FCC Web Documents citing 51.318

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2003A1.txt
  • those loops that are used to serve ``predominantly residential'' and ``small office'' buildings. Second, the XO Coalition seeks forbearance from application of the limitation on DS1-capacity transport circuits, 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(e)(2)(ii)(B), when DS1 transport circuits are used as components of DS1-capacity enhanced extended loops (EELs). Third, the XO Coalition seeks forbearance from the UNE eligibility criteria, 47 C.F.R. § 51.318, as applied to EELs. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the XO Coalition's Petition for Forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2895A1.txt
  • the meaning of the Act in any market, and that requiring incumbent LECs to provide SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI with special access circuits at UNE pricing could curtail competition. Qwest further states that forbearance is consistent with the public interest and would not be unreasonably discriminatory. Qwest therefore petitions the Commission to forbear from enforcement of sections 51.309, 51.315, 51.316 and 51.318 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.309, 51.315, 51.316 and 51.318, to the extent those rules require Qwest and other incumbent LECs to convert the existing special access circuits of SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI to UNEs. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
  • dollar Vietnam Implied PPP conversion rate National currencyper current international dollar Republic of Yemen Implied PPP conversion rate National currencyper current international dollar Zambia Implied PPP conversion rate National currencyper current international dollar Zimbabwe Implied PPP conversion rate National currencyper current international dollar Source: International MonetaryFund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011 2008 2009 2010 25.285 24.532 26.073 49.666 50.072 51.318 47.181 42.103 47.475 62.402 57.248 73.066 2.029 2.051 2.093 1.8 1.964 2.246 189.939 190.641 208.099 1.491 1.468 1.523 0.851 0.851 0.855 0.489 0.404 0.481 0.803 0.839 0.845 0.306 0.257 0.287 25.642 27.051 28.437 1.237 1.257 1.273 1,086.221,137.951,242.09 0.883 0.885 0.89 1.065 1.05 1.053 229.18 231.681 234.772 16.693 17.024 17.538 2.765 2.674 2.816 0.811 0.805 0.819 3.428 3.201 3.343 1.519 1.591
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
  • of service quality as perceived by end users, and includes, but is not limited to, service quality as perceived by the requesting telecommunications carrier; and ***** Section 51.309 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b), and by adding paragraphs (d) through (g) to read as follows: § 51.309 Use of unbundled network elements. (a) Except as provided in § 51.318, an incumbent LEC shall not impose limitations, restrictions, or requirements on requests for, or the use of, unbundled network elements for the service a requesting telecommunications carrier seeks to offer. (b) A requesting telecommunications carrier may not access an unbundled network element for the sole purpose of providing non-qualifying services. ***** (d) A requesting telecommunications carrier that accesses and uses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-290A1.txt
  • impairment criteria in our rules. However, these rules do not supersede any audit rights included in any interconnection agreements or other commercial arrangements. See, e.g., Supplemental Order Clarification, 15 FCC Rcd at 9604, para. 32 (noting that some interconnection agreements contain audit rights). Further, we retain our existing certification and auditing rules governing access to EELs. See 47 C.F.R. § 51.318. Of course, this mechanism for addressing incumbent LEC challenges to self-certifications is simply a default process, and pursuant to section 252(a)(1), carriers remain free to negotiate alternative arrangements. 47 U.S.C. § 252(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.103(a), 1.427(b). 5 U.S.C. § 500 et seq. 5 U.S.C. § 553(d)(3). See Interim Order and NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd 16783, 16794, para. 21.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-78A1.txt
  • Enforcement Act and Broadband Access and Services, ET Docket No. 04-295, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 15676 (2004); IP-Enabled Services NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 4897, para. 50 n.158. See Cinergy Comments 12-16; BellSouth Reply at 17. Triennial Review Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 17342-48, paras. 579-84; see 47 C.F.R. § 51.5 (defining commingling); cf. 47 C.F.R. § 51.318. Triennial Review Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 17342, para. 579; 47 C.F.R. §51.5. Id. Cf. Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15631, para. 258 (``For some elements, especially the loop, the requesting carrier will purchase exclusive access to the element for a specific period''). See Comcast Phone Reply at 1-3; Letter from Henk Brands, Counsel for