FCC Web Documents citing 68.3

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, ¶¶ 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define ``Terminal equipment'' as: ``[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services.'' 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 68.100 (``[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.'') (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) (``Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.txt
  • Rulemaking of Helping Equalize Access Rights in Telecommunications Now (HEAR-IT NOW), In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules, Hearing Aid Compatible Phones, RM-8658 (filed June 5, 1995) (HEAR-IT NOW Petition); Request of WAC to Reopen the Petition for Rulemaking, RM-8658 (filed October 10, 2000) (WAC Request). 47 U.S.C. § 610. 47 C.F.R. § 68.4(a). 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. (discussing scope of the exemptions). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). To date, technical standards for hearing aid compatibility have been established only for wireline telephones. Specifically, Section 68.316 of the Commission's rules sets forth the technical requirements for hearing aid compatibility, and Section 68.112 specifies the telephones that are required to be hearing aid compatible. 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.316, 68.112. 47
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with CMRS and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. ``Public mobile service'' is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(b); 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8119 ¶¶ 145-147. The existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a statutory requirement for imposing hearing aid compatibility requirements. See 47 U.S.C. § 610. 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8117-20 ¶¶ 142-150. Id. at 8119-20 ¶¶ 148-150. Specifically, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1058A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1058A1.txt
  • effective upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register. This notice constitutes publication of the effective date of the regulations. We note that the information collection requirements in § 68.105, as adopted in the Part 68 Streamlining Order, were originally established in a separate proceeding as part of the definition of the term ``demarcation point'' in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (1999). Therefore, that rule will become effective upon OMB approval in the Competitive Networks proceeding. For further information, contact Susan Magnotti, (202) 418-2320 (voice), smagnott@fcc.gov, or Dennis Johnson, (202) 418-2320 (voice), dcjohnso@fcc.gov, of the Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau. The TTY number for the Network Services Division is (202) 418-0484. -FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION- In the Matter of 2000 Biennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1206A1.txt
  • Docket No. 96-98, Fourth Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 88-57, 15 FCC Rcd 22983 (2000), erratum, DA 01-750, (rel. March 28, 2001)(Competitive Networks Order). 66 Fed. Reg. 2322 (January 11, 2001) Public Law 104-13 (1995). 47 C.F.R. § 68.105. At the time the Competitive Networks Order was adopted the rule was codified at Section 68.3. However, the Commission has since recodified that rule to Section 68.105. See In the Matter of 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review of Part 68 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, CC Docket No. 99-216, Report and Order, FCC 00-400 (rel. Dec. 21, 2001) 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000. See OMB No. 3060-0975. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.txt
  • bands within the frequency range of 270 kHz to 6 MHz, with a terminating impedance of 135 ohms. Sometimes these limits are referred to as the out-of-band signal power limitations, because the range 4kHz to 6 MHz is outside the voice-band range of 200 Hz to 3995 Hz. For purposes of Part 68, voice-band is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. Elastic Petition, para. 8. FPC v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). 47 C.F.R. §1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.3;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-234A1.txt
  • The Commission will issue a Public Notice at that time specifying the final date for accepting Part 68 applications. Of course, manufacturers may now use TCBs to receive certification for customer premises or terminal equipment; this option is not affected by the Administrative Council's obligations. Finally, we note that the effective date of the new demarcation point definition in Section 68.3 and new rule Section 68.105 is dependent upon the effective date, based on Federal Register publication, of the Competitive Networks Order, 66 Fed. Reg. 2322 (January 11, 2001). (In the Matter of Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets, Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking to Amend Section 1.4000 of the Commission's Rules to Preempt Restrictions on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • TELEPHONE NETWORK SUBPART A - GENERAL Brief Description: This rule defines the point of demarcation between customer premises telephone wiring and the line owned and/or controlled by the local exchange carrier. Need: This rule is necessary to establish competition in the provision and maintenance of inside wire. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, and 303(r). Section Number and Title: 68.3 Definitions (Demarcation Point). 68.105 Minimum Point of Entry and Demarcation Point. Brief Description: This rule requires that all telephones be compatible with hearing aid devices. Need: This rule implements the provisions of the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, and 303(r). Section Number and Title: 68.4 Hearing-aid Compatible Telephones. SUBPART B-CONDITIONS ON USE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1061A1.txt
  • and carrier personnel. Pursuant to the Commission's November 9, 2000 Report and Order in CC Docket 99-216, significant aspects of Part 68 regulation have been privatized. Nevertheless, all suppliers who provide Terminal Equipment for connection to the PSTN, or to wireline carrier-owned facilities used to provide private line services, and who are defined as ``responsible parties'' by 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, must ensure that all applicable Part 68 requirements are met. These include requirements that Terminal Equipment is properly approved for connection, is properly labeled, and is listed in the database of approved TE maintained by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments (ACTA). The Part 68 rules apply to all defined Terminal Equipment, including that manufactured domestically and abroad. Persons who
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.txt
  • premises.'' Id. The Commission found that the proposed language was confusing and substituted ``suitable location'' for ``location of minimum penetration'', and ``customer-designated premises'' for ``[IXC] terminal location or End User premises.'' The Commission also adopted a single definition of ``point of termination'' that applied to both end users and IXCs. Id. at 1196 (App. D, § 2.6). 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining ``premises'' as ``a dwelling unit, other building or a legal unit of real property such as a lot on which a dwelling unit is located, as determined by the provider of telecommunications service's reasonable and nondiscriminatory standard operating practices''). AT&T Petition at 4; ASCENT Comments at 2-3 (citing ECA Tariff Order, 97 FCC 2d at 1152). See SBC Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.txt
  • agent found that at 31 locations cable signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 µV/m at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from165 µV/m to 983 µV/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's CLI at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed CLI performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. On July 25, 2002, the Atlanta Office issued an Order to Cease Operations, pursuant to Section 76.613(c) of the Rules. The system resumed normal operation on July 26, 2002, after being brought into compliance. The Atlanta Office issued a NAL on September 3, 2002,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • to prevent network harm and ensure that telephones are compatible with hearing aids. The purpose of part 68 is, in part, to provide for uniform standards for the compatibility of hearing aids and telephones to ensure that persons with hearing aids have reasonable access to the telephone network. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 201-205, 303(r), 610. Section Number and Title: 68.3 Definitions. SUBPART D -- CONDITIONS FOR TERMINAL EQUIPMENT APPROVAL Brief Description: Among its many provisions, part 68 includes certain requirements for terminal equipment which implement the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA). Congress enacted the TCPA in an effort to address telephone marketing calls and certain telemarketing practices thought to be an invasion of consumer privacy and a risk
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • prevent network harm and ensure that telephones are compatible with hearing aids. The purpose of part 68 is, in part, to provide for uniform standards for the compatibility of hearing aids and telephones to ensure that persons with hearing aids have reasonable access to the telephone network. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 201-205, 303(r) & 610. Section Number and Title: 68.3 Definitions. SUBPART C - TERMINAL EQUIPMENT APPROVAL PROCEDURES Brief Description: Part 68 governs the connection of terminal equipment (TE), e.g., telephones, fax machines, and computer modems, to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and to wireline carrier-provided private lines. Part 68 requires responsible parties, as defined in Section 68.3, to have their TE formally approved for such connection. Subpart C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.txt
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, ¶¶ 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define ``Terminal equipment'' as: ``[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services.'' 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 68.100 (``[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.'') (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) (``Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.txt
  • amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with CMRS and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. ``Public mobile service'' is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(b); 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8119 ¶¶ 145-147. The existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a statutory requirement for imposing hearing aid compatibility requirements. See Pub. L. No. 100-394, 102 Stat. 976 (1988), codified at 47 U.S.C. § 610. 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8119-20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • NTSC N N NTSC -72.0 O O 24 NTSC Y Y NTSC -39.2 O O 25 NTSC N N NTSC -72.8 O O 26 NTSC Y Y NTSC -37.2 O O 27 ATSC Y Y ATSC -50.9 O - 28 ATSC Y Y ATSC -50.9 O - 29 ATSC Y Y ATSC -64.4 O - 30 ATSC N Y ATSC -68.3 O - ATSC N N 31 NTSC N Y NTSC -90.6 O A 32 NTSC Y Y NTSC -40.1 O O 33 ATSC Y Y ATSC -51.7 O - 34 ATSC Y Y ATSC -43.0 O - 35 ATSC Y Y ATSC -41.8 A - 36 ATSC Y Y ATSC -38.6 O - 38 ATSC Y Y ATSC -27.4 O
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Measured Power (dBm) Viewable (Picture/TASO) Reported PSIP 21 N 513.25 -95.7 N 22 N 519.28 -29.8 1 23 N 525.2 -72 N 24 N 531.26 -39.2 1 25 N 537.24 -72.8 N 26 N 543.24 -37.2 1 27 D 548.3 -50.9 Y 26.1 28 D 554.3 -50.9 Y 62.1 29 D 560.3 -64.4 Y 67.1 30 D 566.3 -68.3 Y 30.1 31 N 573.25 -90.6 4 32 N 579.26 -40.1 1 33 D 584.3 -51.7 Y 32.1 34 D 590.3 -43 Y 9.1 35 D 596.3 -41.8 Y 20.1 36 D 602.3 -38.6 Y 5.1 37 38 D 614.3 -27.4 Y 13.1 39 D 620.3 -44.2 Y 7.1 40 D 626.3 -30.9 Y 54.1 41 D 632.3 -42.7 Y
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% Dec 1997 to 2007 29.2% -35.6% -1.8% 36.2% -28.5% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 192. As a third pricing indicator, some analysts believe average revenue per minute ("RPM") is a good proxy for mobile pricing.536 This is calculated by dividing a provider's estimate of average monthly revenue per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.txt
  • WTB-ASAD Sections 1.2110, 1.2111 and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosures Requirements 3060-0995 WTB-ASAD Section 1.2105(c), Bidding Application and Certification Procedures; Prohibition of Collusion 3060-0531 WTB-BD Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) 3060-0690 WTB-BD Section 101.17, Performance Requirements for the 38.6 - 40.0 GHz Frequency Band 3060-0718 WTB-BD Part 101, Governing the Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio Service 3060-0975 WTB-BD Sections 68.3 and 1.4000, Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets Multiple Tenant Environments (MTEs) 3060-1021 WTB-BD Section 25.139, NGSO FSS Coordination and Information Sharing Between MVDDS Licensees in the 12.2 GHz to 12.7 GHz Band 3060-1022 WTB-BD Sections 101.1403, 101.103(f), 101.1413, 101.1440, and 101.1417, MVDDS and DBS Reporting and Third Party Disclosure Requirements 3060-1030 WTB-BD Service Rules for Advanced Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2_Rcd.pdf
  • WTB-ASAD Sections 1.2110, 1.2111 and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosures Requirements 3060-0995 WTB-ASAD Section 1.2105(c), Bidding Application and Certification Procedures; Prohibition of Collusion 3060-0531 WTB-BD Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) 3060-0690 WTB-BD Section 101.17, Performance Requirements for the 38.6 - 40.0 GHz Frequency Band 3060-0718 WTB-BD Part 101, Governing the Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio Service 3060-0975 WTB-BD Sections 68.3 and 1.4000, Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets Multiple Tenant Environments(MTEs) 3060-1021 WTB-BD Section 25.139, NGSO FSS Coordination and Information Sharing Between MVDDS Licensees in the 12.2 GHz to 12.7 GHz Band 3060-1022 WTB-BD Sections 101.1403, 101.103(f), 101.1413, 101.1440, and 101.1417, MVDDS and DBS Reporting and Third Party Disclosure Requirements 8341 3060-1094 WTB-BD Licensing, Operation, and Transition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205368A1.txt
  • Networks Report and Order. First, we correct the ordering clause in paragraph 188 to read as follows: ``IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission WILL PUBLISH a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of the revisions to Section 1.4000 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000, set forth in Appendix B, and the revisions to Section 68.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, set forth in Appendix B, upon OMB approval of the information collection requirements contained in these revisions.'' 2. Second, we correct the citation in the last sentence of Section (b)(4) of the demarcation point definition set forth in Appendix B to read as follows: ``47 C.F.R. § 68.110(c).'' 3. These corrections are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207126A1.txt
  • By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. We issue this erratum to conform the rules appendix with the text of paragraph 55 of the Competitive Networks Report And Order concerning negotiations for the relocation of the telecommunications demarcation point(s) to the minimum point of entry (MPOE). 2. Paragraph (b)(3) in the amendments to the demarcation point definition in Section 68.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, which were contained in appendix B of the Competitive Networks First Report and Order, shall be corrected to read as follows: In any multiunit premises where the demarcation point is not already at the MPOE, the telephone company must comply with a request from the premises owner to relocate the demarcation point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.txt
  • 61.4 3672.065 5916.2575 1720 G7DDT 65.3 4138.9825 5920.2625 1720 G7DDT 60.5 3702.395 5924.2675 1720 G7DDT 60.6 3646.7525 5970 72000 G7DDT 78 3745 5995.5 1720 G7DDT 68.5 3763.5 6015.0575 1720 G7DDT 61.6 3844.3275 6030.965 874 G7DDT 59 3849.9525 6032.495 1720 G7DDT 61.7 3896.2475 6034.4975 1720 G7DDT 62.7 3841.2675 6044.735 437 G7DDT 54.1 3851.5725 6056.525 1720 G7DDT 60.1 3892.2425 6070.0925 1720 G7DDT 68.3 3789.99 6112.945 1720 G7DDT 58.1 3806.01 6144.2425 1720 G7DDT 56.1 3908.87 6185.08 1720 G7DDT 60.4 3998.51 6189.0175 1720 G7DDT 59.2 3984.505 6191.9425 328 G7DDT 61 3975.0875 6206.32 1720 G7DDT 58.2 4082.6025 6208.3225 1720 G7DDT 58.9 3983.6375 6208.8175 874 G7DDT 56.3 3975.92 6210.325 1720 G7DDT 59.8 3985.64 6215.5225 874 G7DDT 56.3 4021.01 6220.945 1720 G7DDT 59.8 4071.92 6222.475 874 G7DDT 56.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238187A1.pdf
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (µV/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 348 µV/m to 887 µV/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 µV/m at a distance of 3 meters. On May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238198A1.pdf
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (µV/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 165 µV/m to 983 µV/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 µV/m at a distance of 3 meters. On July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 13.6 -53.4 Mexico 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 41.8 0.4 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 6720.7 Netherlands 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 3.0 -80.9 Nigeria 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.6 1.1 68.3 Pakistan 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 0.9 -51.3 Peru 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 4.1 5.2 7.0 10.3 5.1 5.0 2.2 -58.5 Philippines 3.5 3.9 4.9 6.0 8.9 13.7 17.6 14.3 14.2 9.8 8.5 -38.3 Poland 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 54.2 Russia 1.2 5.7 6.8 12.4 11.0 13.3 7.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • 9.5 DE District of Columbia 646.2 30.3 615.9 359.1 256.8 56.6 39.4 152.8 248.8 8.0 DC Florida 7,445.3 540.7 6,904.5 4,505.1 2,399.4 933.8 218.4 1,118.1 2,270.3 129.1 FL Georgia 3,411.8 225.7 3,186.1 2,092.0 1,094.0 328.6 116.0 591.1 1,035.7 58.4 GA Hawaii 490.1 49.7 440.3 282.8 157.5 65.1 12.1 73.7 150.9 6.6 HI Idaho 460.9 29.1 431.9 256.4 175.5 69.7 21.8 68.3 159.8 15.7 ID Illinois 4,222.3 455.7 3,766.6 2,645.8 1,120.8 393.5 151.3 517.6 1,062.4 58.4 IL Indiana 2,120.2 223.5 1,896.7 1,312.4 584.3 250.3 60.3 243.8 554.4 29.9 IN Iowa 777.5 25.8 751.7 481.7 270.0 81.6 44.6 119.2 245.4 24.5 IA Kansas 826.8 109.6 717.3 465.9 251.3 71.0 35.5 130.4 236.9 14.4 KS Kentucky 1,381.9 76.5 1,305.4 923.1 382.2 168.4 42.4 158.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • March 116.1 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.5 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • 25.6 16.1 $12,471 98.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.6 46,050,254 44.7 15.1 16.1 17.6 6.4 Aruba $12,186,854 37.2 1.7 35.9 21.6 3.5 $754,634 32.0 0.0 34.7 23.3 10.0 $44,843 0.0 0.0 0.9 92.3 6.8 74,240,211 25.9 2.0 42.1 24.2 5.8 Bahamas, The $34,082,171 76.7 2.2 7.6 12.3 1.3 $3,879,277 49.5 3.1 28.8 15.9 2.7 $63,599 0.0 16.8 83.1 0.0 0.1 198,357,121 68.3 6.9 10.7 9.7 4.3 Barbados $15,108,358 45.0 17.5 10.9 23.3 3.3 $903,620 20.2 6.4 13.1 35.4 24.9 $77,719 0.0 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 85,977,843 24.5 30.0 12.2 26.8 6.5 Bermuda $11,213,390 59.6 1.2 23.0 14.5 1.6 $1,341,549 22.5 0.0 57.6 16.4 3.5 $81 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 98.8 74,846,748 33.3 1.7 47.2 13.3 4.5 Cayman Islands $12,922,248 48.2 1.9 20.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • March 116.1 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.5 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 28.9 28.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 27.7 32.3 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 8.7 28.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 34.7 11.3 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.4 39.6 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1 For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for 2003 and 2004 are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user collected
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.txt
  • 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 24.5 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 37.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 16.2 28.1 26.5 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 27.1 11.2 11.9 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.2 39.3 38.4 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for 2003 through 2005 are based on shares of reported
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276800A1.pdf
  • operator of cable system serving Curwensville, Pennsylvania (Community Unit No. PA-0200). On August 14, 2007 and August 16, 2007, an agent of the Commission's Philadelphia Office inspected the Atlantic Broadband cable system located in Curwensville, Pennsylvania and observed the following violation: T459. 08/14/07 127.2625 129.3 405724 N 0783024 W intersection of Route T454 and T457 (Ed Bloom Road) 08/16/07 127.2625 68.3 405804 N 0783020 W about 30 feet East of Stop Sign at Intersection of Routes T459 and T454. 08/16/07 127.2625 117.3 405808 N 0783135 W pole 73774 at 631 Schofield Street. 08/16/07 127.2625 40.1 405939 N 0783140 W 428 Walnut Street Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • March 116.1 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.5 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
  • 0.0100.0 United States (conterminous) $1,592,004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,127,990 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 122,490,604 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 North and Central America $2,420,234,247 0.021.7 1.119.7 57.5 $190,318,159 0.011.3 0.026.9 61.8 $86,586,705 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 41,002,252,107 0.0 8.5 0.921.3 69.3 Argentina $43,928,555 0.021.2 0.329.1 49.4 $2,063,163 0.011.8 0.019.9 68.2 $13,661,053 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 809,753,384 0.0 3.5 0.627.6 68.3 Bolivia $16,042,894 0.010.7 0.636.3 52.4 $727,108 0.0 2.9 0.010.5 86.6 $1,633,489 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 210,675,087 0.0 5.5 0.639.1 54.9 Brazil $112,308,606 0.037.1 0.221.3 41.4 $5,393,851 0.023.4 0.020.7 55.8 $3,758,855 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,385,707,119 0.022.7 0.626.3 50.5 Chile $24,246,148 0.031.3 1.920.8 46.1 $3,354,523 0.0 5.5 0.043.5 51.0 $1,472,495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 406,269,136 0.013.0 5.326.7 55.0 Colombia $135,099,502 0.029.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.txt
  • 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 23.6 22.8 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 38.4 40.7 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 16.2 28.1 26.1 24.6 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 27.1 11.2 11.9 11.9 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.2 39.3 38.0 36.4 Total All Filers 100.0 %100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0 100.0 %100.0% Note: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. Some data for prior years have been revised. 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 23.6 22.8 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 38.4 40.7 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 16.2 28.1 26.1 24.6 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 27.1 11.2 11.9 11.9 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.2 39.3 38.0 36.4 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1 2 Source: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Industry Revenues(June 2007) and FCC 499-Q filings. Chart 19.9 Share of Universal Service Contributions by Principal Type of Contributor Table 19.18 Share of Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005 January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005 January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005 January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
  • 5.4 6.9 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 162.8 164.5 126.8 331.6 304.0 295.5 304.0 147.4 514.8 225.0 229.1182.2 Total MSA 134.7 135.4 126.8 NA 300.8 249.4 300.8 159.0 510.2 189.1 228.5180.1 Total Non MSA 221.0 191.0 NA331.6 306.7 337.4 306.7 144.3 622.6 264.5 229.6184.9 Total Residence 211.0 205.6 178.7 388.3 362.8 413.0 362.8 172.6 638.3 291.6 269.5226.3 Total Business 68.3 62.3 44.4 175.1 143.6 95.0 143.6 76.0 249.0 86.7 119.2 72.8 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 107.2 142.5 115.3 307.5 280.9 271.9 280.9 132.9 476.9 176.8 184.5139.9 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Reports 21.3% 13.7% 10.7%16.8% 17.3% 18.2% 17.3%13.2% 17.2%18.2%19.0%14.8% Res. Complaints per Mill. Res. Access Lines 13.0 64.8 480.9 729.8 448.62947.0 448.6 29.9 338.9 366.0 166.9 70.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309858A1.pdf
  • with your pay? *AES prescribed items ** Sum of responses excluding DNK/NBJ 6 Percentages are weighted to represent the Agency's population. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 2011 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS Percent Positive Very SatisfiedSatisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Item Response Total** Do Not Know/ No Basis to Judge N 194 372 147 77 38 828 NA % 68.3 23.6 44.7 18.2 8.9 4.5 100.0 72.Have you been notified that you are eligible to telework? Telework means working at a location other than your normal work site during your regular work hours (excludes travel). N % 593 71.4 174 22.0 56 6.6 823 100.0 73.Please select the response below that BEST describes your current teleworking situation: N % 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-208A1.pdf
  • commencing telecommunications services shall include any charges that the carrier customarily assesses to connect subscribers to the network, including facilities-based charges associated with the extension of lines or construction of facilities needed to initiate service. The reduction shall not apply to charges assessed for facilities or equipment that fall on the customer side of demarcation point, as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter. (b) A qualifying low-income consumer may choose one or both of the programs set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. An eligible resident of Tribal lands may participate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. * * * * * (d) An eligible telecommunications carrier shall publicize the availability of Link Up
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.txt
  • 251(c)(6) (emphasis added). 108We note that at least some definitions of "premises" encompass land adjacent to a structure. See, e.g., Mariam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 920 (10th ed. 1994) (defining premises as "a tract of land with the buildings thereon); Black's Law Dictionary, 1199 (7th ed. 1999) (defining premises as "a house or building along with its grounds"); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining "premises" as generally meaning "a dwelling unit, other building or a legal unit of real property on which a dwelling unit is located . . ."). 109Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15791, ¶ 573. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-297 24 indicated in the Advanced Services First Report & Order, such a requirement is an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-366A1_Erratum.pdf
  • addition,wedeclinetorequireauniformrelocationofthedemarcationpointtotheMPOEforthe reasonsdiscussedbelow. 1. Background 42.IntheCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,werequestedcommentonhowourrulesgoverningthe locationofthedemarcationpointbetweenfacilitiescontrolledbythelocaltelephonecarrierandthe (Continuedfrompreviouspage)-------------- interest,consideringsuchfactorsasthedurationofthecontract,thecontractingprovider'sstatusasanewentrant, theeffectoftheexclusivecontractonthedevelopmentofcompetitionandnewtechnology,andefficiencybenefits. MassachusettsNondiscriminatoryAccessOrderat30.Similarly,ourregulationspermitthewaiverofanyprovision ofourrulesforgoodcauseshown.See47C.F.R.§1.3(rulesmaybesuspended,revoked,amended,orwaivedfor goodcauseshown).Thus,inordertocomplywithboththeMassachusettsandthefederalregulations,aprovider seekingtoenterintoanexclusivecontractmustbothmaketherequiredpublicinterestshowingbeforethe MassachusettsDepartmentofTelecommunicationsandobtainawaiverfromtheCommission. 95 SeeEducationPartiesCommentsat10. 96 WenotethattheCompetitiveNetworksNPRMalsoraisedtheissueofwhethertheCommissionshouldamendits rulesgoverningcableinsidewiringsothattelecommunicationsserviceproviders,aswellasmultichannelvideo programmingdistributors(MVPDs),cantakeadvantageofproceduresgoverningthedispositionofhomerunwiring whenanincumbentMVPDnolongerhasalegallyenforceablerighttomaintainitshomerunwiringinabuilding. AsdiscussedintheFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,SectionV.E,infra,weconcludethatwelacksufficient informationintherecordtodeterminewhethertotakethisaction,andseekfurthercommentontheissue. 23002 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 propertyownerinmultipleunitpremisesimpactcompetitiveprovideraccessandwhethermodification ofthoserulesisappropriatetopromotecompetitiveaccess.97 43.Atthetimethecurrenttelecommunicationsinsidewmngruleswereestablished,there existedessentiallynocompetitioninthemarketfortheprovisionoflocaltelephoneservices.Inthetime sincetheenactmentoftheTelecommunicationsActof1996,manycompetitiveLECshavebegun providingservicesthatwereoncetheexclusivedomainoftheincumbents.Thereisevidence,however, thatcontinuedincumbentcontrolovermuchofthewiringinsomeMTEshashinderedthedevelopment offacilities-basedcompetitiveLECsasviablecompetitorsbyunnecessarilyrequiringthemtodealwith theircompetitorsinordertoservetheselocations.98Ontheotherhand,otherpartiesarguethatbuilding ownercontroloverinsidewiringobstructsthegrowthofcompetitorsthatuseunbundledlocalloops, becausetheywouldoftennototherwiseneedtodealwiththebuildingowner.99Inaddition,someargue thattheCommission'srulescreateconfusionregardingthelocationofthedemarcationpointandhave permitteddemarcationpointstobelocatedatinaccessibleplaces. 44.TheCommissionadopteditsdemarcationpointrulesin1984,inordertofostercompetition inthemarketforinstallationandmaintenanceoftelecommunicationsinsidewiring-thewiringthat connectscustomerpremisesequipment(CPE)tothepublicswitchedtelephonenetwork(PSTN)andto otherCPE.IOOThenewrulesestablisheda"demarcationpoint"thatmarkstheendofwiringunder controloftheLECandthebeginningofwiringunderthecontrolofthepropertyownerorsubscriber.1ol Thus,thenewrulespermittedtelecommunicationssubscribersandpremisesownerstoassumeorassign responsibilityforinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiring,whichpreviouslyhadbeenmanaged solelybytheLECsundertariff.102 97 SeeCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,14FCCRedat12708-9,'1!'1!65-67. 98 See,e.g.TeligentCommentsat78;WinStarCommentsat67. 99 SeeletterfromJasonD.Oxman,SeniorGovernmentAffairsCounsel,CovadCommunicationsCompany,toLeon Jaclder,StaffAttorney,FCC,datedAug.24,2000(CovadLetter).Further,buildingownerswouldnotbeobligated toprovide"conditioned"linescapableoftransmittingDigitalSubscriberLine(DSL)signals,asareincumbent LECs. 100 SeePetitionsSeekingAmendmentofPart68oftheCommission'sRulesConcerningtheConnectionof TelephoneEquipment,SystemandProtectiveApparatustotheTelephoneNetwork,FirstReportandOrder,CC DocketNo.81-216,97FCC2d527(1984)(1984DemarcationPointOrder);47C.F.R. §§68.3,68.213. 101 See47C.F.R. §68.3.ThissectioncurrentlydefmestheDemarcationPointformultipleunitpremisesasfollows: "(1)InmultiunitpremisesexistingasofAugust13,1990,theDemarcationPointshallbedeterminedinaccordance withthelocalcarrier'sreasonableandnon-discriminatorystandardoperatingpractices.Provided,however,that wheretherearemultipledemarcationpointswithinthemultiunitpremises,ademarcationpointshallnotbefurther insidethecustomer'spremisesthanapointtwelveinchesfromwherethewiringentersthecustomer'spremises,or asclosetheretoaspracticable.(2)InmultiunitpremisesinwhichwiringisinstalledafterAugust13,1990,including majoradditionsorrearrangementsofwiringexistingasofthatdate,thetelephonecompanymayestablisha reasonableandnon-discriminatorypracticeofplacingthedemarcationpointattheminimumpointofentry.Ifthe telephonecompanydoesnotelecttoestablishapracticeofplacingthedemarcationpointattheminimumpointof entry,themultiunitpremisesownershalldeterminethelocationofthedemarcationpointorpoints...."[d. 102 See1984DemarcationPointOrder,97FCC2d527.Inseveralrelatedorders,theCommissiondeterminedthat theinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiringnolongerconstitutedacornmoncarrierofferingunderTitleIIof theCommunicationsActandthereforedetariffedtheinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiring.See ModificationstotheUniformSystemofAccountsforClassAandClassBTelephoneCompaniesRequiredby (continued....) 23003 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 45.In1990,theCommissionrevisedthedemarcationpointdefinitiontoincreasetheamountof wiringthatmaycomeunderthecontrolofthepropertyownerorsubscriber.l03Atthesametime,inthe caseofMTEs,theCommissionsoughttomakethedefinitionflexibleenoughtoaccommodateexisting buildings.Therefore,inmulti-tenantbuildingsexistingasofAugust13,1990,thedemarcationpointis determinedinaccordancewiththecarrier'sreasonableandnondiscriminatorypractices.Fornew installations,ormajorrenovations,subsequenttoAugust13,1990,thecarriermayestablishapracticeof placingthedemarcationpointattheMPOE.I04Wherethecarrierchoosesnottodoso,thepremises ownermaydeterminethelocationorlocationsofthedemarcationpoint.lOs 46.In1997,theCommissionagainrevisitedtheissueofthedemarcationpointon reconsiderationofthe1990DemarcationPointOrderandFurtherNPRM.I06TheCommissionclarified thattherelocationofthedemarcationpointtotheMPOEcannotbeundertakenunilaterallybythe incumbentLECwithoutthepropertyowner'sconsent,exceptinthecaseofmajormodifications, renovations,orrearrangements.IO?TheCommissionfurtherstatedthat,forthepurposesofSection68.3, arequestforrelocationbythepropertyownerwouldbeconsideredamajormodificationor rearrangementofthewiring.108The1997DemarcationPointOrderalsoincludedaFurtherNoticeof ProposedRulemakingthatrequestedcommenton,amongotherissues,proposedmodificationstothe demarcationpointrule.I09Twopetitionsforclarificationandreconsiderationwere filedinresponsetoissuesdiscussedon reconsiderationinthe1997DemarcationPointOrder.110InJanuary,2000,theCommissionreleasedanorder (Continuedfrompreviouspage)------------- DetariffmgofCustomerPremisesEquipmentandProposedDetariffingofCustomerProvidedCableWiring,CC DocketNo.82-681,ReportandOrder,48Fed.Reg.50534(1983);DetariffmgtheInstallationandMaintenanceof InsideWiring,CCDocketNo.79-105,SecondReportandOrder,51Fed.Reg.8498(1986);Detariffmgthe InstallationandMaintenanceofInsideWiring,CCDocketNo.79-105,MemorandumOpinionandOrder,1FCC Rcd.1190(1986). 103 See IntheMatterofReviewofSections68.104and68.213oftheCommission'sRulesConcerningConnectionof SimpleInsideWiringtotheTelephoneNetwork,ReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking, CCDocket88-57,5FCCRcd4686(1990).(1990DemarcationPointOrderandFurtherNPRM). 104 TheMPOEisdefinedas"eithertheclosestpracticablepointtowherethewiringcrossesapropertylineorthe closestpracticablepointtowherethewiringentersamultiunitbuildingorbuildings."47C.F.R. §68.3. 105 Wenotethatthedefmitionofthedemarcationpointfortelephonecompanycommunicationsfacilitiesisnot identicaltothedemarcationpointdefmitionforcabletelevisionfacilitiesforpurposesofthecableinsidewiring rules.47C.F.R. §76.6(mrn).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.txt
  • Designed to Prevent Harms to the Network and Rules Pertaining to Technical Criteria for Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control Background. In the Notice, we specified that our proposals to privatize and streamline the approval of terminal equipment affect technical criteria in Part 68, Subparts B, C, D, and F. The proposals also affected the technical definitions contained in Section 68.3. Although we tentatively concluded that it was no longer in the public interest for the Commission to continue its direct involvement in terminal equipment approval, we proposed retaining several definitions in Part 68 that are related to other Commission policies outside of terminal equipment interconnection. Accordingly, we proposed to keep in Part 68 the present definitions of: (a) "demarcation point"
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.txt
  • directly connected to the public switched network will not: (1) result in electrical hazards to telephone company personnel; (2) damage telephone company equipment; (3) cause the malfunction of telephone company billing equipment; or (4) degrade service to persons other than the user of the equipment involved, persons the equipment user calls, or those who call the user. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. Equipment manufacturers are not required to comply with the technical standards in Part 68, but CPE that is not certified as meeting these standards cannot be directly connected to the public switched network and have limited marketability. The U.S. Customs Service also prohibits the importation of terminal equipment that is not registered pursuant to Part 68. See 19 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.txt
  • Rulemaking of Helping Equalize Access Rights in Telecommunications Now (HEAR-IT NOW), In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules, Hearing Aid Compatible Phones, RM-8658 (filed June 5, 1995) (HEAR-IT NOW Petition); Request of WAC to Reopen the Petition for Rulemaking, RM-8658 (filed October 10, 2000) (WAC Request). 47 U.S.C. § 610. 47 C.F.R. § 68.4(a). 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. (discussing scope of the exemptions). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). To date, technical standards for hearing aid compatibility have been established only for wireline telephones. Specifically, Section 68.316 of the Commission's rules sets forth the technical requirements for hearing aid compatibility, and Section 68.112 specifies the telephones that are required to be hearing aid compatible. 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.316, 68.112. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-98A1.txt
  • specifications that competitive CPE suppliers need to provide compatible equipment. We also conclude that allowing carriers to bundle CPE with transmission services will not affect the Commission's requirement that CPE not cause harm to the network. We sought comment in the Further Notice on whether the ``demarcation point'' between telephone company communications facilities and terminal equipment, as defined in section 68.3 of the Commission's rules, would change if CPE and interexchange carriers' network offerings were bundled and what effect, if any, this would have on the Commission's Part 68 program. In November 2000, the Commission adopted an Order eliminating certain portions of the Part 68 regulations governing the development of technical criteria and registration procedures for CPE. It found that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.txt
  • equipment that complies with our rules, for any reason, will subject the responsible party to enforcement procedures and penalties pursuant to subpart E of Part 68, including revocation of certification and, for imported goods, refusal of entry. Location of Responsible Party. Section 68.321 requires that the responsible party for purposes of SDoC certification be located in the United States. Section 68.3 requires the responsible party for SDoC to be the importer, if the equipment is imported. Thus, under the current rules, for imported equipment, the importer must be located in the United States. We agree with Industry Canada's observation, however, that some importers of terminal equipment manufactured abroad may not be located within the United States, and that it would be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.txt
  • See 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). See House Report at 9. See also 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A). Public mobile services are air-to-ground radiotelephone services, cellular radio telecommunications services, offshore radio services, rural radio services, public land mobile telephone services, and other common carrier radio communications services covered by Part 22 of our rules. See 47 U.S.C. § 610(f); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The term public mobile services was subsequently reclassified as commercial mobile radio service (CMRS). See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411 (1994) (implementing Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C); 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • See 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). See House Report at 9. See also 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A). Public mobile services are air-to-ground radiotelephone services, cellular radio telecommunications services, offshore radio services, rural radio services, public land mobile telephone services, and other common carrier radio communications services covered by Part 22 of our rules. See 47 U.S.C. § 610(f); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The term public mobile services was subsequently reclassified as commercial mobile radio service (CMRS). See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411 (1994) (implementing Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C); 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
  • One category of this subloop is inside wire, which is defined for purposes of this section as all loop plant owned or controlled by the incumbent LEC at a multiunit customer premises between the minimum point of entry as defined in § 68.105 of this chapter and the point of demarcation of the incumbent LEC's network as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter. (i) Point of technically feasible access. A point of technically feasible access is any point in the incumbent LEC's outside plant at or near a multiunit premises where a technician can access the wire or fiber within the cable without removing a splice case to reach the wire or fiber within to access the wiring in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-111A1.txt
  • dockets is set forth in Appendix B. Petition at 2-3. An inside wire subloop is defined as ``all loop plant owned or controlled by the incumbent LEC at a multiunit customer premises between the minimum point of entry as defined in § 68.105 of this chapter and the point of demarcation of the incumbent LEC's network as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter.'' 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(b)(2). Petition at i. Although Cox uses the term MTEs, the Commission uses the term ``multiunit premises'' in the inside wire subloop rule. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(b)(2). See Petition at 2 (citing Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with CMRS and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. ``Public mobile service'' is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(b); 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8119 ¶¶ 145-147. The existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a statutory requirement for imposing hearing aid compatibility requirements. See 47 U.S.C. § 610. 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8117-20 ¶¶ 142-150. Id. at 8119-20 ¶¶ 148-150. Specifically, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.txt
  • return. Also outlines the individual authorized rates of return for certain carriers' interstate exchange access rates. Part 68 - Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network - Establishes requirements for direct connection to the public switched network of all terminal equipment (except those falling under national security/defense interests). The Wireline Competition Bureau administers: Subpart A (General), sections 68.1 - 68.3, 68.7; Subpart B (Conditions on Use of Terminal Equipment), sections 68.100 - 68.110, 68.160 - 68.162; Subpart C (Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures), sections 68.201 - 68.214, 68.218; Subpart D (Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval), sections 68.300, 68.318-68.322, and 68.326; Subpart E (Complaint Procedures), section 68.418 (b); and Subpart G (Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments). Part 69 - Access Charges -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% Dec 1997 to 2006 25.6% -35.4% -4.2% 31.1% -31.7% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. As a third pricing indicator, some analysts believe average revenue per minute (``RPM'') is a good proxy for mobile pricing. This is calculated by dividing a provider's estimate of average monthly revenue per subscriber (often referred to as average revenue per unit, or ``ARPU'') by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.txt
  • at 19702-06 ¶¶ 89-97. See Joint Consensus Plan at 6-10. See Pub. L. No. 100-394, 102 Stat. 976 (1988), codified at 47 U.S.C. § 610 (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A)(i). The statute references ``public mobile service,'' which is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. In 1994, Congress amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with commercial mobile [radio] services (CMRS) and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). In addition, the existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.txt
  • § 610 (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A)(i). The statute references ``public mobile services,'' which are defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules, and ``private radio services,'' defined as private land mobile radio services and other services characterized by the Commission as private radio services. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B), (C); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. In 1994, Congress amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with commercial mobile [radio] services (CMRS) and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, WT Docket 01-309, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753, 16764-65 ¶ 26 (2003) (2003 Hearing Aid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1_Rcd.pdf
  • § 610 (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act). 347 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A)(i). The statute references "public mobile services," which are defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules, and "private radio services," defined as private land mobile radio services and other services characterized by the Commission as private radio services. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B), (C); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. In 1994, Congress amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with commercialmobile [radio] services (CMRS) and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Section 68.4(a) of theCommission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, WT Docket 01-309,Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753, 16764-65 ¶ 26 (2003) (2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order). 11169
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.txt
  • return. Also outlines the individual authorized rates of return for certain carriers' interstate exchange access rates. Part 68 - Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network - Establishes requirements for direct connection to the public switched network of all terminal equipment (except those falling under national security/defense interests). The Wireline Competition Bureau administers: Subpart A (General), sections 68.1 - 68.3, 68.7; Subpart B (Conditions on Use of Terminal Equipment), sections 68.100 - 68.110, 68.160 - 68.162; Subpart C (Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures), sections 68.201 - 68.214, 68.218; Subpart D (Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval), sections 68.300, 68.318-68.322, and 68.326; Subpart E (Complaint Procedures), section 68.418 (b); and Subpart G (Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments). Part 69 - Access Charges -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2% 100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6% 74.846 4.7% Dec 1997 to 2008 34.1% -35.8% 0.5% 41.0% -25.2% Blended Revenue per Minute. Alternatively, some analysts believe RPM is a good proxy for mobile pricing. This metric is calculated by dividing an estimate of average monthly revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8%71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2%100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6%74.846 4.7% Dec 1997 to 2008 34.1% -35.8% 0.5% 41.0% -25.2% 187.Blended Revenue per Minute. Alternatively, some analysts believe RPM is a good proxy for mobile pricing.565This metric is calculated bydividing an estimate of average monthlyrevenue per subscriber (often referred to as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2% 100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6% 74.846 4.7% 2009 133.7 -0.4% 64.2 0.0% 102.39 1.9% 145.0 2.8% 78.099 4.3% Dec 1997 to 2009 33.7% -35.8% 2.4% 45.0% -21.9% . Average Revenue Per Minute Average Local Monthly Bill Minutes of Use Per Month Average Revenue Per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2%100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6% 74.846 4.7% 2009 133.7 -0.4% 64.2 0.0% 102.39 1.9% 145.0 2.8% 78.099 4.3% Dec 1997 to 2009 33.7% -35.8% 2.4% 45.0% -21.9% 191. Revenue per Voice Minute. In addition to the Cellular CPI, some analysts believe Voice RPM is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.txt
  • there is no imbalance between service to urbanized areas and to non-urbanized areas, and that Section 307(b) retains little or no relevance. Others implicitly recognize an imbalance of service, but argue that radio service properly should be concentrated in urbanized areas, as 79 percent of the American population lives in urban areas. This figure, it should be noted, combines the 68.3 percent of the population living in and around urbanized areas of over 50,000 with the 10.7 percent living in urban clusters of between 40,000 and 50,000 population. This still leaves 21 percent of the population - over 59 million Americans under the 2000 Census - living in rural areas or communities of less than 40,000. These 59 million people, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
  • Average emission limit in dBm Average emission limit in µW/cm² at 3m FCC (current) Toyota Proposed FCC (current) Toyota Proposed Not-in-Motion 23.5 0.20 In-Motion Front 48.3 50 60 88 In-Motion Side/Rear 45.3 30 Peak emission limits in dBm Peak power density limits in µW/cm² at 3m FCC (current) Toyota Proposed FCC (current) Toyota Proposed Not-in- Motion 43.5 20 In-Motion Front 68.3 55 6000 279 In-Motion Side/Rear 65.3 3000 Toyota proposes to consolidate the in-motion, not-in-motion, front, side and rear-looking criterion. Its requested average power density limit of 50 dBm (88 µW/cm² at 3 m) and peak power density limit of 55 dBm (279 µW/cm² at 3m) would be applicable in all directions regardless of the motion status of the vehicle. This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A2.txt
  • 6 1 9 See Appendix B 30 29Cleveland 67.8 4 0 11 1 1 0 11 Spectrum Limited 31 30Salt Lake City-Ogden- 74.8 29 0 11 0 0 0 46 Spectrum Limited 32 33Las Vegas 79.7 26 0 10 2 2 0 39 Spectrum Limited 33 32Kansas City 61.3 9 0 8 8 3 0 24 Spectrum Limited 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 12 9 2 19 See Appendix B 35 36Columbus, OH 75.1 8 5 13 5 5 1 10 Spectrum Limited 36 38Austin 69.7 16 3 11 10 6 0 27 Spectrum Limited 37 35San Jose 76.3 8 0 7 3 3 0 0 Spectrum Limited - see Mkt. 4 38 37Milwaukee-Racine 83.6 2 0 9 7 6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A3.txt
  • 26 26Riverside-San Bernardino 52.0 20 5 8 N/A N/A 2 21 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 27 27Sacramento 76.9 17 5 9 3 3 0 50 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 28 31San Antonio 78.7 11 0 11 8 6 0 23 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 29 28Cincinnati 66.7 5 3 18 N/A N/A 1 9 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 N/A N/A 0 19 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 43 42Raleigh-Durham 63.7 18 2 9 N/A N/A 1 16 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 45 44Nashville 65.9 15 2 12 N/A N/A 0 55 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 46 45Greensboro-Winston-Salem- 66.7 19 4 11 N/A N/A 0 26 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 48 48Oklahoma City 71.4 19 0 13
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Warner (100) 8 Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite 76.0 9 Fox Family Channel 75.7 10 TNN 75.0 11 Lifetime Television 75.0 12 A&E 75.0 13 Weather Channel 74.0 14 MTV 73.2 15 CNN Headline News 72.4 Time Warner 16 QVC 72.2 Comcast (57), AT&T (43) 17 TLC 72.0 AT&T (49), Cox (24.6) 18 AMC 71.0 Cablevision (75) 19 CNBC 71.0 20 VH1 68.3 Notes: In addition to cable, other services such as MMDS (wireless cable), SMATV (satellite master antenna television), satellite, including HSD (home satellite dish) and DBS (direct broadcast satellite), broadcast television and LPTV (low power television) may distribute these signals. Subscriber figures may include these noncable services. Cable affiliates provide 95% of funding for C-SPAN and C-SPAN2, but have no ownership
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.wp
  • utilizes 256 decoder output voltages, one for each of the Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-221 is practically limited to a maximum information transmission speed of 56 kbps. 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.308. 9 Network harm includes service degradation occurring to persons other than the user of the terminal equipment and that user's calling or called party. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The Order establishing the Part 68 program identified four areas of potential harm that may arise as a consequence of permitting the uncontrolled direct connection of telecommunications equipment to the telecommunications network: (1) hazardous voltages, (2) excessive signal power levels, (3) excessive longitudinal imbalance, and (4) improper network control signalling. In the Matter of Proposals for New and Revised Classes
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
  • at 7-12; RCN Comments at 20-21; Teligent Comments at 2-10; WinStar Comments at 2-13. 305 See CoreComm Comments at 35-36; KMC Comments at 22; OpTel Comments at 7; Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Attorney, OpTel, to Magalie R.Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 96-98 and 99-217 (filed July 22, 1999). Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-238 80 169. Section 68.3 of our rules defines the demarcation point as that point on the loop where the telephone company's control of the wire ceases, and the subscriber's control (or, in the case of some multiunit premises, the landlord's control) of the wire begins.306 Thus, the demarcation point is defined by control; it is not a fixed location on the network, but rather
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • Designed to Prevent Harms to the Network and Rules Pertaining to Technical Criteria for Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control Background. In the Notice, we specified that our proposals to privatize and streamline the approval of terminal equipment affect technical criteria in Part 68, Subparts B, C, D, and F. The proposals also affected the technical definitions contained in Section 68.3. Although we tentatively concluded that it was no longer in the public interest for the Commission to continue its direct involvement in terminal equipment approval, we proposed retaining several definitions in Part 68 that are related to other Commission policies outside of terminal equipment interconnection. Accordingly, we proposed to keep in Part 68 the present definitions of: (a) "demarcation point"
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 56 1000.0 479.0 35218 5937 36057 5970 0.0 0.0 92.9 CAONTARIO 46 47 69.9 927.0 17999 12158 17391 11983 0.2 0.5 100.0 CAOXNARD 63 24 50.0 549.0 12050 1792 10943 1280 0.2 0.6 99.6 CAPALMSPRINGS 36 46 50.0 207.0 5986 255 5890 259 1.2 1.4 99.4 CAPALMSPRINGS 42 52 64.41087.0 14117 859 14077 927 4.5 8.3 97.0 CAPARADISE 30 20 68.3 440.0 17736 370 17246 364 0.3 0.0 99.8 CAPORTERVILLE 61 48 74.5 811.0 21858 1330 21490 1278 0.1 0.0 100.0 CARANCHOPALOSVE44 51 224.9 451.0 13335 8016 16382 7109 0.0 0.0 79.1 CAREDDING 7 14 159.11103.0 35718 327 35198 321 0.0 0.0 99.4 CAREDDING 9 18 175.91097.0 35202 322 34666 319 0.0 0.0 99.2 CARIVERSIDE 62 69 175.0 723.0 15815 11178
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • kW to 316 kW; for WMSN-TV in Madison, Wisconsin, from 3.2 kW to at least 8.2 kW; for WUTV-TV in Buffalo, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WUHF-TV, in Rochester, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WZTV-TV in Nashville, Tennessee, from 116.6 kW to 500 kW; and for WVAH-TV in Charleston, West Virginia, from 68.3 kW to at least 460 kW. Sullivan attaches technical exhibits to show that such increases would comport with its de minimis interference standard and would cause little or no additional Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 119 interference to other stations and to provide technical details on proposed directional antenna patterns. It requests that we act on these requests in a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209956-1.pdf
  • could be effected, for example through non-disclosure agreements, although these alone may not be sufficient in cases where the recipient of such information may not have the financial viability to compensate a manufacturer if commercially sensitive information fails to be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Section 1193.43 of the Access Board's Guidelines appears to conflict with Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules. The Commission tentatively concluded that the Access Board's Guidelines "do not overlap, duplicate, or conflict with" existing Commission rules. Pursuant to Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules, telephones must be equipped with a receive volume control that provides a minimum of 12 dB gain and a maximum of 18 dB gain.26Section 1193.43 of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210017-1.pdf
  • goals are laudable, the Access Board's Guidelines unfortunately do not offer the level of specificity nor the level of detail required by telecommunications manufacturers.As an illustration of the problems inherent in applying the Access Board's Guidelines, one need look no fiu-ther than the Commission's HAC Rules whereby the minimum gain requirements for receivers contained in Section 1193.43 (e)4 and Section 68.3 175 of the Commission's Rules appear to be in conflict.Moreover, the Access Board's Guidelines became effective March 5, 1998 and are currently in effect, whereas compliance with the HAC requirements under Section 68.3 17, is not mandatory until January 1, 2000.6 Because the Guidelines lack specificity and may conflict with existing Commission Rules, the Commission should provide sufficient clarification. The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • FCC 99-141 60 We note that signals could, in theory, be transported within multiple tenant environments by means of wireless technology, perhaps using unlicensed spectrum. We are not aware, however, that such wireless transport is in fact occurring on a significant scale. Furthermore, even wireless in-building transport would presumably require the installation of some facilities. 61 See 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining several different options by which the demarcation point between telephone company facilities and subscriber facilities may be determined). The rules for determining control over telephone wiring are to be distinguished from the cable inside wiring rules, which are used to determine the disposition of cable inside wiring when a provider no longer has a legally enforceable right to remain
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • the demarcation point on reconsideration of the 1990 Demarcation Point Order and Further NPRM. The Commission clarified that the relocation of the demarcation point to the MPOE cannot be undertaken unilaterally by the incumbent LEC without the property owner's consent, except in the case of major modifications, renovations, or rearrangements. The Commission further stated that, for the purposes of Section 68.3, a request for relocation by the property owner would be considered a major modification or rearrangement of the wiring. The 1997 Demarcation Point Order also included a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that requested comment on, among other issues, proposed modifications to the demarcation point rule. Two petitions for clarification and reconsideration were filed in response to issues discussed on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • an average growth rate, we have calculated an average of these projections. According to this average figure, the mobile telephone market's total penetration rate would grow at a compound annual average growth rate of approximately 14.7 percent over the next five years and the market would have over 114 million subscribers by the end of 2002. Cellular operators would have 68.3 percent of these subscribers, broadband PCS operators 25.8 percent, and digital SMR operators 5.9 percent. This level of subscribership would translate into a national penetration rate of over 41 percent by the end of 2002. An important trend to note is that all of the projections assume that the new entrants would gain an increasing percentage of each year's incremental
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.txt
  • directly connected to the public switched network will not: (1) result in electrical hazards to telephone company personnel; (2) damage telephone company equipment; (3) cause the malfunction of telephone company billing equipment; or (4) degrade service to persons other than the user of the equipment involved, persons the equipment user calls, or those who call the user. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. Equipment manufacturers are not required to comply with the technical standards in Part 68, but CPE that is not certified as meeting these standards cannot be directly connected to the public switched network, and has limited marketability. The U.S.Customs Service also prohibits the importation of terminal equipment that is not registered pursuant to Part 68. See 19 U.S.C. § 3109.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.wp
  • 1. The authority citation for Part 68 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 1, 4, 5, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 155, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602, 610. 2. Section 68.3 is amended by adding the following definition to the terms used in Part 68: * * * * * Hearing aid compatible: Except as used at §§ 68.4(a)(3) and 68.414 of these rules, the terms hearing aid compatible or hearing aid compatibility are used as defined in § 68.316, unless it is specifically stated that hearing aid compatibility volume control,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3408A1.html
  • agent found that at 31 locations cable signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 V/m at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from165 V/m to 983 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's CLI at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed CLI performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. 5. On July 25, 2002, the Atlanta Office issued an Order to Cease Operations, pursuant to Section 76.613(c) of the Rules.13 The system resumed normal operation on July 26, 2002, after being brought into compliance. The Atlanta Office issued a NAL on September 3,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, PP 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define "Terminal equipment" as: "[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services." 47 C.F.R. S 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S 68.100 ("[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.") (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) ("Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files09/CREPOR09.pdf
  • applies to agreements involving foreign carriers with market power on routes where the termination rates are above benchmark.4 Table A21 shows that U.S. carriers reported 4.6 billion minutes of U.S.-billed traditional settlement traffic in 2009, for which they billed $0.2 billion. Non-Traditional Settlement Arrangements consist of all traffic other than traditionally settled traffic. Table A22 shows that U.S. carriers reported 68.3 billion U.S.-billed non-traditional minutes of traffic in year 2009, for which they billed $5.6 billion. U.S. carriers also reported receiving 23.2 billion foreign-billed non-traditional minutes of traffic in year 2009. These tables may understate the total amount of traffic settled under non-traditional arrangements because it appears that carriers continued to report a small amount of non-traditional settlement traffic as traditional
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fcc98091.pdf
  • an average growth rate, we have calculated an average of these projections. According to this average figure, the mobile telephone market's total penetration rate would grow at a compound annual average growth rate of approximately 14.7 percent over the next five years and the market would have over 114 million subscribers by the end of 2002. Cellular operators would have 68.3 percent of these subscribers, broadband PCS operators 25.8 percent, and digital SMR operators 5.9 percent. This level of subscribership would translate into a national penetration rate of over 41 percent by the end of 2002. An important trend to note is that all of the projections assume that the new entrants would gain an increasing percentage of each year's incremental
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011114-hearing.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011114-hearing.txt
  • Equalize Access Rights in Telecommunications Now (HEAR-IT NOW), In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules, Hearing Aid Compatible Phones, RM-8658 (filed June 5, 1995) (HEAR-IT NOW Petition); Request of WAC to Reopen the Petition for Rulemaking, RM-8658 (filed October 10, 2000) (WAC Request). 3 47 U.S.C. § 610. 4 47 C.F.R. § 68.4(a). 5 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. 6 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The terms public and private mobile services were subsequently reclassified to create two new categories of mobile services, commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) and private mobile radio service (PMRS). See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411 (1994) (implementing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Warner (100) 8 Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite 76.0 9 Fox Family Channel 75.7 10 TNN 75.0 11 Lifetime Television 75.0 12 A&E 75.0 13 Weather Channel 74.0 14 MTV 73.2 15 CNN Headline News 72.4 Time Warner 16 QVC 72.2 Comcast (57), AT&T (43) 17 TLC 72.0 AT&T (49), Cox (24.6) 18 AMC 71.0 Cablevision (75) 19 CNBC 71.0 20 VH1 68.3 Notes: In addition to cable, other services such as MMDS (wireless cable), SMATV (satellite master antenna television), satellite, including HSD (home satellite dish) and DBS (direct broadcast satellite), broadcast television and LPTV (low power television) may distribute these signals. Subscriber figures may include these noncable services. Cable affiliates provide 95% of funding for C-SPAN and C-SPAN2, but have no ownership
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98187.pdf
  • different technologies can sacrifice efficiency significantly.59 We ask for comment on whether there are efficiency problems that can be corrected through standardization of technology interfaces. If there are such problems, should the Commission encourage such standardization? Would such activity by the Commission increase interconnectivity and thereby further the deployment of Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-187 60 See 47 C.F.R. § 68.3; Implementation of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act of 1992, Cable Home Wiring, Report & Order, 8 FCC Rcd 1435 (1993). 61 See, e.g., Amendment of Parts 2, 15, and 97 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Use of Radio Frequencies Above 40 GHz for New Radio Applications, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Fourth Notice of Proposed Rule
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.wp
  • utilizes 256 decoder output voltages, one for each of the Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-221 is practically limited to a maximum information transmission speed of 56 kbps. 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.308. 9 Network harm includes service degradation occurring to persons other than the user of the terminal equipment and that user's calling or called party. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The Order establishing the Part 68 program identified four areas of potential harm that may arise as a consequence of permitting the uncontrolled direct connection of telecommunications equipment to the telecommunications network: (1) hazardous voltages, (2) excessive signal power levels, (3) excessive longitudinal imbalance, and (4) improper network control signalling. In the Matter of Proposals for New and Revised Classes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • entirely the case. Commenters from all facets of the CPE industry were unanimous in their view that the technical requirements designed to protect the network from harm are beneficial to owners of the network, to consumers, and to both domestic and foreign manufacturers. In fact, all parties at the fora argued that all four types of protections listed in section 68.3 are still needed. SBC, for example, discussed at length the technical faults that can cause injury to maintenance personnel, the network physical plant, and to other users of the network. Ameritech and Lucent argued that new technology increases, rather than diminishes, the need for protection of the network from harm and interference to third parties. Thomson pointed out that responsible
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
  • NID does not mark the end of the incumbent's control of the loop facility. Where incumbents maintain ownership and control over a portion of the loop beyond the NID, the definition of the loop as set forth by the Commission in the Local Competition First Report and Order may not provide the competitor with actual access to the subscriber. Section 68.3 of our rules defines the demarcation point as that point on the loop where the telephone company's control of the wire ceases, and the subscriber's control (or, in the case of some multiunit premises, the landlord's control) of the wire begins. Thus, the demarcation point is defined by control; it is not a fixed location on the network, but rather
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • 270 kHz to 6 MHz, with a terminating impedance of 135 ohms. Sometimes, as in the first sentence of the Petition, these limits are called the out-of-band signal power limitations, because the range 4kHz to 6 MHz is outside the voice-band range of 200 Hz to 3995 Hz. For purposes of Part 68, voice-band is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. These limitations were originally intended to limit crosstalk in multichannel analog carrier systems. Multichannel analog carrier systems use frequency division multiplexing to concentrate multiple subscribers' signals onto a single wire pair. Each direction of transmission for each subscriber uses either 4 kHz (single sideband) or 8 kHz (double sideband) of frequency spectrum. Generally, the carrier systems most susceptible to crosstalk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001653.doc
  • 270 kHz to 6 MHz, with a terminating impedance of 135 ohms. Sometimes, as in the first sentence of the Petition, these limits are called the out-of-band signal power limitations, because the range 4kHz to 6 MHz is outside the voice-band range of 200 Hz to 3995 Hz. For purposes of Part 68, voice-band is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. These limitations were originally intended to limit crosstalk in multichannel analog carrier systems. Multichannel analog carrier systems use frequency division multiplexing to concentrate multiple subscribers' signals onto a single wire pair. Each direction of transmission for each subscriber uses either 4 kHz (single sideband) or 8 kHz (double sideband) of frequency spectrum. Generally, the carrier systems most susceptible to crosstalk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00208.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00208.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00208.txt
  • commencing telecommunications services shall include any charges that the carrier customarily assesses to connect subscribers to the network, including facilities-based charges associated with the extension of lines or construction of facilities needed to initiate service. The reduction shall not apply to charges assessed for facilities or equipment that fall on the customer side of demarcation point, as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter. (b) A qualifying low-income consumer may choose one or both of the programs set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. An eligible resident of Tribal lands may participate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. * * * * * (d) An eligible telecommunications carrier shall publicize the availability of Link Up
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.txt
  • 251(c)(6) (emphasis added). We note that at least some definitions of ``premises'' encompass land adjacent to a structure. See, e.g., Mariam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 920 (10th ed. 1994) (defining premises as ``a tract of land with the buildings thereon); Black's Law Dictionary, 1199 (7th ed. 1999) (defining premises as ``a house or building along with its grounds''); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining ``premises'' as generally meaning ``a dwelling unit, other building or a legal unit of real property on which a dwelling unit is located . . .''). Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15791, ¶ 573. Advanced Services First Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 4786, ¶ 44. Ameritech Comments at 2. Local Competition First
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • Designed to Prevent Harms to the Network and Rules Pertaining to Technical Criteria for Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control Background. In the Notice, we specified that our proposals to privatize and streamline the approval of terminal equipment affect technical criteria in Part 68, Subparts B, C, D, and F. The proposals also affected the technical definitions contained in Section 68.3. Although we tentatively concluded that it was no longer in the public interest for the Commission to continue its direct involvement in terminal equipment approval, we proposed retaining several definitions in Part 68 that are related to other Commission policies outside of terminal equipment interconnection. Accordingly, we proposed to keep in Part 68 the present definitions of: (a) "demarcation point"
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.txt
  • Registration") to Specify Standards for and Means of Connection of Telephone Equipment to Lamp and/or Annunciator Functions of Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket Nos. 19528, 20774, 21182, 70 FCC 2d 1800 (1979). Network harm occurs when persons other than the user of the subject terminal equipment and that user's calling or called party suffer service degradation. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The Order establishing the Part 68 program identified four areas of potential harm that may arise as a consequence of permitting the uncontrolled direct connection of telecommunications equipment to the telecommunications network: (1) hazardous voltages, (2) excessive signal power levels, (3) excessive longitudinal imbalance, and (4) improper network control signaling. First R&O, 56 F.C.C. 2d at 602. 47 C.F.R. §
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1000.pdf
  • codes grouped by median household income) Median household income (in each decile of zip codes) December 1999 June 2000 December 1999 June 2000 90-100 $53,494 to $291,938 90.8 95.4 98.4 99.5 80-90 $43,617 to $53,478 77.4 86.9 95.9 98.2 70-80 $38,396 to $43,614 67.0 78.1 94.3 96.8 60-70 $34,744 to $38,395 59.6 73.6 91.7 95.6 50-60 $32,122 to $34,743 53.7 68.3 89.4 93.9 40-50 $29,893 to $32,121 51.8 65.0 88.2 92.7 30-40 $27,542 to $29,892 49.1 62.4 85.9 91.4 20-30 $24,855 to $27,541 48.8 59.6 85.1 90.3 10-20 $21,645 to $24,855 45.3 55.7 82.5 88.1 0-10 $0 to $21,644 41.7 50.5 84.1 89.5 Table 8 % of population in decile that reside in zip codes with high speed service % of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1208_tables.doc
  • 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 32.5 * 1.7 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 12.5 54.7 8.8 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.4 2.5 0.8 2.9 4.4 15.0 52.6 21.5 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.4 68.3 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 13.1 4.4 17.5 21.1 23.0 25.1 9.4 2.0 1.8 0.2 82.5 100.0 Mobile Wireless 32.1 14.1 46.2 28.8 17.9 6.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp98.pdf
  • STATE AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 LINES (1997 USF VOICE HIGH VOICE GRADE Loops in GRADE CAPACITY LINES STATE thousands) COMPANY LINES LINES MICHIGAN 6,258 Ameritech 49.8% 72.3% 49.6% GTE 0.0 * 0.0 MINNESOTA 2,878 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 U S WEST 36.2 64.7 36.0 MISSISSIPPI 1,321 BellSouth 17.2 35.4 13.4 MISSOURI 3,324 SBC 19.6 68.3 20.5 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 MONTANA 508 U S WEST 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEBRASKA 995 U S WEST 30.6 65.6 38.8 NEVADA 1,207 SBC 45.6 85.6 42.4 Sprint 95.7 0.0 99.2 NEW HAMPSHIRE 818 Bell Atlantic 41.9 67.6 37.6 NEW JERSEY 6,201 Bell Atlantic 23.4 40.4 21.6 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEW MEXICO 901 U S WEST 32.4 56.2 33.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • Other Switched 7.4 9.1 10.1 1,518 1,997 1,466 Private Line 1.3 2.0 2.2 2,835 2,089 1,436 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.9 1.9 2.3 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 11.4 13.3 14.9 1,152 1,485 1,088 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 1.0 1.3 1.5 1,700 1,455 932 Operator 9.7 9.4 7.3 3,455 3,199 2,236 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 62.1 65.1 68.3 3,065 2,902 2,572 Private Line 9.2 10.0 11.0 2,790 2,914 2,752 Other Toll Revenues 2 5.3 1.5 4.3 All Toll Revenues Provided to End Users 87.3 87.3 92.3 2,633 2,486 2,446 Total Toll Revenues $98.7 $100.6 $107.3 2,295 2,232 2,093 Sources: 1997 and 1998: Data filed on FCC Form 431 (Telecommunications Relay Service Worksheet) and Form 457 (Universal Service Worksheet).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 3,070 2,156 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.9 1.9 2.3 0.6 0.4 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 11.4 13.3 14.9 21.8 20.0 1,152 1,485 1,088 1,252 952 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.0 1,700 1,455 932 1,017 1,092 Operator 9.7 9.4 7.3 8.4 7.4 3,455 3,199 2,236 3,249 2,717 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 62.1 65.1 68.3 60.4 52.2 3,065 2,902 2,572 2,206 2,214 Private Line 9.2 10.0 11.0 10.4 11.0 2,790 2,914 2,752 3,032 2,859 Other Toll Revenues 2 5.3 1.5 4.3 6.3 6.8 All Toll Revenues Provided to End Users 87.3 87.3 92.3 86.7 78.4 2,633 2,486 2,446 2,310 2,254 Total Toll Revenues 98.7 100.6 107.3 108.5 98.4 2,295 2,232 2,093 2,015 1,906 1 Includes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • 4.9 4.9 61 New York 71.7 11.9 5.1 11.3 1,079 69.4 15.4 3.7 11.5 461 78.3 11.9 4.1 5.7 663 North Carolina 69.8 4.7 9.5 16.0 425 63.6 14.9 6.7 14.9 195 78.3 11.1 4.4 6.2 226 North Dakota 46.4 26.8 3.6 23.2 56 50.0 18.8 6.3 25.0 16 69.2 7.7 5.1 17.9 39 Ohio 66.0 12.2 6.3 15.5 717 68.3 14.4 4.8 12.5 271 71.5 10.9 5.2 12.4 386 Oklahoma 68.4 9.3 3.0 19.3 236 64.1 12.5 4.7 18.8 64 75.8 12.5 3.3 8.3 120 Oregon 72.5 6.1 4.9 16.4 244 64.1 11.7 6.8 17.5 103 79.6 7.3 4.4 8.8 137 Pennsylvania 65.6 14.2 4.6 15.6 873 66.2 18.0 1.6 14.1 305 70.5 12.4 4.1 13.1 590 Rhode Island 80.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • 4.9 4.9 61 New York 71.7 11.9 5.1 11.3 1,079 69.4 15.4 3.7 11.5 461 78.3 11.9 4.1 5.7 663 North Carolina 69.8 4.7 9.5 16.0 425 63.6 14.9 6.7 14.9 195 78.3 11.1 4.4 6.2 226 North Dakota 46.4 26.8 3.6 23.2 56 50.0 18.8 6.3 25.0 16 69.2 7.7 5.1 17.9 39 Ohio 66.0 12.2 6.3 15.5 717 68.3 14.4 4.8 12.5 271 71.5 10.9 5.2 12.4 386 Oklahoma 68.4 9.3 3.0 19.3 236 64.1 12.5 4.7 18.8 64 75.8 12.5 3.3 8.3 120 Oregon 72.5 6.1 4.9 16.4 244 64.1 11.7 6.8 17.5 103 79.6 7.3 4.4 8.8 137 Pennsylvania 65.6 14.2 4.6 15.6 873 66.2 18.0 1.6 14.1 305 70.5 12.4 4.1 13.1 590 Rhode Island 80.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
  • $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4 87.8 85.6 93.8 91.1 93.7 94.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
  • or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 92.1 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 97.3 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.0 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.2 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 96.0 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 95.7 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • Private Service Providers 6.4 1.9 1.8 Shared-Tenant Service Providers * 10.8 3.2 Other Local Service Providers 45.5 21.3 2.5 Total Local Competitors 1,094.3 1,993.7 531.8 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,667.5 22,840.5 4,304.5 Payphone Service Providers 65.5 148.8 10.4 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,271.7 14,004.7 1,874.6 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 156.8 506.5 68.3 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch * 48.8 2.3 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 1.7 33.7 25.0 Providers Wireless Service Providers 1,430.4 14,593.7 1,970.2 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 3,514.6 17,217.7 12,258.3 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 6.6 131.3 58.7 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 7.6 31.8 24.6 Satellite Service Providers 22.6 62.0 31.9 Toll Resellers 729.5 1,756.5 964.2 Other Toll Carriers 8/ 296.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 63.4 75.8 69.7 82.7 85.1 April 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • June 100.0 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 100.0 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 100.0 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 100.0 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 97.2 99.9 99.2 107.3 79.6 94.0 102.7 June 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 Note: Figures for local telephone service, interstate toll service, and intrastate toll service after May, 2000 are converted from 1982-1984 base index series reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Historical data on these series based upon the 1982-1984 index for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 63.4 75.8 69.7 82.7 85.1 April 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 71 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100) All Goods & Services Telephone Services Local ServicesInterstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series IdentifierCUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051CUUR0000SS27061 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 75.8 69.7 82.7 85.1 April 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev02.pdf
  • 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.2 27.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.5 26.8 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 7.2 6.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 42.1 39.8 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 49.3 46.1 Total All Filers 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for the third quarter of 2003 are based on historic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev03.pdf
  • 3.5 3.9 4.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 30.3 30.9 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 32.6 34.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 7.7 8.4 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 29.4 26.6 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 37.1 35.0 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for 2003 are based on shares of reported
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 100.0 401 88 82.0 751 88.3 Montana 81 0 100.0 165 41 80.1 287 85.7 Nebraska 78 0 100.0 377 22 94.5 477 95.4 Nevada 50 1 98.0 55 23 70.5 129 81.4 New Hampshire 126 1 99.2 28 1 96.6 156 98.7 New Jersey 212 0 100.0 27 1 96.4 240 99.6 New Mexico 72 0 100.0 84 39 68.3 195 80.0 New York 586 1 99.8 305 18 94.4 910 97.9 North Carolina 144 0 100.0 363 13 96.5 520 97.5 North Dakota 47 0 100.0 168 87 65.9 302 71.2 Ohio 240 17 93.4 546 64 89.5 867 90.7 Oklahoma 236 0 100.0 288 36 88.9 560 93.6 Oregon 100 0 100.0 219 5 97.8 324 98.5 Pennsylvania
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 1.82 29.8 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 1.82 95.4 926 - 1910Day 2.40 $1.40 -41.7 2.40 1.82 -24.3 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65 -42.0 1.12 1.82 62.3 4251 - 5750Day 2.91 $1.40 -51.9 2.91 1.82 -37.5 Evening 1.74 0.80 -54.0 1.74 1.82 4.5 Night & Weekend 1.16 0.65 -44.0 1.16 1.82 56.7 SOURCE: AT&T TARIFFS AND INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, REFERENCE BOOK OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 100.0 445 50 89.9 763 93.4 Montana 81 0 100.0 164 41 80.0 286 85.7 Nebraska 78 0 100.0 396 4 99.0 478 99.2 Nevada 48 3 94.1 58 21 73.4 130 81.5 New Hampshire 126 1 99.2 31 1 96.9 159 98.7 New Jersey 213 0 100.0 31 2 93.9 246 99.2 New Mexico 71 0 100.0 84 39 68.3 194 79.9 New York 586 1 99.8 313 16 95.1 916 98.1 North Carolina 144 0 100.0 364 12 96.8 520 97.7 North Dakota 46 0 100.0 220 35 86.3 301 88.4 Ohio 239 17 93.4 585 24 96.1 865 95.3 Oklahoma 237 0 100.0 283 36 88.7 556 93.5 Oregon 99 0 100.0 218 5 97.8 322 98.4 Pennsylvania
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.2 27.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.5 26.8 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 7.2 6.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 42.1 39.8 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 49.3 46.1 Total All Filers 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for the third quarter of 2003 are based on historic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.5 3.9 4.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 30.3 30.9 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 32.6 34.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 7.7 8.4 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 29.4 26.6 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 37.1 35.0 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1 2 Source: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Industry Revenues (March 2005). Table 19.17 Share of Universal Service Contributions By Principal Type of Contributor Using Traditional Carrier Categories 1 2 Total: Toll Service Providers For years 1997 through
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 2.9 3.9 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 25.7 25.7 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 15.2 23.5 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.1 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 55.2 46.6 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 59.0 50.7 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for the second quarter of 2003 are based on shares of projected collected end-user revenues. Calculations exclude revenues for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • June 100.0 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 100.0 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 100.0 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 100.0 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 46 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2002 1 2 3 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2002 2002 Reporting Alabama 2,417,624 84.4% 1.18 Alaska 451,038 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,325 0.0 NA Arizona 2,929,763 93.0 1.08 Arkansas 1,453,606 68.3 1.46 California 22,684,649 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,808,697 95.3 1.05 Connecticut 2,322,733 98.9 1.01 Delaware 580,535 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 897,193 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,051,084 98.2 1.02 Georgia 4,952,969 88.5 1.13 Guam 70,975 0.0 NA Hawaii 706,080 99.9 1.00 Idaho 742,213 90.8 1.10 Illinois 7,988,559 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,723,570 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,659,718 64.7 1.55 Kansas 1,572,621 83.6 1.20 Kentucky
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 97.2 99.9 99.2 107.3 79.6 94.0 102.7 June 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 585 Table 5.5 Consumer Price Indices (1982-1984=100) All Goods & Services All Telephone Services Local Services Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 84.5 111.5 355.1 10.0 6.8 311.0 41.6 127.6 100.4 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 106.8 140.3 193.7 56.2 19.6 653.7 116.3 1.4 46.4 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.2 0.0 37.2 21.8 18.2 111.2 0.0 222.6 128.5 6. Software Design 403.8 2.7 134.8 17.1 4.2 177.6 436.5 713.6 81.5 7. Hardware design 7.7 68.3 31.6 0.0 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 45.8 8. Hardware Failure 212.6 348.5 334.3 152.4 31.0 2530.6 327.3 1406.0 995.7 9. Natural Causes 8.3 270.6 766.3 48.8 0.0 52.8 714.1 170.6 679.4 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 9.1 0.8 12. External Power Failure 0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • 525.0 0.0 76.7 555.7 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 75.9 26.7 338.6 0.0 2.8 100.4 42.0 102.3 19.8 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 2.7 10.0 89.1 5.0 0.0 427.8 15.6 14.5 27.5 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 16.8 31.7 5.6 0.0 0.9 63.3 167.8 0.0 6. Software Design 48.8 624.4 154.4 8.4 0.0 31.8 152.0 380.2 68.3 7. Hardware design 0.0 73.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 32.0 0.0 0.3 8. Hardware Failure 168.7 100.1 224.7 49.4 0.0 803.5 6922.0 874.0 759.6 9. Natural Causes 58.2 0.0 1.6 589.1 0.0 0.0 1144.8 1222.3 561.7 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 38.2 78.6 12.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-9.pdf
  • 525.0 0.0 76.6 555.7 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 75.9 26.7 338.6 0.0 2.8 100.4 42.0 102.2 19.8 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 2.7 10.0 89.1 5.0 0.0 427.8 15.6 14.5 27.5 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 16.8 31.7 5.6 0.0 0.9 63.3 167.7 0.0 6. Software Design 48.8 624.4 154.4 8.4 0.0 31.8 152.0 379.9 68.3 7. Hardware design 0.0 73.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 32.0 0.0 0.3 8. Hardware Failure 168.7 100.1 224.7 49.4 0.0 803.5 6922.0 873.4 759.6 9. Natural Causes 58.2 0.0 1.6 589.1 0.0 0.0 1144.8 1221.4 561.7 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 38.1 78.6 12.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Delaware 95.1 88.7 89.7 88.7 94.4 97.3 97.2 91.7 90.2 92.3 94.7 98.0 91.5 96.0 97.2 97.9 98.6 97.5 96.9 94.2 97.7 99.1 97.1 97.8 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 100.0 95.1 98.8 98.8 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 95.2 98.5 100.0 98.9 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 95.2 97.4 98.2 97.4 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4 87.8 85.6 93.8 91.1 93.7 94.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households Table 6.11 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 92.1 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 97.3 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.0 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.2 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 96.0 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 95.7 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • 525.0 0.0 76.7 555.7 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 75.9 26.7 338.6 0.0 2.8 100.4 42.0 102.3 19.8 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 2.7 10.0 89.1 5.0 0.0 427.8 15.6 14.5 27.5 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 16.8 31.7 5.6 0.0 0.9 63.3 167.8 0.0 6. Software Design 48.8 624.4 154.4 8.4 0.0 31.8 152.0 380.2 68.3 7. Hardware design 0.0 73.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 32.0 0.0 0.3 8. Hardware Failure 168.7 100.1 224.7 49.4 0.0 803.5 6922.0 874.0 759.6 9. Natural Causes 58.2 0.0 1.6 589.1 0.0 0.0 1144.8 1222.3 561.7 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 38.2 78.6 12.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Minnesota 88 2,246,696 73.2 0 0.0 823,023 26.8 3,069,719 73.2 MN Mississippi 19 1,326,316 93.4 0 0.0 93,726 6.6 1,420,042 93.4 MS Missouri 43 2,716,232 74.9 721,798 19.9 188,653 5.2 3,626,683 94.8 MO Montana 18 366,557 68.1 0 0.0 171,876 31.9 538,433 68.1 MT Nebraska 41 508,081 50.5 354,618 35.2 143,768 14.3 1,006,467 85.7 NE Nevada 14 358,700 27.2 899,447 68.3 59,431 4.5 1,317,578 95.5 NV New Hampshire 10 818,682 93.5 0 0.0 56,620 6.5 875,302 93.5 NH New Jersey 3 6,519,258 96.6 219,929 3.3 10,492 0.2 6,749,679 99.8 NJ New Mexico 15 811,430 85.0 46,592 4.9 96,474 10.1 954,496 89.9 NM New York 44 11,466,333 89.5 927,873 7.2 424,338 3.3 12,818,544 96.7 NY North Carolina 26 2,544,247 50.0 2,050,316 40.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 79.3 30.4 16.7 29.6 76.8 2.5VT Virginia 3,267.5 223.5 3,044.0 2,033.4 1,010.6 422.3 117.1 439.2 978.6 32.0VA Washington 2,408.0 195.7 2,212.3 1,440.8 771.5 312.7 103.7 318.2 734.6 37.0WA West Virginia 691.0 26.6 664.3 462.7 201.7 106.7 27.0 60.9 194.5 7.2WV Wisconsin 1,552.8 74.9 1,477.9 1,102.3 375.6 143.6 55.4 168.1 367.1 8.5WI Wyoming 210.2 14.0 196.2 124.9 71.3 26.5 14.1 27.7 68.3 3.1WY Puerto Rico 1,136.6 54.3 1,082.3 778.0 304.3 169.0 84.8 18.7 272.6 31.7PR 102 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.10 - Revenues of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Continued Basic Local Service Revenues (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) Total Non- Subject to State Interstate Access Billing and Regulated Separations Collection and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • (0.005)KS Kentucky 225.8 321.4 (95.6) (104.7) 61.8 39.9 9.2 13.8 62.8 (1.064)KY Louisiana 332.0 171.0 161.0 153.7 39.1 25.5 4.9 8.3 38.7 0.402LA Maine 8.7 4.1 4.6 (10.6) 18.3 8.2 3.2 6.5 17.9 0.361ME Maryland (128.8) 71.6 (200.5) (256.4) 110.7 46.3 18.3 45.7 110.2 0.439MD Massachusetts 329.5 14.8 314.7 202.4 114.3 31.9 18.6 62.6 113.0 1.295MA Michigan (1,324.8) (292.0) (1,032.8) (1,068.3) 135.9 90.9 24.4 19.7 135.0 0.912MI Minnesota 552.9 579.1 (26.2) (62.0) 56.2 26.7 8.5 20.7 56.0 0.249MN Mississippi 106.4 154.1 (47.7) (56.8) 25.1 16.9 3.3 4.7 24.9 0.271MS Missouri 97.0 117.1 (20.0) (52.0) 8.3 3.2 1.8 3.0 8.0 0.365MO Montana 344.2 297.6 46.6 41.6 7.4 3.6 1.6 2.2 7.4 0.020MT Nebraska 311.3 276.2 35.0 19.0 21.9 9.2 5.7 6.8 21.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 343.2 188.6 44.8 71.0 304.4 38.8 AZ Arkansas 522.6 78.8 443.9 327.1 117.7 67.2 16.0 24.5 107.7 9.9 AR California 10,469.2 2,140.4 8,328.9 6,376.2 1,968.8 878.9 362.8 493.7 1,735.4 233.4 CA Colorado 1,662.8 115.1 1,547.7 1,127.8 420.1 219.9 67.6 92.7 380.2 39.9 CO Connecticut 1,273.2 90.0 1,183.2 859.0 325.1 109.1 90.1 96.8 296.0 29.1 CT Delaware 231.2 12.2 219.0 150.7 68.3 32.4 8.8 19.1 60.3 8.1 DE District of Columbia 502.3 54.2 448.2 292.3 155.9 35.7 35.1 79.6 150.4 5.4 DC Florida 5,562.1 682.9 4,879.2 3,591.4 1,289.6 664.4 168.9 262.0 1,095.3 194.4 FL Georgia 2,722.2 404.4 2,317.8 1,648.0 674.6 322.7 86.7 158.2 567.6 106.9 GA Hawaii 439.4 79.7 359.7 276.2 83.6 38.0 11.4 20.6 70.0 13.5 HI Idaho 324.5 24.9 299.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 44.0 6.1 MT Nebraska 439.5 40.4 399.1 275.0 125.9 50.7 29.5 37.1 117.3 8.6 NE Nevada 713.8 86.0 627.8 466.5 161.6 63.9 52.3 21.4 137.6 24.1 NV New Hampshire 424.9 20.1 404.8 274.5 130.3 46.3 18.1 43.4 107.8 22.5 NH New Jersey 3,360.9 255.7 3,105.3 2,161.7 943.7 397.5 130.8 299.7 828.0 115.7 NJ New Mexico 491.4 36.4 455.0 325.3 129.8 68.3 21.1 25.4 114.8 14.9 NM New York 8,211.5 544.1 7,667.4 5,216.4 2,451.0 784.9 227.8 1,141.3 2,154.0 297.0 NY North Carolina 2,438.8 299.2 2,139.7 1,561.5 577.3 289.0 80.7 116.5 486.2 91.1 NC North Dakota 100.7 6.9 93.9 63.5 30.4 11.0 6.9 9.1 27.0 3.4 ND Ohio 3,060.5 366.9 2,693.6 2,024.3 671.5 304.7 154.4 137.3 596.4 75.1 OH Oklahoma 892.0 146.5 745.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 43.67 4.26 3.55 1964 47.0 68.0 40.0 51.26 4.40 3.97 1965 51.7 78.8 47.9 59.52 4.49 4.38 1966 56.3 85.1 51.4 70.40 5.13 5.55 1967 57.5 81.8 49.2 72.75 5.51 5.10 1968 60.7 90.6 51.2 76.42 6.18 5.90 1969 63.5 89.0 49.4 85.74 7.03 7.83 1970 61.4 78.4 44.0 91.91 8.04 7.71 1971 62.2 90.1 52.4 92.91 7.39 5.11 1972 68.3 104.5 62.6 103.40 7.21 4.73 1973 73.8 130.9 81.6 120.03 7.44 8.15 1974 72.7 142.8 91.0 139.67 8.57 9.84 1975 66.3 140.4 89.5 142.42 8.83 6.32 1976 72.4 173.8 109.6 158.44 8.43 5.34 1977 78.2 203.5 130.4 184.82 8.02 5.61 1978 82.6 238.1 154.6 216.81 8.73 7.99 1979 85.7 261.8 173.8 255.26 9.63 10.91 1980 84.1 241.4 156.6 286.40 11.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 395.2 12.9 AZ ARKANSAS 673.1 45.8 627.3 464.8 162.5 75.2 56.5 25.2 156.8 5.6 AR CALIFORNIA 11,214.6 396.5 10,818.0 8,422.6 2,395.5 1,263.9 733.1 344.4 2,341.4 54.1 CA COLORADO 1,729.7 60.9 1,668.8 1,203.2 465.6 184.4 200.0 69.7 454.1 11.5 CO CONNECTICUT 1,487.2 0.1 1,487.1 1,101.3 385.8 137.7 172.2 50.3 360.3 25.6 CT DELAWARE 277.0 43.6 233.4 151.4 82.0 21.4 32.0 14.9 68.3 13.7 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 593.3 72.5 520.8 357.7 163.1 47.5 52.8 57.0 157.3 5.8 DC FLORIDA 6,120.5 336.0 5,784.5 4,282.8 1,501.7 781.2 483.9 183.9 1,449.0 52.7 FL GEORGIA 2,780.9 111.7 2,669.2 2,007.3 661.9 305.1 215.8 122.9 643.8 18.1 GA HAWAII 579.4 104.2 475.2 341.2 134.0 62.4 52.2 14.9 129.4 4.6 HI IDAHO 407.3 20.6 386.8 254.4 132.4 54.6 55.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 66.6 SD TENNESSEE 25 2,537,096 80.3 235,612 7.5 387,601 12.3 3,160,309 87.7 TN TEXAS 57 8,768,713 77.7 1,860,194 16.5 650,277 5.8 11,279,184 94.2 TX UTAH 13 972,326 95.1 0 0.0 49,946 4.9 1,022,272 95.1 UT VERMONT 10 321,356 84.5 0 0.0 59,127 15.5 380,483 84.5 VT VIRGINIA 21 3,171,575 76.1 891,934 21.4 103,115 2.5 4,166,624 97.5 VA WASHINGTON 22 2,275,304 68.3 830,474 24.9 227,400 6.8 3,333,178 93.2 WA WEST VIRGINIA 10 775,688 83.4 0 0.0 154,723 16.6 930,411 83.4 WV WISCONSIN 89 2,135,407 67.3 463,140 14.6 574,994 18.1 3,173,541 81.9 WI WYOMING 10 226,771 83.2 0 0.0 45,880 16.8 272,651 83.2 WY UNITED STATES 1,431126,477,302 76.6% 28,401,721 17.2% 10,167,833 6.2% 165,046,856 93.8%US GUAM 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • MINNESOTA 88 2,205,811 73.7 0 0.0 787,168 26.3 2,992,979 73.7 MN MISSISSIPPI 19 1,280,362 93.5 0 0.0 89,187 6.5 1,369,549 93.5 MS MISSOURI 44 2,590,300 75.1 680,236 19.7 180,026 5.2 3,450,562 94.8 MO MONTANA 18 358,852 68.5 0 0.0 164,639 31.5 523,491 68.5 MT NEBRASKA 41 526,026 51.8 349,530 34.4 139,119 13.7 1,014,675 86.3 NE NEVADA 14 348,674 27.3 872,994 68.3 55,852 4.4 1,277,520 95.6 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 12 789,855 93.6 0 0.0 54,099 6.4 843,954 93.6 NH NEW JERSEY 3 6,252,611 96.6 212,925 3.3 9,878 0.2 6,475,414 99.8 NJ NEW MEXICO 15 786,574 85.0 46,388 5.0 92,045 10.0 925,007 90.0 NM NEW YORK 44 11,553,051 90.0 886,879 6.9 403,858 3.1 12,843,788 96.9 NY NORTH CAROLINA 26 2,459,133 49.8 2,013,685 40.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 569.3 806.6 2,834.9 89.0CA Colorado 2,062.7 129.0 1,933.7 1,370.8 563.0 261.2 122.1 163.6 546.8 16.1CO Connecticut 1,393.7 7.7 1,386.0 968.4 417.6 164.7 140.6 91.5 396.8 20.8CT Delaware 297.8 17.7 280.1 187.9 92.2 30.6 19.1 30.7 80.5 11.8DE District of Columbia 663.2 59.2 604.0 374.9 229.1 71.8 39.3 107.4 218.5 10.5DC Florida 7,273.2 638.7 6,634.5 4,799.2 1,835.3 1,030.8 359.5 376.7 1,767.0 68.3 FL Georgia 3,475.6 176.9 3,298.6 2,445.6 853.0 423.5 180.9 224.7 829.2 23.9GA Hawaii 590.7 89.6 501.1 362.4 138.7 66.0 36.0 30.3 132.3 6.4 HI Idaho 458.3 23.2 435.1 279.3 155.8 78.4 36.9 33.8 149.1 6.7 ID Illinois 4,921.5 321.6 4,599.9 3,475.4 1,124.5 507.8 242.3 311.1 1,061.2 63.3 IL Indiana 2,358.1 197.4 2,160.7 1,598.2 562.6 275.7 113.2 141.3 530.2 32.3 IN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 3.1 1.7 1.0 0.1 2.8 3.9 AZ Arkansas 522.6 78.8 443.9 328.7 116.2 66.6 15.8 23.5 105.9 145.2 AR California 10,469.2 2,140.4 8,328.9 6,372.8 1,972.3 888.9 344.6 506.1 1,739.6 2,590.3 CA Colorado 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CO Connecticut 1,273.2 90.0 1,183.2 871.3 312.9 109.8 81.0 95.2 286.0 462.2 CT Delaware 231.2 12.2 219.0 150.7 68.3 32.4 8.8 19.1 60.3 88.2 DE District of Columbia 502.3 54.2 448.2 292.3 155.9 35.7 35.1 79.6 150.4 265.1 DC Florida 5,562.1 682.8 4,879.3 3,590.7 1,290.4 665.0 170.5 261.0 1,096.5 1,528.0 FL Georgia 2,722.2 404.4 2,317.8 1,641.5 681.1 325.0 88.3 157.4 570.7 816.4 GA Hawaii 439.4 79.6 359.8 276.3 83.6 38.0 11.4 20.6 70.0 102.0 HI Idaho 73.7 5.5 68.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 56 1000.0 479.0 35218 5937 36057 5970 0.0 0.0 92.9 CAONTARIO 46 47 69.9 927.0 17999 12158 17391 11983 0.2 0.5 100.0 CAOXNARD 63 24 50.0 549.0 12050 1792 10943 1280 0.2 0.6 99.6 CAPALMSPRINGS 36 46 50.0 207.0 5986 255 5890 259 1.2 1.4 99.4 CAPALMSPRINGS 42 52 64.41087.0 14117 859 14077 927 4.5 8.3 97.0 CAPARADISE 30 20 68.3 440.0 17736 370 17246 364 0.3 0.0 99.8 CAPORTERVILLE 61 48 74.5 811.0 21858 1330 21490 1278 0.1 0.0 100.0 CARANCHOPALOSVE44 51 224.9 451.0 13335 8016 16382 7109 0.0 0.0 79.1 CAREDDING 7 14 159.11103.0 35718 327 35198 321 0.0 0.0 99.4 CAREDDING 9 18 175.91097.0 35202 322 34666 319 0.0 0.0 99.2 CARIVERSIDE 62 69 175.0 723.0 15815 11178
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • kW to 316 kW; for WMSN-TV in Madison, Wisconsin, from 3.2 kW to at least 8.2 kW; for WUTV-TV in Buffalo, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WUHF-TV, in Rochester, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WZTV-TV in Nashville, Tennessee, from 116.6 kW to 500 kW; and for WVAH-TV in Charleston, West Virginia, from 68.3 kW to at least 460 kW. Sullivan attaches technical exhibits to show that such increases would comport with its de minimis interference standard and would cause little or no additional Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 119 interference to other stations and to provide technical details on proposed directional antenna patterns. It requests that we act on these requests in a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209956-1.pdf
  • could be effected, for example through non-disclosure agreements, although these alone may not be sufficient in cases where the recipient of such information may not have the financial viability to compensate a manufacturer if commercially sensitive information fails to be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Section 1193.43 of the Access Board's Guidelines appears to conflict with Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules. The Commission tentatively concluded that the Access Board's Guidelines "do not overlap, duplicate, or conflict with" existing Commission rules. Pursuant to Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules, telephones must be equipped with a receive volume control that provides a minimum of 12 dB gain and a maximum of 18 dB gain.26Section 1193.43 of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210017-1.pdf
  • goals are laudable, the Access Board's Guidelines unfortunately do not offer the level of specificity nor the level of detail required by telecommunications manufacturers.As an illustration of the problems inherent in applying the Access Board's Guidelines, one need look no fiu-ther than the Commission's HAC Rules whereby the minimum gain requirements for receivers contained in Section 1193.43 (e)4 and Section 68.3 175 of the Commission's Rules appear to be in conflict.Moreover, the Access Board's Guidelines became effective March 5, 1998 and are currently in effect, whereas compliance with the HAC requirements under Section 68.3 17, is not mandatory until January 1, 2000.6 Because the Guidelines lack specificity and may conflict with existing Commission Rules, the Commission should provide sufficient clarification. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • FCC 99-141 60 We note that signals could, in theory, be transported within multiple tenant environments by means of wireless technology, perhaps using unlicensed spectrum. We are not aware, however, that such wireless transport is in fact occurring on a significant scale. Furthermore, even wireless in-building transport would presumably require the installation of some facilities. 61 See 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining several different options by which the demarcation point between telephone company facilities and subscriber facilities may be determined). The rules for determining control over telephone wiring are to be distinguished from the cable inside wiring rules, which are used to determine the disposition of cable inside wiring when a provider no longer has a legally enforceable right to remain
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99245.pdf
  • 9-10; WCA Comments II at 4. PAGE 30 claims that the following generation of GPS chips yields still better accuracy in all environments.95 Lucent claims its handset-based, network-assisted GPS technology can provide accuracy of 15 feet outdoors and 100 feet within buildings.96 In a trial in Denver, SnapTrack reported accuracy of 4 to 84 meters, depending on the environment, for 68.3 percent of calls for its own handset-based, network-assisted GPS technology and has proposed an accuracy standard of 90 meters at 67 percent Circular Error of Probability (CEP).97 Providers of network-based technologies also report improved accuracy. KSI states that its network-based approach can do better than the current accuracy requirements and has suggested a 100 meter accuracy standard.98 U.S. Wireless is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • the demarcation point on reconsideration of the 1990 Demarcation Point Order and Further NPRM. The Commission clarified that the relocation of the demarcation point to the MPOE cannot be undertaken unilaterally by the incumbent LEC without the property owner's consent, except in the case of major modifications, renovations, or rearrangements. The Commission further stated that, for the purposes of Section 68.3, a request for relocation by the property owner would be considered a major modification or rearrangement of the wiring. The 1997 Demarcation Point Order also included a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that requested comment on, among other issues, proposed modifications to the demarcation point rule. Two petitions for clarification and reconsideration were filed in response to issues discussed on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • an average growth rate, we have calculated an average of these projections. According to this average figure, the mobile telephone market's total penetration rate would grow at a compound annual average growth rate of approximately 14.7 percent over the next five years and the market would have over 114 million subscribers by the end of 2002. Cellular operators would have 68.3 percent of these subscribers, broadband PCS operators 25.8 percent, and digital SMR operators 5.9 percent. This level of subscribership would translate into a national penetration rate of over 41 percent by the end of 2002. An important trend to note is that all of the projections assume that the new entrants would gain an increasing percentage of each year's incremental
• http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.txt http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.wp
  • 1. The authority citation for Part 68 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 1, 4, 5, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 155, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602, 610. 2. Section 68.3 is amended by adding the following definition to the terms used in Part 68: * * * * * Hearing aid compatible: Except as used at §§ 68.4(a)(3) and 68.414 of these rules, the terms hearing aid compatible or hearing aid compatibility are used as defined in § 68.316, unless it is specifically stated that hearing aid compatibility volume control,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238187A1.html
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (V/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 348 V/m to 887 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules.3 (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 V/m at a distance of 3 meters. On May
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238198A1.html
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (V/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 165 V/m to 983 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules.3 (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 V/m at a distance of 3 meters. On July
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-276800A1.html
  • frequency of 127.2625 MHz at the following locations: Frequency Signal Strength Date Location (MHz) (uV/m) 405806 N 0783025 W 08/14/07 127.2625 86.8 1175 Bloomington Avenue 405905 N 0783015 W 08/14/07 127.2625 141.5 pole # 73693 on Route T459. 405724 N 0783024 W 08/14/07 127.2625 129.3 intersection of Route T454 and T457 (Ed Bloom Road) 405804 N 0783020 W 08/16/07 127.2625 68.3 about 30 feet East of Stop Sign at Intersection of Routes T459 and T454. 405808 N 0783135 W 08/16/07 127.2625 117.3 pole 73774 at 631 Schofield Street. 405939 N 0783140 W 08/16/07 127.2625 40.1 428 Walnut Street 3. Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, Atlantic Broadband must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3408A1.html
  • agent found that at 31 locations cable signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 V/m at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from165 V/m to 983 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's CLI at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed CLI performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. 5. On July 25, 2002, the Atlanta Office issued an Order to Cease Operations, pursuant to Section 76.613(c) of the Rules.13 The system resumed normal operation on July 26, 2002, after being brought into compliance. The Atlanta Office issued a NAL on September 3,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, PP 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define "Terminal equipment" as: "[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services." 47 C.F.R. S 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S 68.100 ("[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.") (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) ("Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-29A2.pdf
  • 6 1 9 See Appendix B 30 29Cleveland 67.8 4 0 11 1 1 0 11 Spectrum Limited 31 30Salt Lake City-Ogden- 74.8 29 0 11 0 0 0 46 Spectrum Limited 32 33Las Vegas 79.7 26 0 10 2 2 0 39 Spectrum Limited 33 32Kansas City 61.3 9 0 8 8 3 0 24 Spectrum Limited 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 12 9 2 19 See Appendix B 35 36Columbus, OH 75.1 8 5 13 5 5 1 10 Spectrum Limited 36 38Austin 69.7 16 3 11 10 6 0 27 Spectrum Limited 37 35San Jose 76.3 8 0 7 3 3 0 0 Spectrum Limited - see Mkt. 4 38 37Milwaukee-Racine 83.6 2 0 9 7 6
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-29A3.pdf
  • 26 26Riverside-San Bernardino 52.0 20 5 8 N/A N/A 2 21 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 27 27Sacramento 76.9 17 5 9 3 3 0 50 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 28 31San Antonio 78.7 11 0 11 8 6 0 23 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 29 28Cincinnati 66.7 5 3 18 N/A N/A 1 9 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 N/A N/A 0 19 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 43 42Raleigh-Durham 63.7 18 2 9 N/A N/A 1 16 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 45 44Nashville 65.9 15 2 12 N/A N/A 0 55 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 46 45Greensboro-Winston-Salem- 66.7 19 4 11 N/A N/A 0 26 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 48 48Oklahoma City 71.4 19 0 13
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-bc/can-dtv.pdf
  • 14 21SURING WI 444400 881525 1000 201 50 201 7 40WAUSAU WI 445514 894131 316 369 836 369 9 29WAUSAU WI 445514 894131 316 369669.8 369 20 24WAUSAU WI 445514 894131 1450 300 50 300 55 0WITTENBERG WI 450333 892610 5000 283 0 0 8 41CHARLESTON WV 382428 815413 158 372 1000 372 11 19CHARLESTON WV 382515 815527 51.3 525 68.3 525 29 39CHARLESTON WV 382812 814635 5000 368 50 212 12 52CLARKSBURG WV 391706 801946 263 262 1000 262 46 28CLARKSBURG WV 391802 802037 155 244 50 244 3 23HUNTINGTON WV 383034 821309 42.7 388425.5 388 13 54HUNTINGTON WV 383021 821233 141 387412.4 387 60 12MARTINSBURG WV 392727 780353 2040 300 3.2 312 24 33MORGANTOWN WV 394145 794545 3020 457139.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 13.6 -53.4 Mexico 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 41.8 0.4 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 6720.7 Netherlands 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 3.0 -80.9 Nigeria 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.6 1.1 68.3 Pakistan 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 0.9 -51.3 Peru 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 4.1 5.2 7.0 10.3 5.1 5.0 2.2 -58.5 Philippines 3.5 3.9 4.9 6.0 8.9 13.7 17.6 14.3 14.2 9.8 8.5 -38.3 Poland 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 54.2 Russia 1.2 5.7 6.8 12.4 11.0 13.3 7.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
  • 0.0100.0 United States (conterminous) $1,592,004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,127,990 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 122,490,604 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 North and Central America $2,420,234,247 0.021.7 1.119.7 57.5 $190,318,159 0.011.3 0.026.9 61.8 $86,586,705 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 41,002,252,107 0.0 8.5 0.921.3 69.3 Argentina $43,928,555 0.021.2 0.329.1 49.4 $2,063,163 0.011.8 0.019.9 68.2 $13,661,053 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 809,753,384 0.0 3.5 0.627.6 68.3 Bolivia $16,042,894 0.010.7 0.636.3 52.4 $727,108 0.0 2.9 0.010.5 86.6 $1,633,489 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 210,675,087 0.0 5.5 0.639.1 54.9 Brazil $112,308,606 0.037.1 0.221.3 41.4 $5,393,851 0.023.4 0.020.7 55.8 $3,758,855 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,385,707,119 0.022.7 0.626.3 50.5 Chile $24,246,148 0.031.3 1.920.8 46.1 $3,354,523 0.0 5.5 0.043.5 51.0 $1,472,495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 406,269,136 0.013.0 5.326.7 55.0 Colombia $135,099,502 0.029.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/TCB-part-68-list.pdf
  • Order, FCC 00-400. 2 See "Sponsor of the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachment", 47 C.F.R. §68.68.602. 3 See "Connection to the Public Switched Telephone Network", 47 C.F.R. §68.201. 4 See "Designation of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs)", 47 C.F.R. §68.160, and "Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies", §68.162. 5 See "Supplier's Declaration of Conformity requirements", 47 C.F.R §68.324. 6 See 47 C.F.R. §68.3, Responsible Party. - 2 - List of Recognized Telecommunications Certification Bodies Scope C ­ Telephone Terminal Equipment The following is a list of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs) recognized by the FCC to perform equipment authorizations under Scope C ­ Telephone Terminal Equipment: ORGANIZATION ADDRESS CONTACT INFO Canada Nemko Canada Inc. 303 River Road Ottawa, Ontario K1V 1H2 Canada Stuart Beck
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/part68faqs.pdf
  • FCC will conduct a de novo review, and rule on technical merit. 7. As a supplier of TE, how do I obtain TE approval? The FCC permitted TE suppliers who provide Terminal Equipment for connection to the PSTN, or to wireline carrier-owned facilities used to provide private line services, and who are "responsible parties" as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, to obtain TE approval in two ways. Suppliers can obtain certification from private Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs). Alternatively, suppliers may declare their own TE to conform to applicable technical criteria using the Suppliers Declaration of Conformity (SDoC), as defined in the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) Guide 22 and FCC Part 68. In either case, the TE must
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/Depreciation0904.doc
  • 2114 TOOLS & OTHER WK EQPT 2,753,742 1,434,826 52.1 1,210,939 44.0 (223,887) -8.1 2121 BUILDINGS 26,826,213 7,193,276 26.8 7,118,375 26.5 (74,901) -0.3 2122 FURNITURE 72,956 54,014 74.0 46,637 63.9 (7,377) -10.1 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT 326,434 292,455 89.6 193,531 59.3 (98,924) -30.3 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUNICATION EQ 494,880 398,925 80.6 283,183 57.2 (115,742) -23.4 2124 GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTERS 6,547,644 5,405,329 82.6 4,470,227 68.3 (935,102) -14.3 2211 ANALOG SWITCHING 1,033,546 1,174,487 113.6 804,170 77.8 (370,318) -35.8 2212 DIGITAL SWITCHING 60,533,171 32,952,478 54.4 29,532,987 48.8 (3,419,491) -5.6 2220 OPERATOR SYSTEMS 590,391 320,274 54.2 348,507 59.0 28,233 4.8 2231 RADIO SYSTEMS 596,333 480,754 80.6 402,983 67.6 (77,771) -13.0 2232 CIRCUIT - COMBINED 20,877,353 14,584,037 69.9 11,784,767 56.4 (2,799,270) -13.4 2232.1 CIRCUIT - DDS 422,217 407,807 96.6
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, ¶¶ 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define ``Terminal equipment'' as: ``[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services.'' 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 68.100 (``[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.'') (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) (``Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.txt
  • Rulemaking of Helping Equalize Access Rights in Telecommunications Now (HEAR-IT NOW), In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules, Hearing Aid Compatible Phones, RM-8658 (filed June 5, 1995) (HEAR-IT NOW Petition); Request of WAC to Reopen the Petition for Rulemaking, RM-8658 (filed October 10, 2000) (WAC Request). 47 U.S.C. § 610. 47 C.F.R. § 68.4(a). 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. (discussing scope of the exemptions). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). To date, technical standards for hearing aid compatibility have been established only for wireline telephones. Specifically, Section 68.316 of the Commission's rules sets forth the technical requirements for hearing aid compatibility, and Section 68.112 specifies the telephones that are required to be hearing aid compatible. 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.316, 68.112. 47
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with CMRS and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. ``Public mobile service'' is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(b); 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8119 ¶¶ 145-147. The existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a statutory requirement for imposing hearing aid compatibility requirements. See 47 U.S.C. § 610. 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8117-20 ¶¶ 142-150. Id. at 8119-20 ¶¶ 148-150. Specifically, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1058A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1058A1.txt
  • effective upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register. This notice constitutes publication of the effective date of the regulations. We note that the information collection requirements in § 68.105, as adopted in the Part 68 Streamlining Order, were originally established in a separate proceeding as part of the definition of the term ``demarcation point'' in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (1999). Therefore, that rule will become effective upon OMB approval in the Competitive Networks proceeding. For further information, contact Susan Magnotti, (202) 418-2320 (voice), smagnott@fcc.gov, or Dennis Johnson, (202) 418-2320 (voice), dcjohnso@fcc.gov, of the Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau. The TTY number for the Network Services Division is (202) 418-0484. -FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION- In the Matter of 2000 Biennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1206A1.txt
  • Docket No. 96-98, Fourth Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 88-57, 15 FCC Rcd 22983 (2000), erratum, DA 01-750, (rel. March 28, 2001)(Competitive Networks Order). 66 Fed. Reg. 2322 (January 11, 2001) Public Law 104-13 (1995). 47 C.F.R. § 68.105. At the time the Competitive Networks Order was adopted the rule was codified at Section 68.3. However, the Commission has since recodified that rule to Section 68.105. See In the Matter of 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review of Part 68 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, CC Docket No. 99-216, Report and Order, FCC 00-400 (rel. Dec. 21, 2001) 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000. See OMB No. 3060-0975. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.txt
  • bands within the frequency range of 270 kHz to 6 MHz, with a terminating impedance of 135 ohms. Sometimes these limits are referred to as the out-of-band signal power limitations, because the range 4kHz to 6 MHz is outside the voice-band range of 200 Hz to 3995 Hz. For purposes of Part 68, voice-band is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. Elastic Petition, para. 8. FPC v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). 47 C.F.R. §1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.3;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-234A1.txt
  • The Commission will issue a Public Notice at that time specifying the final date for accepting Part 68 applications. Of course, manufacturers may now use TCBs to receive certification for customer premises or terminal equipment; this option is not affected by the Administrative Council's obligations. Finally, we note that the effective date of the new demarcation point definition in Section 68.3 and new rule Section 68.105 is dependent upon the effective date, based on Federal Register publication, of the Competitive Networks Order, 66 Fed. Reg. 2322 (January 11, 2001). (In the Matter of Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets, Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking to Amend Section 1.4000 of the Commission's Rules to Preempt Restrictions on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • TELEPHONE NETWORK SUBPART A - GENERAL Brief Description: This rule defines the point of demarcation between customer premises telephone wiring and the line owned and/or controlled by the local exchange carrier. Need: This rule is necessary to establish competition in the provision and maintenance of inside wire. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, and 303(r). Section Number and Title: 68.3 Definitions (Demarcation Point). 68.105 Minimum Point of Entry and Demarcation Point. Brief Description: This rule requires that all telephones be compatible with hearing aid devices. Need: This rule implements the provisions of the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, and 303(r). Section Number and Title: 68.4 Hearing-aid Compatible Telephones. SUBPART B-CONDITIONS ON USE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1061A1.txt
  • and carrier personnel. Pursuant to the Commission's November 9, 2000 Report and Order in CC Docket 99-216, significant aspects of Part 68 regulation have been privatized. Nevertheless, all suppliers who provide Terminal Equipment for connection to the PSTN, or to wireline carrier-owned facilities used to provide private line services, and who are defined as ``responsible parties'' by 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, must ensure that all applicable Part 68 requirements are met. These include requirements that Terminal Equipment is properly approved for connection, is properly labeled, and is listed in the database of approved TE maintained by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments (ACTA). The Part 68 rules apply to all defined Terminal Equipment, including that manufactured domestically and abroad. Persons who
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.txt
  • premises.'' Id. The Commission found that the proposed language was confusing and substituted ``suitable location'' for ``location of minimum penetration'', and ``customer-designated premises'' for ``[IXC] terminal location or End User premises.'' The Commission also adopted a single definition of ``point of termination'' that applied to both end users and IXCs. Id. at 1196 (App. D, § 2.6). 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining ``premises'' as ``a dwelling unit, other building or a legal unit of real property such as a lot on which a dwelling unit is located, as determined by the provider of telecommunications service's reasonable and nondiscriminatory standard operating practices''). AT&T Petition at 4; ASCENT Comments at 2-3 (citing ECA Tariff Order, 97 FCC 2d at 1152). See SBC Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3408A1.txt
  • agent found that at 31 locations cable signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 µV/m at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from165 µV/m to 983 µV/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's CLI at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed CLI performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. On July 25, 2002, the Atlanta Office issued an Order to Cease Operations, pursuant to Section 76.613(c) of the Rules. The system resumed normal operation on July 26, 2002, after being brought into compliance. The Atlanta Office issued a NAL on September 3, 2002,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • to prevent network harm and ensure that telephones are compatible with hearing aids. The purpose of part 68 is, in part, to provide for uniform standards for the compatibility of hearing aids and telephones to ensure that persons with hearing aids have reasonable access to the telephone network. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 201-205, 303(r), 610. Section Number and Title: 68.3 Definitions. SUBPART D -- CONDITIONS FOR TERMINAL EQUIPMENT APPROVAL Brief Description: Among its many provisions, part 68 includes certain requirements for terminal equipment which implement the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA). Congress enacted the TCPA in an effort to address telephone marketing calls and certain telemarketing practices thought to be an invasion of consumer privacy and a risk
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • prevent network harm and ensure that telephones are compatible with hearing aids. The purpose of part 68 is, in part, to provide for uniform standards for the compatibility of hearing aids and telephones to ensure that persons with hearing aids have reasonable access to the telephone network. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 201-205, 303(r) & 610. Section Number and Title: 68.3 Definitions. SUBPART C - TERMINAL EQUIPMENT APPROVAL PROCEDURES Brief Description: Part 68 governs the connection of terminal equipment (TE), e.g., telephones, fax machines, and computer modems, to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and to wireline carrier-provided private lines. Part 68 requires responsible parties, as defined in Section 68.3, to have their TE formally approved for such connection. Subpart C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.txt
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, ¶¶ 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define ``Terminal equipment'' as: ``[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services.'' 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 68.100 (``[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.'') (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) (``Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.txt
  • amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with CMRS and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. ``Public mobile service'' is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(b); 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8119 ¶¶ 145-147. The existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a statutory requirement for imposing hearing aid compatibility requirements. See Pub. L. No. 100-394, 102 Stat. 976 (1988), codified at 47 U.S.C. § 610. 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8119-20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • NTSC N N NTSC -72.0 O O 24 NTSC Y Y NTSC -39.2 O O 25 NTSC N N NTSC -72.8 O O 26 NTSC Y Y NTSC -37.2 O O 27 ATSC Y Y ATSC -50.9 O - 28 ATSC Y Y ATSC -50.9 O - 29 ATSC Y Y ATSC -64.4 O - 30 ATSC N Y ATSC -68.3 O - ATSC N N 31 NTSC N Y NTSC -90.6 O A 32 NTSC Y Y NTSC -40.1 O O 33 ATSC Y Y ATSC -51.7 O - 34 ATSC Y Y ATSC -43.0 O - 35 ATSC Y Y ATSC -41.8 A - 36 ATSC Y Y ATSC -38.6 O - 38 ATSC Y Y ATSC -27.4 O
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Measured Power (dBm) Viewable (Picture/TASO) Reported PSIP 21 N 513.25 -95.7 N 22 N 519.28 -29.8 1 23 N 525.2 -72 N 24 N 531.26 -39.2 1 25 N 537.24 -72.8 N 26 N 543.24 -37.2 1 27 D 548.3 -50.9 Y 26.1 28 D 554.3 -50.9 Y 62.1 29 D 560.3 -64.4 Y 67.1 30 D 566.3 -68.3 Y 30.1 31 N 573.25 -90.6 4 32 N 579.26 -40.1 1 33 D 584.3 -51.7 Y 32.1 34 D 590.3 -43 Y 9.1 35 D 596.3 -41.8 Y 20.1 36 D 602.3 -38.6 Y 5.1 37 38 D 614.3 -27.4 Y 13.1 39 D 620.3 -44.2 Y 7.1 40 D 626.3 -30.9 Y 54.1 41 D 632.3 -42.7 Y
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% Dec 1997 to 2007 29.2% -35.6% -1.8% 36.2% -28.5% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 192. As a third pricing indicator, some analysts believe average revenue per minute ("RPM") is a good proxy for mobile pricing.536 This is calculated by dividing a provider's estimate of average monthly revenue per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.txt
  • WTB-ASAD Sections 1.2110, 1.2111 and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosures Requirements 3060-0995 WTB-ASAD Section 1.2105(c), Bidding Application and Certification Procedures; Prohibition of Collusion 3060-0531 WTB-BD Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) 3060-0690 WTB-BD Section 101.17, Performance Requirements for the 38.6 - 40.0 GHz Frequency Band 3060-0718 WTB-BD Part 101, Governing the Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio Service 3060-0975 WTB-BD Sections 68.3 and 1.4000, Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets Multiple Tenant Environments (MTEs) 3060-1021 WTB-BD Section 25.139, NGSO FSS Coordination and Information Sharing Between MVDDS Licensees in the 12.2 GHz to 12.7 GHz Band 3060-1022 WTB-BD Sections 101.1403, 101.103(f), 101.1413, 101.1440, and 101.1417, MVDDS and DBS Reporting and Third Party Disclosure Requirements 3060-1030 WTB-BD Service Rules for Advanced Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2_Rcd.pdf
  • WTB-ASAD Sections 1.2110, 1.2111 and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosures Requirements 3060-0995 WTB-ASAD Section 1.2105(c), Bidding Application and Certification Procedures; Prohibition of Collusion 3060-0531 WTB-BD Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) 3060-0690 WTB-BD Section 101.17, Performance Requirements for the 38.6 - 40.0 GHz Frequency Band 3060-0718 WTB-BD Part 101, Governing the Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio Service 3060-0975 WTB-BD Sections 68.3 and 1.4000, Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local Telecommunications Markets Multiple Tenant Environments(MTEs) 3060-1021 WTB-BD Section 25.139, NGSO FSS Coordination and Information Sharing Between MVDDS Licensees in the 12.2 GHz to 12.7 GHz Band 3060-1022 WTB-BD Sections 101.1403, 101.103(f), 101.1413, 101.1440, and 101.1417, MVDDS and DBS Reporting and Third Party Disclosure Requirements 8341 3060-1094 WTB-BD Licensing, Operation, and Transition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205368A1.txt
  • Networks Report and Order. First, we correct the ordering clause in paragraph 188 to read as follows: ``IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission WILL PUBLISH a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of the revisions to Section 1.4000 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000, set forth in Appendix B, and the revisions to Section 68.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, set forth in Appendix B, upon OMB approval of the information collection requirements contained in these revisions.'' 2. Second, we correct the citation in the last sentence of Section (b)(4) of the demarcation point definition set forth in Appendix B to read as follows: ``47 C.F.R. § 68.110(c).'' 3. These corrections are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207126A1.txt
  • By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. We issue this erratum to conform the rules appendix with the text of paragraph 55 of the Competitive Networks Report And Order concerning negotiations for the relocation of the telecommunications demarcation point(s) to the minimum point of entry (MPOE). 2. Paragraph (b)(3) in the amendments to the demarcation point definition in Section 68.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, which were contained in appendix B of the Competitive Networks First Report and Order, shall be corrected to read as follows: In any multiunit premises where the demarcation point is not already at the MPOE, the telephone company must comply with a request from the premises owner to relocate the demarcation point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.txt
  • 61.4 3672.065 5916.2575 1720 G7DDT 65.3 4138.9825 5920.2625 1720 G7DDT 60.5 3702.395 5924.2675 1720 G7DDT 60.6 3646.7525 5970 72000 G7DDT 78 3745 5995.5 1720 G7DDT 68.5 3763.5 6015.0575 1720 G7DDT 61.6 3844.3275 6030.965 874 G7DDT 59 3849.9525 6032.495 1720 G7DDT 61.7 3896.2475 6034.4975 1720 G7DDT 62.7 3841.2675 6044.735 437 G7DDT 54.1 3851.5725 6056.525 1720 G7DDT 60.1 3892.2425 6070.0925 1720 G7DDT 68.3 3789.99 6112.945 1720 G7DDT 58.1 3806.01 6144.2425 1720 G7DDT 56.1 3908.87 6185.08 1720 G7DDT 60.4 3998.51 6189.0175 1720 G7DDT 59.2 3984.505 6191.9425 328 G7DDT 61 3975.0875 6206.32 1720 G7DDT 58.2 4082.6025 6208.3225 1720 G7DDT 58.9 3983.6375 6208.8175 874 G7DDT 56.3 3975.92 6210.325 1720 G7DDT 59.8 3985.64 6215.5225 874 G7DDT 56.3 4021.01 6220.945 1720 G7DDT 59.8 4071.92 6222.475 874 G7DDT 56.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238187A1.pdf
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (µV/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 348 µV/m to 887 µV/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 µV/m at a distance of 3 meters. On May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238198A1.pdf
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (µV/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 165 µV/m to 983 µV/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 µV/m at a distance of 3 meters. On July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 13.6 -53.4 Mexico 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 41.8 0.4 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 6720.7 Netherlands 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 3.0 -80.9 Nigeria 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.6 1.1 68.3 Pakistan 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 0.9 -51.3 Peru 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 4.1 5.2 7.0 10.3 5.1 5.0 2.2 -58.5 Philippines 3.5 3.9 4.9 6.0 8.9 13.7 17.6 14.3 14.2 9.8 8.5 -38.3 Poland 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 54.2 Russia 1.2 5.7 6.8 12.4 11.0 13.3 7.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • 9.5 DE District of Columbia 646.2 30.3 615.9 359.1 256.8 56.6 39.4 152.8 248.8 8.0 DC Florida 7,445.3 540.7 6,904.5 4,505.1 2,399.4 933.8 218.4 1,118.1 2,270.3 129.1 FL Georgia 3,411.8 225.7 3,186.1 2,092.0 1,094.0 328.6 116.0 591.1 1,035.7 58.4 GA Hawaii 490.1 49.7 440.3 282.8 157.5 65.1 12.1 73.7 150.9 6.6 HI Idaho 460.9 29.1 431.9 256.4 175.5 69.7 21.8 68.3 159.8 15.7 ID Illinois 4,222.3 455.7 3,766.6 2,645.8 1,120.8 393.5 151.3 517.6 1,062.4 58.4 IL Indiana 2,120.2 223.5 1,896.7 1,312.4 584.3 250.3 60.3 243.8 554.4 29.9 IN Iowa 777.5 25.8 751.7 481.7 270.0 81.6 44.6 119.2 245.4 24.5 IA Kansas 826.8 109.6 717.3 465.9 251.3 71.0 35.5 130.4 236.9 14.4 KS Kentucky 1,381.9 76.5 1,305.4 923.1 382.2 168.4 42.4 158.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • March 116.1 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.5 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • 25.6 16.1 $12,471 98.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.6 46,050,254 44.7 15.1 16.1 17.6 6.4 Aruba $12,186,854 37.2 1.7 35.9 21.6 3.5 $754,634 32.0 0.0 34.7 23.3 10.0 $44,843 0.0 0.0 0.9 92.3 6.8 74,240,211 25.9 2.0 42.1 24.2 5.8 Bahamas, The $34,082,171 76.7 2.2 7.6 12.3 1.3 $3,879,277 49.5 3.1 28.8 15.9 2.7 $63,599 0.0 16.8 83.1 0.0 0.1 198,357,121 68.3 6.9 10.7 9.7 4.3 Barbados $15,108,358 45.0 17.5 10.9 23.3 3.3 $903,620 20.2 6.4 13.1 35.4 24.9 $77,719 0.0 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 85,977,843 24.5 30.0 12.2 26.8 6.5 Bermuda $11,213,390 59.6 1.2 23.0 14.5 1.6 $1,341,549 22.5 0.0 57.6 16.4 3.5 $81 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 98.8 74,846,748 33.3 1.7 47.2 13.3 4.5 Cayman Islands $12,922,248 48.2 1.9 20.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • March 116.1 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.5 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 28.9 28.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 27.7 32.3 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 8.7 28.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 34.7 11.3 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.4 39.6 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1 For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for 2003 and 2004 are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user collected
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.txt
  • 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 24.5 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 37.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 16.2 28.1 26.5 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 27.1 11.2 11.9 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.2 39.3 38.4 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for 2003 through 2005 are based on shares of reported
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276800A1.pdf
  • operator of cable system serving Curwensville, Pennsylvania (Community Unit No. PA-0200). On August 14, 2007 and August 16, 2007, an agent of the Commission's Philadelphia Office inspected the Atlantic Broadband cable system located in Curwensville, Pennsylvania and observed the following violation: T459. 08/14/07 127.2625 129.3 405724 N 0783024 W intersection of Route T454 and T457 (Ed Bloom Road) 08/16/07 127.2625 68.3 405804 N 0783020 W about 30 feet East of Stop Sign at Intersection of Routes T459 and T454. 08/16/07 127.2625 117.3 405808 N 0783135 W pole 73774 at 631 Schofield Street. 08/16/07 127.2625 40.1 405939 N 0783140 W 428 Walnut Street Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • March 116.1 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.5 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
  • 0.0100.0 United States (conterminous) $1,592,004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,127,990 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 122,490,604 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 North and Central America $2,420,234,247 0.021.7 1.119.7 57.5 $190,318,159 0.011.3 0.026.9 61.8 $86,586,705 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 41,002,252,107 0.0 8.5 0.921.3 69.3 Argentina $43,928,555 0.021.2 0.329.1 49.4 $2,063,163 0.011.8 0.019.9 68.2 $13,661,053 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 809,753,384 0.0 3.5 0.627.6 68.3 Bolivia $16,042,894 0.010.7 0.636.3 52.4 $727,108 0.0 2.9 0.010.5 86.6 $1,633,489 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 210,675,087 0.0 5.5 0.639.1 54.9 Brazil $112,308,606 0.037.1 0.221.3 41.4 $5,393,851 0.023.4 0.020.7 55.8 $3,758,855 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,385,707,119 0.022.7 0.626.3 50.5 Chile $24,246,148 0.031.3 1.920.8 46.1 $3,354,523 0.0 5.5 0.043.5 51.0 $1,472,495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 406,269,136 0.013.0 5.326.7 55.0 Colombia $135,099,502 0.029.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.txt
  • 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 23.6 22.8 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 38.4 40.7 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 16.2 28.1 26.1 24.6 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 27.1 11.2 11.9 11.9 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.2 39.3 38.0 36.4 Total All Filers 100.0 %100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0 100.0 %100.0% Note: Detail may not add to totals due to rounding. Some data for prior years have been revised. 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 23.6 22.8 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 38.4 40.7 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 6.8 16.2 28.1 26.1 24.6 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 38.5 27.1 11.2 11.9 11.9 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 45.2 43.2 39.3 38.0 36.4 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1 2 Source: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Industry Revenues(June 2007) and FCC 499-Q filings. Chart 19.9 Share of Universal Service Contributions by Principal Type of Contributor Table 19.18 Share of Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005 January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • 97.5 98.6 97.5 96.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005 January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005 January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
  • 5.4 6.9 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 162.8 164.5 126.8 331.6 304.0 295.5 304.0 147.4 514.8 225.0 229.1182.2 Total MSA 134.7 135.4 126.8 NA 300.8 249.4 300.8 159.0 510.2 189.1 228.5180.1 Total Non MSA 221.0 191.0 NA331.6 306.7 337.4 306.7 144.3 622.6 264.5 229.6184.9 Total Residence 211.0 205.6 178.7 388.3 362.8 413.0 362.8 172.6 638.3 291.6 269.5226.3 Total Business 68.3 62.3 44.4 175.1 143.6 95.0 143.6 76.0 249.0 86.7 119.2 72.8 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 107.2 142.5 115.3 307.5 280.9 271.9 280.9 132.9 476.9 176.8 184.5139.9 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Reports 21.3% 13.7% 10.7%16.8% 17.3% 18.2% 17.3%13.2% 17.2%18.2%19.0%14.8% Res. Complaints per Mill. Res. Access Lines 13.0 64.8 480.9 729.8 448.62947.0 448.6 29.9 338.9 366.0 166.9 70.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 2005January 118.2 94.8 125.9 68.5 65.7 72.9 65.3 February 118.9 95.1 126.9 68.5 65.3 73.8 65.4 March 119.8 95.0 127.4 67.9 64.9 72.5 65.2 April 120.6 95.3 127.8 68.4 64.9 73.4 65.2 May 120.5 94.8 127.3 67.5 64.0 72.6 65.2 June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309858A1.pdf
  • with your pay? *AES prescribed items ** Sum of responses excluding DNK/NBJ 6 Percentages are weighted to represent the Agency's population. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 2011 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS Percent Positive Very SatisfiedSatisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Item Response Total** Do Not Know/ No Basis to Judge N 194 372 147 77 38 828 NA % 68.3 23.6 44.7 18.2 8.9 4.5 100.0 72.Have you been notified that you are eligible to telework? Telework means working at a location other than your normal work site during your regular work hours (excludes travel). N % 593 71.4 174 22.0 56 6.6 823 100.0 73.Please select the response below that BEST describes your current teleworking situation: N % 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-208A1.pdf
  • commencing telecommunications services shall include any charges that the carrier customarily assesses to connect subscribers to the network, including facilities-based charges associated with the extension of lines or construction of facilities needed to initiate service. The reduction shall not apply to charges assessed for facilities or equipment that fall on the customer side of demarcation point, as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter. (b) A qualifying low-income consumer may choose one or both of the programs set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. An eligible resident of Tribal lands may participate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. * * * * * (d) An eligible telecommunications carrier shall publicize the availability of Link Up
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.txt
  • 251(c)(6) (emphasis added). 108We note that at least some definitions of "premises" encompass land adjacent to a structure. See, e.g., Mariam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 920 (10th ed. 1994) (defining premises as "a tract of land with the buildings thereon); Black's Law Dictionary, 1199 (7th ed. 1999) (defining premises as "a house or building along with its grounds"); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining "premises" as generally meaning "a dwelling unit, other building or a legal unit of real property on which a dwelling unit is located . . ."). 109Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15791, ¶ 573. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-297 24 indicated in the Advanced Services First Report & Order, such a requirement is an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-366A1_Erratum.pdf
  • addition,wedeclinetorequireauniformrelocationofthedemarcationpointtotheMPOEforthe reasonsdiscussedbelow. 1. Background 42.IntheCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,werequestedcommentonhowourrulesgoverningthe locationofthedemarcationpointbetweenfacilitiescontrolledbythelocaltelephonecarrierandthe (Continuedfrompreviouspage)-------------- interest,consideringsuchfactorsasthedurationofthecontract,thecontractingprovider'sstatusasanewentrant, theeffectoftheexclusivecontractonthedevelopmentofcompetitionandnewtechnology,andefficiencybenefits. MassachusettsNondiscriminatoryAccessOrderat30.Similarly,ourregulationspermitthewaiverofanyprovision ofourrulesforgoodcauseshown.See47C.F.R.§1.3(rulesmaybesuspended,revoked,amended,orwaivedfor goodcauseshown).Thus,inordertocomplywithboththeMassachusettsandthefederalregulations,aprovider seekingtoenterintoanexclusivecontractmustbothmaketherequiredpublicinterestshowingbeforethe MassachusettsDepartmentofTelecommunicationsandobtainawaiverfromtheCommission. 95 SeeEducationPartiesCommentsat10. 96 WenotethattheCompetitiveNetworksNPRMalsoraisedtheissueofwhethertheCommissionshouldamendits rulesgoverningcableinsidewiringsothattelecommunicationsserviceproviders,aswellasmultichannelvideo programmingdistributors(MVPDs),cantakeadvantageofproceduresgoverningthedispositionofhomerunwiring whenanincumbentMVPDnolongerhasalegallyenforceablerighttomaintainitshomerunwiringinabuilding. AsdiscussedintheFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,SectionV.E,infra,weconcludethatwelacksufficient informationintherecordtodeterminewhethertotakethisaction,andseekfurthercommentontheissue. 23002 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 propertyownerinmultipleunitpremisesimpactcompetitiveprovideraccessandwhethermodification ofthoserulesisappropriatetopromotecompetitiveaccess.97 43.Atthetimethecurrenttelecommunicationsinsidewmngruleswereestablished,there existedessentiallynocompetitioninthemarketfortheprovisionoflocaltelephoneservices.Inthetime sincetheenactmentoftheTelecommunicationsActof1996,manycompetitiveLECshavebegun providingservicesthatwereoncetheexclusivedomainoftheincumbents.Thereisevidence,however, thatcontinuedincumbentcontrolovermuchofthewiringinsomeMTEshashinderedthedevelopment offacilities-basedcompetitiveLECsasviablecompetitorsbyunnecessarilyrequiringthemtodealwith theircompetitorsinordertoservetheselocations.98Ontheotherhand,otherpartiesarguethatbuilding ownercontroloverinsidewiringobstructsthegrowthofcompetitorsthatuseunbundledlocalloops, becausetheywouldoftennototherwiseneedtodealwiththebuildingowner.99Inaddition,someargue thattheCommission'srulescreateconfusionregardingthelocationofthedemarcationpointandhave permitteddemarcationpointstobelocatedatinaccessibleplaces. 44.TheCommissionadopteditsdemarcationpointrulesin1984,inordertofostercompetition inthemarketforinstallationandmaintenanceoftelecommunicationsinsidewiring-thewiringthat connectscustomerpremisesequipment(CPE)tothepublicswitchedtelephonenetwork(PSTN)andto otherCPE.IOOThenewrulesestablisheda"demarcationpoint"thatmarkstheendofwiringunder controloftheLECandthebeginningofwiringunderthecontrolofthepropertyownerorsubscriber.1ol Thus,thenewrulespermittedtelecommunicationssubscribersandpremisesownerstoassumeorassign responsibilityforinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiring,whichpreviouslyhadbeenmanaged solelybytheLECsundertariff.102 97 SeeCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,14FCCRedat12708-9,'1!'1!65-67. 98 See,e.g.TeligentCommentsat78;WinStarCommentsat67. 99 SeeletterfromJasonD.Oxman,SeniorGovernmentAffairsCounsel,CovadCommunicationsCompany,toLeon Jaclder,StaffAttorney,FCC,datedAug.24,2000(CovadLetter).Further,buildingownerswouldnotbeobligated toprovide"conditioned"linescapableoftransmittingDigitalSubscriberLine(DSL)signals,asareincumbent LECs. 100 SeePetitionsSeekingAmendmentofPart68oftheCommission'sRulesConcerningtheConnectionof TelephoneEquipment,SystemandProtectiveApparatustotheTelephoneNetwork,FirstReportandOrder,CC DocketNo.81-216,97FCC2d527(1984)(1984DemarcationPointOrder);47C.F.R. §§68.3,68.213. 101 See47C.F.R. §68.3.ThissectioncurrentlydefmestheDemarcationPointformultipleunitpremisesasfollows: "(1)InmultiunitpremisesexistingasofAugust13,1990,theDemarcationPointshallbedeterminedinaccordance withthelocalcarrier'sreasonableandnon-discriminatorystandardoperatingpractices.Provided,however,that wheretherearemultipledemarcationpointswithinthemultiunitpremises,ademarcationpointshallnotbefurther insidethecustomer'spremisesthanapointtwelveinchesfromwherethewiringentersthecustomer'spremises,or asclosetheretoaspracticable.(2)InmultiunitpremisesinwhichwiringisinstalledafterAugust13,1990,including majoradditionsorrearrangementsofwiringexistingasofthatdate,thetelephonecompanymayestablisha reasonableandnon-discriminatorypracticeofplacingthedemarcationpointattheminimumpointofentry.Ifthe telephonecompanydoesnotelecttoestablishapracticeofplacingthedemarcationpointattheminimumpointof entry,themultiunitpremisesownershalldeterminethelocationofthedemarcationpointorpoints...."[d. 102 See1984DemarcationPointOrder,97FCC2d527.Inseveralrelatedorders,theCommissiondeterminedthat theinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiringnolongerconstitutedacornmoncarrierofferingunderTitleIIof theCommunicationsActandthereforedetariffedtheinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiring.See ModificationstotheUniformSystemofAccountsforClassAandClassBTelephoneCompaniesRequiredby (continued....) 23003 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 45.In1990,theCommissionrevisedthedemarcationpointdefinitiontoincreasetheamountof wiringthatmaycomeunderthecontrolofthepropertyownerorsubscriber.l03Atthesametime,inthe caseofMTEs,theCommissionsoughttomakethedefinitionflexibleenoughtoaccommodateexisting buildings.Therefore,inmulti-tenantbuildingsexistingasofAugust13,1990,thedemarcationpointis determinedinaccordancewiththecarrier'sreasonableandnondiscriminatorypractices.Fornew installations,ormajorrenovations,subsequenttoAugust13,1990,thecarriermayestablishapracticeof placingthedemarcationpointattheMPOE.I04Wherethecarrierchoosesnottodoso,thepremises ownermaydeterminethelocationorlocationsofthedemarcationpoint.lOs 46.In1997,theCommissionagainrevisitedtheissueofthedemarcationpointon reconsiderationofthe1990DemarcationPointOrderandFurtherNPRM.I06TheCommissionclarified thattherelocationofthedemarcationpointtotheMPOEcannotbeundertakenunilaterallybythe incumbentLECwithoutthepropertyowner'sconsent,exceptinthecaseofmajormodifications, renovations,orrearrangements.IO?TheCommissionfurtherstatedthat,forthepurposesofSection68.3, arequestforrelocationbythepropertyownerwouldbeconsideredamajormodificationor rearrangementofthewiring.108The1997DemarcationPointOrderalsoincludedaFurtherNoticeof ProposedRulemakingthatrequestedcommenton,amongotherissues,proposedmodificationstothe demarcationpointrule.I09Twopetitionsforclarificationandreconsiderationwere filedinresponsetoissuesdiscussedon reconsiderationinthe1997DemarcationPointOrder.110InJanuary,2000,theCommissionreleasedanorder (Continuedfrompreviouspage)------------- DetariffmgofCustomerPremisesEquipmentandProposedDetariffingofCustomerProvidedCableWiring,CC DocketNo.82-681,ReportandOrder,48Fed.Reg.50534(1983);DetariffmgtheInstallationandMaintenanceof InsideWiring,CCDocketNo.79-105,SecondReportandOrder,51Fed.Reg.8498(1986);Detariffmgthe InstallationandMaintenanceofInsideWiring,CCDocketNo.79-105,MemorandumOpinionandOrder,1FCC Rcd.1190(1986). 103 See IntheMatterofReviewofSections68.104and68.213oftheCommission'sRulesConcerningConnectionof SimpleInsideWiringtotheTelephoneNetwork,ReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking, CCDocket88-57,5FCCRcd4686(1990).(1990DemarcationPointOrderandFurtherNPRM). 104 TheMPOEisdefinedas"eithertheclosestpracticablepointtowherethewiringcrossesapropertylineorthe closestpracticablepointtowherethewiringentersamultiunitbuildingorbuildings."47C.F.R. §68.3. 105 Wenotethatthedefmitionofthedemarcationpointfortelephonecompanycommunicationsfacilitiesisnot identicaltothedemarcationpointdefmitionforcabletelevisionfacilitiesforpurposesofthecableinsidewiring rules.47C.F.R. §76.6(mrn).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.txt
  • Designed to Prevent Harms to the Network and Rules Pertaining to Technical Criteria for Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control Background. In the Notice, we specified that our proposals to privatize and streamline the approval of terminal equipment affect technical criteria in Part 68, Subparts B, C, D, and F. The proposals also affected the technical definitions contained in Section 68.3. Although we tentatively concluded that it was no longer in the public interest for the Commission to continue its direct involvement in terminal equipment approval, we proposed retaining several definitions in Part 68 that are related to other Commission policies outside of terminal equipment interconnection. Accordingly, we proposed to keep in Part 68 the present definitions of: (a) "demarcation point"
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.txt
  • directly connected to the public switched network will not: (1) result in electrical hazards to telephone company personnel; (2) damage telephone company equipment; (3) cause the malfunction of telephone company billing equipment; or (4) degrade service to persons other than the user of the equipment involved, persons the equipment user calls, or those who call the user. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. Equipment manufacturers are not required to comply with the technical standards in Part 68, but CPE that is not certified as meeting these standards cannot be directly connected to the public switched network and have limited marketability. The U.S. Customs Service also prohibits the importation of terminal equipment that is not registered pursuant to Part 68. See 19 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.txt
  • Rulemaking of Helping Equalize Access Rights in Telecommunications Now (HEAR-IT NOW), In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules, Hearing Aid Compatible Phones, RM-8658 (filed June 5, 1995) (HEAR-IT NOW Petition); Request of WAC to Reopen the Petition for Rulemaking, RM-8658 (filed October 10, 2000) (WAC Request). 47 U.S.C. § 610. 47 C.F.R. § 68.4(a). 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. (discussing scope of the exemptions). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). To date, technical standards for hearing aid compatibility have been established only for wireline telephones. Specifically, Section 68.316 of the Commission's rules sets forth the technical requirements for hearing aid compatibility, and Section 68.112 specifies the telephones that are required to be hearing aid compatible. 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.316, 68.112. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-98A1.txt
  • specifications that competitive CPE suppliers need to provide compatible equipment. We also conclude that allowing carriers to bundle CPE with transmission services will not affect the Commission's requirement that CPE not cause harm to the network. We sought comment in the Further Notice on whether the ``demarcation point'' between telephone company communications facilities and terminal equipment, as defined in section 68.3 of the Commission's rules, would change if CPE and interexchange carriers' network offerings were bundled and what effect, if any, this would have on the Commission's Part 68 program. In November 2000, the Commission adopted an Order eliminating certain portions of the Part 68 regulations governing the development of technical criteria and registration procedures for CPE. It found that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.txt
  • equipment that complies with our rules, for any reason, will subject the responsible party to enforcement procedures and penalties pursuant to subpart E of Part 68, including revocation of certification and, for imported goods, refusal of entry. Location of Responsible Party. Section 68.321 requires that the responsible party for purposes of SDoC certification be located in the United States. Section 68.3 requires the responsible party for SDoC to be the importer, if the equipment is imported. Thus, under the current rules, for imported equipment, the importer must be located in the United States. We agree with Industry Canada's observation, however, that some importers of terminal equipment manufactured abroad may not be located within the United States, and that it would be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.txt
  • See 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). See House Report at 9. See also 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A). Public mobile services are air-to-ground radiotelephone services, cellular radio telecommunications services, offshore radio services, rural radio services, public land mobile telephone services, and other common carrier radio communications services covered by Part 22 of our rules. See 47 U.S.C. § 610(f); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The term public mobile services was subsequently reclassified as commercial mobile radio service (CMRS). See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411 (1994) (implementing Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C); 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • See 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(1). See House Report at 9. See also 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A). Public mobile services are air-to-ground radiotelephone services, cellular radio telecommunications services, offshore radio services, rural radio services, public land mobile telephone services, and other common carrier radio communications services covered by Part 22 of our rules. See 47 U.S.C. § 610(f); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The term public mobile services was subsequently reclassified as commercial mobile radio service (CMRS). See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411 (1994) (implementing Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C); 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
  • One category of this subloop is inside wire, which is defined for purposes of this section as all loop plant owned or controlled by the incumbent LEC at a multiunit customer premises between the minimum point of entry as defined in § 68.105 of this chapter and the point of demarcation of the incumbent LEC's network as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter. (i) Point of technically feasible access. A point of technically feasible access is any point in the incumbent LEC's outside plant at or near a multiunit premises where a technician can access the wire or fiber within the cable without removing a splice case to reach the wire or fiber within to access the wiring in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-111A1.txt
  • dockets is set forth in Appendix B. Petition at 2-3. An inside wire subloop is defined as ``all loop plant owned or controlled by the incumbent LEC at a multiunit customer premises between the minimum point of entry as defined in § 68.105 of this chapter and the point of demarcation of the incumbent LEC's network as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter.'' 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(b)(2). Petition at i. Although Cox uses the term MTEs, the Commission uses the term ``multiunit premises'' in the inside wire subloop rule. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(b)(2). See Petition at 2 (citing Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with CMRS and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. ``Public mobile service'' is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(b); 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8119 ¶¶ 145-147. The existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a statutory requirement for imposing hearing aid compatibility requirements. See 47 U.S.C. § 610. 700 MHz Service Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8117-20 ¶¶ 142-150. Id. at 8119-20 ¶¶ 148-150. Specifically, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.txt
  • return. Also outlines the individual authorized rates of return for certain carriers' interstate exchange access rates. Part 68 - Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network - Establishes requirements for direct connection to the public switched network of all terminal equipment (except those falling under national security/defense interests). The Wireline Competition Bureau administers: Subpart A (General), sections 68.1 - 68.3, 68.7; Subpart B (Conditions on Use of Terminal Equipment), sections 68.100 - 68.110, 68.160 - 68.162; Subpart C (Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures), sections 68.201 - 68.214, 68.218; Subpart D (Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval), sections 68.300, 68.318-68.322, and 68.326; Subpart E (Complaint Procedures), section 68.418 (b); and Subpart G (Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments). Part 69 - Access Charges -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% Dec 1997 to 2006 25.6% -35.4% -4.2% 31.1% -31.7% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. As a third pricing indicator, some analysts believe average revenue per minute (``RPM'') is a good proxy for mobile pricing. This is calculated by dividing a provider's estimate of average monthly revenue per subscriber (often referred to as average revenue per unit, or ``ARPU'') by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.txt
  • at 19702-06 ¶¶ 89-97. See Joint Consensus Plan at 6-10. See Pub. L. No. 100-394, 102 Stat. 976 (1988), codified at 47 U.S.C. § 610 (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A)(i). The statute references ``public mobile service,'' which is defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. In 1994, Congress amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with commercial mobile [radio] services (CMRS) and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16764-65 ¶ 26. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). In addition, the existence of an established, applicable technical standard is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.txt
  • § 610 (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act). 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A)(i). The statute references ``public mobile services,'' which are defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules, and ``private radio services,'' defined as private land mobile radio services and other services characterized by the Commission as private radio services. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B), (C); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. In 1994, Congress amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with commercial mobile [radio] services (CMRS) and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, WT Docket 01-309, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753, 16764-65 ¶ 26 (2003) (2003 Hearing Aid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1_Rcd.pdf
  • § 610 (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act). 347 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(A)(i). The statute references "public mobile services," which are defined to include certain services covered under Part 22 of our rules, and "private radio services," defined as private land mobile radio services and other services characterized by the Commission as private radio services. 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(4)(B), (C); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. In 1994, Congress amended Section 332 of the Communications Act, replacing the public mobile service and private radio service categories with commercialmobile [radio] services (CMRS) and private mobile [radio] service (PMRS). See Section 68.4(a) of theCommission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, WT Docket 01-309,Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753, 16764-65 ¶ 26 (2003) (2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order). 11169
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.txt
  • return. Also outlines the individual authorized rates of return for certain carriers' interstate exchange access rates. Part 68 - Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network - Establishes requirements for direct connection to the public switched network of all terminal equipment (except those falling under national security/defense interests). The Wireline Competition Bureau administers: Subpart A (General), sections 68.1 - 68.3, 68.7; Subpart B (Conditions on Use of Terminal Equipment), sections 68.100 - 68.110, 68.160 - 68.162; Subpart C (Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures), sections 68.201 - 68.214, 68.218; Subpart D (Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval), sections 68.300, 68.318-68.322, and 68.326; Subpart E (Complaint Procedures), section 68.418 (b); and Subpart G (Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments). Part 69 - Access Charges -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2% 100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6% 74.846 4.7% Dec 1997 to 2008 34.1% -35.8% 0.5% 41.0% -25.2% Blended Revenue per Minute. Alternatively, some analysts believe RPM is a good proxy for mobile pricing. This metric is calculated by dividing an estimate of average monthly revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8%71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2%100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6%74.846 4.7% Dec 1997 to 2008 34.1% -35.8% 0.5% 41.0% -25.2% 187.Blended Revenue per Minute. Alternatively, some analysts believe RPM is a good proxy for mobile pricing.565This metric is calculated bydividing an estimate of average monthlyrevenue per subscriber (often referred to as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2% 100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6% 74.846 4.7% 2009 133.7 -0.4% 64.2 0.0% 102.39 1.9% 145.0 2.8% 78.099 4.3% Dec 1997 to 2009 33.7% -35.8% 2.4% 45.0% -21.9% . Average Revenue Per Minute Average Local Monthly Bill Minutes of Use Per Month Average Revenue Per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • -10.4% 99.3 0.8% 113.3 5.2% 88.8 -3.3% 2002 112.1 1.6% 67.4 -1.0% 99.7 0.4% 118.5 4.5% 84.9 -4.4% 2003 114.6 2.3% 66.8 -0.9% 98.3 -1.4% 123.3 4.1% 77.8 -8.4% 2004 117.7 2.7% 66.2 -0.9% 95.8 -2.5% 125.1 1.5% 70.9 -8.9% 2005 121.7 3.4% 65.0 -1.8% 94.9 -0.9% 128.5 2.7% 67.5 -4.8% 2006 125.6 3.2% 64.6 -0.6% 95.8 0.9% 131.1 2.1% 68.3 1.2% 2007 129.2 2.8% 64.4 -0.3% 98.247 2.6% 136.2 3.8% 71.453 4.6% 2008 134.1 3.8% 64.2 -0.2%100.451 2.2% 141.0 3.6% 74.846 4.7% 2009 133.7 -0.4% 64.2 0.0% 102.39 1.9% 145.0 2.8% 78.099 4.3% Dec 1997 to 2009 33.7% -35.8% 2.4% 45.0% -21.9% 191. Revenue per Voice Minute. In addition to the Cellular CPI, some analysts believe Voice RPM is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.txt
  • there is no imbalance between service to urbanized areas and to non-urbanized areas, and that Section 307(b) retains little or no relevance. Others implicitly recognize an imbalance of service, but argue that radio service properly should be concentrated in urbanized areas, as 79 percent of the American population lives in urban areas. This figure, it should be noted, combines the 68.3 percent of the population living in and around urbanized areas of over 50,000 with the 10.7 percent living in urban clusters of between 40,000 and 50,000 population. This still leaves 21 percent of the population - over 59 million Americans under the 2000 Census - living in rural areas or communities of less than 40,000. These 59 million people, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
  • Average emission limit in dBm Average emission limit in µW/cm² at 3m FCC (current) Toyota Proposed FCC (current) Toyota Proposed Not-in-Motion 23.5 0.20 In-Motion Front 48.3 50 60 88 In-Motion Side/Rear 45.3 30 Peak emission limits in dBm Peak power density limits in µW/cm² at 3m FCC (current) Toyota Proposed FCC (current) Toyota Proposed Not-in- Motion 43.5 20 In-Motion Front 68.3 55 6000 279 In-Motion Side/Rear 65.3 3000 Toyota proposes to consolidate the in-motion, not-in-motion, front, side and rear-looking criterion. Its requested average power density limit of 50 dBm (88 µW/cm² at 3 m) and peak power density limit of 55 dBm (279 µW/cm² at 3m) would be applicable in all directions regardless of the motion status of the vehicle. This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A2.txt
  • 6 1 9 See Appendix B 30 29Cleveland 67.8 4 0 11 1 1 0 11 Spectrum Limited 31 30Salt Lake City-Ogden- 74.8 29 0 11 0 0 0 46 Spectrum Limited 32 33Las Vegas 79.7 26 0 10 2 2 0 39 Spectrum Limited 33 32Kansas City 61.3 9 0 8 8 3 0 24 Spectrum Limited 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 12 9 2 19 See Appendix B 35 36Columbus, OH 75.1 8 5 13 5 5 1 10 Spectrum Limited 36 38Austin 69.7 16 3 11 10 6 0 27 Spectrum Limited 37 35San Jose 76.3 8 0 7 3 3 0 0 Spectrum Limited - see Mkt. 4 38 37Milwaukee-Racine 83.6 2 0 9 7 6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A3.txt
  • 26 26Riverside-San Bernardino 52.0 20 5 8 N/A N/A 2 21 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 27 27Sacramento 76.9 17 5 9 3 3 0 50 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 28 31San Antonio 78.7 11 0 11 8 6 0 23 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 29 28Cincinnati 66.7 5 3 18 N/A N/A 1 9 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 N/A N/A 0 19 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 43 42Raleigh-Durham 63.7 18 2 9 N/A N/A 1 16 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 45 44Nashville 65.9 15 2 12 N/A N/A 0 55 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 46 45Greensboro-Winston-Salem- 66.7 19 4 11 N/A N/A 0 26 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 48 48Oklahoma City 71.4 19 0 13
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Warner (100) 8 Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite 76.0 9 Fox Family Channel 75.7 10 TNN 75.0 11 Lifetime Television 75.0 12 A&E 75.0 13 Weather Channel 74.0 14 MTV 73.2 15 CNN Headline News 72.4 Time Warner 16 QVC 72.2 Comcast (57), AT&T (43) 17 TLC 72.0 AT&T (49), Cox (24.6) 18 AMC 71.0 Cablevision (75) 19 CNBC 71.0 20 VH1 68.3 Notes: In addition to cable, other services such as MMDS (wireless cable), SMATV (satellite master antenna television), satellite, including HSD (home satellite dish) and DBS (direct broadcast satellite), broadcast television and LPTV (low power television) may distribute these signals. Subscriber figures may include these noncable services. Cable affiliates provide 95% of funding for C-SPAN and C-SPAN2, but have no ownership
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.wp
  • utilizes 256 decoder output voltages, one for each of the Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-221 is practically limited to a maximum information transmission speed of 56 kbps. 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.308. 9 Network harm includes service degradation occurring to persons other than the user of the terminal equipment and that user's calling or called party. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The Order establishing the Part 68 program identified four areas of potential harm that may arise as a consequence of permitting the uncontrolled direct connection of telecommunications equipment to the telecommunications network: (1) hazardous voltages, (2) excessive signal power levels, (3) excessive longitudinal imbalance, and (4) improper network control signalling. In the Matter of Proposals for New and Revised Classes
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
  • at 7-12; RCN Comments at 20-21; Teligent Comments at 2-10; WinStar Comments at 2-13. 305 See CoreComm Comments at 35-36; KMC Comments at 22; OpTel Comments at 7; Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Attorney, OpTel, to Magalie R.Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 96-98 and 99-217 (filed July 22, 1999). Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-238 80 169. Section 68.3 of our rules defines the demarcation point as that point on the loop where the telephone company's control of the wire ceases, and the subscriber's control (or, in the case of some multiunit premises, the landlord's control) of the wire begins.306 Thus, the demarcation point is defined by control; it is not a fixed location on the network, but rather
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • Designed to Prevent Harms to the Network and Rules Pertaining to Technical Criteria for Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control Background. In the Notice, we specified that our proposals to privatize and streamline the approval of terminal equipment affect technical criteria in Part 68, Subparts B, C, D, and F. The proposals also affected the technical definitions contained in Section 68.3. Although we tentatively concluded that it was no longer in the public interest for the Commission to continue its direct involvement in terminal equipment approval, we proposed retaining several definitions in Part 68 that are related to other Commission policies outside of terminal equipment interconnection. Accordingly, we proposed to keep in Part 68 the present definitions of: (a) "demarcation point"
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 56 1000.0 479.0 35218 5937 36057 5970 0.0 0.0 92.9 CAONTARIO 46 47 69.9 927.0 17999 12158 17391 11983 0.2 0.5 100.0 CAOXNARD 63 24 50.0 549.0 12050 1792 10943 1280 0.2 0.6 99.6 CAPALMSPRINGS 36 46 50.0 207.0 5986 255 5890 259 1.2 1.4 99.4 CAPALMSPRINGS 42 52 64.41087.0 14117 859 14077 927 4.5 8.3 97.0 CAPARADISE 30 20 68.3 440.0 17736 370 17246 364 0.3 0.0 99.8 CAPORTERVILLE 61 48 74.5 811.0 21858 1330 21490 1278 0.1 0.0 100.0 CARANCHOPALOSVE44 51 224.9 451.0 13335 8016 16382 7109 0.0 0.0 79.1 CAREDDING 7 14 159.11103.0 35718 327 35198 321 0.0 0.0 99.4 CAREDDING 9 18 175.91097.0 35202 322 34666 319 0.0 0.0 99.2 CARIVERSIDE 62 69 175.0 723.0 15815 11178
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • kW to 316 kW; for WMSN-TV in Madison, Wisconsin, from 3.2 kW to at least 8.2 kW; for WUTV-TV in Buffalo, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WUHF-TV, in Rochester, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WZTV-TV in Nashville, Tennessee, from 116.6 kW to 500 kW; and for WVAH-TV in Charleston, West Virginia, from 68.3 kW to at least 460 kW. Sullivan attaches technical exhibits to show that such increases would comport with its de minimis interference standard and would cause little or no additional Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 119 interference to other stations and to provide technical details on proposed directional antenna patterns. It requests that we act on these requests in a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209956-1.pdf
  • could be effected, for example through non-disclosure agreements, although these alone may not be sufficient in cases where the recipient of such information may not have the financial viability to compensate a manufacturer if commercially sensitive information fails to be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Section 1193.43 of the Access Board's Guidelines appears to conflict with Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules. The Commission tentatively concluded that the Access Board's Guidelines "do not overlap, duplicate, or conflict with" existing Commission rules. Pursuant to Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules, telephones must be equipped with a receive volume control that provides a minimum of 12 dB gain and a maximum of 18 dB gain.26Section 1193.43 of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210017-1.pdf
  • goals are laudable, the Access Board's Guidelines unfortunately do not offer the level of specificity nor the level of detail required by telecommunications manufacturers.As an illustration of the problems inherent in applying the Access Board's Guidelines, one need look no fiu-ther than the Commission's HAC Rules whereby the minimum gain requirements for receivers contained in Section 1193.43 (e)4 and Section 68.3 175 of the Commission's Rules appear to be in conflict.Moreover, the Access Board's Guidelines became effective March 5, 1998 and are currently in effect, whereas compliance with the HAC requirements under Section 68.3 17, is not mandatory until January 1, 2000.6 Because the Guidelines lack specificity and may conflict with existing Commission Rules, the Commission should provide sufficient clarification. The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • FCC 99-141 60 We note that signals could, in theory, be transported within multiple tenant environments by means of wireless technology, perhaps using unlicensed spectrum. We are not aware, however, that such wireless transport is in fact occurring on a significant scale. Furthermore, even wireless in-building transport would presumably require the installation of some facilities. 61 See 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining several different options by which the demarcation point between telephone company facilities and subscriber facilities may be determined). The rules for determining control over telephone wiring are to be distinguished from the cable inside wiring rules, which are used to determine the disposition of cable inside wiring when a provider no longer has a legally enforceable right to remain
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • the demarcation point on reconsideration of the 1990 Demarcation Point Order and Further NPRM. The Commission clarified that the relocation of the demarcation point to the MPOE cannot be undertaken unilaterally by the incumbent LEC without the property owner's consent, except in the case of major modifications, renovations, or rearrangements. The Commission further stated that, for the purposes of Section 68.3, a request for relocation by the property owner would be considered a major modification or rearrangement of the wiring. The 1997 Demarcation Point Order also included a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that requested comment on, among other issues, proposed modifications to the demarcation point rule. Two petitions for clarification and reconsideration were filed in response to issues discussed on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • an average growth rate, we have calculated an average of these projections. According to this average figure, the mobile telephone market's total penetration rate would grow at a compound annual average growth rate of approximately 14.7 percent over the next five years and the market would have over 114 million subscribers by the end of 2002. Cellular operators would have 68.3 percent of these subscribers, broadband PCS operators 25.8 percent, and digital SMR operators 5.9 percent. This level of subscribership would translate into a national penetration rate of over 41 percent by the end of 2002. An important trend to note is that all of the projections assume that the new entrants would gain an increasing percentage of each year's incremental
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.txt
  • directly connected to the public switched network will not: (1) result in electrical hazards to telephone company personnel; (2) damage telephone company equipment; (3) cause the malfunction of telephone company billing equipment; or (4) degrade service to persons other than the user of the equipment involved, persons the equipment user calls, or those who call the user. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. Equipment manufacturers are not required to comply with the technical standards in Part 68, but CPE that is not certified as meeting these standards cannot be directly connected to the public switched network, and has limited marketability. The U.S.Customs Service also prohibits the importation of terminal equipment that is not registered pursuant to Part 68. See 19 U.S.C. § 3109.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.wp
  • 1. The authority citation for Part 68 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 1, 4, 5, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 155, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602, 610. 2. Section 68.3 is amended by adding the following definition to the terms used in Part 68: * * * * * Hearing aid compatible: Except as used at §§ 68.4(a)(3) and 68.414 of these rules, the terms hearing aid compatible or hearing aid compatibility are used as defined in § 68.316, unless it is specifically stated that hearing aid compatibility volume control,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3408A1.html
  • agent found that at 31 locations cable signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 V/m at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from165 V/m to 983 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's CLI at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed CLI performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. 5. On July 25, 2002, the Atlanta Office issued an Order to Cease Operations, pursuant to Section 76.613(c) of the Rules.13 The system resumed normal operation on July 26, 2002, after being brought into compliance. The Atlanta Office issued a NAL on September 3,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, PP 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define "Terminal equipment" as: "[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services." 47 C.F.R. S 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S 68.100 ("[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.") (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) ("Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files09/CREPOR09.pdf
  • applies to agreements involving foreign carriers with market power on routes where the termination rates are above benchmark.4 Table A21 shows that U.S. carriers reported 4.6 billion minutes of U.S.-billed traditional settlement traffic in 2009, for which they billed $0.2 billion. Non-Traditional Settlement Arrangements consist of all traffic other than traditionally settled traffic. Table A22 shows that U.S. carriers reported 68.3 billion U.S.-billed non-traditional minutes of traffic in year 2009, for which they billed $5.6 billion. U.S. carriers also reported receiving 23.2 billion foreign-billed non-traditional minutes of traffic in year 2009. These tables may understate the total amount of traffic settled under non-traditional arrangements because it appears that carriers continued to report a small amount of non-traditional settlement traffic as traditional
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fcc98091.pdf
  • an average growth rate, we have calculated an average of these projections. According to this average figure, the mobile telephone market's total penetration rate would grow at a compound annual average growth rate of approximately 14.7 percent over the next five years and the market would have over 114 million subscribers by the end of 2002. Cellular operators would have 68.3 percent of these subscribers, broadband PCS operators 25.8 percent, and digital SMR operators 5.9 percent. This level of subscribership would translate into a national penetration rate of over 41 percent by the end of 2002. An important trend to note is that all of the projections assume that the new entrants would gain an increasing percentage of each year's incremental
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011114-hearing.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011114-hearing.txt
  • Equalize Access Rights in Telecommunications Now (HEAR-IT NOW), In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules, Hearing Aid Compatible Phones, RM-8658 (filed June 5, 1995) (HEAR-IT NOW Petition); Request of WAC to Reopen the Petition for Rulemaking, RM-8658 (filed October 10, 2000) (WAC Request). 3 47 U.S.C. § 610. 4 47 C.F.R. § 68.4(a). 5 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. 6 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The terms public and private mobile services were subsequently reclassified to create two new categories of mobile services, commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) and private mobile radio service (PMRS). See Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 1411 (1994) (implementing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Warner (100) 8 Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite 76.0 9 Fox Family Channel 75.7 10 TNN 75.0 11 Lifetime Television 75.0 12 A&E 75.0 13 Weather Channel 74.0 14 MTV 73.2 15 CNN Headline News 72.4 Time Warner 16 QVC 72.2 Comcast (57), AT&T (43) 17 TLC 72.0 AT&T (49), Cox (24.6) 18 AMC 71.0 Cablevision (75) 19 CNBC 71.0 20 VH1 68.3 Notes: In addition to cable, other services such as MMDS (wireless cable), SMATV (satellite master antenna television), satellite, including HSD (home satellite dish) and DBS (direct broadcast satellite), broadcast television and LPTV (low power television) may distribute these signals. Subscriber figures may include these noncable services. Cable affiliates provide 95% of funding for C-SPAN and C-SPAN2, but have no ownership
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98187.pdf
  • different technologies can sacrifice efficiency significantly.59 We ask for comment on whether there are efficiency problems that can be corrected through standardization of technology interfaces. If there are such problems, should the Commission encourage such standardization? Would such activity by the Commission increase interconnectivity and thereby further the deployment of Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-187 60 See 47 C.F.R. § 68.3; Implementation of the Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act of 1992, Cable Home Wiring, Report & Order, 8 FCC Rcd 1435 (1993). 61 See, e.g., Amendment of Parts 2, 15, and 97 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Use of Radio Frequencies Above 40 GHz for New Radio Applications, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Fourth Notice of Proposed Rule
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.wp
  • utilizes 256 decoder output voltages, one for each of the Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-221 is practically limited to a maximum information transmission speed of 56 kbps. 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.308. 9 Network harm includes service degradation occurring to persons other than the user of the terminal equipment and that user's calling or called party. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The Order establishing the Part 68 program identified four areas of potential harm that may arise as a consequence of permitting the uncontrolled direct connection of telecommunications equipment to the telecommunications network: (1) hazardous voltages, (2) excessive signal power levels, (3) excessive longitudinal imbalance, and (4) improper network control signalling. In the Matter of Proposals for New and Revised Classes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • entirely the case. Commenters from all facets of the CPE industry were unanimous in their view that the technical requirements designed to protect the network from harm are beneficial to owners of the network, to consumers, and to both domestic and foreign manufacturers. In fact, all parties at the fora argued that all four types of protections listed in section 68.3 are still needed. SBC, for example, discussed at length the technical faults that can cause injury to maintenance personnel, the network physical plant, and to other users of the network. Ameritech and Lucent argued that new technology increases, rather than diminishes, the need for protection of the network from harm and interference to third parties. Thomson pointed out that responsible
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
  • NID does not mark the end of the incumbent's control of the loop facility. Where incumbents maintain ownership and control over a portion of the loop beyond the NID, the definition of the loop as set forth by the Commission in the Local Competition First Report and Order may not provide the competitor with actual access to the subscriber. Section 68.3 of our rules defines the demarcation point as that point on the loop where the telephone company's control of the wire ceases, and the subscriber's control (or, in the case of some multiunit premises, the landlord's control) of the wire begins. Thus, the demarcation point is defined by control; it is not a fixed location on the network, but rather
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • 270 kHz to 6 MHz, with a terminating impedance of 135 ohms. Sometimes, as in the first sentence of the Petition, these limits are called the out-of-band signal power limitations, because the range 4kHz to 6 MHz is outside the voice-band range of 200 Hz to 3995 Hz. For purposes of Part 68, voice-band is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. These limitations were originally intended to limit crosstalk in multichannel analog carrier systems. Multichannel analog carrier systems use frequency division multiplexing to concentrate multiple subscribers' signals onto a single wire pair. Each direction of transmission for each subscriber uses either 4 kHz (single sideband) or 8 kHz (double sideband) of frequency spectrum. Generally, the carrier systems most susceptible to crosstalk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001653.doc
  • 270 kHz to 6 MHz, with a terminating impedance of 135 ohms. Sometimes, as in the first sentence of the Petition, these limits are called the out-of-band signal power limitations, because the range 4kHz to 6 MHz is outside the voice-band range of 200 Hz to 3995 Hz. For purposes of Part 68, voice-band is defined in 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. These limitations were originally intended to limit crosstalk in multichannel analog carrier systems. Multichannel analog carrier systems use frequency division multiplexing to concentrate multiple subscribers' signals onto a single wire pair. Each direction of transmission for each subscriber uses either 4 kHz (single sideband) or 8 kHz (double sideband) of frequency spectrum. Generally, the carrier systems most susceptible to crosstalk
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00208.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00208.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00208.txt
  • commencing telecommunications services shall include any charges that the carrier customarily assesses to connect subscribers to the network, including facilities-based charges associated with the extension of lines or construction of facilities needed to initiate service. The reduction shall not apply to charges assessed for facilities or equipment that fall on the customer side of demarcation point, as defined in § 68.3 of this chapter. (b) A qualifying low-income consumer may choose one or both of the programs set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. An eligible resident of Tribal lands may participate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. * * * * * (d) An eligible telecommunications carrier shall publicize the availability of Link Up
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.txt
  • 251(c)(6) (emphasis added). We note that at least some definitions of ``premises'' encompass land adjacent to a structure. See, e.g., Mariam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 920 (10th ed. 1994) (defining premises as ``a tract of land with the buildings thereon); Black's Law Dictionary, 1199 (7th ed. 1999) (defining premises as ``a house or building along with its grounds''); 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining ``premises'' as generally meaning ``a dwelling unit, other building or a legal unit of real property on which a dwelling unit is located . . .''). Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15791, ¶ 573. Advanced Services First Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 4786, ¶ 44. Ameritech Comments at 2. Local Competition First
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • Designed to Prevent Harms to the Network and Rules Pertaining to Technical Criteria for Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control Background. In the Notice, we specified that our proposals to privatize and streamline the approval of terminal equipment affect technical criteria in Part 68, Subparts B, C, D, and F. The proposals also affected the technical definitions contained in Section 68.3. Although we tentatively concluded that it was no longer in the public interest for the Commission to continue its direct involvement in terminal equipment approval, we proposed retaining several definitions in Part 68 that are related to other Commission policies outside of terminal equipment interconnection. Accordingly, we proposed to keep in Part 68 the present definitions of: (a) "demarcation point"
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.txt
  • Registration") to Specify Standards for and Means of Connection of Telephone Equipment to Lamp and/or Annunciator Functions of Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket Nos. 19528, 20774, 21182, 70 FCC 2d 1800 (1979). Network harm occurs when persons other than the user of the subject terminal equipment and that user's calling or called party suffer service degradation. 47 C.F.R. § 68.3. The Order establishing the Part 68 program identified four areas of potential harm that may arise as a consequence of permitting the uncontrolled direct connection of telecommunications equipment to the telecommunications network: (1) hazardous voltages, (2) excessive signal power levels, (3) excessive longitudinal imbalance, and (4) improper network control signaling. First R&O, 56 F.C.C. 2d at 602. 47 C.F.R. §
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1000.pdf
  • codes grouped by median household income) Median household income (in each decile of zip codes) December 1999 June 2000 December 1999 June 2000 90-100 $53,494 to $291,938 90.8 95.4 98.4 99.5 80-90 $43,617 to $53,478 77.4 86.9 95.9 98.2 70-80 $38,396 to $43,614 67.0 78.1 94.3 96.8 60-70 $34,744 to $38,395 59.6 73.6 91.7 95.6 50-60 $32,122 to $34,743 53.7 68.3 89.4 93.9 40-50 $29,893 to $32,121 51.8 65.0 88.2 92.7 30-40 $27,542 to $29,892 49.1 62.4 85.9 91.4 20-30 $24,855 to $27,541 48.8 59.6 85.1 90.3 10-20 $21,645 to $24,855 45.3 55.7 82.5 88.1 0-10 $0 to $21,644 41.7 50.5 84.1 89.5 Table 8 % of population in decile that reside in zip codes with high speed service % of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1208_tables.doc
  • 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 32.5 * 1.7 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 12.5 54.7 8.8 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.4 2.5 0.8 2.9 4.4 15.0 52.6 21.5 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.4 68.3 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 13.1 4.4 17.5 21.1 23.0 25.1 9.4 2.0 1.8 0.2 82.5 100.0 Mobile Wireless 32.1 14.1 46.2 28.8 17.9 6.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp98.pdf
  • STATE AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 LINES (1997 USF VOICE HIGH VOICE GRADE Loops in GRADE CAPACITY LINES STATE thousands) COMPANY LINES LINES MICHIGAN 6,258 Ameritech 49.8% 72.3% 49.6% GTE 0.0 * 0.0 MINNESOTA 2,878 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 U S WEST 36.2 64.7 36.0 MISSISSIPPI 1,321 BellSouth 17.2 35.4 13.4 MISSOURI 3,324 SBC 19.6 68.3 20.5 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 MONTANA 508 U S WEST 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEBRASKA 995 U S WEST 30.6 65.6 38.8 NEVADA 1,207 SBC 45.6 85.6 42.4 Sprint 95.7 0.0 99.2 NEW HAMPSHIRE 818 Bell Atlantic 41.9 67.6 37.6 NEW JERSEY 6,201 Bell Atlantic 23.4 40.4 21.6 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEW MEXICO 901 U S WEST 32.4 56.2 33.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • Other Switched 7.4 9.1 10.1 1,518 1,997 1,466 Private Line 1.3 2.0 2.2 2,835 2,089 1,436 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.9 1.9 2.3 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 11.4 13.3 14.9 1,152 1,485 1,088 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 1.0 1.3 1.5 1,700 1,455 932 Operator 9.7 9.4 7.3 3,455 3,199 2,236 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 62.1 65.1 68.3 3,065 2,902 2,572 Private Line 9.2 10.0 11.0 2,790 2,914 2,752 Other Toll Revenues 2 5.3 1.5 4.3 All Toll Revenues Provided to End Users 87.3 87.3 92.3 2,633 2,486 2,446 Total Toll Revenues $98.7 $100.6 $107.3 2,295 2,232 2,093 Sources: 1997 and 1998: Data filed on FCC Form 431 (Telecommunications Relay Service Worksheet) and Form 457 (Universal Service Worksheet).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 3,070 2,156 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.9 1.9 2.3 0.6 0.4 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 11.4 13.3 14.9 21.8 20.0 1,152 1,485 1,088 1,252 952 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.0 1,700 1,455 932 1,017 1,092 Operator 9.7 9.4 7.3 8.4 7.4 3,455 3,199 2,236 3,249 2,717 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 62.1 65.1 68.3 60.4 52.2 3,065 2,902 2,572 2,206 2,214 Private Line 9.2 10.0 11.0 10.4 11.0 2,790 2,914 2,752 3,032 2,859 Other Toll Revenues 2 5.3 1.5 4.3 6.3 6.8 All Toll Revenues Provided to End Users 87.3 87.3 92.3 86.7 78.4 2,633 2,486 2,446 2,310 2,254 Total Toll Revenues 98.7 100.6 107.3 108.5 98.4 2,295 2,232 2,093 2,015 1,906 1 Includes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • 4.9 4.9 61 New York 71.7 11.9 5.1 11.3 1,079 69.4 15.4 3.7 11.5 461 78.3 11.9 4.1 5.7 663 North Carolina 69.8 4.7 9.5 16.0 425 63.6 14.9 6.7 14.9 195 78.3 11.1 4.4 6.2 226 North Dakota 46.4 26.8 3.6 23.2 56 50.0 18.8 6.3 25.0 16 69.2 7.7 5.1 17.9 39 Ohio 66.0 12.2 6.3 15.5 717 68.3 14.4 4.8 12.5 271 71.5 10.9 5.2 12.4 386 Oklahoma 68.4 9.3 3.0 19.3 236 64.1 12.5 4.7 18.8 64 75.8 12.5 3.3 8.3 120 Oregon 72.5 6.1 4.9 16.4 244 64.1 11.7 6.8 17.5 103 79.6 7.3 4.4 8.8 137 Pennsylvania 65.6 14.2 4.6 15.6 873 66.2 18.0 1.6 14.1 305 70.5 12.4 4.1 13.1 590 Rhode Island 80.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • 4.9 4.9 61 New York 71.7 11.9 5.1 11.3 1,079 69.4 15.4 3.7 11.5 461 78.3 11.9 4.1 5.7 663 North Carolina 69.8 4.7 9.5 16.0 425 63.6 14.9 6.7 14.9 195 78.3 11.1 4.4 6.2 226 North Dakota 46.4 26.8 3.6 23.2 56 50.0 18.8 6.3 25.0 16 69.2 7.7 5.1 17.9 39 Ohio 66.0 12.2 6.3 15.5 717 68.3 14.4 4.8 12.5 271 71.5 10.9 5.2 12.4 386 Oklahoma 68.4 9.3 3.0 19.3 236 64.1 12.5 4.7 18.8 64 75.8 12.5 3.3 8.3 120 Oregon 72.5 6.1 4.9 16.4 244 64.1 11.7 6.8 17.5 103 79.6 7.3 4.4 8.8 137 Pennsylvania 65.6 14.2 4.6 15.6 873 66.2 18.0 1.6 14.1 305 70.5 12.4 4.1 13.1 590 Rhode Island 80.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
  • $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4 87.8 85.6 93.8 91.1 93.7 94.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
  • or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 92.1 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 97.3 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.0 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.2 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 96.0 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 95.7 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 96.2 97.5 98.6 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 99.4 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 95.6 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 72.9 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 92.8 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 96.7 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 94.1 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 96.1 All Households 95.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
  • Private Service Providers 6.4 1.9 1.8 Shared-Tenant Service Providers * 10.8 3.2 Other Local Service Providers 45.5 21.3 2.5 Total Local Competitors 1,094.3 1,993.7 531.8 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,667.5 22,840.5 4,304.5 Payphone Service Providers 65.5 148.8 10.4 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 1,271.7 14,004.7 1,874.6 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 156.8 506.5 68.3 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch * 48.8 2.3 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 1.7 33.7 25.0 Providers Wireless Service Providers 1,430.4 14,593.7 1,970.2 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 3,514.6 17,217.7 12,258.3 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 6.6 131.3 58.7 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 7.6 31.8 24.6 Satellite Service Providers 22.6 62.0 31.9 Toll Resellers 729.5 1,756.5 964.2 Other Toll Carriers 8/ 296.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 63.4 75.8 69.7 82.7 85.1 April 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • June 100.0 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 100.0 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 100.0 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 100.0 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 97.2 99.9 99.2 107.3 79.6 94.0 102.7 June 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • March 116.2 96.7 124.2 73.1 70.6 77.2 66.5 April 116.6 96.5 123.9 72.8 70.1 77.2 66.4 May 117.2 95.9 124.2 71.3 68.8 75.5 66.5 June 117.6 95.8 124.2 71.2 68.4 75.4 66.4 July 117.4 95.6 124.7 70.1 67.6 74.2 66.5 August 117.5 95.0 124.7 68.7 66.0 72.9 66.5 September 117.7 95.3 124.9 69.6 67.0 73.9 66.3 October 118.4 94.6 125.2 68.3 65.7 72.6 65.5 November 118.4 94.9 125.1 69.3 66.4 74.0 65.5 December 118.0 94.8 125.5 68.6 65.7 73.4 65.6 Note: Figures for local telephone service, interstate toll service, and intrastate toll service after May, 2000 are converted from 1982-1984 base index series reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Historical data on these series based upon the 1982-1984 index for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 63.4 75.8 69.7 82.7 85.1 April 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 71 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100) All Goods & Services Telephone Services Local ServicesInterstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series IdentifierCUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051CUUR0000SS27061 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 75.8 69.7 82.7 85.1 April 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev02.pdf
  • 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.2 27.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.5 26.8 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 7.2 6.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 42.1 39.8 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 49.3 46.1 Total All Filers 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for the third quarter of 2003 are based on historic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev03.pdf
  • 3.5 3.9 4.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 30.3 30.9 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 32.6 34.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 7.7 8.4 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 29.4 26.6 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 37.1 35.0 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for 2003 are based on shares of reported
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 100.0 401 88 82.0 751 88.3 Montana 81 0 100.0 165 41 80.1 287 85.7 Nebraska 78 0 100.0 377 22 94.5 477 95.4 Nevada 50 1 98.0 55 23 70.5 129 81.4 New Hampshire 126 1 99.2 28 1 96.6 156 98.7 New Jersey 212 0 100.0 27 1 96.4 240 99.6 New Mexico 72 0 100.0 84 39 68.3 195 80.0 New York 586 1 99.8 305 18 94.4 910 97.9 North Carolina 144 0 100.0 363 13 96.5 520 97.5 North Dakota 47 0 100.0 168 87 65.9 302 71.2 Ohio 240 17 93.4 546 64 89.5 867 90.7 Oklahoma 236 0 100.0 288 36 88.9 560 93.6 Oregon 100 0 100.0 219 5 97.8 324 98.5 Pennsylvania
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 1.82 29.8 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 1.82 95.4 926 - 1910Day 2.40 $1.40 -41.7 2.40 1.82 -24.3 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65 -42.0 1.12 1.82 62.3 4251 - 5750Day 2.91 $1.40 -51.9 2.91 1.82 -37.5 Evening 1.74 0.80 -54.0 1.74 1.82 4.5 Night & Weekend 1.16 0.65 -44.0 1.16 1.82 56.7 SOURCE: AT&T TARIFFS AND INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, REFERENCE BOOK OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 100.0 445 50 89.9 763 93.4 Montana 81 0 100.0 164 41 80.0 286 85.7 Nebraska 78 0 100.0 396 4 99.0 478 99.2 Nevada 48 3 94.1 58 21 73.4 130 81.5 New Hampshire 126 1 99.2 31 1 96.9 159 98.7 New Jersey 213 0 100.0 31 2 93.9 246 99.2 New Mexico 71 0 100.0 84 39 68.3 194 79.9 New York 586 1 99.8 313 16 95.1 916 98.1 North Carolina 144 0 100.0 364 12 96.8 520 97.7 North Dakota 46 0 100.0 220 35 86.3 301 88.4 Ohio 239 17 93.4 585 24 96.1 865 95.3 Oklahoma 237 0 100.0 283 36 88.7 556 93.5 Oregon 99 0 100.0 218 5 97.8 322 98.4 Pennsylvania
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.2 27.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.5 26.8 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 7.2 6.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 42.1 39.8 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 49.3 46.1 Total All Filers 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for the third quarter of 2003 are based on historic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.5 3.9 4.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 30.3 30.9 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 32.6 34.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 5.0 7.7 8.4 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 53.3 43.6 29.4 26.6 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 56.7 48.6 37.1 35.0 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1 2 Source: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Industry Revenues (March 2005). Table 19.17 Share of Universal Service Contributions By Principal Type of Contributor Using Traditional Carrier Categories 1 2 Total: Toll Service Providers For years 1997 through
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 2.9 3.9 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 25.7 25.7 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 15.2 23.5 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.1 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3 61.9 55.2 46.6 Total: Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.9 70.6 64.9 59.0 50.7 Total All Filers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1/For years 1997 through 2002, the percentages are based on shares of reported subject interstate and international end-user billed revenues. The percentages shown for the second quarter of 2003 are based on shares of projected collected end-user revenues. Calculations exclude revenues for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • June 100.0 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 100.0 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 100.0 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 100.0 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 46 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2002 1 2 3 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2002 2002 Reporting Alabama 2,417,624 84.4% 1.18 Alaska 451,038 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,325 0.0 NA Arizona 2,929,763 93.0 1.08 Arkansas 1,453,606 68.3 1.46 California 22,684,649 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,808,697 95.3 1.05 Connecticut 2,322,733 98.9 1.01 Delaware 580,535 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 897,193 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,051,084 98.2 1.02 Georgia 4,952,969 88.5 1.13 Guam 70,975 0.0 NA Hawaii 706,080 99.9 1.00 Idaho 742,213 90.8 1.10 Illinois 7,988,559 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,723,570 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,659,718 64.7 1.55 Kansas 1,572,621 83.6 1.20 Kentucky
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 97.9 97.4 96.9 96.7 96.2 97.5 98.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.4 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.3 98.6 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.5 100.0 98.8 99.4 100.0 99.2 99.1 98.5 99.0 100.0 All Households 95.5 96.3 95.2 96.6 97.1 95.3 95.8 96.8 95.5 96.9 District of Columbia $9,999 or less 92.5 84.8 81.7 81.5 81.8 89.5 84.8 87.3 79.5 68.3 $10,000 - $19,999 94.6 91.5 91.8 88.6 91.5 95.0 91.4 87.7 90.8 86.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.2 93.9 95.4 94.0 96.8 98.5 97.4 95.2 92.4 92.6 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.0 97.4 93.0 98.7 100.0 96.5 97.4 96.3 96.2 $40,000 or more 98.7 97.5 98.3 99.2 96.9 97.0 99.4 98.4 96.3 99.5 All Households 95.9 92.0 91.9 91.4 92.9 95.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 97.2 99.9 99.2 107.3 79.6 94.0 102.7 June 96.4 98.9 99.3 105.3 77.6 93.5 102.2 July 97.9 100.9 99.0 108.7 76.3 94.3 103.4 August 97.2 99.6 97.8 109.1 76.7 94.3 102.3 September 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 585 Table 5.5 Consumer Price Indices (1982-1984=100) All Goods & Services All Telephone Services Local Services Interstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 84.5 111.5 355.1 10.0 6.8 311.0 41.6 127.6 100.4 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 106.8 140.3 193.7 56.2 19.6 653.7 116.3 1.4 46.4 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.2 0.0 37.2 21.8 18.2 111.2 0.0 222.6 128.5 6. Software Design 403.8 2.7 134.8 17.1 4.2 177.6 436.5 713.6 81.5 7. Hardware design 7.7 68.3 31.6 0.0 0.0 47.6 0.0 0.0 45.8 8. Hardware Failure 212.6 348.5 334.3 152.4 31.0 2530.6 327.3 1406.0 995.7 9. Natural Causes 8.3 270.6 766.3 48.8 0.0 52.8 714.1 170.6 679.4 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 9.1 0.8 12. External Power Failure 0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • 525.0 0.0 76.7 555.7 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 75.9 26.7 338.6 0.0 2.8 100.4 42.0 102.3 19.8 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 2.7 10.0 89.1 5.0 0.0 427.8 15.6 14.5 27.5 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 16.8 31.7 5.6 0.0 0.9 63.3 167.8 0.0 6. Software Design 48.8 624.4 154.4 8.4 0.0 31.8 152.0 380.2 68.3 7. Hardware design 0.0 73.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 32.0 0.0 0.3 8. Hardware Failure 168.7 100.1 224.7 49.4 0.0 803.5 6922.0 874.0 759.6 9. Natural Causes 58.2 0.0 1.6 589.1 0.0 0.0 1144.8 1222.3 561.7 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 38.2 78.6 12.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-9.pdf
  • 525.0 0.0 76.6 555.7 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 75.9 26.7 338.6 0.0 2.8 100.4 42.0 102.2 19.8 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 2.7 10.0 89.1 5.0 0.0 427.8 15.6 14.5 27.5 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 16.8 31.7 5.6 0.0 0.9 63.3 167.7 0.0 6. Software Design 48.8 624.4 154.4 8.4 0.0 31.8 152.0 379.9 68.3 7. Hardware design 0.0 73.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 32.0 0.0 0.3 8. Hardware Failure 168.7 100.1 224.7 49.4 0.0 803.5 6922.0 873.4 759.6 9. Natural Causes 58.2 0.0 1.6 589.1 0.0 0.0 1144.8 1221.4 561.7 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 38.1 78.6 12.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 67.1 93.4 March 135.0 119.3 153.2 67.5 93.3 April 135.2 119.3 153.4 67.5 92.9 May 135.6 119.3 153.6 67.5 92.6 June 136.0 119.5 153.6 67.5 93.1 July 136.2 119.6 153.8 67.5 93.2 August 136.6 119.7 154.1 67.5 93.2 September 137.2 119.9 154.2 68.0 93.1 October 137.4 120.0 154.5 68.0 92.9 November 137.8 120.4 155.0 68.2 93.3 December 137.9 120.5 155.0 68.3 93.1 1992January 138.1 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.5 February 138.6 120.8 155.8 68.6 92.2 March 139.3 120.9 156.2 68.6 91.8 April 139.5 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 May 139.7 120.8 156.2 68.6 91.4 June 140.2 119.9 154.7 68.2 91.2 July 140.5 120.3 155.7 67.5 91.4 August 140.9 120.1 155.4 67.6 91.2 September 141.3 120.0 155.3 67.4 91.1 October 141.8 120.0 155.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Delaware 95.1 88.7 89.7 88.7 94.4 97.3 97.2 91.7 90.2 92.3 94.7 98.0 91.5 96.0 97.2 97.9 98.6 97.5 96.9 94.2 97.7 99.1 97.1 97.8 100.0 100.0 97.4 97.4 100.0 95.1 98.8 98.8 100.0 99.4 100.0 97.4 95.2 98.5 100.0 98.9 96.9 95.6 96.0 95.3 95.2 97.4 98.2 97.4 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4 87.8 85.6 93.8 91.1 93.7 94.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households $9,999 or less $10,000 - $19,999 $20,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $39,999 $40,000 or more All Households Table 6.11 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 District of Columbia 68.3 72.9 83.2 81.4 81.1 86.1 88.4 86.6 92.1 86.0 92.8 91.4 93.6 93.7 93.7 91.2 87.6 97.3 92.6 96.7 96.8 97.4 93.2 89.7 89.1 90.3 96.0 96.2 94.1 98.5 98.4 98.5 94.3 93.8 92.0 99.2 99.5 96.1 97.2 98.1 97.5 96.1 98.8 97.4 96.0 87.9 89.1 92.3 92.5 91.4 91.7 92.4 91.0 95.7 Florida 84.7 84.2 86.7 86.6 84.4 85.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • 525.0 0.0 76.7 555.7 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 75.9 26.7 338.6 0.0 2.8 100.4 42.0 102.3 19.8 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 2.7 10.0 89.1 5.0 0.0 427.8 15.6 14.5 27.5 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 16.8 31.7 5.6 0.0 0.9 63.3 167.8 0.0 6. Software Design 48.8 624.4 154.4 8.4 0.0 31.8 152.0 380.2 68.3 7. Hardware design 0.0 73.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 32.0 0.0 0.3 8. Hardware Failure 168.7 100.1 224.7 49.4 0.0 803.5 6922.0 874.0 759.6 9. Natural Causes 58.2 0.0 1.6 589.1 0.0 0.0 1144.8 1222.3 561.7 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 38.2 78.6 12.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Minnesota 88 2,246,696 73.2 0 0.0 823,023 26.8 3,069,719 73.2 MN Mississippi 19 1,326,316 93.4 0 0.0 93,726 6.6 1,420,042 93.4 MS Missouri 43 2,716,232 74.9 721,798 19.9 188,653 5.2 3,626,683 94.8 MO Montana 18 366,557 68.1 0 0.0 171,876 31.9 538,433 68.1 MT Nebraska 41 508,081 50.5 354,618 35.2 143,768 14.3 1,006,467 85.7 NE Nevada 14 358,700 27.2 899,447 68.3 59,431 4.5 1,317,578 95.5 NV New Hampshire 10 818,682 93.5 0 0.0 56,620 6.5 875,302 93.5 NH New Jersey 3 6,519,258 96.6 219,929 3.3 10,492 0.2 6,749,679 99.8 NJ New Mexico 15 811,430 85.0 46,592 4.9 96,474 10.1 954,496 89.9 NM New York 44 11,466,333 89.5 927,873 7.2 424,338 3.3 12,818,544 96.7 NY North Carolina 26 2,544,247 50.0 2,050,316 40.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 79.3 30.4 16.7 29.6 76.8 2.5VT Virginia 3,267.5 223.5 3,044.0 2,033.4 1,010.6 422.3 117.1 439.2 978.6 32.0VA Washington 2,408.0 195.7 2,212.3 1,440.8 771.5 312.7 103.7 318.2 734.6 37.0WA West Virginia 691.0 26.6 664.3 462.7 201.7 106.7 27.0 60.9 194.5 7.2WV Wisconsin 1,552.8 74.9 1,477.9 1,102.3 375.6 143.6 55.4 168.1 367.1 8.5WI Wyoming 210.2 14.0 196.2 124.9 71.3 26.5 14.1 27.7 68.3 3.1WY Puerto Rico 1,136.6 54.3 1,082.3 778.0 304.3 169.0 84.8 18.7 272.6 31.7PR 102 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.10 - Revenues of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Continued Basic Local Service Revenues (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) Total Non- Subject to State Interstate Access Billing and Regulated Separations Collection and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • (0.005)KS Kentucky 225.8 321.4 (95.6) (104.7) 61.8 39.9 9.2 13.8 62.8 (1.064)KY Louisiana 332.0 171.0 161.0 153.7 39.1 25.5 4.9 8.3 38.7 0.402LA Maine 8.7 4.1 4.6 (10.6) 18.3 8.2 3.2 6.5 17.9 0.361ME Maryland (128.8) 71.6 (200.5) (256.4) 110.7 46.3 18.3 45.7 110.2 0.439MD Massachusetts 329.5 14.8 314.7 202.4 114.3 31.9 18.6 62.6 113.0 1.295MA Michigan (1,324.8) (292.0) (1,032.8) (1,068.3) 135.9 90.9 24.4 19.7 135.0 0.912MI Minnesota 552.9 579.1 (26.2) (62.0) 56.2 26.7 8.5 20.7 56.0 0.249MN Mississippi 106.4 154.1 (47.7) (56.8) 25.1 16.9 3.3 4.7 24.9 0.271MS Missouri 97.0 117.1 (20.0) (52.0) 8.3 3.2 1.8 3.0 8.0 0.365MO Montana 344.2 297.6 46.6 41.6 7.4 3.6 1.6 2.2 7.4 0.020MT Nebraska 311.3 276.2 35.0 19.0 21.9 9.2 5.7 6.8 21.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 343.2 188.6 44.8 71.0 304.4 38.8 AZ Arkansas 522.6 78.8 443.9 327.1 117.7 67.2 16.0 24.5 107.7 9.9 AR California 10,469.2 2,140.4 8,328.9 6,376.2 1,968.8 878.9 362.8 493.7 1,735.4 233.4 CA Colorado 1,662.8 115.1 1,547.7 1,127.8 420.1 219.9 67.6 92.7 380.2 39.9 CO Connecticut 1,273.2 90.0 1,183.2 859.0 325.1 109.1 90.1 96.8 296.0 29.1 CT Delaware 231.2 12.2 219.0 150.7 68.3 32.4 8.8 19.1 60.3 8.1 DE District of Columbia 502.3 54.2 448.2 292.3 155.9 35.7 35.1 79.6 150.4 5.4 DC Florida 5,562.1 682.9 4,879.2 3,591.4 1,289.6 664.4 168.9 262.0 1,095.3 194.4 FL Georgia 2,722.2 404.4 2,317.8 1,648.0 674.6 322.7 86.7 158.2 567.6 106.9 GA Hawaii 439.4 79.7 359.7 276.2 83.6 38.0 11.4 20.6 70.0 13.5 HI Idaho 324.5 24.9 299.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 44.0 6.1 MT Nebraska 439.5 40.4 399.1 275.0 125.9 50.7 29.5 37.1 117.3 8.6 NE Nevada 713.8 86.0 627.8 466.5 161.6 63.9 52.3 21.4 137.6 24.1 NV New Hampshire 424.9 20.1 404.8 274.5 130.3 46.3 18.1 43.4 107.8 22.5 NH New Jersey 3,360.9 255.7 3,105.3 2,161.7 943.7 397.5 130.8 299.7 828.0 115.7 NJ New Mexico 491.4 36.4 455.0 325.3 129.8 68.3 21.1 25.4 114.8 14.9 NM New York 8,211.5 544.1 7,667.4 5,216.4 2,451.0 784.9 227.8 1,141.3 2,154.0 297.0 NY North Carolina 2,438.8 299.2 2,139.7 1,561.5 577.3 289.0 80.7 116.5 486.2 91.1 NC North Dakota 100.7 6.9 93.9 63.5 30.4 11.0 6.9 9.1 27.0 3.4 ND Ohio 3,060.5 366.9 2,693.6 2,024.3 671.5 304.7 154.4 137.3 596.4 75.1 OH Oklahoma 892.0 146.5 745.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 43.67 4.26 3.55 1964 47.0 68.0 40.0 51.26 4.40 3.97 1965 51.7 78.8 47.9 59.52 4.49 4.38 1966 56.3 85.1 51.4 70.40 5.13 5.55 1967 57.5 81.8 49.2 72.75 5.51 5.10 1968 60.7 90.6 51.2 76.42 6.18 5.90 1969 63.5 89.0 49.4 85.74 7.03 7.83 1970 61.4 78.4 44.0 91.91 8.04 7.71 1971 62.2 90.1 52.4 92.91 7.39 5.11 1972 68.3 104.5 62.6 103.40 7.21 4.73 1973 73.8 130.9 81.6 120.03 7.44 8.15 1974 72.7 142.8 91.0 139.67 8.57 9.84 1975 66.3 140.4 89.5 142.42 8.83 6.32 1976 72.4 173.8 109.6 158.44 8.43 5.34 1977 78.2 203.5 130.4 184.82 8.02 5.61 1978 82.6 238.1 154.6 216.81 8.73 7.99 1979 85.7 261.8 173.8 255.26 9.63 10.91 1980 84.1 241.4 156.6 286.40 11.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 395.2 12.9 AZ ARKANSAS 673.1 45.8 627.3 464.8 162.5 75.2 56.5 25.2 156.8 5.6 AR CALIFORNIA 11,214.6 396.5 10,818.0 8,422.6 2,395.5 1,263.9 733.1 344.4 2,341.4 54.1 CA COLORADO 1,729.7 60.9 1,668.8 1,203.2 465.6 184.4 200.0 69.7 454.1 11.5 CO CONNECTICUT 1,487.2 0.1 1,487.1 1,101.3 385.8 137.7 172.2 50.3 360.3 25.6 CT DELAWARE 277.0 43.6 233.4 151.4 82.0 21.4 32.0 14.9 68.3 13.7 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 593.3 72.5 520.8 357.7 163.1 47.5 52.8 57.0 157.3 5.8 DC FLORIDA 6,120.5 336.0 5,784.5 4,282.8 1,501.7 781.2 483.9 183.9 1,449.0 52.7 FL GEORGIA 2,780.9 111.7 2,669.2 2,007.3 661.9 305.1 215.8 122.9 643.8 18.1 GA HAWAII 579.4 104.2 475.2 341.2 134.0 62.4 52.2 14.9 129.4 4.6 HI IDAHO 407.3 20.6 386.8 254.4 132.4 54.6 55.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 66.6 SD TENNESSEE 25 2,537,096 80.3 235,612 7.5 387,601 12.3 3,160,309 87.7 TN TEXAS 57 8,768,713 77.7 1,860,194 16.5 650,277 5.8 11,279,184 94.2 TX UTAH 13 972,326 95.1 0 0.0 49,946 4.9 1,022,272 95.1 UT VERMONT 10 321,356 84.5 0 0.0 59,127 15.5 380,483 84.5 VT VIRGINIA 21 3,171,575 76.1 891,934 21.4 103,115 2.5 4,166,624 97.5 VA WASHINGTON 22 2,275,304 68.3 830,474 24.9 227,400 6.8 3,333,178 93.2 WA WEST VIRGINIA 10 775,688 83.4 0 0.0 154,723 16.6 930,411 83.4 WV WISCONSIN 89 2,135,407 67.3 463,140 14.6 574,994 18.1 3,173,541 81.9 WI WYOMING 10 226,771 83.2 0 0.0 45,880 16.8 272,651 83.2 WY UNITED STATES 1,431126,477,302 76.6% 28,401,721 17.2% 10,167,833 6.2% 165,046,856 93.8%US GUAM 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • MINNESOTA 88 2,205,811 73.7 0 0.0 787,168 26.3 2,992,979 73.7 MN MISSISSIPPI 19 1,280,362 93.5 0 0.0 89,187 6.5 1,369,549 93.5 MS MISSOURI 44 2,590,300 75.1 680,236 19.7 180,026 5.2 3,450,562 94.8 MO MONTANA 18 358,852 68.5 0 0.0 164,639 31.5 523,491 68.5 MT NEBRASKA 41 526,026 51.8 349,530 34.4 139,119 13.7 1,014,675 86.3 NE NEVADA 14 348,674 27.3 872,994 68.3 55,852 4.4 1,277,520 95.6 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 12 789,855 93.6 0 0.0 54,099 6.4 843,954 93.6 NH NEW JERSEY 3 6,252,611 96.6 212,925 3.3 9,878 0.2 6,475,414 99.8 NJ NEW MEXICO 15 786,574 85.0 46,388 5.0 92,045 10.0 925,007 90.0 NM NEW YORK 44 11,553,051 90.0 886,879 6.9 403,858 3.1 12,843,788 96.9 NY NORTH CAROLINA 26 2,459,133 49.8 2,013,685 40.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 569.3 806.6 2,834.9 89.0CA Colorado 2,062.7 129.0 1,933.7 1,370.8 563.0 261.2 122.1 163.6 546.8 16.1CO Connecticut 1,393.7 7.7 1,386.0 968.4 417.6 164.7 140.6 91.5 396.8 20.8CT Delaware 297.8 17.7 280.1 187.9 92.2 30.6 19.1 30.7 80.5 11.8DE District of Columbia 663.2 59.2 604.0 374.9 229.1 71.8 39.3 107.4 218.5 10.5DC Florida 7,273.2 638.7 6,634.5 4,799.2 1,835.3 1,030.8 359.5 376.7 1,767.0 68.3 FL Georgia 3,475.6 176.9 3,298.6 2,445.6 853.0 423.5 180.9 224.7 829.2 23.9GA Hawaii 590.7 89.6 501.1 362.4 138.7 66.0 36.0 30.3 132.3 6.4 HI Idaho 458.3 23.2 435.1 279.3 155.8 78.4 36.9 33.8 149.1 6.7 ID Illinois 4,921.5 321.6 4,599.9 3,475.4 1,124.5 507.8 242.3 311.1 1,061.2 63.3 IL Indiana 2,358.1 197.4 2,160.7 1,598.2 562.6 275.7 113.2 141.3 530.2 32.3 IN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 3.1 1.7 1.0 0.1 2.8 3.9 AZ Arkansas 522.6 78.8 443.9 328.7 116.2 66.6 15.8 23.5 105.9 145.2 AR California 10,469.2 2,140.4 8,328.9 6,372.8 1,972.3 888.9 344.6 506.1 1,739.6 2,590.3 CA Colorado 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CO Connecticut 1,273.2 90.0 1,183.2 871.3 312.9 109.8 81.0 95.2 286.0 462.2 CT Delaware 231.2 12.2 219.0 150.7 68.3 32.4 8.8 19.1 60.3 88.2 DE District of Columbia 502.3 54.2 448.2 292.3 155.9 35.7 35.1 79.6 150.4 265.1 DC Florida 5,562.1 682.8 4,879.3 3,590.7 1,290.4 665.0 170.5 261.0 1,096.5 1,528.0 FL Georgia 2,722.2 404.4 2,317.8 1,641.5 681.1 325.0 88.3 157.4 570.7 816.4 GA Hawaii 439.4 79.6 359.8 276.3 83.6 38.0 11.4 20.6 70.0 102.0 HI Idaho 73.7 5.5 68.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • 56 1000.0 479.0 35218 5937 36057 5970 0.0 0.0 92.9 CAONTARIO 46 47 69.9 927.0 17999 12158 17391 11983 0.2 0.5 100.0 CAOXNARD 63 24 50.0 549.0 12050 1792 10943 1280 0.2 0.6 99.6 CAPALMSPRINGS 36 46 50.0 207.0 5986 255 5890 259 1.2 1.4 99.4 CAPALMSPRINGS 42 52 64.41087.0 14117 859 14077 927 4.5 8.3 97.0 CAPARADISE 30 20 68.3 440.0 17736 370 17246 364 0.3 0.0 99.8 CAPORTERVILLE 61 48 74.5 811.0 21858 1330 21490 1278 0.1 0.0 100.0 CARANCHOPALOSVE44 51 224.9 451.0 13335 8016 16382 7109 0.0 0.0 79.1 CAREDDING 7 14 159.11103.0 35718 327 35198 321 0.0 0.0 99.4 CAREDDING 9 18 175.91097.0 35202 322 34666 319 0.0 0.0 99.2 CARIVERSIDE 62 69 175.0 723.0 15815 11178
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • kW to 316 kW; for WMSN-TV in Madison, Wisconsin, from 3.2 kW to at least 8.2 kW; for WUTV-TV in Buffalo, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WUHF-TV, in Rochester, New York, from 50 kW to 500 kW; for WZTV-TV in Nashville, Tennessee, from 116.6 kW to 500 kW; and for WVAH-TV in Charleston, West Virginia, from 68.3 kW to at least 460 kW. Sullivan attaches technical exhibits to show that such increases would comport with its de minimis interference standard and would cause little or no additional Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 119 interference to other stations and to provide technical details on proposed directional antenna patterns. It requests that we act on these requests in a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209956-1.pdf
  • could be effected, for example through non-disclosure agreements, although these alone may not be sufficient in cases where the recipient of such information may not have the financial viability to compensate a manufacturer if commercially sensitive information fails to be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Section 1193.43 of the Access Board's Guidelines appears to conflict with Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules. The Commission tentatively concluded that the Access Board's Guidelines "do not overlap, duplicate, or conflict with" existing Commission rules. Pursuant to Section 68.3 17 of the Commission's rules, telephones must be equipped with a receive volume control that provides a minimum of 12 dB gain and a maximum of 18 dB gain.26Section 1193.43 of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210017-1.pdf
  • goals are laudable, the Access Board's Guidelines unfortunately do not offer the level of specificity nor the level of detail required by telecommunications manufacturers.As an illustration of the problems inherent in applying the Access Board's Guidelines, one need look no fiu-ther than the Commission's HAC Rules whereby the minimum gain requirements for receivers contained in Section 1193.43 (e)4 and Section 68.3 175 of the Commission's Rules appear to be in conflict.Moreover, the Access Board's Guidelines became effective March 5, 1998 and are currently in effect, whereas compliance with the HAC requirements under Section 68.3 17, is not mandatory until January 1, 2000.6 Because the Guidelines lack specificity and may conflict with existing Commission Rules, the Commission should provide sufficient clarification. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • FCC 99-141 60 We note that signals could, in theory, be transported within multiple tenant environments by means of wireless technology, perhaps using unlicensed spectrum. We are not aware, however, that such wireless transport is in fact occurring on a significant scale. Furthermore, even wireless in-building transport would presumably require the installation of some facilities. 61 See 47 C.F.R. § 68.3 (defining several different options by which the demarcation point between telephone company facilities and subscriber facilities may be determined). The rules for determining control over telephone wiring are to be distinguished from the cable inside wiring rules, which are used to determine the disposition of cable inside wiring when a provider no longer has a legally enforceable right to remain
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99245.pdf
  • 9-10; WCA Comments II at 4. PAGE 30 claims that the following generation of GPS chips yields still better accuracy in all environments.95 Lucent claims its handset-based, network-assisted GPS technology can provide accuracy of 15 feet outdoors and 100 feet within buildings.96 In a trial in Denver, SnapTrack reported accuracy of 4 to 84 meters, depending on the environment, for 68.3 percent of calls for its own handset-based, network-assisted GPS technology and has proposed an accuracy standard of 90 meters at 67 percent Circular Error of Probability (CEP).97 Providers of network-based technologies also report improved accuracy. KSI states that its network-based approach can do better than the current accuracy requirements and has suggested a 100 meter accuracy standard.98 U.S. Wireless is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • the demarcation point on reconsideration of the 1990 Demarcation Point Order and Further NPRM. The Commission clarified that the relocation of the demarcation point to the MPOE cannot be undertaken unilaterally by the incumbent LEC without the property owner's consent, except in the case of major modifications, renovations, or rearrangements. The Commission further stated that, for the purposes of Section 68.3, a request for relocation by the property owner would be considered a major modification or rearrangement of the wiring. The 1997 Demarcation Point Order also included a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that requested comment on, among other issues, proposed modifications to the demarcation point rule. Two petitions for clarification and reconsideration were filed in response to issues discussed on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • an average growth rate, we have calculated an average of these projections. According to this average figure, the mobile telephone market's total penetration rate would grow at a compound annual average growth rate of approximately 14.7 percent over the next five years and the market would have over 114 million subscribers by the end of 2002. Cellular operators would have 68.3 percent of these subscribers, broadband PCS operators 25.8 percent, and digital SMR operators 5.9 percent. This level of subscribership would translate into a national penetration rate of over 41 percent by the end of 2002. An important trend to note is that all of the projections assume that the new entrants would gain an increasing percentage of each year's incremental
• http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.txt http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hacrules.wp
  • 1. The authority citation for Part 68 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 1, 4, 5, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 155, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602, 610. 2. Section 68.3 is amended by adding the following definition to the terms used in Part 68: * * * * * Hearing aid compatible: Except as used at §§ 68.4(a)(3) and 68.414 of these rules, the terms hearing aid compatible or hearing aid compatibility are used as defined in § 68.316, unless it is specifically stated that hearing aid compatibility volume control,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238187A1.html
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (V/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 348 V/m to 887 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules.3 (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 V/m at a distance of 3 meters. On May
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238198A1.html
  • signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 microvolts per meter (V/m) at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage, in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from 165 V/m to 983 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's cumulative leakage index (``CLI'') at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed cumulative signal leakage performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules.3 (See Attachment A.) III. DISCUSSION 3. Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules requires cable operators to limit signal leakage in the frequency band from 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz to 20 V/m at a distance of 3 meters. On July
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-276800A1.html
  • frequency of 127.2625 MHz at the following locations: Frequency Signal Strength Date Location (MHz) (uV/m) 405806 N 0783025 W 08/14/07 127.2625 86.8 1175 Bloomington Avenue 405905 N 0783015 W 08/14/07 127.2625 141.5 pole # 73693 on Route T459. 405724 N 0783024 W 08/14/07 127.2625 129.3 intersection of Route T454 and T457 (Ed Bloom Road) 405804 N 0783020 W 08/16/07 127.2625 68.3 about 30 feet East of Stop Sign at Intersection of Routes T459 and T454. 405808 N 0783135 W 08/16/07 127.2625 117.3 pole 73774 at 631 Schofield Street. 405939 N 0783140 W 08/16/07 127.2625 40.1 428 Walnut Street 3. Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, Atlantic Broadband must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3408A1.html
  • agent found that at 31 locations cable signal leakage on the frequency 121.2625 MHz significantly exceeded 20 V/m at a distance of at least three meters from each leakage in violation of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Rules. The measured leaks ranged from165 V/m to 983 V/m. Based on these measurements, the agent calculated the system's CLI at a value of 68.3, exceeding the allowed CLI performance criteria of 64, in violation of Section 76.611(a)(1) of the Rules. 5. On July 25, 2002, the Atlanta Office issued an Order to Cease Operations, pursuant to Section 76.613(c) of the Rules.13 The system resumed normal operation on July 26, 2002, after being brought into compliance. The Atlanta Office issued a NAL on September 3,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
  • to provide both cable service and a non-cable service, such as high-speed Internet access). Response at 6, 12, PP 14, 43-44. The Commission's rules define "Terminal equipment" as: "[C]ommunications equipment located on the customer's premises at the end of a communications link, used to permit the stations involved to accomplish the provision of telecommunications or information services." 47 C.F.R. S 68.3. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. S 68.100 ("[T]erminal equipment may be directly connected to the public switched telephone network, including private line services provided over wireline facilities that are owned by providers of wireline telecommunications.") (emphasis added); 47 C.F.R. 68.106(a) ("Customers connecting terminal equipment or protective circuitry to the public switched telephone network shall, upon request of the provider of wireline
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-29A2.pdf
  • 6 1 9 See Appendix B 30 29Cleveland 67.8 4 0 11 1 1 0 11 Spectrum Limited 31 30Salt Lake City-Ogden- 74.8 29 0 11 0 0 0 46 Spectrum Limited 32 33Las Vegas 79.7 26 0 10 2 2 0 39 Spectrum Limited 33 32Kansas City 61.3 9 0 8 8 3 0 24 Spectrum Limited 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 12 9 2 19 See Appendix B 35 36Columbus, OH 75.1 8 5 13 5 5 1 10 Spectrum Limited 36 38Austin 69.7 16 3 11 10 6 0 27 Spectrum Limited 37 35San Jose 76.3 8 0 7 3 3 0 0 Spectrum Limited - see Mkt. 4 38 37Milwaukee-Racine 83.6 2 0 9 7 6
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-29A3.pdf
  • 26 26Riverside-San Bernardino 52.0 20 5 8 N/A N/A 2 21 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 27 27Sacramento 76.9 17 5 9 3 3 0 50 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 28 31San Antonio 78.7 11 0 11 8 6 0 23 Spectrum Limited (20 min.) 29 28Cincinnati 66.7 5 3 18 N/A N/A 1 9 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 34 34Orlando 68.3 6 2 5 N/A N/A 0 19 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 43 42Raleigh-Durham 63.7 18 2 9 N/A N/A 1 16 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 45 44Nashville 65.9 15 2 12 N/A N/A 0 55 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 46 45Greensboro-Winston-Salem- 66.7 19 4 11 N/A N/A 0 26 Spectrum Available (30 min.) 48 48Oklahoma City 71.4 19 0 13
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-bc/can-dtv.pdf
  • 14 21SURING WI 444400 881525 1000 201 50 201 7 40WAUSAU WI 445514 894131 316 369 836 369 9 29WAUSAU WI 445514 894131 316 369669.8 369 20 24WAUSAU WI 445514 894131 1450 300 50 300 55 0WITTENBERG WI 450333 892610 5000 283 0 0 8 41CHARLESTON WV 382428 815413 158 372 1000 372 11 19CHARLESTON WV 382515 815527 51.3 525 68.3 525 29 39CHARLESTON WV 382812 814635 5000 368 50 212 12 52CLARKSBURG WV 391706 801946 263 262 1000 262 46 28CLARKSBURG WV 391802 802037 155 244 50 244 3 23HUNTINGTON WV 383034 821309 42.7 388425.5 388 13 54HUNTINGTON WV 383021 821233 141 387412.4 387 60 12MARTINSBURG WV 392727 780353 2040 300 3.2 312 24 33MORGANTOWN WV 394145 794545 3020 457139.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 13.6 -53.4 Mexico 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 41.8 0.4 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 6720.7 Netherlands 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 3.0 -80.9 Nigeria 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.6 1.1 68.3 Pakistan 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 0.9 -51.3 Peru 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 4.1 5.2 7.0 10.3 5.1 5.0 2.2 -58.5 Philippines 3.5 3.9 4.9 6.0 8.9 13.7 17.6 14.3 14.2 9.8 8.5 -38.3 Poland 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 54.2 Russia 1.2 5.7 6.8 12.4 11.0 13.3 7.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
  • 0.0100.0 United States (conterminous) $1,592,004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $3,127,990 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 122,490,604 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 North and Central America $2,420,234,247 0.021.7 1.119.7 57.5 $190,318,159 0.011.3 0.026.9 61.8 $86,586,705 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 41,002,252,107 0.0 8.5 0.921.3 69.3 Argentina $43,928,555 0.021.2 0.329.1 49.4 $2,063,163 0.011.8 0.019.9 68.2 $13,661,053 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 809,753,384 0.0 3.5 0.627.6 68.3 Bolivia $16,042,894 0.010.7 0.636.3 52.4 $727,108 0.0 2.9 0.010.5 86.6 $1,633,489 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 210,675,087 0.0 5.5 0.639.1 54.9 Brazil $112,308,606 0.037.1 0.221.3 41.4 $5,393,851 0.023.4 0.020.7 55.8 $3,758,855 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,385,707,119 0.022.7 0.626.3 50.5 Chile $24,246,148 0.031.3 1.920.8 46.1 $3,354,523 0.0 5.5 0.043.5 51.0 $1,472,495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 406,269,136 0.013.0 5.326.7 55.0 Colombia $135,099,502 0.029.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/TCB-part-68-list.pdf
  • Order, FCC 00-400. 2 See "Sponsor of the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachment", 47 C.F.R. §68.68.602. 3 See "Connection to the Public Switched Telephone Network", 47 C.F.R. §68.201. 4 See "Designation of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs)", 47 C.F.R. §68.160, and "Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies", §68.162. 5 See "Supplier's Declaration of Conformity requirements", 47 C.F.R §68.324. 6 See 47 C.F.R. §68.3, Responsible Party. - 2 - List of Recognized Telecommunications Certification Bodies Scope C ­ Telephone Terminal Equipment The following is a list of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs) recognized by the FCC to perform equipment authorizations under Scope C ­ Telephone Terminal Equipment: ORGANIZATION ADDRESS CONTACT INFO Canada Nemko Canada Inc. 303 River Road Ottawa, Ontario K1V 1H2 Canada Stuart Beck
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/part68faqs.pdf
  • FCC will conduct a de novo review, and rule on technical merit. 7. As a supplier of TE, how do I obtain TE approval? The FCC permitted TE suppliers who provide Terminal Equipment for connection to the PSTN, or to wireline carrier-owned facilities used to provide private line services, and who are "responsible parties" as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 68.3, to obtain TE approval in two ways. Suppliers can obtain certification from private Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs). Alternatively, suppliers may declare their own TE to conform to applicable technical criteria using the Suppliers Declaration of Conformity (SDoC), as defined in the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) Guide 22 and FCC Part 68. In either case, the TE must
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/Depreciation0904.doc
  • 2114 TOOLS & OTHER WK EQPT 2,753,742 1,434,826 52.1 1,210,939 44.0 (223,887) -8.1 2121 BUILDINGS 26,826,213 7,193,276 26.8 7,118,375 26.5 (74,901) -0.3 2122 FURNITURE 72,956 54,014 74.0 46,637 63.9 (7,377) -10.1 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT 326,434 292,455 89.6 193,531 59.3 (98,924) -30.3 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUNICATION EQ 494,880 398,925 80.6 283,183 57.2 (115,742) -23.4 2124 GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTERS 6,547,644 5,405,329 82.6 4,470,227 68.3 (935,102) -14.3 2211 ANALOG SWITCHING 1,033,546 1,174,487 113.6 804,170 77.8 (370,318) -35.8 2212 DIGITAL SWITCHING 60,533,171 32,952,478 54.4 29,532,987 48.8 (3,419,491) -5.6 2220 OPERATOR SYSTEMS 590,391 320,274 54.2 348,507 59.0 28,233 4.8 2231 RADIO SYSTEMS 596,333 480,754 80.6 402,983 67.6 (77,771) -13.0 2232 CIRCUIT - COMBINED 20,877,353 14,584,037 69.9 11,784,767 56.4 (2,799,270) -13.4 2232.1 CIRCUIT - DDS 422,217 407,807 96.6