FCC Web Documents citing 64.1511

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges and refunds. 64.1512 Involuntary blocking of pay-per-call services. 64.1513 Verification of charitable status. 64.1514 Generation of signaling tones. 64.1515 Recovery of costs. SUBPART P -- CALLING PARTY TELEPHONE NUMBER; PRIVACY Brief Description: The requirements in part 64, subpart P are based on the Commission's authority under sections 1, 4, 201-205, and 218 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges and refunds. 64.1512 Involuntary blocking of pay-per-call services. 64.1513 Verification of charitable status. 64.1514 Generation of signaling tones. 64.1515 Recovery of costs. SUBPART Q -- IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 273(d)(5) OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT: DISPUTE RESOLUTION REGARDING EQUIPMENT STANDARDS Brief Description: These rules implement section 273(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by setting forth procedures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.txt
  • pay-per-call information providers because it no longer wished to provide billing and collection service, and because usage had declined. Chladek v. Verizon N.Y. Inc., No. 02 Civ 2355(RO), 2003 WL 21305347 at 1 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (also citing Y2K concerns). See, e.g., Northwest Nevada Telco 2003 Comment at 1, MicroVoice Applications, Inc. 2003 Comment at 2; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.1511 and 1512. As noted in the First TDDRA Order, Congress specifically cited the example of a consumer who ``has chronic complaints'' about pay-per-call transactions as an example of when involuntary blocking could be appropriately applied. See First TDDRA Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6885 at 6901 n.148. See Letter from Peter J. Brennan, Mobile Entertainment Forum, to Marlene Dortch, Secretary, Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges and refunds. 64.1512 Involuntary blocking of pay-per-call services. 64.1513 Verification of charitable status. 64.1514 Generation of signaling tones. 64.1515 Recovery of costs. SUBPART P -- CALLING PARTY TELEPHONE NUMBER; PRIVACY Brief Description: The requirements in part 64, subpart P are based on the Commission's authority under sections 1, 4, 201-205, and 218 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges and refunds. 64.1512 Involuntary blocking of pay-per-call services. 64.1513 Verification of charitable status. 64.1514 Generation of signaling tones. 64.1515 Recovery of costs. SUBPART Q -- IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 273(d)(5) OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT: DISPUTE RESOLUTION REGARDING EQUIPMENT STANDARDS Brief Description: These rules implement section 273(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by setting forth procedures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.txt
  • pay-per-call information providers because it no longer wished to provide billing and collection service, and because usage had declined. Chladek v. Verizon N.Y. Inc., No. 02 Civ 2355(RO), 2003 WL 21305347 at 1 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (also citing Y2K concerns). See, e.g., Northwest Nevada Telco 2003 Comment at 1, MicroVoice Applications, Inc. 2003 Comment at 2; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.1511 and 1512. As noted in the First TDDRA Order, Congress specifically cited the example of a consumer who ``has chronic complaints'' about pay-per-call transactions as an example of when involuntary blocking could be appropriately applied. See First TDDRA Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6885 at 6901 n.148. See Letter from Peter J. Brennan, Mobile Entertainment Forum, to Marlene Dortch, Secretary, Federal