FCC Web Documents citing 27.53
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-846A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-846A1.pdf
- for equipment purchased or operated pursuant to this waiver. Manufacturers filing for a grant of an application for new radios or a request to modify grants for radios already authorized must include a copy of this waiver with the application to include these channels. See AASHTO Comments at 1; PSST Comments at 3; NPSTC Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. 27.53(c)(2) and (c)(4). Because channels in the frequency range 775-776/805-806 MHz must be removed from radios upon expiration of this waiver, the described added potential for interference will not occur once the channels are removed. We note that rendering the radio permanently incapable of operating on the Guard Band channels would require costly modifications that could not readily be performed in
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.txt
- of areas served by other licensees. These safe-harbor examples are intended to provide WCS licensees a degree of certainty as to compliance with the substantial service requirement by the end of the initial license term. Licensees can meet this requirement in other ways, and licensees' showings will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. * * * * * 8. Section 27.53 is amended by adding new paragraph (f) as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (f) For the band 4940-4990 MHz: The peak power of any emission outside the licensee's authorized band, either measured in, or referred to a 1 MHz instrument bandwidth, shall be attenuated below the maximum peak spectral density by at least 43 +
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
- rule as being inapplicable in the case where adjacent spectrum is separately licensed to the same entity, or a cooperating entity. In response, the Bureau granted relief in the form of a waiver. See Omnipoint Request for Broadband Declaratory Ruling or Waiver Concerning PCS Emission Limits Rule Section 24.238, DA 00-1767, 15 FCC Rcd 13422 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(10). See proposed rules 22.917 and 24.238 in Appendix A. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d). See proposed rule paragraphs Sections 22.917(b) and 24.238(b) in Appendix A. See Part 22 Rewrite, 9 FCC Rcd at 6558. We note that alternative services are exempt from wave polarization requirements pursuant to 22.901(d)(2). Andrew Corporation, Petition for Rulemaking, filed September 18, 1998
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.txt
- kHz Frequency Offset 8 C. Section 90.543(a) - ACCP Values for Base Station Frequency Offsets Greater than 400 kHz 9 D. Section 90.543(a) - Clarification that Values for Offsets Greater than 400 kHz Apply Above and Below Authorized Center Frequency 10 E. Section 90.543(a) - Deletion of ACCP Absolute (dBm) Values for Mobiles 15 F. Terminology Update 17 G. Section 27.53(d) - Corresponding Changes to ACCP Values for Transmitters Operating in the 700 MHz Guard Bands 18 IV. Conclusion 19 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 20 A. Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 20 B. Paperwork Reduction Act 21 C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 22 D. Comment Dates 23 E. Further Information 26 VI. Ordering Clauses 28 appendix a Proposed Rule Changes APPENDIX B
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
- 47 C.F.R. 24.236, 27.55. 47 C.F.R. 22.150, 101.103. ``Licensees in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service must coordinate . . . channel usage at each transmitter location within 121 kilometers (75 miles) of any transmitter locations authorized to other licensees or proposed by tentative selectees or other applicants . . . .'' 47 C.F.R. 22.907. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(3); see also Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10857 144 (citing 47 C.F.R. 22.359(iii), 22.917(e), 24.238). See 47 C.F.R. 24.237. See NTIA AWS Assessment at 12. Government operations in the 1710-1755 MHz band at 16 Department of Defense (DOD) sites listed in Appendix A to this Notice must be protected for continued military use
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
- See 47 C.F.R. 22.99. 47 C.F.R. 22.351. This sentence provides: ``Except as otherwise provided in this part, each channel or channel block is assigned exclusively to one common carrier in each service area.'' 47 C.F.R. 22.351. See para. 28, supra. 47 C.F.R. 22.352. 47 C.F.R. 22.99. 47 C.F.R. 22.359. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(10) (Wireless Communications Services OOBE limits). OOBE interference results from emissions on frequencies outside a licensee's authorized band that fall within the passband of an adjacent licensee's receiver(s). A passband is the range of frequencies within which fall the desired signals (i.e., the signals intended to be received by the receiver). OOBE interference cannot be mitigated through receiver filtering, and differs
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
- stations transmitting in the 1995-2000 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands are limited to a peak effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of 1640 watts and a peak output power of 100 watts. (2) Fixed, mobile, and portable (hand-held) stations operating in the 2020-2025 MHz bands are limited to a peak EIRP of 1 watt. * * * * * In 27.53, redesignate paragraphs (h), (i), (j), (k) and (l) as paragraphs (i), (j), (k), (l) and (m), respectively, and add new paragraph (h) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (h) For operations in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz bands, the power of any emission outside a licensee's frequency block
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
- & n.137. See infra section III.B. RTG Comments at 7. Base station transmitters on Blocks C and D must meet a 76 + 10 log P OOBE limit, and C and D block mobile transmitters must meet a 65 + 10 log P limit, for all emissions into the 764-776 and 794-806 MHz public safety bands. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53. For example, base transmitters operating in the 752-762 MHz D block must limit emissions to the 76 + 10 log P level in spectrum only two megahertz from the upper edge of the band, and mobile stations operating in the 777-782 MHz C block must limit emissions to the 65 + 10 log P level in spectrum only one megahertz
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.txt
- limits to protect public safety operations in the event broadband operations are permitted in the public safety block. Moreover, we seek comment on whether, in the event the Commission maintains the current ACP limits and does not apply OOBE limits to the Guard Bands as Access/Pegasus request, we should amend the current ACP tables currently set forth in rule section 27.53(d) to account for operations wider than 150 kilohertz. If commenters believe this is necessary, we seek comment on the appropriate attenuation values for bandwidths greater than 150 kilohertz, so as to maintain adequate protection for public safety operations. Finally, we ask any proponent of changes to the ACP/OOBE limits to comment on how its proposal will fulfill the primary responsibility
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
- multiple spectrum blocks for the provision of broadband services. We find that the OOBE limits we are applying here are readily achievable by the A Block licensees, yet will provide appropriate out-of-band protection to other Upper 700 MHz operations. Accordingly, we will no longer require the reconfigured A Block licensees to comply with the ACP limits set forth in Section 27.53(d) of our rules. Frequency Coordination and the Cellular Architecture Prohibition. In addition to imposing the more stringent OOBE limits, the Upper 700 MHz Second Report and Order required that guard band users employ frequency coordination procedures in cooperation with 700 MHz public safety coordinators, and prohibited the use of cellular architectures in the Guard Bands. Given the elevated risk of
- http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.txt
- at 15349 157, 15351 163. Id. at 15348 153, 154. We note that only the C Block, located adjacent to the D Block, is licensed on a REAG basis. Id. at 15293 4. See id. at 15315-16 62. See id. at 15450 457. Id. See id. at 15316 63. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d)(3), (5). D Block base stations must meet a 76 + 10log P dB limit in a 6.25 kHz band segment and D Block mobile and portable stations must meet a 65 + 10log P dB limit in a 6.25 kHz band segment. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d)(1), (2), (4). See 47 C.F.R. 27.50(b)(2), (3),
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1612A1.txt
- to the minimum necessary for successful communications. Antenna height limits: Fixed stations transmitting in the 1710-1755 MHz band are limited to a maximum antenna height of ten meters above ground. Signal strength limits: ower of any emission outside a licensee's frequency block must be reduced below the transmitter power (P) by at least 43 + 10 log10 (P) dB. (Section 27.53(g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 27.53(g), contains more information about this limit.) Other protection requirements: Prior to operating a base or fixed station, AWS-1 licensees must coordinate the proposed operation with incumbent fixed point-to-point microwave stations in the 2110-2155 MHz band. (See 47 C.F.R. 27.1111, 27.1131.) Any AWS-1 licensee in the 2110-2180 MHz band that causes actual
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.txt
- decisions about their participation in Auction No. 69 and their bidding strategy. 1.4 GHz Band licensees must comply with the pertinent rule sections set forth in 47 C.F.R. Part 27. Also, potential bidders should be aware that as part of the 2007 World Radio Communications Conference, WRC-07, NTIA has proposed more stringent out-of-band emission limits than presently specified in Section 27.53(i) of the Commission's rules in the bands 1350-1400 MHz and 1427-1452. The potential for stricter emission limits could impact the operations in these bands. Potential bidders are reminded that they are solely responsible for investigating and evaluating all technical and marketplace factors that may have a bearing on the value of the 1.4 GHz band licenses in this auction. The
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.txt
- with USA Digital's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on USA Digital's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), USA Digital and its channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed, and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Sections 21.908 and 74.936; (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.txt
- with USA Digital's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on USA Digital's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), USA Digital and its channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed, and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Sections 21.908 and 74.936; (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.txt
- TV One's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on Digital TV One's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in Digital TV One's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-123A1.txt
- until re-accommodated in accordance with the National Defense Authorization Act of 1999. 1.4 GHz Band licensees must comply with the pertinent rule sections set forth in 47 C.F.R. Part 27. Also, potential bidders should be aware that as part of the 2007 World Radio Communications Conference, WRC-07, NTIA has proposed more stringent out-of-band emission limits than presently specified in Section 27.53(i) of the Commission's rules in the bands 1350-1400 MHz and 1427-1452. The potential for stricter emission limits could impact the operations in these bands. Mock Auction. On Monday, February 5, 2007, the Bureau will conduct a mock auction, which will allow qualified bidders to familiarize themselves with the FCC Auction System. Only qualified bidders will be permitted to participate in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2167A1.txt
- conjunction with USA Digital's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on USA Digital's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), USA Digital and its channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Section 21.908 and 74.936; Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.txt
- with Choice's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Section 27.50(h)(l)(i) and (ii). (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on the BRS licensee's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(1)(3). Additionally, pursuant to Section 27.53(1)(5), Choice and Shekinah shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed, and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Sections 21.908 and 74.936. (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in Choice's system
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.txt
- in conjunction with RCT's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on RCT's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in RCT's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in the LBS
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.txt
- used in conjunction with CNI's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for pre-transition operations in Section 27.50(h)(l)(i) and (ii). (4) Any channels used for the transmission of video programming on CNI's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the pre-transition emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(1)(1). (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in CNI's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dB [m(]V/m or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005. (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.txt
- maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Sections 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii) on the ``post-transition'' BRS/EBS band plan set forth in Sections 27.5(i)(2)(ii) and (iii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on DCTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in DCTC's Brush Hill system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.txt
- in conjunction with Northern's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on Northern's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in Northern's Bath system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.txt
- in conjunction with RCT's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on RCT's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in RCT's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in the LBS
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.txt
- in conjunction with Starcom's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on Starcom's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in Starcom's Fairmont, Minnesota system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.txt
- in conjunction with United's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on United's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in United's Milton and Egeland systems will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.txt
- then-existing subscribers; (4) C&W's main transmit site shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h); (5) Any channels used for the transmission of video programming on C&W's analog system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(1); (6) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in C&W's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (7) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in the LBS
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.txt
- in conjunction with CTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on CTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), CTC and its EBS channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed, and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Sections 21.908 and 74.936; (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-295A1.txt
- Digital TV One's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on Digital TV One's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in Digital TV One's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; Section 27.1220 (regarding the 5.5 MHz wide channels in the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1108A1.pdf
- Reconfigured A Block Because the reconfigured Guard Band A Block will now be located at 757-758/787-788 MHz between the Upper 700 MHz Band C and D Blocks, and will no longer be adjacent to public safety narrowband spectrum, the Commission concluded that it is no longer necessary to apply the adjacent channel power (ACP) emissions criteria set forth in Section 27.53(d) of the rules to the A Block. Instead, OOBE limits will be applied, which are consistent with emission limits applicable to the C Block. Thus, A Block licensees are required to attenuateout-of-band byat least 43 +10log P dB. Further, the Commission will continue to apply heightened out-of-band emissions criteria in order to provide adequate protection to public safety. Therefore A
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
- and licensed for wireless communications services (WCS). Subpart C sets out the technical standards regarding WCS. Need: The identified rules are necessary to set forth the technical standards for WCS. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 332, 336, and 337. Section Number and Title: 27.50 Power and antenna height limits. 27.51 Equipment authorization. 27.52 RF safety. 27.53 Emission limits. 27.54 Frequency stability. 27.55 Signal strength limits. 27.56 Antenna structures; air navigation safety. 27.57 International coordination. 27.58 Interference to BRS/EBS receivers. 27.63 Disturbance of AM broadcast station antenna patterns. 27.64 Protection from interference. SUBPART D-COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR THE 2305-2320 MHz AND 2345-2360 MHz BANDS Brief Description: The part 27 rules state the conditions under which spectrum is
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2245A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2245A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2245A2.txt
- MHz; 2010-2025 MHz published on April 4, 2008 and available at: . See Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in WT Docket No. 99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120, and MM Docket No 00-83 available at: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_doc ument=6511359021. $ % j econsider our OOBE limits at that time. We note, however, that Section 27.53(f) currently states that in the event of harmful interference the Commission may, at its discretion, require greater attenuation than specified in the rules.'' available at: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_doc ument=6513075423. See Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in WT Docket No. 03-66, WT Docket No 03-67, MM Docket No. 97-217; WT Docket No. 02-68, WT Docket No. 00-230, at
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-967A1.txt
- ensure that they remain ``subordinate'' to neighboring EBS stations. In this case, however, FAU's neighbors support its Waiver Request so long as their GSAs are not reduced. Furthermore, the licensees have agreed ``that the normal FCC rules affecting neighboring co-channel and adjacent-channel stations shall henceforth govern the operation of these neighboring GSA facilities including, as applicable, those contained in Sections 27.53, 27.55, and 27.1221.'' Under those circumstances, we conclude that granting FAU a waiver to allow Stations WHR877, WHR894, and WHR895 to have GSAs would be consistent with the policy underlying the Two-Way Second Reconsideration Order, so long as those GSAs exclude any area that would overlap with existing GSAs of neighboring co-channel licensees. We also conclude that a waiver would
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.txt
- Western's wireless cable system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channel used for the transmission of analog video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(1). Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), Oklahoma Western shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1_Rcd.pdf
- Western's wireless cable system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channel used for the transmission of analog video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(1). Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), Oklahoma Western shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.txt
- such request must cover all of the material to which the request applies. See 47 C.F.R. 0.459(a). See Section VI. ``Contact Information,'' below. See Section II.J. ``Maintaining Current Information in Short-Form Applications,'' below. 47 C.F.R. 1.2107(d). See http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/anticollusion See 47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. 27.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. 27.50(h), 27.53(m), 27.55(a)(4), 27.1221. See Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Further Competitive Bidding Procedures; Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1_Rcd.pdf
- the applicable technical rules.70 for Public Inspection." Any such request must cover all of the material to which the request applies. See 47 C.F.R. 0.459(a). 61SeeSection VI. "Contact Information," below. 62SeeSection II.J. "Maintaining Current Information in Short-FormApplications," below. 6347 C.F.R. 1.2107(d). 64Seehttp://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/anticollusion 65See47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(1). 66See47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(2). 67See47 C.F.R. 27.1206(b). 68See47 C.F.R. 27.50(h), 27.53(m), 27.55(a)(4), 27.1221. 69SeeAmendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Part 1 of the Commission's Rules -Further Competitive Bidding Procedures; Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2294A1.txt
- used in conjunction with NCC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on NCC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in NCC's Bowbells system will be permitted to operate at any point along its GSA boundary at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in its underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; Section 27.1220 (regarding the 5.5 MHz wide channels in the LBS and
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2294A1_Rcd.pdf
- at 2. 14Id. at ii, 2-3, 6. 15Id.at 3. 16Id. at 8. 17Id. at 6. 18Id.at 3. 19Id.at 3. 20Id. at1. 12956 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2294 Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on NCC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3);21 Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in NCC's Bowbells system will be permitted to operate at any point along its GSA boundary at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in its underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; Section 27.1220 (regarding the 5.5 MHz wide channels in the LBS and
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.txt
- TerreStar Comments at 3. Sprint Nextel Petition at 6-7 and Reply at 8-10. 47 C.F.R. 1.3. Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. 25.252(a)(1). Application Exhibit 1, Attachment B at 1. Id. See 47 C.F.R. 24.238(a). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(g). See AWS-2 NPRM at 105. Application Exhibit 1, Attachment B at 2. In comments on the ASW-3 NPRM, ICO likewise advocated an OOBE attenuation of (43 + 10*log(P) dB) for AWS-3 base stations in the 2155-2175 MHz band. See ICO Comments to AWS-3 NPRM at 4. Id. at 3-4. ICO notes in this regard that the Commission concluded in the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.txt
- from the reference point at Linares, N.L., Mexico on the southwest. See 47 C.F.R. 27.1208. See also, BRS/EBS 4th MO&O & 2nd FNPRM, WT Docket No. 03-66, 23 FCC Rcd 5992, 6040 127. See 47 C.F.R. 27.5(i)(2). See 47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. 27.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. 27.50(h), 27.53(m), 27.55(a)(4), 27.1221. See Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Further Competitive Bidding Procedures; Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1_Rcd.pdf
- the band on a co-primary basis with the Code Division Multiple Access ("CDMA") Mobile Satellite Service ("MSS"),14 grandfathered Broadcast Auxiliary Service ("BAS") stations,15and grandfathered land mobile and microwave licenses licensed under Parts 90 and 101 of the Commission's rules, respectively.16In 6See47 C.F.R. 27.5(i)(2). 7See47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(1). 8See47 C.F.R. 27.1206(a)(2). 9See47 C.F.R. 27.1206(b). 10See47 C.F.R. 27.50(h), 27.53(m), 27.55(a)(4), 27.1221. 11SeeAmendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Part 1 of the Commission's Rules -Further Competitive Bidding Procedures; Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-863A1.txt
- for USA Digital to make investments in its system. We note that USA Digital has already made significant investments to expand its service offerings to the citizens of Billings, Montana. Finally, we reject Clearwire's argument that the Bureau did not justify the waiver of the technical rules afforded USA Digital. USA Digital requested a waiver of Sections 27.50(h)(l)(i) and (ii), 27.53(l)(3), 27.53(l)(5), 27.55(a)(4)(i), and 27.1221, and supported this request with an engineering analysis that addressed the interference concerns of USA Digital's neighbors. In the face of such a showing, we find that the Bureau properly waived these rules, and explained its rationale for doing so. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES For the reasons discussed above, we conclude that Libmot's Petition does not
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-863A1_Rcd.pdf
- difficult for USA Digital to make investments in its system.46We note that USA Digital has already made significant investments to expand its service offerings to the citizens ofBillings, Montana.47 13. Finally, we reject Clearwire's argument that the Bureau did not justify the waiver of the technical rules afforded USA Digital. USA Digital requested a waiver of Sections 27.50(h)(l)(i) and (ii), 27.53(l)(3), 27.53(l)(5), 27.55(a)(4)(i), and 27.1221,48and supported this request with an engineering 37Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Jul. 19, 2007) at 2-3. 38MO&O, 22 FCC Rcd at 9351-9352 6-7;BRS/EBS R&O, 19 FCC Rcd at 14198-14199 75-77. 39BRS/EBS R&O, 19 FCC Rcd at 14199 77. 40Id. 41Id. 42SeeClearwire Petition at 9; Clearwire Reply at 7. 43BRS/EBS R&O,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-865A1.txt
- waiver period, C&W's main transmit site shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h); During the limited waiver period, all channels used for the transmission of video programming on C&W's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for such as set forth in Section 27.53(l)(1); During the limited waiver period, all of the BRS and EBS channels in C&W's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005, in conjunction with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i); During the limited waiver period, Sections
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-865A1_Rcd.pdf
- waiver period, C&W's main transmit site shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Section 27.50(h); During the limited waiver period, all channels used for the transmission of video programming on C&W's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for such as set forth in Section 27.53(l)(1); During the limited waiver period, all of the BRS and EBS channels in C&W's system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005, in conjunction with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i); 15Id. at 3. 16Id. at 3.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-866A1.txt
- currently used in conjunction with CTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of video programming on CTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the pre-transition emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), CTC and its channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Section 21.908 and 74.936; Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in CTC's
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-866A1_Rcd.pdf
- currently used in conjunction with CTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of video programming on CTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the pre-transition emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3).18In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), CTC and its channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Section 21.908 and 74.936; Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in CTC's system
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-867A1.txt
- maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Sections 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii) on the ``post-transition'' BRS/EBS band plan set forth in Sections 27.5(i)(2)(ii) and (iii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on DCTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in DCTC's Brush Hill system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-867A1_Rcd.pdf
- maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Sections 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii) on the "post-transition" BRS/EBS band plan set forth in Sections 27.5(i)(2)(ii) and (iii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on DCTC's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3);32 (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in DCTC's Brush Hill system will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; (6) Sections 27.1220 (regarding 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-868A1.txt
- used in conjunction with United's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on United's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3); Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in United's Milton and Egeland systems will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; Section 27.1220 (regarding the 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-868A1_Rcd.pdf
- used in conjunction with United's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on United's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3);23 Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS channels in United's Milton and Egeland systems will be permitted to operate at any point along their respective GSA boundaries at the greater signal strength of 47 dBu or the strength authorized in their underlying licenses as of January 10, 2005; Section 27.1220 (regarding the 5.5 MHz wide channels in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1.txt
- Oklahoma Western's wireless cable system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of analog video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(1). Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), Oklahoma Western shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1_Rcd.pdf
- with Oklahoma Western's wireless cable system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for "pre-transition" operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); Any channel used for the transmission of analog video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre-transition" emission limits for analog video programming channels set forthin Section 27.53(l)(1). Any channel used for the transmission of digital video programming on Oklahoma Western's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the "pre- transition" emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), Oklahoma Western shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.txt
- the pre-transition band plan set forth in Section 27.5(i)(1). CCB and the EBS licensees should be authorized to continue operating at their current EIRP power levels pursuant to Section 27.50(h)(i) and (ii) of the rules. All channels in CCB's system should be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(m)(1) of the rules. CCB and its EBS lessors will participate in good faith in any transition process relating to any geographic area that overlaps their GSA. In conjunction with any such transition, CCB and its EBS lessors will subsequently make such modifications to their facilities at the proponent's expense as the proponent may reasonably request in an effort to reduce
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1_Rcd.pdf
- 1.925(b)(3). 747 C.F.R. 27.1230 et. seq. 9099 CCB and the EBS licensees should be authorized to continue operating at their current EIRP power levels pursuant to Section 27.50(h)(i) and (ii) of the rules. All channels in CCB's system should be permitted to continue operating under the "pre- transition" emission limits for analog video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(m)(1) of the rules.8 CCB and its EBS lessors will participate in good faith in any transition process relating to any geographic area that overlaps their GSA. In conjunction with any such transition, CCB and its EBS lessors will subsequently make such modifications to their facilities at the proponent's expense as the proponent may reasonably request in an effort to reduce
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-33A1.txt
- Broadband Service Technical Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: January 7, 2010 Released: January 8, 2010 By the Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: introduction The Broadband Division (Division) of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB or Bureau) has before it a request by RC Technologies Corporation (RCT), seeking a waiver of Sections 27.53(m), 27.1221, and 27.1222 of the Commission's Rules for itself and all of its Educational Broadband Service (EBS) licensees/lessors in the Geographic Service Areas (GSAs) of Sisseton, and Kranzburg, South Dakota. For the reasons stated below, we grant RCT's 2009 Waiver Request, subject to conditions designed to minimize harm to neighboring licensees and to ensure that the relevant stations are transitioned
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-33A1_Rcd.pdf
- Broadband Radio Service and Educational Broadband Service Technical Rules )))))))) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: January 7, 2010 Released: January 8, 2010 By the Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Broadband Division (Division) of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB or Bureau) has before it a request by RC Technologies Corporation (RCT), seeking a waiver of Sections 27.53(m), 27.1221, and 27.1222 of the Commission's Rules1for itself and all of its Educational Broadband Service (EBS) licensees/lessors in the Geographic Service Areas (GSAs) of Sisseton,2and Kranzburg, South Dakota.3For the reasons stated below, we grant RCT's 2009 Waiver Request, subject to conditions designed to minimize harm to neighboring licensees and to ensure that the relevant stations are transitioned to the new
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-592A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-592A1.txt
- 2347.5-2360 MHz band must utilize automatic transmit power control when operating so the station operates with the minimum power necessary for successful communications. (iv) Prohibition on external vehicle-mounted antennas. The use of external vehicle-mounted antennas for mobile and portable stations transmitting in the 2305-2317.5 MHz band or the 2347.5-2360 MHz band is prohibited. * * * * * Amend Section 27.53 by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3), removing and reserving paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(9), and revising paragraph (a)(10) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. (a) For operations in the 2305-2320 MHz band and the 2345-2360 MHz band, the power of any emission outside a licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) (with
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-592A1_Rcd.pdf
- 2347.5-2360 MHz band must utilize automatic transmit power control when operating so the station operates with the minimum power necessary for successful communications. (iv) Prohibition on external vehicle-mounted antennas. The use of external vehicle-mounted antennas for mobile and portable stations transmitting in the 2305-2317.5 MHz band or the 2347.5-2360 MHz band is prohibited. * * * * * 3.Amend Section 27.53 by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3), removing and reserving paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(9), and revising paragraph (a)(10) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. (a) For operations in the 2305-2320 MHz band and the 2345-2360 MHz band, the power of any emission outside a licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) (with
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
- rules set forth emission limitations for WCS licensees in various bands; establish standards such that WCS licensees will not harmfully interfere with television or DTV broadcasting; and establish procedures and consequences for when a WCS licensee, either voluntarily or involuntarily, discontinues operations. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 332, 336 and 337. Section Number and Title: 27.53(c), (d), (e) Emission limits 27.60 TV/DTV interference protection criteria. 27.66 Discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of service. SUBPART F-COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR THE 698-806 MHZ BAND Brief Description: Part 27 contains the Commission rules relating to miscellaneous wireless communications services (WCS), specifically, the conditions under which spectrum is made available and licensed for the provision of wireless communications services in the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2050A1.txt
- for the proposal in the CTIA petition, which will be evaluated in a separate proceeding. WTB staff also declines to recommend any Section 11-based modifications to the Part 17 rules (which deal with the construction, marking and lighting of antenna structures), as PCIA - The Wireless Infrastructure Association requested, or to the Commission's out-of-band emission (OOBE) requirements, among them section 27.53, as Ericsson, Inc. requested, because these rules are designed to address critical regulatory goals regardless of competitive developments. Specifically, the purpose of the Part 17 rules is to ensure public safety and the purpose of the OOBE requirements is to protect against interference. Thus, WTB does not recommend that the Commission repeal or modify any of these rules as no
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-846A1.txt
- for equipment purchased or operated pursuant to this waiver. Manufacturers filing for a grant of an application for new radios or a request to modify grants for radios already authorized must include a copy of this waiver with the application to include these channels. See AASHTO Comments at 1; PSST Comments at 3; NPSTC Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. 27.53(c)(2) and (c)(4). Because channels in the frequency range 775-776/805-806 MHz must be removed from radios upon expiration of this waiver, the described added potential for interference will not occur once the channels are removed. We note that rendering the radio permanently incapable of operating on the Guard Band channels would require costly modifications that could not readily be performed in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-914A1.doc
- and 2360 MHz, not less than 55 + 10 log (P) dB at 2300 MHz, not less than 61 + 10 log (P) dB at 2296 MHz, not less than 67 + 10 log (P) dB at 2292 MHz, and not less than 70 + 10 log (P) dB below 2288 MHz and above 2365 MHz (see 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(3), and (4)(i), (ii), and (iii)). Base, fixed, and CPE stations. For base and fixed stations' operations, and for WCS CPE operating with an average EIRP greater than 2 Watts, in the 2305-2320 MHz band and the 2345-2360 MHz band, the OOBE, as measured over a 1-megahertz resolution bandwidth, must be attenuated below the transmitter power P by a factor of
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184135A1.txt
- Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. 18. Section 27.53 is amended by revising paragraph (a), redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (f), and adding new paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to read as follows: 27.53 (a) For operations in the bands 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz, the power of any emission outside the licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) within the licensed
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204983A1.txt
- mandatory pairing of spectrum blocks for the assignment process, reflected an assessment that the most commonly- used transmission procedure for PCS, cellular, and other established mobile and fixed wireless applications, requires paired spectrum. Furthermore, we agree with US WEST'S contention that modifying the power limits would be a better means for enabling TDD operations than In addition, we modify Sections 27.53 and 27.60 of our Rules appropriately to reflect these revisions. 21 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Red at 491-94 (paras. 35-42);Appendix B, 27.5(b), at 543. 2 ArrayComm Petition at 5-14. ArrayComm Petition at 6-7. 24 US WEST Opposition at 9. 25 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Red at 494 (para. 42). 20851 _________________Federal
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
- 73.77 34,820,345 47.67 19,068,986 26.11 Maine 204,337 8,183,013 40.05 6,286,112 30.76 1,896,901 9.28 Maryland 866,743 15,600,731 18.00 8,851,542 10.21 6,749,189 7.79 Massachusetts 982,989 28,077,711 28.56 13,420,333 13.65 14,657,378 14.91 Michigan 1,785,160 44,687,451 25.03 23,787,269 13.33 20,900,183 11.71 Minnesota 846,891 26,504,960 31.30 16,540,378 19.53 9,964,582 11.77 Mississippi 492,645 38,852,160 78.86 24,419,729 49.57 14,432,431 29.30 Missouri 924,445 43,548,617 47.11 18,099,051 19.58 25,449,566 27.53 Montana 149,995 3,959,885 26.40 2,936,427 19.58 1,023,458 6.82 Nebraska 285,402 7,714,469 27.03 6,360,630 22.29 1,353,839 4.74 Nevada 369,498 4,863,132 13.16 4,429,735 11.99 433,397 1.17 New Hampshire 207,671 2,337,760 11.26 1,667,377 8.03 670,383 3.23 New Jersey 1,367,438 55,698,865 40.73 30,051,243 21.98 25,647,623 18.76 New Mexico 320,234 64,232,969 200.58 22,540,649 70.39 41,692,320 130.19 New York 2,888,233 437,315,692 151.41 181,369,130 62.80 255,946,562 88.62
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.txt
- 73.77 34,820,345 47.67 19,068,986 26.11 Maine 204,337 8,183,013 40.05 6,286,112 30.76 1,896,901 9.28 Maryland 866,743 15,600,731 18.00 8,851,542 10.21 6,749,189 7.79 Massachusetts 982,989 28,077,711 28.56 13,420,333 13.65 14,657,378 14.91 Michigan 1,785,160 44,687,451 25.03 23,787,269 13.33 20,900,183 11.71 Minnesota 846,891 26,504,960 31.30 16,540,378 19.53 9,964,582 11.77 Mississippi 492,645 38,852,160 78.86 24,419,729 49.57 14,432,431 29.30 Missouri 924,445 43,548,617 47.11 18,099,051 19.58 25,449,566 27.53 Montana 149,995 3,959,885 26.40 2,936,427 19.58 1,023,458 6.82 Nebraska 285,402 7,714,469 27.03 6,360,630 22.29 1,353,839 4.74 Nevada 369,498 4,863,132 13.16 4,429,735 11.99 433,397 1.17 New Hampshire 207,671 2,337,760 11.26 1,667,377 8.03 670,383 3.23 New Jersey 1,367,438 55,698,865 40.73 30,051,243 21.98 25,647,623 18.76 New Mexico 320,234 64,232,969 200.58 22,540,649 70.39 41,692,320 130.19 New York 2,888,233 437,315,692 151.41 181,369,130 62.80 255,946,562 88.62
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
- 55.82 42,491,861 44.54 10,760,563 11.28 Texas 4,525,394 219,009,161 48.40 140,614,639 31.07 78,394,522 17.32 Utah 508,430 15,598,354 30.68 11,604,928 22.83 3,993,426 7.85 Vermont 96,638 1,793,324 18.56 1,364,177 14.12 429,147 4.44 Virgin Islands 16,750 4,062,164 242.52 2,171,940 129.67 1,890,224 112.85 Virginia 1,214,472 28,281,104 23.29 23,580,804 19.42 4,700,300 3.87 Washington 1,031,985 20,378,941 19.75 12,258,602 11.88 8,120,339 7.87 West Virginia 280,866 11,199,403 39.87 7,731,854 27.53 3,467,549 12.35 Wisconsin 875,174 27,218,572 31.10 14,128,312 16.14 13,090,260 14.96 Wyoming 84,409 3,729,876 44.19 3,253,511 38.54 476,365 5.64 Totals 49,752,817 $2,060,307,026 $41.41 $1,306,759,426 $26.27 $753,547,600 $15.15 Activity through June 30, 2007. Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements can be made after the end of the program year. Also disbursements may continue beyond the end of the program
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A6.txt
- 55.82 42,491,861 44.54 10,760,563 11.28 Texas 4,525,394 219,009,161 48.40 140,614,639 31.07 78,394,522 17.32 Utah 508,430 15,598,354 30.68 11,604,928 22.83 3,993,426 7.85 Vermont 96,638 1,793,324 18.56 1,364,177 14.12 429,147 4.44 Virgin Islands 16,750 4,062,164 242.52 2,171,940 129.67 1,890,224 112.85 Virginia 1,214,472 28,281,104 23.29 23,580,804 19.42 4,700,300 3.87 Washington 1,031,985 20,378,941 19.75 12,258,602 11.88 8,120,339 7.87 West Virginia 280,866 11,199,403 39.87 7,731,854 27.53 3,467,549 12.35 Wisconsin 875,174 27,218,572 31.10 14,128,312 16.14 13,090,260 14.96 Wyoming 84,409 3,729,876 44.19 3,253,511 38.54 476,365 5.64 Totals 49,752,817 $2,060,307,026 $41.41 $1,306,759,426 $26.27 $753,547,600 $15.15 Activity through June 30, 2007. Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements can be made after the end of the program year. Also disbursements may continue beyond the end of the program
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281542A1.txt
- In Paragraph 55, the Commission decided to maintain the existing out-of-band emission limits for user stations. Because of other changes made to the rule, however, the text of the rule adopted by the Commission mistakenly eliminated any out-of-band emission limits for fixed digital user stations. Accordingly, in order to maintain the Commission's intent to maintain the existing limits, rule Section 27.53(m)(2)(v) has been added to read as follows: ``For all fixed digital user stations, the attenuation factor shall be not less than 43 + 10 log (P) dB at the channel edge." In Paragraph 59, the Commission adopted WCA's proposal to allow a licensee to measure out-of-band emissions from the outermost edges of the combined channels. The rule text adopting that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281685A1.txt
- April 21, 2008 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: On April 10, 2008, the Commission released a Report and Order and Order Proposing Modification (Globalstar ATC Report and Order), FCC 08-98, in the above-captioned proceeding. This Erratum corrects the Globalstar ATC Report and Order as follows: Footnotes 111-113 are corrected to read as follows: 111 See 47 C.F.R. 27.53 (as revised by Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Further Competitive Bidding Procedures; Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules With
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
- of Columbia 76,876 25,579,641 332.74 632,337 8.23 24,947,304 324.51 Florida 2,675,024 69,859,932 26.12 58,498,652 21.87 11,361,280 4.25 Georgia 1,598,461 59,096,371 36.97 49,711,350 31.10 9,385,021 5.87 Guam 30,986 1,035,312 33.41 1,019,341 32.90 15,971 0.52 Hawaii 182,818 3,434,192 18.78 2,156,661 11.80 1,277,531 6.99 Idaho 261,982 4,294,385 16.39 3,066,525 11.71 1,227,860 4.69 Illinois 2,111,706 94,156,748 44.59 62,420,271 29.56 31,736,477 15.03 Indiana 1,035,074 28,496,438 27.53 22,103,930 21.35 6,392,508 6.18 Iowa 483,482 11,421,641 23.62 9,773,164 20.21 1,648,477 3.41 Kansas 467,285 15,424,754 33.01 12,849,874 27.50 2,574,880 5.51 Kentucky 679,878 26,451,481 38.91 16,307,491 23.99 10,143,990 14.92 Louisiana 654,526 72,138,116 110.21 53,477,386 81.70 18,660,730 28.51 Maine 195,498 7,265,956 37.17 5,859,812 29.97 1,406,144 7.19 Maryland 860,020 16,023,048 18.63 10,329,903 12.01 5,693,145 6.62 Massachusetts 971,909 30,332,556 31.21 22,341,919 22.99 7,990,637 8.22
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
- England - Rhode Island RI 1,044,872 725,530 319,342 30.56 Verizon South - Contel - South Carolina SC 44,837 31,578 13,260 29.57 Verizon South - South Carolina SC 416,386 304,925 111,460 26.77 AT&T - BellSouth - South Carolina SC 3,643,045 2,681,082 961,963 26.41 Qwest - South Dakota SD 596,225 397,862 198,362 33.27 AT&T - BellSouth - Tennessee TN 5,513,308 3,995,718 1,517,590 27.53 Embarq - United Telephone - Southeast - Tennessee TN 449,562 347,316 102,246 22.74 Embarq - Centel Telephone Co. of Texas TX 513,859 394,031 119,828 23.32 Verizon Southwest - Contel Texas TX 329,393 249,987 79,406 24.11 Verizon Southwest - Texas TX 4,020,029 2,983,932 1,036,098 25.77 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Texas TX 20,087,990 13,783,517 6,304,473 31.38 Embarq - United Telephone Company
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A6.pdf
- of Columbia 76,876 25,579,641 332.74 632,337 8.23 24,947,304 324.51 Florida 2,675,024 69,859,932 26.12 58,498,652 21.87 11,361,280 4.25 Georgia 1,598,461 59,096,371 36.97 49,711,350 31.10 9,385,021 5.87 Guam 30,986 1,035,312 33.41 1,019,341 32.90 15,971 0.52 Hawaii 182,818 3,434,192 18.78 2,156,661 11.80 1,277,531 6.99 Idaho 261,982 4,294,385 16.39 3,066,525 11.71 1,227,860 4.69 Illinois 2,111,706 94,156,748 44.59 62,420,271 29.56 31,736,477 15.03 Indiana 1,035,074 28,496,438 27.53 22,103,930 21.35 6,392,508 6.18 Iowa 483,482 11,421,641 23.62 9,773,164 20.21 1,648,477 3.41 Kansas 467,285 15,424,754 33.01 12,849,874 27.50 2,574,880 5.51 Kentucky 679,878 26,451,481 38.91 16,307,491 23.99 10,143,990 14.92 Louisiana 654,526 72,138,116 110.21 53,477,386 81.70 18,660,730 28.51 Maine 195,498 7,265,956 37.17 5,859,812 29.97 1,406,144 7.19 Maryland 860,020 16,023,048 18.63 10,329,903 12.01 5,693,145 6.62 Massachusetts 971,909 30,332,556 31.21 22,341,919 22.99 7,990,637 8.22
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298694A1.txt
- NASA) to agree with the information adopted in Section 27.73 of the Report and Order and Second Report and Order. Fifth, we correct paragraph 143 and the text of Section 27.50(a)(2) to reflect that outdoor antennas and installations are prohibited for fixed WCS CPE operating at 2 Watts or less average EIRP; correct typographical errors in Sections 25.144(e)(9)(i), 27.50(a)(2), and 27.53(a)(2); and correct paragraph 112 and the text of Section 27.53(a)(5) to list all of the WCS frequency blocks. The specific corrections are discussed in the following paragraphs: In footnote 71 of the Report and Order and Second Report and Order, we correct a typographical error in the second sentence to correctly refer to the pertinent Appendix, to read as follows:
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298694A1_Erratum.doc
- NASA) to agree with the information adopted in Section 27.73 of the Report and Order and Second Report and Order. Fifth, we correct paragraph 143 and the text of Section 27.50(a)(2) to reflect that outdoor antennas and installations are prohibited for fixed WCS CPE operating at 2 Watts or less average EIRP; correct typographical errors in Sections 25.144(e)(9)(i), 27.50(a)(2), and 27.53(a)(2); and correct paragraph 112 and the text of Section 27.53(a)(5) to list all of the WCS frequency blocks. The specific corrections are discussed in the following paragraphs: In footnote 71 of the Report and Order and Second Report and Order, we correct a typographical error in the second sentence to correctly refer to the pertinent Appendix, to read as follows:
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299770A1.txt
- -44 dBm overload threshold agreed upon by the parties for the A and B blocks, we find that permitting an average EIRP of 2 kW over a 5-megahertz bandwidth (or 400 W/MHz) in the WCS A and B blocks will result in a separation distance of less than 347 meters.'' In paragraphs 140-143, the final rule text in Sections 27.50(a)(2), 27.53(a)(2), and 27.53(a)(3) in Appendix B, and paragraphs 8-10 and 34 of the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) in Appendix C, to express the 20-W peak or 2-W operating EIRP for WCS CPE using the same methodology that was used to specify the allowed average and/or peak EIRP for WCS base, fixed, mobile, and portable stations, we correct the following. (As
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299770A1_Erratum.doc
- -44 dBm overload threshold agreed upon by the parties for the A and B blocks, we find that permitting an average EIRP of 2 kW over a 5-megahertz bandwidth (or 400 W/MHz) in the WCS A and B blocks will result in a separation distance of less than 347 meters.'' In paragraphs 140-143, the final rule text in Sections 27.50(a)(2), 27.53(a)(2), and 27.53(a)(3) in Appendix B, and paragraphs 8-10 and 34 of the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) in Appendix C, to express the 20-W peak or 2-W operating EIRP for WCS CPE using the same methodology that was used to specify the allowed average and/or peak EIRP for WCS base, fixed, mobile, and portable stations, we correct the following. (As
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302294A1.txt
- No. 10-142, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry, 26-34 (2010). See, Fixed and Mobile Services in the Mobile Satellite Service Bands, supra note 8, at 27-30. Joint Statement of Chairman Julius Genachowski and Commissioner Meredith A. Baker On Verizon Wireless' Rural 4G Initiative, May 12, 2010. Available at: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298131A1.pdf See, e.g., Emission Limits, 47 C.F.R. 27.53 (2009). See Statement of Commission Meredith A. Baker On Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands, Sept. 23, 2010. Available at: http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db0923/FCC-10-174A 6.pdf Bringing Broadband to Rural American: Report on a Rural Broadband Strategy at 145, May 22, 2009. Available at: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291012A1.pdf 7%7
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302603A1.txt
- Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Report No. 2920 November 4, 2010 CONSUMER & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU REFERENCE INFORMATION CENTER ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ RM NO. RULES SEC. PETITIONER DATE RECEIVED NATURE OF PETITION 11614 27.53(m) Wireless 10/22/10 In the Matter of Wireless Communications Communications Association Association International (WCAI) Int'l Petition to Amend Section 27.53(m) of the Commission's Rules (Filed By: Fred Campbell 1333 H Street, NW Suite 700 West Washington, DC 20005) ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________FCC PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information: 202-418-0500 TTY: 1-888-835-5322 $ (R)[*
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
- Federal Communications Commission | November 7, 2011 Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulations removed (190 as of 11/1/11) CFR Section Effective date in FR Eliminated rules for International Fixed Public Radio Communication Services. Part 23 3/25/10 Eliminated restrictions on mobile repeater stations for the business radio frequency users. 90.247(b) 90.247(c) 90.267(e)(3) 5/14/10 Eliminate restrictions on WCS service 27.53(a)(6) 27.53 (a)(9) 9/1/10 Removed rules to simplify and streamline the E-rate program. 54.506 54.517 54.522 1/3/11 Revises the Amateur Radio Service rules to clarify the rules with respect to amateur service vanity call signs, eliminating licensee confusion. 0.191(o) 0.392(g) 2/14/11 Eliminated restrictions on Amateur Radio Service: eliminate the automatic power control provision which has proven to be virtually impossible to
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
- 8, 2011. The Public Notice was published in the Federal Register on December 28, 2011. Regulations removed (219 as of 5/1/12) CFR Section Effective date in FR Eliminated rules for International Fixed Public Radio Communication Services. Part 23 3/25/10 Eliminated restrictions on mobile repeater stations for the business radio frequency users. 90.247(b) 90.247(c) 90.267(e)(3) 5/14/10 Eliminated restrictions on WCS service 27.53(a)(6) 27.53(a)(9) 9/1/10 Removed rules to simplify and streamline the E-rate program. 54.506 54.517 54.522 1/3/11 Revised the Amateur Radio Service rules to clarify the rules with respect to amateur service vanity call signs, eliminating licensee confusion. 0.191(o) 0.392(g) 2/14/11 Eliminated restrictions on Amateur Radio Service: eliminated the automatic power control provision which has proven to be virtually impossible to implement,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-224A1.doc
- the peak power of a wireless system, which could make certain transmissions, such as those of TRW's Spitfire system, impracticable in the 776-794 MHz band. It concludes that clarifying that power levels be measured over a 3 microsecond time period will serve to enable different types of transmissions in the 700 MHz spectrum. TRW also requests that we clarify Sections 27.53(c)(4) and 27.53(d)(5) of our Rules to indicate whether the references to the 6.25 kHz bandwidth in those rules are intended to apply to the resolution bandwidth only, or whether they are intended also to reflect the bandwidth to which the measurement must be adjusted. Finally, TRW, in conjunction with its request that we extend the same OOBE limits applicable to
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-90A1.pdf
- and 776-794 MHz" in lieu thereof, in newly-designated paragraph (b)(1) and the heading for Table 1 following paragraph (c) by deleting the phrase "747-762 MHz" and substituting the phrase "746-764 MHz" in lieu thereof, and in newly- designated paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) by deleting the phrase "777-792 MHz " and substituting the phrase "776-794 MHz" in lieu thereof. 12. Section 27.53 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (f) and (g), respectively, and is further amended in newly-designated paragraph (f) by deleting the phrase "747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz bands" and substituting the phrase "746-764 MHz and 776-794 MHz bands" in lieu thereof, and by adding a new paragraph (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-90A1_Erratum.doc
- MHz and 776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof, in newly-designated paragraph (b)(1) and the heading for Table 1 following paragraph (c) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz'' in lieu thereof, and in newly-designated paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) by deleting the phrase ``777-792 MHz '' and substituting the phrase ``776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof. 12. Section 27.53 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (f) and (g), respectively, and is further amended in newly-designated paragraph (f) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz bands'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz and 776-794 MHz bands'' in lieu thereof, and by adding a new paragraph (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
- rule as being inapplicable in the case where adjacent spectrum is separately licensed to the same entity, or a cooperating entity. In response, the Bureau granted relief in the form of a waiver. See Omnipoint Request for Broadband Declaratory Ruling or Waiver Concerning PCS Emission Limits Rule Section 24.238, DA 00-1767, 15 FCC Rcd 13422 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(10). See proposed rules 22.917 and 24.238 in Appendix A. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d). See proposed rule paragraphs Sections 22.917(b) and 24.238(b) in Appendix A. See Part 22 Rewrite, 9 FCC Rcd at 6558. We note that alternative services are exempt from wave polarization requirements pursuant to 22.901(d)(2). Andrew Corporation, Petition for Rulemaking, filed September 18, 1998
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-2A1.txt
- whether we assume that, as Motorola contends, interference to a public safety base station receiver could occur from a commercial base station transmitter operating as far away as 4.8 km, or whether we assume that interference could occur only from commercial base stations operating as close as 400-700 m from a public safety base station receiver. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(f). See APCO Letter. Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-2 ________________________________________________________________________ _____________ Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-2 ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ p q
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.txt
- the absence of data and other support from the many parties to this proceeding, we should not increase OOBE limits given the potential adverse effects that may result on the commercial usefulness of the spectrum. If developments in the industry change significantly by 2006 or later, we can reconsider our OOBE limits at that time. We note, however, that Section 27.53(f) currently states that in the event of harmful interference the Commission may, at its discretion, require greater attenuation than specified in the rules. Although we adopted an additional 76 + 10 log P dB limit to apply to OOBE of Upper 700 MHz commercial licensees that might fall within the Upper 700 MHz public safety bands, we see no need
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-185A1.txt
- could occur from stations operating at 1 kW ERP or less. Moreover licensees operating at power levels that exceed 1 kW are required to notify all licensees authorized on adjacent blocks that are located within 75 km. This requirement provides adjacent channel licensees, including licensees on 746-747 MHz, the opportunity to adopt measures to mitigate interference. Finally, by meeting Section 27.53(f)'s limits on the power of ``any emission outside a licensee's frequency band(s),'' which would include any OOBE on 746-747 MHz, a Block A, B, and/or C Lower 700 MHz licensee operating at up to 50 kW will protect mobile and base receive stations on 746-747 MHz from harmful interference that could arise due to out-of-band emissions. Access Spectrum claims that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-185A1_Erratum.doc
- could occur from stations operating at 1 kW ERP or less. Moreover licensees operating at power levels that exceed 1 kW are required to notify all licensees authorized on adjacent blocks that are located within 75 km. This requirement provides adjacent channel licensees, including licensees on 746-747 MHz, the opportunity to adopt measures to mitigate interference. Finally, by meeting Section 27.53(f)'s limits on the power of ``any emission outside a licensee's frequency band(s),'' which would include any OOBE on 746-747 MHz, a Block A, B, and/or C Lower 700 MHz licensee operating at up to 50 kW will protect mobile and base receive stations on 746-747 MHz from harmful interference that could arise due to out-of-band emissions. Access Spectrum claims that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-204A1.txt
- reconsideration are required by Section 1.106(f) of our Rules to be submitted within the same 30-day time frame provided for petitions. Section 1.429(d) of our Rules, however, provides for supplements by grant of leave, and in this instance we consider staff's request for supplemental materials at the Aug. 15 meeting constitutes such leave. See note 2, supra. 47 C.F.R. 27.53(c). Cingular Jan. 23 ex parte at 2; AWS Jan. 17 ex parte at 2-3. Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM, 15 FCC Rcd at 20850 para. 8. Id. at 20849 para. 6 (noting BellSouth proposal to `flip' the base and mobile band designations). The Commission has also recently allocated spectrum permitting unlicensed use of such non-paired technologies. See Reallocation of
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.txt
- Alcatel Reply Comments at 23. Motorola Comments at 5. See id. at 4. See Motorola Reply Comments at 2 (citing NSMA Comments at 18; Fixed Wireless Comments at 20-21; Alcatel Comments at 26-29; Winstar Comments at 6-7). See Motorola Reply Comments at 2-3. See id. at 3. Motorola Comments at 5. See id. at 5 (citing 47 C.F.R. 24.238, 27.53, 90.669, 90.691). 47 C.F.R. 101.111(a)(2)(iv). Motorola Comments at 5. See Triton Network Systems (TNS) Comments at 2-3; Giganet Wireless Systems, Inc. (Giganet) Comments at 5; Winstar Comments at 7; NSMA Comments at 19; Fixed Wireless Comments at 21; Alcatel Comments at 29; NSMA Rely Comments at 17; Alcatel Reply Comments at 22; Teligent, Inc. (Teligent) Reply Comments at 2-3.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.txt
- kHz Frequency Offset 8 C. Section 90.543(a) - ACCP Values for Base Station Frequency Offsets Greater than 400 kHz 9 D. Section 90.543(a) - Clarification that Values for Offsets Greater than 400 kHz Apply Above and Below Authorized Center Frequency 10 E. Section 90.543(a) - Deletion of ACCP Absolute (dBm) Values for Mobiles 15 F. Terminology Update 17 G. Section 27.53(d) - Corresponding Changes to ACCP Values for Transmitters Operating in the 700 MHz Guard Bands 18 IV. Conclusion 19 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 20 A. Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 20 B. Paperwork Reduction Act 21 C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 22 D. Comment Dates 23 E. Further Information 26 VI. Ordering Clauses 28 appendix a Proposed Rule Changes APPENDIX B
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
- 47 C.F.R. 24.236, 27.55. 47 C.F.R. 22.150, 101.103. ``Licensees in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service must coordinate . . . channel usage at each transmitter location within 121 kilometers (75 miles) of any transmitter locations authorized to other licensees or proposed by tentative selectees or other applicants . . . .'' 47 C.F.R. 22.907. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(3); see also Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10857 144 (citing 47 C.F.R. 22.359(iii), 22.917(e), 24.238). See 47 C.F.R. 24.237. See NTIA AWS Assessment at 12. Government operations in the 1710-1755 MHz band at 16 Department of Defense (DOD) sites listed in Appendix A to this Notice must be protected for continued military use
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.txt
- made in the 27 Megahertz Service Rules R&O for the band 2385-2390 MHz in Parts 1, 27, and 87 of our Rules by deleting regulations containing this band from Sections 1.1307 (Environmental Assessments); 27.1(b)(7) (Basis and Purpose); 27.4 (Terms and definitions); 27.5(g) (Frequencies); 27.6(g) (Service areas); 27.11(h) (Initial authorization); 27.12(b) (Eligibility); 27.13(f) (License period); 27.50(f) (Power and antenna height limits); 27.53(i) (Emission limits); and 87.173, note 1 (Frequencies); and by deleting Part 27, Subpart K (2385-2390 MHz Band). In the Table of Frequency Allocations, we also propose to revise the entry for the band 2385-2390 MHz by replacing the cross reference to Part 27 of our Rules (Miscellaneous Wireless Communications Services) with a cross reference to Part 87 of our Rules
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.txt
- (hand-held) stations operating in the 1710-1755 MHz band are limited to a peak EIRP of 1 watt. Fixed stations operating in this band are limited to a maximum antenna height of 10 meters above ground, and mobile and portable stations must employ a means for limiting power to the minimum necessary for successful communications. * * * * * Section 27.53 is amended by re-designating paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) as paragraphs (h), (i), (j), (k), and (l), respectively, and adding a new paragraph (g) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (g) For operations in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands, the power of any emission outside a licensee's frequency block
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
- at pg. 4-5. Id. at pg. ii. Id. at pg. 10. Id. at pg. 12-13. Id. at pg. 16-18 and at footnote 44. Id. at pg. 19-20. Id. at pg. 20-22. Id. at pg. 22-23. Id. at technical appendix, pg. 1-3. Time Domain comments at pg. iii. Id. at pg. 14-17. Id. at pg. iii and 15-16. 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(9). Id. at pg. 16. See, also, Memorandum Opinion and Order in WT Docket No. 96-228, 12 FCC Rcd 3977 (1997) at para. 25. Time Domain comments at pg. 12. Id. at pg. 12-13. Id. at pg. 13-14. Id. at pg. 14; R&O, supra, at para. 169. SARA comments at pg. 4-7. XSI comments at pg. 22. Id. at pg. iv,
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
- See 47 C.F.R. 22.99. 47 C.F.R. 22.351. This sentence provides: ``Except as otherwise provided in this part, each channel or channel block is assigned exclusively to one common carrier in each service area.'' 47 C.F.R. 22.351. See para. 28, supra. 47 C.F.R. 22.352. 47 C.F.R. 22.99. 47 C.F.R. 22.359. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.53(a)(10) (Wireless Communications Services OOBE limits). OOBE interference results from emissions on frequencies outside a licensee's authorized band that fall within the passband of an adjacent licensee's receiver(s). A passband is the range of frequencies within which fall the desired signals (i.e., the signals intended to be received by the receiver). OOBE interference cannot be mitigated through receiver filtering, and differs
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
- bandwidth. If a non-uniform emission were substituted at the station, station power would still be limited to a maximum of 33.3 watts EIRP within any 100 kHz segment of the 6 MHz channel, irrespective of the fact that this would result in a total 6 MHz channel power of less than 2000 watts EIRP. * * * * * Section 27.53 is amended by redesignating paragraph (l) as paragraph (m) by adding a new paragraph (l) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (l) For BRS and EBS stations, the power of any emissions outside the licensee's frequency bands of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) measured in watts. (1) For analog
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
- stations transmitting in the 1995-2000 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands are limited to a peak effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of 1640 watts and a peak output power of 100 watts. (2) Fixed, mobile, and portable (hand-held) stations operating in the 2020-2025 MHz bands are limited to a peak EIRP of 1 watt. * * * * * In 27.53, redesignate paragraphs (h), (i), (j), (k) and (l) as paragraphs (i), (j), (k), (l) and (m), respectively, and add new paragraph (h) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (h) For operations in the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz bands, the power of any emission outside a licensee's frequency block
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.txt
- apply to Band Managers: * * * * * 17. Section 27.13 is amended by removing paragraph (f). 27.13 License period. * * * * * 18. Section 27.50 is amended by removing paragraphs (g), (g)(1), and (g)(2) and redesignating paragraph (h) as paragraph (g). 27.50 Power and antenna height limits. * * * * * 19. Section 27.53 is amended by removing paragraph (k) and redesignating paragraph (l) as paragraph (k). 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * 20. Subpart K is deleted. PART 87 - AVIATION SERVICES 21. The authority citation for Part 87 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e) unless otherwise noted. Interpret
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-258A1.txt
- The R&O provides for the immediate implementation of geographic area licensing upon the effective date of the rules. At that time, licensees will be permitted to add new facilities or modify existing facilities in any location within the geographic service area in which they are licensed. While the R&O provided new technical limitations such as power (Section 27.50(h)), emission (Section 27.53(l)), and GSA boundary signal strength limits (Section 27.55(a)(4)), for post-transition operations, it did not specifically set forth any technical limitations for pre-transition operations. Thus, a literal reading of the rules could suggest that no technical limitations exist pre-transition. WCA suggests that we modify our new rules to bring both pre-transition and post-transition operations explicitly within the purview of our new
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
- is from cellular base station to air-ground base stations, and vice versa, and from airborne mobiles to cellular mobiles, and vice versa. The airborne mobiles, however, are generally too far away from terrestrial cellular mobiles when operating for mobile-to-mobile interference to occur. These technologies include GSM, TDMA, CDMA, and OFDM. See 47 C.F.R. 22.917(d). See also id. 24.238(d), 27.53(k). AirCell and Boeing propose to hand off air-ground service to terrestrial services (such as PCS) during take-off, landing, and while on the ground. See AirCell Further Notes on the Deployment of Two Cross-Polarized Systems at 4-7. See 800 MHz Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15050 151. Nextel November 16 Ex parte at 12. For example, Nextel calculates a 53 dB
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
- is from cellular base station to air-ground base stations, and vice versa, and from airborne mobiles to cellular mobiles, and vice versa. The airborne mobiles, however, are generally too far away from terrestrial cellular mobiles when operating for mobile-to-mobile interference to occur. These technologies include GSM, TDMA, CDMA, and OFDM. See 47 C.F.R. 22.917(d). See also id. 24.238(d), 27.53(k). AirCell and Boeing propose to hand off air-ground service to terrestrial services (such as PCS) during take-off, landing, and while on the ground. See AirCell Further Notes on the Deployment of Two Cross-Polarized Systems at 4-7. See 800 MHz Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15050 151. Nextel November 16 Ex parte at 12. For example, Nextel calculates a 53 dB
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-9A1.txt
- 700 MHz Public Safety Band (12.5 kHz equipment) from December 31, 2006 until December 31, 2014; and defer the prohibition on filing applications for new systems that operate utilizing 12.5 kHz voice channels from December 31, 2006 until December 31, 2014. In the Sixth Report and Order, we take the following actions: change the terminology used in Sections 90.543 and 27.53 of the Commission's rules from Adjacent Channel Coupled Power (ACCP) to Adjacent Channel Power (ACP); and adopt recommended changes to the ACP limits in Sections 90.543 and 27.53 of the Commission's rules. In the Seventh Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that we adopt today, we seek comment on: A proposal made by the Private Radio Section of the Wireless Communications Division
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
- & n.137. See infra section III.B. RTG Comments at 7. Base station transmitters on Blocks C and D must meet a 76 + 10 log P OOBE limit, and C and D block mobile transmitters must meet a 65 + 10 log P limit, for all emissions into the 764-776 and 794-806 MHz public safety bands. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53. For example, base transmitters operating in the 752-762 MHz D block must limit emissions to the 76 + 10 log P level in spectrum only two megahertz from the upper edge of the band, and mobile stations operating in the 777-782 MHz C block must limit emissions to the 65 + 10 log P level in spectrum only one megahertz
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.txt
- limits to protect public safety operations in the event broadband operations are permitted in the public safety block. Moreover, we seek comment on whether, in the event the Commission maintains the current ACP limits and does not apply OOBE limits to the Guard Bands as Access/Pegasus request, we should amend the current ACP tables currently set forth in rule section 27.53(d) to account for operations wider than 150 kilohertz. If commenters believe this is necessary, we seek comment on the appropriate attenuation values for bandwidths greater than 150 kilohertz, so as to maintain adequate protection for public safety operations. Finally, we ask any proponent of changes to the ACP/OOBE limits to comment on how its proposal will fulfill the primary responsibility
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-43A1.txt
- by removing and reserving paragraph (f). (h) Revise the amendatory instruction and final rule in Appendix C: Final Rules, for Section 27.50, to read as follows: 27.50 [Amended] Section 27.50 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (g) and retaining paragraphs (h) and (i). (i) Revise the amendatory instruction and final rule in Appendix C: Final Rules, for Section 27.53, to read as follows: 27.53 [Amended] Section 27.53 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (k) and retaining paragraphs (l) and (m). (k) Revise the amendatory instruction and final rule in Appendix C: Final Rules, for Part 27, Subpart K, to read as follows: Subpart K-[Removed] Subpart K is removed and reserved. See Association for Maximum Service Television and
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-46A1.txt
- with WATCH TV's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the maximum EIRP limits set forth for ``pre-transition'' operations in Section 27.50(h)(1)(i) and (ii); (4) Any channels used for the transmission of digital video programming on WATCH TV's system shall be permitted to continue operating under the ``pre-transition'' emission limits for digital video programming channels set forth in Section 27.53(l)(3). In addition, per Section 27.53(l)(5), WATCH TV and its EBS channel lessors shall be permitted to operate fixed, temporary fixed and mobile data stations deployed as of January 10, 2005, provided that those facilities are in compliance with the emission limits set forth in former Sections 21.908 and 74.936; (5) Consistent with Section 27.55(a)(4)(i), all of the BRS and EBS
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
- multiple spectrum blocks for the provision of broadband services. We find that the OOBE limits we are applying here are readily achievable by the A Block licensees, yet will provide appropriate out-of-band protection to other Upper 700 MHz operations. Accordingly, we will no longer require the reconfigured A Block licensees to comply with the ACP limits set forth in Section 27.53(d) of our rules. Frequency Coordination and the Cellular Architecture Prohibition. In addition to imposing the more stringent OOBE limits, the Upper 700 MHz Second Report and Order required that guard band users employ frequency coordination procedures in cooperation with 700 MHz public safety coordinators, and prohibited the use of cellular architectures in the Guard Bands. Given the elevated risk of
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
- multiple spectrum blocks for the provision of broadband services. We find that the OOBE limits we are applying here are readily achievable by the A Block licensees, yet will provide appropriate out-of-band protection to other Upper 700 MHz operations. Accordingly, we will no longer require the reconfigured A Block licensees to comply with the ACP limits set forth in Section 27.53(d) of our rules. Frequency Coordination and the Cellular Architecture Prohibition. In addition to imposing the more stringent OOBE limits, the Upper 700 MHz Second Report and Order required that guard band users employ frequency coordination procedures in cooperation with 700 MHz public safety coordinators, and prohibited the use of cellular architectures in the Guard Bands. Given the elevated risk of
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.txt
- of this authorization to StratusWave (such notification including the location, power, and antenna information of the EBS licensee's proposed base stations, the proposed area of operation of any user stations, and such other information as StratusWave may need to determine any changes StratusWave must make to its operations), StratusWave shall reduce or terminate service as necessary to comply with Sections 27.53(l), 27.55(a)(4), and 27.1221 of the Commission's Rules with respect to the operations identified by the EBS licensee. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Application, File No. 0002362083 (filed Oct. 25, 2005) (Centerville Application). Application, File No. 0002362089 (filed Oct. 25, 2005) (Arden Application). The substance of each of StratusWave's requests for waiver is the same. The requests for waiver
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-16A1.txt
- 2 kW EIRP within 1.3 kilometers of any NWS Upper Air Site. Crown Castle has agreed to comply voluntarily with such a coordination requirement ``to ensure the protection of radiosonde receive sites operating in spectrum bands adjacent to the 1670-1675 MHz band.'' Radio Astronomy Service. Crown Castle has not requested, nor do we grant, a waiver of the current Section 27.53(j) OOBE limits, which are intended to protect licensees in adjacent spectrum. In this regard, we note that the 1670-1675 MHz band is adjacent to and just above a Radio Astronomy Service (RAS) band that contains two of the four hydroxyl line frequencies, namely 1665 and 1667 MHz. Passive observation of these lines by RAS observatories provides scientific information that allows
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.txt
- mobile services in the upper portion of the S-band conflicts with ATC operations previously designated for use in the 2492.5-2498 MHz band. Because of this allocation change, we will move ATC operations down five megahertz to the 2487.5-2493 MHz band, which continues to allow at least two megahertz of MSS-only use between ATC operations and non-MSS services.'' 47 C.F.R. 27.53(l)(2). 47 C.F.R. 27.53(l)(2). 47 C.F.R. 27.53(l). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(l)(2). See 47 C.F.R. 25.254(a)(3). See SBE Petition for Reconsideration of the Big LEO Order on Reconsideration and AWS 5th MO&O, filed May 22, 2006. See 47 U.S.C. 316. We made a similar Section 316 modification to Iridium's license when we decided that TDMA MSS operators
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.txt
- Bands, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 8064, 8103-04 (2007) 105-06. See 47 C.F.R. 27.50(c), 27.55(b). See Response to Supplemental Comments of Satellite DARS Licensees by the National Association of Broadcasters, IB Docket No. 95-91 (filed Jan. 9, 1998) at 3. Id. at 7. Id. Id. at 6. Id., Exhibit A, proposed Section 27.53(a)(2). The full text of this proposed rule reads as follows: ``Notwithstanding [the suppression of OOBE by 75+10log(p) for WCS base station operations], for non-mobile stations transmitting less than 2 Watts average transmitter output power, and for mobile stations transmitting less than 2 Watts average equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), by a factor of not less than 55+10log(P) dB on all
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.txt
- the transition as well. We will not, however, reduce the power capabilities of all Lower 700 MHz Band licensees either during or after the DTV transition as MSTV requests. Under Section 27.60 of our rules, 700 MHz licensees must limit their stations' transmissions to specified field strength levels at co-channel and adjacent channel broadcasters' Grade B contours, and under Section 27.53 of our rules, 700 MHz licensees must meet prescribed out-of-band emission limits with respect to adjacent band operations. MSTV has not provided any reasoning as to why these requirements will not be met if and when base stations operate at high power levels. Rather, MSTV bases its request for a power reduction on a general, but speculative, concern that higher
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1_Erratum.doc
- the transition as well. We will not, however, reduce the power capabilities of all Lower 700 MHz Band licensees either during or after the DTV transition as MSTV requests. Under Section 27.60 of our rules, 700 MHz licensees must limit their stations' transmissions to specified field strength levels at co-channel and adjacent channel broadcasters' Grade B contours, and under Section 27.53 of our rules, 700 MHz licensees must meet prescribed out-of-band emission limits with respect to adjacent band operations. MSTV has not provided any reasoning as to why these requirements will not be met if and when base stations operate at high power levels. Rather, MSTV bases its request for a power reduction on a general, but speculative, concern that higher
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.txt
- at 15349 157, 15351 163. Id. at 15348 153, 154. We note that only the C Block, located adjacent to the D Block, is licensed on a REAG basis. Id. at 15293 4. See id. at 15315-16 62. See id. at 15450 457. Id. See id. at 15316 63. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d)(3), (5). D Block base stations must meet a 76 + 10log P dB limit in a 6.25 kHz band segment and D Block mobile and portable stations must meet a 65 + 10log P dB limit in a 6.25 kHz band segment. See 47 C.F.R. 27.53(d)(1), (2), (4). See 47 C.F.R. 27.50(b)(2), (3),
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.txt
- an RMS-equivalent voltage. The measurement results shall be properly adjusted for any instrument limitations, such as detector response times, limited resolution bandwidth capability when compared to the emission bandwidth, sensitivity, etc., so as to obtain a true peak measurement for the emission in question over the full bandwidth of the channel. * * * * * Paragraph (h) of Section 27.53 is revised as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. (h) For operations in the 1710-1755 MHz, 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, and 2110-2180 MHz bands, the power of any emission outside a licensee's frequency block shall be attenuated in accordance with the following: (1) For all operations in the 1710-1755 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, and 2110-2155 MHz bands and for all base and
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.txt
- the Indiana Higher Education Telecommunication System Opposition at 3 (``Source for Learning Opposition''). See NEBSA Opposition at 7-9; CTN Comments at 3; Source for Learning Opposition at 4. See WCA Reply at 10. The Middle Band Segment, 2572-2614 MHz, has different post-transition technical rules designed to accommodate high-power, high-site video operations after the transition. See 47 C.F.R. 27.5(i)(2), 27.50(h)(1), 27.53(l)(1), 27.55(a)(4)(iii). See Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Application, Public Interest Statement at 41. See Id. See AT&T Petition to Deny at 8-13. See Id. at 9. See Id. at 9-10. AT&T claims that Applicants will control all available MBS spectrum in at least 284 counties. Id. at 10 n.27. It claims that in another 1,799 counties, Applicants will control all available BRS MBS
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.txt
- the various out-of-band emission requirements imposed on base stations and user stations to be measured at the outermost edges of the combined channels where two or more channels (licensed to one or more entities) are used as part of the same system. Although the BRS/EBS R&O did not discuss the issue of measuring across contiguous channels, the Commission adopted Section 27.53(m) which applied out-of-band emission limits at the edge of each individual channel. In the BRS/EBS Modification Order, the Commission modified Section 27.53(m) to state that licensees should measure out-of-band emissions at three megahertz from their channel's edges. WCA filed a petition for reconsideration of the BRS/EBS R&O asserting that the Commission should have adopted the Coalition's unopposed proposal on this
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-98A1.txt
- Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 1975-76, 23-26. Big LEO Spectrum Sharing Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 13389, 72. BRS and the Educational Broadband Service (EBS) operate in the same bands and follow the same technical rules. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.1220-27.1222. See 47 C.F.R. 25.255. See 47 C.F.R. 25.254(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. 27.53 (as revised by Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Further Competitive Bidding Procedures; Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules With
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
- part 17 of this chapter). (3) The RTU may be connected to an external antenna not more than 6.1 m (20 feet) above ground or above an existing man-made structure (other than an antenna structure). Connectors that are used to connect RTUs to an external antenna shall not be of the types generally known as ``F-type'' or ``BNC type.'' Section 27.53 is amended by adding paragraph (o) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (o) For operations in the 218-219 MHz band, all transmissions by each cellular transmitter station and by each response transmitter unit shall use an emission type that complies with the following standard for unnecessary radiation. (1) All spurious and out-of-band emissions
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
- part 17 of this chapter). (3) The RTU may be connected to an external antenna not more than 6.1 m (20 feet) above ground or above an existing man-made structure (other than an antenna structure). Connectors that are used to connect RTUs to an external antenna shall not be of the types generally known as "F-type" or "BNC type." 9.Section 27.53 is amended by adding paragraph (o) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (o) For operations in the 218-219MHz band, all transmissions by each cellular transmitter station and by each response transmitter unit shall use an emission type that complies with the following standard for unnecessary radiation. 7688 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-106 (1)
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.txt
- for the 2008 auction advised bidders that the rules governing auctioned licenses would be subject to ``pending and future proceedings'' before the Commission. See Auction of 700 MHz Band Licenses Scheduled for January 24, 2008, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 18141, 18156, para. 42 (2007). See, e.g., AT&T PN Reply at 34-35. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.5(b)-(c), 27.6(b)-(c), 27.14, 27.53(c)-(e). See supra Part III.E. 47 U.S.C. 154(k). In a similar vein, Section 257 of the Act directs the Commission to report to Congress every three years on ``market entry barriers'' that the Commission recommends be eliminated, including ``barriers for entrepreneurs and other small businesses in the provision and ownership of telecommunications services and information services.'' 47 U.S.C. 257(a)
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf
- setting procedures for the 2008 auction advised bidders that the rules governing auctioned licenses would be subject to "pending and future proceedings" beforethe Commission. SeeAuction of 700 MHz Band Licenses Scheduled for January 24, 2008, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 18141, 18156, para. 42 (2007). 441See, e.g., AT&T PN Reply at 3435. 442See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 27.5(b)(c), 27.6(b)(c), 27.14, 27.53(c)(e). 443See supraPart III.E. 44447 U.S.C. 154(k). In a similar vein, Section 257 of the Act directs the Commission to report to Congress every three years on "market entry barriers" that the Commission recommends be eliminated, including "barriers for entrepreneurs and other small businesses in the provision and ownership of telecommunications services and information services." 47 U.S.C. 257(a) &
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
- protect AMT operations above the WCS band, mobile and portable stations' OOBE must also be attenuated by a factor of not less than 43 + 10 log (P) dB in the 2360-2365 MHz band, and not less than 70 + 10 log (P) dB above 2365 MHz. We revise the 110 + 10 log (P) dB OOBE attenuation in Section 27.53(a)(2) accordingly, and remove Section 27.53(a)(9), which provides that portable devices in the 2305-2315 MHz band may operate subject to an OOBE attenuation of 93 + 10 log (P) dB into the SDARS band, provided that they meet certain technical requirements. In the 2007 Notice, we sought comment on the costs and benefits of revising the OOBE limits that currently apply
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
- mobile and point-to-multipoint services. Specifically, affected licensees must serve 25 (rather than 40) percent of the population within 42 months, and 50(rather than 75) percent within 72 months. (Continued from previous page) available athttp://www.nsma.org/recommendation/WG18-91-032.pdf (last visited Oct.21, 2009). In our Part 27 Rules, we currently require a WCS portable device operating in the 2305-2315 MHz band to employ ATPC. 47C.F.R. 27.53(a)(9)(iv). 6Consistent with our existing Rules for the 2.5 GHz band in Section 27.53(m)(6), however, in the 1-megahertz bands immediately outside and adjacent to the WCS frequency blocks (i.e., at 2304-2305 and 2360-2361 MHz), a resolution bandwidth of at least 1 percent of the emission bandwidth of the fundamental emission of the transmitter may be employed, provided the measured power is
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.txt
- 22.355, Public Mobile Services, frequency tolerance; 22.913, Cellular Radiotelephone Service effective radiated power limits; 22.917, Cellular Radiotelephone Service, emission limitations for cellular equipment; 24.232, Broadband Personal Communications Service, power and antenna height limits; 24.238, Broadband Personal Communications Service, emission limitations for Broadband PCS equipment; 27.50, Miscellaneous Wireless Communications Services, power and antenna height limits; 27.53, Miscellaneous Wireless Communications Services, emission limits; 90.205, Private Land Mobile Radio Services, power and antenna height limits; 90.210, Private Land Mobile Radio Services, emission masks; 90.219, Private Land Mobile Radio Services, use of signal boosters; and 90.247, Private Land Mobile Radio Services, mobile repeater stations. (c) Signal boosters operated in portable RF exposure conditions as described
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-63A1.txt
- interference. See Motorola comments at 4-5; see also APCO comments at 2. ACPR is a widely accepted test parameter for characterizing the interference potential of a device. An identical methodology (adjacent channel power or ACP) is currently utilized in the Commission's Rules in lieu of emission masks to determine interference potential in certain public safety bands. See 47 C.F.R 27.53(e), 90.543(a). See Request, Attachment A at 7. Id. at 2. See Request at 8. See 47 C.F.R. 90.209(b)(5). See Request at 1. See proposed Section 90.221 in Appendix A for the specific ACP requirements. See Request at 5-7. We also note that the ACP limits in the TETRA standard are at least as stringent as the ACP limits in
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-63A1_Rcd.pdf
- interference. See Motorola comments at 4-5; see also APCO comments at 2. ACPR is a widely accepted test parameter for characterizing the interference potential of a device. An identical methodology (adjacent channel power or ACP) is currently utilized in the Commission's Rules in lieu of emission masks to determine interference potential in certain public safety bands. See 47 C.F.R 27.53(e), 90.543(a). 27See Request, Attachment A at 7. 28Id. at 2. 29See Request at 8. 30See 47 C.F.R. 90.209(b)(5). 31SeeRequest at 1. 6506 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-63 two kilohertz does not appear likely to have a significant impact on adjacent channel interference. Second, we believe that the more stringent TETRA limits on adjacent channel power (ACP) and out-of- band
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-81A1.txt
- 1 megahertz bands immediately outside and adjacent to the frequency block. 43 + 10 log (P) dB beyond 5 megahertz from the channel edges, and 55 + 10 log (P) dB attenuation factor at a distance of "X" megahertz from the channel edges, where "X" is the greater of 6 megahertz or the actual emission bandwidth as defined in Section 27.53(m)(6) of the Commission's rules. WCAI asserts that these changes would allow operators to provide the full uplink capacity available in 20 megahertz or wider channels, and would harmonize the Commission's out-of-band emission limits with 3GPP standards for out-of-band emission limits in the 2.5 GHz band. WCAI recognizes that its proposal would be a loosening of the out-of-band emission limits, but
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
- procedure for base stations operating in 2180-2200 MHz. However, as mentioned above, in the AWS-1 band this procedure applies to mobile and base transmissions. We believe that it is similarly reasonable to apply this procedure to both mobile and base transmissions in the AWS-4 band. Proposal. To address potential harmful electromagnetic interference within the AWS-4 band, we propose that Section 27.53(h) of the Commission's rules, which includes OOBE attenuation of 43+10*log10(P) dB and the associated measurement procedure, should be expanded to apply to AWS-4 operations in the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands. We seek comment on this proposal. Commenters should discuss and quantify the costs and benefits of this proposal and any proposed alternative approaches. Interference with Services in Adjacent
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
- any other criteria, in addition to distance to the service area boundary, that would trigger a need to coordinate. 65. We seek comment on what, if any, limits for equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP) are necessary or appropriate under either a coordination or field strength limit approach. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 116 47 C.F.R. 27.64. 117 Section 27.53 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 27.53; see also Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10854-57 (paras. 136-144). We were required to adopt a more stringent level of attenuation in order to adequately protect adjacent-band satellite DARS reception, among other concerns, from WCS transmissions. Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10855 (para. 138).
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.txt
- Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. 18. Section 27.53 is amended by revising paragraph (a), redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (f), and adding new paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. (a) For operations in the bands 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz, the power of any emission outside the licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) within
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.txt
- MHz and 776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof, in newly-designated paragraph (b)(1) and the heading for Table 1 following paragraph (c) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz'' in lieu thereof, and in newly-designated paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) by deleting the phrase ``777-792 MHz '' and substituting the phrase ``776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof. 12. Section 27.53 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (f) and (g), respectively, and is further amended in newly-designated paragraph (f) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz bands'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz and 776-794 MHz bands'' in lieu thereof, and by adding a new paragraph (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits.
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.pdf
- of areas served by other licensees. These safe-harbor examples are intended to provide WCS licensees a degree of certainty as to compliance with the substantial service requirement by the end of the initial license term. Licensees can meet this requirement in other ways, and licensees' showings will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. * * * * * 8. Section 27.53 is amended by adding new paragraph (f) as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (f) For the band 4940-4990 MHz: The peak power of any emission outside the licensee's authorized band, either measured in, or referred to a 1 MHz instrument bandwidth, shall be attenuated below the maximum peak spectral density by at least 43 +
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fc970112.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fc970112.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fc970112.wp
- in the 2320-2345 MHz band by not less than 80 + 10 log (p) dB for fixed, land, and radiolocation land station transmissions and 110 + 10 log (p) dB for mobile and radiolocation mobile station transmissions, where p is the transmitter power in watts. 41 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-112 Specifically, parties should note that per 47 C.F.R. 27.53(c), when emissions outside of the authorized bandwidth 42 cause harmful interference, we may, at our discretion, require greater attenuation than that specified in the Rules. 15 26.We recognize, however, that it is possible to provide a reasonable level of protection to DARS by taking into account a specific WCS system, although it may exceed the out-of-band emission limits adopted in
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
- Subpart A -- General Information Sec. 27.1Basis and purpose. 27.2Permissible communications. 27.3Other applicable rule parts. 27.4Terms and definitions. 27.5 Frequencies. 27.6Service areas. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-50 17 Subpart B -- Applications and Licenses 27.11Initial authorization. 27.12Eligibility. 27.13License period. 27.14Construction requirements; Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings. 27.15Geographic partitioning and spectrum disaggregation. Subpart C -- Technical Standards 27.51Equipment authorization. 27.52RF safety. 27.53Emission limits. 27.54Frequency stability. 27.55Field strength limits. 27.56Antenna structures; air navigation safety. 27.57International coordination. 27.59Environmental requirements. 27.61Quiet zones. 27.63Disturbance of AM broadcast station antenna patterns. 27.64Protection from interference. Subpart D -- Competitive Bidding Procedures for WCS 27.201WCS subject to competitive bidding. 27.202Competitive bidding mechanisms. 27.203Withdrawal, default and disqualification payments. 27.204Bidding application and certification procedures; prohibition of collusion. 27.205Submission of upfront payments.
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
- chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. Such equipment if approved or accepted will not normally be included in the Commission's Radio Equipment List but will be individually enumerated on the station authorization. Sec. 27.52 RF safety. Sec. 27.53 Emission limits. (2) For mobile operations, including radiolocation: By a factor not less than 110 + 10 log (p) dB on all frequencies between 2320 and 2345 MHz. (3) For fixed and mobile operations, including radiolocation: By a factor not less than 70 + 10 log (p) dB on all frequencies below 2300 MHz and on all frequencies above 2370
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020260-policechiefs.pdf
- two issues that make the achievement of 90 dB of isolation impossible. The base to base path must include the gain of two antennas and the affect of a mast head amplifier of approximately 5 dB. This essentially 3 Ibid. 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking FCC 00-224 13 - 27 and CFR47 27.53 Emission Limits 7 reduces the amount of isolation by 25 dB, back to the 65 dB for the base to mobile case. Due to the large number of CMRS sites required for capacity, a site separation of 2 miles between CMRS deployments is assumed. Figure 4 illustrates that there will be two potential interferers if the Public Safety site is
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000005.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000005.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000005.txt
- Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. 18. Section 27.53 is amended by revising paragraph (a), redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (f), and adding new paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. (a) For operations in the bands 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz, the power of any emission outside the licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) within
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000224.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000224.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000224.txt
- the peak power of a wireless system, which could make certain transmissions, such as those of TRW's Spitfire system, impracticable in the 776-794 MHz band. It concludes that clarifying that power levels be measured over a 3 microsecond time period will serve to enable different types of transmissions in the 700 MHz spectrum. TRW also requests that we clarify Sections 27.53(c)(4) and 27.53(d)(5) of our Rules to indicate whether the references to the 6.25 kHz bandwidth in those rules are intended to apply to the resolution bandwidth only, or whether they are intended also to reflect the bandwidth to which the measurement must be adjusted. Finally, TRW, in conjunction with its request that we extend the same OOBE limits applicable to
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/fc000090.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/fc000090.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/fc000090.txt
- MHz and 776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof, in newly-designated paragraph (b)(1) and the heading for Table 1 following paragraph (c) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz'' in lieu thereof, and in newly-designated paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) by deleting the phrase ``777-792 MHz '' and substituting the phrase ``776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof. 12. Section 27.53 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (f) and (g), respectively, and is further amended in newly-designated paragraph (f) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz bands'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz and 776-794 MHz bands'' in lieu thereof, and by adding a new paragraph (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits.
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.txt
- the absence of data and other support from the many parties to this proceeding, we should not increase OOBE limits given the potential adverse effects that may result on the commercial usefulness of the spectrum. If developments in the industry change significantly by 2006 or later, we can reconsider our OOBE limits at that time. We note, however, that Section 27.53(f) currently states that in the event of harmful interference the Commission may, at its discretion, require greater attenuation than specified in the rules.338 123. Although we adopted an additional 76 + 10 log P dB limit to apply to OOBE of Upper 700 MHz commercial licensees that might fall within the Upper 700 MHz public safety bands,339 we see no
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.txt
- transmitter power (p). Compliance with this provision shall be based on the use of measurement instrumentation employing a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz or less, but at least one percent of the emission bandwidth of the fundamental emission of the transmitter, provided the measured energy is integrated over a 1 MHz bandwidth. These are the same procedures established in Section 27.53(a)(4) of our rules for 2.3 GHz WCS. 416 124. We decline to adopt the InsideTrax proposal because it proposes a standard that is approximately 12 dB more restrictive then the standard limit on out-of-band emissions that we generally employ for other services. Of all the proposals, the InsideTrax proposal is the most restrictive. We are particularly concerned that this proposal
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/60/resources/03_KHarper.pdf
- emission outside a licensee's frequency band(s) of operation licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) within the licensed band(s) of power (P) within the licensed band(s) of operation, measured in watts, by at least operation, measured in watts, by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB ( 27.53(f)) 43 + 10 log (P) dB ( 27.53(f)) Signal Strength Limits Signal Strength Limits Field strength limit: 40 dB V/m ( 27.55) Field strength limit: 40 dB V/m ( 27.55) Licensees operating at power levels Licensees operating at power levels greater than 1 kW ERP must comply with greater than 1 kW ERP must comply with a Power Flux Density
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/69/resources/ServiceRules.pdf
- band(s) of operation shall be attenuated frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) within the licensed below the transmitter power (P) within the licensed band(s) of operation, measured in watts, by at band(s) of operation, measured in watts, by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB. least 43 + 10 log (P) dB. see see27.53(i) 27.53(i) Emission Limits, cont Emission Limits, cont''dd... ... Potential bidders should be aware that as part of Potential bidders should be aware that as part of the 2007 World Radio Communications the 2007 World Radio Communications Conference, WRC Conference, WRC--07, NTIA has proposed more 07, NTIA has proposed more stringent out stringent out--of of--band emission limits than band emission limits
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/86/resources/DueDiligence.pdf
- In markets where transition has not been completed, pre-transition operations must be protected If transition has not been completed in a BTA when a license is issued, winner may be liable for costs of transitioning EBS licensees to new band plan WT Docket No. 06-136 transition status Technical Rules MBS has different rules from LBS/UBS Power limits 27.50(h) Emission limits 27.53(m) Signal strength limits at border 27.55(a)(4) Height Benchmarking 27.1221 Licensing Rules Part 27 Eligibility License term and renewal expectancy Build-out requirements Partitioning and Disaggregation Part 27 Part 27, specifically, subparts A, B, C, and M rules apply to the band The BRS band is a flexible licensing band rules allow any fixed and mobile communications consistent with technical rules
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
- totals due to rounding. Monthly Telephone Rate Including Touch-Tone, Cost of a Connection Charges Least-Cost Telephone Surcharges, and Taxes Five-Minute Including Touch-Tone, Inside Wiring Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Same-Zone Surcharges, and Taxes Maintenance Service Service Alabama Huntsville BellSouth $26.84 $22.04 $0.05 $40.00 $5.50 Alaska Anchorage Anchorage 21.61 53.50 2.00 Arizona Tuscon Qwest 22.66 17.25 0.20 27.50 4.75 Arkansas Pine Bluff SBC 27.53 18.88 0.07 45.00 4.45 Arkansas West Memphis SBC 33.55 17.88 0.07 45.00 4.45 California Anaheim SBC 16.05 11.69 0.05 33.01 2.99 California Bakersfield SBC 16.05 10.87 0.05 33.01 2.99 California Fresno SBC 16.05 10.87 0.05 33.01 2.99 California Long Beach Verizon 28.47 20.06 0.08 46.00 1.75 California Los Angeles SBC 16.05 10.87 0.05 33.01 2.99 California Oakland SBC 16.05 10.87
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
- Wyoming WY 194,174 122,923 71,251 36.69 Subject to 11 - 7 Table 11.2 Expenses and Taxes ($000) - 2003 Study Area State Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate All Reporting Local Exchange Companies $86,363,517 $60,854,472 $25,544,505 29.58% Bell Operating Companies 81,037,283 56,828,561 24,236,220 29.91 Other Reporting Local Exchange Companies 5,326,234 4,025,911 1,308,285 24.56 BellSouth - Alabama AL 1,023,174 740,911 281,711 27.53 Verizon - California - Contel - Arizona AZ 6,634 4,347 2,711 40.87 Qwest - Arizona AZ 1,467,141 1,021,467 445,776 30.38 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 552,156 400,188 152,337 27.59 Verizon - Contel - California CA 204,967 146,680 58,472 28.53 Verizon - NW - West Coast California CA 7,412 5,804 1,635 22.06 Verizon - GTE - California CA 2,105,161
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
- BellSouth - Kentucky KY 1,637,539 1,208,988 428,550 26.17 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 194,735 146,445 48,288 24.80 GTE - South - Contel - Kentucky KY 168,842 133,085 35,757 21.18 GTE - South - Kentucky KY 718,203 556,385 161,818 22.53 BellSouth - Louisiana LA 3,260,364 2,470,156 790,208 24.24 Bell Atlantic - New England - Maine ME 996,013 721,791 274,222 27.53 Bell Atlantic - Maryland MD 3,624,218 2,545,021 1,125,465 31.05 Bell Atlantic - New England - Maine MA 6,180,131 4,352,344 1,827,787 29.58 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 5,813,708 4,482,077 1,331,632 22.91 GTE - Contel South - Michigan MI 72,999 59,401 13,598 18.63 GTE - North - Michigan MI 1,043,615 831,133 212,481 20.36 U S WEST - Minnesota MN 2,621,240
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
- 105,435 79,018 27,969 26.53 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company - Central PR 758,667 569,744 207,930 27.41 Verizon - New England - Rhode Island RI 328,395 238,658 89,733 27.32 BellSouth - South Carolina SC 832,781 624,607 208,570 25.04 Verizon - South - Contel - South Carolina SC 14,090 9,859 4,288 30.43 Verizon - South - Carolina SC 110,665 80,199 30,463 27.53 Qwest - South Dakota SD 146,199 100,955 45,438 31.08 BellSouth - Tennessee TN 1,372,001 1,007,116 365,228 26.62 Sprint - UTC - Southeast - Tennessee TN 98,639 77,402 21,237 21.53 Verizon - Southwest - Contel - Texas TX 39,261 24,504 14,757 37.59 Verizon - Southwest - Texas TX 936,043 687,851 248,224 26.52 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Texas TX 5,469,032 4,020,260
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00363.doc
- follows: 27.50 Power limits. * * * * * (c) The following power and antenna height limits apply to base and fixed stations operating in the 3650-3700 MHz band: Base and fixed stations must not exceed an effective radiated power of 1640 watts and an antenna height of 300 m height above average terrain, or its equivalent. 11. Section 27.53 is modified by redesignating paragraph (f) as paragraph (g) and adding a new paragraph (f) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (f) Base and fixed service operations in the 3650-3700 MHz band are subject to the emission limits set forth in 101.111 of this chapter. * * * * * 12. Section
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
- Subpart A -- General Information Sec. 27.1Basis and purpose. 27.2Permissible communications. 27.3Other applicable rule parts. 27.4Terms and definitions. 27.5 Frequencies. 27.6Service areas. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-50 17 Subpart B -- Applications and Licenses 27.11Initial authorization. 27.12Eligibility. 27.13License period. 27.14Construction requirements; Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings. 27.15Geographic partitioning and spectrum disaggregation. Subpart C -- Technical Standards 27.51Equipment authorization. 27.52RF safety. 27.53Emission limits. 27.54Frequency stability. 27.55Field strength limits. 27.56Antenna structures; air navigation safety. 27.57International coordination. 27.59Environmental requirements. 27.61Quiet zones. 27.63Disturbance of AM broadcast station antenna patterns. 27.64Protection from interference. Subpart D -- Competitive Bidding Procedures for WCS 27.201WCS subject to competitive bidding. 27.202Competitive bidding mechanisms. 27.203Withdrawal, default and disqualification payments. 27.204Bidding application and certification procedures; prohibition of collusion. 27.205Submission of upfront payments.
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
- any other criteria, in addition to distance to the service area boundary, that would trigger a need to coordinate. 65. We seek comment on what, if any, limits for equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP) are necessary or appropriate under either a coordination or field strength limit approach. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 116 47 C.F.R. 27.64. 117 Section 27.53 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 27.53; see also Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10854-57 (paras. 136-144). We were required to adopt a more stringent level of attenuation in order to adequately protect adjacent-band satellite DARS reception, among other concerns, from WCS transmissions. Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10855 (para. 138).
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00063.doc
- of areas served by other licensees. These safe-harbor examples are intended to provide WCS licensees a degree of certainty as to compliance with the substantial service requirement by the end of the initial license term. Licensees can meet this requirement in other ways, and licensees' showings will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. * * * * * 8. Section 27.53 is amended by adding new paragraph (f) as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. * * * * * (f) For the band 4940-4990 MHz: The peak power of any emission outside the licensee's authorized band, either measured in, or referred to a 1 MHz instrument bandwidth, shall be attenuated below the maximum peak spectral density by at least 43 +
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.txt
- Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. 18. Section 27.53 is amended by revising paragraph (a), redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (f), and adding new paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits. (a) For operations in the bands 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz, the power of any emission outside the licensee's frequency band(s) of operation shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) within
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.txt
- MHz and 776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof, in newly-designated paragraph (b)(1) and the heading for Table 1 following paragraph (c) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz'' in lieu thereof, and in newly-designated paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) by deleting the phrase ``777-792 MHz '' and substituting the phrase ``776-794 MHz'' in lieu thereof. 12. Section 27.53 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (f) and (g), respectively, and is further amended in newly-designated paragraph (f) by deleting the phrase ``747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz bands'' and substituting the phrase ``746-764 MHz and 776-794 MHz bands'' in lieu thereof, and by adding a new paragraph (e) to read as follows: 27.53 Emission limits.
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00224.doc
- the peak power of a wireless system, which could make certain transmissions, such as those of TRW's Spitfire system, impracticable in the 776-794 MHz band. It concludes that clarifying that power levels be measured over a 3 microsecond time period will serve to enable different types of transmissions in the 700 MHz spectrum. TRW also requests that we clarify Sections 27.53(c)(4) and 27.53(d)(5) of our Rules to indicate whether the references to the 6.25 kHz bandwidth in those rules are intended to apply to the resolution bandwidth only, or whether they are intended also to reflect the bandwidth to which the measurement must be adjusted. Finally, TRW, in conjunction with its request that we extend the same OOBE limits applicable to