FCC Web Documents citing 36.302

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-11A1.txt
  • 5300. (a) The amounts in this account are apportioned among the operations on the basis of analysis during a representative period of the portion of Account 1171, Allowance for doubtful accounts, related to telecommunications billing. 14. Revise § 36.301 to read as follows: § 36.301 Section arrangement. (a) This subpart is arranged in sections as follows: General .................................................. 36.301 and 36.302. Plant Specific Operations Expenses: General ................................................ 36.310. Network Support/General Support Expenses--Accounts 6110 and 6120 (Class B Telephone Companies); Accounts 6112, 6113, 6114, 6121, 6122, 6123, and 6124 (Class A Telephone Companies)............ 36.311. Central Office Expenses--Accounts 6210, 6220, 6230 (Class B Telephone Companies); Accounts 6211, 6212, 6220, 6231, and 6232 (Class A Telephone Companies) ............................................ 36.321 Information Origination/Termination Expenses--Account 6310 (Class
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209957-1.pdf
  • products because the degree of difficulty or expense of providing them currently would exceed the "readily achievable" threshold. In addition, the DOJ regulations implementing the ADA do not require operators of public accommodations to modify their policies, practices, or procedures where "the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the [public accommodation's] goods, services, facilities. . . ." 28 C.F.R. 36.302. Likewise, telecommunications and customer premises equipment manufacturers should not be required to add accessibility features if doing so would alter fundamentally the nature of the equipment. For example, a manufacturer of a very small communications device intended to meet a market need for such small devices would not be required to incorporate accessibility features -- such as large control buttons
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210026-1.pdf
  • for non-accessible products and services that do not provide an equivalent or similar function offer at a comparable price. In many cases a modification of ones' policies and/or practices as required by Title III of the ADA would provide the necessary corrective action. Ultimately, promotional offers that utilize accessible products are the ideal solution! Title III of the ADA (Section 36.302) requires that "a public accommodation shall make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures, when the modifications are necessary to afford goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to individuals with disabilities, unless the public accommodation can demonstrate that making modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations."We would like to see the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210097-1.pdf
  • CPE manufacturers are not required to add accessibility features if doing so would alter fundamentally the nature of the equipment. The DOJ regulations implementing the ADA do not require operators of public accommodations to modify their policies, practices, or procedures where "the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the [public accommodation's] goods, services, facilities. . . ." 28 C.F.R. 36.302. For example, a manufacturer of a very small communications device intended to meet a market need for such small devices is not required to incorporate accessibility features -- for example, large control buttons or visual display on a wrist- watch sized paging device -- that would require enlarging the size of the device, thereby altering its fundamental characteristic of "smallness."
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209957-1.pdf
  • products because the degree of difficulty or expense of providing them currently would exceed the "readily achievable" threshold. In addition, the DOJ regulations implementing the ADA do not require operators of public accommodations to modify their policies, practices, or procedures where "the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the [public accommodation's] goods, services, facilities. . . ." 28 C.F.R. 36.302. Likewise, telecommunications and customer premises equipment manufacturers should not be required to add accessibility features if doing so would alter fundamentally the nature of the equipment. For example, a manufacturer of a very small communications device intended to meet a market need for such small devices would not be required to incorporate accessibility features -- such as large control buttons
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210026-1.pdf
  • for non-accessible products and services that do not provide an equivalent or similar function offer at a comparable price. In many cases a modification of ones' policies and/or practices as required by Title III of the ADA would provide the necessary corrective action. Ultimately, promotional offers that utilize accessible products are the ideal solution! Title III of the ADA (Section 36.302) requires that "a public accommodation shall make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures, when the modifications are necessary to afford goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to individuals with disabilities, unless the public accommodation can demonstrate that making modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations."We would like to see the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210097-1.pdf
  • CPE manufacturers are not required to add accessibility features if doing so would alter fundamentally the nature of the equipment. The DOJ regulations implementing the ADA do not require operators of public accommodations to modify their policies, practices, or procedures where "the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the [public accommodation's] goods, services, facilities. . . ." 28 C.F.R. 36.302. For example, a manufacturer of a very small communications device intended to meet a market need for such small devices is not required to incorporate accessibility features -- for example, large control buttons or visual display on a wrist- watch sized paging device -- that would require enlarging the size of the device, thereby altering its fundamental characteristic of "smallness."