FCC Web Documents citing 32.12

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • - Frontier of Rochester NY 250,828 203,027 47,801 19.06 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 88,435 60,284 28,043 31.71 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 127,824 99,457 28,367 22.19 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 77,238 55,292 23,770 30.78 Verizon - South - North Carolina NC 150,574 91,434 59,149 39.28 BellSouth - North Carolina NC 1,230,717 836,270 395,253 32.12 Sprint - Carolina Tel. & Tel. of North Carolina NC 466,472 349,905 116,566 24.99 Qwest - North Dakota ND 92,776 60,730 31,061 33.48 ALLTEL - Western Reserve - Ohio OH 76,858 52,878 23,980 31.20 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Ohio OH 350,386 274,386 74,838 21.36 Verizon - North - Ohio OH 436,619 335,468 101,329 23.21 SBC - Ameritech - Ohio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • - Frontier of Rochester NY 250,828 203,027 47,801 19.06 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 88,435 60,284 28,043 31.71 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 127,824 99,457 28,367 22.19 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 77,238 55,292 23,770 30.78 Verizon - South - North Carolina NC 150,574 91,434 59,149 39.28 BellSouth - North Carolina NC 1,230,717 836,270 395,253 32.12 Sprint - Carolina Tel. & Tel. of North Carolina NC 466,472 349,905 116,566 24.99 Qwest - North Dakota ND 92,776 60,730 31,061 33.48 ALLTEL - Western Reserve - Ohio OH 76,858 52,878 23,980 31.20 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Ohio OH 350,386 274,386 74,838 21.36 Verizon - North - Ohio OH 436,619 335,468 101,329 23.21 SBC - Ameritech - Ohio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 41.44 Florida Miami 40.65 40.65 40.6740.1337.4040.6441.63 43.86 44.75 44.70 44.70 Florida Tampa 37.66 37.87 41.0941.0941.1841.1842.21 44.98 45.39 45.36 45.26 Florida West Palm Beach 39.47 37.39 38.1338.6740.6637.3838.60 41.76 42.57 43.13 44.02 Georgia Albany 39.74 39.74 41.0041.0041.1541.7042.98 45.16 46.80 46.47 45.94 Georgia Atlanta 53.64 58.82 58.8758.8758.8158.8160.25 62.60 64.84 64.22 64.22 Hawaii Honolulu 42.74 44.39 46.0947.3247.3247.3248.20 49.63 51.85 51.19 51.05 Illinois Chicago 34.12 32.12 31.9131.9133.7435.1236.12 33.08 33.23 32.88 36.64 Illinois Decatur 38.01 35.96 35.7135.1540.1742.4943.49 40.50 20.81 40.63 44.38 Illinois Rock Island 38.64 36.58 36.5835.7740.7942.0243.08 40.24 40.51 40.33 44.08 Indiana Indianapolis 57.46 56.78 55.8455.8455.8456.0757.27 59.03 54.51 49.68 49.76 Indiana Terre Haute 47.07 47.07 47.0347.0343.9143.9137.99 41.96 41.46 41.47 41.29 Iowa Fort Dodge 22.44 22.44 22.4422.4425.9525.3426.26 28.81 29.25 29.78 30.03 Kentucky Louisville 60.96 61.01 55.8756.8445.2745.3348.75 45.12 45.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.txt
  • to each account listed in 47 C.F.R. § 54.301 (b) (I) - (IV), for the calendar year [insert date] (47 C.F.R. § 54.301(b)). Local switching support - is an ILEC and has provided USAC with the historical total unseparated dollar amount assigned to each account listed in 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(b) (I) - (IV) and pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 32.12 (b) for the calendar year [insert date] (47 C.F.R. § 54.301(e) and 47 C.F.R. § 32.12(b)). Sale or transfer of exchanges - (for safety valve support) is a rural incumbent local exchange carrier and has provided written notice to USAC that the Beneficiary has acquired access lines on [insert date] that may be eligible for safety valve support (47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Louisiana LA 5,960,387 4,507,485 1,536,001 25.77 Verizon New England - Maine ME 1,865,786 1,321,395 541,913 29.04 Verizon Maryland MD 7,684,968 4,912,012 2,852,010 37.11 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,937,527 6,894,302 4,103,493 37.52 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,692,604 1,293,904 488,698 28.87 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 10,275,718 7,630,483 2,808,288 27.33 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,683,911 3,211,493 1,504,362 32.12 AT&T - BellSouth - Mississippi MS 4,107,110 3,064,341 1,105,832 26.92 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 287,362 222,175 65,624 22.84 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 13,283 9,534 3,778 28.44 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,570 52,829 16,864 24.24 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 792,349 611,284 182,172 22.99 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Louisiana LA 5,960,387 4,507,485 1,536,001 25.77 Verizon New England - Maine ME 1,865,786 1,321,395 541,913 29.04 Verizon Maryland MD 7,684,968 4,912,012 2,852,010 37.11 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,937,527 6,894,302 4,103,493 37.52 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,692,604 1,293,904 488,698 28.87 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 10,275,718 7,630,483 2,808,288 27.33 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,683,911 3,211,493 1,504,362 32.12 AT&T - BellSouth - Mississippi MS 4,107,110 3,064,341 1,105,832 26.92 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 287,362 222,175 65,624 22.84 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 13,283 9,534 3,778 28.44 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,570 52,829 16,864 24.24 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 792,349 611,284 182,172 22.99 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Surcharges, and Taxes Same-Zone Including Touch-Tone, State City Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Daytime Call Surcharges, and Taxes Service Service New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 49.14 30.87 0.15 60.02 New York Binghamton Verizon 31.47 0.11 121.82 New York Buffalo Verizon 32.20 0.11 124.62 New York Massena Verizon 31.30 0.11 121.14 New York New York City Verizon 32.93 0.11 124.51 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 32.12 0.11 124.33 New York Rochester Citizen 20.21 0.15 58.05 North Carolina Raleigh AT&T 46.64 69.39 North Carolina Rockingham AT&T 47.14 69.39 Ohio Canton Ameritech 38.15 0.08 66.62 Ohio Cincinnati Cincinnati Bell 53.79 37.31 0.15 49.75 Ohio Cleveland AT&T 35.16 0.08 67.72 Ohio Columbus AT&T 34.68 0.08 66.78 Ohio Toledo AT&T 35.67 0.08 67.09 Oregon Corvallis Qwest 37.86 28.78 0.15 34.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
  • Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(I), and 154(j) and 220 as amended, unless otherwise noted. Table of Contents, Part 32-Uniform System of Accounts for Telecommunications Companies is revised to read as follows: PART 32-UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES Subpart A-Preface Sec. 32.1 Background. 32.2 Basis of the accounts. 32.3 Authority 32.4 Communications Act. Subpart B-General Instructions 32.11 Classification of companies. 32.12 Records. 32.13 Accounts-general. 32.14 Regulated accounts. 32.15 [Reserved] 32.16 Changes in accounting standards. 32.17 Interpretation of accounts. 32.18 Waivers. 32.19 Address for reports and correspondence. 32.20 Numbering convention. 32.21 Sequence of accounts. 32.22 Comprehensive interperiod tax allocation. 32.23 Nonregulated activities. 32.24 Compensated absences. 32.25 Unusual items and contingent liabilities. 32.26 Materiality. 32.27 Transactions with affiliates. Subpart C-Instructions for Balance Sheet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-32A1.txt
  • AS ONE DEM[;] 2. INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER TRAFFIC HAS BEEN CATEGORIZED AS INTERSTATE.'' The parties agree that if, for the 1997-1998 Monitoring Period, ATU had assigned the costs for ISP traffic to the intrastate jurisdiction and counted two DEMs for each minute of intraoffice calls, then ATU's rate of return for the interstate switched traffic sensitive category would have been 32.12 %, far in excess of the maximum allowable rate of return of 11.65%. GCI filed this Complaint on August 24, 2000. GCI alleges that ATU's conduct during the 1997-1998 Monitoring Period violated the Act in several ways. In Count 1, GCI alleges that ATU violated Commission orders requiring ISP traffic costs to be assigned to the intrastate jurisdiction for jurisdictional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.txt
  • follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j) and 220 as amended, unless otherwise noted. Table of Contents, Part 32-Uniform System of Accounts for Telecommunications Companies is revised to read as follows: PART 32-UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES Subpart A-Preface Sec. 32.1 Background. 32.2 Basis of the accounts. 32.3 Authority. 32.4 Communications Act. Subpart B-General Instructions 32.11 Classification of companies. 32.12 Records. 32.13 Accounts-general. 32.14 Regulated accounts. 32.15 [Reserved] 32.16 Changes in accounting standards. 32.17 Interpretation of accounts. 32.18 Waivers. 32.19 Address for reports and correspondence. 32.20 Numbering convention. 32.21 Sequence of accounts. 32.22 Comprehensive interperiod tax allocation. 32.23 Nonregulated activities. 32.24 Compensated absences. 32.25 Unusual items and contingent liabilities. 32.26 Materiality. 32.27 Transactions with affiliates. Subpart C-Instructions for Balance Sheet
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01032.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01032.html
  • AS ONE DEM[;] 2. INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER TRAFFIC HAS BEEN CATEGORIZED AS INTERSTATE.'' The parties agree that if, for the 1997-1998 Monitoring Period, ATU had assigned the costs for ISP traffic to the intrastate jurisdiction and counted two DEMs for each minute of intraoffice calls, then ATU's rate of return for the interstate switched traffic sensitive category would have been 32.12 %, far in excess of the maximum allowable rate of return of 11.65%. GCI filed this Complaint on August 24, 2000. GCI alleges that ATU's conduct during the 1997-1998 Monitoring Period violated the Act in several ways. In Count 1, GCI alleges that ATU violated Commission orders requiring ISP traffic costs to be assigned to the intrastate jurisdiction for jurisdictional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • West Palm Beach 38.43 37.81 38.15 38.60 39.47 37.39 38.13 38.67 40.66 37.38 38.6039.59 Georgia Albany 42.67 41.87 39.14 39.70 39.74 39.74 41.00 41.00 41.15 41.70 42.9843.69 Georgia Atlanta 53.32 53.61 53.61 53.61 53.64 58.82 58.87 58.87 58.81 58.81 60.2561.02 Hawaii Honolulu 40.17 40.25 40.25 41.85 42.74 44.39 46.09 47.32 47.32 47.32 48.2050.70 Illinois Chicago 34.17 34.20 33.87 34.13 34.12 32.12 31.91 31.91 33.74 35.12 36.1235.86 Illinois Decatur 37.89 37.92 37.76 38.02 38.01 35.96 35.71 35.15 40.17 42.49 43.4943.03 Illinois Rock Island 38.66 38.57 38.39 38.65 38.64 36.58 36.58 35.77 40.79 42.02 43.0842.63 Indiana Indianapolis 60.85 60.85 59.96 60.24 57.46 56.78 55.84 55.84 55.84 56.07 57.2757.97 Indiana Terre Haute 46.39 46.98 46.98 46.98 47.07 47.07 47.03 47.03 43.91 43.91 37.9938.66 Iowa
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 37.39 38.13 38.67 40.66 37.38 38.60 40.00 41.75 Georgia Albany 42.67 41.87 39.14 39.70 39.74 39.74 41.00 41.00 41.15 41.70 42.98 44.08 45.44 Georgia Atlanta 53.32 53.61 53.61 53.61 53.64 58.82 58.87 58.87 58.81 58.81 60.25 60.46 63.02 Hawaii Honolulu 40.17 40.25 40.25 41.85 42.74 44.39 46.09 47.32 47.32 47.32 48.20 51.71 53.12 Illinois Chicago 34.17 34.20 33.87 34.13 34.12 32.12 31.91 31.91 33.74 35.12 36.12 36.01 36.30 Illinois Decatur 37.89 37.92 37.76 38.02 38.01 35.96 35.71 35.15 40.17 42.49 43.49 43.37 43.35 Illinois Rock Island 38.66 38.57 38.39 38.65 38.64 36.58 36.58 35.77 40.79 42.02 43.08 42.74 43.06 Indiana Indianapolis 60.85 60.85 59.96 60.24 57.46 56.78 55.84 55.84 55.84 56.07 57.27 58.50 53.23 Indiana Terre Haute 46.39 46.98 46.98 46.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 41.18 41.18 42.21 42.51 44.98 45.46 Florida West Palm Beach 38.60 39.47 37.39 38.1338.67 40.66 37.38 38.60 40.00 41.76 42.57 Georgia Albany 39.70 39.74 39.74 41.0041.00 41.15 41.70 42.98 44.08 45.16 46.80 Georgia Atlanta 53.61 53.64 58.82 58.8758.87 58.81 58.81 60.25 60.46 62.60 64.84 Hawaii Honolulu 41.85 42.74 44.39 46.0947.32 47.32 47.32 48.20 51.71 49.63 49.70 Illinois Chicago 34.13 34.12 32.12 31.9131.91 33.74 35.12 36.12 36.01 33.08 33.44 Illinois Decatur 38.02 38.01 35.96 35.7135.15 40.17 42.49 43.49 43.37 40.50 41.04 Illinois Rock Island 38.65 38.64 36.58 36.5835.77 40.79 42.02 43.08 42.74 40.24 40.73 Indiana Indianapolis 60.24 57.46 56.78 55.8455.84 55.84 56.07 57.27 58.50 59.03 54.51 Indiana Terre Haute 46.98 47.07 47.07 47.0347.03 43.91 43.91 37.99 39.03 41.96 42.05 Iowa Fort Dodge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • ColumbiaWashington 35.32 33.37 39.1737.8434.8535.8136.34 36.18 39.16 39.08 Florida Miami 40.65 40.65 40.6740.1337.4040.6441.63 43.86 44.75 44.70 Florida Tampa 37.66 37.87 41.0941.0941.1841.1842.21 44.98 45.39 45.17 Florida West Palm Beach 39.47 37.39 38.1338.6740.6637.3838.60 41.76 42.57 43.13 Georgia Albany 39.74 39.74 41.0041.0041.1541.7042.98 45.16 46.80 46.47 Georgia Atlanta 53.64 58.82 58.8758.8758.8158.8160.25 62.60 64.84 64.22 Hawaii Honolulu 42.74 44.39 46.0947.3247.3247.3248.20 49.63 51.85 51.52 Illinois Chicago 34.12 32.12 31.9131.9133.7435.1236.12 33.08 33.23 32.88 Illinois Decatur 38.01 35.96 35.7135.1540.1742.4943.49 40.50 20.81 40.46 Illinois Rock Island 38.64 36.58 36.5835.7740.7942.0243.08 40.24 40.51 40.16 Indiana Indianapolis 57.46 56.78 55.8455.8455.8456.0757.27 59.03 54.51 50.22 Indiana Terre Haute 47.07 47.07 47.0347.0343.9143.9137.99 41.96 41.46 41.47 Iowa Fort Dodge 22.44 22.44 22.4422.4425.9525.3426.26 28.81 29.25 29.78 Kentucky Louisville 60.96 61.01 55.8756.8445.2745.3348.75 45.12 45.80 45.60 Louisiana Baton Rouge 48.55 49.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 37.39 38.13 38.13 Florida Tampa 40.70 40.91 41.53 37.66 37.66 37.87 41.09 41.09 Florida Miami 40.60 37.65 41.44 41.88 40.65 40.65 40.67 40.67 Georgia Albany 42.67 41.87 39.14 39.70 39.74 39.74 41.00 41.00 Georgia Atlanta 53.32 53.61 53.61 53.61 53.64 58.82 58.87 58.87 Hawaii Honolulu 40.17 40.25 40.25 41.85 42.74 44.39 46.09 47.32 Illinois Chicago 34.17 34.20 33.87 34.13 34.12 32.12 31.91 31.91 Illinois Decatur 37.89 37.92 37.76 38.02 38.01 35.96 35.71 35.71 Illinois Rock Island 38.66 38.57 38.39 38.65 38.64 36.58 36.58 36.58 Indiana Indianapolis 60.85 60.85 59.96 60.24 57.46 56.78 55.84 55.84 Indiana Terre Haute 46.39 46.98 46.98 46.98 47.07 47.07 47.03 47.03 Iowa Fort Dodge 20.51 22.17 22.17 22.17 22.44 22.44 22.44 22.44 Kentucky Louisville 58.75 61.01 60.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 40.70 40.91 41.53 37.66 37.66 37.87 41.09 41.09 41.18 Florida Miami 40.60 37.65 41.44 41.88 40.65 40.65 40.67 40.13 39.40 Georgia Albany 42.67 41.87 39.14 39.70 39.74 39.74 41.00 41.00 41.15 Georgia Atlanta 53.32 53.61 53.61 53.61 53.64 58.82 58.87 58.87 58.81 Hawaii Honolulu 40.17 40.25 40.25 41.85 42.74 44.39 46.09 47.32 47.32 Illinois Chicago 34.17 34.20 33.87 34.13 34.12 32.12 31.91 31.91 33.87 Illinois Decatur 37.89 37.92 37.76 38.02 38.01 35.96 35.71 35.15 37.76 Illinois Rock Island 38.66 38.57 38.39 38.65 38.64 36.58 36.58 35.77 38.39 Indiana Indianapolis 60.85 60.85 59.96 60.24 57.46 56.78 55.84 55.84 55.84 Indiana Terre Haute 46.39 46.98 46.98 46.98 47.07 47.07 47.03 47.03 47.03 Iowa Fort Dodge 20.51 22.17 22.17 22.17 22.44 22.44 22.44 22.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • COOPERATIVE 12.74 12.10 9.59 8.53 32.03 14.33 109SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 12.38 12.10 9.30 16.94 7.63 13.58 110SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.86 12.29 12.24 10.71 (9.10) 12.57 11.32 111STRASBURG TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.70 12.11 133.44 8.27 11.18 8.61 112TELEPHONE UTILITIES EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOC. 13.23 12.07 24.94 13.11 3.44 17.48 14.42 113THE CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 20.52 10.80 68.48 10.65 227.78 32.12 114UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.82 12.09 18.32 13.74 12.25 13.15 115WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.09 11.96 12.78 14.13 17.86 15.33 116WEBB-DICKENS TELEPHONE CORPORATION 10.46 12.06 (14.17) 7.88 24.97 11.31 117WEST RIVER MUTUAL AID TELEPHONE CORP. 11.50 12.09 3.26 15.79 4.96 10.81 1/ Rate is from their final report for the period covered January 1, 1987 to June 30, 1989. 2/ Company
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 4.19 3.06 72.29 442112 C MID-PLAINS RURAL TEL. CO-OP. INC. 9.37 5.85 3.33 18.78 442114 C CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TEXAS 0.97 2.27 -1.28 INFINITE 442116 C MUENSTER TEL. CORP. OF TX DBA NORTEX COMM. 9.72 9.61 0.10 12.77 442117 C CENTURYTEL OF PORT ARANSAS, INC. -6.60 5.58 -11.53 -43.99 442130 C PEOPLES TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE - TX 13.66 4.85 8.40 32.12 442131 C POKA-LAMBRO TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 0.20 1.20 -0.99 3.32 442134 C RIVIERA TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 41.86 1.25 40.10 73.08 442135 C SOUTHWEST TEXAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.49 2.86 -2.30 0.70 442140 C CENTURYTEL OF SAN MARCOS, INC. -1.14 5.80 -6.56 -36.56 442141 C SANTA ROSA TEL. COOP.,INC. 11.31 2.38 8.72 25.29 442143 C SOUTH PLAINS TEL. COOP.,INC. 0.89 3.79 -2.80
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01032.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01032.html
  • AS ONE DEM[;] 2. INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER TRAFFIC HAS BEEN CATEGORIZED AS INTERSTATE.'' The parties agree that if, for the 1997-1998 Monitoring Period, ATU had assigned the costs for ISP traffic to the intrastate jurisdiction and counted two DEMs for each minute of intraoffice calls, then ATU's rate of return for the interstate switched traffic sensitive category would have been 32.12 %, far in excess of the maximum allowable rate of return of 11.65%. GCI filed this Complaint on August 24, 2000. GCI alleges that ATU's conduct during the 1997-1998 Monitoring Period violated the Act in several ways. In Count 1, GCI alleges that ATU violated Commission orders requiring ISP traffic costs to be assigned to the intrastate jurisdiction for jurisdictional