FCC Web Documents citing 68.215
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.txt
- of harm. 68.110 Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment. 68.112 Hearing aid-compatibility. 68.160 Designation of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) 68.162 Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies Subpart C-Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.211 Terminal equipment approval revocation procedures. 68.213 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' non-system simple customer premises wiring. 68.215 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' system premises wiring that serves more than four subscriber access lines. 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. 68.224 Notice of non-hearing aid compatibility. Subpart D-Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval 68.300 Approval of terminal equipment for connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.316 Hearing aid compatibility: technical requirements. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
- Commission did not identify any proprietary concerns associated with NIDs.461 No parties in this proceeding identify any proprietary concerns associated with the NID, and we find none. We therefore apply the "impair" standard of section 251(d)(2)(A) to determine whether NIDs are subject to the unbundling obligations of the Act. c. Unbundling Analysis 458 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.3, 68.104, 68.213, 68.215. 459 See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34; Choice One Joint Comments at 19; KMC Comments at 18; MCI WorldCom Comments at 45, 47; MGC Comments at 19; Qwest Comments at 67. 460 See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34-35; CompTel Comments at 36. 461 In the Local Competition First Report and Order, the Commission concluded that incumbent LECs must
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
- of harm. 68.110 Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment. 68.112 Hearing aid-compatibility. 68.160 Designation of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) 68.162 Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies Subpart C-Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.211 Terminal equipment approval revocation procedures. 68.213 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' non-system simple customer premises wiring. 68.215 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' system premises wiring that serves more than four subscriber access lines. 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. 68.224 Notice of non-hearing aid compatibility. Subpart D-Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval 68.300 Approval of terminal equipment for connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.316 Hearing aid compatibility: technical requirements. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
- 81-216, Report and Order, 97 F.C.C.2d 527 (1984), stay denied, FCC 84-5684 (rel. Nov. 20, 1984), recon. granted in part, 50 Fed. Reg. 29384 (1985); Detariffing the Installation and Maintenance of Inside Wiring, CC Docket No. 79-105, Second Report and Order, 51 Fed. Reg. 8498 (1986), recon. granted in part, 1 FCC Rcd. 1190 (1986); see 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.213, 68.215. 35 or all circumstances, from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners.160 We also request comment on whether we should adopt any such rule in addition to any building owner nondiscriminatory access requirement. We seek comment on whether we have the authority to forbid common carriers from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners or managers under section 201 of
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
- have generally done so by referencing such standards by specific title, number and year in our rules. Accordingly one alternative is a deregulatory paradigm that involves referencing industry standards specifically in our Part 68 rules. Such specific references, however, must be updated through a rulemaking proceeding to reflect a newer version of any given standard. For example, in sections 68.3, 68.215(d)(4) and 68.317(a) of our current rules, we reference specific industry standards rather than including the entire technical description in our rules. Commenters indicate that this procedure, while removing technical criteria from our rules, nevertheless creates a ``bottleneck'' as the referenced standards may become obsolete and the reference must be updated in a rulemaking proceeding. The delay caused by the need
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
- 20; Net2000 Comments at 12-13; Rhythms Comments at 18. See, e.g., Cable and Wireless Comments at 34-35; Choice One Joint Comments at 19; CoreComm Comments at 31. As we discuss at Section (V)(A) supra, where we define the loop, the loop may terminate at the NID, before the NID, or beyond the NID. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.3, 68.104, 68.213, 68.215. See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34; Choice One Joint Comments at 19; KMC Comments at 18; MCI WorldCom Comments at 45, 47; MGC Comments at 19; Qwest Comments at 67. See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34-35; CompTel Comments at 36. In the Local Competition First Report and Order, the Commission concluded that incumbent LECs must offer unbundled access
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
- of harm. 68.110 Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment. 68.112 Hearing aid-compatibility. 68.160 Designation of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) 68.162 Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies Subpart C-Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.211 Terminal equipment approval revocation procedures. 68.213 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' non-system simple customer premises wiring. 68.215 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' system premises wiring that serves more than four subscriber access lines. 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. 68.224 Notice of non-hearing aid compatibility. Subpart D-Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval 68.300 Approval of terminal equipment for connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.316 Hearing aid compatibility: technical requirements. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.txt
- provided under the local telephone company's reasonable and non-discriminatory standard operating practices." 1985 Order, 97 FCC 2d at 566. The telephone company protector is a device designed to protect equipment, buildings, and persons by preventing the transmission of hazardous voltages through the telephone line. Hazardous voltages can result from lightning or power surges. 47 C.F.R. § 68.213(a). 47 C.F.R. § 68.215. See Deployment of Wireline services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, Third Report and Order, CC Docket No. 98-147, and Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Fourth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-98, FCC 99-355, (Adopted Nov. 19, 1999), at para. 4 (``we adopt measures to promote the availability of competitive broadband . . .
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
- 81-216, Report and Order, 97 F.C.C.2d 527 (1984), stay denied, FCC 84-5684 (rel. Nov. 20, 1984), recon. granted in part, 50 Fed. Reg. 29384 (1985); Detariffing the Installation and Maintenance of Inside Wiring, CC Docket No. 79-105, Second Report and Order, 51 Fed. Reg. 8498 (1986), recon. granted in part, 1 FCC Rcd. 1190 (1986); see 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.213, 68.215. 35 or all circumstances, from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners.160 We also request comment on whether we should adopt any such rule in addition to any building owner nondiscriminatory access requirement. We seek comment on whether we have the authority to forbid common carriers from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners or managers under section 201 of
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.txt
- of harm. 68.110 Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment. 68.112 Hearing aid-compatibility. 68.160 Designation of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) 68.162 Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies Subpart C-Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.211 Terminal equipment approval revocation procedures. 68.213 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' non-system simple customer premises wiring. 68.215 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' system premises wiring that serves more than four subscriber access lines. 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. 68.224 Notice of non-hearing aid compatibility. Subpart D-Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval 68.300 Approval of terminal equipment for connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.316 Hearing aid compatibility: technical requirements. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
- Commission did not identify any proprietary concerns associated with NIDs.461 No parties in this proceeding identify any proprietary concerns associated with the NID, and we find none. We therefore apply the "impair" standard of section 251(d)(2)(A) to determine whether NIDs are subject to the unbundling obligations of the Act. c. Unbundling Analysis 458 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.3, 68.104, 68.213, 68.215. 459 See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34; Choice One Joint Comments at 19; KMC Comments at 18; MCI WorldCom Comments at 45, 47; MGC Comments at 19; Qwest Comments at 67. 460 See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34-35; CompTel Comments at 36. 461 In the Local Competition First Report and Order, the Commission concluded that incumbent LECs must
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
- of harm. 68.110 Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment. 68.112 Hearing aid-compatibility. 68.160 Designation of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) 68.162 Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies Subpart C-Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.211 Terminal equipment approval revocation procedures. 68.213 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' non-system simple customer premises wiring. 68.215 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' system premises wiring that serves more than four subscriber access lines. 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. 68.224 Notice of non-hearing aid compatibility. Subpart D-Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval 68.300 Approval of terminal equipment for connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.316 Hearing aid compatibility: technical requirements. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
- 81-216, Report and Order, 97 F.C.C.2d 527 (1984), stay denied, FCC 84-5684 (rel. Nov. 20, 1984), recon. granted in part, 50 Fed. Reg. 29384 (1985); Detariffing the Installation and Maintenance of Inside Wiring, CC Docket No. 79-105, Second Report and Order, 51 Fed. Reg. 8498 (1986), recon. granted in part, 1 FCC Rcd. 1190 (1986); see 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.213, 68.215. 35 or all circumstances, from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners.160 We also request comment on whether we should adopt any such rule in addition to any building owner nondiscriminatory access requirement. We seek comment on whether we have the authority to forbid common carriers from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners or managers under section 201 of
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
- have generally done so by referencing such standards by specific title, number and year in our rules. Accordingly one alternative is a deregulatory paradigm that involves referencing industry standards specifically in our Part 68 rules. Such specific references, however, must be updated through a rulemaking proceeding to reflect a newer version of any given standard. For example, in sections 68.3, 68.215(d)(4) and 68.317(a) of our current rules, we reference specific industry standards rather than including the entire technical description in our rules. Commenters indicate that this procedure, while removing technical criteria from our rules, nevertheless creates a ``bottleneck'' as the referenced standards may become obsolete and the reference must be updated in a rulemaking proceeding. The delay caused by the need
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
- 20; Net2000 Comments at 12-13; Rhythms Comments at 18. See, e.g., Cable and Wireless Comments at 34-35; Choice One Joint Comments at 19; CoreComm Comments at 31. As we discuss at Section (V)(A) supra, where we define the loop, the loop may terminate at the NID, before the NID, or beyond the NID. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.3, 68.104, 68.213, 68.215. See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34; Choice One Joint Comments at 19; KMC Comments at 18; MCI WorldCom Comments at 45, 47; MGC Comments at 19; Qwest Comments at 67. See Cable & Wireless Comments at 34-35; CompTel Comments at 36. In the Local Competition First Report and Order, the Commission concluded that incumbent LECs must offer unbundled access
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
- of harm. 68.110 Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment. 68.112 Hearing aid-compatibility. 68.160 Designation of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) 68.162 Requirements for Telecommunications Certification Bodies Subpart C-Terminal Equipment Approval Procedures 68.201 Connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.211 Terminal equipment approval revocation procedures. 68.213 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' non-system simple customer premises wiring. 68.215 Installation of other than ``fully protected'' system premises wiring that serves more than four subscriber access lines. 68.218 Responsibility of the party acquiring equipment authorization. 68.224 Notice of non-hearing aid compatibility. Subpart D-Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval 68.300 Approval of terminal equipment for connection to the public switched telephone network. 68.316 Hearing aid compatibility: technical requirements. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc99405.txt
- provided under the local telephone company's reasonable and non-discriminatory standard operating practices." 1985 Order, 97 FCC 2d at 566. The telephone company protector is a device designed to protect equipment, buildings, and persons by preventing the transmission of hazardous voltages through the telephone line. Hazardous voltages can result from lightning or power surges. 47 C.F.R. § 68.213(a). 47 C.F.R. § 68.215. See Deployment of Wireline services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, Third Report and Order, CC Docket No. 98-147, and Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Fourth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-98, FCC 99-355, (Adopted Nov. 19, 1999), at para. 4 (``we adopt measures to promote the availability of competitive broadband . . .
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
- 81-216, Report and Order, 97 F.C.C.2d 527 (1984), stay denied, FCC 84-5684 (rel. Nov. 20, 1984), recon. granted in part, 50 Fed. Reg. 29384 (1985); Detariffing the Installation and Maintenance of Inside Wiring, CC Docket No. 79-105, Second Report and Order, 51 Fed. Reg. 8498 (1986), recon. granted in part, 1 FCC Rcd. 1190 (1986); see 47 C.F.R. §§ 68.213, 68.215. 35 or all circumstances, from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners.160 We also request comment on whether we should adopt any such rule in addition to any building owner nondiscriminatory access requirement. We seek comment on whether we have the authority to forbid common carriers from entering into exclusive contracts with building owners or managers under section 201 of