FCC Web Documents citing 51.209

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • in the local exchange and exchange access markets by removing operational barriers to competition and by requiring incumbent LECs to provide nondiscriminatory access to services. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 251, 252. Section Number and Title: 51.201 Resale (cross-reference to Part 51 subpart G). 51.203 Number Portability (cross-reference to Part 52 subpart C). 51.205 Dialing parity: General. 51.207 Local dialing parity. 51.209 Toll dialing parity. 51.211 Toll dialing parity implementation schedule. 51.213 Toll dialing parity implementation plans. 51.215 Dialing parity: Cost recovery. 51.217 Nondiscriminatory access: Telephone numbers, operator services, directory assistance services, and directory listings. 51.219 Access to rights of way (cross-reference to Part 1 subpart J). 51.221 Reciprocal compensation (cross-reference to Part 51 subpart H). 51.223 Application of additional requirements. SUBPART
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.txt
  • than to IXCs, even if dialed on a 1+ basis? We seek comment on the relative merits and drawbacks of such an approach, and ask parties to identify any technical impediments to such routing requirements. For instance, we recognize that the current Commission rules may require that intraMTA calls dialed on a 1+ basis be routed through IXCs. Specifically, section 51.209 of the Commission's rules requires LECs to implement toll dialing parity through a presubscription process that permits a customer to select a carrier to which all designated calls on a customer's line will be routed automatically. Should this rule be changed? We ask parties to explain what technical or network changes would be needed if all intraMTA CMRS traffic were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-113A1.txt
  • completed outside of the caller's immediate local calling area but within the same LATA is an intraLATA toll call, while a call that is completed outside of both the caller's immediate local calling area and his or her LATA is an interLATA toll call. Id. at 19418, 19419, paras. 47, 49. The Commission codified the intraLATA presubscription requirements in Section 51.209 of its rules. Subsection (c) provides that ``[a] LEC may not assign automatically a customer's intraLATA toll traffic to itself, to its subsidiaries or affiliates, to the customer's presubscribed interLATA or interstate toll carrier, or to any other carrier.'' 47 C.F.R. § 51.209(c). After implementation of intraLATA toll dialing parity, subscribers such as Thorpe could receive service from three different
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 61.45(b) (explaining how price cap LECs must adjust their price cap indices for various baskets of price cap services, including the interstate interexchange basket). 107 See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6811, 6812. For explanations of "LATA," as well as corridor and interstate intraLATA toll services, see Section IV.B. 108 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.205, 51.209, 51.211, 51.213; Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 19392 (1996) (Dialing Parity Order) (implementing dialing parity requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 251), vacated in part, California v. FCC, 124 F.3d 934 (8th Cir. 1997), rev'd, AT&T v. Iowa
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • C.F.R. § 61.45(b) (explaining how price cap LECs must adjust their price cap indices for various baskets of price cap services, including the interstate interexchange basket). 107 See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6811, 6812. For explanations of "LATA," as well as corridor and interstate intraLATA toll services, see Section IV.B. 108 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.205, 51.209, 51.211, 51.213; Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 19392 (1996) (Dialing Parity Order) (implementing dialing parity requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 251), vacated in part, California v. FCC, 124 F.3d 934 (8th Cir. 1997), rev'd, AT&T v. Iowa
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992777.doc
  • 64.1150. On October 8, 1999, ITS filed a Petition for Waiver (Waiver Petition). On November 22, 1999, ITS filed a Supplement to the Waiver Petition (Supplement to Petition). On December 15, 1999, ITS filed a Second Supplement to the Waiver Petition (Second Supplement to Petition). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See 47 C.F.R. § 51.209. Second Supplement to Petition at 1. We note that the authorization and verification rules apply to changes in local exchange as well as interexchange service. Section 258 Order at ¶81. See notification letter, Waiver Petition, Attachment A. See notification letter, Supplement to Petition, Attachment B. Supplement to Petition at 2. Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2777 ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ ­ ¼ ¾
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
  • C.F.R. § 61.45(b) (explaining how price cap LECs must adjust their price cap indices for various baskets of price cap services, including the interstate interexchange basket). 107 See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6811, 6812. For explanations of "LATA," as well as corridor and interstate intraLATA toll services, see Section IV.B. 108 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.205, 51.209, 51.211, 51.213; Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 19392 (1996) (Dialing Parity Order) (implementing dialing parity requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 251), vacated in part, California v. FCC, 124 F.3d 934 (8th Cir. 1997), rev'd, AT&T v. Iowa