FCC Web Documents citing 52.25

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1000A1.txt
  • 29, 2000). The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Litelco by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Litelco received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to increase
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Neclec by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Neclec received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of receipt. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letters to Net-Tel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipts reflect that Net-Tel received the Bureau's letters, but do not indicate the date of delivery. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1003A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to NPI certified mail, by return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that NPI received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to NATC by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that NATC received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of delivery. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to North County by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that North County received the Bureau's letter on February 3, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Optel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Optel received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letters to Paging Source by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Paging Source received the Bureau's letters on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to R and G Distributors by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that R and G Distributors received the Bureau's letter on February 6, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Trivergent by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Trivergent received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1010A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to USA Mobile by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that USA Mobile received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Vanguard by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Vanguard received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Winsome by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Winsome received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Allpage by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Allpage received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to American Metrocomm by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that American Metrocomm received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-993A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to ATX by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that ATX received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to CDS by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that CDS received the Bureau's letter on February 3, 2000. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-995A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-995A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Chickasaw by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Chickasaw received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Core by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Core received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of receipt. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Digital Teleport by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Digital Teleport received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Fulltel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Fulltel received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.txt
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to IDS by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that IDS received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • the Commission.'' Need: This subpart provides rules that are designed to ensure that users of telecommunications services can retain, at the same location, their existing telephone numbers when they switch from one local exchange telecommunications carrier to another. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 251. Section Numbers and Titles: 52.21 Definitions. 52.23 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by LECs. 52.25 Database architecture and administration. 52.27 Deployment of transitional measures for number portability. 52.29 Cost recovery for transitional measures for number portability. 52.31 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by CMRS providers. PART 61 - TARIFFS Subpart c - GENERAL RULES FOR NONDOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions of sections 201,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Maintenance) by Bell Operating Companies (BOC's) 08/31/09 3060-0727 Sec. 73.213 01/31/10 3060-0734 Secs. 53.211 and 53.213 06/30/08 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 06/30/09 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 01/31/09 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 11/30/07 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749 Sec. 64.1509
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • 53.209, 53.211 and 53.213; Sections 260 and 271-276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 07/31/11 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 06/30/09 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 01/31/09 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 01/31/11 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 and CC Docket No. 95-116 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • 53.211 and 53.213; and Sections 260 and 271-276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 07/31/11 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 03/31/12 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 12/31/11 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 01/31/11 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32, 52.33, 52.34, 52.35, and 52.36; and CC Docket No. 95-116 07/31/13 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 02/28/13 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.txt
  • The Proposal is endorsed by the NANC and the NAPM LLC. The Proposal represents our consensus view of the best process for selection of an LNPA(s) to provide the neutral, technologically proficient, and cost-effective administrative services that are necessary for achieving the important pro-consumer and pro-competitive purposes of local number portability (``LNP''). Significantly, the Proposal reflects the requirements of Sections 52.25 and 52.26 of the FCC's current rules, including the report to the Commission prepared by the NANC's LNPA SWG, dated April 25, 1997 (``Working Group Report''), which is incorporated by reference in Section 52.26(a) of the Commission's rules. The PRoposal Reflects the Current Delegations of Authority and FCC rules Regarding LNPA Selection Under the Commission's existing rules, the NANC has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.txt
  • industry testing and activation. If the SWG is unable to reach consensus regarding any issue, the issue shall be referred for resolution to the FCC, subject to appropriate protections for confidential information. 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352 (1996) (First LNP Order). 47 CFR § 52.25(c). The Commission directed the NANC to make a recommendation within seven months of its initial meeting. The Commission also directed the NANC to recommend the administrator selection process, the duties of the local number portability administrator(s), the location of regional databases, the overall national architecture, and technical specifications for the regional databases. First LNP Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8401,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 79.50 75.00 75.00 District of ColumbiaWashington 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 99.49 115.73 115.73 Florida Miami 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 60.20 64.45 64.23 64.58 72.92 80.46 Florida Tampa 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 81.30 93.70 93.70 Florida West Palm Beach 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 59.92 64.39 64.18 64.42 72.60 80.46 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 54.97 49.61 44.61 53.91 58.68 58.68 Illinois Chicago 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 59.99 58.42 58.42 58.42 52.35 52.35 Illinois Decatur 93.17 57.72 57.72 57.72 57.72 59.55 57.98 57.98 57.98
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 663,885 32,912,983 49.58 20,158,431 30.36 12,754,552 19.21 Louisiana 727,709 53,489,614 73.50 47,069,359 64.68 6,420,255 8.82 Maine 202,084 8,191,168 40.53 6,638,583 32.85 1,552,585 7.68 Maryland 869,113 15,181,301 17.47 11,474,871 13.20 3,706,430 4.26 Massachusetts 980,459 27,213,497 27.76 16,766,689 17.10 10,446,808 10.66 Michigan 1,757,604 55,069,371 31.33 30,140,700 17.15 24,928,671 14.18 Minnesota 842,854 26,424,759 31.35 17,887,542 21.22 8,537,217 10.13 Mississippi 493,540 38,673,840 78.36 25,785,163 52.25 12,888,677 26.11 Missouri 905,941 43,441,891 47.95 32,440,980 35.81 11,000,911 12.14 Montana 148,356 3,973,853 26.79 2,980,467 20.09 993,386 6.70 Nebraska 285,542 7,695,991 26.95 6,421,505 22.49 1,274,486 4.46 Nevada 385,401 4,863,073 12.62 4,593,693 11.92 269,380 0.70 New Hampshire 207,417 2,325,139 11.21 1,711,299 8.25 613,840 2.96 New Jersey 1,380,753 55,515,925 40.21 35,254,397 25.53 20,261,528 14.67 New Mexico 323,066 90,187,609 279.16 38,614,423 119.52 51,573,186
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • 663,885 32,912,983 49.58 20,158,431 30.36 12,754,552 19.21 Louisiana 727,709 53,489,614 73.50 47,069,359 64.68 6,420,255 8.82 Maine 202,084 8,191,168 40.53 6,638,583 32.85 1,552,585 7.68 Maryland 869,113 15,181,301 17.47 11,474,871 13.20 3,706,430 4.26 Massachusetts 980,459 27,213,497 27.76 16,766,689 17.10 10,446,808 10.66 Michigan 1,757,604 55,069,371 31.33 30,140,700 17.15 24,928,671 14.18 Minnesota 842,854 26,424,759 31.35 17,887,542 21.22 8,537,217 10.13 Mississippi 493,540 38,673,840 78.36 25,785,163 52.25 12,888,677 26.11 Missouri 905,941 43,441,891 47.95 32,440,980 35.81 11,000,911 12.14 Montana 148,356 3,973,853 26.79 2,980,467 20.09 993,386 6.70 Nebraska 285,542 7,695,991 26.95 6,421,505 22.49 1,274,486 4.46 Nevada 385,401 4,863,073 12.62 4,593,693 11.92 269,380 0.70 New Hampshire 207,417 2,325,139 11.21 1,711,299 8.25 613,840 2.96 New Jersey 1,380,753 55,515,925 40.21 35,254,397 25.53 20,261,528 14.67 New Mexico 323,066 90,187,609 279.16 38,614,423 119.52 51,573,186
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Reporting Local Exchange Companies 2,269,152 1,198,676 1,062,493 46.82 CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Northern Alabama AL 36,199 24,239 11,960 33.04 CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Southern Alabama AL 44,988 26,260 18,728 41.63 AT&T - BellSouth - Alabama AL 258,994 189,382 69,551 26.85 Verizon California - Contel - Arizona AZ 2,016 997 75 3.72 Qwest - Arizona AZ 187,518 89,493 97,969 52.25 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 147,116 77,626 68,320 46.44 Verizon California - Contel - California CA 71,120 30,979 39,619 55.71 Citizens Telecom. of California - Shasta - California CA 50,258 15,394 34,864 69.37 Verizon - Northwest - West Coast California CA 848 851 (8) (0.94) Verizon California - GTE - California CA 464,769 158,777 302,840 65.16 AT&T -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Reporting Local Exchange Companies 2,269,152 1,198,676 1,062,493 46.82 CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Northern Alabama AL 36,199 24,239 11,960 33.04 CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Southern Alabama AL 44,988 26,260 18,728 41.63 AT&T - BellSouth - Alabama AL 258,994 189,382 69,551 26.85 Verizon California - Contel - Arizona AZ 2,016 997 75 3.72 Qwest - Arizona AZ 187,518 89,493 97,969 52.25 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 147,116 77,626 68,320 46.44 Verizon California - Contel - California CA 71,120 30,979 39,619 55.71 Citizens Telecom. of California - Shasta - California CA 50,258 15,394 34,864 69.37 Verizon - Northwest - West Coast California CA 848 851 (8) (0.94) Verizon California - GTE - California CA 464,769 158,777 302,840 65.16 AT&T -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 99.49 99.49 99.49 99.49 99.49 Florida Miami 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 60.20 64.45 64.23 64.58 64.58 71.23 71.23 72.96 Florida Tampa 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 81.30 81.30 81.30 81.30 81.30 Florida West Palm Beach 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 59.92 64.39 64.18 64.42 64.42 71.23 71.23 72.96 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 60.64 60.64 60.64 Hawaii Honolulu 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 54.97 49.61 44.61 53.91 52.09 52.09 52.09 52.09 Illinois Chicago 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 59.99 58.42 58.42 58.42 52.35 52.35 52.35 52.35 Illinois Decatur 93.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305777A1.pdf
  • still an open proceeding at the FCC. We are only looking here at the issues that were brought to us at the NANC for a potential resolution. As initial matters we've concluded that the FCC has clearly placed this portion of the matter before the NANC to address and actually that there is a real question as to whether 47CFR 52.25 allows the UR elements to be included in NPAC database. Now that is we're saying there is a question. I'm not going to go through all of the background. Don in particular I want to thank him for his work on this. Don's memory, and knowledge, and experience particularly with the Future Numbering Committee, goes back much further than mine
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305778A1.pdf
  • MS. O'DONNELL: By FCC rule NANC selects the NPAC vendor, the LNP administrator. MR. CLAY: No, the NAPM LLC actually selects the vendor and we do that on behalf of the FCC. The NANC has oversight of the NAPM LLC but we actually are managing the contracts on behalf of the FCC. MS. O'DONNELL: So when I'm reading 47 CFR 52.25 (c), (d) and (f) NANC shall select the (unintelligible) portability administrator, that doesn't apply anymore? MR. CLAY: Well, I actually can't answer your question without looking at this but actually the responsibility of selecting a vendor has been with the NAPM LLC. MS. O'DONNELL: I'm respectfully disagreeing with that. MR. CLAY: Okay, that's fine. CHAIRMAN KANE: We will look into
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305779A1.pdf
  • dispute into two issues, one of which was procedural, one of which was substantive. The procedural issue was, was the full appropriate process followed in the adoption of these change orders and the substantive one was do the URI fields in the instant change orders which are change numbers number 429, 430, and 435 meet the requirement of 47 C.F.R. 52.25(f) that the fields in NPAC ``shall be limited to the information necessary to route telephone calls to the appropriate telecommunication carriers.'' Our conclusion on the first issue was that the full appropriate process was not followed, that the NANC had never actually made that determination itself as we believe the rules clearly require. And on the second issue we recommended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308243A2.pdf
  • chairman of NANC to review the request of Telecordia Technologies, Inc. for the North American Numbering Council to resolve the dispute concerning NANC Change Orders 429, 430 and 435. The dispute involves two issues, one substantive and one procedural: 1. Do the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) fields in Change Orders 429, 430, and 435 meet the requirement of 47 C.F.R. 52.25(f) that the fields in the Number Portability Administration Center "shall be limited to the information necessary to route telephone calls to the appropriate telecommunications carriers." 2. Was the full appropriate process followed in the adoption of these changes orders. The Dispute Resolution Team has reviewed all of the comments filed in this matter with the NANC. As the comments are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308243A3.doc
  • was submitted by Telcordia Technologies, Inc. ("Telcordia") on May 26, 2009, pursuant to Section 52.26(b)(3) of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") rules. Telcordia challenges the adoption of these change orders on both substantive and procedural grounds. Substantively, Telcordia argues that the change orders are defective because it believes that the URI fields do not meet with the Section 52.25(f) requirement that information in the number portability databases "shall be limited to the information necessary to route telephone calls to the appropriate telecommunications carriers." Procedurally, Telcordia argues that the change orders are defective because neither the NANC nor the Commission made an express finding that the URIs constitute "necessary" information. The NANC has thoroughly reviewed Telcordia's arguments and has considered
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by LECs. * * * * * (f) The Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, shall monitor the progress of local exchange carriers implementing number portability, and may direct such carriers to take any actions necessary to ensure compliance with the deployment schedule set forth in the appendix to this part 52. 82. Section 52.25 is amended by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: § 52.25 Database architecture and administration. * * * * * (g) Any state may opt out of its designated regional database and implement a state-specific database. A state must notify the Wireline Competition Bureau and NANC that it plans to implement a state-specific database within 60 days from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.txt
  • number portability at this time are likely to be better addressed in the context of Section 208 formal compliant proceedings or related mediations as opposed to FCC-initiated forfeiture proceedings. In this connection, we note that a violation of our number portability rules would constitute an unjust and unreasonable practice under section 201(b) of the Act. . 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, 52.25(e). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See e.g., Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Waiver, CC Docket Nos. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); Intercommunity Telephone Company, LLC Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); and North Central Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Petition for Waiver,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.txt
  • number portability at this time are likely to be better addressed in the context of Section 208 formal compliant proceedings or related mediations as opposed to FCC-initiated forfeiture proceedings. In this connection, we note that a violation of our number portability rules would constitute an unjust and unreasonable practice under section 201(b) of the Act. . 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, 52.25(e). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See e.g., Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Waiver, CC Docket Nos. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); Intercommunity Telephone Company, LLC Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); and North Central Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Petition for Waiver,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.txt
  • Notice is included as Appendix A. See Intermodal Number Portability Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 23698, para. 1. We note that a carrier may petition the Commission for additional time or waiver of the intermodal porting requirements if it can provide substantial, credible evidence that there are special circumstances that warrant departure from existing rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 52.25(e). In addition, under section 251(f)(2) of the Act, a LEC with fewer than two percent of the nation's subscriber lines installed in the aggregate nationwide may petition the appropriate state commission for suspension or modification of the requirements of section 251(b). See 47 U.S.C. § 251(f)(2). Further, in light of the court's determination that the Intermodal Number Portability Order resulted
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Litelco by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Litelco received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Neclec by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Neclec received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of receipt. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letters to Net-Tel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipts reflect that Net-Tel received the Bureau's letters, but do not indicate the date of delivery. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to NPI certified mail, by return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that NPI received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to NATC by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that NATC received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of delivery. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to North County by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that North County received the Bureau's letter on February 3, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Optel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Optel received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letters to Paging Source by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Paging Source received the Bureau's letters on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to R and G Distributors by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that R and G Distributors received the Bureau's letter on February 6, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Trivergent by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Trivergent received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to USA Mobile by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that USA Mobile received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Vanguard by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Vanguard received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Winsome by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Winsome received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Allpage by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Allpage received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to American Metrocomm by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that American Metrocomm received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to ATX by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that ATX received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to CDS by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that CDS received the Bureau's letter on February 3, 2000. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Chickasaw by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Chickasaw received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Core by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Core received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of receipt. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Digital Teleport by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Digital Teleport received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Fulltel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Fulltel received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to IDS by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that IDS received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
  • [143]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [144]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [145]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [146]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [147]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [148]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [149]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [150]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [151]Fri (07-14-12) 44.27 KB [152]Sat (07-15-12) 80.39 KB License Records [153]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [154]Mon (07-10-12) 147.48 KB [155]Tue (07-11-12) 52.25 KB [156]Wed (07-12-12) 151.37 KB [157]Thu (07-13-12) 50.21 KB [158]Fri (07-14-12) 61.13 KB [159]Sat (07-15-12) 0.16 KB Commercial Radio and Restricted Radiotelephone - FRC Application Records [160]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [161]Mon (07-10-12) 4.41 KB [162]Tue (07-11-12) 19.36 KB [163]Wed (07-12-12) 12.91 KB [164]Thu (07-13-12) 15.28 KB [165]Fri (07-14-12) 9.43 KB [166]Sat (07-15-12) 7.27 KB License Records [167]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
  • [166]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [167]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [168]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [169]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [170]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [171]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [172]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [173]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [174]Fri (07-14-12) 44.27 KB [175]Sat (07-15-12) 80.39 KB License Records [176]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [177]Mon (07-10-12) 147.48 KB [178]Tue (07-11-12) 52.25 KB [179]Wed (07-12-12) 151.37 KB [180]Thu (07-13-12) 50.21 KB [181]Fri (07-14-12) 61.13 KB [182]Sat (07-15-12) 0.16 KB Commercial Radio and Restricted Radiotelephone - FRC Application Records [183]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [184]Mon (07-10-12) 4.41 KB [185]Tue (07-11-12) 19.36 KB [186]Wed (07-12-12) 12.91 KB [187]Thu (07-13-12) 15.28 KB [188]Fri (07-14-12) 9.43 KB [189]Sat (07-15-12) 7.27 KB License Records [190]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • [166]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [167]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [168]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [169]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [170]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [171]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [172]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [173]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [174]Fri (07-14-12) 44.27 KB [175]Sat (07-15-12) 80.39 KB License Records [176]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [177]Mon (07-10-12) 147.48 KB [178]Tue (07-11-12) 52.25 KB [179]Wed (07-12-12) 151.37 KB [180]Thu (07-13-12) 50.21 KB [181]Fri (07-14-12) 61.13 KB [182]Sat (07-15-12) 0.16 KB Commercial Radio and Restricted Radiotelephone - FRC Application Records [183]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [184]Mon (07-10-12) 4.41 KB [185]Tue (07-11-12) 19.36 KB [186]Wed (07-12-12) 12.91 KB [187]Thu (07-13-12) 15.28 KB [188]Fri (07-14-12) 9.43 KB [189]Sat (07-15-12) 7.27 KB License Records [190]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
  • [166]Thu (07-13-12) 9.25 KB [167]Fri (07-14-12) 11.84 KB [168]Sat (07-15-12) 2.05 KB Cellular - 47 CFR Part 22 Application Records [169]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [170]Mon (07-10-12) 22.55 KB [171]Tue (07-11-12) 33.04 KB [172]Wed (07-12-12) 34.23 KB [173]Thu (07-13-12) 50.56 KB [174]Fri (07-14-12) 44.27 KB [175]Sat (07-15-12) 80.39 KB License Records [176]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [177]Mon (07-17-12) 13.71 KB [178]Tue (07-11-12) 52.25 KB [179]Wed (07-12-12) 151.37 KB [180]Thu (07-13-12) 50.21 KB [181]Fri (07-14-12) 61.13 KB [182]Sat (07-15-12) 0.16 KB Commercial Radio and Restricted Radiotelephone - FRC Application Records [183]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [184]Mon (07-10-12) 4.41 KB [185]Tue (07-11-12) 19.36 KB [186]Wed (07-12-12) 12.91 KB [187]Thu (07-13-12) 15.28 KB [188]Fri (07-14-12) 9.43 KB [189]Sat (07-15-12) 7.27 KB License Records [190]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • DC Washington 70.16 71.09 66.03 66.03 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 Florida Miami 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 60.20 60.20 64.45 Florida Tampa 67.15 67.59 67.59 78.89 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 Florida West Palm Beach 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 59.92 59.92 64.39 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 45.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 54.97 49.62 49.62 Illinois Chicago 93.64 93.68 93.03 93.03 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 59.99 59.99 58.42 Illinois Decatur 93.30 93.33 93.17 93.17 93.17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 66.03 66.03 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 Florida Miami 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 60.20 60.20 64.45 64.23 Florida Tampa 67.15 67.59 67.59 78.89 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 Florida West Palm Beach 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 59.92 59.92 64.39 64.17 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 45.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 54.97 49.62 49.61 49.61 Illinois Chicago 93.64 93.68 93.03 93.03 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 59.99 59.99 58.42 58.42 Illinois Decatur 93.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 68.90 79.50 79.50 District of ColumbiaWashington 66.03 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 97.19 Florida Miami 58.32 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 60.20 60.20 64.45 64.23 64.58 Florida Tampa 78.89 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 Florida West Palm Beach 58.32 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 59.92 59.92 64.39 64.18 64.42 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 47.50 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 54.97 49.62 49.61 44.61 44.61 Illinois Chicago 93.03 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 59.99 59.99 58.42 58.42 58.42 Illinois Decatur 93.17 93.17 57.72 57.72 57.72 57.72 59.55 59.55 57.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 68.90 68.90 68.90 79.50 79.50 79.50 District of Columbia Washington 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 83.25 99.49 99.49 Florida Miami 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 60.20 64.45 64.23 64.58 64.58 Florida Tampa 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 74.07 81.30 81.30 Florida West Palm Beach 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 59.92 64.39 64.18 64.42 64.42 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 54.97 49.61 44.61 53.91 53.91 Illinois Chicago 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 59.99 58.42 58.42 58.42 58.42 Illinois Decatur 93.17 57.72 57.72 57.72 57.72 59.55 57.98 57.98 57.98 57.98 Illinois Rock Island
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 69.00 69.00 67.76 66.03 70.57 70.16 71.09 66.03 66.03 66.03 66.03 FL Miami 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.57 54.57 54.50 54.50 54.50 56.00 56.00 Tampa 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 58.90 73.90 68.90 68.90 W. Palm Beach 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.50 54.57 54.57 54.50 54.50 54.50 56.00 56.00 GA Albany 50.25 50.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 Atlanta 50.25 50.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 HI Honolulu 27.00 51.00 60.00 45.50 45.50 47.50 30.50 45.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 IL Chicago 43.00 45.55 70.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 84.50 52.35 Decatur 43.00 45.55 70.50 84.50 84.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 Connecticut Norwalk 60.00 63.60 63.60 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 District of ColumbiaWashington 70.16 71.09 66.03 66.03 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 Florida West Palm Beach 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 Florida Tampa 67.15 67.59 67.59 78.89 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 Florida Miami 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 45.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 Illinois Chicago 93.64 93.68 93.03 93.03 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 Illinois Decatur 93.30 93.33 93.17 93.17 93.17 57.72 57.72 57.72 Illinois Rock Island 93.36 93.40 93.17 93.17 93.17 57.72 57.72 57.72 Indiana Indianapolis
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Connecticut Norwalk 60.00 63.60 63.60 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 District of ColumbiaWashington 70.16 71.09 66.03 66.03 66.03 66.03 83.25 83.25 83.25 Florida West Palm Beach 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 59.92 59.92 59.92 60.20 Florida Tampa 67.15 67.59 67.59 78.89 78.89 78.89 74.07 74.07 74.07 Florida Miami 57.84 57.77 57.77 58.32 59.92 60.20 60.20 60.20 59.92 Georgia Albany 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 Georgia Atlanta 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 52.25 58.25 58.25 Hawaii Honolulu 45.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 47.50 51.47 52.97 52.97 Illinois Chicago 93.64 93.68 93.03 93.03 93.03 57.64 57.64 57.64 57.64 Illinois Decatur 93.30 93.33 93.17 93.17 93.17 57.72 57.72 57.72 57.72 Illinois Rock Island 93.36 93.40 93.17 93.17 93.17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 19.81 15.68 30CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NEVADA 14.94 11.95 15.94 19.57 1,652.87 9.56 17.65 31CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NORTH CAROLINA 13.71 11.95 9.60 16.36 42.42 21.65 17.92 32CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF OHIO 17.94 11.95 (1.35) 27.66 (66.31) 132.26 34.63 33CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TEXAS 13.10 11.95 14.34 17.20 528.07 10.41 15.79 34CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA 12.99 11.95 14.07 13.71 52.25 27.60 16.03 35THE CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE COMPANY 22.02 18.62 93.44 11.48 - 109.30 17.76 36CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.95 12.86 7.29 12.29 24.02 15.18 13.54 37CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.93 11.84 47.68 11.00 - 18.88 14.30 38CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF MAINE 14.83 11.94 11.56 20.45 329.23 19.60 20.29 39CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF VERMONT 13.68 11.94 13.18 17.45 169.38 16.16 17.27 40CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • LA 1,464,355 1,118,699 391,801 26.76 22.70 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 561,080 383,356 183,670 32.74 15.28 Verizon - Maryland MD 2,245,671 1,438,959 889,610 39.61 13.41 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 3,359,365 2,150,947 1,209,325 36.00 7.47 Verizon - Contel South - Michigan MI 48,980 34,211 12,411 25.34 8.03 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 339,161 231,815 177,227 52.25 16.48 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 2,107,118 1,442,461 819,420 38.89 20.31 Qwest - Minnesota MN NA NA NA NA NA BellSouth - Mississippi MS 1,058,344 794,118 295,522 27.92 15.51 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 2,012,221 1,357,374 642,799 31.94 16.90 Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 217,188 165,895 55,522 25.56 37.39 Qwest - Montana MT NA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • SBC - Pacific Bell - California CA 6,417,436 4,426,457 2,178,319 33.94 25.12 Sure/West/Roseville Tel - California CA 182,857 138,490 46,026 25.17 0.02 Qwest - Colorado CO 2,926,050 2,159,357 787,516 26.91 21.85 SBC - SNET - CT CT 1,469,062 1,041,494 512,974 34.92 23.86 Verizon - Delaware DE 336,517 228,456 120,585 35.83 26.43 Verizon - District of Columbia DC 618,098 324,520 322,940 52.25 14.12 Verizon - Florida FL 1,325,462 948,339 470,759 35.52 24.84 BellSouth - Florida FL 3,884,788 2,806,265 1,242,286 31.98 23.89 Sprint - Florida FL 1,614,434 1,253,186 374,514 23.20 50.68 ALLTEL Georgia Communications GA 333,857 240,455 94,940 28.44 10.81 BellSouth - Georgia GA 4,156,950 2,890,578 1,384,207 33.30 16.17 Verizon - Hawaii HI 491,319 369,684 222,359 45.26 16.69 Verizon - NW - Idaho
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd010424.html
  • apparent wilful violation of section 52.15(f) by failing to report its number utilization and forecast data.. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/20/2001 by NAL. (DA No. 01-1005). ENF [114]DA-01-1005A1.pdf [115]DA-01-1005A1.doc [116]DA-01-1005A1.txt CDS NETWORKS, INC.. Issued a notice of apparent liability to CDS Networks, Inc., proposing a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 for an apparent wilfull violation of section 52.25(f) of the Commission's rules for failing to report its number utilization and forecast data.. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/20/2001 by NAL. (DA No. 01-994). ENF [117]DA-01-994A1.pdf [118]DA-01-994A1.doc [119]DA-01-994A1.txt USA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. II. Issued a notice of apparent liability for a forfeiture in the amount of $12,000 to USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II for its apparent wilful violation
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Litelco by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Litelco received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Neclec by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Neclec received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of receipt. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letters to Net-Tel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipts reflect that Net-Tel received the Bureau's letters, but do not indicate the date of delivery. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to NPI certified mail, by return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that NPI received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to NATC by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that NATC received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of delivery. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to North County by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that North County received the Bureau's letter on February 3, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Optel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Optel received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letters to Paging Source by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Paging Source received the Bureau's letters on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to R and G Distributors by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that R and G Distributors received the Bureau's letter on February 6, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Trivergent by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Trivergent received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to USA Mobile by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that USA Mobile received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Vanguard by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Vanguard received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Winsome by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Winsome received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Allpage by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Allpage received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to American Metrocomm by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that American Metrocomm received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to ATX by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that ATX received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to CDS by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that CDS received the Bureau's letter on February 3, 2000. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Chickasaw by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Chickasaw received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Core by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Core received the Bureau's letter but does not indicate the date of receipt. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Digital Teleport by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Digital Teleport received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to Fulltel by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that Fulltel received the Bureau's letter on February 5, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.html
  • 2000). Id. The NRUF reports are due on or before February 1 and on or before August 1 of each year. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). However, we note that the deadline for filing reports due August 1, 2000 was extended to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (Jul. 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 52.25(g)(3)(iv). See NRO Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7609-10. The Enforcement Bureau mailed the January 29, 2001 letter to IDS by certified mail, return receipt requested. The return receipt reflects that IDS received the Bureau's letter on February 2, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). Recently, the Commission amended Section 1.80 of its rules to make