofficesthatservecompetitiveinterexchange carriersincasesinwhichtherehasbeenabonafiderequestforconversiontoequal access.SeeSections36.191(a)and36.421.InSectionIoftheARMISAccess Report,carriersmustreportallcoststhatmeetthesecriteria.Insubsequentsections, carriersmustreportallothercostsafterremovingequalaccesscosts.Carriershaving anequalaccesselementmustenterthesecostsintheequalaccesscolumn(column k).Carriersnothavinganequalaccesselementmustenterthesecostsinthe appropriatecolumn. A.Investments 10 EqualAccessinvestmentinGeneralSupportFacilitiesthatisallocatedpursuantto Sections36.191(c)and69.308(a).SeealsoSection36.111. 11 EqualAccessminutes-of-useusedtoallocateEqualAccessinvestmentinGeneral SupportFacilitiespursuanttoSection36.191(c). 12 EqualAccessinvestmentinCategory2CentralOfficeEquipment(COE)thatis allocatedpursuanttoSections36.191(c)and69.308(a).SeealsoSection36.124. 13 EqualAccessminutes-of-useusedtoallocateEqualAccessinvestmentinCategory 2COEpursuanttoSection36.191(c). 14 EqualAccessinvestmentinCategory3COEthatisallocatedpursuanttoSections 36.191(c)and69.308(a). 15 EqualAccessminutes-of-useusedtoallocateEqualAccessinvestmentinCategory 3COEpursuanttoSection36.191(c). 16
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304PF98.PDF
  • containinganN/A,thecarriermustentertheamount(s)andanexplanationasafootnote tothefield.Theamount(s)mustnotbeenteredintheN/A'dfield.Allotherfields mustbepopulated.Iftherearenodataapplicabletoagivenfield,enterzero. 2.ReportingcarriersmustfollowthespecificinstructionsprovidedintheattachedColumn DescriptionsandRowInstructions.Inaddition,carriersmustfollowthejurisdictional separationsandaccesschargeproceduressetforthinParts36,65and69ofthe Commission'sRulesandreferencedintheRowInstructions.Carriersmustexplainany deviationsinfootnotes.Donotincludeexplanatorynotesinthetransmittalletter;such notesmustbeincludedintheFootnotessectionofthefilingasindicatedinthe AutomatedReportSpecificationsandPaperReportSpecifications. 3.AdjustmentstoaccommodatereallocationofcommonpowercostsinPart36fromthe assignmentmethodinPart32mustbecompletedbeforeenteringdatainthisreport. AlthoughthereallocationofcommonpowercostsbetweenCOEcategoriesdoesnot occuruntilCOEisseparated,theseadjustmentsmustbemadepriortoenteringdatain theAccessReportinordertopreserveitslinearintegrity.Iftheseadjustmentsarenot madepriortoenteringthedatainthisreport,columns(p)plus(q)plus(r)willnot equalcolumn(d)forrows1100through1400. 4.WhenreportinginvestmentamountsforPlant,OtherInvestment,andReserves,usethe sameaveragingmethodologyasinstructedfortheARMISReport43-03.When reportingRevenues,Expenses,Taxes,Return(exceptrateofreturn),andRevenue Requirementdata,carriersmustprovidethetotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly, quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies.Whenreportingallocationfactors,carriersmust reportdataasfollows:(1)usageamounts,suchasminutes,shouldbereportedastotal annualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudiesthatrepresentthe totalusagefor365days.Forexample,sevendaystudiesmustbeprojectedtoreflect eachmonth'stotalusageforatotaloftwelvemonths;(2)expensesorrevenues,when usedasanallocationfactor,shouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumof monthly,quarterly,orsemi-annualstudies;(3)allocationfactorssuchasweightedactual contactsshouldbereportedastotalannualdataorthesumofmonthly,quarterly,or semi-annualstudies;(4)percentageallocationfactors,suchastheLoopAllocation Factor,shouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage;and(5)terminations,users, andmilesshouldbereportedasaweightedannualaverage. Page3of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 5.Alldatamustbereported"asearned,"i.e.,afteradjustmentstopriorperiodsandSNFA adjustments. 6.Ifanentryistobeasubtraction,indicatesobyplacingaminussigninthecolumn immediatelyprecedingthenumericdata,e.g.,use-4,NOT-4or(4)forthedatadisk file. 7.Thegeneralstructureofthisreportisasfollows.Amountsthatacarrierallocates betweenjurisdictionsand/oramongaccesscategoriesandelementsareindicatedon rowsnotdesignated"forallocation."Theserowsarefollowedbyrowsindicatingthe allocationfactorusedtoallocatetheprecedinglines.Alldirectlyassignedamounts mustbereportedonrowsthatarenotdesignated"forallocation."Thesymbol"#" precedingtheapplicablerowdescriptionwouldindicateitemsthatarenotdollarsor percentages(e.g.,minutes,miles,conversationalminutes,workingloops,etc.)Alldata thatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestpenny(e.g.,costperloop)is indicatedbyasymbol"$"(dollarsign)precedingtheapplicablerowdescription.All datathatmustbeenteredindollarsroundedtothenearestthousand(e.g.,equalaccess investment)isindicatedbythesymbol"K$"precedingtheapplicablerowdescription. Allfactorsthatmustbereportedasapercentageareprecededbythesymbol"%" (percentsign).Thesymbol"%"intherowinstructionwouldindicateitemstobe enteredasapercent(e.g.,rateofreturn). 8.Incasesinwhichthetotalinterstateamountofthecostcategoryisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoPart69,thePart69datamustbereportedonthetotalrowforthatcategory asindicatedintherowinstructionsforthetotalrow.AllPart69amountsforacost categorymustequalthetotaloftheamountsallocatedtotheinterstatejurisdictionfor thatcategory. 9.AlltermsandabbreviationsusedinthereportandinstructionsaredefinedinSection 69.2oftheCommission'sRules,theGlossaryoftheSeparationsManual,andPart36 oftheCommission'sRules. 10.Alldollaramountsmustberoundedtothenearestthousand,withtheexceptionofrows 1273,1335,1453,1495,9005,9008and9009.Thedollaramountsintheserowsmust beroundedtothenearestpennyandsuchamountsmustbeenteredindollarsandcents (e.g.,ifcostperloopis$6.445,itmustbeenteredas6.45).Amountsofminutes (including,butnotlimitedto,connectionminutes,DEMsandMOU)mustberounded tothenearestmillion,exceptfortollminutes(onrow1127),whichmustberounded tothenearestthousand.Allsecondsincludingweightedstandardworksecondsmust beroundedtothousands.Allweightedactualcontacts,users,loops,accesslines, terminationsandnumberofhouseholdsreceivinglifelineconnectionassistance(row 9007)mustbereportedinwholenumbers.Allconversation-minute-milesmustbe roundedtothenearestmillion.Allcircuitmiles/kilometers(including,butnotlimited Page4of158 FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.-GeneralInstructions December1998 to,MOUmiles/kilometers)mustberoundedtothenearestthousand.Allrateofreturn amountsmustbeenteredinpercentandmustberoundedto2decimalplaces(e.g., 23.70561shouldbeenteredas23.71).Allotherpercentageamountsmustbeentered inpercentandmustberoundedto4decimalplaces(e.g.,23.70561shouldbeentered as23.7056).Allotheramounts(including,butnotlimitedto,serviceobservingunits, MTSmessages,PLaccountsandTWXconnections)mustberoundedtothenearest thousand. FCC Report 43-04 - Report Definition - Form December 1998 Page 5 of 158 FCC Report 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT COMPANY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX Version STUDY AREA: XXXXXXXXXXXX SUBMISSION XXX PERIOD: From mmm yyyyy To mmm yyyyy TABLE I
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4304C99.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4304P99.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4304C00.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4304P00.PDF
  • Part 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9.All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10.All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand, with the exception of Rows 1273, 1335, 1453, 1495, 9005, 9008 and 9009. The dollar amounts in these rows must be rounded to the nearest penny and such amounts must be entered in
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2001PDFs/4304C01.PDF
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2002PDFs/4304c02.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2002PDFs/4304p02.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2003PDFs/4304c03.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2003PDFs/4304p03.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2004PDFs/4304c04.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2004PDFs/4304p04.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2005PDFs/4304c05.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2005PDFs/4304p05.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2006PDFs/4304c06.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2006PDFs/4304p06.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2007PDFs/4304c07.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2007PDFs/4304p07.pdf
  • 69 data must be reported on the total row for that category as indicated in the row instructions for the total row. All Part 69 amounts for a cost category must equal the total of the amounts allocated to the interstate jurisdiction for that category. 9. All terms and abbreviations used in the report and instructions are defined in Section 69.2 of the Commission's Rules, the Glossary of the Separations Manual, and Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. 10. All dollar amounts must be rounded to the nearest thousand. Amounts of minutes (including, but not limited to, conversation minutes, tandem minutes, and dial equipment minutes) must be rounded to the nearest million. All seconds including weighted standard work seconds must be
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/dkt_86_182_order_da_90_30.pdf
  • read, "Total Telecommunications Property, the total of rows 1540, 2240, and row 2250". Row 3080 -The instruction is revised to read, "Total accumulated depreciation, total of rows 40,3010,3020,3030,3040, 3050, 3060, and 3010". Row 3090 -The instruction is revised to read, "Accumulated amortization of capital leases associated with General Support Facilities and which accumulated amortization is allocated pursuant to Sections 36.505(a), 69.2(z), and 69.301(a)". Row 3091 -The instruction is revised to read, "General Support Facilities investment used to allocate accumulated amortization of associated capital leases pursuant to Sections 36.505(a), 69.2(z), and 69.301(a)". Row 3100 -The instruction is revised to read, "Accumulated amortization of capital leases associated with Switching Equipment and which accumulated amortization is allocated pursuant to Sections 36.505(a), 69.2(z), and 69.301(a)".
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/order_da_91_143.pdf
  • and 69." Taxes not Row 3340 is revised to read, "Total Net Current Deferred Operating Income Taxes, total of rows 44,3280,3290,3300,3310,3320,3330, and 3332. If net current deferred operating income taxes are apportioned among the access elements based on Teleconununicationfl Plant in Service, enter the amounts of net current deferred operating income l:.axes on this -row, pursuant to Parts 36.506 and 69.2(z) and 69.301(a);!' Row 3402 is added. It reads, "Other IfJet Noncurrent Deferred Operating Income Taxes not included above that are allocated pursuant to Parts 36.506 and 69.2(a) and 69.301(a)". Row 3410 is revised to read, "Total Net Noncurrent Deferred Operating Income Taxes, total of rows 46,3350,3360,3370,3380,3390,3400 and 3402. If net noncurrent deferred operating income taxes are apportioned among the access
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/archive/2006ord.html
  • Application filed for the Acquisition of Selected Assets of Qwest Corporation by Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. * Streamlined Pleading Cycle Established WC Docket No. 06-82 Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. and Qwest Corporation Seek Waiver of the Study Area Boundary Freeze as Codified in Part 36, and Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. Seeks Waiver of Sections 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(B), 54.305, 54.314(D), 54.903(A), 69.2(Hh), 69.3(E)(6) and 69.3(E)(11) of the Commission's Rules * Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. Seeks Waiver of the Commission's Stay of the Provision of Enhanced Lifeline and Link-Up Support to Customers on Near-Tribal Lands DA 06-934 CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109. Comments Due: 5/11/06. Replies Due: 5/18/06. [379]Word | [380]Acrobat 04/26/06 PUBLIC NOTICE: Domestic Section 214 Application filed for
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/2005archive.html
  • port telephone numbers geographically outside of rate centers during this period of service disruption. (Dkt No. 95-116 , 99-200). [62][Word] [63][Acrobat] 8/22/2005 Public Notice:Qwest Corporation Petition For Waiver Of Depreciation Regulation. (Dkt No 05-259) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 09/21/2005. Reply Comments Due: 10/06/2005. [64][Word] [65][Acrobat] 8/11/2005 Order: Westgate Communications And Beaver Creek Telephone Company's Requests For Waiver Of Sections 69.2(HH) And 69.601 Of The Commission's Rules. Granted the Petition for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-69 , 05-58). [66][Word] [67][Acrobat] 8/11/2005 Order: Allband Communications Cooperative Petition For Waiver Of Sections 69.2(HH) And 69.601 Of The Commission's Rules. Granted Allband's Request for Waiver. (Dkt No. 05-174). [68][Word] [69][Acrobat] 8/8/2005 Public Notice:SBC Files Cost Allocation Manual Revision. (DA No. 05-2261). Comments Due: 09/06/2005. Reply
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/Archives/highcost2001archive.html
  • announces posting of updated Turbo-Pascal version of the cost model. Comments Due: 45 days from publication in Federal Register. Reply Comments Due: 60 days from publication in Federal Register. (Dkt No. CC-96-45, Released 6/20/01) DA No. 01-1458. [60]Text [61]Word The Common Carrier Bureau released a Public Notice announcing that Skyline Telephone is seeking a waiver of sections 36.611, 36.612 AND 69.2(HH) Universal Service Fund" to provide expedited and economic service to previously unserved areas. Comments Due: 06/29/2001 Reply Comments Due: 07/16/2001. (Dkt No 96-45, DA No. 01-1414, released 6/15/01) [62]Text [63]Word Common Carrier Bureau released an Order granting the requests from Amana Colonies Telephone Company and South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company: for a waiver of the definition of "study area" contained
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/Archives/highcost2005archive.html
  • this order released today, we grant petition of NTELOS to be designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) for requested service areas in Virginia. [48]Word | [49]Acrobat 5/16/05 Order: In this order released today, we grant a request from Sandwich Isles for waiver of the study area boundary freeze codified in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36, and sections 36.611 and 69.2(hh) of the Commissions rules. We also grant Sandwich Isles a waiver of the definition of incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) in Part 36 and in section 54.5 of the Commissions rules to the limited extent necessary to permit Sandwich Isles to receive universal service support based on its own costs. These waivers will permit Sandwich Isles to continue being treated