FCC Web Documents citing 51.233

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.txt
  • SECTION 251(h)(2) OF THE ACT WC DOCKET NO. 02-78 Comments Due: May 6, 2002 Reply Comments Due: May 15, 2002 On February 5, 2002, Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (Mid-Rivers) filed a petition for order declaring Mid-Rivers an incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2), and section 51.233(b) of the Commission`s Rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 51.223(b). The Mid-River petition requests the Commission to issue an order declaring that Mid-River shall be treated as an incumbent LEC in the Terry, Montana telephone exchange. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • investment. These rules also ensure that competitors receive prompt and accurate notice of changes that could affect their ability to interconnect with the incumbent's network. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 251(a), 251(c)(2) and (6) and 251(d). Section Number and Title: Binder group management. Brief Description: This subsection generally implements section 251(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Section 51.233 sets forth the steps that must be taken by a carrier claiming that a deployed advanced service is significantly degrading the performance of other advanced services, including notifying the deploying carrier and allowing that carrier a reasonable opportunity to correct the problem. The rule provides that, where a carrier demonstrates that a deployed technology is significantly degrading the performance of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
  • copper lines, and may not restrict its testing to voice transmission only. (D) Where the requesting telecommunications carrier is seeking access to the high frequency portion of a copper loop or copper subloop pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section and the incumbent LEC claims that conditioning that loop or subloop will significantly degrade, as defined in § 51.233, the voiceband services that the incumbent LEC is currently providing over that loop or subloop, the incumbent LEC must either: (1) Locate another copper loop or copper subloop that has been or can be conditioned, migrate the incumbent LEC's voiceband service to that loop or subloop, and provide the requesting telecommunications carrier with access to the high frequency portion of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-355A1.txt
  • line conditioning, the requesting carrier has the option of refusing, in whole, or in part, to have the line conditioned, and a requesting carrier's refusal of some or all aspects of line conditioning will not diminish its right of access to the high frequency portion of the loop. (ii) Where conditioning the loop will significantly degrade, as defined in section 51.233, the voiceband services that the incumbent LEC is currently providing over that loop, the incumbent LEC must either (A) locate another loop that has been or can be conditioned, migrate the incumbent LEC's voiceband service to that loop, and provide the requesting carrier with access to the high frequency portion of the alternative loop; or (B) make a showing to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.txt
  • line conditioning, the requesting carrier has the option of refusing, in whole, or in part, to have the line conditioned, and a requesting carrier's refusal of some or all aspects of line conditioning will not diminish its right of access to the high frequency portion of the loop. (ii) Where conditioning the loop will significantly degrade, as defined in section 51.233, the voiceband services that the incumbent LEC is currently providing over that loop, the incumbent LEC must either (A) locate another loop that has been or can be conditioned, migrate the incumbent LEC's voiceband service to that loop, and provide the requesting carrier with access to the high frequency portion of the alternative loop; or (B) make a showing to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.txt
  • line conditioning, the requesting carrier has the option of refusing, in whole, or in part, to have the line conditioned, and a requesting carrier's refusal of some or all aspects of line conditioning will not diminish its right of access to the high frequency portion of the loop. (ii) Where conditioning the loop will significantly degrade, as defined in section 51.233, the voiceband services that the incumbent LEC is currently providing over that loop, the incumbent LEC must either (A) locate another loop that has been or can be conditioned, migrate the incumbent LEC's voiceband service to that loop, and provide the requesting carrier with access to the high frequency portion of the alternative loop; or (B) make a showing to