FCC Web Documents citing 69.120
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
- rules for rate-of-return carriers also greatly reduce the resources required in the tariff review process. Need: Section 69.101 was adopted to replace rate-of-return regulation with a form of incentive regulation, one that directly limits rates by means of price caps, for the largest local exchange carriers. Section 69.119 was adopted to stimulate the introduction of innovative new enhanced services. Section 69.120 established a new switched access element for queries by interexchange carriers to local exchange carrier line information databases. Section 69.127 was adopted to encourage efficient use of transport facilities by allowing pricing that reflects costs, creating a rate structure conducive to interexchange competition, and avoiding interference with the development of interstate access competition. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 201,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
- costs of these functions. As a result, these costs are recovered through per-minute charges assessed on completed calls. 47 C.F.R. § 69.106. As discussed below, LECs choosing to adopt a separate SS7 signalling rate elements, similar to those established by Ameritech under waiver, may recover a large part of their call setup costs through that mechanism. 192 47 C.F.R. § 69.120. 16045 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-158 addition, incumbent LECs recover some costs associated with the provision of certain signalling information necessary for third parties to offer tandem switching through the "signalling for tandem switching" rate element.194 147. Imposing a call setup charge for interexchange calls should not overlap with any of these existing rate elements. Nevertheless, we clarify that an
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
- rules for rate-of-return carriers also greatly reduce the resources required in the tariff review process. Need: Section 69.101 was adopted to replace rate-of-return regulation with a form of incentive regulation, one that directly limits rates by means of price caps, for the largest local exchange carriers. Section 69.119 was adopted to stimulate the introduction of innovative new enhanced services. Section 69.120 established a new switched access element for queries by interexchange carriers to local exchange carrier line information databases. Section 69.127 was adopted to encourage efficient use of transport facilities by allowing pricing that reflects costs, creating a rate structure conducive to interexchange competition, and avoiding interference with the development of interstate access competition. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 201,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
- costs of these functions. As a result, these costs are recovered through per-minute charges assessed on completed calls. 47 C.F.R. § 69.106. As discussed below, LECs choosing to adopt a separate SS7 signalling rate elements, similar to those established by Ameritech under waiver, may recover a large part of their call setup costs through that mechanism. 192 47 C.F.R. § 69.120. 16045 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-158 addition, incumbent LECs recover some costs associated with the provision of certain signalling information necessary for third parties to offer tandem switching through the "signalling for tandem switching" rate element.194 147. Imposing a call setup charge for interexchange calls should not overlap with any of these existing rate elements. Nevertheless, we clarify that an