FCC Web Documents citing 52.26

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.txt
  • ž ž ž ž " Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Telephone Number Portability New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. Petition for Partial Reconsideration, and for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver of Sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 99-200 CC Docket No. 96-98 CC Docket No. 95-115 ORDER Adopted: June 11, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: 1. On March 13, 2002, the New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1304A1.txt
  • FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: May 11, 2004 Released: May 13, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CenturyTel, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., CenturyTel of Cowiche, Inc., and CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. (collectively, ``CenturyTel''), during the period November 24, 2003 to April 14, 2004, apparently violated section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules by willfully and repeatedly failing to route calls from CenturyTel's customers in Washington to wireless customers with ported numbers. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, and for the reasons discussed below, we find that CenturyTel is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2065A1.txt
  • ) ) File No. EB-04-IH-0012 Acct. No. 200432080136 FRN Nos. 0001-5846-97, 0003-7386-89, 0001-5825-43 ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2004 Released: July 12, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') has been conducting an investigation into possible violations by CenturyTel, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., CenturyTel of Cowiche, Inc., and CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. (collectively, ``CenturyTel'') of section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules by failing to route calls from CenturyTel's customers to ported wireless numbers. The Bureau and CenturyTel have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • by Bell Operating Companies (BOC's) 08/31/09 3060-0727 Sec. 73.213 01/31/10 3060-0734 Secs. 53.211 and 53.213 06/30/08 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 06/30/09 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 01/31/09 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 11/30/07 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749 Sec. 64.1509 04/30/10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • 53.211 and 53.213; Sections 260 and 271-276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 07/31/11 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 06/30/09 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 01/31/09 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 01/31/11 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 and CC Docket No. 95-116 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • and 53.213; and Sections 260 and 271-276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 07/31/11 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 03/31/12 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 12/31/11 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 01/31/11 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32, 52.33, 52.34, 52.35, and 52.36; and CC Docket No. 95-116 07/31/13 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 02/28/13 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 10/31/12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.txt
  • is endorsed by the NANC and the NAPM LLC. The Proposal represents our consensus view of the best process for selection of an LNPA(s) to provide the neutral, technologically proficient, and cost-effective administrative services that are necessary for achieving the important pro-consumer and pro-competitive purposes of local number portability (``LNP''). Significantly, the Proposal reflects the requirements of Sections 52.25 and 52.26 of the FCC's current rules, including the report to the Commission prepared by the NANC's LNPA SWG, dated April 25, 1997 (``Working Group Report''), which is incorporated by reference in Section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules. The PRoposal Reflects the Current Delegations of Authority and FCC rules Regarding LNPA Selection Under the Commission's existing rules, the NANC has oversight authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203906A1.txt
  • of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service Modification filed to add INTELSAT 709 as a point of communication. 41 ° 28 ' 0.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 209H Steger Road, WILL, FRANKFORT, IL 87 ° 46 ' 36.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW CORPORATION 1 10 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA10-46B 52.26 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2K50W9W 55.76 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 5K60W9W 67.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00W9W 77.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36MOF9F 82.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36MOF9F 88.40 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36MOFXW 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 2K50W9W 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 5K60W9W 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M00W9W 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207998A1.txt
  • 2K50W9W 55.76 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 5K60W9W 67.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00W9W 72.00 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 3M00W9W 75.00 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 6M00W9W 77.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F9F 82.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F9F 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0FXW 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz HARRIS ANT 3 11 meters ANTENNA ID: 5260 52.26 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2K50W9W 55.76 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 5K60W9W 67.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00W9W 72.00 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 3M00W9W 75.00 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 6M00W9W 77.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F9F 82.50 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F9F 88.40 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0FXW 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz ANDREW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239503A1.pdf
  • Notice needed to be issued noting the changes to the flows since they are going to be a part of the FCC Rules. Mr. Williams responded that he was not familiar with the process, but was sure that the FCC would need to review the changes before making them a part of the FCC Rules. Mr. O'Connor stated that Section 52.26 of the FCC Rules point to the report that contains the original flows, and that Rule adopts those flows to be the correct flows. He opined that if there are changes to the flows, they would have to be adopted by the FCC to replace what is already in the Rules. Chairman Atkinson inquired as to whether there is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245175A1.pdf
  • Atkinson advised that under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Requirements, an Executive Session will have to be approved by the head of the agency. A 30-day advance notice is required unless good cause is shown. Mr. Williams as the DFO will have the responsibility of getting approval to have an Executive Session. Chairman Atkinson further advised that under Section 52.26 of the FCC Rules (NANC Recommendations on Local Number Portability Administration, Section A3), ``the NANC shall provide ongoing oversight of number portability administration, including oversight of the regional LLCs subject to Commission review. Parties shall attempt to resolve issues regarding number portability deployment among themselves, and, if necessary, under the auspices of the NANC. If any party objects to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272591A1.pdf
  • fully respond to every one before this group gets involved in adding this to an agenda item. I think the experts with the contract are at the LLC, and I think that given what I've heard today, these are issues that need to be resolved in-house at the LLC first before they're at the NANC. Thank you. CHAIRMAN: Yes. And 52.26(b)3 says parties shall attempt to resolve between themselves, but it does allow the NANC outlet to a certain extent. Again, I don't want to cut off discussion on this, but we do have an obligation to let the people who are working here leave and clean up before the government closes. So I do appreciate everyone coming out today. And
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278600A1.pdf
  • the characterization that this represents consensus of an industry. MR. KOUTSKY: A couple of points I'd like to make in terms of this matter. The one point I would like to stress is that we are charged, NANC is charged with overseeing the Number Portability Administration in the United States. The NAPM is given immediate oversight over that. Commission rule 52.26B I think is fairly clear as to what the structures are, which is NAPM is for the lower, NANC is in the middle, and all of this is subject to actually C review. I do want to stress that I don't view these as private contracts between private parties. I believe this is a contract that does the public's business,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 39.71 41.05 39.58 45.97 15 Verizon North Inc. (Illinois - COIL) 42.83 41.27 41.72 60.34 54.09 53.67 44.51 41.03 14.11 16 Verizon North Inc. (Indiana - COIN) 54.82 51.36 40.36 47.34 46.06 46.55 47.67 41.40 34.61 17 Verizon North Inc. (Ohio - GTOH) 19.83 20.96 18.58 19.39 19.53 20.45 21.88 21.7 21.83 18 Verizon North Inc. (Pennsylvania - GTPA) 9.42 52.26 20.50 13.76 22.50 23.17 21.95 21.41 14.67 19 Verizon North Inc. (Wisconsin - GTWI) 17.19 13.86 11.536 10.85 9.90 14.16 16.99 17.85 16.08 20 Verizon North/Verizon South (GTIN + GLIN = GAIN) 20.06 22.78 22.34 22.64 24.75 32.82 33.00 32.47 29.06 21 Verizon North/Contel South (GTMI + GLMI = GAMI) 20.06 17.88 14.836 15.10 16.64 17.49 16.45 15.75 13.17 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292016A1.txt
  • 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA56-114B 46.50 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 42K7G18 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 42K7G18 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 128KG1W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 64K0G1W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 171KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 341KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 532KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 85K0G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W 52.26 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M47G7W 52.79 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M67G7W 53.68 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M04G7W 53.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M16G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W Points of Communication: Page 7 of 13 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - AMC-6 - (72 W.L.) 1 - SATMEX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293617A1.txt
  • 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA56-114B 46.50 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 42K7G18 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 42K7G18 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 128KG1W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 64K0G1W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 171KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 341KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 532KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 85K0G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W 52.26 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M47G7W 52.79 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M67G7W Page 3 of 18 53.68 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M04G7W 53.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M16G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - AMC-6 - (72 W.L.) 1 - SATMEX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296563A1.pdf
  • Day due date, but the Old SP determined that it is a Non-Simple Port, a response is due back to the New SP in four (4) hours...'' LNPA-WG's Recommendation Exceeds the Scope of the Task Assigned to the NANC The Council must consider the scope of the task that it was assigned by the Commission. Currently, as codified in Section 52.26(a) of the Commission's Rules, 45 CFR 52.26(a), local number portability administration shall comply with the Report of NANC's Local Number Portability Administration Selection Working Group, dated April 25, 1997 (Working Group Report) and its appendices, which are incorporated into the Commission's rule. Step 7 of the Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows - Provisioning - Figure 1 of Appendix B, states
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 38.92 32.886 40.74 43.61 39.71 41.05 15 Verizon North Inc. (Illinois - COIL) 48.90 42.82 41.27 41.72 60.34 54.09 53.67 44.51 16 Verizon North Inc. (Indiana - COIN) 70.42 54.82 51.36 40.36 47.34 46.06 46.55 47.67 17 Verizon North Inc. (Ohio - GTOH) 29.59 19.66 20.96 18.58 19.39 19.53 20.45 21.88 18 Verizon North Inc. (Pennsylvania - GTPA) 29.13 9.28 52.26 20.50 13.76 22.50 23.17 21.95 19 Verizon North Inc. (Wisconsin - GTWI) 21.76 17.16 13.86 11.536 10.85 9.90 14.16 16.99 20 Verizon North/Verizon South (GTIN + GLIN = GAIN) 26.98 19.97 22.78 22.34 22.64 24.75 32.82 33.00 21 Verizon North/Contel South (GTMI + GLMI = GAMI) 23.38 20.00 17.88 14.836 15.10 16.64 17.49 16.45 22 Verizon North/Verizon South (GTIL +
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302727A1.txt
  • LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service 29 ° 58 ' 13.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 5901 EARHARD EXPRESSWAY, Jefferson, NEW ORLEANS, LA 90 ° 12 ' 12.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 18 of 20 ANDREW 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA56-114B 46.50 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 42K7G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W 52.26 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M47G7W 52.79 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M67G7W 53.68 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M04G7W 53.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M16G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 42K7G7W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 128KG1W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 64K0G1W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 171KG7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303758A1.txt
  • Broadpoint Wireless License Co., LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service 29 ° 58 ' 13.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 5901 EARHARD EXPRESSWAY, Jefferson, NEW ORLEANS, LA 90 ° 12 ' 12.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA56-114B 46.50 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 42K7G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W 52.26 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M47G7W 52.79 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M67G7W 53.68 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M04G7W 53.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M16G7W 51.92 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M36G7W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 42K7G7W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 128KG1W 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 64K0G1W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 171KG7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308243A3.doc
  • 429, 430, and 435. Change Orders 429, 430, and 435 provide for the inclusion in the Number Portability Administration Center ("NPAC") database and provision through that database of Uniform Resource Identifier ("URI") fields for Voice, Multimedia Messaging Service ("MMS"), and Short Messaging Service ("SMS"). The request was submitted by Telcordia Technologies, Inc. ("Telcordia") on May 26, 2009, pursuant to Section 52.26(b)(3) of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") rules. Telcordia challenges the adoption of these change orders on both substantive and procedural grounds. Substantively, Telcordia argues that the change orders are defective because it believes that the URI fields do not meet with the Section 52.25(f) requirement that information in the number portability databases "shall be limited to the information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • 60 days from the release date of the Public Notice issued by the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, identifying the administrator selected by the NANC and the proposed locations of the regional databases. Carriers may challenge a state's decision to opt out of the regional database system by filing a petition with the Commission. * * * * * 83. Section 52.26 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows: § 52.26 NANC recommendations on Local Number Portability Administration. * * * * * (b)(3) The NANC shall provide ongoing oversight of number portability administration, including oversight of the regional LLCs, subject to Commission review. Parties shall attempt to resolve issues regarding number portability deployment among themselves and, if necessary,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-16A1.txt
  • of number portability administration, for a recommended resolution to be submitted by NANC to the Common Carrier Bureau as and when such issues arise in the context of the provision of number portability. Costs of the Regional Databases Billing and Collection Issues Background In the Third Report and Order, we stated that, as part of its management duties under section 52.26 of the Commission's rules, the local number portability administrator (LNPA) of each regional database must collect sufficient revenues to fund the operation and management of that database. We required the LNPA to allocate the costs of each regional database among carriers in proportion to each carrier's intrastate, interstate, and international end-user telecommunications revenues attributable to that region. We also noted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-217A1.txt
  • as number portability or local number portability (LNP), allows consumers to retain their existing phone numbers when switching carriers. See 47 U.S.C. § 153(30); 47 C.F.R. § 52.21(l); Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8368 (1996). See 47 U.S.C. § 251. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.26 See North American Numbering Council Local Number Portability Selection Working Group Final Report and Recommendation to the FCC, Appendix E (rel. April 25, 1997); 47 C.F.R. § 52.26. Over the past several years, the NANC has studied the wireline porting interval and reviewed options for reducing the length of the wireline porting interval. See North American Numbering Council Local Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.txt
  • VoIP service customer selects a number outside his current rate center, or if the interconnected VoIP service customer selects a number within his geographic rate center and moves out of that rate center, and then requests porting to a wireline carrier in his new rate center, the customer would not be able to port the number. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.26(a). We expect interconnected VoIP providers to fully inform their customers about these limitations, particularly limitations that result from the portable nature of, and use of non-geographic numbers by, certain interconnected VoIP services. (providing a summary of the various porting obligations). See id. To the extent that an interconnected VoIP provider is certificated or licensed as a carrier, then the Title
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.txt
  • 52.21 is amended by adding paragraph (w) as follows: § 52.21 Definitions ***** (w) The term 2009 LNP Porting Intervals Order refers to In the Matters of Local Number Portability Porting Interval and Validation Requirements; Telephone Number Portability, WC Docket No. 07-244, CC Docket No. 95-116, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 09-41 (2009). 3. Section 52.26 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) as follows: § 52.26 NANC Recommendations on Local Number Portability Administration. (a) Local number portability administration must comply with the recommendations of the North American Numbering Council (NANC) as set forth in the report to the Commission prepared by the NANC's Local Number Portability Administration Selection Working Group, dated April 25, 1997
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-85A1.txt
  • set of provisioning process flows to carry out operations needed to implement local number portability. On August 18, 1997, the Commission adopted and incorporated into its rules the NANC's recommendation for the provisioning process flows. The provisioning flows submitted by the NANC that we adopt in this Order supersede and replace those that the Commission incorporated by reference into section 52.26(a) of its rules in 1997. As a result, we revise our rules accordingly to exclude the outdated provisioning flows. The Commission also adopted in 1997 the NANC's recommendation of a four-business day porting interval for wireline ports, which covered both simple and non-simple ports. As discussed above, the Commission's Porting Interval Order reduced the porting interval for simple wireline and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.wp
  • Servs. Comm'n Comments at 4. 345 Id. Cf. U S WEST Reply at 15 (arguing that such an allocator would not reach flat-rated services); PCIA Comments at 7 (arguing that an allocator based on minutes of use may discriminate against carriers with certain network designs or customer calling patterns). 346 AirTouch Communications Comments at 2, 9. 347 47 C.F.R. § 52.26. 348 See In re Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 8776, 9206-07 (1997) (Universal Service Order), appeal pending sub nom. Texas Office of Public Util. Counsel, No. 97-60421 (5th Cir. filed June 25, 1997). 349 This differs from the assessment base for determining universal service contributions, which, in accord with section 254(d) of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1304A1.html
  • FORFEITURE Adopted: May 11, 2004 Released: May 13, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CenturyTel, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., CenturyTel of Cowiche, Inc., and CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. (collectively, ``CenturyTel''), during the period November 24, 2003 to April 14, 2004, apparently violated section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules by willfully and repeatedly failing to route calls from CenturyTel's customers in Washington to wireless customers with ported numbers.1 Based on our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, and for the reasons discussed below, we find that CenturyTel is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2065A1.html
  • 0001-5846-97, of Cowiche, Inc., and 0003-7386-89, 0001-5825-43 CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2004 Released: July 12, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') has been conducting an investigation into possible violations by CenturyTel, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., CenturyTel of Cowiche, Inc., and CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. (collectively, ``CenturyTel'') of section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules1 by failing to route calls from CenturyTel's customers to ported wireless numbers.2 2. The Bureau and CenturyTel have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.wp
  • Servs. Comm'n Comments at 4. 345 Id. Cf. U S WEST Reply at 15 (arguing that such an allocator would not reach flat-rated services); PCIA Comments at 7 (arguing that an allocator based on minutes of use may discriminate against carriers with certain network designs or customer calling patterns). 346 AirTouch Communications Comments at 2, 9. 347 47 C.F.R. § 52.26. 348 See In re Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 8776, 9206-07 (1997) (Universal Service Order), appeal pending sub nom. Texas Office of Public Util. Counsel, No. 97-60421 (5th Cir. filed June 25, 1997). 349 This differs from the assessment base for determining universal service contributions, which, in accord with section 254(d) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/da002204.doc
  • to read as follows: Authority: Sec.1, 2, 4, 5, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154, 155 unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply secs. 3, 4, 201-05, 207-09, 218, 225-7, 251-2, 271 and 332, 48 Stat. 1070, as amended, 1077; 47 U.S.C. 153, 154, 201-05, 207-09, 218, 225-7, 251-2, 271 and 332 unless otherwise noted. 24. Section 52.26(c) is amended by removing the words ''1919 M Street, NW, Room 239 (FCC Reference Center)'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Reference Information Center, 445-12th Street, SW, Room CY- A257)''. PART 73 -- RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 25. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336. Section 73.622(c) is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020611.html
  • any voluntary payments for the remainder of the merger condition period. (Dkt No. 98-141). Action by: Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 06/10/2002 by LETTER. (DA No. 02-1360). WCB [34]DA-02-1360A1.doc [35]DA-02-1360A1.pdf [36]DA-02-1360A1.txt IN THE MATTER OF NUMBERING RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION. Dismissed without prejudice the Petition for Reconsideration, for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver of sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's rules and regulations. (Dkt No. 95-115, 96-98, 99-200). Action by: Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division. Adopted: 06/11/2002 by ORDER. (DA No. 02-1335). WCB [37]DA-02-1335A1.doc [38]DA-02-1335A1.pdf [39]DA-02-1335A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JUNE 10, 2002, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 111: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 2000 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW AMENDMENT OF PARTS 43 AND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040513.html
  • the Commission's rules regarding unsolicited fax advertising. Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 04-1333). EB [51]DA-04-1333A1.doc [52]DA-04-1333A1.pdf [53]DA-04-1333A1.txt CENTURYTEL, INC., CENTURYTEL OF WASHINGTON, INC., CENTURYTEL OF COWICHE, INC., AND CENTURYTEL OF INTER ISLAND, INC. Notified CenturyTel, et al. of apparent liability for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $100,000 for violating Section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/11/2004 by NALF. (DA No. 04-1304). EB [54]DA-04-1304A1.doc [55]DA-04-1304A1.pdf [56]DA-04-1304A1.txt KM TELEVISION OF EL DORADO, L.L.C. V. EPPS CABLE TV. Dismissed the must carry complaint filed by KM Television of El Dorado, L.L.C. against Epps Cable TV. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 05/07/2004 by MO&O. (DA
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1304A1.html
  • FORFEITURE Adopted: May 11, 2004 Released: May 13, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CenturyTel, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., CenturyTel of Cowiche, Inc., and CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. (collectively, ``CenturyTel''), during the period November 24, 2003 to April 14, 2004, apparently violated section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules by willfully and repeatedly failing to route calls from CenturyTel's customers in Washington to wireless customers with ported numbers.1 Based on our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, and for the reasons discussed below, we find that CenturyTel is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2065A1.html
  • 0001-5846-97, of Cowiche, Inc., and 0003-7386-89, 0001-5825-43 CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2004 Released: July 12, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') has been conducting an investigation into possible violations by CenturyTel, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., CenturyTel of Cowiche, Inc., and CenturyTel of Inter Island, Inc. (collectively, ``CenturyTel'') of section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules1 by failing to route calls from CenturyTel's customers to ported wireless numbers.2 2. The Bureau and CenturyTel have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2005/03-1414-031105.pdf
  • from the Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligation ¶ 31, 17 F.C.C.R. 14,972, 14,985-86, ¶ 34, at 14,986-87 (2002). In 1997, the FCC received the NANC's recommendations regarding wireline-to-wireline service provider portability and issued a second order that adopted those recommendations. See 6 Second Report and Order, Telephone Number Portability, 12 F.C.C.R. 12,281 (1997) (Second Order); 47 C.F.R. § 52.26(a) (codifying the NANC Working Group Report). Like the First Order, the Second Order was issued pursuant to notice and comment and included a regulatory flexibility analysis. Second Order ¶ 2, 12 F.C.C.R. at 12,283, app. C, at 12,358. Under the Second Order, wireline-to-wireline number portability was "limited to carriers with facilities or numbering resources in the same rate center .
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive02.html
  • held on proposals to reform the Commission's Universal Service Contribution Methodology. Docket number(s) 90-571, 92-237, 95-116, 96-45, 98-170, 98-171, and 99-200. DA 02-1375. Public Notice: [[294]Word] | [[295]Text] | [[296]Acrobat] 6/11/2002 IN THE MATTER OF NUMBERING RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION FCC dismissed without prejudice the Petition for Reconsideration, for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver of sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's rules and regulations. Docket number(s) 95-115, 96-98, and 99-200. DA 02-1335. Order: [[297]Word] | [[298]Text] | [[299]Acrobat] __________________________________________________________________ 5/22/2002 FCC Releases Study on Telephone Trends. News Release: [[300]Word] | [[301]Acrobat] 5/21/2002 FCC Releases New Telephone Subscribership Report. News Release: [[302]Word] | [[303]Acrobat] 5/16/2002 News Release: FCC begins proceeding on sunset of long distance separate affiliate