FCC Web Documents citing 25.143

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1315A1.txt
  • review of that order filed on July 31, 1997 by L/Q Licensee, Inc., TRW Inc., and Motorola Satellite Communications, Inc. ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. This order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd 9663 (Int'l Bur. 1997), applications for review pending (``MCHI License Order''). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(3). MCHI License Order, supra, at �26. The Commission declared in the Report and Order that it would generally require Big LEO licensees to begin construction of two satellites within one year of receiving feeder-link frequency assignments, to begin construction of the remaining satellites within three years, to complete construction of the first two within four years, and to put their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1631A1.txt
  • systems must be capable of operating across at least seventy percent of the United States' 2 GHz MSS allocation in the 1990-2025 and 2165-2200 MHz bands. The Commission also requires that 2 GHz MSS systems be capable of operating without fixed frequency translations between the uplink and downlink frequencies. Boeing's proposed system meets these requirements. 2. NGSO Coverage Requirements Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires NGSO 2 GHz MSS systems to provide continuous coverage throughout all 50 states, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands by ensuring that at least one satellite is visible at an elevation angle of at least five degrees within this geographic area at all times. In addition, at locations as far north as 70 degrees North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1632A1.txt
  • its annual reports, and file a certification with the Commission within ten days following each of the milestones specified above. G. Orbital Debris Mitigation Currently, the FCC addresses issues regarding orbital debris and satellite systems on a case-by-case basis, under the general ``public interest, convenience and necessity'' standard in the Communications Act. To facilitate our orbital debris analysis, under Section 25.143(b)(1) of our rules, 2 GHz MSS system proponents are required to ``describe the design and operational strategies that they will use, if any, to mitigate orbital debris.'' This rule also requires 2 GHz MSS system proponents to ``submit a casualty risk assessment if planned post-mission disposal involves atmospheric re-entry of the spacecraft.'' In adopting this requirement, the Commission indicated that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1633A1.txt
  • of operating across at least seventy percent of the United States' 2 GHz MSS allocation in the 1990-2025 MHz and 2165-2200 MHz bands. The Commission also requires that 2 GHz MSS systems be capable of operating without fixed frequency translations between the uplink and downlink frequencies. Constellation's proposed 2 GHz MSS system meets these requirements. 2. NGSO Coverage Requirements Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires NGSO 2 GHz MSS systems to provide continuous coverage throughout all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, i.e., that at least one satellite is visible at an elevation angle of at least five degrees at all times within this geographic area. In addition, at locations as far north as 70 degrees North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1634A1.txt
  • Order concluded that hybrid NGSO/GSO systems, such as Globalstar's system, must meet the same coverage requirements established for other satellite systems. Thus, the NGSO portion of a hybrid system must comply with the NGSO 2 GHz MSS system coverage requirements and the GSO portion must comply with the GSO 2 GHz MSS system coverage requirements. a. NGSO Coverage Requirements Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires NGSO 2 GHz MSS systems to be capable of providing continuous coverage throughout all 50 states, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands by ensuring that at least one satellite is visible at an elevation angle of at least five degrees within this geographic area at all times. In addition, at locations as far north as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1635A1.txt
  • operating across at least seventy percent of the United States' 2 GHz MSS allocation in the 1990-2025 MHz and 2165-2200 MHz bands. The Commission also requires that 2 GHz MSS systems be capable of operating without fixed frequency translations between the uplink and downlink frequencies in the service-link bands. ICO's proposed system meets these requirements. 2. NGSO Coverage Requirements Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires NGSO 2 GHz MSS systems to provide continuous coverage throughout all fifty states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, i.e., that at least one satellite is visible at an elevation angle of at least five degrees at all times within this geographic area. In addition, at locations as far north as 70 degrees North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1636A1.txt
  • must be capable of operating across at least seventy percent of the United States' 2 GHz MSS allocation in the 1990-2025 MHz and 2165-2200 MHz bands. The Commission also requires that 2 GHz MSS systems be capable of operating without fixed frequency translations between the uplink and downlink frequencies. Iridium's proposed system meets these requirements. 2. NGSO Coverage Requirements Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires NGSO 2 GHz MSS systems to provide continuous coverage throughout all fifty states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, i.e., that at least one satellite is visible at an elevation angle of at least five degrees at all times within this geographic area. In addition, at locations as far north as 70 degrees North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1637A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1637A1.txt
  • of operating across at least seventy percent of the United States' 2 GHz MSS allocation in the 1990-2025 MHz and 2165-2200 MHz bands. The Commission also requires that 2 GHz MSS systems be capable of operating without fixed frequency translations between the uplink and downlink frequencies. MCHI's proposed 2 GHz MSS system meets these requirements. 2. NGSO Coverage Requirements Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires NGSO 2 GHz MSS systems to provide continuous coverage throughout all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, i.e., that at least one satellite is visible at an elevation angle of at least five degrees at all times within this geographic area. In addition, at locations as far north as 70 degrees North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1638A1.txt
  • its annual reports, and file a certification with the Commission within ten days following each of the milestones specified above. E. Orbital Debris Mitigation Currently, the FCC addresses issues regarding orbital debris and satellite systems on a case-by-case basis, under the general ``public interest, convenience and necessity'' standard in the Communications Act. To facilitate our orbital debris analysis, under Section 25.143(b)(1) of our rules, 2 GHz MSS system proponents are required to ``describe the design and operational strategies that they will use, if any, to mitigate orbital debris.'' This rule also requires 2 GHz MSS system proponents to ``submit a casualty risk assessment if planned post-mission disposal involves atmospheric re-entry of the spacecraft.'' In adopting this requirement, the Commission indicated that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1468A1.txt
  • Inc. (Order and Authorization), DA 96-1924, 11 FCC Rcd 16410 (Int'l Bur. 1996). See also Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and Policies Pertaining to a Mobile Satellite Service in the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 MHz Frequency Bands (Report and Order), CC Docket No. 92-166, FCC 94-261, 9 FCC Rcd 5936 �189 (1994). MCHI License Order at �42. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(2) (2001). Letter dated June 19, 1998 to the Commission's Secretary from Pedro L. Rustan, Vice President, Space Segment Technology and Operations Group. Letter dated July 31, 2000 to the Commission's Secretary from Raul Rodriguez and David Keir, counsel for MCHI. Letter dated September 28, 2000 to counsel for MCHI from Thomas Tycz, Chief of Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • for space station authorizations. 25.115 Application for earth station authorizations. 25.116 Amendments to applications. 25.117 Modification of station license. 25.118 Modifications not requiring prior authorization. 25.119 Assignment or transfer of control of station authorization. 25.120 Application for special temporary authorization. 25.121 License term and renewals. 25.130 Filing requirements for transmitting earth stations. 25.132 Verification of earth station antenna performance standards. 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service. 25.145 Licensing conditions for the Fixed-Satellite Service in the 20/30 GHz bands. 25.160 Administrative sanctions. 25.163 Reinstatement. SUBPART D - TECHNIAL OPERATIONS Brief Description: This rule requires that all video satellite uplink transmissions, licensed under Part 25 be encoded with a signal to identify the station. The rule specifies that a subcarrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3086A1.txt
  • system by July 2000, complete construction of the first two satellites by July 2001, and place the system fully into operation by July 2003. The license order declared that the license would become null and void in the event that Constellation failed to meet the milestone schedule, unless the Commission were to extend the schedule for good cause shown. Section 25.143(e)(2) of the Commission's rules requires a Big LEO licensee to report whether it has met a milestone within ten days following the milestone deadline. In July 1998 Constellation certified that it met its first milestone deadline by executing a satellite construction contract with Orbital Sciences Corp. (``Orbital Sciences''). Constellation has not, however, certified completion of the next two construction milestones,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.txt
  • modification of its 2 GHz MSS license, however. Like all other 2 GHz MSS licenses issued to date, Boeing's license is contingent upon compliance with a ``milestone'' implementation schedule that, among other things, required the licensee to ``enter [into a] non-contingent satellite manufacturing contract'' by July 17, 2002. Within ten days of the July 17 deadline, as required by Section 25.143(e)(2) of the Commission's rules, Boeing filed a signed statement from a corporate official certifying compliance with the milestone requirement, with a copy of a signed construction agreement. Boeing supplemented its milestone showing with additional relevant information filed on October 15 and December 16, 2002 in response to inquiries from International Bureau staff. III. DISCUSSION A. General Policy Regarding License Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1_Erratum.doc
  • modification of its 2 GHz MSS license, however. Like all other 2 GHz MSS licenses issued to date, Boeing's license is contingent upon compliance with a ``milestone'' implementation schedule that, among other things, required the licensee to ``enter [into a] non-contingent satellite manufacturing contract'' by July 17, 2002. Within ten days of the July 17 deadline, as required by Section 25.143(e)(2) of the Commission's rules, Boeing filed a signed statement from a corporate official certifying compliance with the milestone requirement, with a copy of a signed construction agreement. Boeing supplemented its milestone showing with additional relevant information filed on October 15 and December 16, 2002 in response to inquiries from International Bureau staff. III. DISCUSSION A. General Policy Regarding License Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-285A1.txt
  • 10; Constellation Application for Minor Modification of Authorization at pp. 9 and 10. The applicants maintain that because the ICO system is designed to use narrow-band TDMA channelization, it could accommodate MCHI's and Constellation's feeder-link operation under the proposed sharing arrangement without any increase in its currently-authorized feeder-link bandwidth. MCHI Modification Application at p.10; Constellation Modification Application at p.10. Section 25.143(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(g) (2001), prohibits ``[t]rafficking in bare licenses'' for 1.6 GHz or 2 GHz MSS systems. The Commission adopted this restriction to prevent the sale for profit of interests in licenses for unbuilt stations. Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band (Report and Order), FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-328A1.txt
  • L.P., Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 13739 (Int'l Bur./OET 2001) (2 GHz MSS License). Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 16127, 16177-78 � 106 (2000) (2 GHz MSS Order); 2 GHz MSS License, 16 FCC Rcd at 13753 � 36. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143 (2002). Letter dated July 17, 2002 to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC from Mr. William D. Wallace, counsel for Globalstar L.P. Letter dated July 18, 2002 to Mr. William D. Wallace, Crowell & Moring, counsel for Globalstar from Cassandra C. Thomas, Deputy Chief of Satellite Division, International Bureau, FCC. Additionally, by letter, dated October 4, 2002, the Chief, Satellite Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-58A1.txt
  • (Holdings) Limited, pursuant to agreements to sell controlling shares of their stock to ICO (``Stock Purchase Agreements''). On September 4, 2002, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Cingular Wireless LLC, and Verizon Wireless (``Petitioners'') jointly filed a petition to deny the transfer applications - arguing, among other things, that the proposed transactions would violate the Commission's pertinent anti-trafficking rule, 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(g)(3). The Applicants and ICO contended in a Joint Opposition that the proposed transfers of control were permissible under the anti-trafficking rule because they were incidental to larger transactions involving other assets and because the Applicants' current owners would not realize a profit from the sale of license interests. In support of the latter contention, the Applicants submitted affidavits from ICO's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1724A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit J DA 04-1724 Report No. SPB-208 June 16, 2004 International Bureau Satellite Division Information Orbital Debris Mitigation: Clarification of 47 C.F.R. Sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) Regarding Casualty Risk Assessment for Satellite Atmospheric Re-entry Sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) of the Commission's Rules require applicants requesting certain satellite authorizations to submit a narrative statement describing the design and operational strategies, if any, that they will use to mitigate orbital debris. These rules specifically require applicants to submit a casualty risk assessment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2436A1.txt
  • Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. On July 29, 2004, the Satellite Divisioni, by delegated authority, dismissed as defective without prejudice to refiling, Denali Telecom, LLC's NGSO FSS Ku-band application, File Nos. SAT-LOA-19970926-00127, SAT-AMD-19990108-00001, and SAT-AMD-20020916-00195 and SAT-AMD-20031219-00364, Call Sign S2299, pursuant to a public notice entitled "International Bureau Satellite Division Information, Orbital Debris Mitigation Plan, Clarification of 47 C.F.R. Sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) Regarding Casualty Risk Assessment for Satellite Atmospheric Re-entry," Public Notice, Report No. SPB-208, DA 04-1724 (rel. June 16, 2004), which required certain applicants to file a casualty risk assessment by July 19, 2004. In SAT-AMD-20020916-00195, Denali Telecom, LLC disclosed that "atmospheric reentry is favored for spacecraft disposal at the end of mission life." Consequently, Denali Telecom,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1504A1.txt
  • will likely result in ICO missing the ultimate date for having a system in operation, the grant of ICO's modification will be conditioned on a number of intermediate milestones consistent with the performance schedule in its satellite-construction contract. We will also require ICO to report any significant deviations from the current contractual schedule for completion of satellite construction. Coverage Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires 2 GHz MSS GSO systems to be capable of providing continuous coverage throughout all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, if technically feasible. As described in the application for modification, the ICO-G satellite will be equipped with a phased-array 2 GHz antenna generating 56 flexible spot beams, which will enable provision of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1504A1_Erratum.doc
  • will likely result in ICO missing the ultimate date for having a system in operation, the grant of ICO's modification will be conditioned on a number of intermediate milestones consistent with the performance schedule in its satellite-construction contract. We will also require ICO to report any significant deviations from the current contractual schedule for completion of satellite construction. Coverage Section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires 2 GHz MSS GSO systems to be capable of providing continuous coverage throughout all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, if technically feasible. As described in the application for modification, the ICO-G satellite will be equipped with a phased-array 2 GHz antenna generating 56 flexible spot beams, which will enable provision of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • qualification as an applicant, which enhances the likelihood that the proposed systems will be constructed, launched, and operated if licensed. Need: To establish proper procedures for submitting the correct information for filing space station applications. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154. Interprets or applies 47 U.S.C. 701-744. Section Number and Title: 25.142 Licensing provisions for the non-voice, non-geostationary mobile- satellite service. 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. Brief Description: This subpart includes well-defined procedures for processing applications including the requirement for public notice. Need: To establish proper procedures for submitting the correct information for filing space station applications and to allow for public notice of such applications. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301,302, 303,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1940A1.txt
  • service rules or sharing criteria, and argues that it would be unnecessary to impose the default service rules on EESS. Space Imaging further asserts that the majority of the default service rules referred to in Section 25.217 of the Commission's rules, by their own terms, do not apply to an in-orbit EESS system. Specifically, Space Imaging maintains that Sections 25.142(d), 25.143(b)(2)(ii), 25.143(b)(2)(iii), 25.204(g), and 25.210(c) of the default service rules are inapplicable. Space Imaging also maintains that Sections 25.210(d), 25.210(f), 25.210(i) and 25.210(k) of the Commission's rules are inapplicable, but requests that, to the extent the Commission believes otherwise, the Commission grant Space Imaging a waiver of these rules. We agree with Space Imaging that it is not necessary to apply
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2037A1.txt
  • No. 02-34, and First Report and Order in IB Docket No. 02-54, 18 FCC Rcd at 10760, 10827 �� 175-75 (2003) (First Space Station Reform Order). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.146(k). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.111(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.146(i)(4). 2002 Conforming Amendment, File No. SAT-AMD-20020917-00167, at Exhibit C, pages 7-9. Orbital Debris Mitigation: Clarification of 47 C.F.R. Sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) Regarding Casualty Risk Assessment for Satellite Atmospheric Re-entry, Public Notice, Report No. SPB-208, DA 04-1724 (released June 16, 2004) (Casualty Risk PN). October 1, 2004 Letter from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, to Jeffrey Olson, Attorney for SkyBridge, L.L.C. November 10, 2004 Letter from Jeffrey H. Olson and Diane C. Gaylor, Attorneys for SkyBridge, L.L.C.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • interchange traffic that are denied to any other United States company. Need: Prohibits applicants for a space station in the mobile satellite service listed above from obtaining special concessions for the handling of traffic that are not available to United States companies. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 701-744; 47 U.S.C. 154. Interprets or applies 47 U.S.C. 303. Section Number and Title: 25.143(h) Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. SUBPART C-TECHNICAL STANDARDS Brief Description: Establishes technical standards for coordination of sites and frequencies for geostationary orbiting and non-geostationary orbiting earth stations operating in a frequency band where both have a co-primary allocation. Need: Provides space station and earth station operators with standards and operating procedures to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.txt
  • Returned Spectrum in the 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service Frequency Bands, Order, IB Docket Nos. 05-220 and 05-221, 20 FCC Rcd 19696 (2005) (Petitions for Reconsideration pending). ICO Modification Application, Attachment B at 16; ICO Amended Application at 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.140(b)(2). ICO Modification Application, Attachment B at 16; ICO Amended Application at 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2). ICO's proposed satellite will provide coverage to all 50 states as well as to Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. ICO Modification Application, Attachment B at 13. ICO Modification Application at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(g) (telemetry, tracking, and telecommand functions for U.S. domestic satellites shall be conducted at either or both edges of the allocated band(s)). Amendment of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-864A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 25.140(b)(2). May 18 Letter, at 2. Letter to David M. Drucker, Manager, contactMEO Communications, LLC from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, FCC, dated June 16, 2004, 19 FCC Rcd 8867 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2004) (June 16 Letter). Public Notice, International Bureau Satellite Division Information, Report No. SPB-208, Orbital Debris Mitigation: Clarification of 47 C.F.R. sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) Regarding Casualty Risk Assessment for Satellite Atmospheric Reentry, 19 FCC Rcd 10714 (Int'l Bur., Sat. Div., 2004) (Orbital Debris Public Notice); Public Notice, International Bureau Satellite Division Information: Clarification of 47 CFR � 25.140(B)(2), Space Station Application Interference Analysis, Report No. SPB-207, 19 FCC Rcd 10652 (Int'l Bur., Sat. Div., 2004). See also Mobile Satellite Ventures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-864A1_Erratum.doc
  • 47 C.F.R. � 25.140(b)(2). May 18 Letter, at 2. Letter to David M. Drucker, Manager, contactMEO Communications, LLC from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, FCC, dated June 16, 2004, 19 FCC Rcd 8867 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2004) (June 16 Letter). Public Notice, International Bureau Satellite Division Information, Report No. SPB-208, Orbital Debris Mitigation: Clarification of 47 C.F.R. sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) Regarding Casualty Risk Assessment for Satellite Atmospheric Reentry, 19 FCC Rcd 10714 (Int'l Bur., Sat. Div., 2004) (Orbital Debris Public Notice); Public Notice, International Bureau Satellite Division Information: Clarification of 47 CFR � 25.140(B)(2), Space Station Application Interference Analysis, Report No. SPB-207, 19 FCC Rcd 10652 (Int'l Bur., Sat. Div., 2004). See also Mobile Satellite Ventures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4723A1.txt
  • Space Applications Accepted for Filing, Report No. SAT-00449 (June 8, 2007). Comments on Application for Limited Waiver, filed July 9, 2007. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., LP v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) and WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Application for Limited Waiver, Exhibit 2. See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(b)(iii) and 25.149(b)(1)(ii) (requiring fulltime coverage of the fifty states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4723 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4723 �@��� = C D c � � (R) � � � � h� h� h* h� � F �@ 0 0 � � �! 6* X> �Y � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1809A1.txt
  • Application may be granted. Globalstar lists these issues as ``the substantial likelihood that Iridium will be forced to de-orbit some of all of its satellites well before the launch of any second-generation constellation,'' ``whether Iridium's assertion that it provides `complete coverage of the entire globe' . . . is materially misleading,'' ``whether Iridium satisfies the coverage requirements contained in section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules,'' and ``whether Iridium is operating in other countries unlawfully in certain portions of the L-band spectrum for which it has only obtained the authority to operate in the United States.'' Globalstar fails to provide any evidence to support its allegations, and we do not believe that any of these allegations, even if true, are relevant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1809A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to GHQ, to Paul J. Feldman, Counsel to Cornell University (dated Dec. 22, 2008), attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Opposition. 79Globalstar Petition to Deny at 8. 10737 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1809 "whether Iridium's assertion that it provides `complete coverage of the entire globe' . . . is materially misleading,"80"whether Iridium satisfies the coverage requirements contained in section 25.143(b)(2) of the Commission's rules,"81and "whether Iridium is operating in other countries unlawfully in certain portions of the L-band spectrum for which it has only obtained the authority to operate in the United States."82Globalstar fails to provide any evidence to support its allegations, and we do not believe that any of these allegations, even if true, are relevant to the question
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.txt
  • be capable of providing service at any time throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, ``if technically feasible.'' The technical feasibility proviso has no bearing on this case, as ICO has not alleged that a technical problem will prevent its G1 satellite from providing fulltime service in any portion of the coverage area specified in Section 25.143(b)(2)(iv). Furthermore, even if ICO were correct in its interpretation of Section 25.143(b)(2), it would still be barred by the terms of Sections 74.690(e)(1)(i) and 78.40(f)(2) from commencing ATC operation before the rebanding requirements specified therein have been met. Granting ICO's alternative request for waiver of the commercial-availability requirement (and likewise waiving Sections 74.690(e)(1)(i) and 78.40(f)(2)) to allow it to commence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-428A1.txt
  • any license issued under the default rules will be subject to any subsequent service rules it adopts. Consequently, we require Northrop Grumman to modify its operations, if necessary, to bring them into conformance with any service rules the Commission may later adopt. The default rules applicable to Northrop Grumman's proposed V-band NGSO system are Sections 25.142(d) (prohibition of exclusionary agreements); 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and 25.143(b)(2)(iii) (geographic service area requirements); 25.204(g) (earth station uplink requirements during rain fade conditions); 25.210(c) (ability to change transponder flux densities by ground command); 25.210(d) and 25.210(f) (full frequency reuse); 25.210(i) (cross-polarization isolation requirements); 25.210(k) (antenna measurements); and 25.210(l) (reporting requirements). We address these requirements below. Prohibition of Exclusionary Agreements. Section 25.142 (d) of the Commission's rules prohibits Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.txt
  • to that document.. TerreStar does not propose to provide Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (Route) Service, and the license granted herein does not include authority for such operation. ATC Amendment Narrative, Attachment 2 at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b). ATC Second Reconsideration Order at �89. ATC Amendment Narrative at 8. Inmarsat Comments at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(1). See also 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2)(iv). 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(3). ATC Amendment Narrative at 7 and 8. In support of the certification of compliance with the geographic coverage rule, TerreStar cross-referenced coverage maps in a technical amendment to its spectrum reservation. See SAT-MOD-20070529-00075 (granted Nov. 28, 2008), Figures 8 and 10-13. Sprint Nextel Petition at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 74.690(e)(1). BAS licensees operating in the 1990-2025
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1_Rcd.pdf
  • rebanding ofall existing Cable Television Relay Service ("CARS") stations in the top thirty markets.39The amended rules allow 2 GHz MSS systems to provide MSS and ATC in cleared markets, subject to a requirement to avoid interfering with BAS or CARS incumbents operating with primary status in the 1990-2025 MHz band in adjacent 3147 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(1). See also47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2)(iv). 3247 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(3). 33ATC Amendment Narrative at 7 and 8. In support of the certification of compliance with the geographic coverage rule, TerreStar cross-referenced coverage maps in a technical amendment to its spectrum reservation. SeeSAT- MOD-20070529-00075 (granted Nov. 28, 2008), Figures 8 and 10-13. 34Sprint Nextel Petition at 2. 3547 C.F.R. � 74.690(e)(1). BAS licensees operating in the 1990-2025
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.txt
  • in which the satellites are in circular orbits of the same period, distributed uniformly on the celestial sphere in orbital planes separated equally around a reference plane. M. Richharia, Mobile Satellite Communications: Principles and Trends, Pearson Education Ltd 2001, � 2.3.3. Narrative Attachment to 12/21/2009 Amendment and Applications for License Modification at 15. Id. at 10. Id. at 9. Section 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.43(b)(2)(ii) and (iii), requires Big LEO systems to be capable of providing service in any given location between 70� North latitude and 55� South latitude at least 75% of the time and of providing service at all times at locations throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1_Rcd.pdf
  • second-generation Globalstar satellites, using the frequencies currently authorized for operation with first-generation satellites.16Second, Globalstar requests modification of its license for first- generation space stations to permit the eight satellites launched in 2007 to be re-positioned to operate in (... Continued from previous page.) 9Narrative Attachment to 12/21/2009 Amendment and Applications for License Modificationat 15. 10Id.at 10. 11Id. at 9. 12Section 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.43(b)(2)(ii) and (iii), requires Big LEO systems to be capable of providing service in any given location between 70� North latitude and 55� South latitude at least 75% of the time and of providing service at all times at locations throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1789A1.txt
  • both being measured in a 4 kHz or larger bandwidth, and b = frequency of measurement relative to the carrier frequency. :o Paragraph 25.202(f)(4) provides that when emissions outside of the authorized bandwidth cause harmful interference, the Commission may require attenuation to levels below the limits specified in Subsection 25.202(f). :i 9 FCC Red at 1189. " id. -' See47C.F.R. �25.143(e). 13959 22. Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.261 of the FCC's rules. 47 C.F.R. �0.261. IT IS ORDERED, that Application No. 85-SAT-ML-96 for modification of license IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein, in accordance with the technical specifications set forth in the application and consistently with the FCC's rules except insofar as expressly waived herein. 23. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1923A1.txt
  • the Commission for good cause shown, this authorization will become null and void in the event that the licensee fails to meet the following progress schedule: Construction Construction Fully Commenced Completed Operational First two system satellites November 1997 November 2000 Remaining system satellites November 1999 November 2002 18 9 FCC Red at 6008 H189. 19 Id 20 See 47 C.F.R. �25.143(e). 20426 Construction Commenced First two system satellites November 1997 Remaining system satellites November 1999 Construction Completed November 2000 Fully Oerational November 2002 28. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate space stations or use the assigned frequencies beyond the term thereof or in any manner other than authorized herein; that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1924A1.txt
  • hi the U.S., the requested waiver would facilitate obtaining "landing rights" for Globalstar providers in foreign countries and that because the frequencies in question have been allocated for MSS feeder links hi all three ITU regions, assignment of them as requested would make it possible for the Globalstar system to provide world-wide coverage, consistently with the manifest intention of Subsect. 25.143 (b)(2)(ii) of the FCC's rules. L/Q asserts, moreover, that the Report of the Conference Preparatory Meeting. 10-on which the Commission largely relied hi formulating the U.S. proposals for WRC-95, confirmed that the requested 5 and 7 GHz frequencies could be used for nongeostationary MSS feeder links compatibly with existing uses, and L/Q contends that if the waiver is granted, compliance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215094A1.txt
  • file with the Commission, a current IRS Determination Letter documenting its nonprofit status, a certification of governmental authority, or certification from a governmental authority attesting to its exempt status. Fee Calculation: $98,125 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Use fee code "0174" on FCC Form 159 when making payment for space stations in geostationary orbit. Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. NON-GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEMS:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222675A1.txt
  • in this proceeding released on May 14, 2002, FCC 02-134. In Paragraph 75 of the Report and Order, the Commission said that it was adopting a suggestion to include a note in Section 25.216 of the Commission's rules cross-referencing Sections 25.202(f) and 25.213(a)(1). Instead of referring to Section 25.213(a)(1), however, the corresponding note in the rule-change appendix erroneously mentions Section 25.143(a). We are therefore amending the note to Section 25.216 to read as follows: NOTE: Operation of mobile earth stations is also subject to all pertinent emission limits specified in other sections of the Commission's Rules. See Sections 25.202(f) and 25.213(a)(1). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite Division Federal Communications Commission DA 02-XXX Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224082A1.txt
  • so, the failure to modify Section 25.136(a) as ordered in the Big LEO Order was inadvertently carried over to the 2 GHz MSS Order. We now correct this error by revising Section 25.136(a) to include aircraft cockpit communications as well as aircraft Cabin Communications, as originally ordered in the text of the Big LEO Order. Second, the title of Section 25.143 of the Commission's rules is corrected to include 2 GHz MSS systems in addition to 1.6/2.4 GHz MSS systems. The Commission ordered 2 GHz MSS systems to comply with Section 25.143 as part of the 2 GHz MSS Order and amended Section 25.143 to reflect this fact. These amendments were included in the final rules that were adopted in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225022A1.txt
  • authorized to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100) whose license was granted on or before October 1, 2001. Fee Calculation: $99,700 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Use fee code "0274" on FCC Form 159 when making payment for space stations in geostationary orbit. Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. NON-GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEMS:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.txt
  • of station license. * * * * * (f) An application for modification of a space station license to add an ancillary terrestrial component to an eligible satellite network will be treated as a request for a minor modification if the particulars of operations provided by the applicant comply with the criteria specified in � 25.149. The text of Section 25.143(j), is revised as follows: In Section 25.143(j), the reference to ``25.147'' is revised to read ``25.149''. The revised rule reads: � 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and the 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. * * * * * (j) Pre-Operational Testing. An MSS ATC licensee may, without further authority from the Commission, conduct equipment tests for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249904A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249904A4.pdf
  • Remittance Advice when making such payments. Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $114,675 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Beginning this year, non-geostationary orbit satellite system licensees will receive a pre-printed regulatory fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250357A1.txt
  • has filed an amendment to its pending application to launch and operate a non-geostationary satellite system in the Ku-band (see Application File Nos. 48-SAT-P/LA-97 (IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-1997-0228-00021); 89-SAT-AMEND-97 (IBFS File No. SAT-AMD-19970703-00058), 130-SAT-AMEND-98 (IBFS File No. SAT-AMD-19980630-00056), SAT-AMD-19990108-00004, SAT-AMD-20020917-00167) pursuant to a public notice entitled "International Bureau Satellite Division Information, Orbital Debris Mitigation Plan, Clarification of 47 C.F.R. Sections 25.143(b), 25.145(c)(3), 25.146(i)(4) and 25.217(d) Regarding Casualty Risk Assessment for Satellite Atmospheric Re-entry," Public Notice, DA 04-1724, Report No. SPB-208 (rel. June 16, 2004). Lockheed Martin Corporation S2370 SAT-AMD-20040721-00142E Amendment 07/21/2004 12:37:02:54600 Date Filed: Page 1 of 3 In response to the July 9, 2004 letter from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Lockheed Martin Corporation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260098A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260098A5.pdf
  • Remittance Advice when making those payments. Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $111,925 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-geostationary orbit satellite system licensees will receive a pre-printed regulatory fee bill (FCC Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266849A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266849A6.pdf
  • Remittance Advice when making those payments. Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $111,425 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-geostationary orbit satellite system licensees will receive a pre-printed regulatory fee bill (FCC Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275938A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275938A6.pdf
  • to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $109,200 per operational space station in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) as of October 1, 2006. A fee payment is required ``upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d).'' Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-geostationary orbit satellite system licensees will receive a pre-printed regulatory fee bill (FCC Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277446A1.txt
  • 202.719.7049 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE McLEAN, VA 22102 PHON� 703.905.2800 FAX 703.905.2820 www.wileyrein.com October 15,2007 OCT 1 52607 Federal Communications Commissiofl Office of the Secretary Jennifer Hindin 202.719.4975 jhindln@wileyrein.com Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 445 12th street, S.W. Re: Iridium Constellation LLC, 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile Satellite System License, Call Sign S2 1 10, Section 25.143(e) Annual Report and Request for Confidential Treatment Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 Dear Ms. Dortch: Comsion .. 's da--- - - - ___ 47 C.F.R. 6 25.143(e), Iridium Constellation LLC ("Iridium"), by its attorneys, hereby notifies the Commission that a confidential annual report regarding the status of the Iridium 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile Satellite Services system as of September 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277447A1.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NETWORKS One Discovery Square 12010 Sunset Hills Rd Suite 900 Reston, VA 20190 VIA HAND DELIVERY Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, DC 20554 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Re: TerreStar Networks Inc. 2007 Annual Report for 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service System Dear Ms. Dortch: TerreStar Networks Inc. ("TerreStar"), pursuant to Section 25.143(e)(l) of the Commission's rules,l hereby submits its annual report for its 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service ("MSS") system. The information in this report is current as of September 30, 2007.2 Introduction TerreStar holds a letter of intent ("LOI") authorization to provide MSS in the United States via TerreStar-1 using spectrum in the 2 GHz band? The LO1 authorization permits the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277448A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OCT 1 52007 Federal Communications Commissiord Office of the Secretary IC0 October 1 5,2007 By Hand Delivery Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12`~ Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Re: File No. SAT-MOD-20070806-00110 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 25.143(e) of the Commission's rules,' New IC0 Satellite Services G.P. ("ICO") submits the enclosed annual report on the status of its 2 GHz mobile satellite service system. In accordance with Section 25.143(e), a copy of this filing is being submitted to the Commission's Columbia Operations Center in Columbia, Maryland. Please direct any questions about this submission to the undersigned. Respectfully submitted,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284863A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284863A4.pdf
  • to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $119,300 per operational space station in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) as of October 1, 2007. A fee payment is required ``upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d).'' Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-geostationary orbit satellite system licensees will receive a pre-printed regulatory fee bill (FCC Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292888A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292888A5.pdf
  • to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $127,175 per operational space station in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) as of October 1, 2008. A fee payment is required ``upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d).'' Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-Geostationary orbit space station and DBS licensees will not receive a pre-printed regulatory fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300742A1.pdf
  • to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $127,925 per operational space station in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) as of October 1, 2009. A fee payment is required ``upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d).'' Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-Geostationary orbit space station and DBS licensees will not receive a pre-printed regulatory fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309145A1.pdf
  • to operate space stations in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $131,375 per operational space station in geostationary orbit in accordance with section 25.121(d) as of October 1, 2010. A fee payment is required ``upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d).'' Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Notice of Billing: Non-Geostationary orbit space station and DBS licensees will not receive a pre-printed regulatory fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.txt
  • Band, to Reallocate the 29.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, Third Report and Order, CC Docket No. 92-297, 12 FCC Rcd 22310 at � 34 (1997) (28 GHz Third Report and Order). See Big LEO Report and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6414 at � 24; 47 C.F.R. �25.143(b)(2)(ii-iii); see also 28 GHz Third Report and Order at � 34. We propose that NGSO FSS systems be capable of serving locations as far north as 70� North latitude and as far south as 55� South latitude for at least 75 percent of every 24-hour period in order to cover the majority of the world's population. See 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-172A1.txt
  • [and] (iii) That the proposed system is capable of providing ... services on a continuous basis throughout the fifty states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands ... i.e., that at least one satellite will be visible above the horizon at an elevation angle of at least 5� at all times within the prescribed geographic area .... 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2) (emphasis added). Opposition of Teledesic Corporation filed Feb. 5, 1998, p.6. Consolidated Comments of Lockheed Martin Corporation filed Feb. 5, 1998, p.5. The inverse relationship is non-linear, as incremental differences in elevation angle at the low end of the range have more impact on rain fade than differences at the high end. For instance, the difference between elevation angles of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-196A1.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 39. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.txt
  • authorization. 2 GHz MSS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 16177-78 � 106. 2 GHz MSS systems must, within ten days after a milestone, either certify its completion or inform the Commission that the milestone has not been met. If a system does not file a certification that the milestone has been met, the authorization is automatically cancelled. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(3). 2 GHz MSS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 16139 � 18. In this context, ``abandoned spectrum'' includes all licensed (or, for non-U.S.-entity access, reserved) spectrum that the Commission reclaims as a result of the system proponent voluntarily turning in the license or missing milestones. Id. at 16144-49 �� 31-44. Petition for Reconsideration of Globalstar, L.P., IB Docket No. 99-81 (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-225A1.txt
  • 14 FCC Rcd 19,931 (1999). See, e.g., Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band, IB Docket No. 95-91, GEN Docket No. 90-357, Report and Order, Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 12 FCC Rcd 5754, 5810 � 138 (1997) (``DARS Order''). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii); 2 GHz Service Rules Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 16,153 � 56. ICO Letter at 6. See 2 GHz Service Rules Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 16139-40, � 19. In today's companion proceeding on advanced wireless services, we seek comment on how to redistribute this so-called ``abandoned spectrum.'' See Advanced Wireless Services FNPRM, FCC 01-224, at � 28.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-97A1.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-110A1.txt
  • * (5) * * * * * * * * (13) Space station license applicants subject to this section other than Direct Broadcast Satellite applicants shall provide detailed information demonstrating the financial qualifications of the applicant to construct and launch the proposed satellites. Applications shall provide the financial information required by Sec. 25.140 (b) through (e), Sec. 25.142(a)(4), or Sec. 25.143(b)(3), as appropriate; (14) A clear and detailed statement of whether the space station is to be operated on a common carrier basis, or whether non-common carrier transactions are proposed. If non-common carrier transactions are proposed, describe the nature of the transactions and specify the number of transponders to be offered on a non-common carrier basis. In addition, satellite applications in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-123A1.txt
  • Bur. and Office of Eng. and Tech. 2001); In The Matter Of Application Of The Boeing Company, Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd. 13691, 13702 (Int'l Bur. 2001). In the Matter of Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC No. 02-80, IB Docket No. 02-54 (adopted March 14, 2002). Notice, 16 FCC Rcd. at 9701. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(g) (2GHz MSS and Big LEO services trafficking rule); 47 C.F.R. � 25.145 (d) (Ka-Band FSS trafficking rule). See Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and First Report and Order, IB Docket No. 02-34, FCC No. 02-45 (adopted February 14, 2002). In that notice of proposed rulemaking the Commission proposes lifting the anti-trafficking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.txt
  • 1610-1660.5 MHz band shall suppress the power density of emissions in the 1605-1610 MHz band to an extent determined by linear interpolation from -70 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to -10 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz. NOTE: Operation of mobile earth stations is also subject to all pertinent emissions limits specified in other sections of the Commission's Rules. See Sections 25.202(f) and 25.143(a). APPENDIX B Proposed Rule Changes Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 25, is amended as follows: 1. Paragraph (e) of Section 25.216 is amended to read as follows: (e) The e.i.r.p. density of emissions from mobile earth stations with assigned uplink frequencies between 1990 MHz and 2025 MHz shall not exceed -70 dBW/MHz, averaged over 20 milliseconds,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1_Erratum.doc
  • 1610-1660.5 MHz band shall suppress the power density of emissions in the 1605-1610 MHz band to an extent determined by linear interpolation from -70 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to -10 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz. NOTE: Operation of mobile earth stations is also subject to all pertinent emissions limits specified in other sections of the Commission's Rules. See Sections 25.202(f) and 25.143(a). APPENDIX B Proposed Rule Changes Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 25, is amended as follows: 1. Paragraph (e) of Section 25.216 is amended to read as follows: (e) The e.i.r.p. density of emissions from mobile earth stations with assigned uplink frequencies between 1990 MHz and 2025 MHz shall not exceed -70 dBW/MHz, averaged over 20 milliseconds,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 40. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.txt
  • and switching hardware to provide seamless communications during an in-line interference event. See ITU-R S.1431. A homogeneous constellation standard is defined by a set of orbital parameters and transmission characteristics. Orbital parameters are typically comprised of Epoch, Orbital Inclination, Right Ascension of Ascending Node (RAAN), Argument of Perigee, Eccentricity, Mean Motion, and Mean Anomaly. 47 C.F.R. �� 25.140(c), 25.142(a)(4), and 25.143(b)(3). The Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 16127 (2000) (``2 GHz Report and Order''). The ITU deadline for putting these U.S. systems into use is May 18, 2003. A two-year extension may be granted under certain circumstances, thus the latest date to bring into
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-45A1.txt
  • space station license applicants can provide information on polarization isolation, polarization switching, and alignment of polarization vectors relative to the equatorial plane. This information is necessary to determine whether the space station will meet requirements currently in Section 25.210 of our rules. We also propose mandating that applicants certify that they will comply with the service area requirements of Sections 25.143, 25.145, and 25.208, and the out-of-band emission requirements of Section 25.202. We propose requiring all satellite applicants to complete FCC Form 312, including the more detailed version of Schedule S proposed in this Notice, and to provide information in accordance with Section 25.114. By requiring more detailed and standardized information in satellite applications, we intend to facilitate our review of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-80A1.txt
  • kinetic energy. This demonstration should address whether stored energy will be removed at the spacecraft's end-of-life, by depleting residual fuel and leaving all fuel line valves open, venting any pressurized system, leaving all batteries in a permanent discharge state, and removing any remaining source of stored energy, or through other equivalent procedures specifically disclosed in the application. ***** 2. Section 25.143 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (b) as follows: 25.143 Licensing Provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. ***** (b) Qualification Requirements. (1) General Requirements: Each application for a space station system authorization in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service or 2 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service shall describe in detail the proposed satellite system, setting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.txt
  • Applicants must also file information demonstrating compliance with all requirements of this section, and showing, based on existing system information publicly available at the Commission at the time of filing, that they will not cause unacceptable interference to any non-voice, non-geostationary mobile-satellite service system authorized to construct or operate. * * * (a)(4) [reserved.] * * * * * � 25.143 [Amended]. 16. Amend � 25.143 by removing and reserving paragraphs (b)(3) and (g). 17. Amend � 25.144 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 25.144 Licensing provisions for the 2.3 GHz satellite digital audio radio service. * * * * * (b) Milestone Requirements. Each applicant for system authorization in the satellite digital audio radio service must demonstrate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1_Erratum.doc
  • Applicants must also file information demonstrating compliance with all requirements of this section, and showing, based on existing system information publicly available at the Commission at the time of filing, that they will not cause unacceptable interference to any non-voice, non-geostationary mobile-satellite service system authorized to construct or operate. * * * (a)(4) [reserved.] * * * * * � 25.143 [Amended]. 16. Amend � 25.143 by removing and reserving paragraphs (b)(3) and (g). 17. Amend � 25.144 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 25.144 Licensing provisions for the 2.3 GHz satellite digital audio radio service. * * * * * (b) Milestone Requirements. Each applicant for system authorization in the satellite digital audio radio service must demonstrate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-122A1.txt
  • Inc. (Order and Authorization), DA 96-1924, 11 FCC Rcd 16410 (Int'l Bur. 1996). See also Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and Policies Pertaining to a Mobile Satellite Service in the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 MHz Frequency Bands (Report and Order), CC Docket No. 92-166, FCC 94-261, 9 FCC Rcd 5936, �189 (1994). MCHI License Order at �42. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(2) (2001). Letter dated June 19, 1998 to the Commission's Secretary from Pedro L. Rustan, Vice President, Space Segment Technology and Operations Group. Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc. Annual Status Report to the Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30, 1998. Letter dated July 31, 2000 to the Commission's Secretary from Raul Rodriguez and David Keir, counsel for MCHI, with attached affidavit. Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-122A1_Erratum.doc
  • Inc. (Order and Authorization), DA 96-1924, 11 FCC Rcd 16410 (Int'l Bur. 1996). See also Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules and Policies Pertaining to a Mobile Satellite Service in the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 MHz Frequency Bands (Report and Order), CC Docket No. 92-166, FCC 94-261, 9 FCC Rcd 5936, �189 (1994). MCHI License Order at �42. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(2) (2001). Letter dated June 19, 1998 to the Commission's Secretary from Pedro L. Rustan, Vice President, Space Segment Technology and Operations Group. Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc. Annual Status Report to the Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30, 1998. Letter dated July 31, 2000 to the Commission's Secretary from Raul Rodriguez and David Keir, counsel for MCHI, with attached affidavit. Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.txt
  • Mobile Satellite Service, 2 FCC Rcd 485 (1987) (Available at address in �0.445 of this chapter.); (9) Applications to license multiple space station systems in the non-voice, non-geostationary mobile-satellite service under blanket operating authority shall also provide all information specified in �25.142; and (10) Applications for authorizations in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service shall also provide all information specified in �25.143. (11) In addition to a statement of whether the space station is to be operated on a common carrier basis, or whether non-common carrier transactions are proposed, as specified in paragraph (c)(11) of this section, satellite applications in the Direct Broadcast Satellite service must provide a clear and detailed statement of whether the space station is to be operated on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1_Erratum.doc
  • Mobile Satellite Service, 2 FCC Rcd 485 (1987) (Available at address in �0.445 of this chapter.); (9) Applications to license multiple space station systems in the non-voice, non-geostationary mobile-satellite service under blanket operating authority shall also provide all information specified in �25.142; and (10) Applications for authorizations in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service shall also provide all information specified in �25.143. (11) In addition to a statement of whether the space station is to be operated on a common carrier basis, or whether non-common carrier transactions are proposed, as specified in paragraph (c)(11) of this section, satellite applications in the Direct Broadcast Satellite service must provide a clear and detailed statement of whether the space station is to be operated on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
  • a grant of authority pursuant to the licensing and service rules we adopt today, which, among other things, require the MSS ATC applicant to demonstrate that it provides substantial satellite service to the public and that it will operate MSS ATC only in the spectrum segments we authorized for ATC operations. See, e.g., infra App. B (adopting 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(j), which requires licensing prior to operation). Constellation Comments at 5, 10; MCHI Comments at 8-11; ICO Comments at 23; MSV Comments at 15-17. Constellation Comments at 5, 10; MCHI Comments at 8-11. See, e.g., Loral Comments at 9; Globalstar Bondholders Comments at 27. Constellation Comments at iii, 5; MCHI Comments at ii, 2, 10-11; ICO Comments at iii, 23-25, 31-36;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
  • a grant of authority pursuant to the licensing and service rules we adopt today, which, among other things, require the MSS ATC applicant to demonstrate that it provides substantial satellite service to the public and that it will operate MSS ATC only in the spectrum segments we authorized for ATC operations. See, e.g., infra App. B (adopting 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(j), which requires licensing prior to operation). Constellation Comments at 5, 10; MCHI Comments at 8-11; ICO Comments at 23; MSV Comments at 15-17. Constellation Comments at 5, 10; MCHI Comments at 8-11. See, e.g., Loral Comments at 9; Globalstar Bondholders Comments at 27. Constellation Comments at iii, 5; MCHI Comments at ii, 2, 10-11; ICO Comments at iii, 23-25, 31-36;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.txt
  • license. * * * * * (f) An application for modification of a space station license to add an ancillary terrestrial component to an eligible satellite network will be treated as a request for a minor modification if the particulars of operations provided by the applicant comply with the criteria specified in � 25.147. * * * * * Section 25.143 is amended to read as follows: � 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and the 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. * * * * * (i) Incorporation of ancillary terrestrial component base stations into a 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service network or a 2 GHz mobile-satellite service network. Any licensee authorized to construct and launch a 1.6/2.4 GHz or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3_Erratum.doc
  • license. * * * * * (f) An application for modification of a space station license to add an ancillary terrestrial component to an eligible satellite network will be treated as a request for a minor modification if the particulars of operations provided by the applicant comply with the criteria specified in � 25.147. * * * * * Section 25.143 is amended to read as follows: � 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and the 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. * * * * * (i) Incorporation of ancillary terrestrial component base stations into a 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service network or a 2 GHz mobile-satellite service network. Any licensee authorized to construct and launch a 1.6/2.4 GHz or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • at 11. ICO Mar. 8, 2001 Ex Parte Letter, Annex B at 17. Boeing Comments Oct. 19, 2001, App. A, Table 4. See ICO Ex Parte Letter, April 10, 2002 at 2. See App. C2, � 1.3. Out-of-band emission from an ICO MSS terminals are identified in 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(f). Boeing Supplemental Comments at 10. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2)(ii)(2001). See Boeing April 5, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 11. See ICO April 10, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Attach. C. See Boeing April 5, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 12. The precise number calculated by Boeing was 2.068 km. > (last visited, Jan. 30, 2003) (offering propagation software). In Tables 2.2.4.2.A and 2.2.4.2.B the free space loss is the sum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • at 11. ICO Mar. 8, 2001 Ex Parte Letter, Annex B at 17. Boeing Comments Oct. 19, 2001, App. A, Table 4. See ICO Ex Parte Letter, April 10, 2002 at 2. See App. C2, � 1.3. Out-of-band emission from an ICO MSS terminals are identified in 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(f). Boeing Supplemental Comments at 10. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2)(ii)(2001). See Boeing April 5, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 11. See ICO April 10, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Attach. C. See Boeing April 5, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 12. The precise number calculated by Boeing was 2.068 km. > (last visited, Jan. 30, 2003) (offering propagation software). In Tables 2.2.4.2.A and 2.2.4.2.B the free space loss is the sum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.txt
  • all of the gating criteria. We agree with ICO that our MSS Flexibility Decision expressly contemplates that construction and testing activities for ATC can occur prior to commencement of MSS operations, and we do not see any benefit in precluding such construction and testing, at the applicant's risk. Accordingly, as suggested by the Wireless Carriers, we revise pending rule Section 25.143(j) to eliminate the language requiring that MSS operators have a conditioned ATC authorization before engaging in preoperational construction and testing, and instead, clarify that we will permit such construction and testing, at the operator's risk, at any time after an MSS provider has initiated physical construction on the MSS system satellites and notified us concerning the initiation of MSS system
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-16A1.txt
  • MSS licensees with .38 megahertz of additional spectrum in each direction) or to modify assignments under one of two proposed options. See Letter of Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel to ICO Satellite Services G.P. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, File No. 188-SAT-LOI-97; IBFS Nos. SAT-LOI-19970926-00163; SAT-AMD-20000612-00107; SAT-AMD-20001103-00155 (October 15, 2002) (2 GHz MSS Selected Assignment Notification, Annual Section 25.143(e) Report, and Section 25.121(d)(2) Certification). We note that over the course of this proceeding, ICO has filed under a number of names, including ICO Satellite Services G.P. and ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Ltd. For purposes of our discussion, we use the name ``ICO'' in all references. Further Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 16054 � 22 n.65 (citing 2 GHz MSS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-217A1.txt
  • use of non-geostationary satellite systems that subscribers equipped with mobile transceivers could use to conduct two-way voice and date communications with similarly-equipped subscribers or telephone users anywhere else in the world. The Commission's rules specify that the 1610-1626.5 MHz and 2483.5-2500 MHz bands are to be used for transmission between Big LEO satellites and mobile terminals. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143. Constellation Communications Holdings, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 02-3086, 17 FCC Rcd 22584 (Int'l Bur. 2002) (``Nullification Order''). Constellation had separately sought to assign its Big LEO authorization to ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited (``ICO''). See File No. SAT-T/C-20020718-00114. Constellation's request was dismissed as moot as a result of its Big LEO authorization being declared null and void. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-130A1.txt
  • a casualty risk assessment if planned post-mission disposal involves atmospheric re-entry of the space station. In general, an assessment should include an estimate as to whether portions of the spacecraft will survive re-entry and reach the surface of the Earth, as well as an estimate of the resulting probability of human casualty. * * * * * 5. Revise � 25.143(b)(1) to read as follows: � 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. * * * * * (b) Qualification Requirements - (1) General Requirements. Each application for a space station system authorization in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service or 2 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service shall describe in detail the proposed satellite system, setting forth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-131A1.txt
  • 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems, ET Docket No. 00-258, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 16043, 16056 � 28 (2001) (AWS Further Notice). AWS Further Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 16051 � 16 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(3)). In this document, the term "ICO" refers to either ICO Services Limited or its parent, ICO Global Communications (Holding) Limited, depending on context. See Constellation Communications Holdings, Inc., Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 13724, 13731 � 15 (Int'l Bur./OET 2001) (Constellation 2 GHz MSS Order); Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc., Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 13794, 13800 � 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-144A1.txt
  • TerreStar would incur a $10 million liability, over and above the amount that would otherwise be due, if it were to terminate without cause fifteen months or more after contract execution. Id., Exhibit F at 1. Letter of Gregory C. Staple, counsel for TMI, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated and filed July 26, 2002. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(3) (requiring licensees to certify milestone compliance or file a notice of non-compliance within ten days after a milestone deadline). Letter dated Aug. 23, 2002 from Jan Skora, Director General, Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Regulatory Branch, to Ted H. Ignacy, filed as attachment to Letter dated April 21, 2003 from Gregory C. Staple to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary. Letter from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
  • in the narrowband PCS band. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.3. These would involve certain frequencies in the Paging and Radio Telephone Service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 20.561 (providing for one-way or two-way mobile operation on certain VHF and UHF channels); 22.651 (providing for trunked mobile operation on 470-512 MHz channels in New York-Northern New Jersey and Houston). 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(i)-(k). We have already determined that short-term de facto transfer spectrum leasing arrangements, which are by definition only temporary arrangements, do not raise potential competitive harm and thus are not subject to the Commission's competition policies. See Report and Order at � 178. For instance, in the future we anticipate significant advances in voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and the provision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.txt
  • DS-3 service disruption reporting by cable, wireline, and wireless service providers that includes transmission paths that support public data networks. Satellite licensing and several technical portions of our rules require the limited disclosure of information on some satellite outages in the context of determining the extent to which the electromagnetic spectrum is being used efficiently. See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.144(c), 25.145(g), 25.149(b), and 25.210(k). With the exception of the requirement that those Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) licensees using ancillary terrestrial components (which use spectrum terrestrially) must report certain outages within 10 days of their occurrence (47 C.F.R. �� 25.149(b)(2)(iii)), these rules require the filing of reports on an annual basis. As a consequence, these rules do not provide for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-201A1.txt
  • with these reports. Instead, carriers may submit the information in aggregate form. These reports must be filed once per year by each MSS carrier subject to the call center rule. In order to reduce the burden on carriers, the call center report will be due on the same day that MSS licensees must file their annual reports pursuant to Section 25.143. Therefore, the first call center reports will be due on October 15, 2005. We do not believe that this reporting requirement will impose substantial burdens on carriers, contrary to Globalstar's position. The information that we are collecting is minimal. Consistent the Commission's recent requirement that all Part 25-related filings be filed electronically, we require the post-implementation report to be filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.txt
  • always been subject to the requirements of Section 63.100 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 63.100. As discussed below, satellite licensing and several technical portions of our rules require the limited disclosure of information on some satellite outages in the context of determining the extent to which the electromagnetic spectrum is being used efficiently. See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.144(c), 25.145(g), 25.149(b), and 25.210(k). With the exception of the requirement that those Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) licensees using ancillary terrestrial components (which use spectrum terrestrially) must report certain outages within 10 days of their occurrence (47 C.F.R. �� 25.149(b)(2)(iii)), these rules require the filing of reports on an annual basis. As a consequence, these rules do not provide for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.txt
  • the time, consistent with the coverage requirements for 2 GHz MSS GSO operators.'' 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(1)(i). By contrast, the service rules for GSO 2 GHz MSS systems require the systems to be ``capable of providing mobile satellite services on a continuous basis throughout the 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, if technically feasible.'' 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(2)(iv) (emphasis supplied). The L-band consists of the bands assigned by the Commission in the United States for MSS operations: 1525-1544 MHz and 1545-1559 MHz for downlinks, and 1626.5-1645.5 MHz and 1646.5-1660.5 MHz for uplinks. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. The five operators in the L-band and their authorizing countries are MSV (United States), TMI (Canada), Inmarsat (United Kingdom), Solidaridad (Mexico),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.txt
  • Under the existing DBS due diligence milestones, authorization holders must complete contracting for all system satellites within one year of grant; complete construction of the first satellite in the system within four years of grant; and all satellites in the system must be in operation within six years of grant. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.148(b). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(e) (reporting requirements for 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service (MSS) and 2 GHz MSS; 25.144(c) (reporting requirements for satellite digital audio radio service (SDARS); 25.145(f) (reporting requirements for fixed-satellite service in the 20/30 GHz bands); 25.10(l) (reporting requirements for FSS in the 4/6 GHz band). Other elements of the annual reports include a listing of non-scheduled transponder outages that last more than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • 11. 47 C.F.R. � 25.164. Under this milestone schedule, the licensee must enter into a binding, non-contingent construction contract within one year of grant; complete critical design review within two years; begin construction within three years; and launch and operate the satellite within five years of grant. 47 C.F.R. � 25.165. 47 C.F.R. � 25.159. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(e) (reporting requirements for 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service (MSS) and 2 GHz MSS; 25.144(c) (reporting requirements for satellite digital audio radio service (SDARS); 25.145(f) (reporting requirements for fixed-satellite service in the 20/30 GHz bands); 25.10(l) (reporting requirements for FSS in the 4/6 GHz band). Other elements of the annual reports include a listing of non-scheduled transponder outages that last more than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • 11. 47 C.F.R. � 25.164. Under this milestone schedule, the licensee must enter into a binding, non-contingent construction contract within one year of grant; complete critical design review within two years; begin construction within three years; and launch and operate the satellite within five years of grant. 47 C.F.R. � 25.165. 47 C.F.R. � 25.159. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(e) (reporting requirements for 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service (MSS) and 2 GHz MSS; 25.144(c) (reporting requirements for satellite digital audio radio service (SDARS); 25.145(f) (reporting requirements for fixed-satellite service in the 20/30 GHz bands); 25.10(l) (reporting requirements for FSS in the 4/6 GHz band). Other elements of the annual reports include a listing of non-scheduled transponder outages that last more than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.txt
  • Bermuda Comments at 4. In addition, Bermuda contends that, the ``grant stamp'' replacement procedure should be selectively applied and should recognize ITU procedures for extending the life of network notifications. See First Space Station Licensing Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10854-56, paras. 250-54. See also 47 C.F.R. � 25.165(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.151. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(e) (reporting requirements for 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service (MSS) and 2 GHz MSS); 25.144(c) (reporting requirements for satellite digital audio radio service (SDARS); 25.145(f) (reporting requirements for the NGSO fixed-satellite service in the 20/30 GHz bands); 25.210(l) (reporting requirements for FSS). Other elements of the annual reports include a listing of non-scheduled transponder outages that last more than 30 minutes and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.txt
  • MSS operators using geosynchronous satellites to maintain a spare satellite. 47 C.F.R. �� 25.149(b)(1)(i), 25.149(b)(2)(ii). Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands, Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 01-185, 18 FCC Rcd 13590 at �� 8-13 (2003) (Flexibility Recon Order). See also 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(i)-(j); Flexibility R&O at � 250. 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(a)(1). Flexibility R&O at � 107-08. Transmissions from base stations to mobile terminals must take place in the 2180-2200 MHz band. 47 C.F.R. � 25.255. On May 13, 2009, ICO filed a letter to notify the Commission that it has changed its corporate name to New DBSD Satellite Services G.P. with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.txt
  • ESV operations. Boeing Petition at 8. Boeing Petition at 8-9. Boeing Petition at 10. Boeing Petition at 8. Boeing Petition at 12-13. Boeing Petition at 14. See Intelsat Opposition at 10-14; ARINC Opposition at 1 n.1; MTN Opposition at 3 & n.7. Intelsat Opposition at 11. Intelsat Opposition at 11. Intelsat Opposition at 12 & n.36 (citing 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(a)(2), 25.134(b), 25.138(b)). We note that Boeing's higher off-axis power-density proposal pertains to the side lobes, and not the main beam, of the ESV antenna. ESV applicants may increase the main beam e.i.r.p. without increasing the off-axis e.i.r.p. spectral-density by using a larger antenna. See Boeing Petition at 4-5 n.12. In fact, Boeing provided very little justification in its comments to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1_Rcd.pdf
  • ESV operations. 19Boeing Petition at 8. 20Boeing Petition at 8-9. 21Boeing Petition at 10. 22Boeing Petition at 8. 23Boeing Petition at 12-13. 24Boeing Petition at 14. 25See Intelsat Opposition at 10-14; ARINC Opposition at 1 n.1; MTN Opposition at 3 & n.7. 26Intelsat Opposition at 11. 27Intelsat Opposition at 11. 28Intelsat Opposition at 12 & n.36 (citing 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(a)(2), 25.134(b), 25.138(b)). 29We note that Boeing's higher off-axis power-density proposal pertains to the side lobes, and not the main beam, of the ESV antenna. ESV applicants may increase the main beam e.i.r.p. without increasing the off-axis e.i.r.p. spectral-densityby using a larger antenna. 10373 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-63 Order, the Commission declined to adopt Boeing's request for higher off-axis power-density
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.txt
  • Commission. As part of the coordination process, applicants shall show that they will not cause unacceptable interference to authorized Federal Government users, based upon existing system information provided by the Government. The frequency assignment and coordination of the satellite system with Federal Government users shall be completed prior to grant of authorization. * * * * * 15. In � 25.143, revise paragraph (e)(1)(iii) to read as follows: � 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile Satellite Service and 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service. * * * * * (e) * * * (1) * * * (iii) A detailed description of the use made of the in-orbit satellite system. That description should identify the percentage of time that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Space Stations, Fifth Report and Order, IB Docket No. 00-248, 20 FCC Rcd 5666 (2005) (Part 25 Earth Station Streamlining Fifth Report and Order). 6For instance, we propose to delete definitions for "active satellite" and "passive satellite." 747 C.F.R. � 25.110(c). 8 See47 C.F.R. �� 25.134(d), 25.115(a)(1). 9See, e.g., proposed revisions to 47 C.F.R. �� 25.110(c); 25.113(a); 25.134(d) and (h); 25.143(e)(1)(iii); 25.146; 25.150; 25.210(d) and (f); 25.212; 25.272(a); 25.274(b); and 25.276(c) in Appendix A. 10See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 25.156(d)(4) (use of the term "feeder link"), 25.133 (use of the term "mobile earth terminal"), 25.136 (use of the term "1.5/1.6 Mobile Satellite Service"). 1552 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-21 comment onproposed language that will clarify a number of definitions currently in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
  • MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) Satellite Communications (25) Wireless Communications (27) PART 25- SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS The authority citation for part 25 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 701-744. Interprets or applies Sections 4, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309 and 332 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309 and 332, unless otherwise noted. Section 25.143 is amended by revising paragraphs (i) and (k) to read as follows: � 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service and 2 GHz mobile-satellite service. ***** (i) Incorporation of ancillary terrestrial component base stations into a 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service network. Any licensee authorized to construct and launch a 1.6/2.4 GHz system may construct ancillary terrestrial component (ATC)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-279A1.txt
  • violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The Constellation Order appropriately compared the Bell Atlantic letter to the letter found satisfactory to meet our financial qualifications rule in the National Exchange 1' These requirements, and the documentation necessary to establish they have been met, are outlined in greater detail at 47 C.F.R. � 25.140(c) and (d). See also 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(b)(3); Big LEO Order at 35. 12 Constellation Order at H 15. 18507 case. Constellation itself had identified the case in its pleadings as a relevant Commission precedent, and Constellation concedes that it had actual notice of the text of that letter. Furthermore, the Constellation Order embodies an administrative adjudication, and "agency adjudication should not be confused with notice and comment
• http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/ib/forms/help/sch_s4d.pdf
  • (Watts) Bus (Watts) Total (Watts) Solar Array (Watts) Depth of Battery Discharge (%) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) % % % % S17. CERTIFICATIONS a. Are the power flux density limits of � 25.208 met? b. Are the appropriate service area coverage requirements of � 25.143(b)(ii) and (iii), or � 25.145(c)(1) and (2) met? c. Are the frequency tolerances of � 25.202(e) and the out-of-band emission limits of � 25.202(f)(1), (2), and (3) met? YES NO N/A YES NO N/A YES NO N/A In addition to the information required in this Form, the space station applicant is required to provide all the information specified in Section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • authorization. 2 GHz MSS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 16177-78 � 106. 2 GHz MSS systems must, within ten days after a milestone, either certify its completion or inform the Commission that the milestone has not been met. If a system does not file a certification that the milestone has been met, the authorization is automatically cancelled. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(3). 2 GHz MSS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 16139 � 18. In this context, ``abandoned spectrum'' includes all licensed (or, for non-U.S.-entity access, reserved) spectrum that the Commission reclaims as a result of the system proponent voluntarily turning in the license or missing milestones. Id. at 16144-49 �� 31-44. Petition for Reconsideration of Globalstar, L.P., IB Docket No. 99-81 (filed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.txt
  • operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we are clarifying our current definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 39. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2000/pnmd0004.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2000/pnmd0004.pdf
  • file with the Commission, a current IRS Determination Letter documenting its nonprofit status, a certification of governmental authority, or certification from a governmental authority attesting to its exempt status. Fee Calculation: $94,650 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Use fee code "0074" on FCC Form 159 when making payment for space stations in geostationary orbit. Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. NON-GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEMS:
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/pnmd0104.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/pnmd0104.pdf
  • file with the Commission, a current IRS Determination Letter documenting its nonprofit status, a certification of governmental authority, or certification from a governmental authority attesting to its exempt status. Fee Calculation: $98,125 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Use fee code "0174" on FCC Form 159 when making payment for space stations in geostationary orbit. Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. NON-GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEMS:
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fees/factsheets/owe-ib.pdf
  • Stations and Direct Broadcast Satellite Service Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate space stations in geostationary orbit1 in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $115,625 per operational station2 in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate systems of satellites in non-geostationary orbit under Part 25 to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.wp
  • very small aperture terminal (VSAT) networks. 25.135 Licensing provisions for earth station networks in the non-voice, non- geostationary mobile-satellite service. 25.136 Operating provisions for earth station networks in the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service. SPACE STATIONS 25.140 Qualifications of domestic fixed-satellite space station licensees. 25.141 Licensing provisions for the radiodetermination satellite service 25.142 Licensing provisions for the non-voice, non-geostationary mobile-satellite service. 25.143 Licensing provisions for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobile-satellite service. 25.144 Licensing provisions for the 2.3 GHz satellite digital audio radio service. PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS 25.150 Receipt of applications. 25.151 Public notice period. 25.152 Dismissal and return of applications. 25.153 Repetitious applications. 25.154 Opposition to applications and other pleadings. 25.155 Mutually exclusive applications. 25.156 Consideration of applications. FORFEITURE, TERMINATION, AND REINSTATEMENT OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • authorization. 2 GHz MSS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 16177-78 � 106. 2 GHz MSS systems must, within ten days after a milestone, either certify its completion or inform the Commission that the milestone has not been met. If a system does not file a certification that the milestone has been met, the authorization is automatically cancelled. 47 C.F.R. � 25.143(e)(3). 2 GHz MSS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 16139 � 18. In this context, ``abandoned spectrum'' includes all licensed (or, for non-U.S.-entity access, reserved) spectrum that the Commission reclaims as a result of the system proponent voluntarily turning in the license or missing milestones. Id. at 16144-49 �� 31-44. Petition for Reconsideration of Globalstar, L.P., IB Docket No. 99-81 (filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00302.doc
  • applying the same annual reporting requirements to 2 GHz MSS operators as we currently apply to other satellite systems. The reporting rules require system operators to file reports specifying satellite system implementation, anticipated launch dates, system utilization, and system outages or malfunctions. The reports also are used to determine annual regulatory fees for each system. We proposed to amend Section 25.143(e) of the Commission's rules to apply these requirements to 2 GHz MSS operators. We adopt the reporting requirements as proposed in the Notice, with the addition of requiring satellite operators receiving expansion spectrum to report on the actual number of subscriber minutes originating or terminating in unserved areas as a percentage of the actual U.S. system use. The commenters agree
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1999/fcc99146.pdf
  • operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we are clarifying our current definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38 Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc00117.doc
  • operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we are clarifying our current definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.txt
  • operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we are clarifying our current definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 38. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.txt
  • is operational in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license) we previously clarified our definition of an operational LEO satellite to prevent misinterpretation of our intent as follows: Licensees of Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems (such as LEOs) are assessed a regulatory fee upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to �� 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to � 25.120(d). d. International Bearer Circuits 39. Regulatory fees for International Bearer Circuits are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers (either domestic or international) activating the circuit in any transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. Payment of the fee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2000/pnmd0004.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2000/pnmd0004.pdf
  • file with the Commission, a current IRS Determination Letter documenting its nonprofit status, a certification of governmental authority, or certification from a governmental authority attesting to its exempt status. Fee Calculation: $94,650 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Use fee code "0074" on FCC Form 159 when making payment for space stations in geostationary orbit. Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. NON-GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEMS:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/pnmd0104.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/pnmd0104.pdf
  • file with the Commission, a current IRS Determination Letter documenting its nonprofit status, a certification of governmental authority, or certification from a governmental authority attesting to its exempt status. Fee Calculation: $98,125 per operational station in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Use fee code "0174" on FCC Form 159 when making payment for space stations in geostationary orbit. Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. NON-GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEMS:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040617.html
  • DIGEST NO. 112: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Report No: SPB-207 Released: 06/16/2004. INTERNATIONAL BUREAU SATELLITE DIVISION INFORMATION: CLARIFICATION OF 47 C.F.R. 25.140(B)(2) SPACE STATION APPLICATION INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS. (DA No. 04-1708). IB. Contact: Robert Nelson at (202) 418-2341 [37]DA-04-1708A1.doc [38]DA-04-1708A1.pdf [39]DA-04-1708A1.txt Report No: SPB-208 Released: 06/16/2004. INTERNATIONAL BUREAU SATELLITE DIVISION INFORMATION ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION: CLARIFICATION OF 47 C.F.R. SECTIONS 25.143(B), 25.145(C)(3), 25.146(I)(4) AND 25.217(D) REGARDING CASUALTY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SATELLITE ATMOSPHERE RE-ENTRY. (DA No. 04-1724). IB. Contact: Sankar Persaud at (202) 418-2441, email: Sankar.Persaud@fcc.gov [40]DA-04-1724A1.doc [41]DA-04-1724A1.pdf [42]DA-04-1724A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- AFRISPACE, INC. - APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO LAUNCH AND OPERATE A REPLACEMENT SATELLITE, AFRISTAR-2, AT 21 DEGREES E.L. AND TO CO-LOCATE IT WITH AFRI-STAR-1, FILE NO. SAT-LOA-20040413-00082, CALL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Document_Indexes/International/2004_index_IB_Public_Notice.html
  • for Filing. Report Number: SES-00613 06/16/2004 [504]DOC-248439A1.pdf [505]DOC-248439A1.txt DOC-248441 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INFORMATION. Re: Actions Taken. Report Number: SES-00614 06/16/2004 [506]DOC-248441A1.pdf [507]DOC-248441A1.txt DA-04-1708 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU SATELLITE DIVISION INFORMATION: CLARIFICATION OF 47 C.F.R. ? 25.140(B)(2) SPACE STATION APPLICATION INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS. Report Number: SPB-207 06/16/2004 [508]DA-04-1708A1.doc [509]DA-04-1708A1.pdf [510]DA-04-1708A1.txt DA-04-1724 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU SATELLITE DIVISION INFORMATION ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION: CLARIFICATION OF 47 C.F.R. SECTIONS 25.143(B), 25.145(C)(3), 25.146(I)(4) AND 25.217(D) REGARDING CASUALTY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SATELLITE ATMOSPHERE RE-ENTRY. Report Number: SPB-208 06/16/2004 [511]DA-04-1724A1.doc [512]DA-04-1724A1.pdf [513]DA-04-1724A1.txt DA-04-1689 WRC-07 ADVISORY COMMITTEE - MEETINGS OF THE INFORMAL WORKING GROUPS 06/14/2004 [514]DA-04-1689A1.doc [515]DA-04-1689A1.pdf [516]DA-04-1689A1.txt DA-04-1698 THE FCC'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE 2007 WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE PROPOSES PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 ISSUES 06/14/2004 [517]DOC-248493A1.doc [518]DA-04-1698A1.doc [519]DA-04-1698A1.pdf [520]DA-04-1698A1.txt DOC-248142 STREAMLINED INTERNATIONAL APPLICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/fees/factsheets/owe-ib.pdf
  • Stations and Direct Broadcast Satellite Service Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate space stations in geostationary orbit1 in accordance with section 25.121(d) and direct broadcast satellites (Part 100). Fee Calculation: $115,625 per operational station2 in geostationary orbit. A fee payment is required "upon the commencement of operation of a system's first satellite as reported annually pursuant to sections 25.142(c), 25.143(e), 25.145(g), or upon certification of operation of a single satellite pursuant to section 25.121(d)". Multiple technically identical geostationary satellites co-located at the same orbital location will be considered one station for the purpose of per-space station regulatory fee calculation. Non-Geostationary Orbit Satellite Systems Who Must Pay: Entities authorized to operate systems of satellites in non-geostationary orbit under Part 25 to