FCC Web Documents citing 23.16

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2010 03 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276876A1.txt
  • 29.84 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2006) State City 1993 1994
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-260A1.txt
  • 3 Average Completion Notice Interval - Non-Mechanized [P-5] A.2.15.1.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/KY(%) 15.02 14.17 13.59 15.15 A.2.15.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/GA(hours) 8.82 6.89 9.16 7.93 A.2.15.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/GA(hours) 18.73 4 G-10 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLECNotes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-260 Georgia Performance Metric Data March April May June A.2.15.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/GA(hours) 26.63 33.33 31.51 23.16 A.2.15.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/GA(hours) 8.81 9.18 17.20 12.91 A.2.15.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/GA(hours) 0.02 3 A.2.15.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/GA(hours) 14.00 14.00 0.02 1,2,3 A.2.15.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/GA(hours) 150.54 174.98 322.06 121.19 3 A.2.15.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/GA(hours) 29.59 21.87 51.65 75.40 A.2.15.3.2.2Design (Specials)/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/GA(hours) 15.63 2 A.2.15.4.1.1PBX/<10 circuits/Dispatch/GA(hours) 36.55 28.97 67.28 62.581,2,3,4 A.2.15.4.1.2PBX/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/GA(hours) 55.66 21.50 29.70 21.03 4 A.2.15.4.2.1PBX/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/GA(hours) 48.21 10.94 2,3 A.2.15.4.2.2PBX/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/GA(hours) 22.15 0.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 29 5W SAN ANTONIO BEXAR TX 50.6 1353.31 30 22 26N 103 39 46W ALPINE BREWSTER TX 11 Tower Locations That Appear To Require FCC Registration 53.04 191.11 32 57 17N 96 49 13W DALLAS DALLAS TX 58.52 182.58 32 58 5N 96 49 7W DALLAS DALLAS TX 57.91 176.78 28 31 13N 99 51 33W CARRIZO SPRINGS DIMMIT TX 23.16 31.09 26 10 40N 98 14 1W MC ALLEN HIDALGO TX 46.63 487.07 32 55 52N 99 46 59W STAMFORD JONES TX 50.29 1087.53 33 56 17N 102 20 41W LITTLEFIELD LAMB TX 55.78 85.34 32 9 18N 94 19 14W CARTHAGE PANOLA TX 60.05 377.34 32 45 0N 98 55 39W BRECKENRIDGE STEPHENS TX 27.13 542.54 32 26 4.1N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1393A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1394A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1562A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1649A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1924A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1925A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1926A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1927A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1932A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2511A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2527A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2531A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2532A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2535A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2544A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2850A1.txt
  • service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Bright House has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2854A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2855A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2912A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Franchise Areas listed in Attachment A are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2931A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in Springfield are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Comcast has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the Community. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Community listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3238A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3251A1.txt
  • DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in the news media serving the City. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the City are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV''), and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. The two DBS providers are physically able to offer MVPD service to subscribers in the 40 Communities listed in Attachment A.I (the ``40 Communities''). There exist no regulatory, technical, or other impediments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3329A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3331A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3332A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3335A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, we conclude that the population of the communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3336A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed on Attachment A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3337A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3350A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the evidence of national and regional advertising that Service Electric submits in support of its petition, we conclude that the population of the communities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-530A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-544A1.txt
  • the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that nearly 33 percent of Rio Rancho households are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population of Rio Rancho
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-545A1.txt
  • presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Adelphia has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. We conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-546A1.txt
  • is available. Mediacom has provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in local and national media serving the franchise areas. This evidence consists of 13 examples of Minneapolis Star Tribune DBS ads from June 9 through August 13, 2003, and of DBS ads on six different nationally distributed cable channels. Moreover, the two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of these data, we conclude that the population of the Franchise Area at issue may be deemed reasonably aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-547A1.txt
  • fifteen percent of the households in the franchise area. Turning to the first prong of this test, DBS service is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • provided evidence of the advertising of DBS service in regional and national media serving the franchise areas. The LFAs contended that this evidence is inadequate to establish that the Community populations have been sufficiently made aware of the availability of DBS services to satisfy the first prong of the competing provider test. We disagree. DBS subscriber growth has reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004. Direct TV is the second largest MVPD. We find it reasonable to conclude that for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test, the population of the Communities at issue here is aware of the availability of DBS services. With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-996A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-193A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities are DBS subscribers, we conclude that the population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-254A1.txt
  • first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``Dish'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-278A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 25 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH has become the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-284A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-285A1.txt
  • Turning to the first prong of this test, the DBS service of DirecTV, Inc. (``DirecTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-63A1.txt
  • this test, we find that the direct broadcast satellite (``DBS'') service of DirecTV Inc. (``DirectTV'') and DISH Network (``DISH'') is presumed to be technically available due to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. DirecTV has become the second largest MVPD, and DISH the fourth largest MVPD. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in each of the communities listed on Attachment A are DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-78A1.txt
  • to its nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are made reasonably aware that the service is available. Time Warner asserts that households in the Communities are reasonably aware that DBS service is available based on the penetration rates in the communities at issue. The two DBS providers' subscriber growth reached approximately 23.16 million as of June 30, 2004, comprising approximately 23 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and DISH the fourth largest, MVPD provider. In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that more than 15 percent of the households in the Communities listed on Attachment A are DBS subscribers, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. Home satellite dish (HSD) represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM 2,230,840 1,580,255 650,586 29.16 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM 129,838 79,574 50,264 38.71 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM 156,582 105,879 50,703 32.38 Citizens - Red Hook NY 47,555 30,421 17,134 36.03 Citizens - Upstate NY 731,058 561,780 169,278 23.16 Citizens - Western Counties NY 77,006 57,515 19,491 25.31 Verizon New York Telephone NY 28,266,963 18,846,554 9,420,409 33.33 Citizens - Frontier of Rochester NY 1,333,958 1,033,505 300,453 22.52 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 518,379 362,537 155,842 30.06 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 584,485 457,267 127,218 21.77 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 390,364 292,145 98,219 25.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 28.30 28.95 28.73 29.91 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 7,517,899 4,830,037 2,770,652 36.85 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA 10,740,128 6,788,533 4,011,744 37.35 Verizon North - Michigan MI 1,688,970 1,292,998 480,603 28.46 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 9,873,433 7,297,539 2,732,761 27.68 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,732,448 3,268,210 1,491,610 31.52 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 3,915,182 2,920,816 1,048,671 26.78 CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO 278,799 214,710 64,559 23.16 CenturyTel of Missouri - Belle-Hermann MO 12,615 9,026 3,617 28.67 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southern Missouri MO 69,914 53,267 16,781 24.00 CenturyTel of Missouri - Southwest Missouri MO 775,631 598,201 178,580 23.02 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 5,934,108 4,000,681 1,923,244 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone of Missouri MO 645,095 481,406 171,575 26.60 Qwest - Montana MT 990,773 682,118
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 21.65 21.76 23.15 23.69 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 20.29 20.40 22.01 20.94 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 21.54 21.65 23.04 23.41 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 26.11 26.02 32.45 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 28.62 28.69 28.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 18.21 18.39 18.43 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • COMPANY 32.31 -2.09 35.14 0.00 381509 A WOLVERTON TEL. CO. 2.74 -1.88 4.71 4.84 381601 A ABSARAKA COOP TELEPHONE CO. 5.07 0.00 5.07 7.30 381604 C BEK COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 4.82 -2.17 7.14 7.82 381607 C CONSOLIDATED TELCOM 9.81 -0.60 10.47 18.95 381610 C DAKOTA CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 1.40 -1.92 3.39 1.88 381611 C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. 7.72 -1.51 9.37 23.16 381611A C DICKEY RURAL TEL COOP. -2.57 -2.18 -0.40 -13.42 381614 A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) 2.53 -1.29 3.87 3.90 381614A A POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP (POLAR TELECOM) -1.16 -2.28 1.15 -10.40 381615 A GRIGGS COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.71 -2.17 2.95 0.64 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.63 -1.81 7.57 13.57 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • Satellite Service (DBS and HSD): DBS continues to increase its share of the MVPD market, while other MVPDs continue to experience losses in market share. As of June 2004, DBS represented a 25.1 percent of all MVPD households, and DIRECTV and EchoStar rank among the four largest providers of multichannel video programming service. In June 2004, DBS operators had over 23.16 million subscribers, an increase of close to 14 percent since the 2003 Report. HSD represents another 0.36 percent of all MVPD subscribers as of June 2004, with approximately 335,800 subscribers to HSD services, as measured by the number of HSD users that actually purchase programming packages. Broadband Service Providers (BSPs): BSPs are entities that compete with existing cable systems using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • subscribership of approximately 26,000 homes, and announced that it was launching a new HD programming service with 21 channels, 10 of which EchoStar agreed to carry initially, with all 21 being available to EchoStar subscribers by 2006. Subscribership. As of June 2005, approximately 26.12 million U.S. households subscribed to DBS service. This represents an increase of 12.8 percent over the 23.16 million DBS subscribers we reported last year. DBS accounts for approximately 27.7 percent of all U.S. MVPD subscribers. Analysts attribute DBS' continued growth to the increase in local-into-local broadcast stations; service enhancements, including multiple room viewing solutions and HDTV; and the ability to co-market DSL service. In terms of subscriber penetration, DBS penetration initially occurred primarily in rural and small
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1998 1999 2000 2001 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.26 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 19.63 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.45 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 23.86 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 27.85 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 14.68 New Mexico Alamogordo 19.75 19.12 19.37 20.21 20.46 20.65 20.82 20.99 20.99 19.03 17.50 18.21 New York Binghamton 22.90 25.74 25.31 25.31 24.52 26.03 23.80 23.76 23.74 23.74 23.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 28.16 Missouri Kansas City 20.27 20.33 20.33 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 21.00 Missouri Mexico 17.00 17.07 17.07 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 20.41 Missouri St. Louis 20.10 20.16 20.16 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 21.13 Montana Butte 19.25 19.25 19.25 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 25.39 Nebraska Grand Island 21.78 21.85 21.86 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 26.79 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.43 13.16 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 16.41 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities* (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 26.42 26.42 26.03 26.03 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.75 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22003 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 25.26 24.81 25.80 27.05 28.30 28.95 28.73 Missouri Kansas City 20.40 19.03 18.15 18.15 19.53 19.53 18.25 19.21 20.68 20.33 20.25 19.81 Missouri Mexico 17.14 15.81 17.19 17.19 17.26 17.26 17.26 18.42 20.10 18.76 18.91 18.40 Missouri St. Louis 20.23 19.05 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.18 18.28 19.32 20.87 20.52 20.73 20.23 Montana Butte 18.22 18.22 18.22 18.22 19.26 19.69 22.70 23.16 24.23 26.25 26.54 26.02 Nebraska Grand Island 21.88 21.88 21.85 21.76 23.39 23.27 26.22 27.14 26.25 29.64 29.38 28.75 New Jersey Phillipsburg 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.05 13.05 13.05 13.21 15.31 15.93 16.30 17.09 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15) State City 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-4.pdf
  • Commitments State/territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 737,294 $22,082,549 $29.95 $15,815,098 $21.45 $6,267,452 $8.50 Alaska 134,358 11,156,494 83.04 9,419,627 70.11 1,736,867 12.93 American Samoa 15,897 2,124,079 133.62 1,938,161 121.92 185,918 11.70 Arizona 922,180 60,575,838 65.69 40,496,696 43.91 20,079,141 21.77 Arkansas 449,805 21,047,283 46.79 12,144,282 27.00 8,903,002 19.79 California 6,248,610 337,705,448 54.04 192,975,002 30.88 144,730,446 23.16 Colorado 742,145 16,696,696 22.50 11,918,299 16.06 4,778,397 6.44 Connecticut 570,228 17,718,203 31.07 16,228,904 28.46 1,489,300 2.61 Delaware 115,555 1,779,504 15.40 952,011 8.24 827,493 7.16 Dist. of Columbia 75,392 7,367,394 97.72 2,498,210 33.14 4,869,185 64.58 Florida 2,500,478 55,918,727 22.36 44,153,571 17.66 11,765,156 4.71 Georgia 1,470,634 72,483,675 49.29 51,379,904 34.94 21,103,771 14.35 Guam 31,992 2,502,191 78.21 1,908,695 59.66 593,496 18.55 Hawaii 184,546
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Louisiana LA 983,105 745,015 238,587 24.27 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 342,921 253,538 89,378 26.06 Verizon - Maryland MD 1,499,753 1,060,342 439,521 29.31 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,134,100 1,447,262 686,781 32.18 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI 1,860,894 1,469,054 392,507 21.09 Verizon - Contel of the South - Michigan MI 20,566 15,804 4,763 23.16 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 284,024 225,441 58,586 20.63 Qwest - Minnesota MN 974,975 710,186 264,825 27.16 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 596,874 440,889 156,211 26.17 Verizon - Midwest - Contel of Eastern Missouri MO 927 802 611 65.91 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Systems Missouri MO 12,796 9,848 4,034 31.53 Verizon - Midwest - Contel Missouri MO 107,236 83,402
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md981007.pdf
  • SERVICE Oct 07, 1998 (SINGLE & MULTICHANNEL) Report No. D-1007 APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING: FILE NUMBER APPLICANT CHANNEL PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 50689-CM-P-98 VIRGINIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (E group) CASA GRANDE, AZ CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 32 49 27 N. - Long. 111 42 09 W. 3 MI. S.E. OF CASA GRANDE, CASA GRANDE, AZ Call Sign WMI839 Antenna C/L 76 FT. ( 23.16 meters) non-common carrier status. Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50690-CM-P-98 GTE MEDIA VENTURES INCORPORATED (F group) HONOLULU, HI CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 21 24 24 N. - Long. 158 06 02 W. PALIKEA RIDGE ON PALEHUA ROAD, HONOLULU, HI Call Sign WHT718 Antenna C/L 78 FT. ( 23.77 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50691-CM-P-98 MOLOKA'I NETWORK CORPORATION (E group) HONOLULU, HI