FCC Web Documents citing 52.11

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-860A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-860A1.pdf
  • 8-9. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, ¶ 7. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. § 153(30) (providing that ``number portability'' means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, ¶ 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) (``Answer'') at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at ¶¶ 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, ¶ 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.pdf
  • infra. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, ¶¶ 7-9. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. § 153(30) (providing that ``number portability'' means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, ¶ 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) (``Answer'') at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at ¶¶ 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, ¶ 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.txt
  • employment statistics (such as race and gender), and the existence of any pending EEO-related complaints. CTIA Petition, supra note 45, at 6. We note that the Rural Cellular Association also supports elimination of section 1.815 in comments filed in the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's biennial review docket (WT Docket No. 02-310). See Rural Cellular Association Comments at 2. 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.11, 52.12, 52.20. See Local Competition and Broadband Reporting, CC Docket No. 99-301, Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 2070 (2001); Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No.98-146, Third
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • jurisdiction over those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Need: The rules provide a framework for ensuring fair and impartial access to numbering resources, which is a critical component of encouraging a competitive telecommunications market in the United States. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 251. Section Numbers and Titles: 52.7 Definitions. 52.9 General requirements. 52.11 North American Numbering Council. 52.13 North American Numbering Plan Administrator. 52.15 Central office code administration. 52.17 Costs of number administration. 52.19 Area code relief. SUBPART C -- NUMBER PORTABILITY Brief Description: These rules implement the requirements of section 251(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, which requires all LECs ``to provide, to the extent technically feasible, number portability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-860A1.txt
  • 8-9. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, ¶ 7. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. § 153(30) (providing that ``number portability'' means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, ¶ 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) (``Answer'') at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at ¶¶ 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, ¶ 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207247A1.txt
  • (116.8 W.L.) E000662 SES-LIC-20001023-02067 RADIO U/SPIRIT COMMUNICATIONS Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 40 ° 7 ' 16.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 70 DORCHESTER SQ., FRANKLIN, WESTERVILLE, OH 82 ° 55 ' 3.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: CHANNEL MASTER 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 62-24356-01 Page 4 of 11 52.11 dBW MULTI CARRIER DIGITAL SCPC 1/2 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 400KG1D 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 400KG1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000660 SES-LIC-20001025-02050 NEXSTAR BROADCASTING OF ROCHESTER, LLC Application for Authority Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 201 Humboldt St., Monroe, Rochester, NY LOCATION: AvL Technologies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263703A1.txt
  • spacing. 37 ° 23 ' 40.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 642 NORTH PASTORIA AVE. (1.8 METER K18), SANTA CLARA, SUNNYVALE, CA 122 ° 2 ' 34.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN 1K18 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1194-500 35.61 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 8K00G2W 38.34 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 15K0G2W 44.36 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 60K0G2W 52.11 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 358KG2W Page 8 of 12 55.06 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 705KG2W 59.59 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 8K00G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 15K0G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 60K0G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 358KG2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 705KG2W 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264449A1.txt
  • spacing. 37 ° 23 ' 40.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 642 NORTH PASTORIA AVE. (1.8 METER K18), SANTA CLARA, SUNNYVALE, CA 122 ° 2 ' 34.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN 1K18 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1194-500 35.61 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 8K00G2W 38.34 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 15K0G2W 44.36 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 60K0G2W 52.11 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 358KG2W 55.06 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 705KG2W 59.59 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 8K00G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 15K0G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 60K0G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 358KG2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 705KG2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281401A1.pdf
  • Service 37 ° 23 ' 40.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 642 NORTH PASTORIA AVE. (1.8 METER K18), SANTA CLARA, SUNNYVALE, CA 122 ° 2 ' 34.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN 1K18 1.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 1194-500 35.61 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 8K00G2W 38.34 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 15K0G2W 44.36 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 60K0G2W 52.11 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 358KG2W 55.06 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 705KG2W 59.59 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 8K00G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 15K0G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 60K0G2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 358KG2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 705KG2W 0.00 dBW 11700.0000 - 12200.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308243A3.doc
  • calls to the appropriate telecommunications carriers,'' as required by Section 52.25(f) of the FCC rules. Additionally, Telcordia argues that because some of the URIs facilitate IP-based routing of ``information services'' and because voice, SMS, and MMS communications were being routed successfully without these URIs, these fields could not be considered ``necessary'' to the routing of ``telephone calls.'' Pursuant to Section 52.11 and 52.26 of the FCC rules, the NANC initiated this formal dispute resolution process in July 2009. As discussed in more detail in Section 3.0 below, for more than a year since, a panel of NANC members has served as a Dispute Resolution Team to provide the NANC with an impartial and focused review of the dispute by participants that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.txt
  • the NANPA, the Pooling Administrator (PA), and the billing and collection agent are currently selected through a competitive bidding process pursuant to the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR). Thus, the North American Numbering Council (NANC), the Commission's advisory committee for numbering issues, no longer is responsible for recommending an entity to serve as the NANPA. We therefore propose to repeal section 52.11(d). We also propose to modify sections 52.13(b) and 52.13(b)(3) to reflect the current role of the Commission in directing policy on and accommodating current and future numbering needs. We further propose to delete references to the Central Office Code Utilization Survey (COCUS), which is no longer used by the NANPA to collect number utilization and forecast information from carriers. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.txt
  • to modify section 52.5 to include American Samoa. No parties oppose our proposal to update section 52.5 with this modification. We therefore modify section 52.5 as set forth in Appendix B. In addition, we update section 52.17(b) by changing the reference to ``Common Carrier Bureau'' to ``Wireline Competition Bureau'' as set forth in Appendix B. Subpart B - Administration. Sections 52.11, 52.13, and 52.15 involve the administration of telecommunications numbers for the provision of telecommunications services. In particular, section 52.11 provides the duties of the North American Numbering Council; section 52.13 governs the duties of the North American Numbering Plan Administrator; and section 52.15 describes central office code administration. The Commission proposed the repeal of sections 52.11(d), 52.15(b)(3), 52.15(c) through (e)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.txt
  • infra. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, ¶¶ 7-9. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. § 153(30) (providing that ``number portability'' means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, ¶ 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) (``Answer'') at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at ¶¶ 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, ¶ 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • On Time 98.78 84.65 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-11 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C OR-4-05- 2000 Work Completion Notice (PCN) ­ % On Time 99.79 100 OR-5 - Percent Flow-Through OR-5-01- 2000 % Flow Through - Total 52.47 52.11 48.48 43.16 48.27 OR-5-03- 2000 % Flow Through Achieved 94.58 94.47 96.64 93.78 95 OR-6 - Order Accuracy OR-6-01- 2000 % Accuracy - Orders 93.31 93.7 90.29 92.98 96.58 OR-6-02- 2000 % Accuracy ­ Opportunities 99.23 99.2 OR-6-03- 2000 % Accuracy ­ LSRC 100 99.77 0.1 0.17 0.13 OR-7 - Order Completeness OR-7-01- 2000 % Order Confirmation/Rejects sent within 3
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-860A1.html
  • 8-9. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, P: 7. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. S: 153(30) (providing that "number portability" means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, P: 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) ("Answer") at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at P:P: 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, P: 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-159A1.html
  • infra. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, P:P: 7-9. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. S: 153(30) (providing that "number portability" means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, P: 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) ("Answer") at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at P:P: 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, P: 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.wp
  • stored voice services on an interconnected basis, or any SMR provider that is not interconnected to the public switched network. 47 C.F.R. § 52.1(c). We note that several parties have petitioned for reconsideration of the definition of "covered SMR." We will address this issue in a subsequent order. First Report & Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8439; 47 C.F.R. § 52.11(b). 428 First Report & Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8439-40. 429 Id. at 8440; 47 C.F.R. § 52.11(a). 430 First Report & Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8440-41; 47 C.F.R. § 52.11(c), (e). 431 First Report & Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8441; 47 C.F.R. § 52.11(d). 432 AirTouch Petition at 14-16; GTE Petition at 21-23; see also CTIA Petition
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Cleveland 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 50.47 50.04 49.46 49.07 Ohio Columbus 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 50.47 50.04 49.46 49.07 Ohio Toledo 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 54.22 54.22 51.15 52.53 52.10 51.52 51.13 Oregon Corvallis 56.89 60.37 47.08 48.14 48.23 45.15 47.72 48.14 51.08 46.40 47.43 44.19 Oregon Portland 57.17 60.67 47.46 52.11 52.24 51.65 50.52 50.64 53.31 48.47 49.07 45.81 Pennsylvania Allentown 35.42 35.17 35.40 37.57 37.47 38.84 39.20 37.03 37.83 37.71 37.67 37.67 Pennsylvania Ellwood City 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20 40.20 39.76 40.56 40.44 40.40 40.40 Pennsylvania Johnstown 55.65 57.87 56.73 57.78 42.46 42.11 42.47 42.45 60.93 63.24 63.23 63.19 Pennsylvania New Castle 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 50.47 50.04 49.46 49.45 49.44 Ohio Columbus 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 50.47 50.04 49.46 49.45 49.44 Ohio Toledo 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 54.22 54.22 51.15 52.53 52.10 51.52 51.51 51.50 Oregon Corvallis 56.89 60.37 47.08 48.14 48.23 45.15 47.72 48.14 51.08 46.40 47.43 45.06 38.99 Oregon Portland 57.17 60.67 47.46 52.11 52.24 51.65 50.52 50.64 53.31 48.47 49.07 45.35 42.86 Pennsylvania Allentown 35.42 35.17 35.40 37.57 37.47 38.84 39.20 37.03 37.83 37.71 37.67 38.29 37.21 Pennsylvania Ellwood City 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20 40.20 39.76 40.56 40.44 40.40 41.02 39.94 Pennsylvania Johnstown 55.65 57.87 56.73 57.78 42.46 42.11 42.47 42.45 60.93 63.24 63.23 63.81 57.18 Pennsylvania New Castle 38.09 37.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 56.52 56.52 54.22 54.22 53.21 Ohio Cincinnati 62.90 63.83 64.00 64.61 66.97 70.26 70.26 70.26 Ohio Cleveland 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 Ohio Columbus 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 Ohio Toledo 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 54.22 54.22 53.21 Oregon Corvallis 56.89 60.37 47.08 48.14 48.23 45.15 47.72 48.14 Oregon Portland 57.17 60.67 47.46 52.11 52.24 51.65 50.52 50.64 Pennsylvania Allentown 35.42 35.17 35.40 37.57 37.47 38.84 39.20 37.03 Pennsylvania Ellwood City 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20 40.20 39.76 Pennsylvania Johnstown 55.65 57.87 56.73 57.78 42.46 42.11 42.47 42.45 Pennsylvania New Castle 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20 40.56 39.76 Pennsylvania Philadelphia 30.07 29.82 30.05 32.11 32.01 32.01 28.55 31.30 Pennsylvania Pittsburgh 30.07 29.82
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Ohio Cincinnati 62.90 63.83 64.00 64.61 66.97 70.26 70.26 70.26 68.17 Ohio Cleveland 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 56.52 Ohio Columbus 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 53.19 52.16 51.15 56.52 Ohio Toledo 55.56 55.42 55.58 56.52 56.52 54.22 54.22 51.15 56.52 Oregon Corvallis 56.89 60.37 47.08 48.14 48.23 45.15 47.72 48.14 51.08 Oregon Portland 57.17 60.67 47.46 52.11 52.24 51.65 50.52 50.64 53.31 Pennsylvania Allentown 35.42 35.17 35.40 37.57 37.47 38.84 39.20 37.03 37.47 Pennsylvania Ellwood City 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20 40.20 39.76 40.20 Pennsylvania Johnstown 55.65 57.87 56.73 57.78 42.46 42.11 42.47 42.45 60.93 Pennsylvania New Castle 38.09 37.84 38.07 40.30 40.20 40.20 40.56 39.76 40.20 Pennsylvania Philadelphia 30.07 29.82 30.05 32.11 32.01 32.01 28.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • 125,076 51,617 29.26 BellSouth - Louisiana LA 328,884 235,454 94,007 28.58 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 42,141 23,799 18,345 43.53 Verizon - Maryland MD 155,159 57,091 98,028 63.18 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA (121,949) (142,897) 20,991 -17.21 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 78,055 52,304 25,729 32.96 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 297,882 141,612 155,222 52.11 Qwest - Minnesota MN 165,723 57,970 107,717 65.00 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 270,415 220,722 50,103 18.53 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 218,508 103,454 113,962 52.15 Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 69,588 42,260 27,329 39.27 Qwest - Montana MT 53,390 33,543 19,845 37.17 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE 51,272 41,508 7,952 15.51 Qwest - Nebraska NE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • On Time 98.78 84.65 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-11 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C OR-4-05- 2000 Work Completion Notice (PCN) ­ % On Time 99.79 100 OR-5 - Percent Flow-Through OR-5-01- 2000 % Flow Through - Total 52.47 52.11 48.48 43.16 48.27 OR-5-03- 2000 % Flow Through Achieved 94.58 94.47 96.64 93.78 95 OR-6 - Order Accuracy OR-6-01- 2000 % Accuracy - Orders 93.31 93.7 90.29 92.98 96.58 OR-6-02- 2000 % Accuracy ­ Opportunities 99.23 99.2 OR-6-03- 2000 % Accuracy ­ LSRC 100 99.77 0.1 0.17 0.13 OR-7 - Order Completeness OR-7-01- 2000 % Order Confirmation/Rejects sent within 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-860A1.html
  • 8-9. See, e.g., Joint Statement at 6, P: 7. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 251(b)(2); 47 U.S.C. S: 153(30) (providing that "number portability" means the ability of users of telecommunications services to retain, at the same location, existing telecommunications numbers without impairment of quality, reliability, or convenience when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another). See also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 52.11, 52.21-26. See, e.g., Complaint at 8, P: 10, and at Ex. E; Answer of Verizon, File No. EB-08-MD-002 (filed Feb. 21, 2008) ("Answer") at Exs. 22-27; In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12281, 12315-16 at P:P: 55-56 (1997). See, e.g., Joint Statement at 9, P: 20. The Competitive Carrier may submit the