FCC Web Documents citing 51.717

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.pdf
  • of this case, billing delays of 15 or 20 months qualify as an unreasonable practice within the meaning of Section 201(b)''). MAP Reply at 6-7, ¶¶ 13-15 (citing Airtouch Cellular v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 13502 (2001)). Airtouch Cellular v. Pacific Bell, 16 FCC Rcd at 13508, ¶ 16. See id. Cf. 47 C.F.R. § 51.717(b) (providing that a CMRS provider seeking to renegotiate a non-reciprocal compensation arrangement with an incumbent LEC established prior to August 8, 1996 ``shall be entitled to assess upon the incumbent LEC the same rates for the transport and termination of telecommunications traffic that the incumbent LEC assesses upon the CMRS provider pursuant to the pre-existing arrangement'' until a new reciprocal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.txt
  • of this case, billing delays of 15 or 20 months qualify as an unreasonable practice within the meaning of Section 201(b)''). MAP Reply at 6-7, ¶¶ 13-15 (citing Airtouch Cellular v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 13502 (2001)). Airtouch Cellular v. Pacific Bell, 16 FCC Rcd at 13508, ¶ 16. See id. Cf. 47 C.F.R. § 51.717(b) (providing that a CMRS provider seeking to renegotiate a non-reciprocal compensation arrangement with an incumbent LEC established prior to August 8, 1996 ``shall be entitled to assess upon the incumbent LEC the same rates for the transport and termination of telecommunications traffic that the incumbent LEC assesses upon the CMRS provider pursuant to the pre-existing arrangement'' until a new reciprocal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
  • channels of the 800 MHz Band by incoming geographically-based (EA) licensees. These provisions were a component of the 1995 reconfiguration of the 800 MHz band from site-based to geographic-based service that has since been completed. 90.699(a) 90.699(b) 90.699(c) 90.699(e) 90.699(f) Adopted 11/1/11 pending FR Publication Removed rules to reform and modernize the universal service and intercarrier compensation systems. 36.602 51.707 51.717 54.303 54.311 54.316 12/29/11 Eliminated Part 2, Subpart N, FCC procedure for testing Class A, B and S Emergency Position Indicating Radiobeacons (EPIRBs). 2.1501-2.1517 2/1/12 Eliminated rules listing the dates by which intentional radiators, unintentional radiators, radio receivers and equipment operating in the 902-905 MHz band had to comply with the rules adopted in the 1989 revision to Part 15.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-194A1.doc
  • Utils. Bd., 120 F.3d at 800 n.21, 820 n.39; see also supra note 11. Local Competition Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 16185, 16189. See Brief for Intervenors CMRS Providers in Support of Respondents, filed December 23, 1996, in No. 96-3321, Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, at 4-6 (arguing in favor of validity of §§ 51.701(b), 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a), 51.715(d), and 51.717 of the Commission's rules); see also Reply Brief of the Mid-sized Local Exchange Carriers, filed January 6, 1997, in No. 96-3321, Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, at 34 (arguing against LEC-CMRS interconnection regime adopted in the Local Competition Order). 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 0.405[1], pp. 622-24 (2d ed. 1974)(quoted in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-131A1.txt
  • for such access (see FCC 01-131, paras. 34, 36, 39, 42-43); or Telecommunications traffic exchanged between a LEC and a CMRS provider that, at the beginning of the call, originates and terminates within the same Major Trading Area, as defined in § 24.202(a) of this chapter. 3. Sections 51.701(a), 51.701(c) through (e), 51.703, 51.705, 51.707, 51.709, 51.711, 51.713, 51.715, and 51.717 are each amended by striking "local" before "telecommunications traffic" each place such word appears. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Intercarrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic (CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 99-68) In this Order, we re-affirm our prior conclusion that telecommunications traffic delivered to Internet service providers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.txt
  • interstate or foreign commerce by wire or radio...to establish physical connections with other carriers..." 47 U.S.C. § 201(a). 47 U.S.C. § 152(b). Id. See 47 U.S.C. § 251(i). See 47 U.S.C. § 253(e); see also section 601(c) of the 1996 Act. Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d at 800 n.21. December 29 letter at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.715(d), 51.717(b). 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 160. 47 U.S.C. § 160(e). Local Competition Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 16016-17 ¶ 1043. Alternatively, in rural settings, wireless carriers can elect to deliver CMRS-originated calls to a large ILEC (typically a Regional Bell Operating Company [RBOC]) for routing to the rural LEC carrier. The large ILEC and rural LEC are interconnected
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • §51.705(c) or in accordance with a bill-and-keep methodology as defined in §51.713. * * * * * (d) If the rates for transport and termination of Non-Access Telecommunications Traffic in an interim arrangement differ from the rates established by a state commission pursuant to §51.705, the state commission shall require carriers to make adjustments to past compensation. * * * §51.717 [Removed and Reserved] Remove and reserve §51.717. Add new subpart J to part 51 to read as follows: Subpart J-Transitional Access Service Pricing Sec. 51.901 Purpose and Scope of transitional access service pricing rules. 51.903 Definitions. 51.905 Implementation. 51.907 Transition of Price Cap Carrier access charges. 51.909 Transition of Rate-of-Return carrier access charges. 51.911 Reciprocal compensation rates for CLECs. 51.913
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
  • termination of local telecommunications traffic 51.701 Scope of transport and termination pricing rules. 51.703 Reciprocal compensation obligation of LECs. 51.705 Incumbent LECs' rates for transport and termination. 51.707 Default proxies for incumbent LECs' transport and termination rates. 51.709 Rate structure for transport and termination. 51.711 Symmetrical reciprocal compensation. 51.713 Bill-and-keep arrangements for reciprocal compensation. 51.715 Interim transport and termination pricing. 51.717 Renegotiation of existing non-reciprocal arrangements. Subpart I - Procedures for implementation of section 252 of the Act. 51.801 Commission action upon a state commission's failure to act to carry out its responsibility under section 252 of the Act. Federal Communications Commission 96-325 B-9 51.803 Procedures for Commission notification of a state commission's failure to act. 51.805 The Commission's authority over
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
  • interstate or foreign commerce by wire or radio...to establish physical connections with other carriers..." 47 U.S.C. § 201(a). 47 U.S.C. § 152(b). Id. See 47 U.S.C. § 251(i). See 47 U.S.C. § 253(e); see also section 601(c) of the 1996 Act. Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d at 800 n.21. December 29 letter at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.715(d), 51.717(b). 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 160. 47 U.S.C. § 160(e). Local Competition Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 16016-17 ¶ 1043. Alternatively, in rural settings, wireless carriers can elect to deliver CMRS-originated calls to a large ILEC (typically a Regional Bell Operating Company [RBOC]) for routing to the rural LEC carrier. The large ILEC and rural LEC are interconnected
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • (a) until a new agreement has been either arbitrated or negotiated and has been approved by a state commission, the CMRS provider shall be entitled to assess upon the incumbent LEC the same rates for the transport and termination of local telecommunications traffic that the incumbent LEC assesses upon the CMRS provider pursuant to the preexisting arrangement." 47 C.F.R. § 51.717(b). 963 We note, however, that Radiofone's claim may be relevant to our public interest analysis. PCIA also makes arguments regarding paging interconnection directed to public interest considerations. See PCIA Comments at 9-11. 964 The final sentence of section 271(c)(1)(A) states: "For the purpose of this subparagraph, services provided pursuant to subpart K of part 22 of the Commission's regulations (47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01131.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01131.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01131.txt
  • for such access (see FCC 01-131, paras. 34, 36, 39, 42-43); or Telecommunications traffic exchanged between a LEC and a CMRS provider that, at the beginning of the call, originates and terminates within the same Major Trading Area, as defined in § 24.202(a) of this chapter. 3. Sections 51.701(a), 51.701(c) through (e), 51.703, 51.705, 51.707, 51.709, 51.711, 51.713, 51.715, and 51.717 are each amended by striking "local" before "telecommunications traffic" each place such word appears. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Intercarrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic (CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 99-68) In this Order, we re-affirm our prior conclusion that telecommunications traffic delivered to Internet service providers
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1065A1.html
  • of this case, billing delays of 15 or 20 months qualify as an unreasonable practice within the meaning of Section 201(b)"). MAP Reply at 6-7, P:P: 13-15 (citing Airtouch Cellular v. Pacific Bell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 13502 (2001)). Airtouch Cellular v. Pacific Bell, 16 FCC Rcd at 13508, P: 16. See id. Cf. 47 C.F.R. S: 51.717(b) (providing that a CMRS provider seeking to renegotiate a non-reciprocal compensation arrangement with an incumbent LEC established prior to August 8, 1996 "shall be entitled to assess upon the incumbent LEC the same rates for the transport and termination of telecommunications traffic that the incumbent LEC assesses upon the CMRS provider pursuant to the pre-existing arrangement" until a new reciprocal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
  • interstate or foreign commerce by wire or radio...to establish physical connections with other carriers..." 47 U.S.C. § 201(a). 47 U.S.C. § 152(b). Id. See 47 U.S.C. § 251(i). See 47 U.S.C. § 253(e); see also section 601(c) of the 1996 Act. Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, 120 F.3d at 800 n.21. December 29 letter at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.715(d), 51.717(b). 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 160. 47 U.S.C. § 160(e). Local Competition Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 16016-17 ¶ 1043. Alternatively, in rural settings, wireless carriers can elect to deliver CMRS-originated calls to a large ILEC (typically a Regional Bell Operating Company [RBOC]) for routing to the rural LEC carrier. The large ILEC and rural LEC are interconnected
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
  • termination of local telecommunications traffic 51.701 Scope of transport and termination pricing rules. 51.703 Reciprocal compensation obligation of LECs. 51.705 Incumbent LECs' rates for transport and termination. 51.707 Default proxies for incumbent LECs' transport and termination rates. 51.709 Rate structure for transport and termination. 51.711 Symmetrical reciprocal compensation. 51.713 Bill-and-keep arrangements for reciprocal compensation. 51.715 Interim transport and termination pricing. 51.717 Renegotiation of existing non-reciprocal arrangements. Subpart I - Procedures for implementation of section 252 of the Act. 51.801 Commission action upon a state commission's failure to act to carry out its responsibility under section 252 of the Act. Federal Communications Commission 96-325 B-9 51.803 Procedures for Commission notification of a state commission's failure to act. 51.805 The Commission's authority over
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • (a) until a new agreement has been either arbitrated or negotiated and has been approved by a state commission, the CMRS provider shall be entitled to assess upon the incumbent LEC the same rates for the transport and termination of local telecommunications traffic that the incumbent LEC assesses upon the CMRS provider pursuant to the preexisting arrangement." 47 C.F.R. § 51.717(b). 963 We note, however, that Radiofone's claim may be relevant to our public interest analysis. PCIA also makes arguments regarding paging interconnection directed to public interest considerations. See PCIA Comments at 9-11. 964 The final sentence of section 271(c)(1)(A) states: "For the purpose of this subparagraph, services provided pursuant to subpart K of part 22 of the Commission's regulations (47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01131.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01131.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01131.txt
  • for such access (see FCC 01-131, paras. 34, 36, 39, 42-43); or Telecommunications traffic exchanged between a LEC and a CMRS provider that, at the beginning of the call, originates and terminates within the same Major Trading Area, as defined in § 24.202(a) of this chapter. 3. Sections 51.701(a), 51.701(c) through (e), 51.703, 51.705, 51.707, 51.709, 51.711, 51.713, 51.715, and 51.717 are each amended by striking "local" before "telecommunications traffic" each place such word appears. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Intercarrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic (CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 99-68) In this Order, we re-affirm our prior conclusion that telecommunications traffic delivered to Internet service providers
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/iowa51.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/iowa51.wp
  • Radio Service (CMRS) providers, see 47 U.S.C. 152(b) (exempting the provisions of section 332), 332(c)(3)(A), and because section 332(c)(1)(B) gives the FCC the authority to order LECs to interconnect with CMRS carriers, we believe that the Commission has the authority to issue the rules of special concern to the CMRS providers, i.e., 47 C.F.R. 51.701, 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a)(1), 51.715(d), and 51.717, but only as these provisions apply to CMRS providers. Thus, rules 51.701, 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a)(1), 51.715(d), and 51.717 remain in full force and effect with respect to the CMRS providers, and our order of vacation does not apply to them in the CMRS context. ^22We acknowledge that the words "any interconnection, service, or network element" could indicate that the FCC's
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/iowa51.html
  • Radio Service (CMRS) providers, see 47 U.S.C. 152(b) (exempting the provisions of section 332), 332(c)(3)(A), and because section 332(c)(1)(B) gives the FCC the authority to order LECs to interconnect with CMRS carriers, we believe that the Commission has the authority to issue the rules of special concern to the CMRS providers, i.e., 47 C.F.R. 51.701, 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a)(1), 51.715(d), and 51.717, but only as these provisions apply to CMRS providers. Thus, rules 51.701, 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a)(1), 51.715(d), and 51.717 remain in full force and effect with respect to the CMRS providers, and our order of vacation does not apply to them in the CMRS context. ^22We acknowledge that the words "any interconnection, service, or network element" could indicate that the FCC's
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1376.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1376.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1376.pdf
  • (CMRS) providers, see 47 U.S.C. §§ 152(b) (exempting the provisions of section 332), 332(c)(3)(A), and because section 332(c)(1)(B) gives the FCC the authority to order LECs to interconnect with CMRS carriers, we believe that the Commission has the authority to issue the rules of special concern to the CMRS providers, i.e., 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.701, 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a)(1), 51.715(d), and 51.717, but only as these provisions apply to CMRS providers. Thus, rules 51.701, 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a)(1), 51.715(d), and 51.717 remain in full force and effect with respect to the CMRS providers, and our order of vacation does not apply to them in the CMRS context. Iowa Utilities Bd., 120 F.3d at 800 n.21 (emphasis added). In the Local Competition Order itself,