FCC Web Documents citing 52.23

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.txt
  • limitations based on proximity to 50 urbanized areas), 90.741 (licensees of Phase I nationwide 220-222 MHz systems must construct and operate in 28 of 100 listed urbanized areas). See also Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Bio-Medical Telemetry Operations, PR Docket No. 80-422, Report and Order, 85 FCC2d 745 ¶ 9 (1981). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 52.23 (schedule for deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by local exchange carriers is defined, in part, by reference to 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)). See U.S. Department of Commerce, Airline Distance Between Cities in the United States, Appendix, page 226; 47 C.F.R. § 90.261. See, e.g., The Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2013A1.txt
  • Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Wireless carriers, for example, are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493. >. See Pooling Administrator Press Release. Numbering Resource Optimization Second Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 325. NeuStar received a one-year contract with an option to renew each year for up to five years, at the discretion of the FCC. See Pooling Administrator Press Release. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2479A1.txt
  • NXXs in the 847 NPA were depleted. See Pooling Administrator Press Release. Wireless carriers, for example, are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493. >. Some commenters contend that the state commissions have failed to implement a cost recovery system for carriers incurring costs from state pooling trials. See, e.g., United States Telecom Association (USTA) Comments at 3-4 (Florida Commission Petition); BellSouth Comments at 4 (South Carolina Commission Petition); USTA Comments at 5 (South Carolina Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3025A1.txt
  • NXXs in the 847 NPA were depleted. See Pooling Administrator Press Release. Wireless carriers, for example, are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493. >. See, e.g., February 2001 Delegation Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3487; March 2001 Delegation Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 5483; August 2001 Delegation Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 15850; October 2001 Delegation Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 18869. Numbering Resource Optimization Third Report and Order at paras 24-46. Numbering Resource Optimization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-386A1.txt
  • timely manner. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Wireless carriers are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493, para. 16. >. See Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7639-40. The competitive bidding process is currently under way. Numbering Resource Optimization Second Report and Order at para. 39. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7651, para. 169. See Numbering Resource Optimization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-656A1.txt
  • timely manner. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Wireless carriers are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493. >. See Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7639-40. Numbering Resource Optimization Second Report and Order at para. 39. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7651. See Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Numbering Resource Optimization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.txt
  • ž ž ž ž ž " Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Telephone Number Portability New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. Petition for Partial Reconsideration, and for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver of Sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 99-200 CC Docket No. 96-98 CC Docket No. 95-115 ORDER Adopted: June 11, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: 1. On March 13, 2002, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2190A1.txt
  • 13th Petition remains pending, and we do not address the merits of that issue in this letter. Letter from John T. Scott, III, Verizon Wireless to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed May 20, 2003). Id. at 1. Id. at 2. Id. at 1. 47 U.S.C. § 153 and 47 C.F.R. § 52.21(k). 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23, 52.31. Numbering Resource Optimization, Fourth Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket Nos. 99-200 and 95-116, FCC 03-126 (rel. June 18, 2003). First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8433. x y › £ Ò Ø ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3915A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. Inter-Community Telephone Company, LLC Petitions for Waiver of Section 52.23(c) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 95-116 ORDER Adopted: December 10, 2003 Released: December 11, 2003 By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: We grant the requests of Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. (Franklin) and Inter-Community Telephone Company, LLC (Inter-Community) to withdraw their petitions for waiver. In the petitions, Franklin and Inter-Community requested limited relief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.txt
  • rules in Part 54. The staff also recommends eliminating certain rules in Part 36, subpart F that refer to specific time periods that have lapsed. The staff further recommends revisions to certain rule sections in Part 54 to update certain provisions and dates, for removal of provisions for which funding periods have expired, and for elimination of sections 52.15(d)-(e) and 52.23(c)-(e)(elapsed implementation dates). Other recommendations. CTIA, in a petition for rulemaking filed in another docket, proposes to eliminate section 1.815 of the Commission's rules, which requires common carriers to file annual employment reports (FCC Form 395) with the Commission. Because this data collection is administered by WCB's Industry Analysis and Technology Division, WCB reviewed the rule as part of this biennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.txt
  • requests for services will not be delayed due to carriers' difficulty in obtaining numbering resources. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 52.9(b), and 52.23(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 52.9(b), 52.23(e), the petition filed by The North-Eastern Pennsylvania Telephone Company is DENIED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of The North-Eastern Pennsylvania Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 52.23(b) of the Commission's Rules, filed March 23,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1455A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(e); see also 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d). Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352 (1996). See 2002 Forbearance Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 14982 (2002). Id. at 14986. Yorkville Petition at 2. Choice Wireless Petition at 2. TMP Companies Petition at 2. We note that, under Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1456A1.txt
  • No. 95-116 ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2004 Released: May 24, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. In this Order, we dismiss as procedurally defective a request for extension of time filed by Upper Peninsula Telephone Company (UPTC) to implement local number portability (LNP) in eighteen (18) of the nineteen (19) rural telephone exchanges in its network. Section 52.23(e) of the Commission's rules requires requests for extension of the LNP implementation schedule to be filed 60 days before the deadline. The implementation deadline for carriers outside of the top 100 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) who have received a request for LNP is May 24, 2004. UPTC's petition is dated April 16, 2004, which is less than 60 days in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-459A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Number Resource Optimization Telephone Number Portability Cellular Mobile Systems of St. Cloud, LLC Limited Waiver and Extension of Section 52.23(c) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 99-200 CC Docket No. 95-116 ORDER Adopted: February 23, 2004 Released: February 24, 2004 By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: We grant the requests of Cellular Mobile Systems of St. Cloud, LLC (CMS) to withdraw their petition for waiver. In the petition, CMS requests an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-69A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability Bentleyville Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 52.23 (c) of the Commission Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 95-116 ORDER Adopted: January 14, 2004 Released: January 15, 2004 By the Assistant Deputy Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On November 21, 2003, Bentleyville Telephone Company (Bentleyville) filed the above-captioned petition for waiver of section 52.23(c) of the Commission rules. Specifically, Bentleyville seeks waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2714A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(e); see also 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d). 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d). TeleGuam Letter at 1. As a practical matter, it appears that GTA Telecom will need to upgrade its network in order for GTA Wireless to implement the GuamCell BFR, and because of their common affiliation, we will hold GTA Wireless and its parent, TeleGuam, responsible for any delay in doing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-538A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(e); see also 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d). Copper Valley Petition at 4. Id. Id. at 5. Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Supplement to Petition for Limited Waiver or Extension of Time from Copper Valley Wireless, Inc., filed February 23, 2005 at 2. We reject Copper Valley's argument that it is entitled to relief under section 251(f)(2) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • technically feasible, number portability in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Commission.'' Need: This subpart provides rules that are designed to ensure that users of telecommunications services can retain, at the same location, their existing telephone numbers when they switch from one local exchange telecommunications carrier to another. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 251. Section Numbers and Titles: 52.21 Definitions. 52.23 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by LECs. 52.25 Database architecture and administration. 52.27 Deployment of transitional measures for number portability. 52.29 Cost recovery for transitional measures for number portability. 52.31 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by CMRS providers. PART 61 - TARIFFS Subpart c - GENERAL RULES FOR NONDOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1174A1.txt
  • and untimely. On April 16, 2004, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) received a petition from UPTC requesting an extension of time for LNP implementation. On May 24, 2004, the Bureau released an Order dismissing UPTC's request for an extension of time to implement LNP because the request was not filed 60 days before the implementation deadline as required by section 52.23(e) of the Commission's rules. In response to the Dismissal Order, UPTC filed a Petition for Reconsideration on June 22, 2004, asking the Bureau to consider the merits of the request. UPTC, however, improperly filed the Petition for Reconsideration with the Bureau instead of with the Secretary's office. Section 1.106(i) of the Commission's rules requires petitions for reconsideration to be filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1565A1.txt
  • (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Wait Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See Wait Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See id. at 1159. 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d); see also 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(e). 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d). See GTE Pacifica Petition at 5. See First Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 7314 ¶ 137; 2002 Forbearance Order, 17 FCC Rcd. at 14986 ¶ 31. TeleGuam, 20 FCC Rcd. at 16327 ¶ 10 n.28. See id. at 16327 ¶ 12. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.31(d)(2) (A carrier requesting an extension of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Installation, and Maintenance) by Bell Operating Companies (BOC's) 08/31/09 3060-0727 Sec. 73.213 01/31/10 3060-0734 Secs. 53.211 and 53.213 06/30/08 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 06/30/09 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 01/31/09 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 11/30/07 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.txt
  • porting responsibilities.''); JSI Comments at 12-14 (``Time Warner is seeking to create a one-way approach to porting and the Commission should reject the Petition.''). Because our number portability rules apply to all local exchange carriers, customers effectively are able to port numbers to VoIP providers today by virtue of their relationship with a wholesale local exchange carrier. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23. We note that Verizon already makes such a commitment under its agreements with Time Warner Cable. See Verizon Reply Comments at 11-12. See IP-Enabled Services NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 4911-12, para. 73. See, e.g., Neutral Tandem Comments at 1, 5, 7 (seeking Commission protection against incumbent LEC and state restrictions on resale and tandem competition, and for the establishment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1317A1.pdf
  • then the provider must facilitate a valid request for porting to or from: (1)a wireless carrier whose coverage area overlaps with the geographiclocation of the porting-out numbering partner's rate center; (2) a wireline carrier with facilities or numbering resources in the same rate center; or (3) another interconnected VoIP provider whose numbering partner meets the requirements of (1) or (2). [47C.F.R.§§52.23, 52.34] If the interconnected VoIP provider's numbering partner is a covered Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) provider then the provider must facilitate a valid request for porting to or from: (1) another wireless 4 carrier; (2) a wireline carrier within the telephone number's originating rate center; or (3) another interconnected VoIP provider whose numbering partner meets the requirements of (1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • 3060-0734 Secs. 53.209, 53.211 and 53.213; Sections 260 and 271-276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 07/31/11 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 06/30/09 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 01/31/09 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 01/31/11 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 and CC Docket No. 95-116 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • Secs. 53.209, 53.211 and 53.213; and Sections 260 and 271-276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 07/31/11 3060-0737 Disclosure Requirements for Information Services Provided Under a Presubscription or Comparable Arrangement 03/31/12 3060-0740 Sec. 95.1015 12/31/11 3060-0741 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98 01/31/11 3060-0742 Secs. 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32, 52.33, 52.34, 52.35, and 52.36; and CC Docket No. 95-116 07/31/13 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 02/28/13 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236302A1.txt
  • FARM PLAZA, BLDG. C-4, MCLEAN, BLOOMINGTON, IL 88 ° 57 ' 21.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREWS 1 3.7 meters ANTENNA ID: ES37PK 71.55 dBW 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 7M70G7D 7.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 7M70G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.1 VSAT(1.2M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.2 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.2M-QD 52.23 dBW 1.5 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.2 VSAT(1.8M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.8 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.8M-QD 61.27 dBW 4.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 3M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.3 VSAT(2.4M.)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238007A1.txt
  • FARM PLAZA, BLDG. C-4, MCLEAN, BLOOMINGTON, IL 88 ° 57 ' 21.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREWS 1 3.7 meters ANTENNA ID: ES37PK 71.55 dBW 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 7M70G7D 7.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 7M70G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.1 VSAT(1.2M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.2 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.2M-QD 52.23 dBW 1.5 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.2 VSAT(1.8M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.8 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.8M-QD 61.27 dBW 4.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 3M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.3 VSAT(2.4M.)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269718A1.txt
  • MCLEAN, BLOOMINGTON, IL 88 ° 57 ' 21.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 9 of 16 ANDREWS 1 3.7 meters ANTENNA ID: ES37PK 71.55 dBW 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 7M70G7D 7.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 7M70G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.1 VSAT(1.2M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.2 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.2M-QD 52.23 dBW 1.5 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.2 VSAT(1.8M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.8 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.8M-QD 61.27 dBW 4.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 3M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.3 VSAT(2.4M.)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270918A1.txt
  • FARM PLAZA, BLDG. C-4, MCLEAN, BLOOMINGTON, IL 88 ° 57 ' 21.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREWS 1 3.7 meters ANTENNA ID: ES37PK 71.55 dBW 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 7M70G7D 7.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 7M70G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.1 VSAT(1.2M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.2 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.2M-QD 52.23 dBW 1.5 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M50G7D 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M50G7D SITE ID: TRANSP.2 VSAT(1.8M.) TRANSPORTABLE, VARIOUS, (50 UNITS) LOCATION: VERTEXRSI VERTEX 1.8 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.8M-QD 61.27 dBW 4.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M50G7D Page 21 of 35 9.0 MBPS, QPSK, FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 3M50G7D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-104A1.pdf
  • 2000, which is expected to 270 Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10385. See also ALTS comments at 23; Nextel comments at 19; Small Business Alliance comments at 9. The Commission required wireline carriers in the largest 100 MSAs to implement LNP as of December 31, 1998, in switches that another carrier has requested be made LNP capable. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)(1). As of January 1, 1999, LECs may request LNP in other LECs' individual switches in areas outside of the largest 100 MSAs, to be provided no later than six months after receiving the request. CMRS carriers are not required to deploy LNP until November 24, 2002. See CMRS LNP Forbearance Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 3093. We do not, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.txt
  • used to support LNP, and therefore we have required LNP capable carriers to participate in thousands-block number pooling. Specifically, we have mandated thousands-block number pooling in the top 100 MSAs were carriers are required to be LNP capable. Outside the top 100 MSAs carriers are required to become LNP capable after receiving a request from another carrier. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b). The specific roll-out schedule for national thousands-block number pooling will be adopted after the Pooling Administrator is selected. First Report and Order, 15 fcc Rcd. at 7632-33, para. 134. Id. 47 U.S.C. § 251(f). See Letter from Yog R. Varma, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, to Ronald Conners, Director, North American Numbering Plan Administrator, dated June 6, 2000 (DA 00-1247);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.txt
  • limitations based on proximity to 50 urbanized areas), 90.741 (licensees of Phase I nationwide 220-222 MHz systems must construct and operate in 28 of 100 listed urbanized areas). See also Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Bio-Medical Telemetry Operations, PR Docket No. 80-422, Report and Order, 85 FCC2d 745 ¶ 9 (1981). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 52.23 (schedule for deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by local exchange carriers is defined, in part, by reference to 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)). See U.S. Department of Commerce, Airline Distance Between Cities in the United States, Appendix, page 226; 47 C.F.R. § 90.261. See, e.g., The Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • have access to all data reported to the Administrator. Contributors may make requests for Commission nondisclosure of company-specific revenue information under §0.459 of this chapter by so indicating on the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet at the time that the subject data are submitted. The Commission shall make all decisions regarding nondisclosure of company-specific information. * * * * * 81. Section 52.23 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows: § 52.23 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by LECs. * * * * * (f) The Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, shall monitor the progress of local exchange carriers implementing number portability, and may direct such carriers to take any actions necessary to ensure compliance with the deployment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-215A1.txt
  • porting volumes as a result of CMRS carriers' participation in number pooling and number portability. We note that, while not addressing the merits of Verizon's petition for forbearance, APCO, NENA, and NASNA have expressed concern about potential degradation of 911 services for customers who port numbers, and urge the Commission to enforce the LNP performance criteria set forth in section 52.23 of the Commission's rules. See Letter from James R. Hobson, Counsel for NENA, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (filed Jan. 30, 2002) at 2-3. While we recognize these concerns, to the extent that wireless carriers are deploying automatic location identification technology in their networks according to compliance plans approved by the Commission, we conclude that they will satisfy the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.txt
  • MSAs included in CMSAs on the Census Bureau's list of the largest 100 MSAs should be included on the Commission's list of the top 100 MSAs. Receiving comment on such matters will help us promote our goal of implementing number portability effectively and efficiently. Legal Basis The authority for actions proposed in this Further Notice may be found in Section 52.23 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR § 52.23, and in sections 1, 3, 4, 201-201, 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, and 251. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities To Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and, where
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-126A1.txt
  • 52.21(r) should be deleted: § 52.21 Definitions. *** (a) The term 100 largest MSAs includes the 100 largest MSAs as identified in the 1990 U.S. Census reports, as set forth in the Appendix to this part, as well as those areas identified as one of the largest 100 MSAs on subsequent updates to the U.S. Census reports. *** 4. Section 52.23 is revised to read as follows: § 52.23 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by LECs. *** (b) (1) All LECs must provide a long-term database method for number portability in the 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), as defined in Section 52.21(k) of this part, in switches for which another carrier has made a specific request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-237A1.txt
  • seek clarification or review of that portion of the Bureau's letter pertaining to the implication of the porting interval for E911. Id. at 2. Id. Id. at 9. Id. at 6. Id. 47 U.S.C. § 153 and 47 C.F.R. § 52.21(k). Wireless Carrier Group Petition at 7-8. Id. at 17. Id. Id. Id. at 18. Id. Id. 47 CFR §§ 52.23, 52.31. 47 C.F.R. § 52.31. Wireless Carrier Group Petition at 20-21. Rural Telecommunications Group (RTG) Comments on CTIA's May 13th Petition at ii. Id. Ex Parte Presentation of the Rural Wireless Working Group Re: Rural Wireless Number Portability Guidelines, Section 1.3, (filed Aug. 25, 2003) (Rural Wireless Working Group Filing). Letter from Diane Cornell, CTIA to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.txt
  • Radio Service (CMRS) providers as well as wireline service providers.'' The Commission adopted rules implementing the LNP requirements. Section 52.21(k) of the rules defines number portability to mean ``the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another.'' Section 52.23(b)(1) provides that ``all local exchange carriers (LECs) must provide a long-term database method for number portability in the 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) by December 31, 1998 ... in switches for which another carrier has made a specific request for the provision of number portability ...'' Finally, Section 52.23(b)(2)(i) of the Commission rules provides that ``any wireline carrier that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.txt
  • it appears that portions of paragraphs (d) and (e) are no longer applicable. We therefore seek comment on our proposal to modify or delete these provisions. Subpart C - Number Portability. We also seek comment on several proposed changes to our local number portability (LNP) rules to reflect the current status of LNP implementation. Specifically, we propose to update section 52.23 to reflect the passage of the deadline for deployment of LNP in the largest 100 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Specifically, section 52.23(b) sets forth requirements relating to the initial deployment of wireline LNP, which was completed in 1998. Accordingly, we seek comment of whether these rules should be modified. Similarly, sections 52.23(d) through (f) contain provisions relating to the original
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-35A1.txt
  • to 50 urbanized areas); 47 C.F.R. § 90.741 (licensees of Phase I nationwide 220-222 MHz systems must construct and operate in 28 of 100 listed urbanized areas). See also Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Bio-Medical Telemetry Operations, PR Docket No. 80-422, Report and Order, 85 FCC 2d 745 ¶ 9 (1981). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 52.23 (schedule for deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by local exchange carriers is defined, in part, by reference to 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)). See U.S. Department of Commerce, Airline Distance Between Cities in the United States, Appendix, page 226; 47 C.F.R. § 90.261. NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 14955 ¶ 16; See, e.g., The Development of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-35A1_Erratum.doc
  • to 50 urbanized areas); 47 C.F.R. § 90.741 (licensees of Phase I nationwide 220-222 MHz systems must construct and operate in 28 of 100 listed urbanized areas). See also Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Bio-Medical Telemetry Operations, PR Docket No. 80-422, Report and Order, 85 FCC 2d 745 ¶ 9 (1981). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 52.23 (schedule for deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by local exchange carriers is defined, in part, by reference to 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)). See U.S. Department of Commerce, Airline Distance Between Cities in the United States, Appendix, page 226; 47 C.F.R. § 90.261. NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 14955 ¶ 16; See, e.g., The Development of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.txt
  • August 28th, 2005. We do not extend the relief granted in this order to carriers operating in the state of Florida, because the telecommunications infrastructure in Florida apparently was not subject to the same level of destruction as was the infrastructure in parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.15 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23, 52.31. See Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8447, para. 181 (1996). See also Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 23697, 23706, para. 22 (2003). 47 C.F.R. § 1.3. This rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.txt
  • location of the original rate center associated with the number to be ported, provided that the porting-in carrier maintains the number's original rate center designation following the port. The order defined wireless ``coverage area'' as the area in which wireless service can be received from the wireless carrier. B. Legal Basis for Rules The Intermodal Order was authorized under Section 52.23 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.23, and in Sections 1, 3, 4(i), 201, 202, 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154(i), 201, 202, and 251. C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Rules Would Apply The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.txt
  • of section 52.15(d) and section 52.15(e), in its entirety. No parties oppose our proposed changes, which are necessary to update and conform these rule sections with current policy and practice. We therefore modify sections 52.13(b) and (b)(3), 52.13(c)(4), and 52.15(b)(3) and (d), and delete sections 52.11(d), 52.15(c) and (e) as set forth in Appendix B. Subpart C - Portability. Sections 52.23 and 52.31 provide for deadlines for deployment of LNP and sections 52.27 and 52.29 provide regulations for transitional measures. The Commission proposed modifying sections 52.23 and 52.31 to reflect the passage of these deadlines and proposed to modify sections 52.27 and 52.29 to reflect the fact that long-term database methods for number portability have been implemented. The Rural Telecommunications Group,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.txt
  • is amended by redesignating paragraphs (h) through (r) as paragraphs (i) through (s), and by adding new paragraph (h) to read as follows: * * * * * (h) The term ``interconnected VoIP provider'' is an entity that provides interconnected VoIP service as that term is defined in section 9.3 of these rules. * * * * * 6. Section 52.23 is amended by adding the following paragraph: * * * * * (h)(1) Porting from a wireline carrier to a wireless carrier is required where the requesting wireless carrier's ``coverage area,'' as defined in paragraph (h)(2), overlaps the geographic location in which the customer's wireline number is provisioned, provided that the porting-in carrier maintains the number's original rate center designation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.txt
  • the requirements and conditions for administration and use of numbering resources for telecommunications services in the United States. Part 52 rule sections that address the operations and activities of common carriers include: Subpart A (Scope and Authority); Subpart B (Administration), sections 52.7 to 52.16(a) - (f), 52.17 (a) and (b), 52.19; Subpart C (Number Portability), sections 52.20, 52.21(a)-(g) and (i)-(s), 52.23 to 52.31, 52.32(a)-(d), 52.33 and 52.34; Subpart D (Toll Free Numbers). Part 53 - Special Provisions Concerning Bell Operating Companies - Establishes special requirements applicable to Bell Operating Companies, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 272. Part 54 - Universal Service - Establishes mechanisms for the preservation and advancement of Universal Service pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 254. Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.txt
  • the requirements and conditions for administration and use of numbering resources for telecommunications services in the United States. Part 52 rule sections that address the operations and activities of common carriers include: Subpart A (Scope and Authority); Subpart B (Administration), sections 52.7 to 52.16(a) - (f), 52.17 (a) and (b), 52.19; Subpart C (Number Portability), sections 52.20, 52.21(a)-(g) and (i)-(s), 52.23 to 52.31, 52.32(a)-(d), 52.33 and 52.34; Subpart D (Toll Free Numbers). Part 53 - Special Provisions Concerning Bell Operating Companies - Establishes special requirements applicable to Bell Operating Companies, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 272. Part 54 - Universal Service - Establishes mechanisms for the preservation and advancement of Universal Service pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 254. Part
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • we seek comment on whether allowing carriers to port unassigned numbers among themselves may result in call-routing problems and public safety concerns. We also seek comment on whether state commissions should make the determination to allow carriers to use UNP in a given area. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 251 NANC Report at § 5.1.2. 252 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)(1). 253 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)(2)(iv)(C) and (D). For switches that do not require hardware changes or complete replacement, LNP must be offered within 30 days (if the subject switch is a remote switch supported by a host switch equipped for LNP) or 60 days (if the subject switch requires software, but not hardware, changes to support LNP). 47 C.F.R. §
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • portability through remote call forwarding (RCF),858 flexible direct inward dialing (DID),859 or any other comparable and technically feasible Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-271 860 See First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8356, 8409, 8411-12 (promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 52.7 regarding the provision of interim number portability) (later renumbered to 47 C.F.R. § 52.27). 861 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23(b)-(f); First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8355-56, 8399-8404. For a description of the long-term method, see Third Number Portability Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11708-12. 862 See 47 C.F.R. § 52.29; First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8417-24. 863 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.32-52.33; Third Number Portability Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11706-07. 864 120 F.3d
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 95-116, RM 8535 at paras. 1, 6-9 (June 23, 1999)(Fourth Number Portability Order). Fourth Number Portability Order at para. 10 (citing In re Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8409-12 (1996)(First Number Portability Order). See also 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. §§52.23(b)-(f); Second BellSouth Louisiana Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 20758; First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8355-56, 8399-8404; Third Number Portability Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11708-12. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.29; Second BellSouth Louisiana Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 20758; First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8417-24. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.32-52.33; Second BellSouth Louisiana Order,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wlnp/documents/attresponse_092303.pdf
  • completed. There are various personnel that need to be trained in order to implement LNP. AWS has implemented training programs for (i) its customer services group handling incoming calls from customers and providing technical support and trouble shooting; (ii) its porting administration group (ìPAGî), which is responsible for trouble-shooting porting issues and problems with other 1 See 47 C.F.R. Sections 52.23(b)(2)(ii) and (iii). SFO 234717v4 26290-325 3 carriers and the NPAC; and (iii) all of its sales and activation channels.2 The scope of training varies by group but generally encompasses a variety of areas, including training on systems for porting activation, initiation, and inter-carrier communications; new processes and procedures for handling ports; and trouble-shooting. The duration of training depends on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • we seek comment on whether allowing carriers to port unassigned numbers among themselves may result in call-routing problems and public safety concerns. We also seek comment on whether state commissions should make the determination to allow carriers to use UNP in a given area. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 251 NANC Report at § 5.1.2. 252 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)(1). 253 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)(2)(iv)(C) and (D). For switches that do not require hardware changes or complete replacement, LNP must be offered within 30 days (if the subject switch is a remote switch supported by a host switch equipped for LNP) or 60 days (if the subject switch requires software, but not hardware, changes to support LNP). 47 C.F.R. §
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.wp
  • Cellular Association [RCA] NTCA/OPASTCO Replies, filed 10/10/96: ACSI Bell Atlantic BellSouth CBT GTE MCI NYNEX Pacific SBC USTA U S West Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-74 B-1 APPENDIX B - FINAL RULES AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS Part 52 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52 - NUMBERING 1. Section 52.23 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(4) through (a)(8), removing paragraph (a)(9), and revising paragraphs (b) and (g) to read as follows: § 52.23 Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by LECs. (a) * * * (4) Does not result in unreasonable degradation in service quality or network reliability when implemented; (5) Does not result in any degradation in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • portability through remote call forwarding (RCF),858 flexible direct inward dialing (DID),859 or any other comparable and technically feasible Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-271 860 See First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8356, 8409, 8411-12 (promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 52.7 regarding the provision of interim number portability) (later renumbered to 47 C.F.R. § 52.27). 861 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23(b)-(f); First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8355-56, 8399-8404. For a description of the long-term method, see Third Number Portability Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11708-12. 862 See 47 C.F.R. § 52.29; First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8417-24. 863 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.32-52.33; Third Number Portability Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11706-07. 864 120 F.3d
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992633.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992633.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116 ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 4. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992634.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992634.txt
  • Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 87-313, FCC 97-168 (rel. May 30, 1997) at 17 n.26. When implementing LNP, the Commission established a phased implementation schedule based on MSAs. Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 95-116, RM 8535, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8394-95, ¶ 81 (1996). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(c). When implementing LNP, the Commission established a phased implementation schedule based on MSAs. Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 95-116, RM 8535, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8394-95, ¶ 81 (1996). Letter from Paul S. Keller, New Hampshire Commission, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated November 10, 1999. The New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992635.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992635.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116 ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 3. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992636.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992636.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116 ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 3. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992637.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992637.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116 ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 3. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99246.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99246.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116 ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 8. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99247.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99247.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116, ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 8. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99248.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99248.txt
  • establishing requirements for wireless carriers' participation in number pooling in the Numbering Resource Optimization docket. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket No. 98-229 and CC Docket No. 95-116, 14 FCC Rcd. 3092, 3116, ¶ 48 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 8. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99249.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99249.txt
  • permanent LNP, but does not provide a rationale specifically supporting the request. Petition at 4. We interpret this request to be related to the Florida Commission's petition for authority to conduct thousands-block pooling trials, because requiring carriers to implement LNP has the potential to increase the number of carriers that can participate in the pooling trials. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). See supra ¶ 8. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), ``Resolution Urging State Commissions to Consider Honoring Utility Requests to Defer Deadlines Because of Y2K Considerations,'' adopted July 23, 1999. See also Memorandum from Jacob J. Lew, Director, Chief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99260.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99260.txt
  • Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 87-313, FCC 97-168 (rel. May 30, 1997) at 17 n.26. When implementing LNP, the Commission established a phased implementation schedule based on MSAs. Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 95-116, RM 8535, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8394-95, ¶ 81 (1996). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(c). When implementing LNP, the Commission established a phased implementation schedule based on MSAs. Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 95-116, RM 8535, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8394-95, ¶ 81 (1996). Letter from Trina M. Bragdon, Maine Commission, to Magalie Roman Salas, FCC, dated September 7, 1999. The Maine Commission also
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 95-116, RM 8535 at paras. 1, 6-9 (June 23, 1999)(Fourth Number Portability Order). Fourth Number Portability Order at para. 10 (citing In re Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8409-12 (1996)(First Number Portability Order). See also 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. §§52.23(b)-(f); Second BellSouth Louisiana Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 20758; First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8355-56, 8399-8404; Third Number Portability Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11708-12. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.29; Second BellSouth Louisiana Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 20758; First Number Portability Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8417-24. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.32-52.33; Second BellSouth Louisiana Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001616.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001616.txt
  • plans in a timely manner. See Numbering Resource Optimization Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Wireless carriers are not required to implement LNP until November 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). >. See Letter from Todd D. Daubert, Counsel for Winstar, to Magalie R. Salas, FCC, dated July 28, 1999. See Numbering Resource Optimization Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7639-40. See Numbering Resource Optimization Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Numbering Resource Optimization Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7663-64. 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(2). Numbering Resource Optimization Order, 15 FCC Rcd at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.txt
  • at 25; Qwest comments at 5. Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10385. See also ALTS comments at 23; Nextel comments at 19; Small Business Alliance comments at 9. The Commission required wireline carriers in the largest 100 MSAs to implement LNP as of December 31, 1998, in switches that another carrier has requested be made LNP capable. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)(1). As of January 1, 1999, LECs may request LNP in other LECs' individual switches in areas outside of the largest 100 MSAs, to be provided no later than six months after receiving the request. CMRS carriers are not required to deploy LNP until November 24, 2002. See CMRS LNP Forbearance Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 3093. We do not, in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.txt
  • used to support LNP, and therefore we have required LNP capable carriers to participate in thousands-block number pooling. Specifically, we have mandated thousands-block number pooling in the top 100 MSAs were carriers are required to be LNP capable. Outside the top 100 MSAs carriers are required to become LNP capable after receiving a request from another carrier. 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b). The specific roll-out schedule for national thousands-block number pooling will be adopted after the Pooling Administrator is selected. First Report and Order, 15 fcc Rcd. at 7632-33, para. 134. Id. 47 U.S.C. § 251(f). See Letter from Yog R. Varma, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, to Ronald Conners, Director, North American Numbering Plan Administrator, dated June 6, 2000 (DA 00-1247);
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010386.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010386.txt
  • timely manner. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Wireless carriers are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493, para. 16. >. See Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7639-40. The competitive bidding process is currently under way. Numbering Resource Optimization Second Report and Order at para. 39. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7651, para. 169. See Numbering Resource Optimization
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010656.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010656.txt
  • timely manner. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Wireless carriers are not required to implement LNP until November 24, 2002. See Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association's Petition for Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligations and Telephone Number Portability, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3092, 3116 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(b)-(c). California Delegation Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17493. >. See Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7639-40. Numbering Resource Optimization Second Report and Order at para. 39. Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7651. See Numbering Resource Optimization First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7652. Numbering Resource Optimization
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980911.html
  • DA 98-1806 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Waiver of Local Number Portability Deadline On September 2, 1998, OGC Telecomm, LTD. d/b/a OGI Telecomm, L.P. filed a petition seeking a waiver and extension of Phase III implementation deadline, from September 21 to November 21, and a waiver of the 60-day advance notification requirement contained in 47 C.F.R. Section 52.23(e), for the Portland, OR MSA. Comments on OGC Telecomm's petitions for waiver and extension of the Phase III implementation deadline until November 21, and waiver of the 60-day advance notification requirement due September 18; replies due September 25. Contact: Gayle Radley Teicher, Network Services Division at (202) 418-1515; TTY: (202) 418-0484. INTERNATIONAL BUREAU IB 98-148, CC 90-337; NPRM 8/6/98 (adopted
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980918.html
  • DA 98-1806 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Waiver of Local Number Portability Deadline On September 2, 1998, OGC Telecomm, LTD. d/b/a OGI Telecomm, L.P. filed a petition seeking a waiver and extension of Phase III implementation deadline, from September 21 to November 21, and a waiver of the 60-day advance notification requirement contained in 47 C.F.R. Section 52.23(e), for the Portland, OR MSA. Comments on OGC Telecomm's petitions for waiver and extension of the Phase III implementation deadline until November 21, and waiver of the 60-day advance notification requirement due September 18; replies due September 25. Contact: Gayle Radley Teicher, Network Services Division at (202) 418-1515; TTY: (202) 418-0484. PN 9/11/98; DA 98-1815 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980925.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op980925.wp
  • DA 98-1806 Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Waiver of Local Number Portability Deadline On September 2, 1998, OGC Telecomm, LTD. d/b/a OGI Telecomm, L.P. filed a petition seeking a waiver and extension of Phase III implementation deadline, from September 21 to November 21, and a waiver of the 60-day advance notification requirement contained in 47 C.F.R. Section 52.23(e), for the Portland, OR MSA. Comments on OGC Telecomm's petitions for waiver and extension of the Phase III implementation deadline until November 21, and waiver of the 60-day advance notification requirement due September 18*; replies due September 25. Contact: Gayle Radley Teicher, Network Services Division at (202) 418-1515; TTY: (202) 418-0484. PN 9/11/98; DA 98-1815 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980401.html
  • the Commission. Adopted: March 31, 1998. by MO&O on Recond. (FCC No. 98-52). CCB Internet URL: [15]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98052.txt TELEPHONE NUMBER PORTABILITY. Granted, to the extent indicated, petitions filed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) and Pacific Bell (Pacific) requesting extensions of the Commission's Local Number Portability (LNP) Deployment Schedule and a petition for waiver of the requirement, set forth in section 52.23(e) of the Commission's rules, that a company seeking to extend a number portability implementation deadline must do so at least 60 days in advance of that deadline; date for the SBC Companies' Phase I implementation of LNP in the Houston, TX MSA is extended to May 26, 1998. Dkt No.: CC- 95-116. Action by Chief, Network Services Division. Adopted: March
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020611.html
  • calculating any voluntary payments for the remainder of the merger condition period. (Dkt No. 98-141). Action by: Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 06/10/2002 by LETTER. (DA No. 02-1360). WCB [34]DA-02-1360A1.doc [35]DA-02-1360A1.pdf [36]DA-02-1360A1.txt IN THE MATTER OF NUMBERING RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION. Dismissed without prejudice the Petition for Reconsideration, for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver of sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's rules and regulations. (Dkt No. 95-115, 96-98, 99-200). Action by: Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division. Adopted: 06/11/2002 by ORDER. (DA No. 02-1335). WCB [37]DA-02-1335A1.doc [38]DA-02-1335A1.pdf [39]DA-02-1335A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JUNE 10, 2002, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 111: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 2000 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW AMENDMENT OF PARTS 43
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd031211.html
  • 03-3926). IB [63]DA-03-3926A1.doc [64]DA-03-3926A1.pdf [65]DA-03-3926A1.txt CALL SIGN: E980250, LORAL SKYNET NETWORK SERVICES, INC. Dismissed the Application without prejudice to refiling. Action by: Chief, Systems Analysis Branch, Satellite Division, International Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 03-3904). IB [66]DA-03-3904A1.pdf [67]DA-03-3904A1.txt TELEPHONE NUMBER PORTABILITY, FRANKLIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. AND INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY. Granted the Requests to Withdraw their Petitions for Waiver of Section 52.23(C). (Dkt No. 95-116). Action by: Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 12/10/2003 by ORDER. (DA No. 03-3915). WCB [68]DA-03-3915A1.doc [69]DA-03-3915A1.pdf [70]DA-03-3915A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED DECEMBER 10, 2003, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 234: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 12/10/2003. RELOCATION OF GETTYSBURG OFFICE OFF-SITE MAILROOM. OMD. Contact: Robin Hewitt at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040116.html
  • INVITED ON APPLICATION OF MCLEODUSA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. TO DISCONTINUE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. (DA No. 04-78). (Dkt No 04-08). Comments Due: 01/29/2004. WCB. Contact: Carmell Weathers at (202) 418-2325, email: Carmell.Weathers@fcc.gov or Denise Coca at (202) 418-0574, email: Denise.Coca@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [62]DA-04-78A1.doc [63]DA-04-78A1.pdf [64]DA-04-78A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TELEPHONE NUMBER PORTABILITY/BENTLEYVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 52.23 (C) OF THE COMMISSION RULES. Granted the request to withdraw petition for waiver of section 52.23(c) of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 95-116). Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 01/14/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-69). WCB [65]DA-04-69A1.doc [66]DA-04-69A1.pdf [67]DA-04-69A1.txt AUCTION OF DIRECT BROADCAST SATELLITE LICENSES. Affirmed our conclusion in the Auction No. 52 Comment
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040224.html
  • Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 02/23/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-465). CGB [65]DA-04-465A1.doc [66]DA-04-465A1.pdf [67]DA-04-465A1.txt COFFEE COUNTY BROADCASTING, INC., MANCHESTER, TENNESSEE. Denied the Petition for Reconsideration. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/20/2004 by MO&O. (DA No. 04-445). EB [68]DA-04-445A1.doc [69]DA-04-445A1.pdf [70]DA-04-445A1.txt NUMBER RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION, TELEPHONE NUMBER PORTABILITY, CELLULAR MOBILE SYSTEMS OF ST. CLOUD, LLC, LIMITED WAIVER AND EXTENSION OF SECTION 52.23(C). Granted Petition to Withdraw Waiver and Extension. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 02/23/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-459). WCB [71]DA-04-459A1.doc [72]DA-04-459A1.pdf [73]DA-04-459A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED FEBRUARY 23, 2004, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 35: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEWS RELEASES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- FCC COMMISSIONERS COPPS AND ADELSTEIN REACT
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2005/03-1414-031105.pdf
  • 52.21(q), with 47 U.S.C. § 153(30). In addition, the First Order clarified that the portability obligation included not only porting between wireline carriers, but also "intermodal portability": the porting of numbers from wireline carriers to wireless providers, and vice versa. First Order ¶ 152, 11 F.C.C.R. at 8431, ¶ 155, at 8433, ¶ 166, at 8440; see 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23(b), 52.31(a).1 5 LECs, the FCC relied on another statute, the Telecommunications Act of 1934, as the basis for imposing a porting obligation on wireless carriers. Id. ¶ 4, at 8355, ¶ 153, at 8431 (relying on the FCC's authority over the wireless spectrum, as described in 47 U.S.C. § 332). Although the First Order mandated service provider portability, it expressly
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive02.html
  • be held on proposals to reform the Commission's Universal Service Contribution Methodology. Docket number(s) 90-571, 92-237, 95-116, 96-45, 98-170, 98-171, and 99-200. DA 02-1375. Public Notice: [[294]Word] | [[295]Text] | [[296]Acrobat] 6/11/2002 IN THE MATTER OF NUMBERING RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION FCC dismissed without prejudice the Petition for Reconsideration, for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver of sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's rules and regulations. Docket number(s) 95-115, 96-98, and 99-200. DA 02-1335. Order: [[297]Word] | [[298]Text] | [[299]Acrobat] __________________________________________________________________ 5/22/2002 FCC Releases Study on Telephone Trends. News Release: [[300]Word] | [[301]Acrobat] 5/21/2002 FCC Releases New Telephone Subscribership Report. News Release: [[302]Word] | [[303]Acrobat] 5/16/2002 News Release: FCC begins proceeding on sunset of long distance separate