FCC Web Documents citing 51.223
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.txt
- NO. 02-78 Comments Due: May 6, 2002 Reply Comments Due: May 15, 2002 On February 5, 2002, Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (Mid-Rivers) filed a petition for order declaring Mid-Rivers an incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2), and section 51.233(b) of the Commission`s Rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 51.223(b). The Mid-River petition requests the Commission to issue an order declaring that Mid-River shall be treated as an incumbent LEC in the Terry, Montana telephone exchange. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2871A1.txt
- SOUTH SLOPE INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIER IN IOWA EXCHANGES OF OXFORD, TIFFIN, AND SOLON WC DOCKET NO. 04-347 Comments Due: October 4, 2004 Reply Comments Due: October 19, 2004 On August 24, 2004, South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, Inc. (South Slope) filed a petition pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the Act) and section 51.223(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 51.223(b). Specifically, South Slope requests that the Commission declare it to be an incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) in the Iowa exchanges of Oxford, Tiffin, and Solon. South Slope states that it satisfies the three-part test of section 251(h)(2) of the Act in order to be declared an incumbent LEC in these three
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
- General. 51.207 Local dialing parity. 51.209 Toll dialing parity. 51.211 Toll dialing parity implementation schedule. 51.213 Toll dialing parity implementation plans. 51.215 Dialing parity: Cost recovery. 51.217 Nondiscriminatory access: Telephone numbers, operator services, directory assistance services, and directory listings. 51.219 Access to rights of way (cross-reference to Part 1 subpart J). 51.221 Reciprocal compensation (cross-reference to Part 51 subpart H). 51.223 Application of additional requirements. SUBPART -- D -- ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS Brief Description: This subsection generally implements section 251(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, which imposes additional obligations on incumbent LECs. Under this subpart, incumbent LECs must negotiate interconnection agreements with requesting telecommunications carriers in good faith, and file the terms and conditions
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1567A1.txt
- COMMUNICATIONS ACT WC DOCKET NO. 08-123 Comments Due: July 31, 2008 Reply Comments Due: August 15, 2008 On June 25, 2008, Channel Islands Telephone Company (CIT) filed a petition for an order declaring CIT to be an incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2), and section 51.223(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 51.223(b). The CIT petition requests that the Commission issue an order and rule declaring that CIT shall be treated as the incumbent LEC in the Channel Islands, California telephone exchange. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2071A1.txt
- Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Petition of Channel Islands Telephone Company For Order Declaring It an Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier in the Channel Islands, CA Pursuant to Section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended and Section 51.223(b) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 08-123 ORDER Adopted: December 27, 2011 Released: December 27, 2011 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Order, we deny Channel Islands Telephone Company's (CIT's) petition requesting that the Commission adopt an Order and rule ``declaring that CIT shall be treated as the incumbent
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-272A1_Erratum.doc
- Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12642-45 ¶ 218-227; 39 GHz Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18636 ¶ 76. See, e.g., LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12644 ¶ 223. 47 U.S.C. § 153(44). 47 U.S.C. § 153(46). See NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 19274 ¶ 18. 47 C.F.R. § 51.100. 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.201 - 51.223. See 1.947 (b) of the of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.947 (b). A change in regulatory status would require Commission prior authorization, however, if the change raised issues concerning the benchmark contained in Section 310(b)(4) of the Act. See infra n. 180. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.947, 101.305. NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 19274 ¶ 19. Id. We note
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-252A1.txt
- England Telephone Co., 27 F.Supp.2d 326, 336-37 (D.Conn. 1998)), rev'd on other grounds, Ass'n of Communications Enterprises v. FCC, 235 F.3d 662 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See generally, Guam Declaratory Ruling and NPRM, 12 FCC Rcd 6925; Guam Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 13765 (determining by rulemaking the incumbent LEC status of GTA). 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2). See also section 51.223 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 51.223, which implements section 251(h)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2). See Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15499, 16110, para. 1248. Qwest is the incumbent LEC in Terry, Montana because its predecessor, U S WEST, was a member of NECA and was the exclusive local exchange carrier in Terry on the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-132A1.txt
- Review Act. In addition, the Commission will send a copy of the Report and Order, including this certification to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA, and will also publish it in the Federal Register. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2), and section 51.223 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 51.223, that Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. will be treated as an incumbent local exchange carrier for purposes of section 251 in the Terry, Montana exchange, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Qwest is relieved of its dominant carrier status for its interstate telecommunications services in the Terry exchange as described herein.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-237A1.txt
- prepare and file access charge tariffs on behalf of all telephone companies that do not file separate tariffs or concur in a joint access tariff of another telephone company for all access elements.'' 47 C.F.R. § 69.601(a). 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(1). We refer to these incumbent LECs as legacy incumbent LECs. 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2); see also 47 C.F.R. § 51.223 (implementing section 251(h)(2) of the Act). 47 U.S.C. § 251(h)(2); see Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Interconnection Between Local Exchange Carriers and Commercial Mobil Radio Service Providers, CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 95-185, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15499, 16110, para. 1248 (1996) (subsequent history omitted) (stating that a ``clear and convincing''
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
- follows: PART 51 -- INTERCONNECTION Subpart A - General information Sec. 51.1 Basis and purpose. Federal Communications Commission 96-325 B-6 51.3 Applicability to negotiated agreements. 51.5 Terms and definitions. Subpart B - Telecommunications carriers 51.100 General duty. Subpart C - Obligations of all local exchange carriers 51.201 Resale. 51.203 Number portability. 51.219 Access to rights of way. 51.221 Reciprocal compensation. 51.223 Application of additional requirements. Subpart D - Additional obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers 51.301 Duty to negotiate. 51.303 Preexisting agreements. 51.305 Interconnection. 51.307 Duty to provide access on an unbundled basis to network elements. 51.309 Use of unbundled network elements. 51.311 Nondiscriminatory access to unbundled network elements. 51.313 Just, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms and conditions for the provision of
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.txt
- Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12642-45 ¶ 218-227; 39 GHz Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18636 ¶ 76. See, e.g., LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12644 ¶ 223. 47 U.S.C. § 153(44). 47 U.S.C. § 153(46). See NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 19274 ¶ 18. 47 C.F.R. § 51.100. 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.201 - 51.223. See 1.947 (b) of the of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.947 (b). A change in regulatory status would require Commission prior authorization, however, if the change raised issues concerning the benchmark contained in Section 310(b)(4) of the Act. See infra n. 180. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.947, 101.305. NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 19274 ¶ 19. Id. We note
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
- follows: PART 51 -- INTERCONNECTION Subpart A - General information Sec. 51.1 Basis and purpose. Federal Communications Commission 96-325 B-6 51.3 Applicability to negotiated agreements. 51.5 Terms and definitions. Subpart B - Telecommunications carriers 51.100 General duty. Subpart C - Obligations of all local exchange carriers 51.201 Resale. 51.203 Number portability. 51.219 Access to rights of way. 51.221 Reciprocal compensation. 51.223 Application of additional requirements. Subpart D - Additional obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers 51.301 Duty to negotiate. 51.303 Preexisting agreements. 51.305 Interconnection. 51.307 Duty to provide access on an unbundled basis to network elements. 51.309 Use of unbundled network elements. 51.311 Nondiscriminatory access to unbundled network elements. 51.313 Just, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms and conditions for the provision of
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99386.doc
- Arkansas Act pursuant to section 253 of the Communications Act. 103. The only argument in the record supporting preemption of the enforcement of section 11(e) is that section 11(e) allegedly directs the Arkansas Commission to impose on non-incumbent LECs (i.e., competing LECs) the obligations of section 251(c) of the Communications Act. Such a directive allegedly would be inconsistent with section 51.223(a) of our rules, which provides, in pertinent part, that "[a] state may not impose the obligations set forth in section 251(c) of the Act on a LEC that is not classified as an incumbent LEC. . . ." This inconsistency allegedly would create such substantial burdens for competing LECs that it would effectively prohibit the ability of competing LECs to
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00363.doc
- status. See 47 U.S.C. § 153(44). See 47 U.S.C. § 153(46). See Amendments to Parts 1, 2 and 101 of the Commission's Rules To License Fixed Services at 24 GHz, WT Docket 99-327, Report and Order, FCC 00-272, ¶ 27, (rel. Aug. 1, 2000) ("24 GHz Report and Order"). See 47 C.F.R. § 51.100. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.201 - 51.223. See Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10848 (¶ 121). , infra. See 47 C.F.R. § 27.66, as codified by 700 MHz First Report and Order. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.947 and 101.305. See 4.9 GHz Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 4793 (¶ 33) See 47 U.S.C. § 303(y)(2). See BBA, Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251.
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00272.doc
- Order, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12642-45 ¶ 218-227; 39 GHz Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18636 ¶ 76. See, e.g., LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12644 ¶ 223. 47 U.S.C. § 153(44). 47 U.S.C. § 153(46). See NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 19274 ¶ 18. 47 C.F.R. § 51.100. 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.201 - 51.223. See 1.947 (b) of the of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.947 (b). A change in regulatory status would require Commission prior authorization, however, if the change raised issues concerning the benchmark contained in Section 310(b)(4) of the Act. See infra n. 180. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.947, 101.305. NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 19274 ¶ 19. Id. We note
- http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd111228.html
- 99-200 ) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 01/11/2012. WCB . Contact: Marilyn Jones at (202) 418-1580 or Marilyn.Jones@fcc.gov [50]DA-11-2074A1.doc [51]DA-11-2074A1.pdf [52]DA-11-2074A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PETITION OF CHANNEL ISLANDS TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR ORDER DECLARING IT AN INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIER IN THE CHANNEL ISLANDS, CA PURSUANT TO SECTION 251(H)(2) OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED AND SECTION 51.223(B) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Denied the petition without prejudice to re-filing. (Dkt No. 08-123 ). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 12/27/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-2071). WCB [53]DA-11-2071A1.doc [54]DA-11-2071A1.pdf [55]DA-11-2071A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311691A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311691A1.txt 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311692A1.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311692A1.txt 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311694A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311694A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311693A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311693A2.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311720A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311720A1.txt 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311738A1.pdf 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311738A1.txt 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311731A1.pdf 14.
- http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/archive/2004ord.html
- [263]Acrobat 9/3/04 PUBLIC NOTICE Re: Petition for Order declaring South Slope Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier in Iowa exchanges of Oxford, Tiffin, and Solon - WC Dkt No. 04-347 - DA 04-2871. On August 24, 2004, South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, Inc. filed a petition pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the Act) and section 51.223(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 51.223(b). [264]Word | [265]Acrobat 9/2/04 PUBLIC NOTICE Re: Domestic Section 214 Application filed for Transfer of Control of Looking Glass Networks, Inc and Looking Glass Networks of Virginia. DA 04-2868. WC Dkt No. 04-293. [266]Word | [267]Acrobat 9/2/04 PUBLIC NOTICE Re: Domestic Section 214 Application filed for Transfer of Control of Granite State Long