FCC Web Documents citing 61.28

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • STA Order at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • interim waiver of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • disclosure rules to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.txt
  • PRT is not required to establish an ``interexchange basket'' pursuant to section 61.42(d)(4) of the Commission's rules, to the extent that rule would require the establishment of an interexchange basket for the services covered by this Order when those services are provided through an entity other than a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate; and (3) PRT need not comply with section 61.28 of the Commission's rules for the provision of in-region, international telecommunications services to the extent, and only to the extent, that PRTC or a PRTC affiliate would be treated as a dominant carrier under that rule specifically because of PRTC's provision of in-region, international telecommunications services through an entity other than a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate. To the extent that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: The Part 61, Subpart D rules apply to international dominant carriers. Section 61.28 was adopted to specify tariff filing requirements for such carriers to ensure rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205 and 403. Section Number and Title: 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. Subpart E-GENERAL RULES FOR DOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The Part 61 rules are designed to implement the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.txt
  • or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days. 12. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to § 63.10 of this chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • (seven or fifteen days' notice for local exchange carriers), and 226(h)(1)(A) (``changes in [informational tariff] rates, terms, or conditions shall be filed no later than the first day on which the changed rates, terms, or conditions are in effect''); 47 C.F.R. § 61.23(c) (one day's notice for non-dominant carriers). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.13 et seq., 61.18, et seq., 61.28, et seq., and 61.31, et seq. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C §§ 204(a) (suspension and investigation of tariff publications) and 205(a) (action on unlawful tariff publications). See New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. FCC, 826 F.2d 1101, 1108 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (section 4(i) serves as the Communications Act's ``necessary and proper clause''); see also 47 U.S.C. § 303(r) (authority to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-93A1.txt
  • international inbound collect calls to the United States are permitted to file a tariff for such services. (e) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of ``on-demand'' Mobile Satellite Services are permitted to file a tariff for such services applicable to those customers that have not entered into pre-existing service contracts designating a specific provider for such services. 13. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation under § 63.10 of this Chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.pdf
  • non-dominant and are prohibited from filing tariffs except for the limited purposes contained in §§ 61.19(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules. See Competitive Carrier First Report and Order, 85 FCC 2d at 23, para. 63; AT&T Reclassification Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 3271. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.38, 61.58. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.3(ee), 61.41-61.49. See 47 C.F.R. § 61.28(a)-(b). See LEC Classification Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,804-05, paras. 85-86 (citations omitted). See LEC Classification Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,804-05, para. 86 (noting that ``[b]ecause we have previously found that markets for long distance services are substantially competitive in most areas, marketplace forces should effectively deter carriers that face competition from engaging in the practices that Congress sought
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-12A1.txt
  • the rules, to the extent that rule 61.42(d)(4) would require the establishment of an interexchange basket for the provision of in-region, interstate, interLATA telecommunications services it chooses to provide on an integrated basis. We otherwise do not forbear from the application of section 61.42(d)(4). International Services. The Commission forbears from applying the tariffing requirements for dominant international carriers in section 61.28 of the rules to Qwest to the extent that, and only to the extent that, Qwest would be treated as a dominant carrier under that section for no other reason than it is providing in-region, international telecommunications services on an integrated basis. To the extent that Qwest otherwise would be treated as a dominant carrier with regard to international services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.txt
  • (a), (c), and (d) of the Act, which apply to ``entry and discontinuance of services or transfers of control by dominant carriers'' and any portion of section 272 of the Act that would require Qwest to provide in-region, interstate, interLATA telecommunications services ``through a Section 272 affiliate or any other separate affiliate in order to be deemed non-dominant;'' (2) sections 61.28, 61.31-.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58-.59, 65.1(b)(1), 65.1(b)(3), and 65.600 of our rules, which set forth dominant carrier price cap and rate of return regulations and require dominant carriers to file tariffs on up to 15-days notice with cost support; (3) sections 63.03, 63.10, 63.18, 63.19, 63.21, 63.23, and 63.60-.90 of our rules, which apply to entry and discontinuance of services or transfers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.txt
  • to section 61.42(d)(4) of our rules, to the extent that section 61.42(d)(4) would require the establishment of an interexchange basket for the services covered by this Order when those services are provided directly or through an affiliate that is neither a section 272 nor a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate; and (3) AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest need not comply with section 61.28 of our rules for the provision of in-region, international telecommunications services to the extent that, and only to the extent that, the BOCs or their affiliates that are neither section 272 nor rule 64.1903 separate affiliates would be treated as dominant carriers under section 61.28 for no other reason than their provision of in-region, international telecommunications services. To the extent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.txt
  • 12, 2007 Ex Parte Letter at 1; see also Section 272 Sunset Order, FCC 07-59. This includes relief from: tariff obligations (as set forth in Section 203 of the Act and sections 61.31-61.38 and 61.43 of the Commission's rules), interexchange basket requirements (as set forth in section 61.42(d)(4)of the Commission's rules), international service tariff filings (as set forth in section 61.28 of the Commission's rules), discontinuance and transfer of control requirements (as set forth in sections 63.03, 63.19, 63.21, 63.23, and 63.30-63.90 of the Commission's rules), contract filing and reporting for exchange of services and routing of traffic and rates (as set forth in section 43.51of the Commission's rules), and structural safeguards (as set forth in section 272 of the Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • facilitating the compilation of aggregate carrier data for industry analysis purposes. We believe that including all tariffs on ETFS will improve public access to these filings and will greatly enhance the transparency and efficiency of the tariff filing process. We invite interested parties to comment on these anticipated benefits. Additionally, we propose that international dominant carriers filing pursuant to section 61.28 of the Commission's rules should be subject to electronic filing. We seek comment on this proposal. Requirements applicable to carriers filing tariffs electronically are different from those that apply to carriers filing tariffs via diskette, CD ROM and/or paper. By requiring electronic filing of all tariffs, the same rules will apply to all tariff filers, which will help ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • parties to more efficiently identify tariffs that may be unlawful and/or in violation of Commission rules and precedent. We conclude that including all tariffs on the ETFS will improve public access to these filings and will greatly enhance the transparency and efficiency of the tariff filing process. For these reasons, we also require international dominant carriers filing pursuant to section 61.28 of the Commission's rules to be subject to electronic filing. Filing Requirements. In the ETFS NPRM, we proposed that all tariff filers file electronically subject to sections 61.14, 61.15, and 61.16 of the Commission's rules. No comments were filed opposing this proposal. Accordingly, we conclude that it is appropriate to apply the same electronic filing requirements to all tariff filers
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • tariff by Carrier Name and F.C.C. Tariff Number; (c) The issuing carrier must specifically identify in its tariff the rates being cross-referenced so as to leave no doubt as to the exact rates that will apply, including but not limited to any applicable credits, discounts, promotions; and (d) The issuing carrier must keep its cross-references current. 15. Insert before Section 61.28, "Subpart D - General Tariff Rules for International Dominant Carriers". 16. Insert new Section 61.28 to read as follows: § 61.28 International Dominant Carrier Tariff Filing Requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route due only to a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to Section 63.10 of this Chapter shall
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
  • or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days. 12. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to § 63.10 of this chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • tariff by Carrier Name and F.C.C. Tariff Number; (c) The issuing carrier must specifically identify in its tariff the rates being cross-referenced so as to leave no doubt as to the exact rates that will apply, including but not limited to any applicable credits, discounts, promotions; and (d) The issuing carrier must keep its cross-references current. 15. Insert before Section 61.28, "Subpart D - General Tariff Rules for International Dominant Carriers". 16. Insert new Section 61.28 to read as follows: § 61.28 International Dominant Carrier Tariff Filing Requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route due only to a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to Section 63.10 of this Chapter shall
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 49.53 49.53 51.78 52.43 53.59 53.11 Connecticut Norwalk 42.80 44.37 43.65 44.49 44.68 46.69 46.69 46.69 48.94 49.50 50.64 50.16 DC Washington 35.20 35.34 35.62 35.73 35.73 33.75 35.79 37.84 35.33 36.34 36.34 36.28 Florida Miami 61.32 56.68 62.40 63.02 61.80 56.38 56.41 56.48 57.68 57.38 58.02 57.02 Florida Tampa 61.17 61.43 62.37 52.77 52.77 52.97 67.60 67.60 67.74 57.65 61.28 59.95 Florida West Palm Beach58.13 57.16 57.66 58.28 57.12 52.08 53.08 53.22 53.46 53.16 54.51 54.80 Georgia Albany 63.39 62.06 59.59 60.15 60.18 60.18 62.10 63.16 64.72 65.00 65.49 65.49 Georgia Atlanta 79.27 79.11 81.39 81.39 81.42 89.45 89.49 89.06 90.28 90.01 90.74 90.82 Hawaii Honolulu 49.20 50.50 50.47 53.21 54.23 56.41 58.38 62.99 62.99 63.20 63.20 65.56 Illinois Chicago
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 52.25 Connecticut Norwalk 42.80 44.37 43.65 44.49 44.68 46.69 46.69 46.69 48.94 49.50 50.64 50.77 49.33 District of Columbia Washington 35.20 35.34 35.62 35.73 35.73 33.75 35.79 37.84 35.33 36.34 36.34 37.22 40.32 Florida Miami 61.32 56.68 62.40 63.02 61.80 56.38 56.41 56.48 57.68 57.38 58.02 57.67 57.98 Florida Tampa 61.17 61.43 62.37 52.77 52.77 52.97 67.60 67.60 67.74 57.65 61.28 60.68 60.42 Florida West Palm Beach58.13 57.16 57.66 58.28 57.12 52.08 53.08 53.22 53.46 53.16 54.51 55.44 55.72 Georgia Albany 63.39 62.06 59.59 60.15 60.18 60.18 62.10 63.16 64.72 65.00 65.49 66.09 66.14 Georgia Atlanta 79.27 79.11 81.39 81.39 81.42 89.45 89.49 89.06 90.28 90.01 90.74 89.98 91.83 Hawaii Honolulu 49.20 50.50 50.47 53.21 54.23 56.41 58.38 62.99 62.99 63.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
  • or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days. 12. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to § 63.10 of this chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2001/fcc01093.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2001/fcc01093.txt
  • international inbound collect calls to the United States are permitted to file a tariff for such services. (e) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of ``on-demand'' Mobile Satellite Services are permitted to file a tariff for such services applicable to those customers that have not entered into pre-existing service contracts designating a specific provider for such services. 13. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation under § 63.10 of this Chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost support
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
  • 6, 1999). * [34]FCC 99-51 , Report and Order, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review Review of International Common Carrier Regulations, IB Docket No. 98-118 (released March 23, 1999). Contents [35]PART 43 REPORTS OF COMMUNICATION COMMON CARRIERS AND CERTAIN AFFILIATES [36] [37]43.51 Contracts and concessions. [38] [39]43.61 Reports of international telecommunications traffic. [40] [41]43.82 International circuit status reports. [42]PART 61 TARIFFS [43] 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. [44]PART 63 EXTENSION OF LINES, NEW LINES AND DISCONTINUANCE, REDUCTION, OUTAGE AND IMPAIRMENT OF SERVICE BY COMMON CARRIERS; AND GRANTS OF RECOGNIZED PRIVATE OPERATING AGENCY STATUS [45] 63.09 Definitions applicable to international Section 214 authorizations. [46] [47]63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. [48] 63.11 Notification by and prior approval for U.S. international carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • STA Order at 4-5, paras. 9-11. AT&T STA Order at 2, para. 2. See AT&T STA Order at 5, para. 11; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-335. AT&T STA Order at 3-5, paras. 7-11. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. BellSouth Petition at 1. BellSouth Petition at 1-2. See Verizon Petition at 1-3; see also Qwest Petition at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59; see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996); see also Verizon Petition at 2; Qwest Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section); see
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
  • interim waiver of certain dominant carrier regulations. The other seeks forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) with regard to the same regulations. The regulations that Verizon seeks an interim waiver of or forbearance from include the following: section 203 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 203; dominant carrier tariffing requirements set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (sections 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.58 and 61.59); price cap regulation set forth in part 61 of the Commission's rules (e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 - 61.49); the Commission's accounting requirements to the extent that they require nonregulated treatment of interexchange services if Verizon decides to provide them on an integrated basis; the Commission's Computer III requirements including Comparably Efficient Interconnection and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
  • disclosure rules to engage in disaster recovery planning and response. See Petition of AT&T, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Mar. 10, 2006); see also Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority and Waiver to Support Disaster Planning and Response, WC Docket 06-63 (Apr. 4, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.28, 61.32, 61.33, 61.38, 61.41-61.49, 61.58 and 61.59. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 17539 (1996). 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.12(b)(2), 63.19(b), 63.21(c), and 63.71(c) (second half of section). 47 C.F.R. § 64.1903(a). Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry), Report and Order 104
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.txt
  • PRT is not required to establish an ``interexchange basket'' pursuant to section 61.42(d)(4) of the Commission's rules, to the extent that rule would require the establishment of an interexchange basket for the services covered by this Order when those services are provided through an entity other than a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate; and (3) PRT need not comply with section 61.28 of the Commission's rules for the provision of in-region, international telecommunications services to the extent, and only to the extent, that PRTC or a PRTC affiliate would be treated as a dominant carrier under that rule specifically because of PRTC's provision of in-region, international telecommunications services through an entity other than a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate. To the extent that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • implement the provisions of sections 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and ensure that rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. These rules govern the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Need: The Part 61, Subpart D rules apply to international dominant carriers. Section 61.28 was adopted to specify tariff filing requirements for such carriers to ensure rates are just, reasonable, and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205 and 403. Section Number and Title: 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. Subpart E-GENERAL RULES FOR DOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The Part 61 rules are designed to implement the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.txt
  • or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days. 12. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to § 63.10 of this chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • (seven or fifteen days' notice for local exchange carriers), and 226(h)(1)(A) (``changes in [informational tariff] rates, terms, or conditions shall be filed no later than the first day on which the changed rates, terms, or conditions are in effect''); 47 C.F.R. § 61.23(c) (one day's notice for non-dominant carriers). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.13 et seq., 61.18, et seq., 61.28, et seq., and 61.31, et seq. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C §§ 204(a) (suspension and investigation of tariff publications) and 205(a) (action on unlawful tariff publications). See New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. FCC, 826 F.2d 1101, 1108 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (section 4(i) serves as the Communications Act's ``necessary and proper clause''); see also 47 U.S.C. § 303(r) (authority to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-93A1.txt
  • international inbound collect calls to the United States are permitted to file a tariff for such services. (e) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of ``on-demand'' Mobile Satellite Services are permitted to file a tariff for such services applicable to those customers that have not entered into pre-existing service contracts designating a specific provider for such services. 13. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation under § 63.10 of this Chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.pdf
  • non-dominant and are prohibited from filing tariffs except for the limited purposes contained in §§ 61.19(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules. See Competitive Carrier First Report and Order, 85 FCC 2d at 23, para. 63; AT&T Reclassification Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 3271. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.38, 61.58. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.3(ee), 61.41-61.49. See 47 C.F.R. § 61.28(a)-(b). See LEC Classification Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,804-05, paras. 85-86 (citations omitted). See LEC Classification Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 15,804-05, para. 86 (noting that ``[b]ecause we have previously found that markets for long distance services are substantially competitive in most areas, marketplace forces should effectively deter carriers that face competition from engaging in the practices that Congress sought
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-12A1.txt
  • the rules, to the extent that rule 61.42(d)(4) would require the establishment of an interexchange basket for the provision of in-region, interstate, interLATA telecommunications services it chooses to provide on an integrated basis. We otherwise do not forbear from the application of section 61.42(d)(4). International Services. The Commission forbears from applying the tariffing requirements for dominant international carriers in section 61.28 of the rules to Qwest to the extent that, and only to the extent that, Qwest would be treated as a dominant carrier under that section for no other reason than it is providing in-region, international telecommunications services on an integrated basis. To the extent that Qwest otherwise would be treated as a dominant carrier with regard to international services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.txt
  • (a), (c), and (d) of the Act, which apply to ``entry and discontinuance of services or transfers of control by dominant carriers'' and any portion of section 272 of the Act that would require Qwest to provide in-region, interstate, interLATA telecommunications services ``through a Section 272 affiliate or any other separate affiliate in order to be deemed non-dominant;'' (2) sections 61.28, 61.31-.38, 61.41-.49, 61.58-.59, 65.1(b)(1), 65.1(b)(3), and 65.600 of our rules, which set forth dominant carrier price cap and rate of return regulations and require dominant carriers to file tariffs on up to 15-days notice with cost support; (3) sections 63.03, 63.10, 63.18, 63.19, 63.21, 63.23, and 63.60-.90 of our rules, which apply to entry and discontinuance of services or transfers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.txt
  • to section 61.42(d)(4) of our rules, to the extent that section 61.42(d)(4) would require the establishment of an interexchange basket for the services covered by this Order when those services are provided directly or through an affiliate that is neither a section 272 nor a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate; and (3) AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest need not comply with section 61.28 of our rules for the provision of in-region, international telecommunications services to the extent that, and only to the extent that, the BOCs or their affiliates that are neither section 272 nor rule 64.1903 separate affiliates would be treated as dominant carriers under section 61.28 for no other reason than their provision of in-region, international telecommunications services. To the extent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.txt
  • 12, 2007 Ex Parte Letter at 1; see also Section 272 Sunset Order, FCC 07-59. This includes relief from: tariff obligations (as set forth in Section 203 of the Act and sections 61.31-61.38 and 61.43 of the Commission's rules), interexchange basket requirements (as set forth in section 61.42(d)(4)of the Commission's rules), international service tariff filings (as set forth in section 61.28 of the Commission's rules), discontinuance and transfer of control requirements (as set forth in sections 63.03, 63.19, 63.21, 63.23, and 63.30-63.90 of the Commission's rules), contract filing and reporting for exchange of services and routing of traffic and rates (as set forth in section 43.51of the Commission's rules), and structural safeguards (as set forth in section 272 of the Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • facilitating the compilation of aggregate carrier data for industry analysis purposes. We believe that including all tariffs on ETFS will improve public access to these filings and will greatly enhance the transparency and efficiency of the tariff filing process. We invite interested parties to comment on these anticipated benefits. Additionally, we propose that international dominant carriers filing pursuant to section 61.28 of the Commission's rules should be subject to electronic filing. We seek comment on this proposal. Requirements applicable to carriers filing tariffs electronically are different from those that apply to carriers filing tariffs via diskette, CD ROM and/or paper. By requiring electronic filing of all tariffs, the same rules will apply to all tariff filers, which will help ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • parties to more efficiently identify tariffs that may be unlawful and/or in violation of Commission rules and precedent. We conclude that including all tariffs on the ETFS will improve public access to these filings and will greatly enhance the transparency and efficiency of the tariff filing process. For these reasons, we also require international dominant carriers filing pursuant to section 61.28 of the Commission's rules to be subject to electronic filing. Filing Requirements. In the ETFS NPRM, we proposed that all tariff filers file electronically subject to sections 61.14, 61.15, and 61.16 of the Commission's rules. No comments were filed opposing this proposal. Accordingly, we conclude that it is appropriate to apply the same electronic filing requirements to all tariff filers
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • tariff by Carrier Name and F.C.C. Tariff Number; (c) The issuing carrier must specifically identify in its tariff the rates being cross-referenced so as to leave no doubt as to the exact rates that will apply, including but not limited to any applicable credits, discounts, promotions; and (d) The issuing carrier must keep its cross-references current. 15. Insert before Section 61.28, "Subpart D - General Tariff Rules for International Dominant Carriers". 16. Insert new Section 61.28 to read as follows: § 61.28 International Dominant Carrier Tariff Filing Requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route due only to a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to Section 63.10 of this Chapter shall
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
  • or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days. 12. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to § 63.10 of this chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • tariff by Carrier Name and F.C.C. Tariff Number; (c) The issuing carrier must specifically identify in its tariff the rates being cross-referenced so as to leave no doubt as to the exact rates that will apply, including but not limited to any applicable credits, discounts, promotions; and (d) The issuing carrier must keep its cross-references current. 15. Insert before Section 61.28, "Subpart D - General Tariff Rules for International Dominant Carriers". 16. Insert new Section 61.28 to read as follows: § 61.28 International Dominant Carrier Tariff Filing Requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route due only to a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to Section 63.10 of this Chapter shall
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 49.53 49.53 51.78 52.43 53.59 53.11 Connecticut Norwalk 42.80 44.37 43.65 44.49 44.68 46.69 46.69 46.69 48.94 49.50 50.64 50.16 DC Washington 35.20 35.34 35.62 35.73 35.73 33.75 35.79 37.84 35.33 36.34 36.34 36.28 Florida Miami 61.32 56.68 62.40 63.02 61.80 56.38 56.41 56.48 57.68 57.38 58.02 57.02 Florida Tampa 61.17 61.43 62.37 52.77 52.77 52.97 67.60 67.60 67.74 57.65 61.28 59.95 Florida West Palm Beach58.13 57.16 57.66 58.28 57.12 52.08 53.08 53.22 53.46 53.16 54.51 54.80 Georgia Albany 63.39 62.06 59.59 60.15 60.18 60.18 62.10 63.16 64.72 65.00 65.49 65.49 Georgia Atlanta 79.27 79.11 81.39 81.39 81.42 89.45 89.49 89.06 90.28 90.01 90.74 90.82 Hawaii Honolulu 49.20 50.50 50.47 53.21 54.23 56.41 58.38 62.99 62.99 63.20 63.20 65.56 Illinois Chicago
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 52.25 Connecticut Norwalk 42.80 44.37 43.65 44.49 44.68 46.69 46.69 46.69 48.94 49.50 50.64 50.77 49.33 District of Columbia Washington 35.20 35.34 35.62 35.73 35.73 33.75 35.79 37.84 35.33 36.34 36.34 37.22 40.32 Florida Miami 61.32 56.68 62.40 63.02 61.80 56.38 56.41 56.48 57.68 57.38 58.02 57.67 57.98 Florida Tampa 61.17 61.43 62.37 52.77 52.77 52.97 67.60 67.60 67.74 57.65 61.28 60.68 60.42 Florida West Palm Beach58.13 57.16 57.66 58.28 57.12 52.08 53.08 53.22 53.46 53.16 54.51 55.44 55.72 Georgia Albany 63.39 62.06 59.59 60.15 60.18 60.18 62.10 63.16 64.72 65.00 65.49 66.09 66.14 Georgia Atlanta 79.27 79.11 81.39 81.39 81.42 89.45 89.49 89.06 90.28 90.01 90.74 89.98 91.83 Hawaii Honolulu 49.20 50.50 50.47 53.21 54.23 56.41 58.38 62.99 62.99 63.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
  • or to initiate a change with respect to their primary interexchange carrier. Such tariff will enable the interexchange carrier to provide service to the customer until the interexchange carrier and the customer consummate a written agreement, but in no event shall the interexchange carrier provide service to its customer pursuant to such tariff for more than 45 days. 12. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation pursuant to § 63.10 of this chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2001/fcc01093.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2001/fcc01093.txt
  • international inbound collect calls to the United States are permitted to file a tariff for such services. (e) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of ``on-demand'' Mobile Satellite Services are permitted to file a tariff for such services applicable to those customers that have not entered into pre-existing service contracts designating a specific provider for such services. 13. Section 61.28 is revised to read as follows: § 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. (a) Any carrier classified as dominant for the provision of particular international communications services on a particular route for any reason other than a foreign carrier affiliation under § 63.10 of this Chapter shall file tariffs for those services pursuant to the notice and cost support
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
  • 6, 1999). * [34]FCC 99-51 , Report and Order, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review Review of International Common Carrier Regulations, IB Docket No. 98-118 (released March 23, 1999). Contents [35]PART 43 REPORTS OF COMMUNICATION COMMON CARRIERS AND CERTAIN AFFILIATES [36] [37]43.51 Contracts and concessions. [38] [39]43.61 Reports of international telecommunications traffic. [40] [41]43.82 International circuit status reports. [42]PART 61 TARIFFS [43] 61.28 International dominant carrier tariff filing requirements. [44]PART 63 EXTENSION OF LINES, NEW LINES AND DISCONTINUANCE, REDUCTION, OUTAGE AND IMPAIRMENT OF SERVICE BY COMMON CARRIERS; AND GRANTS OF RECOGNIZED PRIVATE OPERATING AGENCY STATUS [45] 63.09 Definitions applicable to international Section 214 authorizations. [46] [47]63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. [48] 63.11 Notification by and prior approval for U.S. international carriers