FCC Web Documents citing 61.33

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2011 12 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.wp
  • Rcd 12335, 12336 (para. 5) (Com. Car. Bur., 1998) (ETFS Order). 14 Bell Atlantic Comments at 12. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-173 4 context tends to undercut the Commission's goals in adopting ETFS. We therefore amend section 61.14(b) of the rules as shown in Appendix B, to permit electronic signatures as Bell Atlantic suggests. C. Electronic Cover Letters 8. Section 61.33(a) of the Commission's rules establishes certain format requirements for transmittal letters accompanying dominant carriers' tariff filings.15 Some incumbent LECs claim that section 61.33(a) does not accommodate electronic filings, and propose revising section 61.33(a) to be applicable to electronic filings.16 We disagree that the requirements in section 61.33(a) should be extended to electronic tariff filings. The rules for carriers filing tariff
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.txt
  • Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) 3.9 8.25 2.93 8.28 3.03 9.26 2.76 17.38 3.44 8.45 PR-3 - Completed within Specified Days PR-3-01-2100 % Completed in 1 Day (1-5 Lines - No Dispatch) 89.64 76.93 85.88 76.57 80.2 72.29 80.28 75.15 80.69 69.08 PR-3-06-2100 % Completed in 3 Days (1-5 Lines - Dispatch) 80.67 74.29 73.02 74.7 72.54 73.16 64.83 60.94 58.08 61.33 PR-3-09-2100 % Completed in 5 Days (1-5 Lines ­ Dispatch) 97.69 98.89 97.5 99.08 97.09 99.62 93.64 96.45 88.19 90.63 PR-5-01-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ Facilities 2.84 3 3.35 3.09 3.04 3.14 2.91 2.68 3.07 3.17 PR-5-02-2100 % Orders Held for Facilities > 15 Days 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.09 0 0.08 0 POTS - Business
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.wp
  • Rcd 12335, 12336 (para. 5) (Com. Car. Bur., 1998) (ETFS Order). 14 Bell Atlantic Comments at 12. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-173 4 context tends to undercut the Commission's goals in adopting ETFS. We therefore amend section 61.14(b) of the rules as shown in Appendix B, to permit electronic signatures as Bell Atlantic suggests. C. Electronic Cover Letters 8. Section 61.33(a) of the Commission's rules establishes certain format requirements for transmittal letters accompanying dominant carriers' tariff filings.15 Some incumbent LECs claim that section 61.33(a) does not accommodate electronic filings, and propose revising section 61.33(a) to be applicable to electronic filings.16 We disagree that the requirements in section 61.33(a) should be extended to electronic tariff filings. The rules for carriers filing tariff
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.wp
  • Rcd 12335, 12336 (para. 5) (Com. Car. Bur., 1998) (ETFS Order). 14 Bell Atlantic Comments at 12. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-173 4 context tends to undercut the Commission's goals in adopting ETFS. We therefore amend section 61.14(b) of the rules as shown in Appendix B, to permit electronic signatures as Bell Atlantic suggests. C. Electronic Cover Letters 8. Section 61.33(a) of the Commission's rules establishes certain format requirements for transmittal letters accompanying dominant carriers' tariff filings.15 Some incumbent LECs claim that section 61.33(a) does not accommodate electronic filings, and propose revising section 61.33(a) to be applicable to electronic filings.16 We disagree that the requirements in section 61.33(a) should be extended to electronic tariff filings. The rules for carriers filing tariff
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99173.wp
  • Rcd 12335, 12336 (para. 5) (Com. Car. Bur., 1998) (ETFS Order). 14 Bell Atlantic Comments at 12. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-173 4 context tends to undercut the Commission's goals in adopting ETFS. We therefore amend section 61.14(b) of the rules as shown in Appendix B, to permit electronic signatures as Bell Atlantic suggests. C. Electronic Cover Letters 8. Section 61.33(a) of the Commission's rules establishes certain format requirements for transmittal letters accompanying dominant carriers' tariff filings.15 Some incumbent LECs claim that section 61.33(a) does not accommodate electronic filings, and propose revising section 61.33(a) to be applicable to electronic filings.16 We disagree that the requirements in section 61.33(a) should be extended to electronic tariff filings. The rules for carriers filing tariff
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
  • which has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311(d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminated outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 76.1613 9/9/11 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957 76.960-961 76.1402 76.1605-1606 9/9/11 Part 1, Subpart D Broadcast Applications & Proceedings (duplicative of rules in Part 73). 1.502-615 9/9/11 Required Commission to review the Interstate Cost Recovery Plan (the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • this election by September 14, 2000. Iowa Telecom requests that it now be permitted to change its election by filing a cost study for its Average Traffic Sensitive (ATS) rates. Alternatively, Iowa Telecom requests that the Commission forbear from enforcing the target rate for the ATS charge prescribed in section 61.3(qq) of its rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(qq). Under section 61.33(qq), Iowa Telecom is permitted to charge an ATS rate of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
  • ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS WC Docket No. 05-277 COMMENTS DUE: October 18, 2005 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: October 28, 2005 On September 19, 2005, BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) filed a petition requesting waiver of certain aspects of the Commission's dominant carrier regulations that would otherwise apply to BellSouth's provision of in-region interexchange services after December 19, 2005. Specifically, BellSouth seeks waiver of sections 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, and of any other ancillary Commission rules to the extent they could be read to impose a tariff filing obligation with respect to these services. BellSouth also seeks a limited waiver of sections 61.41-61.49, pertaining to price cap regulations, to the extent these rules relate to BellSouth's long distance offerings. Additionally, BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see also Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
  • that the Commission forbear from applying to Verizon certain obligations in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Verizon seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)); Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (id. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (id. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (id. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Verizon claims that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104 FCC 2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1257A1.txt
  • City and DBS subscriber data from the Satellite Broadcasting and Communication Association. Using this data, Time Warner applied the five-digit zip code allocation formula previously approved by the Commission and the evidence indicated that DBS providers serve 9.67 percent of the total households in San Marcos. Time Warner therefore argues that the combination of DBS and Grande subscribers reflect that 61.33 percent of San Marcos households subscribe to an MVPD other than Time Warner. Thus, Time Warner argues that it is arguably also subject to competing provider effective competition in San Marcos. When the petition was filed, Grande offered service to 90 households. Since that time, however, Grande has continued to expand the number of subscribers and made major improvements to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
  • Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). Specifically, according to its Petitions, Qwest seeks forbearance from loop and transport unbundling obligations pursuant to sections 251(c) and 271(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, and section 51.319(a), (b), (e) of the Commission's rules. For mass market and enterprise services, Qwest also seeks forbearance from Part 61 dominant carrier tariffing requirements (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59); Part 61 price cap regulation (47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49); Computer III requirements, including CEI and ONA requirements; and dominant carrier requirements arising under section 214 of the Act and Part 63 of the Commission's rules concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • Dominant Carriers Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: Section 61.33 facilitates tariff transmittals filed on 7- or 15-days' notice and to clearly identify such transmittals for the ease and convenience of those who may want to comment on the filings. Section 61.45 was adopted to avoid unfairly imposing a subsidy burden on ratepayers and will align charges more closely with LECs' costs. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24, First Protective Order, DA 08-470 (WCB, rel. Feb. 27, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • Seattle Petition) (collectively, Qwest Petitions). On May 3, 2007 and August 3, 2007, Qwest filed errata to make certain corrections to its petitions. 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). See, e.g., Qwest Denver Petition at 3; Qwest Minneapolis-St. Paul Petition at 3-4; Qwest Phoenix Petition at 3; Qwest Seattle Petition at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
  • Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket No. 04-223, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 08-49, First Protective Order, DA 08-879 (WCB, rel. Apr. 15, 2008) (First Protective Order); Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
  • the geographic area that is encompassed by the 64 Qwest wire centers located within the boundaries of the Phoenix MSA. Id. at 1, 11. Id. at 7 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Specifically, Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1 and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. at 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04). Id. at 11. Id. at 8. Id. at 8-10. Id. at 1. On April 27, 2007, Qwest filed four petitions seeking certain forbearance relief in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle MSAs. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See Petition of Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008) (Verizon Rhode Island Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 160(a). Verizon Rhode Island Petition at 3 n.4 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA: Virginia Beach City; Norfolk City; Chesapeake City; Newport News City; Hampton City; Portsmouth City; York County; James City County; Gloucester County; Poquoson City; and Williamsburg City. See Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 1 n.2. Verizon Virginia Beach Petition at 3 n.5 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-61.49). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). See, e.g., Petition of Ameritech Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of Section 275(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, CC Docket No. 98-65, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 6415 (CCB 1999). See 47 U.S.C. § 155(c). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203308A1.txt
  • ``61.45(i)(3).'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(i), definition of ``w,'' by deleting ``CMT,'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first sentence, by replacing ``§ 61.42(d)(1), (2), and (3)'' with ``§§ 61.42(d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), first and second sentence; § 61.45(b)(1)(ii)(B); § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A); § 61.45(i)(1)(A), first and third sentences; and § 61.45(i)(2) by replacing each time it appears ``61.33(qq)'' with ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), second sentence, by inserting ``of this section'' after ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(ii), third sentence, by inserting ``§'' before ``61.3(qq)'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(A) by replacing ``subparagraph (B)'' with ``paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) of this section'' and by replacing ``PICC'' with ``PIC'' Amend Appendix B, § 61.45(b)(1)(iii)(B), first sentence, by replacing ``§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280207A1.pdf
  • ID: 8009a 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D Page 4 of 14 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280897A1.pdf
  • of 33 78.34 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 77.09 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 72.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 69.59 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F 67.34 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 65.78 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 62.77 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 61.33 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 60.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 58.30 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 55.28 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 52.32 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 38.80 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4K00G7D 77.00 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 0.00 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293977A1.txt
  • Stations Grant of Authority 12/10/2009 - 12/10/2024 Renewal GCI Communication Corp. Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 30 ' 9.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11107 234TH AVE SE, KING, ISSAQUAH, WA 122 ° 1 ' 37.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: HARRIS 13M 13 meters ANTENNA ID: 5270 Page 15 of 18 61.33 dBW QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M76G7W QPSK MODULATION FOR TELEPHONY, FACSIMILE, AND DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M76G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - ANIK E1 - (118.7 W.L.) 1 - ANIK E2 - (111.1 W.L) E990313 SES-RWL-20091008-01305 E Date Effective: 10/09/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311 (d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminate outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 9/9/11 Appendix 38 The Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR 76.1613 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
  • which has proven to be virtually impossible to implement, and to encourage amateur stations to experiment with spread spectrum communications technologies. 97.311(d) 97.5(b)(4) 4/29/11 Eliminated outdated and unnecessary reporting requirements related to international telecommunications traffic. 43.53 43.61 (b) 43.61 (c) 63.23 (e) 7/19/11 Rule revisions enabling all tariff filers to file tariffs electronically over the Internet. 61.21 61.22 61.23 61.32 61.33 61.151 61.152 61.153 61.52(a) 7/20/11 Fairness Doctrine, Personal Attack & Political Editorial Rules. 73.1910 76.209 76.1612 76.1613 9/9/11 Broadcast Flag. 73.8000 73.9000-9009 9/9/11 Cable Programming Service Tier Complaints. 76.950-951 76.953-957 76.960-961 76.1402 76.1605-1606 9/9/11 Part 1, Subpart D Broadcast Applications & Proceedings (duplicative of rules in Part 73). 1.502-615 9/9/11 Required Commission to review the Interstate Cost Recovery Plan (the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • grounds for rejection of the non-complying publication, a determination that it is unlawful or other action. 9. Section 61.15(a) is proposed to be amended by adding a new subsection (4) as follows: (4) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the cover letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. Section 61.33(a) is proposed to be amended by deleting the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (3), adding the word ``and'' at the end of subsection (4), and adding a new subsection (5) as follows: (5) Include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the carrier on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See subpart W of Part 1 of this Title.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.00 33.64 40.00 1a,2a,3a,4a,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 42.59 21.74 29.41 22.22 45.34 27.59 43.35 66.67 1c,2b,3c,4b,4n UNE Specials MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 2.00 0.81 2.70 0.90 2.84 1.04 2.34 MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 8.32 6.20 6.50 5.82 6.35 5.73 6.30 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 61.33 57.19 58.41 55.67 61.54 50.21 57.52 1n,2n,3n,4n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 5.33 2.46 1.77 1.90 0.77 2.05 2.65 1n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 21.43 24.32 17.36 24.56 14.18 27.28 15.83 Interconnection Interconnection Trunks Delivered to CLECs OR-1-12 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted) 86.96 100.00 92.59 96.88 1c,2b,3c OR-1-12 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-246A1.txt
  • a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 61.21 Cover letters. * * * * * (a) * * * All cover letters and letters of transmittal shall include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) of the issuing carrier(s) on whose behalf the letter is submitted. See part 1, subpart W of this chapter. * * * * * Section 61.33 is amended by removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(3); inserting a semi-colon at the end of paragraph (a)(3); deleting the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4); adding the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(4); and by adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • to the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. The latter should be clearly labeled as the ``Public Reference Copy.'' The copies of supporting information required here are in addition to those required by § 61.38(c). The issuing carrier must file the copies required by this paragraph so they will be received on the same date as the filings in paragraph (a). Section 61.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (g) to read as follows: 61.33 Letters of transmittal. * * * * * (a)(3) State whether copies have been delivered to the Commercial Contractor and the Chief, Pricing Policy Division. * * * * * (g) The letter of transmittal must be substantially in the following format: (Exact name of carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-212A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19415 (2005) (Qwest Omaha Forbearance Order), aff'd, Qwest Corp. v. FCC, 482 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (Qwest Corp. v. FCC). Verizon seeks forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-63.66. See, e.g., Letter from Joseph Jackson, Associate Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 at 7 (filed June 13, 2007) (Verizon June 13, 2007 Ex Parte Letter). 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). (discussing Computer Inquiry III requirements). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-118A1.txt
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 21293, 21924-25, paras. 1-2 (2007) (Verizon 6 MSA Order); pet. for review pending, No. 08-1012 (D.C. Cir. filed Jan. 14, 2008). Verizon sought forbearance from the following: tariffing requirements, price cap regulation, and dominant carrier requirements concerning the processes for acquiring lines, discontinuing services, assignment or transfers of control, and acquiring affiliations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58, 61.59, 63.03, 63.04, 63.60-.66. See Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21924, para. 1. 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). Verizon 6 MSA Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21307-11, paras. 27-34. Id. Id. at 21307-08, para. 27. Id. at 21312, para. 36. Id. at 21318-19, para. 45. See Petition of Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.txt
  • Seattle petitions); Letters from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President - Federal Regulatory, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed Aug. 3, 2007) (filing two separate letters correcting the Denver and Seattle petitions). See Appendix A for a list of commenters. 47 U.S.C. § 160. . 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(a), (b), (e). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, 61.59. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03, 63.04. In its petitions, Qwest requested forbearance from Sections 63.60-66 of the Commission's rules, but subsequently withdrew this aspect of its petitions; therefore, we do not include those rule sections in our analysis below. See Qwest June 13, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 4. ; Qwest June 13, 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • Petition at 7 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 251(c)). Qwest seeks this relief for its wholesale provision of voice-grade, DS1, and DS3 unbundled loop and transport facilities. Id. Qwest also seeks forbearance from the congruent loop and transport unbundling obligations of 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(2)(B)(ii). Id. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.319(a), 51.319(b), and 51.319(e)). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58, and 61.59). Qwest asserts that if it is granted forbearance relief from these dominant carrier tariffing requirements, it would willingly accept, as a condition of such relief, being subject to the permissive tariffing rules that apply to competitive LECs. Id. at 7-8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.18-61.26). Id. at 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41-49). Qwest asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • the public interest for the reasons stated herein. For consistency and administrative clarity we propose changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A. For example, we propose consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, propose to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. We believe that these proposed changes are necessary to accomplish the numerous goals anticipated with the implementation of mandatory electronic tariff filing for all tariff filing entities. We seek comment on these proposed changes. Finally, we invite comment on other considerations and alternatives interested parties believe relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • the Commission's commercial contractor. For consistency and administrative clarity, we proposed changes to additional sections in Part 61 of the Commission's rules as shown in Appendix A of the ETFS NPRM. For example, we proposed consolidating the requirements for letters of transmittal and cover letters in section 61.15 of the Commission's rules, and therefore, proposed to delete sections 61.21 and 61.33 of our rules because those rules would be duplicative of section 61.15. Commenters did not object to these proposals, and we adopt the rule revisions in Appendix A. Administration. As we proposed in the ETFS NPRM and consistent with the Streamlined Tariff Order, we conclude that the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau will be responsible for administering the adoption
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-349A1.txt
  • at least sufficient to demonstrate that the filing (1) does not restrict the availability of any service in "thin route" countries, and (2) has the same rate impact on "thin route" users as on high volume users. Any tariff filing that does not meet both these criteria shall not be subject to streamlined treatment. Comsat must still comply with Section 61.33 of our rules which requires a concise explanation of the nature and purpose of the tariff filing. Comsat's space segment tariffs may be filed on fourteen days notice and will be presumed lawful for purposes of advance tariff review. Interested parties may file petitions against/these tariffs pursuant to the time tables prescribed in our existing rules.76 We will thus have
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • letter to the Secretary of the Commission in lieu of the Mellon Bank. The Form 159 should display the Electronic Audit Code in the box in the upper left hand corner marked "reserved." Issuing carriers should submit these fee materials on the same date as the submission in paragraph (a). * * * 20. Revise the first sentence of Section 61.33(a) to read as follows: § 61.33 Letters of Transmittal. (a) Except as specified in § 61.32(b), all publications filed with the Commission must be numbered consecutively by the issuing carrier beginning with Number 1, and must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal, (21 cm x 29.7 cm) or 8½ by 11 inches (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) in size.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/callanal.pdf
  • - 18 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating trend changes in ARPM & Access cost Y=ln(revenue per minute net of access) Regression 1: Regression Output: Constant 0 Annual Std Err of Y Est 0.033639 -0.0498 R Squared 0.909815 semi-annual No. of Observations 6 semi-annual Degrees of Freedom 4 -0.02522 X Coefficient(s) -0.05108 -1.92069 Std Err of Coef. 0.008041 0.031316 t Statistic -6.35 -61.33 ln (ARPM - access) Trend Constant predicted trend 1992 -2.0030 -0.0511 -1.9207 -1.9718 0.1392 1993 -1.9827 -0.1022 -1.9207 -2.0229 0.1323 1994 -2.0835 -0.1532 -1.9207 -2.0739 0.1257 1995 -2.1290 -0.2043 -1.9207 -2.1250 0.1194 1996 -2.1436 -0.2554 -1.9207 -2.1761 0.1135 1997 -2.2550 -0.3065 -1.9207 -2.2272 0.1078 1998 -2.1440 -0.3576 -1.9207 -2.2783 0.1025 Prepared by IAD B - 19 3/20/2000 Workpaper 4: Estimating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 40.70 42.76 44.41 45.98 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 41.93 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 45.92 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.20 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 57.99 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.06 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 60.79 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 52.99 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 40.70 42.76 44.41 44.65 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 38.92 39.48 41.01 42.23 42.37 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 39.72 40.27 41.75 46.34 46.38 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 49.82 46.07 48.54 48.80 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 55.21 55.85 58.33 58.60 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 85.87 85.61 82.05 72.66 63.25 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 62.28 61.64 61.30 59.68 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 50.96 53.77 53.56 52.35 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Massachusetts Springfield 36.07 37.91 39.70 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 36.96 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 39.11 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 61.00 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 Nebraska Grand Island 58.74 58.39 57.92 59.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 51.36 45.62 41.59 41.59 41.51 41.51 Michigan Detroit 36.53 34.85 36.78 38.36 39.07 39.86 42.93 42.09 42.40 Michigan Grand Rapids 35.90 35.91 35.08 36.54 37.24 37.97 37.75 37.02 37.26 Michigan Saginaw 35.70 35.70 34.88 36.37 37.07 38.58 39.93 40.29 40.60 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 43.18 44.76 44.85 47.48 49.05 49.34 48.73 48.93 50.24 Minnesota Minneapolis 54.30 54.28 56.57 60.07 61.64 61.93 61.33 61.52 62.84 Mississippi Pascagoula 85.07 86.02 85.26 82.93 83.67 83.67 84.39 84.86 83.81 Missouri Kansas City 63.68 63.37 63.19 65.22 61.15 60.77 60.96 60.30 60.30 Missouri Mexico 45.17 44.87 44.70 46.65 43.29 48.72 48.92 49.11 49.11 Missouri St. Louis 62.49 62.19 62.01 64.01 61.15 60.22 60.40 60.37 60.37 Montana Butte 56.07 56.07 56.07 54.63 54.28 54.63 54.63 56.44 59.27 Nebraska
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90 116MIDLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.97 12.38 (2.62) 29.54 - 21.12 25.79 117MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.51 12.38 - 5.20 - (21.74) (8.24) 118NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.19 12.42 (2.40) 5.05 (160.37) 22.32 9.59 119ORCHARD FARM TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.95 14.19 - 13.97 - - 12.67 120PHILLIPS COUNTY TELEPHONE COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • PARIS TEL., INC. 1.85 5.03 -3.03 -15.86 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. -23.63 6.04 -27.98 -100.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. 9.70 0.90 8.73 18.52 320807 A PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 4.08 6.71 -2.47 -73.01 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA 6.61 -0.84 7.52 59.70 320813 A PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -0.89 0.00 -0.89 -61.33 320815 A ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 17.82 4.73 12.50 0.00 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. 15.34 4.80 10.06 74.54 320818 A SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.96 4.63 4.14 0.00 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 10.67 10.93 -0.23 -15.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -9.36 3.55 -12.46 -50.48 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -1.36