FCC Web Documents citing 64.2007

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.pdf
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. (``Cbeyond''). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``the Act'') and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information (``CPNI''). The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, the Bureau
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.pdf
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``Bureau'') and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.2007. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be served by
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf
  • the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.txt
  • and Other Customer Information: Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115 & 96-149 at ¶ 7 & n.23, Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Sept. 7, 2001) (finding that the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect with the exception of Section 64.2007(c)). Qwest currently has authority to offer electronic reverse directory services pursuant to a wavier granted by the Commission for electronic white pages. U S West CEI Waiver, 11 FCC Rcd at 1195. SBC Petition at 2. SBC notes in its petition (at 2 n.1) that SNET may not be covered by the Commission's CEI requirements because SNET was not a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.txt
  • Other Customer Information: Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115 & 96-149, Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 16506, 16510, para. 7 & n.23 (2001) (finding that the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect with the exception of Section 64.2007(c)). 47 U.S.C. § 271. 47 U.S.C. § 271(g)(4). See Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Section 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket No. 96-149, Order on Remand, 16 FCC Rcd 9751, 9754-55, para. 8 (2001). 47 U.S.C. § 272(a)(2)(B)(i), (a)(2)(C). 47 U.S.C. § 272(f)(2); see also Request for Extension of the Sunset Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.txt
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.txt
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. (``Cbeyond''). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``the Act'') and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information (``CPNI''). The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, the Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1321A1.pdf
  • its customer's individuallyidentifiable CPNI, for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer, to its agents and its affiliates that provide communications-related services. ßA telecommunications carrier mayalso permit such persons or entities to obtain access to such CPNI for such purposes. oExceptfor use and disclosure of CPNI that is permitted without customer approval, or as otherwise described in section 64.2007(b) or otherwise provided in section 222, a telecommunications carrier mayonlyuse, disclose, or permit access to its customer's individuallyidentifiable CPNI subject to opt-in approval. oA telecommunications carrier mayobtain approval through written, oral or electronic methods. 5 ßA telecommunications carrier relying on oral approval shall bear the burden of demonstrating that such approval has been given in compliance with the Commission's rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • the customer's approval or disapproval in effect until the customer revokes or limits it; and requires carriers to maintain records of customer approval for at least one year. Need: These rules further Congress' goals of fostering competition in telecommunications markets and ensuring the privacy of customer information. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 218, 222, 254(k). Section Number and Title: 64.2007 Approval required for use of customer proprietary network information. Brief Description: This rule requires carriers to provide notice to customers of their right to restrict the use of, disclosure of, and access to the customer's CPNI, establishes the methods for providing and the required content of such notice, and requires carriers to maintain records of this notification for at least
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.txt
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.txt
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``Bureau'') and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.2007. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be served by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.txt
  • the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.txt
  • opt-in customer approval. Had the court intended to take the unusual step of vacating portions of the order and rules not before it, we believe it would have said so explicitly. Accordingly, we conclude that the court sought to eliminate only the specific section of our rules that was before it, and that its vacatur order applied only to Section 64.2007(c), the only provision inextricably tied to the opt-in mechanism. The remainder of the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect. In reaching this determination, we note that Section 64.2007 contains customer notification requirements, which are needed regardless of whether an opt-in or opt-out regime is in effect. These requirements, set forth in paragraph (f) of this rule, ensure that a carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.txt
  • of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115, 96-149, Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 16506, 16510, para. 7 and n.23 (rel. Sept. 7, 2001) (CPNI Clarification Order) (finding that the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect following US West with the exception of Section 64.2007(c)). CPNI is information derived from the telecommunications carriers' provision of telecommunications services and includes information concerning where, when, and to whom a customer places a call, as well as the types of service offerings to which the customer subscribes and the extent to which the service is used. See Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers' Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.txt
  • the boundaries of a customer's implied consent concerning use of CPNI); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2005(a). Except as required by law, carriers may not disclose CPNI to third parties or their own affiliates that do not provide communications-related services unless the consumer has given ``opt in'' consent, which is express written, oral, or electronic consent. 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2005(b), 64.2007(b)(3); 64.2008(e); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2003(h) (defining ``opt-in approval''). Under the Commission's current rules, carriers must receive a customer's opt-out approval before intra-company use of CPNI beyond the total service approach, and before disclosing CPNI to affiliates and joint venture partners that provide communications-related services. 47 U.S.C. § 64.2005(a), (b); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2005(b)(1). A customer is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.txt
  • service as that term is defined in section 9.3 of these rules, may use CPNI, without customer approval, to market services formerly known as adjunct-to-basic services, such as, but not limited to, speed dialing, computer-provided directory assistance, call monitoring, call tracing, call blocking, call return, repeat dialing, call tracking, call waiting, caller I.D., call forwarding, and certain centrex features. Section 64.2007 is amended by deleting paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3), and revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: (b) Use of Opt-Out and Opt-In Approval Processes. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or opt-in approval, use its customer's individually identifiable CPNI for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.txt
  • the time, location, or duration of any call and, for inbound calls, the number from which the call was placed, and the time, location, or duration of any call.'' Id. at 6936, para. 13 n.45. Id. at 6933, para. 12. Id at 6937-39, paras. 15-17. Id. at 6940-41, paras. 20-22. Id. at 6942, 6943-45, paras. 24, 26-32. 47 C.F.R. § 64.2007(b); see also EPIC CPNI Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 6947-53, paras. 37-49 (finding that new circumstances - including the growing illicit demand for personal information, the significant harm that can result from breaches of confidentiality, and the increasing risk of disclosure - ``force us to reassess our existing regulations''). EPIC CPNI Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 6954-57, paras. 54-59. The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4090A1.html
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. ("Cbeyond"). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("the Act") and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information ("CPNI"). 2. The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-16A1.html
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. 2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1118A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("Bureau") and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2007. 2. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99223.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99223.txt
  • gained from another carrier in marketing efforts.17 (e) We address various aspects of a customer's approval to use CPNI consistent with section 222. We also grandfather a limited set of pre-existing notifications to use CPNI and adopt the conclusions reached in the Common Carrier Bureau's Clarification Order.18 We also eliminate, in an effort to reduce confusion and regulatory micro-management, section 64.2007(f)(4) of our rules, which requires a carrier's solicitation for approval, if written, to be on the same document as the carrier's notification.19 Further, we affirm our decision to exercise our preemption authority on a case-by-case basis for state rules that conflict with our own.20 (f) We lessen the regulatory burden of various CPNI safeguards while continuing to require that carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980828.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980828.wp
  • Prisbrey at (202) 418-7400. CC 96-115; PN 8/7/98; DA 98-1582 Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Petition for Waiver of Customer Proprietary Network Information Rules - CC Docket No. 96-115 0 On July 20, 1998, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control filed a petition seeking a waiver of the Customer Proprietary Network Information requirements contained in 47 C.F.R. section 64.2007(2)iii and v, which prohibit the transfer of CPNI without affirmative customer consent. Comments due August 24, 1998*; replies due September 1, 1998. Contact: Janice Myles, Policy and Program Planning at (202) 418-1577. CC 98-147, CC 98-11, CC 98-26, CC 98-32, CC 98-78, CC 98-91; MO&O and NPRM 8/7/98; FCC 98-188 Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability The Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980810.html
  • Jeff Prisbrey (202) 418-7400. Internet URL: [15]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981 587.pdf Released: August 7, 1998. PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON PETITION FOR WAIVER OF CUSTOMER PROPRIETARY NETWORK INFORMATION RULES - CC DOCKET NO. 96-115.On July 20, 1998, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control filed a peititon seeking a waiver of the Customer Proprietary Network Information requirements contained in 47 C.F.R. section 64.2007(2)iii and v, which prohibit the transfer of CPNI without affirmative customer consent. Comments due August 24; replies September 1. (DA No. 98-1582). Contact: Janice Myles, Policy and Program Planning at (202) 418-1577. Report No: 337. Released: August 7, 1998. MASS MEDIA BUREAU CALL SIGN ACTIONS. Internet URL: [16]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Call_Sign_Chan ges/pnmm8114.wp Report No: LB-98-59. Released: August 7, 1998. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU COMMERCIAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4090A1.html
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. ("Cbeyond"). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("the Act") and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information ("CPNI"). 2. The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-16A1.html
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. 2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1118A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("Bureau") and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2007. 2. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/uswestcpni.html
  • regulations also describe the means by which a carrier must obtain customer approval. Section 222(c)(1) did not elaborate as to what form that approval should take. The FCC decided to require an "opt-in" approach, in which a carrier must obtain prior express approval from a customer through written, oral, or electronic means before using the customer's CPNI. See 47 C.F.R. 64.2007(b). The government acknowledged that the means of approval could have taken numerous other forms, including an "opt-out" approach, in which approval would be inferred from the customer-carrier relationship unless the customer specifically requested that his or her CPNI be restricted. Petitioner challenges the FCC's chosen approval process, claiming it violates the First Amendment by restricting its ability to engage in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.pdf
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. (``Cbeyond''). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``the Act'') and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information (``CPNI''). The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, the Bureau
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.pdf
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``Bureau'') and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.2007. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be served by
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf
  • the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.txt
  • and Other Customer Information: Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115 & 96-149 at ¶ 7 & n.23, Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Sept. 7, 2001) (finding that the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect with the exception of Section 64.2007(c)). Qwest currently has authority to offer electronic reverse directory services pursuant to a wavier granted by the Commission for electronic white pages. U S West CEI Waiver, 11 FCC Rcd at 1195. SBC Petition at 2. SBC notes in its petition (at 2 n.1) that SNET may not be covered by the Commission's CEI requirements because SNET was not a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.txt
  • Other Customer Information: Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115 & 96-149, Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 16506, 16510, para. 7 & n.23 (2001) (finding that the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect with the exception of Section 64.2007(c)). 47 U.S.C. § 271. 47 U.S.C. § 271(g)(4). See Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Section 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, CC Docket No. 96-149, Order on Remand, 16 FCC Rcd 9751, 9754-55, para. 8 (2001). 47 U.S.C. § 272(a)(2)(B)(i), (a)(2)(C). 47 U.S.C. § 272(f)(2); see also Request for Extension of the Sunset Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3812A1.txt
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T Inc. (``AT&T''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4090A1.txt
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. (``Cbeyond''). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``the Act'') and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information (``CPNI''). The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, the Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1321A1.pdf
  • its customer's individuallyidentifiable CPNI, for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer, to its agents and its affiliates that provide communications-related services. ßA telecommunications carrier mayalso permit such persons or entities to obtain access to such CPNI for such purposes. oExceptfor use and disclosure of CPNI that is permitted without customer approval, or as otherwise described in section 64.2007(b) or otherwise provided in section 222, a telecommunications carrier mayonlyuse, disclose, or permit access to its customer's individuallyidentifiable CPNI subject to opt-in approval. oA telecommunications carrier mayobtain approval through written, oral or electronic methods. 5 ßA telecommunications carrier relying on oral approval shall bear the burden of demonstrating that such approval has been given in compliance with the Commission's rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • the customer's approval or disapproval in effect until the customer revokes or limits it; and requires carriers to maintain records of customer approval for at least one year. Need: These rules further Congress' goals of fostering competition in telecommunications markets and ensuring the privacy of customer information. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 218, 222, 254(k). Section Number and Title: 64.2007 Approval required for use of customer proprietary network information. Brief Description: This rule requires carriers to provide notice to customers of their right to restrict the use of, disclosure of, and access to the customer's CPNI, establishes the methods for providing and the required content of such notice, and requires carriers to maintain records of this notification for at least
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-16A1.txt
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``the AT&T Companies''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's (``Commission'') rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1118A1.txt
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``Bureau'') and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act'' or ``Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.2007. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be served by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2224A1.txt
  • the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively ``AT&T'' or ``Company''). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.txt
  • opt-in customer approval. Had the court intended to take the unusual step of vacating portions of the order and rules not before it, we believe it would have said so explicitly. Accordingly, we conclude that the court sought to eliminate only the specific section of our rules that was before it, and that its vacatur order applied only to Section 64.2007(c), the only provision inextricably tied to the opt-in mechanism. The remainder of the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect. In reaching this determination, we note that Section 64.2007 contains customer notification requirements, which are needed regardless of whether an opt-in or opt-out regime is in effect. These requirements, set forth in paragraph (f) of this rule, ensure that a carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.txt
  • of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket Nos. 96-115, 96-149, Clarification Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 16506, 16510, para. 7 and n.23 (rel. Sept. 7, 2001) (CPNI Clarification Order) (finding that the Commission's CPNI rules remain in effect following US West with the exception of Section 64.2007(c)). CPNI is information derived from the telecommunications carriers' provision of telecommunications services and includes information concerning where, when, and to whom a customer places a call, as well as the types of service offerings to which the customer subscribes and the extent to which the service is used. See Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers' Use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.txt
  • the boundaries of a customer's implied consent concerning use of CPNI); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2005(a). Except as required by law, carriers may not disclose CPNI to third parties or their own affiliates that do not provide communications-related services unless the consumer has given ``opt in'' consent, which is express written, oral, or electronic consent. 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2005(b), 64.2007(b)(3); 64.2008(e); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2003(h) (defining ``opt-in approval''). Under the Commission's current rules, carriers must receive a customer's opt-out approval before intra-company use of CPNI beyond the total service approach, and before disclosing CPNI to affiliates and joint venture partners that provide communications-related services. 47 U.S.C. § 64.2005(a), (b); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.2005(b)(1). A customer is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.txt
  • service as that term is defined in section 9.3 of these rules, may use CPNI, without customer approval, to market services formerly known as adjunct-to-basic services, such as, but not limited to, speed dialing, computer-provided directory assistance, call monitoring, call tracing, call blocking, call return, repeat dialing, call tracking, call waiting, caller I.D., call forwarding, and certain centrex features. Section 64.2007 is amended by deleting paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3), and revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: (b) Use of Opt-Out and Opt-In Approval Processes. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or opt-in approval, use its customer's individually identifiable CPNI for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.txt
  • the time, location, or duration of any call and, for inbound calls, the number from which the call was placed, and the time, location, or duration of any call.'' Id. at 6936, para. 13 n.45. Id. at 6933, para. 12. Id at 6937-39, paras. 15-17. Id. at 6940-41, paras. 20-22. Id. at 6942, 6943-45, paras. 24, 26-32. 47 C.F.R. § 64.2007(b); see also EPIC CPNI Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 6947-53, paras. 37-49 (finding that new circumstances - including the growing illicit demand for personal information, the significant harm that can result from breaches of confidentiality, and the increasing risk of disclosure - ``force us to reassess our existing regulations''). EPIC CPNI Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 6954-57, paras. 54-59. The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4090A1.html
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. ("Cbeyond"). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("the Act") and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information ("CPNI"). 2. The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-16A1.html
  • adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates (collectively "AT&T" or "the AT&T Companies"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against the AT&T Companies for possible violation of section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(3)(ii), 64.2008(d)(3)(v) and 64.2009(a) of the Federal Communication Commission's ("Commission") rules relating to the confidentiality of customer proprietary network information, and sections 201(b) and 254 of the Act, and sections 54.712(a), 69.131 and 69.158 of the Commission's rules relating to the recovery of universal service fund contributions from end-user customers. 2. The Bureau and the AT&T Companies have negotiated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1118A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("Bureau") and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2007. 2. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99223.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99223.txt
  • gained from another carrier in marketing efforts.17 (e) We address various aspects of a customer's approval to use CPNI consistent with section 222. We also grandfather a limited set of pre-existing notifications to use CPNI and adopt the conclusions reached in the Common Carrier Bureau's Clarification Order.18 We also eliminate, in an effort to reduce confusion and regulatory micro-management, section 64.2007(f)(4) of our rules, which requires a carrier's solicitation for approval, if written, to be on the same document as the carrier's notification.19 Further, we affirm our decision to exercise our preemption authority on a case-by-case basis for state rules that conflict with our own.20 (f) We lessen the regulatory burden of various CPNI safeguards while continuing to require that carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980828.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980828.wp
  • Prisbrey at (202) 418-7400. CC 96-115; PN 8/7/98; DA 98-1582 Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Petition for Waiver of Customer Proprietary Network Information Rules - CC Docket No. 96-115 0 On July 20, 1998, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control filed a petition seeking a waiver of the Customer Proprietary Network Information requirements contained in 47 C.F.R. section 64.2007(2)iii and v, which prohibit the transfer of CPNI without affirmative customer consent. Comments due August 24, 1998*; replies due September 1, 1998. Contact: Janice Myles, Policy and Program Planning at (202) 418-1577. CC 98-147, CC 98-11, CC 98-26, CC 98-32, CC 98-78, CC 98-91; MO&O and NPRM 8/7/98; FCC 98-188 Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability The Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980810.html
  • Jeff Prisbrey (202) 418-7400. Internet URL: [15]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981 587.pdf Released: August 7, 1998. PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON PETITION FOR WAIVER OF CUSTOMER PROPRIETARY NETWORK INFORMATION RULES - CC DOCKET NO. 96-115.On July 20, 1998, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control filed a peititon seeking a waiver of the Customer Proprietary Network Information requirements contained in 47 C.F.R. section 64.2007(2)iii and v, which prohibit the transfer of CPNI without affirmative customer consent. Comments due August 24; replies September 1. (DA No. 98-1582). Contact: Janice Myles, Policy and Program Planning at (202) 418-1577. Report No: 337. Released: August 7, 1998. MASS MEDIA BUREAU CALL SIGN ACTIONS. Internet URL: [16]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Call_Sign_Chan ges/pnmm8114.wp Report No: LB-98-59. Released: August 7, 1998. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU COMMERCIAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3812A1.html
  • the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and AT&T Inc. ("AT&T"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") regarding AT&T Corp.'s compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(a), 64.2008(d)(2), and 64.2009(a). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4090A1.html
  • into between the Bureau and Cbeyond Communications, Inc. ("Cbeyond"). The Consent Decree terminates a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") against Cbeyond for its apparent violation of section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("the Act") and section 64.2009(e) of the Commission's rules. In addition, the Consent decree terminates an investigation into Cbeyond's compliance with section 64.2007(a)(3) of the Commission's rules regarding customer proprietary network information ("CPNI"). 2. The Bureau and Cbeyond have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before the Bureau, and in the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1118A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("Bureau") and Verizon. The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Verizon's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act" or "Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and section 64.2007 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 64.2007. 2. The Bureau and Verizon have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we find that the public interest would be
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2224A1.html
  • the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and AT&T Inc. on behalf of all AT&T Inc. subsidiaries that are subject to the CPNI rules (collectively "AT&T" or "Company"). The Consent Decree terminates investigations initiated by the Bureau regarding AT&T's compliance with section 222(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 222(c)(1), and sections 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 64.2007, 64.2008(d) and 64.2008(d)(3)(v). 2. The Bureau and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/uswestcpni.html
  • regulations also describe the means by which a carrier must obtain customer approval. Section 222(c)(1) did not elaborate as to what form that approval should take. The FCC decided to require an "opt-in" approach, in which a carrier must obtain prior express approval from a customer through written, oral, or electronic means before using the customer's CPNI. See 47 C.F.R. 64.2007(b). The government acknowledged that the means of approval could have taken numerous other forms, including an "opt-out" approach, in which approval would be inferred from the customer-carrier relationship unless the customer specifically requested that his or her CPNI be restricted. Petitioner challenges the FCC's chosen approval process, claiming it violates the First Amendment by restricting its ability to engage in