FCC Web Documents citing 64.2008

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the terms
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.txt
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1321A1.pdf
  • ÿNotification before use of CPNI oNotification generally ßPrior to anysolicitation for customer approval, a telecommunications carrier must provide notification to the customer of the customer's right to restrict use of, disclosure of, and access to that customer's CPNI. ßIndividual notice to customers must be provided when soliciting approval to use, disclose, or permit access to customers' CPNI. [47 C.F.R. § 64.2008] oContent of Notice ßCustomer notification must provide sufficient information to enable the customer to make an informed decisionas to whether to permit a carrier to use, disclose, or permit access to, the customer's CPNI. The notification must state that the customer has a right, and the carrier has a duty, under federal law, to protect the confidentiality of CPNI. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • customer's CPNI, establishes the methods for providing and the required content of such notice, and requires carriers to maintain records of this notification for at least one year. Need: These rules further Congress' goals of fostering competition in telecommunications markets and ensuring the privacy of customer information. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 218, 222, 254(k). Section Number and Title: 64.2008 Notice required for use of customer proprietary network information. Brief Description: This rule establishes safeguards that carriers must implement to ensure compliance with the Commission's CPNI regulations, including specific record keeping, personnel training, and disciplinary, compliance and certification processes. Need: These rules further Congress' goals of fostering competition in telecommunications markets and ensuring the privacy of customer information. Legal Basis:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.txt
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the terms
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.txt
  • See, e.g., NAAG Comment at 6. See supra para. 3. See also CAN-SPAM Act, Section 2(a)(1) through (3) and (6), 15 U.S.C.§ 7701(a)(1) through (3) and (6). See NAAG Comment at 5-6 (indicating a need for disclosures), Consumers Union Comment at 2 (contending that express prior authorization should include clear disclosure requirements). See CPNI Order, para. 89, 47 C.F.R. § 64.2008(c)(4)-(c)(5). See also Verizon Wireless Comment at 7 (contending that authorization notice should be conspicuous and easily understood by consumers). This authorization cannot be bundled with other authorizations such as, building upon the example above, authorization for someone to receive notification from their mechanic that their car is fixed. Similarly, the authorization cannot be bundled with advertising. For example, it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.txt
  • In part because ``CPNI'' is not a term with which most customers are familiar, we seek comment on whether the notifications carriers provide subscribers regarding the use and disclosure of CPNI are written clearly enough so that customers adequately understand that the notices concern the privacy of personal telephone records and the scope of disclosure authorized. We note that section 64.2008(c) of the Commission's rules requires that customer notifications be comprehensible and not be misleading. We seek comment on what changes to our rules, if any, are necessary to ensure that customers fully understand what personal records telecommunications carriers seek permission to use and/or disclose. Should the Commission adopt any additional reporting requirements related to the disclosure of CPNI? As noted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 64.2005(a). . (modifying this disclosure requirement to require customer opt-in consent). A customer is deemed to have provided ``opt-out approval'' if that customer has been given appropriate notification of the carrier's request for consent consistent with the Commission's rules and the customer has failed to object to such use or disclosure within the waiting period described in section 64.2008(d)(1) of the Commission's rules, a minimum of 30 days. 47 C.F.R. § 64.2003(i); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2008(d)(1). Under the Commission's rules, carriers must also receive a customer's opt-out approval before intra-company use of CPNI beyond the total service approach. 47 U.S.C. § 64.2005(a), (b). Except as required by law, carriers may not disclose CPNI to third parties, or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-16A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. 2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-16A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. 2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the terms
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.txt
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1321A1.pdf
  • ÿNotification before use of CPNI oNotification generally ßPrior to anysolicitation for customer approval, a telecommunications carrier must provide notification to the customer of the customer's right to restrict use of, disclosure of, and access to that customer's CPNI. ßIndividual notice to customers must be provided when soliciting approval to use, disclose, or permit access to customers' CPNI. [47 C.F.R. § 64.2008] oContent of Notice ßCustomer notification must provide sufficient information to enable the customer to make an informed decisionas to whether to permit a carrier to use, disclose, or permit access to, the customer's CPNI. The notification must state that the customer has a right, and the carrier has a duty, under federal law, to protect the confidentiality of CPNI. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • customer's CPNI, establishes the methods for providing and the required content of such notice, and requires carriers to maintain records of this notification for at least one year. Need: These rules further Congress' goals of fostering competition in telecommunications markets and ensuring the privacy of customer information. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 218, 222, 254(k). Section Number and Title: 64.2008 Notice required for use of customer proprietary network information. Brief Description: This rule establishes safeguards that carriers must implement to ensure compliance with the Commission's CPNI regulations, including specific record keeping, personnel training, and disciplinary, compliance and certification processes. Need: These rules further Congress' goals of fostering competition in telecommunications markets and ensuring the privacy of customer information. Legal Basis:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.txt
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the terms
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.txt
  • See, e.g., NAAG Comment at 6. See supra para. 3. See also CAN-SPAM Act, Section 2(a)(1) through (3) and (6), 15 U.S.C.§ 7701(a)(1) through (3) and (6). See NAAG Comment at 5-6 (indicating a need for disclosures), Consumers Union Comment at 2 (contending that express prior authorization should include clear disclosure requirements). See CPNI Order, para. 89, 47 C.F.R. § 64.2008(c)(4)-(c)(5). See also Verizon Wireless Comment at 7 (contending that authorization notice should be conspicuous and easily understood by consumers). This authorization cannot be bundled with other authorizations such as, building upon the example above, authorization for someone to receive notification from their mechanic that their car is fixed. Similarly, the authorization cannot be bundled with advertising. For example, it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.txt
  • In part because ``CPNI'' is not a term with which most customers are familiar, we seek comment on whether the notifications carriers provide subscribers regarding the use and disclosure of CPNI are written clearly enough so that customers adequately understand that the notices concern the privacy of personal telephone records and the scope of disclosure authorized. We note that section 64.2008(c) of the Commission's rules requires that customer notifications be comprehensible and not be misleading. We seek comment on what changes to our rules, if any, are necessary to ensure that customers fully understand what personal records telecommunications carriers seek permission to use and/or disclose. Should the Commission adopt any additional reporting requirements related to the disclosure of CPNI? As noted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 64.2005(a). . (modifying this disclosure requirement to require customer opt-in consent). A customer is deemed to have provided ``opt-out approval'' if that customer has been given appropriate notification of the carrier's request for consent consistent with the Commission's rules and the customer has failed to object to such use or disclosure within the waiting period described in section 64.2008(d)(1) of the Commission's rules, a minimum of 30 days. 47 C.F.R. § 64.2003(i); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2008(d)(1). Under the Commission's rules, carriers must also receive a customer's opt-out approval before intra-company use of CPNI beyond the total service approach. 47 U.S.C. § 64.2005(a), (b). Except as required by law, carriers may not disclose CPNI to third parties, or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-16A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. 2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find