FCC Web Documents citing 27.64

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.txt
  • These include 47 dBuV/m for PCS and 55 dBuV/m for 4660-4685 MHz licenses. In Section 27.55 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission adopted a field strength limit of 47 dBuV/m for licensees in the 2.3 GHz band. Therefore, commenters who support a boundary limit should propose a specific value and explain the method they have used in deriving it. Section 27.64 of the Commission's Rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • the 698-746 MHz band, both generally and if used in conjunction with field strength standards. Should we adopt a general coordination approach is adopted, comments are requested on whether specific aspects of procedures, such as those contained in Section 22.150 of the Commission's rules, should apply or, alternatively, whether a general requirement such as the cellular rule should apply. Section 27.64 of the Commission's rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 332, 336, and 337. Section Number and Title: 27.50 Power and antenna height limits. 27.51 Equipment authorization. 27.52 RF safety. 27.53 Emission limits. 27.54 Frequency stability. 27.55 Signal strength limits. 27.56 Antenna structures; air navigation safety. 27.57 International coordination. 27.58 Interference to BRS/EBS receivers. 27.63 Disturbance of AM broadcast station antenna patterns. 27.64 Protection from interference. SUBPART D-COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR THE 2305-2320 MHz AND 2345-2360 MHz BANDS Brief Description: The part 27 rules state the conditions under which spectrum is made available and licensed for the provision of wireless communications services (WCS) in specified bands. Subpart D sets forth the rules governing the use of competitive bidding to resolve mutually exclusive applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-874A1.txt
  • Local Franchise Areas in Illinois and Michigan, 21 FCC Rcd 1175 (2006). 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(e)(2). See 47 C.F.R. § 76.905(g). See also Petition at 5-6. See Petition at 6 (listings available at www.directv.com and www.dishnetwork.com). See Petition at 6-7. Id. at 7-8. With regard to Acton, Time Warner notes that while the aggregate DBS subscribership for this community is 27.64 %, the Time Warner subscribership for this franchise area is less than 15 percent. Time Warner requests that if the Commission declines to find competing provider effective competition in Acton, then it seeks a finding that Acton is subject to effective competition pursuant to the low penetration effective competition test. Petition at 8; See, e.g., Charter Communications Properties, LLC, 17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Texas TX 1,148,480 826,281 323,766 28.19 Qwest - Utah UT 2,933,489 2,030,038 918,797 31.32 Verizon New England - Vermont VT 1,001,546 658,054 341,409 34.09 Embarq - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA 813,348 629,432 184,092 22.63 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA 1,487,405 1,099,032 400,475 26.92 Verizon Virginia VA 8,476,771 5,833,713 2,707,555 31.94 Verizon South - Virginia VA 105,367 77,531 29,126 27.64 Embarq - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA 293,157 220,415 74,550 25.43 CenturyTel of Washington WA 571,911 408,463 164,276 28.72 Verizon Northwest - Contel/Washington WA 304,837 230,408 76,078 24.96 Verizon - Northwest - Washington WA 2,302,267 1,717,086 616,760 26.79 Qwest - Washington WA 6,516,155 4,840,256 1,719,484 26.39 Verizon West Virginia WV 2,164,449 1,494,881 694,216 32.07 Verizon North -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Texas TX 1,148,480 826,281 323,766 28.19 Qwest - Utah UT 2,933,489 2,030,038 918,797 31.32 Verizon New England - Vermont VT 1,001,546 658,054 341,409 34.09 Embarq - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA 813,348 629,432 184,092 22.63 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA 1,487,405 1,099,032 400,475 26.92 Verizon Virginia VA 8,476,771 5,833,713 2,707,555 31.94 Verizon South - Virginia VA 105,367 77,531 29,126 27.64 Embarq - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA 293,157 220,415 74,550 25.43 CenturyTel of Washington WA 571,911 408,463 164,276 28.72 Verizon Northwest - Contel/Washington WA 304,837 230,408 76,078 24.96 Verizon - Northwest - Washington WA 2,302,267 1,717,086 616,760 26.79 Qwest - Washington WA 6,516,155 4,840,256 1,719,484 26.39 Verizon West Virginia WV 2,164,449 1,494,881 694,216 32.07 Verizon North -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.txt
  • and wireless local loop to residents with mobility needs that seldom extend beyond these smaller geographic areas. See CROW Comments at 8-9. See, e.g., CROW Comments at 7-8; Leap Comments at 1; NTCA Comments at 2. Spectrum Reallocation Policy Statement, 14 FCC Rcd at 19879-80 ¶ 25. See supra Section III.B.1.a. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.51, 27.54, 27.56, 27.57, 27.63, 27.64. See Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 7312 ¶ 78. See Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 521-22 ¶ 111; see also Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM, 15 FCC Rcd at 20851 at ¶ 10. See Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 7300 ¶ 43. An analog television transmitter operating at 50 kW would not provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • the 698-746 MHz band, both generally and if used in conjunction with field strength standards. Should we adopt a general coordination approach is adopted, comments are requested on whether specific aspects of procedures, such as those contained in Section 22.150 of the Commission's rules, should apply or, alternatively, whether a general requirement such as the cellular rule should apply. Section 27.64 of the Commission's rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-213A1.txt
  • with longer terms. For example, in AT&T/Comcast, the Commission approved a divestiture trust that would last for at least five years. That case involved the merger of AT&T Corp. (AT&T) and Comcast Corporation (Comcast) who were, respectively, the largest and third largest U.S. cable television companies. The trust was created to allow the merged company to dispose of AT&T's prior 27.64 percent interest in Time Warner Entertainment. L.P. (TWE), who was the second largest U.S. cable operator. In approving the trust, the Commission imposed the same basic requirements for a valid trust that it had enumerated in the Tender Offers Policy Statement, except that it allowed AT&T greater than usual influence over the trust assets, because it found that the divestiture
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • the 698-746 MHz band, both generally and if used in conjunction with field strength standards. Should we adopt a general coordination approach is adopted, comments are requested on whether specific aspects of procedures, such as those contained in Section 22.150 of the Commission's rules, should apply or, alternatively, whether a general requirement such as the cellular rule should apply. Section 27.64 of the Commission's rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • there should be any other criteria, in addition to distance to the service area boundary, that would trigger a need to coordinate. 65. We seek comment on what, if any, limits for equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP) are necessary or appropriate under either a coordination or field strength limit approach. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 116 47 C.F.R. § 27.64. 117 Section 27.53 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 27.53; see also Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10854-57 (paras. 136-144). We were required to adopt a more stringent level of attenuation in order to adequately protect adjacent-band satellite DARS reception, among other concerns, from WCS transmissions. Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.pdf
  • These include 47 dBuV/m for PCS and 55 dBuV/m for 4660-4685 MHz licenses. In Section 27.55 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission adopted a field strength limit of 47 dBuV/m for licensees in the 2.3 GHz band. Therefore, commenters who support a boundary limit should propose a specific value and explain the method they have used in deriving it. Section 27.64 of the Commission's Rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • FCC 97-50 17 Subpart B -- Applications and Licenses 27.11Initial authorization. 27.12Eligibility. 27.13License period. 27.14Construction requirements; Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings. 27.15Geographic partitioning and spectrum disaggregation. Subpart C -- Technical Standards 27.51Equipment authorization. 27.52RF safety. 27.53Emission limits. 27.54Frequency stability. 27.55Field strength limits. 27.56Antenna structures; air navigation safety. 27.57International coordination. 27.59Environmental requirements. 27.61Quiet zones. 27.63Disturbance of AM broadcast station antenna patterns. 27.64Protection from interference. Subpart D -- Competitive Bidding Procedures for WCS 27.201WCS subject to competitive bidding. 27.202Competitive bidding mechanisms. 27.203Withdrawal, default and disqualification payments. 27.204Bidding application and certification procedures; prohibition of collusion. 27.205Submission of upfront payments. 27.206Submission of down payment and filing of long-form applications. 27.207Procedures for filing petitions to deny against long-form WCS applications. 27.208License grant, denial, default, and disqualification.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • for the installation and (3) continued maintenance of any detuning apparatus Interference to base receivers from mobile transmitters. necessary to restore proper non-directional performance No protection is provided against mobile-to-base of the AM station tower. interference. (b) Directional AM stations. If tower construction or modification is planned within 3 kilometers (1.9 miles) (4) Interference to fixed stations. Licensees should Sec. 27.64 Protection from interference. (b) Intermodulation interference. Licensees should attempt to resolve such interference by technical means. attempt to resolve such interference by technical means or bidder's bid amount. These amounts will be deducted operating arrangements. from any upfront payments or down payments that the (5) Anomalous or infrequent propagation defaulting or disqualified bidder has deposited with the modes. No protection
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.txt
  • kW ERP maximum limit for the Lower 700 MHz Band would permit both wireless services and certain new broadcast operations,283 yet still allow efficient and flexible use of the spectrum without offsetting costs.284 The Notice asked whether the possible technology or technologies used to provide 278 See supra Section III.B.1.a. 279 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.51, 27.54, 27.56, 27.57, 27.63, 27.64. 280 See Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 7312 ¶ 78. 281 See Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 521-22 ¶ 111; see also Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM, 15 FCC Rcd at 20851 at ¶ 10. 282 See Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 7300 ¶ 43. 283 An analog television transmitter operating at 50
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • ) × := gzgsoradsinglatr ( ) × := ezeradsinelatr ( ) × := egxexgx - := egy eygy - := egzezgz - := disteg egx2egy2 + egz2 + ( ) := range from earth station to BSS sat (km)...: disteg 3.8825104 ´ = eleacoserad 2 disteg2 + gsorad2 - 2erad × disteg × æçè ö÷ør2d×90. - := elevation angle (deg) ele27.64 = Perform the calculations specified in ITU Rec. P.618-6 to obtain a curve of the attenuation exceeded vs. probability Relabel some variable names to the terminology used in P.618-6 q ele := elevation angle from ES to the satellite (deg) felat := latitude of the Earth Station (deg) Earth Location Input Parameters eirp53.0 := : Satellite down-link peak EIRP (dBW)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 10.28 12.54 11.07 6.38 (973.30) 4.60 5.11 16Texas ALLTEL, Inc. 10.73 12.54 7.48 8.90 0.00 13.32 10.06 17Western Reserve Telephone Company 10.50 12.54 7.37 13.11 (2,646.38) 10.29 11.40 18C-R Telephone Company 29.48 12.35 168.35 57.25 2.20 29.22 19CenturyTel of Midwest-Michigan, Inc./CenturyTel of MI., Inc. 16.48 11.25 37.79 20CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. 17.10 12.33 29.30 21CenturyTel of Wisconsin, Inc. 24.26 11.25 27.64 22Chillicothe Telephone Company, The 18.35 12.95 44.27 2.72 25.26 15.91 23Coastal Untilities, Inc. 17.55 11.25 33.17 15.22 0.00 6.13 13.90 24Concord Telephone Co. 18.59 11.25 35.98 30.11 0.00 28.86 24.17 25El Paso Telephone Co. 25.68 12.35 66.48 30.22 22.70 28.04 26Farmers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 11.95 11.25 22.41 17.95 0.00 3.67 9.07 27Fort Bend Telephone Co. dba TXU Communications 14.42 1.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror97.pdf
  • INTERSTATE LINE ACCESS OFFICE INFORMATIONTRANSPORT TOTAL NATIONAL EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOCIATION 11.94% 11.61% 11.42% - - - 12.34% 1ALLTEL ALABAMA, INC. 15.31 11.59 78.98 19.71 26.16 21.14 2ALLTEL CAROLINA, INC. 16.06 11.59 22.57 26.12 41.31 30.33 3ALLTEL FLORIDA, INC. 12.75 11.59 24.99 14.38 14.17 14.08 4ALLTEL GEORGIA PROPERTIES 13.92 12.87 19.65 18.86 13.18 15.63 5ALLTEL KENTUCKY 17.34 11.59 0.22 26.16 39.22 27.64 6ALLTEL MISSISSIPPI, INC. 13.33 11.59 18.91 20.21 16.73 19.16 7ALLTEL MISSOURI PROPERTIES 12.18 11.59 10.15 12.58 16.41 14.63 8ALLTEL NEW YORK, INC. 15.27 11.59 20.37 24.28 14.25 20.49 9ALLTEL OKLAHOMA PROPERTIES 11.42 11.59 15.70 12.09 6.43 10.62 10ALLTEL PENNSYLVANIA, INC. 14.43 11.59 25.74 23.15 15.24 18.93 11ALLTEL SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. 14.27 11.59 16.98 23.98 16.48 21.59 12SUGAR LAND TELEPHONE CO.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 40.17 1982 96.5 10.18 18.98 1943 17.3 3.64 37.85 1983 99.6 13.58 24.53 1944 17.6 3.66 37.41 1984 103.9 15.18 26.28 1945 18.0 3.67 36.68 1985 107.6 16.26 27.19 1946 19.5 3.67 33.86 1986 109.6 17.70 29.05 1947 22.3 3.70 29.85 1987 113.6 18.18 28.79 1948 24.1 3.91 29.19 1988 118.3 18.11 27.54 1949 23.8 4.02 30.39 1989 124.0 19.05 27.64 1950 24.1 4.29 32.02 1990 130.7 19.24 26.48 1951 26.0 4.48 31.00 1991 136.2 19.77 26.11 1952 26.5 4.62 31.36 1992 140.3 19.72 25.29 1953 26.7 4.93 33.22 1993 144.5 19.95 24.84 1954 26.9 5.10 34.11 1994 148.2 19.81 24.05 1955 26.8 5.19 34.84 1995 152.4 20.01 23.62 1956 27.2 5.24 34.66 1996 156.9 19.95 22.87 1957 28.1 5.28 33.80
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 40.17 1982 96.5 10.18 18.98 1943 17.3 3.64 37.85 1983 99.6 13.58 24.53 1944 17.6 3.66 37.41 1984 103.9 15.18 26.28 1945 18.0 3.67 36.68 1985 107.6 16.26 27.19 1946 19.5 3.67 33.86 1986 109.6 17.70 29.05 1947 22.3 3.70 29.85 1987 113.6 18.18 28.79 1948 24.1 3.91 29.19 1988 118.3 18.11 27.54 1949 23.8 4.02 30.39 1989 124.0 19.05 27.64 1950 24.1 4.29 32.02 1990 130.7 19.24 26.48 1951 26.0 4.48 31.00 1991 136.2 19.77 26.11 1952 26.5 4.62 31.36 1992 140.3 19.72 25.29 1953 26.7 4.93 33.22 1993 144.5 19.95 24.84 1954 26.9 5.10 34.11 1994 148.2 19.81 24.05 1955 26.8 5.19 34.84 1995 152.4 20.01 23.62 1956 27.2 5.24 34.66 1996 156.9 19.95 22.87 1957 28.1 5.28 33.80
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • SBC - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN 2,761,248 2,017,613 743,635 26.93 Sprint - United Tel Company of Indiana IN 466,619 356,262 110,357 23.65 Qwest - Iowa IA NA NA NA NA SBC - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 1,981,162 1,363,902 617,261 31.16 BellSouth - Kentucky KY 255,176 194,002 61,172 23.97 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 2,027,662 1,467,210 560,452 27.64 BellSouth - Louisiana LA 4,044,141 3,058,503 985,639 24.37 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 1,207,064 863,331 343,732 28.48 Verizon - Maryland MD 4,995,783 3,353,955 1,641,827 32.86 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 7,291,487 4,760,397 2,531,090 34.71 Verizon - Contel South - Michigan MI 104,186 84,018 20,169 19.36 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 1,323,705 1,053,343 270,362 20.42 SBC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • - Arizona AZ 6,279,595 4,506,640 1,787,509 28.47 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 2,426,136 1,749,699 671,424 27.67 Verizon - Contel - California CA 1,098,749 854,597 250,139 22.77 Verizon - NW - West Coast California CA 42,767 29,924 13,049 30.51 Verizon - GTE - California CA 10,056,273 7,833,744 2,542,725 25.28 SBC - Pacific Bell - California CA 33,270,595 24,261,349 9,196,788 27.64 Sure/West/Roseville Tel - California CA 401,149 293,934 108,625 27.08 Qwest - Colorado CO 8,252,940 6,018,163 2,253,471 27.31 SBC - SNET - CT CT 5,170,886 3,630,576 1,621,889 31.37 Verizon - Delaware DE 1,120,664 764,077 366,252 32.68 Verizon - District of Columbia DC 1,967,700 1,097,713 894,618 45.47 Verizon - Florida FL 5,300,440 3,905,320 1,487,230 28.06 BellSouth - Florida FL 13,872,443 10,034,983 3,986,430
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 19.86 11 - 25 Table 11.6 Average Net Investment - Continued ($000) - 2000 Study Area State Subject to Percent Rate of Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Return Verizon - California - Contel Nevada NV 41,712 26,785 15,734 37.72% 29.33% SBC - Nevada Bell NV 294,273 212,318 82,840 28.15 21.76 Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV 666,756 516,532 157,035 23.55 27.64 Verizon - New England - New Hampshire NH 719,270 485,742 234,119 32.55 20.97 Verizon - New Jersey NJ 3,640,844 2,212,270 1,497,190 41.12 22.65 Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 128,617 99,821 33,840 26.31 54.88 Qwest - New Mexico NM 691,725 500,577 197,149 28.50 22.18 Verizon - New York NY 9,302,871 6,415,669 2,915,165 31.34 11.31 Citizens Telecom -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Virginia VA 248,069 186,359 61,710 24.88 Verizon - Northwest - Contel - Washington WA 243,684 187,693 55,991 22.98 Verizon - Northwest - Washington WA 2,126,962 1,637,419 489,543 23.02 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the NW - Washington WA 214,790 162,358 52,431 24.41 Qwest - Washington WA 5,714,405 4,146,100 1,568,306 27.44 Verizon - West Virginia WV 2,104,860 1,523,168 581,692 27.64 SBC - Ameritech - Wisconsin Bell WI 3,387,457 2,498,245 889,211 26.25 Verizon - North - Wisconsin WI 963,307 741,057 222,250 23.07 Qwest - Wyoming WY 811,337 558,079 253,257 31.21 11 - 26 Table 11.13 Total Other Investment ($000) - 2001 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate All Reporting Local Exchange Companies ($2,060,845) ($4,150,881) $4,391,883 (213.11)%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • the 698-746 MHz band, both generally and if used in conjunction with field strength standards. Should we adopt a general coordination approach is adopted, comments are requested on whether specific aspects of procedures, such as those contained in Section 22.150 of the Commission's rules, should apply or, alternatively, whether a general requirement such as the cellular rule should apply. Section 27.64 of the Commission's rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • FCC 97-50 17 Subpart B -- Applications and Licenses 27.11Initial authorization. 27.12Eligibility. 27.13License period. 27.14Construction requirements; Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings. 27.15Geographic partitioning and spectrum disaggregation. Subpart C -- Technical Standards 27.51Equipment authorization. 27.52RF safety. 27.53Emission limits. 27.54Frequency stability. 27.55Field strength limits. 27.56Antenna structures; air navigation safety. 27.57International coordination. 27.59Environmental requirements. 27.61Quiet zones. 27.63Disturbance of AM broadcast station antenna patterns. 27.64Protection from interference. Subpart D -- Competitive Bidding Procedures for WCS 27.201WCS subject to competitive bidding. 27.202Competitive bidding mechanisms. 27.203Withdrawal, default and disqualification payments. 27.204Bidding application and certification procedures; prohibition of collusion. 27.205Submission of upfront payments. 27.206Submission of down payment and filing of long-form applications. 27.207Procedures for filing petitions to deny against long-form WCS applications. 27.208License grant, denial, default, and disqualification.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • there should be any other criteria, in addition to distance to the service area boundary, that would trigger a need to coordinate. 65. We seek comment on what, if any, limits for equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP) are necessary or appropriate under either a coordination or field strength limit approach. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 116 47 C.F.R. § 27.64. 117 Section 27.53 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 27.53; see also Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10854-57 (paras. 136-144). We were required to adopt a more stringent level of attenuation in order to adequately protect adjacent-band satellite DARS reception, among other concerns, from WCS transmissions. Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00063.doc
  • These include 47 dBuV/m for PCS and 55 dBuV/m for 4660-4685 MHz licenses. In Section 27.55 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission adopted a field strength limit of 47 dBuV/m for licensees in the 2.3 GHz band. Therefore, commenters who support a boundary limit should propose a specific value and explain the method they have used in deriving it. Section 27.64 of the Commission's Rules states generally that Part 27 stations operating in full accordance with applicable Commission rules and the terms and conditions of their authorizations are normally considered to be non-interfering, and provides for Commission action, after notice and hearing, to require modifications to eliminate significant interference. In view of the variety of services that might be provided by