FCC Web Documents citing 27.16

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1148A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1148A1.pdf
  • provided to licensees of the upper 700 MHz C Block spectrum regarding compliance with their disclosure obligations, particularly regarding disclosure to third-party application developers and device manufacturers of criteria and approval procedures (to the extent applicable). For example, these disclosures include, to the extent applicable, establishing a transparent and efficient approval process for third parties, as set forth in Rule 27.16(d).'' 25 FCC Rcd at 17959, para. 98. See id. at 17940, para. 58 & n.188. Id. at 17937, para. 54. See ACA Comments at 9; CTIA Comments at 11; MetroPCS Comments at 5; NCTA Comments at 4-5; USTA Comments at 4, 8. As noted in the Open Internet Order, the term ``edge provider'' is used to describe content, application, service,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • disaggregator or the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements set forth in § 27.14, then these requirements will be considered to be satisfied for both parties. If neither the disaggregator nor the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements, then both parties will be subject to the consequences enumerated in § 27.14(g)-(h) for this failure. Part 27 is amended by adding new Section 27.16 to read as follows: § 27.16 Network access requirements for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands. (a) Applicability. This section shall apply only to the authorizations for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands assigned and only if the results of the first auction in which licenses for such authorizations are offered satisfied the applicable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1624A1.txt
  • LLC has a 15.09 percent interest in WCI. Enhanced Colorado Issuer, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enhanced Capital Partners, LLC. The ten percent or greater interest holders of Enhanced Colorado Partners, LLC are Andrew Paul (20 percent), Reservoir Capital Partners (19.33 percent) and KHC, LLC (11.99 percent). Coral Technology Partners VI, LP and Andrew M. Paul each hold a 27.16 percent interest in WCI. The general partner and one percent interest holder in Coral Technology Partners VI, LP is Coral Management Partners VI, LLC, now known as Coral's Momentum Fund Management Partners, LLC. The ten percent interest holders of Coral's Momentum Fund Management Partners, LLC are Yuval Almog (72.5 percent) and Todd Ortberg (12.5 percent). North Dakota State Investment Board-Pension
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2572A1.txt
  • We note that grant of the applications of Verizon Wireless is subject to the conditions adopted by the Commission in the Auction 73 Order: (1) Verizon Wireless' effectuation of a voluntary divestiture of 10 megahertz in CMA551 New Jersey 2-Ocean; and (2) placement of a statement on Verizon Wireless' C-Block licenses that ``This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules.'' Auction 73 Order. We also note that the grant of the application of Small Ventures, another C-Block applicant, is subject to placement of a statement on its C-Block licenses that ``This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules.'' Auction 73 Order. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-8A1.txt
  • granted. AT&T Mobility Spectrum, LLC Application for 700 MHz Band Licenses, Auction No. 73, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 08-2824 (rel. Dec. 31, 2008). We also note that the grant of the application of Triad 700, LLC, file no. 0003382992, is subject to placement of a statement on its C-Block licenses that ``This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules.'' See Union Telephone Company, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Applications for 700 MHz Band Licenses, Auction No. 73, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08-257 (rel. Nov. 13, 2008). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 h i i j Ë Ì
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1148A1.txt
  • provided to licensees of the upper 700 MHz C Block spectrum regarding compliance with their disclosure obligations, particularly regarding disclosure to third-party application developers and device manufacturers of criteria and approval procedures (to the extent applicable). For example, these disclosures include, to the extent applicable, establishing a transparent and efficient approval process for third parties, as set forth in Rule 27.16(d).'' 25 FCC Rcd at 17959, para. 98. See id. at 17940, para. 58 & n.188. Id. at 17937, para. 54. See ACA Comments at 9; CTIA Comments at 11; MetroPCS Comments at 5; NCTA Comments at 4-5; USTA Comments at 4, 8. As noted in the Open Internet Order, the term ``edge provider'' is used to describe content, application, service,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 23.78 28.67 29.60 30.06 31.60 30.74 32.30 Virginia Smithfield 17.01 17.01 17.01 16.90 16.90 16.90 16.90 17.87 27.82 33.29 30.81 30.59 30.42 Washington Everett 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 19.53 20.47 22.27 24.65 24.71 24.49 27.17 Washington Seattle 17.00 17.00 16.22 15.93 15.97 15.61 18.16 19.03 19.23 21.91 22.01 21.33 21.28 West Virginia Huntington 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.21 27.68 27.16 27.16 25.69 27.47 29.16 29.25 30.67 31.26 Wisconsin Milwaukee 16.56 15.91 15.91 15.92 15.92 15.92 16.76 17.46 34.75 34.95 35.56 33.56 33.82 Wisconsin Racine 16.61 15.96 15.87 15.88 15.88 15.88 16.40 17.09 34.61 34.93 35.54 33.54 33.82 1Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 local calls elsewhere.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 28.48 0.51 27.84 INFINITE 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. 1.13 -4.37 5.76 4.63 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. 8.70 -7.88 18.00 429.22 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. 0.15 -4.69 5.07 0.86 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 29.80 -0.15 29.99 INFINITE 260415 C PEOPLES RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP. 13.64 -0.67 14.41 27.16 260417 A SALEM TEL. CO. 25.49 -2.92 29.27 INFINITE 260418 C SOUTH CENTRAL RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 10.35 -0.75 11.19 21.64 260419 A THACKER/GRIGSBY TEL. CO., INC. 10.80 -1.94 12.99 103.96 260421 C WEST KY. RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 3.94 -2.10 6.17 6.59 265061 C CINCINNATI BELL-KY -1.17 -2.81 1.69 0.00 265182 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-KY -1.03 -4.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118 313,781 31.67 ALLTEL - Nebraska NE 637,326 465,302 173,129 27.16 Qwest - Nebraska NE 1,585,658 1,039,608 555,077 35.01 Sprint - Central Telephone - Nevada NV 1,766,871 1,365,837 403,797 22.85 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV 118,239 74,834 44,518 37.65 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Nevada Bell NV 822,241 579,561 254,747 30.98 Table 11.3 Gross Investment ($000) - 2005 11 - 7 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 28.48 0.51 27.84 INFINITE 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. 1.13 -4.37 5.76 4.63 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. 8.70 -7.88 18.00 429.22 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. 0.15 -4.69 5.07 0.86 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 29.80 -0.15 29.99 INFINITE 260415 C PEOPLES RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP. 13.64 -0.67 14.41 27.16 260417 A SALEM TEL. CO. 25.49 -2.92 29.27 INFINITE 260418 C SOUTH CENTRAL RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 10.35 -0.75 11.19 21.64 260419 A THACKER/GRIGSBY TEL. CO., INC. 10.80 -1.94 12.99 103.96 260421 C WEST KY. RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 3.94 -2.10 6.17 6.59 265061 C CINCINNATI BELL-KY -1.17 -2.81 1.69 0.00 265182 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-KY -1.03 -4.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 31.05 Virginia Smithfield 17.01 17.01 17.01 16.90 16.90 16.90 16.90 17.87 27.82 33.29 30.81 30.59 30.42 30.83 28.72 Washington Everett 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 19.53 20.47 22.27 24.65 24.71 24.49 27.17 27.09 28.96 Washington Seattle 17.00 17.00 16.22 15.93 15.97 15.61 18.16 19.03 19.23 21.91 22.01 21.33 21.28 21.05 21.23 West Virginia Huntington 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.21 27.68 27.16 27.16 25.69 27.47 29.16 29.25 30.67 30.91 31.18 31.31 Wisconsin Milwaukee 16.56 15.91 15.91 15.92 15.92 15.92 16.76 17.46 34.75 34.95 35.56 33.56 33.84 37.01 38.59 Wisconsin Racine 16.61 15.96 15.87 15.88 15.88 15.88 16.40 17.09 34.61 34.93 35.54 33.54 33.82 36.99 38.57 1Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 40.37 1998 163.0 19.76 26.10 1961 29.9 5.61 40.40 1999 166.6 19.93 25.76 1962 30.2 5.62 40.07 2000 172.2 20.78 25.98 1963 30.6 5.65 39.75 2001 177.1 22.62 27.50 1964 31.0 5.66 39.31 2002 179.9 24.07 28.81 1965 31.5 5.67 38.75 2003 184.0 24.52 28.69 1966 32.4 5.64 37.48 2004 188.9 24.52 27.95 1967 33.4 5.60 36.10 2005 195.3 24.64 27.16 1968 34.8 5.61 34.71 2006 201.6 25.26 26.98 1969 36.7 5.68 33.32 2007 207.3 25.62 26.61 1970 38.8 5.76 31.96 2008 215.3 1971 40.5 6.04 32.11 1972 41.8 6.38 32.86 1973 44.4 6.69 32.44 1974 49.3 7.08 30.92 1975 53.8 7.32 29.29 1976 56.9 7.81 29.55 1977 60.6 8.07 28.67 Sources:Averages for 1940 through 1982 are from an AT&T local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • disaggregator or the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements set forth in § 27.14, then these requirements will be considered to be satisfied for both parties. If neither the disaggregator nor the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements, then both parties will be subject to the consequences enumerated in § 27.14(g)-(h) for this failure. Part 27 is amended by adding new Section 27.16 to read as follows: § 27.16 Network access requirements for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands. (a) Applicability. This section shall apply only to the authorizations for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands assigned and only if the results of the first auction in which licenses for such authorizations are offered satisfied the applicable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
  • disaggregator or the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements set forth in § 27.14, then these requirements will be considered to be satisfied for both parties. If neither the disaggregator nor the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements, then both parties will be subject to the consequences enumerated in § 27.14(g)-(h) for this failure. Part 27 is amended by adding new Section 27.16 to read as follows: § 27.16 Network access requirements for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands. (a) Applicability. This section shall apply only to the authorizations for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands assigned and only if the results of the first auction in which licenses for such authorizations are offered satisfied the applicable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111; 11 U.S.C. § 525; 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(g)(iv). See Frontline Comments in PS Docket No. 06-229 at 29-31; Frontline Mar. 6 Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 16-19. See also Frontline Mar. 26 Ex Parte in WT Docket Nos. 06-150 and 06-169 and PS Docket No. 06-229, Attachment (Frontline's proposed 47 C.F.R. § § 27.16, 27.51). See Frontline Comments in PS Docket No. 06-229 at 30; Frontline Mar. 6 Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 16-17. Frontline Mar. 6 Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 17. Id. at 18. See Media Access Project Mar. 22 Ex Parte in WT Docket Nos. 05-211 and 06-150 and PS Docket No. 06-229; Ad Hoc Public Interest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1_Erratum.doc
  • See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111; 11 U.S.C. § 525; 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(g)(iv). See Frontline Comments in PS Docket No. 06-229 at 29-31; Frontline Mar. 6 Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 16-19. See also Frontline Mar. 26 Ex Parte in WT Docket Nos. 06-150 and 06-169 and PS Docket No. 06-229, Attachment (Frontline's proposed 47 C.F.R. § § 27.16, 27.51). See Frontline Comments in PS Docket No. 06-229 at 30; Frontline Mar. 6 Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 16-17. Frontline Mar. 6 Comments in WT Docket No. 06-150 at 17. Id. at 18. See Media Access Project Mar. 22 Ex Parte in WT Docket Nos. 05-211 and 06-150 and PS Docket No. 06-229; Ad Hoc Public Interest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.txt
  • set forth in §27.14. If either the disaggregator or the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements set forth in §27.14, then these requirements will be considered to be satisfied for both parties. If neither the disaggregator nor the disaggregatee meets the construction requirements, then both parties will be subject to the consequences enumerated in §27.14(g) and (h) for this failure. Section 27.16 is revised as follows: § 27.16. Network access requirements for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands and for the 2155-2180 MHz band (the AWS-3 Band). (a) Applicability. This section shall apply only to the authorizations for Block C in the 746-757 and 776-787 MHz bands (700 C Block) assigned as a result of Auction 73 and to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.txt
  • Verizon Wireless, as discussed below. In addition, as explained below, we grant in part a Petition to Condition Grant (``Petition'') of Verizon Wireless's application for seven 700 MHz C Block spectrum licenses filed by Google Inc. and Google Airwaves Inc. (collectively, ``Google''), by placing the following condition on all C Block licenses: ``This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules.'' In light of our actions in this Order, we direct the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to process the above-referenced Auction 73 applications consistent with this Order and the Commission's rules. background Auction 73 Auction 73 offered 1,099 licenses in the 700 MHz band, involving a total of 62 megahertz located in the 698-806 MHz spectrum. The 700
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A4.txt
  • band. Specifically, the item identifies 17 CMAs for Verizon Wireless and one CMA for Union Telephone in which the licensee would exceed the 95 megahertz screen, and grants the Auction 73 Form 601 applications of both Union Telephone and Verizon Wireless, subject to the divestiture of spectrum in one market by Verizon Wireless. In addition, this item clarifies that section 27.16 of the Commission's rules applies to recently auctioned licenses in the 700 MHz C Block. Specifically, section 27.16 states that ``[l]icensees offering service on spectrum subject to this section shall not deny, limit, or restrict the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice on the licensee's C Block network.'' While I support this clarification,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A5.txt
  • am voting to support this order, which resolves two pending Auction 73 applications. I am pleased that we have refrained from introducing a wholly new competitive analysis, which would have been procedurally deficient given the lack of notice or opportunity for public comment. Nonetheless, I am concurring with respect to the condition imposed upon Verizon Wireless, which states that Section 27.16 of the Commission's rules applies to the company as the winning bidder of the 700 MHz C Block spectrum. While I do not oppose outright this condition given its narrowness, I continue to question the substance and meaning of this rule in the first place. Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-257 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-257 $ þÿÿÿ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.txt
  • merged entity. Cellular South Reply at 24-25. See Petition for Rulemaking Regarding Exclusivity Arrangements Between Commercial Wireless Carriers and Handset Manufacturers, filed by RCA, May 20, 2008; Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment On Petition For Rulemaking Regarding Exclusivity Arrangements Between Commercial Wireless Carriers And Handset Manufacturers, Public Notice, DA 08-2278 (Oct. 10, 2008). PISC Reply at 5-6. See 27 C.F.R. §27.16. Information Request Response at 23. PISC Petition to Deny at 13-14; see also Consumers Union Comments at 2 (expressing concern that Verizon Wireless will not implement ODI by the end of 2008 as originally pledged); Comments of the Computer and Communications Industry Association at 1 (filed Oct. 27, 2008) (urging the Commission to adopt ``openness conditions that promote portability of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1.txt
  • complexity of new convergence devices poses additional challenges because they are likely to be subject to multiple sets of differing regulations for each embedded transmitter. One example of this broad trend is the increasing availability of devices that include both the capacity to play digital music and a wireless communications capability, as occurs on smart phones. See 47 C.F.R. § 27.16 (2008). A popular example of competing standards battling in the marketplace involves the introduction of videocassette recorders (VCRs) and the separate Betamax and VHS formats. Betamax was first to market in November 1975, but the rival VHS standard ultimately became the dominant standard. Once videocassette manufacturers stopped producing recordings in Betamax format, the value of Betamax VCRs dropped and, eventually,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of new applications and services? E. Business Models and Practices 61. We seek comment on what innovative business models and practices are being adopted in 72One example of this broad trend is the increasing availability of devices that include both the capacity to play digital music and a wireless communications capability, as occurs on smart phones. 73See 47 C.F.R. § 27.16 (2008). 74A popular example of competing standards battling in the marketplace involves the introduction of videocassette recorders (VCRs) and the separate Betamax and VHS formats. Betamax was first to market in November 1975, but the rival VHS standard ultimately became the dominant standard. Once videocassette manufacturers stopped producing recordings in Betamax format, the value of Betamax VCRs dropped and, eventually,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.txt
  • Law, Verizon Wireless, to Marlene Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 06-150 at 1 (filed Jul. 27, 2007) (stating its opposition to ``the `open access' rules proposed by Google and other parties, as well as to the rules that we understand are being considered by the Commission''). 700 MHz Second Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 15289; 47 C.F.R. § 27.16. 700 MHz Second Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 15363 n.463 (``As we note below, the Commission has not yet made a finding regarding whether to apply open access requirements to wireless broadband services generally, and in this Order, defers that determination to the appropriate pending [Broadband Industry Practices and Skype] proceedings''); see also id. at 15361, para. 194
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.txt
  • provided to licensees of the upper 700 MHz C Block spectrum regarding compliance with their disclosure obligations, particularly regarding disclosure to third-party application developers and device manufacturers of criteria and approval procedures (to the extent applicable). For example, these disclosures include, to the extent applicable, establishing a transparent and efficient approval process for third parties, as set forth in Rule 27.16(d). No Blocking We adopt a no blocking rule that guarantees end users' access to the web and protects against mobile broadband providers' blocking applications that compete with their other primary service offering-voice and video telephony-while ensuring that mobile broadband providers can engage in reasonable network management: A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet access service, insofar as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf
  • INTERNET PROTECTIONS 11. In the Open Internet NPRM, we sought comment on the best means for preserving and promoting a free and open Internet.6We noted the near-unanimous view that the 4Service Rules for the 698­746, 747­762 and 777­792 MHz Bands et al., Second Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 15289 (2007) (700 MHz Second Report and Order); 47 C.F.R. § 27.16. 5Broadband Industry Practices, Notice of Inquiry, 22 FCC Rcd 7894, 7896, para. 8 (2007). 6SeePreserving theOpen Internetet al., Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 13064, 13067­68, paras. 10, 16 (2009) (Open Internet NPRM). 17908 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-201 Internet's openness and the transparency of its protocols have been critical to its unparalleled success.7Citing evidence of broadband providers covertly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-188A1.txt
  • Petition to Deny at 12-16. Free Press Petition to Deny at 5, 18, 21-22. Free Press Petition to Deny at 5, 22. Free Press Petition to Deny at 5, 22-23. Free Press Petition to Deny at 4, 17 (citing Preserving the Open Internet, Broadband Industry Practices, GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52, FCC 10-201 (2010)); 47 C.F.R. § 27.16. Joint Opposition at 24-25, 28-32. Joint Opposition at 22-23 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 310(d)). Joint Opposition at 24. See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17463 ¶ 29; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582 ¶ 22; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21546 ¶ 43. ; High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-188A1_Rcd.pdf
  • license). 206Free Press Petition to Deny at 12-16. 207Free Press Petition to Deny at 5, 18, 21-22. 208FreePress Petition to Deny at 5, 22. 209Free Press Petition to Deny at 5, 22-23. 210Free Press Petition to Deny at 4, 17 (citing Preserving the Open Internet, Broadband Industry Practices, GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52, FCC 10-201 (2010));47 C.F.R.§ 27.16. 211Joint Opposition at 24-25, 28-32. 212Joint Opposition at 22-23 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 310(d)). 213Joint Opposition at 24. 17621 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-188 79.Discussion.We decline to adopt these additional conditions or grant these requests for relief. These additional requests are not transaction-specific and do not address the potential harms identified above. As we have noted in prior proceedings, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-1148A1.html
  • provided to licensees of the upper 700 MHz C Block spectrum regarding compliance with their disclosure obligations, particularly regarding disclosure to third-party application developers and device manufacturers of criteria and approval procedures (to the extent applicable). For example, these disclosures include, to the extent applicable, establishing a transparent and efficient approval process for third parties, as set forth in Rule 27.16(d)." 25 FCC Rcd at 17959, para. 98. See id. at 17940, para. 58 & n.188. Id. at 17937, para. 54. See ACA Comments at 9; CTIA Comments at 11; MetroPCS Comments at 5; NCTA Comments at 4-5; USTA Comments at 4, 8. As noted in the Open Internet Order, the term "edge provider" is used to describe content, application, service,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • for the leasing or franchising of spectrum should be subject to license control requirements and, if CMRS is provided, that the attribution to lessees and franchisees of such interests should be applied for purposes of the CMRS spectrum cap. TDS advocates the 245 articulation of guidelines defining the "ultimate responsibility" of the licensee in the context of proposed rule Section 27.16. TDS regards such guidelines as essential in providing a workable level of certainty for participants in leasing arrangements. Finally, TDS requests the application of such a franchising policy to other CMRS services. 246 96. Decision. Consistent with the weight of the comments and with the Commission's recent decision to adopt the approach proposed in WT Docket No. 96-148 for broadband
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 23.90 23.78 23.78 23.78 23.78 28.67 29.53 Virginia Smithfield 17.14 16.90 17.01 17.01 17.01 17.01 16.90 16.90 16.90 16.90 17.87 26.73 Washington Everett 21.96 19.86 20.54 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 19.53 20.47 21.02 Washington Seattle 16.13 16.06 16.21 17.00 17.00 16.22 15.93 15.97 15.61 18.16 19.03 19.70 West Virginia Huntington 28.63 28.63 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.21 27.68 27.16 27.16 25.69 27.10 Wisconsin Milwaukee 23.11 16.66 16.66 16.56 15.91 15.91 15.92 15.92 15.92 16.76 17.46 27.49 Wisconsin Racine 20.97 16.63 16.63 16.61 15.96 15.87 15.88 15.88 15.88 16.40 17.09 27.49 *Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 local calls elsewhere. Rates include touch-tone service, surcharges, 911 charges, and taxes. 8 Table 1.5 Connection Charges
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 23.78 28.67 29.60 30.93 Virginia Smithfield 17.14 16.90 17.01 17.01 17.01 17.01 16.90 16.90 16.90 16.90 17.87 27.82 29.09 Washington Everett 21.96 19.86 20.54 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 19.53 20.47 22.27 23.54 Washington Seattle 16.13 16.06 16.21 17.00 17.00 16.22 15.93 15.97 15.61 18.16 19.03 19.23 20.35 West Virginia Huntington 28.63 28.63 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.21 27.68 27.16 27.16 25.69 27.47 28.61 Wisconsin Milwaukee 23.11 16.66 16.66 16.56 15.91 15.91 15.92 15.92 15.92 16.76 17.46 34.75 35.19 Wisconsin Racine 20.97 16.63 16.63 16.61 15.96 15.87 15.88 15.88 15.88 16.40 17.09 34.61 35.04 *Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 local calls elsewhere. All rates include
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • Virginia Richmond 24.60 24.60 23.90 23.78 23.78 23.78 23.78 28.67 29.60 30.06 28.90 Virginia Smithfield 17.01 17.01 17.01 16.90 16.90 16.90 16.90 17.87 27.82 33.29 33.86 Washington Everett 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 19.53 20.47 22.27 24.65 24.75 Washington Seattle 17.00 17.00 16.22 15.93 15.97 15.61 18.16 19.03 19.23 21.91 22.01 West Virginia Huntington 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.21 27.68 27.16 27.16 25.69 27.47 29.16 29.69 Wisconsin Milwaukee 16.56 15.91 15.91 15.92 15.92 15.92 16.76 17.46 34.75 34.95 35.56 Wisconsin Racine 16.61 15.96 15.87 15.88 15.88 15.88 16.40 17.09 34.61 34.93 35.54 1Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 local calls elsewhere. All rates include touch-tone service, surcharges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 23.90 23.78 23.78 23.78 23.78 28.67 29.60 30.06 31.60 31.43 Virginia Smithfield 17.01 17.01 17.01 16.90 16.90 16.90 16.90 17.87 27.82 33.29 30.81 30.59 Washington Everett 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 18.97 19.53 20.47 22.27 24.65 24.71 24.49 Washington Seattle 17.00 17.00 16.22 15.93 15.97 15.61 18.16 19.03 19.23 21.91 22.01 21.33 West Virginia Huntington 28.73 28.73 28.73 28.21 27.68 27.16 27.16 25.69 27.47 29.16 29.25 23.32 Wisconsin Milwaukee 16.56 15.91 15.91 15.92 15.92 15.92 16.76 17.46 34.75 34.95 35.56 33.84 Wisconsin Racine 16.61 15.96 15.87 15.88 15.88 15.88 16.40 17.09 34.61 34.93 35.54 33.58 1Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. Rates are for flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 local calls elsewhere. All rates include
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 43.63 21.82 Texas Houston SBC 17.76 9.22 44.48 22.24 Texas San Antonio SBC 16.15 7.68 44.96 22.48 Utah Logan US West 15.70 7.82 26.50 13.25 Virginia Richmond Bell Atlantic 23.78 13.17 38.50 19.25 Virginia Smithfield GTE 16.90 6.71 30.00 15.00 Washington Everett GTE 18.97 11.19 46.67 23.34 Washington Seattle US West 15.97 10.99 32.98 16.49 West Virginia Huntington Bell Atlantic 27.16 20.85 42.00 21.00 Wisconsin Milwaukee Ameritech 16.36 16.36 34.90 0.00 Wisconsin Racine Ameritech 16.31 16.31 34.74 0.00 * Rate is for flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 local calls, elsewhere 14 15 3. Business Rates The Urban Rates Survey also collects information on charges for business service. Rates for three different types of service are collected; rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 12.68 0.0800 44.06 3.50 Texas San Antonio SBC 16.35 11.37 0.0800 43.85 3.50 Utah Logan US West 17.73 16.24 0.0848 26.50 2.99 Virginia Richmond Bell Atlantic 23.78 15.23 0.0993 38.50 1.25 Virginia Smithfield GTE 16.90 15.08 0.1070 30.00 2.50 Washington Everett GTE 18.97 8.97 46.67 2.50 Washington Seattle US West 18.16 14.47 0.0691 32.98 2.99 West Virginia Huntington Bell Atlantic 27.16 11.13 0.1550 42.00 1.25 Wisconsin Milwaukee Ameritech 10.36 0.0600 47.52 Wisconsin Racine Ameritech 10.30 0.0600 47.30 6 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities * (as of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Alabama Huntsville $25.14 $25.57 $25.20 $24.60 $24.60 $23.06 $22.67 $22.67$22.67 Alaska Anchorage 10.56 10.56 14.45 16.20 14.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • - Arizona AZ NA NA NA NA SBC - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 2,426,134 1,750,654 670,283 27.63 Verizon - Contel - California CA 1,098,749 854,597 250,139 22.77 Verizon - NW - West Coast California CA 42,767 29,924 13,049 30.51 Verizon - GTE - California CA 10,056,273 7,833,744 2,542,725 25.28 SBC - Pacific Bell - California CA 33,270,602 24,379,902 9,037,539 27.16 Sure/West/Roseville Tel - California CA 401,149 293,934 108,625 27.08 Qwest - Colorado CO NA NA NA NA SBC - Southern New England Telephone - CT CT 5,170,886 3,668,005 1,584,575 30.64 Verizon - Delaware DE 1,120,664 764,077 366,252 32.68 Verizon - District of Columbia DC 1,967,700 1,097,713 894,618 45.47 Verizon - Florida FL 5,302,128 3,906,623 1,487,615 28.06 BellSouth - Florida FL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 1.96 -3.79 552351 C LINCOLN COUNTY TELEPHONE SYSTEM INC. 12.69 -2.21 15.24 INFINITE 552353 C MOAPA VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.97 -0.65 11.70 0.00 552356 C RIO VIRGIN TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.64 6.41 3.04 0.00 553304 C HUMBOLDT TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.20 3.71 9.15 14.51 554431 C CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEVADA-NORTH 1.72 -2.90 4.75 3.14 554432 C CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEVADA-SOUTH -32.15 -6.86 -27.16 -79.88 555173 C NEVADA BELL 3.90 -0.59 4.52 0.00 TOTAL: NEW HAMPSHIRE -0.14 -0.60 0.47 -11.14 120038 C BRETTON WOODS TEL. CO. 15.43 18.52 -2.60 0.00 120039 C GRANITE STATE TEL., INC. 0.18 2.02 -1.81 -19.54 120042 A DIXVILLE TEL. CO. 22.46 12.53 8.83 43.71 120043 A DUNBARTON TEL. CO. 15.70 2.86 12.48 INFINITE 120045 C KEARSARGE TEL. CO. 8.92
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 1,636,772 1,172,766 464,006 28.35 Verizon - Contel - California CA 806,079 639,952 166,127 20.61 Verizon - NW - West Coast California CA 29,364 20,378 8,986 30.60 Verizon - GTE - California CA 8,395,586 6,645,044 1,750,542 20.85 SBC - Pacific Bell - California CA 23,559,581 17,372,491 6,187,090 26.26 Sure/West/Roseville Tel - California CA 202,282 147,345 54,936 27.16 Qwest - Colorado CO 4,968,657 3,617,905 1,350,752 27.19 SBC - SNET - CT CT 3,506,186 2,454,077 1,052,109 30.01 Verizon - Delaware DE 750,666 513,765 236,901 31.56 Verizon - District of Columbia DC 1,232,629 710,574 522,055 42.35 Verizon - Florida FL 3,778,503 2,835,235 943,268 24.96 BellSouth - Florida FL 9,520,372 6,896,324 2,624,048 27.56 Sprint - Florida FL 3,187,986 2,399,211 788,775 24.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -6.43 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.65 0.00 8.65 13.72 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -10.98 -2.08 -9.09 -16.37 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 8.74 -2.09 11.06 76.68 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA -2.78 -0.56 -2.23 -18.46 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 1.07 2.69 -1.57 -10.32 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 16.66 -8.25 27.16 31.70 250306 C FRONTIER COMM. OF AL, INC. -3.94 0.57 -4.49 -100.00 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 7.70 4.14 3.41 6.95 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL -2.26 0.30 -2.55 -11.74 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 8.09 -1.32 9.54 32.61 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC -1.64 -5.78 4.39 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.57 0.89 3.65 3.56
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • - Pacific Bell - California CA 1,321,293 989,383 497,571 37.66 U S WEST - Colorado CO 310,034 204,106 116,211 37.48 SBC - Southern New England Telephone - CT CT 151,439 82,383 67,863 44.81 Bell Atlantic - Delaware DE 52,927 30,015 21,234 40.12 Bell Atlantic - District of Columbia DC 125,914 69,811 59,797 47.49 BellSouth - Florida FL 923,874 752,546 250,957 27.16 GTE - Florida FL 296,523 209,301 105,175 35.47 Sprint - Florida FL 359,074 204,070 155,004 43.17 ALLTEL - Georgia GA 104,710 81,617 20,085 19.18 BellSouth - Georgia GA 791,241 650,923 191,401 24.19 GTE - Hawaiian Telephone HI 119,882 95,095 42,071 35.09 GTE - Northwest - Idaho ID 34,620 10,201 16,228 46.87 U S WEST - Idaho ID 69,712 45,891 24,156
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 930,222 748,932 181,290 19.49 Sprint - United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania PA 634,291 495,916 138,375 21.82 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company PR 214,858 163,645 51,213 23.84 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company - Central PR 2,082,647 1,519,633 563,015 27.03 Verizon - New England - Rhode Island RI 721,554 501,346 220,208 30.52 BellSouth - South Carolina SC 2,294,441 1,671,374 623,067 27.16 Verizon - South - Contel - South Carolina SC 34,893 25,730 9,163 26.26 Verizon - South - Carolina SC 328,232 253,226 75,006 22.85 Qwest - South Dakota SD 446,655 295,798 150,857 33.77 BellSouth - Tennessee TN 3,473,685 2,488,573 985,112 28.36 Sprint - UTC - Southeast - Tennessee TN 333,565 258,406 75,159 22.53 Verizon - Southwest - Contel - Texas TX
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • for the leasing or franchising of spectrum should be subject to license control requirements and, if CMRS is provided, that the attribution to lessees and franchisees of such interests should be applied for purposes of the CMRS spectrum cap. TDS advocates the 245 articulation of guidelines defining the "ultimate responsibility" of the licensee in the context of proposed rule Section 27.16. TDS regards such guidelines as essential in providing a workable level of certainty for participants in leasing arrangements. Finally, TDS requests the application of such a franchising policy to other CMRS services. 246 96. Decision. Consistent with the weight of the comments and with the Commission's recent decision to adopt the approach proposed in WT Docket No. 96-148 for broadband
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-1148A1.html
  • provided to licensees of the upper 700 MHz C Block spectrum regarding compliance with their disclosure obligations, particularly regarding disclosure to third-party application developers and device manufacturers of criteria and approval procedures (to the extent applicable). For example, these disclosures include, to the extent applicable, establishing a transparent and efficient approval process for third parties, as set forth in Rule 27.16(d)." 25 FCC Rcd at 17959, para. 98. See id. at 17940, para. 58 & n.188. Id. at 17937, para. 54. See ACA Comments at 9; CTIA Comments at 11; MetroPCS Comments at 5; NCTA Comments at 4-5; USTA Comments at 4, 8. As noted in the Open Internet Order, the term "edge provider" is used to describe content, application, service,