FCC Web Documents citing 24.247

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1090A1.txt
  • New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (New Cingular) on May 15, 2006 (Withdrawal Request). New Cingular is the successor-in-interest to AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (AWS). On April 8, 2004, AWS filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling (Petition). In that Petition, AWS requested that the Commission affirm the right of AWS to collect microwave cost-sharing reimbursement from Pinpoint Communications, Inc. under Section 24.247(a) of the Commission rules and an interpretation of that rule by the PCIA Microwave Clearinghouse known as the ``immediate trigger'' policy. On May 15, 2006, New Cingular, as AWS's successor-in-interest, withdrew the Petition and requested that the Commission terminate this proceeding. The Mobility Division has reviewed the Withdrawal Request of New Cingular and finds that it raises no substantial or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-123A1.txt
  • Appendix A of the First Report and Order dictates that a later-entrant PCS licensee is not obligated to reimburse a PCS relocator for the cost of relocating a link that is entirely within the PCS relocator's MTA or BTA, regardless of whether the location of the later-entrant PCS licensee's base station is within the Proximity Threshold rectangle described in Section 24.247(a) of the Commission's rules. We disagree. We do not believe that there is an inconsistency between the chart in Appendix A of the First Report and Order and the Proximity Threshold test adopted by the Commission in that Order. Thus, we find that the Proximity Threshold test set forth in Section 24.247 controls when a reimbursement obligation exists for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
  • paired frequency blocks 1910-1915 MHz and 1990-1995 MHz are available for assignment in the 175 Economic Areas defined in § 90.7 of this chapter. The 1910-1915 MHz block shall be used for mobile/portable station transmissions while the 1990-1995 MHz block shall be used for base station transmissions. * * * * * A new paragraph (c) is added to Section 24.247 as follows: § 24.247 Triggering a reimbursement obligation. * * * * * (c) Any new entrants granted licenses for the 1910-1915 MHz band must reimburse UTAM a pro rata share of its total expenses incurred by UTAM as of the date that the new entrants gain access to the band. The percent required by new entrants to pay shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • paired frequency blocks 1910-1915 MHz and 1990-1995 MHz are available for assignment in the 175 Economic Areas defined in § 90.7 of this chapter. The 1910-1915 MHz block shall be used for mobile/portable station transmissions while the 1990-1995 MHz block shall be used for base station transmissions. * * * * * A new paragraph (c) is added to Section 24.247 as follows: § 24.247 Triggering a reimbursement obligation. * * * * * (c) Any new entrants granted licenses for the 1910-1915 MHz band must reimburse UTAM a pro rata share of its total expenses incurred by UTAM as of the date that the new entrants gain access to the band. The percent required by new entrants to pay shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-219A1.txt
  • Nextel if it funds any relocation. Once Nextel receives credit for any relocation expenses for microwave links in the 1915-1920 MHz band as part of the band clearing offset process established in the 800 MHz R&O, it will not be entitled to seek reimbursement from new AWS entrants for these previously credited expenses. See 47 C.F.R. § 24.239 and § 24.247 in Appendix A infra. We note that the AWS 2 GHz Service Rules NPRM proposes to license the 1915-1920 MHz band under Part 27. If necessary, we will modify our rules to ensure that the reimbursement right we establish for UTAM herein is reflected in the rule part under which we ultimately adopt service rules for the band. A TVPU
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.txt
  • Microwave Cost Sharing Rules,'' DA 05-612 (Wireless Tel. Bur. rel. March 8, 2005). Our overview of the plan here thus describes how the plan operated prior to the termination date. See Microwave Cost Sharing First R&O and FNPRM, 11 FCC Rcd at 8878, Appendix A, ¶ 3; 47 C.F.R. § 24.243. See 47 C.F.R. § 24.249(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 24.247. Id. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 24.243, 24.249. The cost sharing formula calculates a benefiting entrant's reimbursement obligation based on the total ``actual'' costs of relocation, the number of prior entrants that would have interfered with the link, and the number of months that have passed since the relocator first obtained reimbursement rights. 47 C.F.R. § 24.243. The number of months
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.txt
  • Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd 5141 (WTB 2005). Our overview of the plan here thus describes how the plan operated prior to the sunset date. See Microwave Cost Sharing First R&O and FNPRM, 11 FCC Rcd at 8878, Appendix A, ¶ 3; 47 C.F.R. § 24.243. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.103(d). See 47 C.F.R. § 24.249(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 24.247. See id. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 24.243, 24.249. The cost sharing formula calculates a benefiting entrant's reimbursement obligation based on the total ``actual'' costs of relocation, the number of prior entrants that would have interfered with the link, and the number of months that have passed since the relocator first obtained reimbursement rights. 47 C.F.R. § 24.243. The number of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00123.doc
  • Appendix A of the First Report and Order dictates that a later-entrant PCS licensee is not obligated to reimburse a PCS relocator for the cost of relocating a link that is entirely within the PCS relocator's MTA or BTA, regardless of whether the location of the later-entrant PCS licensee's base station is within the Proximity Threshold rectangle described in Section 24.247(a) of the Commission's rules. We disagree. We do not believe that there is an inconsistency between the chart in Appendix A of the First Report and Order and the Proximity Threshold test adopted by the Commission in that Order. Thus, we find that the Proximity Threshold test set forth in Section 24.247 controls when a reimbursement obligation exists for a